20011831 Ver 1_Complete File_20011213

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
December 7, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508, Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615-6814
kTITENTION: Ms. Jean Manuele
NCDOT Coordinator
0118 3
1
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Request for NWP 23 & 33 for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 45 over
the Dan River on SR 2282 in Rockingham County, F.A. Project BRSTP-87(10),
State Project No. 8.1511601, TIP No. B-3368, Divison 7.
Dear Ms. Manuele:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) & Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation,
permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN) for the subject project. The North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 45 with a new
bridge east (downstream) of the existing bridge. The proposed bridge will be approximately 796
feet long and 43 feet wide rail to rail with 12-foot travel lanes. A four-foot shoulder with a curb
and a five to six-foot sidewalk will lie provided on both sides of the bridge. The proposed bridge
will be constructed from a temporary work bridge located downstream from the proposed bridge.
An additional work bridge will be used upstream of the existing bridge to facilitate in the .
demolition of the existing bridge. Work bridges are not discussed in the CE; however, they are
necessary to the construction of this project. Deck drainage will be carried off the bridge and
diverted into the proposed hazardous spill catch basin. Please see the attached permit drawings
for details regarding the temporary work bridges and the hazardous spill catch basin. Traffic will
be maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
Approach work will include the realignment of SR 2282 to the east. A two-lane roadway with
14-foot lanes with curb and gutter and 10-foot berms will be constructed on the northern
approach to the bridge. A left-turn lane will be provided for both northbound and southbound
traffic on SR 2282 at Harris Street. On the southern approach, a two-lane roadway with two 12-

foot lanes and 8-foot shoulders will be constructed. Clearing on the project shall be by Method
III.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Bridge Demolition: The superstructure of Bridge Number 45 is composed of a reinforced
concrete deck, with the span over the Dan River supported by a concrete arch which completely
spans the river. Removal of the reinforced concrete piers on either side of the river will result in
disturbance at the river's edge but is not expected to result in temporary fill. Explosives may be
required to safely remove the arch span. If Bridge Number 45 is removed entirely by the use of
explosives, the resulting maximum temporary fill will be approximately 474 cubic yards. Any
use of explosives will be coordinated with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and the Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC). It may be
possible to remove the bridge deck piece by piece utilizing a temporary work bridge, therefore
reducing the amount of temporary fill. However, this may become unsafe in which case
explosives will be used to remove the remainder of the existing bridge. It is difficult to estimate
the minimum amount of temporary fill associated with bridge demolition due to the uncertainty
of how the existing bridge will be demolished. However, the maximum amount of temporary fill
associated with bridge demolition is approximately 474 cubic yards, resulting only if explosives
must be used to dismantle the entire existing structure. All measures will be taken to avoid any
temporary fill from entering Waters of the U.S.
Wetland Impacts. Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts will occur during project
construction. Wetland delineations were conducted by NCDOT biologists using the criteria
specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Due to the small size of
the wetland, it was not verified by the USACE. Wetland impacts are due to the placement of the
hazardous spill basin and consist of permanent fill, totaling approximately 0.037 acre. These
impacts are identified on Sheet 4 of 7 of the.permit drawings. Wetland impacts do not exceed
1/10 of an acre, therefore no wetland mitigation is proposed.
Surface Water Impacts: Two temporary work bridges will be constructed to aid in the
construction of the proposed bridge and with demolition of the existing structure. Each work
bridge will be approximately 30 ft wide and long enough to span the Dan River. If needed, clean
riprap, at areas of bridge supports, may be used to level these structures. The resulting
temporary fill occurring from the placement of the work bridge bents in the river will be less
than 1/10 acre. All riprap will be removed from the streambed to the extent practicable.
RESTORATION PLAN
The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the work bridges will be removed.
Clean riprap, at areas of bridge supports, may be needed to make the structures level. All efforts
will be made to remove the riprap to the extent practicable.
Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a February 19, 2002 letting date
with an availability date of April 1, 2002. It is expected that the contractor will begin the
construction of the work bridge in May 2002 to aid in construction of the new bridge. The
temporary work bridge will be removed within 90 days of the completion of the deck slab for the
new bridge. The second temporary work bridge will be constructed to aid in demolition of the
2

existing bridge. This temporary structure will be removed within 90 days of the completion of
the removal of the existing bridge.
Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove the riprap used for the
temporary work bridges. After the temporary work bridges are no longer required, all material
placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the contractor. The contractor
will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal of and the disposal of all unused
materials off-site.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
The existing bridge has a concrete deck, with a concrete closed spandrel arch span over the Dan
River. This type of structure makes it difficult to remove the existing structure without the use of
explosives. For this reason, a field meeting was held on September 17, 2001 with representatives
from the USACE, DWQ and NCDOT to discuss bridge demolition. The following
environmental commitments have been agreed upon:
• If it is necessary to use explosives during bridge demolition, personnel representing the
WRC, USACE and DWQ will be notified of the dates, so that they may be present.
• NCDOT will avoid using explosives during the months of May and June of any year due to
fish spawning in the Dan River as well as during periods of high flow in the Dan River.
• The surface water intake located approx. 0.2 miles downstream of Bridge Number 45 will be
notified prior to the use of any explosives that may be necessary during bridge demolition. A
notice will be placed in the local newspaper alerting nearby residents if explosives are
necessary and when they will be used.
• All precautions must be used to control the blast and the turbidity from the blast.
• Turbidity curtains will be used to contain sediment and debris. All measures will betaken to
protect the downstream water intake.
• Following bridge demolition, any debris allowed to fall into the Dan River will first be
removed by "picking" it out of the channel by boat. Any debris remaining in the river will be
removed at the discretion of the regulatory agencies (USACE, DWQ and WRC). It may be
necessary for the agencies to meet on-site to determine if the streambed should be dragged to
remove the remaining debris.
• Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition & Removal will be implemented.
• NCDOT will strictly adhere to "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B
.0024) (High Quality Water Standards) throughout design and construction of this project.
• Deck drainage will be carried.off the bridge and diverted into the proposed hazardous spill
catch basin.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a programmatic
"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not anticipate
requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed under a Nationwide 23 and a Nationwide
33 in accordance with the Federal Register of March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages
12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is
requested from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at
[phone], ext. 286.
Sincerely,
C/V)
William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
Project. Development and Environmental Analysis
VCB/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele, NC Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Raleigh
Mr. Tom McCartney, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., NCDOT Structure Design, Raleigh
Mr. John Alford, P.E.; NCDOT Roadway Design, Raleigh
Mr. Burt Tasaico, P.E., NCDOT Program Development, Raleigh
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., NCDOT Highway Design Branch, Raleigh
Mr. Dave Henderson, P.E., NCDOT Hydraulics, Raleigh
Mr. Mike Mills, P.E., NCDOT Division 7 Engineer, Greensboro
Mr. Len Smith, NCDOT Division 7 Environmental Officer, McLeansville
Mr.Jay McInnis, NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis, Raleigh

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
I . Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules _
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 23 and NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
Mailing Address: 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: 919-733-3141 Fax Number: 919-733-9794
E-mail Address: bgilmoreQ,)dot state nc.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: William D. Gilmore, P. E.
Company Affiliation: Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch Manager
Mailing Address: Same as above
Telephone Number: 919-733-3141 Fax Number: 919-733-9794
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3368
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Rockingham Nearest Town: Eden
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Bridge No. 45 on SR 2282 over the
Dan River, located in the southwestern part of Eden
5.- Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately.lists the
coordinates for each crossing ,of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Highway corridor with roadway shoulders and an existing bridge over the Dan River
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Dan River
9
10. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
11. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Roadway widening and Bridge replacement
(Public Transportation)
12. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy duty excavation
equipment such as trucks, dozers, cranes, boats and other various
equipment necessary for bridge and roadway construction and bridge
demolition.
13. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Urban and Residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide Justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project, The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 5 of 12
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
s
7
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both.structure and flooding.
** .100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.05 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.037 acre
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Permanent 611 0.037 yes Approx. 500 ft Linear scrub-shrub

Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
No Impacts

* List each impact separately anu identity temporary impacts. impacts tnciuae, out are not umnea to: culverts anu nssowatcu Lip-tap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named.stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres)
Name of Waterbody.

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
2,3 Temporary Fill due to
work bridges <0.1 Dan River, river

List eacn impact separately ana taenary tcmparaly Impattl. 1I11paL'. ulL luuL, VLLL cL vL ........ - --a
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired-site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Wetlands will be impacted by the proposed construction of a hazardous spill catch basin to protect
the water supply intake downstream of Bridge No 45 Temporary surface water fill will occur due
to the construction of temporary work bridges, but will be removed once construction of the new
bridge and demolition of the existing bridge are complete. Bridge. demolition may result in
temporary fill, however all measures will be taken to keep fill from entering surface waters.
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Wafer Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed `impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan. must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in . DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/striny,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Wetland impacts do not exceed 1/10 of an acre, therefore mitigation is not proposed
for this project. `
Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrQ/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If'yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers- associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 9 of 12
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse); 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify . )?
Yes E] No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Gone z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious. acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes No
Page 10 of 12
NORTH CAROLINA
N,,C.D.O.T.
DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY ROCYJNGIL M COUN77
E
REPLACT.II FM OF BRIDG
NO. 45 ON NC 87
MAPS
OVER THE DAN RIVER
STATE PROJECT#81511604 B-3368
SHEET 1 OF 7
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY

,.LEGEND

-WLB - WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
L
WETLAND
L
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
WETLAND
12'-48'

DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
® SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL IN
® SURFACE WATER
(POND) SINGLE TREE
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
?-.- ROOTWAO
WATER
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
¦ • •• • ¦ • CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP
TB
TOP OF BANK
WE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
- EDGE OF WATER
-
- 5
OR PARCEL NUMBER
c IF AVAILABLE
- -
- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL BZ1 BUFFER ZONE 1
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY BZ2 BUFFER ZONE 2
- -NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- -PL - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB-' EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL '
- EPB - ' EXIST. ENDANGERED

- -- - -- - WATER SURFACE

XX LIVE STAKES
x x X X
X N.C.D.O.T.
BOULDER
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CORE FIBER ROLLS ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE
NQ 46 ON NC 87
OVER THE DAN RIVER
STATE PROJECT NO.81611601
(B-3368)
SHM Zero DATE 10/26/01

I I
1
I ?
-----1
?
1 1

I ?
?
i
I ?
I I ?
?
o i 1 J
co I 1 ) E
0 1
I O
CL I \ W
? I z..

ICI ?/ ,
1001
IW I
to
Im

z

Iw -----
---

O
- Ln }-CD
=
/ 0
_ m
a- o_
O a F-
? o_
J_
F-
UD'
1

x

0 °
® ?U
x cox
z r

+
'IT
w Q
E-
zo M
o W X T :c
v0F 0
a
° z
oz az9
Z P* U a o
>a
0
O
O

O
0
M
O
+
rn
W

0 ? W
u
M a U

+ ® U
F,

x
O
O P?
CA

?
M A
O
00
N

O
N
N
00
LO Ln O
Ln Ln

3 ? ate? ? s
a0 ao a4
d
06 rj
®x zza
F? o 14 0w
u°E
z a
0 Z Viz? F ?`
z M W % c
>?a
~a
w
F- rf
a
w
U
J
N •?
w wl ?N
3
Um '
W
O
O
N
a p M - O
O n
O , Z Q
Q J
J F-
Ld
? O
W >- ..i
9 r? - - - O J
00
` P-4 o
O?
Or?B? 71` .e
N
s ?
V?
c-n
w
0
m
Cl
w
N
0
a-
0
a
0
?w
000
3a
q w _
II
II _
l l
I I
iI _
II
it
t? -
_ I
I
I
00
Iu
IZ w
I z
H -T - W N H Ij-1?"
T W HV) I u F-
lo a
co >-
Ic
z
I~_
IX
W
7 ?I
I I
I I
I I
9• L II
0l wwp Z II
lI _

®
xU

-4-zz o

z ?

<
a
zoa
zz ?zd a

A
l
4 d
w
V V) )
Q V 7
m=o?
Cr >-
oV) -Q
S-?S

II a ZLLl
(
II
I I
a, Ng?
,?, o ?w
ix
+ M 'y 0
QQa?-NQ
ix
co>l
(I 341 w Q ? X XLLJ
m
II t-a z=mzw

I ? °a
Ld I
:)F-
:)F- *
w
w
a
H

E4 O CD
;
® t7 ?y
cz` x
,.
FzA
=
'+ab
0
z G7 v o a
?rj?•
f-+ 0 Z
V1 beI a :2
o
.?
a a
A
II o
III
II
HI?- -
z II TOWNS
J m II I TOWNSHIP
_ z 11 S ?,
I I ?
w.
0
m E c
m .rn
3 O ? ?
O

Z
C

H U
N R (0
O
(? X L CL
a W U E

W U- o
n
E v
o
0
v
F-
W
U
U)
-a
U

N C O L
0 O
=
v
LL
? m

C O m
- m L p

}
Q N
CC
a _
O N

t N .L L
v p
D U
F- ?
a °
a °
1- CL ca
X

W
?
0
Z J (0
CL
°

W
N
l
- N L Ca O O
LL?`-'
> O O
C
.N N

O L
U •-
L`
N Q
O n, U Y
O
5 -
n 3
a?
Un N y f6
O O
v a

N H

o _
O
O C
J J
J
O E
Y
O
? L
_
t d

?
L

J

fn Z N O
H
0
0
cv
00

to
co I-

00
(n L co
C'
N
O

H 1
3o?
Z
O W
?U1>0
0
Q wx?l> r
V O0ooO?Y
z zz o
0UWwQ I`
?p"?x x
A
amH ?,
0
N
M
m
m
LL
Bridge Number 45
On SR 2282 Over the Dan River
Rockingham County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-87(10)
State Project 8.1511601 K
TIP Project Number B-3368
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
APPROVED:
12-ZQ - oa \?? ?D
Date William D. Gilmore, P. E.
Manager of Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
Date Nicholas L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
And
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Bridge Number 45
On SR 2282 Over the Dan River
Rockingham County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-87(10)
State Project 8.1511601
TIP Project Number B-3368
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
Jamks A. McInnis Jr., P.E.
Project Development Engineer

29" 6
Robert P. Hanson, P.E.
Project Development Unit Head
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
PROJECT COMMITMENTS .............................................................................................. i
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................... 1
A. Project Purpose .............................................................................................................. 1
• B. General Description ........................................................................................................ 1
C. Cost Estimates ................................................................................................................ 1
II. NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT ............................................................................. 2
A. Description of Existing Facility ..................................................................................... 2
1. Functional Classification ............................................................................................. 2
2. Roadway ...................................................................................................................... 2
3. Existing Structure ........................................................................................................ 3
4. Right of Way and Access Control ...................................... 4
.........................................
B. Utilities 4
...........................................................................................................................
C. School Bus Data ............................................................................................................. 4
D. Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................. 4
E. Accident Record ............................................................................................................. 5
III . PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................................. 5
A. Proposed Structure ......................................................................................................... 5
B. Roadway ......................................................................................................................... 5
C. Design Speed/Design Exceptions ................................................................
D. Right of Way and Access Control .............................................. 6
....................................
E. Bicycle Accommodations/Sidewalks .............................................. 6
...............................
F. Degree of Utility Conflict ............................................................................................... 6
G. Maintenance of Traffic ................................................................................................... 6
IV. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................7
V. PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION ..................8
A. Cultural Resources .........................................................................................................8
B. Section 4(f) Resources ...................................................................................................9
C. Natural Resources ........................................................................................................10
1. Biotic Resources ..................................................................:.....................................10
a. Terrestrial Communities .........................................................................................10
b. Aquatic Communities .............................................................................................12
c. Summary of Anticipated Effects ............................................................................12
2. Water Resources ........................................................................................................13
a. Streams, Rivers, Impoundments .............................................................................13
b. Water Quality .........................................................................................................14
c. Summary of Anticipated Effects ............................................................................14
3. Wetlands (Waters of the U.S.) ...................................................................................15
4. Bridge Demolition .....................................................................................................15
5. Rare and Protected Species ........................................................................................16
a. Federally-Protected Species ...................................................................................16
b. Federal Species of Concern/State Protected Species .............................................17
D. Relocation of Residences and Businesses ....................................................................17
E. Minority/Low-Income Populations ..............................................................................17
F. Land Use and Farmland ................................................................................................17
G. Flood Hazard Evaluation .............................................................................................18
H. Traffic Noise and Air Quality
1. Hazardous Materials ......................................................................................................18
VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION ....................................................................19
VII. BASIS FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ..........................................................20
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Anticipated Effects on Biotic Communities ........................................12
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure II-1 - SR 2282 North of Bridge Number 45
Figure II-2 - SR 2282 South of Bridge Number 45
Figure II-3 - View of Bridge Deck
Figure II-4 - Side View of Bridge Number 45
Figure 1 - Geographic Location Map
Figure 2 - Proposed Improvements
Figure 3 - Proposed Typical Section
Figure 4 - Wetlands/100-Year Floodplain in Project Area
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
Appendix B - Memorandum of Agreement
Appendix C - Comments Received
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Bridge Number 45
On SR 2282 Over the Dan River
Rockingham County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-87(10)
State Project 8.1511601
TIP Project Number B-3368
Federal Highway Administration
The North Carolina Division Office of the Federal Highway Administration will
forward an executed copy of the memorandum of agreement regarding the project's effect
on National Register-eligible Bridge Number 45 to the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation.
Structure Design Unit
NCDOT will use 1372 millimeter (54-inch) two-bar metal rails on the
replacement. bridge. The concrete portion of the proposed bridge rail will include inset
panels similar to those on the rail of the existing bridge. Once preliminary drawings of
the new structure are complete, NCDOT will provide the State Historic Preservation
Office with copies of the drawings for their comments. The proposed 1372 millimeter
(54-inch) rails will accommodate bicycles.
NCDO'r will provide decorative light posts and fixtures on the proposed bridge. The
City of Eden will maintain the light posts and fixtures and pay utility bills for the lights.
Deck drains for the proposed new bridge will not drain directly into the river, but will
be directed into the proposed hazardous spill catch basin.
Program Development Branch
A municipal agreement will be prepared between NCDOT and the City of Eden
r regarding maintenance of the proposed light fixtures on the new bridge prior to project
construction.
Categorical Exclusion-B-3368 Page 1 of 2
December, 2000
i
Roadside Environmental Unit/Hydraulics Unit
NCDOT will strictly adhere to "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds"
(15A NCAC 04B .0024) (HQW standards) throughout design and construction of this
project:
A hazardous spill catch basin will be required for the project.
The use of turbidity curtains during in-stream work will be studied during z
development of erosion control plans for the project and curtains will be utilized if it is
determined they will be effective in the conditions found in the Dan River.
Division Seven
NCDOT will implement Best Management, Practices for Bridge Demolition and
Removal. Explosives may be required to safely remove the arch span of the existing
bridge. Any use of explosives will be coordinated with the US Army Corps of Engineers,
the NC Division of Water Quality, and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
Roadway Design Unit
Paved shoulders 1.2` meters-(4 feet) wide are proposed on the southern approach and
42 meter (14-foot) lanes are proposed on the northern approach to the new bridge in order to
accommodate bicycles.
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Prior to the demolition of Bridge Number 45, NCDOT will record the existing
conditions of the bridge and its surroundings in accordance with a Historic Structures and
Landscape Recordation Plan. The written and photographic -documentation will be
deposited with the North Carolina Division of Archives and History.
Due to landowner objections, an archaeological survey of the project area cannot be
performed until after NCDOT has acquired right of way for the project. NCDOT will perform
archaeological investigations for this project prior to construction and coordinate further with
SHPO and FHWA, as necessary.
Categorical Exclusion - B-3368 Page 2 of 2
December, 2000
ii
Bridge Number 45
On SR 2282 Over the Dan River
Rockingham County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-87(10)
State Project 8.1511601
TIP Project Number B-3368
1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. Project Purpose
The purpose of the project is to replace an obsolete bridge carrying SR 2282 over
the Dan River in Rockingham County.
B. General Description
The project involves the removal and replacement of Bridge Number 45, which
carries SR 2282 (Hamilton Street-Old NC 87) over the Dan River. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridge during construction of the project. The project area is
shown on Figure 1.
TIP Project B-3368 is included in the draft 2002-2008 North Carolina
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Right of way acquisition is scheduled for
fiscal year 2001 and construction is scheduled for fiscal year 2002.
C. Cost Estimates
The estimated costs for project B-3368 are as follows:
Construction $ 4,850,000
Right of Way $ 136,600
Total Cost $ 4,986,600
The total estimated cost included in the draft 2002-2008 TIP for the project is
$2,500,000. This includes $100,000 for right of way and $2,400,000 for construction.
II. NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
A. Description of Existing Facility
1. Functional Classification
SR 2282 is classified as an urban minor arterial in the North Carolina functional
classification system.
2. Roadway
SR 2282 north of Bridge Number 45 is a two-lane roadway, with two 5.4 meter
(18-foot) lanes and a curb on the outside (no gutter) (see Figure II-1). A variable width
berm is provided outside the curb. South of the bridge, SR 2282 is a two-lane roadway
with 3.6 meter (12-foot) lanes and 1.8 meter (4-foot) grassed shoulders (see Figure II-2).
The vertical alignment of SR 2282 in the vicinity of Bridge Number 45 is good. The
horizontal alignment of SR 2282 north of the river is good. The horizontal alignment of
the roadway south of the river is fair. A sharp horizontal curve exists south of the river.
The speed limit along SR 2282 changes from 35 MPH north of the river to 45 MPH south
of the river.
2
Figure 11-1 SR 2282 North of Bridge Number 45
3. Existing Structure
Bridge Number 45 was constructed in 1922. The bridge is 246 meters (808 feet)
long and has a clear roadway width of six meters (20 feet) (see Figure II-3). The bridge
has a sufficiency rating of 47.9 (out of 100 possible rating points). The bridge has a
concrete deck, with a concrete closed spandrel arch span over the Dan River and concrete
girders spanning the floodplain on either side of the river (see Figure II-4). The bridge
has concrete rails. A 1.5 meter (5-foot) wooden walkway is supported by steel girders
cantilevered from the east side of the bridge. Bridge Number 45 has been determined to
be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (see Section V-A).
P'igure 11-2 SR 2282 South of Bridge Number 45
Figure 11-3 View of Bridge Deck
4. Right of Way and Access Control
Existing right of way along SR 2282 within the project limits is approximately
18 meters (60 feet). No control of access exists along SR 2282.
B. Utilities
A water line crosses under the Dan River east of the existing bridge. A sewer line
runs along the west side of SR 2282 north of the river. A second sewer line runs under
SR 2282 north of the bridge. A gas line crosses under SR 2282 north of the bridge. High
voltage overhead power lines also cross SR 2282 north of the river.
C. School Bus Data
Four school buses currently cross Bridge Number 45 twice daily.
D. Traffic Volumes
Currently, approximately 6,200 vehicles per day cross Bridge Number 45. By the
year 2025, this number is projected to increase to 12,800 vehicles per day. It is estimated
that tractor trailers and single unit trucks make up four and five percent, respectively, of the
average daily traffic crossing Bridge Number 45.
4
Figure H-4 Side View of Bridge Number 45
E. Accident Record
Between August, 1994 and July, 1997, three accidents occurred in the vicinity of
Bridge Number 45. None of these accidents involved fatalities.
III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Proposed Structure
A new bridge, 243 meters (796 feet) long with a 13.1 meter (43-foot) rail to rail
width will be constructed east of the existing bridge. Two 3.6 meter (12-foot) travel lanes
will be provided across the new bridge. A 1.2 meter (4-foot) shoulder with a curb and a
1.65 meter (5'-6") sidewalk will be provided on both sides of the bridge. A two-bar
metal rail will be utilized on the bridge, as requested by the State Historic Preservation
Office (see Section V-A). The concrete portion of the proposed rail will include inset
panels similar to those on the rail of the existing bridge. The proposed two-bar metal rail
will be 1372 millimeters (54 inches) high in order to accommodate bicycles (see Section
III-E). Figure 3B shows the proposed typical section across the new bridge.
NCDOT will provide decorative light posts and fixtures on the proposed bridge. The
City of Eden will maintain the light posts and fixtures and pay utility bills for the lights. A
municipal agreement will be prepared between NCDOT and the City of Eden regarding
maintenance of the proposed light fixtures prior to project construction.
Deck drains on the proposed new bridge will not drain directly into the river.
Deck drainage will be carried off the bridge and diverted into the proposed hazardous
spill catch basin (see Section V-C-2).
B. Roadway
SR 2282 will be realigned to the east in order to allow construction of the new
bridge east of the old structure.
A two-lane roadway with 4.2 meter (14-foot) lanes with curb and gutter and three
meter (10-foot) berms will be constructed on the northern approach to the bridge. Figure
3A shows the proposed typical section for the bridge approaches. A left-turn lane will be
provided for both northbound and southbound traffic on SR 2282 at Harris Street. The
pavement width north of Harris Street will vary in order to tie-in to the existing roadway.
The proposed 4.2 meter lanes will accommodate bicyclists (see Section III-E).
On the southern approach to the proposed bridge, a two lane roadway with two
3.6 meter (12-foot) lanes and 2.4 meter (8-foot) shoulders (1.2 meter (4-foot) paved) will
5
be constructed. The proposed 1.2 meter paved shoulders will accommodate bicyclists
(see Section III-E).
A 35 MPH speed limit is anticipated across the new bridge.
C. Design Speed/Design Exceptions
A 70 km/h (45 MPH) design speed is proposed for the subject project. It is
anticipated no design exceptions will be required.
D. Right of Way and Access Control
A variable amount of additional right of way, up to approximately 28 meters
(90 feet), will be required for this project (see Figure 2). North of the Dan River,
additional right of way will be required on the east side of SR 2282 from the river to Harris
Street. At Harris Street, additional right of way will be required on both sides of SR 2282.
Additional right of way will be required along the east side of SR 2282 south of the river.
Temporary easements to contain construction will be required along much of the project, as
well.
No control of access is proposed for the project.
E. Bicycle Accommodations/Sidewalks
SR 2282 is a part of the "North Line Trace" North Carolina bicycling highway.
The proposed 4.2 meter (14-foot) lanes on the northern approach to the bridge, the 1.2
meter (4-foot) shoulder across the new structure and the proposed 1.2 meter (4-foot)
paved shoulder on the southern approach to the bridge will accommodate bicyclists. The
proposed 1372 millimeter (54-inch) two-bar metal rails on the new structure will
accommodate bicyclists, as well. A 1.65 meter (5%6") sidewalk will be provided on both
sides of the new bridge.
F. Degree of Utility Conflict
The proposed project is expected to have a medium to high degree of utility
conflict. Utilities affected by this project will be relocated prior to construction.
G. Maintenance of Traffic
Traffic will be maintained at all times during construction. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridge during construction of the proposed new structure.
6
IV. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Three build alternatives and the no-build alternative were considered for the
project.
CONSTRUCT A NEW BRIDGE
Both a two-lane and a four-lane bridge were considered as alternatives for the
project due to the high traffic volumes projected for SR 2282 in the design year.(2025). A
two-lane bridge can be constructed to the east of the existing bridge without encroaching
on the existing bridge. Traffic would be maintained on the existing bridge during
construction.
i
A four-lane bridge would require the removal of the existing bridge. A four-lane
bridge would have to be built in stages, with traffic maintained on the existing bridge until
a portion of the new bridge could be built. Traffic would then be shifted on to the
completed portion. of the new bridge. The old bridge would be removed and the new
bridge would be completed.
Total project construction cost with a two-lane bridge would be approximately
$4,850,000, while total construction cost with a four-lane bridge would be $7,500,000. A
four-lane bridge was rejected due to the additional cost and the fact there are currently no
plans to widen SR 2282 on either side of the Dan River. A two-lane bridge could be
widened in the future when SR 2282 is widened.
REHABILITATE/WIDEN EXISTING BRIDGE
I
Rehabilitating and widening Bridge Number 45 is not considered a viable
alternative due to its poor condition.
NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE
The "no-build" alternative is the least expensive alternative from a construction
cost standpoint and also avoids the anticipated adverse effects of the proposed project.
However, if the "no-build" alternative were chosen, Bridge Number 45 would eventually
have to be closed to traffic, increasing travel time and travel cost for roadway users.
Because of the project's benefits, the "no-build" alternative is not recommended.
7
V. PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. Cultural Resources
This project is subject to the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. One structure eligible for the National Register of Historic Places has
been identified in the area of potential effect of the project.
Bridge Number 45 has been determined to be eligible for the National Register
under Criterion C (Design/Construction). The bridge was built in 1922 and is one of only
26 remaining concrete arch bridges in North Carolina. The State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) concurred in this determination in a letter dated February 7, 2000 (see
Page C-5 of Appendix C).
NCDOT recommends that the existing bridge be removed as a part of the project.
Rehabilitation of the existing bridge is not considered a viable alternative. The size and
poor condition of this bridge would make it prohibitively expensive for a private
organization to maintain this bridge for pedestrian use. Removal of this bridge will result
in an "Adverse Effect" on this National Register eligible structure. The SHPO concurred
with this adverse effect finding at a meeting held on June 1, 2000. Appendix C contains a
copy of the concurrence form (see Page C-3 of Appendix Q.
In order to mitigate for the adverse effect on Bridge Number 45, the State Historic
Preservation Office, the Federal Highway Administration, the North Carolina Department
of Transportation, the City of Eden, and the Eden Preservation Commission have signed a
Memorandum of Agreement stipulating the following:
Prior to the demolition of Bridge No. 45, NCDOT shall record the existing
conditions of the bridge and its surroundings in accordance with a Historic
Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan. The written and photographic
documentation will be deposited with the North Carolina Division of Archives
and History/SHPO to be made part of the permanent statewide survey and
iconographic collection.
NCDOT will provide light posts and light fixtures on the new structure along the
length of the bridge rails. The City of Eden will assume responsibility for
maintaining the light fixtures and posts and for utility bills associated with the
lights. Once NCDOT completes the preliminary general drawings for the
structure that use a one-sided paneled bridge rail, then NCDOT shall consult with
the North Carolina SHPO and the Eden Preservation Commission and allow each
an opportunity to comment on the preliminary general structure plans.
Appendix B of this document contains a copy of the memorandum of agreement.
8
No archaeological sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places are
located within the area of potential effect of the project. In a letter dated April 28, 1998
the State Historic Preservation Office noted the existence of a previously identified
prehistoric archaeological site in the project area and requested an archaeological survey
be performed for the project (see page C-7 of Appendix Q. Due to landowner objections,
an archaeological survey cannot be performed until after NCDOT has acquired right of
way for the project. NCDOT will perform archaeological investigations for this project
prior to construction and coordinate further with SHPO and FHWA, as necessary.
B. Section 4(f) Resources
Bridge Number 45 is the only resource in the project area protected by Section 4(f)
of the DOT Act of 1966, as amended. As discussed in Section V-A, the removal of Bridge
Number 45 will result in an "adverse effect" on this National Register-eligible structure.
This "adverse effect" constitutes a "use" of this Section 4(f) resource.
Since this project necessitates the use of a historic bridge and meets the criteria set
forth in the Federal Register (July 5, 1983), a programmatic Section 4(f) evaluation
satisfies the requirements of Section 4(f).
The following alternatives which avoid use of the historic bridge structure have
been fully evaluated: (1) do nothing; (2) build a new structure at a didererit location
without affecting the historic integrity of the structure, as determined by procedures
implementing the National Historic Preservation Act; and (3) rehabilitate the historic
bridge without affecting the historic integrity of the structure, as determined by procedures
implementing the National Historic Preservation Act. These alternatives Were not found to
be feasible and prudent.
All possible planning to minimize harm to the historic bridge Have been
incorporated into the project. Measures to minimize harm include:
Prior to the demolition of Bridge No. 45, NCDOT shall record the existing
conditions of the bridge and its surroundings in accordance with a Historic
Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan. The written and photographic
documentation will be deposited with the North Carolina Division of Archives
and History/SHPO to be made part of the permanent statewide survey and
iconographic collection.
NCDOT will provide light posts and light fixtures on the new structure along the
length of the bridge rails. The City of Eden will assume responsibility for
maintaining the light fixtures and posts and for utility bills associated with the
lights. Once NCDOT completes the preliminary general drawings for the
structure that use a one-sided paneled bridge rail, then NCDOT shall consult with
9
the North Carolina SHPO and the Eden Preservation Commission and allow each
an opportunity to comment on the preliminary general structure plans.
This project has been coordinated with the State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO), whose correspondence is included in Appendix C of this document. Section 106
has been resolved and documented, and the SHPO concurs with the proposed mitigation.
Approval of the programmatic Section 4(f) evaluation by the Federal Highway
Administration Division Administrator is included as Appendix A of this document.
C. Natural Resources
1. Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial communities. Descriptions of the
terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community classifications. Fauna
observed during the site visit are denoted with an asterisk (*). Spoor evidence equates to
observation of the species. Published range distributions and habitat analysis were used
in estimating fauna expected to be present within the project area.
a. Terrestrial Communities
Four distinct terrestrial communities are present in the project study area:
maintained/disturbed, mixed hardwood forest, riparian fringe and scrub-shrub wetland.
Community boundaries within the study area are generally well defined without a
significant transition zone between them. Many faunal species likely to occur within the
study area may exploit all communities for shelter and foraging opportunities, or as
movement corridors.
Maintained/Disturbed
The maintained/disturbed community includes road shoulders along SR 2282, a
sewer easement, a residential area and an agricultural field. Road shoulders and utility
corridors are irregularly maintained, receiving only periodic mowing and herbicide
applications. The residential area is located at the northern end of the project and
includes maintained lawns primarily consisting of fescue grass, American holly and great
laurel.
The width of the road shoulder is approximately 2.4 meters (8 feet). Vegetation
occurring within highly maintained portions of the road shoulder include low growing
species such as: fescue, buckhorn plantain, broad-leaf plantain and dandelion. Areas
receiving less frequent maintenance are occupied by Japanese honeysuckle, trumpet vine,
wingstem and poison ivy.
10
The sewer easement runs parallel to the Dan River and is located on the slope of
the north bank of the river. The vegetation along the easement is dominated by Japanese
grass, path rush and broad-leaf plantain. The agricultural field is located on the southeast
side of the existing bridge and is harvested for forage crops consisting primarily of fescue
grass.
Mixed Hardwood Forest
The mixed hardwood forest is restricted to the southern end of the project on both
sides of SR 2282. The transition from mixed hardwood forest to the surrounding
communities is abrupt due to the change in vegetation and maintenance activities. The
canopy is primarily composed of hackberry, sugar maple, red mulberry and black walnut.
The shrub layer consists of Chinese privet and smooth sumac.
Riparian Fringe
The riparian fringe includes the lower portions of the northern bank of the Dan
River and forested areas of the southern bank of the river. The canopy is comprised of
boxelder, sycamore and river birch. Herbaceous vegetation includes stinging nettles and
violets.
Scrub-Shrub Wetland
The scrub-shrub wetland is located in the southeastern quadrant of the project between
the toe of slope of the forested roadway embankment and the agricultural field.
Vegetation within the wetland includes: black willow, water ash, softstem rush, false
nettle, sedges, buttonbush and rose mallow.
Wildlife
Mammals found within the project area include: the hispid cotton rat, house
mouse, Norway rat and least shrew. The hispid cotton rat thrives in dense vegetation
associated with field edges. The Virginia oppossum. and raccoon are very adaptive
mammals which frequent areas of human settlement. The gray fox preys heavily on
cottontails and other rodents found in this type of habitat.
Birds foraging within the project area include: brown thrasher, Carolina wren,
great blue heron, common crow, field sparrow, eastern bluebird, turkey vulture and
killdeer.
Reptiles found within the project area include: redbelly snake, rat snake, rough
green snake, eastern hognose snake, five-lined skink, snapping turtle, spotted turtle and
eastern fence lizard.
11
The forest communities near surface water provide excellent habitat for
amphibians such as Fowler's toad, spring peeper, American toad, slimy salamander and
pickerel frog.
b. Aquatic Communities
Two aquatic communities, the Dan River and a jurisdictional stream, will be
affected by the proposed project. The stream bank along the northern portion of the Dan
River is steep, yet stable. The southern portion is low with an extensive floodplain.
Fish species likely to occur in the Dan River include: sunfish, creek chub,
largemouth bass, yellow bullhead catfish and margined madtom. Invertebrates likely to
be present include: crayfish, dragonflies, damselflies, nymphal and larval stages of
caddisflies and stoneflies, whirligig beetles and water striders.
The second aquatic community is an intermittent stream that runs parallel to the
Dan River Bridge on the southwest side. The stream is jurisdictional from the Dan River
to approximately 300 feet (91.4 meters) south. At this point it becomes a
non jurisdictional storm water channel.
c. Summary of Anticipated Effects
Project construction will have various effects on the biotic resources described.
Table 1 below summarizes potential quantitative losses to biotic communities resulting
from project construction. Estimated impacts are derived using the proposed right of way
for the two bridge alternatives. Usually, project construction does not require the use of
the entire right of way; therefore, actual impacts may be less.
Table 1
Anticipated Effects on Biotic Communities
Community Two-Lane Bridge Four-Lane Bridge
Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.10 (0.24) 0.23 (0.57)
Riparian Fringe 0.06 (0.16) 0.10 (0.23)
Scrub-Shrub Wetland 0.12 (0.30) 0.19 (0.46)
Maintained/Disturbed 0.81 (2.01) 1.12 (2.76)
Totals: 1.09 (2.71) 1.64 (4.02)
Note: Values cited are in hectares (acres).
Plant communities found along the project area serve as nesting and sheltering
habitat for various wildlife. Replacing Bridge Number 45 will reduce habitat for faunal
species, thereby diminishing faunal numbers. Habitat reduction concentrates wildlife into
smaller areas, thus causing some species to become more susceptible to disease, predation
and starvation.
12
Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become road shoulders and
early successional habitat. Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the
roadway while attracting other wildlife by the creation of more early successional habitat.
Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for
the species. This temporary displacement of animals may result in an increase in
competition for remaining resources.
Aquatic communities are sensitive to small changes in their envirpnment. Stream
channelization, scouring, siltation, sedimentation and erosion from construction-related
work would affect water quality and biological constituents. Although direct impacts
may be temporary, environmental impacts from these construction processes may result
in long term or irreversible effects.
In-stream construction alters the stream substrate and may remove streamside
vegetation at the site. Disturbances to the substrate will destroy aquatic vegetation and
produce siltation, which clogs the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms
(sessile filter-feeders and deposit-feeders), fish and amphibian species. Benthic
organisms can also be covered by excessive amounts of sediment. Turbidity reduces light
penetration, thus decreasing the growth of aquatic vegetation.
2. Water Resources
a. Streams, Rivers, Impoundments
The Dan River and the jurisdictional intermittent stream running parallel to the existing
bridge are the only surface waters directly affected by the proposed project. The Dan River is
located in sub-basin 03-02-03 of the Roanoke River Basin.
At Bridge Number 45, the channel of the Dan River is approximately 30.5 meters
(100 feet) wide and the river has an average depth of one meter (3 feet). There is an extensive
riparian fringe located on the northeast, southwest and southeast quadrants of the bridge. The
north side is characterized by a steep embankment.
The intermittent stream is located on the southwest side of Bridge Number 45. The
stream is jurisdictional from the Dan River to approximately 91.4 meters (300 feet) south. At
this point it becomes a non jurisdictional storm water channel.
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). The classification of the Dan River at Bridge Number 45 is WS-IV CA.
WS-IV waters are water supplies generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds
or protected areas. The "CA" designation denotes a critical area. Bridge Number 45 is
within the critical area of the Dan River Water Supply Watershed. Approximately 0.3
kilometers (0.2 mile) downstream from the existing bridge is a surface water intake.
13
Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), WS-I, WS-II, -nor Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 kilometers (one mile) of the project area.
b. Water Quality
A biological sampling station is located on the Smith River at NC 14, approximately
4.8 kilometers (3 miles) from the project area. This site was last sampled in August, 1994 and
received a rating of Good-Fair. The Smith River has its confluence with the Dan River
approximately 1.4 kilometers (0.9 mile) downstream of Bridge Number 45.
The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) is a network of stream, lake, and
estuarine water quality monitoring stations. One AMS station is located within
4.8 kilometers (3 miles) of Bridge Number 45, on the Smith River. A review of the
monitoring information obtained from this location indicated no violations have occurred,
however, two elevated chloride concentrations were recorded during July and September,
1993 (DWQ, 1996).
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger
is required to register for a permit. Five permitted dischargers are located within
4.8 kilometers (3 miles) and upstream of Bridge Number 45. Three of these dischargers
are private residences, one is a mobile home park and one is a sand company.
c. Summary of Anticipated Effects
Surface water impacts were derived using proposed right of way widths.
Anticipated surface water impacts will be 18.3 meters (60 feet) for the Two-Lane Bridge
Alternative and approximately 121.9 meters (400 feet) for the Four-Lane Bridge
Alternative.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters:
• Increased sedimentation and siltation from construction and/or erosion.
• Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and
vegetation removal.
• Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to
surface and ground water flow from construction.
• Changes in water temperature due to removal of streamside vegetation.
• Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas.
14
Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction,
toxic spills, and increased vehicular use.
Precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study
area. NCDOT Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be
strictly followed during construction of this project.
NCDOT will strictly adhere to "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds"
(15A NCAC 04B .0024) (HQW standards) throughout design and construction of this
project. A hazardous spill catch basin will be required for the proposed Dan River
crossing.
3. Wetlands (Waters of the U.S.)
Any action that proposes to place dredged or fill materials into "Waters of the
United States" falls under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers, and must
follow the statutory provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
One wetland is present within the project area and is located between the
agricultural field and the mixed hardwood forest on the southeastern side of the project
(see Figure 4). The wetland can be described as palustrine scrub-shrub deciduous
saturated.
The Two-lane bridge alternative will affect approximately 0.12 hectares (0.3 acre)
of wetlands while the Four-lane Bridge Alternative will affect approximately 0.19
hectares (0.46 acre) of wetlands.
A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (23) is likely to be applicable
for project impacts to Waters of the United States. A North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Section 401 Water Quality General Certification is required prior to issuance of
the nationwide permit.
Compensatory mitigation is not usually required with a Nationwide Permit
Number 23, however the final decision regarding compensatory mitigation will be made
by the Corps of Engineers.
4. Bridge Demolition
The superstructure of Bridge Number 45 is composed of a reinforced concrete
deck, with the span over the Dan River supported by a concrete arch which completely
spans the river. The removal of Bridge Number 45 will result in 470 cubic yards of
temporary fill. Removal of the reinforced concrete piers on either side of the river will
result in disturbance at the river's edge but is not expected to result in temporary fill.
15
Explosives may be required to safely remove the arch span. Any use of
explosives will be coordinated with the US Army Corps of Engineers, the NC Division of
Water Quality, and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
The use of turbidity curtains will be studied during development of erosion
control plans for the project and curtains will be utilized if it is determined they will be
effective in the conditions found in the Dan River.
5. Rare and Protected Species
a. Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of
June 16, 2000, the US Fish and Wildlife Service lists one federally-protected species for
Rockingham County, the smooth coneflower.
Echinacea laevigata (smooth coneflower) Endangered
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Smooth. coneflower is a perennial herb that grows from simple or branched
rhizomes. Habitat for the smooth coneflower is found in areas of meadows, open
woodlands, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides, power line rights-of-way, clearcuts, and dry
limestone bluffs. Suitable habitat for smooth coneflower is present within the road
shoulder portions of the project study area and within the sewer easement. A plant by plant
survey for smooth coneflower was conducted on June 10, 1999 by NCDOT biologists. No
specimens were found during the survey. A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program
database of rare species and unique habitats revealed that no known occurrences of smooth
coneflower occur within 1.6 kilometers (1 mile) of the project study area. Therefore,
project construction will not affect smooth coneflower.
Recently, examples of either the James or Tar River spinymussel were found in the
Dan River in Stokes County. The exact species of spinymussel found has not yet been
determined, however, both the James and Tar River spinymussels are listed as endangered
by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Because of the possibility of endangered mussels
being affected by this project, NCDOT contracted with the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission to conduct mussel surveys for this project. No protected mussels were found.
Therefore, it is anticipated project construction will not affect any federally-protected
mussels.
16
b. Federal Species of Concern/State Protected Species
There is one Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed for Rockingham County,
Heller's trefoil (Lotus helleri). Organisms listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Significantly Rare (SR) or Special Concern (SC) by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) list of rare species and unique habitats are afforded state protection
under the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and
Conservation Act of 1979.
Heller's trefoil is listed as a "Candidate" species for North Carolina. Habitat is
present in the project area for Heller's trefoil. A survey for this species was not
conducted during the site visit, nor was the species observed. A review of the NCNHP
database of rare species and unique habitats revealed no records of North Carolina rare
and/or protected species in or near the project study area.
D. Relocation of Residences and Businesses
The project will not require the relocation of any residences or businesses.
E. Minority/Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 requires that each federal agency, to the greatest extent
allowed by law, administer and implement its programs, policies, and activities that affect
human health or the environment so as to identify and avoid "disproportionately high and
adverse" effects on minority and low-income populations.
A citizens informational workshop was held for the project on September 21,
2000. This workshop was advertised in local newspapers. Newsletters announcing the
workshop were mailed to property owners along the project. Through this public
involvement program, citizens have been kept informed of the proposed project. No
concerns have been raised related to mint ity or low-income populations.
Based on project studies and coordination undertaken with regard to affected
communities, the proposed project has been implemented in accordance with Executive
Order 12898.
F. Land Use and Farmland
Land in the project. area falls within the zoning jurisdiction of the City of Eden.
North of the river, a large industrial plant (Karastan Rug) is located east of SR 2282 and
homes are located on the west side of SR 2282. Land surrounding the project south of
the Dan River is wooded with an agricultural field located east of SR 2282.
17
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their
representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on
prime and important farmland soils. North Carolina Executive Order Number 96 requires
all state agencies to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on
prime farmland soils, as designated by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). These
soils are determined by the SCS based on criteria such as crop yield and level of input of
economic resources. Land which is planned or zoned for urban development is not
subject to the same level of preservation afforded other rural, agricultural areas.
Land surrounding the project north of the Dan River is in an urbanized area.
Although some of the land south of the river is currently farmed, this land is within the
extra-territorial jurisdiction of Eden and is currently zoned RS (Residential Suburban).
While there is farmland adjacent to the existing bridge, potential impacts or conversion of
farmland should be minimal as the areas involved are adjacent to the road and are small
strips of land. Any conversion of farmland should be very small and would not disrupt
any farming operations.
G. Flood Hazard Evaluation
Rockingham County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular
Program. The proposed project is located in a designated flood hazard area. The proposed
bridge will not have any adverse impact on the existing floodplain. The 100-year
floodplain in the project area is shown on Figure 4.
H. Traffic Noise and Air Quali
This project is not expected to have an effect on traffic noise levels. The project
will relocate SR 2282 slightly to the east, however, the only receptor east of SR 2282
north of the Dan River is an industrial plant. No receptors exist east of SR 2282 within
the project limits south of the river. Temporary noise increases may occur during
construction, but construction noise will be temporary in nature and generally limited to
daylight hours.
This project involves the replacement of a two-lane bridge with a new two-lane
bridge and will not result in an increase in the traffic carrying capacity of SR 2282. This
is an air quality "neutral" project, it is not required to be included in the regional
emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required.
I. Hazardous Materials
No properties containing underground storage tanks or likely to contain hazardous
materials will be affected by the project.
18
VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A citizens informational workshop was held for this project on September 21,
2000 in the Community Room at Eden City Hall. Approximately 22 citizens attended the
meeting.
All in attendance at the workshop spoke in favor of replacing the existing bridge.
Some asked if the reverse curve south of the bridge could be straightened as a part of the
project, and if constructing the new bridge to the west had been considered as an
alternative. It was explained that straightening the curve is beyond the scope of this
bridge replacement project. A separate project would have to be programmed (funded) to.
straighten the curve. Constructing the new bridge to the west would increase the cost and
impacts of the project.
Some interest was expressed in preserving the existing bridge for pedestrian use.
NCDOT staff explained that to do so would require local government or an organization
to assume liability and maintenance for the bridge. Given the size and condition of the
existing bridge, maintenance would be expensive.
One citizen stated he represented a non-profit organization which would be
willing to assume maintenance and liability for the existing bridge. However, this group
is not yet organized. NCDOT staff asked the group to submit a formal request regarding
the existing bridge. NCDOT has not received a written request from this organization.
Representatives of the Eden Historic Preservation Commission attended the workshop.
The Commission has written NCDOT asking that a special rail and lights be provided on. the
new bridge. Because of this special request, the concrete portion of the proposed two-bar
metal rail will be designed with inset panels similar to the rail on the existing bridge.
NCDOT will provide decorative light posts and fixtures on the proposed bridge. The City of
Eden will maintain the light posts and fixtures and pay utility bills for the lights.
Comments have been requested from the agencies listed below. An asterisk (*)
denotes agencies from which written comments have been received. Comments are
included in Appendix C.
*Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
U.S. Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
(Wilmington District)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Raleigh
U.S. Geological Survey - Raleigh
N.C. Department of Administration - State Clearinghouse
*N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
*N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
19
VII. BASIS FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Based on the studies performed for the proposed project, it is concluded the
project will not result in significant social, economic, or environmental impacts, and the
categorical exclusion classification, as defined in 40 CFR 1508.4 and 23 CFR 771.117, is
appropriate.
20
MILES
O I 2
1
0 I 2 3
KILOMETERS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 45 ON SR 2282
OVER DAN RIVER
B-3368
FIGURE I
fi' r ,?v 0 54 •?
< t
a k ,?}
rt ?,? 4 a
MATCNLINE x
.
e v
r'
RW?
iy Y
y
}
DAN
z
w.
Lil
Ell
4C
Cl)
J 1
r?
C%j
K<
ta '-z
_ f #
?`65s ? ` ? ?i R e`t; ?' SP +.vww. 'r+?x?.wsaw_da?wt .raww+ .:=R
+ ..
wit. - ?,r '' c yy s 3 41' J
W
u
7
.+ i z r
r s
?`_4 f < S j t a Cdr `s O? if1 '
e ¢ tai C"' Cl
tom. s i' Lit r? t U.l
C) 0 0 z
??, #? yam, ?` `:•' _ ,?.`+'r,? Lf.. L?. : `?,
00
?0
M
M
l_m
u
LLI
O
M
CL
CL
I--
W
z 0
O o
V co
W
N 0
J W
Q N
V O0
CL O
CL
W
°o
N
0 T
O F-
w X.
W
D
N
Q
z tD M
0 0
v m W

LLI

W Q

D
J
V u.i
p
N -
^
?a„ 0
O CO U.
F- C z
o
W
? A LL
O
0
e
u
t
7
L
J
1
0
TIP PROJECT B-3368
TYPICAL SECTION
ON PROPOSED BRIDGE
r
NO SCALE
BRIDGE RAIL AS SHOWN ON THIS FIGURE IS
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY AND
DOES NOT EXACTLY MATCH PROPOSED RAIL.
FIGURE 313
/ I! \ 1 J '1l 1?? ? i
- i
Clx
1
1 \ .e.
J \
° w Jam/ f yr k} 1 ?i ` }' \ / 1 V, ?. II t
'* .€d ree3te, \ J j 2H2 ..1 e t
MAI
{`It „9 ,?. r , ? !?? " ? 4i ,i ? l: ° /': J r ? l /'- J ??.J [? J r i•' i, ' /t?t)1 .? i
Alt.
6 00'
r ? • .. iitl 1 ? p, ?,
tdoo '?1 k
'_/ 1 i ( a•• 1 ^Q p;_, r, •.'?% ? y?3 ?,?+ f.. ;-G'.? ; r^ ?\\; 1, ? ?! ri 7tir G'O.ti. \.?. ,? $y? ..
'? \'`?' ?.. r° a -? f:!/ .?': t' Fir a"?? f••1 J O ??'?-'I, i5`
`I:. Y h,. '' .9 ir'? ?_ f / V •'1? ? Y _~` •.' ? J,f' -' f / ,??\-?'?' y7 ,•? ° ` '. I r3 ? - / ?' ?, ,
`l l?-?r ° rR ° ? ? ?n\U ` t..?? '. ?? c.( ?v \' '•-? ?? ,'-' + -. o ? ?5 ? ` 1 yam/'/ -
r ,r`QU Y .c ?" v C ?1,J?
; t?'•?... ?'?:`- ,l ?,. j V3 /? .. i c>' fit.., C;_
R 5J*
x
?..':!" -.fir - ??,- f?? 11 f"J •.\''+ \ ? .(r° • {`t1 t •`.lt.,?? _ ! l? ? r'i /r--•nJ',1.????;-!-?.. `\
73
J
(.mot- q /
/?, i ?l is k? ('? "l p r r' °j?; ? i ? ? ?', .. \ i r ! ?) > ?%i?r??'1 .a ??' ti-• i i
Fl? 1,
?o? ?•i--.__-? t + r` t ! 'r. ?? - ` _ : 1- '.'S ?_',??'+? i--??J?-h.?. iL-.. ?e^.-?'•"'?' i rt`' ?.. ?V t i
r i-?t.. /? ', '.fir-?,?,-,r-'4-=r _-"?{?4? /^i?\ 'a'te-ti ?° -? _ ? ? \r «??-. • ??\ t_ \ {i L-,l? 1 `. 1.,. _-..?.-.' r t
,r\1 ?ty: °? ?.. ??\,+ (/. / ?L. i ?' ??\ ?..?\.7? ` ? ??? ?_, ? ??l t ,ttl? ? t? ? ? ! O? / ? r__-- ? ,? 1\ ? ., /
? >? ? ? {. c? i-'•``,'.V{t y'"t' . ^ f ?"/>?l`y '7 / `7 c. f. \? ?-"?` ? E t i?U ? ?i_-/?f ?` ? ? , i rr
-, ? 1 ,??•?Z,? ? cx?cs ?--?, L;' ??•-/??L/'??.` ` ?( ?! `1 ?? ? ` ?'?? . ? ? rr_?, /? r-?? ? f ? ??1 rj
S : 1 ?L\` t :_'!. ? Sy r-,\ ?`?3?t.. •, v., .?' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
• ' t a`\ TRANSPORTATION ?t
r v ^? ?.` LEGEND DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .
1 ?`i rr-?L ?\ U \ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND r
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
Q WETLAND AREA V?
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ROCKRICHAN COUNTY lZ
REPLACE BRIDGE N0.45 ON SR 2282 '..?
v.?` !rte "far' J?,(?; tIr/ - \r` fix. !f ??
OVER THE DAN RIVER
????? ?--., -''•r ?_?\?,????- ?`?j?/ (`????\ ._?: - - '?? 8-3368 ••l_:•
SOUTHWEST EDEN QUADRANGLE 1:24000 FIGURE 4
r--4
APPENDIX A
PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS
THAT NECESSITATE THE USE OF HISTORIC BRIDGES
F. A. Project: BRSTP-87(10)
State Project: 8.1511601
TIP. No. B-3368
Description: Replacement of Bridge Number 45 on SR 2282 over the Dan River,
Rockingham County. Bridge Number 45 will be replaced with a new
two-lane structure to the east of the existing bridge. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
Yes No
1. Is the bridge to be replaced or ?
rehabilitated with Federal funds? X
2. Does the project require the use of
a historic bridge structure which is ?
on or eligible for listing on the x
National Register of Historic Places?
3. Is the bridge a National Historic
Landmark? F-1 X
4. Has agreement been reached among the
FHWA, the State Historic Preservation ?
Officer (SHPO), and the Advisory Council X
on Historic Preservation (ACHP) through
procedures pursuant to Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)?
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE
AND PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and found
not to be feasible and prudent:
Do nothing
Does the "do nothing" alternative:
(a) correct the problem situation that
caused the bridge to be considered
deficient?
(b) pose serious and unacceptable safety
hazards?
Yes No
X F-1
?x
x?
A-1
Yes No
2. Build a new structure at a different
location without a ectin the historic X ?
integrity o the structure.
(a) The following reasons were reviewed:
(circle, as appropriate)
(i) The present bridge has already
been located at the only feasible .
and prudent site
and/or (ii) Adverse social, environmental,
or economic impacts were noted
and/or (iii) Cost and engineering difficulties
reach extraordinary magnitude
and/or (iv) The existing bridge cannot be
preserved due to the extent of
rehabilitation, because no
responsible party will maintain
and preserve the historic bridge,
or the permitting authority
requires removal or demolition.
3. Rehabilitate the historic bridge without
affecting a storic integrity o the X F-I
structure.
(a) The following reasons were reviewed:
(circle, as appropriate)
Q (i) a bridge is so structurally
deficient that it cannot be
rehabilitated to meet the
acceptable load requirements
and meet National Register
criteria
and/o (ii) The bridge is seriously
deficient geometrically and
cannot be widened to meet the
required capacity and meet
National Register criteria
A-2
MINIMIZATION OF HARM
Yes No
The project includes all possible planning x F-I
to minimize harm.
2. Measures to minimize harm include the
following: (circle, as appropriate)
a. For bridges that are to be
rehabilitated, the historic
integrity of the bridge is preserved
to the greatest extent possible,
consistent with unavoidable transportation
needs, safety, and load requirements.
b. For bridges that are to be
rehabilitated to the point that the
historic integrity is affected or that
are to be removed or demolished, the
FHWA ensures that, in accordance with
the Historic American Engineering
Record (HAER) standards, or other
suitable means developed through
consultation, fully adequate records
are made of the bridge.
c. For bridges that are to be replaced,
the existing bridge is made available
for an alternative use, provided a
responsible party agrees to maintain
and preserve the bridge.
OFor bridges that are adversely affected,
agreement among the SHPO, ACHP, and
FHWA is reached through the Section
106 process of the NHPA on measures
to minimize harm and those measures
are incorporated into the project.
A-3
3. Specific measures to minimize harm are
discussed below:
The State Historic Preservation Office, the Federal Highway Administration and the
North Carolina Department of Transportation have signed a Memorandum of Agreement
stipulating the following:
Prior to the demolition of Bridge No. 45, NCDOT shall record the existing
conditions of the bridge and its surroundings in accordance with a Historic
Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan. The written and photographic
documentation will be deposited with the North Carolina Division of Archives
and History/SHPO to be made part of the permanent statewide survey and
iconographic collection.
NCDOT will provide light posts and light fixtures on the new structure along the
length of the bridge rails. The City of Eden will assume responsibility for
maintaining the light fixtures and posts and for utility bills associated with the
lights. Once NCDOT completes the preliminary general drawings for the
structure that use a one-sided paneled bridge rail, then NCDOT shall consult with
the North Carolina SHPO and the Eden Preservation Commission and allow each
an opportunity to comment on the preliminary general structure plans.
Note: Any response in a box requires additional information prior to approval. Consult
Nationwide 4(f) evaluation.
A-4
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
a. State Historic Preservation Officer (see Appendix B)
b. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (see Appendix B)
c. Local/State/Federal Agencies (see Appendix B)
d. US Coast Guard (N/A)
(for bridges requiring bridge permits)
SUMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on
July 5, 1983.
All required alternatives have been evaluated and the findings made are clearly applicable
to this project.
There are no feasible and prudent alternatives to the use of the historic bridge. The
project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and there are assurances that the
measures to minimize harm will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed.
Approved: /
Date Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT
? 2 29.-ov
Date ?of Division Administrator, FHWA
A-5
APPENDIX B
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
FOR
THE REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 45
ON SR 2282 OVER DAN RIVER,
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has determined that the
replacement of Bridge No. 45 on SR 2282 over the Dan River in Rockingharh County,
North Carolina (the undertaking) will have an effect upon Bridge No. 45, a structure
determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, and has
consulted with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to
36 CFR Part 800, regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f); and
WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) participated in
the consultation and have been invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agreement;
WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Eden and the Eden Preservation Commission
have participated in the consultation and have been invited to concur in this
Memorandum of Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, FHWA and the North Carolina SHPO agree that the undertaking
shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take in to
account the effect of the undertaking on the historic property.
STIPULATIONS
FHWA will ensure that the following measures are carried out:
1. Recordation: Prior to the demolition of Bridge No. 45, NCDOT shall record the
existing conditions of the bridge and its surroundings in accordance with a
Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan {Appendix A}. The written
and photographic documentation will be deposited with the North Carolina
Division of Archives and History/SHPO to be made part of the permanent
statewide survey and iconographic collection.
II. Replacement Bridge Design: NCDOT will provide light posts and light fixtures
on the new structure along the length of the bridge rails. The City of Eden will
assume responsibility for maintaining the light fixtures and posts and for utility
bills associated with the lights. Once NCDOT completes the preliminary general
drawings for the structure that use a one-sided paneled bridge rail, then NCDOT
shall consult with the North Carolina SHPO and the Eden Preservation
Commission and allow each an opportunity to comment on the preliminary
general structure plans
III. Dispute Resolution: Should the North Carolina SHPO object within thirty (30)
days to any plans or documentation provided for review pursuant to this
agreement, FHWA shall consult with the North Carolina SHPO to resolve the
objection. If FHWA or the North Carolina SHPO determines that the objection
cannot be resolved, FHWA shall forward all documentation relevant to the
dispute to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Council). Within thirty
(30) days after receipt of all pertinent documentation, the Council will either:
A. Provide FHWA with recommendations which FHWA will take into
account in reaching a final decision regarding the dispute, or
B. Notify FHWA that it will comment pursuant to 36 CFR Section
800.7(c)) and proceed to comment. Any Council comment provided in
response to such a request will be taken into account by FHWA in
accordance with 36 CFR Section 800.7(c)(4) with reference to the subject
of the dispute.
Any recommendation or comment provided by the Council will be understood to
pertain only to the subject of the dispute; FHWA's responsibility to carry out all
the actions under this agreement that are not the subject of the dispute will remain
unchanged.
DEC-2-31-00 10:49 PM CITY.OF.EDEN
910 62Z 5952 P.02
Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by FHWA and the North Carolina SHPO,
its subsequent filing with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and
implementation of its terms evidence that.FNWA has afforded the Council an opportunity
to Comment on the replacement of Bridgc No. 45 on SR 2282 aver the Dan River and its
effects on Bridge No.45, and that FIIWA has taken into account the effects of the
undertaking on the historic property.
AGREE:
-1 ---- ? ?- Z4
FEDERAL 16

HWAY ADMINISTRATION

1'H CAROI.TNA STATE HISTORIC
CONCUR:
G
crry
VA
fNA EPARTMLNT OF TRANSPORTATION
f?
Z'Z `I-() C)
DATE
DATE
C!/o
1212-9100
D TE
DAIE
" Ll)z
PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FILED BY:
DATE
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRF•SF.RVATION
APPENDIX A
Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
For the Replacement of Bridge No. 45 on SR 2282
Over the Dan River
Rockingham County, North Carolina
TIP No. B-3368, State Project No. 8.1511601
Federal Aid No. BRSTP-87(10)
Landscape
Site plan sketch of the existing conditions of Bridge No. 45.
Photographic Requirements
Selected photographic views of Bridge No. 45 as a whole, and views of the
structure and its setting, including:
? Overall views of the structure (elevations and oblique views)
? Overall views of the project area, showing the relationship of the structure to
its setting
Photographic Format .
? Color slides (all views)
? 35 mm or larger black and white negatives (all views)
? Two (2) sets of the black and white contact sheets (all views)
? All processing to be done to archival standards
? All photographs and negatives to be labeled according to Division of Archives
and History standards
Copies and Curation
One (1) set of all photographic documentation will be deposited with the North
Carolina Division of Archives and History/State Historic Preservation Office to
be made a permanent part of the statewide survey and iconographic collection.
One (1) copy of the black and white contact sheets will be placed in NCDOT's
files for the project in the Historic Architecture Section of the Project
Development & Environmental Analysis Branch.
APPENDIX C
COMMENTS RECEIVED

Advisory
Council On
Historic
Preservation
??v U
f7ti^?r1 hh 7,107-
-,!:p is 2000
The Old Post Office Building =-
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, #809
Washington, DC 20004 .. _ _ i
SEP 13 2000
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bam Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27601 _
REF: Proposed Replacement of Dan River Bridge No. 45 T -..
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Graf:
L-. _.sGL.?._
On August 28, 2000, we received your notification and supporting documentation regarding the adverse
effects of the proposed undertaking on this property which is eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places. Based upon the information you provided, we have concluded that Appendix A, Criteria
for Council Involvement in Reviewing Individual Section 106 Cases, of our regulations, "Protection of
Historic Properties" (36 CFR Part 800) does not apply to this undertaking. Accordingly, we do not believe
that our participation in the consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(b)(iv), you will need to file the final Memorandum of Agreement (MOA),
developed in consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and related
documentation at the conclusion of the consultation process. The filing of this MOA with the Council is
required in order for the Federal Highway Administration to complete its compliance responsibilities under
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. We will retain a copy of the MOA for our files as
requirements of the completion of the Section 106 process.

If you have any questions or require the further assistance of the Council, please contact Ralston Cox at
202-606-8505 or via entail at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Don L. Klima
Director
Office of Planning and Review
C-1
Federal Ahl 4 BRSTP-87(10) TIP # B-3368 County: Rockingham
CONCURRENCE FOWM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bridge No 45 on NC 87 over the Dan River
On June 1, 2000, representatives of the
® North Carolina Department of Transportation
Z (NCDOT)
4 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
reviewed the subject project and agreed
there are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
F1 there are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
? there is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
there is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
?Pprot's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the reverse.
Signed:

FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency

Mate Historic Preservation Officer
Uate
Date
Date
c
Date
C-3
Federal.-lid n BRSTP-87(10) TIP # B-3368 County: Itockin!ham
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).

Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
5 D ?- C i,?,? ?,ItS ( 2 C
T5 r "!1e, I)o. W E
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).

Initialed: NCDOT N- FHWA
SHPO
C-4
„STAif
L D,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
James B. Hunt Jr.. Governor Division of Archives and History'
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
February 7, 2000
J
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Replace Bridge No. 45 over SR 2282, over Dan River, TIP No. B-3368, Rockingham
County, ER 00-8238
Dear Mr. Graf.
Thank you for your letter of November 30, 1999, transmitting the survey report by Mary Pope Furr
concerning the above project.
For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that
the following eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under the criterion cited:
Bridge No. 45 is eligible for the National Register under Criterion C for Design/Construction as
one of twenty-six (26) remaining concrete arch bridges in the state.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.

Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:scb
cc: B. Church
W. Gilmore
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 50' N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Seri ice Center. Rulei:_h NC 2'699-4617 [phone] 73 3 3653
671
ARCHAF.OLOGN 42I N. Rlount St-. Raleigh NC 4610 :Mai! Scniet Center. Raleigh NC 27690-461a
- [phone] 71
7 11 3--
3
18(11
RESTOR.'rI0N 31? N. Mount St.. Raleigh NC' 6110-4oI3
4o:3 Mail Srnirc Denier. Ralct_h N( ' (911) 733-634 --
4?U1
SURVEN & PLANNING 515 N. Mount ti(,. Raleigh NC 4015 Mail Service ('enter. Raleigh NC "099-4618 (919) 733-6.545 71 5
C-5
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
C-6
FT ?Z
°3 `Ce. 4
?Z
Nn
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
IF Betty Ray Hp f'2971%98
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Bridge 45 on NC 87 over Dan River, Eden,
Rockingham County, B-3368, Federal Aid Project
BRSTP-87(10), State Project 8.151 1601, ER 98-
8597
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director

T APR 3 0 1998
DIVJTOI?CF
We regret staff was unable to attend the scoping meeting for the above project on
March 26, 1998. However, Debbie Bevin met with Bill Goodwin of the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) on April 15, 1998, to discuss the
project and view the project photographs and aerial.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, Bridge 45 was built in 1922 and should
be evaluated for National Register eligibility. We recommend that no additional
historic architectural survey be conducted for this project.
Prehistoric archaeological site 31 RK98 is located in the field south of the Dan River
and east of NC 87 and may be affected by the proposed bridge replacement. The
site was recorded in 1987 by Pete Adkins who reported that the owner said human
burials washed out of the site during the 1972 flood. Pottery, mussel shell, and
projectile points have also been reported.
We recommend that an archaeological survey of the area of potential effect be
conducted and site 31 RK98 be relocated and the boundaries determined. If the site
will be affected, sufficient investigation should be done to determine National
Register eligibility.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
C-7
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 g
Nicholas L. Graf
4/28/98, Page 2
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
?/Dav rook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: H. F. Vick
B. Church
T. Padgett
1

C-8
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
NCDENR
March 23, 1998
JAMES B. HUNTJR..
GOVERNOR
MFMORANDU_M
WAYNEMCDEVITT..
-SECRETARY ,
TO: Bill Goodwin, Project Engineer
DOT, Planning and Environmental
DR. PHILIP K:.MCKNELLY-
DIRECTOR
FROM: Stephen Hall
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets -- Replace Bridge No. 45, NC 87,
Rockingham County
REFERENCE: TIP B-3368
The Natural Heritage Program database contains records for two species of rare fish
from sites in the Dan River close to the proposed bridge replacement: the riverweed
darter (Etheostoma podostemone) and the bigeye jumprock (Scartomyzon ariommus),
_ both state listed as Special Concern.
In order to avoid impacts associated with sedimentation, all Best Management Practices
the control of erosion and sedimentation should be followed. Since these species
f
or
are also vulnerable to concrete toxicity, we further recommend that all concrete used
- = in this project be fully cured before it comes into contact with the water.

In order to ensure compliance with these recommendations, all contractors working on
* = this project should be clearly informed in writing of the need to follow these practices.
}= All work should be monitored on a frequent basis.

/sph

T Alc

P.O. Box 27687, RALEIGH INC 2761 1-7687 PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
;? ??
L AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
y F