20201051 Ver 1_401 Application_20200814

0 CAROLINA 3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
ECOSYSTEMS P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
August 12, 2020
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
RE: Pre -Construction Notification: Nationwide Permit 12 and General Certification 4133
853W Zone Improvements
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Roden -Reynolds,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI), in conjunction with Black & Veatch, has prepared the attached
Pre -Construction Notification on behalf of the Union County Public Works. An electronic
application for a Section 404 Nationwide Permit 12 and a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification No. 4133 are being submitted for this project along with corresponding figures,
impact exhibits, and engineering plans.
In support of this, Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI) completed a delineation of streams and
wetlands for this 22.2 acre waterline corridor and has attached the associated maps and data
forms. Delineations were performed in November 2015, in compliance with methodology set
forth in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE
1987) and subsequent guidance including the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional
Supplement. Surface waters were assessed for jurisdiction under the CWA using field indications
of ordinary high water mark and the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream
Identification Form Version 4.11. This delineation was field checked by CEI staff on April 29,
2020.
Union County is planning waterline infrastructure improvements in Monroe, NC. The project
begins at the intersection of Haywood Road and Secrest Short Cut Road. It then runs along
Secrest Short Cut Road and N. Rocky River Road. Finally, its ends near the intersection of N.
Rocky River Road and Price Short Cut Road. This site is primarily roadside alignment along
farm fields, subdivisions and some forested areas. The land use in the vicinity of the project is
primarily suburban development with farm fields.
This project would require impacts associated with the proposed waterline improvement. The
proposed project would have 5 temporary stream impacts (2 of which are near perpendicular
crossings), 10 permanent stream impacts, and 4 wetland impacts. Impact details can be seen on
the ePCN, Figure 5, and Final Design Plans (attached).
The preceding information, along with the associated electronic Pre -Construction Notification,
Vicinity map, USGS map, Aquatic Features map, NRCS map, Impact Site map and engineering
plans are being submitted for your review of this project. A copy of this application is also being
provided to the NC Division of Water Resources for their review and issuance of GC 4133.

Mr. Roden -Reynolds
August 12, 2020
853W Zone Improvements
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your earliest
convenience at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
eat 2�-
Philip May
Senior Environmental Scientist
Cc: Paul Wcjoski, NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
John Shutak, P.E., Union County Public Works
Scot Thompson P.E., Black & Veatch
Attachments:
- Electronic Pre -Construction Notification Form
- Final Design Plans
- NCNHP Project Report
- Delineation Package
- Figure 1: Vicinity Map
- Figure 2: USGS Map
- Figure 3: Aquatic Resources Map
- Figure 4: NRCS Map
- Figure 5: Impact Exhibits

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201051
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Nboresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
853W Zone Improvements
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
John Shutak, P.E.
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/14/2020
Nearest Body of Water
South Fork Crooked Creek / Stewarts Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
South Fork Crooked Creek: C / Stewarts Creek: WS-III
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.038597
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Union
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.600228
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
L.1
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Varies (see plans) - Easements acquired by Union County
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
500 North Main Street
Address tine 2
city
Monroe
Postal / Zip Code
28112
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rwince / Ifgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U

1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
it appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Monroe
2 Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
Varies - see plans
2c. Project Address
Street Address
N. Rocky River Road
Address tine 2
City
Monroe
Postal / Zip Code
28110
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
South Fork Crooked Creek/ Stewarts Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
South Fork Crooked Creek: C / Stewarts Creek: WS-III
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401050702,030401050503,030401050501
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
22.2
State / Province / I?gion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is primarily maintained roadsides along farm fields, subdivisions and some forested areas. The land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily suburban development with farm
fields and some commercial areas.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Union_PCN_USGS.pdf 2.73MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Un io n_PCN_NRCS. pdf 7.54 MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.261 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
644 linear feet of intermittent stream and 174 linear feet of perennial stream
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The initial purpose of this project is to improve hydraulics from the Watkins Pump Station into the County's existing distribution system. The water main will also convey water from a
future new Water Treatment Plant (WTP) to the existing service area. Once the WTP is operating, flow direction will reverse and come from the plant into the distribution system. The
water main improves system hydraulics both now and in the future.
The county is divided into both the Catawba River and Yadkin/Pee-Dee River watersheds, but currently all the water comes from the Catawba River through the Catawba River Water
Treatment Plant (CRWTP) in Lancaster County, SC. The new WTP will provide a Yadkin River source so that Union County can balance their demands and water supplies better. This
waterline is the first portion of this backbone, while also addressing current hydraulics within the existing distribution system.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*

The project begins at the intersection of Haywood Road and Secrest Short Cut Road. It then runs along Secrest Short Cut Road and N. Rocky River Road. Finally, it ends near the
intersection of N. Rocky River Road and Price Short Cut Road. This waterline will serve Monroe and the surrounding areas. The proposed project consists of 27,600 linear feet of
waterline replacement. The project will replace the existing 12-inch water transmission line with a 36-inch water transmission main from station 10+00 to station 252+75. At station
252+00, the 36-inch line will tie into another 36-inch water transmission line that is yet to be built. This tie in line is yet to be designed but will connect to the new WTP in the Yadkin -
Pee Dee River Basin. The remaining line replaces mostly existing 8-inch waterline with a 16-inch transmission main and then ties into the existing water system at the end of the project.
The proposed project would have 5 temporary stream impacts (2 of which are near perpendicular crossings), 10 permanent (no loss) stream impacts, and 4 wetland impacts. Impact
details can be seen on Figure 5 (attached). The proposed temporary stream impacts would constitute a total of 396 linear feet and the proposed permanent (no loss) stream impacts
would constitute a total of 421 linear feet. All permanent stream impacts result from installation of rip rap to maintain stream morphology, prevent erosion, and protect the water line, and
would not result in loss of Waters of the US. The project would also have a total of 0.187 acre of temporary wetland impact and 0.074 acre of permanent wetland impact. All permanent
wetland impacts are associated with the clearing and conversion of forested wetlands into herbaceous wetlands within the proposed maintenance/access corridor. Forested wetlands
within the limits of disturbance but outside of the proposed access corridor would be cleared for construction and then allowed to regenerate forest vegetation. Al impact areas will be
returned to existing grade after installation of the waterline.
Sediment and erosion control measures would be implemented according to INC requirements, and approved by NCDEMLR prior to implementation. Jurisdictional areas adjacent to
construction areas would be clearly marked with protection fencing or other similar methods to avoid inadvertent encroachment. Copies of permits and impact areas would be provided
to the prime contractor and all subcontractors working in or near jurisdictional areas. Land clearing would take place along with installation of erosion control devices. Construction
would be accomplished using typical equipment including excavators and backhoes for trench construction. Additional standard equipment may be used as required.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
186110 - 853W - 100 % COMPILED CONSTRUCTION SET_ 07.09.2020 (1).pdf 44.76MB
Union_PCN_Fig5_lmpactE)(hibits.pdf 1.94MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
Comments:
Delineation was performed initially in November 2015, and field checked in April 2020. Delineation
information is provided. All areas will be within the proposed easements, once acquired.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Hopper and Rob Crowther - November 2015
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Other: Field checked by Preston Butler on April 29, 2020
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Un ion853 Waterline_Delineation Package.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
41.86MB
r Unknown
Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
This project is a stand-alone improvement to the existing water distribution system, while also anticipating future flows from the planned WTP. The future connection to the WTP (see
Final Design document - Sheet C25) will be completed in conjunction with the WTP construction, but is accounted for in this project to avoid multiple disturbances to jurisdictional
resources. Water from the new plant is expected to enter this backbone system prior to 2025.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory u I
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
r Open Waters F Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of Impact
Jurisdicition*(?)]2g.
area*
W1
Wetland Conversion
P
Headwater Forest
WF
Yes
Corps
0.016
(acres)
W1
Pipeline Installation
T
Headwater Forest
WF
No
Corps
0.062
(acres)

W2
Wetland Conversion
P
Headwater Forest
WG
Yes
Corps
0.015
(acres)
W2
Pipeline Installation
T
Headwater Forest
WG
No
Corps
0.092
(acres)
W3
Wetland Conversion
P
ffomland Hardwood Forest
WI
Yes
Corps
0.034
(acres)
W4
Wetland Conversion
P
Headwater Forest
WJ
Yes
Corps
0.009
(acres)
W4
Pipeline Installation
T
Headwater Forest
�Vv,
Corps
0.033
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0 187
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.261
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.074
2h. Comments:
Permanent impacts are a result of conversion of forested wetland within the proposed permanent maintained corridor. No permanent loss of wetland
will result from the project.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
Stream Type *
3f. Type of3g.
S. width *
3h. Impact(
�3a.
Jurisdiction"
length*
S1
Pipeline Installation and
Temporary
Stabilization
SE
Intermittent
Corps
2
47
Boring
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
g2
Pipelinelnstallation and
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SE
Intermittent
Corps
2
44
Boring
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S3
Pipeline Installation
Temporary
Stabilization
SF
Intermittent
Corps
6
98
Average (feet)
(lirearfeet)
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Stewarts Creek
Perennial
Corps
32
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S5
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SH
Intermittent
Corps
58
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S6
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SI
Intermittent
Corps
6
27
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
37
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SK
Perennial
Corps
5
30
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
gg
Pipeline Installation
Temporary
Stabilization
SJ
Intermittent
Corps
3
225
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
gg
Pipeline Installation
Temporary
Stabilization jsi
Intermittent
Corps
3
14
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
�01
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Si
Intermittent
Corps
3
22
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S11
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Dry Fork
Perennial
Corps
12
33
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S12
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SIN
Perennial
Corps
5
43
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S13
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Bearskin Creek
Perennial
Corps
15
68
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S14
Pipeline Installation
Temporary
Stabilization
SQ
Intermittent
Corps
2
12
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
M
Pipeline Installation
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SQ
Intermittent
Corps
2
64
Average (feet)
(lirrfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
421
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
817
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
396
3j. Comments:
Permanent stream impacts depicted above would not result in a loss of Waters of the US. Rip -rap will be placed at or belowthe stream bed and not
result in an obstruction or fill above grade.

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed waterline is designed to cross jurisdictional areas perpendicularly where possible and is located along roadsides to limit impacts to
already disturbed areas as much as possible, considering the location of adjacent utilities and other constraints. Limits of disturbance of the project
are being minimized through jurisdictional areas, including temporary construction access areas, and the maintained corridor is limited to 20 feet wide
Parallel temporary impacts to stream SF are unavoidable due to easement availability (residential properties near road). Stream SF is a modified
natural stream already located within an utility corridor. The proposed alignment co -locates the water main within that corridor to limit disturbance of
additional areas. Stream SF will be returned to exsting grade and location after construction, stabilized with matting, and seeded with native seed mix
to stabilize the channel banks. Mowing of the maintained access corridor after construction will avoid stream banks.
Parallel temporary impacts to stream SJ, which appears to be a modified natural channel, are unavoidable due to required sewer offsets and
easement availability. Relocating the waterline to avoid stream SJ would likely increase wetland impacts and permanent wetland conversion. Stream SJ
will be returned to existing grade and location after construction, stabilized with matting, and seeded with native seed mix to stabilize the channel
banks. Mowing of the maintained access corridor after construction will avoid stream banks.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A temporary pump -around would be utilized to dewater streams within proposed impact areas during construction and will be removed at the end of
each work day. Best management practices and sedimentation and erosion control methods will be used throughout construction. No equipment or
maintenance activities will occur adjacent to jurisdictional areas, with the exception of addressing emergency equipment failure. All temporary impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands and streams during construction will be returned to their original configuration and seeded in a timely manner for stabilization.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Total permanent impact to wetlands is less than 0.10 acre and does not typically require mitigation under a NWP 12. The permanent impact will result in conversion rather than loss of
aquatic resources. Stream impacts will also not result in a permanent loss since rip -rap will be placed below the natural elevation of the stream beds as described above.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
The project is located in the Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin, outside the Goose Creek Watershed, and is therefore not subject to NC Riparian Buffer Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The project is a replacement of existing infrastructure with minimal impervious surface associated with the project.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPPJSEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
County funds will be used to construct the project, which is below the criteria required for the preparation of an environmental document under SEPA.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional development is anticipated to result from the project as there is no change in service area. Increases in flow would be addressed, if
necessary, during future permitting of the WTP.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?`
r Yes r No
r Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Note regarding item 5i - at this time it cannot be guaranteed that some percussive activity will be required to install the water main, but specific areas
have not been identified.
An eAsting EO (Schweinitts sunflower) is located north of the project area. No disturbance to this area will result from the project. Surveys have been
performed along the corridor in 2015 and no Schweinitts was found.
USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation online mapper. Accessed 8/6/2020.
NCNHP Data E)plorer online mapper. Accessed 7/20/2020.
See attached NCNHP Site Report.
Consultation Documentation Upload
project_report _853_union_county_waterline_25760_25760.pdf 1.02MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://wm. fish eries. n oa a. gov/resou rce/ma p/esse ntia I -fish -habitat -ma ppe r
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
HPOWEB Map Service http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoveb/
There are no historic properties listed on the site, however there are multiple sites apprommately 300 feet east of the site. These properties, UN1140,
UN1141, UN1142, and UN1143, are not in, or eligible for, the National Register.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year flood plain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Areas of disturbance within the FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain will be returned to existing grade.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Union County FEMA GIS floodplain mapping, North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
htt p: //mm. n cfl ood ma p s. co nV
Miscellaneous
Comments
Please see the attached cover letter for additional information.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Union _Figure1_Vicinity.pdf 597.95KB
Union_Figure3_AquaticResourceslvlap.pdf 26.38MB
Union_PCN _Coverl-etter_08122020.pdf 98.64KB
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
John Shutak
Signature
Ja& ]4k*
Date
8/14/2020

'Hem6y, Bridge
Stallings
Lake
Parrd
�j
1
Unionville
w
f
VAN
M
&M , --
I
�'
Indian Trail
rlmwl
`
t0 o
-_
Welsey�Chapel
-4 Ell
ON
Latitude: 35.038597 d-:
-80.600228
Project ..,
County, NC
ImprovementsUnion
_.
Study .County,

O
-ff D
h.
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
((��1 CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�1:JECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 1 of 10)

tg l FAX
.. �'
ip
/ A
IN
Pip
4.
1 YLr , k r.� -
IL aa
Ai
yR y
2
�.
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 2 of 10)

N
'Y �',
Sk
4.
_
A
b 4A
A r�
1
r i �.
W-
y r
A`
"
t
} 7
.L
i
1 .. .o J. '�j(}(/.Y A Ar - � �p � it } ��*- ` }� • 1.'h{_ '�1 r
"I 1
•
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 3 of 10)

1 , 4f _
1 T `%
:AP r ►
F /!
TV -
AN
F r
�. 711�
T � 3
` � � :mow '�. � ..,• , �; �,q�`
.A rk. yy IL
y
7.4" T,7,4.i�wf
t i
�i
M y�►��N T
0
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 4 of 10)

t
1 �' � � C_•C' F
N.
N
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised:
�ECOSYSTEMS
0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised:
a
A
853W Zone Improvements
Union County, NC
Figure 3: Aquatic
Resources Map (Sheet 5 of 10)
1

'r
SI
1
to's
. . ....... .. . ....
s
�s
'J'..
�N t
ra�
^_`4'4% k
AL
w ON x
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
DCAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 6 of 10)

F r I
k
r t Y
x ,
6
P
L $+
r
ter,
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS
0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 7 of 10)

4r,
ft
i 4
�y
Not-
'i F
x
,A
4
i
f.
IWA
own
IL
ISOMER— T
f
f
VtX
12
44
it slim..
4 �
C
* h
4 4
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
(0��1P
CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 9 of 10)

Bearskin Creek (S ,
km
if
IL
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 10 of 10)

G>+
W
1 0
01'
a
000
-�
� z
F
70 a --I
r
Z
O
MYERS RD
4�
KIKER `BROCK DR/
� q
n
a
v
p 650
LN45
C / p 0 spy
� LU
W O Q a SSG
V OC
❑ F
z-
0
W
ro a n n
tewa
r
I
ce r V
arry Lake Aso
o a
Rd
� JA S HAMS LTOt4
fa
550 0 a p
N
0
'a
r�
0
�-
° � sECREsrp
o �650
Li
.� Q � X
� as
akers -Helms ^ o
N Study Area Sheet Limits
Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
�
DRevised: Union County, NC
CAROLINA Feet ECOSYSTEMS 0 500 1,000 Bakers (2013), Matthews (2013), Monroe (2013), Revised: Figure 2•
and Waxhaw (2013) US Geological
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: USGS Map (Sheet 1 of 2)

NCharlotte-Mor
Executive
Airport
,650
0
.N 0
--650Q
? DVYIFo rk
0
W
G)
J V
O
Q
4
J
650-
Co�r�NFNT
vt
(21
G4LDMIH r 1 /,
F RD
0
.01
ood-Acres
° Clu
0
'G `Pinede
z s
mil'
oj��
0
Z� 650
o�QUICK,RD�
B� arskl��
N Study Area Sheet Limits
Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
�
0Revised: Union County, NC
CAROLINA ECOSYSTEMS Feet
0 500 1,000 Bakers (2013), Matthews (2013), Monroe (2013), Revised: Figure 2•
and Waxhaw (2013) US Geological
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: USGS Map (Sheet 2 of 2)
N
M
A '
a
7H,DR
1
650
az,
a

GOrC
7nF
%)N
4;0 WE'
MR?
CmEl A
ILE
I bw
.k A RuB
7131B
��--
SCA T.i 6
CnA3
rr,R?
n
I L 1'!1
j. AV
N, 6 J C.rn i
14d U11
Cal B c
6'1 7
Ela P, Ll B
Crrifk
Shiloh
JJjj.1)
CITIO
L
`711�
sh i f A
0 ke rsp
N Study Area Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
f*7%QAROL1NA mmmmmE::::� Feet Sheet Limits Revised: Union County, NC
\�� ECOSYSTEMS 0 500 1,000 Revised: Figure 4:
Union County NRCS Soil Survey Map
Sheets 13, 18, and 23 Revised: NRCS Map (Sheet 1 of 2)

RIM
L + s
C•mB
�Ia okers
[ter ri D fil rrFB
at 6-4
r` +
N I R
N I C?
/'Ai h !
Ilk CmE3 LIB
Cm.L
RI,I Z ~
C1IA.
cm 13
BiNe
G3k1 F!-.1 krw
1
Salem �
SAT
P a1 `H 56..
mH
ti -
�1F'; r -
,� Testa rr`rew
AL
CIA
P'
I
-j u r
C 2 Iry 1F �}y
r
8de2
Ioh '
f IiA
-MC
— K ., 1� i
N Study Area Map Dare: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Feet
q CAROLINA � Sheet Limits Revised: Union County, NC
� ECOSYSTEMS 0 500 1,000
Revised: Figure 4:
Union County NRCS Soil Survey Map
Sheets 13, 18, and 23 Revised: NRCS Map (Sheet 2 of 2)

Ac
0 RP J
RP
RD
4
(-J
0
1k Wk
J)
L14
J
-�P
St
Rakers -77 J
Y
L)
te HAbill"
ake 93U �7
0
V\
--H-e
QParx
�S L ood-Aer s-
h hark - \ -11
Hig, n
bL
A
-C,;TIL I /V
601
"'chni
-0-
-M- NROE
a tfz S
nO-n (i riarwood,
aBr.FRv.
..
Cai
Pinedell
�J
nroe Aj�pom
------ Impact Locations
Impact Site 1 - Sl, S2, W1
Impact Site 2 - S3
i (I, �; a, �Y = v MU %
Impact Site 3 - S4
Impact Site 4 - S5, W2
3 Impact Site 5 - S6
Impact Site 6 - S7, W3
V Impact Site 7 - S8
"oPo Pam,
n
/,,4 Impact Site 8 - S9,SI0
-7,
J
Impact Site 9 - S I I
1PD
Impact Site 10 W4
<
40
Impact Site 11 -S12
Impact Site 12 - S13
Impact Site 13 -S14,S15
N Project Limits of Disturbance 853W Zone Improvements
e,NCAROLINA Union County, NC
IZ:,iECOSYSTEMS Miles Impact Site
0 0.25 0.5 Bakers (2013), Matthews (2013), Monroe (2013), Figure 5.0:
August 2020 and Waxhaw (2013) US Geological Impact Site Index Map
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map

WI: Temporary Impacts: 2686 Sq. ft. (0.062 acres)
WI: Permanent (Conversion) Impacts: 690 Sq. ft.
S 1: Temporary Impacts: 47 linear feet
S2: Permanent (No Loss) Impacts: 44 linear feet
FA
/
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent(Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
0 20 40 ®Permenant (No Loss) stream Impact -Temporary Wetland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Comoms Revised: Figure5.1:
0'%.p Stream Channels
Revised: Impact Site 1

/
/
/
/ S3: Temporary Impact: 98 linear feet
/
/
� / a
/
/
/
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
wIL � Construction Limits � Wetlands �T/-�
Feet 'v imposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
(\1\/� � AROLI NA ® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact - Temporary Wedand Impacts
�/-COSYSTEMS 0 20 40 Q Temporary, Stream Impact /s/1, Comoms Revised:
Figure 5.2:
O/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 2

i
i
i
i
i
i
S4: Permanent (No Loss) Impact: 32 linear feet
�v
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact -Temporary Welland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS 0 20 40 QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Conoms Revised:
Figure 5.3:
0/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 3

W2: Temporary Impact: 4017 Sq. ft. (0.092 acres)
W2: Permanent (Conversion) Impact: 66~ q. (0.015 acres
S5: Permanent (N Los mpact: 58 line feef `
-----I---}--}—
UP
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
wIL � Construction Limits � Wetlands �T/-�
Feet 'v imposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
�1 AROLI NA ® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact - Temporary Wetland Impacts
�/ _COSYSTEMS 0 20 40 Temporary Stream Impact NI,Comoms Revised:
Figure 5.4:
0/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 4

i
i
i
S6: Permanent (No s) Impact 27 linear feet
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent(Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact -Temporary Welland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS 0 20 40 QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Conoms Revised:
Figure 5.5:
O/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 5

i
J
W3: Permanent (Conversion) Impact: 1484 Sq. ft. (0.034
S7: Permanent (N
D Loss) Impact: 30 linear feet
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent(Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact -Temporary Welland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS 0 20 40 QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Conoms Revised:
Figure 5.6:
0/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 6

S8: Temporary Impact: 225 linear feet
N
Construction Limits
(Z� Wetlands
Map Date: August 2020
853W Zone Improvements
Revised:
AROLINA
mmmmmm== Feet
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts
Union County, NC
ECOSYSTEMS
0 20
40
®Permenant (No Loss) stream Impact -Temporary Wetland Impacts
QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Comoms
Revised:
Figure5.7:
O�%.p Stream Channels
Impact Site 7
Revised:

S9: Temporar Impact: 14 linear feet
/ S 10: Permanent No Loss) Impact: 22 linear feet
LftWAft
1
I
I
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact - Temporary Welland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS 0 20 40 QTemporary Stream Impact 1'Conoms Revised:
Figure 5.8:
O/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 8

i
• S 11: Permanent No Loss) Impact: 33 linear feet
1
r
i
i
i
i
N wMap Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
IL� Construction Limits � Wetlands �T/-�
Feet 'v imposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
�1 - AROLI NA ® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact - Temporary Wedand Impacts
_COSYSTEMS 0 20 40 M Temporary Stream Impact NI,Comoms Revised:
Figure 5.9:
O/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 9

1 - /
W4: Temporary Impact: 1452 Sq. ft. (0.033 acres) /
W4: Permanent (Conversion) Impact: 383 Sq. ft. (0.009 acres) /
/
i
L
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent(Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
0 20 40 ®Permenant (No Loss) stream Impact —Temporary Wetland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Comoms Revised: Figure5.10:
O�%.p Stream Channels
Revised: Impact Site 10

� ` 1
S12: Permanent (No Loss) Impact: 43 linear feet
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
wIL � Construction Limits � Wetlands �T/-�
Feet 'v imposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent (Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
�1 AROLI NA ® Permenant (No Loss) Stream Impact - Temporary Wedand Impacts
�/ _COSYSTEMS 0 20 40 �Temporary Stream Impact NI,Comoms Revised:
Figure 5.11:
O/ Stream Channels `
Revised: Impact Site 11

/
S 13: Permanent (No Loss) Impact: 68 linear feet
/
/
l � �
/
/ Q
/
/
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (Z� Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent(Cotrversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
0 20 40 ®Permenant (No Loss) stream Impact -Temporary Wetland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS QTemporary Stream Impact 1'Comoms Revised: Figure5.12:
O�%.p Stream Channels
Revised: Impact Site 12

i
1 / i
f f
/ f
V /
f
S 14: Temporary Impact: 12 linear feet
f / S 15: Permanent (No Loss) Impact: 64 linear feet
4000
/
r /
r l f
000, /
/ 1
040,i
l
/
N Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
Construction Limits (�D Wetlands �T/-�
^Proposed Waterline Alignment - Permanent(Conversion) Wetland Impacts Revised: Union County, NC
AROLINA Feet
0 20 40 ® Permenant (No Loss) stream Impact - Temporary Wetland Impacts
ECOSYSTEMS QTemporary Stream Impact /s/1'Comoms Revised: Figure5.13:
O�%.p Stream Channels
Revised: Impact Site 13

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12499
July 20, 2020
Brian Smith
Carolina Ecosystems
3040 NC 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
RE. 853 Union County Waterline
Dear Brian Smith:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
853 Union County Waterline
July 20, 2020
NCNHDE-12499
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area _
axono EO ID Scientific Nam Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Freshwater 3063 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell 2018-10-24 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G4 S4
Bivalve Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on July 20, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
853 Union County Waterline
July 20, 2020
NCNHDE-12499
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status us Rank Rank
a j Date a Rank
Freshwater 19515 Toxolasma pullus Savannah Lilliput 2009-05-13 E 3-Medium --- Endangered G2 S2
Bivalve
Freshwater 3063 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell 2018-10-24 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G4 S4
Bivalve Rare
Freshwater 29558 Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell 2009-05-13 E 3-Medium --- Significantly G4 S4
Bivalve Rare
Freshwater 16905 Villosa vaughaniana Carolina Creekshell 2019-09-26 E 3-Medium --- Endangered G2G3 S3
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish13879 Etheostoma collis Carolina Darter 2010-05-13 B 3-Medium --- Special G3 S3
Concern
Vascular Plant 3518 Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's Sunflower 2010-10-13 D 2-High Endangered Endangered G3 S3
Vascular Plant 15301 Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's Sunflower 2018-10-30 D 2-High Endangered Endangered G3 S3
Vascular Plant 34596 Symphyotrichum Georgia Aster 2018-10-30 D 2-High Candidate Threatened G3 S3
georgianum
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
bite Name RepTentational Rating Collective Rating
YAD/Crooked Creek Aquatic Habitat R3 (High) C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner Type
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on July 20, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-12499: 853 Union County Waterline
ChestnutVO
°°
Q0
CJS
n,°e
Ru
7a 1 8
Creek
_
ed
Cro°�
n
;6011
xc
° :'w0o
rn
ROarxke Chule-nad
M:
a
T
St
Slewarts
re.
707 ft.
��
Q
4.1
oil
fJeese. Rd -
y Hw Rolling _-0
/ Sig Monroe - Hilla 2'
Airport ._ Country. C yhJ
4�e jai Club
J`
Wesley Chapel. I �.
o r
m - 0 '!*in C,w�/how R Mon
_ Cross' `o
0
4,
Ld
Nsult-
bv
9N �
WF, 'V.1l tF tL, - r <
V m F. i l
July 20, 2020
Project Boundary
❑
Buffered Project Boundary
®
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
El
Managed Area (MAREA)
1:66,870
0 0.5 1 2 mi
0 0.75 1.5 3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NIL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 4 of 4