20181272 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2020_20200804

ID#* 20181272 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 08/05/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/4/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r- Wetlands r` Buffer r` Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Paul Wiesner
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20181272
Existing IDY
Project Type:
Project Name:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Greenbrier Stream Restoration Site
County: Yadkin
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Greenbrier_ 100086_MYO_2020.pdf 11.92MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Paul Wiesner
Signature:*

As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
FINAL
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Monitoring Year 0
Data Collection Period:
April 2020
Submission Date:
July 2020

NCDEQ Contract No. 7616
DMS ID No. 100086
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01755
NCDWR ID: 20181272
Prepared For: Prepared By:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street; 3rd Floor
Raleigh, NC 27603
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Cary, NC 27511

Providing ecosystem planning and restoration services to support a sustainable environment
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27511

Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net

Mr. Paul Wiesner
NCDEQ – Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravencroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801

July 31, 2020

RE: Response to Draft As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report (MY0) Comments dated July 24,
2020
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin – CU# 03040101 - Yadkin County, North Carolina
NCDMS Project # 100086, Contract # 7616

Dear Mr. Wiesner,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) has reviewed the comments on the Draft As-Built
Baseline Monitoring Report provided July 24, 2020. The comments have been addressed as
described below and the Final Baseline Report and electronic deliverables have been revised in
response to this review.
• Section 1.0 Project Summary: As noted in the IRT app roved mitigation plan, please include the
following statement in Section 1.0 Project Summary; “The Greenbrier Stream Restoration site
was instituted via NCDEQ-DMS RFP # 16-007406. As approved by the NCIRT, all projects
contracted under the 16-007406 RFP have a cool or warm service type. Penalties will not be
assessed for using these project mitigation credits to satisfy cool or warm requirements.”
o The statement has been added to the first paragraph of Section 1.0 Project
Summary.

• Table 1: The “Mitigation Plan Footage or Acreage” for UT1 R1 should be updated to 843 linear
feet as documented in the IRT approved mitigation plan.
o Mitigation Plan Footage for UT1 R1 has been updated to 843 linear feet in Table 1.

• Table 2: The project’s Institution Date is 6/27/2018 (contract execution date). The project
mitigation plan was finalized (IRT approved) in December 2019. Please include the data
collection complete date for the as-built survey (even if it is the same as the completion date).
Please include the month/s in the data collection complete date cell for the As -built Baseline
Monitoring Report. Please update the As-built Baseline Monitoring Report Completion date.
Please QA/QC the table and update accordingly.
o Table 2 has been updated and the dates in the table have been reviewed.

Providing ecosystem planning and restoration services to support a sustainable environment
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27511

Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net

• Table 4: Please include the project stream’s thermal regime (warm) in the table. DMS
understands that this is not in the DMS template/guidance but is an important element of the
project information.
o The project thermal regime information has been added to Table 4.

• CCPV Maps: Please remove the Pre-Existing Stream layer from the CCPV sheets in the report.
Please keep this layer in the electronic support files for reference and documentation. DMS
understands that this layer is requested in the MY0 template/ guidance; however, it clutters
the map for this project. DMS & EPR can provide the IRT with a comparison map of the existing
channel and constructed channel upon request .
o The Pre-Existing stream layer has been removed from the CCPV map but the
shapefile is still included in the electronic support files.

• Table 7: In the Annual Means column, the “size (ACRES)” cell is currently 0.10. With four
permanent plots, shouldn’t that be 0.08? Please QA/ QC and update the table as necessary.
o The size in acres of each plot is .024711 acres, which was rounded to .02 in Table 7
of the draft submission. When the area of all 4 plots was combined, it rounded to
0.10 acres. These acreages have been expanded to 6 significant figures to more
accurately reflect the size of each plot.

• Stream Data & Cross Section Plots: Four (4) o f the cross section plots appear to be mislabeled.
Based on the record drawings, there are no cross sections located in reach UT1 Reach 2.
Further; the cross section features (Riffle/ Pool) in Table 9 (XS 4,5, & 8) do not match what is
shown on the cross section plots. As an example, Table 9 notes that Cross Section 8 is a Pool
while the Cross Section 8 plot identifies it as a Riffle. Please QA/ QC and correct the cross
section plots, labels, and stream data (Tables 8a -Table 10d) and confirm it is correct i n the
final MY0 report. The electronic support files should also be updated accordingly .
o The cross section plots have been relabeled and Table 9 has been updated to match
the cross section plots. The electronic support files have also been updated.

• Appendix E: Record Drawings: Please also provide Record Drawing planting sheets noting any
planting substitutions/ deviations from the IRT approved mitigation plan’s planting plan
(Appendix 8 Sheets 3B, 9, and 10 in the IRT approved mitigation plan). Planting deviations and
substitutions should be shown in red.
o There were no planting substitutions or deviations fro m the IRT approved mitigation
plan’s planting plan. Two plan sheets have been added to the As -Built plans to show
the planting plan.

Electronic Support File Comments:
• Please merge and attribute segments that were provided for the as-built stream features, and
format these features so that each record/feature in the attribute table represents a project

Providing ecosystem planning and restoration services to support a sustainable environment
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27511

Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net

component within the asset table. Please ensure that the feature leng ths match the reported
as-built footage.
o The features in the GB_AsBuilt_Streams shapefile have been merged for each
individual reach and attributes for the reach name, mitigation approach, and length
in linear feet have been added for each feature. The as-built footage in Appendix A,
Table 1 has been updated to match the footage for each feature in the As -Built
streams shapefile.

• Please include the zero credit stream feature that connects creditable features (i.e. easement
break that segments UT1R1). Also, please include the UT1R2 EII segment.
o The zero credit stream feature at the culvert crossing on UT1 Reach 1 has been
added, as well as the EII segment of UT1R2. These features can be found in the
GB_AsBuilt_Streams shapefile.

• Please include the easement polygon feature included in Figs. 2-2B.
o The conservation easement polygon has been included in the electronic submittal.
The shapefile is named GB_CE.

• Please review and revise labeling in Figs. 2-2B, specifically for UT1R2 and UT1R3, as well as
UT1A and UT1A-1.
o Stream name labels in Figures 2-2B have been revised.

• Please provide the stand alone as-built .pdf and .dwg files with the final electronic submittal.
This as-built survey should bear a Professional Land Surveyor (PLS) seal.
o A .pdf and .dwg version of the as-built survey have been included in the electronic
submittal Support Files, 5. As-Built Plans.

If you have any questions regarding the As-Built Baseline Report, please contact me at 919-388-0787
or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely, Amy James, PWS

Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Mitigation Components .................................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Construction ................................................................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 In-Stream Work and Floodplain Grading ................................................................................. 3
1.4 Site Planting .................................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 BASELINE DATA ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 3
2.1 Performance Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Stream Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 4
2.2.1 Stream Profile ......................................................................................................................... 5
2.2.2 Stream Dimension .................................................................................................................. 5
2.2.3 Channel Stability ..................................................................................................................... 6
2.2.4 Stream Hydrology ................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 Riparian Vegetation......................................................................................................................... 7
2.3.1 Baseline Vegetation Monitoring ............................................................................................. 7
3.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 8

Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina
TABLES
Table A. USACE Mitigation Success Criteria
Table B. Stream Monitoring Summary
Table C. Riparian Vegetation Monitoring Summary

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Project Information Tables
Table 1 . Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Baseline Photo Log
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Vegetation Planting Information
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 7. Stem Count by Plot
Vegetation Photo Log
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Monitoring Data – Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table 10. Monitoring Data – Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Cross Section Plots
Appendix E: As-built Plan Sheets
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 1
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC (EPR) implemented the Greenbrier Stream
Mitigation Project (Project; Site) for the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) to
provide 2,300 stream mitigation credits (SMCs) in the Yadkin River Basin, Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 03040101. The Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project was instituted via NCDEQ-DMS RFP
# 16-007406. As approved by the NCIRT, all projects contracted under the 16-007406 RFP have
a cool or warm service type. Penalties will not be assessed for using these project mitigation
credits to satisfy cool or warm requirements. The Project restored and enhanced 2,530 linear
feet (LF) of one perennial (UT1) and three intermittent (UT1A, UT1A-1, and UT1B) unnamed
tributaries (UT) to South Deep Creek within a 6.7-acre conservation easement. Mitigation assets
are listed in Table 1 of Appendix A.
The Site is located in DMS targeted local watershed 03040101130020. The Site was historically
utilized for agricultural and cattle practices. As such, streams and existing wetlands in the
project area were adversely impacted by direct cattle access, farming activities, and stream
channelization. The Site is situated on once active pastureland in a WS-III watershed that is 57%
agricultural land, 33% forest, 6% developed open space, and 3% herbaceous land. Prior to
construction activities, project streams were incised, straightened, and suffered from significant
cattle damage. The adjacent wetlands were small, but similarly trampled, and heavily grazed.
Pre-construction, or pre-existing, site conditions are provided in Table 4 of Appendix A and the
Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables in Appendix D. Photos and a more detailed description
of Site conditions before restoration are available in the Mitigation Plan (Final version
submitted December 2019).
1.1 Goals and Objectives
The Project goals were established based on an assessment of site conditions and restoration
potential with careful consideration of the stressors identified in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report (NCEEP, 2009) and Yadkin Pee-Dee Basinwide
Water Quality Plan (NCDWQ, 2008). As such, the established project goals include:
1) Reduce sediment inputs and stream turbidity;
2) Reduce nutrient inputs;
3) Reduce fecal coliform inputs;
4) Restore/enhance degraded riparian buffers;
5) Protect high resource value waters (including water supply classifications);
6) Implement agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in agricultural watersheds.
Site construction, planting, and baseline vegetation data collection were completed in April
2020 and the as-built survey was completed in May 2020. A detailed timeline of the Project
activity and reporting history is provided in Table 2 of Appendix A. During construction, minor
adjustments were made to the project design. All changes from the design are detailed below
in Section 1.3.1. Baseline (MY0) profiles and cross-section dimensions closely match the design
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 2
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

parameters with little variation. The Site was built as designed and is expected to meet the
upcoming monitoring year’s success criteria.
The proposed streams were broken into six reaches for design purposes. UT1 consists of three
reaches while each of the other three tributaries consist of one reach. The design criteria were
based on surveys of multiple reference reaches conducted in the past, published reference
reach data, and on design criteria and monitoring data from past successful restoration projects
performed throughout the Piedmont region of North Carolina. Restoration practices involved
raising the streambeds of the project streams and reconnecting them with active floodplains
along the fall of the valley, thereby restoring flow dynamics and a healthy headwater stream
system. Buffers in excess of 50 feet were established along most reaches.
Functional uplift will come from restoring natural riparian vegetation, excluding livestock from
all project streams, and restoring the project streams to a stable condition, connected to their
adjacent floodplains. The Project has restored the plan and bed form diversity to conditions
similar to reference channels (Appendix D, Table 8). Functional uplift was achieved by
incorporating rock and woody structures throughout the reach and by planting a forested
buffer that will serve as a source of large woody debris in the future. Additionally, lateral
stability was improved in the short term by removing the cattle and reducing shear stresses in
the channel. As the riparian buffer continues to establish, lateral stability should improve
further and increase the resiliency of the restored channels.
1.2 Mitigation Components
The current condition plan view (CCPV) in Appendix B (Figure 2) shows the mitigation assets
along with the location of monitoring features. Post-construction conditions (Appendix A, Table
1) at the Site generated 2,413.48 SMCs as a result of the following:
• 2,336 linear feet of Priority 2 stream restoration
• 193.7 linear feet of Enhancement II
As illustrated in the As-Built Plan Sheets in Appendix E, the plan form of the proposed streams
did not deviate significantly from the proposed design and the stream lengths are unchanged
from the approved mitigation plan.
Additional construction activities performed at the Site included the following:
• Installing approximately 900 live stakes along restored and enhanced streambanks,
• Planting approximately 4,450 trees and shrubs within the easement,
• Fencing of the entire conservation easement, and
• Installing a well, multiple cattle waterers, and water lines to support these facilities.
1.3 Construction
Construction began in March 2020 and site earthwork was completed at the end of April 2020.
Table 3 in Appendix A outlines the Project contacts. During construction there was at least one
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 3
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

bankfull, or near bankfull, discharge event. Site visits after the event documented wrack lines
and recent sediment deposition on the floodplain of the newly built channel.
Deviations from the design are shown in the As-Built Plan Sheets (Appendix E) and are
described in detail within this section.
1.3.1 In-Stream Work and Floodplain Grading
The As-Built Plan Sheets (Appendix E) provide a visual markup of the design to show what was
installed during construction. The Site was built as designed and is expected to meet the
upcoming monitoring year’s success criteria. All changes from the design are detailed below.
The alignment of the constructed stream was altered slightly at the downstream end of the
culvert under Collins Road to preserve a large sycamore. A small boulder toe was constructed
downstream of the pipe to protect the road embankment.
The upstream end (10+00 to 10+50) of UT1A-1 was relocated slightly from the design plans to
match the alignment of the existing valley. This did not result in a reduction in enhanced stream
length and the step pool sequence was constructed as designed.
All woody riffles were changed to constructed stone riffles throughout the site at the direction
of the engineer. Brush material was installed in each constructed riffle to provide woody
material in each structure.
UT1 R1 Station 17+25: Rock step was not constructed. Due to bedrock in the channel.
UT1 R3 Station 27+75: Toe wood was added to meander bend to provide additional bank
protection and large woody debris.
1.4 Site Planting
Site planting (including live stakes) was completed in April 2020. No significant changes were
made to the original planting plan.
2.0 BASELINE DATA ASSESSMENT
This report establishes the baseline data that will be used to determine the success of the
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project. The performance criteria and as-built site conditions are
described in the following sections to evaluate whether the project is meeting the success
criteria in subsequent monitoring years.
2.1 Performance Criteria
Project success criteria were established in accordance with the NCDMS Mitigation Plan
Template (ver. 06/2017), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Wilmington District Public Notice:
Notification of Issuance of Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Conducted for Wilmington District (October 24, 2016). The monitoring plan for the site will
follow this guidance. Table A details the USACE success criteria that evaluate whether project
goals have been met throughout the monitoring period.

Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 4
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

Table A. USACE Mitigation Success Criteria
Restored Stream Channels
• All streams must maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
• Continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days, for both
perennial and intermittent streams.
• Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 for all measured cross sections on a given reach.
• Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be above 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach
for C and E streams stream types and above 1.4 for B stream types.
• BHR and ER should not change by more than 10% in any given year for all measured cross sections
on a given reach.
• Must document occurrence of at least 4 bankfull events in separate years during the monitoring
period.
Riparian Vegetation
• Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3;
a minimum of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 4; and a minimum of 210 stems per
acre must be present at year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7. Certain native
species, which are appropriate to plant on-site to provide a diverse vegetation community, do not
typically grow to these heights in 7 years and will be excluded from the height performance
standard. For this project, the excluded species is Quercus nigra (water oak).
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting
list for the site.
• Any single species can only account for 50% of the required stems per monitoring plot.

2.2 Stream Monitoring
Stream monitoring will include monitoring of the hydrologic and geomorphic functions of UT1,
UT1A, and UT1B. Monitored parameters, methods, schedule/frequency, and extent are
summarized in Table B. These monitoring parameters follow USACE guidance but will also allow
for monitoring of other parameters to document site performance related to the project goals
listed in Section 1.1. The locations of the established monitoring cross sections are shown in
Figure 2 (Appendix B).

Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 5
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

Table B. Stream Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/
Frequency Number/ Extent
Stream Profile Full longitudinal survey As-built only (unless
otherwise required)
All restored and
enhanced stream
channels
Stream Dimension Cross sections Years 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 7
UT1 – 6 (3 riffle/3 pool)
UT1A – 1 (riffle)
UT1B – 1 (riffle)
Channel Stability
Visual Assessment Yearly All restored stream
channels
Additional Cross sections Yearly
Only if instability is
documented during
monitoring
Stream Hydrology
Pressure transducers
Precipitation recorder
Photos of flood indicators
Continuous
recording through
monitoring period
UT1 – 1
UT1A – 1
UT1B - 1
OHWM
Visual assessment and
documentation of
indicators outlined in RGL
05-05
Yearly All restored stream
channels

2.2.1 Stream Profile
A full longitudinal profile was surveyed for the entire length of the restored streams in May
2020 to document as-built conditions. This survey is tied to a permanent benchmark and
includes thalweg, right bank, and left bank features. Profile measurements were taken at the
head of each feature (e.g. riffle, pool) and at the max depth of pools. The locations of in-stream
structures and cross-sections are shown on the profile plot as well, which is included in
Appendix D.
The surveyed longitudinal profile shows that the constructed bedform features are consistent
with the reference and design criteria. Table 8 in Appendix D summarizes the measured profile
data. The longitudinal profile will not be surveyed in subsequent years unless vertical channel
instability has been observed during monitoring and remedial actions or repairs are needed.
2.2.2 Stream Dimension
Eight (8) permanent cross sections were installed across the site; 6 on UT1 and 1 each on UT1A
and UT1B. Five (5) cross sections were installed in riffles and 3 were installed in pools. Each
cross-section was marked using a length of rebar and steel t-posts on both streambanks. The
location and elevation of each pin was recorded to facilitate data comparison from year to year.
Cross-sections will be surveyed in Monitoring Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 and reported data will
include measurements of Bank Height Ratio (BHR) and Entrenchment Ratio (ER). Reference
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 6
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

photos will be taken of both streambanks every year to provide a visual assessment of any
changes that may occur.
The surveyed cross-sections indicate that the as-built stream dimensions are consistent with
the reference and design criteria. The cross -section plots, photos, and data summary (Tables 8,
9, and 10) are included in Appendix D. These tables will be updated in subsequent monitoring
years to facilitate comparison between monitoring years. There should be little change in the
channel dimension data over the monitoring period, but if changes do take place they will be
documented and evaluated to determine if they indicate a shift toward stability (potentially
represented by settling, vegetative changes, or deposition on top of stream banks) or instability
(represented by erosion and down-cutting). Any unstable areas will be assessed to determine
whether they are systemic and whether repairs are needed.
2.2.3 Channel Stability
Channel stability will be assessed on a yearly basis using photographs to visually document the
condition of the restored project streams. Photographs will be taken from the same location in
the same direction each year. Sixteen (16) photo points were established during baseline
monitoring and are shown in the CCPV (Figure 2) and As-Built Plan Sheets (Appendix E).
Visual assessments of channel stability will also be made regularly throughout the monitoring
year. Any potential issues with the site will be documented, photographed, and reported in the
yearly monitoring report. Additional cross-sections will only be surveyed if instability is
documented during monitoring.
2.2.4 Stream Hydrology
Three (3) pressure transducers were installed in UT1, UT1A, and UT1B to docu ment stream flow
and the occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period. The locations of these
gauges are shown in the CCPV (Figure 2 in Appendix B) and As-Built Plan Sheets (Appendix E).
All three gauges were installed in the downstream end of pools. The constructed bankfull
elevation at each gauge was recorded. This elevation will be compared with the gauge readings
to determine whether a bankfull event has occurred. Photos will be taken of flood indicators
such as debris lines and sediment deposition on the floodplain whenever it is apparent that a
bankfull event has occurred.
This Project will utilize a tipping bucket rain gauge installed at another EPR-completed stream
restoration approximately 0.75 miles to the southeast (Meadowbrook, DMS project no.
100024) to accurately document rainfall at the Site. The rainfall data will be compared to the
flow gauge data to verify that high flows at the Site are correlated with rainfall events. The
monitoring gauges will be downloaded regularly throughout each monitoring year and data will
be presented in the annual monitoring reports.
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 7
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

2.3 Riparian Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring will evaluate the establishment of planted and volunteer
vegetation across the site. Monitored parameters, methods, schedule/frequency, and extent
are summarized in Table C. These monitoring parameters follow USACE guidance but will also
allow for monitoring of other parameters to document site performance related to the project
goals listed in Section 1.1.
Table C. Riparian Vegetation Monitoring Summary
Parameter Method Schedule/
Frequency Number/ Extent Data Collected
Vegetation
establishment
and vigor
Permanent
vegetation plots,
0.02 acre in size
(minimum)
Between July
1st and leaf
drop. As-built,
Years 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 7
4 plots, spread
across site
Species, height,
location, planted vs.
volunteer, and age.
Annual random
vegetation plots,
0.02 acre in size
(minimum)
Between July
1st and leaf
drop. Years 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7
2 plots,
randomly
selected each
year
Species, and height.

2.3.1 Baseline Vegetation Monitoring
Baseline vegetation monitoring occurred in April 2020, soon after site planting was completed.
Final vegetation plot location did not vary significantly from the locations suggested in the
mitigation plan. The corners of the permanent vegetation plots were marked using steel t-posts
and the location of each plot was surveyed during the as-built survey. The individual trees
within each permanent plot were tagged to facilitate monitoring efforts in future years, though
due to the time of year, short time span from planting, and general stem size/characteristics,
species identification could not be completed for the Baseline Report. The planted stems were
counted and measured during baseline monitoring. Species data will be collected during
Monitoring Year 1. In subsequent monitoring years, the location of the temporary random
vegetation plots will be recorded using GPS and species and height data will be collected.
Planted stems per plot ranged from 15 to 19, or 607 to 769 stems per acre. The locations of the
4 permanent vegetation plots are shown in the CCPV (Figure 2).

Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Report-Final 8
DMS Project ID #100086
Yadkin County, North Carolina

3.0 REFERENCES
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services. 2017. As-
built Baseline Monitoring Report Format, Data, and Content Requirement June 2017.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2008. Yadkin Pee-Dee Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2016. Wilmington District Public Notice: Notification of Issuance
of Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for
Wilmington District.

Appendix A
Project Information Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes

Existing Mitigation
Project Wetland Footage Plan As-Built Approach
Component Position and or Footage or Footage or Restoration Priority Mitigation Mitigation
(reach ID, etc.)1 HydroType2 Acreage Stationing Acreage Acreage Level Level Ratio (X:1)Credits Notes/Comments
UT1 Reach 1 926 10+06 - 18+79 843.00 852.00 R P2 1 843.00
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock,
and Permanent Conservation
Easement.
UT1 Reach 2 40 18+79 - 19+19 40.00 40.00 E2 E2 2.5 16.00
Planted Buffer, Exclusion of
Livestock, and Permanent
Conservation Easement
UT1 Reach 3 992 19+19 - 30+16 1097.00 1141.00 R P1, P2 1 1097.00
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock,
and Permanent Conservation
Easement.
UT1A-1 154 10+00 - 11+54 153.70 145.00 E2 E2 2.5 61.48
Grade Control/Habitat Structures,
Benching, Exclusion of Livestock,
and Permanent Conservation
Easement.
UT1A 115 11+54 - 13+02 148.50 153.00 R P2 1 148.50
UT1B 195 10+00 - 12+48 247.50 228.00 R P2 1 247.50
2,413.48
Stream Non-riparian
Wetland Overall
(linear feet)(acres)Credits
Riverine Non-
Riverine
Restoration 2,336 Stream 2,413.48
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II 193.7
Rehabilitation
Preservation
High Quality Pres
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Restoration Level Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Full Channel Restoration, Planted
Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock,
and Permanent Conservation
Easement.
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 100086)
Total Assets Summary:
Appendix A
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Elapsed Time Since grading complete:0 yrs 0 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete:0 yrs 0 months
Number of reporting Years1:0
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or Deliverable Complete Delivery
Institution Date --Jun-18
404 permit date --Feb-20
Final Mitigation Plan 2018 - 2019 Dec-19
Final Design – Construction Plans --Feb-20
Site Earthwork March - April 2020 Apr-20
Bare-root plantings --Apr-20
As-built Survey Jun-20 Jun-20
As-built Baseline Monitoring Report May-20 Jul-20
Year 1 Monitoring 2020 Nov-20
Year 2 Monitoring 2021 Nov-21
Year 3 Monitoring 2022 Nov-22
Year 4 Monitoring 2023 Nov-23
Year 5 Monitoring 2024 Nov-24
Year 6 Monitoring 2025 Nov-25
Year 7 Monitoring 2026 Nov-26
1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 100086)
Appendix A
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Designer Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140, Cary, NC 27511
Primary project design POC Kevin Tweedy, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor North State Environmental
2889 Lowery St, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Construction contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland
Survey Contractor Kinder Land Surveying
203 W. Lebanon St., Mount Airy, NC 27030
Survey contractor POC Frank Kinder [phone]
Planting Contractor North State Environmental
2889 Lowery St, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Planting contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland
Seeding Contractor North State Environmental
2889 Lowery St, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland
Seed Mix Source Green Resource, Colfax, NC
336-855-6363
Nursery Stock Supplier Dykes and Son Nursery, McMinnville, TN
931-668-8833
Live Stake Supplier Foggy Mountain Nursery, Lansing, NC
336-384-5323
Monitoring Performers Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
Stream Monitoring POC Jake Byers, EPR [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Amy James, EPR [phone]

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 100086)
Appendix A
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-
digit 03040101
UT1A
115
Unconfined
0.01 Sq.Mi., 8 Ac
Intermittent (25)
WS-III
F4
B4
IV
X
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 100086)
Project Background Information
Project Name Greenbrier Stream Restoration Project
County Yadkin
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin Pee-Dee
Project Area (acres) 6.7
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)latitude 36 deg 8’ 54” N, longitude 80 deg 49’ 46” W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems
Planted)6.3
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area <1%
CGIA Land Use Classification Agriculture/Pasture 49%, Forest 42%, 8%
Residential/Developed
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-
digit 3040101130020
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square
Miles)85 acres/ 0.13 Sq.Mi. (Total)
WarmProject Stream Thermal Regime
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately
confined, unconfined)
Moderately
confined Unconfined Unconfined
Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)0.13 Sq.Mi., 85
Ac 0.01 Sq.Mi., 8 Ac 0.02 Sq.Mi., 10 Ac
Reach Summary Information
Parameters UT1 UT1A-1 UT1B
Length of reach (linear feet)1958 154 195
Stream Classification (existing)B4c/B4 B4 G4
Stream Classification (proposed)B4/C4 B4 B4
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial (37)Intermittent (24.5)Intermittent (21.5)
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable?Resolved?Supporting Docs?
Evolutionary trend (Simon)IV III III
FEMA classification X X X
Historic Preservation Act No
Water of the United States - Section 404 Yes Yes USACE NWP 27 - ID# SAW-2018-01755
Water of the United States - Section 401 Yes Yes DWR 401 WQC No. 4134 -- ID # 20181272
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
WS-III WS-III WS-III
Yes
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or
CAMA)No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No N/A N/A
Division of Land Quality (Erosion and
Sediment Control)Yes Yes General Permit NCG010000 -
ID # YADKI-2020-010
Endangered Species Act No Yes Categorical Exclusion Document; Appendix
6 in Mitigation Plan
Appendix A
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Appendix B
Visual Assessment Exhibits and Guidance
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Baseline Photo Log
Vegetation Photo Log
PROJECT LOCATION
36.1488° N
80.8289° W
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION
YADKIN COUNTY, NC
VICINITY MAP
Figure 1
PREPARED BY:
#
0 21
Miles
Legend
Conservation Easement
PREPARED FOR:NCDEQDivision ofMitigation Services
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!>
!>
!>
UT1 - Reach 1
UT1A-1
UT1 - Reach 3
UT1B
Collins Road
Figure 2A
Figure 2B
UT1 - Reach 2
UT1A
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
Yadkin County, NC
MY0: 2020
Current Condition Plan View: Overview Map
FIGURE 2 ³DMS ProjectID# 100086
Streams - Restoration
Streams - Enhancement
No Credit
Conservation Easement
Top of Bank
!(Photo Points
!>Stream Gauges
Cross Sections
Veg Plots
JULY 2020
NC OneMap Orthoimagery (2018)
1 inch = 200 feet
0 200100
Feet
10+0011+001
2
+
0
0
1
3
+
0
0
14
+
0
0
1
5
+
0
0
16+00
17+0
0
1
8
+
0
0
10+00
11+0
0
1
2
+
0
0
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!>
!>
UT1 - Reach 1
UT1A-1
Collins Road
UT1A
1
16
VP-1
VP-2
2
3
4
5
XS-1
XS-2
SG-2
SG-1
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
Yadkin County, NC
MY0: 2020
Current Condition Plan View: Asset Map
FIGURE 2A
0 100
Feet ³DMS ProjectID# 100086
Streams - Restoration
Streams - Enhancement
No Credit
Conservation Easement
Structures
Top of Bank
!(Photo Points
!>Stream Gauges
Cross Sections
Veg Plots
JULY 2020
NC OneMap Orthoimagery (2018)
1 inch = 100 feet
1
8
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
20+00
21
+
0
0
22+0
0
23+00
24+0025+0026+00
27
+
0
0
2
8
+
0
0
29+0030+0
0
10+00
11+0
0
1
2
+
0
0
13+0010+001
1
+
0
0
1
2
+
0
0
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!>
!>
UT1A-1
UT1 - Reach 3
UT1B
UT1 - Reach 2
UT1A
XS-6
16VP-2
VP-3
VP-4
5
6
7
9
10
11
15
12
13
14
8
XS-8
XS-7
XS-3
XS-5
XS-4
SG-2
SG-3
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
Yadkin County, NC
MY0: 2020
Current Condition Plan View: Asset Map
FIGURE 2B
0 100
Feet ³DMS ProjectID# 100086
Streams - Restoration
Streams - Enhancement
No Credit
Conservation Easement
Structures
Top of Bank
!(Photo Points
!>Stream Gauges
Cross Sections
Veg Plots
JULY 2020
NC OneMap Orthoimagery (2018)
1 inch = 100 feet
Appendix B
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline (April 2020) - Photo Log

Photo Point 1 – UT1 Reach 1, Sta. 10+00
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 2 – UT1 Reach 1, Sta. 11+50
Facing Upstream (4/29/2020)

Photo Point 3 – UT1 Reach 1, Sta. 13+55
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 4 – UT1 Reach 1, Sta. 15+00
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)

Photo Point 5 – UT1 Reach 1, Sta. 17+60
Facing Upstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 6 – UT1 Reach 1, Sta. 18+50
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)

Appendix B
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline - Photo Log

Photo Point 7 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 19+60
Facing Upstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 8 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 21+00
Looking Upstream at UT1A From UT1 (4/29/2020)

Photo Point 9 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 22+40
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 10 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 24+30
Facing Upstream (4/29/2020)

Photo Point 11 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 25+55
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 12 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 26+45
Looking Upstream at UT1B From UT1 (4/29/2020)

Appendix B
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Baseline - Photo Log

Photo Point 13 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 27+55
Facing Upstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 14 – UT1 Reach 3, Sta. 29+45
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)

Photo Point 15A – UT1B, Sta. 11+90
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 15B – UT1B, Sta. 11+90
Facing Upstream (4/29/2020)

Photo Point 16 – UT1A, Sta. 12+00
Facing Downstream (4/29/2020)
Photo Point 16B – UT1A, Sta. 12+00
Facing Upstream Towards UT1A-1 (4/29/2020)

Appendix C
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS No. 100086
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
Vegetation Photo Log

Veg Plot 1 – NE Corner (4/29/2020) Veg Plot 2 – NW Corner (4/29/2020)

Veg Plot 3 – NW Corner (4/29/2020) Veg Plot 4 – NW Corner (4/29/2020)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Vegetation Planting Information
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 7. Stem Count By Plot

Scientific Name % by Species Approx. Stem
Count
Sambucus canadensis 10%92
Cornus amonum 40%367
Salix sericea 30%275
Salix nigra 20%184
100%918
Scientific Name Common Name % by Species Approx. Stem
Count
Wetland Indicator
Status
Betula nigra River Birch 20%682 FACW
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 20%682 FACW
Quercus nigra Water Oak 10%341 FAC
Ulmus americana American Elm 10%341 FACW
Diospryos virginiana Persimmon 10%341 FAC
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 10%341 FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 20%682 FAC
Total 100%3411
Scientific Name Common Name % by Species Approx. Stem
Count
Wetland Indicator
Status
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 20%208 FACW
Lindera benzoin Spicebush 25%260 FACW
Cercis canadensis Redbud 20%208 FACU
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 15%156 FAC
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 20%208 FACW
Total 100%1040
Plot #Total Stems per Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
1 728 Yes
2 607 Yes
3 769 Yes
4 688 Yes
Project Avg 698 Yes
Silky Dogwood
Silky Willow
Black Willow
Total
Trees (75%) Planted 9' X 9' Spacing – 538 Trees/ Acre
Shrubs (25%) Planted 16' X 16' Spacing - 164 Shrubs/ Acre
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Livestake Planting (1.5 acres)
Table 5. Vegetation Planting Information
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No.100086)
Common Name
Elderberry
Appendix C
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS No. 100086
Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total Planted Vol Total
Betula nigra River Birch Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree
Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree
Diospryos virginiana Persimmon Tree
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry Shrub
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub
18 18 15 15 19 19 17 17 69 69
18 0 18 15 0 15 19 0 19 17 0 17 69 0 69
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
728 0 728 607 0 607 769 0 769 688 0 688 698 0 698
Color for Density
1
Volunteer Species Included in Total
VP-4
size (ACRES)0.024711
Species count
1
0.024711
1
0.024711
Initial count of bare root planted stems, species TBD
Stem count
size (ares)1
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Scientific Name
Table 7. Stem Count By Plot
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No.100086)
Current Plot Data (MY0 2020)Annual Means
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Common Name
Species
Type
0.024711
VP-1 VP-2
Stems per ACRE
0.098844
VP-3 MY0 (2020)
Exceeds requirements by 10%
1
Appendix C
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS No. 100086

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Monitoring Data – Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table 10. Monitoring Data – Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Cross Section Plots

Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)2.6 12 6.2 4.3 4.8 4.8 5.3 0.7 2 3.26 6.2 -6.6 --5.7 6.2 6.7 -5.9 ---1
Floodprone Width (ft)20.0 26.5 26.5 33.0 9.2 2 8.7 11.2 -13.7 --25.0 35.0 45.0 ->59.7 ---1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.4 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 2 0.5 0.6 -0.6 --0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.7 ---1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.2 2 0.7 0.7 -0.8 --0.5 0.6 0.7 -1.2 ---1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.8 8 3.1 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.3 0.5 2 2.3 2.7 -3.2 --2.7 3.0 3.3 -4.0 ---1
Width/Depth Ratio 5.6 8.4 8.4 11.1 3.9 2 12.0 15.0 -18 --11.0 13.0 15.0 -8.8 ---1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.9 0.2 2 1.4 1.8 -2.2 --4.0 5.7 7.3 ->10.1 ---1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.5 2.1 2.1 2.8 0.9 2 1.0 1.0 -1.0 --1.0 1.0 1.0 -1.0 ---1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 17 33 16 26 24 39 8 14
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.027 0.032 0.032 0.038 0.008 2 0.019 0.025 -0.032 --0.039 0.051 0.063 0.018 0.028 0.028 0.039 0.005 14
Pool Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 11 19 8 14 15 19 3 14
Pool Max depth (ft)0.6 1.3 1.3 1.9 0.9 2 1.11 1.5 -1.9 --1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4 2.0 2.0 2.9 0.4 14
Pool Spacing (ft)40.0 80.0 80.0 120.0 56.6 25 3.1 17.2 -31.2 --3 17 31 28 42 40 60 11 14
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)6.0 19.0 20.0 38.0 11.4 8 N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A 17.2 20.4 20.5 23.8 2.0 8
Radius of Curvature (ft)37.0 46.8 47.5 55.0 7.9 4 N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A 21.7 32.0 27.9 51.7 10.7 10
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)7.7 9.7 9.9 11.4 1.7 4 N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A 3.7 5.4 4.7 8.8 1.8 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)66.0 111.7 86.0 224.0 57.8 11 N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A 50.0 93.1 99.0 113.0 19.1 9
Meander Width Ratio 1.2 4.0 4.2 7.9 2.4 8 N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A 2.9 3.5 3.5 4.0 0.3 8
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) lb/s
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)2.8 1.9 2.0
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)5 15 6.2
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1 Reach 1 (843 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Total riffle length 60-70% of reach length
Total pool length 30-40% of reach length
0.45 0.82 1.24
23 36 34
84 142 160
B4c B4 B4 B4
2.79 2.3 1.8
7 7
926 -919 852
865 -865
0.018 -0.035 0.032
1.07 1.1-1.2 1.03 1.02
0.5 -0.7 0.95
0.019 -0.036 0.032
--
--
--
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)2.7 12 8.0 7.1 9.3 9.3 11.5 3.1 2 3.3 4.8 -6.2 --7.1 7.6 8.1 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7 0.0 2
Floodprone Width (ft)11.4 15.3 15.3 19.1 5.5 2 7.6 7.8 -8.1 --20.0 54.0 88.0 42.3 52.3 52.3 >62.4 -2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.4 1.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1 2 0.4 0.5 -0.6 --0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 2 0.6 0.7 -0.7 --0.7 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 10 4.8 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.6 0.4 2 1.3 2.4 -3.6 --4.1 4.5 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 0.1 2
Width/Depth Ratio 12.4 20.6 20.6 28.7 11.5 2 12 14 -15 --12.0 15.0 18.0 14.5 14.6 14.6 14.7 0.2 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.1 2 1.6 1.7 -1.7 --4.0 5.7 7.3 6.4 7.9 7.9 >9.4 -2
1Bank Height Ratio 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.5 0.9 2 1.0 1.0 -1.0 --1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 21 40 12 29 28 49 10 12
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.016 0.031 0.031 0.046 0.021 2 0.018 0.020 -0.023 --0.014 0.019 0.023 0.010 0.017 0.017 0.025 0.005 12
Pool Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9 21 30 23 28 26 42 6 12
Pool Max depth (ft)0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.1 2 0.7 1.2 -1.7 --1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.9 0.3 12
Pool Spacing (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17 25 -33 --26 40 53 30 47 47 62 8 12
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)8.0 13.8 12.0 23.0 5.0 15.0 16.6 27.3 -38.0 --27.0 44.0 61.0 29.3 33.5 33.6 37.9 2.5 21
Radius of Curvature (ft)14.0 28.1 26.0 44.0 11.6 7.0 9.5 11.9 -14.3 --15.0 19.0 23.0 17.5 22.5 22.4 26.2 2.7 20
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)1.5 3.0 2.8 4.7 1.2 7.0 2.0 2.5 -3.0 --2.0 2.5 3.0 2.6 3.4 3.4 3.9 0.4 20
Meander Wavelength (ft)36.0 71.8 61.0 128.0 29.0 15.0 33.3 49.9 -66.5 --53.0 80.0 107.0 51.0 67.7 64.5 87.0 9.4 20
Meander Width Ratio 3.9 7.7 6.6 13.8 29.0 15.0 3.5 5.8 -8.0 --3.5 5.8 8.0 4.4 5.0 5.1 5.7 0.4 8
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) lb/s
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)3.0 6.0 2.2
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)6 60 10.4
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1 Reach 3 (1097 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Total riffle length 60-70% of reach length
Total pool length 30-40% of reach length
0.79 0.54 0.38
18 19 24
87.8 79.6 75.0
B4 C4 C4 C4
3.1 2.8 4.1
12.5 12.5
991.6 -1097 1141
902 -902
0.015 -0.013 0.014
1.09 1.2 to 1.4 1.22 1.26
0.3 -1.1 1.6
0.016 -0.016 0.014
--
--
--
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 -1 1.6 2.5 -3.5 --3.1 3.6 4.1 -4.5 ---1
Floodprone Width (ft)4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 -1 3.5 4.5 -5.5 --5.0 7.5 10.0 -22.3 ---1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.3 1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 -1 0.3 0.3 -0.4 --0.2 0.3 0.4 -0.4 ---1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 -1 0.4 0.4 -0.5 --0.3 0.4 0.5 -0.6 ---1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 6 1.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -1 0.7 0.9 -1.1 --0.9 1.0 1.1 -1.8 ---1
Width/Depth Ratio 26.8 26.8 26.8 26.8 -1 12.0 15.0 -18 --10.0 12.9 15.0 -11.6 ---1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 -1 1.4 1.8 -2.2 --1.4 2.1 2.8 -4.9 ---1
1Bank Height Ratio 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 -1 1.0 1.0 -1.1 --1.0 1.0 1.0 -1.0 ---1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.0 8.0 11.0 9 14 15 19 4 5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.029 0.070 0.070 0.110 0.057 2 0.086 0.113 -0.140 --0.023 0.030 0.036 0.012 0.029 0.032 0.047 0.012 5
Pool Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.0 5.0 12.0 5 12 12 20 5 5
Pool Max depth (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.7 0.9 -1.2 --0.6 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.2 5
Pool Spacing (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.3 6.9 -12.5 --2.0 10.0 18.0 18 23 22 32 5 4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) lb/s
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)3.0 2.0 1.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)3 12 1.8
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1A (148.5 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Total riffle length 60-70% of reach length
Total pool length 30-40% of reach length
0.68 0.35 0.40
38 10 7
N/A N/A 80
F4 B4 B4 B4
3.8 2 1.1
2.0 2.0
115 -148.5 153
114 -144
0.078 -0.020 0.018
1.01 1.1 to 1.2 1.03 1.06
0.01 -0.02 0.13
0.078 -0.021 0.018
--
--
--
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8 3.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 -1 1.7 2.7 -3.7 --3.1 3.6 4.1 -3.7 ---1
Floodprone Width (ft)6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 -1 3.8 4.9 -6.0 --5.0 7.5 10.0 ->19.34 ---1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.3 1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -1 0.3 0.4 -0.4 --0.2 0.3 0.4 -0.2 ---1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 -1 0.4 0.5 -0.5 --0.3 0.4 0.5 -0.4 ---1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 6 1.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 -1 0.9 1.1 -1.3 --0.9 1.0 1.1 -0.9 ---1
Width/Depth Ratio 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 -1 12.0 15.0 -18.0 --10.0 12.9 15.0 -15.3 ---1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 -1 1.4 1.8 -2.2 --1.4 2.1 2.8 ->5.26 ---1
1Bank Height Ratio 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 -1 1.0 1.0 -1.1 --1.0 1.0 1.0 -1.0 ---1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.0 10.0 15.0 15 18 19 20 2 3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.035 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.005 2 0.026 0.035 -0.043 --0.019 0.024 0.030 0.050 0.055 0.055 0.060 0.004 3
Pool Length (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0 12.0 15.0 12 15 12 20 4 3
Pool Max depth (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.7 1.0 -1.3 --0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.2 3
Pool Spacing (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.4 7.5 -13.7 --2.0 10.0 18.0 27 29 27 34 3 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -N/A --N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) lb/s
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)3.0 2.0 1.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)3 12 1.8
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1B (247.50 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Total riffle length 60-70% of reach length
Total pool length 30-40% of reach length
0.75 0.3 0.37
11 10 15
N/A N/A 75
G4 B4 B4 B4
1 2.3 2.6
2.3 2.3
195 -248 228
181 -215
0.0239 -0.017 0.026
1.08 1.1 to 1.2 1.15 1.06
0.03 -0.04 0.18
0.0239 -0.02 0.026
--
--
--
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 1127.92 1120.53 1097.81 1094.95 1090.59
Bankfull Width (ft)7.46 5.9 6.62 11.86 6.65
Floodprone Width (ft)N/A >59.7 42.29 N/A >62.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 0.67 0.45 1.38 0.46
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.45 1.18 0.63 2.61 0.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.7 3.97 2.99 16.41 3.08
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.29 8.81 14.71 8.59 14.46
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio N/A >10.12 6.39 N/A >9.39
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 1086.63 1097.98 1089.94
Bankfull Width (ft)9.95 4.54 3.68
Floodprone Width (ft)N/A 22.27 >19.34
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.27 0.39 0.24
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.74 0.63 0.35
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)12.61 1.76 0.87
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 7.83 11.64 15.33
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio N/A 4.90 >5.26
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0
UT1 Reach 3 UT1A UT1B
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire
the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with DMS. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: “It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional
data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.”
Cross Section 6 (Pool)Cross Section 7 (Riffle)Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Table 9. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086)
Cross Section 1 (Pool)Cross Section 2 (Riffle)Cross Section 3 (Riffle)Cross Section 4 (Pool)Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
UT1 Reach 1 UT1 Reach 3
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)-5.9 ---1
Floodprone Width (ft)->59.7 ---1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)-0.7 ---1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)-1.2 ---1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)-4.0 ---1
Width/Depth Ratio -8.8 ---1
Entrenchment Ratio ->10.1 ---1
1Bank Height Ratio -1.0 ---1
Riffle Length (ft)16 26 24 39 8 14
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.018 0.0279 0.028 0.039 0.0049 14
Pool Length (ft)8 14 15 19 3 14
Pool Max depth (ft)1.4 2.0 2.0 2.9 0.4 14
Pool Spacing (ft)28 42 40 60 11 14
Channel Beltwidth (ft)17.2 20.4 20.5 23.8 2.0 8
Radius of Curvature (ft)21.7 32.0 27.9 51.7 10.7 10
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)3.7 5.4 4.7 8.8 1.8 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)50.0 93.1 99.0 113.0 19.1 9
Meander Width Ratio 2.9 3.5 3.5 4.0 0.3 8
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
0.032
1.02
0.032
852
B4
Additional Reach Parameters
Profile
Pattern
Table 10a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1 Reach 1 (843 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile
data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7 0.0212 2
Floodprone Width (ft)42.29 52.345 52.345 >62.4 -2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.45 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.0071 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.63 0.69 0.69 0.74 0.0778 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2.99 3.04 3.04 3.08 0.0636 2
Width/Depth Ratio 14.46 14.59 14.59 14.71 0.1768 2
Entrenchment Ratio 6.39 7.89 7.89 >9.4 -2
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 2
Riffle Length (ft)12 29 28 49 10 12
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.010 0.0168 0.0165 0.025 0.0052 12
Pool Length (ft)23 28 26 42 6 12
Pool Max depth (ft)1.8 2.2 2.2 2.9 0.3 12
Pool Spacing (ft)30 47 47 62 8 12
Channel Beltwidth (ft)29.3 33.5 33.6 37.9 2.5 21
Radius of Curvature (ft)17.5 22.5 22.4 26.2 2.7 20
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)2.6 3.4 3.4 3.9 0.4 20
Meander Wavelength (ft)51.0 67.7 64.5 87.0 9.4 20
Meander Width Ratio 4.4 5.0 5.1 5.7 0.4 8
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
0.014
1.26
0.014
1141
C4
Additional Reach Parameters
Profile
Pattern
Table 10b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1 Reach 3 (1097 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile
data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)-4.5 ---1
Floodprone Width (ft)-22.27 ---1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)-0.39 ---1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)-0.63 ---1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)-1.76 ---1
Width/Depth Ratio -11.64 ---1
Entrenchment Ratio -4.9 ---1
1Bank Height Ratio -1.0 ---1
Riffle Length (ft)9 14 15 19 4 5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.012 0.0292 0.032 0.047 0.0122 5
Pool Length (ft)5 12 12 20 5 5
Pool Max depth (ft)0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.2 5
Pool Spacing (ft)18 23 22 32 5 4
Channel Beltwidth (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
0.018
1.06
0.018
153
B4
Additional Reach Parameters
Profile
Pattern
Table 10c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1A (148.5 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile
data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)-3.7 ---1
Floodprone Width (ft)->19.3 ---1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)-0.2 ---1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)-0.4 ---1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)-0.9 ---1
Width/Depth Ratio -15.3 ---1
Entrenchment Ratio ->5.3 ---1
1Bank Height Ratio -1.0 ---1
Riffle Length (ft)15 18 19 20 2 3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.050 0.055 0.055 0.060 0.0041 3
Pool Length (ft)12 15 12 20 4 3
Pool Max depth (ft)0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.2 3
Pool Spacing (ft)27 29 27 34 3 3
Channel Beltwidth (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
0.026
1.06
0.026
228
B4
Additional Reach Parameters
Profile
Pattern
Table 10d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project (DMS No. 100086) - UT1B (247.5 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile
data indicate significant shifts from baseline
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS # 100086
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
1130
1135
1140
1145
1150
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 -Sta. 10+00 -15+00
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections Cross Vane Rock Step Log J-Hook
XS1
Begin UT1 R1
XS2
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
1130
1135
15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 -Sta. 15+00 -20+00
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections
Cross Vane Rock Step Log J-Hook Culvert
Culvert Crossing
End UT1 R1
Begin UT1 R2
End UT1 R2
Begin UT1 R3
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1070
1075
1080
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
1115
20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 -Sta. 20+00 -25+00
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections Cross Vane Rock Step Log J-Hook
XS3
XS4
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 -Sta. 25+00 -30+00
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections Log J-Hook
XS-5
XS-6
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1 -Sta. 30+00 -31+16
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections Cross Vane
End UT1 R3
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1080
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1A -Sta. 10+00 -12+90
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections Rock Step
End UT1A
Begin UT1A
XS7
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1075
1080
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
1115
1120
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00Elevation (ft)Stationing (ft)
Longitudinal Profile -Baseline (May 2020)
UT1B -Sta. 10+00 -11+80
As-Built Thalweg - MY0 2020 Right Bank Left Bank Cross Sections Rock Step
XS8
Begin UT1B
End UT1B
Appendix D
Greenbrier Stream Mitigation Project
DMS #100086
1127.92 6.7 7.46 N/A N/A 1.45 0.9 8.29 N/A 1.0
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Max Depth
(ft)
XS1 looking upstream XS1 facing right bank
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
XS1 - UT1 Reach 1
Station 11+28 - Pool
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS1 Pool -11+28
As-Built - May 2020
Bankfull
1120.53 3.97 5.9 1121.71 >59.7 1.18 0.67 8.81 >10.12 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS2 looking upstream XS2 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 13+91 - Riffle
XS2 - UT1 Reach 1
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS2 Riffle-13+91
As-Built - May 2020
Floodprone
Bankfull
1097.81 2.99 6.62 1098.44 42.29 0.63 0.45 14.71 6.39 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS3 looking upstream XS3 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 19+94 - Riffle
XS3 - UT1 Reach 3
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS3 Riffle -19+94
As-Built - May 2020
Floodprone
Bankfull
1094.95 16.41 11.86 N/A N/A 2.61 1.38 8.59 N/A 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS4 looking upstream XS4 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 22+48 - Pool
XS4 - UT1 Reach 3
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - June 2020
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS4 Pool -22+48
As-Built - May 2020
Bankfull
1090.59 3.08 6.65 1091.33 >62.4 0.74 0.46 14.46 >9.39 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS5 looking upstream XS5 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 25+88 - Riffle
XS5 - UT1 Reach 3
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS5 Riffle -25+88
As-Built - May 2020
Floodprone
Bankfull
1086.63 12.61 9.95 N/A N/A 2.74 1.27 7.83 N/A 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS6 looking upstream XS6 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 28+30 - Pool
XS6 - UT1 Reach 3
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS6 Pool -28+30
As-Built - May 2020
Bankfull
1097.98 1.76 4.54 1098.61 22.27 0.63 0.39 11.64 4.9 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS7 looking upstream XS7 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 12+44 - Riffle
XS7 - UT1A
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS7 Riffle -12+44
As-Built - May 2020
Floodprone
Bankfull
1089.94 0.87 3.68 1090.29 >19.34 0.35 0.24 15.33 >5.26 1.0
Max Depth
(ft)
Mean Depth
(ft)W/D Ratio ER Bank Height
Ratio
XS8 looking upstream XS8 looking downstream
Bankfull
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Area (ft2)
Bankfull
Width (ft)
Floodprone
Elevation (ft)
Floodprone
Width (ft)
Station 11+71 - Riffle
XS8 - UT1B
Cross Section Plot - Baseline - May 2020
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
0 5 10 15 20 25Elevation (ft)Distance (ft)
XS8 Riffle-11+71
As-Built - May 2020
Floodprone
Bankfull

Appendix E
As-Built Plan Drawings

z
0
a
0
w
a
w
F
w
m
z
w
w
0
U
w
O
o�
INDEX OF SHEETS
1 • • • TITLE SHEET
2 • • • STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
GENERAL NOTES
3-6... PLAN AND PROFILE
7... PROFILE (UTIAANDUTIBONLY)
I, Franklin G. Kinder, certify that this map was drawn under my
supervision from an actual GPS survey made under my supervision
and the following information was used to perform the survey.
Class of survey: A
Positional Accuracy: 0.03 FT — Vert. Accuracy 0.02 FT
Type of CPS field procedure: GNSS North Carolina CORS RTK Network
Dates of survey —May — June 2020
Dotum/Epoch — NAD83(2011)
Published Fixed Control Use: N/A
Geoid Model: GEOID128
Combined Grid Foctor(s) 1.00005478
Units: U.S. SURVEY FOOT
Equipment Used: Spectra Precision SP60 ADVANCED GNSS RECEIVER
07/14/20
DATE FRANKLIN G. KINDER, PLS L-4462
00 GRAPHIC SCALES
20 10 O 20 40
PLANS
20 10 O 20 40
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 2.5 O 5 20
owl
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
REVISIONS
I97: ATA11►10-13
YADKIN COUNTY
LOCATION: COLLINS RD, YADKIN COUNTY, NC
TYPE OF WORK: RECORD DRAWINGS
DATE
PREPARED FOR:
N-r-10
Mt pgodon Services
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1 652
PAUL W I ESN ER
PROJECT MANAGER
104
n
7
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
5 ECOSYSTEM 1 150 SE MAYNARD ROAD
PLANNING& SUITE RALEIG ,
C�RALEIGH, NC 2751 1
RESTORATION LICENSE #P 11$2
PR FR NGI/NEER
X#`,/+�/�
��� '� CAS //
O /
v�,•.E • S� •,t/�i
yv ®®r
Ito f' •.� .+
039201
SPRING 2020
JAKE BYERS, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
COMPLETION DATE:
♦��i�
P.E.
SIGNA UR

STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
0
ROCK J-HOOK JH
ROCK VANE Rv
OFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE av
ROCK CROSS VANE xv
TEMPORARY SILT CHECK
ROOT WAD Q
GRADE CONTROL LOG J-HOOK VANE LJH
®
LOG VANE w
®
LOG STEP Ls
000
ROCK STEP Rs
/-\
LOG CROSS VANE xv
an
CONSTRUCTED CASCADE cc
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE cR
�p o
BOULDER CLUSTER
LOG ROLLER LR
94 GRADE CONTROL WOODY RIFFLE 9
TOEWOOD WITH GEOLIFT O
— SF — SAFETY FENCE
— TP — TAPE FENCE
-I I ( - SILT FENCE
—X— FENCE
ce CONSERVATION EASEMENT
- - 20 - - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
- - - - - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
------- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
— — - BANKFULL BENCH (GRADE)
PROPERTY LINE
- DOT RIGHT OF WAY
MONITORING FEATURES
VP VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
MONITORING GAUGE
0-- PHOTO POINT
xa,-.-•-.- MONITORING CROSS SECTION
ASBUILT FEATURES
ASBUI LT CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
?� ASBUILTTOE WOOD
: ACCESS ROAD
10+00
STREAM THALWEG
STREAM TOP OF BANKS
FOOT BRIDGE
- TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
ru-- PERMANENT FORD STREAM CROSSING PFc
® TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
TREE REMOVAL
SOD MATS sM
{�
TREE PROTECTION
GEOLIFT
DEBRIS JAM DJ-T#
0
CHANNEL FILL / DITCH PLUG
GRADE BANK 2:1 OR FLATTER
SINGLE WING DEFLECTOR SQQ
r Re -
I_
EXISTING WETLANDS
DOUBLE WING DEFLECTOR D�
_._ _ _ _
VEGETATED SWALE
�J
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
**NOTE: ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 RECORD DRAWINGS JB KLT 7/13/20
GENERAL NOTES
1. CONSTRUCTION WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL 2020.
2. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KINDER LAND SURVEYING IN OCTOBER 2018.
3. ASBUILT SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KINDER LAND SURVEYING IN MAY 2020.
4. ALL WOODY RIFFLES WERE REPLACED WITH CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES PER DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
5. SURVEYED ASBUILT FEATURES ARE SHOWN IN DARK BLACK, DESIGN FEATURES ARE SHOWN IN GREY, AND
ANY FIELD CHANGES THAT WERE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE SHOWN IN RED, THE CONTOURS
SHOWN ARE ASBUILT CONTOURS.
PREPARED FOR:
Ncl
Alitiygtlo I nI S I -IT
aOx HPNY
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1 652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699.1652
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NC
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
rem RESTORATION
1 150 SE MAYNARD ROAD, SUITE 140
RALEIGH, NC 27511
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT # cHEETNO.
104 2
SYMBOLOGY /
NOTES
CARO�>i�
'� J1
Q5 L
039201
7/1

o i
; IED NEW FENCE
TO EXISTING FENCE
.cl �•
REDIRECTED FLOW
/ FROM CULVERT TO
/ PRESERVE LARGE SYCAtGiORE; -
CONSTRUCED BOULDER
TOE TO PROTECT ROAD LJH TYP
EMBANKWIENT XV TYP
„"tea 1Q© 11 +®® UT I REACH 1
SG 1 +QQ
-�'
s ' EXCAVATED PLUNGE POOL TYP
` AND LINED WITH 2' CLASS I STONE
/� cF
UT 1 ~ °�
VP-1
TYP
r 0
RS `1�k�
NOTES: _� _ —` �°c I \
Vq-
TYP
1. BOULDERS AND LOGS WERE USED INTERCHANGEABLY PER THE DIRECTION OF '' may_ j `-TIED NEW FENCE 10 10 O 20 40
THE ENGINEER AND BASED OFF AVAILABLITY OF ONSITE LOGS. / TO EXISTING FENCE
2. TOEWOODS, GEOLIFTS, ROOTWADS AND TRANSPLANTS WERE SUBSTITUTED FOR SCALE (F
USE AS BANK PROTECTION PER THE DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. E L n I
as
I
III rI{
I;II rl I II !� �� I' 11I IIII Ifi!I illl.r�ll �� !I
l ,I III Ii II 1�I Illy l 1 l I: III �� lI I�
-4
Ld
za�miiw_�z�1wz5!] _I
z
_
a 1,135
III1III I�
iII j�lII• IIIi .III�� �„�I �j'II
Ijl
;III IjI
IIi�
Ill
�.'III
1111
I.iIIII1IIl
i
m I:;I � I I' I i I - I'O, 36C
`II _II -Ii�I�IC�!II II! ,'I ,III 11II . . InI�II . IL'IIliIli,:Ii►;l�II 1,iIl�IIl
_IIII ,•I.,IIII _,�1lIIIIf
_ �'I
W�FZZ-��¢�•'
�
wJ—IIIi II'.I II
.. .,1 TR.
41,11
Ti
, _
I,_1,125 I I I
4��17
0 IIIIII yI�Ihi
IlII'I''
. IItIi
li
¢,
-
l,i
w.
I
I r I I
I
I I
�.
I
I-,��:, , I
III !II IIII III II ;I I',
0 1,115 AS UILT THALWEG I
ate. �.. -. y�
lil 11' ii°
i I I I
T-J-T- --
TIT
i I
� it i i I I I I i I l i I{ li I
_ I � I
m
I i'��I III I I � I I � , I �� �I I I 'III III! I�I
_ I
:
: I I
zji
� iI 1 �tI��1`'�I ` ��►IIII/
i'I ,I�IL I ��'
K
+ 11+ 12+00 13+00 14+00 �a /
'1 0 00
w
0 0 S
0
REVISIONS
NO.
DESCRIPTION
ENGR.
APPROV
DATE
1
RECORD DRAWINGS
JB
KLT
7/13/20
PREPARED FOR:
Mitlqoffon Services
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1 652
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
-
ECOSYSTEM
L
039201
PLANNING &
••.•� 7��
' RESTORATION/'�►
i ✓ �U'tT�.••
• .. Q FQ.���
150 SE MMAYNARD ROAD, SUITEC 2751 , 140
LICENSE # P-1 182
/ a�1
;�

NOTES: =5,
1. BOULDERS AND LOGS WERE USED INTCHANGEABLY PER THE DIRECTION OF REALIGNED CHANNEL
THE ENGINEER AND BASED OFF AVAILASLJTY OF ONSITE LOGS. TO MATCH WITH THE -
2. TOEWOODS, GEOLIFTS, ROOTWADS AN® TRANSPLANTS WERE SUBSTITUTED FOR EXISTING VALLEY
USE AS BANK PROTECTION PER THE Dlg2 TION OF ENGINEER. - fJ
11 INSTALLED (2) 1 O' GATES
X=
1
EXCAVATED PLUNGE POOL
_ AND LINED WITH CLASS I STONE
INSTALLED 30' ' 1 7+00
OF 48" RCP
00
�U
�4
INSTALLED 30' OF 18" HDPE—/
REVISIONS
NO.
DESCRIPTION
ENGR.
APPROV
DATE
1
RECORD DRAWINGS
JB
KLT
7/13/20
pipe
'1,,,48",R1bbed
polyethylene pipe (RPP)
1 REACH 1 STA. 1 o+o()
78't00
UT 1 REACH 2
DID NOT CONSTRUCT
ROCK STEP DUE TO
BEDROCK STREAMBELI END UT REACH 1
BEGIN UT 1 REACH
STA.18+79
U
REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF BLOCK FOUNDATION.
11 _
i"PLAN
PROFILE
VP-2
y(s,
UT 1 REACH 3-
19+00
7
BUILT PLUNGE POOL
AND LINE WITH 2'
CLASS ISTONE
C3C.ls11N u I I rctr-kk.n 10 10 O 20 40
INSTALL(~ 2 1 O' GATES STA. 1 9+ 1 9
PREPARED FOR:
Mi ngatian Servtres
11—ITAL *UAL IT I
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699.1652
oil 'milli INE11
um
mom
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
P IN3ER
�` r
ECOSYSTEM
03 201
PLANNING &
�� .�'�'GF lE e
MAR RTORATIIO
o
��� ,QB'm
1 150 MAY AD, SUITE
RALEIGH, NC 2751 1
LICENSE # P-1 182

I
i
NOTES:
1. BOUL
PROJECT # MSHEETNO.104
I/P 2
ul
m END UT] —A VP-3
— -� STA. ] 3+02.20
dlr 10 10 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)
I Ili.., I .L i �II j jl III I I
I
II
j I i Ir
1,105 I
�, II
I I II I
_GI liy I I � I I Iji I II I I I I I j I I I jl I f l I II I� I I i�
1 j I,I i jell II� �11 II � I
I i
I
• I� —
jI
11 I
i 'I it I �, I I I II II �IrII I' I j I II Ij I I � I IIII I I
f III ''�j j III I II j I I j1 Il j it 11 ail
I I I I I
I I
I I 1 ! I I I I 'I ill I I� I I I'I I I
I I i I
I
jI I
41!
aI
diill ll ti
?,II.jIIII
ij
�77
I I !ilI
�1Itil III�I
ICI III I 1I iiIII
,I
(II I1II
�rIII
I'ILI
.._.
C�HWUQ9
....
,
��
Ii
:
LLJ
Z z
� I '
1'085
II I
I
I�I�I
_„_..__...—
I, ' j
'I I I
DESIGNPROFILE ' ! Tr
I
Ij I I I
I I
�u
I i. I iiI Ii I 11iI .i I
I 1I 1 I
I I
iI
I I
it
.�-iI_If"lI
. I
I `
....,..�I
....
1,075 CAI;
I
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 2400+
i
REVISIONS
ION
r PREPARED FOR:
Mitigation Services
INC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1 652
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NC
GIN
0 _2C I �

REVISIONS
7/1
PREPARED FOR:
Kra
tgorfon Se llres
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1652
PROJECT# SHEETNO.
104 6
PLAN /
PROFILE
- 1"111 f
tt
sp
p
i
a P.
•
.a�039 0 �e _
-� ,
�y,

UTIA-IAND UTIA
77�7i 77, �'77,V,
it
!111 lit �')l I it HUI
�_7 -7-- LL
F',
T.
1,115
7
71171
T
It
It
7H
IT -1-7
I T
1,105 J��. IM
71"T 1-771 1 it
it
REVISIONS I
DESCRIPTION
ENGR.
APPROV
DATE
I
RECORD DRAWINGS
JB
KILT
7/13/20
PREPARED FOR:
INC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1652
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NC
Mom
oil
MINI
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
1 150 SE MAYNARD ROAD, SUITE 140
RALEIGH, NC 2751 1
LICENSE# P- 1 182

ALL PLANTING WAS COMPLETED ACCORDING TO�T-He THE DESIGN
AND THERE WERE NO DEVIATIONS FROM—TH-E-PLANTING PLAN.
ROJECT # SHEET NO.
104
AS -BUILT
VEGETATION
I FENCING
�cA 40 20 0 40 80
® ZONE 1
REVISIONS
i I RECORDDRAWINGS I JB I KLT 17/13/201
MINgaHoN Ser Wres
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1 652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1652
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NC
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
1 150 SE MAYNARD ROAD, SUITE 140
RALEIGH, NC 2751 1
LICENSE # P-1 182
0)
w
w
U)
w
z
J
T
U
I—
d

ALL PLANTING WAS COMPLETED ACCORDING TO THE THE DESIGN
AND THERE WERE NO DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANTING PLAN.
OD
w
w
z
N
w
z
I
U
F-
Q
,
REVISIONS
NO.
DESCRIPTION
ENGR,
APPROV
DATE
1
RECORD DRAWINGS
JB
KLT
7/13/20
PREP
Mtn oatian Services
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1652
GREENBRIER STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NC
ffJ—ECT 4SHEET NO.04 OI
AS -BUILT
VEGETATION
/ FENCING
�cA 40 20 O 40 80
2 N INC %
c Q
.►. - L .
ECOSYSTEM = 03 ol r,
PLANNING & s4,4,�?7�
r .Q N
RESTORATION
1 150 SE MAYNARD ROAD, SUITE 140 , • . • V `�
RALEIGH, NC 2751 i
LICENSE # P-1 182