20161268 Ver 2_U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request_20190829 (2)

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:36 AM
To:Wylie, Mike
Cc:Mickey Sugg; Herndon, T. Mason; Steenhuis, Joanne
Subject:\[External\] FW: U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request
Attachments:image001.png; U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request_signed.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

Mike,

Attached is the PJD request for the Corbett Tract specifically where the contractors have identified a potential borrow
source for the Military Cut Off project in northern New Hanover County. As you can see the ditches that exist on the site
appear to have drained the property according to the contractor's consultant.

I am offering your office to accompany the Corps, NCDOT, DWR, and Balfour Beatty's consultant on a site visit to verify
the current conditions of the site. I know it's not much lead time but this visit would need to occur within the next three
weeks, no later than Sept 20.

Please advise if you would like to accompany us during this site visit.

Once the site visit has occurred the Corps will need to make a verification decision as the client needs to procure more
borrow to complete the on-going project.

Please advise what role you would like to take with this action.

Brad Shaver

-----Original Message-----
From: Herndon, T. Mason \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:03 AM
To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Steenhuis, Joanne
<[e-mail]>
Subject: \[Non-DoD Source\] U-4751 Corbett Pit #2 PJD Request

Attached is the PJD request that BB and Hal Owens Consulting provided for Corbett Pit #2. Please let me know how we
need to proceed since this one has EPA interest. Thanks

Mason Herndon

Environmental Program Supervisor
1

Division 3

NCDOT- Division of Highways

910-341-2036 office

910-604-0050 mobile

[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

5501 Barbados Blvd

Castle Hayne, NC 28429

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the

North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

2

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Mason Herndon,5501 Barbados Blvd,Castle Hayne NC 28429
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Wilmington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.318634 Long.: -77.834547
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Island Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
SEE ATTACHED SHEET

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT
TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated Type of aquatic Geographic authority
Number (decimal (decimal amount of resources(i.e., to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) aquatic resources wetland vs. resource"may be"
in review area non-wetland subject(i.e.,Section
(acreage and waters) 404 or Section 10/404)
linear feet,if
applicable
1 34.321597 -77.83757 3690 linear ft non-wetland 404
waters
2 34.321181 -77.835977 57901inear ft non wetland 404
waters
3 34.31532 -77.839659 3290 linear ft non-wetland 404
waters
4 34.323801 -77.832674 5640 linear ft non-wetland 404
waters
5 34.319769 -77.833059 1620 linear ft non-wetland 404
waters
6 34.317458 -77.82894 1470 linear ft non-wetland 404
waters
E 34.319317 -77.827711 0.5 ac wetland 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3)the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
n Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
n Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
n USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Quad: Scott's Hill 2016 1:240000
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: websoil survey
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Digitally signed 9 Mason Herndon
Date:2019.08.29 0855:18-04'00'
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

I
I 1
I
I
I
�'
•
✓ ♦
♦
/ ♦ I
••
•
•
•
•
I ♦�, ♦♦♦♦♦ • ✓ \ g
•
• / / 1
ft♦ I ■• uI ln, o•
♦•
7,
tt
1 •♦♦♦ ✓ ":"
/
•
I1 ♦♦♦ ✓ ♦ / d
•
I1 ♦♦♦ Iil
I `Q r, ♦ / / �r
- Tait
I • _ h/q o\v
/, u
PRIVATE
/i%iii'— i/ii `\
ROAD \
•
Ills
iil ii \` ♦41
I 1 iii iii -, ii ii a° ♦j
I
1 ui lii _ ; i/'iii "``\ is I I
\A,
uliii i%i%Nil
1 iii ii -_ -`` ill iiff \\\\\\ 4 ♦ -
- �u \\ -ate - /4'"� a a P OS
ft
•
1 ‘‘\` ‘
��\ \ ii iil `a / ; EDIMENT CO Ep SPECIAL
I 1 ``�\ \ `-`' ;aa�- iiii,' �y ♦ S NEEDED NTROL FENCE
�\�\ //lllil / ` PROPOSED
•
\\ / n, / a\\` SAF SILT gc uII\\\\\\\ �. y/ //, !k ETY FENCE ■
• `� \` \ iiii i'i'llll / ♦ ALONG PERIMETER •
`������\ iii 1iil iii p�� `��\��\ q �eWaterin9 BaSln I I
\\ i' iii �.\�__ in\n
■ , ////// ���;; u p 1 ,th Surface m 70' X 140' PROPOSED
I ■ ,
/// -"- iii skimmer out/et HAUL ROAD
toil �r�r_-__ram-`- ������'
♦ `� \ \ iii liil
1 _-___-_, iii
ui
♦ iii iil ---,r,,;�,,_ l/u 1 1�1
♦ `���\ ill,
+n POND � � ---: ___________——_— -
-
—
I liiliil ` 1 _ s-, — F UN[3-RY ss —ss —ss —■ —ss /s —_----- \
IN
liiliih'il JURISDICTIONAL
�s ♦ �— /i \\
„/ RISDICTIONAL /� \\ / \\ •
/ DITC ♦ I
•
•
\
1 •, \\\\\\\IN
a l"i, /aii H / 1 ■
ull5 /n / l \\
♦ \2"\ llil� lillill - // ; Dewatering Basin
♦ \\ i l iii ul/ 70'
""m ,4// ___-; I ♦ surface 1
I ♦ �uii iii illliil lig
I ♦ With x140' I \ ■
♦ ii ul1 ski \ :i
♦ ui ui 4/� mer o t
m I
iiii iii ill iil i°lil \\ ♦ u I�t I 1
Z '0 u, 4// a -- o� I
I I PI
iiil°i iiiiu -- c. \ I / m
a/ii/ ii \ /4 ♦ 5F �4 I ula a\\a /u, „l nl In
ui n, //4f
4/lii � \\` \ ♦Iuiili �lllll a\`o\ w\ ♦Ili iii AT
\`p` \ Iiii'i' lii iil \ \ \ ,nl„l au\ a \II 19'
illiil \`\u\\ ——' I
\ WETLAND
lii lii ; Oii l i' ryl,°ill iil 11 iii/1 n / lu l 1 /u ii/i pnlll ■;' ,JURISDICTIONi iii / A I \\\ ARY _ '_
1 ;��4 n�\ �u In L a\ \\ \\ -� -
41 --g,
UND
`\\\\\\ ill iii o\p \\ Iff
Ig
♦ •ON
1 \\, %,/// DITCH \ ♦ B ��
1 `C�2 � lii lei' I iiiiu V;;\
/91
"�\ �` \ ♦ ROAD -EXISTING - /
1 \�\ ill i'i lii i 1, \\ \ \ ♦ 1
1 4/ vl lil \\\\\\ \ ♦ • E
1 `\\\ ill it i°ili \�\ \\\ ♦ _ 4
A+
, , /; JURISDICTIONAL \
/ DI TC
q ni 11/lye / lu H \\. \ \ ♦ *
Iui iii i iii 1'iii q\`\\' w\ "MOP•
iI L O/U/4 //�h,/ ���4/ a\ \ SILT qe o
EXISTING j Ill l/1, i"/// \ `�FETY FEN
PRI VA TE ✓ iiii PROPOSED Ili ryliii \\ ALQNG PERIMETER
\ Z N
sill/ H q U llll %%% \
ETER o M
RC AD; l.;'III L ROAD J//i ♦ �� j
•y 00 .
:e' , -
_ 0 Z
1 .4 * , ,
_ I iii///
in iil a ‘‘\‘',`
\o /4rir ■
✓ -- c-- illliil liili �\
/p gill .ql l/l \\\\P \ ♦ M -
' , ---- ` -``-- ,lllnl I fu11/ \\
� -,,_- �/ n/ ._ a/„ \\ \``
- 7,.,_
%�� 41::"
o��\ ♦✓ 11 "`\\` \ ♦ ■a\ \ 7joi **.\\
\ ' Ni,40 I
. 211111 / PROPOSED % /���G _ v,C• _ A.
;G
• �///„ -- ,;;iiii;- ,,\\``
•
I
iiii,, ;;;, � ,,_;;�;, Hq SED ,,\`\`
1;o*
\\\;``‘‘.. V\____g sr
♦_� —g v. *
ROAD
\\ -cam
-�r,��,,a ..
\ •
-�'�ia�;;==ate
♦ z. PROPOSED \0\��‘ _ _ -
'.� CROSSING
\
. I
,,�`.� PROPOSED - 7.I . - #✓�''
�♦ , HAU \ \\ ��
-
•
♦ Smft. ....1"--1-. .-.--1_ - --)
, '41 AD \`\\��\� • I
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
`♦ DOTW . .... .
--. - - �i` _ _•
`'
`•♦• R/W r
■
•
.........
■ de
IL
r J �� /
- •• li- f milLt
r % 1 SI TE I
- 4-1—
. r
111
_ . ■ Vicinity Sketch
■ • ■ • _ • • ' - Not to Scale
CHECKED DATE
NO. DATE APPR. NO. DATE APPR.
_._
T
SR 1409 MILITARY CUTOFF CORBETT II TRACTS PROJECT ENGINEER °M)
;11
0 «�� © 0 0�� «�� 0 ' ��� NEWHANOVERCOUNTY, NORTHCAROLINGT FRIECEA2ROAD EXTENSION) FROM SR .�31409TO US17INWILMINGTOND. REED 3865OVEREW PLAN WETLA�Ds
- PROJECT MANAGER REV. NO.
TIP PROJECT U 4751 CONTRACT Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. SCHUSTER
APPROVED DRAWN DATE CLIENT APPROVAL 0
C203980 430 Eastwood Road,Wilmington,NC 28403 D. REED 7/30/2019
APPROVED SCALE W.O. N0. ISSUED FOR DATE SHEET OF
AS NOTED

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 1. Map o f candidate site provided by B a1four B eatty
/ f
N lDU STRlES NC- _ EXIST PR VA r
a ein °RSETT
z
ROAD
j .4„ ,._:___ p Ir
! /NDUS TAWS IN
3 Ac roo
{.I/ .I ra. .mn�a241 I 'IC
rr/r (
\ \\i, Zr.°)
SKAGGS Ir:'7" �: _ PROPOSE-�-
\ HAUL
\ fll -__M1 ROAp --
\ r^ I�I•r Jl1RfSDICnOIYAL�'r.. M �+
,\ {. I _ DITCH PROPOSEp ��
1' LI
I INpDSgESrINC 'r'/ \, 1.
r .,, Anb; r[� "7/P'f-, � SKAGGS47 SKAGGS 1',1
• Y P.'. .N1R1 ?
jl °'"°arc aon Ii • SOICTIpyygL
DITCH � CAMERON .S"
\ II' h
•\ r�l durl•DICTI L IN $TRBesTI \
r \ 2i'�� D! M ONA AREA IIi-ANC \
ING PRIVA rE I PROPOSE➢ 5t)A«es 1
RGAp\ ! NAUL ROAp\ 4
\\\\1 5G OAS B
� _ .cr<o —SKAGGS •.«„m'"�•r 't
RRppFD
t. t $/i NAUL RAp
INOUSiRIESINCifigCaR6ETT M� ..'I
AREA II_ .: 'd 82' O/S
�,I ACRES __
PROPOSED
`� CROSSINGIki. �. �
PROPOSED `.•��\ HAUL ROAD DOT R/W
'DOT R/W.--. :-,,:':--
/W .,.J' I
t
NC DOT R/W ,
SR 1409 (MILITARY CUTOFF CORNETT II TRACTS
ROAD E ) FROM NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1409 TO US 17 IN WILMINGTON
TIP PROJECT 1J-4751 CONTRACT Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
C 203 980 430 Eastwood Read.Wilmington,NC 28403
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations,Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 2. USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, Quadrangle: Scotts Hill,NC 2016
J 1
f c die V;
i = ��I\
Iilik ':——. — ,etc IN ®_ ',F
So
11C:''' 1 6:7 \‘11 —r, 4
04isvp
Nil
iv., A, , 4 Wip, I I._
at 1 ..)10.,kr-- ...,I-1m- - Ili'
4 D
1 * .._ 4_it
frer f
f g• .
L 1" 0 _.
]( •
I'� • .. �—
•
•• 0 4311- .1111111N1111ftito . 1
tiiF �
it
_,( -t•••yi -6e- Q:dik*---7?7:4;41d- -6.
--- 4ta i e.i1:41,- 47: ,
is; — —H,
v �� --.i rYr yit �!r
CIF — — __ yy� —“.
SI
40;14Z0&cc --- ----, 114
— ,— •
4•-) '''-I "'w-4
_ _
_,,,,_.„ _.__,t6,
......_ ....,_
_..,._ ___
_._ ..._ fkr._ . Mk,
_ R — e alf w ALE '44111
yLF t ;:f:
.._ zoie,,,,,.., —
4,0 —1 i...- .:,,_--- — ......tr,
,,,_ _.,_ . ,
50 ,
.. - ,_ _. ..,t„
-- LI II__ 1 . � - + - _ . .._
rr_
SCALD 1:24 000
1 0-5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1090 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
1 0-5 9 1
MILE
1000 a 700a 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 11000 9000 10000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF19BS
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations,Permitting, and Consulting

Figure 3. I•TRCS Soil Survey I.Iap HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
‘1111ratioWIFP '' Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
_ Baymeade fine sand. 1 to 6
percent slopes
.e 7 4/rtiii
C: Johnston soils
- Leon sand
911k,„
JO Be `du Murvillefine sand
Ortt
Se Seagate tine sand
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
-:_:-.....,... , ‘ 1Alf
of the version daters} listed below.
Soil Survey Area: New Hanover jaunty, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: version 19, Sep la: 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows)for map scales
�
1:50, '0O or larger_
y -
• ��• �_. Al Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Nov 21, 2018—Nov
y "� .- ',' 28, 2018
fil ..
74
Map saili 1:15,806 f perked a,A nd a(11^x 8.5')sheet
L.
N D 30 4W 1111 130
Feat
C 500 1L00 2000 3300
Kap p :110312 Meter Cane'mudred :ViGSE 4 Edge ti¢;UTM Zone 134 WCS 4
,SD,,, Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
iiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Scier ce Investigations • Wetland Delineations,Permitting, and Consulting

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Figure 4. Jurisdictional wetlands and ditches
Not a survey
i
-•'
I.
Exrsr�Nc PRIvarE ca`8ET7
1,, ROAD / INDUS ES fNc / 2•
;f ;.
=_ EMS rING PRIVATE f f
i f 7 _ ROAD \ Y '
If i NAREAIES cDRe[rr ) ^,
'! f T3 A� ,NC 5% r
1.
Iti t
y
,\ JDRISDrC77ONAL f�_ .•\\` _ ✓)ITCH
// •,� PROPOSED I -.
f CRoss ND
Dataform#1
ii t. a // •�^ yy
r Iko�s�rrsBEs rwc ry '
AREACRes '"T KAGGS SKAGGS
7
I
LRISD.
..Tn "1 n:a•'ii: ,+ DITCH 1 caMERON ^B..
,p )
'\• i, 7 . JURISDICTI CORBerT \'�
.\ is INDU5 I2 INC
iI I Df7CM ONAL AREA n_ .
rING PRIIV TE PROPOSED I y�.fl tO A,
I f HAUL PRO 1"
`' AD l eV 1 50' 0/S e
--PRosOSED 1% SKAGGS .98m .i�, ! JURfS0f- r ALPROPOS \17.7.,/:717.,
°i°1e.�i = _ DITCrr P CRoss,,G 1
a3 HAUL OSED
7J LR6 3�
AO
�=-- INDUSTRfES INC" p �
�� ARE41I_C �g2 G/S i�
� `i ACRES PROPOSED r. _`� �
\<` ` CROSSING 1. � - •__.
HAUL `- _�
--'`GAD ` - ��_ __ DOT RAY
l
`DOT RAW l —` __ �--
unit of
LNCDOT R/w ,Study Area
Jurisdictional Ditches "
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations,Permitting, and Consulting

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%):
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Na (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances'present? Yes No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondartk-idicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR UI _ Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Mass Trim Lines(B16)
_ Water Marks(Si) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Crayfish Burrows(CS)
Drift Deposits(83) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) Other(Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Sphagnum moss(08)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (NB)
6.
=Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) OBL species x 1 =
1 FACW species x 2=
2 FAC species x 3=
3 FACU species x 4=
4 UPL species x 5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index =B/A=
=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. _ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
2. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
6. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover Tree-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) (7.6 cm)or larger in diameter at breast height(DBH).
1. Sapling-Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. approximately 20 ft(6 m)or more in height and less
than 3 in.(7.6 cm)DBH.
3.
4. Shrub-Woody plants,excluding woody vines,
5 approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m)in height.
6. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, including
7 herbaceous vines,regardless of size,and woody
plants,except woody vines, less than approximately
6. 3 ft(1 m)in height.
9.
Woody vine-All woody vines,regardless of height.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) _ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T, U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P, T,U) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0, P,T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR 0, S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P, S,T, U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

********************************************************************************
----Lateral Effect Program Summary----
Application of Skaggs Method
Copyright 2006-2014. Brian D Phillips, R Wayne Skaggs, G M Chescheir
North Carolina State University Dept of Biological & Agricultural Engineering
Version: 2.8.1.0
Project Run Date and Time: 7/29/2019 1:58:11 PM
********************************************************************************
Project Information
Project : Corbett II
User: Dail Reed
Company /Agency: Balfour Beatty
Project Location: New Hanover County
Soil ID: Mu
Site Parameters
State: North Carolina
County / Parish: New_Hanover
Surface Storage: 2_inch_(5.0_cm)
Ditch Depth or Depth to Water Surface: 2 ft
Depth to Restrictive Layer: 15 ft
Drainable Porosity: 0.04
Hydroperiod: 14 days
User defined T25 or Default T25: DEFAULT
T25 value: 3.2 days
User Conductivity or Soil Survey Conductivity: SOIL SURVEY
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity: 11.1185 in/hr
Hydraulic Conductivity Data by Layer for Soil: Mu Murville_undrained
Weighted Hydraulic Conductivity Calculated Using: Average K Values
Bottom Depth in Low K in/hr High K in/hr Average K in/hr
Layer 1 8.00 5.95 19.98 12.968478
Layer 2 45.00 1.98 5.95 3.968496
Layer 3 180.00 5.95 19.98 12.968478
Layer 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Layer 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Layer 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Layer 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Layer 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lateral Effect: 180.7 ft
file:///CVUsers/dreed/Documents/00%20MILCUTOFF/REC%20PLANS/CORBETT%20II/Mu%2015%20Lateral_Effect Summary.txt[7/31/2019 11:58:56 AM]