20201049 Ver 1_PJD_20200814

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑✓
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: UT to Big Branch Project Site
2. Work Type: Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The project is primarily funded by the Disaster Recovery Act of 2016 to help communities and citizens recover from damage that
resulted from wildfires and Hurricane Matthew. Heavy flooding from Hurricane Matthew resulted in severe bank erosion of UT to Big
Branch. Construction activities will involve installing in -stream structures, bank grading, and planting native riparian species along the
stream corridor to improve stream stability. Tn-stream structures including constructed riffles and log sills will provide grade control
and bedform diversity for increased aquatic habitat opportunities.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Wildlands Engineering (Applicant)
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Carlynn Walker, Wildlands Engineering
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
1416 Cedar Fork Road Beulaville, NC 28518; 34.875382 N,-77.701810 W
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: see attached
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Duplin
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Beulaville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Big Branch
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Cape Fear (03030007)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
❑ Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
El No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

% P
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
May 22, 2020
Mr. Thomas Charles
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification
Disaster Recovery Act Technical Services (DRATS) Stream Repair Project (UT to Big Branch Site)
Duplin County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Charles:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is requesting written verification from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) regarding the extent of potential waters of the United States within the subject project area. The UT to
Big Branch project site is located in Duplin County, NC (Figures 1 and 2). The project is primarily funded by the
Disaster Recovery Act of 2016 to help communities and citizens recover from damage that resulted from
Hurricane Matthew and wildfires. Heavy flooding from Hurricane Matthew resulted in severe bank erosion of UT
to Big Branch on project parcels. The project will involve installing in -stream structures, bank grading, and
planting native riparian species to improve stream stability. In -stream structures including constructed riffles
and log sills will provide grade control and bedform diversity for increased aquatic habitat opportunities.
Methodology
On May 6, 2020 Wildlands delineated potential waters of the United States within the proposed project area.
These areas were delineated using the USACE Routine On -Site Determination Method defined by the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Regional
Supplement. Wetland Determination Data Forms representative of on -site wetland areas as well as upland areas
have been enclosed.
Non -wetland waters (streams) were reviewed using USACE Ordinary High -Water Marks guidance (2005) and
classified using the North Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (Version 4.11, 2010). NCDWR Stream Classification Forms
representative of on -site stream channels are enclosed.
Potential Waters of the United States
The results of the on -site field investigation indicate that there are two non -wetland waters within the proposed
project area which include two unnamed tributaries (UT's) to Big Branch. For project purposes these channels
are identified as UT to Big Branch and an unnamed channelized stream. One wetland area and two agriculturally
maintained ditches were identified within the proposed project area (Figure 3).
On -site stream channels are located within Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030007). Approximate linear footage
and acreage of on -site waters are summarized in Table 1.
UT to Big Branch Project Site
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 1

Table 1. Summary of On -Site Potential Waters of the United States
NCDWR
Feature
Classification
Length (LF)
Acreage
Watershed (ac)
Stream Scores
Intermittent Non -Wetland
UT to Big Branch
1503
283
27
Water
Intermittent Non -Wetland
Channelized Stream
98
-
70
20.25
Water
Wetland A
Headwater Forest
0.071
-
Total:
1,601
0.071
Streams
UT to Big Branch and the unnamed channelized stream are intermittent non -wetland waters that originate off
the project property. The upstream project limit begins at a culvert crossing. The streambanks of UT to Big
Branch have been severely eroded, and the un-named stream has been channelized for agricultural purposes
which has altered the natural geomorphic, hydrologic, and biological characteristics of the stream.
Wetlands
Wetland A was classified as a headwater forest using the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM)
classification key and the evaluator's best professional judgment. The wetland is in the upper portion of the
project and is located in the floodplain adjacent to UT to Big Branch. This wetland exhibited a low chroma matrix
with oxidized rhizospheres in the upper 12 inches of the soil. Wetland Determination Data Forms representative
of the wetland and the associated upland point are enclosed.
Soils
Soil series within the project area predominantly include Foreston loamy fine sand (FoA) and Leon sand (LnA).
Foreston soils are poorly drained soils and are mapped along the lower portion of the project stream near Cedar
Fork Road. Leon soils are poorly drained and are mapped along the upper portion of the project stream. Soil
mapping units (Figure 4) are from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation
(NRCS) Web Soil Survey website (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm).
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-851-9986 or at [e-mail] should you have any
questions regarding this request for preliminary jurisdictional verification.
Sincerely,
GW" d bA
Carlynn Walker
UT to Big Branch Project Site
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 2

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington district
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Mi ssions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CounlyLocator. aspx
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1416 Cedar Fork Road
City, State:
Beulaville, NC
County: D u p l i n
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): see attached
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Carlynn Walker
Mailing Address: 312 W. Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone] x120
[e-mail]
❑ I am the current property owner.
W] I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: James Lanier
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
N/A
[e-mail]
i Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Carlynn Walker
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner 0 Authorized Agents
8/14/2020
Date
Siena re
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
✓❑ Other: Stream Repair Site
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 5.826 acres.
F1The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
W]
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.874498
Longitude:-77.702198
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoLy-Permit-
Pro aam/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
a USGS Topographic Map
Fr-(] Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
✓❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/does/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.arM.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and onthe Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for anAJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 5/22/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Carlynn Walker, 312 W. Millbrook Rd., Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Duplin City: Beulaville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.874498 Long.: -77.702198
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See attached

1 ) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
FE-] Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
F-] Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
F-] Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
F-] USGS NHD data.
F-] USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Richlands Quad 1:6,000
FEW Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
F-1 State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 1 00-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map, 2016
or ■❑ Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, May 2020
❑ Previous determ i nation (s). File no. and date of response letter:
F-1 Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later Murisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signaturend date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Table 1. Summary of On -Site Potential Waters of the United States
Estimate Amount of Aquatic
Feature
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin Class
Class of Aquatic Resource
Resource in Review Area
Potential Non -Wetland
UT to Big Branch
34.874498
-77.702198
Riverine - Streambed
1503
Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland
Channelized Stream
34.876082
-77.700976
Riverine - Streambed
98
Waters of the US
Wetland A
34.878011
-77.700673
Palustrine - Emergent
0.071
Potential Waters of the US

Mutual Agreement
for
Stream Stabilization/Restoration
(NCDA & CS Hurricane Project)
Resource Institute (RI) is a non-profit organization that assists organizations and
individuals in carrying out projects to protect natural and human resources while promoting
economic development. Rl can assist with projects in a variety of ways, including, but not limited
to, fund-raising, administering project funds, and contracting for services needed to complete a
project. RI is assisting NCDA & CS to help farmers and landowners address eroding stream banks
that were negatively affecting them through loss of property, hazards for livestock, sediment
transport into a stream and degraded aquatic habitat associated with hurricane damage. The
farmer/landowner has either initiated an application for assistance or has already signed an
agreement/contract for assistance with NCDA & CS. RI's role is to help facilitate the design,
construction oversight and certification of the work for these projects with NCDA & CS. RI
provides these services through an agreement with NCDA &CS.
RI will assist the farmer/landowner by helping to address issues related to managing and
contracting for the required design, planning, permitting and construction work for stream
enhancement practices on the site, as well as necessary structure work, and bank stabilization. RI's
objective is to help address current water quality degradation issues; however, work cannot be
guaranteed for acts of nature related to flood events or beyond the one year work warranty given
by the contractor. RI is working with NCDA, Conservation Districts and the farmers/landowners
to help reduce those impacts as much as possible.
In providing services to the farmer/landowner on this tract of land for stream
restoration/stabilization activities to be performed we thereby mutually agree to the following
items:
1. The farmer/landowner will allow ingress and egress for all activities related to the stream
restoration/stabilization such as: surveys, engineering, construction, monitoring, etc. for
RI and its agents.
2. RI will provide project management services such as, obtaining the technical resources,
bidding and contracting of project elements, and project construction oversight.
TSP Engineer Firm: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Phone): 704-332-7754
TSP Engineer Name: Aaron Earley, TSP-13-9259
Page 1 of 2
(Phone) : 704-332-7754

)Lolll
tv
Co' my
1,525
Stream Length
Fa►/mJr/landowner Print Name and Title
F*li4er/landowner Signature and Title
)-
Date
1
e r.1 C.d
Entall Address
Phone Number
Resource Institute Incorporated
Chairman, Resource Institute RC&D, Inc.
08/03/2020
Date
UT to Big Branch
Stream Name

LANIER. MLLIAPel
WIFE V ENCIY L LANIER
v: 3285-
G 6 IJ8 ! 679
24.29Acres
JENKINS. R-:DBER.T TH-:)hr1AS
WIFE JENKINS. JA-:s-:)UELINE hot.
07-1 754- --
DIR WOO f 769
ee 3.96 Acres
•
•
LANIER. KIhr1BERLY H. HIRS C!O GERREN LAMER
07-22 38- - -
• CIB 981 1462
27.95 Acres
4F
� T1
13M D c '
rrs or�r•+ z
wz
-4 LANIER. RI -:'HARD RALPH. JR.
O V IFE KAYE F. LANIER
07-2 343- - - •
GB 1199 ; 566
70 29.26Acres
ED4'VARDS. CHARLES b'Y.. JR.
WIFE LISA EDWARDS �
07-425---
DB 1039: 768
24.09 Acres
•
•
LANIER, RICHARD RALPH, JR. & WIFE KAYE P. LANIER
Parcel #: 07-2343- - - Property Address:1715 & 1810
Account #:5251743 Mailing Address:860 FOUNTAINTOWN RD BEULAVILLE NC 285187587
Deed Ref: 1199/566 1997 Year Built:0 Misc. Impry Value:$10114
Year Built:0 Last Sale Price: $0 Fire Code: 05
Deeded Acres:29.26 Assessed Value:23700 Notes:CONV_NOTES
Last Sale Date: 01/02/1997 Property Class:1 Re ma rks: "J ACK TRACT'
Year Built:0 Heat SQ Feet:0 Land Value Only:$63800
•
0
•
LANIER. RICHARD F
07-4004---
DB 1607: 815
24.02 Acr-es
DUPLIN COUNTY GIS
DISCLAIMER: May 13, 2020
The information gathered from this site is
for informational purposes only and the
map(s) printed from this site should NOT be
used as or in place of an actual survey.
The map(s) should NOT be used in sales
orconveyances.
Generated by http://gis.duplincountync.com

VYIFE LISA J. EDVYARDS LANIER RAL PH. JR_ BRINSON. KEN NETH H. TRUSTEE
"-913-- - WIFE KAY P. LAMER BRINSON. JOYCE R. TRUSTEE
DB 1648 ; 81 07-1919- - - 07- 431- - -
27Ars DB 1148 413 DB 942 335
22Acres 40.5 Acres
LANIER. WILLIAM C
WIFE WENDY L LANIE
07-3289- - -
DB 1408 ! 679
24.29 Acres
0011 D
LY��F-
1809 i
EDWARDS. CHARLES W.
WIFE LISA EDWARDS
07- 42 5- - -
D B 10391 760
13,
JENKINS. ROB ERTTHOMAS
WIFE JENKINS. JACQUELINE h1.
07-175 4- - -
D B 1700 ; 769
23.96Acres
LANIER KIMEIE MRS CEO OERREN
07 2238- - DB 981 i 462
95 Acres
LANIER. RICHARD RALPH. JR.
WIFE KAYE P. LANIER
Q - 1199
DB 1199l566
29.26Acres
JONES. PEGGY LAMER
07-424---
DB 1291 429
i 972 Acres
LANIER. JAMES DEWEY
07-2232---
D B 1051 ; 573
29 Acres
r,EID
BROWN. LEON OUTHRIE
07- 5 93- - -
DB 1009 ; 565
55.46Acres
LANIER. RICHARD F
07-4004- - -
DB 1607f 815
24.02 Acres
FOSTER. ONA FAYE LE
07-1117- - -
DB440.224
21.92 Acres
< j
LANIER DOUGLAS LYNN
WIFE LANIER WANDA B.
07- 45 8- - -
DB 879! 419
86.33Acres
RAYNOR. HEBER H. FOUNTAIN. BENJANIIN TRUSTEE
WIFE RAYNOR--BRENDA H. FOUNTAIN. JUDITH A TRUSTEE
07-3265-- _ -- 07-1125---
DB 1748; 474 DB 114; 201
31 Acres 179.04Acres
LANIER, KIMBERLY H. HRS C/O GERREN LANIER
Parcel #: 07-2238- - - Property Address:1362 CEDAR FORK RD
Account #: 5218125 Mailing Address:1362 CEDAR FORK RD BEULAVILLE NC 28518
Deed Ref: 981/462 2006 Year Built:1984 Misc. Impry Value:$5252
Year Built:1984 Last Sale Price: $0 Fire Code: 05
Deeded Acres:27.95 Assessed Value:45900 Notes: CO NV_ NOTES
Last Sale Date: 03/15/1987 Property Class:3 Remarks: MAP BK 12 PG 68
Year Built:1984 Heat SQ Feet:1456 Land Value Only:$91500
DUPLIN COUNTY GIS
DISCLAIMER: May 21, 2020
The information gathered from this site is
for informational purposes only and the
map(s) printed from this site should NOT be
used as or in place of an actual survey.
The map(s) should NOT be used in sales
orconveyances.
Generated by http://gis.duplincountyne.com

BROWN, GARY WAYNE
Parcel #: 07- 612- - -
Account #: 1198951
Deed Ref: 1276/278 2003
Year Built:1900
Deeded Acres:1
Last Sale Date:
Year Built:1900
BROWN. GARY VYAYNE
07- 612 - - -
DB 1276 ; 278
1 Acres
:_1=
R-Own
`Ell AR FORK 'CONIho1UNITY BLDti G.
07-E031- - -
DB
'I Acres
SmLqmm
F•
BR%'JWN. MICHAEL T
QFE PAN SEY NICOLE BROWN
07- 4-30---
DB1546;268
2 Acrev
KIRBY. ANNIE LAURIE BRINSON
07- 444- - -
DB94.5;270
17.125 Acres
Property Address:1424 CEDAR FORK RD
Mailing Address:1424 CEDAR FORK RD BEULAVILLE
NC 28518
Year Built:1900
Misc. Impry Value:$2376
Last Sale Price:
Fire Code: 05
Assessed Value:20800
Notes: CO NV_ NOTES
Property Class:2
Re marks:2 SWMH
Heat SQ Feet:772
Land Value Only:$15500
DUPLIN COUNTY GIS
DISCLAIMER: May 13, 2020
The information gathered from this site is
for informational purposes only and the
map(s) printed from this site should NOT be
used as or in place of an actual survey.
The map(s) should NOT be used in sales
orconveyances.
Generated by http://gis.duplincountync.com

CEDAR FORE{ COMMUNITY BLDG_
07-EO31---
DB
1 Acres
i4acow
BROWN. GARY WAYNE
07-612---
DB 1276l278
1 Acres
P%=�
BROWN. NICHAEL T.
WIFE PANSEY NICOLE BROWN
07- 430- - -
DB1546r 268
2 Acres
•
GFDAR
Of,wR'
11514
KIRBY. ANNIE LAURIE BRINSON
07- 444- - -
DB 945 ; 270
17.125 A ores
CEDAR FORK COMMUNITY BLDG.
Parcel #: 07-EO31- - -
Property Address:1412 CEDAR FORK RD
Account #: 1783410
Mailing Address: RR 2 BEULAVILLE NC 28518
Deed Ref: / 0
Year Built:1960
Misc. Irl Value:$3822
Year Built:1960
Last Sale Price: $0
Fire Code: 05
Deeded Acres:1
Assessed Value:52300
Notes: CO NV_ NOTES
Last Sale Date:
Property Class:4
Remarks:
Year Built:1960
Heat SQ Feet:1464
Land Value Only:$15500
LANIER JANETCHERYL
07-22 37- - -
DB 94E ; 237
2.18Aaes
EDWARDS. ELIZABETH B
07- 445- - -
DB 1064; 4-50
8Acres
DUPLIN COUNTY GIS
DISCLAIMER: May 13, 2020
The information gathered from this site is
for informational purposes only and the
map(s) printed from this site should NOT be
used as or in place of an actual survey.
The map(s) should NOT be used in sales
orconveyances.
Generated by http://gis.duplincountyne.com

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: UT to Big Branch City/County: Duplin Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 -Upland
Investigator(s): C.Walker Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.875657 Long:-77.701275 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon Sand NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1 -Upland
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Ligustrum sinense
10 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Platanus occidentalis
2 No
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
12 =Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
6 20% of total cover:
3
FACW species 2 x 2 = 4
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FAC species 97 x 3 = 291
1. Ligustrum sinense
85 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
2.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 99 (A) 295 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.98
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
85 =Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2 No
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
2 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
1 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 -Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/1 100
Loamy/Clayey
4-18 10YR 5/2 98
10YR 6/6 5 C PL
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)—Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
149A)
—Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: UT to Big Branch City/County: Duplin Sampling Date: 5/6/2020
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP 2 - A
Investigator(s): C.Walker Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 34.878011 Long:-77.700673 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Leon Sand NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP 2 - A
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
1.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
2.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 270 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Juncus tenuis
90 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP 2 - A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 6/8 2 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-16 2.5YR 5/2 93 10YR 6/8 7 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
x Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)—Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
—Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

NC DWO Stream Identification form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectlSite: [�R - Lid
t t�ai'?�-
Latitude:;, t.�
r '11 2
Gr
Evaluator: Cs
County: B iJ y+I
e
Longitude: T I
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ' ® ..
if>_ 19 or Perennial if> 30-
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemera intermitten Perennial
p
Other ChGinneiiZed
e. Quad Name:
9 `a.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =)
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2
32.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
aent
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence4.
1
2
3
Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
L21
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
i
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0'�
0.5
1
1.5
1C. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Subtotal = - l
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
C
3
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Rio Ioav (Subtotal = '2. -19 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
D
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22, Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23_ Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
(0 ;
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0
0.5
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FA CW = 0.75 OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
©ate: o 2"'
ProjectlSite: } tf
Latitude: I
Evaluator: C 0 1 Ke r
County: 01uplin
Longitude: 0 '
aVV
®"
Total Points:
is at least intermittent ~�
ircle one)
Stream bet71nte7rm!it�tetntcyerenniall
Ephemeral
Other i. '�_'`�_ ���t'-;
Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30' 1
if 2: 19
e. Quad
g"
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal = 14 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
is Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3 j
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
;1�
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,y
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
D
1;�
2
3
5. Active/relict fioodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent afluvfal deposits
0
1
2
3
S. Headcuts
03
1
2'
3
9. Grade control
C),
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
El artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13, Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 -
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = (o, a )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
D
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
01�
'0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0,=
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI
= 1.5 Cher =
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: A r') P ;E y At`s Iu)
A0l 0 $.�

Representative Site Photographs

I
UT to Big Branch Channelized Stream
Upland - DP1
Maintained Agricultural Ditch 1
Wetland — DP2
Maintained Agricultural Ditch 2
UT to Big Branch Project Site
Project Site Photographs

- Assessment Area
D3 Hydrologic Unit Code (12 Digit)
030300070302
a.
4
�y
a
���pti`�"�swamp
❑uis,nS1aTO ft� dw qds
g�nr a rn E�
030300070306
„'.'to
l�
C
' 4
030300070403
�WILDLANDS 0 0.5 1 Miles
E N G I N E E R I N G t
l i i i l
1,
030203020102
�1
r
y �J
*,1
I
r
f '
r �
r �
r
a
030300070402
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
UT to Big Branch Project Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030007
Duplin County, NC

•
■ Assessment Area
41
y
Ooie - \6
Richlands USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle
F
�WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 250 500 Feet Figure 2 Topographic Map
UT to Big Branch Project Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030007
Duplin County, NC

•� Assessment Area
® Potential Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Agricultural Ditches
2 ft Contours
O Data Points
k N
f S
b r
rr
/ 5• r
4R1
ti-
FK• 4
wWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 100 200 Feet
IIIII
Figure 3 Site Map
UT to Big Branch Project Site
PCape Fear River Basin 03030007
�1 Duplin County, NC

Potential Non -Wetlands Waters of the US Soils
® Potential Waters of the US FoA - Foreston loamy fine sand, 0-2% slopes
•� Assessment Area LnA - Leon sand, 0-2% slopes
WoA - Woodington loamy fine sand, 0-1% slopes
AWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
1
1
1
1
I�
.J
•.I
0 100 200 Feet Figure 4 Soils Map
P UT to Big Branch Project Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030007
Duplin County, NC