WQ0016247_Modification_20200805 (2)

Initial Review
Reviewer Thornburg, Nathaniel
Is this submittal an application? (Excluding additional information.)*
r Yes r No
Permit Number (IR)* WQ0016247
Applicant/Permittee Synagro Central, LLC
Applicant/Permittee Address 284 Boger Rd Mocksville, INC 27028
Is the owner in BIMS? r Yes r No Is the facility in BIMS? r Yes r No
Owner Type Organization
Facility Name Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
County Alexander
Fee Category Major
Is this a complete
application?*
r Yes r No
Signature Authority
Signature Authority Title
Signature Authority Email
Document Type (if non -application)
Email Notifications
Does this need review bythe hydrogeologist?* r Yes r No
Regional Office
CO Reviewer
Admin Reviewer
Fee Amount 395
Complete App Date 08/05/2020
Below list any additional email address that need notification about a new project.
Email Address
Comments to be added to email notfication
Comments for Kendall
Comments for RO

Comments for Reviewer
Comments for Applicant

Submittal Form
Project Contact Information
Rease provide information on the person to be contacted by N B Staff regarding electibnittal, confirmation of receipt, other
.......................................................... electronic surece, aner correspondence.
_ -
Name * Chris Wynne
Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Information
........ ......... ....................................................................................................................................... .
Application/Document Type* r New (Fee Req ui red)
c Modification - Major (Fee Required)
r Renewal with Major Modification (Fee
Required)
r Annual Report
r Additional Information
r Other
Phone Number*
3369098627
O Modification - Minor
C Renewal
C GW-59, NDMR, NDMLR, NDAR-1,
NDAR-2
r Residual Annual Report
r Change of Ownership
We no longer accept these monitoring reports through this portal. Please click on the link below and it will take you to the correct form.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge_Monitoring_Report
Permit Type:*
r Wastewater Irrigation r High -Rate Infiltration
r Other Wastewater r Reclaimed Water
r Closed -Loop Recycle r Residuals
r Single -Family Residence Wastewater r Other
Irrigation
Permit Number:*
WQ0016247
Fbs Current Existing permt number
Applicant/Permittee*
Synagro Central, LLC
Applicant/Permittee Address*
284 Boger Rd Mocksville, NC 27028
Facility Name *
Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
Please provide comments/notes
on your current submittal below.
Modification of Synagro's Class B permit. Find all additional information in submittal. Thanks!
At this time, paper copies are no longer required. If you have any questions about what is required, please contact Tessa Monday at
[e-mail] or [phone].
Please attach all information required or requested for this submittal to be reviewed here.*
(Application Form Engineering Rans, Spec'rfications, Calculations, Rc.)
Synagro Class B mod ification_Final_07242020.pdf 49.12MB
upload only 1 RCF docurrent (less than 250 M3). Mitiple documents nest be corrbined into one RJF file unless file is larger than
upload limit.
* W By checking this box, I acknowledge that I understand the application will not be
accepted for pre -review until the fee (if required) has been received by the Non -
Discharge Branch. Application fees must be submitted by check or money order
and made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ). I also confirm that the uploaded document is a single PDF with all parts
of the application in correct order (as specified by the application).
Mail payment to:
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
Attn: Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Signature *
6 w
Submission Date Is filled in automatically once submitted.

SYNAGRO
July 2411, 2020
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section -- Class B Residuals Permit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATTENTION: Mr. Nathaniel Thornburg
REFERENCE: APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION of Permit #WQ0016247
Synagro Western Piedmont, LLC
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
Synagro Western Piedmont, LLC is submitting this application to modify the referenced
residuals land application permit.
It is requested that 15 fields and 3 sources be added to the referenced permit. The new
fields and sources are as follows:
CH-78, Fields 1,2,3, and 5
CH-73, Field 10
HA-47, Fields 1, 2, 3, and 4
RC-49, Fields 1-6
City of Mayodan WWTP
Town of Siler City WWTP
Harnett County Regional North Plant
Enclosed is a check for $395.00 to cover the fee associated with a major permit modification.
This application package should contain all information necessary to complete the requested
modification of Synagro's land application permit. However, if you require additional
information or have further questions, please contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail]. Thank you in advance for the timely and efficient review of the
application.
Sincerely
4-
Christopher C. Wynne
Technical Services Specialist
284 Boger Road, Mocksville, NC 27028 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 —RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This application is for treatment, storage, transport, and/or land application of Class B residuals (may include residuals that
are generated from a water treatment plant or other type facilities) on the proposed or currently approved land application site(s) under
15A NCAC 02T . l 100,
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) Application: (All Application Packages):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer,
® The Applicant's Certification on Page 5 of this form shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b). An alternate
person may be designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the criteria in 15ti
NCAC 02T .0I06(b).
® If this project is for a modification of an existing permit, submit one copy of the existing permit.
® Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit, or 90 days prior to
operation of proposed facility(ies) for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units.
B. Application Fee (New and Major Modification Application Packages)
Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ).
FFacility Classification New Permit F_­Major Modification r
Major (land are permitted for > 300 acres) $1,310 $395
Minor (land are permitted for < 300 acres) $810 $245
- A major modification shall be defined as any permit modification that: increases the generating facility's residuals dry tonnage;
adds additional land application areas not previously approved for that particular program [including transferring of field(s) from
one program to another]; adds additional residuals sources; or includes the addition of new treatment or storage units/processes not
previously permitted. There is no fee for minor modifications to a permit.
C. Cover Letter (All Application Packages)
® List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action.
D. Environmental Assessments (May be Required — See 15A NCAC IC .0300)
® Submit a copy of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also, include
information on any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the construction of the residuals
treatment and storage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or lands are used for
the construction of the subject facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Pagel of3

E. Operation and Maintenance Plan (New and Renewal Application Packages)
® For Modification Application, if there are any changes to the existing plan, submit an updated O&M plan.
® Submit the O&M Plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T. I 1 10 and include at a minimum:
® Operational functions; describe the operation of the program to show what operations are necessary for the program to
function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
® Maintenance schedules; may include equipment calibration, maintenance of signs, etc.
® Safety measures; may include safety training program, manuals, signs, etc.
® Spill response plan; including control, containment, remediation, emergency contact information, etc.
® Inspection plan including the following infonmation;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the inspections.
® Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and procedures to assure that the
selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative of the residuals management program.
® Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken by the inspector in the event
that noncompliance is observed.
® Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring.
® Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored.
® Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected. Fluctuation in temperature,
flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the residuals gathered during a particular sampling event. The
sampling plan shall account for any foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for
residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requu-ements (e.g. facilities that land apply multiple times per
year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most
likely to be negatively affected by cold temperatures.
THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS (G to M) ARE REQUIRED FOR DEDICATED PROGRAM ONLY.
F. Program Determination
❑ Dedicated residuals land application programs are ones in which land application sites meet the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T
.1102(12). Specifically, a residuals land application program is designated as dedicated if any of the following are applicable:
❑ Any land application site certified f'or the residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or frequencies
greater than agronomic rates.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal,
and agricultural crop production is of secondary i nportance.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals through fixed irrigation
facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system.
❑ Please contact the Non -Discharge Permitting Unit if you need any assistance in determining whether your residuals program
falls under the dedicated program definitions.
G. Program Information
❑ Provide an explanation of why a dedicated system is required instead of a conventional non -dedicated system.
❑ Provide an explanation of the dedicated system and its operation.
H. Detailed Site Maps (All New or Modification Application Packages)
❑ Submit three (3) sets of standard size plans and two (2) sets of 1 1" by 17" plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF
only). For Modifications, submit plans specific to the modifications) only.
❑ Plans must include the following minimum items:
❑ A general location map, a vicinity map and a topographic map with contours not exceeding 10 feet or 25% of the total site
relief and showing all facility related structures and fences within the land application area.
❑ The location of all wells (including usage and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and
perennial), springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features within 500 feet of the land application site(s).
❑ Delineation of the review and compliance boundaries
❑ Setbacks as required by 15 A NCAC 02T ,1108
❑ Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site(s),
❑ A map showing the entire irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's
evaluation. The irrigation plans shall show each nozzle/emitter and wetted area (when applicable). Clearly label spray
irrigation zones as they will be operated.
❑ Plans must depict a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate thatthey are anything other than final plans. However, the plans may be labeled with
the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 3

I. Project Evaluation and Receiver Site Management Plan (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites)
❑ Submit a project evaluation and receiversite management plan (ifapplicable)with recommendationsconcemingeovercrops
and their ability to accept theproposedapplication rates.
J. Hydrogeologic Report (All New Application Packages or Modifications involving increasing the totaldesign capacity)
❑ Submit a detailed hydrogeologic evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 104(d)(4) and current Division Policy
available at: htt //www.newater.oi'Rules_Policieseand_Regulationg/. The document shall be silted, sealed and dated by a
qualified prof essiona I.
K. Engineering Design Documents (All New or Modification Application Packages with fixed hiigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through fixed supply system)
❑ Submit engineering design documents that have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer and/or
Professional Land Surveyor in accordance with 15ANCAC 02T .1 104(d)(2). For Modif ications, submit a n updated site map
specific to the modification(s) only.
❑ The design documents must include the following minunum items:
❑ Engineering plans for the facility and equipmentexceptthose p reviou sly permitted unless they are directly tied into thenew
units or are critical tothe understandingofthe complete process;
❑ Specifications describing m aterials to be used, method of construction, and means forensuring quality and integrity of the
finished product including leaking testing; and
❑ Engineering calculations including hydraulic and pollutant loading, sizing criteria, hydraulic profile, total dynamic head
curve analysis for eachpump,and irrigation design.
❑ Soil mapping units shown on all disposal sites.
L. Water Balance (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites utilizing fixed irrigation facilities or
irrigation facilities fed through fixed supply systems)
❑ Submitacompleted and accurate water balance unaccordancewith 15ANCAC 02T2T.1IQ4(d)(5)and current Division Policy
availableat: httt)://www.newater.orRules Policies and Re ulations/.
M. Property Ownership Documentation (All New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/orrelocatedt'eatment
or irrigation components)
❑ Property ownership documentation shall consist ofone ofthe following:
❑ Legal documentation of ownership (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporation), or
El Written notarized intent to purchase agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or
❑ An easement running with the land specifica lly indicating the intended use of the property and meeting the requirements of
15A NCAC 02L .0107(f), or
❑ A written notarized lease agreement signed by both parties, indicating the intended use of theproperty, as well as a pla t or
survey map.
ONE ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
By U.S. Postal Service:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
By Cou lerLSpecial Delivery:
512 N. SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 —RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
FORM: RLAP 06-16
I. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name: Synagro Central, LLC
Applicant type: ❑ Individual ® Corporation ❑ General Partnership ❑ Privately -Owned Public Utility
❑ Federal ❑ State ❑ Municipal ❑ County
Signature authority's name per 15A NCAC 02T .0106: Robert N. Roth Title: Technical Services Manager
Applicant's mailing address: 284 Boger Rd
City: Mocksville_ State: NC Zip: 27028
Telephone number:[phone] Email Address: rroth?a synagro,com
2. Consultant's name: Chris Wynne License Number (for P.E.):
Affiliation: ❑ On Staff ® Retained (Firm: Synagro LLC )
Consultant's mailing address: 284 Boger Rd.
City: Mocksville State: NC Zip: 27028-
Telephone number: [phone] Email Address: [e-mail]
3. Agronomist's name: License Number:
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ❑ On Staff ❑ Retained (Firm: _)
Agronomist's mailing address:
City: State: Zip: -
Telephone number: (_)= Email Address:
4. Soil Scientist's name: Christopher Mum X License Number: 1284
Affiliation: ❑ N/A ❑ On Staff ® Retained (Firm: N/A)
Soil Scientist's mailing address: 5401 Thacker Dairy Rd
City: Greensboro State: NC Zip: 27406
Telephone number. [phone] Email Address: [e-mail]
5. Fee submitted: $395.00 (See Instruction B)
U. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application is for (check all that apply): ❑ new, ® modified, ❑ renewed permit
2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing permit, provide the following:
Permit number. WQ0016247
Date of most -recently issued permit: 11/17/2017
Date of most -recently certified Attachment A (if different than the permit):
Date of most -recently certified Attachment B (if different than the permit):
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 1 of 5

III. RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION:
1. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: Source specific
City: State: Zip: -
Coordinates: Latitude: ° "' Longitude:
Datum: NAD 84 Level of accuracy: Second
Method of measurement: MAP,
2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Source specific
3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs f'or the residuals land application program, their
certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table:
Designation
Name
Affiliation
Certification Number
ORC
Robert N. Roth
Synagro
1001672
Back -Up ORC
Adam Brigman
Synagro
1006653
Additional Back -Up
ORCs
if applicable)
If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the
candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school
and certification test:
4. Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program:
a. Plant Available Nitrogen Sannnarp: Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals
source -generating facilities as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application and list the results in the
following table:
Maximum amount of residuals to be certified: 3 140 dry tons per year.
PAN
Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton
(Weighted Average)
Pounds of PAN per Year
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
First -Year
32.36
36.63
101,612
115,004
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted
49.38
53.64
155,051
168,443
b. LandA iplicativn Site UseSununarl : Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently ceitifed and
proposed f'or certification with this application:
Category
Use
Acres
Comments
Crops
Forest or Plantation
0
Row Crops
54.8
Hay
436.9
Pasture
699.5
Total:
1191.2
Methods
Surface
1191.2
Incorporation or Injection
0
Total:
1191.2
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 2 of 5

Assumed
Acres Required Using
Acres Required Using
Application Rate
First -Year PAN Concentrations
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN
(lbs PAN/nc _ i)
Concentrations
Surface
Incorporation or
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
Injection
2032.2
2300.1
3101.0
3368.9
so
100
1016.1
1150.0
1550.5
1684.4
150
677.4
766.7
1033.7
1123.0
200
508.1
575.0
775.3
842.2
6. If applicable, provide a plananda schedule to resolve anyknown issues thatwould prevent land application of the proposed
residuals due to the violation of North Carolina Administrative Code (e.g. not enougli storage,not enough land, vector reduction
practices not in place, etc.):
7. Specify typeof residuals program (See Instruction F): ® Non-dedicatcd ❑ Dedicated
IfDedicA-tc-d, specify the following (clieck all that apply):
❑ Residuals program contains any land application sitc(s) that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than agronomic
rates, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land applicationsite(s) that is used primarily forresiduals disposal, and agricultural crop
production is of secondary importance, explain;
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals through fixed u-igation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through a fixed supply system, explain,
IV. RESIDUALS SOURCE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified residuals source)
Complete and submit the following Residuals SourceCe•trficalion and all associated documentation.
Residuals Source
Certification
V. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION: (Required for all new, renewed, or modified land application site)
Complete and submit the following Land Applications Site Certification and all associated documentation.
Land Application Siite
Certification. doc
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 3 of 5

Note: Item VI. Applicable to Dedicated Program with fixed irrigation system only.
VI. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR FIXED IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. The irrigation system is: ❑ Spray ❑ Drip
2. Disposal system is: ❑ existing ❑ proposed.
3. Minimum depth to mean seasonal high watertable (SHWT)within irrigation sites(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation: feet
below ground surface. Rules l 5ANCAC 02T.0505(u)requires at least one -foot vcrticalseparation between SHWT and ground
surface.
4. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area?
❑ Yes or ❑ No If Yes, please explain if the soil scientist reportaddresses artificial structures andplea seindicate if
structures are to be maintained or modified:
5. Loading r'atesrecommended bythe Soil Scientist Evaluation:
Soil Series
Fields within Soil Area
Recommended
Loading Rate
(in/hr)
Recommended
Loading Rate
(in/yr)
6. Design loading rates are equal or less thanth eloading rates recommended bySoil Scientist?
❑ Yes or❑ No IfNo, explain why 15ANCAC 02T.0505(n) is notmet.
7. Non -dedicated System Design (fill in the appropriate inforniation foreither a spray ordrip irrigation system):
Field / Zone
Design Area
ft2)
Number of
Nozzles
Maximum Application
Rate gallons/hr)
Design Annual Loading
Rate (allons/yr)
Total
Spray Irrigation Design Element
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Wetted diameterofnozzles
ft
Wetted area of nozzles
ft2
Nozzle capacity
gpm
Nozzle manufacturer/ model
/
Elevation of highest nozzle
ft
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 4 of 5

Applicant's Certification (signing authority must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106):
The applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility without proper
closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any active
compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 15A NCAC 02T .0105.
® Yes ❑ No, Explain;
T-,&e, a 0 , Rvti-, r"WC-C i-
(Signature Authority's Name — PLEASE PRINT) (Title)
attest that this application for :m !y h %'JrV L C
(Facility Nanic)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Resources
may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless specifically
granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action,
which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water
Resources should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed
and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as
incomplete.
Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A and § 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to
exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Signature: Date: 7— ' Z o 2_ o
FORM: RLAP 06-16 Page 5 of 5

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0016247 (Synagro Western Piedmont Class B)
Inspection Plan
Inspections for the land application of residuals will be conducted on a weekly basis at the land application site during the land
application activities of this project. The inspection frequency is based on the time frame that it is going to take to complete the
project and the amount of dry tons to be land applied from this facility. The inspections will consist of inspecting a current field
that is being applied as well as inspecting random fields that have been completed. These inspections will consist of:
1. Verifying that the Pre -Operations Check List has been completed and signed by both Operations and Technical staff.
2. Checking the calculated loads to ensure the correct amount of residuals are being land applied.
3. Ensure that all manned equipment has a copy of the spill control plan, the permit, and the operations and maintenance
plan.
4. Ensure that the field has been flagged properly and that all buffers are being adhered to.
5. Ensure that the Crop and Landowner Verification form has been filled out.
6. Verifying that thecorrect numberof samples of the residuals has beentaken and that it meetsthe criteria for land
application.
7. The records will be kept in the project files in the respective office for the project.
8. The Permittee or Inspector shall report by telephone to the Fayetteville Regional Office by Telephone at 910-433-3300 as
soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after or the next working day following the occurrence or the first knowledge
of the occurrence of the following.
• Any occurrence with the distribution program resulting in the land application of significant amounts of material
that is abnormal in quantity or characteristics.
• Any failure of the distribution system that results in the release to surface waters.
• Any time that self -monitoring indicates that the facility has gone out of compliance with the permit.
• Any process failure that results in the system not adequately treating the residuals.
• Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
• Any release that requires immediate reporting outside of normal business hours shall be called in to DENR at 1-
800-662-7956,1-800-858-0368, or 1-919-733-3300. These numbers are to be called in the event of a release to
surface waters, imminent failure of a storage system when the event occurs outside of normal business hours.
• Within 5days of the first notice of on occurrence a written response in the form of a letter shall be sent to DENR
outlining the actions taken or purposed actions taken to ensure that the problem does not recur. Persons
responsible for inspections on this project are as follows:
Chris Wynne, Technical Services Specialist [phone]

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0016247
Sampling Plan
Sampling for this project consists of sampling the residuals prior to or during the time that land applicationis
occurring. This will result in one round of sampling to occur before land application commences inorder to ensure
that the residuals are suitable for land application. Based on the dry tonnage of this plant this will be four samples for
all parameters peryear with the exception of the TCLP.
The residuals shall be sampled annually for the following: (Regulatory level in milligrams per liter in parentheses.)
Arsenic (5.0)
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene (7.5)
Nitrobenzene (2.0)
Barium (100.0)
1, 2-Dichloroethane (0.5)
Pentachlorophenol (100.0)
Benzene (0.5)
1, 1-Dichloroethylene (0.7)
Pyridine (5.0)
Cadmium (1.0)
2, 4-Dinitrotoluene (0.13)
Selenium (1.0)
Carbon tetrachloride (0.5)
Endrin (0.02)
Silver (5.0)
Chlordane (0.03)
Hexachlorobenzene (0.13
Tetrachloroethylene (0.7)
Chlorobenzene (100.0)
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide) (0.008)Toxaphene
(0.5)
Chloroform (6.0)
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene (0.5)
Trichloroethylene (0.5)
Chromium (5.0)
Hexachlorethane (3.0)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (400.0)
M-Cresol (200.0)
Lead (5.0)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (2.0)
o-Cresol (200.0)
Lindane (0.4)
2,4,5 TP ( Silvex) (1.0)
p-Cresol (200.0)
Mercury (0.2)
Vinyl Chloride (0.2)
Cresol(200.0)
Methoxychlor (10.0)
2,4-D (10.0)
Methyl ethyl ketone (200.0)
The residuals will also be sampled based on the chart below for the following constituents
Dry Tons Generated
(short tons per year)
Monitoring Frequency
(Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111)
<319
1 time per year
=>319-<1,650
1 per Quarter (4 times per year)
=>1,650-<16,500
1 every 60 days (6 times per year)
=>16,500
1 every month (12 times per year)
Aluminum
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Arsenic
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Lead
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Magnesium
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Potassium
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen (calculation)
Selenium
Sodium
% Total Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Zinc
In order to meet pathogen requirements the material will be sampled to meet the fecal coliform density requirement. The grab
samples will be pulled from the pad, basin, or lagoon for either plant that are currently holding the residuals. Other samples that
will be pulled are a TCLP and a nutrient and metals sample to prove that the material is suitable for land application. The nutrient
and metal and TCLP sample will be collected randomly and consist of at least 10 individual samples mixed together in order to get
the composite sample for these parameters.
The following people are responsible for sampling:
Chris Wynne, Technical Services Specialist [phone]

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
SYNAGRO RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0016247 (Synagro Western Piedmont)
Operational Functions
The operation function ofthis project is going to involve mixing the lagoon with lagoon mixersto achieve a well mixed
and consistent material thatwill be spread as a liquid for land application. It is goingto be spread at agronomic rates
that are determined bythe nutrient and metal samplethat is currentforthat monitoring period. It is goingto be spread
with a liquid applicator that will use pressure to spread the material in such a wayto achieve a consistent spread
pattern. The material is goingto be land applied on fields that are in normal agricultural row crop production or grass
land.
Safety Measures
Synagro believes in operating in a safety conscious manner and has all employees participate in quarterly online safety
course that are designed to help its employees recognize safety issues and take steps to prevent accidents from
occurring. In addition all Synagro employees have the authority to stop operations if they think any aspect of the
operation is going to cause environmental or personal harm.
Maintenance Schedule
Synagro will follow the maintenance schedule asrecommended bythe Synagrofleet managerforthe equipment
iecessaryto complete thejob.

SPILL RESPONSE PLAN
PROJECT: SYNAGRO WESTERN PIEDMONT PERMIT W00016247
IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT OF A SPILL, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN
IMMEDIATELY:
1. MANAGEMENT OF SPILL CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES:
The Synagro Operations Manager shall take immediate charge and initiate clean-up activities. Synagro labor and
equipment is to be utilized. In the event additional labor and equipment is required, assistance may be requested from the
NC Department of Transportation, and other private contractors as necessary.
2. HALT THE SOURCE OF THE SPILL:
Such as a ruptured container or damaged transport unit.
3. CONTAIN THE SPILL:
Form a barrier. Sufficient quantities of straw shall be used for such purposes. Earthen barriers may be constructed to
augment the straw bale containment area of the spill. The Synagro Operations Manager or the person in charge on the
spill site will advise the clean-up personnel where to get the straw, lime, and other items necessary to complete the clean-
up operation, i.e., local farmers, fails supply centers, nurseries, etc.
4. CLEAN-UP:
Employ front-end loaders, vacuum equipment, sludge application vehicles, and/or local septic tank service to remove as
much of the spilled material as possible. Straw and/or sand should be scattered in the spill area to soak up the remaining
material. The straw- and sand -soaked material will be collected and removed to a disposal area approved by
representatives of the state regulatory agency.
5. FINAL CLEAN-UP:
Employ rotary brush sweeper if needed, and apply lime to the spill area upon the approval of the clean-up efforts by the
state regulatory representative. If the event occurs on private property, the clean-up will be completed to the satisfaction
of the property owner and state regulatory representatives. The ultimate goal will be to restore the spill area to its original
condition if possible.
6. NOTIFICATION:
As soon as possible after the spill occurs, the Synagro Operations Manager or assistant will notify the Synagro Central
office, and they will then be responsible for notifying other key Synagro personnel.
7. REPORTING:
Synagro Central personnel will notify the Winston-Salem Regional office at [phone] as soon as possible, but not
more than 24 hours after, or on the next working day following the occurrence. The Operations Manager shall provide a
written report within 48 hours of the spill to the Technical Services Director. The report shall list all relative information
and actions taken. Synagro Central personnel will file a written report to the Winston-Salem Regional office of the
NCDENR within 5 days of the occurrence. For after hours reporting the Division's emergency number shall be called to
report all incidences (1-800-858-0368) or (919-733-3300).

Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a cheeldist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
Formorehilbi-mrlion,visillheH,alerQualilyPermiuingSec lion'sNon-Dischar ePei-mittinz g Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 100. Do notsubmit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SDR 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supportingdocunlentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 1 1-15) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to thisfonn. Ifnecessary for clarity ordue to space restrictions, attachmentsto the
application may be made, as long asthe a ttachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed_ perm its, submit a separate certification for each source facility.
® Formodifedpennits,submitaseparatecertificationforonlythosefacilitiesthatareaffectedbytheproposedmodification.
® Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities.
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
® For eachsource facility, attach the following:
®Vicinity map -A vicinity map that shows the location ofthefacility and meetsall ofthe criteria in the "MalmGuidance for
Residuals Land Application Pemmits".
® Process flowdiagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are tobe generated, treated, processed, andstored attlmefacility.
® Quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item 1. 8.
Ensure that the amountofresiduals listed isthe maxvnunm amount expected to be generated by the facility forthe life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
® Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the pla n deta ils how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pa thogen reduction a n d
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/ordisposed.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
® For eachsource facility, attach the following:
® Laboratory analytical reports and operationaldata -reports for alllaboratory analyses used tocomplete this certification.
® Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
® For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility alongwith the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page I of I

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: S_ Yna�,,ro Western Piedmont. LLC
Status
Codea
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current"
Proposed
N
Harnett County Utilities
North Harnett Regional
WWTP
Harnett
NCO021636
0
1500
N
Town of Mayodan
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham
NCO021873
0
315
N
Town of Siler City
Siler City WWTP
Chatham
NCO026441
0
1325
I
a Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Dlvlslon of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM: RSC 06-16
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
1. Facility Name: North HamettReyional WWTP
2. Facility permit holder is: ❑ Federal, El State, ®, Local Government, or ❑ Private.
Facility permit issued by: ® Div. of Water Resources, ❑ Div. of Envii•onmentalHealth,
or Da Other (explain: ).
3. Facility contactperson and title: Billy Thomas, Plant ORS:
Complete mailing address: 607 Edwards Brothers Dr
City:LiIlington State: NC Zip: -27546
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: bthomas( hatnett.org
4. Facility physical address: 607 Edwards Brothers Dr
City: Lillie on State: NC Zip: 27546-
Coordinates: Latitude:35°23'45'� Longitude:78°48'04"
Datum: NAD 84 Level of a ccuracy: Second
Method of measurement: MAP
5. Purpose of the facility:
® treatmentofmunicipalwastewater, ❑ treatmentof 100%domesticwastewater,
Q treatmentofpotablewater, ❑ treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
0, treatmentof industrial wastewatermixed with domesticwastewater,
(approximate percentages: 1 1% industrial and _ % domestic)
❑ other (explaui: ).
6. Does the facility have an approvedpretreatment program: ® Yes No
7. Facility petinitted/design flow: 77.5 MGD and facility average daily flow: 4_4 MGD
8, Average amountof residuals being generated at this facility 572.2 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volumeofresiduals treatment: Aerobic Digestion with 2-1 million gallon basins
Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside ofresiduals treatmentunits): 5 acre, 26 million gallon facultative lagoon
H. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
® 40 CFR Pail 503 or Q 40 CFR Pail 257,
Note: Only residua Is that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated under 40
CFR Part 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under40 CFR Part 257.
2, Specify if residuals are defined under 15A NCAC 02T.1 102(61as:
® B iological Q Non -Biological
Note: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, anunal
processutg wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed film systems).
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1 of 5

3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -mu n icipa 1, domestic wastewater only)
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: ❑ yes Z no.
If yes, list the number(s): f
b. Specify whether or notthe residuals exhibit any ofthe characteristics defined by40 CFR §261.21-
261.24: P yes ® no.
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
well a s thosef orcorrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
Laboratory: Pace Ana] ticaIServices LLC and Date of analysis:3/18/2020
Passed corrosivity test: ® yes ❑ no. pH: sm. (2 < pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: ® yes ❑ no. Flashpoint:>140 OF(> 140°F)
Passed reactivity test: 19ycs 0 no, HCN: ND nig/kg (<250) & H2S: 180 nig/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(1119/1)
Result
(rng/1)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
()Itg/1)
Result
(mg/U
Arsenic
5.0
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
ND
Barium
100.0
0.4
Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene
0.5
ND
Benzene
0.5
ND
Hcxachloroethane
3.0
ND
Cadmium
1.0
ND
Lead
5.0
ND
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5
ND
Lindane
0.4
ND
Chlordane
0.03
ND
Mercury
0.2
ND
Chlorobenzene
100.0
ND
Methoxychlor
10.0
ND
Chloroform
6.0
ND
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
200.0
ND
Chromium
5.0
ND
Nitrobenzene
2.0
ND
ni-Cresol
200.0
ND
Pent achlorophenol
100.0
ND
' o-Cresol
200.0
ND
Pyridine
I 5.0
I ND
p-Cresol
200.0
ND
Selenium
I 1.0
I ND
Cresol
200.0
ND
Silver
5.0
I ND
2,4-D
I U
ND
Tetrachloroethylene
l 0.7
I ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
ND
Toxaphene
0.5
I ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
ND
Trichloroethylene
0.5
ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
ND
2,4,5-Trichloroplienol
` 400.0
I ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
I 2.0
I ND
' Endrin
0.02
ND
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
I 1.0
I ND
Heptachlorand its Hydroxide
0.008
ND
Vinyl Chloride
I 0.2
I ND
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 2 of 5

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e,, as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentration form eta lsregulated under 15A NCAC 02T .1 105.
a. For D1slribntiOnlLand Application: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., o n a dry weight
basis) for the following meta 1parameteis:
Laboratoiy: Pace Ana 1 byicalServices, LLC and Date of analysis: 05/01 /2020
Parameter
Ceiling
Concentration Limits
(ClassA & ClassB)
(mg/kg)
Monthly Average
Concentration Limits
(Class A On ))
(nig/kg)
Result
(nrg/kg)
Arsenic
75
41
4.8
Cadmium
85
39
1.1
Copper
4,300
1,500
220
Lead
840
300
16
Mercury
57
17
ND
Molybdenum
75
n/a
ND
Nickel
420
420
11
Selenium
100
100
ND
Zinc
7,500
2,800
670
b. For Snnfuce Dispolul Unit (Lind ilh Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the follownig metal parameters:
Laboratory: andDateofanalysis:
Distance from Disposal
Unit to Boundary to
Closest Property Line
(meters, checkone)
Arsenic
(,ng/kg)
Chromium
019/1T)
Nickel
(rng/kg)
❑' > 0 but< 25
30
200
210
❑ > 25 but< 50
34
220
240
❑ >_ 50 but< 75
39
260
270
❑ >_75 but< 100
46
300
320
❑ > 100 but< 125
53
360
390
❑ >_125
62
450
420
Result (mg/kg)
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 3 of 5

5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Totalsolids: 2.19 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and
micronutrient parameters:
Laboratoiy: Pace AnalyticalSeryices, LLC and Date of analysis:05/01/2020
Parameter
Result
(rig/kg)
Aluminum
38000
Ammonia -Nitrogen
3300
Ca Icium
15000
Magnesium
3800
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
112
pH (Standard Unit)
7.0
Phosphorus
14000
Potassium
1800
Sodium
2300
TotalKjeldahl Nitrogen
30000
c. Using the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 0:64
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc,), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth].
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: 30 %. This
rate is a (check one): ® defaultvalue,or ❑ actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical
justification as to why the selected defaultvaluc is appropriate to be applied to these residuals: ,I l
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill theresults in the following table:
Application Method
First (151) Year PAN
Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mg/kg)
(nrg/kg)
Surf'a ce
9772
14981
Injection/Incorporation
14981
16631
6. Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses: N/A
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 4 of 5

7. Pathogen Reduction; Per 15A NCAC 02T.1 106,specify how residuals will meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For Distribution/L,nd Application of0as.s A or Equivalent:
[]' A fecalcolifonn density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
[], A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of tot a ldry solids.
AND one of the followings (except fornon-biological residuals):
❑ Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.]106(b)(3)(A)] -Time/TemperatureComplianee.
Alternative [15A NCAC 02T.1106(b)(3)(B)] -Alkaline Treatment.
Q1 Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.1106(b)(3)(C)] -Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.]106(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Vn•us/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑! Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.1106 (3)(E)-(K)1 - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP).
Specify one: Elcomposting, 8I heatdrying, ❑ Ircattreatrnent,
❑ thermophilic aerobic digestion, ❑ beta ray irradiation,
❑ gain marayirradiation, or ❑ pasteurization.
b. Fo►•LtnrdA )lic�rtioato ClassB:
Ej Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.1106(c)(1)]-Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
❑ Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.1 106(c)(2)] - Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP).
Specify one: ❑ aerobic digestion, ❑ air drying, ❑ anaerobiedigestion,
❑; composting, or ❑ lime stabilization.
c. For Srrt face Dlslrasrrl:
0, Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II.7a. above.
Q Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in item 1I.7b. above.
❑I Exempt -If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in Item II.9. below[ 15A NCAC 02T.1 106(a)(2)].
❑' Not Applicable - Non-Biologicai Residuals with NO Domestic WastewaterContribution.
8, Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR): Per 15ANCAC 02T.1 107,specify howresiduals will meetthe VAR requirements:
® Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.1107(a)(1)] - 39%Volatile Solids Reduct ion (Aerobic/Ana erobic Digestion).
❑' Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(2)] - 40-DayBench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
® Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(3)] - 30-DayBcnelr Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
® Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(5)] - 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
® Altemative 6 [15A NCAC 02T.1107(a)(6)] -Alkaline Stabilization.
❑: Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T.1 ]07(a)(7)] - Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
❑ Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(9)] -Drying ofUnstabilized Residuals.
® Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.] 107(a)(9)] - Injection.
Alternative 10 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 1 07(a)(I 0)]- Incorporation.
Eli Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only - Soil/Other Material Cover [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 107(b)(2)].
❑j Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic WastewaterContribution.
Note: For annnalprocessi ig residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 5 of 5

Iowz) fudom.,umm) 1jamwu
'Y'd 'HaININ v ONVIZAvm Au% qVKOIDn Avn fu-.Li qm"m
all
WHOIDn Avn6na-li aw""
E I I
41
Zky
pi
Vill E� .1,Z2 "IN �Ojlqyl
7
MAIL
L- J
T
it
0*9ZI 'A313 0001A 'HA 001 :310N

VICINITY MAP
Harnett
Lillington 7 Regional
Qf:jv,,.Waste Water
SYNAGRO
COUNTY: Harnett OWNER(S): North Harnett Regional WWTP

f 1 i C 1 1
aplip
YAIRIk.ME'A'
Fix
Aarrcna+ a Grsa-
AFC i
`1
, ILl� �
-16
� ' i
ettmcfiosau�arnte i
1{"',
r=
`��•-' � Mwer4'r.-'-
.�.—.�•
. � �1��T
r—._ems—x—._.._. e�
� e .-8—.
—�-

Residuals Sampling Plan
Synagro Residuals Land Application for WQ0016247
Harnett County Regional North Treatment Plant
Nutrients and Metals Analysis
Sampling Point: Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Based on Diy Tons
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Pace Analytical Services, LLC
Pathogen (Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration)
Sampling Point: Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Based on Dry Tons
Sample Type: 7 Grab samples
Lab: Cameron Testing
Vector (38% VSR)
TCLP
Sampling Point: Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Based on Diy Tons
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Cameron Testing
Sampling Point: Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Annually
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Sununit Environmental Technologies, Inc

Quantitative Justification for Residuals Production Rate
F acility:
Harnett County Utilities /North Harnett Regional WWTP
Requested Permitted Rate:
Current:
Requested
Justification:
1500 Diy Tons/year
1500 Diy Tons/year
Based off the past 3 years diy tonnage:
2019: 787.7 Dry Tons
2018: 374.6 Dry Tons
2017: 554.3 Dry Tons
Calculations:
Average: 572.2 Dry Tons
Based on the average daily flows of 4,400,000 gallons per d ay, 1500 dry tons per year should be
sufficient for any increase in volumes.
Total Dry Tons = gallons of residuals x % solids x 8.34 lbs/gallon
2,000 lbs/ton
= 4,400,000 Lrallons x_ 0.0219 x 8.34 Ilion
2,000 lbs/ton
= 402 dry tons
Chris Wynne, Technical Services Specialist

aceAnalytical
Report of Analysis
Synagro
12701 Lancaster Hwy
Pineville, NC 28134
Attention: Nate Roth
Project Name: North Harnett WWTP
Lot Number:VC03022
Date Completed:03/18/2020
M
03/18/2020 2:35 PM
Approved and released by:
Lab Director - Greenville: Lucas Odom
AdM-
AASI Falrortal arnedArENn 6oa+?
4B
ACC F1 E D I T E 0
7ESTMOUWRATONv
The electronic signature above is the equivalent of a handwritten signature.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc,)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172
Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page l of 10

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
SC DHEC No: 32010001 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
Synagro
Lot Number: VC03022
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary
following this Case Narrative, The sample receiving date is documented in the header information
associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most
current approved NELAC standards, the Pace Analytical Services, LLC ("Pace") Quality Assurance
Management Plan (QAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPs), and Pace policies. Any exceptions to
the NELAC standards, the QAMP, SOPs or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below.
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
qualifier
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Pace Project Manager listed on the
cover page.
The pH analysis associated with the sample(s) in this report was/were performed after the method
recommended 15 minute holding time.
Metals by ICP
Due to low percent solids sample -001 was weighed out at 3 times the normal weight. The LOQ has been
elevated to reflect the dilution.
Nitrate
The following sample was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: VC03022-002. The LOQ has
been elevated to reflect the dilution.
Paint Filter
Sample -001 has been qualified with an "H", however, there is not a method defined hold time for this
parameter.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmetal Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 2 of 10

Guent:aynagro
Laooraiory 11J:vL:U3ULL-UU'I
Description: NH 20
Matrix: Solid
Date Sampled:0212812020 1300
% Solids: 5.05 03/03/2020
2237
Date Received:0310312020
Inorganic non-metals
Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
(% Solids) SM 2540G
1 03/03/2020 2237 MDD
46788
1
(Ignitability) 1010A
1 03/09/2020 1716 SLC
47298
1
(Paint Filter) 9095B
1 03/10/2020 1443 SLC
1
(Reactive Cya) 7.3.3
1 03/10/2020 0000 KFE
03/10/2020 1046
1
(Reactive Sul) 7.3.4
1 03/10/2020 1925 HET
03/10/2020 1046
1
(Soil pH meas) 9045D
1 03/05/2020 2211 SRB
47065
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
% Solids
SM 254OG
5.05
%
1
Ignitability (Pensky-Martens Closed
-Cup)
1010A
>140
140
0
° F
1
Paint Filter Test
9095B
Fail H`
passifail
1
Reactive Cyanide
7.3.3
ND
50
50
mg/kg
1
Reactive Sulfide
7.3.4
180
50
50
mg/kg
1
Soil pH measured in water @ 20.9 ° C
9045D
7.4
su
1
TCLP Volatiles
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
Leachate Date
1 1311t503OB
8260D
10 03/13/2020 0445 JTH
47756
03/11/2020 2110
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
Benzene
71-43-2 8260D
ND
0.050
0,0040
mg/L
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
78-93-3 8260D
ND
0.10
0,020
mg/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5 8260D
ND
0,050
0,0040
mg/L
1
xobenzene
108-90-7 8260D
ND
0.050
0.0040
mg/L
1
L.nloroform
67-66-3 8260D
ND
0,050
0,0040
mg/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2 8260D
ND
0.050
0.0040
mg/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4 8260D
ND
0.050
0.0040
mg/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4 8260D
ND
0.050
0.0040
mg/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6 8260D
ND
0.050
0.0040
mg/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4 8260D
ND
0.010
0.0040
mg/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
Bromofluorobenzene
99 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
97 70-130
Toluene-d8
104 70-130
TCLP Semivolatiles
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
Leachate Date
1 1311/3520C
8270E
1 03/12/2020 1657 SCD
03/10/2020 1710
47402
03/08/2020 2357
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ DL Units Run
LOQ Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range OL —Detection Limit
N D = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
�il of holding time W = Reported on wetweightbasis
Fo..a Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 3 of 10

t.uem:bynagro
Description: NH 20
Date Sampled:02/28/2020 1300
Date Received:03/03/2020
TCLP Semivolatiles
Laooraiory lu: vt.usuzZ-uu'l
Matrix: Solid
%Solids: 5.05 03/03/2020 2237
Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch Leachate Date
1311/3520C 8270E 1 03/12/2020 1657 SCD 03/10/2020 1710 47402 03/08/2020 2357
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8270E
ND
0.040
0.0050
mg/L
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
8270E
ND
0.080
0.0050
mg/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
8270E
ND
0.040
0.0050
mg/L
1
Hexachiorobutadiene
87-68-3
8270E
ND
0.040
0.0050
mg/L
1
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
8270E
ND
0.040
0.010
mg/L
1
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
8270E
ND
0.040
0.010
mg/L
1
3+4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
8270E
ND
0.040
0.015
mg/L
1
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
8270E
ND
0.040
0.015
mg/L
I
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
8270E
ND
0.20
0.020
mg/L
1
Pyridine
110-86-1
8270E
ND
0.040
0.0050
mg/L
1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
8270E
ND
0.040
0.0050
mg/L
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
8270E
ND
0.040
0.0050
mg/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyl
68
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
50
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
74
38-127
Phenol-d5
79
28-128
Terphenyl-d 14
84
10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
69
41-144
TCLP Herbicides
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
Leachate Date
1 1311/8151A
8151A
1 03/16/20201847 JJG
03/12/2020 1747
47726
03/08/2020 2357
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units Run
2,4-D
94-75-7 8151A
ND
0.020
0.0050
mg/L 1
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
93-72-1 8151A
ND
0.0050
0.0013
mg/L 1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
DCAA
74 50-112
TCLP Pesticides
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
Leachate Date
1 1311/3520C
8081B
1 03/13/20201621 DAL1
03/11/2020 1452
47527
03/08/2020 2357
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units Run
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
58-89-9 8081B
ND
0.00040
0.00017
mg/L 1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantilation of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit
N D = Not detected at orabove The DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPO between two GC columns exceeds 40% J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
rt of holding time W = Reported on wet weightbasis
P—e Analytical Services, LLC (formeiiy Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www,pacelabs.com
Page 4 of 10

Lment: oynagro
Description: NH 20
Date Sampled:02/28/2020 1300
Date Received:03/03/2020
TCL.P Pesticides
i-aooratory lu: VL:usuGL-uui
Matrix: Solid
% Solids: 5.05 03/03/2020 2237
i Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch Leachate Date
i 1311/3520C 8081B 1 03/13/2020 1621 DAL1 03/11/2020 1452 47527 03/08/2020 2357
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
Chlordane
57-74-9
8081B
ND
0.0040
0.0015
mg/L
1
Endrin
72-20-8
8081B
ND
0,00040
0.00015
mg/L
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8
8081B
ND
0.00040
0.00015
mg/L
1
Heptachlor epoxide
1024-57-3
8081B
ND
0.00040
0,00016
mg/L
1
Methoxychlor
72-43-5
8081B
ND
0.0016
0.00021
mg/L
1
Toxaphene
8001-35-2
8081B
ND
0.0080
0.0030
mg/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
Decachlorobiphenyl 88 20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xyiene 87 26-132
TCLP Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch Leachate Date
1 1311/3010A 6010D 1 03/10/2020 1033 LLL 03/09/2020 2018 47306 03/08/2020 2357
1 1311/7470A 7470A 1 03/10/2020 1522 KSH2 03/10/2020 0941 47316 03/08/2020 2357
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ DL Units Run
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
0.15
0.025
mg/L
1
Barium
7440-39-3
6010D
0.40
0.25
0.031
mg/L
1
r'gdmium
7440-43-9
6010D
ND
0.050
0.0060
mg/L
1
omium
7440-47-3
6010D
ND
0.10
0.013
mg/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
6010D
ND
0.10
0.047
mg/L
1
Mercury
7439-97-6
7470A
ND
0.0020
0.00091
mg/L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
0.20
0.085
mg/L
1
Silver
7440-22-4
6010D
ND
0.10
0.021
mg/L
1
Footnote(s): 'Paint Filter: 5mL collected;
LOQ - Limit of Quanlilation B - Detected in the method blank E = Quanlitalion of compound exceeded the calibration range DL Detection Limit
ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% J = Estimated result < LOD and> DL
it of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 5 of 10

ument:aynagro
Description: N H 1
Date Sampled:0212812020 1300
Date Received:0310312020
Laooratory iu:vuuauzz-uue
Matrix: Solid
% Solids: 1.97 0310312020 2237
Inorganic
non-metals
7
1 t Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
_
Prep Date Batch
1
(% Solids) SM 254OG
1
03/03/2020 2237 MDD
46788
1 350.1
(Ammonia - N ) 350.1
5
03/09/2020 1336 SLC
46871
2
(Nitrate - N) 9056A
5
03/17/2020 1253 AMR
48204
1
(Nitrite - N) 9056A
5
03/11/2020 1836 AMR
47697
1
(Phosphorus) 365.1
10
03/06/2020 1358 DMA
03/06/2020 0937 47087
1
(Soil pH meas) 9045D
1
03/05/2020 2215 SRB
47065
1 351.4
(TKN) 351.2
1
03/04/2020 1544 DMA
03/04/2020 1002 46808
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
% Solids
SM 254OG
1.97
%
1
Ammonia - N (gas diffusion)
350.1
6500
250
130
mg/kg
1
Nitrate - N (soluble)
9056A
210
130
6.2
mg/kg
2
Nitrite - N (soluble)
9056A
36 J
51
4.9
mg/kg
1
Phosphorus
7723-14.0 365.1
15000
2500
510
mg/kg
1
Soil pH measured in water@ 21 ° C
9045D
7.3
su
1
TKN
351.2
77000
1300
1300
mg/kg
1
CVAA
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
7471E
7471B
1 03/04/2020 1642 KSH2
03/04/2020 1230 46714
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q LOQ DL Units Run
mercury
7439-97-6 7471E
ND 3.8 0.91 mg/kg 1
ICP-AES
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1 3050B
6010D
1 03/09/2020 1946 LLL
03/06/2020 1452 46709
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result
Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
Aluminum
7429.90.5
601OD
6700
330
120
mg/kg
1
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
ND
12
4.1
mg/kg
1
Cadmium
7440.43-9
6010D
1.6
J
4.1
1.0
mg/kg
1
Calcium
7440-70.2
6010D
7000
4100
510
mg/kg
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
7.1
J
8.2
2.0
mg/kg
1
Copper
7440-50-8
6010D
77
8.2
3.7
mg/kg
1
Iron
7439-89-6
6010D
5600
82
37
mg/kg
1
Lead
7439.92.1
6010D
4.9
J
8.2
3.7
mg/kg
1
Magnesium
7439-95-4
6010D
650
J
4100
510
mg/kg
1
Manganese
7439-96-5
6010D
380
12
4.8
mg/kg
1
Molybdenum
7439-98-7
6010D
ND
33
8.2
mg/kg
1
Nickel
7440-02-0
6010D
ND
33
8.6
mg/kg
1
LOD =Limit of Quantitation B - Detected in the method blank E - Quantitaticn of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit
ND = Not detected at or above the DL N - Recovery is out of criteria P -The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% J = Estimated result a LOD and > DL
it of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 6 of 10

unem: aynagro
Laooratory iu: vcusu«-uuz
Description: NH 1
Matrix: Solid
Date Sampled:02/28/2020 1300
% Solids: 1.97
03/03/2020 2237
Date Received:03/03/2020
ICP-AES
_
i Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 3050B
6010D 1 03/09/2020 1946 LLL
03/06/2020 1452 46709
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ DL
Units
Run
Potassium
7440.09-7 6010D
2800 J
4100 510
mg/kg
1
Selenium
7782-49-2 6010D
ND
16 6.6
mg/kg
1
Sodium
7440-23-5 6010D
3700 J
4100 510
mg/kg
1
Zinc
7440.66-6 6010D
240
41 10
mg/kg
1
LOO = Limit of Quanlitation 0 = Detecled in the method blank E = Quantltation of compound exceeded the calihratlon range DL = Detection Limit
N D = Not detected a t or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds40% J = Estimated result < LOQ and> DL
it of holding time W - Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 7 of 10

Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
Pace Analytical Seivices, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 9 of 10

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Sheet1
Shaaly Environmental 3arvlcos, Inc.
1t)f: Vinlago Point Drive
ti arrla' Chaim cd Cusfody Racc rd Wed coluntle, South Care[ine 20172 Number
4,
1Mpph«le Na. (803) 791-97CO Fax Vo. (BL5)79i-B11S
p trl
-1YheAro I
R.!Dod to Gonteet `
)`rU�J��rnitrtfr'ti.Vcti"n
> amFb+(krHao limit)
1 �lIuj+ I1,It
Y'wYl:il Nil ) '4l1 r 1 NN�ItIj u
'�:hktt7 i
j 2�a 3aaer R4,
l H{lntre Nu tfs+r �L:, /Eami ' "
My Slakr
klreks-Alta t4C
25pCLbs
's7R?.E
FrvcarVai.v
I.Vl*re3, d;HNOj 7,O&OH
�, NaQN�ns i. Hr7.
r
3 W2®UE 8. Wa . ht:..
A
rt
a
!
a
1
1
♦ r�IUU1
j �i C0302 j
�'
L.10
—
NG
ies�il Pahl ells TLC014
CCE
(rato 7-1 IV Gre981 Ralb
l 1plape[Ne Te
i
=u1
Pe Lc
W�hr,
I t
PH
PCB
S7rS1
M l
Nrnhe
P.ONlMlaer
�`
r
i
Me1rSx
'3w UN Wier S one-
[ Sampetofa7rzcri on
1 tecrltail %li;rewiearrOmt'rbp"'oi4d
j tnaleOne)
DOW
Trims
'cam
o
I
�;
x
x
x
x
f 1� r Ia
j : ��
G
✓
�1:m,Vcuna-"5Ael WrMarre6rwUNMr%,HtawftmY^
gt . dvd rl tRWSh ptezld "!IM 7dvx por_uc,
Lr'G"Vler
slit'Dlepuadl
OI Renia Cr ini � G` pa.1w Lab
it ; Gtrtfimfirn
ic6dhke b.ieiimlk zziri
r4ar*azajd, FlmrneKe
F � +tn H 4l1Wnc?ei
i, Reimilo
Dzta 2 T-nn q
1. AKRNll V
cote
Z POArr.W "I b7
CQte
Time
2. NaoEhlea W
oe e
I Winquarral by
C'l.Y
dire
1Rettmw w
Date
,1 n ��V1 � /
4 'llingt.�ch u1 CY ff \ �'1 e, 1
tl rr
Tjfnr2 � M
4 a 3
Nate; All Samples aro rat iinad for six woeke hrorn Waiipt unless other arrangements are LABLS2 CKY
mado R 4iccicnxrlCh�elQ yd' Q vcPeck
y-t:'�
3
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive Wes[ Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 9 of 10

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC
Slwbkv m¢uneryInc laps t 911
D<,jftnrl NeroLkt-MCOW:-4 LnNtI) etBrl_lk S4>t>ni><ple Receipt Checklist (STIC')
Client: Synagro eta° / 07ff1;in-o20 L,or;ft 1;C03022
cans ofrecelpi.
SES1 FI C i:nl ❑ (IP5
❑ Yes ®Hu
1. Were custody seals ove,4v tt un the owl er7
Ycs N:-
NA 2. if custoe. seibb wean rusenr, were th" inlael turd unhrvtken'l
pl-I Strip IlY NA
C)dnrine Sl-ip ID: NA Tested by -,NA _
Original tamNretnr'a upon receipt Dcrived (CotreGtod) :eu» pe:a:ure upon Teceiht 'Molid Snap -Cup ill: 14-2113
5.2 /5.). `C
NA /,NA �(, \'A ;NA AC NA INA aL
tvtexhod: �Tert�para{uro Mani: QAgpainst Bottles IR (itm 1D: 6 IR Gun Corrcation hactot: °C
Mrthr,d of coo:nnt: ® We, ice ❑ :ca Packs ❑ 13 ice ❑ None
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
_
3. ]:fern rulurc of airy cnoler cxr.eeded 6,t3°C, was Project Manager Notified"
PM wsc Nu',if cd by: phnne l ornail I fucerlu-fucc (circle one).
® Yes
❑'Na
❑ NA
4, is tite Commercial courier's packing slip attached to this falrm'j
5. Wuxi prt>per custody ptu=rlurta (mlinquishe i/Teaeived) rollowcd'?
0 yes
❑ NO
j4 Ycs
Nt7
6. Ware satuple IDs listed on the CCQC_'
Yes
❑ Nn
_
7, 1:1ere sample Ms listed oil (Ili slim le cnnininnrs?
Ycs
❑ No
S. lrlas eollvc'ion Me A time listed on ilia COO?
❑ Yes
MP
9, Was collewon date& time listed on all swilple coutainers'-r_
10. Did all oorrtAll r'Label ialanrmlion (10, date, tfr io) agree with lttu t:C U'.
® YuS
❑ o
Wj YeS
11. W(ro tests to:w Wrfonued lima on tie COC?
12, Did all sxntples arrive in the prop:tr Luntilincrs for each lest and/or itt Aoot: condition
n No
l
Yes
El No
(anhroken, lids on, cti;J1
13. Was adcquate sample valtnne availnldc?
Yes
❑ No
_
❑ Yes
VI No
1,1. Were all s. nlplt�-Cccived within is the holdiag limo or4K hnitr5, wi icliever cwnvs f<rst'1
Yes
ONO
15. Werc any sam leS containers missingimcess oim"a one) stunpirs 4ot.listed on COC7
❑ Yes
❑ No
O n A
Id. Pot VDA and RSK• 17S samples. were bubbics pvcseni ?"ne:: size" ('A"or 6mm in diameter)
in mlly of Hie VOA vials?
❑ YCS
"No
Q.'%io
NA
17- WerC ul1 1�1C(�linet�:Srtnlliier]t s;llilplCy re{~Cil'ed }11..r [rH t7f 7
I8. Werc all cyanlde samples trmivA nt a Ill1 - 12 and sulfide xnmpl_Y received fit a p1: = 9?
❑ YaF
®i~1A
71Ycs ❑ No
19. Were M applic Ic dH ! I'KN{t yanldap tens 625 (,z 0,5TnWL.) same es n ee ofr>r.-6 nl
0 NA
clsltirin�7
❑ Yrxa ❑ No
®NA 20. 'ti um c:i{ntT mnarks,hvcquests fi_e, roquestec dilutions. MSAvlSrl drs'gnatfoa&, etc...;
er,rrct:l;ran y transcribed frurn the CDC Into the couuneul SCCdon in I .IIv1S?
❑ Yes No
121. Was the goulc ntrrrther kiell on the cojiWner label's If C5, Quote r NA4
�aaulple l'rt Serration Miusr be eouipleted for any sar:lple(s) incomeclly preserved or with hoadspaot;,)
'ample(s) NA
were reccivcd incorrectly praser% xW 4111d were adjusted accordir-gly
in sample rcceivi_rtg
with. NA_nll,of circle ono: HM)4, ITNG3, .Hel, NuOH using SR * NAfirm
pfnzesen�tlen NA If Mom, than one pirmmpnhwti is neetkd, picese t101e itt 1111113 GOn11TI MS bc: %
SwIlple(s) NA
Nvele YeCCjVW with bubblcs: 6 marl 41 diameter"
Sairiplcs(s) NA
were mccived )with TRC: > 0.5 mg.2 (117619 is rru) rind were
adjusted eccotdingly in siimple receiving wills-widilan tniosuffatc (Na,S2()3) with Shealy 11): NA
hR barcode l4bcl3 applied by; 13MG _ Didr: (00312020
Comnlcins:
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www,pacelabs.com
Page 10 of 10

aceAnalytical
Report of Analysis
Synagro
12701 Lancaster Hwy
Pineville, NC 28134
Attention: Nate Roth
Project Name: Harnett
Lot Number:VD23025
Date Completed:05/01/2020
05/04/2020 11:44 AM
Approved and released by:
Lab Director - Greenville: Lucas Odom
`Q`PCCRFp� �
ANSI Nali"jlArwd fahaa &j1d
'Q e
ACC REDIY ED
TFSTINGLASMATONY
The electronic signature above is the equivalent of a handwritten signature.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Pace Analytical Services, LLC,
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172
Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page l of

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
SCDHEC No: 32010001 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
Synagro
Lot Number: VD23025
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary
following this Case Narrative. The sample receiving date is documented in the header information
associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most
current approved NELAC standards, the Pace Analytical Services, LLC ("Pace") Quality Assurance
Management Plan (QAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPs), and Pace policies. Any exceptions to
the NELAC standards, the QAMP, SOPs or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below.
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
qualifier
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Pace Project Manager listed on the
cover page.
The pH analysis associated with the sample(s) in this report was/were performed after the method
recommended 15 minute holding time.
Metals by ICP
Due to low percent solids the samples were weighed out 3 times the normal amount. The LOQ has been
elevated to reflect the dilution.
Nitrate
The following sample was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: VD23025-001. The LOQ has
been elevated to reflect the dilution.
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmetal Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 2 of

Uienr:bynagro
Laooraiory iu: vuzsuto-uui
Description: Harnett WWTP
Matrix:
Solid
Date Sampled:04121/2020 1115
% Solids:
2.19 0412312020 2207
Date Received:0412312020
Inorganic non-metals
_
Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
.I
(% Solids) SM 254OG
1 04/23/2020 2207 HET
51982
1 350.1
(Ammonia - N) 350.1
2 04/28/2020 1528 SLC
52271
2
(Nitrate - N) 9056A
5 05/01/2020 0920 AMR
52669
1
(Nitrite - N) 9056A
1 04/26/2020 0148 HKL
52211
1
(Phosphorus) 365.1
10 04/28/2020 1639 DMA
04/28/2020 1146
52263
1
(Soil pH meas) 9045D
1 04/23/2020 1927 SRB
51981
1 351.4
(TKN) 351.2
1 04/29/2020 1508 DMA
04/29/2020 0934
52375
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
% Solids
SM 254OG
2.19
%
1
Ammonia - N (gas diffusion)
350.1
3300
91
47
mg/kg
1
Nitrate - N (soluble)
9056A
97 J
110
5.6
mg/kg
2
Nitrite - N (soluble)
9056A
15
9.1
0.88
mg/kg
1
Phosphorus
7723-14.0 365.1
14000
2300
460
mg/kg
1
Soil pH measured in water @ 18.2 ° C
9045D
7.0
su
1
TKN
351.2
30000
1100
1100
mg/kg
1
CVAA
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 7471B
7471B
1 04/27/2020 2333 JMH
04/27/2020 0317
51971
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
NAgrcury
7439-97-6 7471B
ND
3.7
0.88
mg/kg
1
ICP-AES
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 3050B
6010D
1 04/27/2020 2003 LLL
04125120201414
51966
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result
Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
Aluminum
7429.90-5
6010D
38000
300
110
mg/kg
1
Arsenic
7440-38-2
6010D
4.8
J
11
3.8
mg/kg
1
Cadmium
7440.43-9
6010D
1.1
J
3.8
0.95
mg/kg
1
Calcium
7440-70-2
6010D
15000
3800
470
mg/kg
1
Chromium
7440-47-3
6010D
20
7.6
1.9
mg/kg
1
Copper
7440-50.8
6010D
220
7.6
3.4
mg/kg
1
Iron
7439-89-6
6010D
19000
76
34
mg/kg
1
Lead
7439.92-1
6010D
16
7.6
3.4
mg/kg
1
Magnesium
7439-95-4
6010D
1200
J
3800
470
mg/kg
1
Manganese
7439.96-5
6010D
1200
11
4.5
mg/kg
1
Molybdenum
7439-98-7
6010D
ND
30
7.6
mg/kg
1
Nickel
7440-02-0
6010D
11
J
30
7.9
mg/kg
1
LOQ - Limit of Quantilation B - Detected in the method blank E - Quanlitalion of compound exceeded the calibration range DL = Detection Limit
ND -Not defected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria P - The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
it of holding time W-Reportedonwetwelghtbasis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 3 of 7

Uienubynagro
Description: Harnett WWTP
Date Sampled:04121/2020 1115
Date Received:04/23/2020
ICP-AES
Laooraiory lu: vuzsu1a-uu3
Matrix: Solid
% Solids: 2.19 04/23/2020 2207
i Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3050B 6010D 1 04/27/2020 2003 LLL 04/25/2020 1414 51966
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
DL
Units
Run
Potassium
7440-09-7
6010D
1800 J
3800
470
mg/kg
1
Selenium
7782-49-2
6010D
ND
15
6.1
mg/kg
1
Sodium
7440-23.5
6010D
2300 J
3800
470
mg/kg
1
Zinc
7440-66-6
6010D
670
38
9.5
mg/kg
1
LOD= Limit of0uantitation 8= Detected inthemethod blank E=Ouanlilatlonofcompound exceeded the calibration range DL=DetecrlonLimit
ND = Not detected at or above the DL N - Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% J = Estimated result < LOD and > DL
ul of holding lime W = Reported on wet weight basis
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 4 of

Chain of Custody
�1T1
Miscellaneous Documents
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Page 5 of 7

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC
6
R
L�
'L
'C
W
.�
eg
O
`�"
Q
q
o
�—`
k7
ti
R-
IF
t�
iE
t
m.S.
�c
4111titIJTi
��
91
p�'
OLD
001.
0
W 1- o
aas rjp PUG I10
•i
0U
❑
Auliij w$i;d
Tt
a
(iEWI's
!
1LJ
tes9:� ON,
n
5
r
t•Ia'v w6vurS
a
v
lad
ri
xoltsad �l�J Ilh�
m
S [f
"f?:{?f{•:�S.L,k,.((7,,��,}1};;,r
':14: I .: G1; 4.1iw7�fr••.'+.RT�{
:
SI911ruv
r ;yy'((
Lik=
gR:vy' legjs rrJ�;
7}_�,. '.t��k:.
Sa: F`.f.,i4ti�
ar'i,i
�.
.i•
� �
����,,An rr11
•_11M
�
V
c
�4
��
ti
d
rS
{A
r
F
6D
l�L o
La
o
~
14
❑
Eday
y
L..J
a4j
60
�
x :4
v)
CL
T
,nr
X rtl
F
a
�
r•
t
_
y
�3r
C
,JS
m
.S
y
d
rL
•r.
K v�
�.s�
N
r
r
+ v �
�
➢
Id
MI
,`u
'�
F 10FC
hT•
'
4 �
v
C
� .� cS
1�1
I�
L �
d
h
'd
kc/•
r
�..
IV w
LI
pp�p
Ill
.r
t{
•1
}
Gam!
fi
.�
.�
fi
.�
G?
tr
diC�
r..
cc
c
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (B03) 791-9700 Fax [phone] www.pacelabs,com
"age 6 of 7

PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC
Stcn;s Cnvironrr-nial Som z _y, ]r PnNr i Or:
rtxuir .td Numbar_ htCOot "f? O'T.r ve nim 4.213418
SAmp1C Receipt Cbeeldist (,SRC:)
Client .Synkoi Cooler Inspomd byl4we: dMG ; 04123212020 Lot lh 1'IM13.25
Mc.U1s ol'eet U4 t:
❑ S1781 ❑ C[ienl 0 tIPS tnjfFedU OHter: -
—
Yas 6fl No
� I. %V= custodY scats p_�seat ua the cooler;
Ycs Na
NA 2, lfcnkt,ld r seals w:n re}e:st were they intout anil ttnbml.erl?
rIl Strip I1); NA
Chlorine Strip 11); _:CIA Tested by:N'.1 _
Original ternpernture
upon roceipt 1 Derived (Corrected) temperature upon receipt %Solid Snap-Cu1> :13: 1' -2043
5,$ /5_8 oL
NA /N'A oC NA 'NA °C ONA °C
Medlud: 0'1'emperatwe Bl:uik OAnainsl Mottles Ifs t inn lit; 6 TR Gun l:orrect[on Facto:'
Meth.cdofecwlunt:_ 0 Wet lac ❑ Tee lacks ❑ixy icc ❑ None
❑ Y
El No
NA
3. If temperntw)a Of any Gooier ex rreded 6,0°C, wrs Project Manager Notified'?
I'M wns Notified by: phone I cmaa / fac"u-face (circls one).
® Yes
❑ N o
0 NA
4, Is the commen cial eo3Ticr's packing slip a:tuuluxl to this lorm?
Yes
❑ No
15. wort proper wsrody prul,'t:(illr't:s { L'IIY tliSlnPl Ct'C{ i4'C{3) IUIIaIVCII?
aj Yes
Nip
16. Were sample IDy listed on the COC'?
� Yw
❑ Nn
?. Wen; sumple 10s listed oo ell sample ennt,tiness?
Yes
❑ No
8. was sollcadon date R time :issed on the COC I
❑ Yes
®�lo
_
9. Wag colim-lion dale & time listed On ah sairrp]e containers?
® Yas
❑ No
10, Did a][ container label information (ID, dale, tit)ie) arrt;e with iL• e. COC?
® Yes
❑ No
I I. v4'tsn, faststo be In:rlbintied 101tid as The COC_I
® Yes
❑ Na
12. Did all samples arrive in the prOFar containers for eadi lc.l andlor n good condilior.
(utsbrf,,ken, ]ids on, ctc.)? J j
Vss
©No
13_ W&K adequw-, santplu volume available?
_0 Yvs
O'Nol
114. Wao all samples teeeivi:d within',4 the holding(imc or •IR hours, whicliuv r come.; first?
Yas
O No
15_ )l'r:re atny sr:mpics conuincrs naissnt < i:xcess ci,mle one) rainplC: Igor I`srcd on COC'?
16, For VOA find RSA,-17 s smuiplus, Were bubbles present >"pea --size" (:4"Dr 61nm in diameter)
[] YGs
❑ No
0 NA
in any of the VOA vials?
❑ Ycs
❑ No
NA
17- Wint all DRO.I netalshlutnew sainpius received at a pH of < 2?
Yes
Igo
®it'A
18. Wert; all 'cyanide som les reLyivcd at a aT > 12 find sulfide samples received ut n p1I > 9?
0 Yes
O Na
DNA
l4. Wcre all app ioa leNHa,r17CN.Icylirti elp nriatt!677 (<:0 yn ps ) sornplcs tree ot'rCstcua
c111orine7 _
20. Wait Anent rouiarks;4cqucs1s (i,G. raquemd dilutions, 'MYNISCn dusignationt;, etc...)
d Yg
❑ No
0 NA
correctly trisn cribed C."ii the COC into tic cunlmctnt sPr.rloa hi LIMS?
CJ `t'cc
No
LI. Was tine + sA,, number 11.4'Nrl on this container label? If i:s, quote it NA
Sample Prrmwva lion (Must he cnnlplatt d Cor tiny santplc(s) incum.� ily preserved or �vilit ht�t¢elnaGe,)
Sampte(s) NA
wit: rcccived incorrectly pl sorvix! and were aaluhted accordingly
in sample receivi,rg
wits? NA a L of circic one: H2SO4. I M, 01, BCI, NLOH using Sk. ft NA
I' 1'itrleofp+vsavuiicm TA Tfgore than one preservative is neWvti, plea.5e;1o(+) inn die+:ummen-.5 ht.-low,
rnple(s) NA
were r=`ved with 1xibbles>b run:in diameter':
npleS(s) ItA-
Fl
were rccoived sviih'I'RC ,> 0.5 ni,%'L (Tf 419 is pin) and ivcra
usted uccordingly in. somplc-mcciving with sodium lhsosul'.ttc Ni a,%C( ) with slicilly 1D: NA
SR barcc:rt labels applied by: 131fo i T>,_to; D4/23/2020 - 1
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] WvM.pacelabs.com
Page 7 or7

Cameron Testing Services, Inc, Laboratory Report MC DENR*654
NC PHHS #37799
US EPA#NC01918
Client:
Synagro
CTS Projt.
2002-215
Project,.
Harnett WWTP
Requlatary
Yes
Sample Information
4ample'l
M. Boyd
D Oto 02127120
RoCOWGO:
J. Cameron Rat®
02/27/20
Analyses and Results
. thods
R16(pronce i
2002-215
1
3ildgla C;f Peo-Coliform-S;
<134000
MI/a
I54800
02/28120 RL
0222D - MF
2
<35400
cruig
35400
3
<38400
CM9
38400
4
<43400
OFLY9
43400
5
<29600
M/9
29600
6
<68400
GFUN
SU400
7
<48500
CFUtJ)
48500
Gownean
<48800
2002-215 01
1
31wdDt Gr TS
0,745%
0-01
02e27120 RL
2540 G JS
2
3
2.61%
%
0,01
4
2,31%
u
0.01
5
3,38%
0.01
6
1.71%
1s
0.01
7
2,06%
%
0,01
Report
Review
/) L � ell ac
Lab Diroctor Date
219 S. Steele Sit. 919-208-11140
5anfiird NC 27330 Chris

8% Report
Project Synagro
Client: Hamett WWTP
38% Volatiles Reduction
(EPA 625/R-921013, Appendix D)
CTS Proj.
Regulatory
-2002-216
Sampled
Received
i
Ref. Methods
Std_ Meth. 1931 ed
ar M_ Boyd
Irate 02127120
By J_ Cameron
Darn 02/27/20
RequesteAnalysis
Analy
As
2540 G - TS
2540 G - VS
Type I Grab
Matrix � Sludge
Sample ID
tabib
TS N
�
V8 (,�j A.� Ctalyf�rs
Analyst
in
out
-0B 0.38%
-09 1.27%
74.4% 45
57.5% -09 FVSR (VK) 53.5%
ERp
'Pass> 38W
Lab Director
Notes:
Pare i
1 '
Date:

219 S Stee.'e Str.
Sanford, NC 22;33
Phone, 919-20a-4240
Cameron Testing Services, Inc.
NC W&JOW Cori: #654 NC PHHS Corr 9 37799 US EPA NC01919
Chain of Custody
Page of
COi ny, Synagro
E,nall:
mOcyd*synagrc.ccr
CTS lab use onty
Con1 ?Melinda Boyd
phone-
336-W9-a627
SN"?� ��
Ai ddrress (City, 284 Boger Rd.
I"ax
tca (YIN)
sute,Z" Mocksville. NC 27028
Noon:
Pear& (VI
j?1 ojec1_I I J :"'7
I T' lMelinda
Rash i1f1N} bue:
Coosctba Nsme:
Boy
S�rtatu�:
r!�W�, -L���
Sample lnforinaticM
Number c►fb6tfles
Requested Ana"is
Sample I D
_� �
x
6
z_
}
$
o
n z
� <
Preservaliti�s_ fujrt +ved. t�(o?I.
IFl2 SP4. H(N)03, (Na)Th:�May. Na(0)K
CTS Lab
ci'
M
° °
qtrie� {x), jrrdicste
e
`/�'
I
I
—
-
--
- -
Relin Dish tf:
Received-
DatelTime
/�J��/�
C50
/f /�jJ' j
V
Rash wo> v e ll ,requae prior approval. Addit anal charges will apply

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one orip-inaI and two conies of the application and
supl)ortin2 documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Na7-Dischcitge Peruri11ii7g�Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SDR 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit a separate certification for each source facility.
® For modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification,
® Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities.
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Vicinity map - A vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for
Residuals Land Application Permits".
® Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed naiz-ative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility.
® Quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8.
Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
® Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification.
® Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
® For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page l of 1

RESIDLALS SOURCE FACILITY SUN MARY
Applicant's name: 'Synagro Western Piedmont, LLC
Status
Code
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current b
Proposed
N
Harnett County Utilities
North H�trtP Regional
Harnett
NCO021636
0
1500
315
N
Town ofMayodan
MayodanWWTP
Rockingham
NCO021873
0
N
Town of Siler City
Siler City WWTP
Chatham
NCO026441
0
1325
3 Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM: RSC 06-16
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
1. Facility Name: Town of Ma odan WWTP
2. Facility permit holder is: ❑ Federal, ❑ State, ® Local Government, or ❑ Private.
Facility permit issued by: ® Div. of Water Resources, ❑ Div. of Environmental Health,
or ❑ Other (explain: ).
3. Facility contact person and title: Nadine Blackwell, Suez Area Manage`
Complete mailing address: 2625 Neudorf Road
City: Clemmoni State: NC Zip: `7012-
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: nadine.hlackwell(2suez.com
4. Facility physical address: Cardwell Rd (end of road, South).
City: Mayodan State: NC Zip: s 7027
Coordinates: Latitude: 36' 23' 58" Longitude: 79' 57' 23_I"
Datum: NAD 84, Level of accuracy: Second
Method of measurement: MAP
5. Purpose of the facility:
® treatnent of municipal wastewater, ❑ treatment of 100% domestic wastewater,
❑ treatment of potable water, ❑ treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
❑ treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater,
(approximate percentages: % industrial and % domestic)
❑ other (explain: ).
6. Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: ® Yes ❑ No
7. Facility permitted/design flow: 3.0 MGD and facility average daily flow: 1.028 MGD
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility Est.1100 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility;
Type and volume of residuals treatment: Extended Aeration treatment with 4.5 million gallon capacity.
Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): Digestor and aeration basins estimated 4.9
million capacity
II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
® 40 CFR Part 503 or ❑ 40 CFR Part 257.
Note: Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated under 40
CFR Part 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Part 257.
2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15A NCAC 02T.1 102(61 as:
® Biological ❑ Non -Biological
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page] of5

Note: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, animal
processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed film systems).
3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only)
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: ❑ yes ® no.
If yes, list the number(s):
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21-
261.24: ❑ yes ® no.
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
Laboratory: Environmental Chemist, Inc. and Date of analysis: 5/6/2020
Passed corrosivity test: ® yes ❑ no. pH: sm, (2 <pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: ® yes ❑ no. Flashpoint: >206, OF (> 140°F)
Passed reactivity test: ® yes ❑no. HCN: 0.084 mg/kg (<250) & HzS: <0.5 mg/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(mgN)
Result
(mg/1)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(raga)
Result
(mg/1)
Arsenic
5.0
<1.0
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
<0.05
Barium
100.0
<1.0
Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene
0.5
<0.05
Benzene
0.5
<0.01
Hexachloroethane
3.0
<0.05
Cadmium
1.0
<1.0
Lead
5.0
<1.0
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5
<0.01
Lindane
0.4
<0.0005
Chlordane
0.03
<0.02
Mercury
0.2
<0.0002
Chlorobenzene
100.0
<0.01
Methoxychlor
10.0
<0.0005
Chlorofonn
6.0
<0.01
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
200.0
<0.05
Chromium
5.0
< 1.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
<0.05
m-Cresol
200.0
<0.05
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
<0.25
o-Cresol
200.0
<0.05
Pyridine
5.0
<0.05
p-Cresol
200.0
<0.05
Selenium
1.0
<1.0
Cresol
200.0
<0.05
Silver
5.0
<1.0
2,4-D
10.0
<1.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
<0.01
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
<0.003
Toxaphene
0.5
<0.05
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
<0.05
Trichloroethylene
0.5
<0.01
1, 1 -Dichloroethylene
0.7
<0.01
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
<0.05
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
<0.05
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
<0.05
Endrin
0.02
<.0005
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
<0.0003
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide
0.008
<.0005
Vinyl Chloride
0.2
<0.01
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 2 of 5

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 15A NCAC 02T .1105.
a. For Dish•ihttliwr/LrtttrlApplicatiott: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratory: Environment I, Inc and Date of analysis: 5/07/2020
Parameter
Ceiling
Concentration Limits
(C1assA & ClassB)
Ong/kg)
Monthly Average
Concentration Limits
(Class A Only)
(mg4g)
Result
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
75
41
<2.5
Cadmium
85
39
IA
Copper
4,300
1,500
625
Lead
840
300
131
Mercury
57
17
I 0.96
Molybdenum
75
n/a
7
Nickel
420
420
17
Selenium
100
100
I <5.0
Zinc
7,500
2,800
642
b. ForSttrfitce Disposal Unil j andfill : Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratory: L and Date of analysis:
Distance from Disposal
Unit to Boundary to
Closest Property Line
(meters, check one)
Arsenic
(mg/kg)
Chromium
(mg/kg)
Nickel
(mg/kg)
❑ > 0 but < 25
30
200
210
❑ > 25 but < 50
34
220
240
❑ > 50 but < 75
39
260
270
❑ > 75 but < 100
46
300
320
❑ > 100 but < 125
53
360
390
❑ > 125
62
450
420
Result (mg/kg)
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 3 of 5

5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 1.69 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and
mrcronutrrent parameters:
Laboratory: Environment I, Inc. and Date of analysis: 5/07/2020
Parameter
Result
(mg/kg)
Aluminum
9979
Ammonia -Nitrogen
1736
Calcium
9664
Magnesium
3141
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
2795
pl-1 (Standard Unit)
4.7
Phosphorus
3239
Potassium
4054
Sodium
5.6
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
55590
c. Using the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 0.73
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth],
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: 90 %. This
rate is a (check one): ® default value, or ❑ actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical
justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals:
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a diy weight basis) and fill the results in the following table:
Application Method
First (I") Year PAN
Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Surface
19,819
30,325
Injection/Incorporation
20,687
31,193
6. Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses: N
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 4 of 5

7. Pathogen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1 106, specify how residuals will meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For Distribution/Land Application of Class A or Equivalent:
❑ A fecal colifor7n density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
❑ A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals):
❑ Alternative 1 [ 15A NCAC 02T. 1106(b)(3)(A)] - Time/Temperature Compliance.
❑ Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.1 106(b)(3)(B)] - Alkaline Treatment.
❑ Alternative 3 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 106(b)(3)(C)] - Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T. 1106(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 5 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP).
Specify one: ❑ composting, ❑ heat drying, ❑ heat treatment,
❑ therrnophilic aerobic digestion, ❑ beta ray irradiation,
❑ gamma ray irTadiation, or ❑ pasteurization.
b. For Land Application of Clarss B:
® Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(1)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
❑ Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.1106(c)(2)] - Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP).
Specify one: ❑ aerobic digestion, ❑ air drying, ❑ anaerobic digestion,
❑ composting, or ❑ lime stabilization.
c. For Surface Disposarl:
❑ Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item 11. 7a, above.
❑ Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7b. above.
❑ Exempt- if Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in Item II.8. below [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 106(a)(2)].
❑ Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
8. Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR): Per 15A NCAC 02T,1 107, specify how residuals will meet the VAR requirements:
® Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T. I 107(a)(1)] - 38% Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(2)] - 40-Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
® Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(3)] - 30-Day Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
® Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.1107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion),
❑
Altemative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(5)]
- 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
®
Alternative 6 [15A NCAC 02T.1107(a)(6)]
- Alkaline Stabilization.
❑
Altemative 7 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(7)]
- Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
❑
Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T.1107(a)(8)]
- Drying of Unstabilized Residuals.
®
Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(9)] - Injection.
® Alternative 10 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(I 0)] - Incoiporation.
❑ Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only - Soil/Other Material Cover [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(b)(2)].
C] Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC O6-16 Page 5 of 5

VICINITY MAP SYNAGRO
a
a
4�
Z�
Sturm, Ruger & Co, Inc
4
r
r
�4
o°
Y171
�ahPcl n
TWOAGNEG P
Nubian Goats
COUNTY: Rockingham OWNER(S): Mayodan WWTP

Town of Mayodan
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
NPDCS Permit NCO021873
The Town of Mayodan Wastewater Treatment Plant is a 3.0 MGD design capacity facility. The
annual average discharge volume in 2019 was 1.028 MGD. The facility treats a combination of
domestic, industrial and commercial wastewaters. The treatment scheme includes an influent lift
station, influent bar screens, an influent sampler, influent splitter box, aeration basins and
secondary clarifiers. The treated effluent is disinfected by chlorination (Sodium Hypochorite)
followed by dechlorination (Sodium Bisulfite) and flows through a flow measuring device, prior
to discharge to the Mayo River. Excess biological sludge is thickened in one of two gravity
thickeners and subsequently digested in an aerobic digester. The stabilized sludge is then land
applied (on permitted sites) as a liquid directly from the digester or other approved disposal sites.
The volumetric capacities are noted on the flow schematic.

I nfl vent
T- --. Inftuen# Bar Slow ------- 6om Unifi
P
Plant In uent
Pump
Chlorins
Contact
#1
FLOW SCHEMATIC
TOWN OF MAYODAN WWTP
*- Aeration Basin -
Aeratio i Basin ; 1.75 MGD E Aeration Basin
1.25 M D Total, 1.5 MGD
Hypochlorite
Liquid Control ;
Bleach Building
r ,
r ,
¢i Waste Sludge_._-•-- --'-•--•-- --�-- -- __ __.�...-- -••• - -_ _- -- -_
Return Sludge --------=-------------- ---------
Sludge st❑�g�
Clarifier Pumping Loadin
0.143 M ��ding Clarifier Digestor
0.143 MG
t ' - 0-400 MG _ _ uump
i d n Clarifier Clarifier r
- ` 0.400 MG 0.400 MG Digestor
` Li uid i + 0.400 MG
q Sludge � Sodium �------------------
------ v
Cl Thickener; Bisulifte Idg
502 Waste Sludge
Flow
Meter
Chlorine
Chlorine Contact # 2
Contact # 3

Residuals Sampling Plan
Synagro Residuals Land Application for WQ0016247
Mayodan WWTP
Nutrients and Metals Analysis
• Sampling Point: Digestor
• Sampling Frequency: Annually
• Sample Type: Composite
• Lab: Pace Analytical
Pathogen Reduction (Fecal Colif'orm Density Demonstration)
• Sampling Point: Digestor
• Sampling Frequency: Annually
• Sample Type: Grab
• Lab: Environment 1, Inc.
Vector Attraction Reduction (Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test)
TCLP
• Sampling Point: Digestor
• Sampling Frequency: Annually
0 Sample Type: Grab
• Lab: In-house
• Sampling Point: Digestor
• Sampling Frequency: Once per permit
• Sample Type: Composite
• Lab: Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc

MAYODAN WWTP
QUANTITATIVE JUSTIFICATION FOR RESIDUALS
Due to the lack of recent residuals removal and fluctuating plant operations the quantity
of residuals is a function of historical data and plant capacities.
-Estimated maximum of 3.75 million gallons
-2.0% solids
-8.34 lbs/gal
(3,750,000 X 8.34 X 2.0%) / 2000 = 315 Dry Tons
Given the lack of recent historical land application data, it is requested that Mayodan
WWTP be permitted for 315 di tons/vr.

F77 :77
Environmental Chemists, Inc.
envirochem 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Lab 910.392,4424 Fax
�} 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252,473.5702 Lab/Fax
255-A WiLmin tun i�ighlvay, Jacksonville, NC 285,40 • 910.347,5843 Lab/Fay
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS info(a,)environmentalchenlists.com
Environment - 1
Post Office Box 7085
Greenville NC 27858
Attention:
Lab ID Sample ID:
20-17717 Site: Sludge Sample
Test
Date of Report: May 20, 2020
Customer PO #:
Customer ID: 08100051
Report #: 2020-07200
Project ID: Suez Water (Mayodan WWTP)
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
4/29/2020 9:00 AM Solid/Sludge Client
Method Results Date Analyzed
Chlordane (TCLP)
SW 846 Method 808113I3510
<0.02 mg/L
05/06/2020
Endrin (TCLP)
SW 846 Method 8081B13510
<0.0005 mg/L
05/06/2020
Heptachlor (TCLP)
SW 846Metliod 80811313510
<0.0005 mg/L
05/06/2020
Heptachlor epoxide (TCLP)
SW 846 Method 808113I3510
<0.0005 mg/L
05/06/2020
Lindane (TCLP)
SW 846 Method 8081 BI3510
<0.0005 mg/L
05/06/2020
Methoxychlor (TCLP)
SW 846 Method 808113I3510
<0.0005 mg/L
05/06/2020
Toxaphene (TCLP)
SW 646Method 80811313510
<0.05 mg/L
05/06/2020
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (TCLP)
SW 846 method 6270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (TCLP)
SW 846 method 82708510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
Cresol (TCLP)
SW 846 method 82708510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene (TCLP)
SW 846 method 82708510
<0,050 mg/L
05/05/2020
Hexachlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
Hexachloroethane (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
m + p-Cresol (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
Nitrobenzene (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
o-Cresol (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
Pentachlorophenol (TCLP)
SW 846 method 8270/3510
<0.250 mg/L
05/05/2020
Pyridine (TCLP)
SW 846 method 827013510
<0.050 mg/L
05/05/2020
2,4,5-TP (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8151A
<0.003 mg/L
05/09/2020
2,4.0 (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8151A
<0.003 mg/L
05/09/2020
1,1-Dichloroethylene (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8260/5030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
1,2-Dichloroethane (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8260/5030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Benzene (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8260/5030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Carbon Tetrachloride (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8260/5030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Report#:: 2020-07200 Page 1 of2

• •
rs�ni
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS
Environmental Chemists, Inca
6602 Windmill Wily, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223Lab « 910,392.4424 Fax
710 Bowsertown Read, Mantco, NC 27954 ® 252,473,5702 Lab/Fax
2-95-A Wilmington I lighway, Jacksonville, NC 2£540 e 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax
in ft)riisenviroaunentalcheniists,com
Environment - 1
Date of Report: May 20, 2020
Post Office Box 7085
Customer PO #:
Greenville NC
27858
Customer ID: 08100051
Attention:
Report #: 2020-07200
Project ID: Suez Water (Mayodan WWTP)
Chlorobenzene (TCLP)
SW846 Method 826015030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Chloroform (TCLP)
SW846 Method 826015030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Methyl ethyl ketone (TCLP)
SW846Method 826015030
<0,05 mg/L
05/13/2020
Tetrachloroethylene (TCLP)
SW846Method 8260/5030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Trichloroethylene (TCLP)
SW846 Method 826015030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
Vinyl Chloride (TCLP)
SW846 Method 8260/5030
<0.01 mg/L
05/13/2020
RCI
Cyanide
EPA 335A
0.084 mg/kg
05/08/2020
Sulfide
SM450OSD
<0.50 mg/kg
05/11/2020
Reporting limit elevated due
to matrix interference.
Ignitability
SW 846 method 1010
>190 °F
05/20/2020
pH
S W 846 Method 90450
5.51 units
05/11/2020
TCLP Metals
Arsenic
EPA 200.7
<'I ,0 mg/L
05/06/2020
Barium
EPA 200.7
<1.0 mg/L
05/06/2020
Cadmium
EPA 200.7
<1.0 mg/L
05/06/2020
Chromium
EPA 200.7
<1.0 mg/L
05/06/2020
Lead
EPA 200.7
<1.0 mg/L
05/06/2020
Selenium
EPA 200.7
<1.0 mg/L
05106/2020
Silver
EPA 200.7
<1.0 mg/L
05/08/2020
Mercury
EPA 245.1
<0,0002 mg/L
05/08/2020
Comment:
Reviewed by:
Report tt:: 2020-07200
Page 2 of 2

Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94
Sample Receipt Checklist
6602 Windmill Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
910.392.0223
Client: _..,.__Date: I -jam Report Number:�j�—[:�_j��
f Receipt of sample: Delivered UPS D FeclEx ❑ Other D
D YES
D NO
N/A
1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? J�
❑ YES I
❑ NO
N/A
12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken?
Original temperature upon receipt T) C. Corrected temperature upon receipt °Ci
How temperature taken: Cl Temperature Blank Against Bottles
IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0
D YES
❑ NO 13.
If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified?
X YES
❑ NO 1
4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed?
21t YES
❑ NO
5. Were sample ID's listed on the COO
�) YES
❑ NO
16. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers?
YES
❑ NO
7. Were collection date and time listed on the COO
YES
D NO
8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COO
I{ YES
D NO
9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test?
YES
10 NO
10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test?
YES
D NO
11. Was adequate sample volume availableT
JJK YES
D NO
12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests?
D YES
D NO
13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2?
�D YES
D NO
14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12?
D YES
I ❑ NO
15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9?
D YES
❑ NO
16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? **
D YES
❑ NO
117. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <O.S m/L?
D YES
10 NO
1 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes?
* TOC/Volatiles are pH checked attime of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet.
Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace)
Sample(s) __ were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly
by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH
Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below
Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or
notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time:
Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace
COMMENTS:
DOC. QA.002

x
Z
O
0
U
p
z
LU
Q
oQ
l
o
Z
Q
O W Q
o
mQ
LLJ
N
Ur
O U Z
Q Z S N Z
'Lu
U Q 3 (lj
w
CIJ w
m
Ir
a
U)
cn c! Z ¢ O
O
ULLJ
O
ul
0c
U
W
¢
¢
U ¢ m U
171
�
O
w
w
O
U
y
w
U' l�
Z C]
ri
U
a
oU
U
y
2
5 '" �J
2
(NJ
S1S31i��fJ.3Wf/}Jt1d
v
"�
n
1
Q
V
1r�
6
F^
Z
W
U
d
ejaxa d'i0L
g
O
C
U
d
slulaw d-17,1.
V—
d
sappiyaH d 101
L"
L
Lu
U
d
saps !McI C11,31
->^
o
U
d
]OAS/IDA dliol,
I
n
d
,U!Rquaru2j
a z
SHJNIV1N0030N
'^
C4
LU
n
m
m'
N01103i100.1V
> O
0.:'3Nll1VEi3dW33.1
m'
o
ram.
7 U Z
ui
N0110]1�001V 1/hn d0
C]
ui
0
I/bw'3N180lHOlVl01
a
c
z
c3 0Lu
M
Q
W
i
F
4
a ` U
Z
O
y
—
U7Orl
T—W-0j.
ao
CN
m
N.
(" 7
OI
z
CU a)
o �
nn
n
E cn
m n
rn =
� U
� N
O �
d
O j
U O
O c9
to
U U
c9 O
L
N N
L
O G
1�

Nmw'Hw@mE@M TA hcupumbd
114 OAKMONT DRIVE
GREENVII LE N,C. 27858
L+TATJ,LAlS; BLACKWELL
P.O. BOY 7.279
CLENIZ•SONS , NC, 27012
VN' I'Judls
Ftllalluiusll-nt ((]L'y WL 1:zsis), mg/1rg
Arm* (dry ;wt. vuasis), -ng/1rg
:si.cduar� (cloy ,ir,. C,'nsds), 961E/t(g
Co.,lrnhim (dry : 1. basis), mg/I(g
Copper (du';/ %%'L Q:a;is), fng/!rg
�11rc,upldasu �, i , (Airy w1v La,`s),ralg/s(g
L vkj (dry ,ieigl l b"IsiS), rng/1tg
1-4aguasitum (dr/ -:v3, basis), Ing/I(g
f6enury (dfi-;/
lq#e:tm0 (ch'y vvl. Iiastsl, o-ugl;rg•
Fo nsf'50"a (du',v 114. bmi's), toghtg
Seiun llrm !airy 10, basis), n1glt(g
SG'lium (dry M. basis): mg/l(g
?Mm (dory wt. bQ515), aq/1cg
Sc(Wirn A;11504'@IUOT) RR'tio (aslc)
T olal Solidv, w,
1'KH (r:lury ,g'i,), rng/ (g
F 7 a�uaP,e t 1 dirogEm (dEa y wl� ),tuag/l'.g
F,l3tsypl`Drwr.m, T. (dry ;aft.), o'ng/QcE
I'Twale-1,10 $ie (r10/ 'Pl.), -jug/kg
Piao1 Avadlmb a Mgrrogelz, Ir►g/icg
Moiybdeour;rm (dry ;it, bpsls), mg/1(g
sln(ige /luaAlysts Metbod
^oampie r3ele. Amlyst Carle
4.7
05/01/2C
JP/j:,
40):Mll
8879
05/07/26
LFJ
E7'0,200.7
<2.5
05/13/20
krt'i Me.
311311-04
M4
05/07/20
it,6
IEIPA290.7
1.4
O5/G8124E
M Ti'Nf
,;130-c-4
625
05/07/20
IL?,
'PUPP,;200.7
22
05/07/20
C•IA'1
ZlibAMM
51
MR/29
i`iThA
3iiw, lM4
31.4E
05/07/20
L!Y'
I2Yk20,7
0.96
OS/04/20
tNiTf/d
U474713
17
'85/08/20
F3
UA200.7
4054
05/08/20
i:.L,,1•
FU`4200.7
<S-0
05/14/20
MTI/;
3113B.04
2489
05/08/20
US
C,'PA200,7
642
05/07/20
LFJ
R FA2010
5.6
1.68
04/30/20
1W1v:R
254W-L 1
e 55592
05/07/20
'l'l H
351.2 R2-93
c 17
115/01PIO
'4'011
35U—1 !U-5,3
a 32S
95/0-7120
J:"i'L,
NM-7/
2795
05/05/29
T LVJ
71,S3.2 U2-93
15819
O5/lt3/20
8RA
7
05/07/20
LCU
1Sc A209.7
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
U11 990
DATE COLLECTEDs 0;/29/20
DATE, REPORTED z 05/l 8/20
RF'vzmg3V BY, 1,7Z
0 uncert!kSee, dat- . OWR doeo not orCor non,nqueoua CaYtification Pot 4iia aralYVICa1 procedure.

r-
0
o
u
_.
w
r\
Q
z ¢
�i
�3
� J
Ilk
and
12
FjX'-j'
d
ltJ tr`Lil
(..) Q QQ
p
W QQQ�
3
v, �
_
o
I!
-is
Fs -3ljSWA(NVUVd
S f..
I
I
II
i
I
I
I
I
I
Il
I
Ck
V
Ck
rk
l
SI:A:
De
�
Ems,
II
z
o
SH3NiVIMO3O H
G O w
-
m
NOIDT"OO B
Ga,'3U()tVU33w31
—
f�
I,
Q 17171 171
rFOI�a3'rroo IV use, ao
'aNILiOlhla
I�
lAiul IV.LUJ.
.
Lu
CS
0
.� Z
a
m
tla z A. U L:
to
N
LO
m
0l
Z
a
Qj
v
cu
'A
•D N
O Q)
0) �
En
a(ni
O
n o
E a,
O
U O
� tb
f11
U N
U �
f11
n C
� 0)
n
a� cu
E
cn c7
.N
Cf
N
C`f
0
E
I
Ln

Wwi&prinkLrjq Water Iti: 1771,
Wastewater FAi 10
14 OAKMONT DRIVE PHONE [phone]
GREENVILLE, N.C. 27858 FAX [phone]
SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-SLUDGE)
NADXNE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS ,NC 27012
PARAMETERS
Total Residue, mg/I
Fecal Colirorm (MPN), /grain Solids
Sample
Sample
Sample
#1
#2
#3
17360
17260
17200
45000
46000
76000
ZD#: 990 B
DATE COLLECTED: 04/29/20
DATE REPORTED : 05/04/20
REVIEWED BY:
Sample Sample Analysis Method
#4 #5 Daly Analyst Cade
17360 17460 04/30/20 MAR 2540B-11
45000 200000 04/29/20 MAR 9221E-06

14 OAKMONT DRIVE
GREENVILLE, N.C. 27858
SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-SLUDGE)
NADINE BLACKWELL
P.O. BOX 1279
CLEMMONS ,NC 27012
wtirF_ka„r•._,, DrinkSn8 Water TA
Waateua t er ID: 10
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
ID#: 990 B
DATE COLLECTED: 04/29/20
DATE REPORTED : 05/04/20
REVIEWED BY:
Semple Sample Analysis Method
PARAMETERS N6 N7 Date Analyst Code
Total Residue, mg/1 16720 17220 04/30/20 MAR 2540E-11
Fecal Colif'orm (MPH /gram Solids 47000 52000 04/29/20 MAR 9221E-06

Environment , .ac. CHAIN OF CUSI —oDY RECORD
P.O. Box 7085, 114 Oakmont Dr.
Page I of 1
Greenville, NC 27858
environment) inc.com
DISINFECTION
CHLORINE NEUIRALIZED AT CO-LECTION
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
CHLORINE
o
pH CHECK (LAB)
CLIENT: 990 B Week: s
UV
P
P
CONTAINER TYPE, PIG
SUEZ WATER (MAYODAN WWTP-SLUDGE)
NADINE BLACKWELL
NONE
{
P.O. BOX 1279
CLENIINONS NC 27012
A
A
CHEMICAL PRESERVATION
A -NONE D -NAOH
E o
[phone]
z w
�3
¢
„
LU
B HNC, E HCL
J
Cc 0
Er
LU
z
a
us
C HZSO; F - ZINC ACETATE/NAOH
COLLECTION
cc:a
LU o
a
o
c�
G NATHIOSLLFATE
SAMPLE LOCATION
DATE
1IME
Sample #1
��
2
s =
s# �a
CLASSIFICAT ON:
Sample I!2
2
WASTPNATER(NPDES)
Sample II3
2
tray. r
DRINKINGWATER
R
Sample #4
2
DWRIGW
Sam le#5
P
2
x
!�
�
LSample I!6
I%
�'
2j
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[
I
[
I
SOLID WASTE SECTION
Sample #7
��
�
J�
f
2
��?�
�
':"a*
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (SEAL) MAINTAINED
DURING S.ENT/DELIVERY
I
Y N
€
SAMPLES COLLECTED BY:
(Plea?,l
Z
f [
[
I
I
[
I
l
f
l[
I[
l
l
l[[
1
1
1
II
�
SAMPLESRECE 1NLABAT--[---d -C
R ISHED BY (SIG.) (SAMPLER)
D TPTIME
RECEIVED BY (SIG.)
DATEITIME
COMMENTS:
T
—
UISH SIG.}
DATEIiIME
R1 CEN {SIG.)
DA ME
QUISHI±DBY(Sl3.)
DATEtTIME
1
RECEIVED BY (SIG.)
ATFITIME
1
FSE READ Instructions for completing this form on the reverse side. Sampler must place a"C" for composite sample or a "G" for
FORM as Grab sample in the blocks above for each parameter requested. N ,75214

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
0
M
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
own or ma oaan
V00002672
5/13/2020
15.1
/13/2020 / 11:00 am
iary Moore
/13/2020 / 11:05 am
'ary Moore
milliliters
1.68 % Dry Solids
15.1 degrees Celsius
15.1 [degrees Celsius
0.0
10.1
1.D
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.54 mg Oxygen/L/Hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.151 mg Oxygen/hr/g
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1,402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:l: 0.210'mg Oxygen/hr/g
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
10.2 --
10
I
I
9.8 --�
y = -0.042 .X + 10-1 M
%.6
0
o _
/A
/A
q9.4
9.2
9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)
Sample Location: Mayodan Digester
Sample Date: 5/13/2020
Sample Time: 11:00 AM
Analysis Date: 5/13/2020
Analysis Time: 11:05AM

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise rioted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Pl ater Qualioi Pewnitting Section's Non -Discharge Permiltln Unit
General This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 100. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15, FORM: DCAR 11-15, or FORM: SDR 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 11-15) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessaiy for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit a separate ceitification for each source facility.
® For modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification.
® Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities,
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Vicinity map - A vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for
Residuals Land Application Permits".
® Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility.
® Quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item 1. 8.
Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
® Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
® Foreach source facility, attach the following:
® Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification.
® Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
® For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page I of I

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: a.3Tagro Western Piedmont, LLC
Status
Codea
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum DryTons Per Year
Current
Proposed
N
Hamett County Utilities
North Hamett Regional egional
Hamett
NCO021636
0
1500
N
Town of Mayodan
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham
NCO021873
0
315
N
Town of Siler City
Siler City WWTP
Chatham
NCO026441
0
1325
a Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1

DWR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM: RSC 06-16
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
. Facility Name: Siler City WWTP
2. Facility permit holder is: ❑ Federal, ❑ State, ® Local Government, or ❑ Private.
Facility pennit issued by: ® Div. of Water Resources, ❑ Div. of Environmental Health,
or ❑ Other (explain: ).
3. Facility contact person and title: Brittany York, WW Su
Rerinten nt
Complete mailing address: 370 Waste Treatment Plant Rd.
City: Siler City State: NC Zip: 27344
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: byork a,silereity.org
4. Facility physical address: 370 Waste Treatment Plant Rd
City: Siler City State: NC Zip: 27344-___j
Coordinates: Latitude: 350 43' 44" Longitude: 790 25' 39"
Datum: NAD 84', Level of accuracy: ]Second
Method of measurement: MAP
5. Purpose of the facility:
® treatment of municipal wastewater, ❑ treatment of 100% domestic wastewater,
❑ treatment of potable water, ❑ treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
❑ treatment of industrial wastewater in ixed with domestic wastewater,
(approximate percentages: % industrial and % domestic)
❑ other (explain: ' ).
6. Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Facility permitted/design flow: 4_0 MGD and facility average daily flow: 1_8 MGD
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility Est. 425 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the fbllowing regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volume of residuals treatment: 1.8 MG Oxidation Ditches
Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): 1 MG Sludge Thickening Basin
RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
Z 40 CFR Part 503 or ❑ 40 CFR Part 257.
Note: Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated under 40
CFR Part 503, othemise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Part 257.
2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15A NCAC 02T.1 102(6) as:
® Biological ❑ Non -Biological
Note: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, anunal
processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed fihn systems).
FORM: RSC06-16 Page 1 of

r
3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only)
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: ❑ yes ® no.
If yes, list the number(s): F
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21-
261.24: ❑ yes ® no.
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
Laboratory: Summit Environmental and Date of analysis: 2/4/2020
Passed corrosivity test: ® yes ❑ no. pH: s.u. (2 < pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: ® yes ❑ no. Flashpoint: nonflammable °F (> 140°F)
Passed reactivity test: Eyes ❑no. HCN: ND mg/kg (<250) & H2S: ND mg/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(mg/!)
Result
(mg//)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(mg/l)
Result
(mg/l)
Arsenic
5.0
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
ND
Barium
100.0
ND
Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene
0.5
ND
Benzene
0.5
ND
Hexachloroethane
3.0
ND
Cadmium
1.0
ND
Lead
5.0
ND
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5
ND
Lindane
0.4
ND
Chlordane
0.03
ND
Mercury
0.2
ND
Chlorobenzene
100.0
ND
Methoxychlor
10.0
ND
Chloroform
6.0
ND
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
200.0
ND
Chromium
5.0
ND
Nitrobenzene
2.0
ND
in -Cresol
200.0
ND
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
ND
o-Cresol
200.0
ND
Pyridine
5.0
ND
p-Cresol
200.0
ND
Selenium
1.0
ND
Cresol
200.0
ND
Silver
5.0
ND
2,4-D
10.0
ND
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
ND
Toxaphene
0.5
ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
ND
Trichloroethylene
0.5
ND
1, 1 -Dichloroethylene
0.7
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
ND
2,4-Dinit•otoluene
0.13
ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
ND
Endrin
0.02
ND
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
ND
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide
0.008
ND
Vinyl Chloride
0.2
ND
FORM: RSC 06-16
Page 2 of 5

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under _15A NCAC 02T .1 105.
a. For Dlstr•ilontionlLand Application Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratoiy: Waypoint Analytical and Date of analysis: 4/08/2020
Parameter
Ceiling
Concentration Limits
(ClassA & ClassB)
(mg/kg)
Monthly Average
Concentration Limits
(Class A Only)
(mg/kg)
Result
(mg/kg)
Arsenic
75
41
< 18.5
Cadmium
85
39
<3.7
Copper
4,300
1,500
270
Lead
840
300
<11.1
Mercury
57
17
<0.548
Molybdenum
75
n/a
<9.26
Nickel
420
420
21.3
Selenium
100
100
<18.5
Zinc
7,500
2,800
485
b. For Surface Disttnsrrl Urril (laud ll). Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dhy weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratoiy: and Date of analysis:
Distance from Disposal
Unit to Boundary to
Closest Property Line
(meters, check one)
Arsenic
(mg/kg)
Chromium
(mg/kg)
Nickel
(mg/kg)
❑ > 0 but < 25
30
200
210
❑ > 25 but < 50
34
220
240
❑ > 50 but < 75
39
260
270
❑ > 75 but < 100
46
300
320
❑ >_ 100 but < 125
53
360
390
❑ > 125
62
450
420
Result (mg/kg)
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 3 of 5

5. Nut rient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 2.66 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a diy weight basis) for the following nutrient and
micronutrient parameters:
Laboratory: Waxpoint Analytical and Date of analysis: 4/08/2020
Parameter
Result
(mg/kg)
Aluminum
51,500
Ammonia -Nitrogen
5,960
Calcium
11,300
Magnesium
1,570
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
1,490
pH (Standard Unit)
6.4
Phosphorus
17,500
Potassium
3,460
Sodium
4,960
Total lejeldahl Nitrogen
66,300
c. Using the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 1.89
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth].
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: 30 %. This
rate is a (check one): ® default value, or ❑ actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treahnent of municipal or domestic wastewater, cxpkiin or provide technical
justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals:
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill the results in the following table:
Application Method
First (I") Year PAN
Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Surface
22,572
34,344
Injection/Incorporation
25,552
37,324
6. Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses: N/A
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 4 of 5

7. P.itho[Zen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1 106, specify how residuals will meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For Dislribrrliorr/L(ind Applieallorr of'Class A or E2niyalew:
❑ A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
❑ A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals):
❑ Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.1 106(b)(3)(A)] - Time/Temperature Compliance.
❑ Alternative 2 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1106(b)(3)(B)] - Alkaline Treatment.
❑ Alternative 3 [ 15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(C)] - Prior Testing f'or Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 4 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 I O6(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 5 [ 15A NCAC 02T.1 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP).
Specify one: ❑ composting, ❑ heat drying, ❑ heat treatment,
❑ thennophilic aerobic digestion, ❑ beta ray irradiation,
❑ gamma ray irradiation, or ❑ pasteurization.
b. For Lar1d Applicrrfiorr ofiCla.Vs B:
® Alternative I [I5A NCAC 02T.1 106(c)(I )] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
❑ Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.1106(c)(2)] - Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP),
Specify one: ❑ aerobic digestion, ❑ air drying, ❑ anaerobic digestion,
❑ composting, or ❑ lime stabilization.
c. ForSrrfireeD4osa
❑ Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item 11. 7a. above.
❑ Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item I1. 7b. above.
❑ Exempt - If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in Item 11.8. below [ 15A NCAC 02T. 1106(a)(2)].
❑ Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
8. Vector Attraction Reduction VAR): Per 15A NCAC 02T.1 107, specify how residuals will meet the VAR requirements:
® Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(1)] - 38% Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T. 1107(a)(2)] - 40-Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
® Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(3)] - 30-Day Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
® Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T. 1107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(5)] - 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
® Altemative 6 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization.
❑ Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(7)] - Dzying of Stabilized Residuals.
❑ Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(8)] - Diying of Unstabilized Residuals,
® Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(9)] - Injection.
® Alternative 10 [15A NCAC 02T.1 107(a)(10)] - Incorporation.
❑ Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only - Soil/Other Material Cover [ 15A NCAC 02T.I 107(b)(2)].
❑ Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 5 of 5

VICINITY MAP SYNAGRO
�mnimeia s V Murphy USA
Ea Chlckc_n 'N BrarBQ T
jaragles az�
San Eellpo Mcmlram
Walmart Supercenter
ro
Waste Management -
Sanford Transfer Station
azi "
°Ves Creek
ai
WASTE WATER Y1
TREATMENT PLAT
az 1
COUNTY: Chatham OWNER(S): Ski- City Wastewater Treatment Plant

TOWN OF SILER CITY PERMIT RENEWAL
QUANTITATIVE JUSTIFICATION FOR RESIDUALS PRODUCTION RATE
The following is a record of the annual land application volume for the Town of Siler
City's wastewater treatment plant:
Year Dt' Tons Lanz! A > >lierl
2016 336.55
2017 450.59
2018 301.29
2019 340.72
The proposed permitted volume (1,325 diy tons per year) is greater than the anticipated
need for the coming years. Over the 5 years shown above the average number of dry tons
land applied were 357.28, which is well within reason of the permitted dry tonnage.
Looking forward the volume of material is expected to increase due to returning
industries.

Residuals Sampling Plan
Synagro Residuals Land Application WQ0016247
Town of Siler City NC WWTP
Nutrients and Metals Analysis
• Sampling Point: Basin
• Sampling Frequency: 4/yr
• Sample Type: Composite
• Lab: Waypoint Analytical
Pathogen Reduction (Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration)
• Sampling Point: Basin
• Sampling Frequency: 4/yr
• Sample Type: Grab
0 Lab: Meritech Inc. Environmental Lab
Vector Attraction Reduction (SOUR Test)
TCLP
• Sampling Point: Digester
• Sampling Frequency: 4/yr
• Sample Type: Composite
• Lab: In house
• Sampling Point: Basin
• Sampling Frequency: Annually
• Sample Type: Composite
• Lab: Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc

,6 -
>—
J
U
Q
F—
Z
W
W
a WO
F�
W LLJ J
� 3Q
Q
3
U
W
J
A
1
A AY.i+ln�-ii
K1{ yy
Sg400dr��i
ry pry
n nnrf
r
qq
ri
vvI�
i H
vn
nri
y{n
v
J
I
ySpf
.o-nn�ea..
oR&fyRniCS6R19AR=Ff
r�� sr rv. w gAyYa �w .r w w wu-r�bMwVtwtil+ mw a �awan �ws

Process Flow
• Flow comes into the Plant, Travels through the Bar
screen where it removes bigger items (rags, gloves,
sticks, feminine products)
• Then it flows into the Grit Collector where the
majority of the grit and sand is removed via the Grit
auger, which dumps into a dumpster and is removed
twice a week.
• Flow then travels to the Influent pump station where
the flow is pumped up the hill to the Oxidation
Ditches
• Then it proceeds to the Clarifiers thru the splitter
box where the Lime and Alum is added
• From the Clarifier the water travels to the Filters by
way of the junction box where Chlorine is added
• From the Tertiary filters the water travels to the
contact chamber, S02 is added and
• Then down the cascade aerator and out to the creek.
• From the clarifiers the sludge will either be returned
to the Oxidation Ditches or wasted to the Digesters
• Where it then goes to the Thicken Sludge Basin and
out to the farms.

SUMMIT
E[��IR;7A1fd�fd7AL��CNk�fSL+��33�5, iti�`
J1n�lyticat �ab�ra[nN�s
February 13,2020
Ryan Copeland
Synagro
284 Boger Rd.
Mocksville, NC 27028
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
RE:
Dear Ryan Copeland:
Suninrit Emviroumental Technologies, hrc.
3310 TVin St.
Cigahoga Falls, Olrio 44223
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
TVebsite: h11n:/Annj,.se[1ek.conl
Order No.: 20011551
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 1/24/2020 fbr the
analyses presented in the following report.
There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted
in the Case Narrative.
Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits
except where noted.
If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call the
laboratory.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Woolf
Project Manager
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arkansas 88-0735, California 07256CA, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0108, Delaware, Florida NF1,AC E87688, Georgia E87688, Idaho OH00923, Illinois
200061, Indiana C-OH-13, Kansas E-10347, Kentucky (Underground Storage Tank) 3, Kentucky 90146, Louisiana 04061, Matyland 339, Minnesota
409711, New Hampshire 2996, New Jersey OH006, Now York 11777, NorthCarorura 39705 and 631, NotthDakota R-201, Ohio DW, Oltio VAP
CL0052, Oklahoma 9940, Oregon OH200001, Pennsylvania 010, Rhode Island LA000317, South Carolina 92016001, Texas TI 04704466-11-5, Utah
OH00923201 1-1, VirginJa VELAP 9456, Washington C891
Page 1 of 32

�1T S,mm,tfEurlroua,enta,Technologies, Inc. Case Narrative
S3310 R in St.
ENVU10A ENTAL TVCIIN01.oG1rqS, INC: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 WO#: 20011551
Analyflcal taboralar)ev TEL: [phone] FAX [phone]
tVebslfe: a1r ://Wwiv.setlekeoul Date: 2/13/2020
CLIENT: Synagro
Project:
WorkOrder Narrative:
2001 1551: This report in its entirety consists of the following documents: Cover Letter, Case Narrative,
Analytical Results, QC Summaty Report, Applicable Accreditation Information, Chain -of -Custody,
Cooler Receipt Form, and other applicable forms as necessary. All documents contain the Summit
Environmental Technologies, Inc., Work Order Number assigned to this report.
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., holds the accreditations/certifications listed at the bottom of
the cover letter that may or may not pertain to this report. Please refer to the "Accreditation Program
Analytes Repotl" for accredited analytes list.
The information contained in this analytical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental
Technologies, Inc. and that of the customer. It cannot be reproduced in any form without the consent of
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. or the customer for which this report was issued. The results
contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions can vary at different
times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not responsible
for use or interpretation of the data included herein.
All results for Solid Samples are reported on an "as received" or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as
"dry weight" using the "-dry" designation on the reporting units.
This report is believed to meet all of the requirements of the accrediting agency, where applicable. Any
comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below.
Prep Sample QC Comments:
2001 1590-001 A 507180: Prep Comments for MtlPrep_TCLP(3010A), Sample 20011590-001 A:
Sample filtered after digestion.
Analytical Sequence Sample Notes:
2001 1551-001A TCLP-SVOC-CPEST(808 I B): Bracketing CCVs failed high for some
analytes. Samples in batch 41806 were non -detect for all analytes.
2001 1551-001A TCLP-SVOC-CPEST(8081 B): LCS exhibited high recovery for several analytes;
Sample is ND
2001 1551-001 A TCLP-SVOC-HERB_NPW(8321 B): Sample exhibited high recovery of Surrogate:
DCAA; Sample is non -detect for all analytes of interest.
Original
Page 2 of 32

SUMMIT S,mnnil Environmental Technologies, Inc. Case Narrative
3310 6Vin S!.
ENVIII01JPsi LWAL'tGCIMMOGWS, Wr. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 WO#: 20011551
Analytical Loborarorw 7EL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
6Vebsife: htty:/hi�rw.seuek.cor,, Date: 2/13/2020
CLIENT: Synagro
Project:
Analytical Sequence QC Notes:
CCV-108861 VOC-MSTR_NPW(8260): The VOC CCV (Batch R 108861) exhibited high recovery for
Vinyl Chloride; All samples were ND.
Original
Page 3 of 32

SUMMj0t Srnnrrrit Lrrnirorrrrrerrtnl 3310 Teclufl, in /n Qualifiers and Acronyms
33/0 V
ENVInOWADOTAL 1ECIfN01,t1( jFC;' Pmr Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio442� WO##: 20011551
tlnatVrlcal Laboralarlas TEL: [phone]I FAX: [phone]d
Website: Irtty:/in°mu.sellek.co Date: 2/13/2020
These commonly used Qualifiers and Acronyms may or may not be present in this report,
Qualifiers
T The compound was analyzed for but was not detected.
J The reported value is greater than the Method Detection Limit but less than the Reporting Limit.
H The hold time for sample preparation and/or analysis was exceeded.
D The result is reported from a dilution.
E The result exceeded the linear range of the calibration or is estimated due to interference.
MC The result is below the Minimum Compound Limit.
* The result exceeds the Regulatory Limit or Maximum Contamination Limit.
m Manual integration was used to determine the area response.
cl Manual integration in which peak was deleted
N The result is presumptive based on a Mass Spectral library search assuming a 1:1 response.
P The second column confirmation exceeded 25%difference.
C The result has been confirmed by GUMS.
N The result was not confirmed when GC/MS Analysis was perlormed.
B/NIB+ The analyte was detected in the associated blank,
C The ICB or CCB contained reportable amounts of analyte.
QC-/+ The CCV recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
R/QDR The RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QL-/+ The LCS or LCSD recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
QLR The LCS/LCSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QNI-/+ The MS or MSD recovery failed low (-) or high (+),
QNIR The MS/MSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QV-/+ The ICV recovery failed low (-) or high (+).
S The spike result was outside of accepted recovery limits,
Z Deviation; A deviation from the method was performed; Please refer to the Case Narrative for
additional information
Acronyms
ND
Not Detected
RL
Reporting I..imit
QC
Quality Control
MDL
Method Detection Limit
MB
Method Blank
LOD
Level of Detection
LCS
Laboratory Control Sample
LOQ
I..evel OfQuantilation
LCSD
I..aboratory Control Sample Duplicate
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
QCS
Quality Control Sample
CRQL
Contract Required Quantitation Limit
DUP
Duplicate
PL
Permit Limit
MS
Matrix Spike
RegU l
Regulatory Limit
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate
MCL
Maximum Contamination Limit
RPD
Relative Percent Different
MinCL
Minimum Compound Limit
ICV
Initial Calibration Verification
RA
Reanalysis
ICB
Initial Calibration Blank
RE
Reextraction
CCV
Continuing Calibration Verification
TIC
Tentatively Identified Compound
CCB
Continuing Calibration Blank
RT
Retention Time
RLC
Reporting Limit Check
CIF
Calibration Factor
DF
Dilution Factor
RF
Response Factor
This list of Qualifiers and Acronyms reflects the most commonly utilized Qualifiers and Acronyms for reporting,
Please refer to the Analytical Notes in the Case Narrative for any Qualifiers or Acronyms that do not appear in this
list or for additional information regarding the use of these Qualifiers on reported data.
Original
Page 4 of 32

SUMMIMF Sraniirii Gnriroiriireirial Technologies,1,ic. Workorder
3310 6Vin Sr.
E6WHIONfill Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Sample Summary
AsmlyVci t L dbOral0 ve TEL: [phone] / PAX: [phone] WO#l: 20011551
Websire: hrrn://ma,r.seuek.conr 13-Feb-20
CLIENT: Synagro
Project:
Lab SamplelD Client Sample LD
20011551-001 SilerCity WWTP
Tag No Date Collcetcd
1/22/2020 1:15:00 PM
Date Received Matrix
1/24/2020 10:20:00 AM Sludge
Page 5 of 32

SUMMIT nnN„.;,v;rn,,s•,narTacl,u310 n.0 DATES REPORT
33f0IVinS7.
ENVIiIOtLAEt7TAt 1711kn14gIFR.tNC Qi,oho, lYAls Ohio 44223
Annlptleaf tabOratorlla 7EL: [phone] EAK [phone] WON: 20011551
IYehVile: hIt r.'v u�r..re!lekernn 13-Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project:
Sample 11) Client Sample in Collection Date Matrix TestNnme Leachate Date Prep Date
Analysis Date
20011551-OOIA SilerCilyNV\VTP V22/20201:15.00PM Sludge IgnitabilityoPSolids(SW-846t 1030)
2/3/20201:00:00PM
PH (SW9045D)
V2912020 12:15:53 PM
Reactive Cyanide (9014/7.3.3.2)-Solid
216/20203t36:001'M
Reactive Sulfide (9034)/7.3.4.2
2/16/2020 1:15:00 PM
'TCLP Heibicides by EPA 83218 1/31/2020 5.00.00 PM
2/7/2020 829:00 AM
TCLP Mercury Analysis (S W I311/747 V31/2020 5:00:00 PM 2/4/2020 9 00:00 AM
2/4/2020 2:16:00 PM
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/60101131/2020 5:00:00 PM 2/3/2020 I 1:35:00 AM
2/4/2020 1:41.20 PM
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8(1731/20205,0O:OOPM 2/3/202010:45:00AM
2/6/202012:27:00AM
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis 1/31/2020 5:00:00 PM 2/3/2020 10:3Q00 AM
2/4/2020 k24:00PM
(SW 1311/8270)
TCLP Volmiles Analysis 1/31/20205:00-OOPM
2/3/20207:58:OOPM
Original
Page 6 of 32

Summit Envir•onmewal Technologies, hrc' Analytical Report
u mm i ss 33/0 4Vhr Sr.
ENVIIIONIACNiALTt:OIINOt.O€;Itln, Mr, Criyahoga Falls, oleo 44223 (base report)
Analytica/ Labaralarlm 7EL: [phone] FAX: [phone] WO#: 20011551
6Vebsile: lrlrr2-/A nr.serrek.cOm Date Rcported: 2/13/2020
CLIENT: Synagro Tag Number:
Matrix: SLUDGE Collection Date: 1/22/2020 1:15:00 PM
Lab ID: 20011551-OOIA
Project:
Client Sample ID Siler City WWTP
Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
SW7470A
SW7470A Analyst: MJM
TCLP MERCURY ANALYSIS (SW1311 /7470)
TCLP Mercury
ND
0.00200
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 2:16:00 PM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
SW6010D
SW3010A Analyst: EAM
TCLP METALS ANALYSIS (SW1311/6010)
TCLPArsenic(As)
ND
0.500
mg/L
1
21412020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP Cadmium(Ccl)
ND
0.100
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
ND
0.200
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP Lead(Pb)
ND
0.500
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP Selenium(Se)
ND
0.0500
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP Silver(Ag)
ND
0.500
mg/L
1
2/4/2020 1:41:20 PM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
SW8270
SW3510C Analyst: SFG
TCLP SEMI-VOLATILES ANALYSIS (SW1311/8270)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.500
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.500
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
0.100
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Cresols, Total
ND
10.0
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND
0.0400
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
0.100
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Hexachloro ethane
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Nitrobenzene
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Pentachlorophenol
ND
0,500
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Pyridine
ND
0.500
mg/L
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Surr: 2-Fluorophenol
53.6
10 - 109
%Rec
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Surr: Phenol-d6
52.4
10 - 109
%Rec
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
62.5
19 - 120
%Rec
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Surr: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
74.2
10 - 120
%Rec
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
60.3
22 - 117
%Rec
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Surr: p-Terpheny1-d14
90.0
34 - 116
%Rec
2
2/4/2020 7:24:00 PM
Qualifiers: B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E
Value above quantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
M
Manual Integration used to determine area response
/ MC
Value is below Minimum Compound Limit,
N
Tentatively identified compounds
l ND
Not Detected
P
Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Permit Limit
R
RPD outside accepted recovery limits Original
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
U
Samples with CalcVal < MDL
Page 7 of 32

Snmmir Environmental Technologies, Inc,
S U Eqn
MM I i 3310 fVie St.
faVllttlNlnCM7AL"ti iiNr71.[7CIC",, tNr Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Armiytical toboreroni, TEL: [phone] FAX. [phone]
fVebsiie: Lrtm:/RviU=11ek.com
Analytical Report
(base report)
WO#: 20011551
Datc Reported: 2/13/2020
CLIENT: Synagro Tag Number:
Matrix: SLUDGE Collection Date: 1/22/2020 1:15:00 PM
Lab ID: 20011551-OOIA
Project:
Client Sample ID Siler City WWTP
Analyses Result RL Qua[ Units DF Date Analyzed
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
TCLP PESTICIDES ANALYSIS (SW1311/8081)
Chlordane, total
ND
Toxaphene
ND
Endrin
ND
gamma-BHC
ND
Heptachlor
ND
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
Methoxychlor
ND
Surr: TCMX
14A
Surr. DCB
18.4
TCLP HERBICIDES BY EPA 8321 B
2,4-D ND
2,4,5-TP ND
Surr: 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic aci 149
SW8081 SW3510C Analyst: SEK
0.125 mg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
0.250 mg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
0.0125 dQL+ mg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
0.0125 dQC+ mg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
0.0125iQC+QL+mg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
0.0125iQC+QL+mg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
0.0125iQC+QLimg/L
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
10 -1 19 %Rec
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
10 - 119 %Rec
5
2/6/2020 12:27:00 AM
SW8321A SW1311M Analyst: BJH
0.500 mg/L 50 2/7/2020 8:29:00 AM
0.500 mg/L 50 2/7/2020 8:29:00 AM
70 - 130 S %Rec 50 2/7/2020 8:29:00 AM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -SOLID
SW8260 SW1311M Analyst: RMT
TCLP VOLATILES ANALYSIS
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
MEK
ND
10.0
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Benzene
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Chlorobenzene
ND
5.00
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Chloroform
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Tetra chloroethene
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Trichloroethene
ND
0.500
mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.200
QC+ mg/L 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
98.2
70 - 130
%Rec 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
106
70 - 130
%Rec 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Surr: Toluene-d8
103
70 - 130
%Rec 100 2/3/2020 7:58:00 PM
Qualifiers: B Anaiyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation oranalysis exceeded
M Manual Integration used to detenninearea response
MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit,
N Tentatively identified compounds
ND Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
PI. Pennit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery lim its Original
RL Reporting Detection Limit
U Samples with CalcVal < MDL
Page 8of32

1
SUMM111-
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
33/0 6Vin St.
Analytical Report
ENVIItL11JIAENTAt TTCIINr1LOCIFS, mr..
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohfo 44223
(base report)
AnalytIcal Lattoratoner
TEL- [phone] FAX. [phone]
WOM 20011551
6f ebsite: httn;/Ariviv.sellek.cO1 t
Date Reported: 2/13/2020
CLIENT:
Synagro
Tag Number:
Matrix:
SLUDGE
Collection Date:
1/22/2020 1:15:00 PM
Lab ID:
20011551-OOIA
Project:
Client Sample ID Siler City WWTP
Analyses
Result RL Qual Units
DF Date Analyzed
RCI-SOLID-Wl IGNITABILITY1030
SW9014 Analyst: CXS
REACTIVE CYANIDE (901417.3.3.2)-SOLID
Cyanide, Reactive ND 12.1
mg/Kg I 2/6/2020 3:36:00 PM
RCI-SOLID-Wl IGNITABILITY1030
SW1030 Analyst: AJT
IGNITABILITY OF SOLIDS (SW-846: 1030)
Ignitability non-flammable
mm/sec 1 2/3/2020 1:00:00 PM
RCI-SOLID-Wl IGNITABILITY1030
SW9045D Analyst: VVK
PH (SW9045D)
PH 6.8
s.u.@20.9C 1 1/29/2020 12:15:53 PM
RCI-SOLID-WI IGNITABILITY1030
SW9034 Analyst: CXS
REACTIVE SULFIDE (9034)17.3.4.2
Sulfide, Reactive ND 25.0
mg/Kg 1 2/16/2020 1:15:00 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
G Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
i MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit.
N Tentatively identified compowids
l ND Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits Original
R.I_ Reporting Detection Limit
U Samples with CalcVal < MDL
Page 9 of 32

UMM,T Summit EnNirorrulerrinlTechrrologies, lnc. Accreditation Program
3310 Rin St. Anal tes Report
514VInONWENTAL 1'E(:HNO[ OMF ;, WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Y I'
Amlykal Leboraloilte 78L: [phone] rAX: [phone] WOM 20011551
Websire. 13-Feb-20
Client: Synagro State: NW
Project: Program Name: NC WW SCM
Sample 1D Matrix
Test Name
Analyte
Status
200115 51-001 A Sludge
Ignitability of Solids (SW-846'. 1030)
Ignitability
A
Sludge
pH (SW9045D)
Hydrogen ton (pH)
A
Sludge
Reactive Cyanide (9014/7.3.3.2)-Solid
Cyanide, Reactive
U
Sludge
Reactive Sulfide (9034)/7.3.4.2
Sulfide, Reactive
U
Sludge
TCLP Herbicides by EPA 8321 B
2,4,5-TP
A
Sludge
TCLP Herbicides by EPA 8321 B
2,4-D
A
Sludge
TCLP Mercury Analysis (SW 1311/7470)
Mercwy
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (S W 131 1/6010)
Arsenic
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Barium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Cadmium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (S W 1311/6010)
Chromium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Lead
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis(SW1311/6010)
Selenium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Silver
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Chlordane, total
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (S W 1311/8081)
Endrin
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 1311 /8081)
gamma-BHC
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Heptachlor
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW131 1/8081)
Heptachlor epoxide
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (S W 1311/8081)
Methoxychlor
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (S W 131 1 /8081)
Toxaphene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (S W1311/8270)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW 1311/8270)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
A
Sludge
TCLPSemi-Volaliles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (S W 131 1 /8270)
Cresols, Total
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (SW 131 1/8270)
I-lexachlorobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (SW131 1/8270)
Hexachlorobrdadicne
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (S W 131 1/8270)
I-lexachloroelhane
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (S W 1311/8270)
Nitrobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Pentachlorophenol
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volaliles Analysis (SW 1311/8270)
Pyridine
A
Original # 1
Page 10 of 32

Sunni! Environmental Technologies, hrc,
Accreditation Program
UM'Nt
331nwrnS`
Anal tes Report
Y
EN0110}J6ACNTAL T�CNN01 001r£., Mr
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
AfwVflcal Laborator)&
TEL: [phone] FAY: [phone]
WO#: 20011551
Websife: lit fr.//u srsr.selfekconr
13-Feb-20
Client:
Synagro
State: NW
Project:
Program Name: NC_WW SCM
Sample ID Matrix
Test [tame
Analyte
Status
20011551-001A Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Arialysis
Ll-Dichloroethene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
1,2-Dichloroethane
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
2-Butanone
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Benzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Carbon tetrachloride
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Chlorobenzcne
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Chlorolorm
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Tetrachlorocthene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Trichloroclhene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Vinyl chloride
A
Original # I
Page 11 of 32

SwInnitbrirmiu,e,rinl7 chnologies, Inc. SQC SUMMARY REPORT
,u M M' IVinr SI.
EN%gMONMENTAL T[f.HHOrOOri ;, Wr Ctq'ahogn Fo!!s3310 Ohio 14223
AnMytfrnf Ln6nrntnlraP 76L: f330) 253-82 11 1,;4X: [phone] W011: 20011551
Wehrire: h11u mvsv.serrek vain 13-Peb-20
Client: Synagro
Project: 13atch[D: 41775
iamplelD: MB•41775
SampType: MBLK
TestCode: TCLP-VOC-M Units: mglL
Prep Date: 113112020
RunNo: 108884
'.Bent ID: PBS
Batch ID: 41775
TestNo: SW8260 SW1311M
Analysis Date: 21412020
SegNo: 2603620
\nalyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowt-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.0500
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0,0500
MEK
ND
1.00
Benzene
ND
0.0500
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.0500
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.500
Chloroform
ND
0.0500
Tetrachloroethene
ND
0.0500
Trichforoethene
ND
0.0500
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.0200
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
492
Sure: Dibromofluoromethane
520
Surr: Toluene d8
517
Qnnliriers: B Analyte defected in the associated Method Blank
I Analytedctaledbeloevquanlitationfimits
ND Not Detected
R RYD outside accepted recovery limits
500.0 98.4 70 130
500.0 104 70 130
500.0 103 70 130
E Value above quantitation range
M Manual lntegation used to determine area response
P Second column confirmation exceeds
I(L Reporting Detection Limit
Page 12 of 32
H Holding times for preparalion or anai)
MC Value is beloev Minimum Compound
Pt, Permit Limit
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Q C+
Original

91SUMM111- 3310JYilr S1-
Sunnuil himuiroroneulrrl7echns,bu- QC SUMMARY REPORT
33l0 l
Ei�VIat3MAEN1'pL tCC nNdl.dRlFS, INt' Cbyalugo l"ollr, Ohio 44223
WOtt: 20011551
Annfyliral Lpbnralnlleo 7EL: (330) 253-A2111,AK (330) 2534469
Websile. ham-llmutre.sellek.ivmr 13-Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project: Batch ID: 41795
Sample ID- MB-41795
SampType: M13LK
TestCode: Mti-TCLP•7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 213/2020
RunNo: 108891
Client ID: PBS
Balch ID: 41795
TestNo: SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 214/2020
SegNo: 2604322
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit High✓_imil RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimil Qual
TCLP Arsenic(As)
ND
0.500
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
TCLP Cadmium(Cd)
ND
0.100
TCLPChromium(Cr)
ND
0200
TCLP Lead(Pb)
ND
0.500
TCLP Selenium(Se)
ND
0.0500
TCLP Silver(Ag)
ND
0.500
Sample ID: LCS-41795
SampType: LCS
TestCode: Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mglL
Prep Date: 2/3/2020
RunNo: 108891
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 41795
TestNo: SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Dale: 2/4/2020
SegNo: 2604323
Analyle
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC Lowl-imit Hightlmit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Arsenic(As)
1.97
0.500
2.000
0
98.3
80
120
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
2.000
0
104
80
120
TCLPCadmium(Cd)
2.20
0.100
2.000
0
110
80
120
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
2.06
0.200
2.000
0
103
80
120
TCLP Lead(PW
2.17
0.500
2,000
0
108
80
120
TCLP Selemum(Se)
2.18
0.0500
2.000
0
109
80
120
TCLP Silver(Ag)
2.19
0.500
2.000
0
i09
80
120
Qunlifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times far preparation or anal)
f Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Mammal Integration used to determine area response MC Value is belmv Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected P Second column continuation exceeds PL Permit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RI, Repating Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 13 of 32

iuMM111,,»,»ac,,,itrn,,,e»i�larr,,3310rinSi. QC SUMMARY REPORT
33/0 WinSi.
ENWROWNUTAL=iIHOLOW-S.IHC 01,io44223
AahlytfCnl tRbnrefarlFS TEL [phone]// FAX: [phone] W09: 20011551
IYebsire: heu./Av,rsv..cei7ektour 13-f'eh-10
Client: Synagro
Project: Kateh[D: 41814
;ample ID: MB-41814
SampType: MBLK
TeslCode: SVOC•BNA_T Units: mg/L
Prep Dale: 21312020
RunNw 108857
aient ID: PBS
Balch ID: 41814
TesiNo: SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Dale: 2/412020
SegNo: 2604887
knalyte
Result
POL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC Lowl-imil Hight-imil RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimil Oual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.100
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.250
2,4,6Trichlorophenol
ND
0.250
2,4-Dlnilrololuene
ND
0-0500
o-Cresol
ND
0,250
Cresols, Total
ND
5.00
Hexachloro-1,3-buladiene
ND
0,0200
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
0,0500
Hexachloroethane
ND
0A00
Nitrobenzene
ND
0.100
Pentachlorophenol
ND
0.250
Pyridine
ND
0.250
Surr: 2-Fluorophenol
0,450
Surr- Phenol-d6
0-488
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0.471
Surr: 2, 4,6-Tri bromophenol
0-812
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.474
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0,861
Qualifiers: B .4ualyte detected in the associated Method Blank
I Analyte detected below quantitatioa limits
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
1.000
45.0
10
109
1.000
48.8
10
109
1.000
471
19
120
1-000
81.2
10
120
1.000
47.4
22
117
1.000
86A
34
116
E Value above quantitatiourange
M Manual integration used to determine area response
P Second column confirmation exceeds
RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 14 of 32
H Holding times for preparation or anal)
MC Value is belowMnimum Compound
PL Pem,it Limit Original
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco

{
SUMMII Samr, r Gmirn,rrneninl Techn33ogles, h t.
33I0 IVin SY,
, I(-xynhogn Fa!!s, Ohio a4223
A rMfyHOBl Labprefarle8 TIil: (330) 253,7211 FAX[phone]
IVebsire: hrtn:, rruerr.yeiiekrnnr
QC SUMMARY REPORT
W09: 20011551
13-Feb-27l
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchED: 41814
Sample ID: LCS-41814
SampType: LCS
TestCode: SVOC-BNA_T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 21312020
RunNo: 108857
Client ID: LCSS
BalchlD: 41814
TestNo: SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 2/412020
SegNo: 2604888
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit Hight-imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzens
0.373
0A00
0.8000
0
46.6
36.4
130
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0,757
0.250
0.8000
0
94.7
31.7
132
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0727
0,250
0,8000
0
90-9
31-1
133
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.893
0.0500
0.8000
0
112
43.3
130
o-Cresol
0-584
0.250
0.8000
0
730
32.9
130
Cresols, Total
ND
5.00
1.600
0
74-5
31-7
130
Hexachloro-1,3•buladiene
0.388
0.0200
0.8000
0
48.5
31-4
130
Hexachlorobenzene
0.688
0.0500
0.8000
0
86.0
43.1
130
Hexachloreelhane
0.335
0.100
0.8000
0
41.9
36.5
130
Nitrobenzene
0.540
0A00
0.8000
0
67.5
39-5
130
Penlachlorophanol
0.812
0.250
0.8000
0
102
34
130
Pyn'dine
0.269
0.250
0.8000
0
33.6
10
130
Surr: 2-5luorophenol
0.631
1.000
63.1
17.1
130
Surr: Phenol-d6
0.647
1,000
64.7
10
130
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0.626
1.000
62.6
32.6
130
Surr: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
1.01
1,000
101
4.43
130
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.639
1.000
63.9
41-8
130
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.937
1.000
93.7
36.4
130
Qualifiers: B Annlyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times tot preparation oranalS
] Annlyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used todctcmiinc area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected P Second column contimiation exceeds PL Pcnnit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RI, Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 16 of 32

S umm'll .Srmmmil Inc.
3310 I rein S!.
ftJ 01VIR0111.t[i/TALIWIM01.(:1f3.1111 CnJWWgorn/Ls,01dodd223
Malyllenl Lebereferfe- Trla [phone] FAY, [phone]
Wehshe. hap:/hvuvir.seflek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
W09: 20011551
13-Feb-20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchID: 41814
ample to: 20011447�001AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode: SVOC-BNA T Units: mg1L
Prep Date: 213/2020
RunNo: 108857
lien 1D: Batch QC
Batch ID: 41814
TestNo: SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 21412020
SegNo: 2606452
,nalyte
Result
POL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimil RPD Ref Val
° RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.342
0.200
0.8000
0
42.7
33.8
126
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.782
0.500
0.8000
0
97.8
28.7
144
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.850
0.500
0-8000
0
106
12.8
153
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.729
0A00
0.8000
0
91A
20.4
155
0-Cresol
0.666
0.500
0,8000
0
83.2
10
148
Cresols, Total
ND
10.0
1,600
0
85.8
10
148
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.368
0.0400
0,8000
0
46.0
29
126
Hexachlorobenzene
0.679
0.100
0.8000
0
84.9
33.7
134
Hexachloroethane
0-323
0.200
0.8000
0
40.4
32.8
132
Nilrobenzene
0-562
0.200
0.8000
0
702
20
158
Pentachlorophenol
0-937
0.500
0.8000
0
117
10
176
Pyridine
ND
0500
0.8000
0
44.3
10
130
Surr:2-Fluorophenol
0
1,000
0
3.39
130
Surr: Phenol-d6
0.732
1.000
73.2
5
130
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0-648
1.000
64.8
14-5
154
Surr. 2,4.6-Tribromophenol
0.998
1.000
99.8
19-5
130
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl
0313
1,000
71.3
34.4
130
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.901
1.000
90.1
8-86
156
Qunliriers: R Analytedetected inthe associated Method Blank
3 Analyte detected below quantitalion l imits
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
E Value above quantitaii on range
M Manual Integration used to dctennine area response
P Second column confirmation exceeds
RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 16 of 32
In
Sd
H Holding times for preparation or anall
MC Value is below Minimum Compound
PL Pennit Limit Original
S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco

SUMMIT-s,,,r nE,rr;,,urneunlTeelnw310JrinSi. QC SUMMARY REPORT
3310 IYin.Sl.
UAIIIIONMEWAL TECIMM-0( r., INC (7nyahognNnHs. Ohio 44223
Anfll yth al Labotalorim ML: (330) 253,1211 FfUi [phone] WOk: 20011551
IVehsile: 1rlrn:/.5rmrr.reruerxrr 13-Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchED: 4I814
;ample ID: 20011447.001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TeslCode: SVOC-i3NA_T Units: mg1L
Prep Dale: 21312020
Run No: 108857
:lien( ID: 6atchQC
Balch ID: 41814
TestNo: SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Dale: 21412020
SegNo: 2606453
malyle
Result
PQL SPK Value SPK RefVal
%REC Low17mi1 HighLimil RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimil Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.302
0.200
0.8000
0
37.8
33.8
126
0.3416
12.2
30
2,4,5-Ti'ichlorophenol
0.715
0,500
0.8000
0
89,4
28.7
144
0,7820
8.98
30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.804
0.500
0.8000
0
101
12.8
153
0.8504
5,56
30
2,4-Diniltololuene
0.729
0100
0.8000
0
91.2
20.4
155
0.7288
0.0549
30
o-Cresol
0,641
0.500
0.8000
0
80.2
10
148
0.6656
3.73
30
Cresols, Total
ND
10.0
1-600
0
81.5
10
148
0
0
30
Hexachloro-1,3-buladiene
0.360
0.0400
0.8000
0
45.0
29
126
0.3680
2.20
30
Hexachlorobenzene
0.632
0,100
0.8000
0
79.0
33.7
134
0.6792
7.20
30
Hexachloroelhane
0,274
0.200
0.8000
0
34.3
32.8
132
03228
16.4
30
Nitrobenzene
0.539
0,200
0,8000
0
67.4
20
158
0.5620
4.22
30
Penlachlorophenol
0.909
0,500
08000
0
114
10
176
0.9372
3.03
30
Pyridine
ND
0,500
0.8000
0
44.8
10
130
0
0
30 In
Sure 2-Ruorophenol
0
1 000
0
3,39
130
0
Sd
Surr Phenol-c16
0,667
1.000
66.7
10
130
0
Surr:: Nitrobenzene.c15
0.632
1.000
63.2
14.5
154
0
Surr. 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.957
1.000
95.7
19.5
130
0
Surr.2-Fluorobiphenyl
0700
1.000
70.0
34.4
130
0
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.847
1.000
843
8-86
156
0
Qunlirierst B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quanlitation
range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal}
J Analyte detected below
quanti tationrunits
M Manual Integration
usediodeiemrine
area response
MC
Value is below Minimum
Compound
Original
ND Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
PemritLimit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RI. Reporting Detection Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside accepted rcco
Page 17 of 32

Srnuuth h'nPirumnewal Achuologies, Ijk. SUMMIT. 3310IrwSt. QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENVIRON AN TAL IU1,nN01 amr. r, Mr. CupnhogrPnlJc 01do 44223
AnnfyflrnJ / nbaretari�� y✓OH: 20011551
77s•L: 030) 253,1211 FA,\: [phone]
IVebs&,: G!!n:/ iru•u seUak.eoui 13.Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchED: 41818
Sample ID: MB-41818
SampType: MBLK
TestCode: HG TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 214/2020
RunNo: 108886
Client ID: PBS
Batch 10: 41818
TeslNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 214/2020
SegNo: 2603657
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lawl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury ND 0,00200
Sample ID: LCS-41818
SampType: LCS
TestCode: HG_TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 2/412020
RunNo: 108886
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 41818
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 21412020
SegNo: 2603658
Analyte
Resuit
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury 0.00402 0.00200 0.00400 0 101 80 120
Sample ID: 20011609.001AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode: HG_TCLPJ74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 214/2020
RunNo: 108886
ClientlD: BalchQC
Balch ID: 41818
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Dale: 214/2020
SegNo: 2603668
Analyle
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury 0.00424 0.00200 000400 0 106 75 125
Sample ID: 20011609.001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode: HG_TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 2/412020
RunNo: 108886
Client ID: BalchQC
Batch 10: 41818
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 2/412020
SegNo: 2603669
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury 0-00436 0.00200
0.00400 0 109 75
125
0,00424 2.79 20
Qualifiers: li Analytedeiected in the associated Method Blank
E Vaiue above quantitation range
H
holding times for preparation or anal)
1 Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used todetemiine area response
MC
Vaiue isbelow Minimum Compound
Original
IVD Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
Pl.
Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
ILL Repotting Detection Limit
S
Spikc Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 18 of 32

S V M1� ' nirEn, I,urnror Trcrn3310 411st. QC SUMMARY REPORT
33ID SS';a S1.
ENV11100 14TALTECIINOLOGW3,INC Clr}'nrwgnFull."Ohio44223
Annlytlenf Laborefanes TEL: [phone] FAA. [phone] WON: 20011551
IVeAs;le; h+rn:nv,eu..venek.roru 13-Feh-10
Client: Synagro
Project: Batchl& 41818
Sample ID: 20011609.001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode: HG_TCLPJ74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 21412020
RunNo: 108886
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 41818
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 214r2020
SegNo: 2603669
Analyle
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sampte ID: M62-41818
SampType: MBLK
TestCode: HG_TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 2)412020
RunNo: 108886
Client lD: PBS
Batch ID: 41818
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 21412020
SegNo: 2603670
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDL-unit Qual
TCLP Mercury ND 0.00200
Sample 10: TCLP BLANK 2-3-20 SampType: MBLK
TestCode: HG TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 21412020
RunNo: 108886
Client ID: PBS Batch ID: 41818
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 21412020
SegNo: 2603678
Analyte Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury
ND 0.00200
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected 1n the associated Method Blank
3 Analyte detected below quantitalion limits
1VD Not Detected
R RPD outride accepted recovery limits
E Value above quantilation range H Holding limes for preparation or anal)
M Manual integration used todetermine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
P Second column confirmation exceeds FL Permit LimitOriginal
RL Reporh ng Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 19 of 32

Swunth Enwro„r„rmal fMn„ kgles. Inc.
QC SUMMARY REPORT
u m m, � 3310 irurS1.
BNvlt[OtiInENTAi tEf.7if10LO;;iFS, INC Grl+olx gn hb1Ls Ohio 44??3
Annfytioai Ln6olafoNes TEL [phone] FAX (330) 253-I4B9 W09: 20011551
Illebsile: r77r.! r.vellr,(.con 13-Feb-20
Client: Synagro
Project: Batchm: R108624
Sample ID: LCS-R108624
SampType: LCS
TeslCode: pH_Oil(90450 Units: s.u.@20.9C
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108624
Client 10: LCSW
Batch ID: R108624
TestNo: SW90450
Analysis Date: 1/29/2020
SegNo: 2592160
Analyte
Result
POL SPKvalue SPKRefVal %REC
LcwUmit HighLimit RPDRefVal
° RPD RPDLimit Oual
pH 7.0 7.0 0 999 90 110
Sample ID: CHECK 7
SampType: LCS
TestCode: pH_Oil(9045D Units: s.u.@21.1C
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108624
Client 10: LCSW
Batch ID: R108624
TeslNo: SW90450
Analysis Dale: 112912020
SegNo: 2592362
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal %REC
LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
° RPD RPDLimit Oual
pH 7.0 To 0 99.9 90 110
SampleID: CHECK 7
SampType: LCS
TestCode: pH_Olf(9045D Units: s.u.@21.3C
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108624
Client 1D: LCSW
BatchlD: R108624
TeslNe: SW90450
Analysis Dale: 1/29/2020
SegNo: 2594509
Analyte
Result
POL SPKvalue SPKRefVal %REC
Lcwt-imit HighLimit RPDRefVal
° RPD RPDLimit Oual
pH 7-0
7.0 0 100 90 110
Qualifiers: B Anatytedetected inthe associaledMethodBlank E Value above quanlitationrange li molding times for preparation or anal)
7 Analyte detected below quantitation limits M MaoualIntegration used todetemtinearea response MC Value is below MinimumCompotmd
ND NotDelecled P Second column confionati on exceeds PL Permit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 20 of 32

SUMMIT- Tec,,n33111IsMSLQC SUMMARY REPORT
3310 lfri» SL, C,»Tnhnga,�irllr, 0111a 44223
Malylleal Lnbareforips TEL: [phone]Tff. 1330) 253-4489 WOk: 20011551
iyebsile: hrNI.,hu-reu%serlek.cn»r 13-F'eh_20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchlD: RI08624
;ample SD: 20010820.001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: pH_NPW(450 Units: s.u.@20.2C
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108624
Ilient ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R108624
TestNo: SW90450
Analysis Date: 1/29/2020
SagNo: 2592172
lnalyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Rat Val %REC
Lowl-imit Hight-imil RPD Ref Vat
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
pH 6,8
NOTES:
pH is an EPA field recommended parameter. Per 40 CFR 136.3, hold time is 15 minutes from collection.
Qunlificrs:
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
1 Analytedetected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
E Value above quantitation range
M Manual Integration used to detenninearea response
P Second column confirmation exceeds
RI. Reporting Detection Limit
Page 21 of 32
6.8 0.3 5 H
H Holding times for preparation or anal)
MC Value is belmv Minimum Compound
PL Permit Limit Original
S Spike Recovery outside accepted rcco

Summit &mwhaaorental Pech,tologles, hrc. S.UMM17- 3310INnSI. QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENWITONM94TAI-TGGHNn4f11irr,.%, mC C'nyahogaFalls, Ohio 44223
An tlyflrel Lxhorataller' WOk: 20011551
ITL: (330) 233 Y2111 !,t': [phone]
Weh.We: hRn:/Mw u seDe k.c'anr 13-Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchED: R108839
Sample ID: LCS•R108839
SampType: LCS
TestCode: Ignitabllity_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client to: LCSS
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 21312020
SegNo: 2601828
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPK Ref Vat %REC
Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitabilily 8.29 7.240 0 115 70 130
Sample ID: 20010917-001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitability_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID! R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 2/312020
SegNo: 2601830
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Igmtabilfty non-flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011093-001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitabillty_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601832
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPK Ref Vat
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability non-flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011093.002ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitabllity_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 2/312020
SegNo: 2601834
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPK Ref Val %REC
LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability non-flammable
0 0 20
Qualifiers: 8 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitatior range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal)
J Analyte detected below quanti tation limits
ND Not Detected
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
P Second column confirmation exceeds
MC
Pt.
Value is below Minimum Compound
Permit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovay limits
RL Reporting Detection Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside accepted rem
Page 22 of 32

s� �+* J'»»„»,iGai.�„me»larleetn310Win St QC SUMMARY REPORT
331 U {Vi» JY.
ENVI1100,104TALTEGNHnLrlGtr;,lr,a Ca3ahogalitRa:Ohio 44223
Anm/Ptten/ Ltrbonsforl" TL•L [phone] F/LY.. (.330) 233-4489 WON: 2001 I551
We/,site: .501facorn 13-Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project: 13atchED: R108839
Sample ID, 20011093-002ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: tgnitablllty_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
Runblo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601834
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ret Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qua]
Sample ID: 20011324-001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitability_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
Runblo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601836
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
O/oREC Lowl.imit Hight-imil RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qua]
Ignitability non-flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011551-001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: tgnitability_S Units: mm/sec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: Sitar City WWTP
Batch tD: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 2/3/2020
SegNo: 2601838
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability non-flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011552-001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitability_S Units: mm/sec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch to: R106639
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 21312020
SegNo: 2601840
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref VaI
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability
non-flammable
Qualifilers: B Analytc detected in the associated Method Blank
3 Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
0 0 20
E Value above quantitation range It Holding times for preparation or anal3
M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
P Second column confirmation exceeds PL Pemtit Limit
RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovety outsideaccepted mco
Page 23 of 32
Original

SUMMIffSfunnri! Gwiromuenlal 3310 Teclmahrc.
lU Iv8'ins7.
ENYInUNM8H1'AL ti?CII1rfILQGif ;. trrr. C.r(tnhoxa l cells. Ohio 44223
AnafyAtal Lnbarnto^Ire TEL: [phone]T U17. [phone]
1VeDsile. lrrin:IA"e tnr.serlek.cnor
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WOk: 20011551
13-Feh-20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchlD: R108839
Sample ID: 20011553-001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignilabilily_S Units: mm/sec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BaIchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Dale: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601842
Analyle
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability non-flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011412.001ADUP
SampType: DUP
TeslCode: Ignilabllity_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BaIchQC
Balch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 2/3/2020
SegNo: 2601844
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability non flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011412.001ATRIP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitabillty_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BaIchQC
BatchlD: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601845
Analyte
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC LowUmit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability non flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011412.002ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode:Ignitabillty_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BaIchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 21312020
SegNo: 2601847
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitabilily 0.450
0.4100 9.30 20
Qualiliers: B Analyte devetedinthe associated Method Blank
E Value abovcquantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal)
I Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used to detemiine area response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected
P Second column eonlimiation"ceeds
PL
permit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL Repotting Detection Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 24 of 32

czm"SUMMIT Summitldmirnrrnmrrinl Technologies, Inc.
3310 na v..
ENVISQNI.11INTAl-MIiNOILDOWS,M CrytrhnbmF'alls,01rioda123
Me}yflral Lnbararerlec TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Nehi He: lelln:/lxnnr..cerlek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WOO: 20011551
FJ_Feb-20
Client: Synagro
Project: RatchlD: R108839
Sample ID: 20011412-002ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: lgnitability_S Units: mm/sec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch 10: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 21312020
SegNo: 2601847
Analyte
Result
PUL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
°/aREC Lowl.imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPOLimit Qua[
Sample ID: 20011412-002ATRIP SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignilablllty_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601848
Analyte Result
PUL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimil Uual
Ignitability 0.430 0.4100 4.76 20
Sample ID: 20011412.003ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitabllity_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
ClientlD: BatchQC
BatchlM R108839
TeslNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601850
Analyte
Result
PUL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimil Uual
Ignitability non-flammable 0 0 20
Sample ID: 20011412.004ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitabllky_S Units: mmisec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 213/2020
SegNo: 2601852
Analyte
Result
PUL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC Lowlimit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimil Uual
Ignitability non-flammable
0 0 20
....-.+-_--•-------._..,--..-.---._..-.....-_ ..- ..--"----..--a•--.-'----------......... -----_�_.__ ..._._...---__................
ND Not Detected P Second column confirmat(on exceeds PL Pennit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S SpikeRecavery outside accepted reco
Page 26 of 32

Summit EnWrnonterrtalTechanlogies.11ttt SUMMIT- iV 331001. QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENVIIIBNhteNTALWMINfn6fIYS,IN(- Croynhogn7•hll. Ohm44223
Annly+lCnf LFlbnratarlr 7ZL: [phone] GiIX: (330) 253-444I WOt+: 20011551
Website: rnek.cwtt 13-Feh-10
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchID: R108839
Sample iD: 20011412-005ADUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode: Ignitabilily_S Units: mm/sec
Prep Date:
RunNo: 108839
lienl ID: BalchQC
Batch ID: R108839
TestNo: SW1030
Analysis Date: 2/312020
SegNo: 2601854
4nalyte
Result
PoL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit Kght imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit oust
Ignitability
non-flammable
Qunlifiers: A Analytc detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
E Value above quantitation range
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
P Second column conlinnadon exceeds
RL Reporting Detection limit
Page 26 of 32
0 0 20
11 Holding times for preparation or anal3
MC Value is below Minimum Compound
PL Permit Limit
S Spike Recovery atttside accepted reco
Original

summur
.Summit Eurirnrma!ulal Teclrr3310 Wvi &.
3310 i{'dr 17.
0IOh'a 44223
Aonlylkn11nbareforlor TEL: [phone] FAX [phone]
Wchvile. hllo:/.irn'trsellek.rarn
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WOtk 20011551
13_Feb-20
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchED: B109221
Sample ID: MB-R109221
SampType: MBLK
TestCode: Cyanide,Rea Units: mg/Kg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109221
Client ID: PBS
Batch10: R109221
TestNo: SW9014
Analysis Date: 216/2020
SegNo: 2620714
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit Hight.imil RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Dual
Cyanide, Reactive NO 10.7
Sample ID: LCS-R109221
SampType: LCS
TestCode: Cyanlde,Rea Units: mg/Kg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109221
Client ID: LCSS
Batch I0: R109221
TestNo: SW9014
Analysis Date: 2/6/2020
SegNo: 2620715
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK RefVal
%REC Lowlimil HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Cyanide, Reactive NO 12.5 10.00 0 96.9 85 110
Sample ID: RLC-R109221
SampType: RLC
TestCode: Cyanide,Rea Units: mg/Kg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109221
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R109221
TestNo: SW9014
Analysis Date: 2/612020
SegNo: 2620717
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK RefVal
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Dual
Cyanide, Reactive NO 12.1 05000 0 125 50 150
Sample ID: 20011287-OOBAMS
SampType: MS
TestCode: Cyanide,Rea Units: mg/Kg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109221
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch 10: R109221
TestNo: SW9014
Analysis Date: 216/2020
SegNo: 2620724
Analyle
Result
PQL SPKvalue SPKRefVal
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPDRefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Dual
le, Reactive NO 12.1 10,00 0 95.3 81.6 122
Qualifiiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitati on range
H
Holding times for preparation or anall
J Anal ytedetected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
NO Not Detected
P Second column cordirmati on exceeds
PL
Original
Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL Reporting Detection Limit
S
Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 27 of 32

-� � �, � Srrnmdl f�3rrrcnnr.rrenlnl Technologies. Inc.
3310 IViu St.
ENVI110M.1 4TAL trCIM01.01.1., trtc Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Anntyllent tnbonnfaHrf TEL: [phone] FAY, [phone]
1f'ehcile: hllec �irarm..eellekram
QC SUMMARY REPORT
W09: 20011551
13-Feb-20
Client: Synagro
Project: 111tchlD: R109221
Sample ID: 20011287.008AMS
SampType: MS
TeslCode: Cyanide,Rea Units: mglKg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109221
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R109221
Tes1No: SW9014
Analysis Dale: 216/2020
SegNo: 2620724
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit Highlimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qua]
Sample ID: 20011287-008AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode: Cyanlde,Rea Units: mglKg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109221
Client ID: BalchQC
Batch ID: R109221
TestNo: SW9014
Analysis Date: 21612020
SegNo: 2620725
Ana(yte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl imit Highlimit RPD Ref Va(
%RPD RPDLimil Qual
Cyanide, Reactive ND 12.1 10.00 0 96.2 81.6 122 0 0 5
Qualifiierc 8 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anall
I Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual lntebaaton used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected P Second column co�mcati.on exceeds Pi. Pennit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Repotting Detection Limit S Spike B.ccovery outside accepted rem
Page 28 of 32

5uM10111 SuuurNrlrwlrnsurrntnlTecblrologier/rrc.
E3310 IVb R..
BNVI8Ur0aYNTALTftTiroot.UAIG7,iNC CutwhogaFW4 ON,, 44223
Art,tfyfleal Laboreforlep TEI.: (330) 253.82111 €X: [phone]
IlreOsih^ blro:/iu�rnr.xelrck-error
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Wolff: 20011551
13-Feb-2f!
Client: Synagro
Project: BatchlD: R109223
Sample ID: 20011287.008AMS
SampType: MS
TestCcde: Suffide,React Units: mg/Kg
Prep Date:
Run No: 109223
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R109223
TestNo: SW9034
Analysis Date: 211612020
SegNo: 2620766
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD RefVal
%RPD RPDLimit Quai
Sulfide, Reactive 4580 25.0 4800 0 95.4 80 120 H
Sample ID: 20011287-008AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode: Sulfide,React Units: mg/Kg
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109223
Client ID: BatchQC
Balch 10: R109223
TestNo: SW9034
Analysis Date: 211612020
SegNo: 2620767
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sulfide, Reactive 4540 25.0 4800 0 94.6 80 120 4580 0.877 30 H
Qunlifilers: 8 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank L Vaiuc above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal)
3 Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC value is bdmv Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected P Second column confirmation exceeds Pl. Permit Limit Original
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted reco
Page 29 of 32

S V MMI't Srunuril Lm7mmnerrtnl TerAno310W, iu Sf. irm.
33101YQC SUMMARY REPORT
ffIENblllUNMLNiAi tecMxataCrT-3, INCCn3nlragn Fn1G; Olrio 44223
WOtt: 20011551
Annly0cal Loborednrlps TFJ,- [phone] FiLY. [phone]
Webslle: hNn:. •Irmsellek.cmn 13-Pe&20
Client: Synagro
Project: liatclill): R109223
Sample ID: MB-R109223
SampType: MBLK
TestCode: Sulfide,React Units: mg1L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 109223
Client ID: PBW
Match ID: R109223
Tes1No- SW9034
Analysis Date: 2116/2020
SegNo: 2620758
Analyte
Result
POL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sulfide, Reactive ND 25.0
Sample ID: LCS-R109223
SampType: LCS
TestCede: Sulfide,Reac1 Units- rngJL
Prep pate:
RunNo: 109223
Client ID: LCSW
Match ID: R109223
TestNo: SW9034
Analysis Date- 211612020
SegNo: 2620759
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
° RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sulfide, Reactive 4560 25-0 4800 0 95.0 85 115
Qualifiers: 11 Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H I lolding times for preparation or anal?
1 Analyte detected belocvquantitation limits M Manual Lttcgration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ND Not Detected P Second column continuation exceeds Pt, Permit Limit
Original
R JLPD outside accepted recovery limits RL ReponingDetection limit S Spikettecovezy outside accepted reco
Page 30 of 32

SaO��f��
S�G[�fySa�
f�
uOultguo7 3o iagtunH
aAljHAddBdJ�
�a14N aul�R=Ma'+IV�V `aBPnIS�'iS
00-0 'PMbjj-1 'PIIoS-q -.Yljleku
i�isadwo�
1
G
C--p
k
z
d]]
d
J
i/)
'"
v
0
u
c�
E
m
r
age 31 of 32

SUMMIT Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win Sr.
ENVIIT0fll 0J1`AL TCL`NN01,11CIES. Mr Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Sample Log -in Check List
AnolVNcal Lalioratbrhs TEL: [phone],A : [phone]
01ebsite: hum,iinviv.sellek.com
Client Name: SYN-NC-27028 Work Order Number: 20011551 RcptNo: 1
Logged by: John A.Semenik
Completed By: John A.Semenik
Reviewed By: Jennifer Woolf
1/24/2020 10:20:00 AM
1/24/2020 3:16:26 PM
1/31/2020 3:26:00 PM
Chain of CustodU
1. Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Present ❑
2, How was the sample delivered? UPS
Log In
3, Coolers are present? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
4, Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes ❑ No ❑
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Present❑
No. Seal Date: Signed By:
5. Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes d❑ No ❑ NA ❑
6. Were all samples received at a temperature of >0° C to 6.0°C Yes d❑ No ❑ NA ❑
7. Sample(s) in proper container(s)?
Yes
d❑
No ❑
8. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
Yes
d❑
No ❑
g, Are samples (except VOA and ONG) properly preserved?
Yes
d❑
No ❑
10. Was preservative added to bottles?
Yes
❑
No d❑ NA ❑
11, Is the headspace in the VOA vials less than 1/4 inch or 6 mm?
Yes
❑
No ❑ No VOA Vials❑
12, Were any sample containers received broken?
Yes
❑
No d❑
13, Does paperwork match bottle labels?
Yes
d❑
No ❑
(Note discrepancies on chain of custody)
14, Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody?
Yes
No ❑
15. Is it clear what analyses were requested?
Yes
❑
No ❑
16, Were all holding times able to be met?
Yes
❑
No ❑
(If no, notify customer for authorization.)
Special Handling (if applicable)
17, Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order?
Yes
❑
No ❑ NA d❑
Person Notified: Date:
By Whom: Via: ❑ eMaii ❑ Phone ❑ Fax ❑ In Person
Regarding:
Client Instructions:
18. Additional remarks:
Cooler Information
Not Pre:
Seal No
Page 32 of 32

Waypoint..
ANALYTICAL
4/15/2020
Synagro Central LLC/ Siler City
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 20-097-0001
Project Description: Siler City
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 4/6/2020 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method, Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method, Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and NELAC unless otherwise indicated.
Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated, This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
PM• or 607-
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratoty's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratoty's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Page 1 of 6

Waypoint-(D
ANALYTICAL
Report Number: 20-097-0001
Client Project Description: Siler City
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Lab No
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected
Date Received
Method
Lab ID
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
SM-4S00-NH3C
WP MTN
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
9045D
WP MTN
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
4500NO3F-2011
WP MTN
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
6010D
WP MTN
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
SW-7471B
WP MTN
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
WP MTN
70952
Siler City
Solids
04/02/2020 10:05
04/06/2020
SM-2540G
WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 2 of 6

0
Waypoint, 7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-94010 Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
46490
Synagro Central LLC/ Siler City Ryan Copeland
Mary Brewer Project Slier City Report Date 04/1S/2020
284 Boger Road Information Received : 04/06/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Ryan Copeland
Report Number : 20-097-0001 REPORTOF ANALYSIS Agronomist
mistMcGiy
Agronomist
Lab No : 70952 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : Siler City Sampled: 4/2/2020 10:05
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Moisture
97.3
%
0.010
1
04/07/201615
ADM
SM-2S40G
Test
Results
Units
MQL
DF
Date / Time
By
Analytical
Analyzed
Method
Ammonia Nitrogen
5960
mg/Kg - dry
3700
1
04/1S/20 14:00
JPJ
SM-4S00-NH3C
Nitrate +Nitrite-N
1490
mg/Kg - diy
178
1
04/13/20 14:01
ZBD
4SOONO3F-2011
Organic N
60400
mg/Kg - dry
9260
1
04/13/20 14:00
CALCULATION
pH
6.4
S.U.
1
04/13/20 OS;39
JSL
904SD
Total Solids
2.66
%
0.010
1
04/07/20 HAS
ADM
SM-2S40G
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
66300
mg/Kg - dry
9260
1
04/13/20 14:00
JPJ
oM-4S00-NH3C-TKlN
Phosphorus
17500
mg/Kg - diy
18S
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Aluminum
51500
mg/Kg - dry
18S
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Arsenic
<18.5
mg/Kg - dry
18.5
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Calcium
11300
mg/Kg - diy
926
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Cadmium
<3,70
mg/Kg - dry
3.70
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Chromium
16.3
mg/Kg - dry
9,26
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Copper
270
mg/Kg - diy
9.26
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Iron
34000
mg/Kg - dry
18S
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Lead
<11.1
mg/Kg - dry
11.1
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Magnesium
1570
mg/Kg - dry
18S
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Manganese
1050
mg/Kg - dry
18.5
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Qualifiers/ DF
Dilution Factor
L
Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL
Method Quantitation Limit
Page 3 of 6

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46490
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Siler City Ryan Copeland
Mary Brewer Project Siler City Report Date : 04/15/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Received : 04/06/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By ; Ryan Copeland Pauric McGroary
Report Number :20-097-0001 REPORTOFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 70952 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : Slier City Sampled: 4/2/2020 10:05
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury
<0.548
mg/Kg - dry
0.548
1
04/08/20 11:45
DDB
SW-7471B
Molybdenum
<9.26
mg/Kg - dry
9.26
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Nickel
21.3
mg/Kg - dry
9.26
t
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Potassium
3460
mg/Kg - dry
185
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Selenium
<18.5
mg/Kg - dry
18.5
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Sodium
4960
mg/Kg - dry
926
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Zinc
485
mg/Kg - dry
46.3
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Sulfur
6040
mg/Kg - dry
185
1
04/08/20 20:46
TJS
6010D
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 4 of 6

(D
WayplRint
7621 Whltepine Road, Richmond, VA23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
AYTICAL
www.waypointanalytical.com
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number: 46490
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/ Siler City
Report Number: 20-097-0001
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex 0 US Postal 0 Lab
0 Other:
is UPS 0 Client 0 Courier
Thermometer ID:
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
I* Yes
0 No
Number of coolers/boxes received
IT-1
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
0 Yes
0 No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No Not Present
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
0 Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes
0 No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Yes
0 No
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 — compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No N/A
High concentration container (48 hr)
F_ Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions Included?
0 Yes
No
Comments: —
Signature: 113randi Watson
Date
& Time: 04/0612020 10:29:38
Page 5 of 6

SAMPLING LOG #
PROJECT MANAGER: -
Phone: ( 336 ) 60 ` " �N
Svnaaro Central LLC: Sifer ON
Siler city
20-097-0001
Aso CHAIN OF CUSTODY
04062020
10:27:20 RECORD & ANALYSIS
RECORD
i attest mat me proper field sampling procedures
were used daring fFre caif1wdon of (hose samples
y� CQPWWVD
A do L CUSTOMER SAMPLING SAMPLE # OF SAMPLING METHOD METHOD
LAB # SA19PLE I.D. LOCATION TYPE CONTAINERS DATE TIME PRESERVED SHIPPED
Relinquished by Sampler. Date Time Redeved by: REMARKS:
Rft COPIELA00 045
Relinquished by: Time Re leved by:
W-5
Relinquished by.
Time
M
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-r""
PO#:
J 0� For ' " C., monitoring purposes,
ESIAl
SAMPLE
ANALYSIS REQUEST
l'D'
SL1
SL2
I NHS!
NO,N
IJr�anl
Cd
+ CP
NI
Pb
As
Hg
I Se
pH
C.8�
��
Mo
Cl
NOQ-N
SL1: Total Solids (Molst n), Total l9eldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potawfurn
SL2: Basic Test SLi plus Sulfur, Calcium, Magnesium, Sodium, Iron, Alurninum, Manganese, Copper and Zinc
T
Ns,
0
ro

Contact: Ryan Copeland
Client: Synagro
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC 27028
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Page 1
Report Date: 4/14/2020
Project: Siler City
Date Sample Rcvd: 4/3/2020
Meritech Work Order #
04032031 Sample: Siler City 1 Grab
4/3/20
Parameters
Results Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
% Total Solids
1.65 % 4/7/20
0-100 %
SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge)
6,061 col/gdrywt 4/3/20
130 col/g dry wt
SM 9222D
Meritech Work Order #
04032032 Sample: Siler City 2 Grab
4/3/20
Parameters
Results Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
%Total Solids
2.04 % 4/7/20
0-100 %
SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge)
8,467 col/g dry wt 4/3/20
130 col/g dry wt
SM 9222D
Meritech Work Order #
04032033 Sample: Siler City 3 Grab
4/3/20
Parameters
Results Analysis Date
ReportingRpporting Limit
Method
% Total Solids
2.25 % 4/7/20
0-100 %
SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge)
6,869 col/gdry wt 4/3/20
130 col/gdrywt
SM 9222D
Meritech Work Order #
04032034 Sample: Siler City 4 Grab
4/3/20
Parameters
Results Analysis Date
Rep-o
Method
% Total Solids
3.25 % 4/7/20
0-100 %
SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge)
4,755 col/g drywt 4/3/20
130 col/g dry wt
SM 9222D
Meritech Work Order # 04032035 Sample: Siler City 5 Grab 4/3/20
Parameters Results Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method
% Total Solids 3.30 % 4/7/20 0-100 % SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge) 6,061 col/gdrywt 4/3/20 130 col/g dry wt SM 9222D
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

LIN"41
Contact: Ryan Copeland
Client: Synagro
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC 27028
Meritech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No.165
Page 2
Report Date: 4/14/2020
Project: Siler City
Date Sample Rcvd: 4/3/2020
Meritech Work Order # 04032036 Sample: Siler City 6 Grab 4/3/20
Parameters Results Analysis Date RW. orting Limit Method
%Total Solids 3.26 % 4/7/20 0-100 % SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge) 5,020 col/gdry wt 4/3/20 130 col/g drywt SM 9222D
Meritech Work Order # 04032037 Sample: Siler City 7 Grab 4/3/20
Parameters Results Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method
%Total Solids 3.26 % 4/7/20 0-100 % SM 2540B
Fecal Coliform (Sludge) 6,414 col/g dry wt 4/3/20 130 col/g drywt SM 9222D
1 hereby certify that (have reviewed and approve these data. "Mk U-k-'
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

5-9-201b Chain of Custody Record (COC) _
NPDES#:
Client: 57��f�-Phone: � dv�
AddFax:
L� �ck5vi�-�- IJC- Email: �C'-PcuwCc SV'tp7z'o [ oM
Project: 1L&L C,y
pp P.O.#:
Attention: (,Cc-,ANO Turn Around Time*
How would you like your report sent? *RUSH work needs prior approval.
Circle all that apply: mail preferred), Fax, Mail Std 10 s) 5�ai{s 24
� M E R ITECH, INC.�
V' ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
642TamcoRd. Phone: [phone]
Reidsville NC 27320 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
www.meritechlabs.com
Sample Location and/or 1 D #
Sampling Dates & Times
Person Taking Sample (Sign/Print): Nfo 0ceLAAnLab�Use
Only
�
Start
End
Comp?
Grab?
# of
Cont.
Test
(s)
Required
On Ice? s
/ No
pH OK?
CI OK?
Date
Time
_ Date
Time
3
3>
F7
s
r
3s
F7..................
'-TT.
................ 7
37
I
Temperature Upon Receipt:
�r
Method of
Dechlorination (<0.5 ppm) of Ammonia, Cyanide, Phenol and TKN samples must be done in the field prior to preservation.***
Shipment:
Comments:
Compositor #
J UPS
IJug#
U /Fed Ex
Are these results f or regulatory purposes? Yes No ❑
Report results in: mg/L ❑ mg/kg ❑ ug/L Ll
Hand Delivery
Relinquished by: 6� /' _ rc- Lq� Date: 1 /3/Zo Time: 13 ZU
v (� 1
Received by: Date: Time:
U Other
Relinquished by: Date: Time:
Received by: Date: Time:
Relinquished by: Date: Time:
Rec ' ed by Lab i �� ��lC Date: Time: 1

snerCity wastetreatmentPiantLab. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE (SOUR)
Date Sample Taken .7y Analysis Done By 94
Time Taken ;::;2 ; 10 AM f Aerated from AM/PM to AM/PM
By Whom 4314 Aeration Time — (Must be < 2 hrs.)
Temperature When Taken 20 °C Analysis Start Time e9:-q0
Location of Sample : (Circle One) Digester A or D' ester B r road)
NOTE: Temperature should be between 10°C and 30°C Aeration required if DO is < 5
% Total Solids
Place 25 gms. to 50 gms. of sample
for % total solids @ 30 mis.
SAMPLE #1
Dish #
mis. 3l�
Wt. of Dish,g } . a t4 6 Q)
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g _^3:3 .1J.` j
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g 72 r 3 S g U
SAMPLE #2
Dish #
mis. 3�
Wt. ofDish,g /, 9 ,,�te15,
Wt.of Wet sample+Dish,g
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g
Placed in 103-105 degrees C oven @ _ I: -
Taken out of oven @
Drying time hrs. min,
Placed In dessicator & weighed .
% TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt, of Dried residue + dish --Wt. of Dish . x 1000 (x 100 )
Wt. of Wet sample +dish,g. -Wt. of Dish,g. x 1000
Sample #1 %Total Solids=
Sample #2 % Total Solids=
R,:3.�VO--
2,;?^ &511 - /.,s
�..: 5 r3 � •— lr�� le �
�� 4�'fcC •— 149��
30r.001-1 3
ores i �IOCiJ )t�

SilercityWastetreatmentPlant Lab. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE (SOUR)
Date Sample Taken _ q- 2 - 2 0 Analysis Done By 84
Time Taken _ _ Q: oci A M ' Aerated from --- AM/PM to -- AMIPM
By Whom i3if _ Aeration Time (Must he < 2 hrs.)
Temperature When Taken ;2 i il °C Analysis Start Time ? : C 5- rM
Location of Sample : (Circle One) ester ' r Digester B(near road)
NOTE: Temperature should be between 10°C and 30°C Aeration required if DO is < 5
TEMP.°C
TIME(min)
<>=<
DOReading(mpnl
% Total Solids
Start=20.
0
'7.5
Place 25 gms. to 50 gms. of sample
1
7.Y3
for % total solids @ 30 mis.
2
Le
3
SAMPLE #1
4
] , j
Dish # j
5
7. C 41
mis. 3y
6
Mid.=,r'O.di
7
Cr.�tJ
Wt. ofDish,gi
is
$
.73
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g 31. y93
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dlsh,g• �d
10
11
,14
SAMPLE #2
12
Dish # ;2
13
ZZ
mis.�
...........14
.
;
End= 7Q.'
15
i
Wt, of Dlsh,g
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g ._31, 5 e 13 _
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dlsh,g 7
Placed in 103-105 degrees C oven @ .; /0
Taken out of oven @ nrr-,
Drying time F�Lhrs. D min.
Placed in dessicator & weighed .
(o TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt. of Dried residue + dish - Wt, of Dish . x 1000 ( x 100 )
Wt. of Wet sample +dish,g. -Wt. of Dish,g. x 1000
Sample #1 %Total Solids= 1 3! 1
,31,q�5'�- 1,�.3iI
Sample #2 % Total Solids= ,
- 5 0j :3 - �, s' '.j j
d-.5- 71 Q'9"
4�y 1I9go

sflerCity wastetreatmentPlant Leb. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE (SOUR)
Date Sample Taken `f ? 7'V) Analysis Done By 3,14
Time Taken :'? :1�5- A Aerated from AM/PM to AM/PM
By Whom Aeration Time (Must he < 2 hrs.)
Temperature When Taken — °C _ Analysis Start Time
Location of Sample ; (Circle One) Digester A or(ti ester B n> road)
NOTE: Temperature should be between 10°C and 30°C Aeration required if DO is < 5
% Total Solids
Place 25 gms. to 50 gms. of sample
for % total solids @ 30 mis.
SAMPLE #1
Dish #
mis. 3G
Wt. of Dish,g '. ; P, ' [1� _
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g 3,2.
Wt. of Dried Residue+ Dish,g,J:�
SAMPLE #2
Dish #
mis. 30
Wt, of Dish,g 9- u q :!�
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g 3�� f G :5 5
Wt. of Dn'ed Residue + Dish,9 Lo .11 f7
Placed in 103-105 degrees C oven @
Taken out of oven @
Drying time hrs.—
Placed in dessicator & weighed .
% TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt. of Dried residue + dish,g - Wt. of Dish,q. x 1000 x 100 )
Wt. of Wet sample +dish,g. -Wt. of Dish,g, x 1000
Sample #1 %Total Solids=
Sample #2 % Total Solids=
193 -- 2. ���P 1 .3b,19g5-
?,C��?�O .�.a4z5 Y d57S5-
/� = �`

sflercitywastetreatment Piantl.ab. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE (SOUR)
Date Sample Taken '"t"it.-.aD Analysis Done By
Time Taken � . AM,-W Aerated from AMI o 'I -1, AMO!0
By Whom b- Aeration Time 6; 4-- (Must be < 2 hrs.)
Temperature When Taken a1" _°C Analysis Start Time
Location of Sample : (Circle One) cEigester r Digester B(near road)
NOTE: Temperature should be between 10°C and 30°C Aeration required if DO is < 5
% Total Solids
Place 25 gms. to 50 gms. of sample
for % total solids @ 30 mis.
SAMPLE #1
Dish #
mis.
'3 0
Wt. of Dish,g 1 .1 S 4 L)
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g . '3 a : y t�� ,L' 3
'7 Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g 12. 7.3 k
SAMPLE #2
Dish #
mis.
2
10
Wt. of Dish,g / . $ J
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g G 3 3
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g _ 2,YL 6 b
Placed in 103-105 degrees C oven @ '3"'4
Taken out of ove (—
Drying timers. min.
Placed in dessicator & weighed .
Yo TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt. of Dried residue + dish,g- Wt. of Dish.q x 1000 (x 100 )
Wt. of Wet sample +dish,g. -Wt. of Dish,g. x 1000
Sample #1 %Total Solids=
36.611 9
Sample #2 % Total Solids=
lkj 1. q 90

m*,City w�°�m��Plant Lab. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE '\
Date Sample Taken
_
��
Ana�o�Done By ~�;
Time Taken
l
AM&Aerated
from '�T
By Whom
Aeration Time uutbe<2hro.)
Temperature When Taken 20
CIC
Analysis Start Time �
Location ofSample : (Circle
One) Digester omrroad)
NOTE: Temperature should be bobmoon 1O,C and
30"C Aeration required if DO is < 5
96 Total Solids
TEMP.00
TIME(min)
Reading (rng�)
Place 25gmo.ho5Ogmo.ofsample
for 96 \nbe| solids @3O m|o.
3
SAMPLE#1
Dioh#
m|o.
Wt. o[nISn.9
Wt.of Wet nample+oish.0
Wt. n/Dried Residue +oish.g 2.
10
SAMPLE#2
�12
Dish #
13
MIS.
14
15
Wt. mDish u
7-777
�L rNw�num�e+0d`g
w/,vrDried Residue +oinh.0
Placed in 103'105degr
Taken out nf opn @
'Zhm.
Drying time 0min.
Placed in deooicatnr&weighed .
% TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt. of Dried residue + dish, Wt. of Dish,(
�
Sample #1 %T�o Sn�o 2��� '�- i^2~k» S '�66 q1
Sample hQ96Total SnUdo= 63.11 ,~"�� ��
/°�_
-- `---~—�-- ^`°v � --------~'--^
/�^/^7
AV
/~°/ '»

SilerCllyWasletreatmentPlant Lab. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE (SOUR)
Date Sample Taken tI ' Zq A'' Analysis Done By
Time Taken i o .. 10 wpm Aerated from AM/PM to AM/PM
By Whom 6!4�? Aeration Time — (Must be < 2 hrs.)
Temperature When Taken 7,0 °C Analysis Start Time 10!114!}m
Location of Sample : (Circle One) Digester A o k�oica
ear road)
NOTE: Temperature should be between 10' Aeration required if DO is < 5
% Total Solids
Place 25 gms, to 50 gms. of sample
for % total solids @ 30 mis.
SAMPLE #1
Dish # 1
mis. _ .�t
Wt. of Dlsh,g t. S x (a 7
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g .31 el 9 U
Wt. of Dried Resldu e + Dish,g `Z .20:3
SAMPLE #2
Dish # .2,
mis. '30 r"
Wt. of Dish,g 1 c I q.13
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g .3i j r 64) 1 2�
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g a 316% 1
Placed in 103-105 degrees C oven @ 0 Ai►Z
Taken out of oven @ y `,2G ?rA
Drying time 4 hrs. 45 min.
Placed in dessicator & weighed .
% TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt. of Dried residue + dlsh,g - Wt. of Dish,g. x 1000 (x 100 )
Wt. of Wet sample +dish,g. -Wt. of Dish,g. x 1000
Sample #1 %Total Solids= 2' y Z a s +' g 2 (o S
31, eIclo1 - I . g %-_
D.6gW
---.4 (1 oov)
3o.1bIto
Sample #2 % Total Solids--
-1W 29114`1
j1g1'`/0
AV ),91x

Slier City Wastetreatment Plant Lob. SPECIFIC OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE (SOUR)
Date Sample Taken 7 - I -7-0 Analysis Done By 6
Time Taken C? !� AM M Aarated from AM/PM to AM/PM
By Whom 16.5Aeration Time -- (Must be < 2 hrs.)
Temperature When Taken _ Iri °C Analysis Start Time GI : Hy Am
Location of Sample : (Circle One) Digester A o Di ester B ear road)
NOTE: Temperature should be between 10"C and 30°C Aeration required if DO is < 5
% Total Solids
Place 25 gms. to 50 gms. of sample
for % total solids @ 30 mis.
SAMPLE #1
Dish # _
mis. 130
Wt. of Dish,g
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g -21
SAMPLE #2
Dish #
mis. -30
Wt. of Dish,g I ' % Z(a
Wt.of Wet sample +Dish,g 3 i , 5Z09
Wt. of Dried Residue + Dish,g .2,Y36 Cyr
Placed In 103-105 degrees C oven @ _Jp : GyA01
Taken out of oven @ ly, 10 Pm
Drying time .6—_hrs. /O min.
Placed in desslcator & weighed .
Xo TOTAL SOLIDS = Wt. of Dried residue + dishg - Wt. of Dish . x 1000 (x 100 )
Wt. of Wet sample +dish,g. -Wt. of Dish,g. x 1000
Sample #1 %Total Solids=
Sample #2 % Total Solids-
�i�S�v9- fr9ya �
d, r ��
G C�
OT, 7ra q 7
5 ciao -vz f,
N, c,,793
.I)*,,, .© V.

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checldist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one or•ieinal and two copies of the application and
suoporting documentation
For more inrormation, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section 'sNon-Dischar gY� aft;g Unit
General — This certification provides detailed information of receiving sites for land application of Class B residuals (may include
water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review
without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16 or FORM: SDR 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted,the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies oftlre application and supportingdocuincntation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) fort". Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this f orrn. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachment s
to the application may be rnade,a s long as the a tta chrnents are numbered to correspond to the section and itern to which they
refer.
® For new or renewed pennits, submit therequcsted inf6rmationforall landapplication sites.
® For modified pennits, submit the requested information for only those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the
proposed modification,
B. Land Application Site information:
® The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in table I. The
status categories and their corresponding codes areas follows:
♦ New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) ♦ Transferred (T) ♦ Deleted (D)
® Attach the following in accordance with each status code:
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
County Board
Notifica tion. doc
Land Owner
Agreernent
(If applicable)
r_v,'-
✓
✓
✓
✓
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An upda ted vicinity/setback ma p in a ccordance with the "Mao Guidance
✓
✓
✓
for Residuals Land Anylication_Permits"
A soils and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
✓
Evaluation Policy"
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page l of 3

updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative
pollutant loadinAn
rates CPLRs)
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indicated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
✓
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil map requirements in the "Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not
✓
be permitted to multiple Pcrmittccs over the same tune criod)
This item may be required for land application site with a status code "NI", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining; attachment requirements.
® Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the periit (five years).
® Predominant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment "B" of the existing pennit, or
nameofthesoil series asprovidedbythe licensed soil scientist.
® Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of cacti
site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please
note that the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct
mappnrgunit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly:
® For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
infornation on both the soil series name a nd the slope of the soil), the Applicant may detenninc the represents tive slope
by using the average slope provided in the County Soil Survey (or equivalent). A soil type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have representative slope of 6%.
® New Sites to be permitted must havcslopes determined as pa►t of the soils report prepared bya licensed soil scientist.
® Acceptable methods for determining location coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) and their cor,esponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching(ADD)
• Aeria 1 Photography with Ground Control (AER)
• Ca dastralSmvey(SUR)
• Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEO)
• LORAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Conversion from Coordinate Plane (CP) • Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Conversion fi-om Township -Section -Range (TSR) • Remote Sensing (RS)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Merc (UTM) • Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
• Map Interpretation by Digita 1 or Manual Extraction (MAP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications hrformation: (new sites only)
® Use an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the
residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each
map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, theidentificd location, and be of clear and reproducible qua ity.
® Surface water body classifications information may be found at: lrttp://deq.nc.p-ov/about/divisions/watcr-
tesaurceslnlamnine/classification standards/classifications
® Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
® A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
htt :/n /deq,nc,gov/contact/re6onaj-offices
® General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waterbodieswith assigned
subba sins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
1. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map (an 8.5 x 1 1-inch sheet showingthe project area
should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whethera Stream classification was completed).
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see
Table 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as
"UT to sh•eam rrame" as the waterbody name.
3. Open the link httR:/Ideg.ne.g ov/about/divisions/water-resources/planninyJclassificat ion-standards/classifications.
® Stream Classification Process: One of the optionsbelow may be used depending on the known initial project information.
® KNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select proper basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically a s this will provide
the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 2 of 3

2. Locate then a in e of the identified waterbody(from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The tenn
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classificationsapplicable to the project.
® KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select the proper county from the List all Waterbodies in county,hydrologically report.
2.Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same watcrbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The terin
"source" in the description means the beginning of the wa terbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
® UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clicka ble basin map to hydrologically soiled list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring tip the hydrologically soiled list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the reporl, select and verify the location description. The teen
"source" in the description means the beginning of the wa terbody segment (most upstream point).
5. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
® Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15ANCAC 0213.0301 i .
N Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications canies the same classification as tha t assigned
to the stream seginent to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaterstributary to tidalsaltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) a fter November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" finless case -by -case reclassification proceedings are conducted.
N The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or forspecific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassce River Basin
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classificd "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Basin And Savannah
River Drainage Area
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Such streams in the Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified "B Tr."
French Broad River
Basin
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B."
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the Statcof Tennessee are classified "C."
Broad River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina arc classified "C."
New River Basin
Strca ms entering the State ofTennessee are classified "C."
Catawba RiverBasin
Streamsentering South Carolina arc classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Roanoke River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr
Reservoir and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or
described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North
Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the
classification "C and B."
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C."
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw." except the main drainage
I canalstoPain licoSound and itsbayswhich shall be classified "SC."
Pas uotankRiverBasin
I All drainage canalsnotnoted in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 3 of 3

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Synatrro Western Piedmont RLAP
Land application sites currently certified: 813.6 net acres and Total to be certified: 377.6 net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Code'
Site/Field
ID
Landowners
O
Lessees or Operator(s)
O
Net Acres
Count y
Crop(s) s
pO
Predominant Soil
Series Name y
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope,
N
RC-49-01
Ann Purgason
21.2
Rockingham
Pasture
Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-02
Bennett Farms LLC
10.7
Rockingham
Row Crop
Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-03
Bennett Farms LLC
7.4
Rockingham
Hay
Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-04
Bennett Farms LLC
10.7
Rockingham
Hay
Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-05
Bennett Farms LLC
8.7
Rockingham
Row Crop
Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-06
Bennett Farms LLC
5.8
Rockingham
Hay
Clifford
CgB2
N
HA-47-1
James W. Pope
19.2
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyA
N
HA-47-2
James W. Pope
9.9
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyA
N
HA-47-3
James W. Pope
11.0
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyB
N
HA-47-4
James W. Pope
4.3
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyB
N
CH-78-1
Bobby Branch
66.4
Chatham
Pasture
Cid-Lignum
CmB
N
CH-78-2
Bobby Branch
40.7
Chatham
Pasture
Cid-Lignum
CmB
N
CH-78-3
Bobby Branch
57.6
Chatham
Pasture
Cid-Lignum
Cm.B
N
CH-78-5
Bobby Branch
65.5
Chatham
Pasture
Georgeville
GeB2
N
CH-73-10
Doug Ellis
38.5
Chatham
Hay
Georgeville
GeB2
N
N
N
N
N
Status Code for land application
sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦
R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred)
♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
C Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
H. WATCRBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Current and Proposed
P
Class
RC-49-01
36° 17' 22"
79° 57' 26"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-3 1-1
C
C
RC-49-02
36° 17' 22.4"
79° 57' 67'
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-3 1-1
C
C
RC-49-03
36° 17' 22.3"
790 56' 54.4"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-3 1-1
C
C
RC-49-04
360 17' 17.8"
790 56' 53.9"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-3 1-1
C
C
RC-49-05
360 17' 12.5"
7Q0 57' 6.2"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-3 1-1
C
C
RC-49-06
360 17' 23"
790 57' 12.7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Holans Creek, 22-3 1-1
C
C
HA-47-1
350 34' 41"
780 74' 88"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Second Silver Run, 18-20-33-1
WS-Iv
WS-Iv
HA-47-2
350 20' 52"
780 44' 55"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Second Silver Run, 18-20-33-1
WS-Iv
WS-Iv
HA-47-3
350 34' 97"
78° 74' 70"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Cape Fear River, 18-(16.7)
WS-Iv
WS-Iv
HA-47-4
350 35' 22"
780 74' 67"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Cape Fear River, 18-(16.7)
WS-Iv
WS-Iv
CH-78-1
350 37' 13.5"
790 21' 46.7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Sandy Branch, 17-43-16-1
C
C
CH-78-2
350 36' 53.3"
790 22' 21.7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Sandy Branch, 17-43-16-1
C
C
CH-78-3
350 37' 11.9"
790 22' 7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Sandy Branch, 17-43-16-1
C
C
CH-78-5
350 40' 27.9"
790 22' 18.4"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Tick Creek, 17-43-13
C
C
CH-73-10
350 40' 77"
790 27' 50.2"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Tick Creek, 17-43-13
C
° , "
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (II.) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Pacre 2

GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 4,000`
4,000' 0 4,000'
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
N C-RC-49
Fields 1-6

APPLICATION MAP
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA UNSUITABLE AREA
— —�— — — PRIVATE ROAD OW WATER
STREAM ONSITE HOUSE
GRAPHIC SCALE
DRAIN OFFSITE HOUSE
"_
FENCE OUTBUILDING 660'
0 660'
PROPERTY LINE WELL
SOIL BORING
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
N C-RC`49
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area, All
locations are approximate.
Fields 1-6

1
l
5
l
f
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=800'
800, 0 800,
j 5 �
1I a i
� J
i f'—
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area, The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NO 04
Fields 1-6

SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 660`
sso' 0 sso'
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area, The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area, All
locations are approximate.
N C- RC-49
Fields 1-6

nWg
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a cliecklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will lielp produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for (lie
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant sliall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
FO;- lore inf))rmalion, visit the Water Qarctlily Permitting Section's Non-Dischmye Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between (he Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T •1100. Do not
submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA O6.16):
Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
(�] Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
[� A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's came: !IMrkCV-o We�T icz hereinafter referred referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
(Yes/no)
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional)
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
e
ToLs e-
AjA Fe-eek
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, Rill use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement sliall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
sliall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

1, STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2, Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise pernut the use of the land application sitc(s) to a third ptu•ty, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section II) are met.
4, Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification firom the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the
land application sitc(s).
6, The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals
land application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pit of the land application sitc(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final
soil pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for
the specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of
nutrients (e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land
application events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application sitc(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
II. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land
application sitc(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the
posting of signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sitc(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that tu'e to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land
application events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be hauvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-
month period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface f'or four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food craps with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals arc applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
IILALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105(h) allows the
compliance boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance
boundary provided the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
AA re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) 1D: T-C-46i - 1
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance bounday and attach a map showing the newly proposed
compliance boundary to the application package)
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: is currently permitted under another
residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ: The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this
agreement, he/she is requesting that the ficld(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred
into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FOW: LOA 06- I6 Page 2 of 3

Landowners Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another Municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein. Landowner name: ' !' A/ Al
Address:: _ j5 '� �u -p(6
City: ZJ TEf ��5 CJtti4) '� State: rl% '� —Zip: 9,7-3.s
Phone: 3 - Q),% 70 SKI ,p y7 E-mail address:
Signature: _ �/ (l!y DaLc: —A 9 04w
NORTH CAROLINA,l _ COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that �in_Y Cif Sdy'1
personally appeared before Me this day and acknowledged the due rexecution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS My hand and official seal this the �h
day of �V'IWfh , 20 20
Signature and seal: ,WUfJ f
ROBERT N. ROTH
My commission expires: Del- NOTARY PUBLIC
GUILFORD COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State: Zip:
E-mail
Date:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: T h� / /jv Y ,kQ-6�
Signature: Date: d
FORM: I.OA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .1100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting( nit.
General This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with , SA NCAC 02T . I IOU. Do not
submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his repree1sentative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: -Ur tr:�c�Yo (jCS ��L y e-J+nnn
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field W
Lease
(yes/no)
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional)
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
-c-a�-2..�
I r��
� roc,
kv}Mid Fce-J-
� -- 4 cl — 3 . if, G
A/0
NAV
I'A 1Mij Fa;�
f
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page] of3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
f
Landowner name:
Address: / [
City: ! ! y�State: _ �� _ _ _ _ _ _ Zip: '7 5 _
Phone: Y3 E-mail address: e ►^ Y' H�' �-Cca?!01
Signature: tf/ Date:T/
NORTH CAROLINA, . tci„L� L, yCOUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that �' �161 CUtin (SJV JMVJ-�
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the co t h
day of , 20 2 fJ
Signature and seal: Kelly Dillon
Noiary Public
My commission expires: ' � am ,
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City: _ _ _ _ State: _
Phone: E-mail
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
Date:
Zip:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name:
Signature: _ 'lop— 2� _ _ _ _ Date: — 6LZ (4 /ZQ
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

SOIL DESCRIPTION SFIE, ET SYNAGRO
Project: %/i`'r� (� )I L�=��+'10i•Landowner:
Site:kr _ Field: Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): Acres (net): Crop: G r
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth
PROFILE A 4 • ,�,
Texture
;. •
Color
Structure Mottles
l
ram_
✓I
Depth to SHWT:
Depth
& type of restrictive
layer:
S oil Series:
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE B i
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Notes: 14,t h,&JG
Described By:
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
s Sand
1 Weak
I Loam
2 Moderate
si Silt
3 Strong
c Clay
Date:
Structure Tvoe
gr
Granular
abk
pl
Platy
sbk
pr
Prismatic
sg
cpr
Columnar
m
Angular Blocky
Subangular Blocky
Single Grained
Massive

SHEET SYNAGRO
SOIL DESCRIPTION SH n
1,fJ7
Project: 4142E Fow ndowner:' > r
Site: A___-- Field: Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): Acres (net): Crop: 6t ;
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure
PROFILE A A _r --7 r-L I r
Depth to SHWT: ')q
Depth & type of restrictive layer: y
Soil Series:
Mottles
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure es _
PROFILE B
�G -U o d �1 1►
1
l
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:•q'
1238 r
Soil Series: �' ��
Notes:
Described By: Date: D�
Leciend
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Type
s Sand
1 Weak
gr
Granular abk
Angular Blocky
I Loam
2 Moderate
pl
Platy sbk
Subangular Blocky
si Silt
3 Strong
pr
Prismatic sg
Single Grained
c Clay
cpr
Columnar m
Massive

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET1401
AGRO
e
,o
Project: Landowner: ,��✓ A,�:fL
Site: L Field: Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): Acres (net): Crop: j4sea-
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE A l9• r '�fe ---UA
f•k �� �_ Ile C�
Depth to SHWT: t
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Horizon Depth Texture Color
PROFILE B
Structure Mottles
� ran The
u
w
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series: 1238
Notes: ?L,Z
Described By: r Date:
`�
Le end
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Tvpe
s Sand
1 Weak
gr
Granular abk
Angular Blocky
I Loam
2 Moderate
pl
Platy sbk
Subangular Blocky
si Silt
3 Strong
pr
Prismatic sg
Single Grained
c Clay
cpr
Columnar m
Massive

NAGRO
SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: d Landowner: d�h1ca1�'_
Site: _ _ Field: Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): Acres (net): Crop:
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
PROFILE A I
PROFILE B
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive la
yer:
Soil Series:
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure Mottles
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Described By:
Date: v Ado 4 0
Legend
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Type
s Sand
1 Weak
gr
Granular abk
Angular Blocky
I Loam
2 Moderate
p1
Platy sbk
Subangular Blocky
si Silt
3 Strong
pr
Prismatic sg
Single Grained
c Clay
cpr
Columnar m
Massive

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET NAGRO
f
Project: &N n I'A.0 4 °� , A ' ''Y"J",t � ' Landowner: � I� � 1,4— ,
Site: Field: 9 Sample #: Slope:
Acres (gross): Acres (net): Crop: - Ark
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horniz�on Depth Texture Color Structure
PROFILE A ��T �� sc
8� Ili elf q
Mottles
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer: �
Soil Series: rr -,l'°tv?ofi�T
Horizon Depth Texture
Color Structure r' "
PROFILE B
De th to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Q_AtntlytA
Notes;
Described By:
Date:
Le end
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure Type
s Sand
1 Weak
gr
Granular abk Angular Blocky
I Loam
2 Moderate
pl
Platy sbk Subangular Blocky
si Silt
3 Strong
pr
Prismatic sg Single Grained
c Clay
cpr
Columnar m Massive

SOIL DESCRIPTION SHEET
Project: " BO-A 96Y
Site: r t Field: 4—
Acres (gross): Acres (net):
SYNAGR0
Landowner: 44-
a-� —
Sample #:
Slope: , 3
c
Crop.
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Horizon Depth Texture Color Structure
PROFILE A At? 15.4, 7. 4v. w
- 1L. 1+ �.
PROFILE B
Notes:
Legend
Mottles
Depth to SHWT: - �
Depth & type of restrictive layer: +�
Soil Series: 6,14b,424 Z94,2 4 ,. 1: , �Ew�eJ1.f
Horizon Depth Texture
Depth to SHWT:
Depth & type of restrictive layer:
Soil Series:
Described By:
Color Structure Mottles
Date:1W
�
Texture
Structure Grade
Structure jpe
s Sand
1 Weak
gr
Granular abk
Angular Blocky
I Loam
2 Moderate
pl
Platy sbk
Subangular Blocky
si Silt
3 Strong
pr
Prismatic sg
Single Grained
c Clay
cpr
Columnar m
Massive

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomi/ Report No. FY20-SLO31178
v I r 14 g, Client: Jim Goodwin Advisor: Nate Roth
y, , r
Heavy Metals 156 Jess Lane Synagro - PALS Account
Stokesdale, NC 27357 284 Boger Rd
Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction Mocksville, NC 27028
Sampled County : Rockingham
LinkstoHW�flInformation
Client ID: 508595 Advisor ID: 425354
Sampled: 04/10/2020 Recelved: 05/21/2020 compleied: 05/27/2020 Farm: RL-49
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routinesoiliesi information as well as heavy metals datain a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results. Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extraciani, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Note elevated lead (Pb) in samples 49.02 and 49-04. Although the above
metals here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer
recommendations. Ja athi Kamalakanihan, Agronomist, 512712020
Sample ID: 49-01
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrass/rim, M 0.0 120-200 140 20 0 0 0 $ 0 0
Note 12 Note:
2- 0.0
Test Results (units - WN In g/cm3; CEC and Na In meg1100 cm' ; NO3-N In mgldnr3): Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.09 0.93 3.8 77 0.9 5.8 4 64 49 20 270 80 65 25 25 27 0.1 3
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.3 Chromium, 0.5 Lead, 4.7 Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 49-02
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (16lacre)
More
Crop (tonslacre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.4 0 140 10 0 0 0 6 2 0
Note: 3
2- 0.0
Test Results (units - WN in g1cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3•N In mgldnr3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-1 Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3.N
0.04 0,95 5.1 78 1.1 5.6 4 70 40 31 496 32 29 8 8 20 0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.2 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.1 Chromium, 0.3 Lead, 9.6 Selenium, 0.1
North Carolina
Tk*ULO Trwt tvndCommi»Mon
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the Noah Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxier, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomll
Report No. FY20-SLO31178
Jim Goodwin
Page 2 of 4
Sample ID: 49-03
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (Iblacre)
More
Crop (tonslacre) N P205
K20
Mg S
Mn
2n Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrassfTim, M 0.0 120-200 140
110
0 0
0
$ 0
0
Note: 12 Note.
2- 0.0
Test Results [units - WN in g1cm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N In mgldnf ]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 2n.I
2n-AI Cu-I
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.13 0.92 4.9 84 0.8 6.2 3 14 46 36
79 30
32
15
15 36
0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.2
Lead, 4.3
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 49-04
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tonslacre) N P205
K20
Mg S
Mn
2n Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrassfTim, M 0.5 120-200 140
100
0 0
0
$ $
0
Note: 12 Note:
2- 0.0
Test Results [units - WN in g1cm3; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N In mgldm3jr
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 2n-I
2n-AI Cu4
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.13 0.88 4.0 71 1.2 5.5 2 21 37 30
387 15
26
20
20 25
0.1 3
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.3
Lead, 7.7
Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 49.05
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tonslacre) N P205
K20
Mg S
Mn
2n Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Soybean 0.6 0 90
20
0 0
0
0 2
0
Note: 3
2- 0.0
Test Results [units - WN in g1cm3; CEC and Na In meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 2n-I
2n-AI Cu-I
Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.18 0.93 4.6 73 1.2 5.5 20 69 44 22
445 34
30
50
50 25
0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.2
Chromium, 0.3
Lead, 3.8
Selenium, 0.1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Webslte: www.ncagr.gov/agronomit
Report No. FY20-SL031178
Jim Goodwin
Page 3 of 4
Sample ID: 49-06
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (Iblacre)
More
Crop (tonstacre) N P2O5 K2O
Mg S Mn Zn Cu H Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrasslrim, M 0.0 120-200 150 110
0 0 $ $ $
0 Note: 12Note:
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units -WN In g1cm3; CEC and Na In megf100 cm3; NO3•N in mgldm3J:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC HS% Ac pH P.l K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I
Mn-Ali Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.04 0.85 3.7 98 0.1 6.4 1 17 73 22 296 8
15 6 6 22
0.1 3
Heavy Metals (pails per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.1
Chromium, 0.3 Lead, 5.1
Selenium, 0.0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Webslte: www.ncagr.goviagronomil
Report No, FY20-SLO31178
Jim Goodwin
Page 4 o f 4
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low forthe crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
8
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting-
BS %
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at on(
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM %
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately foreach nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/ac(e unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for 8) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS -I levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index forcfop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
armers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If$, pH$, $pH, C or Z
M-O
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to Oofe: Secondary Nutrients and Micr+onutnents In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.govlagronomitpubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations forsmall areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit-m",,i.ncagrgoy/avroncn*obuad4.htmflf nd information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowners Guide to Fertilizer
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
WN
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, 8S%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-1, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-Al 1, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S4, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS-1, NO3-N (not routinely
Zn-I
zinc index
available)) indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit r+�+w•ncaar.gov/agronomi/wrst.hfm

Waypointe)
ANALYTICAL
6/12/2020
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 20-160-0005
Project Description: Jim Goodwin
RC-49
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 6/8/2020 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method. Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and N ELAC unless otherwise indicated.
Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
?, K. Xcry
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Page 1 of 10

Q)
Waypoint,
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL
www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number: 20-160-0005
Client Project Description: Jim Goodwin
RC-49
Lab No
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected Date Received Method
Lab ID
72587
01
Solids
06/08/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72588
02
Solids
06/08/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72589
03
Solids
06/08/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72590
04
Solids
06/08/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72591
05
Solids
06/08/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72592
06
Solids
06/08/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN; Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 2 of 10

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypolntanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical Nate Roth
Mary Brewer Project Jim Goodwin Report Date : 06/12/2020
284 Boger Road Information : RC-49 Received : 06/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Nate Roth
Report Number:20-160-000S REPORTOFANALYSIS Agronomist
Pauric ry
Lab No : 72587 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 01 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL
Mercury 0.0404 mg/Kg 0.0151
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
DF Date/Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
1 06/11/2010:37 DDB SW-7471B
L Limit Exceeded
Page 3 of 10

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/Technical Nate Roth
Mary Brewer Project Jim Goodwin Report Date 06/12/2020
284 Boger Road Information : RC-49 Received 06/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
mG G�N�
Submitted By : Nate Roth
Report Number : 20-160-0005 REPORTOFANALYSIS Agronomist
ry
Lab No : 72588 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 02 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date /Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0549 mg/Kg 0.0141 1 06/11/2010:39 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 4 of. 10

0
7621 Whltepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Waypoint, Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical Nate Roth
Mary Brewer Project Jim Goodwin Report Date : 06/12/2020
284 Boger Road Information ; RC-49 Received 06/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028 XF
Submitted By : Nate Roth Pauric McGroary
Report Number: 20-160-0005 REPORT OFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No ; 72589 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID: 03 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date ITime By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0644 mg/Kg 0.0141 1 06/11/2010:40 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 5 of 10

0
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Waypoint Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical Nate Roth
Mary Brewer Project Jim Goodwin Report Date 06/12/2020
284 Boger Road Information : RC-49 Received : 06/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028 mc
Submitted By : Nate Roth Pauric McGroary
Report Number :20-160-0005 REPORT OFANALlKSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 72590 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 04 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0430 mg/Kg 0.0159 1 06/11/2010:44 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 6 of 10

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical Nate Roth
Mary Brewer Project Jim Goodwin Report Date : 06/12/2020
284 Boger Road Information : RC-49 Received : 06/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Nate Roth Pauric McGroary
Report Number : 20-160-0005 REPORTOFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 72591 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID: 05 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date/Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0343 mg/Kg 0,0136 1 06/11/2010:45 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 7 of 10

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical Nate Roth
Mary Brewer Project Jim Goodwin Report Date 06/12/2020
284 Boger Road Information : RC-49 Received : 06/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
mG G�
Submitted By ; Nate Roth Pauric McGroary
Report Number : 20-160-0005 REPORTOFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 72592 Matrix; Solids
Sample ID: 06 Sampled;
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0603 mg/Kg O.01S6 1 06/11/2010:46 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 8 of 10

Waypigint(DAYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number: 46622
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/Technical
Report Number: 20-160-0005
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex I. US Postal 0 Lab
0 UPS 0 Client 0 Courier
0 Other:
Thermometer ID:
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
I. Yes
0 No
Number of coolers/boxes received
F-7
i0
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Yes
0 No
I* Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No
I* Not Present
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
I. Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
ID Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
ID Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
ID Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
ID Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
0 Yes
ID No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
0 Yes
ID No
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No
ID N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No
ID N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No
ID N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 —compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No
ID N/A
High concentration container (48 hr) [_ Low concentration Encore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions included? 0 Yes
Comments: I
40 No
Signature: Brandi Watson 1 Date & Time: 106/08/2020 09:34:04
Page 9 of 10

OT 3o OZ abad
U
U
O
�
u
C
Cl
\
I
n
�J
o
E
>
.s
E
a
�
U
J
LL
Y U
I4k
a)o
.,
a
a
�v
_
u
m
O in
I
i
N
nLn
u
ti
=
v
a)
O
I
j
I`
z
M
m
a
lii
76
1
%
t
n.
r
1
V
�
C
fV
L
r
f C
T
l
B
� �
- c�
ro
.
B
Q
ci CC 4 .
1
n
>• '
N
C
w
a C. v
—
=
Q
r �n u
•
V
� � � � O
n
n
U
N '7 —
(n
N
p C
U d7 W10
O
ir
_
�m
2'
i
u
0
InU)
C)
L
a°1
(D W
—
l
_
C)_
Z
ti
%n } L 7
m
V
.•c-
J
G� O
0 .v _ a
a
M. C
j
N
ra
t o
>- C p
O
30
�
..
Q. c c
•1
�
—I
a r � ai �
x C. y a
m
crj
V)

'In - A
a"4THIS
BOOK 1576 vac 87Y(2)
wr. ,II
iIIIIY^IIII
Flied
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:17 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT' To
15A NCAC on .Howe)
I, JAMES REESE GOODWIN JR , certify that I ani a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 156 JESS LANE Parcel No,: 163729
City: STOKESDALE State: NC Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that l do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Permittee listed on the following
page.
af For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setbacIt from 50 feet to o feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0 feet rrom my property line.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setbacIt from 400 feet to 100.feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as no feet from my residence.
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 11-18
CHANGE; OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED**
,"..a,. 1,,,.,,11-
Date:
� 27� � Page 1 ora
/v

Permittee: Synagro Western Piedmont RI_AP
Address: 284 Boger Rd. Mochville NC 27028 Permit No,: W00016247
City: MocicsvilIe State: NC Zip Code:27028_Cou11ty: Davie
NORTH CAROLINA, TO&fv COUNTY
I, N IZo a Notary Public for&,�County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify thatti personally appeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the day of
SEAL
ROBERT N. ROTH Signature of Notary Public —
NOTARY PUBLIC
GUILFORD COUNTY �12y eanrnaissiorr e.�pirea _ �'�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
161.7 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM NDRA4PW-1.AS I I-18 Page 2 of

i,. aoo. 1576 aara 89 (2)
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:18 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B, GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMMNT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 02T .1108(c)
I, EDWARD R BAILES__ , certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 541 ALBERT ROAD Parcel No.: 116200
City: STOKESDALE— __ State: NC Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Permittee listed on the following
page.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 50.feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0 feet froin my propertyline.
6For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100 feet from my residence.
"THIS WAIVER SHALT, BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED"
Signature: _aO/�.� Date:
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS I1-18 4 k9 Page I oft
!n'l o clLs 01 -1f e/

Pexmittee: Synagro Western Piedmont R.LAP
Address: 284 Boger Rd. Mocksville NC 27028 _Permit No.: W00016247
Ci y:Mocksyille State: NC Zip Code:27028 County: Davie
NOR'I'H CAROLINA, oGJ- VW fjtt.,, COUNTY
1, 1Lol� �3._r�- 1'll , a Notary Public for. Vt+1 Il 1Y& _.. _County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify that .., J4,(,/A personally appeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the )foo�regoing instrument.
Witness my band and official seal, this the ! I day of ,WA Z(.,Z
SEA /J Z
ROBERT N. ROTH
NOTARY PUBLIC Signature of Notary Public
GUILFORD COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN My commission expires.,
Once notarized, this fonn shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NDRMPW-1_AS 1 l-18 Page 2 of

BOOK 1576 Pn1cc p91 (2)
�frr. 5e:300 111111111111111111111111I
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deecfs
04/09/2020 01:30:19 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 021' .1108(c)
I, THURMAN EUGENE SMITH , certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 530 ALBERT ROAD Parcel No.: 116201
City: STOKESDALE States NC Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Penuittee listed on the following
page.
Foes- the parcel identilied above, I consent to a reduced setback from 50,feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0 feet from my propertyline.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback froln 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as_100 feet from any residence.
"THIS WAIVER SHALL BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED"
G
Signature:
l? per126
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 1148 7_0 q T0". " Pagel of 2
2�m Zs

Perroittee: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
Address: 284 Bover Rd. Mocksville, NC 27028 _Permit No.: WQ016247
City:Mocksville State: NC Zip Code:27028 County: Davie
NO�R�THl_CA_jR_O�LINA, &Lr tM. COUNTY I
I, IUD i t & I �1 � � , a Notary Public for kl 1 Po14, County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify that_J&( �MkA F"CIU-62a .55Eh personally appeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument,
m Witness y hand and official seal, this the���
day of � "6h Zo Z O_, .
T
aRTTAFiy N, ROTH Signature of Notary Public
LFORD COUNTY OF NO My cot�t►►tissiott expires -
STATE
NORTH CAITOLINA
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 1 l-18 Page 2 of

Ma,r, q, KZU IU;53AM No. iyh"1 F. 'i
BOOK 1576 PAGE 93 (2 )
597301
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:20 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS D RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 02T ,1108(c)
I, PATRICIA A KPIMER , certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at;
Address; 518 ALBERT ROAD_ _ Parcel No.; 116241
City: STOlaSDALE State; NC Zip Code: 27357 County; ROC KIN't: HAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applieant/Permittee listod on the following
page,
For the parcel identified above, Z consent to a reduced setback from 50,feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as_Q Eeet from my propei�tyline.
. For the parcel identified above, Z consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 10 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100 feet ft-om illy residence.
**THIS WAIVER SHALL BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED**
Siguat�tre; cl�wc..;--c�� Cr; , 4
FCCZM;XDRIv2W-Ias 11,18
te; 5 ` 0 'O—;)
Wt 'Ro,44h
2�(f i3cyc-f ?e.
,/r /t%` Z 2p age 1 of
�OG��5cJr �

Ma;1, 4. 20U 1 U: AAM No. 3yb2 r, 4
Per:ruttee: S na ro 'Western Piedmont DLLAP
Address: 284 Boger U, Mocksville NC 2 028 PerniitNo.: W00016Z 7
City:Mocksville, State: NC Zip Codo:27029 County: avie
_ ct�.se_ J I COUNTY
T, IiY1 e�i� `� >1� UAl *otary Public for 1_ Cotinty,
do hereby certify that i-'UkX \`\60i k V\6 - personally appeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrunieut.
Witness xny hand and official seal, this the day of
,SEAL aft ��Ao
lit
AMELIA DIANE NUNLEY Signature of Notary Pubrl'e
NOTARY PUBLIC
Comm Reg.
eajIh#718 of Virginia Ally eomr2ti.ssion expires Q �U(. A d,�a
Reg. A�71f1387?� ' c�
My Commission Expires
Once notarized, this form shatl be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A, copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of dater Resources
Non-bischaxge Bunch
16171VZO. Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NpRNIPW-LAS 11-19 page 2 of

, . +v
BOOK 1576 aaGEII 95 (2)
p� 597302
IIIIIIYYIA^I
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:21 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 021' .1108(c)
I, ALTON GLENN KING. certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 487 ALBERT ROAD Parcel No.: 116234
City: STOKESDALE_. .State: NC _—Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Permittee listed on the following
page.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 50 feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0,1'eet from my property line.
[,For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100 feet from my residence.
**THIS WAIVER SHALL BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED* *
Signature: f Date: Ir _
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 11-18 n Page 1 of
Adc S ul 11 e I /JL 2Yn 2 8

Permittee: SLnagro Western Piedmont RLAP
Address: 284 Boger Rd. Mocksville, NC 27028 _ Permit No.: WQ0016247
City:Mocksville State: NC Zip Code:27028,County: Davie
NORTH CAROLINA, o K , COUNTY
I, P,f' �- � � �o t` \ , a Notary Public for i o ! County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify that Al:b n g leylyt KI nn personally appeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
ri
Witness my hand and official seal, this the 1_day of wdq
_.
SEAI.
ROBERT N. ROTH Signature ofNvtaq Public
GUlOT01y cot ICmX
STATE pF COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA My coufmission exhi►es 20Z-1
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NDR_NTW-LAS 11-18 Page 2 of

A -
ak (�
BOOK 1576 PAGE 97 (2)
'°"° 111
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:22 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 02T .1108(c)
I, WILLIAM MATTHEW DEREMER , rectify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 470 ALBERT ROAD Parcel No.: 116233
City: STOKESDALE State: NC Zip Code: 27357 County: _ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Permittee listed on the following
page.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from S0.feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0 feet from my propertyline.
[� For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100 feet from my residence.
"THIS WAIVER SHALL BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED"
FORM: NDRMPW-r-AS 11-18
Date: 19 �+ PC'
're-1w(A +a ; NaJL 41-h
2� 4 Page 1 of 2
^CA suol < / JC 2::i6' 2'?
i

Permittee: Synag!•o Western Piedmont RLAP
Address: 284 Boger Rd. Mocksy lle, NC 27028 PermitNo.: WQ0016247
City:Mocksville State: NC Zip Code:27028 County: Davie
NORTH CAROLIN' A, COUNTY
1, T o�l_r �- IV 1� ' , a Notary Public for County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify that Wli " t ic4m k4heo_ Aft,-N _peA•sonally appeared bef'or•e me tliis day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this theff day of &Weh _ 2D ZQ
SEACED
Signature ofNorary Public
INA'
My corrrrrrissiorr ezpir•es _ ec. zo Z-4
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the fbllowing address;
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Noi-th Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 1 l-18 Page 2 of

,A- "
BOOK 1576 PAGE 99 (2)
"'n. 111111111111111111111
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:23 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
lAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENTTO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT" I'O
15A NCAC 021' .1108(c)
I, WILLIAM M DEREMER__ certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 440 ALBERT ROAD Parcel No.: 116136
City: STOKESDALE _ _ __ Slate: NC Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGI-JAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the ApplicantlPermittee listed on the Following
page.
W For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 5o_feet to o feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0 feet from my propertyline.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100 feet from my residence,
"`THIS WAIVER SI-JALL BFI TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED**
Signature: — — Date: R®
Taily V1 in
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 1I-IS 2,0 'I�Uey Page ] of
M12,1-,rSur'1r1_ f �Jc 2 020

Permiace: Sytiagro Western Piedmont RLAP
Address: 284 BggerR& Mocksville NC 27028 Permit No-: W 00162d7
City:Mocksville State: NC Zip Code:27028 Comity: Davie
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY 4
I _1P f �. D -,a Notary Public for emi I-FOY(iC County, North Carolina,
do herebyeertify that ?�'bafb `ty personally nppeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the day of LA
SEA L
ROBERT N, ROTH
NOTARY PUBLIC
GUILrORD COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Signature of Notary Prrblie
My Commission expires
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NIDRMPW-[.AS 11-7 8 Page 2 of 2

BOOK t576 a,:Ge tOt (2)
�, 11111II1IlN61IP1Pl1lil�
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:24 PM
Fee Ami: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 02T .1108(c)
I, BOBBY EUGENE EATON JR , certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 449 ALBERT ROAD
Parcel No.: 116238
City: STOKESDALE_ State: NC _Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Permittee listed on the following
page.
Vor the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 50 feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 01'eet from my propertyline.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100.feet from my residence.
"THIS WAIVER SHALL BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE Of OWNERSHIP Or ANY PARTIES INVOLVED"
Signature: _Date:
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 11-18 Page 1 of 2
Vq U i N t �J 270 z 9

Permittee: SynaUo Westeni Piedmont RLAP
Address: 284 Boger Rd. Mocksville, NC 27028 Permit No.: WQ0016247 _.
City:Mocksville State: NC Zip Code:27028 County: Davie
NORTH C.ARO,. kLINA, COUNTY
I, "Va10,�,f�- N �o' , a Notary Public for ^County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify that l +1114 e_ GAyon VV . personally appeared before me this day
and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the /V'day of U"lW�y1_ 7Q1(a
SEAL
ROBERT N. ROTH
NOTARY PUBLIC
GUILFORD COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Signature of Notary Publie
My Commission eehires c
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 11-18 Page 2of2

BOOK 1576 PAGE 103 (2 )
597306
1111111111111111111111
Filed
Rockingham County, NC
Benjamin J. Curtis, Register of Deeds
04/09/2020 01:30:25 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 NC Excise Tax: $0.00
LAUREN B. GAMMON
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
NON• -DISCHARGE RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WAIVER
FOR THE APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE SETBACKS PURSUANT TO
15A NCAC 02T .1108(c)
1, GEORGE ROGER TYSINGER _, certify that I am a deeded owner of the property located at:
Address: 175 JESS LANE
Parcel No,: 115242
City: STOKESDALE_ State:. NC ___Zip Code: 27357 County: ROCKINGHAM
Furthermore, I certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding this property, and that I do hereby
agree that the setback distances cited below be granted to the Applicant/Permittee listed on the following
page.
[ For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 50 feet to 0 feet, thereby
allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 0 feet from my propertyline.
For the parcel identified above, I consent to a reduced setback from 400 feet to 100 feet,
thereby allowing the application of Class B residuals as near as 100 feet from my residence.
"THIS WAIVER SHALL BE TERMINATED UPON CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY PARTIES INVOLVED"
Signature:_ Date: / ��f'
-­ Tefwv 1Jce_
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 1 l-18 Z$4 '�n9'e1 Page 1 of
WtoOr—s L) f f f' r— /J�— Z �F-S

Permittee, Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
Address: 294 Bogey Rd. Mocksville, NC 27029 Pei-mit No.: WQ0016247
City:Mocksville State: NC Zip Code:27028_County: Davie
NORTH CAROLINA 'ZoGV-:\ COUNTY
K, a Notary Public for. loc i f �oy !� County, North Carolina,
do hereby certify that Ge�)Y�P� �IS4;P_�i personally appeared before me this day
NIJ and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the_L Its
day of MIA(Gh 'zoZ,Q,
S
ROBERT N. ROTH
NOTARY PUBLIC Signature of Notary Public
GUILFORD COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA p
My commission ewj;ires pe-L, l
Once notarized, this form shall be recorded at the Register of Deeds in the county or
counties in which the described properties are located. A copy of the recorded waiver
shall be sent to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Non -Discharge Branch
1617 Mail Seivice Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
FORM: NDRMPW-LAS 11-18 Page 2 of

VICINITY MAP
cc
L / ii
�....
jr
+4061k
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 4,000'
4.C(1e1 0 n,cca
The compliance boundary is established either 250 it from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
In the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area, The review boundary Is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the porimetor of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate,
3r'
NC-HA-47
Fields 1-4

APPLICATION MAP
y
Z ; r
Lin
10
/ ❑* ,S
l n✓ e� LLL l j»
S
0111
,
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA UNSUITABLE AREA
— — — — — — PRIVATE ROAD WATER GRAPHIC SCALE
STREAM ONSITE HOUSE 1" = 660'
eso o 6W
DRAIN OFFSITE HOUSE
W—.X W— FENCE OUTBUILDING
PROPERTY LINE 0 WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feel within I _L1 A_ A47
in the properly boundary, whichever Is closest to the application area. The review boundary Is established NVV flit A
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of tho residuals application area. All
locations are approximate, Fields 1-4

TOPOGRAPHIC 1MAP
C2O 1�
III
,
,
it Ce
�'rvr %
GRAPHIC SCALE
V = 1,000'
soon 0 11000'
The compliance boundary Is established either 250 ft from the residuols application area or 50 feel within A I I V_�L1 AA .4'T
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary Is established f V f�
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of tho residuals application area. All
locations are approximate, Fields 1-4

I(D SOIL SURVEY
Cr x
Q � ;
I�
V)
k
i
v-v
�I
GRAPHIC SCALE
9" = 800'
000, 0 a00'
The compliance boundary Is established either 250 ft front the residuals application area or 50 feet within NC- HA-47
In the properly boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary Is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the porimelor of the residuals application area, All ,1
locations are approximate. Fields 1-4

nwp
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
I SA NCAC 02T .1100— LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a cheeldist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application an
supporting documentation
Fa•more infjormatron, }visit the WaterQtialityPertnitting Section's Non-Dischai-ze rn ' t Unit.
General —This document is an agreementbetwecn the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant orother type residuals) in accordance with _15A NCAC 02T .11 OQ. Do not submit
this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otheiivise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supportingdocumentatio n listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) f'oim. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. if necessary for clarity or due to space restjictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prcpare a separate agreement for cacti set of land application sites that arc owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must beprovided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name; Synayy-o Western Piedmont RLAP
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
(yes/no)
Laud Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional)
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
NC-HA-47-1
N
Pasture
Grazing
NC-HA-47-2
N
Pasture
Gazing
NC-HA-47-3
N
Pasture
Grazing
NC-HA-47-4
N
Pasture
Grazing
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residua Is.
this Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM; LOA 06-16 Page] of3

I. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the Ituid
application site(s).
6, The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement ofany residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application sitc(s).
1 1. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement a d schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terns and conditions of the pennit take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
tern of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
iI. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or thelandowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period followi g a residuals land application event, Such conln'ols may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application sitc(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals laud application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not beharvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food amps with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 20-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface f'or four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested f'or a 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
HLALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COWLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please sheets one)
1 SA NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, ISA NCAC 02T .0105(h) allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please marls one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale forthe requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACIINOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: . is currently permitted under another
residuals land application program; Pennit Number WQ: The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this
agreement, Ire/shc is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred
into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. l certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other perniitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives fbr water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name:
�w_" ap e,
Address: Jr T 1 ' BOSS
City: L;14
h
State: N G Zip:
Phone: _ E-mail address:
Signature: Date:
NORTH CAROLINA, boo'v-%.L. A— COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that Toe t_
2775
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
day of V "ViAV , 20 GU
Signature and seal: �✓ �'�
My commission expires: Q Z NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: E-mail address:
Signature: -- -- Date:
Permittee's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: Q42
Signature: /?�'✓v "� / ! fi r Date: A(��� p

SYNAGRO, HARNETT COUNTY UTILITIES CLASS B PERMIT
WQ 0014885
SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that soil profile evaluations were conducted on the proposed application
sites for the Harnett County Utilities project by Piedmont Environmental Associates,
P.A. on behalf of Synagro Central, LLC. The evaluations consisted of hand auger
borings and descriptions of the soils on the application sites. All hand auger borings
included in this package were either performed by me or under my direct supervision.
All other work performed for this permit application was conducted by Synagro Central,
LLC.
G. Christopher Murray, L.S.S.
No. 1284
Synagro, Harnett County Utilities Project, Various Fields

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Harnett County Utilities (WQ 0014885)
% Slope: 2%
Site: J.W. Pope Farm
Crop: Forage/Pasture
PIEDMONT
Field: J.W. Pope, Field 1
Conducted
By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35"34'41"N
Date: 9/10/2019
ENVIRONMENTAL
-78'74'88"W
Soil Series: Aycock
A a o a I w r■ s, •. w.
o
w
W
>
C a
a
o
v
O
N 6
N
e N
O
U
O
U
O
Q
rn U ;v m
>
> t0
N LhI ?�
N
O
N
OI
fU C N ate.
U
u
C1 N Y I
p m
O Gi O' `I
S
O
5
Ap
0-6 10YR 3/3
moist
I sl
I mod
I med
gr
fr
ns
np�
E
6-10 10YR 3161
moist
I sl I mod
I med
gr
fr
ns
np
Btt
10-30 1 10YR 514
1
moist
cl mod
med
sbk
ri
s
B12
30-48 10YR 514
1 5YR &5, 1oYR 7/3
com.
med.
C$D
moist
cl mod
med
sbk
fi
s
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silly clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Tyne
wk weak
gr granular
m moderate
pl platy
str strong
pr prismatic
cpr columnar
abk angular blocky
sbk subangular blocky
sg single grained
ma massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistency
fr friable
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/parched)
34 1 perched

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Harnett County Utilities (WQ 0014885)
% Slope: 2%
Site: J.W. Pope Farm
Crop: Forage/Pasture
, PIEDMONT
Field: J.W. Pope, Field 2
Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35°20'52"N
Date: 9/10/2019
ENVIRONMENTAL
-78"44'55"W
Soil Series: Aycock
w a s o a I w r a Z. P. A.
m
Ci
w
N
d
m y
U G .O.
7
N CO V)
t
}a} ti
t
O O
c U U
L
Q
U
fn i
O
N
y
(
� �' C
N ..L+ x O/
Gt
N M
KI
<i
O O
y�
i S
S
S N 5
10
wI
Ap 0-4 10YR 313
moist
fsl
mod
med
gr
fr
I ns
np-1
E 4-11 10YR 413
moist
sl mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Bt1 11-25 10YR 514
-
moist
cl mod
med
sbk
fi
s
p
Bt2 25-42 10YR 514
- I I
moist
cl mod
med
sbk
ri
s
p
Bt3 42-48
10YR 514
5YR s15, 10YR 7r2 com. med.
C&D
moist
c wk
I med
abk
I fi
s
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
Sid
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistency
fr friable
vfr veryfriable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (a arentl erched)
45 1 perched

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Harnett County Utilities (WQ 0014885) % Slope: 2%
Site: J.W. Pope Farm
Crop: Forage/Pasture
`; PIEDMONT
Field: J.W. Pope, Field 3
Conducted By: GC Murray
I
Coordinates:35°34'97"N
Date:9/10/2019
ENVIRONMENTAL
-78°74'69.7"W
Soil Series: Aycock
w s : o c w r ■ . .. w .
N
L)
n
fl
Q
N
W U
d
N
L O
C
U
G
U3
N
O O
L) i>
2
4
Q
fJ O
en U y
7
7
C
a U .
N y K N
•O Z'i
aY
Z'i
_N C r 7
Z'i
U
U
U C �.
4 .1C
N N O
T n S S
O
S
O N O �
S rY S
i+
iA
w
iA
--' O nI
1. S
Ap
0-5
10YR 3/3
moist
sl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
n
E
5-12
10YR 3/4
-
moist
fsl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Btl
12-32
10YR 5/4
-
moist
cl
mod
med
sbk
fi
s
p
Bt2
32-48
10YR 5/4
5YR 6/5, 10YR P2
com.
med.
C&D
moist
cl
wk
med
abk
ft
s
p
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr granular
m moderate
pl platy
str strong
pr prismatic
cpr columnar
abk angular blocky
sbk subangular blocky
sg single grained
ma massive
Structure Size
f flne
med medium
Moist Consistencv
fr friable
vfr vefyfriable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Ty a {apparentlperched)
38 perched

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Harnett County Utilities (WQ 0014885)
% Slope: 2%
Site: J.W. Pope Farm
Crop: Forage/Pasture
PIEDMONT
Field: J.W. Pope, Field 4
Conducted
By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35°35'22"N
Date: 9/10/2019
FuMrsnuuruTAr
-78°74'66.8"W
Soil Series: Aycock
w ■ s o c I w r > > . P.A.
LLIa
m
o
d c
} a
O O
u
a
O N
U
` = N
C) W
N `
W
0� C N +O+
U
U
U
la
0
O O S
O
S
Ap
0-4
10YR 3/3
moist
I
sl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
E
4-10
10YR 4/3
-
moist
sl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Bt1
10-34
10YR 5/4
-
moist
cl
mod
I med
sbk
fi
s
p
Bt2
34-48
10YR 5/4
-
-
moist
cl
wk
med
sbk
fi
s
p
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
sci
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr granular
m moderate
pl platy
str strong
pr prismatic
cpr columnar
abk angular blocky
sbk subangular blocky
sg single grained
ma massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistency
fr friable
vfr very friable
fi firm
vti very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govfagronomlr Report No, FY20-SL001678�
IIl14ri Client: JWPope Advisor: SYNAGROCenIraILLC
*�µl
Heavy Metals 5815 Ross Rd One Commerce Square
Lillingion, NC 27546 Suite 204
Washington, NC27889
y kr Soil Report
o Sampled County : Harnett
Sampled
Links to tipipfid Information
_-- Client ID: 500901 Advisor ID: 400832
sampred: Recewed: 08/01/2019 compreted: 08/12/2019 Farm:
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals undersoil test lab results. using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extracianl, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic(As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, 8, selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Although the above metals here are not believed to pose a concern for
plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels, Note any time and fertilizer recommendations. Where soil test phosphorus (P)
is very hi h P-1 > 100 cro s will not respond to additional P applied. David H. Hard , Agronomist, August 12 2019
Sample ID; 01-01
Recommendations: Lime NUinents acre
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 20 110 0 20 0 0 0 0
Note: 12
2 - Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 20 110 0 20 0 0 0 0
Note: 12
Test Results (units - WN in grcm3; CEC and Na in megr100 cm3; NO3-N in mgrdm3]; Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-1 Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 1.27 5.2 81 1.0 6.1 55 50 54 22 23 92 71 71 60 60 72 0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.4 Cadmium, 0.1 Nickel, 0.4 Chromium, 0.3 Lead, 7.5 Selenium, 0.1
Sample ID: 01-02
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients acre
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P205 K20 Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 - Bermuda hay/past., M 0.5 180-220 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: 12
2-Bermuda hay/past, M 0.0 180-220 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note 12
Test Results (units - WN In g/cm3; CEC and Na in megr100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-1 Mn-Ali Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.60 1.21 6.7 78 1.5 5.7 51 67 55 18 38 249 166 166 298 298 251 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.1 Nickel, 0.5 Chromium, 0.3 Lead, 11.8 Selenium, 0.1
North Carolina
[Al
buur Trud rd6rl CivivoiWon
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler.Commissioner ofApriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronoml/
Report No.
FY20-SL001678
JW Pope
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: 01-03
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P305
K20
Mg S
Mn
2n Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Bermuda hay/past., M 1.4 180-220 0
100
0 0
0
0 0
0
Note: 12
2-Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
100
0 0
0
0 0
0
Note: 12
Test Results (units - W N In g/cm3; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3; NO3-N In mg/dm3j:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
2n-I
2n-Al Cu-I
Na ESP
SS -I NOa-N
1,31 1.18 5.6 57 2.4 5.1 122 55 40 12
46 64
55 55
89
89 72
0.1
2
Heavy Metals (parts per million)' Arsenic, 0.5 Cadmium, 0A
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.3
Lead, 7.7
Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 01-04
Recommendations: Lime
Nuir enis ( acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P205
K20
Mg S
Mn
2n Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Bermuda hay/past., M 0.0 180-220 0
0
0 0
pH$
0 0
0
Note: 12 Note:
2-Bermuda hay/past-, M 0.0 180-220 0
0
0 0
pH$
0 0
0
Note: 12 Note:
Test Results (units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N In mg/dn�]j
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC 13S% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
2n-I
2n-AI Cu-I
Na ESP
SS -I NO3-N
0.46 0.86 9.8 99 0.1 7.3 195 614 38 30
63 153
88 88
256
256 104
0.1
1
ieavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.3 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.5
Chromium, 0.2
Lead, 2.8
Selenium, 0.0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Webslte: www.ncagr.govlagronomll
Reporl No. FY20-SL001678
JW Pope
Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is toolow for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at one
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-I
potassium index
Ib/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K2O
potash
forthe crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on testresults and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganeseindex
3rmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels, If $, PH$, $PH, C or Z
M-O
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronorriL/pubs.htm.
NOa-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations forsmall areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of lb/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit ivww.nca r. v/a mnomi/ob art4_ht Ind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P2O5
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W!V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, WfV, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-Al
zinc availability index
remaining 16 (P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-1, Mn-Al 1, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinely
Zn-I
zinc index
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit ww ncarlaov/anronomi/uyrst.htm

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
6/10/2020
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 20-156-0003
Project Description: JW Pope
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 6/4/2020 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method. Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and NELAC unless otherwise indicated.
Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report,
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Page 1 of 8

Waypoint,(D
ANALYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number:
20-156-0003
Client Project Description,
JW Pope
Lab No Client Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected Date Received
Method
Lab ID
72564 1
Solids
06/04/2020
SW-7471B
W P MTN
72565 2
Solids
06/04/2020
SW-7471B
WP MTN
72566 3
Solids
06/04/2020
SW-7471B
WP MTN
72567 4
Solids
06/04/2020
SW-7471B
WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 2 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer Project JW Pope
284 Boger Road Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Report Number: 20-156-0003 REPORT OFANAL YSIS
Lab No : 72564
Sample ID ; 1
Report Date : 06/10/2020
Received ; 06/04/2020
pot" r 6eb7-01
Pauric McGroaty
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury <0,0143 mg/Kg 0.0143 1 06/09/2012:38 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 3 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer Project JW Pope
284 Boger Road Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Report Number : 20-156-0003 REPORTOFANALYSIS
Lab No : 72565
Sample ID: 2
Report Date : 06/10/2020
Received : 06/04/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled;
Test Results Units MQL DF Date I Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0189 mg/Kg 0.0146 1 06/09/2012:39 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 4 of 8

0
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Waypoint Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypolntanalytical.com
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer Project JW Pope Report Date 06/10/2020
284 Boger Road Information Received : 06/04/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028 me GIN
Pauric McGroary
Report Number :20-156-0003 REPORT OFANAL YSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 72566 Matrix; Solids
Sample ID : 3 Sampled:
Test Results Units MOL DF Date I Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0477 mg/Kg 0.0151 1 06/09/2012:40 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 5 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer Project JW Pope
284 Boger Road Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Report Number :20-156-0003 REPORTOFANALYSIS
Lab No : 72567
Sample ID: 4
Report Date 06/10/2020
Received 06/04/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0393 mg/Kg 0.0143 1 06/09/2012:42 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 6 of 8

Waypoeinto
ANALYTICAL
7621 Whltepine Road, Richmond, VA23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:46622
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/Technical
Report Number: 20-156-0003
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex 0 US Postal 0 Lab
is UPS 0 Client 0 Courier
0 Other:
Thermometer ID:
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
le Yes
0 No
Number of coolers/boxes received
I 3
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
0 Yes
0 No
I. Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No
I. Not Present
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
0 Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
I. Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
I. Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
I. Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
I. Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
I. Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
0 Yes
I. No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
0 Yes
I. No
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 — compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
High concentration container (48 hr)
High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d)
[_ Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
F_ Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions included? 0 Yes I. No
Comments:
Signature: lBrandi Watson Date & Time: 106/04/2020 09:41:39
Page 7 of 8

(D
WaYPAoint_
NALYTICAL
S- - ----- - ---_
111 IIIV 11 IIIVlllllll Wll IV III II 4662206-04-2020
Swraao Central LLCJ Technical 09:39:56
JW Pope
'M Account #
/
Grower/Project Information
ormation
tiubmltted by
Charge To
-51 va_� Po
Farm ID
�A - � � Field ID
1gOC k--� v{1[,e,
lJ G 2 -70
Credit Card #
I CSV
Exp. Date:
/
Phone #
.9 3 La
107 rL Z 7
IE-mail address
C W IVto e Q f> two • c. tit
Crop Into For Recommendations
Sample ID
Lab Number
(Lab Use
Only)
S1 M
'S2M - Spe6ifyAdditional
Tests
S3M
Soluble
Salts
Texture
NO3-N
Additional
Tests
Intended
Crop
Yield
Goal
Alternative
Crop
Yield
Goal
Previous Crop
B jCujFejMnjNaj S jZn
7 _ Lab# E 72564-1 1
3 Cust: 46622 Synaqro Central LLC/ Technical
- Col: Rec: 06/04/2020 00:00
-� 20-156-00o3 Preservation:
I I I I I I I r
Lab# E 72565-1 2
Cust.-46622 Synaqro Central LLC/ Technical
Col: Rec: 06/04/2020 00:00
20-IS6-0003 Preservabon:
_ Lab# E 72566-1 3
Cust: 46622 Synaqro Central LLC/ Technical
— Col; Rec: 06/04/2020 00:00
20-1564003 Pressration:
Lab# E 72567-1 4
Oust:46622 SynagmCentral LLC/Technical
Cot
0 : 0003 Rer= 06/04/2020 00:00
Preservation:
Mehlich 1117est Packages
Special Instructions or Additional Tests
SiM - Orgarvc matter. Phosphorus, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, pH, Buffer pH
Cation Exchange Capacity, and % Base Saturation.
S2M -Test S1 M plus any two of the following: Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc,
Manganese, Iron, Copper. Each additional test (above two) cost $2.00.
S3M -Test S1M plus Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc, Manganese, Copper, and Iron.
�t4 4- p yt M LO vz o Y

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 4,000'
000' o 4,000'
i
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
N C-CH-78
Fields 1-3,5
�■

APPLICATION MAP
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
— —�— — — PRIVATE ROAD
STREAM
DRAIN
X X x FENCE
PROPERTY LINE
UNSUITABLE AREA
WATER
+ ONSITE HOUSE
0
OFFSITE HOUSE
❑
OUTBUILDING
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 660'
660' 0 660'
NC-CH-78
Fields 1,3

APPLICATION MAP
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
— —�— — ^ PRIVATE ROAD
C
STREAM
DRAIN
.
-- FENCE
❑
PROPERTY LINE
0
UNSUITABLE AREA
WATER
ONSITE HOUSE
OFFSITE HOUSE
OUTBUILDING
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 660'
sso' o sso'
E
NC-CH-78
Field 2

((�
APPLICATION MAP
1
■
Z
■ 000� ' Q
� o
i
■
i
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
UNSUITABLE AREA
PRIVATE ROAD
WATER GRAPHIC SCALE
STREAM !
ONSITE HOUSE 1 " = 660'
DRAIN .
sso' o sso'
OFFSITE HOUSE
FENCE ❑
OUTBUILDING
PROPERTY LINE 0
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ftfrom the residuals
application area or 50 feet within
N C-CH-78
in the property boundary,
whichever is closest to the application area.
The review boundary is established
midway between
the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the
locations are approximate.
residuals application area. All
Field 5

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
s
1 ` `
t if
r �. •Jf ! i ., !
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=1,000'
1,000, 0 1,000,
i
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NC-CH-78
Fields 1-3

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Ln {,
1-1
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 1,000'
1,000, 0 1,000-
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NC-CH-78
Field 5

SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 " = 800'
800, 0 800,
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
N C-CH-78
Field 1

ref:
SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
V = 800'
800, 0 800,
r r
0
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within NC-CH-78
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area, All
locations are approximate. Field 2

SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 660'
660' 0 660'
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft f rom the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NC-CH-78
Field 3

SOIL SURVEY
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 660'
660' 0 660'
i
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NC-CH-78
Field 5

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Dlvlslon of Water Resources
15A NCA'C 02T .l 100 — LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted. the Applicant shall submit one original and two conies of the apLlication and
supporting documentation
For ►nore injor►nation, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's rt-DischorQe Permitting Unit,
General -- This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with Do not
submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otheruise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form, If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicants narne: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following tacility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
es/no
(Y )
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
PP g
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
o tional
(optional)
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
pasture)
NC-CH-78-1
N
Pasture
Grazing
NC-CH-78-2
N
Pasture
Grazing
NC-CH-78-3
N
Pasture
Grazing
NC-CH-78-5
N
Pasture
Grazing
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Pagel of 3

1. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section II) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the
land application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with inf oimation and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals
land application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pI-I of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lure shall be applied to achieve a final
soil pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for
the specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of
nutrients (e.g., f61ilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application sitc(s).
11, The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land
application events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative priorto and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
I1. RESTRICTIONS:
I. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land
application site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the
posting of signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land
application events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-
month period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil,
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
ULALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105(h) allows the
compliance boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance
boundary provided the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the f ollowing;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed
compliance boundary to the application package)
® A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: , is currently permitted under another
residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ: The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this
agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transf6Ted
into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
POPA/[- I nA nti_iti PaaP 7 of I

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to la d apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landownername:
Address: '(—) 1
City: �Z- �� -�Z State: _�� L Zip:
Phone: �� E-mail address: (��c_ S` sl�
Signature: Date:
NORTH CAROLINA, Ctia�ti�� COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that —
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the 5e-k)e- ee_ e
day of
r-
Signature and seal:
L.
My commission expires:
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
, 20 Z
GUILFORD COUNTY
STATE OF ]NORTH CAHOLWA
I certify that 1 have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail
Date:
Zip:
I certify that 1 have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name:
Signature: iDate:
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of

SYNAGRO, HARNETT COUNTY CLASS B PERMIT
WQ 0007066
SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that soil profile evaluations were conducted on the proposed application
sites for the Harnett County project by Piedmont Environmental Associates, P.A. on
behalf of Synagro Central, LLC. The evaluations consisted of hand auger borings and
descriptions of the soils on the application sites. All hand auger borings included in this
package were either performed by me or under my direct supervision. All other work
performed for this permit application was conducted by Synagro Central, LLC.
G. Christopher Murray, L.S.S,
No. 1284
Synagro, Harnett County MTP Project, Various Fields

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro Harnettt Co. (WQ 0007066) % Slope: 3%
Site: CH_78 Crop: Forage/Pasture
Field: Field 1 Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.6220 N Date: 12/6/2019
-79.3619 W Soil Series: Cid/Lignum
PIEDMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL
A S s Oct AT us, P A.
BC
1 23-27 12.5YR 4/81 1- -
-
moist I sicl
I mod
I med
I sbk
I fi
I s
Ip
CR
28
-
-
- -
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Seasonal High Water Table:
Structure Grade
Structure Type
Structure Size
Depth (") Type (apparentlperched)
wk weak
gr
granular
f fine
20 perched
m moderate
pl
platy
med medium
str strong
pr
cpr
prismatic
columnar
SM
blocky$~�
PHAR
OP
abk
angular
sbk
subangular blocky
Moist Consistency
sg
single grained
fr friable
o A.
ma
massive
vfr very friable
mf �•�
fi firm
1z�Qr ►ems
A very firm
'

Soil Profrle Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro Harnettt Co.
(WQ 0007066)
% Slope: 3%
Site: CH_78
Crop: Forage/Pasture
PIEDMONT
Field: Field 2
Conducted
By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.6159 N
Date: 12/6/2019
-79.3664 W
Soil Series: Cid/Lignu m
ASSOCIATE:. P• w.
a,
a
w
a
ua
w
a
d
=
V w
W
N
i N
H
3
d CCn
N
7C
d
d
d
3
7
3 C U
t
K
i
i U N
p y cC
r n S
O
S
O
S
O a O
S fY S
n
n
0 l0
n S n n
Ap
0-5
10YR 3/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
n
E
5-11
10YR 6/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Bt
11-25
10YR 5/8
10YR 6/6, 10YR 7/11
few
I med
I C&D
I moist
sic
I mod
I med
I sbk
I vfi
I vs
I vp
BC
25-32
10YR 5/8
-
-
-
-
moist
sicl
mod
med
sbk
fi
s
CR
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Seasonal High Water Table:
Structure Grade Structure Type Structure Size Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)
wk weak gr granular f fine 19 perched
m moderate pl platy med medium
str strong pr prismatic
cpr columnar
abk angular blocky
sbk subangular blocky Moist Consistency
sg single grained fr friable
ma massive Or very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro Harnettt Co. (WQ 0007066) % Slope: 3%
Site: CH_78 Crop: Forage/Pasture
Field: Field 3 Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.6145 N Date: 12/6/2019
-79.3725 W Soil Series: Cid/Lignum
O
O
v
O
O
_ •=
U
V
O
X
G!
T f•1
S
S
PIEDMONT
ASSOCIATES, P. A.
=
00
3
W
Q
OC
�
W
N
N
d
H
m
h
N
G! G!
O O
S S
C
x
O
fY
O
S
x
`
w
fn
v
fA
O
+3+
fA
=
o
r
O
S
Ap
1 0-6
1 10YR 3/3
1
moist
sil
I mod
I med
gr
fr
ns
n
E
1 6-11
1 10YR 6/3
1 -
4 -
-
-
moist
I sil
! mod
I med
I gr
I fr
ns
np
Bt
11-19
10YR 5/8
10YR 6/6, 10YR 7/1
few
med
C&D
moist
sic
mod
med
sbk
fi
s
p
CR
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Legend:
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Seasonal High Water Table:
Structure Size
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)
f fine
14 perched
med medium
soft
f
Moist Consisten
G
fr friable
a T
vfr very friable
v�
fi firm
fi
F� 12"
AKW""
vfi very firm

Soil Proirle Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro Harnettt Co. (WO 0007066) % Slope: 3%
Site: CH_78 Crop: Forage/Pasture � PIEDMONT
Field: Field 5 Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.6768 N Date: 12/6/2019 ENVIRONMENTAL
-79.3734 W Soil Series: Georgeville/Tarrus w s so c I w To s. P. A.
w
C
O
C)
O
C)
J
Q
W
N
fn
L
O
V
y
I
l
1
i
0
O
U)
_
N
w
`
G7
O
C
3
V
V
41
V
41
C
V
i+
O
07
ca
O
O
O
N
y
3
N
H
Ap
0-7
10YR 3/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
mod med gr
fr
ns np
AB
7-13 10YR 6/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
mod med gr
fr
ns n
Bt
I 13-33 12.5YR 5/8I -
I -
I-
I-
I moist
I c
I mod I med ] sbk I fi
I s
I p ]
] BC
I 33-39 12.5YR 5/8I -
I -
I-
I -
I moist
I sicl I wk I med I sbk I fi
I s
I p I
C
139-48
12.5YR 5/81
-
1 -
1-
1 -
I moist
I sil
I wk I med
I sbk
I fi
I s
I p I
Legend:
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
Structure Size
wk weak
gr
granular
f fine
m moderate
pl
platy
med medium
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
Moist Consistency
sg
single grained
fr friable
ma
massive
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)

NCDA&CS f - inomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www,n- ,gr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. Fi _j-SL019874
Client:
f,f Heavy Metals
Bobby Branch
284 Boger Rd
Advisor: Bobby Branch
284 Boger Rd
Mocksville, NC 27028
Mocksville, NC 27028
Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction
Sampled County: Chatham
-- - -- - _ Client ID: 505064
Advisor ID: 505064
Sampled: 12/06/2019 Received: 12/19/2019 Completed: 01/03/2020 Farm: CH-78
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metalsdata in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results.
Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows:
arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium
(Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Although the above metals here are not believed
to pose a concern for
plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer recommendations. Where
soil test phosphorus (P) is
very hi h P-I a 100),crops will not respond to additional P applied. Ja athi Kamalakanthan 1 /3/2020
Sample ID: 78-01
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Fescue/OGrass/rim, M 0.6 120-200 90 30
0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 12
2-Fescue/OGrass/rim, M 0.0 120-200 90 30
0 0 0 0
0 0
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm):
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-I Na ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.09 0.91 5.2 77 1.2 5.3 22 57 48 23 48 97
75 75 27 27
76 0.2 4
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.3
Chromium, 0.1 Lead,
2.2 Selenium, 0.0
Sample ID: 78-02
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 2.4 120-200 140 100
0 0 0 0
0 0
2- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 140 100
0 0 0 0
0 0
Test Results [units - WN i n g/cm3; CEC and N a i n meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm):
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-I Na ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.32 0.92 5.2 34 3.4 4.5 4 20 18 14 56 67
57 57 135 135
30 0.3 6
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.0 Cadmium, 0.0 Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.1 Lead,
2.0 Selenium, 0.0
North Carolina
A
Tobxco Trust Find Ctmmmwon
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler• Commissioner of Awiculture

NCDA&CS A,,_.momic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.i._-gr.gov/agronomi/
ReportNo. Fl .,,-SL019874
Bobby Branch
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: 78-03
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (Eons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 1.1 120-200 110
110
0 0
0
$
0
0
Note: 12 Note:
2 -Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 110
110
0 0
0
$
0
0
Note 12 Note:
Test Results [units -WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/drn ):
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn,AI
Cu-I
Na ESP
SS4 NO3-N
0.09 0.98 5.3 68 1.7 5.0 13 16 45 22
62 80
65 65
16
16
81
0.4 8
Heavy Metals (parts per million); Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.0
Nickel, 0.3
Chromium, 0.1
Lead,
2.9
Selenium,
0.0
Sample ID: 78-0 5
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 0
50
0 0
0
0
0
0
2- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 0
50
0 0
0
0
0
0
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3):
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P4 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS4 NO3-N
0.46 0.75 8.9 87 1.1 6.0 207 46 65 20
39 212
144 144
463
463
571
0.2 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.2 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
5.2
Selenium,
0.1

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
6/10/2020
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 20-156-0005
Project Description: Bobby Branch
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 6/4/2020 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method. Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and NELAC unless otherwise indicated,
Ceitain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
4O., [4'�y
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Laboratory's liability In any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis In question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Page 1 of 8

Waypoint
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL
www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample
Summary Table
Report Number: 20-156-0005
Client Project Description: Bobby Branch
Lab No Client Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected Date Received Method
Lab ID
72569 1
Solids
06/04/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72570 2
Solids
06/04/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72571 3
Solids
06/04/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72572 4
Solids
06/04/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 2 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Mary Brewer Project Bobby Branch Report Date : 06/10/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Received : 06/04/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Report Number: 20-156-0005 REPORTOFANALYS7S Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Lab No : 72569 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 1 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date t Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0201 mg/Kg 0.0148 1 06/09/2012:44 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 3 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Mary Brewer Project Bobby Branch Report Date : 06/10/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Received : 06/04/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Report Number: 20-156-0005 REPORT OFANALYSIS Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Lab No : 72570 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 2 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0279 mg/Kg 0.0156 1 06/09/2012:46 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 4 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
7621 White pine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 1 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Mary Brewer Project Bobby Branch Report Date : 06/10/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Received : 06/04/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Report Number : 20-156-0005 REPORT OFANALYS7S Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Lab No : 72571 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 3 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0187 mg/Kg 0.0156 1 06/09/2012:47 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 5 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Mary Brewer Project Bobby Branch
284 Boger Road Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
Report Number: 20-156-0005
Lab No : 72572
Sample ID: A, 5
Test
Mercury
REPORT OPANAL YUS
Results Units
0.0352 mg/Kg
MQL
0.0151
Report Date : 06/10/2020
Received ; 06/04/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
1 06/09/2012:48 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quandtation Limit
Page G of 8

Air
WaypNALYTICAL
7621 Whltepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number: 46622
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Report Number: 20.156-0005
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex 0 US Postal 0 Lab 0 Other:
is UPS 0 Client 0 Courier Thermometer ID:
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised? 0 Yes 0 No
Number of coolers/boxes received
1
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
0 Yes
0 No
I. Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No
Not Present
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
0 Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
0 Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
0 Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
0 Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
0 Yes
I. No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
0 Yes
I. No
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 — compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No
I. N/A
High concentration container (48 hr) F Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d) r Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions included? 0 Yes No
Comments: I
Signature: [Brandi Watson 1 Date & Time: 06/04/2020 09:50:09
Page 7 of 8

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
Illl►Ilil�llillflll>rlNl�l��ll�llalll�fllulll�
Synagro Cenho.
j I account
Grower/Project Information w_� V iformation
3- c 66 �� �� � SUbrritled By Charge To
Farm ID
IField ID
I
r�Ucicc-v €�� OJ C_ Z�0 ZQ
Credit Card # CSV I I Exp. Date: /
Phone #
3 3 (� �, L%
E-mail address
C Vj I v'At- cP Sy rna-1 w - C4
Crop Info For Recommendations
Sample ID
Lab Number 'S2NI - Specify Additional
Tests Soluble Additional Intended Yeld Altemative
(Lab Use S1M ^^- c 7n S3M Salts Texture NO;-N Tests Crop I Goal Crop
Lab# E 72569-1 1 — Lab# E 72571-1 3
Cust: 46622 Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Cot: - Cust: 46622 Synagro Central LLC/ Teclirncal
20-156-0005 Rec: 06/04/2020 00:00 Col:
06/04/2020 00:00
Preservation: _ 20-156-0005 Preservation:
I r
Lab# E 72570-1 2
— — Lab# E
Cust: 46622 Synagro Central LLC/ Technical Cust_u 72572-I 4
465
Col: Rec: 06/04/2020 00:00 Col: SMagro Central LLC/ Te�ni
20-156-0005 Preservation: � — ',56-0005 P aRec:06/pq/2020 i 'bon: 00:00
I
Mehlich III Test Packages Special Instructions or .31 Tests
Yield
Goal
Previous Crop
Z
5
S1 M - Organic matter, Phosphorus, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, pH, Buffer pH
Cation Exchange Capacity, and % Base Saturation.
S2M - Test S1 M plus any two of the following: Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc,
Manganese, Iron, Copper. Each additional test (above mo) cost S2.00.
S3M - Test S1M plus Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc, Manganese, Copper, and Iron.
I _ l _ C r �k e t-( y

VICINITY MAP
1�WaAa
p "'WHd
Z
pg4.W1 ('.nwc4 /W �71) �
117d
{j
h j
r
I fJzl
,ht111�^Htl 1 ]]:
'•k Vgnrpt BgslrptRd '
.r
IXdve Ad
IWnlee url Bonlee E1
113fi
• 1 Lx�S
,1 ]3 1rl 76
, fl„n14L fell
n a s
VA
OI
907
�a
x 17,78
nv�ld
100
peo"�'ka CfrurrhlldF
K
51 1141 Hear Creek
lix
lii 7s� ^
GRAPHIC SCALE
111 = 5,000'
5,000' 0 5,000'
The compliance boundary is established either 250 R from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
N C-C H-73
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
Field 10

APPLICATION MAP
i P:nrwn
APPLICATION AREA
— —�— — — — PRIVATE ROAD
STREAM
DRAIN
.
FENCE
PROPERTY LINE
0
UNSUITABLE AREA
WATER
ONSITE HOUSE
OFFSITE HOUSE
OUTBUILDING
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=660'
ssoa o sso'
NC-CH-73
Field 10

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
A ry
z
ids
i
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=800'
800' 0 800,
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ftfrom the residuals application area or 50 feet within
N C-CH-73
in the property boundary,
whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area, All
locations are approximate,
Field 10

Ix
I0
4
z
SOIL SURVEY
N--
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 1,000'
1,000- 0 1,000,
The compliance boundary Is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feetwithin NC-CH-73
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area, All
locations are approximate. Field 10

41AIR
Division of Water Resources
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02T .1100 —LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
sporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Nora -Discharge Permitting Unit.
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or othertype residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1 100. Do not submit
this agreement f'or review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do
not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to
the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits:
Applicant's name: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
(yes/no)
Land Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Sou rce
(optional)
Special note
(no-till/over-seed/
Pasture)
NC-CH-73-10
N
Pasture
Hay
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
shall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page i of 3

I. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity fbr the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDL-NR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
5. The Perrnittee must request and obtain a permit modification fi•om the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the land
application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules fbr typical cropping patterns, a description of the
equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals land
application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final soil
pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable fbr the
specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10, The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with in formation regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of nutrients
(e.g., fertil izer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land application
events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13, The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
11. RESTRICTIONS:
1. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land application
site(s) during active use and fbr the 12-month period following a residuals land application event. Such controls may include the posting of
signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites thatare to be used for grazing shall have Fencing that will be used to prevent access duringthese periods after such residuals land application
events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-month
period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested fora 20-month period lollowing a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the landshall not be harvested fora 38-month period following a residuals land application
event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
I It. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0105 h 7 allows the compliance
boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance boundary provided
the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance bounda►y is needed for field(s) ID:
(Please include the rationale fbrthe requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed compliance
boundary to the application package)
® A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: is currently permitted under another
residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ: The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this
agreement, he/she is requesting that the I ield(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred
into the new program;
(Name of the new program)
{ ()TlNA, T C)A 0A_1(, Dana') nf`3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that l have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein,
Landowner name:
Address: 43 t✓IN /e'e/ «�
City: /Yf 6tr,de, State: N
Phone:, -E-mail address:___
Signature: Date:
NORTH CAR NA, COUNTY
zip: li�7 _;_20 7)
�2J
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that���
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the . I ALenv k
day of
Signature and seal: /Z'V'v`L;-
My commission expires: L 61
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
,20Z0
ROBERT N. ROTH
GUILFORD COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail address:
Date:
Zip:
1 certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: Q/j 0 1� — _.
Signature: / 1 X! / Date: I2�/
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

SYNAGRO, HARNETT COUNTY CLASS B PERMIT
WQ 0007066
SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that soil profile evaluations were conducted on the proposed application
sites for the Harnett County project by Piedmont Environmental Associates, P.A. on
behalf of Synagro Central, LLC. The evaluations consisted of hand auger borings and
descriptions of the soils on the application sites. All hand auger borings included in this
package were either performed by me or under my direct supervision. All other work
performed for this permit application was conducted by Synagro Central, LLC.
G. Christopher Murray, L.S.S.
No. 1284
Synagro, Harnett County WUVTP Project, Various Fields

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project: Synagro Harnettt Co. (WQ 0007066)
% Slope: 2%
Site: CH_73
Crop: Forage/Pasture
Field: Field 10
Conducted By: GC Murray
Coordinates: 35.6669 N
Date: 12/6/2019
-79.4648 W
Soil Series: Georgeville
a�
H
H
o
�
m
v
_O
O
�
N
_ =
O
U
O
U
Q
4
N
O
U
y
N
r+
X
w
N
r
T
x
n
F.
F.F.S.-N
S
I ~AT
Ass O c I Arcs, P. A.
w
N
}
�
U
H H
C
N
O
V
'W
,DUI
V
V N
O
Y
v
A
rn
rn
rn S
n
n
A
0-5
10YR 3/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sit
mod
I med
r
fr
ns
np
AB
5-14
10YR 6/3
-
-
-
-
moist
sil
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Bt
14-48
1 2.5YR 4/81
1-
-
-1
moist
I c
I mod
med
I sbk
I fi
I s
p
Legend:
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Seasonal High Water Table:
Structure Size.
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)
f fine
-
med medium
S014
OP HE
Moist Consistency
fr friable
0
vfr very friable
fi firm
y'F
vfi very firm

NCDA&CS Ay-. nomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.i._ _gr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. F , _ ,-SL019873
Client: Synagro
Advisor: Synagro
Heavy Metals Synagro
Synagro
284 Boger Rd.
284 Boger Rd.
Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction Mocksville, NC 27028
Mocksville, NC 27028
:�..41
Sampled County : Chatham
Links to Helpful Ir
- - - Client ID: 503079
Advisor ID: 503079
Sampled: Received: 12/19/2019 Completed: 01/03/2020 Farm:
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results.
Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium
(Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Although the above metals here are not believed
to pose a concern for
plant growth, continue to m nitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer recommendations. Jagathi Kamalakanthan 1 /3/2020
Sample ID: 73-1.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn
Cu B Information
Lime History:
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.4 120-200 100 20 0 0 0 0
0 0
2- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 100 20 0 0 0 0
0 0
Test Results [units - WN i n g/cm3; CEC and N a i n meq/100 cm3; NO3-N i n mg/dm3 : Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH Pg K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.27 0.79 10.6 87 1.4 5.8 16 65 54 29 83 244 163 163 201 201
146 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.0 Cadmium, 0.1 Nickel, 0.3 Chromium, 0.1 Lead,
2.1 Selenium, 0.1
North Caro;'..:
71
Reprogramming oft he laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Aprrculture

Waypoint
ANALYTICAL
6/10/2020
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 20-156-0004
Project Description: Doug Ellis
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 6/4/2020 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method. Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and NELAC unless otherwise indicated.
Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Resultsfor solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
L.aboratay's liablilly in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratay's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Page 1 of 5

Q)
Waypoint. 7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number: 20-156-0004
Client Project Description: Doug Ellis
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received Method Lab ID
72568 10 Solids 06/04/2020 SW-74716 WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 2 of 5

Waypoint
ANALYTICAL
46622
Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypoiiitaiialytical.com
Mary Brewer Project Doug Ellis Report Date : 06/10/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Received : 06/04/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028
Pam« mG ��►�
Report Number :20-156-0004 REPORT OFANAL YSIS Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Lab No : 72568 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 10 Sampled:
Test Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0375 mg/Kg 0.0154 1 06/09/2012:43 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quandtation Limit
Page 3 0£ 5

Wayppint.0AYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www_waypointanalytical.com
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number: 46622
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/ Technical
Report Number: 20-156-0004
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex 0 US Postal 0 Lab 0 Other:
is UPS 0 Client 0 Courier Thermometer ID: ;
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised? 0 Yes 0 No
Number of coolers/boxes received
1
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
0 Yes
0 No
Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No
Not Present
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
0 Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
is Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
0 Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
0 Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
0 Yes
No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
0 Yes
No
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No
N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No
N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No
N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 -- compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No
N/A
High concentration container (48 hr) Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions included?
0 Yes
0 No
Comments:
Signature: IBrandi Watson ] Date & Time: 06/04/2020 09:49:22
Page 4 of 5

Waypoeint
ANALYTICAL
• SOIL ^"""
7E sLLCF Teciu466622
ub�i�w�iwi�wi�wi�iw
douo Ent 2020
c9:4s 24
Account #
Grower/Project Information
on
5ubminea rsy Charge To
p�14 s
J
I
�ILr15 �V tiK'r
Farm ID
GN-� 3 Field ID
IJC- 27 D 2-
Credit Card #
CSV
Exp. Date:
Phone #
3 (s 11) Z
E-mail address
I G �.,, i v, c, try 5-1 t q'� C 0 "
Crop Info For Recommendations
Sample ID
Lab Number
(Lab Use
Only)
SW
S21VI - Specifjlrl Additional
Tests
S3M
Soluble
Salts
Texture
NO3-N
Additional
Tests
Intended
Crop
Yield
Goal
Attemative
Crop
Yield
Goat
Previous Crop
B
Cu
Fe
Mn
Na
S
Zn
I
Lab# E 72568-1 10
Cust: 46622 synagro central u.CJ Technical
Col: Rec: 06/04/2020 00:00
20-156-0004 Prese^vab°n'.
i
-- -
Mehlich
III Test Packages
Special
Instructions or Additional Tests
S1M - Organic matter, Phosphorus, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, pH, Buffer pH
Cation Exchange Capacity, and % Base Saturation.
S2M -Test S1M plus ary two of the follovAng: Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc,
Manganese, Iron, Copper. Each additional test (above two) cost S2.00.
S3M - Test S 1 M plus Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc, Manganese, Copper, and Iron.
i l
1
!!!

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
Date: 5/21/20
To: Name of Chairman to the Board of County Commissioners: MARK{ F. RICHARDSON
Complete mailing address: PO Box 101
City: Wentworth State: NC Zip: 27375-
County where land application sites are located: Rockingham
From: Applicant's name: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP (on behalf of the Division of Water Resources in
accordance with Session Law 2013-340)
Contact person and title: Nate Roth, Technical_ Services Manager
Complete mailing address: 284 Boger Rd,
City: Mocksville State: NC Zip: 27028-"
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: i•roth@syna rg o.com
Subject: Notification of residual land application site proposal
This is to notify you that the Applicant listed above will be submitting an application to the Division of Water
Resources for the land application of residual solids to site(s) located in your county. During this review, the Division
will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced. Attached to this form is information regarding residuals -
generating sources and locations of the proposed land application sites. Please forward this letter and its associated
attachments to the appropriate Department within your County (i.e., Health or Environmental Health Department and
Planning Department) if applicable.
More information of the land application sites included in this application will be available at the following
Division of Water Resources Regional Off ice:
Name of appropriate regional office: Winston Salem Re ional Office
Complete inailing address: 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite300
City: Winston Salem State: NC Zip: 27105-
Telephone number: 336) 776-9800
Expected date of application submission: 1
Should you desire to comment on this application, please do so no later than 30 calendar days following the
expected application submission date. If you have any questions or comments about this notification, or if you would like
more information, please contact the appropriate regional office at the telephone number provided above. Thank you in
advance for your attention to this matter.
Enclosures: Source Facility Summaiy
Land Application Site Suininary
Maps
Non-Dischaige Pennitling Unit
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, Nodh Carolina 27699-1617
Phone; 919-807-64641 Internet: hitpalpooal.ncdenr.ora7webhua
An Equal Oppoilunily%AKrmativeAclionEmployer -Made in pail with recycled paper FORM: CBN 06-16

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name_ J'-agr'o'Western Piedmont RLA.P
Status
Codea
Facility Permit holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current b
Proposed
N
Town of Mayodan
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham
NC00218ri
0
315
E Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page I

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Slna_¢ro Western PiedmontRLAP
Land application sites currently certified: 813.6 net acres and Total to be certified: 64.5 Mayodan net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Code'
Site/Field
ID
Landowners
()
Lessee(s)or O s
Operator(s) ()
Net Acres
CountyCrop(s
)
Predominant Soil
b Mapping Unit
Series Name or Rep. Slope'
N
RC-49-01
Ann Purgason
Jim Goodwin
21.2
Rockingham
Ps'r
Clifford
CgB2
N
Bennett Farms LLC
Jim Goodwin
:0.7
Rockinghamg
Clifford
CgB2
N
k(fz9-03°
Bennett Farms LLC
Jim Goodwin
7.4
Rockingham
Hay
+ Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-04
Bennett Farms LLC
Jim Goodwin
10.7
Rockingham
Hay
Clifford
CgB2 I
N
RC-49-05
Bennett Farms LLC
Jim Goodwin
8.7
Rockingham
Row Crop
Clifford
CgB2
N
RC-49-06
Bennett Farms LLC
Jim Goodwin
5.8
Rockingham
Hay
Clifford
CgB2
N
E:
M
N
j= l,YAM
z Status Code for land application sites are: + N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) + M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
Mapping unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e_ fora 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
II. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and Current and Proposed
Datum
Stream index No. 1 Class
RC-49-01
§,6A4° 17' 22"
79�� 57' 26"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-31-1 C C
NO '�l'l
36° 17' 22.42"
79- 57' 6.7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second Little Hogans Creek, 22-31-1
C
C
- ; 3'6- 17'22.3"
T9° 56' 54.4"
NAD 83
ADD
NearestSecond
Little Hogans Creek, 22-31-1
C
C
RC-49-04 36- 17' 17.8"
79° 56' 53.9"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
I Little Hogans Creek, 22-31-1
C
C
RC-49-05 36° 17' 12.5"
° 57' 6.2"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-31-1
C
C
RC a9 06
36" 17' 23"
790 57' 12.7
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Little Hogans Creek, 22-31-1
C
C
r
NAD $3
ADD
Nearest Second
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
OHIO
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (1L) of the same field on the same page_
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page I

VICINITY MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" ^ 4,000'
4,000' 0 4,000'
The complianceboundaty is established either 250 fl from the residuals application area or 50 feelwilhin
In the property boundary, whichever Is closest to the appllcatlon area. The review boundary Is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area, All
locations are approximate,
N C- RC-49
Fields 1-6

Proof of Delivery
Dear Customer,
This notice serves as proof of delivery for the shipment listed below,
Tracking Number
1Z51F76W0105526616
service
UPS Next Day Air®j
)elivered On
07/17/2020 10:13 A.M.
Delivered To
STOKESDALE, NC, US
Weight
0.50 LBS
Shipped / Billed On
07/16/2020
Left At
Front Door
Thank you for giving us this opportunity to serve you. Details are only available for shipments delivered ~within the last 120
days. Please print for your records if YOU require this information after 120 days.
Sincerely,
UPS
Tracking results provided by UPS: 07/17/2020 10:54 A.M. EST
Print this page

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R, van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
Date: 6/26/2020
To: Name of Chairman to the Board of County Commissioners: Howard L. Penny
Complete mailing address: PO Box 736
City: Coats
State: NC Zip: 27521-
County where land application sites are located: Harnett
From: Applicant's name: Synagro Western Piedmont RLAP (on behalf of the Division of Water Resources in
accordance with Session Law 2013-340)
Contact person and title: Chris Wynne, Technical Services Specialist
Complete mailing address: 284 Boger Rd.
City: Mocksville State: NC Zip: 27028
Telephone number: 336909-8627 E-mail address: ewynne n,syna rg a.com
Subject: Notification of residual land application site proposal
This is to notify you that the Applicant listed above will be submitting an application to the Division of Water
Resources for the land application of residual solids to site(s) located in your county. During this review, the Division
will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced. Attached to this forth is infbrmation regarding residuals -
generating sources and locations of the proposed land application sites. Please forward this letter and its associated
attachments to the appropriate Department within your County (i.e., Health or Environmental Health Department and
Planning Department) if applicable.
More information of the land application sites included in this application will be available at the following
Division of Water Resources Regional Office:
Name of appropriate regional office: Fayetteville Regional Office
Complete mailing address: 225 Green St, Suite 714
City: Fayetteville State: NC Zip: 28301-
Telephone number: [phone]
Expected date of application submission: 6/26/20
Should you desire to comment on this application, please do so no later than 30 calendar days following the
expected application submission date. If you have any questions or comments about this notification, or if you would like
more information, please contact the appropriate regional office at the telephone number provided above. Thank you in
advance for your attention to this matter.
Enclosures: Source Facility Summary
Land Application Site Summary
Maps
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Nodh Carolina 27699.1617
Phone: [phone] t Internet: htta:/lrwrtal.ncdenr.oM1weh/wa
An Equal Opporlunity t Affirmative Action Employer —Made in pat wilh recycled paper FORM: CBN 06- l6

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: Synagro Western Piedmont, LLC
Status
a
Code
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current
Proposed
N
Harnett County Utilities
North Harnett Regional
WWTP
Harnett
NCO021636
0
1500
8 Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e. not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM_ RSC 06-16 Page 1

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Svnaaro Western Piedmont RLAP
Land application sites currently certified: 813.6 net acres and Total to be certified: 44.4 Harnettnet acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status Site/Field
Code" ID
Landowner(s)
Lessee(s) or Operator(s)
Net Acres
County
Crop(s)
Predominant Soil
Series Name
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope`
N
HA-47-1
James W. Pope
James W. Pope
19.2
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyA
N
HA-47-2
James W. Pope
James W. Pope
9.9
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyA
N
HA-47-3
James W. Pope
James W. Pope
11.0
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyB
N
HA-47-4
James W. Pope
James W. Pope
4.3
Harnett
Pasture
Aycock
AyB
Status Code for land application sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
'Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
II. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Current and Proposed
p
Class
HA-47-1
350 34' 41"
780 74' 88"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Second Silver Run, 18-20-33-1
WS-Iv
WS-Iv
HA-47-2
350 20' 52"
780 44' 55"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Second Silver Run 18-20-33-1
WS-Iv
WS-Iv
HA-47-3
350 34' 97"
780 74' 70"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Cape Fear River, 18-(16.7)
WS-Iv
WS-1v
HA-47-4
350 35' 22"
780 74' 67"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Cape FearRiver, 18-(16.7)
WS-Iv
WS-1v
Note: Please keep the site information (I.) and waterbody information (11.) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1

VICINITY MAP
r
\"*�
f 1a .� V�
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 4,000'
4,000' 0 4,000'
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NC-HA-47
Fields 1-4

Tracking Number: 70200090000151709551
Status
Your item was picked up at the post office at 3:60 pm on
@r Delivered
July 7, 2020 in COATS, NC 27521.
J* 7. 2020 a13.50 pm
OeWemed. IrrdiMwl Picked Up st Post Office
COATS, NC 2752%
Get Updates v
Text & Email Updates
Tracking History
Product Information
See Less ^
Delivered
Reprove X

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
Date: 7/6/2020
To: Name of Chairman to the Board of County Commissioners: Karen Howard
Complete mailing address: PO Box 1809
City: Pittsboro
State: NC Zip: 27312-
County where land application sites are located: Chatham
From: Applicant's name: Synagro Western Piedmont, LLC (on behalf of the Division of Water Resources in accordance
with Session Law 2013-340)
Contact person and title: Chris Wynne
Complete mailing address: 284 Boer Rd.
City: Mocksville State: NC Zip: 27028
Telephone number: 336 909-8627 E-mail address: cwynncta`e,synagro.cotn
Subject: Notification of residual land application site proposal
This is to notify you that the Applicant listed above will be submitting an application to the Division of Water
Resources for the land application of residual solids to site(s) located in your county. During this review, the Division
will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced. Attached to this form is information regarding residuals -
generating sources and locations of the proposed land application sites. Please forward this letter and its associated
attachments to the appropriate Department within your County (i.e., Health or Environmental Health Department and
Planning Department) if applicable.
More information of the land application sites included in this application will be available at the following
Division of Water Resources Regional Office:
Name of appropriate regional office: Raleigh Regional Office
Complete mailing address: 3800 Barrett Drive
City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27609-
Telephone number: [phone]
Expected date of application submission: 7/13/2020
Should you desire to comment on this application, please do so no later than 30 calendar days following the
expected application submission date. If you have any questions or comments about this notification, or if you would like
more information, please contact the appropriate regional office at the telephone number provided above. Thank you in
advance for your attention to this matter.
Enclosures: Source Facility Summary
Land Application Site Summary
Maps
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Caiolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] l Internet: http:l/podal._n_cdenr.orglwebAN
An Equal Oppodunily k Affirmalive AM n Employer — Made in part with recycled pa per FORM: CBN06-16

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: Suynagro Western Piedmont, LLC
Status
Codes
I
Facility Permit Holder
� Facility Name
County Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current n
Proposed
N
Harnett County Utilities
North Harnett Regional
WWTP
Harnett
NCO021636
0
1500
N
Town of Siler City
Siler City WWTP
Chatham NCO026441
0
1325
a Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently pennitted fbr distribution, Iand application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 06-16 Page 1

LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Synam Western Piedmont RLAP
Land application sites currently certified: 813.6 net acres and Total to be certified: 268.7 Chatham net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Status
Code'
Site/Field
ID
Landowners
I ()
Lessees or Operator(s)
()
Net Acres
Count Y
Crop(s) s
P()
Predominant Soil
Series Name b
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope°
N
CH-78-1
Bobby Branch
66.4
Chatham
Pasture
Cid-Lignum
CmB
N
I CH-78-2
Bobby Branch
40.7
Chatham
Pasture
Cid-Lignum
CmB
N
I CH-78-3
Bobby Branch
57.6
Chatham
Pasture
Cid-Lignum
CmB
N
I CH-78-5
Bobby Branch
65.5
Chatham
I Pasture
Georgeville
GeB2
N
CH-73-16
Doug Ellis
38.5
Chatham
Hay
Georgeville
GeB2
Status Code for land application sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) OM(Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
H. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method
Code
Location Accuracy
L
Waterbody Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Current and Proposed
Class
CH-78-1
1 350 37' 13.5"
f 79° 21' 46.7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Sandy Branch, 17-43-16-1
C
C
CH-78-2
350 36' 53.3"
790 22' 21.7"
I NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Sandy Branch, 17-43-16-1
C
C
CH-78-3
1 350 37' 11.9"
79- 22' 7"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Sandy Branch, 17-43-16-1
C
C
CH-78-5
350 40' 27.9"
790 22' 18.4"
! NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
I Tick Creek, 17-43-13
C
C
CH-73-10
350 40' 77"
790 27' 50.2"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
Tick Creek, 17-43-13
C
C
Note: Please keep the site information (1.) and waterbody infonnation (II_) of the same field on the same page.
FORM: LASC 06-16 Page 1

GRAPHIC SCALE
T' = 4,000'
ON' o a,000-
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
NC-CH-78
Fields 1-3,5

��fCJrXGh i IJ
t
Jo6kjru�,y,3? $N
d
A
c7� ecrfrr tt.�
FIN
0
Vv; Fs CA-Ch4di
VICINITY MAP
0 7 {1�FO
L�nfreK'� FY�n�r.
11b; m
Iva ttrs
I Sa1
e r
f1d^d.
rt
f 111 K-BE,n
_ ID
' lll9
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 5,000'
510001 0 5,000'
The compliance boundary is established either250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within NC-CH-73
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate. Field 10

Tracking Number. 70192280000164349514
Status
Your item was delivered at 10:42 am on July 9, 2020 in G Delivered
PITTSBORO, NC 27312_ July 9, 2620 at 10:42 am
Detrvered
PTTTSBOAO. NC 27312
Get Updates v
Dalivened
Text & Email Updates
Tracking History
Product Information
See Less ^
v
v
Remove X