19990222 Ver 1_Other Documents_20000606 (2)

°?.?°
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 16, 1999

DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Mike Bell, USACE Washington
FROM: V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Assistant Manager C
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
SUBJECT: Revised Mitigation Plan, Greene Street Bridge Mitigation Site
Bridge No. 411 over the Tar River on SR 1531 and Pitt Street (extension)
TIP B-2225
Attached, please find the revised mitigation plan for the Greene Street Bridge Mitigation Site. Distribution o1'
this revised report (within two months of issuance of the permit) fulfills `Special Condition part f of the Individual
Permit No. 199505645. If you have any questions, please contact Karen M. Lynch at [phone].
A-
cc: Mr. David Cox, WRC .
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. David Franklin, USACE Wilmington
Ms. Alice Gordon, PD&EA
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ
Mr. Pushker Kharecha, USACE Wilmington
File B-2225
Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Greene Street Bridge
Pitt County
Bridge Number 411 on SR 1531 and Pitt Street (extension)
TIP Project Number B-2225
North Carolina State Project Number 8.2220601
Prepared by
Natural Systems Unit II
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
August 16, 1999
1.0 Introduction and Description of Proposed Project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the
existing Greene Street bridge over the Tar River in Greenville and construct an additional
bridge 330 feet upstream, extending Pitt Street across the Tar River. Both bridges will
provide one-way traffic flow, circulating northbound and southbound traffic through the
central business district of Greenville. Greene Street will provide a two-lane bridge for
northbound traffic, while Pitt Street will accommodate two lanes of southbound traffic.
Both bridges will provide a 28-foot travelway with two feet allocated for bicycles on the
right side of the bridges. In addition. each bridge will have five-foot sidewalks.
Environmental impacts associated with this project are considered in several documents.
Most recently. the document "Environmental Assessment and Programmatic Section 4(t)
Evaluation (1996)" was completed.
2.0 Wetland Resources
2.1 Methodology
Wetlands were delineated by Tim W. Savidge of NCDOT on June 27, 1996 using the
"Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual" (1987). A total of four wetland sites
were identified in the delineation; these were verified by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) on August 27, 1996. Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were
determined to be 0.66 acres. Mechanized clearing in wetlands will account for 0.11 acres
of impacts and the remaining 0.55 acres of impacts will be from fill.
2.2 Impacted Wetlands
Of the total 0.66 acres of wetland impacts, 0.36 acres are cypress swamp, 0.2 acres are
bottomland hardwoods and 0.1 acre consists of graminoid marsh (disturbed, utility right-
of-way). Using the "Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina - Third
Approximation" (Schafale and Weakley 1990), these wetlands are classified as cypress-
gum swamp (brownwater subtype), coastal plain levee forest (brownwater subtype) and a
regularly disturbed transmission line easement containing shrubby and herbaceous
vegetation.
3.0 Mitigation
3.1 Purpose and Goals
Compensatory mitigation to offset the impacts of this project will occur onsite. The
NCDOT has purchased 3.1 acres of land between the proposed bridges specifically to be
used for mitigation for Project B-2225. A deed containing a boundary description of the
property purchased for mitigation is attached.
This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of creation/restoration, 0.40
acres of enhancement and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland levee forest and adjacent
bottomlands. The premise of mitigation would be to provide a contiguous bottomland
hardwood and cypress swamp system in areas where fill had previously been placed and
to enhance areas that had been continually altered for utility-line right of way. Because of
the proximity of adjacent urban areas, it is important to maintain or increase (by creating,
restoring or enhancing) wetlands in sites such as this, as wetlands provide flood stora-,e
and the opportL1111t%' for pollutant removal and sediment filtration and retention.
4.0 Site Description
Pockets of bottomland hardwood wetlands occur on the project property among the
alluvial levee forest, adjacent to the Tar River. Further from the river, cypress swamp
occurs in deeper depressions. Disturbed freshwater marsh and continually maintained
higher around are found throughout the property along utility and bridge right of ways.
In general, this area contains only slight changes in elevation with the lower depressions
being occupied by cypress swamp and the higher areas adjacent to the river, an alluvial
levee system. The property is traversed by a gravel access road and utility lines and
structures, all of which will be removed.
4.1 Hydrology
Overbank flooding occurs from the Tar River, although a high berm likely reduces the
amount and frequency of overbank flooding from the river into the levee forest. The
United States Geological Survey has intermittently collected gage height data from the
Tar River at Greenville (station 902084000) at this location. River stage data were
collected from 1985 through the middle of September 1990 and again from April 1997
through the present. Gaps often exist in data collection so the precise extent of river
flooding is unknown. Overbank flooding was noted on the north side of the river during
a site visit on January 29, 1999. The river stage was 10.3 feet when overbank flooding
occurred. A review of hydrological data has shown that overbank flooding is a frequent
phenomena that occurs frequently during the growing season. On the average, overbank
flooding occurred 21 days during the growing season when considering the last six years
that data were collected.
Hydrology of the cypress swamp is influenced by a man-made canal located adjacent to
the project that flushes water back and forth from the Tar River. Cypress swamps
generally have a long hydroperiod, being flooded throughout the winter and episodically
in the summer. Adjacent to the project site, beavers have impounded a canal, creating
deeper backwaters.
4.2 Vegetation
Wetland communities on the project site include cypress-gum swamp (brownwater
subtype), coastal plain levee forest (brownwater subtype) and a regularly disturbed
transmission line easement containing shrubby and herbaceous vegetation. Dominant
vegetation in and adjacent to the cypress swamp includes trees such as baldcypress
(Taxodium distichum), American elm (Ulmus americana), water ash (Fraxinus
caroliniana), water hickory (Carya ayuaticu) and swamp cottonwood (Populus
heterophylla). Ironwood (Carpinzt.s caroliniana) is a common understory tree on slightly
higher elevations, Several species of shrubs including hawthorn (Crataegus sp.) and
buttonbush (Cephulanthus occidentalis) are present. Dominant vegetation in the levee
forest and bottomlands include sycamore (Plutanus occidentalis), Green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvunicu), river birch (Betula nigru), willow oak (Ouercus phellos) and water
hickory (Curyu ayuaticu). The disturbed marsh consists of a variety of grasses, sedges
and herbs with some shrubby gro%\th. The Invasive aquatic plant, alligator \%eed
(.41terncn thera:?hiloxeroicles) is also prevalent near a drainage ditch. Re_>ular mowinh!
under utility lines has prevented succession into mature cypress swamp.
-1.3 Soils .
Two soil types occur within the mitigation site and both are considered to be hydric
(USDA 1989). Soils adjacent to the Tar River and within 500 feet are classified as Bibb
complex. This mapping series consists of flood plain soils or alluvial deposits consisting
of a variety of tine sandy loams. Areas of Bibb soils experience very frequent flooding
for brief periods. Beyond 500 feet from the river, the site contains soils classified as
Cape Fear loam. These soils are also poorly drained with the soils being frequently
flooded for brief periods. Both soil types are rated as 'good' for supporting suitable
wildlife habitat (cover and food) including hardwood trees and shrubs (Karnowski et. al
1974).
5.0 Proposed Wetland Mitigation
Mitigated wetlands would support a levee system adjacent to the river that trancends into
deeper bottomland hardwoods and cypress swamp with more contiguous flow than is
currently present. The mitigation site is comprised of a total of 3.1 acres located between
the proposed Pitt Street bridge and Greene Street as depicted in Figure. 1. Of this acreage,
2.15 acres are for enhancement and restoration/creation in addition to 0.95 acres of
preservation. Figure 2a illustrates existing wetlands and Figure 2b outlines mitigation
areas for comparison.
The mitigation site encompasses regularly mowed, disturbed right-of-way (former utility
line right-of-way) that functions as a fresh water marsh. This freshwater marsh was
determined to be at an elevation of 0.9 - 1.8 m mean sea level (msl). Once planted, this
area would revert to cypress swamp such as that found near the northern end of the
project site.
The cleared land near the northern boundary would be graded to the elevation of the
existing, adjacent cypress swamp. In addition, the portion of gravel road adjacent to
cypress swamp would be graded and planted as cypress swamp. Elevation of the existing
cypress swamp was found to range from 1.1 - 1.9 m msl.
Bottomland hardwood wetlands were determined to range in elevation from 1.8 - 2.1 m
msl with a small portion of the wetlands located at 2.4 in msl. Higher areas adjacent to
the maintained bridge right-of way would be graded to the elevation of the current
bottomlands. The existing gravel road and land adjacent to the bridges would be graded
to the elevation of the bottomlands and planted in hardwoods similar to those existing in
the bottomlands. There is also a triangular shaped area of non-wetland vegetation that
contains predominately invasive Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) that would be
cleared and graded to allow a continuation of bottomland forest.

O
i"

a
z
z
z v 7-
0 CD
'
D O -

z Q
n

0-
U)
m

G)
CD
I
(D
V)
CD
O?
3
c n
-
J
r-f-
ll<rn
W
i
N
N
N
Ul

` n
i

?re3a a?\
io
of
?I

1
? ••
? z
m

.f, ? i -? C7 0 0 o x

i,
y
C
--I z
m 5 ? D
?,/ " ? O Oz z Or
m
D m
> m m O D

-..? ? z v Gl y v

-
-? m ' O
n z `n z
' .. m N
'_' D N m
O
n O
T
Z _
e`

i
i

N

i

i ? CJ

,

CD
I
?
r Oo
r a?
I?
OC/1
co
r--
n
O
r
N
N
_ w•
I Lr v? ,, -
c l - ? ? _ ?1 c
r ??f CD' I
r
Z` I 1 C ? ~ d ? ? x??f G
r
L-cc
NRPMO
'Al
Nl?
I-ME
I CO
CD ::D C?j
C U i 7 \ \\ \ \ ' I / i
`1;91
CZ)j ZEE
CD CLJ
? CIS .-__-_. F z I i I I?i;,1 ,z\?? ;; 1 \ M{ • ?? a
7-1
I opsoll lroin hh-dicr (non-Wet) areas \ ill he stockpiled onsitc and later reuse<i for topsoil
in the mitigated areas once grading is completed. The stockpiled topsoil will ! c clearly
labeled so that their intended use is known.
5.1 Kvdrologic restoration
Mitigation will involve extending existing wetlands by grading non-wet areas to the
elevation of the wetland areas. Stockpiled topsoil will be incorporated on top of the
graded area. -Vreas of microtopographic relief will be created throughout the area to be
graded. In addition. removal of the gravel access road will provide for a more contiguous
overland flow of water. As previously mentioned, overbank flooding from the Tar River
is sufficient to create h,,-drological conditions favorable for successful mitigation.
5.2 Plant community restoration
When grading is complete, vegetative communities will match the adjacent wetland with
the created/restored levee community grading into a bottomland hardwoods; cypress
swamp, toward the north end of the project. Trees to be planted in the cypress swamp
include bald cypress (40%), swamp tupelo (swamp blackgum - A ssa aquatica)
(40%), green ash (10%) and water hickory (10%).
Closer to the river, trees to be planted in the bottomland hardwood area include
sycamore, green ash, river birch, willow oak and water hickory. These proposed tree
species are found onsite and are consistent with the community assemblages described by
Schafale and Weakley (1990).
Hardwood trees to be planted will be at least 12 to 18" tall and at least a year old at the
time of planting. Trees will be planted on 8-foot centers with a variety of trees in each
row to create a mosaic of different types of trees.
5.3 Site considerations
Due to the occurrence of active beavers in the mitigation area, either tree protection or
beaver removal may be necessary to insure the survival of trees. In addition. the marsh
area has been invaded by Alligator weed (.4Iternanthera philoxeroides), a noxious aquatic
plant that may invade higher ground. Two initial sprayings (early summer and late fall)
with an appropriate herbicide such as Rodeo may be necessary to reduce the
competitiveness of this weed. As canopy cover increases, this aggressive weed will
likely become diminished.
Since construction equipment will be active on the mitigation site, problems with soil
compaction are likely. After grading and installation of stockpiled topsoil, soil
compaction will be corrected (ripped) with the use of subsoiling equipment. Appropriate
erosion control measures will be implemented to minimize impacts to water quality. If
necessary, the soil will be stabilized with annuals (such as winter rye) to reduce erosion.
Topsoil from existing high ground will be stockpiled for inclusion into replanted areas.
Since soil fertility varies considerably, fertilizer supplements may be necessar.,.
6.0 Monitoring plan
6.1 Hy(b-olo,n-
Placement of (40-inch) groundwater monitoring wells will occur 1) the levee forest
depression (bottomlands) and 2) in the created/restored site adjacent to the bridge.
Surface water monitoring wells will also be placed in the two newly created/restored
areas described above. Duplicate surface water wells will be placed in the
created/restored swamp forest (3b) and duplicate surface water wells will be placed in the
existing swamp forest two years prior to mitigation implementation (3a) as illustrated in
Figure 2b. Data from these wells will be collected throughout the year with particular
attention paid to the hydrology present during the growing season from March 15 through
November 16. y y
In the cypress swamp area to be created/restored, success will be determined using data
from monitoring wells (well 3b) to demonstrate that inundation or saturation within 12
inches of the ground has existed consecutively for at least 25% of the growing season.
Hydrologic data from the south portion of the mitigation site in the created/restored
bottomlands (well 92) will demonstrate that inundation or saturation within 12 inches of
the ground has existed consecutively for at least 12.5% of the growing season.
If either community fails to meet the criteria listed above (25% for cypress swamp forest,
12.5% for bottomlands) a comparative analysis of the hydrologic data from the
restoration/creation area and corresponding reference area will be performed to determine
whether the data are statistically different.
6.2 Vegetation
After planting, two vegetation monitoring plots will be established in mitigated areas that
are located adjacent to monitoring wells. One monitoring plot will be located in an area
that is (currently) non-wet near the bridge right-of-way and the other monitoring plot will
be in the disturbed utility right of way, adjacent to the existing cypress swamp.
Monitoring plots will be 50'x50' in size. Plots will be monitored annually by stem
counts (# and species per plot) and assessment of plant vigor (healthy, unhealthy) and
species composition. Adjustments (additions of plantings) may occur if deemed
necessary.
Since vegetation in the mitigated area is to grade from levee forest to bottomland
hardwood to deeper cypress swamp, the vegetation of planted trees should match
adjacent existing wetlands with success determined at the end of the fifth growing season.
Successful plantings will be determined by obtaining at least 260 of the target trees per
acre after five years. The target number of 260 trees per acre after five years is
determined by a ratio assuming that 680 trees per acre are planted initially. Target
species are defined as trees from the list of species to be planted as stated in Section 5.2.
6.3 Dee riwnation 01'Succ'c!ss1111 Success will be achieved if one of the above criteria (percentage of -grow in-a season or
statistically similar water levels between wells) is met and if the planted vegetation are
successful.
7.0 Mitigation Credit Ratios
NCDOT proposes to mitigate for 0.66 acres of impact through a combination of
restoration. creation. enhancement and preservation. Three and one tenth acres of land
were purchased solel% for mitigation of project B-2225 and will be used to compensate
for unavoidable impacts to wetlands. Of this land, 2.1 acres will be used for active
mitigation: 0.34 acres are to be restored/created as cypress swamp and 0.40 acres are to
be enhanced as cypress swamp. Approximately 1.41 acres will be created/restored as
bottomland hardwood. Much of the remaining parcel of land (0.95 acres) is forested
upland levee with pockets of wetlands and would be more beneficial intact, from an
ecological perspective, as branches and root systems of vegetation provide filtration,
nutrient adsorption and sediment retention.
For this project, NCDOT has exceeded the required ratio for compensatory mitigation.
Three and one tenth acres will be used for mitigation of 0.66 acres of impact which yields
a mitigation to impacts ratio of greater than 4:1.
8.0 Implementation and Reporting Schedule
Because the mitigation site is contiguous with the project site, restoration and
enhancement of the B-2225 bridge site will occur towards completion of the construction
phase of the bridges, since soil compaction from heavy equipment and injury to small
trees may present problems. Construction and grading of the mitigation site will be
initiated immediately after the bridge project is completed. Planting of tree species will
take place the following fall/winter. The mitigation site shall be constricted and planted
by May 31, 2004. Monitoring of the hydrology and vegetation will be conducted for five
years with annual monitoring reports submitted to the appropriate agencies in January of
each following year.
9.0 As-built reports
Within 90 days (by August 31, 2004) after the mitigation project is completed, a
description, photos and as-built plans describing the Greene Street mitigation site will be
provided to the appropriate resource agencies. Pertinent information such as the degree
of established vegetation, vegetation monitoring plots, data from surface and ground
water wells and ground elevations will be included in the as built reports.
10.0 Dispensation of propertri
NCDOT will retain ownership of the mitigation site and protect it in perpetuity. It is
possible that classes from nearby East Carolina University would like to use the area for
the study of wetlands.
References
Carter and Burgess, Inc. 1996. Environmental assessment and programmatic section 4(f)
evaluation. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
and NC Department of Transportation, Division of Highways..
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual.
Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg MS.
Karnowski, E.H. , J.B. Newman, J. Dunn and J.A. Meadows. 1974. Soil Survey of Pitt
County, North Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service and NC Agricultural
Experiment Station. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D. C. 73
)PP.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of
North Carolina, Third Approximation. NC Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR, Raleigh. 325pp.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1989. Hydric soils of North Carolina.
Soil Conservation Service, Raleigh, NC. 20 pp.
/ I
I
$Q.00
[[ T I
ECCISn T;lr ?CF
I
F, xc.i.:,e Tax I
oUUn IJ,IJ illl r)r) /
nnrt: rr, lu°t n ,.. 0 i0u1
t•ARChr, nr?
I1' ording Ti.mc, k and Pao^
x Lot No. Parce.L T<lentif.ier. No.
ri£icd by County on the day of 19
i.l after recordinq to Albert E. Joyner, Division Right of Way Agent, NC Department
Transportation, 105 E:astbrook Drive, Greenville, ITC 27058
is instrument was prepared by Robert If. Arnold, III, Right of Way Agent
NC Department of Transportation
ief description for the Index: Property described in Deed Book 641, Page 485, Pitt County
gistry.
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
IS DEED made this, 19thday of June
GRANTOR
IOBBY RAY O'NEAL AND WIFE,
IARBARA L. O'NEAL
168 US 413
'ARMVILLE, NC 27828
19 98 , by and between
GRANTEE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
All AGENCY OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
105 EASTBROOK DRIVE
GREENVILLE, 11C 27859
iter in appropriate block for each p-t t.y: n.nne, addre_^,n, and, if appropriate, character of
itity e.q. corporation or partnership.
in designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
icr_essorn, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural., masculine, feminine or neuter
required by context.
TNESSETII, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration rf $4,125.00_paid by the Grantee,
in receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant:, bargain,
X11 and convey unto the grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land
tuated GREENVILLE Township, PITT ____County, Plortt: Carolina and more
rrticularly described as follows:
Being a portion of that property described in Deed Book, 641, Page 495,
Pitt County Registry, paid tract is lying between the proposed eastern
right of way boundary of Survey Line-h-, Pitt Street Extension, and tare
-Flan -tern r.i.oht of way boundary of Survey Line-[ Greenn St.r.eet,
and extends from the northern bank of the Tar River norttn.rard.Ly to a
rtraight line extending from a point located 9.607 m, (31.5') westerly
from and normal to Survey Station 20+60, Survey Line-hl-to a point located
15 m, (49.21') easterly from and normal to Survey Station 21100, Survey
Said tract contains 3.170 Acres more or less.
Sue W. Smith, beneficiary, and William 11. Lewis, Jr.., trustee, have entered
into the execrrti.on of the foregoing instrument for the purpose of re.lonsinq
any aril all interest in the property hereinnbove described an set forth in that
deed of trust dated April. 2, 1996, to Sue PI. Smith, beneficiary, -,I Wi.l.li.am ff.
Lewis, -Jr., trustee From Bobby Ray O'tlea.l, and r.,i.fe Har.bnra O'rlenl. recorded in Deed
(look 641, Page 497, Pitt County Regi..^,tr.y, and in no way ,rnrrant: t:he title to tl,o
Grantee.
.. M- Ans,-. Form 11-,. 1 19 76
rar.(r j,)
T ,
rty herni.rlabovpp des,:,.iL....l as .,,'Plirc:i by r,rrantor Icy inntrumnnl. r:e,-ordnd in
map showing the above described property is recorded in plat Ftook -----
---- `' n c7 e
TO HAVE AND TO uOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and a.Ll privil.gnr, and npprrrtennnces
thereto belonging to the Grantee in E„e simple,
And the Grantor covenants•wittr the Grantee, that Grantut: is seized of the- premieres in free
simple, has the right to convey the same .in fee simple, that title is marketable and free
and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against
the Lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter. .stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions. None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set their hands and seals, or if corporate, has
caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers
and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Director.. the day and year
first above written.
(SEAL )
Bobby R. O' Nga 1.
N-eal -ea- IT (SEAL)
(SEAL)
ru?eo,lJ.?3rr'Lh can Li.ciar.y
(SEAL)
fill.lam lL? ,ewi.s,jr.., I_rusLee
SEAL-STAMP NORTH CAROLINA COUNTZ OF PITT
I, klft&t[_ , a Notary Public of said county do hereby
certify that_Bfl6 y e. a ?ANin / ,. _/ ,_..o _ P_ / . n. ,i / .
u m r, V f un[I`VK,
personally appeared before m this day and acknowledged d the c
Cxtir' on of
the forego?ng instrument. Witness my (rand and official stamp or seal,
this r/tday of 19-76.
My Commission ex ices:
.3-.2-90 NOTARY
The forego' Pitt N. C.
g Certificate(s) of ?9?z1 f,
is/arc r_ertifie t be correct. This instrum
the date and time and in the Book and Page sho
By
N.C. Bar Assoc. Form tro. 7 1J'i6
ROBERT N. ARNOLD III -NOTARY FU"
?
County of stew A
eat and this certificate are duly regi stered at
wn on the first page hereof.
REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR?? COULlTY
Deputy/Assistant - Register of Deeds
FILED
ANNIE e.•IIULD0
fll.?;I;,CEft o? UF?(;g??? J
. Lam, ?I II'1 J U `19
;III I rOu!ITY, IIC

C C? L Z

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199505645
August 15, 2000
Mr. William D. Gilmore, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Pq
AUG i
VIETLAUDJ UMU?...
?4riTE?iSECT?`.`
Reference the Department of the Army (DA) permit issued to you on June 30, 1999, and
your written request of June 22, 2000, for a permit modification to construct temporary work
bridges in the Tar River. One 38 meter long and 8.6 meter wide temporary work bridge will be
supported with steel piles in the Tar River immediately downstream of bents 2 and 3 of the
proposed Pitt Street Bridge. The second temporary work bridge will be the same size and also
supported by steel piles in the Tar River immediately upstream of bents 3,4 and 5 of the proposed
Green Street Bridge. This modification request is associated with the replacement of the Greene
Street Bridge (SR 1531) and the construction of a new parallel bridge to extend Pitt Street across
the Tar River in Greenville, North Carolina (TIP B-2225, Federal Aid Project No. BRN-6964(1),
State Project No. 8.2220601). Please see the attached construction drawings for reference.
This modification request was coordinated during the monthly interagency concurrence
meeting on June 15, 2000, with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, as well as other
appropriate State and Federal agencies. The coordination resulted in no objections to this
modification request. Therefore, the permit is hereby modified in accordance with the specific
work activities described above. It is understood that all conditions of the original permit remain
applicable and that the expiration date is unchanged.
Any questions regarding this correspondence may be directed to Mr. Michael Bell,
NCDOT Coordinator/Regulatory Project Manager at the Washington Regulatory Field Office,
telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
James W. DeLony
Colonel, U.S. Army
District Engineer

Enclosure
Copies Furnished(without enclosure):
Mr. John Hennessy
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wetlands Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. William L. Cox, Chief
Wetlands Protection Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Tom McCartney
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. David Cox
Post Office Box 118
Northside, North Carolina 27564
2

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M bas B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
r SEP 2
DAvID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1. The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under
?y
/tiit?en
2

A
SCALE

MAPS
nog

nvme. •
T
) al sclk
r
Shatmetm

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO.411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET I OFS
©. + '-? \ I + 1;.11'4 I'. I441 4 I, ? i
\Q I1I?? it 6 Ng6?P, ??1 f1 1 1 r? r
? 1 ri I r? l • +? ?? 1 ? ? ? •? ? WOODS
a?i a?i a???l J?f?
\ ov's, `
Woods
P
O

S
\i
C- IE PT o? ?RAAfsppR-f('S-C?oN
-Frco3e Z3 - ? z z ?
fe-Cw,%. k- V)--)orf%,Qi*e ,' bra 4r L4fi
s lj e-e.--t- 3 04 7 g (Z S (9 °t

O Ai
O 5i
O
:ems f?;'.?€
i?
.2ffA jai( r / , /
GUY LEAD TABLE
STR. No. 13 t+r
AHEAD BAClG ?.
•`;?,? ?;t ?_( \ \ / 70',64' 70',64` s ?; `
Wooos P.I. 1099,.•j1,
I?111 r 'I
??1t r
STA. 4+99.47 A
0 WHITE CONCRETE CO. EL,1' J!
k \ DB W 43, PG 149 89'2556.'RT.
MB 6, PG 101
' /C/ • r'? c, 13
/ BOO ti? ??? ,? rE•\ \ \ /? ? ,``4 /
.i? WOODS \ ~,t f ct. y .. .1" yt ,±I s . t ` A `?kiJ , r1
I fl
-.?
GUY LEAD TABLE
STR. a a
No. 13-1
AHEAD BACK •N,^? .o ? ? •• I? j /w \?? ? j ????? ? ? ?i ??i
J
a'... .. -' k0 50'.44' 50'.44' TQ1116 ??.\\ / / iII Jr?;
0 13-1
EQUAWN
P.I. 1118
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD WOODS
si 45'42'52" LT.
??J I-p?
4
' 1 1?1 1 1 1 ?? ?jJj 1
•? ?' ,fir I 1 ??j ?; r???1'? 1 . Irj•? ??? ?? ? ?
i>roSe c? 13 _ ZZZ S
f n
sti?-t ? ? 7 ?iZS?99
1,`« 1) E3 D 2 4, °G 573
5 cy?- ±= 1dYJl?t?idt? ? j
I ? . Itr
?0rifrlta
1 R4,/'.1CND P ?CC(l
•rt`? X l ` /?rt,J?1?J1?? ??J;? ?J??JE ? _ / ?UD-Tti H. MI_LIR
DB 25---?G ;,97
D13 G 52, 901
1 4"a r4 IJI? ?? I?f? I •?x"\ 01 n 54' PG 827
b w ?G 858
.-'• #, -dr" ?i 1 ! I 1 , ' r111 I ` / / /
MOPJ
mM ON
eU 1 ?; t JI ?? t?iJ / 4T` 1005 \ \ '// % co
??? t' , I I I I I I+
13
GODS •. / (v /
t ? / / fl? 1?JI?JIr;??1 •/ / /
503f31" r.
?`' a? .t'F' ,; // ?f Jl? I? JI +• ! / PD ?F001 .o DB 64
a
7.•' y.?3 y / ' III If ,?J,?J,(? , 1 \ / /
?x44•,.t?. r.• r?• oa ? ? JI JJ?? j(t Ji?J? / \/ / / \??
t /•?.t WOODS
WOODS
?J (J ?. /
Ila
/po
7 f1 1„ } i
.... .... ......... ............«.............................................. .................
.1.':Cky?re', t ',??JI Jt I Jfi f i ?PJE \Y_ / / P.I. 104E3 .° G
.ry' r krt ',r f 1r# I JI G / / / STA. 10+06.66
ar?,?.•,? ;f-?? • ''?a??,?,j?J??yJr^?;;j ? / / / ?'?_44'53'32' LT.
?4. LO
Ail
4 LO
J,rJ I11 - --- - - f-- -
I' ^I IJ'?IJ' I J' 1 I
M J ON .? «•,.
•?`? ?y ? .:y?,,jl S •,;?JIiJ?I JgFI(Fn??JI I JI1 , ? II` / N ._._.
r?+ ?sJAi` `.•j? t?1'?711 JI JI ?JI IyJI J P, ! {O
tt' •,•t lr? ? • 4 ? I I I ? - - -
TP-1141??J?IN.1JII off fir I + - R/W - - - - -
`, .'• ; .' / /' WOODS / GUY LEAD TABLE
STIR. No. 12
AHEAD BACK
90',84' 70',64'
BOBBY RAY O'NEAL NOTE: FRAME AHEAD GUY
DB 641, PG 485
jH C. DATE RI
r
? ` ? •'?? • i?" 1 ? '/i/? Eve s?rt,-V
' ?? rJllrl d1c)
.. (?I C ? ? ?.} . -Trot t•?s.? o r'? ? t o ?-?
. _ ?1j Pro ems}- Y3-Z.ZZS
?zit A %-1- Mod. -P-o r Lk+,
F1 Zs-j
:HUP.ST
552
4:?-) Ll C. P! w aYZ l: A
o'NEAL
G 485
j G P ? L jw !l2 Lr?1
WOODS
?. P.. &. ?._........ O ..............._..... 230..kV......................................................_............... ............ ....... .. /........
--------p ----- ---- CIRCUIT 16 --- /
--- O ---- (?1! 1 i CIRCUIT 17
C, C
- - - - WOODS 0 - - ? ? • A A ? A ? ! - - - EQUAT10i?
P.I.
+ STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK =
I- STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAD
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'-680 MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE. 4 34'02'30' LT.
VISIONS
projec+ 13-ZZZS
Word
S? f 6 7 c:,17-1197
CONSULTING
I DWN: JGQ I CKD: SJB/HGB I APPD: RKB

.z.
k-61 It
•? 0

NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER H ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.
NC
•o? \ ? ? ryox
LEGEND
Q EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0
- -+III- -
fffE

PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCATION
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
GUY AND ANCHOR COMBINATION
SPAN GUYS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPERTY LINE
DITCH LINE
FENCE
WET AREA ylz4/49
PLAN & PROFILE
OMMISSION 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
I CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
N OLINA
.. FOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
rl 0 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
Tr- O Ie c-+ - Z Z Z SHEET:
N.C.D.O.T. PROJECT
D, P-t^ rn,'1+ MCC', tflr Ric+l l0/ Werk e-2225 2 of 2
G?_ - _ 7 a 7 g'ZS' qcj )UTH COORD FILE:
SEP, -01' 99 (WED) 09:24
1 06
USACOE TEL:[phone] P. 001 _
FACSIMILE TRANSMMAL H2ADER SH 0
Fd ?a d Ira tome. » ? 2S.I ?. tna orc?+:r+t a
COMMAJ+101 NAYEJ OFFICE TELEPHC NE FAX W.
OFFICE OFFICE W. (AlIfOVQ Caris..?.)
SY?toOl. (AUTdVCWCamm, )
t
s Qj u% ??
1249 ,
COS 4w- 8cJ asp-q?.r tb??. t?) 97? ?? 99
W1 < e t36LL
TIh
:p V1 M 1A GU pJ a as t( I", ? sd{
C: AS GTION J'AELEDE?lC>r NO. PI?OE9
ItWLdlnq rol
Ifiicdarl
(41C-olaa-J28G (111 q}1'?6 Z-'79-r 7
DATE-71W LA?IT}I YEAR RELEASER'S SWATURE
Sue Da v,+G
Attached for your review is a request for permit modification from NCDOT to impact
additional wetlands as a result of power line relocation out of the Greene Street
mitigation area.
Please comment by September 15, 1999.
Thanks,
Mike Bell
Phone: [phone] ext. 26
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
SEP. -01' 99 (WED) 09:24 USACOE TEL: [phone] P. 002
RECENED
AUG 2 b 1999
REGULATORY HRANCH
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMFWT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. Hurry JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. DAVIDMCCOY
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps ofF.ci&eers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 278894000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531(Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) propo= to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There wiU be two types of impacts. '
1. The fast will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not Jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand cleating will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be conereto in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmisslon line footings, These are the types of structures permitted under
SEP. -O1' 99 (WED) 09:25 USACOE TEL: [phone] P. 003
Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor-to the DWQ.
Tho CP&L Une will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC lino will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has coma to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as dcecribed in
the Mitigation Plan. in keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetadon and the arcs will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation Bite will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the Impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24,1999, we are providing drawings
depicting tho overhead transmission lines. We request that tho pcrTWt for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,

William D. Gilmore, P.B., Manager
V Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mir. john Doinoy, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mir, Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William L Rogers, RE, Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P-E,, Division 2 Engineer
SEP. -01' 99 OVED) 09:25 USACOE TEL: [phone] P. 004

1

?Mw,r?n?h.
1
66
57 END PROJECT
• 1 a
3B '' --•`
411
GREENVILLE
?o?• je.?,o
AU
BEGIN PROJECT
i
VICINITY
MAPS

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTAT[ON
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (I3-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO.411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SNUET I OF 17
sc•u
SEP. -O1' 99110) 09:25 USACOE TEL:[phone] P. 005
Sl"PE LOCATIONS
w
U)
O
2
i?enc t'a1 °
Lon
I J
I
` p Y1
' it l
Ir ??
?i in
al/ 'I'C7
if
'fr=s
i
W)
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
C, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
,?? PITT COUNTY
qPROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACE1'IENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 8,2220601 sHnCT2 or.7
SEP. -O1' 99(WED) 09:25
USACOE
TEL:[phone] P.006
ti 1 li '1ili?ilJ?
?? . \??t' ?? ?(i?1 . ` WOODS
?,.Co
? s. R ?
4?I? \
MK30p3
/
Y
I
I
r
r r' r

(y C. 1) F, PT o-? -T R RU sp O R,-rPj-V % o N
'Pr
{'.?rw,:? Ylnod???ca4+ih 4r GlfAlty
she-e.-t- 3 0? 7 ts(zs qq
t? C C.
Q_ 5(
0 5(
O
I
/ ? r
SEP. -O1' 99 (WED) 09:26 USACOE
IN

:-,,•:i. woods

M

TEL:[phone]

She0--t q 0 7 Pizs-lg9
P. 007
i
13
i

C r p T -Tr-m nsiil o r '?? A r1
Prose ? $ - 2-ZZ ?
-for
SEP. -01' 99(19ED) 09:26 USACOE TEL:[phone] P. 008
118 D 24, PG 573 ,'J,
pp 11JJ
li? '
t Ail, ire; a
•I,I ?' A?1a?
I R.
\ ` J' ?,J? ' ' IJ? JJ ! R MOND
{ I?I1J 1 r? JUp H. MIL R
jowl, "" fJ,?J?I J?? i rrr \I %-., DB G552, O 801
•:,? /' // ??!' ? i ? 6 D PG 858
01 X
Mom
c;j
`9R
/? \ ?/I i, I ' '` •ti/ ??Z.? // BOBBY F•
/
DO
/x/
N , woopS J J?1 L ?RQ?OpS
/ / .% [L :•'?' i-.1::-95• ..rte i
r1? ?f •,,,,C?l ;,? ...... ?.. .._.wn,.n?n„?.:..._,..r.rn„n»,.mw.?.1,.H..:1.,?••?I
i .•• .
/? - Jr. _-----Lrl
,fir TP-1141 R/W -
• / / GUY LEAD TA13LE
waoo5 STR. No. 12
.. •. p ` AHEAD BACK
If BOBBY RAY O'NEAL ao'.av 70',a4' NOTE: FRAME AHEAD GUY
• '' - i DB 641, PG 485
ra,r DATE RI
4 1".
N dl- -
Mcf-I U+' i 6y
9 off' rf 8 Zsl99
SEP. -O1' 99 (WED) 09:26 USACOE
:HURST
552
Ca u e- f:l w A-464
G P ? L RlW r*"A
.- ZIE5 O'NEAL
0 495
TEL:[phone]
P, 009
WOODS
ter-'- /
F _ _ J!s- 4 230 kV
.. ?..?-. _ .......................... .. .........,..................... ..... ..................
.......................... ........ 7...._...............
----- y ----- * rr -R CIRCUIT 1a--
CIRCUIT 17
11
J! 10
- - vwma 0r o - - a a. A11a??
+ TA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
Lo STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAD
V1, d 34'02'30' LT.
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'--S" MIN. FROIJ TOP OF POLE.
VISIONS
?}G ,fie }, of 'TrAvlS aIr0r-,
e+ S-z2zf
'
per.?+ ??' VYlad • ?' r U?+? ??'`/ Work
S? f 6 Of 7
CONSULTING
ovm; JCQ CKD: SJI3/HCB APPD: I1K8
SEP. -01' 99 (WED) 09:27
USACOE
TEL:[phone]
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
LOADING DISTRICT- MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUALAND (NARCISSUS)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 Iba.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 Iba.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 Iba,
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT BOx OF 1272 'NARCISSUS- SAG AT
GO- (NO WIND) INITIAL. CONDITION.
2. DANGER II ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.
LEGEND
0 EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
0 - -- PROPOSED LINE LOCATION

.•h
"'`r -------? EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
'•.?'?y
© .
EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
•`'?,
` y _ _ ] PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
• ` ~' ` - -NII- -• EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
" ?••
O ({{f-- GUY AND ANCHOR COMBINATION
\ ©
?
``•., • -..r?? SPAN GUYS
\
\ N
\ -- - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
\? \ - PROPERTY LINE
? ?,/ _ ••_••.- - DITCH LINE
FENCE
WET AREA `i / z ? 4 9
PLAN & PROFILE
COMMISSION
OLINA FOR
a
? ?? ?- ?' p?- . r?'' Try ?S (?ir?t.`C• ? o'r•1
N
Tr- ojee}' -Lz26
/
D. P-? 'I-- U1'1 cdd. ? r r Wor k
rr1
5.+ 7 rf 7
115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
'3RIDGE CONNECTOR
N.C,D,O,T. PROJECT
e-2225 2 of 2
)UTH COORD FILE:
P. 010
i , J trl ' I I
N d W ~ J~ ~ ~ I n, j 1Iv!- I ~ ,r nI- ~ N, ~ ~
J I ~ lvy~ ~ i r~ ~ K M rn vl ~ ~ d ai i i 9 d Nsn I t ! n~v] I xxlpr ~ ~ v4 ~N Or.+y~gr~~+Dr ~ er <+d~r~
~...I I ' ~ ~~71' U~ ~ I ~~~0.-N O~.xlp i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I~ 4, ~ ~ ~I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ta. f h i ~ N r t 'f ( I I I I III
~ O3 (7 L~ (9 l7 i ?1 ' U' U Q C7 Zi i01"~~~1-1 I-1.l-F-f-t~~ 011-~ F-F-hl-F-1-1-~~ f i..v. ~.v~.. ~ 1 1~ u. ' I i~ I O~ LL . ~I rn I ~ h d ~ v) L R I" ~ ~ MM ~ v`v~
1`~0 MIDMd~Od~DOONMMM MtOd~O OON~ MP M wwv.- w . ww w~n~.- w.- r ww -----i------ i U ~N.__--- - _ _ _ w _ ~y ~,r ~ M~~OdrOd1000NM1~M1 N.~-NNN w..~v `n.nM/.- w r r w~/~/ ~/~MA~
_ . _ --v- w
15 14 13-1 13
12 11 ip
i 1
I t ~ I l
I I ~ i ~ N
u~v I ~ i ~ I
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i i I ~ ~ ~
~ I i
I ~ ~ i '
TRANSFER EXISTING 7 No. 9 AW STATICS AND ~ i p TRANSFER E>'ISi1NC 7 No. 9 AW STATICS AN
272 AAC CONUU INSTALL NEW 7 No. 9 AW STATICS AND CTO S ~ , 1272 AAC CONDUCTORS 55D RULING SPAN } SPAN 1l UC ORS I
1 ~ ( ~ I I ~ i I ~ ~ . I I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
I - - - - ~ i I ~ - I ~ i ~ I I 1 ~ I j I ~ ~ I
I i I I
i I ~ .I ~ ~ I ~ I,
~ ' EXIS11Nt; ~ ~ I, {j
! 1 ? ~ CPdd 1Jt>kV ~ 61IF I i ! , I , I
T N i ~ (U IlE f.fdUV1U) I \ ~ • / • I i
i I ~ ~ II e j
j ~ \ I i I) ~ ~ EXISTING N ~ ~ ~ ~ ` CO DOCTORS ~ t I i ~ f ~
'I ~ TO BE TRANSFERRED ~ i ( ~ I ~ I ~ i ` I I ,
II ~ rn i I ,r
I - ; I ~ I ~ ' 1 ~ ~ I ' li ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I I
50 ! ~ I \ r~ ~
__jl - M .t. ~ 1 ~~Y... w.,~_..t -
I ~~r~,~+~ rrr~' i- I r EXISTING d ) I r; EXISTING TLL. PULE~-~I iu I' I ( ( I
- r- ~ G.I M ( TO BE I I le I ( (TO BE REMOVED) ~ I~,.~'
~I I I EXISTING CONDUCTORS ~ ICI ~-r-~. .....w..a~ ~ •r .~II~
i ~I I TO BE TRANSFERRED of I~~ EXISTING CONDUCTORS t' I
~ I 5 I u) 507.19' GUARD I~ RAIL I
I I I 100 YEAR FLOOD 1 ! l i~ - li Ili
N.CA .T. r ! .0 (348.8) 309.39' ~ ~ ( - - - r _t_ ~ -1 . t. _t_ - / ~ ~ ~
I 'i ; ( ) x i 499.47 - ! I ~ i x r i \ x 483.34 475.17 i ~
~ ~ I ~ ~ r i PR t I In r I ORDINARY ; ~ PROPOSED ~ i , FlLL ~ ~ ORDINARY
I _ ~ r ( ~ ~ I ~ T: NIGfI WATER I r ~ E.. ~ r f. r ~ ~ I ' r ; I ~ 1 HICFI WA 11 N
i i, f~t'flt)i) I 1 f_ r ~ ~ . i ; ~ I ~ a (N.(. C) ia.1) 1 ~ r .r
' ""~i~..._ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ rr ? r.. •r L.mr aYr rr r ~ . Y r err I ~ i
I ~ _ N I ~ I - b - w ; _ _ _ _ _ - _ ~ lp _ _ ~
o ~ I f I dN ~ n a~ . I d ~ i,i '"'1 3 OI u
J m= h .N o ~ z m I O I ~ J x WwJ
I ~o W o I NM _~r! z ~~w~ a h d
I a o. d m ~ ~ u °~'rn ~o w Q h , io ~ ~ ° Z I 3 i ~ ~I +o w w a z~ I d I ~oN w ~ ~ ~
'I vii ,I`' ion ~ ~ 3 a~~Q V' r r .
~+p~~r had ~ I I ~ a d ; w~ ~ I + q+
Q d' N 1- i J h ~ ~ ~I i ~ qY. ~ ~ I
Q a~ k rn 1~
~ vhi a i O
M .-N JI W I ~ I I I II ~ p ; ^N r-
~ F I nj~~ j ~dr OF { I 3I sI ~
7: ~ ~ N N N i i v~w JO I i ~ v~ I I ~,viF'w I
W i W
55+00 50+00 0+00 5-~ 00 10+~00 15 ?-00 20+00
REn~ Es~ATE Acoulsl~oNS
~ { ~tiY,.r'`1 DB 562, PG 48 i~ /T. S. hnwrv sFlo~
~ /T. ~ DN ~q, PG 180 ~ ~ ~
i~fa,~,i~, ~ ,t ~ J; l ~ ~ ~ i 1, ~ i ~ ~J' ~'C~ ` ~fi~~~>!I
~~i7A n ~ ~ fb ~ ' ,rl ri ~ ~ , 1, .~(~1', r ~ i i v ~ i ~
• 1 ~ , , , ~i ~ / ~
x,111 1 1 1 1111~4~~~) / i i i r I I t `1 ~ r i f i r JL I71~ Y W_ k ~
~ ~ b!"~`f`' J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T l r ~ r 7 ' r r, ~ l;l! NI)~ fl, wi111111URS1 ~
4 1- ~!~a I)~ Il . lr ~ ~J~;JJ~~J~ \ ~ h A I)ll ,f f, lil ll lr r r i r~ r r"~ ` Ufl M .'id, I'G 1,51 rr r
~ \ ~y I)li U )n I~G 51.5 J; I r/ ~ \ \ ~ 1 t i r NOTES _ . _ . _ ~_m_..
S 1. ~~J I / r \ T ~ ~ , o ~ ~ ~I 1, TRANSMISSION - 115kY lNSULAiION
A .a 1,~! ' f PHASF CONDUCTOR • THREE (3) 1212 kcmll AAC B1 STRAND (NARgSSUS)
1 ~ ~ ~ , J~i,~'JJ,r,J~ . ~ ( ti ~ li r~J~ ~Irl1 / 1 ~_i ~ l ~1 ;.4 , r, J, r 7~ , 1i~ JAI . r r ) _ LOADING 015TRICT -MEDIUM (DESIGN)MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
~ - ~ x ~ ,'1~1~1~~ N a7d~l~t,l,~ i r 4 r CUY I f AD IAHLf % ~ r -r. DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 Ib~, Ilrtis to ;1+~,; ~V BREAKING STRENGTH - 72,000 Ib~.
b ! ifr 1 ~`w J ~ J i ~ L~ ~,~1 i,l~i~7 „i'~T,, r ~U(!(41+ II 'di 1. ~ ~ i 1~- 1J ~ •A,~dJ~l~~ _1~J~11J~ 1~,J1~~ I i ,;IJ(~ U; 11 .{I RULING SPAN - 5DU it.
~ < < ~ ~ ~ ~i Dfl I",R, I'., , ~ Ah11 All (fA(~ f . 0 '~,ij) t' ~ ! ~ ' ~ r 1 OFD"~ . ~ ~ ~ I r i~ ~I ti. ' 1~~J~~.J, ~ir I r I) 1 ',1 4~r1 . ~Q',~ { ~ ~ 70',84' 70,84 ~ i ? ~ , ~ ~J i~ 1 DI) I"~R, I~~, M~! U.H.G.W. -DUAL 7 Nn, 11 A1,UMOWCLD h 4 r. ',1, I'~~~~ 1+;n J:, a„~ ~ ~ MAXIMUM CONDUCT(?1i DESIGN 1EMPERATURE - 120' FiNAI
+x;l>Cl~; ~ ` r 1 ~ ~ a. 'I i i ~ ~ 4 I ~ I r f~~~El `~4, Ptl Q~r~'~X ~ ~ P.I. 1099'A! ~ ~ na ~ ~ rr 1 r i .P, d~ ~ `,a, I't, n)1 ~ DESIGN TENSION - 2,199
vnx)u5 JI 1 ~ J~~ ~ i r ,1 r r D O ~4, ~ w ~ ~ I w r ' r D O ~4.-P(; 85H ~ • O.H.C.W. SAC SET AT 60% Oi 1272 NARgSSUS SAG AT 60' (NO WINp) INITIAL CONDITION,
~ ~ ~ ' ~ WRITE CONCRETE CU. Q,~~ STA. 4+99.47 ~ J'~~1~ J~ 'w, , J! ~ ~ rrrr r r 1 ` Q- ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ . ~ ~ ~ , r r ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~H w as, Pc !as , ~ 892558 RT, ~ ~ IJ~ ~ ~ j ~ , , ,
~ t ~ MB 6 PG 101 ! ~ ~ ~~1 ti i ~ 'r r ~ ~ ~ L Q ~ J 7 J> I A V i I ~ ~ rr r ,.L ~ ~ - ~ L . f i ~ uor7 ~ ~~.1'<<~ 2. DANGER II ALL LINES ARE TO DE CONSIDERED ENERgZED UNLESS
d~ ~ ~ / 1 0~ ~y ~ 1 1 1>~ S 1 1 ~ i r r r CLEARLY GROUNOEU ON BOTH 90E5 OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
~ Q' ~ / 1 3, PROPERTY LINES 5HOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
~ , 8 , ~ . , , , , , , , I ~ 1 ~ s I ,~J,~J~ al 1! ~ NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY,
. ~ a/' ~ \ Q' r r r 4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
' w.: y. \ ! ' j: ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ it ~ w00DS~,. / rr / \s ~ ~ COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERSY
AUH(3Y RAY O'PdEAI
q' O- 'ti ~ ~ ?p i~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 I ~ r ~ ~ j A ~ 1 1 1 r r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U13 641, PC 48',
~ I I ~ A LEGENp _ :.:.~~:w _..w~
x ~ J~J'a r ~ ~ EX?STINO POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
~ Y' 'x000$ ~ ~ ~t ti ~q ~ i , ~J:~J,y~~ I~ J, ~J~ , 1 J / ~ !~A, i S ~N ~7 i . / V {-P Q ` M r,'.a~ i~V ,IJi~14~,~ Mxy~~-, .7fA1 ~ ~ r WOOD5 ~_-,..N Z_ wuous ~ --~t r ~ . _n , ~ r . ~ EXISTING POU: LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED t r -
• - 11177 ~V' i . Air a ~,I ~ 1 - f..~. ~ ~ /l_ . l.. ~ _ '1. - - - b _ _ , ,
r, ~ r ~ 7n ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ,r ~;7 r 'k ~ ~ ~~t,~~ J,I i•~ ~ ~7 I r ~ ~ 7 . r ~ r ~ . i ! PROPOSED POLE LOCATION '
GUY LL AD TABLE . , . , . 7 . . Y......, r h ~.l~r1,1• IrI II d.I u~It ~C.r;! r., ,h,~ rr C P k L ~ 1SU kV PROPOSED LINE LOCATION ...w...,...af..l. Y.IY n.Mf..f.i~~ ~ ~ . . ....e ~ ~ • '
~ ~ ` t STR. No. 13-1 ~ ~ ~ . I I ~ i J ~ ~~7 ~ 0~' c ~ ~ ~ ( ! r 7~ld ! I ~,l.1, ~ r ~ P.I. 1048 ~ ~ ; • ~ + EXIStiNG TRANSMi5SI0N LINE - TO BE REMOVED ~;I ~
I i~,17~7, ~~I i ~ . AHEAD BACK ~ i TP-1118 J.,~1j, J,;Jl~177~~T r ~ , ~ STA. 10+06.88 r~~~r~~ L~ 86 ~f~1,~1+~~~ / EXISTING 1RANSMIS~ON LINE - TO BE RETAINED
50 44 50 44 ~ ~ ~ i ~ : ~ , ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ r >t ~ ~ r 4_445332 lT. _ r ~ ~ r ~l~A~Ild ~ LL I _ _ - - _ _ _ `y~~rllf ~ _ RAW _ _ _ _ -
O -n,,.~.,~' r r ~ i J n I,~ ,,1 i I! r r p ~ ~II r~" - - ~ ~ L ,,,1,7:11~ JAI _ _ J.---- ~ J - - rJ + + CINCUI T 18 ~ PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT OF WAY I I~~LII~I,~ , _
-1....~ ~ ~ / G~ ~ ,11;I.Ir~,1,111~ ~ / ~ 1 ! ~ 7.1,1, 1, / 12 - 1 ~ ~ 13- I ~ fr~lt,l,l r r r ~ ar ,1'.~I~~, _ • ~ . -NN- EXISiINQ OVERHEAD DISIRIBU110N LINE
0 J ,r;1,! _ ~ ~ ~'d~ ~4f~1,~1+ CIRCUIT 1'7 ~ EffE"'-""" CUY ANO ANCHOR COMBINATION
~.w~~~~w~.~.~ Irrr~.w~.y ~.I ~ .?~r rr Ji 7'LI i 1 ~ ~ r ~ .w, ~ ?if~tt't~yt~Trhy J~ ,.~~.y..f.~ ~y1~ 1,, + , ri ~ ~ ~ SPAN GUYS
_i .rte ~ 14 - •,~J~,;~ ~ 1. 11~IlJlI ,i n ~ ~ ' , it ~I~~ f1~;1~ + ~ f ~,~~~f ~,I l~f'~Y ~ ~ ~ ry
~~c~. - - - - TP-i 4~ ~ ~ ' ~ , r Jt , ~ 1' P, - - , - - R/w - - - ~ i 1 ~ 10 ~ - - RIGHT-OF-WAY 1, a! , r~
it EQUATION ~ ~ -R/W ~,.~,Y, - - A?
P~pN . P.I. 1119 ~ Q 0 ' J X c, SO r1Nn~~ ~ ~ STA. 48+40.81 LINE BACI(_ ' ~ ~ ~ 0 woods ~ ~ \ ~ - PROPERLY LINE O ~ ~ \ ~ EQUA110N
~ woods r ~ GUY LEAD TABLE S~ STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD 'J~i , r , , waw ~ P.I. - _ . _ - DITCH LINE + ~ STA. 19+65.17 LINE RACK \
~ 4a'~7`52' LT ~ I ~ ,n+ N~, I? ~ , ; ,.a~+, .TA 1i 171.8;5 lIN1 Ali[ ~t) FCNCE t \
f ~ ! a..- . A ~ ~ d ~ . ~ , r a ~ a ~ 7 t + ~ 90' N4' 70~ 84' . ~ ~ ~ . a 41!~~~ WET AREA
i ,i , ~ , , ; , ~ NOTE. FliAME A ,17ai~td~,i+A-~+ lJ i il~.~;IIiY 17AY c}?7f~1 i { ~ 1~.i.17:,r~~ ~;7 1~~ COTE. FliAME AHCAD C311Y fOR 5TA11C ON POLE C 3-d MINY FYi0h1 TOP of ~OLEf ~ ~ ~ ~~zq 99
\ ~ i, J,~,1,1~~, r , ~ ( i)N 641, f'G ad', - PLAN & PROFILE
~f ICI ~ .l JAI J~~ ~,~,S,i 7.i 7 ~ndn r ~ n,~ any ~~a,J.~J,~a..L~d ~1~.1 r, (7i.. ~AT~ DATE REVISIONS
1-4 ~
GREE VI UTILITIES N LE COMMISSION 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
f,J GREENVILLE 'JORTH CAROLINA CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
I. ~ t r. r FOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
BRIDGE CONNECTOR
~ ~ nuG~i nda W41,ot.nNG ENGINEFii`; f 7MGAuCJI;U~fG?a I~ RALEIGH, N.C. SCALE: SHEET:
1"R100' NORZ, C.D.O.T. PROJECT
()wN JGO CKD: SJ801GB APPD: IiKB OATC- UFi/?ti/M FILE: 140-4824 1"-20' VERT, B-2215 2 OF 2
.i1uANCH 1UYd
CAD FILE; 140SOUTH COORD FILE: