SW4200601_12052-Southwick Solar LLC-NCDEQ SW Revisions-Calcs-2020-08-07_20200807

OAKWOOD SOLAR FARM, LLC
EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
JUNE 11 th, 2020
REVISED AUGUST 5th, 2020
e •:
PINE GATE RENEWABLES, LLC
130 ROBERTS STREET
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
JEFF HUNTLEY
[phone]
168 PATTON AVENUE
/ ASHEVILLE, NO 28MI
° SS, O ��A / PHONE (828) 252-MM
JJ 'v FAX [phone]
Zo Q �9<e�
SEAL - Civil
- 035093 - Design 52 WALNUT STREET - SUITE
9
i 00 � \C Concepts, PA WA28786
PHONE(B28YNESIALLE, NC-4410
PHONE [phone]
NCEIELS LICENSE 4: C-2184 www dAId-ig.—ncepts.c— FAX [phone]
RY° °R ° Np C\•
JOB N0. 12056

OAKWOOD SOLAR FARM, LLC
CDC Proj ect No.: 12056
CDCCR.Tig.
Concepts, PA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Narrative
2. Checklist
3. Drainage Area Maps
4. Drainage Runoff Summary
S. Stormwater Peak Flow Calculations
6. Temporary Skimmer Basin Calculations
7. Temporary Ditch Calculations
8. Rip Rap Aprons
9. NRCS Soil Report
10. Figures
1. USGS Topo Map
11. FEMA FIRMette Map
111. NOAA Precipitation Intensity Table
IV. NOAA Precipitation Depth Table
V. Deed
VI. Permission to Disturb Letter
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5432, Asheville, NC 28813
168 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 52 Walnut Street— Suite 9, Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

l0
"go
CDCC,D
ivil
eignoncepts, RSA
Project Name: OAKWOOD SOLAR FARM, LLC
Project Location: 6519 US HWY 70 MEBANE, NC 27302
CDC Project No. 12056
Date: August 5th, 2020
PROJECT NARRATIVE
General
The proposed OAKWOOD SOLAR FARM, LLC project encompass an approximate area of
52.1 acres, 32 acres of which is disturbed. The proposed plan will involve the construction of a
solar array field with an access gravel road, security fencing and landscape buffers. The project
area was logged in the early 2000's. The site's current condition is best described as forest in the
early -mid stages of re-establishment with dense underbrush.
Erosion Control
Proposed erosion control measures consist of a construction entrance, silt fence, temporary
diversion ditches, temporary skimmer sediment basins, and temporary/permanent seeding to
prevent sediment from leaving the site.
The project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. We do not anticipate any negative
downstream impacts due to the discharge from the site.
Stormwater
The project is low density and will result in a reduction in flow -rates for the 1-year, 24-hour and
10-year, 24-hour storm events as shown in the included calculations. The proposed land use is
best characterized as a meadow which is protected from grazing. The grass is typically allowed
to grow to a height of 12-18 inches before cutting and it will be maintained in a dense state.
Sheet flow is encouraged. As a result, permanent stormwater control measures are not required
or proposed.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5432, Asheville, NC 28813
168 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801 52 Walnut Street — Suite 9, Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

4:16MNUF1T&1l4QILYi140kfilVQ01[K•]01r1:l•]N»el011:JN44ILYilILIVil dNNVJIATITcd:Ixd:aF.11
The following items shall be incorporated with respect to specific site conditions, in an erosion & sedimentation control plan:
NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000
Designation on the plans where the 7 or 14 day ground stabilization requirements apply per Part II.E.1 of the permit.
Design of basins with one acre or more of drainage area for surface withdrawal as per Part II.B.8 of the permit.
LOCATION INFORMATION
✓ Project location & labeled vicinity map (roads, streets, landmarks)
✓ North arrow and scale
✓ Identify River Basin.
✓ Provide a copy of site located on applicable USGS quadrangle and
NRCS Soils maps if it is in a River Basin with Riparian Buffer
requirements.
GENERAL SITE FEATURES (Plan elements)
✓ Property lines & ownership ID for adjoining properties
✓ Existing contours (topographic lines)
✓ Proposed contours
✓ Limits of disturbed area (provide acreage total, delineate limits,
and label). Be sure to include all access to measures, lots that will
be disturbed, and utilities that may extend offsite.
✓ Planned and existing building locations and elevations
✓ Planned & existing road locations & elevations, including
temporary access roads
Lot and/or building numbers
✓ Hydrogeologic features: rock outcrops, seeps, springs, wetland
and their limits, streams, lakes, ponds, dams, etc. (include all
required local or state buffer zones and any DWQ Riparian Buffer
determinations)
✓ Easements and drainageways, particularly required for offsite
affected areas. Include copies of any recorded easements and/or
agreements with adjoining property owners.
✓ Profiles of streets, utilities, ditch lines, etc.
N/A Stockpiled topsoil or subsoil locations
N/A If the same person conducts the land -disturbing activity & any
related borrow or waste activity, the related borrow or waste
activity shall constitute part of the land -disturbing activity unless
the borrow or waste activity is regulated under the Mining Act of
1971, or is a landfill regulated by the Division of Waste
Management. If the land -disturbing activity and any related
borrow or waste activity are not conducted by the same person,
they shall be considered separate land -disturbing activities and
must be permitted either through the Sedimentation Pollution
Control Act as a one -use borrow site or through the Mining Act.
N/A Location and details associated with any onsite stone crushing or
other processing of material excavated. If the affected area
associated with excavation, processing, stockpiles and transport
of such materials will comprise 1 or more acres, and materials will
be leaving the development tract, a mining permit will be required.
N/A Required Army Corps 404 permit and Water Quality 401
certification (e.g. stream disturbances over 150 linear feet)
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (on plan)
✓ Legend (provide appropriate symbols for all measures and
reference them to the construction details)
✓ Location of temporary measures
✓ Location of permanent measures
✓ Construction drawings and details for
temporary and permanent measures. Show measures to scale on
plan and include proposed contours where necessary. Ensure
design storage requirements are maintained through all phases of
construction.
✓ Maintenance requirements for measures
✓ Contact person responsible for maintenance
SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES
✓ Existing and planned drainage patterns (include off -site areas that
drain through project and address temporary and permanent
conveyance of stormwater over graded slopes)
✓ Method used to determine acreage of land being disturbed and
drainage areas to all proposed measures (e.g. delineation map)
✓ Size, pipe material and location of culverts and sewers
✓ Soil information: type, special characteristics
✓ Soil information below culvert storm outlets
Name and classification of receiving water course or name of
municipal operator (only where stormwater discharges are to
occur)
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
✓ Pre -construction runoff calculations for each outlet from the site (at
peak discharge points). Be sure to provide all supporting data for
the computation methods used (rainfall data for required storm
events, time of concentration/storm duration, and runoff
coefficients).
✓ Design calculations for peak discharges of runoff (including the
construction phase & the final runoff coefficients for the site)
N/A Design calcs for culverts and storm sewers (include HW, TW and
outlet velocities)
✓ Discharge and velocity calculations for open channel and ditch
flows (easement & rights -of -way)
✓ Design calcs for cross sections and method of stabilization for
existing and planned channels (include temporary linings). Include
appropriate permissible velocity and/or shear stress data.
✓ Design calcs and construction details for energy dissipaters below
culvert and storm sewer outlets (include stone/material specs &
apron dimensions). Avoid discharges on fill slopes.
✓ Design calcs and dimension of sediment basins (note current
surface area and dewatering standards as well as diversion of
runoff to the basins). Be sure that all surface drains, including
ditches and berms, will have positive drainage to the basins.
VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION
✓ Area & acreage to be stabilized with vegetation
✓ Method of soil preparation
✓ Seed type & rates (temporary & permanent)
✓ Fertilizer type and rates
✓ Mulch type and rates (include mulch anchoring methods)
NOTE: Plan should include provisions for groundcover in accordance with
NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000.
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM
✓ Completed, signed & notarized FR/O Form
✓ Accurate application fee payable to NCDEQ ($65.00 per acre
rounded up the next acre with no ceiling amount)
N/A Certificate of assumed name, if the owner is a partnership
N/A Name of Registered Agent (if applicable)
✓ Copy of the most current Deed for the site. Please make sure the
deed(s) and ownership information are consistent between the
plan sheets, local records and this form.
✓ Provide latitude & longitude (in decimal degrees) at the project
entrance.
✓ Two hard -copies of the plans (some regional offices require
additional plans or multiple sizes; please contact the regional
coordinator prior to such submittal.)
NOTE: For the Express Permitting Option, inquire at the local Regional
Office for availability. Express Reviews are performed by
appointment only.
NARRATIVE AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
✓ Narrative describing the nature & purpose of the construction
activity.
✓ Construction sequence related to erosion and sediment control
(including installation of critical measures prior to the initiation of
the land -disturbing activity & removal of measures after areas they
serve are permanently stabilized). Address all phases of
construction and necessary practices associated with temporary
stream bypasses and/or crossings.
N/A Bid specifications related only to erosion control
rev. 05142019

e
8S �
r fir L
es'
N
G
w
m
Q
a
z
LPL
e
eS
z
1
J
L
\
I
O c
Cl) .
ms
I
I
d1lb
O
CD
N
O
N
H
N
a

I
I
I
I
I
I
O
u,
0

cIVII
IaeSign
Gancepts, RSA.
SummaryDrainage Runoff
Oakwood Solar Farm, LLC
CDC Proj ect No.: 12056
Drainage Area
Pre -Area
(ac.)
Post -Area
(ac.)
Pre -Construction
Peak Runoff (cfs)
Post Construction
Peak Runoff cfs
%
Increase
DA1
7.37
10.64
1.20
0.92
-23%
DA2
7.2
3.93
0.81
0.47
-42%
DA3
7.14
8.73
1.07
0.77
-28%
DA4
8.47
6.88
1.09
0.78
-28%
Total
30.2
30.2
4.2
2.9
Drainage Area
Pre -Area
(ac.)
Post -Area
(ac.)
Pre -Construction
Peak Runoff (cfs)
Post Construction
Peak Runoff cfs
%
Increase
DA1
7.37
10.64
14.77
12.58
-15%
DA2
7.2
3.93
9.82
7.98
DA3
7.14
8.73
13.36
12.99
t-3
DA4
8.47
6.88
13.51
11.29
Total
30.2
30.2
51.5
44.8
Note:
Information calculated using HydroCAD software.
Issued 8/5/2020

N/
NJ
1 S 2S Vn-!
C 4S
DA 1 DA 2 DA 3 DA 4
Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for Oakwood Pre -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA, Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC

Oakwood Pre -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(acres) (s u bcatch me nt-n u m be rs)
30.180 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B (1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S)
30.180 60 TOTAL AREA

Oakwood Pre -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Soil Listing (all nodes)
Area Soil Subcatchment
(acres) Group Numbers
0.000
HSG A
30.180
HSG B 1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S
0.000
HSG C
0.000
HSG D
0.000
Other
30.180
TOTAL AREA

Oakwood Pre -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4
Ground Covers (all nodes)
HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment
(acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers
0.000 30.180 0.000 0.000 0.000 30.180 Woods, Fair 1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S
0.000 30.180 0.000 0.000 0.000 30.180 TOTAL AREA

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Runoff Area=7.370 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.24"
Flow Length=538'
Slope=0.0279 '/' Tc=20.1 min CN=60 Runoff=1.20 cfs 0.149 of
Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Runoff Area=7.200 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.24"
Flow Length=882'
Slope=0.0193 T Tc=35.8 min CN=60 Runoff=0.81 cfs 0.143 of
Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Runoff Area=7.140 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.24"
Flow Length=787'
Slope=0.0407 '/' Tc=22.5 min CN=60 Runoff=1.07 cfs 0.144 of
Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Runoff Area=8.470 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.24"
Flow Length=886'
Slope=0.0305 '/' Tc=28.6 min CN=60 Runoff=1.09 cfs 0.170 of
Total Runoff Area = 30.180 ac Runoff Volume = 0.606 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.24"
100.00% Pervious = 30.180 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Runoff = 1.20 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.149 af, Depth> 0.24"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
7.370 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
7.370 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
20.1 538 0.0279 0.45 Lag/CN Method, DA 1
Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Hyd rog raph
1.20
cfs
Type II 24-hr
1,-yr
1...
24-fir Rainfall=2.88"
D
Runoff Are: a=7:370:ac
j Runoff Volume=0.149 of
Runoff Depth>0.24"
Flbw Ltength=538'
Slope=0 0279 T
Tc=20.1 rn: in
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time (hours)
p Runoff

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Runoff = 0.81 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.143 af, Depth> 0.24"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
7.200 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
7.200 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
35.8 882 0.0193 0.41 Lag/CN Method, DA 2
N
U
3
0
LL
Time (hours)
p Runoff

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Runoff = 1.07 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.144 af, Depth> 0.24"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
7.140 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
7.140 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
22.5 787 0.0407 0.58 Lag/CN Method, DA 3
N
U
3
0
LL
Time (hours)
p Runoff

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Runoff = 1.09 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 0.170 af, Depth> 0.24"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
8.470 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
8.470 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
28.6 886 0.0305 0.52 Lag/CN Method, DA 4
N
U
3
0
LL
Time (hours)
p Runoff

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall= 6. 00 "
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Runoff Area=7.370 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.72"
Flow Length=538'
Slope=0.0279 '/' Tc=20.1 min CN=60 Runoff=14.77 cfs 1.057 of
Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Runoff Area=7.200 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.71"
Flow Length=882'
Slope=0.0193 '/' Tc=35.8 min CN=60 Runoff=9.82 cfs 1.025 of
Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Runoff Area=7.140 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.72"
Flow Length=787'
Slope=0.0407 '/' Tc=22.5 min CN=60 Runoff=13.36 cfs 1.023 of
Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Runoff Area=8.470 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.71"
Flow Length=886'
Slope=0.0305 '/' Tc=28.6 min CN=60 Runoff=13.51 cfs 1.210 of
Total Runoff Area = 30.180 ac Runoff Volume = 4.315 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.72"
100.00% Pervious = 30.180 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall= 6. 00 "
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Runoff = 14.77 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1.057 af, Depth> 1.72"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
7.370 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
7.370 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc
Length
Slope
Velocity Capacity Description
(min)
(feet)
(ft/ft)
(ft/sec) (cfs)
20.1
538
0.0279
0.45 Lag/CN Method, DA 1
Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Hydrograph
6.;
`
14.77 cfs
Type II 24-hr
4,
10-yr_
2
Rair�fa�l=.QO"
1
%
R�4-hr
Uunoff Area=7,370 ac
j
RunpfF Volumne=1.057 of
91,
8f
%
Ruoff Depth>1.72"
7 '
Flow Length=538'
6,'
'/'
Slope-0 0279
s
/
Tc=20.1 min_
4
3'�
CN=60
2��'
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
p Runoff

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall= 6. 00 "
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Runoff = 9.82 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 1.025 af, Depth> 1.71"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
7.200 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
7.200 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc
Length
Slope
Velocity Capacity Description
(min)
(feet)
(ft/ft)
(ft/sec) (cfs)
35.8
882
0.0193
0.41 Lag/CN Method, DA 2
p Runoff
Time (hours)

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall= 6. 00 "
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Runoff = 13.36 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 1.023 af, Depth> 1.72"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
7.140 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
7.140 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc
Length
Slope
Velocity Capacity Description
(min)
(feet)
(ft/ft)
(ft/sec) (cfs)
22.5
787
0.0407
0.58 Lag/CN Method, DA 3
p Runoff
Time (hours)

Oakwood Pre -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall= 6. 00 "
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 7/27/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Runoff = 13.51 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 1.210 af, Depth> 1.71"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
8.470 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B
8.470 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc
Length
Slope
Velocity Capacity Description
(min)
(feet)
(ft/ft)
(ft/sec) (cfs)
28.6
886
0.0305
0.52 Lag/CN Method, DA 4
p Runoff
Time (hours)

1S 2S 3S 4S
DA 1 DA 2 DA 3 DA 4
!cat Reach on UnkI Routing Diagram for Oakwood Post -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA, Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC

Oakwood Post -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area CN Description
(acres) (su bcatch me nt-n u mbe rs)
0.740 85 Gravel roads, HSG B (1 S, 4S)
29.440 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B (1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S)
30.180 59 TOTAL AREA

Oakwood Post -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3
Soil Listing (all nodes)
Area
Soil
Subcatchment
(acres)
Group
Numbers
0.000
HSG A
30.180
HSG B
1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S
0.000
HSG C
0.000
HSG D
0.000
Other
30.180
TOTAL AREA

Oakwood Post -construction
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4
Ground Covers (all nodes)
HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment
(acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers
0.000 0.740 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.740 Gravel roads 1 S, 4S
0.000 29.440 0.000 0.000 0.000 29.440 Meadow, non -grazed 1 S, 2S, 3S,
4S
0.000 30.180 0.000 0.000 0.000 30.180 TOTAL AREA

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1 S: DA 1
Runoff Area=10.640 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.21"
Flow Length=1,029'
Slope=0.0204 '/' Tc=40.4 min CN=59 Runoff=0.92 cfs 0.189 of
Subcatchment2S: DA 2
Runoff Area=3.930 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.19"
Flow Length=496'
Slope=0.0404 '/' Tc=16.4 min CN=58 Runoff=0.47 cfs 0.063 of
Subcatchment3S: DA 3
Runoff Area=8.730 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.19"
Flow Length=854'
Slope=0.0363 '/' Tc=26.8 min CN=58 Runoff=0.77 cfs 0.140 of
Subcatchment4S: DA 4
Runoff Area=6.880 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.22"
Flow Length=779'
Slope=0.0334 '/' Tc=25.3 min CN=59 Runoff=0.78 cfs 0.124 of
Total Runoff Area = 30.180 ac Runoff Volume = 0.516 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.21"
100.00% Pervious = 30.180 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Runoff = 0.92 cfs @ 12.56 hrs, Volume= 0.189 af, Depth> 0.21"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
10.060 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
0.580 85 Gravel roads, HSG B
10.640 59 Weighted Average
10.640 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
40.4 1,029 0.0204 0.42 Lag/CN Method, DA 1
Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Hydrograph
1 . 0 Runoff
0.92 cfs
Type II 24-hr
1-yr j
24-hr Rainfall=2.88 j;
Runoff Area=10.640 ac j
N
Runoff Volume=0.189 of
3 Runoff Depth>0.21 ,
Flow Length=1,029'
Slope=0.0204 '/'
Tc = 40.4 min
CN=59
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Runoff = 0.47 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Depth> 0.19"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
3.930 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
3.930 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
16.4 496 0.0404 0.50 Lag/CN Method, DA 2
Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Hydrograph
0.52
0.5 0.47 cfs
0.48
0.46 Type II 24-hr
0.44
0.42 � -y r
03s j 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
0.36
0.34 / Runoff Area=3.930 ac
0.32
o .3 j; Runoff Volume=0.063 of
.28
3 0.26 % Runoff Depth>0.19
0 0.24
LL 0.22 Flow Length=496'
0.2
0.18 !; Slope=0.0404 '/'
0.16
0.14 %�� Tc=16.4 min
0.12 //�
0.1 /�� CN 58
0.08
0.04
0.02
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
p� Runoff

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Runoff = 0.77 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 0.140 af, Depth> 0.19"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
8.730 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
8.730 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
26.8 854 0.0363 0.53 Lag/CN Method, DA 3
Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Hydrograph
p� Runoff
0.77 cfs
Type 11 24-h r
1-yr
24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
jRunoff Area=8.730 ac
Runoff Volume=0.140 of
Runoff Depth>0.19"
Flow Length=854`
Slope=0.0363 'L'_
Tc=26.8 min
-
=//58-
s
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Runoff = 0.78 cfs @ 12.30 hrs, Volume= 0.124 af, Depth> 0.22"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
Area (ac) CN Description
6.720 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
0.160 85 Gravel roads, HSG B
6.880 59 Weighted Average
6.880 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
25.3 779 0.0334 0.51 Lag/CN Method, DA 4
Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Hydrograph
0.85
0.78 cfs
0.8
Type 11 24-hr
0.75
j
0.7
' j 1-y r
0.65
j, 24-hr Rainfall=2.88"
0.6
00.6
Runoff Area=6.880 ac
N 0.5
j Runoff Volume=0.124 of
3 0.45
j Runoff Depth>0.22"
0 0.4
LL
/ Flow Length=779'
0s5
,,
0.3
Slope=0.0334 '/'
0.25
Tc=25.3 m i n
0.2
0.15
CN=59
0.1
0.05
11
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
p Runoff

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1 S: DA 1
Runoff Area=10.640 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.63"
Flow Length=1,029'
Slope=0.0204 '/' Tc=40.4 min CN=59 Runoff=12.58 cfs 1.442 of
Subcatchment2S: DA 2
Runoff Area=3.930 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.57"
Flow Length=496'
Slope=0.0404 '/' Tc=16.4 min CN=58 Runoff=7.98 cfs 0.514 of
Subcatchment3S: DA 3
Runoff Area=8.730 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.56"
Flow Length=854'
Slope=0.0363 '/' Tc=26.8 min CN=58 Runoff=12.99 cfs 1.136 of
Subcatchment4S: DA 4
Runoff Area=6.880 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.64"
Flow Length=779'
Slope=0.0334 '/' Tc=25.3 min CN=59 Runoff=11.29 cfs 0.940 of
Total Runoff Area = 30.180 ac Runoff Volume = 4.031 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.60"
100.00% Pervious = 30.180 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Runoff = 12.58 cfs @ 12.41 hrs, Volume= 1.442 af, Depth> 1.63"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
10.060 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
0.580 85 Gravel roads, HSG B
10.640 59 Weighted Average
10.640 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
40.4 1,029 0.0204 0.42 Lag/CN Method, DA 1
Subcatchment 1S: DA 1
Hydrograph
14
0 Runoff
13
12.58 cfs
Type 11 24-hr
12
10-yr -
% 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
10
9
Runoff Area=10.640 ac
H 8
Runoff Volume=1.442 of
3 7
/
j Runoff Depth>1.63"
LL 6
Flow Length=1,029'
5
'/'
j Slope=0.0204
4
Tc=40.4 min
3
r
CN=59
2
0'
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12
Summary for Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Runoff = 7.98 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.514 af, Depth> 1.57"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
3.930 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
3.930 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
16.4 496 0.0404 0.50 Lag/CN Method, DA 2
N
0
LL
Subcatchment 2S: DA 2
Hydrograph
7.98 CfS I
o Runoff
®®
12■
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Type II 24-hr
10-yr
24-hr_ Rainfal I=_6.00"_
Runoff Area=3.930 ac
Runoff Volume=0514 of
- Runoff Depth>1.57"
Flow Length=496'
Slope=0.0404 '/'
- Tc=16.4 min-
CN=58
12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13
Summary for Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Runoff = 12.99 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 1.136 af, Depth> 1.56"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
8.730 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
8.730 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
26.8 854 0.0363 0.53 Lag/CN Method, DA 3
Subcatchment 3S: DA 3
Hydrograph
14 , 12.99 cfS o Runoff
13 j Type 11.24-hr
12 / 10-yr
11 j 24-hr Rainfall=6.00" -
10
9 % Runoff Area=8.730 ac
$ Runoff Volume=1.136 of
3 7 % Runoff Depth>1.56"
LL 6 j Flow Length=854'
5 j Slope=0.0363 '/'
4 Tc=26.8 min
3 CN=58
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

Oakwood Post -construction Type 11 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Prepared by Civil Design Concepts, PA Printed 8/5/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 04679 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14
Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Runoff = 11.29 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.940 af, Depth> 1.64"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10-yr, 24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Area (ac) CN Description
6.720 58 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG B
0.160 85 Gravel roads, HSG B
6.880 59 Weighted Average
6.880 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
25.3 779 0.0334 0.51 Lag/CN Method, DA 4
Subcatchment 4S: DA 4
Hydrograph
0 Runoff
12
11.29 cfs
11
j Type 11 24-hr
10
'%/ 10-yr
24-hr Rainfall=6.00"
Runoff Area=6.880 ac
Runoff Volume=0.940 of
3
Runoff Depth>1.64"
6
LL
% Flow Length=779,
5
Slope=0.0334 I
4�j
Tc=25.3 min
3
CN=59
2
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

COD C CWH
L?esign
Concepts, RA
Oakwood Solar
CDC Proj ect No.: 12056
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN SCHEDULE
BASIN INFORMATION
Trap/Basin ID
A
B
C
Units
Basin Type
Skimmer
Skimmer
Skimmer
Maximum Drainage Area
10
10
10
acre
Drainage Area (DA)
8.36
3.41
7.03
acre
Disturbed Area
8.36
3.41
7.03
acre
Runoff Coefficient (C)
0.6
0.6
0.6
Rainfall Intensity (h0)
7.15
7.15
7.15
in/hr
Top of Water Length
165
100
165
feet
Top of Water Width
78
50
60
feet
L/W Ratio
2.1:1
2.0:1
2.8:1
feet
Water Depth
2.00
2.00
2.00
feet
Side Slope Ratio
2.00
2.00
2.00
X:1
Bottom of Basin Length
157
92
157
feet
Bottom of Basin Width
1 70
42
52
feet
SURFACE AREA & VOLUME
Runoff (10 Year Event)
35.86
14.63
30.16
cfs
Minimum Volume
15,048
6,138
12,654
cu-ft
Volume Provided
23,860
8,864
18,064
cu-ft
Minimum Surface Area
11,656
4,754
9,802
sq-ft
Surface Area Provided
12,870
5,000
9,900
sq-ft
SKIMMER SIZE
Drawdown Time
3
3
3
days
Skimmer Size
3.0
2.0
2.5
inch
Orifice Diameter
2.7
1.8
2.5
inch
Does the basin have a spillway? Yes
SPILLWAY SIZE
Spillway Dimensions
feet
Water Depth
feet
Free -Board
feet
Notes:
NCDENR E&SC Manual (Ch 6.6)
Weighted Coefficient
at TC
2:1 Min, 6:1 Max
Train for Skimmer & Basin
= Lt - 2 (Slope x Depth)
= Wt - 2 (Slope x Depth)
=DAxCxI
In NC assume 3 days
Faircloth Skimmer Chart
Faircloth Orifice Factors
Basins always have a spillway.
1. Spillway dimensions are calculatued using weir calculations.
2. Rainfall Intensity, I, is obtained from Appendix 8.03.07 from the NC Erosion & Sediment Control Planning & Design Manual
3. Skimmer Design is based off of the Faircloth Skimmer Packet
4. Drawdown time is per NCDENR requirements
Issued 8/5/2020

COD C CWH
L?esign
Concepts, RA
Oakwood Solar
CDC Proj ect No.: 12056
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN SCHEDULE
BASIN INFORMATION
Trap/Basin ID
D
Units
Basin Type
Skimmer
Maximum Drainage Area
10
acre
Drainage Area (DA)
5.84
acre
Disturbed Area
5.84
acre
Runoff Coefficient (C)
0.6
Rainfall Intensity (h0)
7.15
in/hr
Top of Water Length
151
feet
Top of Water Width
55
feet
L/W Ratio
2.7:1
feet
Water Depth
2.00
feet
Side Slope Ratio
2.00
X:1
Bottom of Basin Length
143
feet
Bottom of Basin Width
47
feet
SURFACE AREA & VOLUME
Runoff (10 Year Event)
25.05
cfs
Minimum Volume
10,512
cu-ft
Volume Provided
15,026
cu-ft
Minimum Surface Area
8,142
sq-ft
Surface Area Provided
8,305
sq-ft
SKIMMER SIZE
Drawdown Time
3
days
Skimmer Size
2.5
N/A
N/A
inch
Orifice Diameter
2.2
N/A
N/A
inch
Does the basin have a spillway? Yes
SPILLWAY SIZE
Spillway Dimensions
feet
Water Depth
feet
Free -Board
feet
Notes:
NCDENR E&SC Manual (Ch 6.6)
Weighted Coefficient
at TC
2:1 Min, 6:1 Max
Train for Skimmer & Basin
= Lt - 2 (Slope x Depth)
= Wt - 2 (Slope x Depth)
=DAxCxI
In NC assume 3 days
Faircloth Skimmer Chart
Faircloth Orifice Factors
Basins always have a spillway.
1. Spillway dimensions are calculatued using weir calculations.
2. Rainfall Intensity, I, is obtained from Appendix 8.03.07 from the NC Erosion & Sediment Control Planning & Design Manual
3. Skimmer Design is based off of the Faircloth Skimmer Packet
4. Drawdown time is per NCDENR requirements
Issued 8/5/2020

.Q
Ln
Q
C
N
(0
m
Lv
E
E
to
C
O
(0
3
cr
LU
i
i
75
3
c�
G
cd
G
Cf]
N
E
L
O
Ln
z
w
0
U
z
Ln
M
C
O
U
N
Ln
n
r-I
G
2
J
U
wi
N
V
0)
(0
u
U
N
I
J
-i
Lv
(0
.L.J
N
Lv
N
N
N
_cu
O
N
cu
E
Lv
Lw
(0
U
O
c
cu
U
Li-
N
O
U
U
FO
O
4J
E
cts
L
L.J
N
CL
3
Ln
3
O
c
Lv
L
c
O
CL
m
4L
m
cu
U
L
3
N
L
cu
4L
cu
15
O
4L
L
cu
cu
4—
O
'n
Lv
U
N
LJ �
cu y
u U GO
CU
Lw
0 U
O .—
y
(13 L
cu
cu >
L
3 N
N L
(0 3
Lv V1
E (mu
— E
L l�
cu
4— cu
O -C
dA
t C
dA �
C
c L
J (�
Z
rn 0 0
cn cn cn
L L —
>
N N 0
on on Lv
Lv Lv Lv
L L L
U U LL
CL
L �
O
L
Ln CO
00
r4
N
Lfl
06
M
II II II C 2 II
C7 J O 2
a4L- CLU
> °�
_N
LU
>cu

2�
4�
c
cu
cu

.Q
Ln
co
C
N
(0
m
Lv
E
E
to
C
O
(0
3
cr
LU
i
i
75
3
c�
G
cd
G
Cf]
E
L
O
Ln
z
w
0
U
z
Ln
M
C
O
U
N
Ln
n
r-I
G
2
J
U
wi
N
V
0)
(0
u
U
N
I
J
-i
Lv
(0
.L.J
N
Lv
N
N
N
_cu
O
N
cu
E
Lv
Lw
(0
U
O
c
cu
U
N
O
U
U
FO
O
4J
E
cts
L
L.J
N
CL
3
Ln
3
O
c
Lv
L
c
O
CL
m
4L
m
cu
U
L
3
N
L
cu
4L
cu
15
O
4L
L
cu
cu
4—
O
'n
Lv
U
N
LJ �
cu y
u U GO
CU
Lw
0 U
O .—
y
(13 L
cu
cu >
L
3 N
N L
(0 3
Lv V1
C
G (mu
— E
L l�
cu
4— cu
O -C
dA
� C
dA >
C
c L
J (�
Z
rn 0 0
cn cn cn
L L —
>
N N 0
on on Lv
Lv Lv Lv
L L L
U U LL
CL
L �
O
L
Ln CO
00
r4
-i
N
M
r -I
M
uVm
II II II C 2 II
C7 J O 2
a4L- CLU
> °�
_N
LU
>cu

2�
4�
c
cu
cu

CL
Ln
U
c
N
(0
m
cu
E
E
(n
i
O
(0
3
cr
LU
i
i
75
3
c�
G
cd
G
Cf]
(0
E
L
O
Ln
z
w
0
U
z
Ln
M
C
O
U
N
Ln
n
r-I
G
2
J
U
wi
N
V
0)
(0
u
U
N
I
J
-i
cu
(0
N
cu
N
N
N
_cu
O
N
cu
cu
tw
(0
U
O
c
cu
U
4-
N
O
U
U
FO
O
4J
E
c�
L
Y
N
CL
3
on
3
O
c
cu
L
c
O
CL
m
Y
m
cu
U
L
3
N
L
cu
Y
cu
15
Y
O
Y
L
cu
cu
4—
O
V1
cu
U
N
cu y
u U GO
CU
Y
t
0 U
O .—
y
(B L
cu
cu >
L
3 N
N L
(0 3
U on
G (B
- G
L l�
cu
4— cu
O -C
dA
� C
dA �
c L
J (�
Z
M 0 0
M M M
L L —
>
N N 0
V1 V1 N
cu cu cu
L L L
U U LL
CL
L �
O
L
Ln CO
00
r4
I
N
CL
4
Y
U
_O
cu
II II II C 2 II
C7 J O 2
Y 4L CL
> °U
_N
LU
>cu

2�
4�
c
cu
cu

.Q
Ln
0
N
(0
m
Lv
E
E
to
i
O
(0
3
cr
LU
i
i
75
3
cd
G
Cf]
(0
E
L
O
Ln
z
w
0
U
z
Ln
M
C
O
U
N
Ln
n
r-I
G
2
J
U
wJ
N
V
0)
(0
u
U
N
I
J
-i
Lv
(0
N
Lv
N
N
N
_cu
O
N
cu
Lv
Lw
(0
U
O
c
cu
U
4—
N
O
U
U
FO
O
4J
E
cts
L
Y
N
CL
3
Ln
3
O
c
Lv
L
c
O
CL
m
Y
m
cu
U
L
3
N
L
cu
Y
cu
15
Y
O
Y
L
cu
cu
4—
O
'n
Lv
U
N
cu y
u U GO
CU
Y
Lw
0 U
O .—
y
(13 L
cu
cu >
L
3 N
N L
(0 3
Lv V1
C
G (mu
- G
L l�
cu
4— cu
O -C
dA
� C
dA >
c L
J (�
Z
rn 0 0
cn cn cn
L L —
>
N N 0
on on Lv
Lv Lv Lv
L L L
U U LL
CL
L �
O
L
Ln CO
00
r4
00
L.O
cn
N
II II II C 2 II
C7 J O 2
Y 4L CL
> °U
_N
LU
>cu

2�
4�
c
cu
cu

Hydrology Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AUtodeskS Civil 31DO by Autodesk, Inc.
Temp Ditch Al
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Storm frequency (yrs)
= 10
Drainage area (ac)
= 4.800
Rainfall Inten (in/hr)
= 7.144
OF Curve
= Oakwood.IDF
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
3.00
0.00 If
0
Runoff Hyd - Qp = 20.57 (cfs)
Wednesday, Jun 102020
Peak discharge (cfs) = 20.57
Time interval (min) = 1
Runoff coeff. (C) = 0.6
Tc by User (min) = 5
Rec limb factor = 1.00
Runoff Hydrograph
10-yr frequency
5
Hydrograph Volume = 6,172 (cuft); 0.142 (acft)
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• us
3.00
0.00
10
Time (min)

6/12/2020
NORT I
GREEN'
CHANNEL ANALYSIS
> > > Temporary Ditch Al
Name
Temporary Ditch Al
Discharge
20.57
Channel Slope
0.04
Channel Bottom Width
1
Left Side Slope
2
Right Side Slope
2
Low Flow Liner
Retardence Class
C 6-12 in
Vegetation Type
None
Vegetation Density
None
Soil Type
None
C125BN
North American Green
5401 St. Wendel -Cynthiana Rd.
Poseyville, Indiana 47633
Tel. [phone]
> Fax [phone]
www.nagreen.com
ECMDS v7.0
Normal Permissible Calculated Safety Staple
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity Mannings N Remarks
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
C125BN Straight 20.57 cfs 7.48 ft/s 0.95 ft 0.026 2.8 Ibs/ft2 2.37 Ibs/ft2 1.18 STABLE D
Unvegetated
Underlying Straight 20.57 cfs 7.48 ft/s 0.95 ft 0.026 0.65 Ibs/ft2 1.31 Ibs/ft2 0.5 UNSTABLE D
Substrate
https://ecmds.com/project/l 44473/channel-analysis/184934/show 1 /1

Hydrology Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AUtodeskS Civil 3DO by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jun 10 2020
Temp Ditch A2
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Peak discharge (cfs)
= 8.315
Storm frequency (yrs)
= 10
Time interval (min)
= 1
Drainage area (ac)
= 1.940
Runoff coeff. (C)
= 0.6
Rainfall Inten (in/hr)
= 7.144
Tc by User (min)
= 5
OF Curve
= Oakwood.IDF
Rec limb factor
= 1.00
Q (cfs)
10.00
4.00
2.00
Runoff Hyd - Qp = 8.32 (cfs)
Runoff Hydrograph
10-yr frequency
5
Hydrograph Volume = 2,495 (cuft); 0.057 (acft)
Q (cfs)
10.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
10
Time (min)

6/12/2020
NORT I
GREEN'
CHANNEL ANALYSIS
> > > Temporary Ditch A2
Name
Temporary Ditch A2
Discharge
8.315
Channel Slope
0.015
Channel Bottom Width
1
Left Side Slope
2
Right Side Slope
2
Low Flow Liner
Retardence Class
C 6-12 in
Vegetation Type
None
Vegetation Density
None
Soil Type
None
DS75
North American Green
5401 St. Wendel -Cynthiana Rd.
Poseyville, Indiana 47633
Tel. [phone]
> Fax [phone]
www.nagreen.com
ECMDS v7.0
Normal Permissible Calculated Safety Staple
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity Mannings N Remarks
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
DS75 Straight 8.32 cfs 3.42 ft/s 0.88 ft 0.033 1.6 Ibs/ft2 0.82 Ibs/ft2 1.94 STABLE D
Unvegetated
Underlying Straight 8.32 cfs 3.42 ft/s 0.88 ft 0.033 0.37 Ibs/ft2 0.46 Ibs/ft2 0.81 UNSTABLE D
Substrate
https://ecmds.com/project/l 44473/channel-analysis/184936/show 1 /1

Hydrology Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AUtodeskS Civil 3DO by Autodesk, Inc. Thursday, Jun 11 2020
Temp Ditch B
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Peak discharge (cfs)
= 9.387
Storm frequency (yrs)
= 10
Time interval (min)
= 1
Drainage area (ac)
= 2.190
Runoff coeff. (C)
= 0.6
Rainfall Inten (in/hr)
= 7.144
Tc by User (min)
= 5
OF Curve
= Oakwood.IDF
Rec limb factor
= 1.00
Q (cfs)
10.00
4.00
2.00
Runoff Hyd - Qp = 9.39 (cfs)
Runoff Hydrograph
10-yr frequency
5
Hydrograph Volume = 2,816 (cuft); 0.065 (acft)
Q (cfs)
10.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
10
Time (min)

6/12/2020
NORT I
GREEN'
CHANNEL ANALYSIS
> > > Temporary Ditch B
Name
Temporary Ditch B
Discharge
9.387
Channel Slope
0.015
Channel Bottom Width
1
Left Side Slope
2
Right Side Slope
2
Low Flow Liner
Retardence Class
C 6-12 in
Vegetation Type
None
Vegetation Density
None
Soil Type
None
DS75
North American Green
5401 St. Wendel -Cynthiana Rd.
Poseyville, Indiana 47633
Tel. [phone]
> Fax [phone]
www.nagreen.com
ECMDS v7.0
Normal Permissible Calculated Safety Staple
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity Mannings N Remarks
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
DS75 Straight 9.39 cfs 3.54 ft/s 0.93 ft 0.033 1.6 Ibs/ft2 0.87 Ibs/ft2 1.84 STABLE D
Unvegetated
Underlying Straight 9.39 cfs 3.54 ft/s 0.93 ft 0.033 0.37 Ibs/ft2 0.48 Ibs/ft2 0.77 UNSTABLE D
Substrate
https://ecmds.com/project/l 44473/channel-analysis/184937/show 1 /1

Hydrology Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AUtodeskS Civil 31DO by Autodesk, Inc.
Temp Ditch C
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Storm frequency (yrs)
= 10
Drainage area (ac)
= 4.540
Rainfall Inten (in/hr)
= 7.144
OF Curve
= Oakwood.IDF
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
3.00
0.00 W
0
Runoff Hyd - Qp = 19.46 (cfs)
Thursday, Jun 11 2020
Peak discharge (cfs)
= 19.46
Time interval (min)
= 1
Runoff coeff. (C)
= 0.6
Tc by User (min)
= 5
Rec limb factor
= 1.00
Runoff Hydrograph
10-yr frequency
5
Hydrograph Volume = 5,838 (cuft); 0.134 (acft)
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• us
3.00
0.00
10
Time (min)

6/12/2020
NORT I
GREEN'
CHANNEL ANALYSIS
> > > Temporary Ditch C
Name
Temporary Ditch C
Discharge
19.45
Channel Slope
0.01
Channel Bottom Width
1
Left Side Slope
2
Right Side Slope
2
Low Flow Liner
Retardence Class
C 6-12 in
Vegetation Type
None
Vegetation Density
None
Soil Type
None
DS75
North American Green
5401 St. Wendel -Cynthiana Rd.
Poseyville, Indiana 47633
Tel. [phone]
> Fax [phone]
www.nagreen.com
ECMDS v7.0
Normal Permissible Calculated Safety Staple
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity Mannings N Remarks
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
DS75 Straight 19.45 cfs 3.64 ft/s 1.4 ft 0.033 1.6 Ibs/ft2 0.88 Ibs/ft2 1.83 STABLE D
Unvegetated
Underlying Straight 19.45 cfs 3.64 ft/s 1.4 ft 0.033 0.37 Ibs/ft2 0.46 Ibs/ft2 0.81 UNSTABLE D
Substrate
https://ecmds.com/project/l 44473/channel-analysis/184938/show 1 /1

Hydrology Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for AUtodeskS Civil 3DO by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jun 10 2020
Temp Ditch D
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Peak discharge (cfs)
= 11.40
Storm frequency (yrs)
= 10
Time interval (min)
= 1
Drainage area (ac)
= 2.660
Runoff coeff. (C)
= 0.6
Rainfall Inten (in/hr)
= 7.144
Tc by User (min)
= 5
OF Curve
= Oakwood.IDF
Rec limb factor
= 1.00
Q (cfs)
12.00
10.00
: M
.M
4.00
2.00
e
Runoff Hyd - Qp = 11.40 (cfs)
Runoff Hydrograph
10-yr frequency
5
Hydrograph Volume = 3,420 (cuft); 0.079 (acft)
Q (cfs)
12.00
10.00
M
M
4.00
2.00
0.00
10
Time (min)

6/12/2020
NORT I
GREEN'
CHANNEL ANALYSIS
> > > Temporary Ditch D
Name
Temporary Ditch D
Discharge
11.4
Channel Slope
0.025
Channel Bottom Width
1
Left Side Slope
2
Right Side Slope
2
Low Flow Liner
Retardence Class
C 6-12 in
Vegetation Type
None
Vegetation Density
None
Soil Type
None
SC150
North American Green
5401 St. Wendel -Cynthiana Rd.
Poseyville, Indiana 47633
Tel. [phone]
> Fax [phone]
www.nagreen.com
ECMDS v7.0
Normal Permissible Calculated Safety Staple
Phase Reach Discharge Velocity Mannings N Remarks
Depth Shear Stress Shear Stress Factor Pattern
SC150 Straight 11.4 cfs 4.13 ft/s 0.95 ft 0.037 2 Ibs/ft2 1.48 Ibs/ft2 1.35 STABLE D
Unvegetated
Underlying Straight 11.4 cfs 4.13 ft/s 0.95 ft 0.037 0.47 Ibs/ft2 0.82 Ibs/ft2 0.57 UNSTABLE D
Substrate
https://ecmds.com/project/l 44473/channel-analysis/184939/show 1 /1

Appendices
Curves may not be extrapolated.
Figure 8.06a Design of outlet protection protection from a round pipe flowing full, minimum tailwater condition (Tw < 0.5 diameter).
STRUCTURE: RIP RAP A LENGTH: loft
DISCHARGE: ALL SKIMMER BASIN LESS THAN 3 ds WIDTH: 10.25 ft
PIPE DIA. (D) 3 in d50: 0.50 ft
DEPTH: 1.5 ft
Rev. 12/93 8.06.3

USDA United States
= Department of
Agriculture
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Orange County,
North Carolina
Oakwood Solar Farm, LLC
May 18, 2020

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Orange County, North Carolina.......................................................................13
EnC—Enon loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes ...................................................
13
GeB—Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes......................................14
GeC—Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes....................................15
TaD—Tarrus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes.............................................17
W—Water....................................................................................................18
References............................................................................................................19

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
658880 658970 659060 659150
659240
659240
a
659330
36° 540"N
I
I
II

a) '0 a)
oU)
_
U
N
U) U)
m p a)
U
i y
a) �
u
a)
Oa)
O `
m
CO
V 2
2 N U O
U
a)30
p
a)
U O O
E
O
a) 6 U) 6
.92
+
U)
O_
o E
O
U
' w N
m
CL
m
V
— U N
Z
m
a)
N O
iZ-N
'�
a) `' N a
m
U
.O
E
N
U
N-0 O
y
O
Q m
O O
Q 3 O
m a)
U
Of
m °)
O
O
a)
a)
N
O
E m y
L
U)
a) CJ
a)
O >
Z
U O
p
t E u) O
Q
O = L
m
O d
a) '6 y m
Q
" N
O
a)
L 0 m
O
_C
3: y
U
E
U W
�p m 0 a)
N mCL
O-
Z O-
m
N
N O O
p Q
O
m a)
E U)
L
m
U)
U (6
C
(6 .0 mm-� O O
2�
U
a)
m
Oa-
a)
O_ m
O
>+
m
>
U
p O a)
O
O U
>+ O '� U
O
30 O)
U)
2
O
E �' m N
Z
N
O L
O
U
'� N m
O
U
O_
N m E N
—
E
c
a)
N
a)
7 y U O N
U O_�
,� -O
O
a) p
O)
-a Q N C
Q�
U m
U
y
O
O
O N
y
N>
N
Q
U
m
U
CL
3 J
N Q O O
—
a)
a) 0 0
C
G
m
E
Q
m
m s
a)
m�
Z � E
-0 L 0�
a) �- O
a) n
°)
ns
m
a)
a)
o N 0�
'E
U)
m
E C H y
>+ 2
ai m
t N N jp
a�i
O) (6
m 6
m a)
E
0 0) N�
>'
O -0
O y
O- N >+
a) U m m 7
-U) '6
N Q
(n
._
T
O 76 m O_
O
U
C m N w
a) N E rn
O a)
m 3 U
U °?
.J 3 C m m
U .O
Q m
'0
O
L O N E
Q m
U)
.30
OC
E
E
0m= m
O C
E m� U
O pO a
'
'O
m 0
a)
my
O '6am)
U) O
a)
u)
U
U C 2E
Q
U a)
E
O
)
O 'Q
N
O U
O O
n
Q-0
Ln 46
0O
LP
O LOC
W—U U)
a E
u)
Q m
o
U U
Q
y
d y
R O
Li U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>.
00
0
0
L
d
Q
0 J N
CL
a) .0. O
y o
O
m a
0
CL O
U U>
Z
° aR
N L_ y
O U U
�
O
°
a)
R m
U
J a Q
R
C
W
"
!
V
F
m
W
J
y
a
Q
pCL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
R
Q
a
a
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
a w
3 R
3 y
O >
a >
°
w o
O`
o w
Q
_
o
o
a R
R
R R w
LL 3
3
O T
a
w > >
= `o
a R w o
E
coi
O
a)
o `o
Y o
U)
a
y
Q
0
cn
0 0 S o
cn cn p m
o R
m U
o
U (7 (7
m 'm R E
J J
n a)
a
O m
m U)
R a)
U) U)
a
in U)
O
U)
w
a
U
N
M �' i�"'o a
'ory%MVrd hilj�IN
'4k1�
m I�V
Ill.ir ,wdl�V
pO
R
N
I 13 Q
y
Q
V)
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
EnC
Enon loam, 6 to 12 percent
slopes
2.2
4.4%
GeB
Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
24.3
49.3%
GeC
Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes
16.2
32.8%
TaD
Tarrus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
5.7
11.5%
W
Water
1.0
1.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
49.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Orange County, North Carolina
EnC—Enon loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3tgm
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Enon and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Enon
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase
and/or gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 3 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
BE - 8 to 11 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 11 to 33 inches: clay
C - 33 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Wynott
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Wedowee
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Cecil
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
GeB—Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vy6v
Elevation: 160 to 820 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 43 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 61 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 230 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Georgeville and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Georgeville
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or residuum
weathered from argillite and/or residuum weathered from phyllite and/or
residuum weathered from sericite schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: silt loam
E - 9 to 14 inches: silt loam
Bt1 - 14 to 20 inches:
silty clay loam
Bt2 - 20 to 27 inches:
clay
Bt3 - 27 to 49 inches:
silty clay
BCt - 49 to 57 inches:
silty clay loam
C - 57 to 62 inches: silt
loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 9.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Tarrus
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
GeC—Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2vy6n
Elevation: 160 to 820 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 43 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 61 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 230 days
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Georgeville and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Georgeville
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or residuum
weathered from argillite and/or residuum weathered from phyllite and/or
residuum weathered from sericite schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam
BE - 7 to 10 inches: silty clay loam
Bt - 10 to 44 inches: clay
BC - 44 to 53 inches: silty clay loam
C - 53 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat)
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Tarrus
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Shoulder, backslope
: Interfluve
Moderately high to
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
TAD—Tarrus silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2n868
Elevation: 200 to 650 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Tarrus and similar soils: 75 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarrus
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam
Bt - 8 to 50 inches: clay loam
Cr - 50 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Badin
Percent of map unit: 15 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldston
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water.- 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
18

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
20

E USGS U.S. D U'.T, GEOLOGIICAL SURVEY RIOR w NORTEFLAND QUADRANGLEAROOSE UN
q;N USTopo 7 5 MINUTE ERIE
SCALE 24NW °n�,_
_
m
n ® om.e vJwMNe4 n.�ao.oaa ooioi�i�sa000was EFLAND9 NC:

Oz
Z(0
M
N
�1
N ((2 IIV
'K Q
N
IIV
j
IIV
N
(6
U
Q
COL(6
E (6
w
N
(6 y y
C
Y J
C
(6
2
(6 LL
CL O
=
O
O
i_ i O
(6
-0
0 6 a
_ a
°o
N
3
= m
(6
0 0 c
u° 3(0
E 17 a c m
N 6 w
o N E c
0 0
'yti
y0
0= _
d
_
c O
d E
Oi Q 'O
0
LL w N
N
Q uV O
O m '6
o LL "`
2
'O
O
LL
'6
N
(6
3
(/) C
J
cl = i
N
N (6
Q (6
(6(CO U
N
y N
Y L
'r = U
T LL
w -0
N .
_ N
U N=
U O
(6 (6 O=
s
cl (6 C K
N
O
LL
=
E
y0 O
O
i > O (6
N
(6
m (6
(6
Q
E
N
.O (6
w N Q
U (6
= E N
w 3 N
O i E O
(6
2 = 4,5 '6
(6
E
-
J
N LL
O
(6 =
W N N 9
U N-
> (0
Q
N .T+
.�.+ 3 0
C U Q
.O '6 ®^ = E
O
d N E _
O
U>
3 3 N
p N Z O
= O m d LL
= O
N
C
3
U Y
=O = W .o m
(6 C 3 =
= U
(6 C
(6
:+6 '0
= i OQ
O Q
'0 w
= C LL
0 .- -' N
>> A � (6 j
(6 U
E� y U�
U O .�.+ fn .�.+
;
U
N N H O (/) U
o
H m (6
y6 Q
N N
(�6 .�.+
N Q OFF' 3 E 0
c7
O Q (6 w N
o
=
LL c76
�
°� o
u
E
w° 3
Q O>
'..R c
'6
_ _ (o
O O.0 0
li U Q J Q
Nw
Q W
N
Q
>
U J
O (6 0 0 E
U �i U m J
0 Oi '6
U d 2
tlll o
Z U
� N-
O
N
W O p_
_ j O N N
n+ E' 3
N y°� N
i (6 (6
= O
N O •O U O
E N
d LL E
U
N N
N Q (=6 C
p O
�
LL 101
Q
4,5
W
EQ=
;
nOn Q
N �
WW
W W
H
0E
O
'oyO
-0(6
QLLI0�O
i
= O
<
LLI Q
Z
Z
Q N
(0- W
E
CU N
O
(Q6 S
QC
E�mCD�
w
-0`�
0
n�6EQ
E=w N nn
¢
�.C�y
O
79° 13'41.71 "W
0
0
ICD
N
0
0
Lo-
0
CD -
CD
0
LO
0
LO
N
n

Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Mebane, North Carolina, USA -
Latitude: 36.0874*, Longitude:-79.2319°
Elevation: 709.61 ft**��������
L 'source: ESRI Maps
source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
Duration
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000
4.74
5.63
6.54
7.15
7.82
8.24
8.63
8.92
9.22
9.41
5-min
(4.33-5.18)
(5.15-6.16)
(5.98-7.15)
(6.53-7.81)
(7.10-8.53)
(7.46-9.00)
(7.76-9.41)
(7.99-9.74)
(8.18-10.1)
(8.28-10.3)
3.79
4.50
5.24
5.72
6.23
6.56
6.85
7.07
7.29
7.40
10-min
(3.46-4.14)
(4.12-4.93)
(4.79-5.72)
(5.22-6.25)
(5.66-6.80)
(5.95-7.16)
(6.17-7.48)
(6.34-7.73)
(6.47-7.97)
(6.52-8.10)
3.16
3.77
4.42
4.82
5.27
5.54
5.78
5.94
6.12
6.20
15-min
(2.88-3.45)
(3.45-4.13)
(4.04-4.83)
(4.40-5.27)
(4.78-5.75)
(5.02-6.05)
(5.20-6.30)
(5.33-6.50)
(5.43-6.69)
(5.46-6.78)
2.16
2.61
3.14
3.50
3.90
4.17
4.42
4.63
4.87
5.02
30-min
(1.98-2.37)
(2.38-2.85)
(2.87-3.43)
(3.19-3.82)
(3.54-4.26)
(3.78-4.55)
(3.98-4.83)
(4.15-5.06)
(4.32-5.32)
(4.42-5.49)
1.35
1.64
2.01
2.28
2.60
2.83
3.05
3.25
3.49
3.66
60-min
(1.23-1.48)
(1.50-1.79)
(1.84-2.20)
(2.08-2.49)
(2.36-2.83)
(2.56-3.09)
(2.74-3.32)
(2.91-3.55)
(3.10-3.82)
(3.23-4.01)
0.801
0.970
1.20
1.37
1.59
1.75
1.91
2.06
2.26
2.40
[72F7]F
(0.734-0.874)
(0.890-1.06)
(1.10-1.31)
(1.25-1.50)
(1.44-1.73)
(1.58-1.91)
(1.71-2.08)
(1.83-2.24)
(1.99-2.45)
(2.10-2.62)
0.570
0.692
0.858
0.984
1.14
1.26
1.38
1.50
1.65
1.76
3-hr
(0.524-0.621)
(0.637-0.754)
(0.789-0.935)
(0.901-1.07)
(1.04-1.24)
(1.14-1.37)
(1.24-1.50)
(1.34-1.62)
(1.45-1.79)
(1.54-1.91)
0.346
0.419
0.520
0.598
0.701
0.782
0.864
0.946
1.06
1.14
[6F7]F
(0.320-0.378)
(0.387-0.457)
(0.479-0.567)
(0.549-0.650)
(0.639-0.760)
(0.707-0.847)
(0.775-0.934)
(0.839-1.02)
(0.924-1.14)
(0.987-1.24)
0.205
0.247
0.309
0.358
0.425
0.478
0.534
0.591
0.672
0.736
[�12-hr]F
(0.189-0.223)
(0.228-0.270)
(0.284-0.337)
(0.328-0.389)
(0.386-0.460)
(0.431-0.516)
(0.476-0.575)
(0.521-0.636)
(0.581-0.723)
(0.626-0.793)
0.120
0.145
0.181
0.208
0.245
0.275
0.304
0.335
0.376
0.408
[�24-hr]F
(0.112-0.129)
(0.135-0.156)
(0.168-0.194)
(0.194-0.223)
(0.227-0.263)
(0.254-0.295)
(0.280-0.328)
(0.307-0.361)
(0.343-0.406)
(0.371-0.442)
0.070
0.085
0.104
0.119
0.139
0.155
0.171
0.186
0.208
0.224
2-day]F
(0.066-0.075)
(0.079-0.091)
(0.098-0.112)
(0.111-0.128)
(0.130-0.150)
(0.144-0.166)
(0.158-0.184)
(0.172-0.201)
(0.190-0.225)
(0.205-0.243)
0.050
0.059
0.073
0.084
0.098
0.109
0.120
0.131
0.146
0.158
3-day]F
(0.046-0.053)
(0.056-0.064)
(0.068-0.078)
(0.078-0.090)
(0.091-0.105)
(0.101-0.117)
(0.111-0.129)
(0.121-0.142)
(0.134-0.159)
(0.144-0.172)
0.039
0.047
0.058
0.066
0.077
0.086
0.094
0.103
0.116
0.125
4-day]F
(0.037-0.042)
(0.044-0.050)
(0.054-0.062)
(0.061-0.070)
(0.072-0.082)
(0.079-0.092)
(0.087-0.102)
(0.095-0.112)
(0.106-0.125)
(0.114-0.136)
0.026
0.031
0.037
0.042
0.049
0.054
0.060
0.065
0.073
0.079
7-day]F
(0.024-0.027)
(0.029-0.033)
(0.035-0.040)
(0.040-0.045)
(0.046-0.052)
(0.051-0.058)
(0.056-0.064)
(0.061-0.070)
(0.067-0.079)
(0.072-0.086)
0.020
0.024
0.029
0.033
0.038
0.042
0.046
0.050
0.055
0.060
[10-day]F
(0.019-0.022)
(0.023-0.026)
(0.027-0.031)
(0.031-0.035)
(0.036-0.040)
(0.039-0.045)
(0.043-0.049)
(0.046-0.054)
(0.051-0.060)
(0.055-0.065)
0.014
0.016
0.019
0.021
0.024
0.027
0.029
0.032
0.036
0.038
20-day
(0.013-0.014)
(0.015-0.017)
(0.018-0.020)
(0.020-0.022)
(0.023-0.026)
(0.025-0.029)
(0.027-0.031)
(0.030-0.034)
(0.033-0.038)
(0.035-0.041)
0.011
0.013
0.015
0.017
0.019
0.021
0.023
0.024
0.026
0.028
30-day
(0.011-0.012)
(0.013-0.014)
(0.015-0.016)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.018-0.020)
(0.020-0.022)
(0.021-0.024)
(0.023-0.026)
(0.025-0.028)
(0.026-0.030)
0.010
0.011
0.013
0.014
0.016
0.017
0.018
0.019
0.021
0.022
[Fday]F
(0.009-0.010)
(0.011-0.012)
(0.012-0.013)
(0.013-0.015)
(0.015-0.016)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.017-0.019)
(0.018-0.021)
(0.020-0.022)
(0.021-0.024)
0.009
0.010
0.011
0.012
0.013
0.014
0.015
0.016
0.017
0.018
60-day
(0.008-0.009)
(0.010-0.010)
(0.011-0.012)
(0.012-0.013)
(0.013-0.014)
(0.014-0.015)
(0.015-0.016)
(0.015-0.017)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.017-0.019)
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=36.0874&Ion=-79.2319&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 1 /4

5/20/2020
11001GON
1.000
7n
as
C 0100
C
2
2
w
0.010
CL
CL
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
IRDS-based iiintenisity-duratiorii-frequency (DIF) curves
Latitude: 36.0874', Longitude:-79.2319"
00011
1 1
1
1
1 1
ru ro ro
M M
ro
ro
M M
A 4
r� 6
6
6
uA 6
rr)
lD
N
rn
zT LD
Duill-ablon
10.000
L
1.000
Z,
FA
qa
�1110,
4T
W
0.010
Li
0.001 I. 1 -L L L L -j -L -L I 1 2 5 10 2�5 50 100 200 500 1000
Average recurrienice, interval Gyearsp
NOAA Atlas 14, VOILIme 2, Version 3, Created fGMT): Wed May 20 201:08:24 2020
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
imprVal
(years)
2
5
10
25
50
'I 0,0
200
5010
11000
Duration
"m
2. -d ay
t O-tnwi
3-day
t 5-rnO
4-day
301-7"riiin
,?-day
60-rnO
11 O-day
2-tif
20-cay.
................ 3-9" r
30-day
6-tir ................
46-day
t2-ry —
60-cf)ay
24411"
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds-printpage. htm I?Iat=36.0874& Ion =-79.231 9&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 2/4

Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Large scale map
Roanoke
Bra�kta�u�rg , j
w,- v
III
in ton-Sewrr
�r
P rep 9� �G7u rW� mr fl, Rocky [MV�w rit
G ru
een
e'
110011ci;rrm � a tewilVe
60inmu J'aw;k
Large scale aerial
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=36.0874&Ion=-79.2319&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 3/4

MAKIYA` IN11
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=36.0874&Ion=-79.2319&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 4/4

Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Mebane, North Carolina, USA -
Latitude: 36.0874*, Longitude:-79.2319°
Elevation: 709.61 ft**��������
L 'source: ESRI Maps
source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
Duration
1
2
5
10
25
50
�����
100
200
500
1000
0.395
0.469
0.545
0.596
0.652
0.687
0.719
0.743
0.768
0.784
5-min]F
(0.361-0.432)
(0.429-0.513)
(0.498-0.596)
(0.544-0.651)
(0.592-0.711)
(0.622-0.750)
(0.647-0.784)
(0.666-0.812)
(0.682-0.840)
(0.690-0.857)
0.631
0.750
0.873
0.954
1.04
1.09
1.14
1.18
1.22
1.23
[10-min]F
(0.577-0.690)
(0.687-0.821)
(0.798-0.954)
(0.870-1.04)
(0.944-1.13)
(0.991-1.19)
(1.03-1.25)
(1.06-1.29)
(1.08-1.33)
(1.09-1.35)
0.789
0.943
1.10
1.21
1.32
1.39
1.44
1.49
1.53
1.55
[15-min]F
(0.721-0.863)
(0.863-1.03)
(1.01-1.21)
(1.10-1.32)
(1.20-1.44)
(1.25-1.51)
(1.30-1.58)
(1.33-1.63)
(1.36-1.67)
(1.37-1.70)
1.08
1.30
1.57
1.75
1.95
2.09
2.21
2.31
2.43
2.51
30-min
(0.988-1.18)
(1.19-1.43)
(1.43-1.72)
(1.60-1.91)
(1.77-2.13)
(1.89-2.28)
(1.99-2.41)
(2.07-2.53)
(2.16-2.66)
(2.21-2.75)
1.35 7
F 1.64 7
F 2.01 7
F 2.28 7
F 2.60
2.83
3.05
3.25
3.49
3.66
60-min
(1.23-1.48)
(1.50-1.79)
(1.84-2.20)
(2.08-2.49)
(2.36-2.83)
(2.56-3.09)
(2.74-3.32)
(2.91-3.55)
(3.10-3.82)
(3.23-4.01)
1.60
1.94
2.41
2.75
3.18
3.51
3.82
4.12
4.51
4.81
2-hr
(1.47-1.75)
(1.78-2.12)
(2.20-2.63)
(2.51-3.00)
(2.88-3.46)
(3.16-3.81)
(3.42-4.15)
(3.67-4.48)
(3.98-4.91)
(4.19-5.23)
2.08
2.58
2.96
3.43
3.80
4.15
4.50
4.95
5.30
[�3-hr:]F-1.7-1-
(1.57-1.87)
(1.91-2.26)
(2.37-2.81)
(2.71-3.21)
(3.12-3.72)
(3.43-4.11)
(3.73-4.50)
(4.01-4.87)
(4.36-5.37)
(4.62-5.75)
2.07 7
F 2.51 7
F 3.12 7
F 3.58 7
F 4.20
4.68
6.17
6.66
6.33
6.84
[6F7]
(1.92-2.26)
(2.32-2.74)
(2.87-3.39)
(3.29-3.89)
(3.83-4.55)
(4.23-5.07)
(4.64-5.59)
(5.03-6.12)
(5.53-6.84)
(5.91-7.41)
2.47
2.98
3.72
4.31
5.12
6.76
6.43
7.12
8.09
8.87
12-hr
(2.28-2.69)
(2.75-3.26)
(3.42-4.06)
(3.95-4.69)
(4.65-5.54)
(5.19-6.22)
(5.74-6.93)
(6.28-7.67)
(7.00-8.71)
(7.55-9.55)
2.88
F 3.48
F 4.33
F 5.00
F 5.89
6.59
7.30
8.03
9.01
9.78
24-hr
(2.69-3.10) J
(3.25-3.73) J
(4.04-4.65) J
(4.65-5.35) J
(5.46-6.32)
(6.09-7.08)
(6.73-7.86)
(7.37-8.66)
(8.23-9.75)
(8.89-10.6)
3.37 7
F 4.06 7
F 6.01
6.73 7
F 6.69
7.44
8.19
8.95
9.97
10.8
2tlay
(3.16-3.62)
(3.80-4.35)
(4.69-5.37)
(5.35-6.14)
(6.23-7.18)
(6.90-7.99)
(7.57-8.82)
(8.24-9.66)
(9.14-10.8)
(9.82-11.7)
3.57
4.28
5.27
6.02
7.04
7.83
8.63
9.44
10.5
11.4
3{iay
(3.34-3.82)
(4.01-4.59)
(4.93-5.64)
(5.63-6.45)
(6.55-7.55)
(7.26-8.41)
(7.97-9.29)
(8.69-10.2)
(9.64-11.4)
(10.4-12.4)
4.50
5.53
6.32
7.38
8.22
9.07
9.93
11.1
12.0
[�4tlay]F-3.7-6-
(3.52-4.02)
(4.22-4.82)
(5.17-5.91)
(5.90-6.76)
(6.87-7.91)
(7.62-8.82)
(8.37-9.76)
(9.13-10.7)
(10.2-12.0)
(10.9-13.1)
13
6.22
7.07
8.22
9.13
10.1
11.0
12.3
13.3[��]F-4.-377F-6.
(4.06-4.60)
(4.84-5.48)
(5.85-6.64)
(6.64-7.55)
(7.70-8.79)
(8.52-9.78)
(9.34-10.8)
(10.2-11.8)
(11.3-13.2)
(12.1-14.4)
4.89
5.81
6.96
7.87
9.09
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.3
14.3
10-day
(4.61-5.21)
(5.48-6.19)
(6.56-7.42)
(7.40-8.38)
(8.53-9.70)
(9.39-10.7)
(10.3-11.8)
(11.1-12.9)
(12.3-14.4)
(13.2-15.5)
6.52
F 7.69
F 9.07
F 10.2
F 11.7
12.9
14.1
15.4 7
7 17.1 7
7 18.4
20-day
(6.16-6.91) J
(7.26-8.15) J
(8.57-9.62) J
(9.61-10.8) J
(11.0-12.4) J
(12.1-13.7)
(13.2-15.1)
(14.2-16.4)
(15.7-18.3) J
(16.8-19.8)
8.10
9.53
11.0
12.2
13.8
15.0
16.2
17.4
19.0
20.2
30-day
(7.68-8.57)
(9.02-10.1)
(10.5-11.7)
(11.6-12.9)
(13.0-14.6)
(14.1-15.9)
(15.2-17.2)
(16.3-18.5)
(17.7-20.3)
(18.7-21.7)
10.3 7
F 12.0 7
F 13.8 7
F 15.1
16.9
18.3
19.6
21.0
22.7
24.1
45-day
(9.78-10.8)
(11.4-12.6)
(13.1-14.5)
(14.4-15.9)
(16.0-17.8)
(17.3-19.3)
(18.5-20.7)
(19.7-22.2)
(21.2-24.2)
(22.4-25.7)
12.3
14.4
16.2
17.6
19.4
20.8 7
7 22.1 7
7 23.3 7
7 25.0 7
7 26.2
60-day
(11.8-12.9)
(13.7-15.1)
(15.5-17.0)
(16.8-18.5)
(18.5-20.4)
(19.7-21.8)
(20.9-23.3)
(22.1-24.6)
(23.5-26.4)
(24.6-27.8)
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=36.0874&Ion=-79.2319&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1 /4

5/20/2020 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
PIDS-based clep,tgii-duiratiion-firequieiicy (DIDF) cuirves
Latitude: 36.0874', Longitude:: -79.2319"
VON
25
-c 20
5
--l- 7
0 T
ru its its M M its ro M M
6 'A 6 6 � A 4 r.. 8 6 6 uA 8
,-j Duill-ablon rH N ff) zT LD
30
25
5
0
1 2 5 10 2,5 50 100 200 500 1000
Averaigie recurrienice, interval Gyearsp
NOAA Atlas 14, VOILIme 2, Version 3 Created fGMT): Wed May 20 201:07:32 2020
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Average recurrence
imprVal
(years)
2
5
10
25
50
'I 0,0
200
5010
11000
Duration
"m
2. -d ay
t O-tnwi
3-day
t 5-rnO
4-d ay
301-7"riiin
,?-day
60-rnO
11 O-day
2-tif
20-cay.
................ 3-9" r
30-day
6-tir ................
46-day
t2-ry —
60-cf)ay
24411"
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds-printpage. htm I?Iat=36.0874& Ion =-79.231 9&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 2/4

Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Large scale map
Roanoke
Bra�kta�u�rg , j
w,- v
III
in ton-Sewrr
�r
P rep 9� �G7u rW� mr fl, Rocky [MV�w rit
G ru
een
e'
110011ci;rrm � a tewilVe
60inmu J'aw;k
Large scale aerial
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=36.0874&Ion=-79.2319&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 3/4

MAKIYA` IN11
Precipitation Frequency Data Server
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service
National Water Center
1325 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: [e-mail]
Disclaimer
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=36.0874&Ion=-79.2319&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 4/4

fl Iwl
Doc No: 30017119
Recorded: 03/05/2020 04:28,55 PM
Fee Amt: S26.00 Page 1 of 3
Excise Tax: $0.00
Orange County North Carolina
Mark Chilton, Register of Deeds
BK 6648 PG 1178 -1180 (3)
m&�.k,12,-
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
ExciseTax: None(Y
Parcel Identifier 9835-02- 37 Verified by _ County on the T day of , 20
By: _ _ --
Mail/Box to: Davis, Humbert & Jennings, P.A.
This instrument was prepared by: Charles E. Davis, without title examination
Brief description for the Index:
14,
TIUS DEED made this ` day of February, 2020, by and between
GRANTOR
HELEN S. MACE, unmarried
C1:I:1►1�01�1
916 Mace Road
Mebane, NC 27302
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee
simple, all of her one-half undivided interest in that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the Cheeks
Township, Orange County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
For property description reference is hereby made to "Exhibit A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Property herein described IS NOT Grantor's principal residence.
The Property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 260 at Page
1290, Orange County Registry.
(00054464.DOC)NC Bar Association Form No. 3 0 1976, Revised 0 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981

BK 6648 PG 1179 DOC# 30017119
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's one-half undivided interest in the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
Restrictions, easements and rights of way of record pertaining to the property herein described.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above
written.
47. / 11,'c{ _ (SEAL)
Helen S. Mace
STATE OF IV lr#1
COUNTY OF
a Notary Public ofthe County and State aforesaid, certify that Helen S. Mace
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged that the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes
therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official stamp or seal, the �Q,� day of February, 2020.
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
9- i&-:X70IZO
=ALAMANCE
NE
:&Oj o
t� - 1�
Notary Public
I, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein
expressed. WITNESS my hand and official stamp or seal, the day of 2020.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
The foregoing Certificate(S) of is/are certified to be correct. This
instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof.
Register of Deeds for
County
istant-Register of Deeds
{00054464.1)OC}NC Bar Association Form No. 3 * 1976, Revised C 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC liar Association - 1981

BK 6648 PG 1180 DOG# 30017119
"EXH I BIT A"
BEGINNING at an iron stake corner with Andrews and Adams property and running
thence with said Andrews and Morrow South 81 deg. 45' East 1444 ft. to an iron
stake corner with Morrow and Sykes; running thence with said Sykes land South 6
deg. 30' West 2545 feet to an iron stake corner with Mace and Ellington property;
thence with said Ellington North 76 deg. 30' West 256 feet to an iron stake corner
with Sykes and Ellington; thence with said Sykes due North 200 feet to an iron stake
corner with Sykes property; running thence with Sykes, Murdock and Straughn
North 72 deg. West 550 feet to an iron stake corner with Straughn and Hobby;
running thence with said Hobby North 9 deg. East 915 feet to an iron stake in old
road; running thence again with said Hobby North 87 deg. West 373 feet to an iron
stake; thence again with said Hobby due North 239 feet to an iron stake corner with
Adams property; thence with said Adams North 7 deg. West 1130 feet to the
Beginning and containing 57 acres, more or less, as surveyed by J. Ralph Weaver,
Reg. Surveyor, on May 27, 1952.
SAVE AND EXCEPT from the above described property is 4.9 acres4see
record iA Beek 1313--'Ab-
�N I83J -1O Page
q'\—

PIN No: 9825Q29lL7
Deed Book 6648 Page 1178 ^
Street Address_ 6519 US HWY 70 Mebane, NC 27302
Please Print:
Property Owner: Carl & Helen Mace
1, the undersigned, registered property owner of the above referenced property, do hereby authorize
Pine Gate Renewables to act on my behalf and talus all actions necessary for the processing, issuance
and acceptance of this permit or certification and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
916 Mace Rd Mebane, NC 27302
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge,
/ / 1�r
Authorized Signature Date Authorized Signature Date
Carl Mace Helen Mace
Printeda Printed Name

civil
Design
CDCConcepts, PA
Asheville Office • 828.252.5388 Waynesville Office • 828.452.4410
168 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28805 52 Walnut Street, Suite 9 Waynesville, NC 28786
www.cdcgo.com