Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWI0300045_Staff Report_20200717 (2)Permit No. WI0300045 Date: July 15, 2020 County: Rowan To: Michael Rogers UIC Permitting Permittee/Applicant: (Owner) William T. White, Director of Facilities Central Office Reviewer Facility Name: Catawba College L GENERAL INFORMATION 1. This application is (check all that apply) a. Date of Inspection: 07/15/2020 ❑ New ® Renewal ❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification b. Person contacted and contact information: William (Billy) White (704) 232-9173 c. Site visit conducted by: Edward Watson, Hydrogeologist d. Inspection Report Printed from BIMS attached: ❑ Yes ® No, but available in BIMSILaserFiche e. Physical Address of Site including zip code: 2300 West Innes Street, Salisbury, NC 28144 L Driving Directions if rural site and/or no physical address: g. Latitude: Longitude: Source of Lat./Long & Accuracy (i.e., Google Earth, GPS, etc.): GCS WGS 1984 to nearest 10 seconds. IL DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION WELL (S) AND FACILITY 1. Type of injection system: ® Geothermal Heating/Cooling Water Return ❑ In situ Groundwater Remediation ❑ Non -Discharge Groundwater Remediation ❑ Other (Specify: 2. For Geothermal Water Return Well(s) only a. For existing geothermal system only: Were samples collected from Influent/Effluent sampling ports? ® Yes ❑ No. Wells will be sampled by Catawba College and sampling parameters and locations were clarified. Provide well construction information from well tag: Well tags were not observed during the site visit. The MRO has the GW-1 well Construction Records for the UIC wells. b. Does existing or proposed system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ® No If No, please provide source/supply well construction info (i.e., depth, date drilled, well contractor, etc.) and attached map and sketch location of supply well in relation to injection well and any other features in Section IV of this Staff Report. 3. Quality of drainage at site: ® Good ❑ Adequate ❑ Poor 4. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High 5. Does the map included in the Application reasonably represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes ❑ No. If No, or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow. III. E VAL UA TION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If Yes, explain. 2. List any items that you would like WQROS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request. Make sure that you provide a reason for each item: Item Reason 3. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition: 4. Recommendation 5 Condition Reason ❑ Deny. If Deny, please state reasons: ❑ Hold pending receipt and review of additional information by Regional Office ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information ® Issue Signature of Report Preparer(s): Edward Watson 7/15/2020 EDOCUSigned by: A N Nuft F161FB6g MUA3... Signature of WQROS Regional Supervisor: Date: 7.17.2020 IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS/ATTACHMENTS (Optional / If Needed) Well samples are to be collected by the contractor. Commercial laboratory will supply sample bottles and preservatives for G W samples. MRO has provided sample sheets for Influent and Effluent wells. These sample collection sheets include sample parameter information andpreservation method requirements for the G W samples. Note that staff turnover at Catawba College has resulted in loss of institutional knowledge. MROprovided copies of our files to Catawba College staff to aid in their knowledge of the system.