20000391 Ver 1_Complete File_20000324

IL State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh; NC, 27611-5201
bear Mr. Gilmore:
J S 00
'.
A(C-ME-3HR
May 16, 2000
Onslow County
DWQ Project No. 000391
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in 0.149 acres of wetlands and 130 linear feet of streams. Moreover, this certification authorizes
the excavation in 0.568 acres in wetlands for the purpose of replacing Bridges 118 and 119 over the
Northeast Creek on SR 1406 in Onslow County. The project should be constructed in accordance with your
application dated January 28, 2000. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112: This certification corresponds to the
Regional Permit Number 198000291 issued by the Corps of Engineers, and CAMA Major Permit issued by
the Division of Coastal Management. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local
permits before you proceed with. your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying
404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby
responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland tills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to
remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification. In addition to the
attached conditions, the NCDOT should:
1.) Use high quality waters sediment and erosion control measures during the construction of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of'the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a
hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447.
This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 500/o recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
TA I
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachments:
Permit Application
General Conditions
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers WilmingtonField Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Central Files
cAncdot\Project No. 000391\wqc\000391wgc.doc
r
Sincerely,
y rr T Stevens
L

GENERAL CERTIFICATION
FOR PROJECT ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 198000291 (ISSUED TO
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with
requirement of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United
States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Regulations in 15 NCAC 214, Section.0500 and 15 NCAC 2B .0200 for the
discharge of fill material as described in General Permit 198000291.
This Certification replaces Water Quality Certification Number 3025
issued on September 6, 1995. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of
Engineers reauthorizes Regional General Permit 0291 or when deemed
appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category
of activity will not violate applicable portions of Sections 301, 302,
303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Activities authorized by CAMA major permits require written
concurrence from the Division of Water Quality as well as
compliance with all conditions of this General Certification;
2. Activities authorized by Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
minor permits do not require written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality as long as they comply with all
I
other conditions of this General Certification;
3. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices that equal
or exceed those outlined in the most recent edition of the
"North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and
Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual"
(available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be utilized to prevent
exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard (50 NTUs in freshwater streams and rivers; 25 NTUs
in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs);
4. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands
i
or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored
after the Division of Land Resources has released the
project;
5. If an environmental document is required, this Certification
is not valid until a FONSI or ROD is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
6. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete
from coming into contact with waters of the state until the
concrete has hardened;
7. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects
which have applied for CAMA major permits which are proposed,
under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with
all applicable water quality and effluent standards;
Violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project
shall result in revocation of the Certification for that project and may
also result in criminal and/or civil penalties.
i
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may
require submission of a formal application for individual certitcation
for any project in this category that, in his judgement, poses a threat
of significant adverse impact on water quality or remove the existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or groups of
applications prior to a certification decision if such hearings are
deemed to be in the public's best interest by the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: 11 February 1997.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.,
Director
gencert.291
WQC# 3112
a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC, 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
t
SF 00/ 1 MCDENR
June 13, 2000
Onslow County
DWQ Project No. 000391
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in 0.149 acres of wetlands and 130 linear feet of streams. Moreover, this certification authorizes
the excavation in 0.108 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and mechanical clearing in 0.498 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands. The authorized impacts are for the purpose of replacing Bridges 118 and 119 over
the Northeast Creek on SR 1406 in Onslow County. The project should be constructed in accordance with
your application dated January 28, 2000. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112. This certification corresponds to the
Regional Permit Number 198000291 issued by the Corps of Engineers, and CAMA Major Permit issued by
the Division of Coastal Management. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local
permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying
404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby
responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to
remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification. In addition to the
attached conditions, the NCDOT should:
1.) Use high quality waters sediment and erosion control measures during the construction of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a
hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447.
This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
a
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachments:
Permit Application
General Conditions
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Central Files
Sincerely,
c St vens/?
cAncdotTroject No. 000391\uqc\000391wgc.doc
d
GENERAL CERTIFICATION
FOR PROJECT ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 198000291 (ISSUED TO
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with
requirement of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United
States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15 NCAC 2B .0200 for the
discharge of fill material as described in General Permit 198000291.
This Certification replaces Water Quality Certification Number 3025
issued on September 6, 1995. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of
Engineers reauthorizes Regional General Permit 0291 or when deemed
appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category
of activity will not violate applicable portions of Sections 301, 302,
303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Activities authorized by CAMA major permits require written
concurrence from the Division of Water Quality as well as
compliance with all conditions of this General Certification;
2. Activities authorized by Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
minor permits do not require written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality as long as they comply with all
0
other conditions of this General Certification;
3. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices that equal
or exceed those outlined in the most recent edition of the
"North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and
Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual"
(available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be utilized to prevent
exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard (50 NTUs in freshwater streams and rivers; 25 NTUs
in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs);
4. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands
or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored
after the Division of Land Resources has released the
project;
5. If an environmental document is required, this Certification
is not valid until a FONSI or ROD is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
6. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete
from coming into contact with waters of the state until the
concrete has hardened;
7. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects
which have applied for CAMA major permits which are proposed
under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with
all applicable water quality and effluent standards;
Violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project
shall result in revocation of the Certification for that project and may
also result in criminal and/or civil penalties.

The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may
require submission of a formal application for individual certification
for any project in this category that, in his judgement, poses a threat
of significant adverse impact on water quality or remove the existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or groups of
applications prior to a certification decision if such hearings are
deemed to be in the public's best interest by the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: 11 February 1997.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.,
Director
gencert.291
WQC# 3112
B-3215
Subject: B-3215
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:31:42 -0400
From: Eric Black <[e-mail]. nc.us>
Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation
To: John Hennessy <j ohn. hennessy@ncmail. net>
John
Sorry to bother you about this project again, but the numbers aren't adding up.
The total impacts include:
Wetland Impacts
Fill
0.07 ac temp. fill from utility line.
0.079 ac perm. fill from brides
0.149 ac total fill (this is correct on Cert.)
Excavation
0.038 ac perm. excavation
0.07 ac temp. excavation from utility line
0.108 ac excavation total
Mech. Clearing
0.498 ac total
Stream Impacts
130 ft total channel fill
33 yd3 (Worse case) temporary fill from bridge demolition. Do not plan to drop the bridges into the
stream, however this is accounting for a major accident.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Thanks,
Eric Black
1 of 1 06/13/2000 2:49 PM
State of North Carolina
Department of Enviro, iment
and Natural Resources b *?
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 16, 2000
Onslow County
DWQ Project No. 000391
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh; NC, 27611-5201
Tear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in 0.149 acres of wetlands and 130 linear feet of streams. Moreover, this certification authorizes
the excavation in 0.568 acres in wetlands for the purpose of replacing Bridges 118 and 119 over the.
Northeast Creek on SR 1406 in Onslow County. The project should be constructed in accordance with your
application dated January 28, 2000. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112. This certification corresponds to the
Regional Permit Number 198000291 issued by the Corps of Engineers, and CAMA Major Permit issued by
the Division of Coastal Management. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local
permits before you proceed with your project including (but not.limited to) Sediment and Erosion .Control,
Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying
404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby
responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland tills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to
remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification. In addition to the
attached conditions, the NCDOT should:
1.) Use high quality waters sediment and erosion control measures during the construction of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days ofthe date that you receive this letter. To ask for a
hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447.
This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 301 of the C:.;an Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9636.
Attachments:
Permit Application
General Conditions
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers WilmingtonField Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Cent, Files
cAncdot\Project No. 000391\wqc\00039Iwgc.doc

Sincerely,
rr T Stevens
G
i tiOZ
t
GENERAL CERTIFICATION
FOR PROJECT ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 198000291 (ISSUED TO
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with
requirement of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United
States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15 NCAC 2B .0200 for the
discharge of fill material as described in General Permit 198000291.
This Certification replaces Water Quality Certification Number 3025
issued on September 6, 1995. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of
Engineers reauthorizes Regional General Permit 0291 or when deemed
appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category
of activity will not violate applicable portions of Sections 301, 302,
303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Activities authorized by CAMA major permits require written
concurrence from the Division of Water Quality as well as
compliance with all conditions of this General Certification;
2. Activities authorized by Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
minor permits do not require written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality as long as they comply with all
16
other conditions of this General Certification;
3. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices that equal
or exceed those outlined in the most recent edition of the
"North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and
Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual"
(available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be utilized to prevent
exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard (50 NTUs in freshwater streams and rivers; 25 NTUs
in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs);
4. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands
i
or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored
after the Division of Land Resources has released the
protect;
5. If an environmental document is required, this Certification
is not valid until a FONSI or ROD is issued by the State
Clearinghodse;
6. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete
from coming into contact with waters of the state until the
r
concrete has hardened;
7. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects
which have applied for CAMA major permits which are proposed,
under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with
all applicable water quality and effluent standards;-
Violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project
shall result in revocation of the Certification for that project and may
also result in criminal and/or civil penalties.
b
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may
require submission of a formal application for individual certification
for any project in this category that, in his judgement, poses a threat
of significant adverse impact on water quality or remove the existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or groups of
applications prior to a certification decision if such hearings are
deemed to be in the public's best interest by the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality. .
Effective date: 11 February 1997.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.,
Director
i
gencert.291
WQC# 3112
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Bill Gilmore, NCDOT
4 0 o
A0=1% 00=% MOO"
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 3, 2000
Onslow County
DWQ Project # 000391
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Project Development & Env. Analysis Branch
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5261
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 6,490 square feet of
wetlands and dredge 4,704 square feet of wetlands for the purpose of replacing two bridges (#118 and #119) at SR 1406 as described in your
application dated March 24, 2000. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 3112. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Water shed regulations. This -
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a
copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. High quality waters sediment and erosion control measures must be used for this project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of
the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions,
please telephone John Domey at 919-733-9646.
nc
Stevens
Attachment
cc: Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Doug Huggett; DCM
Division of Water Quality - Non-Discharge Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27669-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer -
50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: J. Steenhuis
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Rock Shiver
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NCDOT SR 1406 Bridles 118-119 B-3215
Project Number 00 0391
Recvd From DCM
Received Date 3/24/00 Recvd By Region
Project Type bridge replacement
County Onslow
County2
Region Wilmington
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
LAMA PT @ _NF - 27-10-5 SC NSW 30,410. 0.75
77-0 N F_F_r-r-I--F_F_ ? ?-
Mitioation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more Info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 344623 Longitude (ddmmss) 772140
Comments:
This office does not object to this project but would like to reiterate that all possible means of
controlling turbidity should be used including coffer dams to reduce the amount of water in contact
w/the work zone.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name NCDOT SR 1406 Bridges 118-119 B-3215 County Onslow
Project Number 00 0391 Regional Contact: J. Steenhuis
Date: 4/27/2000
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
0"!
.-A
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation - attn: William D. Gilmore
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridges #118 and #119 on State Road 1406 (Piney Green Rd.) in
Jacksonville, NC., crossing the upper reaches of Northeast Creek.
Photo Index - 1989: No Photo 1984: No Photo
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2492200-2492400 Y:376500
N° °°--•...._,," r
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
sill"
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 12/01/99; 2/29/00
Was Applicant Present - Yes; No W-Eit,q--N.D?S GRO
!°'.?TER QUALITY SECTION
5
6.
7
--
PR
Planned -None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Roadway, Bridges
Planned - Replacement of same
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
OCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - Feb. 18, 2000
Office - Morehead City
SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - City of Jacksonville
Land Classification From LUP - Developed, Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
itD L'Tlll T_. Tl rrr .

(A) Vegetated Wetlands mechanized
Wooded Swamp 4704 sf 6490 sf clearing
21693 sf

(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other shaded by bridge
Open Water 1089 sf 2288 sf
Hi h Ground 26,136 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 1.43 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SC-NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is the N.C. Department of Transportation. The proposal is to
replace the two bridges, #'s 118 and 119 over Northeast Creek, on State Road 1406 (Piney Green Rd.) in
Jacksonville, NC. The bridges will be replaced slightly north of the existing alignment, with a water line
installed under the creek and south of the eastern approach.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT - SR 1406
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site of this proposal is State Road 1406 (Piney Green Rd.) in Jacksonville, NC, where
Bridges #118 and #119 cross Northeast Creek overflow (#118) and Northeast Creek (#119). This
is in the area of Pumpkin Center. The site is approximately +13' msl, and is flanked with
wooded swamp on either side. The proposal is to replace the existing bridges slightly north of
the existing alignment, with an additional width of 28' to allow for 3 lanes. The approaching
roadway will also be widened to three lanes, with a future projection of widening Piney Green
Road to five lanes. This area is primarily residential, and undeveloped wooded swamp and
forest. The roadway is extremely heavily traveled, with a traffic volume of ±20,000 vehicles per
day, and a projected volume of 26,000 vehicles per day.
The site consists of a 24' wide creek body at Bridge #119 (sheet 6 of 12 in the application), and a
18' to 20' wide creek body at Bridge #118 (sheet 4 of 12 in the application). There is a large
amount of delineated Section 404 Wetland in the form of wooded swamp on the site. This
system consists of Tulip Poplar, Loblolly Pine, Red Maple, Sweet Gum, Laurel Oak, Chinese
Privet, Bald Cypress, Green Ash, Black Gum, Red Bay, White Bay, Soft Needle Rush, Catbrier,
and American Elm. The adjacent uplands are forested, and are vegetated primarily with various
pines, Tulip Poplar, Red Bay, Water Oak, and Groundsel Bush. Soils in the area are loams and
sandy loams. Northeast Creek is inland waters at the project site, and is classified SC-NSW by
the Division of Water Quality. The area is closed to shellfishing, and is not designated as
primary nursery area by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. The creek
overflow at Bridge #118 effectively ends at the project site, terminating in a stagnant pool. The
City of Jacksonville Land Use Plan designates the project area as Developed, with all areas lying
within CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern designated Conservation.
The Department of Transportation proposes to replace both bridges slightly north of the existing
alignment, install a new water line, and relocate the channel of the creek overflow at site #118.
Both bridges are currently 52' x 25' in size, with a 10.5' clearance on #118, and a 9.5' clearance
on #119. Normal low water at both sites is ±-2'. The proposed bridges are to be 52' in width, and
80' across for #118 and 100' across for #119. Both are to be cored slab, with two sections of 40'
and 50', with a bent in the middle. There will be 10.5' clearance for both. Both will be stabilized
on the north side with class I rip rap.
The 24" water line will be installed below the creek bed and to the south side of the roadway,
approximately 5' below grade. This installation will require the temporary excavation of .07
acres of wooded swamp and stream, and the temporary fill of .07 acres of the same, through the
side cast methodology to be employed for temporary spoil storage.
The creek in the overflow area, #118, is to be re-channelized to the main channel, some 90' from
the bridge. The application states that 65' will be re-channelized, however, this was calculated
from the end of the existing creek bed. The entire 90' x 20' will be excavated to the point of
intersection with the existing creek. This will require the excavation of approximately 1800
square feet of wooded swamp, and the filling of approximately 5040 square feet of water and
wooded swamp where the existing creek bed terminates. The intent of this aspect of the project
is to improve water quality and navigation.
NC DOT - SR 1406
PAGE 3
The approaches to the bridge will be widened to 36', with 2:1 side slopes to minimize impacts.
The shoulders will be 8', except where guardrails are warranted, where the side slopes will be 11'.
The approaches will extend to 950' northwest of Bridge #118, and 1350' southeast of Bridge
#119.
Construction of this infrastructure is to be accomplished in stages, accommodating existing
traffic during construction.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, this bridge replacement with approach work, channel re-alignment, and water line
installation will result in the following impacts: Approximately 4704 square feet of wooded
swamp will be excavated, 6490 square feet of same will be filled, and 21,693 square feet of the
same will be compacted through mechanized clearing. Approximately 1089 square feet of open
water will be filled and 2288 square feet of same will be usurped by the bridges. Approximately
26,136 square feet of high ground will be graded and filled for the roadway and approaches.
Approximately .14 acres of the wetland impacts are expected to be temporary, as the water line
ditch will be returned to grade, and all temporarily stored spoil removed. There is a high
probability of turbidity to be expected during the construction of this project. Stringent
sedimentation/erosion control measures can minimize this. While the use of 2:1 side slopes
limits direct wetland fill, it is conducive to a large amount of indirect fill, due to the fact that silt
fencing is an inadequate measure to control slopes this abrupt.
Congestion and traffic hazards should be reduced with the widening of the bridges and
approaches to allow for turn lanes. Navigation under the bridges will be eased slightly with the
reduction of the two bents per bridge to a single bent per bridge.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 1.43 acres.
I
T. Barrett March 21, 2000
Morehead City
ATTACHMENT B
WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS AND RATING SHEET
N
C

?.
O m
c)
O
O
L
U
c
W U
:> m
? o
t

U
IL

rn a? ?
.C C V
y O

M

O O

M

w CL
wU E
r-
F- -
3 =
o 0 0
U CL U) m
Q E c - o 0 0
LL H -

(n 'a o° o o°
? a- b 0 0
LL

m
c
O N LO
N
O
O
N
Lo
O
v O
0 O O
Z
IL

Li N O =
.N C -0
co
ti
co
Q m CU t co 7 M
C
G O 0 O v 0 O O

c
0
C
L)
Q 15

? rp
> U co
M
O
O 00
M

O
2 >
"
K O O O
>
- W c
D
Q -?
N
J _
?
- U
o
W CL
?° O O O
E?
-
m o 0 0
F- c
N
C
V
O1
O
rn
_ - c
9
LL N O
O
O O
O

N U)
:3
j N ¢ U) O Q U O Q
CL J ^
N a J O
Cl) Z
U) U U U
N N
LO O W OZ
O
O t- +
C\j +

O Z
J F-

E
M M ?.

°
in
o
o
? J
<
L Q
. N Cl) >
> Z

J
Q
a) O
cn Z
'-

1

1

1

7

T

]

N
,

I

I

I

I

I ~

O
H
and

w
M
M/a
0

J
Z
0
CC
O
J
_V
ML

O
J
V
W
J
V
CL

z ^,
o ,n
H
T
Q W
O ch lRt Y
T
O Q m ° w rJ
go ?- N
1= cr
N w
U
Cl) z 0 z T m LL
p
2 C O LL z
O H
O °
h- U ° W
LL
O
O
LL N Z H
O O N F- LLI
O E ot! O w
H co
z
co

w

z

=
(D

o T-
" g ;

° c °
U c3 o
z
cc
z a
I
i IQ ,5
N r ° •-
O
O
O
O
LO
O
O
t
D
O
m
O
D O
o CV
D
:V
0
?o
CM
0
LO
r
7 O.
O.
n
O
F
2
O uJ
N
~ N y O

W Y W
} Cl)
O m W
a. w
to U
m
z
S
O W y

LL

QQ
? lL Oti O
U
Of W
`
O
U. O Cy Y H
J cv
W
W
x
avao?v co z
>
g
G ?
r U
'j
D W W O
U a cc
CL
z a
O
J
FQ-
Z
O N
cC
O
W O
J_
W
0 O.
CL
J
Q
V
W
W
J_
LL
O
w
CL
0
o -
o
?il I y M (WU 9T Y
C C) m G '- W
I LL? _ cane wmcoU
Hzr z?-
?.xooli.oCn
M.IE,SZ.b? F-. LL. V O O rn w
LL p 3 CO
Z T
81'I I p
Z J N W cr-
i -> O O • m ad O
3 2
I C:) LL
p ) NORTHEAST CRE K H Z CO W z
0 Go
U W O Q
Cc
-A p H U a r>
o W W O
C7 oC O
z
Z CL
i
V) W
o O ?-
LLJ I
w z(/) Q:Qj+Q ac z
1 ?I I ?.QOZ N> OQ
-li I I 3°?'-''?' Q J
V N w 0 Cl) m H
~J W Z I- RC
t LL C3
z ? z
W 1-I W W H
W -
Lli ~
m-?o z Q z J
J W W H
Lij a -? - z°. 0U 01-4 W LL
o 2 Q ?
z = F- U) O
tJ m
I_ a i O
I CL CL W
o
++
0
00+H '` IS HOiVW Q
co
0
0
0
U.
t/1
W
W ?
O
Ln
MATCH STA.

?/ ILL
`0 F
'V? II
39
m ~
?I
I
II
III
?_ II
ILL
28+00 °
Z
a ? r
I- clJ O
0- F r cl) a, w
x om ¢ m p w r.1
I
x'o C`t 1 Q- w o"o
?o
Q \X
Ia
=-i Lori,
rL-Li ?"
m
J p
K\
?I
\K L
J
Sb
i J
I -
I
I I ?

I I UQ
I ~ J
I °a
i

w W N w
CL W? (n
I cl) cn N
I Z

i a
?

I LL

I I?
O
C
v
m m v O
Z ?
0
= U O O Q
o t
LL. O 3 N Z ? F=-
O O O N O W
? H ao w
w otf z

a. Z
0
co cf)

G O
U W O
Z '
z
CL
N
LO
Z
:5
CL
O Z
W 0

H I- Q Q

Q > o Q
?
0 CO 2 ?
4,
W x o W W
o?S
M•?b Z?•?Z W Z ?-

W H op W ?- W H
F- 1= F-- W F-
O Q ? O ? O J
Z W N Z Z J
W _! o W Z W H
0 0 v? 0 ?-+ 0 U-
O ?
V
'1 I
J

m
O
v
?
0
M
m

o a ?. z
F ,? C C? c

--ill F v
I v C
C w
J I ? ?
o ? O
Q
z
z I I
? ?
oz ?o
uz? o
l ?,
,?
a o0?o ^
? > ° o
1
I J ;s
1
l wN °
l i
t
I
1
00 rr-i
J
I a
_
1 N

11 q
z
O

LQ

ti +
O .: C
r? ' U O

Jul
I
I? Q
I
I >
_
I II lC1
1
U F -r

L

I II
X
W ?
^f
I I
I O
+

l N

F--
J ?
Z
Z
O
O

co
N

r*?
t
I
'I
? -,± i 1 ' I N I I
tCD I I II
c ?? ?I I I ?- I ? I I

52+00
j I
I I

I
41

I ?

?
I

I
I
I
?

41
m

I °

I
? I
I?

, l I?
O
I °
N I
zI Z
71 r '? I CD a ? Iw
I I C D
". wa
Co w

8 ?M C)o

12
°D
-? I w
I I CD

c m
41 w o
?? ? ? ? I ? I I
I
/ r I
F

?

50+00 41 I _I"

I
Z
Q c!

-r U, 0

1/ ?r Ir

? I I I II ?
Q
F" L z ? o
? 3 I I I II C
.? z
Q ti ? ^_N„?
" .9

> /
f
° I I I cLt > Q .
o ?
oa
? I
-
?- I I II UC ?, ?;
C z??
?
?
a 1
? ?,
?a I 1 I I I I
I I
z ?
0
?? I I ? II ? O
- I
---- 4- LLJ
Cc CD
I w
/ ! II I I Q
?- I a a
__j L
U-) I
tiIAT;--H LINE ?T,? ?Q+???? -! -
i
'i
3 N
z z
=_ ? z I
F = ,
C O ?;
z zvl
l'
I? I
Ci' +:
G
C`J
(D I G

Z

w
Z

o 00
c ^?

u z v o
Q Ch
.
C. V
OQ U
?
C
p Cr ;
z q ? =
CD

m
N
?
n

U
O U `n
O
+

N u
F
N I?

>? Q?

u

r

O
O
+ A
r ,
N
I ?
I J
Z
I U ?
I z
t I
I
II
I I.
I
t
I lien
i_ Q
Q
I \? >
x
I w
I
? rLj I r---??
i
I L_
I ? ? N
I I / II
I ?I/ m
U? 00
?I w N
I ? \
z
I? w
J
? a
I
L `
V
N

I
i
u
t

J F'-
Q 7 i
C rrl?
z ? n n n

?(1) Z? pc7
as c
U 1
Q J N C?
W
J
4-
LLI
?
zz ti

U LI
'
0
1
o
z L
O
Q
MATCH LINE STA
z
LLJ 4d
LLJ 41
LLJ
z CC)
p yl
LLJ
L
29+00
I I
I it
I JI
I I
I I
I I
/ I C?l-?Od Q -1 Q i i
?-7
41 ? 41 J I r
28 00
LLJ
/ V)
LLJ ' U
,
27+00
I
? Ia*
O I a*
o to
i J I
a
w
a
J
+-7, -
i -T-
JIB r I i i
I it
ti I II
I
V) I
o I
I
I
2
q

?o o z

> z NI
ry
F Z J U 2 q
coq a c
?? I
? ? F

z ?
-L-
m CD
I o W
II I ~ >
II Iw( N
I I Q w
?II I
-11 I u
LLJ
Ir
02 >
mw w
oo-,
I z
w
y
a? I xO z?
cn
3w 1-
,q) M I 3
UJ 4-I z
po Iw F o z
N Fr > N C
I Imo, z
z z >
loz
a -
a- CL o Vn V Z N
0? U y
Iw?,? F F
I ? o .c I
I z Z z z
?LL. ?wl
---WLB WETLAND BOUNCARr
W?
WETLAND
WL
DENOTES FILL IN
i WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL
SURFACE WATER
R
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®4ENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
]DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
r F:LL IN SURFACE
WATER
I-' DENOT_L MECHANISED
DITCH
FLOW DIRECTION
TB
?-- TOP OF BANK
WE
- EDGE OF WATER
- -C- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
---- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- -NO- - NATURAL GROUND
- - PL- - PROPERTY LINE
E - TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-POE- PERMANENT CRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPS- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLAINT BOUNDARY
- _ -°- .. WATER, SIJRFaCE

PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
0 SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
• DRAINAGE INLET
RUC, , -?'
RIP RAP
U ADJACENT PnGPER T Y UWi I=
? OR PARCEL NIJMEEF
IF AVAILABLE
X X X X X LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER,, °uLLS
I
N. C. DEFT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
'ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2260701, ( B-5215 >
I
REPi.ACEJiENT OF BRIDGES
NO. 118 & 119 ON SR 1,!06
OVER NORTHEAST CREE'K.
11/ 17/ 98 REV. 8.''17/ 99
REV. DI 01)
SHEET OF !Z
11P- RO 'IERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NUMBER NAMES ADDRESSES
Q WILLIE HALL 444 GRANTS CREEK RD.
JACKSONVILLE, N.C. 28546

C2? Q. L. PHILLIPS, ESTATE 800 BRIAR CREEK RD.
C/O TOM P. PHILLIPS SUITE AA501
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28502
ONSLOW REALTY CORP. 931 KINSTON HWY.
RICHLANDS, N.C. 28574
P-) LEO WES T ors 643 CHURCH RD.
PINK HILL. N.C. 28572
O TONY FRANEESE 1022 BEECHTREE RD.
JACKSONVILLE, N.C. 2854E
Tf,?'_ CI?C1ed ?U,??bef? ?1rOVz CC('?? `:ror^?
-+C) the c- (Cle-d r??:rr,rcr Icca-I"ed on ?h?
fcllovjIv, ? plcue,, 'Iteu? h?e.ts.
N. C. DEP'T'.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWA1'S
ONSLOW COUNTY
PRO:TT?C'T:8.2200701 ( 11-,)2L') >
IUPL.'?;'H,AENT OF BRIDULS
NO.lli? tZ 111) ON SR I:Ob
OVER N ORTHL.? ST (- ,El'-,K
It//'i7/ Sit REV. 8/ 17,/
RE'?`.0.1,, 00
SHEET - OI' /z-
,mlrrlfr.
H15FMANN
Is ties%
eul..,n a 'velu.o.'s
rJ ° J eT?q cnlsnai .?..- "
B el its e
\^\ FOREST :-,
lrrn en I "?Inrnnr, ; ` "'
u.e .\ y `\ nAdlw`n
u.om Call
? 0 _N rrm_
tt` J + Jacks mill ?$,I.e•
ee.% 1 1 _e,ru,.e
.we use
r ?.
l SnkJ.
aalon Ferry, .'v.,.?Rlr•
?t
1 ep.rwd..
Yf Jll J0
North Topsail 9e.c
?
IpIS..,I iSl .•,l7
? I.q.y,el.wrn ?rr.,,
SQ $Wf C,IY

to alert 81st

-7 I7I ?. / j -T
y y
?\
I
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2260701 (B-5215)
BRID617, NOS.118 AND 119 ON
SR 1x110 OVER LXORTHE.-I.ST CREEK
11/` 17: 96 99
RE V. 01/ 00
tiHI:E F / OF 1Z
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Residential and
Forested property.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGE T'S SIGNATURE
?t/Zo 0 0
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
5
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): Existing project perpendicularly intersects wetlands.
z1C *G14 ARE T]L`(1UIREn T-G GG FISH 1zr41a8 911 f FF3 C•ERVIGE
?-rca?-r--ccrd??' ???E??-- T ?r?xrr-?--?9aaIra-?a-cc,rrc-a
( USF S ) T?79/nn N TIGNAr_
"9RES_SESS HE 'F)--REGAR9INGTHE PRE6EPa?'E GF-AN* FE-9GR>A??Y T 1STF39 Gn
PRGPGSE'9 FGR LISTING ENDANGERED --GR Tr1 EAT ENS9 SPEGISS G ?GRI rC-r"xa
d ABiT-T-?7r77+77?+.?rE GRHiT? AREA THAT MAY B? Trs9 BY Tut PRGPE)s 9 PRG F3GT-.
9TIS GG?;TAGTG9: (Tr}TtTTGH ESPGd7'?fS?4ES tGfl?-T-H?-)?SS AGEN-GI-ES.+
16. YGU ARE IRGD-IG GG?i T- GT- THE; ST2SSL7 -HIST./?4 RI/ PnESSn71TTTGN GFFI ET)
7'IL]al' ERT-iEs iN THE 17ERMiT AREA ?' iiieCZ BAFFEGTE9.B* THE PRGPG F39
PRG EGT . DATE ???GT-E;9: T
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [x] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [x] NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [x] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING:
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
EXCAVATION:
OTHER: 0.37 acres (mechanized clearing)
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.37 acres
iun. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: N/A FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): N/A FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: N/A FT AFTER:
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM:
FT
(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Perpendicular excavation of stream bed to install water line
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Mechanical equipment will include heavy duty excavation
equipment.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Installation of potable 24" water line
3
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): Bridges
No.118 & 119 over Northeast Creek on SR 1406 (Pumpkinseed/Piney Green
Rd).
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Northeast Creek (Class SC-NSW)
RIVER BASIN: White Oak
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ J NO [x] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[x] NO[ ]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
(CAMA)Urban Transition - 1996 Landuse plan update
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION Z.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [x] NO [ ] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: _
Possible additional wetland fill of 0.103 acres may be associated with
U-3810.
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
2
DEM ID: O 0 0 CORPS ACTION ID:
?J
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):NWP;12
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT; Project Development and Environmental Analysis.
2. MAILING ADDRESS: Post Office Box 25201
SUBDIVISION NAME:
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): 919-733-3141
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Onslow NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Jacksonville, NC
1
ORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
. APPLICANT
Landowner:
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Address P. O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Authorized Agent:
Name N/A
Address
City
State
Zip Day Phone
Fax

b. City, town, community or landmark
Jacksonville, NC
C. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1406 Pumpkin Center/Piney Green Rd
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? x Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek sound, bay) Northeast Creek
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridges and install new
water line.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both?
new work
Project name (if any) State No. 8.2260701: (TIP B-3215) c. Will the project be for public, private or
Bridges No. 118 & 119 on SR 1406 over N E Creek commercial use? public
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
County Onslow
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. Replace existing
bridges on new alignment north of existing
alignment. Project will be conducted in stage
construction. See attached drawings for details.
td 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a.
b.
d.
9.
Size of entire tract N/A
Size of individual lot(s) N/A
Approximate elevation of tract above MHW
orNWL 13 ft
Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckalee loam & Craven fine sandy loam.
Vegetation on tract red maple, green ash,
bald cypress, American elm
Man-made features now on tract Two
bridges, power poles, utility lines, & road.
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land
use plan.)
_ Conservation Transitional
_ Developed Community
Rural x Other
*Urban Transition
How is the tract zoned by local government?
R-7 Sinele familv residential.
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? x Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable.)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? Yes x No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes " x No
Are there wetlands on the site? x Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) _ Other x
If yes, has a delineation been conducted'? yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
M. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
N/A
Describe location and type of discharges to
waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
effluent, "wash down", and residential
discharges.) Runoff from Highway
Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 1 1" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only.high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
ORM DCM-MP-1
te. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
ember, landmarks, and the like.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
idjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
igned return receipts as proof that such owners
lave received a copy of the application and plats
iy certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
hat they have 30 days in which to submit comments
,n the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
urther certifies that such notice has been provided.
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
lame See attached
Lddress (Page 2 of permit drawings)
'hone
lame
Lddress
hone
fame
Adress
hone
k list of previous state or federal permits issued
)r work on the project tract. Include permit
umbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
V/A
check for $250 made payable to the Department
'Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
)EHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
>plication.
signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
;eanfront and inlet areas.
, statement of compliance with the N. C.
nvironmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
1) If the project involves the expenditure of
iblic funds or use of public lands, attach a
itement documenting compliance with the
)rth Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
?.J ° o
This is the Z,? day of ,
Print Name William D. Gilmore. P.E.
Signature G - ?? /,) 4J•-3 C,'
Landowner or Autho zed Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM VIP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
x DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
,ised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Cored slab bridge
Water body to be crossed by bridge
Northeast Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 2 feet
Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
x Yes No
If yes, main/overflow
(1) Length of existing bridge 52 ft./52 ft.
(2) Width of existing bridge 25 ft./25 ft.
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 10.5ft./9.5 ft.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All parts will be
removed.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes" x No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
Main/Overflow
g. Length of proposed bridge l 00ft/80ft.
Width of proposed bridge 52ft./52ft.
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
13 ft.
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes x No
If yes, explain Longer bridge, will not restrict
flow.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
10.5ft./10.5ft.
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes x No
If yes, explain
M. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes x No
If yes, explain
Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes x No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
orm DCNI-NIP-5
CULVERTS
Water body in which culvert is to be placed
N/A
Number of culverts proposed N/A
Type of culvert (construction material, style)
N/A
Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
Length of proposed culvert N/A
Width of proposed culvert N/A
Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL N/A
Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain N/A
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes 'No
If yes, explain N/A -
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes x No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
- Coastal Wetlands - SAVs x Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 65'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 20'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 110 yd3
C. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes x No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated N/A
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Upland area determined by contractor.
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
N/A
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes x No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
iced 03/91
orm DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance?_ Yes x No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes x No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes x No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? x Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Relocate water line
on south side of existingproiect. See impact
sheet and drawings for details.
Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes x No
MHW or NWL? x Yes No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 130' e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
(2) Width of area to be filled 13' and erosion controlled? Standard erosion control
(3) Purpose of fill fill existing overflow devices.
channel, channel to be relocated.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs x Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 3441 ft2
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Placement of new approachs,
stream relocation
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? x Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 500'
(2) Width of area to be filled 52'
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway
What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Dozer, crane, heavy duty truck
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes x No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail
1. GENERAL
Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes x No
If yes, explain in detail
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
ZTVZ0a
Date
evised 03/9>
ATTACHMENT A
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION, PERMIT APPLICATIONS, AND PERMIT DRAWINGS
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS / REGULATORY APPROVALS
The project is being processed by the Federal Highways Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion"
(CE) in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The project, however, occurs in a Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA) designated county and does not meet the criteria for a General CAMA bridge
replacement permit. This letter therefore is a request for a CAMA Major Permit.
Attached for your information is a copy of the CAMA Major permit application, preconstruction
notification form (PCN), CE planning document, permit drawings, Wetland Delineation Sheets, Wetland
Rating Sheets, and a check for $250 (See Attachments). Additionally, copies of the letters sent to the
property owners and the certified mail receipts are attached. The signed return receipts from these
property owners will be forwarded to you as soon as possible. By copy of this letter, NCDOT also
requests Nationwide permits 23 and 12 from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), and
the appropriate 401 General Certifications from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr. Eric Black at (919) 733-
1176.
Sincerely,
y' c
William Gilmore, P. E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
W/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
W/o attachment
Mr. John Alford, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P. E., Program Development
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P. E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P. E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. Tom Kendig, Project Development & Environmental Analysis
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Table 1. TIP B-3215 Permanent Stream and Wetland Impacts.
Site Station
No. To/From . Stream Name Wetland
Fill (ac.) Mechanized
Clearing (ac.)t Wetland
Excavation (ac.) Stream Channel
Lost (A.)
l 27+00 to 32+75 Northeast Creek 0.079 0.128 0.038 130
2 23+00 to 30+30 N/A 0 0.37 0 0
Total Impacts 0.079 0.498 0.038 130
impact to wetlands due to mechanized clearing beyond construction limit.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
In efforts to reduce wetland impacts, NCDOT has incorporated the following avoidance and minimization
measures:
1) Reductions of the proposed roadway fill slopes from 3:1 to 2:1.
2) Excavation of the new overflow channel from only the west bank to minimize impacts due to
mechanized clearing. The channel construction sequence will include placement of a
temporary dike in the overflow channel, backfilling the existing channel, and cutting the new
channel. This will take approximately six weeks.
3) All waste and borrow sites will be kept out of wetlands to eliminate additional wetland
impacts.
4) Removal of lateral ditches from wetlands areas.
THREATENED AND/OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
As of December 20, 1999, there are 1 I species that are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or
Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance T(S/A) for Onslow County, North Carolina. Additionally, a
January 10, 2000 review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database indicated
that there is no known occurrence of the eleven federally protected species within 1.0 mile of the project
area. Relevant information for those species listed for Onslow County is included in Table 2.
auic i.. cnuangereu anu t nreatenea apecies ror vnslow
SCietit T Name' R ` ? liln?ditl?lahte * +? ?? , i Stal is $ioio i.c C&clusion;
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A) Section 7 consultation not required.
Amaranthus pumilus seabeach amaranth T No Effect.
Caretta caretta loggerhead sea turtle T No Effect
Carey lutea golden sedge PE No Effect
Charadrius melodus piping plover T No Effect
Chelonia mydas green sea turtle T No Effect
Dermochelys coriacea leatherback sea turtle E No Effect
Felis concolor couguar eastern cougar E No Effect
Lysimachia asperulaefolia rough-leaved loosestrife E No Effect
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker E No Effect
Thalictrum cool i Coole 's meadowrue E No Effect
-t, denotes endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range).
"P" denotes Proposed (a species which has been formally proposed for listing as Endangered. Threatened. or Special Concern,
but has not yet completed the legally mandated listing process.
"T" denotes Threatened (a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the forseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range).
"T(S/A)" denotes Threatened by Similarity of Appearance. species that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other
rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to
Section 7 consultation.

a . STATE
r ?6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 28, 2000
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza Il, 151-B Hwy. 24
Moorehead City, NC 28557
ATTN: Mr. Ted Tyndall
CAMA Central Section District Manager
Dear Sir:

Subject: CAMA Major Permit for Replacement of Bridges 118 & 119 over Northeast Creek
overflow & Northeast Creek on NC 1406. Onslow County. Federal Aid Project No.
BRSTP-1406(2). State Project No. 8.2260701. T.I.P No. B-3215.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridges Nos. 118 and
119 over the Northeast Creek overflow and Northeast Creek respectively. The project consists of
replacing the existing bridges on new alignment north of the existing bridges with the centerlines offset
approximately 21 ft. Approach roadways will have a 36 ft travelway with 8 ft shoulders, including 4 ft
paved shoulders and 11 ft shoulders where guardrails are warranted. The approach work will extend
approximately 950 ft northwest of Bridge No. 118 and 1350 ft southeast of Bridge No. 119 to the existing
three lane roadway section northwest and southeast. The proposed project will be built in phase
construction. Construction sequence will consist of construction of the new alignment while maintaining
traffic on the existing road.
STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS
Stream impacts associated with the project will consist of the permanent fill of 130 linear feet of the
overflow channel for Northeast Creek a Class "SC-NSW" stream (Index No. 19-16(0.5), 8/1/91) and 8
feet of temporary stream impacts resulting from a water line installation. Additionally, the deck and
bridge railings for the superstructure for Bridges No. 118 and No. 119 are composed of concrete, while
the substructure is composed of timber. Both the bridge rail and substructure will be removed without
dropping them into Waters of United States, however, temporary fill resulting from dropping deck
components into waters of the U.S. will be 16 yd3 and 17 yd3 respectively.
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands will result from fill, excavation, and mechanized clearing.
Total permanent wetland impacts will be 0.615 acres. Temporary wetland impacts will result from
excavation (0.7 acres) and fill (0.7 acres) associated with the installation of a new water line. Total
temporary wetland impacts will be 0.14 wetland acres. A summary of all permanent stream and wetland
impacts is included in Table 1 and the attached permit drawings.
Jya ? SUT(
N yr?
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 276 1 1-520 1 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR
January 28, 2000
Onslow Realty Corporation
931 Kinston Highway
Richlands, NC 28574
Dear Sir or Madam:
SECRETARY
Subject: Onslow County, Replacement of Bridges Nos. 118 and 119 over Northeast Creek on SR
1406. Federal Project No. BRSTP-1406(2). State Project No. 8.2260701. TIP No. B-3215.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace bridges 118 and 119 over
the Northeast Creek overflow and Northeast Creek on SR 1406 in Onslow County. The proposed
project will involve replacing the existing structures with two new bridges 80 ft long and 52 ft
wide, and 100 ft long and 52 ft wide respectively. This replacement will take place north of the
existing alignment and local traffic will be maintained on site while the project is built in stage
construction.
The project will require permanent wetland impacts of 0.079 acres of fill, 0.038 acres of
excavation, and 0.498 acres of mechanized clearing. Temporary wetland impacts associated with
the installation of a new water line will include 0.07 acres of fill and 0.07 acres of excavation.
Permanent stream impacts will consist of 130 feet of fill in the Northeast Creek overflow.
Approximately 65 ft of channel will be relocated. Temporary stream impacts consist of 8 feet of
stream excavation due to the water line installation.
A permit from the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management is required for this work.
This permit is being obtained by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). In
that your property is adjacent to the site where this permit is required, a copy of the permit
application is being provided for your review; however, no action is required on your part.
If you have any questions, please contact appropriate CAMA representative, or call Mr. Eric
Black, NCDOT at [phone].
Sincerely,
y- C .
?v /4d'-
William Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
U Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Topsail Beach
•.y?.?.vi a...n pro..
r0PSAR ISL AND
North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Planning and Environmental Branch
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 119 AND 118
OVER NORTHEAST CREEK AND OVERFLOW
ON SR 1406
ONSLOW COUNTY
TIP NO. B-3215 & B-3216
0 500m 1 kilometer
SCALE 1:30 000 FIG . 1
UNOLUVV UUUIV I T
BRIDGE NO. 118
B-3216
LOOKING EAST
LOOKING WEST
NORTH OF BRIDGE
FIGURE 3
ONSLOW COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 119
3215
LOOKING EAST
LOOKING WEST
NORTH OF BRIDGE
FIGURE 3
J vt
Superintendent
Ronald B. Singletary
Deputy Su2crintendent
Freddie S. Canady
Asst. Superintendents
Charles T. Hoyt, Jr.
Barbara B. Newman
November 14, 1996
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
NC Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-6201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Board of Education
Gary Lanvermeier, Chm.
Fred A Holt, V.Chm.
Vicki Davis
Robert B. Gaskins
Fred W. Hargett
Lois C. Meadows
Mary Ann Sharpe
?GEI\
NOV 1 g 1996 f
t
- y D•t'. X51 C' . ,: r ?. ?
Subject: Schools Buses that travel over Bridge No. 118
on State Road 1406 in Onslow County
As per your letter concerning school buses that travel State Road
1406, please be advised that approximately 25 regular school buses
travel this road twice daily and 6 special needs buses travel this
road four times daily.
I would like to suggest that if you are planning to close this road
for an extended period of time, that the closing might be scheduled
during the middle of June through the middle of August when school is
not in session. By scheduling the closing during the summer months,
our bus schedules could stay in tact and our routes would remain the
same and not become longer. Our Transportation Department would also
save money on added fuel costs and drivers' salaries that would be
increased should you do the closing when schools are in session.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. If I can supply you
with any further information, please feel free to give me a call at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Jeff Smith
Transportation Director
JS/jdb
c: Ronald Singletary, Superintendent
Charles Hoyt, Asst. Superintendent
Roger Dixon, Director, Support Services
Marcie Kellum, Transportation Coordinator
Onslow County Schools
P.O. Box 99, Jacksonville, North Carolina 28541-0099
Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Ja mes S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
I LT.R?FA
40
?v
1:3 EHNR
January 16, 1997
MEMORANDUM
T Mr. Joe Westbrook, NCDOT, Planning & Environmental
From: Cyndi Bell, NC Division of Water Quality L L 16
Subject: Water Quality Checklist for Bridge Replacement Projects
Reference your correspondence dated November 5, 1996, in which you requested comments concerning
the scope of work to be performed by Wang Engineering Company, Inc. The Division of Water Quality
requests that NCDOT and its consultant consider the following generic environmental commitments for
design and construction of bridge replacements:
A. DWQ requests that DOT strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled "Design Standards
in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0024) throughout design and construction for this
project in the area that drains to streams having WS (Water Supply), ORW (Outstanding
Resource Water), HQW (High Quality Water), B (Body Contact), SA (Shellfish Water) or Tr
(Trout Water) classifications to protect existing uses.
B. DWQ requests that bridges be replaced on existing location with road closure. If an on-site
detour or bridge/approach road realignment is necessary, the approach fills should be removed to
pre-construction contour and revegetated with native vegetation. Tree species should be planted
at 320 stems per acre.
C. DWQ requests that hazardous spill catch basins be installed at any bridge crossing a stream
classified as WS (Water Supply). The number of catch basins installed should be determined by
the design of the bridge, so that runoff would enter said basin(s) rather than directly flowing into
the stream.
D. To the maximum extent practicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek.
E. Wetland impacts should be avoided (including sediment and erosion control
structures/measures). If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should
be chosen. Mitigation for unavoidable impacts will be required by DWQ if impacts exceed one
acre. Smaller impacts may soon require mitigation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
F. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation
will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow.
The attached table has been prepared by DWQ for your assistance in studying the systems involved in
these bridge replacements. This information includes the DWQ Index Number, DWQ Stream
Classification, river basin, and preliminary comments for each crossing.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Mirrnative Action Em&yer 501/6 recycL*&10 % post consumer paper
Mr. Joe Westbrook Memo
January 16, 1997
Page 2
Thank you for your request for DWQ input. DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met
and designated uses are not lost or degraded. Questions regarding the 401 Certification or other water
quality issues should be directed to Cyndi Bell at [phone] in DWQ's Water Quality Environmental
Sciences Branch.
cc: Micbelle Suverkrubbe
Melba McGee
B2806.DOC

m$ -? m g` m$ m?$ z m
a= a m'E ?
E a
`?
c=
a==
G
?
E E
9
5 3 3$ 3= 3?
5 s 5 a
S 3
? 3 ,
a m
O=
?
0
E
E 1
w0 mam? m? am? ama amt m>
z 2 m z m
z m ?
am? am c 3
;
ama amc
°
V a .-
.
Em EE.m
E? E? E? cE m Z m
Ems, E? m ,Z m ,o
Ems, E
c
_
2 2 2
OD L m t m co L Z m t
(D w
2
m m

m
m
Q y Z
t Z
?
_G

m

S S

E
3 Y
O O
,?
z > > a am m _m

Q J J J m J
H U

E o
3 3 3 3 3
N

C N Z N CO cn to n Q
n
U Q Q U v z N (n cn to

G N U U
N U U
(n (n
U
m O
0 Z N
Q 1p .- p N
.? in
N C? IN N O O N Q N to O
3 C? N w Z
O N m N
$ 0 0 0 o m
D m a J
x
c
U m
0
m .0
`E° E
= Z
O O
0
2 ¢ d:
N ? O
U U
cc
C
m
E Y a
m m E a a m
m
m m co
m
Z 0 ? 3 E E m
N m m U m m
U m m m
U U

E
b a, (n vi c Z
i
U
n es

N v m m Q
U = m m a: x A 3
cn a
0 (n (n z Z
c
°-
0 n
"
m m CD CD
S ti m m m

a
q

m
U

a? a CL m m m m m m m

Q Q ¢ Q ¢ ¢ m m _
m
m m
m m
Q ¢ Q

o an
U p m a> 0 LO
U

-? N Z Z (n m N N N cn N
= N
Z
m

a
.-
nn cc C13
(0 n Lo Cl) b ^
w
N v
Qf m

m m
z

a N Ln

co m rn
Of O O o?
p 0 r 01 t2 `O

F c?
co
m m m m m m m co
m m
m m
E North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Joe Westbrook
NCDOT Planning and Environmental Branch
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor for
Habitat Conservation Progra L
DATE: January 6, 1997
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 119 on SR 1406 over Northeast Creek, Onslow
County, North Carolina, TIP No. B-3215.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided regarding potential impacts to wildlife and fisheries resources. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
We recommend replacement of the existing structure with a bridge, on-site with an off-
site detour, if possible. If an on-site detour is required we request that NCDOT biological staff
visit the site and make a wetland determination to choose the location of the detour.
In addition to any specific comments above, the NCWRC requests NCDOT routinely
minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements.
The NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of
the project and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams.
Replacement of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culverts, is recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
Any channel relocations should be done using state-of-the-art stream relocation techniques and
should be coordinated with the NCWRC.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Joe Westbrook
NCDOT Planning and Environmental Branch
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor ' for
Habitat Conservation Progran"
DATE: January 6, 1997
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 118 on SR 1406 over Northeast Creek overflow,
Onslow County, North Carolina, TIP No. B-3216.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided regarding potential impacts to wildlife and fisheries resources. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
We recommend replacement of the existing structure with a bridge, on-site with an off-
site detour, if possible. If an on-site detour is required we request that NCDOT biological staff
visit the site and make a wetland determination to choose the location of the detour.
In addition to any specific comments above, the NCWRC requests NCDOT routinely
minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements.
The NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of
the project and prevent wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams.
Replacement of bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box
culverts, is recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
Any channel relocations should be done using state-of-the-art stream relocation techniques and
should be coordinated with the NCWRC.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.
V

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
November 22, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook /w
Deputy State istoric Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Bridge Group 14, replace Bridge 119 on
SR 1406 over Northeast Creek, Onslow
County, B-3215, State Project
8.2260701, ER 97-7780
Thank you for your letter of November 5, 1996, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of
historical or architectural importance located within the planning area. We look
forward to meeting with an architectural historian from the North Carolina
Department of Transportation to review the aerial and photographs of the project
area so we can make our survey recommendation.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: N. Graf
B. Church
T. Padgett
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ???
J
s „a SrAT[ ?' ?4
3
, II
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secreta
November 12, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
,?+
? y?h?¢-?_??
FROM: David Brook ils
Deputy State oric Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Bridge Group 14, replace Bridge 118 on
SR 1406 over Northeast Creek overflow,
Onslow County, B-3216, State Project
8.2260801, ER 97-7782
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Thank you for your letter of November 5, 1996, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of
historical or architectural importance located within the planning area. We look
forward to meeting with an architectural historian from the North Carolina
Department of Transportation to review the aerial and photographs of the project
area so we can make our survey recommendation.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: N. Graf
B. Church
T. Padgett
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 }???

Federal Aid R GRtir? 14?? z? TIP R 6 321s County - vkAsL_oVj
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Brief Project Description 9F-FL "& 6R tDIrE Ov. 111 0W Srz 14&(, ovF..R.
rJ•?T1-tEAsr 64ZEEIL
• Rr_ rL l?c??r On 1 1 representatives of the
? 'North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
? Federal Highway Administration (FHw'A)
? North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
revicwcd the subject project at
A scoping meeting
Historic architecmral resources photograph revie•,v session/censultanon
Othcr
All panics present agrccd
? there are no properties over fifty years oid within the project's area of potential c:;ccs.
? there arc no procczics less than fi years old which are considered to roc; Criterion
Consideration G within the project's are: of potential c'Yccts.
there arc prope.^,Ics Over rtm' years old (list attached) within the proicc;'s area of potential c?ict:ts,
but based on tic liistcrcal information available and the photograchs of cock property, prcpe. Lies
identified as arc considered not clisible
for National Register and no fur-her e•:aiuation of them is ncccssan'. y
tlxrc are no National Register-listed prcccrtics within the prcjcc;'s area of potential ccc;s.
S isncd:
CC 1 ! (p y ?
Rcpresc. ,:ti ' ,, DOT D to
V
'FHr the Division dministrator, or other Federal Agency Date
Rcpresc ntatlive, HPO 4?,L?atc
`'State Historic Preservation 0 :cer v i
Date
If a survey report is prepared, a tinal copy ot•this fonn and the attaehcd list will be included
Federal Aid f I? L- TP• 14#(, 3 TIP T
5 • irv l0
County DrJSVVr.I
CONCURRENCE F0RIM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Brief Project Description ;-EPL-Ad-E 8,t (gce Wo. lla• vw 4X 14eb svxg
n1BfZt'NEA? • r-REEt? o??r-t.ow. ?,,?;?„u_ (?vnun kIV.
On _ 1 1 fv 't -7 , representatives of the
i North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
? Federal Highway Administration (FHNvA)
? North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
reviewed the subject project at
A scoping meeting
? Historic architectural resources photograph re•:icw session/censultation
Other
Ail parties present agreed
? there arc no properties over fifth- }'cars pia within the proiect's area of potential cffccts.
there arc no properties less than fife; years old which are considered to meet Criterion
Censidcration G within the project's area or potential cffccts.
thcrc are properties over im• wars old (list artached) «ithln the proiect's area of potential cFcc-,s,
but based on the historical information avaiiable and the phorographs of each property, prone, Lies
identified as arc considered not c'isziblc
for National Register and no further evaluation of them is ncccssan-. y
? tl:crc are no National Register-listed preocr;ics within the project's area of potential cffccts.
Siencd:
Represc yc??NCDOT Date
FHNv r the Division dministrator, or other Federal Agency Date
Representative, ,SHPO 'Date'
1
State Historic Preservation Officer / An r.-
Ira survey report is prepared, a final copy oCtliis runn and the attncltcd list gill be included.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. 80X 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
January 9, 1997
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID Nos. 199701747, 199701748, 199701749, 199701750, 199701751,
199701752, and 199701753 (Various bridge replacement projects)
Q/ C E \
Mr. Frank Vick
Planning and Environmental Branch
- ANt:--
Division of Highways -A-
17,i
North Carolina Department of Transportation Z
Post Office Box 25201 arV?°1C"
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 F
Dear Mr. Vick:
Reference the letters dated November 5, 1996, requesting comments on
potential environmental impacts and scope of work that should be performed for
the bridge replacement projects listed below (please reference our Action ID.
on any future correspondence regarding these projects):
a. Action ID. 199701753, TIP B-3028, Robeson County, Bridge No. 51 on NC
210 over Gallberry Swamp.
b. Action ID. 199701752, TIP B-3043, Sampson County, Bridge No. 139 and
141 SR 1919 over Six Runs Creek.
C. Action ID. 199701751, TIP B-3031, Robeson County, Bridge No. 233 on SR
1318 over Big Raft Swamp.
d. Action ID. 199701750, TIP B-3155, Cumberland County, Bridge No. 194
over CSX Railroad.
e. Action ID. 199701749, TIP B-3215, Onslow County, Bridge 119 on SR 1406
over Northeast Creek.
f. Action ID. 199701748, TIP B-3216, Onslow County, Bridge No. 118 on SR
1406 over'Northeast Creek overflow.
g. Action ID. 199701747, TIP 3029, Robeson County, Bridge No. 58 on NC 71
over Big Raft Swamp.
.?FA
!
-2- 000391'
Although these projects may qualify for Nationwide Permit Authorization
(NWP 23) as a categorical exclusion, the project planning report should
contain sufficient information to document that the proposed activity does not
have more than a minimal individual or cumulative impact on the aquatic
environment. Accordingly, we offer the following comments and recommendations
to be addressed in the planning report:
a. The report should contain the amount of permanent and temporary
impacts to waters and wetlands as well as a description of the type of habitat
that will be affected.
b. Off-site detours are always preferable to on-site (temporary) detours
in wetlands. If an on-site detour is the recommended action, justification
should be provided.
c. Project commitments should include the removal of all temporary fills
from waters and wetlands. In addition, if undercutting is necessary for
temporary detours, the undercut material should be stockpiled to be used to
restore the site.
d. The report should address impacts to recreational navigation (if any)
if a bridge span will be replaced with a box culvert.
e. The report should address potential impacts to anadromous fish passage
if a bridge span will be replaced with culverts.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment during this phase of planning
for these projects. Questions or comments may be addressed to me in the
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Scott McLendon
Regulatory Project Manager
Copy Furnished:
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687