20161268 Ver 2_Corbett Tract field book observations_20200122

Corbett Tract
Attendees: Brad Shaver, Mickey Sugg, Scott McLendon, Mason Herndon, and Joanne Steenhuis
1/14/2020 Field Observations:
DP 1 - splotchy surface (pockets/areas of uncoated grains)
- Organic stripping
- Remains a mucky modifier surface with sample wet
- No saturation within 34”
DP 2 – soil resembles coffee grounds
- Less splotchy soil
- MU soil unit
- No saturation within 27” of surface
Ditch 2 – total ditch depth over 3.5 ‘
- Water at 8” which is about 1” above OHWM
Ditch 3 – 3’ deep ditch
- Water depth 1”
- OHWM in the bottom of the ditch
DP 3 – MU soil Unit
- Similar in nature to DP 2
- Remains mucky mineral with soil wet possibly S7
- Free water at 33”
DP 4 – mucky mineral surface
- Water at 3’
DP 5 – thinner A horizon as previous sample
- MU soil unit
- Much more uncoated sand grains
- Water at 29”
DP 6 – some uncoated grains
- 32” to water table
- bedded
Ditch 5 – 28” deep
- bedded
- water depth 3” today
- OHWM approximately 25”

DP 7 – bedded
- Much more uncoated as compared to dp6
- Very thin layer of mucky mineral
- No muck
DP 8 – bedded
- Some uncoated grains
- 24” to water table
- Water table appears to be positioned on top of clay lens
- Sample taken in middle of bed
Ditch 6 – 27” deep
- Water table at 6”
- OHWM around 5”
DP 9 – bedded
- Sample taken in middle of bed
- No organic
- No water within 38”
DP 10 – bedded
- Appears to meet a hydric soil indicator
- Water at 17”
- Sample taken mid bed
- Adjacent ditch around 1’ deep
Ditch 7 – 24” deep
- Water depth at 5”
- 5-6” OHWM
DP 11 – no water within 24”
- Less aggressively bedded as compared to previous sites
- Possibly mucky modifier in surface sands
Ditch 8 – 32” depth of ditch
- 2” water surface
- No apparent OHWM in bottom of ditch
Ditch 9 – right on break of having an OHWM or not
Ditch 10 – ditch depth around 30”
- No OHWM present
- Non jurisdictional