20201032 Ver 1_401 Application_20200809

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201032
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Tarheel Landing
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/9/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Hannah Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C,NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.41894
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.54689
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
U
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F- Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
R Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
James & Nancy Levinson
2b. Deed book and page no.:
04224,0395
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
PO Box 117
Address Line 2
city
Benson
Postal / Zip Code
27504
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rovince / legion
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)

4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Road
Address Line 2
City
Selma
Postal / Zip Code
27576
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent letter signed.pdf
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
26.53KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Benson
2 Pro Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
163000-57-0639
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address tine 2
City
Rstal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Hannah Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C, NS W
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located iri
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011301
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
43.48
State / Province / legion
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Approximately 41 acre rural farm tract with appropmately 20 acres of cleared land and approbmately 16 acres of unimproved woodland. The cleared land is used for conventional row
crops. The vicinity land use is mostly farm land and woodland. A fewsingle family subdivisions are being built in the general area changing the mostly rural area to a more populated
setting.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes IT No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Quad.pdf 308.91 KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
soil map.pdf 265.48KB

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
10.2 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
-2010feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose it to construct a 29 lot subdivision of single family homes. Each lot will be individually owned by the homeowner.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The 29 lot subdivision will be constructed on the cleared crop land so there should be no clearing of trees. Each individual lot will be used to provide onsite septic for each individual
home. The water will be supplied by the County and electricity from the power company. These utility lines will be installed to run down the constructed streets. The streets will be
graded by bull dozier and motor grader. The streets will then be stoned and asphalted. Drainage will be provided by street ditches draining to drainage easements located on the lot
lines. There will be a small wetland impact (0.04 acre) due to a necessary street crossing. This is the only impact to wetlands and there are no stream or Neuse buffer impacts. There
should be no indirect impacts to the environment by this project. Only lot 2 has wetlands on it. This wetland amount is very small very and located at the back of the lot so it should not
be affected by house construction or on site septic. The wetlands will be shown on the final plot map and language added not to impact the wetlands Without proper permits. This project
has no plans for expansion.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Tarheel Landing for 404 (1).pdf 1.42MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
Neuse buffer determination by Rick Trone 11-13-19. (attached)
51b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
State Neuse Buffer Letter.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
1.25 MB
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands r Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
!a. Site #* (?) 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition * M area*
_11
m�1�C.lvrt ��P Small -Basin W.tIand and B Both 0.040
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.040
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.040
2h. Comments:

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
As stated, the only impact is 0.04 acre to Wetland B. The design tried to cross the wetland at a narrow section. The engineer stated the ditch slopes
have been steepened and the street shoulders narrowed to lessen the wetland impact.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Care will be taken not to work in wet weather conditions and when rain is immanent. Sediment control to protect the wetland Will be installed prior to
construction impact. Care will be taken to only impact the permitted area and construction disturbance will be reduced as much as practical. The
disturbed area will be immediately stabilized with a temporary ground cover.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
u
Impact to wetland is 0.04 acre, there is no stream impact.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) v
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Not adjacent to Neuse Buffers
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is not a phased project. This is a small subdivision which should not generate any additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)

5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-87
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
t^ Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
f Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage
IPaC-US Fish Wildlife
1) Red -cockaded Woodpecker -The red -cockaded woodpecker makes its home in mature pine forests. There does not appear to be any old growth
pines on the property and there will be no construction in the woods. 2) %use River Waterdog-The %use River Waterdog is found in fast flowing
clean streams, there will be no construction or impact of any streams on this project. 3) Carolina Madtorrm The Carolina Madtom prefers clear flowing
water from 1-3 feet deep. There will be no impact to streams on this project. 4) Yellow Lance -The Yellow Lance prefers clean streams, there will be no
impact to strrams on this project.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NC Natural Heritage Program_ Payment_ Receipt.pdf 69.14KB
IPaC_ E)plore Location.pdf 366.55KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
None in Johnston County
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO website above.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO.pdf 274.59KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA link above
Miscellaneous
Comments
I finished the preliminary JD paperwork in February. The reason I did not turn in the preliminary JD request then was because the owner changed engineers and did not return the
signed agent authorization until August 6 to be submitted with the PCN. Thanks
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Tarheel Road JD package.pdf 2.55MB
r
Signature

R By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
Date
8/9/2020

August 5, 2020
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Tarheel Landing S/D, Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described NC Pin 163000-57-0779 for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899. Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. or their subcontractors has my
permission to act as my agent on this property concerning wetlands, streams and stream buffers.
James R. Levinson Date

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information
System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National
Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural
Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for
Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed August, 2019.
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS
User Community
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Scale: 1:4932 - 1 in. = 410.99 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
August 7, 2020
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
8/9/2020 NC Natural Heritage Program: Payment: Receipt
https://checkout.globalgatewaye4.firstdata.com/payment/final_receipt?merchant=WSP-DENR-dmVxoQCxcw&servdt5=2 1/2
Print This Page
NC Natural Heritage Program
Your Order
Quantity Item Unit Price
1 Id: NCNHDE-12642 Title: Tarheel Landing Project Type:
Development/Redevelopment, Residential $100.00 USD 100.00
Total USD 100.00
This order is now complete. Transaction approved!
Here is your receipt:
========== TRANSACTION RECORD ==========
NC NATURAL HERITAGE PROG
121 W JONES ST
RALEIGH, NC 27699
United States
WWW.NCNHP.ORG

TYPE: Pre-Authorization

ACCT: Visa $ 100.00 USD

CARDHOLDER NAME : Wyatt Brown
CARD NUMBER : ############2833
DATE/TIME : 09 Aug 20 16:18:15
REFERENCE # : 001 0097636 M
AUTHOR. # : 81618G
TRANS. REF. : 538

Approved - Thank You 100

Please retain this copy for your records.

Cardholder will pay above amount to
card issuer pursuant to cardholder
agreement.
========================================
8/9/2020 NC Natural Heritage Program: Payment: Receipt
https://checkout.globalgatewaye4.firstdata.com/payment/final_receipt?merchant=WSP-DENR-dmVxoQCxcw&servdt5=2 2/2
Secure Payment provided by First Data Corp.
NC Natural Heritage Program
WOODSLINE (TYP.)WOOD
S
L
I
N
E

(
T
Y
P
.
)
WOO
DSLI
N
E (T
Y
P.)
WOO
DSLI
N
E (T
Y
P.)WOODSLINE (TYP.)EXIST. 15" RCP
INV IN ~ 253.1
INV OUT ~ 25
2
.
5
R/W
R/W
EP
EP TARHEEL R
O
A
D - SR 116860' PUBLI
C R/
W - P
A
VE
D
TARHEEL R
O
A
D

-

S
R

1
1
6
8
60' PUBLIC

R
/
W

-

P
A
V
E
D
EXIST.

1
5
"

C
P
P
INV IN
~

2
6
3
.
1
INV OU
T

~

2
6
2
.
6
EXIST. 15" RCP
INV IN ~ 246.2
INV OUT ~ 262
.
1
EXIST.
1
5
"

C
P
P
INV IN

~

2
6
2
.
5
INV OU
T

~

2
6
2
.
1
EXIST. 18" RCP
INV IN ~ 256.2
INV OUT ~ 255
.
5
EXIST. 15" RCP
INV IN ~ 248.8
INV OUT ~ 247
.
2
EXIST. 30" RCP
INV IN ~ 246.2
INV OUT ~ 24
4
.
9
WV
WV
(wtr)
(wtr)
(wtr)
(wtr)
(wtr)(wtr)
(wtr)
(wtr)(wtr)
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
WETLANDS 4' WOOD FENCEPP
PP
PP
PP W
/
GUY
PP
PP
R
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
0
SCALE: 1" =
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
100'100'
100'
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"=1,000'
20'10'x70'
SITE TRIANGLER/W2
5
'

R
R/W
ROADWAY 30' RPROPOSED ROAD SECTION DETAIL
TYPICAL DETAIL
PROPOSED 50' R/W
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
FOR PROPOSED 20' ROAD PROP.
(R/W)
25'-0" (TYP.)CL 25'-0" (TYP.)
10'-0"
CROWN 1/4" PER FT.
10'-0"6'-0"
SHOULDER
1" PER FT.
3:1 3:1
6'-0"1:18" ABC ON
COMPACTED GRADE
6"
1 1/2" S 9.5 A SUPERPAVE
ASPHALT MIX
PROP.
(R/W)
6'-0"
SHOULDER
1" PER FT.
3:13:1
6'-0"
INTERIOR INTERSECTION DETAIL
TARHEEL ROAD30' R10'x70'
SITE TRIANGLE
R/W
EXISTING ROADWAYR/W2
5
'

R
20'
50'
30'
6'6'
1" PER FT.
SECTION A-A
LC
SLOPE AS REQ'D.
48'
3:1 3:1
SYMMETRICAL CUL-DE-SAC
TYPICAL DETAIL
30'
SITE PLAN INFORMATION:
1.NAME:TARHEEL LANDING SUBDIVISION
2.STREET ADDRESS:TARHEEL ROAD
BENSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27504
3.P.I.N.:164400-71-0058
4.LAND USE (EXISTING/PROPOSED):SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
5.TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS:29
6.TOTAL AREA:41.20 ACRES
7.CURRENT ZONING:AR
8.BUILDING SETBACKS:STREET - 30 FT.
SIDE (STREET) - 20 FT.
SIDE (INTERIOR) - 10'
SIDE (TOTAL) - 10'
REAR - 25 FT.
9.IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA:
MAX IMPERVIOUS 6.18 ACRES (15%)
STREETS 1.51 ACRES
MAX IMPERVIOUS PER LOT 7,014 SF
10.INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY:NO (PER FEMA MAP #3720162000K)
EFFECTIVE DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2006
11.WATERSHED DRAINAGE AREA:UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO HANNAH CREEK (C, NSW)
NOT IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA
12.DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY:50' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
CONNECTION DETAIL
8'-0"6'-0"VARIABLE
PAVEMENT
WIDTH
SHOULDER
WIDTH
5'-0"
1/4" / FT.- 1/4" / FT.+1" / FT.
+2" / FT
.
+3" /
F
T.
5'-0"
- 1" / FT.
-2 1/
4
"

/

F
T
.
-3" /

F
T
.
DRIVEWAY TURNOUT GRADES
TYPICAL DETAIL
SITE
TARHEEL
R
O
A
D

(
S
R
1
1
6
8
)
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW
PURPOSES ONLY
OF 9 SHEETS
THIS ORIGINAL SHEET IS 24"X36", OTHER DIMENSIONS
INDICATE IT HAS BEEN ALTERED. ALL INFORMATION
REPRESENTED ON THIS SHEET IS THE PROPERTY OF
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,
THIS INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN PART
OR WHOLE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
FROM RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. 2019 ©
REVISIONS:DATE:
DATE:ISSUED FOR:
PROJECT NO.:
DRAWN BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL
041318
SEAL
C-3075
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. (C-3075)123 RALEIGH STREETFUQUAY-VARINA, NORTH CAROLINA 27526PHONE - [phone]PRELIMINARY
DRAWING
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 -
PERMITS 6/1/2020
20-009
CSB
CSBLW PROPERTIES, LLC.PO BOX 117BENSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27504TARHEEL LANDING SUBDIVISIONPRELIMINARY SITE PLANC3
1STREET "A" - (50' PUBLIC R/W)28,442 SF
2
35,497 SF 3
29,770 SF 4
26,658 SF
5
35,306 SF
6
28,694 SF
7
22,141 SF
8
22,988 SF
9
22,364 SF
10
27,525 SF
11
24,511 SF
12
23,978 SF
13
28,394 SF
14
24,040 SF
15
23,304 SF
16
23,027 SF
17
23,994 SF
18
33,610 SF
19
30,922 SF
20
41,282 SF
21
42,572 SF
23
44,410 SF
23
33,219 SF
24
33,658 SF
25
40,034 SF
26
39,004 SF
27
23,518 SF
28
23,865 SF
29
26,283 SF
OPEN SPACE 23,316 SFOPEN SPACE
28,576 SF
EXISTING
DITCH
RP WELLONS LAND
AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
DB 5418 PG 299
PIN# 163000-59-6248
MARIE WILLIFORD JOHNSON
DB 1155 PG 275
PIN# 16300-59-2037
RP WELLONS LAND
AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
DB 5249 PG 545
PIN# 163000-49-5061
DKYLE JON ZUZA
DB 5076 PG 416
PIN# 163000-58-1170
CHRIS ERIC JOHNSON &
CORIE ELIZABETH JOHNSON
DB 4790 PG 847
PIN# 163000-58-7730
GROVER DURANE LETT &
ROSHANDA MICHELLE LETT
DB 4943 PG 856
PIN# 163000-58-6359
DEAN B. BENSON &
GERALD L. BENSON
DB 5193 PG 182
PIN# 163000-67-2655
DAVID FRANK HALL &
TAMMY SUE HALL
DB 3051 PG 577
PIN# 163000-57-3867
VRGSPENCER, LLC.
&MYKA 10, LLC
DB 5398 PG 823
PIN# 163000-57-3988
OVERSIZE CULDESAC
(96' DIA. PAVEMENT SECTION)
PER TOWN FIRE STDS.
FOR ALL CULDESACS
DWIGHT & JEANETTE MAYO
DB 3414 PG 490
PIN# 163000-37-8198
COPPER CREEK HOA, INC.
DB 5591 PG 086
PIN# 163000-48-0216
DWIGHT & JEANETTE MAYO
DB 3414 PG 490
PIN# 163000-37-8198
JUDIE WHEELER LIFE ESTATE
DB 1499 PG 808
PIN# 163000-45-5420
JUDIE WHEELER LIFE ESTATE
DB 2880 PG 446
PIN# 163000-65-1574
DEAN & GERALD BENSON
DB 5193 PG 182
PIN# 163000-56-7999 A60
'
R
A48'R25'R
35'
R
25'R
ROW
50'
20'15'
ROW
50'
20'15'A60
'
R
A48'R35'R
WOODALL DAIRY
R
O
A
D

(
S
R
1
3
9
6
)
NC
2
4
2
CEMETERY
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
20' PERMANENT PUBL
I
C
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
20'
P
E
R
M
A
N
E
N
T

P
U
B
L
I
C
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T 20'
PERMANENT
PUBL
ICDRAINAGE
EASEMENT
240
245
250
255
260
265
240'
245'
250'
255'
260'
265'
-0+50 0+00253.00252.98253.621+00253.94254.26254.59254.912+00255.19255.40255.54255.603+00255.59255.50255.37255.244+00255.12254.99254.875+00
-2.08%
1.29%
-0.50%2.08%
PVI STA: 2+50.00
PVI ELEV: 255.87
K: 83.73
LVC: 150.00
BVCS: 1+75.00BVCE: 254.91EVCS: 3+25.00EVCE: 255.50HIGH PT. STA: 2+82.82
HIGH PT ELEV: 255.60 WWWWWWWW W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W DEED BOOK 5076, PAGE 416NC PIN # 163000-58-1170ZONING: RA (TOWN-ETJ)(wtr)(wtr)(wtr)WETLANDSPP0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+
0
0
4
+
6
3 4+005+00R
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
0
SCALE: 1" =
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
50'50'
50'
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1"=1,000'
BARNES LANDING DRIVE - PROFILE VIEW
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 50'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 5'
STREET "A" DRIVE - PLAN VIEW
SCALE:1" = 50'
AS-BUILT NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEER &
OWNER WITH AS-BUILT SURVEY OF ALL INFRASTRUCTURE,
UTILITIES AND STORMWATER DEVICES. ENGINEER, OWNER,
JOHNSTON COUNTY, AND NCDOT MUST APPROVE ALL
INFRASTRUCTURE PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. ALL
BONDS AND SURETIES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND ACTIVE
FOR AT LEAST 1 YEAR AFTER AS-BUILT APPROVAL.
STREET "A" - (50' PUBLIC

R
/
W
)
1
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW
PURPOSES ONLY
OF 9 SHEETS
THIS ORIGINAL SHEET IS 24"X36", OTHER DIMENSIONS
INDICATE IT HAS BEEN ALTERED. ALL INFORMATION
REPRESENTED ON THIS SHEET IS THE PROPERTY OF
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,
THIS INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN PART
OR WHOLE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
FROM RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. 2019 ©
REVISIONS:DATE:
DATE:ISSUED FOR:
PROJECT NO.:
DRAWN BY:
REVIEWED BY:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL
041318
SEAL
C-3075
RED LINE ENGINEERING, P.C. (C-3075)123 RALEIGH STREETFUQUAY-VARINA, NORTH CAROLINA 27526PHONE - [phone]PRELIMINARY
DRAWING
NOT RELEASED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 -
PERMITS 6/1/2020
20-009
CSB
CSBLW PROPERTIES, LLC.PO BOX 117BENSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27504TARHEEL LANDING SUBDIVISIONSTREET A PLAN AND PROFILEC4
SITE
TARHEEL
R
O
A
D

(
S
R
1
1
6
8
)
WOODALL DAIRY
R
O
A
D

(
S
R
1
3
9
6
)
NC
2
4
2
OPEN
SPACE
TARHEEL ROAD SR1168 - (60' PUBLIC R/W)EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
RIPARIAN BUFFER AND WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
WETLAND IMPACT - 1,738 SF / 0.04 ACRE
RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACT - 0 SF
RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACT - 0 SF
STREAM BED IMPACT - 0 LF
48" RCP w/ HEADWALL
(BURY 12" BELOW GRADE
TO PROMOTE AQUATIC
PASSAGE, NO RIP-RAP
IS PROPOSED)
48" RCP w/
HEADWALL
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 1/10
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction
in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 2/10
Local oce
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Oce
 [phone]
 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Oce Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 3/10
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population, even if that sh does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and project-specic information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an ocial
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1
2
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 4/10
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location:
Birds
Amphibians
Fishes
Clams
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 5/10
Critical habitats
Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Threatened
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
1 2
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 6/10
THERE ARE NO MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 7/10
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore
energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also oers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 8/10
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence”
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to conrm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be conrmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 9/10
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional dierences in
polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1A
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
RIVERINE
R4SBC
R5UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
8/9/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/HVAZ4NVNEZAX7HMRUMAQQ2P6AM/resources 10/10
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a dierent manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may aect such activities.