20091106 Ver 1_401 Application_20091009

staK
October 9, 2009
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300
Raleigh NC 27606
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Andrew Williams
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Andrew Williams and Cindy Karoly:
V@NOWIRB
prT 1 6 2009
DENR - WATER MJAL'TY
WETWIDS AND STORIAA'ATER BRANCH
Please find the attached Pre-construction Notification (PCN) and supporting documentation to apply for a
Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 14 for the relocation of Deep River Road in High Point, NC.
The City of High Point has retained Stantec Consulting to provide design services for the relocation of Deep
River Road at the intersection of Deep River Road and Eastchester Road. The project will consist of
relocating the current intersection of Deep River Road and Eastchester Road to where Lake Forest Drive
intersects Eastchester Road. The purpose of the Deep River Road relocation project is to improve safety for
all travelers and reduce traffic congestion through the corridor. Anticipated growth in the surrounding area is
expected to increase traffic volumes in the following years on this major thoroughfare intersection.
Stantec has also been retained to provide environmental services related to permitting. Two drainage
features and their associated Randleman Lake watershed riparian buffers are located within the project's
disturbance area. The first stream, Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT-1) to the West Fork of the Deep River is an
intermittent stream located on the northeast side of the proposed intersection of Deep River Road and Willard
Road. The general flow direction for UT 1 is from west to east toward another Unnamed Tributary that flows
from north to south into the West Fork of the Deep River. Unnamed Tributary 2 (UT-2) and Unnamed
Tributary 3 (UT-3) to the West Fork of the Deep River are perennial streams located on the south side of the
proposed intersection of Deep River Road and Eastchester Road. UT-2 begins at a culvert outfall under NC
68 (Eastchester Road), while UT-3 flows from east to west for approximately 25 feet before converging with
UT-2.
New road fill associated with a new turn lane on Eastchester Road will result in 40' of permanent impacts to a
perennial stream (UT-2). Randleman buffers will also be impacted by this road widening. The proposed
impact to the buffer of UT-3 is a temporary impact created by the installation of a temporary rock check dam
associated with a temporary sediment basin required by the Sediment and Erosion Control Act. Upon
completion of the project, the temporary rock check dam will be removed and the impact site will be restored
to pre-construction conditions. The area of both impacts will be less than the area threshold requirement for
buffer mitigation. The proposed riparian buffer impacts have been quantified and are included in the PCN
form. A reasonable effort has been made to minimize the impacts of the roadway drainage design to the
riparian buffer of the Unnamed Tributaries located within the Randleman Lake Watershed.

StaMec
October 9, 2009
Deep River Road Realignment.
Page 2 of 2
The attachments to this letter contain 5 copies of an agent authorization letter, a PCN form, a vicinity map, a
USGS topographic map, a NRCS soils map, a letter from the City of High Point and associated DWQ Stream
ID form for each respective stream, a notification of jurisdictional determination, a signed categorical
exclusion, a set of roadway design plans showing proposed impacts, and a set of pre-existing condition plans.
Sincerely,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
-4 d'4 / .
Richard Andrews
Environmental Scientist
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
D?oF W A7 fl O
y v
? r
o r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes N No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Deep River Road Relocation
2b. County: Guilford County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: High Point p
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A OCT I G 2009
3. Owner Information IyE DENR-WATER=y
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of High Point
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Mark McDonald, P.E.
3d. Street address: 211 South Hamilton Street
3e. City, state, zip: High Point, N.C.
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]/3226
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.,
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Richard Andrews
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Stantec Consulting
5c. Street address: 801 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 300
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no. [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
Most of the work is being undertaken within an existing
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Right-of-way. The stream impact occurs on a city-owned
permanent drainage easement on the Deep River Church
of Christ Property (18-00-0277-0-001-00-015).
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: -79.979 Longitude: - 36.016
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: Project Area 7.25 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to West Fork of Deep River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Water Supply IV
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is a forested area located in a residential suburban area. A mixture of houses and commercial properties exist in
the vicinity.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
None
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
256 If of stream within the project area
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is being undertaken to help alleviate existing traffic problems and safety issues at the insection of Deep River
Road and NC Hwy. 68 (Eastchester Drive).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves the relocation of Deep River Road through the construction of a new five-lane, curb and gutter
section facility from existing Deep River Road at Sunset Hollow Drive to NC Hwy. 68 (Eastchester Drive) at Lake Forest
Drive. The proposed project is located within the High Point city limits, east of Eastchester Drive at Oak Hollow Lake.
The length of the new road is approximately 2,200 feet. This project also includes a new intersection at Willard Rd.
Existing Deep River Road will end at Willard Road and the existing intersection of Deep River Road and Eastchester
Drive will be abandoned.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
PUN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project involves a simple relocation of an intersection for traffic safety puposes and is not expected to increase
development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated with this project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
51b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
National Heritage Program Virtual Workroom was reviewed on May 5, 2009. A site visit was conducted by Amber
Coleman (Stantec) and Andrea Dvorak-Grantz (Stantec) on 6/17109. No federally protected species or designated critical
habitat occur within 2 miles of the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
1998 Final Habitat Plan for the South Atlantic Region: Essential Fish Habitat Requirements for Fishery
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS (http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh-coral/ims/viewer.htm)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC State Historic Preservation Office website (http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/nrlist.htm) was reviewed and the Historic
Preservation Office as well as the State Archaeology offices were visited to ensure no potential impacts exist. A site visit
was also conducted by Amber Coleman (Stantec) and Andrea Dvorak-Grantz (Stantec) on 6/17/09.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping GIS Data
Richard Andrews /} ,/, ,_
G
fll
s/
g
tu 10/09/09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name A
ppl
icant/Agent's
Si
nnat
uree Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Department of Transportation
May 19, 2009
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
The undersigned, being duly authorized to execute this instrument for and on behalf of the City of
High Point hereby designates and authorizes Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. ("Agent") to act on
behalf of the City of High Point, as the agent in the processing of applications for all necessary
permits issued by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality ("NCDWQ") or the United States Army
Corps of Engineers ("USACE") involving the relocation of Deep River Road, and to furnish, on
request, supplemental information in support of any such application(s). In addition, the undersigned
hereby authorizes Agent to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure permits
issued by NCDWQ or USACE.
The undersigned confirms that each of the representations made herein is true, and that the
undersigned intends that each such statement shall be construed as a representation made on behalf
of the City of High Point and for the purposes described above.
CITY OF HIGH POINT
By:
Name: Mark V. McDonald, P.E.
Title: Transportation Director
City of High Point, P.O. Box 230, 211 South Hamilton Street, High Point, NC 27261 USA
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] TDD:336.883.8517
NORTH CAROLINA'S INTERNATTONALCIT"r
Engineering Services Department
B. Keith Pugh, P.E., Director
April 20, 2009
Mark McDonald, P.E.
Transportation Director
P.O. Box 230
High Point, North Carolina 27260
Re: Drainage feature located at Willard Road and Deep River Road, High Point, NC,
Randleman Rule (15A NCAC 02B.0250) Surface Water and Stream Origin Determination
Dear Mark:
The Engineering Services Department conducted a site visit on April 17, 2009, to identify the existing
drainage feature located at the intersection of Deep River Road and Willard Road. The drainage feature
is not indicated as a stream on the City of High Point Geographical Information System (GIS), USDA
Soil Survey of Guilford County, USGS Quadrangle Map, or the City of High Point Water Supply
Watershed Map, This drainage feature was evaluated using the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Stream Identification Form. The results of the evaluation indicate that for the section of the
drainage feature beginning at the outlet of the existing 24" RCP located on the east side, of Deep River
Road, and ending 69' downstream, does not possess sufficient riparian characteristics to be classified as
surface waters for the purpose of application of the requirements of ISA NCAC 02B .0250, Randleman
Lake Water Supply Watershed: Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas. Stream buffers are not
required for this section of the drainage feature. However, the section of the drainage feature
downstream of the point referenced above does possess sufficient riparian characteristics to be classified
as intermittent surface waters for the purpose of application of the requirements of ISA NCAC 02B
.0250. Stream buffers will be required for this section of the drainage feature.
Please note that the drainage feature was only evaluated to a point located 242' downstream of the
existing 24" RCP that was referenced above. At this point an existing RCP under Willard Road
discharges into the drainage feature. The characteristics of the drainage feature appear to change
somewhat at this confluence. The drainage feature was not evaluated beyond this point.
If you need any additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Terry
. Kune F,P.E., F
Engineering Services Department
High Point, North Carolina
City of High Point, P.O. Box 230, 211 South Hamilton Street, High Point, NC 27261 USA
Fax:[phone] .Phone:[phone] TDD:336.883.8517
= MAY-22-2009 FRI 01:09 PM CITY HPT'ENGINEERING FAX NO. 3368834118 P. 03
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification I-arm; Version 3.1

II
Data: r?..(-1 - p -Projert:_ o66P: tVA?I. Q.'D -- Latitude:
Evaluator. 6&R .. .: ... Srte . w'?L?wQ-O ;- _?• Lorgitude:
TJ QIAN w1,1.tJa•?.. D?IsP RrU6R O::
Total Points: other `r
Stream; is at leashntarrtuttan County-.GwtLf?R7a = - e.g. Quad Name: Gu.tLFoKDryC
if z 19 ar erennial dl 30 Z 8 J`
A. Geomor holo Subtotal t3 "Absent :.VYaak'- ' Moderafe. - Strong
13. Continuous bed and bank - •?- 0- - -- 1` - C2) 3
2. Sinuosity -
3. In-channel structures riffle•pool'sequende =0"
ll -
- - 1- - 2
2 3
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate soling - - - -- 2 3
5. Active/rellefloodplain '.: ... ,.r. __:: .._:..:.;._..

6. Depositional bars or benches - - -
7. Braided channel . -. 0...

:0
0

-_ J
7*
2 3
m 3
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 3
9' Natural levees 3
10. Headcuts
? 2 3
1, Grade controls -?0
- 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway'"' :0'- -- 0:5 .1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on ewstln
USGS or NRCS map,orotho documer tad t i No ?
nvidenfe
Yes = 3
Man-mada ditches are not rate0see diecussOns in manual `-
14. Groundwater Flow/discharge ''` •0`" • ' 1"- 2
15. Water in channel and> 48 hrs since rain or
Water in channel d or rowan season .
' 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0
17. Sediment on plants oYdebns" -:0 0.5' 1
18. Organicdebislinesiorpiles"(Wrack'lines)': 0;' -'05 1 .5
i 19 uvdrir. coils fredozimor h _fe®fa?es{ oresentn';! - No 0.: '. _ Yes= .5

20 , Fibrous roots in channel11
21'. Rooted plants in channel 3. 2 t. 0
22. Crayfish - -°OS 1 1.5
23. Bivalves- ` ,1< 2 3
24. Fish
41
5 -
?- 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 05 i 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and'abundanee) ,? :.
OS
0"-- -. "
1
.5
27. Filamentous algae: 'penphyton ' '• - -K O' - 1 - 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.=: ??0- - - o5
29°. Wetland plants in srreambed ; FAG= 0.5' FACW = 0.75; OBL, 1.5 SAV = 20; Other -
i a 6.'S A94
MAY-22-2009 FRl 01:08 PM CITY HPT ENGINEERING FAX NO, 3368834118
North Carolina Division of Water Quality-- Stream Identification j-orm; Version 3.1
P. 02
4-1-1 - `?':,% GE6P Ng2 RD. Latitude:
Date: d project:
$p•. wr>. w r MN yV rlVae2D
(=valuator. 'r6 rs.GZ ua6 Sile: tJG? ,Jr?.R. ?b - - Longitude:
Total Points. Other
Stream is at least intermittent county: , e.g. quad Name: 6kil,Vot-0! nIC
if=_19or erennralAz30 ??r5 CaUtLhKD
A. Geomorphology (subtotal •5 Absent Wealc :::: : ;Moderate ': .'Strong':
la. Continuous bed and bank - : 0
: - 1: - 2 3
2. Sinuosity .: .. .:.
.0 .. 2 3
3. In-channcl structure: riffle-pool sequence : D - -- 1 - 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic Ioodplain'-, 2 3
6, Depositional bars or benches .T - 2 3 ,
7. Braided channel r 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 2 3
9' Natural levees - - - - 1' 2 - 3
10. Headcuts 2 3
11. Grade controls - - 0:5
12. Natural valley or draine eway` 0 - "' 0.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing,
USGS0rNRCSmap.orothtr, q#pmented
evidence
No
Yes=3
aMan-mado ditches are not rated; gee discussions in-manual
a G,?Arnrnm• /C??Kf..4el ? 1 -
14 Groundwaterflow(discharge ?•'"- - -- - 0` -`"7"- - 2 3
15. Water in channel and> 48 hrisince rain

in channel dry or growing season ! .
Water
Q

w
2 3
16. Leallitter 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris - 10.5 1 1,5
18. Organic debris lines orpiles(Wrack lines) 0 1 1.5
19, Hydric soils (redoximdrph[c features) present? No = 0 Yes
41i t t ,
i
C Rlnlnnv lAnhtnfal
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 2 t 0
210. Rooted plants in channel 3 w? 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 05 mm 1 1.5
23, FNvelves :1 2 3
24. Fish 1.5
25. Amphibians 1.5
26.Macrobenthos(no[eduer'sifyendstiuntlance)•`"" 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; pehphyton" r- : 0- 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriwfungus 0:5 1 1.5
129 P. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; Ol 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other--W
Fwabtd $
° Items 20 and 21 foccs on the presence of upland plants. Item 29 foeusds:on. the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes. (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch 24« ?. 64 8/?r.t0& V
.,.. - ? D-CD. fPtwntR44 t `? 4
it b 12 D.
P. 04
f?
This letter is to document the sne visit that the.Engmeenrig Services Deparbiient conducted on April 30, 2007.
The purpose of the site visit was to identify the. existing diarnage feature located at the proposed intersection of
Deep River Road and Easkliester Drive The. drainage feature is ndicated•as'an intermittent stream on the
USDA Soil Survey of Guilford County It.is not indicated as are'Wlated stream on the City of High Point
Geographical Information System (GiS), USGS Quadrangle Map or the ;ity of High Point Water Supply
Watershed Map. The drainage,fcsture was evaluated m iwo dtff6rent{spotion < on Apnl30, 2007, using the North
Carolina Division of: Water Quality„Stream Identification'Form ;The first sec Jon of the drainage feature consists
of the upstream portion that is located where the proposed intersection of the road will be located. It also
includes an existing 18" HDPE pipe and extends to 30' downstream of the piF a outlet. The second portion of the
drainage feature begins 30 downstream of thz HDPE pipe'outlct and extends,just beyond the-confluence with the
existing RCP pipe outlefat 6astchester Dnvei The results of the evaluation indicated that the first portion of the
drainage feature does not posse'ssi sumhctent:-riparian characteristics tobe classified as surface waters for the
purpose of application of;the•requir-ements ofA SA NCAC 02H :0250; Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed:
Protection and Maintenance of Roarian Areas. Stream buffers are not required for this section of the drainage
feature. However, the,,secptid portion of fhe }Oramagc,feature downstream of• the point referenced above does
possess sufficient riparian-characterispcs to;•,.be classified as pe[unniat surface waters for the purpose of
application of the requirements of 15A NCAC 0213 .0250: `Stream btimfers will be required for this section of the
drainage feature.
Please note that the disinage feature was pgly evaluated to the confluence referenced above. The drainage
feature was not evaluated downstream beyond this point
If you need any additional, information please: contact me at (336)883„8583..
Sincer y,
I`
Terry A. Kuneff P E
Engineering Services Department.
City of High Point P.O.,-Box 230, 21d South Hamilton Street; High Point, NC 27261 USA
F,ax:r3368g3 1;18 Phorie X336 883:3194 :TD6336J383.8517
MAR-10-2009 TUE 12:01 PM CITY HPT ENGINEERING FAX NO, 3368834118 P. 02
I ?I North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identificaticn Form; Version 3.2
Date: a.r. Project:: bi&r, R` ft(t Latitude:
Evaluator: 'f{1X Site: °ko Longitude:
Total Points: 7p S uM •? ?tpF Other
Stream is at least intermittent County, t e.g. Quad Name:
if 219 or perennial if ago ! Gk\?.FOI?
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = S Ab1'. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-poolsequenc
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic flodplain
6. Depositional barspr benches
Braided channel
8Recent alluvial deposits
9' Natural levees 2 3
2 3
2?- 3
2 3
-- 3
Yes =3
10 Headcuts 0 _ 1
11. Grade controls . . 0.5
12 Natural valley or drainageway .0 _ 0 5
13. Second or greaterorder.channel on exlstlng
uSGSorNRCSmaporotherdocumented No.? .•
evidence.
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
<.• .. .. ,.
B. Hydroloov (Subtotal = (.S .: 1
i
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in cha
nnel and> 4B hrs since rainor
Water in channel -dry or Wowing season 16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soil indicators (redoAmorphic features) _

!r;-,

rte, 2 r 3
_
2. 3
0.
? 1.5
1,5
4
present? .. No
?J Yes= 1,5
C. aiolam/ (Suhtntal t2 ?d
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3'. 2
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 t
Crayfish ... .. ?0.5
1 1.5
Bivalves
- _
1 2 3
-
Fish - 0.5 -- ...... _ 1 . 1
5 ---
Amphibians
r -
0.5 1 1 5
_
Macrobenthos (nose d varsity and abundance) 0.5 1 1-5
?27.
ilamentous algae; perlphyton
- .1. 2 --
ran oxidizing ungus.
gu -
_
0 5 1 " _.I
1.5

29 Welland plants in streambed
?V4 I FAC - 0.5, FACW = 0.75. CBS = 1.5 SAV = 2 n• ntr,Ar = n
1
-ItOMS20 and 2l locus on the presence-al upland plants, Ilem.29.fccuses on the presence of aquatlc or wetland4plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form far 2cdilional notes) Sketch:
?t'f?lllRtA 15 S,}?ut,tJN RS' lf?'??.n?tT'f;PiJC piJ • !?
1
1 MAR-10-2009 TUE 12:01 PM CITY HPT ENGINEERING FAX NO. 3368834118 P. 03
North Carolina Division of Water. Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.2
Date: LF50? 07 Project:, DE6e' lt%4fiL ?D. Latitude:
Evaluator: 1114 K Site: Set`•Qs P? ts?rLongitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream Is at least intermittent 1 County: ..
-if a19 or erM 'al if 030 a g. Quad Memo:
A. Geomorphology,LSubtotal=} Absent weak - Moderate ( Strotig
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 - 1 2 (3

B. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2
9' Natural levees 2
10. Headcuts - 0 1 2
11. Grade controls
12 Natural valley or drainaaeway -0?
13. Second or greater order channel an existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented I No =?- Yes = 3
evidence,
Man-made not rated; see dlsoassions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal 1
2. Sinuosity ----:- -? .0 - 1-- - -3 -
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffie-pool, step-pool
sequence
v
_
4. Soil texture or stream subs Vate. sorting
'
5. AcHveireficflootlplain . -. -
- .. .. -." 0 2 3
__
8. pepasitional bars or benches
- 0 -- 2 3
7. Braided channel .: '1 ?- 2 a
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
- _
1C. 2 3
f
r
15-Water in channel and >.48 hrs since rain or
-
'
'
' ,
p.,-
Water in channel
- drXor
gro
in
season - -
16. Leaflitter - 1.5. 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants.or debris - - ' . 0.:
t 1,5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) _
1

19. Hydric soil indicators (redoximorpfiic features) --

present? -- No = 0 Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal = •5 )
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 0
21 . Rootetl plants in channel 3,.
22. Crayfish .
- j.
- 0
_
- ...'-- _ 1 1 5
23 Bwalves
-- - 1 _
2 3
24. Fish _
-
25. Amphibians
26, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ^-'?? 0.5 1
1
1 1.5
1.5

27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
F __
2 w
28. Iron oxidizing bactoria/fungus, . 0: 0,5 1
_
29'. Wetland plants in stroambed N00 ft-'? . FAC = 0.5; FA _
CW = 0.75; CBL = 1.5 SAV = 2. 0: Other = 0
uerns zu are n rocus on the presence of upland planls, J[em.29 focuses. on. the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use bark side cf this form for additonal notes.) -
COPY
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2009-01395 County:' Guilford U.S.G.S. Quad: Guilford
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Andrea Dvorak-Grantz
Address: Stantec Consultine Services. Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road. Suite 300
Raleigh. North Carolina 27606
Telephone No.: 919-851-7308
Property description
Size (acres) 10 acres (approximately) Nearest Town With Point
Nearest Waterway West Fork of the Deep River River Basin Deep River
USGS HUC 03030003 Coordinates N 36.016 W -79.979
Location description The protect site extends both south and northwest from the Deep River Road Willard Road
intersection in Hieh Point. Guilford County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Followint Apply-
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this
property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional
determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CW A)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. on your project area delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or
our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,
provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon fora period not to exceed five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory
Official identified below on _ Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination
and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at 919-554-4884 ext. 26.
C. Basis For Determination
D. Remarks
There is one (1) intermittent streams lacking important aquatic function and 2 perennial streams located within the project
area.
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a -
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Andrew Williams, Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 33 1.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it trust be received at the above address by October 5, 2009.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: AaiG'*J X A( V2 ?
Date August 6, 2009
Expiration Date August 6, 2014
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at htti):Hre,,ulatorv.usacestirvey.com/ to complete the survey
online.
Copy furnished:
Sue Homewood
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Mark McDonald, P.E.
Transportation Director
City of High Point
P.O. Box 230
High Point, North Carolina 27261

NOTIFICATION OF" ApMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
77 . ... <. _ . .
a . ° .
Applicant: City of Hi Point File Number: SAW-2009-01395 Date: August 6, 2009
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
permission)
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I = The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information.may.be found at,htty://www:usace:army mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/rep-or.
. Co s re ulattons at 33 CFR Part331..`:;
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may, provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT:OF CONTACT:FOR... UESTIONS OR INFORMATION .
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Andrew Williams, Regulatory Project Manager . Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Andrew Williams; Project Manager, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801
DWQ 09-1106 City of High Point: Deep River Road Relocation Page 1 of I
DWQ 09-1106 City of High Point: Deep River Road Relocation
Dennison, Laurie
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 10:41 AM
To: [e-mail]
Attachments: 091106COHighPointDeepRiver-l.doc (87 KB)
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more
information related to your recent application. Please note that
this message is being forwarded to you electronically so that you may
expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send your
response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax; it will go
unanswered.
A hard copy of this correspondence is being sent via US Mail. All
response correspondence is to be mailed via hard copy to the 401
Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crab tree Blvd., Raleigh NC
27604 unless otherwise noted. Questions may be directed to Ian
McMillan [phone].
Laurie Dennison
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Main Line: [phone]
Website: http://h2O.gnr.5itate.nc.us/ncwetiands
Note updated email address: [e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.
https:/lhnail.nc.gov/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAACChSeOTRSCT5TNO706... 10/19/2009
Guilford County, NC
GREENSBORO
y ?.
V r
U C
HIGH POINT
f
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Deep River Road Relocation
NCDOT Roads
/ .; Hydrography li
GREENSBORO
HIGH POINT
JAMESTOWN
Miles
0 05 1 2

k,; ?- ? ?-t,?'?,? ? ?? _ •? ? ? - J? \? . ? S ?? ?-.? ? ?? fir' 1???.? .- _
Figure 2 - USGS Topographic Map
Deep River Road VL ?? t, i '??` • j 1'{
USGS 7.5 Topo Quad:
Guilford
a Project Area
Feet
0 625 1,250 2,500 - ' J
`, wee
.. ? ? rM ti,,,y ,,i s,,. ? raS.nlTt.t? I',i , , '?u, ?•µl f a ? 1T il; a?tl ? V ?
.?r t ?raht3? .-'° ?'? , :MFlf3 !t -•? n , I q r ^'.
r« ? F
! Y' q
II G+:,Pj' ] ,,,,/'..+n f? ? ?? - 11 n !•l.li W f i 7 l n,' t!, 'i ?h ' lu .? t ? p1',1 T
ti, , . F?,J!(.?• i1 ?,?ml. ,) rl I , ?1ti"?<tti d ' ti 'i !_,? F !'. 9
NIL, J?
f t f$: r r? t
4
P ?' ..
fie
?y / C
I o )7721 eseriloir
`,j rn; p? ,r, A?C
r-
?\ f r r t ?+1CJ a J'?{I Rd.
pill 1! C 1? ?i? C,
k1
ApH
{ f t it i ?()C? 1 f _ a
.. r f 1 ? ? f r
I lr,. DIY` ,•' 4 y / f?. W r ' ?+
J f f ty??, y?H rj,? ,c•; + ?'J?? /yam ,'V
r a1 F^f1(? o-' l4l` r`
Figure 3 - NRCS Soils Map tIrrx' ??,r,
L, 9 A c A•?
r=
Deep River Road Relocation rP ,r•
a
.' D r
NCDOT Roads t C'!'< ?i
Project Area 't ,?
F t ?A f"?!t???1 fib
0 625 1,250 2,500 : ?".f ?, N1??C?