20201049 Ver 1_401 Application_20200814

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes IT No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201049
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Ur to Big Branch
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Aaron Early
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/14/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Big Branch
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.875382
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Duplin
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes IT No
Longitude:
-77.701810
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Robb Mairs:eads\rlmairs2
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
V
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
27 - Restoration
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
James Lanier
2b. Deed book and page no.:
N/A
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
1362 Cedar Fork Road
Address Line 2
aty
Beulaville
Postal / Zip Code
28518
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rmince / legion
NC
Country
Duplin
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

3a. Name:
Aaron Early
3b. Business Name:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
3c.Address
Street Address
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28203
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Beulaville
Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1416 Cedar Fork Road
Address Line 2
City
Beulaville
Postal / Zip Code
28518
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Big Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300070306
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / F bgion
NC
Country
US
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
US
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located in a primarily rural watershed in eastern Duplin County. The project area includes a section of UT to Big Branch With several unstable, eroding stream banks.
Land uses surrounding the project area include forest, agriculture, and single family residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
t^ Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
UTtoBigBranch_Topo_Map_PCN.pdf 581.91 KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
UTtoBigBranch_Soils _Map_PCN.pdf 514.2KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property

0.071
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,601
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project work is primarily funded by the Disaster Recovery Act of 2016 to help communities and citizens recover from damage that resulted from Hurricane Matthew and wildfires.
Heavy flooding from Hurricane Matthew resulted in severe bank erosion of UT to Big Branch. The purpose of this project is to increase stability of the project stream through the use of
natural channel design techniques, which are described below in section 4i.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Construction activities will involve installing in -stream structures, bank grading, and planting native riparian species along the constructed stream corridor. In -stream structures including
constructed riffles and log sills will provide grade control and bedform diversity for increased aquatic habitat opportunities. Existing culverts will be cut to match the slope, and Class B rip
rap will be used in select areas for stabilization.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
UT to Big BranchPlans.pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Carlynn Walker
Agency/Consultant Company: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
UTto Big Branch PJD. pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
1.12MB
5.28MB
r Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r" Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * r��
2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
W1
Stream Restoration
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
��B.th
]0.056
(acres)
W2
Stream Restoration
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Both
0.005
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.056
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.061
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.005
2h. Comments:

3. Stream Impacts
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact * 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
Stream Restoration
Permanent
Stabilization
UT to Big Branch
g
Intermittent
Both
7
Average (feet)
581
(linearfeet)
S2
Stream Restoration
Tem orar
p y
Other
Channelized Stream
Intermittent
Both
6
Aver�e(feet)
20
(lir�zarfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
581
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
601
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
20
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
During design, efforts were made to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands adjacent to the project area. Construction access is limited to
only the immediate project area.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. During construction, a pump
around will be employed if necessary to avoid working in the wet however the stream has low baseflowthat's unlikely to transport sediment
downstream. Biodegradable coir fiber matting and native riparian vegetation will be used to stabilize the newly graded banks. Silt fence will be installed
between the stream and any temporary stockpile areas to avoid sediment runoff.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes
r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts permitted under NWP 27 are exempt from compensatory mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) u
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Project is not in Buffer Basin
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information V
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federalistate) land?*
r Yes r No

1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
The project work is primarily funded by the Disaster Recovery Act of 2016 to help communities and citizens recover from damage that resulted from
Hurricane Matthew and wildfires.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This stream project will stabilize a degraded stream channel. The project will not cause an increase in development nor will it negatively impact
downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Wildlands reviewed the USFWS Information for Planning Conservation (IPaC) online tool to identify federally listed endangered plant and animal
species that might be impacted by the project. The IPaC review listed these potential endangered and threatened species: the Wood Stork (Mycteria
americana), American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) and Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). No critical habitats were identified by
the IPaC review. Habitat for the Wood Stork is described by the USFWS website "freshwater marshes, narrowtidal creeks, or flooded tidal pools'.
American Alligator habitat is primarily wetland or marshes as described by the USFWS website. The project stream is a sand bed system with eroding
stream banks common along the project reach that doesn't appear likely to support habitat for either the American Alligator or Wood Stork. The
project area lacks a mature pine stands typically used by Red -cockaded woodpecker for nesting and roosting. Although there are some pine trees
present in the adjacent forest they did not comprise a majority of the area.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes
r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map did not show any areas with historic or cultural preservation status in the project area.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
NCHPO Map.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes
r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FIRM Panel 3720348000K eff. 6/20/2018
Project is in Zone Xan area of minimal flood hazard.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
305.87KB
U
UrtoBigBranch_lmpactMap.pdf 1.84MB
Signature U
17 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Carlynn Walker
Signature
&W611 ie �%aMlt
Date
8/14/2020

■ Assessment Area
i ■
• i ■
i ■
_• 4
&char Fork ,
:r • •
�` • 00,
,f. .
Richlands Quadrangle
OftWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
•
0 500 Feet Topographic Map
UT to Big Branch Project Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030007
Duplin County, NC

1 Assessment Area
® Potential Waters of the US
lia `, Potential Non -Wetlands Waters of the US
` C A
^�� I Go
L 1 / NbA
19
FoA
-■ �• 1 � nir e J
0-Ir Id
1 I
j.. x Fa
k
. jilt-
�Vv
W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet
t N G I NE ERI N G
Soils Map
PUT to Big Branch Project Site
�1 Cape Fear River Basin 03030007
Duplin County, NC

4
r�
'Uhtl BNFYsAtI RC1
DUPLIN
Cadar Fork
t
r - d'" ftd
bcSar
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

Stream and Wetland Impact Map
W I L D L A N 0 200 Feet UT to Big Branch Project Site
ENGINEERINGG
Cape Fear River Basin 03030007
Duplin County, NC

BEULAVILLE
CHINQUAPIN
PROJECT
AREA
LYMAN
@
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
�J
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
UT to Big Branch
Duplin County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Resource Institute
wo
RESOURCE
INSTITUTE
DRAFT FINAL PLANS
MAY 8, 2020
"To the best of my professional knowledge,
judgment, and belief, these plans meet
applicable NRCS standards."
TSP-13-9259
Aaron Earley, PE TSP #
Sheet Index
Title Sheet
General Notes and Symbols
Project Overview
Plan and Profile
Details
Sections
Project Directory
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
1430 South Mint St., Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Aaron Earley, PE
704-332-7754
Surveying:
Draper Aden Associates
114 Edinburgh South Drive
Cary, NC 27511
919-827-0864
0.1
0.2
0.3
1.1-1.4
2.1-2.5
3.1-3.3
Owner:
Resource Institute Inc.
2714 Henning Drive
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
336-750-0522
�zH
zw
vzw€�
i

Construction Sequence:
1. Contact North Carolina "One Call" Center (1.800.632.4949) before any excavation.
2. Contact Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (252-946-6481) before any work begins on the project and notify them of the start date.
3. Mobilize equipment and materials to the Site.
4. Identify and establish construction entrance, staging and stockpile areas, haul roads, silt fence, tree protection fencing, and safety fencing as indicated on the Plans for work areas. Install silt fence around the down -slope perimeter of
the staging/stockpile areas to avoid sediment runoff.
5. All haul roads shall be monitored for sediment loss daily. In the event of sediment loss, silt fence or other acceptable sediment and erosion control practices, such as straw wattles, shall be installed. Silt fence outlets shall be located at
points of low elevation or a minimum spacing of 150 ft.
6. Install necessary pump -around or clean water diversions.
7. Establish location and elevation of on -site benchmarks.
8. Complete any necessary demolition work.
9. Construction activities should begin with grading of the west stream bank according to the contours and sections on these plans. Grading of the west stream bank should be completed from downstream to upstream, station 107+00 to
100+50. Maintain clean water diversion in such a manner to facilitate grading of the stream bank without contributing sediment load downstream. The clean water diversion should remain in place until the west bank has been
excavated and stabilized to final grades. Grading work for each day must be stabilized prior to the end of the work day or before the start of any 24 hour rain event greater than 0.1 ". Material stockpiles should be located on the east
bank to prevent the need for construction traffic on the west bank during subsequent steps of construction. Stockpile material, if wet, should be placed and spread in loose lifts to facilitate drying. Wet material is not suitable for reuse as
embankment material.
10. Install clean water diversion for grading the east stream bank. The diversion shall be installed in such a manner to facilitate grading of the stream bank without contributing sediment load downstream. Grading of the east stream bank
should be completed from upstream to downstream, station 100+50 to 115+50. The clean water diversion should remain in place until the east bank has been excavated and stabilized to final grades. Grading work for each day must
be stabilized prior to the end of the work day or before the start of any 24 hour rain event greater than 0.1 ".
11. Suitable excavated material can be spread within the east floodplain in such a manner that does not negatively impact the nearby farm fields or forested land. Any excess excavated material that cannot be spread on site must be
properly disposed of off site at the cost of the contractor.
12. After completion of the bank grading, all work areas shall be left smooth and free of trash, rock, debris, wood, etc. and in a condition suitable for seeding and planting. Graded areas shall transition smoothly to blend with natural ground
areas.
13. Seed and mulch all disturbed soil areas. Do not seed or mulch areas within the existing bankfull channel.
14. Remove all trash and debris from the site and demobilize construction equipment. Remove all temporary sediment and erosion control practices once vegetation has become sufficiently established.
1. All elevations noted in this document are referenced to on -site control points. All elevations should be verified prior to construction. See sheet 0.3 for control point location.
2. Locate all underground utilities and above ground within the project boundary prior to commencing construction. Contractor is responsible for any damage to utilities within the project area. All
damaged utilities shall be repaired at the Contractor's expense.
3. Any disturbed area outside of the grading limits shall be graded and seeded or planted to match pre -disturbed conditions.
4. All silt fencing depicted in the plan shall consist of a double row of silt fence.
5. The Contractor should make all reasonable efforts to reduce sediment loss and minimize disturbance of the site while performing the construction work.
Existing Features
Proposed Features
Erosion Control Features
— — — — — — 100 — — — — — — — Existing 5' Major Contour
Proposed Silt Fence
0 Proposed 5' Major Contour
[X] See Detail 1, Sheet 2.4
101 Existing 1' Minor Contour
Proposed 1' Minor Contour
Existing Fenceline
® Proposed Stone Silt Fence Outlet
Existing Thalweg
RipRap Apron
Proposed Construction Entrance
Existing Overhead Electric Pole
See Detail 2, Sheet 2.4
_ _ _
Existing Gravel Road
Log Sill
;,:� Proposed Haul Road
Existing Treeline
Constructed Riffle
® Proposed Stockpile/ Staging Area
Existing Tree
—LOD— Proposed Limits Of Disturbance
— — — — Existing Property Boundary
Pump Around I
a
N
O

75
70
65
60
100+00
EXISTING 54" SMOOTH STEEL CULVERT
UPSTREAM INVERT= 63.74'
DOWNSTREAM INVERT= 63.42'
PROPOSED
LEFT
AND RIGHT
BENCH
BANKS
STA= 100+59
ELEV = 64.79
o
m
�
0
w
+�
a
¢
o
°+'
u
¢
u
J
u
v¢~i
w
o
o
+
m
1
o
I
1
n
w
a
~
u
w
J
� 1
w
w
I
1
¢
in
--��
-0.4%
L
•
�STA
PROPOSED GRADE
= 100+74
- -
ELEV = 64.69
STA= 100+69
EXISTING GRADE
ELEV = 64.16
100+50 101+00 101+50
�STA = 100+59
ELEV = 64.16
N/F
KIMBERLY H. LANIER
DB. 981 PG. 462
PIN: 349100020663
102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50
Typical Sections
UT to Big Branch
Riffle Section
75 BANKFULL WIDTH = 6.4'
2.4' 1 1.6' 1 2.4'
Dmax= 1.2'
UT to Big Branch
70 Pool Section
65
60
104+00
i
----- -- -r'
---" '
gyp_
---
-------------
- - -"-- -----,
N/F
` ____ --=--------- '----------- KIMBERLY H. LANIER
N/F--------=' DB. 981 PG. 462
KIMBERLY H. LANIER \ ; : PIN: 349100020663_,
DB. 981 PG. 462 =
PIN: 349100020663 ---= ; \ _. ---
iu
IJ
2 r
lu
IQ
1.4
BANKFULL WIDTH = 7.7'
2.7' 2.3' 2.7'
1ST yy1
Dmax- 1.1.
0' 2' 4' 6
(VERTI—)
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
s
z

CFF PRnFll F
00 - 150 ANGLE
PER FIELD D
SILL ELEVATIC
PER PROFILE (TYI
FLOVA
BACKFILL
Plan View
NOTES
FLOW
12" - 15" DIAMETER
BRUSH TOE, RIFFLE BACKFILL HEADER LOG
OR TRANSPLANTS TO LARGER
STREAMS AS DIRECTED BY STREAM
/ ENGINEER
• IN SOME CASES LOG MAY BE ADDED AT UPSTREAM
EXTENT OF RIFFLE TO INCREASE OVERALL RIFFLE
STABILITY. IN THIS CASE THE LOG SILL WOULD BE
INSTALLED DOWNSTREAM OF POOL.
• FOOTER LOG TO BE ADDED IF DROP IS MORE THAN
HEADER LOG DIAMETER.
• LOG MAY BE ANGLED 55° TO 650 RELATIVE TO BANKFULL
3�M
SpIq
NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC
­c:,- v: -._
SILL ELEVATION PER
PROFILE
POOL LENGTH PER PROFILE
POOL DEPTH PER PROFILE
\ 12" - 15" DIAMETER
FOOTER LOG
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
o' 1�
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
EMBED LOG SILL ELEVATION
2' BEYOND BANKFULL (MIN.) PER PROFILE (TYP)
Lo Sill
2.1 NottoScale
6" MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS
ECO-STAKE (TYP) TOP OF BANK
ECO-STAKE (TYP) `TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP)
ECO-STAKE (TYP) \
TOE OF SLOPE
STAKE (TYP)
Section A - A'
Typical Stake
TOP OF BANK
SECURE MATTING IN
6" DEEP TRENCH
,?
S AKE (TYP)
3 Erosion Control Matting
2.1 Not toScale
Eco-Stake
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
B
A
A'
FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
TF
PC
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
Dso = 2 q"
SUPPLEMENT W-ITH
IMPORTED RIVER ROCK
ti
I OF OF CAINN tl I YF)
Plan View
B'
BEAD OF RIFFLE
L OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
NT PER PROFILE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
Dso = 2 - "
SUPPLEMENT WIT
H
IMPORTED RIVER ROCK
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
1
1 i TOP OF BANK (TYP)
SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS
FOR RIFFLE SIDE SLOPES
NOTE:
Native Material Riffle 1. SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR BED MATERIAL
\,3.1,1 Not toScale GRADATION
2. SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS, SHEETS 1.1-1.4, FOR
LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF INDIVIDUAL STRUCTURES.
v
Q
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FILL \
EXISTING GROUND
STEEL POST
2'-0" DEPTH
I
EXTEND FABRIC
INTOTRENCH 4"
NOTES:
1. WHEN REQUIRED TO USE WIRE BACKING USE
WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND WITH
A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH 12"
5
STAY SPACING.
2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN
n Temporary Silt Fence
WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE
o
2.1 Not to Scale
WIRES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NC EROSION
o
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
3. PROVIDE S STEEL POST OF THE
N
SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE. ANGLE
STEEL TYPE.
m
vzw€�

IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
NOTES:
1. PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS.
5. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL
POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS
STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENT CHECKS OF
THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE.
6. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH
WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF
MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING
WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
7. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY
MUST BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY.
8. USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE
AGGREGATE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
INTAKE HOSE "J" TYPE SEAMS.
PUMP BAG PLACED ON
1AGGREGATED OR STRAW.\
DISCHARGE HOSE
INTAKE HOSE
EWATERING
\ PUMP
101 DEWATERING
1 1 BAG
15'
SPOUTSEWN IN
HOLDINGHIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
IN PLACE.
i i �i�i�y✓�i�i y
WATER FLOW
FROM
FILTER FABRIC
DISCHARGE HOSE Inset "A"
Dewatering Bag
SAND BAG (24" X 12" X 6')
OR STONE.
1 IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
FLOW
Inset"B"
IMPERVIOUS DIKE Impervious Dike
(SEE INSET "B")
MIN
DISCHARGE HOSEFILTER FABRIC
10' X 5' STABILIZED OUTLET
DEWATERING BAG USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND Inset "C"
(SEE INSET "A") NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC. Stabilized Outlet
(SEE INSET "C")
Plan View
/'i'\ Pump Around System
22 Not to Scale
STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
NOTE:
1. PROVIDE STABILIZED
OUTLET TO STREAMBED.
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
PHYSICAL PROPERTY
TESTS
REQUIREMENTS
MATERIAL
N/A
POLYETHYLENE
RECOMENDED COLOR
N/A
"INTERNATIONAL ORANGE"
TENSILE YIELD
ASTM D638
AVE. 2000 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH
ASTM D638
AVE. 2900 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ELONGATION AT BREAK (%)
ASTM D638
GREATER THAN 1000
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE
N/A
INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
u
fCS r�
C)
ro Urr
0 r4
j�
\ 6' MAX. WITH WIRE
/y ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
METAL WIRE TIES
ORANGE SAFTY
FENCE
'T" OR 'U" POST DRIVEN
MINIMUM OF 18" INTO GROUND
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z
El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El
a
z Construction Entrance
2.z Not to Scale
II II
II II
u u
a Tree Protection Fencing
L.2 Not toScale
r,
v
Q
................
0
u
N
g
z w

0
TOP OF BANK BANKFULL BENCH CONTINUE LIVE A o w
STAKES TO 11c
I I SE ON TIE U
Z
SECONEL OF � x
U
LIVE STAKE AT CHANNEL a W o
TOP OF BANK
JUNCUS PLUG
BETWEEN NORMAL
\ BASEFLOW AND TOP /
OE OF OF BANK (TYP)
SLOPE EROSION CONTROL %•
MATTING
(SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.4)
TOE OF SLOPE
LINEAR SPACING
8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES BASEFLOW W.S.
3-4' SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS
PLUGS
4-6' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
3-4' SPACING FOR HERBACEOUS
PLUGS
Plan View Section View
BUDS (NODES)
POINTED
UPWARD
1 /2" TO 2" NOTE:
DIAMETER 1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PLAN VIEW DETAILS BY REACH AS
SHOWN ABOVE.
BASE CUT 2' TO 3' LIVE STAKE 2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPER STORAGE, HANDLING AND INSTALLATION.
AT UT TAPERED AT BOTTOM 3. FORM PILOT HOLE IN HARD SOIL OR STONY CONDITIONS TO PREVENT DAMAGE
TO LIVE STAKES.
4. LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DIRECTED BY
'ElilStreambank PlantingTN
5. INSSTALL TALL DORRMM
ANT PRIOR TO LEAF OUT. DEPICTED CONDITION WITH LEAVES
Live Stake Detail 2'3 Not to Scale NOTREPRESENTATIVE OF STAKES AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.
Stmardximk Plmding Zome
Live Stakes and HerbaceousPLugs
S pecies
Cam —Name
Ma<
Spacimg
p i.
Spacimg
Msm. Size
Stratum
% of Total
Sal. atgra
Black W illow
12 R
2-8 ft.
0.5"-1.5" cal.
Shrub
2Vl�
Cormus amomam
SiIlry Dogwood
8ft.
2-8ft.
05"-15"cal.
Shmb
25%
Sarabucuscamad,.—
Elderberry
8ft.
2-8ft.
0.5"-1.5"cal.
Shrub
25%
S.h-crlcea
Silky Willow
8ft.
2-8 ft.
0.5"-1.5" cal.
Shrub
30'/6
Carte alata
Broadwmg Sedge
5ft.
3-5 ft.
1.01'-2.0"plug
Herb
N/A
Carer lurida
Lurid Sedge
5ft.
3-5 ft.
l.d'-2.0" plug
Herb
N/A
Juncus Visas
Commron Rush
5ft.
3-5 ft.
1.0'-2.0"plug
Herb
N,A
100%
Permanent Riparian Seed Plaiting Zone
Pure Live Seed (201bs/acre)
Apprmed
Data,(lbs/acre)
Species Name
Common Name
Stratum
Deredy
All Yeaz
Pamlcumrigidulum
Redtop P—graas
Herb
3
All Yeaz
Agrostishyeambs
Winter Bertgra.
Herb
2
All Yeaz
Rudbeckio hirta
Blaekeyed Susan
Herb
1
All Year
Coreop,asloaceoloto
Lmrceleaf Ticksced
Herb
1
All Yeaz
Carer vulplmoidea
Fox Sedge
Hmb
3
All Yeaz
Elyaw wginicus
Umgmia Wildrye
Herb
3
All Yeaz
I Bid— —utosa
Bearded Beggarticks
Herb
1
All Year
Heliomthua omgustifolm,
Swamp Sumtlower
Herb
1
All Yeaz
Pamicumvirgatum
S,vitchgrass
I Herb
1
All Yeaz
Poa pal-&u
Fowl Bluegrass
Herb
1
All Yeaz
Di hanthelium
clandestimum
Deertongue
Herb
3
/'2-'\P1anting Tables
2.3 Not to Scale
Temporary Seeding
Pure Live Seed
Appr—dDate
Species Name
Common Name
Stratum
ity
Dena (16s/acrere)
Aug 15-May 1
Secale cereal,
Rye Grain
Herb
50
May 1 -Aug 15
Setoria ftalica
German Millet
Herb
50
T
v
Q

Ln
-
"
u
7s
75
65
loom
65
1111111
oil
III
III
oil
III
III
III
oil
IN 02
1111111! 11
60
60
`
----------- -- _— _` _' _ '-`--- - - _--------`
------------------------ - - - -
--------------
------.--------- `
50 50
CMP Removal - STA 108+40
2.4 Not toScale
\
u
� r"
75
75
------
Q
`` --- ----------
70
70
:\ ------
1
65
65
: - :`- ,
_-------
\ ----- `
- -----
60
60
-__--'-_-_
55
55
50 50
0+00 0+50 0+80
z
d'�
------------ �` ;, `
z CMP Removal - STA 111+61
Not to Scale
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
�o
o�
aw
0
aw
REMOVE 3 LF OF 15" CMP
CUT ALONG PROPOSED SLOPE
� PROPOSED GRADE
i
EXISTING GRADE