20010001 Ver 1_Complete File_20001227

TO: Steve Lund, USACOE
Asheville Field Office
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: March 28, 2001
SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Bridge No. 80,
Clark's Creek, TIP B-3262, SRI 136, Temporary Construction Dykes,
Watauga County ;S5ve-d O 3 0I. 000 1
These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and the North
Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 through 113A-10; NCAC 25). The
NCDOT is not modifying their previous design for this project. They are proposing to
use temporary impervious dykes during the construction of footings for the bottomless
culvert.
We do not object to the use of the dykes provided aquatic life passage is not
negatively impacted and the stream is restored to original contours or natural geomorphic
conditions upon project completion. Our previous recommendations for this project
should be followed.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project during the
planning stages. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me
at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Lindsey Riddick, NCDOT
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ
TO: Steve Lund, USACOE
Asheville Field Office
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: January 30, 2001
SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Bridge No. 80
Clarks Creek, TIP B-3262, SR 1136, Watauga County
These comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and the North
Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 through 113A-10; NCAC 25). The
NCDOT proposes to modify their previous plan to install a double barrel culvert at this
location. They now plan to install a bottomless culvert (20.0' wide by 7.0' high).
Removal of the existing bridge should not impact waters.
We do not object to the project as proposed in the letter of January 23, 2001 from
Mr. William D. Gilmore, PE. NCDOT will avoid the trout moratorium period of
November 1 through April 15. The dimension, pattern, and profile of the stream above
and below the project should not be modified. As appropriate, the NCDOT should follow
any pertinent recommendations previously made by North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission concerning this project.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project during the
early planning stages. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please
contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Lindsey Riddick, NCDOT
ST

p'ellssbFo.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
December 21, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Ave., Room 143
Asheville, NC 28801
ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Lund
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY

SUBJECT: Watauga County, Replacement of Bridge No. 80 over the Clarks Creek on SR 1136. TIP
No. B-3262, State Project No. 8.2751001, Federal Aid Project No. MABR7-1136(1).
Attached for your information is a copy of the project planning report for the subject project. Bridge No.
80 will be replaced with a two-barrel (each barrel 8.0-foot by 7.0-foot) reinforced concrete box culvert
50 feet north of the existing structure. Traffic will be maintained on the existing structure during
construction.
There will be 120.0 feet of new approach work to the east and 150.0 feet of new approach work to the
west. Pavement width on the approaches will be 20.0 feet including two 10.0-foot travel lanes.
Additionally, there will be 6-foot grassed shoulders to accommodate curve widening. No jurisdictional
wetlands will be affected by the recommended alternative.
All standard procedures and measures will be implemented to avoid or minimize environmental impacts.
All practical Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be included and properly maintained during
project construction.
The NCDOT will follow all project commitments outlined in the "green sheet" of the approved
Categorical Exclusion. Additionally, as noted on page 10 of the referenced document, there will be no
fill associated with the removal of bridge number 80.
NCWRC has commented that Clark's Creek is a Hatchery Supported Designated Public Mountain Trout
Waters. The following will be implemented to minimize impacts to aquatic resources:
• Where concrete is used, work will be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact stream
water.
• Where possible, heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in the stream channel
to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
. ,r
Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of
completion of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
• In-stream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot buffer zone will be prohibited during the
rainbow trout spawning season of November 1 through April 15.
• Existing trees along the stream will preserved to the extent possible.
The project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in
accordance with 23 CPR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but
propose to proceed under a Nationwide Permit in accordance with 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B-23)
issued 13 December 1996, by the Corps of Engineers. The provisions of Section 330.4 and Appendix A
(C) of these regulations will be followed in the construction of the project.
We anticipate that 401 General Water Quality Certification No. 3107 (Categorical Exclusion) will apply
to this project, and are providing one copy of the CE document to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review. Since this project
occurs in a designated trout county, a copy of this document is also being provided to the N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission for their review.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr. Lindsey Riddick at
[phone] extension 304.
Sincerely, /?-
William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
CC:
w/attachment
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Ron Linville, NCWRC
Mr. Tim Rountree, PE, Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, PE, Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, PE, Programming and TIP
Ms. Debbie Barbour, PE, Highway Design
Mr. David Henderson, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. Don Lee, Roadside Environmental
Mr. R.C. McCann, PE, Division 1 I Engineer
Mr. John Williams, PE
Watauga County
Bridge No. 80 on SR 1136
Over Clarks Creek
Federal Project MABRZ-1136 (1)
State Project 8.2751001
TIP No. B-3262
11 ?j
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
`7/,
F - Z4--?l
Date ?or William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
g--2G-9Y ??' ? ?L.?
Date Nicholas Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator, FHWA

Watauga County
Bridge No. 80 on SR 1136
Over Clarks Creek
Federal Project MABRZ-1136 (1)
State Project 8.2751001
TIP No. B-3262
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
August 1999
Documentation Prepared in
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
``, x.111111111,11//
` od.N CARO/,',,/
DFESS/00,0
SEAL ?•'
022552
I it
PA, 6q4?0_5
Date John L. Williams, P. E.
Project Planning Engineer to 8-// f9 Wq ti e-
X71 a
Date Wayne lliott
Bridge Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
S-24-99
Date Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
PROJECT COM UTMENTS
Watauga County
Bridge No. 80 on SR 1136 0 0 0 011
Over Clarks Creek
Federal Project MABRZ-1136 (1)
State Project 8.2751001
TIP No. B-3262
Geotechnical
A section 6 permit will be required for the foundation investigations necessary on
this project. The investigation will include test borings in soil and/or rock for in-site
testing as well as obtaining samples for laboratory testing. This may require test borings
in streams and/or wetlands.
Resident Engineer/ Roadway Design
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition will be followed during design
and construction of the project. - -
NCWRC has commented that Clark's Creek is a Hatchery Supported Designated Public
Mountain Trout Waters. The following will be implemented to minimize impacts to aquatic
resources:
i
• Where concrete is used, work will be accomplished so that wet concrete does not
contact stream water.
• Where possible, heavy a juipment will be operated from the bank rather than in the
stream channel to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing
other pollutants into the stream.
• Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of completion of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term
erosion control.
• In-stream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot buffer zone will be prohibited
during the rainbow trout spawning season of November 1 through April 15.
• Existing trees along the stream will be preserved to the extent possible
Hydraulic Design Unit
The Hydraulic Design Unit will coordinate the design of the proposed box culvert
and any associated stream realignment with NCWRC during the design phase.
Structure Design Unit
This project must be reviewed under Section 26a of the Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) Act. The final bridge plans, hydraulic analysis of the effects of the
replacement structure on the 100-year flood elevation, and notice of compliance with the
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 will be forwarded to TVA for approval.
Programming & TIP Branch
Project Let date should be scheduled such that the contractors time will be
optimized regarding the November 1 through April 15 in water moratorium.
Page 1 of 1
Watauga County
Bridge No. 80 on SR 1136
Over Clarks Creek
Federal Project MABRZ-1136 (1)
State Project 8.2751001
TIP No. B-3262
Bridge No. 80 is located in Watauga County over Clarks Creek. It is programmed
in the Draft 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a bridge
replacement project. This project is part of the Federal Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program (HBRRP) and has been classified as a "Categorical Exclusion".
No substantial environmental impacts are expected.
1. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Bridge No. 80 will be replaced as recommended in Alternate 1 with a new
structure on new alignment 50 feet north of the existing structure (see Figure 2A). The
new structure will be a 2-barrel (each barrel @ 8 x 7-foot) reinforced concrete box
culvert. Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction.
There will be 120 feet of new approach work to the east and 150 feet of new
approach work to the west. The pavement width on the approaches will be 20 feet
including two 10-foot lanes. Additionally there will be 6-foot grass shoulders to
accommodate curve widening. Based on preliminary design, the design speed will be
approximately 20 mph.
The estimated cost of the project is $326,000 including $300,000 in construction
costs and $26,000 in right of way costs. The estimated cost shown in the Draft 2000-
2006 TIP is $255,000.
III. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS
A design exception will be required. The design speed for this project will be
approximately 20 mph. The road does not have a posted speed limit and is therefore subject to
statutory 55 mph. The alignment in the project vicinity is typical of SR 1136. During the
period October 93 though September 96, the bridge and approaching alignment have no
recorded accidents. Analysis of the alternates indicates that any significant improvement of
the alignment would be very difficult to achieve given the topography and subsequently result
in heavier environmental impacts and higher project costs.
IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS
SR 1136 is classified as a Rural Local Route in the Statewide Functional
Classification System. It is located approximately 2 miles south of Valle Crucis, N. C.
Currently the traffic volume is 600 vehicles per day (VPD) and projected at 900 VPD for
the year 2020. There is no posted speed limit in the vicinity of the bridge. The road
serves primarily local residential and agricultural traffic.
The existing bridge was completed in 1963. It is composed of a one-span timber
and steel superstructure. The deck is 30 feet long and 18 feet wide. The substructure is
composed of two end abutments; one made of concrete the other of timber. There is
approximately 10 feet of vertical clearance between the floorbeams of the bridge deck
and streambed. There is room for one lane of traffic on the bridge.
According to Bridge Maintenance Unit records, the sufficiency rating of the
bridge is 23.8 out of a possible 100. Presently the bridge is posted with weight
restrictions of 8 tons for single vehicles and 17 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers.
Vertical alignment is poor in the project vicinity. The bridge lies in the middle of
a horizontal curve with an operating speed of less than 20 mph. The pavement width on
the approaches to the existing bridge is 16 feet. Shoulders on the approaches of the
bridge are approximately 4 feet wide.
The Traffic Engineering Branch indicates that no accidents have been reported
during the period October 93 through September 96 in the vicinity of the project.
There are 2 daily school bus crossings over the studied bridge. According to the
Transportation Director for Alleghany County closing the road would not be a major
burden.
Bell South Telephone has an aerial cable along the west side of SR 1136. Blue Ridge
Electric Membership Corporation has an electrical service approximately 325 feet north of
the existing bridge.
V. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
There are two "build" options considered in this document as follows:
Alternate 1) (Recommended) Replace Bridge No. 80 with a new two-barrel box
culvert on a location 50 feet north of the existing structure. Traffic will be
detoured offsite during construction. Design has determined that
maintaining traffic onsite is not possible due to lack of a staging area for
construction equipment. The design speed would be approximately 20
mph.
Alternate 2) Replace Bridge No. 80 with a new 2-barrel box culvert on a location
approximately 150 feet north of the existing structure. Traffic would be
maintained on the existing bridge during construction. The design speed
will be approximately 20 mph.
"Do-nothing" is not practical; requiring the eventual closing of the road as the
existing bridge completely deteriorates. Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating
bridge is neither practical nor economical.
Replacing Bridge No. 80 on the same location was considered but discarded. The
reasoning was that Alternate 1 has virtually the same environmental impacts and
monetary cost and an improved alignment compared with the replace in place alternate.
VI. ESTIMATED COST (Table 1)

COMPONENT Recommended
ALTERNATE 1
ALTERNATE 2
Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert
Bridge Removal
Roadway & Approaches *65,000
5,000
126,000 **106,000
5,000
174,000
Mobilization & Miscellaneous 59,000 86,000
Engineering & Contingencies 45,000 79,000
Total Construction $ 300,000 450,000
Right of Way $ 26,000 $ 57,000
Total Cost $ 326,000 $ 507,000
* two barrels @ 8x7 feet, 80 feet long
** two barrels @ 8x7 feet, 130 feet long
VII. DETOUR (ROAD USER COSTS)
An offsite detour would include SR 1112 and NC 105. Road users would have to
travel an average of 2.4 miles more than their normal route along SR 1136. The road
closure would last approximately one year. The total additional costs incurred by road
users would be approximately $131,000.
VIII. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Bridge No. 80 will be replaced as recommended in Alternate 1 with a new
structure on new alignment 50 feet north of the existing structure (see Figure 2A). The
new structure will be a 2-barrel (each barrel @ 8 x 7-foot) reinforced concrete box
culvert. Traffic will be detoured offsite during construction.
There will be 120 feet of new approach work to the east and 150 feet of new
approach work to the west. The pavement width on the approaches will be 20 feet
including two 10-foot lanes. Additionally there will be 6-foot grass shoulders to
accommodate curve widening. Based on preliminary design, the design speed should be
approximately 20 mph.
Alternate I is recommended because it has the lowest cost and least
environmental impact of the alternates considered. While Alternate 2 offers an improved
alignment, the improvement is worth neither the excessive cost nor the impact to the
home 200 feet south of the bridge. The Division concurs in the recommendation.
IX. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. GENERAL
This project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an
inadequate bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
This project is considered to be a "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope
and insignificant environmental consequences.
This bridge replacement will not have a substantial adverse effect on the quality
of the human or natural environment by implementing the environmental commitments
listed in Section II of this document in addition to use of current NCDOT standards and
specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning
regulation. No change in land use is expected to result from construction of this project.
There are no hazardous waste impacts.
No adverse effect on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-way
acquisition will be limited.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not
expected to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
There are no publicly owned parks, recreational facilities, or wildlife and
waterfowl refuges of national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project.
This project will not impact any resource protected by Section 4(f) of the DOT act.
The proposed bridge replacement project will not raise the existing flood levels or
have any significant adverse effect on the existing floodplain.
Utility impacts are considered to be low for the proposed project.
B. AIR AND NOISE
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included
in the regional emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required.
The project is located in Watauga County, which has been determined to be in
compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR part 51 is not
applicable, because the proposed project is located in an attainment area. This project is
not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area.
The project will not substantially increase traffic volumes. Therefore, it will not
have substantial impact on noise levels. Temporary noise increases may occur during
construction.
C. LAND USE & FARMLAND EFFECTS
In the vicinity of this project, Watauga County has no zoning. This project will
impact no soils considered to be prime or important farmland.
D. HISTORICAL EFFECTS & ARCHAEOLOGICAL EFFECTS
On March 11, 1997, the State Historic Preservation Office reviewed the subject
project. Subsequently, they determined that an architectural survey would be required.
An archaeological survey was requested and subsequently performed yielding no
significant sites. The SHPO concurs with FHWA that the project is not likely to affect
any resources of historical significance (see attachments).
E. NATURAL RESOURCES
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Regional Characteristics
The proposed project lies near the Watauga County line in western North
Carolina, 6.0 miles southwest of Boone. The project area lies within the Blue Ridge
Physiographic Province. Elevations in the project area are approximately 2800 feet
National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). The topography of the project vicinity is
characterized by steep slopes ending in incised streams and/or narrow to broad, relatively
flat floodplains. The stream banks of Clark's Creek within the project area are steep at
the bridge but become more gently sloping further north. The project vicinity is a
combination of residential, rural, and agricultural areas.
Soils
A published soil survey for Watauga County was not available; available soil
maps were obtained from the NRCS office. According to the available mapping, the
detailed map units within the project area include Congaree cobbly fine sandy loam (0 to
2 % slopes); Halewood stony clay loam, eroded hilly phase (15 to 30 % slopes);
Halewood stony clay loam, eroded steep phase (30 to 60 % slopes); Stony colluvium
(Tusquitee and Tate soil materials, 2 to 30 % slopes); Stony rough land (Ashe and Porters
soil materials, 30 to 60 % slopes); and Tate loam, undulating phase (2 to 7 % slopes).
Congaree cobbly fine sandy loam (Cs): nonhydric soil with moderate to
moderately rapid permeability. Cobbles and gravel are common in the profile. A
small area of this soil type is mapped at the northern end of the project area.
Halewood stony clay loam, steep phase (Hf): nonhydric soil with medium to high
surface runoff. Soil is moderately erodible if not protected. Rock fragments in
the profile are common. A small area of this soil type is mapped in the western
portion of the project area, west of SR 1136.
Halewood stony clay loam, eroded steep phase (Hg): nonhydric soil with high to
very high surface runoff. Soil is erodible if not protected. Rock fragments in the
profile are frequent. This soil is mapped north of the SR 1136 bridge, between
Clark's Creek and SR 1136, in a broad floodplain now serving as pasture. This
soil is also mapped east of SR 1136.
Stony colluvium (Sb): nonhydric soil; surface runoff is medium to high and
permeability is moderate to moderately rapid. The erosion hazard is very little to
5
moderate. The profile contains stones and is derived from local alluvial or
colluvial materials. This soil type is mapped just north and south of the bridge.
The soil north of the bridge is currently pasture and the soil south of the bridge is
covered by saplings, shrubs, and forbs.
Stony rough land (Sd): nonhydric soil; surface runoff is high to very high. The
erosion hazard is moderate to great. A large number of loose stones and outcrops
of bedrock occur in the profile. This soil type is mapped in the area of two
residences along the south side of SR 1136.
Tate loam, undulating phase (Tc): nonhydric soil; surface runoff is medium to
low. The erosion hazard is negligible. This soil type is mapped east of the
Congaree cobbly fine sandy loam described above. This area consists of pasture
along both sides of Clark's Creek.
Site index is a measure of soil quality and productivity. The site index for these soil
types was not obtained as a published soil survey was not available.
Water Resources
This section contains information concerning water resources likely to be
impacted by the proposed project. Water resource assessments include the physical
characteristics likely to be impacted by the proposed project (determined by field survey),
best usage classifications, and water quality aspects of the water resources. Probable
impacts to surface waters are outlined, as well as the means to minimize impacts.
Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters
The project is located in the Watauga River basin. One surface water resource,
Clark's Creek, will be impacted by the proposed project. Clark's Creek originates
approximately 1.4 miles south of the project area on Nettle Knob. The creek flows north
approximately 2.4 miles to its confluence with Dutch Creek, which is a tributary to the
Watauga River. Clark's Creek is approximately 10.0 to 15.0 feet in width within the
project area and has a moderate streamflow. The substrate of the creek consists of
cobbles, sand, and silt. At the time of the field survey, the creek averaged 11 inches in
depth. The creek flows northeast and is mainly straight. During the site visit the water
was clear with minimal suspended sediment.
Riparian vegetation, consisting mostly of young deciduous trees and shrubs, exists
along the creek banks south of the bridge. North of the bridge, the vegetation has been
cleared for pasture and the banks are grassy. The floodplain appears to be seasonally
flooded along some areas of the bank.
Best Usage Classification
Surface waters in North Carolina are assigned a classification by the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that is designed to maintain, protect, and enhance water quality
within the state. Clark's Creek (Index # 8-12-2) is classified as a Class C waterbody.
6
Class C water resources are used for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing,
wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture.
No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I of
WS-II), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1 mile if the project study
area.
Water Quality
This section describes the water quality of the water resources within the project
area. Potential impacts to water quality from point and nonpoint sources are evaluated.
Water quality assessments are based upon published resource information and field study
observations.
General Watershed Characteristics
Nonpoint source runoff from agricultural land is likely to be the primary source of
water quality degradation to the water resources located within the project vicinity. The
surrounding vicinity appears to be primarily residential and forested land with some small
areas of cropland. Nutrient loading and increased sedimentation from agricultural runoff
and forestry affects water quality. Inputs of nonpoint source pollution from private
residences within the project area may also contribute to water quality degradation.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN), established in 1982
and managed by the DWQ, is part of an on-going ambient, long-term, water-quality
monitoring program. The program has established fixed water-quality monitoring
stations for selected benthic macroinvertebrates. No BMAN stations have been
established along Clark's Creek
Point Source Dischargers
Point source discharges in North Carolina are permitted through the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program administered by the DWQ.
All facilities who discharge to surface waters are required to obtain a permit. There are
no known permitted point source dischargers to Clark's Creek within the project vicinity.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Any action which affects water quality can adversely affect aquatic organisms.
Temporary impacts during the construction phases may result in long-term impacts to the
aquatic community. Replacing an existing structure in the same location with an off-site
detour is the preferred environmental approach. Bridge replacement on a new location
will result in more severe impacts. Therefore, based on environmental impacts, Alternate
I is the preferred alignment. Physical impacts will be the most severe at the point of
bridge replacement.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface water
resources:
increased sediment loading and siltation as a consequence of watershed vegetation
removal, erosion/and or construction
decreased light penetration/water clarity from increased sedimentation
changes in water temperature with vegetation removal
changes in the amount of available organic matter with vegetation removal
increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction
activities and construction equipment, and spills
alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to surface
and groundwater flow from construction
increased scouring of the existing channel due to increased water flows from the
stormwater runoff associated with curb and gutter systems
Construction impacts may not be restricted to the communities in which the construction
activity occurs. Efforts should be made to ensure that no sediment leaves the
construction site. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters should be followed during the construction phase of the project.
BIOTIC RESOURCES
Terrestrial and aquatic communities are included in the description of biotic
resources. Living systems described in the following sections include communities of
associated plants and animals. These descriptions refer to the dominant -flora and fauna in
each community and the relationship of these biotic components. Descriptions of the
terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications. These
classifications follow Schafale and Weakley (1990) where possible. Representative
animal species which are likely to occur in these habitats (based on published range
distributions) are also cited. Scientific nomenclature and common names (when
applicable) are used for the plant and animal species described. Subsequent references to
the same species are by the common name only.
Terrestrial Communities
The two terrestrial communities identified within the project area are man-
dominated and upland forest. Dominant faunal components associated with these
terrestrial areas are described below. Many species are adapted to the entire range of
habitats found along the project alignment but may not be mentioned separately in each
community description.
8
Man-Dominated Community
The man-dominated community includes the road shoulders and residential lawns
where regular maintenance occurs and the pasture which appears to be regularly grazed or
mowed. This community also includes areas which are not regularly maintained
including the embankments and the transition areas between the road shoulders and the
forested areas
Many plant species are adapted to the disturbed and regularly maintained areas.
The species observed in this community type within project area include various grasses
such as fescue and ryegrass, as well as wild onion, dandelion, and white clover. In areas
which are disturbed but not regularly maintained, weedy species and shrubs are invading.
Black locust, goldernrod, and blackberry are present in these areas.
There is a small seep within the floodplain on the east side of Clark's Creek north
of the bridge. This area occurs in the pasture at the toe of the slope, which is at the base
of the embankment of SR 1136. The area is approximately 20 to 30 feet wide and 75 feet
long. Vegetation in this area consists of fescue, as well as soft rush, and sedge which is
regularly grazed or mowed. The ground was saturated to the surface, and the soils
consisted of a dark gray (10 YR 4/1) clay loam.
The animal species present in these disturbed habitats are opportunistic and
capable of surviving on a variety of resources, ranging from vegetation (flowers, leaves,
fruits, and seeds) to both living and dead faunal components. Numerous songbirds such
as the house sparrow, northern mockingbird, cardinal, common grackle, and eastern
kingbird are common in these habitats. A black-capped chickadee was observed in the
area. The areas associated with the pasture may be utilized by white-tailed deer, white-
footed mouse, Virginia opossum, American toad, and rat snake. Species such as red-
tailed hawk and American kestrel may utilize these open areas for hunting.
Upland Forest
This community occurs to the west of Clark's Creek south of Bridge No. 80, and
to the east and west of SR 1136. The community west of Clark's Creek occurs on a
steep, rocky slope. The canopy is comprised of American beech, southern red oak, and
black oak. Great rhododendron dominates the shrub layer and Christmas fern is present
in the herbaceous layer. West of SR 1136, species present include eastern hemlock,
eastern white pine, and black cherry. These areas have been subject to some disturbance
associated with the adjacent residential and agricultural areas. If undisturbed, this
community may eventually resemble the Montane Oak-Hickory Forest as described in
Schafale and Weakley (1990).
A variety of species likely utilizes these upland communities. Birds may include
blue-gray gnatcatcher, Acadian flycatcher, tufted titmouse, northern flicker, eastern wood
9
peewee, white-breasted nuthatch, and purple finch. Other species may include eastern
chipmunk, striped skunk, grey treefrog, Fowler's toad, copperhead, eastern box turtle,
and five-lined skink.
Aquatic Communities
Clark's Creek is a second order stream with good water clarity. Upstream of the
bridge, the stream is high gradient with rapids and step-pools formed from the cobble and
boulder substrate. Downstream of the bridge, the stream becomes a lower gradient
stream with an associated floodplain. The riparian community contains mostly tree and
shrub species upstream of the bridge. Much of the vegetation has been removed
downstream of the bridge and the banks are mostly grassy with a few shrubs.
Watauga County is designated as a "trout" county by the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC). Approximately 1.0 miles downstream is Dutch Creek,
which is a trout creek managed by WRC. Clark's Creek provides habitat for a variety of
species of fish. According to Joseph Mickey, the District 7 Biologist for the WRC, this
portion of Clark's Creek was last sampled in February, 1992. Fish species found during
the sampling effort include wild rainbow trout, stocked brook trout, stone roller, black
nosed dace, and creek chub.
During a limited field survey for benthic macroinvertebrate species, only one snail (Class
Gastropoda), whose species could not be identified, was found in Clark's Creek. It is
likely that the diversity of the macrobenthic community would be greater during warmer
months.
Reptiles and amphibians which inhabit the upland forest community also utilize
the aquatic community. Other species may include queen snake, marbled salamander,
southern two-lined salamander, and southern leopard frog.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Project construction will have various impacts to the previously described
terrestrial and aquatic communities. Any construction activities in or near these resources
have the potential to impact biological functions. This section quantifies and qualifies
potential impacts to the natural communities within the project area in terms of the area
impacted and the plants and animals affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are
considered here along with recommendations to minimize or eliminate impacts.
Bridge No. 80 is composed entirely of timber and steel with the exception of a
concrete abutment. It should be possible to remove all components of the bridge without
dropping them into Waters of the U.S. Therefore, there will be no fill resulting from the
demolition of Bridge No. 80.
10
Terrestrial Communities
Terrestrial communities in the project area will be impacted by project
construction from clearing and paving and loss of the terrestrial community area along
SR 1136. Estimated impacts are derived based on the project lengths of 150 feet for
Alternate 1 and 350 feet for Alternate 2; with an study corridor width of 80 feet. Table 2
details the potential impacts to terrestrial communities by habitat type. Please note that
impacts are based on the entire study corridor width, and that actual loss of habitat will
likely be less.
Table 2
Estimated Area Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Community Impacted Area in acres
Alternate 1 Alternate 2
Disturbed 0.11 0.40
Upland Forest 0.03 0.02
Total Impacts 0.14 0.42
Destruction of natural communities along the project alignment will result in the
loss of foraging and breeding habitats for the various animal species which utilize the
area. Animal species will be displaced into surrounding communities. Adult birds,
mammals, and some reptiles are mobile enough to avoid mortality during construction.
Young animals and less mobile species, such as many amphibians, may suffer direct loss
during construction. Plants and animals found in these upland communities are generally
common throughout western North Carolina.
Impacts to terrestrial communities, particularly in locations having steep to
moderate slopes, can result in the aquatic community receiving heavy sediment loads as a
consequence of erosion. Construction impacts may not be restricted to the communities
in which the construction activity occurs, but may also affect downstream communities.
Efforts should be made to ensure that no sediment leaves the construction site. If
Alternate 2 were selected, the existing bridge would be removed and adjacent land would
be revegetated following construction
Aquatic Communities
Impacts to aquatic communities include fluctuations in water temperatures due to
the loss of riparian vegetation. Shelter and food resources, both in the aquatic and
terrestrial portions of these organisms' life cycles, will be affected by losses in the
terrestrial communities. The loss of aquatic plants and animals will affect terrestrial
fauna which rely on them as a food source.
Temporary and permanent impacts may result to aquatic organisms from
increased sedimentation. Aquatic invertebrates may drift downstream during
construction and recolonize the disturbed area once it has been stabilized. Sediments
have the potential to affect fish and other aquatic life in several ways, including the
clogging and abrading of gills and other respiratory surfaces; affecting the habitat by
scouring and filling-in pools and riffles; altering water chemistry; and smothering
different life stages. Increased sedimentation may cause decreased light penetration
through an increase in turbidity.
Wet concrete should not come into contact with surface water during bridge
construction, as this may affect stream water quality by increasing runoff. Potential
adverse effects can be minimized through the implementation of NCDOT Best
Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters.
JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
This section provides inventories and impact analyses for two federal and state
regulatory issues: Waters of the U.S. (including wetlands) and rare and protected species.
Waters of the United States
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of "Waters of the
United States" as defined in 33 CFR 328.3 and in accordance with provisions of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). Any action that proposes to dredge or place fill material into
surface waters or wetlands falls under these provisions.
Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Within the project area, there is a small seep within the floodplain east of Clark's
Creek, north of the bridge. This area occurs in the pasture at the base of the embankment
of SR 1136. The area is 20 to 30 feet wide and 75 feet long, however, only the southern
tip, which is about 23 feet long, of this seep is within the study corridor of Alternate 2.
Therefore, total wetland size which would be impacted is 0.01 acres.
Clark's Creek meets the definition of surface waters. Clark's Creek is therefore
classified as Waters of the United States. The channel ranges from approximately 10 to
15 feet wide within the project area. The banks on the south side of the bridge are
approximately 4 ft high and consist of rock outcrops and vegetation. On the north side of
the bridge, the banks are lower, l to 2 feet, with a floodplain within a grassy pasture.
12
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Approximately 0.01 acres of wetlands would be impacted by Alternate 2. No
permanent impacts to wetlands will occur from Alternate 1. Project construction cannot
be accomplished without infringing on surface waters. Anticipated surface water impacts
fall under the jurisdiction of the USACE and DWQ.
Within the project area, Clark's Creek is 15 feet wide. Assuming a 80 feet wide
study corridor for both alternates, the construction of either bridge will impact 0.03 acres
and 80 linear feet of surface waters. The actual length of the stream impacts will be
likely be less, depending on final design plans.
Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters are anticipated from the
proposed project. Permits and certifications from various state and federal agencies may
be required prior to construction activities.
Construction is likely to be authorized by provisions of CFR 330.5 (a) Nationwide
Permit (NWP) No. 23 which authorizes activities undertaken, assisted, authorized,
regulated, funded, or financed in whole or in part, by another Federal agency or
department where that agency or department has determined that, pursuant to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act:
the activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions which neither
individually nor cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment;
and
that the Office of the Chief Engineer has been furnished notice of the agency's or
department's application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that
determination.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver thereof,
from DENR prior to issuance of the NWP 23. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or
licensed activity that results in a discharge into Waters of the U.S. In addition, the project
is located in a designated "trout" county where NCDOT is required to obtain a letter of
approval from the WRC.
Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
Since this project will likely be authorized under a Nationwide permit, mitigation
for impacts to surface waters is may or may not be required by the USACE. In
accordance with the Division of Water Quality Wetland Rules [15A NCAC 211 .0506
13
(h)] "Fill or alteration of more than one acre of wetlands will require compensatory
mitigation; and fill or alteration of more than 150 linear feet of streams may require
compensatory mitigation. Since the wetland and stream impacts are lower than these
designated thresholds, compensatory mitigation should not be required.
Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of plants and animals are declining either due to natural forces
or due to their inability to coexist with man. Rare and protected species listed for
Watauga County, and any likely impacts to these species as a result of the proposed
project construction, are discussed in the following sections.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected species for
Watauga County as of May 1999. These species are listed in Table 3.
Table 3
Federally Protected Species for
Watauga County
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status
Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle TS/A
Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Carolina northern flying squirrel E
Geum radiatum Spreading avens E
Houstonia montana Roan Mountain bluet E
Liatris helleri Heller's blazing star T
Notes: "E" Denotes Endangered (a species that is threatened with extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range)
"T" Denotes Threatened (a species that is likely to become an endangered species within
the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range)
"T S/A" Denotes Similarity of Appearance (a species that is listed as threatened due
to similarity of appearance with other rare species).
14
A brief description of the characteristics and habitat requirements of each species, along
with a conclusion regarding potential project impact, follows.
Clemmys muhlenbergh (Bog turtle) Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
Vertebrate Family: Emydidae
Federally Listed: 1997
The bog turtle is a small freshwater turtle reaching a maximum carapace length of
4.5 inches. These turtles have a domed carapace which is weakly keeled and is light
brown to ebony in color. The scutes have a lighter-colored starburst pattern. The
plastron is brownish-black with contrasting yellow or cream areas along the midline.
This species is distinguished by a large conspicuous orange, yellow, or red blotch on each
side of the head.
The bog turtle is semi-aquatic and is typically found in freshwater wetlands
characterized by open fields, meadows, or marshes with slow moving streams, ditches,
and boggy areas. The bog turtle is also found in wetlands in agricultural areas subject to
light to moderate livestock grazing which helps to maintain an intermediate stage of
succession. During the winter, this species hibernates just below the upper surface of
mud. Mating occurs in May and June, and the female deposits two to six eggs in
sphagnum moss or sedge tussocks in May, June or July. The diet of the bog turtle is
varied consisting of beetles, lepidopteran and caddisfly larvae, snails, millipedes,
pondweed and sedge seeds, and carrion.
The southern population of the bog turtle is listed as Threatened due to Similarity
of Appearance to the northern population, therefore, the southern population is not
afforded protection under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. There is a small
wetland area or seep in the project area, however, this area is regularly maintained and the
vegetation was closely cropped or grazed. This seep is not associated with a slow moving
stream or ditch, rather, it occurs as a seasonally wet area at the base of a slope. A search
of the NHP database found no occurrence of the bog turtle in the project vicinity.
Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus (Carolina northern flying squirrel)
Endangered
Vertebrate Family: Sciurdiae
Federally Listed: 1985
The Carolina northern flying squirrel is a small mammal weighing about 95 to
140 g (3 to 5 oz). The adult squirrel is gray with a reddish or brownish wash on the back,
and a grayish white to white underside. It has a large flap of skin along either side of its
body which is connected at the wrist in the front and at the ankle in the rear. The skin
flaps and its broad flattened tail allow the northern flying squirrel to glide from tree to
tree. It is a solely nocturnal animal with large dark eyes.
15
There are several isolated populations of the northern flying squirrel in the
western part of North Carolina along the Tennessee border. This squirrel is found above
5000 feet in the vegetation transition zone between hardwood and coniferous forests.
Both forest types are used to search for food and the hardwood forest is used for nesting
sites. The squirrel can subsist on lichens and fungi throughout much of its range,
however, the diet can also include seeds, buds, fruits, and insects.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No habitat exists in the project area for the Carolina northern flying squirrel. The
project area is characterized by agricultural and residential areas at an elevation of 2800
feet; this species occurs above 5000 feet. A search of the NHP database found no
occurrence of the Carolina northern flying squirrel in the project vicinity. It can be
concluded that the project will not impact this endangered species.
Geum radiatum (Spreading avens)
Endangered
Plant Family: Rosaceae
Federally Listed: 1990
Spreading avens is a perennial herb having stems with an indefinite cyme of
bright yellow radially symmetrical flowers. Flowers of spreading avens are present from
June to early July. Spreading avens has basal leaves which are odd-pinnately compound;
terminal leaflets are kidney shaped and much larger than the lateral leaflets, which are
reduced or absent.
Spreading avens is found only in the North Carolina and Tennessee section of the
Southern Appalachian Mountains. Spreading avens occurs on scarps, bluffs, cliffs and
escarpments on mountains, hills and ridges. Known populations of this plant has been
found to occur at elevations from 5060 to 5800 feet. Other habitat requirements for this
species include full sunlight and shallow acidic soils which contain a composition of
sand, pebbles, humus, sandy loam and clay loam. Most populations are pioneers on
rocky outcrops. The substrate at all the population sites is composed of various igneous,
metamorphic, and metasedimentary rocks
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No habitat exists in the project area for spreading avens. The elevation of the
project area is approximately 2800 feet and known populations occur above 5000 feet. A
search of the NHP database found no occurrence of spreading avens in the project
vicinity. It can be concluded that the project will not impact this endangered species.
16
Houstonia montana (Roan Mountain bluet)
Endangered
(=Hedyotis purpurea var. montana)
Plant Family: Rubiaceae
Federally Listed: 1990
Roan Mountain bluet is a cespitose perennial herb with erect or ascending,
unbranched or weakly terminally branched stems to 8 inches tall from a basal winter
rosette. Cauline leaves are opposite, sessile and ovate, 0.3 to 1.2 inches long and 0.6 to
0.2 to 0.5 inches wide. Flowers are reddish purple and funnel-shaped. The inflorescence
is few flowered, with flowers occurring from late May through August, with peak
flowering in June and July. There is considerable disagreement among the experts
concerning whether the Roan Mountain bluet belongs to the Hedyotis or Houstonia
genus, and whether it is a variety or deserves a full species ranking.
Roan Mountain bluet grows on rocky exposures at high elevations of 4600 to
6270 feet. Bedrock geology is critical for the growth of this species. All sites are on
mafic (i.e. basic) rock, which contrasts with most other high elevation rocky-summit
sites, which are typically on felsic or acidic rock. The plants typically grow in gravel-
filled pockets found on north or northwest facing cliff ledges, or on talus slopes
associated with outcrop exposures on the south or southwest slopes of mountain balds.
Most sites are kept moist by frequent fog, mid-elevation clouds, or summer
thunderstorms.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No habitat exists in the project area for Roan Mountain bluer The elevation of
the project area is approximately 2800 feet and this species occurs above 4600 feet. A
search of the NHP database found no occurrence of Roan Mountain bluet in the project
vicinity. It can be concluded that the project will not impact this endangered species.
Liatris helleri (Heller's blazing star)
Threatened
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: 1987
Heller's blazing star is a perennial herb with an erect stem growing from a
cormlike rootstock. The stiff stems are purple near the base turning to green, and are
strongly ribbed and angulate. Both basal and cauline leaves are numerous, decreasing in
size upward. The leaves are long and narrow, with those at the base 8 to 12 inches in
length. The stems reach up to 16 inches in height and are topped by a showy spike of
lavender flowers 0.3 to 8 inches long. Flowering occurs from July through September.
17
Heller's blazing star typically occurs on sandy soil on rocky summits, cliffs,
ledges and rocky woods at high elevation (3500 to 6000 feet). The plants grow in humus
or clay loams on igneous and metasedimentary rock. Soils are generally acidic (pH 4)
and shallow. Sites occupied by the Heller's blazing star are generally exposed to full sun.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No habitat exists in the project area for Heller's blazing star. The elevation of the
project area is approximately 2800 feet and this species occurs above 3500 feet. A search
of the NHP database found no occurrence of Heller's blazing star in the project vicinity.
It can be concluded that the project will not impact this threatened species.
Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are not legally protected under the Endangered
Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are
formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Table 4 includes FSC species
listed for Watauga County and their state classifications. Organisms which are listed as
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program list of Rare Plant and Animal Species are afforded state protection
under the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and
Conservation Act of 1979; however, the level of protection given to state listed species
does not apply to NCDOT activities.
Table 4
Federal Species of Concern and NC Protected Species for Watauga
County
Scientific Name Common Name NC Status Habitat present
Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Hellbender Sc Yes
Dendroica cerulea Cerulean warbler SR No
Neotoma magister* Alleghany woodrat SC No
Phenocobius teretulus Kanawha Minnow SC No
Sorex palustris punctulatus* Southern water shrew SC No
Sylvilagus obscurus* Appalachian cottontail SR No
Lasmigona subviridus Green floater E Yes
Speyeria diana Diana fritillary butterfly SR No
Abies fraseri Fraser fir C No
Cardamine clematitis Mountain bittercress C No
18
Delphinium exaltatum Tall larkspur E-SC No
Euphorbia purpurea* * Glade spurge C No
Geum geniculatum Bent avens T No
Juglans cinerea Butternut W5 Yes
Lilium grayi Gray's lily T-SC No
Poa paludigena* Bog bluegrass E No
Notes: Source: Amoroso and LeGrand; 1995 Weakley, 1995
T - Threatened, E - Endangered, SC - Special Concern, SR - State Rare, C-Candidate, W5-
rare because of severe decline
* - Denotes a historic record (The species was last observed in the county more than 50 years
ago.)
** - Denotes an obscure record (The date and/or location of observation is uncertain.)
A review of the Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique
habitats revealed no occurrences of any FSC or state protected species within the project
area. Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit. There was a
reported occurrence of bleeding heart (Dicentra eximia), which is listed as a state
Candidate species, approximately 0.4 miles downstream of the project area.
19
FIGURES
_
ii f '• 2 ..-. 1 1312
rO 2 -
N `D 11 17 '+- 1408
-'; W
T 1313 `r O
1 `
- ?

' 1155
2 Villas W
%
1311
-•,
a 1 9 MAST

O 121 GA rv 1 75
116
O 1165
N 194 1177
`• S 1120 `321
••\ `? / 1117 O ?"?•, ? 1115 421
8 9
1119
1 122'
1170 % V
.
11129 03
p
M.,4r
1113
l
1164 A _
6 ROCKY FACE , 4 5 "-k s
1128 . •.
'tpt Valle Cru s 1
i 1130 !
i Q• 1152
1160

1 1135
.
1132
?
112
; O 'ry
11 i i h 3i 11
' 1122
1169 Brid
N
80
3 'L' ;lc' • v? 5 '. 1? 1 i ge
o.
Mathes!, 113 3
1130 :- -A R777
v
C.
i? 1138
E?_ • 1 134 1 13 i
,r A? ?? ` .?\ 1 16B 1580 ,..
? (Z' 1 16 c? •- 1
A
r. _ 1 Fan
1

I IDDc
r I ?
Studied Detour
W ;ATfA UGA 1odd
u ..?.e.us 4
' t
y?Yf
1??6 or No1?N c?`L
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Planning & Environmental Branch
or rMMS?
Watauga County
Replace Bridge No. 80 on SR U36
Over Clarks Creek
M262
Figure 1

is
i
CENTER OF BRIDGE FACING EAST
4
NORTH FACE OF BRIDGE
ATTACHMENTS
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John L. Williams, Project Planning Engineer
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Stephanie E. Goudreau, Eastern Mt. Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 7, 1997
SUBJECT: Scoping comments for replacement of Bridge #80 along SR 1136 over Clark's Creek, Watauga
County, TIP #B-3262.
This correspondence responds to a request by you for our review and preliminary comments regarding the
subject project.
Clark's Creek is a tributary to Dutch Creek, which is Hatchery Supported Designated Public Mountain
Trout Water. According to our records, Clark's Creek supports wild rainbow trout. The North Carolina Department
of Transportation is proposing to replace the existing bridge with a new bridge.
We have the following recommendations for minimizing impacts to fisheries resources:
I) lnstream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot wide buffer zone should be prohibited during the
rainbow trout spawning season of November 1 through April 15 to protect the egg and fry stages of trout.
2) If concrete will be used, work must be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact stream water.
This will lessen the chance of altering the stream's water chemistry and causing a fish kill.
3) Heavy equipment should be operated-from the bank rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
4) Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of ground
disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control. If seeding is done after 1 October 1997, then the
NCDOT should return after I April 1998 to reseed if necessary.
5) Trees along the stream should be preserved as much as possible to provide shade and nutrient input to the
stream.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment during the early stages of this project. If you have
any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 704/652-4257.
e,,. AATF o
???t rf t?3 s
t'
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
April 4, 1997
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Bridge 80 on SR 1136 over Clark's Creek,
Watauga County, B-3262, Federal Aid Project
MABRZ-1136(1), State Project 8.2751001,
ER 97-8348
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
On March 11, 1997, Debbie Bevin of our staff met with North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above
project. We reported our available information on historic architectural and
archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations. NCDOT
provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of no historic structures
located within the area of potential effect. We recommend that no historic
architectural survey be conducted for this project.
A survey for archaeological resources should be conducted for replacement of the
bridge on a new location.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ?0;?Y
?
Nicholas L. Graf
4/4/97, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely, /
Da Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: ?/
H. F. Vick
B. Church
T. Padgett

10
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
July 9, 1998
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Replacement of Bridge 80 on SR 1 136 over
Clarks Creek, Watauga County, Federal Aid
Project MABRZ-1136(1), State Project
8.2751001, TIP B-3262, ER 98-9251
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
/?v E I V EO
JUL 13 1998
2
HIGH:"JA?S ,??
Thank you for your letter of June 12, 1998, transmitting the archaeological survey
report by Thomas J. Padgett concerning the above project.
During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr.
Padgett has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted
in connection with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this
project will not involve significant archaeological resources. -
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: L-4. D. Gilmore
T. Padgett
109 East Jones Street • Raleieh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ???