20000648 Ver 1_Complete File_20000511

FIT 1R.
OR

sU--
N-tw-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.27611-5201
May 5, 2000
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 143
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 0 0 0 6 4 8
ATTN.: Mr. Steve Lund
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: McDowell County, Replacement of Bridge No. 76 over North Muddy Creek on
NC 226, Federal Project No. BRSTP-226(4), State Project No. 8.1871501, T.I.P.
No. B-2997.
Please find enclosed three copies of the project planning report for the above referenced project.
Bridge No. 76 will be replaced on the existing alignment with a bridge 160 feet) long and 32 feet
wide. A temporary on-site detour bridge will be constructed to the south of the existing bridge to
accommodate traffic during construction. No jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted by the
proposed project. The construction of the bridge will require the use of a causeway to provide
access to the site by the construction equipment which will result in temporary fill in surface waters
of 650 square feet (0.015 acres). Construction of the proposed temporary rock causeway is depicted
in the attached drawings (Sheets 1 to 4). We have also enclosed a project site map and
preconstruction notification form.
Temporary Causeway Information: A temporary rock causeway will be required at Bent 1 of the
proposed North Muddy Creek bridge. The causeway will facilitate the construction of drilled shafts
and the placement of prestressed concrete girders. The causeways will consist of riprap on top of
filter fabric as described on Sheet 4 of 5.
Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the causeways will be
removed after their purpose has been served. The temporary fill area will be restored to their
original contours. Elevations and contours in the vicinity of the proposed causeways are available
from field survey notes.

Schedule: The project schedule calls for a December 19, 2000 let date with an availability date of
February 5, 2001. It is expected that the contractor will chose to start construction of the causeways
shortly after that date. The causeway will be in place for approximately twelve (12) months.
Disposal: After the causeways are no longer needed, the contractor will use excavating equipment
to remove the riprap used in the causeways. All causeway material will become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal of and disposal
of all materials off-site.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No.76 has 3 spans totaling 136 feet in length. The bridge railings are
concrete, and the deck is composed of reinforced concrete on steel I-beams. The substructure is
composed of reinforced concrete, with timber pilings at the end bents. The asphalt wearing surface,
the bridge rail, and the steel I-beams will be removed without dropping them into Waters of the
U.S. There is potential for some concrete components of the bridge to be dropped into Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete components
is approximately 74 cubic yards
This project will take place in a mountain trout county. Thus we anticipate that comments from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required. By copy of this letter
and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC
forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers.
It is anticipated that the construction of the causeways will be authorized under Section 404
Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction Access and Dewatering). We are, therefore,
requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing construction of the causeway. All
other aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not anticipate
requesting an individual permit, but propose to proceed under Nationwide Permits 23 in accordance
with the Federal Register of December 13, 1996, Part VII, Volume 61, Number 241.
We anticipate 401 General Certifications will apply to this project. We are providing one copy of
the CE document and the Nationwide 33 permit application information to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Alice Gordon at 919- 733-
1162.
Sincerely,
14 G, 9
fry William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
f Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. J. M. Mills, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
Mr. Ron Linville, NCWRC Coordinator
Mr. Dennis Pipkin, P.E., PD & EA Project Planning Engineer
I
0006 4 8
DEM ID:
CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):23,33
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: N.C. Dept of Transportation; Planning & Environmental
2. MAILING ADDRESS:
Post Office Box 25201
SUBDIVISION NAME:
CITY: Raleigh
STATE: NC ZIP CODE:
27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): 919-733-3141
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: McDowell NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Marion
1

SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Replacement of Bridge No. 76 over North Muddy Creek on
NC 226
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: North Muddy Creek
RIVER BASIN: Catawba
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [x ] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[x ]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x ] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER
OF PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF
401 CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [ x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
0
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED:
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER:
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Temporary Causeway
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND?
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY) :
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Bridge replacement
FT
3
14. STATE REASONS
OUT IN WETLANDS.
IMPACTS):
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [x] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [x] NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [x] NO []
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
(INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
na
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET.OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY?
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL"?
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
L
WNER' /AGEN S SIGNATURE
/2000
T? DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
5
15 HC"RN r _ Littlel
swr Mtn.
f 70?-
rl?
L j MARION '
ror. 4,761 r-
/ 221 ?
0 61UNT
' WEST?,vtAR,QIJ
?p?.1,396 l
\ J(UNINC.) n?
Fri
- .U
A)
MCL ?
?sw
p Iwr
II..?u1 G.?.M IS\ S?k '
X1803
\ 9
\, .
• 1765
11796 1
1797
7
VICINITY
MAPS
1799 •-1798
O • 6 1.
1800 c
1798
Dyst
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
McDOWELL COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1871501 (B-2997)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO.76
ON NC 226 OVER
NORTH MUDDY CREEK
SHEET OF
EAST MARION
rop. 1,651
vI (UNINC.)
•1
?I
e I; /y
i - w' s.urem ?o.u,u?uau

l
00+ 5Z a W I
? I
?a W I

301
N33a0 Ao0nh
H1a0N
------ 301
Ol

O
I
00* 00
I
i _ -
I ?
O0
?3 I
z ^
o z

03 z

0
o x >
O
Zx U ? w ? A

E-4 0 o6 E+ U
w C a V W z x
O
O 0 U 0 0
w A o z
U ? W
z ?
W
L-Li
O R
W
w
dO1

301

I ? III?I ??/ .\

w

w
?-
mil,
tJ'

W Ln
C\j
I- N
LL.
art
4Y
= O r
Ln ?
M

- CiW W
I r

O
LL-
U M

4
T ' In M ii
-
Cr?
= I

w
LLJ
i i z o
w

LLJ o ?
W U W J

O
co

>
_ W
? J
a ? a
W J F-
? O O
Q > I-
h
w
F
a
a
< w
? U
? GG
H
z
z ?
a
G w
\n?
0
up
.a

D
0
c
v
v
c
0
C
n
® a
z
O 3 F m o w?
z ? p .°n as ° y„
d x 00 o o
o w 00 z z
U Q a s z w
z z
d
4
N
0
0
t
N
a
W
F
Fa' S
O
O
ct
N
w
N F
O ?
v
O
O ?
11
II ?
e
.? w
W W
W ?
d' W
? U
O
tr] ?
w z
F ..
O J
W
a w
f?
O O
ti

0 0

E-'
F ? A ? U

.1
Q O
x 0
A
ap ° ?

U O
w ? O
o o a ? z ?

t? z x

m

LL.
N
V)
o a
<
a

M J U ?
U

McDowell County,
Bridge No. 76, on NC 226
Over North Muddy Creek
Federal Aid Project BRSTP-226(4)
State Project 8.1871501
TIP Project B-2997
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
APPROVED:
E,- /Z-717
Date
D to
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

-:Z, William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
C
Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
C A R O • E (17
o
McDowell County,
Bridge No. 76, on NC 226
Over North Muddv Creek
Federal Aid Project BRSTP-226(4)
State Project 8.1871501
TIP Project B-2997
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Branch By:
q 17
Date Dennis Pipkin, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer
Date Wayne Elliott
Bridge Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
g- /2-7 9 l/ ' ??-
Date
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS:
B-2997. McDowell County
Bridge No. 76, on NC 226
Over North Muddy Creek
Federal Aid Project BRSTP-226(4)
State Project 8.1871501
1. Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch (Natural Resources Section):
Trout County Permit Coordination: McDowell County is one of the North Carolina
counties listed as potentially supporting trout. Thus, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) will comment to the Corps of Engineers prior to any Corps action or
concurrence on this project. However, the NCWRC has advised that North Muddy Creek does not
support trout. (See appended NCWRC letter.)
2. Structure Design Unit, Roadway Design Unit, Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch (Natural Resources Section), Resident Engineer:
In-Stream Work: The stream banks at the project location may be too steep to support
construction machinery for the length of bridge required. Therefore, it may be necessary to utilize
temporary in-stream work pads to support the equipment essential for construction of the
temporary and permanent bridges. Design Units will coordinate with PD&EA Natural Resources
Section to insure that appropriate environmental agencies are involved and cognizant of any
necessary in-stream work. Resident Engineer to insure implementation of agreements with: environmental agencies.
3. Roadway Design Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Resident Engineer:
Revegetation: The temporary detour structure and approaches will be removed after the
new bridge is completed, and the area will be revegetated with native species.
4. Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch, Resident Engineer:
Bridge Demolition: The Natural Resources Technical Report for this project was
completed prior to the start of the new documentation procedures for bridge demolition.
Therefore, bridge demolition will be addressed at the time of permit application. During
construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed.
Categorical Exclusion Document Page 1 1
August 12, 1999
i
McDowell Countv,
Bridge No. 76, on NC 226
Over North Muddy Creek
Federal Aid Project BRSTP-226(4)
State Project 8.1871501
TIP Project B-2997
1. SUMMARY OF PROJECT:
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 76, in McDowell County. Bridge No. 76 carries NC 226
over North Muddy Creek, in the east central part of McDowell County. NCDOT and FHWA classify
this action as a Categorical Exclusion, due to the fact that no notable environmental impacts are likely to
occur as a result of project construction.
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 76 with a new bridge at the existing location as shown in Figure
2. The new bridge will be approximately 160 feet in length and 32 feet in overall clear width. A
travelway of 24 feet will be accommodated, with an offset of 4 feet on each side. The new bridge will be
at approximately the same elevation as the existing bridge.
The approach roadway will consist of a 24 foot travelway, with 4 foot paved shoulders. Total
shoulder width will be at least 8 feet, including grassed portions.
A temporary on-site detour bridge will be constructed to the south of the existing bridge to
accommodate traffic during construction. The temporary bridge will be approximately 115 feet in length,
with a roadway elevation approximately 3 feet below that of the existing bridge.
The estimated cost for this project is $1,342,000, including $142,000 for Right-of-Way
acquisition and $1,200,000 for construction. The estimated cost projected by the 2000-2006
Transportation Improvement Program is $586,000; including $90,000 in prior-year cost, $32,000 for
Right-of-Way acquisition, and $464,000 for construction.
H. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS:
No design exceptions are anticipated for this project.
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
NCDOT classifies NC 226 as a Rural Major Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification
System. The land use of the surrounding area is primarily farming and rural residential, with sparse areas
of commercial/retail development. There is a nursing home (the Rocky Pass Adult Care facility) in the
northeast quadrant of the bridge.
Near Bridge No. 76, NC 226 is a two lane, paved facility, with a 22-foot travelway, with one foot
paved shoulders on each side, and six foot wide or greater grassed shoulders on each side. Vertical
alignment in both directions is good, and horizontal alignment is good.
NCDOT built Bridge No. 76 in 1959. The bridge has an asphalt wearing surface on a reinforced
concrete floor on I-Beams. The end bents are reinforced concrete caps on timber piles, and the interior
bents are reinforced concrete post and beam construction. The deck of Bridge No. 76 is 25 feet above the
streambed. Water depth in North Muddy Creek is approximately 3 feet at the bridge vicinity. Bridge No.
76 is 136 feet long, with a 24.0-foot roadway width. It carries two lanes of traffic and the load limit is 30
tons for all vehicles.
According to Bridge Maintenance records, the bridge's sufficiency rating was 49.6 out of a
possible 100.0 in 1992. Although the bridge's sufficiency rating has been advanced to 53.5, it is still
considered deficient, with 8 years of remaining life and a substandard width of 24 feet, and therefore
should be replaced. The current traffic volume is 6300 vehicles per day (VPD), projected to increase to
11,700 VPD by the design year (2020). No speed limit is posted in area, therefore it is assumed to be 55
mph by statute.
Traffic Engineering accident records indicate there were no vehicle crashes reported in the
vicinity of Bridge No. 76 during a recent three year period.
The Transportation Director of McDowell County Schools indicates that there are 7 school
busses crossing the bridge 4 times each day, for a total of 28 trips per day. Road closure would cause
substantial delay and re-routing problems.
NC 226 is not designated as a bicycle route, and there is no indication that an unusual number of
bicyclists use this road.
IV. ALTERNATES:
One method of replacing Bridge No. 76 was studied. This alternate involves a replacement
bridge 160 feet long and 32 feet in clear width. The replacement structure will accommodate a 24-foot
travelway across the bridge with a 4-foot lateral offset on each side.
A temporary on-site detour bridge will be constructed to the south of the existing bridge to
accommodate traffic during construction.
The project alternate was studied as follows:
Alternate One: (Recommended) Replace bridge on existing location with a new structure. Traffic would
be maintained on-site during construction with a detour structure located just south of the existing
structure. The alternate would involve approximately 1,600 feet of approach work, in order to
accommodate the detour tie-ins.
NCDOT recommends Alternate 1 be constructed, since it is the only practical method of
replacing the bridge and maintaining traffic on-site. There is no feasible off-site detour to handle the
large existing volume of traffic. A new alignment alternative was not studied since this would have
resulted in higher cost and less desirable alignment.
The "do-nothing" alternate is not practical, requiring eventual closing of the road as the existing
bridge completely deteriorates. The sufficiency rating of the existing bridge is 53.5 out of 100.0, with a
remaining life of only 8 years. Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating bridge is neither practical nor
economical.
2
V. COST ESTIMATE
Estimated costs of the alternates studied are as follows:
Alternate 1
(Recommended)
Structure
Roadway Approaches
Structure Removal
Temporary Detour
Subtotal
Mobilization
Engineering and Contingencies
Total Construction Cost
Right-of-Way and Utilities
Total Project Cost
$280,800
310,086
23,908
216,750
$831,544
210,546
157,910
$1,200,000
142,000
$1,342,000
VI. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 76 with a new bridge at the existing location as shown in Figure
2. The new bridge will be approximately 160 feet in length and 32 feet in overall clear width. A
travelway of 24 feet will be accommodated, with an offset of 4 feet on each side. The new bridge will be
at approximately the same elevation as the existing bridge. The approach roadway will consist of 24 feet
of travelway, with 4 foot paved shoulders. Total shoulder width will be at least 8 feet, including grassed
portions. Where design requires guardrail, the shoulder will be at least 11 feet wide.
A temporary on-site detour bridge will be constructed to the south of the existing bridge to
maintain traffic during construction. The temporary bridge structure will be approximately 115 feet in
length, with a roadway elevation approximately 3 feet below that of the existing bridge.
Initial design indicates the completed project will provide a design speed of 55 MPH.
The construction of the recommended alternate does not have the potential to cause substantial
impacts to the local environment.
The NCDOT Division 13 Engineer concurs with the selection of Alternate 1.
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. General Environmental Effects
The project is considered to be a "Categorical Exclusion" (CE) due to its limited scope and
insubstantial environmental consequences.
3
The bridge project will not have a substantial adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change in
land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
An adverse relocation effect will occur to one residence. The relocation will be conducted in
accordance with state and federal laws and statutes. The Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and /or the North Carolina Relocation
Assistance Act (General Statutes Chapter 133, GS-133-5 through 133-18) will be followed. A Relocation
Report is included in the attachments to this document.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic or religious opportunities in the area.
No publicly owned parks, recreational facilities or wildlife or waterfowl refuges of national,
state, or local significance are in the vicinity of the project.
Construction of Alternate 1 will not have a substantial adverse impact on the floodplain or
associated flood hazard. The elevation of the 100-year flood will not be increased by more than 12
inches.
NCDOT expects utility conflicts to be low for a project of this size and magnitude. There are no
known hazardous waste sites in the project area.
B. Architectural & Archaeological Resources
Architectural Resources
A meeting was held with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to evaluate potential
effects of the project. No historic structures are located within the area of potential effect; therefore, the
SHPO recommended by letter dated April 4, 1997 (see appendix) that no historic surveys be conducted
for the project.
Archaeological Resources
The SHPO indicated by letter dated April 4, 1997 (see appendix) that an archeological survey
should be performed prior to construction of the project bridge and on-site detour structure.
This survey was accomplished by NCDOT archaeologists, and documented in a study report by
Nick Harper, dated June 1998. This investigation recorded no evidence of archeological materials in the
area of potential effect. No historical records were found of any substantial properties, sites, or events in
the project area. The SHPO concurred with the NCDOT report in their letter of March 29, 1999 (see
appendix). Thus, it is concluded that the project will have no effect on archaeological resources.
4
C. Natural Systems
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Regional Characteristics
The proposed project lies approximately 4.8 miles to the southeast of Marion in McDowell
County. The project area lies within the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province. The topography of the
project vicinity is characterized by moderately steep, rolling hills and moderately broad stream valleys.
The project vicinity is a combination of residential, rural, and agricultural areas. McDowell
County's major economic resources include agriculture, and manufacturing of textiles, furniture, and
pharmaceuticals.
Soils
According to the NRCS Soil Survey of McDowell County (1995), the floodplain of North
Muddy Creek is within the I otla- Braddock-Rosman- Potomac soil association which consists of nearly
level to strongly sloping, somewhat poorly drained to somewhat excessively drained soils, formed in
alluvium on floodplains and stream terraces. The adjacent areas are within the Hayesville-Evard
complex, which are strongly sloping to steep, well-drained soils on intermountain uplands and foothills.
The detailed map units within the project area include Colvard loam, Hayesville clay loam,
Elsinboro loam, Hayesville-Evard complex, and Evard Cowee complex. All of these soils are described
as very deep, well-drained soils with moderate to moderately rapid permeability, and medium to rapid
surface runoff.
Colvard loam (CoA) is described as non-hydric, nearly level soils (0 to 2% slopes) which
occurs on floodplains along small streams. This soil is mapped along the floodplain of North Muddy
Creek.
Hayesville clay loam (HcC2) is mapped to the east of the floodplain within the project
area. This is described as a non-hydric, eroded soil on 6 to 15 % slopes, which occurs on ridgetops. A
small area of Elsinboro loam (EsB) is also mapped east of the floodplain. This rarely flooded, gently
sloping soil (I to 4 % slopes) occurs on low stream terraces.
Hayesville-Evard complex (HeD) is mapped northwest of the floodplain. This soil occurs
on 15 to 25 % side slopes of foothills. Evard-Cowee complex (EwE), which is mapped to the
southeast of the floodplain, is described as non-hydric, steep (25 to 60 %) soils on mountain side
slopes.
5
Water Resources
Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters
The project is located in the Catawba River basin. One surface water resource, North Muddy
Creek, will be impacted by the proposed project. North Muddy Creek originates about 7.0 miles
southwest of the project area and flows to the northeast about 14.5 miles to its confluence with the
Catawba River. The substrate of the river consists of silt, sand, and gravel. The water column contained
sediment giving it a cloudy, greenish appearance. The creek has a canopy of deciduous trees and a
riparian buffer approximately 25 ft wide south of the bridge. A short gap in this vegetated buffer exists
on the north side of the bridge but then continues northward along the creek.
At the time of the field survey, the creek appeared to be more than 5 ft in depth. The stream
flows north and within the project area is fairly straight. A broad, relatively flat floodplain exists along
the western and southeastern sides of the creek. The northeastern side is a moderately sloping hillside.
The banks of the creek are steep and slightly eroded, and are approximately 6 to 10 ft in height.
Best Usage Classification
Surface waters in North Carolina are assigned a classification by the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) that is designed to maintain, protect, and enhance water quality within the state. North Muddy
Creek [Index # 1 ]-32-1-(10.5)] is classified as a Class WS-IV waterbody which are waters used as
sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes for those users where a WS-1,
II or III classification is not feasible. Class WS-IV waters are generally located in moderately to highly
developed watersheds; suitable for all Class C uses. Class C water resources are used for aquatic life
propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture.
No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or
WS-II) or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1 mile of the project study area.
Water Quality
General Watershed Characteristics
Nonpoint source runoff from agricultural land is likely to be the primary source of water quality
degradation to the water resources located within the project vicinity. The surrounding vicinity appears
to be a mix of residential, agricultural and forested land.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
The Benthic Macro invertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN), managed by the DENR, Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) and established in 1982, is part of an on-going ambient long-term water quality
monitoring program. The program has established fixed water quality monitoring stations for selected
benthic macro invertebrates.
6
A BMAN station that has been established along SR 1750 is located approximately 3 mi.
downstream of the project area. This station was sampled in April, 1985, and received a bioclass ification
of "good-fair". This station was sampled again in July, 1992, and August, 1997. the bioclass ification for
both sampling efforts was "good".
Point Source Dischargers
Point source discharges in North Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program administered by the DWQ. There is one permitted
point source discharger within the project vicinity. The Rocky Pass Adult Care facility (NPDES permit #
N00075355) discharges to North Muddy Creek immediately north of NC 226, just downstream of
Bridge No. 76. This facility has a permitted flow of 0.01 MGD. The discharge from this facility is
coded as Domestic - Institutions (which includes colleges, academies, nursing homes, prisons, etc.).
Just outside of the project vicinity, there is a second permitted discharger (Marion-City,
Corpening Creek, NPDES permit # N00031879) located 2.4 km (1.5 mi.) upstream of the bridge. This
facility discharges to Young's Fork, which has its confluence with North Muddy Creek just upstream of
Bridge No. 76. Permitted flow is 3 MGD and the discharge codes are Textiles, Domestic-Municipal, and
Metal Plating.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface water resources:
• increased sediment loading and siltation as a consequence of watershed vegetation
removal, erosion/and or construction.
• decreased light penetration/water clarity from increased sedimentation.
• changes in water temperature with vegetation removal.
• changes in the amount of available organic matter with vegetation removal.
• increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction activities and
construction equipment, and spills.
• alteration of water levels and flows due to interrupfions and/or additions to surface and groundwater
flow from construction.
• increased scouring of the existing channel due to increased water flows from the stormwater runoff
associated with curb and gutter systems.
Efforts will be made to ensure that no sediment leaves the construction site. NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be followed during the construction
phase of the project.
BIOTIC RESOURCES
Terrestrial and aquatic communities are included in the description of biotic resources. These
classifications follow Schafale and Weakley (1990) where possible. Representative animal species
which are likely to occur in these habitats (based on published range distributions) are also cited.
7
Terrestrial Communities
The two terrestrial communities identified within the project area are man-dominated and
riparian. Dominant faunal components associated with these terrestrial areas are described below.
Man-Dominated Community
The man-dominated community includes the fields and agricultural areas, road shoulders, and
some irregularly maintained transitional areas. In the areas where regular maintenance occurs, such as
the narrow road shoulders and the fields, species observed include various grasses, such as fescue and
ryegrass , white clover, plantain, dandelion, crab grass, and wild onion. Irregularly maintained areas
occur north of the bridge between the farm field and the creek, and along the embankments of the road.
These areas contain species such as Japanese honeysuckle, broom sedge, Virginia pine saplings,, Asters,
multiflora rose, pokeweed, giant cane, green brier, blackberry, tree of heaven, and sumac.
The animal species present in these disturbed habitats are opportunistic and capable of surviving
on a variety of resources, ranging from vegetation (flowers, leaves, fruits, and seeds) to both living and
dead faunal components. Carolina chickadee and Northern mockingbird were observed in these areas.
Numerous songbirds such as American robin, cardinal, eastern meadowlark, eastern kingbird, starling,
and gray catbird are common in these habitats. The open grassy fields may be habitat for white-footed
mouse, white-tailed deer, Virginia opossum, American toad, and rat snake. Species such as turkey
vulture, red-tailed hawk, and American kestrel often utilize these open areas for foraging or hunting.
Riparian Community
The riparian community occurs along the banks of North Muddy Creek. South of the bridge, this
community contains some mature trees, as well as some saplings, shrubs, and weedy invasive species.
North of the bridge, this community is less mature, showing signs of past disturbance. The species
observed in the canopy and understory include red maple, sycamore, river birch, and green ash. The
shrub layer includes saplings of some of these species as well as Chinese privet and multiflora rose.
Japanese honeysuckle and giant cane dominate the herbaceous layer. This community most closely
resembles the Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest Community as described in Schafale and
Weakley (1990).
Riparian areas are generally utilized by fauna for protection, reproducing, and foraging. During
the site visit, an eastern phoebe, red-bellied woodpecker, Northern cardinal, and American robin were
observed in these areas. Other birds which may be found include common flicker, white-eyed vireo,
Carolina wren, and white-breasted nuthatch. A variety of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians are also
found in these habitats. Species such as raccoon, beaver, long-tailed weasel, southern copperhead, rough
green snake, gray treefrog, southern leopard frog, and slimy salamander may be found in the riparian
forest.
Aquatic Communities
North Muddy Creek is a low gradient, third order stream having a gravel, sand, and silt substrate
and fair water clarity. Within the project area, the creek is approximately 40 ft wide. The banks of
North Muddy Creek are approximately 6 to 10 ft high and the riparian community contains mostly trees
and shrubs.
8
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) has designated McDowell Count
as a "trout" county. North Muddy Creek provides habitat for a variety of species offish. According to
Christopher Goudreau, the District 8 Biologist for the WRC, North Muddy Creek was sampled in the
vicinity of Bridge No. 76 in 1994. Fish species collected include central stoneroller, white sucker,
striped jumprock, redhorse, margined madtom, bullhead, redbreast sunfish, bluegill, redear sunfish, black
crappie, largemouth bass, warpaint shiner, rosyface shiner, telescope shiner, greenhead shiner, mirror
shiner, Tennessee shiner, mimic shiner, silver shiner, whitetail shiner, river chub, bluehead chub,
longnose dace, northern hog sucker, blotched chub, bigeye chub, fatlips minnow, channel catfish, rock
bass, smallmouth bass, fantail darter, tessellated darter, sharphead darter, greenside darter, greenfin
darter, banded darter, Swannanoa darter, tangerine darter, gilt darter, and mottled sculpin.
North Muddy Creek was sampled in May 1997 at SR 1760 which is located approximately
4.3 mi. downstream of Bridge No. 76. Many of the same species were collected at this location with the
addition of pumpkinseed sunfish, rosyside dace, greenfin shiner, spottail shiner, sandbar shiner, redfin
pickerel, and Piedmont darter.
The following benthic m ac ro invertebrate species were found in North Muddy Creek during a
limited field survey:
• Stonefly larvae
• Mayfly larvae
• Midge larvae
Reptiles and amphibians which inhabit the riparian forest community also utilize the aquatic
community. Other species may include queen snake, southern two-lined salamander, and bullfrog.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Terrestrial Communities
Terrestrial communities in the project area will be impacted by project construction from
clearing and paving and loss of the terrestrial community area along NC 226. Estimated impacts are
derived based on the project lengths for Alternate I and the temporary detour of 1000 ft, and the entire
study corridor width of 80 ft. Table I details the potential impacts to terrestrial communities by habitat
type. Please note that impacts are based on the entire study corridor width, and that actual loss of habitat
will likely be less.
Table 1
Estimated Area Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Community Impacted Area (acres)
Alternate I Temporary Detour
Man-Dominated 1.06 1.47
Riparian 0.06 0.16
Total Impacts 1.12 1.63
9
Destruction of natural communities along the project alignment will result in the loss of foraging
and breeding habitats for the various animal species that utilize the area. Plants and animals found in
these upland communities are generally common throughout western North Carolina.
Impacts to terrestrial communities, particularly in locations having steep to moderate slopes, can
result in the aquatic community receiving heavy sediment loads as a consequence of erosion. Efforts will
be made to ensure that no sediment leaves the construction site.
Aquatic Communities
Impacts to aquatic communities include fluctuations in water temperatures due to the loss of
riparian vegetation. Shelter and food resources, both in the aquatic and terrestrial portions of these
organisms' life cycles, will be affected by losses in the terrestrial communities.
Temporary and permanent impacts may result to aquatic organisms from increased
sedimentation. Aquatic invertebrates may drift downstream during construction and recolonize the
disturbed area once it has been stabilized. Sediments have the potential to affect fish and other aquatic
life in several ways, including the clogging and abrading of gills and other respiratory surfaces; affecting
the habitat by scouring and filling of pools and riffles; altering water chemistry; and smothering different
life stages. Increased sedimentation may cause decreased light penetration through an increase in
turbidity.
Wet concrete will not be allowed to come into contact with surface water during bridge
construction in order to minimize effects of runoff on the stream water quality. Potential adverse effects
will be minimized through the implementation ofNCDOT Best Management Practices for Protection of
Surface Waters.
JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
Waters of the United States
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States" as
defined in 33 CFR 328.3 and in accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344), and are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Any action that
proposes to dredge or place fill material into surface waters or wetlands falls under these provisions.
Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Jurisdictional wetlands do not occur within the project area.
North Muddy Creek meets the definition of surface waters (Waters of the United States). The
channel ranges from approximately 25 to 40 ft wide within the project area.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
No wetlands will be impacted by the project; however, project construction cannot be
accomplished without infringing on surface waters. Anticipated surface water impacts fall under the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
10
Within the project area, North Muddy Creek is 25 to 40 ft wide. Assuming an 80-ft wide study
corridor for both the replacement structure and the temporary detour, the construction of the new bridge
and the temporary detour bridge will each impact 0.06 acre of surface waters. The length of North
Muddy Creek within the study corridors of the replacement bridge and temporary bridge is 160 ft. The
actual length of the stream impacts will be likely be less, depending on final design plans. At this time,
preliminary engineering indicates that no relocation of the stream will be required. The stream is
relatively deeply incised, with banks that may be too steep to support construction machinery for the
length of bridge required. Therefore, it may be necessary to utilize temporary in-stream work pads to
support equipment essential for construction of the temporary and permanent bridges.
Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated from the proposed project. Permits and
certifications from various state and federal agencies may be required prior to construction activities.
Construction is likely to be authorized by provisions of CFR 330.5 (a) Nationwide Permit
(NWP) No. 23, which authorizes activities undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded, or
financed in whole or in part, by another Federal agency or department where that agency or department
has determined that, pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act:
"...the activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental documentation
because it is included within a category of actions which neither individually nor cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment; and
that the Office of the Chief Engineer has been furnished notice of the agency's or department's
application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that determination."
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver thereof, from the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) prior to issuance of the NWP 23. Section
401 of the Clean Water Act requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any federally
permitted or licensed activity that results in a discharge into Waters of the U.S. In addition, the project is
located in a designated "trout" county, where NCDOT must obtain a letter of approval from the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission. Final permit decision rests with the USACE.
Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
Since this project will likely be authorized under a Nationwide permit, mitigation for impacts to
surface waters may or may not be required by the USACE. In accordance with the Division of Water
Quality Wetland Rules [I 5A NCAC 211 .0506 (h)] "Fill or alteration of more than one acre of wetlands
will require compensatory mitigation; and fill or alteration of more than 150 linear feet of streams may
require compensatory mitigation. Since there are no wetlands within the study corridor, wetland
mitigation will not be required. A total of 160 linear feet of North Muddy Creek are located within the
study corridor for the proposed project. The actual right-of-way and associated stream impacts will
likely be lower than the 150 linear feet threshold, depending on final design plans. However, if the final
right-of-way for the replacement structure and temporary detour bridge are greater than 150 linear feet,
compensatory mitigation may be required.
11
Rare and Protected Species
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section
9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists two federally protected species for McDowell County
as of May 13, 1999. These species are listed in Table 2.
Table 2
Federally Protected Species for
McDowell County
Common Name Federal Status
Bog turtle T S/A
Mountain golden heather T
Notes: "T" Denotes Threatened (a species that is likely to become an endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range)
"T S/A" Denotes Similarity of Appearance (a species that is listed as threatened due to
similarity of appearance with other rare species).
A brief description of the characteristics and habitat requirements of each species, along with a
conclusion regarding potential project impact, follows.
Bog turtle Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
Vertebrate Family: Emydidae
Federally Listed: 1997
The southern population of the bog turtle is listed as Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
to the northern population; therefore, the southern population is not afforded protection under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act. No habitat exists in the project area for the bog turtle. There are no
freshwater wetlands characterized by open fields, meadows, or marshes with slow moving streams,
ditches, or boggy areas near the bridge. A search of the NHP database found no occurrence of the bog
turtle in the project vicinity.
Mountain golden heather
Plant Family: Cistaceae
Threatened
Federally Listed: 1980
Mountain golden heather is found at elevations of 2800 to 4000 ft within Burke and McDowell
counties. It grows on exposed quartzite ledges between bare rock and Leiophyllum dominated heath
balds which merge into pine/oak forest. It grows best in full sun.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
12
No habitat exists in the project area for mountain golden heather. This species occurs above an
elevation of 2800 ft, and the project area is at an elevation of about 1400 ft. A search of the NHP
database found no occurrence of mountain golden heather in the project vicinity. It can be concluded
that the project will not impact this threatened species.
D. Air Quality and Traffic Noise
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, thus it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis (if applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not required.
If the project disposes of vegetation by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with
applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15
NCAC 2D.0520.
The project will not substantially increase traffic volumes. Therefore, it will have no substantial
impact on noise levels. Temporary noise increases may occur during construction.
E. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires that all federal agencies or their
representatives, to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on prime and
important farmland soils. These soils are determined by the US Natural Resources Conservation Service
(MRCS) based on criteria such as potential crop yield and possible level of input of economic resources.
The project will result in the conversion of a small amount of land but the area to be converted is void of
agricultural uses. Therefore, no further consideration of impacts to farmland is required.
13
N
? g
.t
(.j MARION'
POP. 4,761 t-,
/ 221
L GRANT
I \
vvESr) MA>Uo?
POP. 1,596
1
\JUNINC.) n 000
Fc4 2
I,
/rA?I
k4l, w tzerSo
tood
McDOSWEL"
v cam ?.
Nab
,., Pleasant Gardenl l
??SwGPN .4 rwn
treat A N® 6 1:
e
6
,Id`eaes (T i Glemvodd
I wI? Suau HiI atL Eyssrtsrru
0?
a ?•
Little
c . 2 ?o Mtn.
\

?} 1833

EAST MANON ` v
POP. 1,851
)UNINC.)

? arc
r

00
1755
1.0
to
\
?,

® l
??r
\
1756

h
2 0

1796 , a

? /
/G? / ? > 17°9 1795
.9 \
1797 - 9

? /
/ ? v 6 1.

?
/ \
1793 T rL.

Dysc

R
? ?.,,
North Carolina
s Department Of Transportation
`r p^ Planning & Environmental Branch
MCDOWELL COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 76 ON NC 226
OVER NORTH MUDDY CREEK
B-2997
0 kilometers 1.6 kilometers 3.2
Figure I
0 miles 1.0 miles 2.0

McDowell County WEST APPROACH LOOKING EAST
Replace Bridge No. 76 on NC 226 FIGURE 3
Over North Muddy Creek
B-2997
EAST APPROACH LOOKING WEST
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission®
312 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff Ingham
North Carolina Department of Transportation
FROM: Stephanie E. Goudreau, Eastern Mt. Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 22, 1997 f
SUBJECT: Preliminary comments for the replacement of Bridge #76 on NC 226 over North Muddy
Creek, McDowell County, TIP #13-2997
This correspondence responds to a request by you for our preliminary comments regarding the
subject project.
Biological staff of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission are familiar with North
Muddy Creek. Our comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the 404 permit process will
reflect that this stream does not support trout. We have not identified any other special concerns
regarding this project.
We have the following general recommendations regarding this project:
1) Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in the stream channel in order to
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
2) If concrete will be used, work should be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact
stream water. This will lessen the chance of altering the stream's water chemistry and causing a
fish kill.
3) Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days
of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment during the early stages of this project. If
you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 704/652-4257.
IIR E L O C A T I O N R E P O R T 11
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
F E.I.S. F-1 CORRIDOR F1 DESIGN
PROJECT: 8.1871501 COUNTY McDowell Alternate 1 of 1 Alternate
I. D. NO.: B-2997 F.A. PROJECT BRSTP-226(4) MANAGER OF
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Bridge No. 76 on NC 226 over the North Muddy CrOam ni- V-1 r7RANCH

ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LE
Type of
Dis lacees
Owners
Tenants Total
Minorities
0-15M
15-25M
2W66W
QF3 0
TAMP
Residential 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Businesses 0 0 0 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For S ale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20M 1 $ 0-150 Q 0-20M 4 $ o-150 2
ANSWE R ALL QUESTIONS 20-40M Q 150-250 Q 2040M 11 150-250 4
Yes No Explain all "YES" answers. 40-70M Q 250-400 0 40-70M 14 250-000 9
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-100M Q 400-600 0 70-100M 25 400-600 3
X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 up Q 60o up Q 10o up 3 600 up 2
displacement? TOTAL 1 0 57 20
X 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond b Number
project? 3. There are no business taken or affected by this project.
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
Indicate size, type, estimated number of 8. As necessary in compliance with state law
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? 11. Housing Authority of the City of Marion and local
6. Source for available housing (list). newspapers Indicate that sufficient DSS housing
X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? properties will be available.
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
X 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. 12. Lewis Realty, Anderson Real Estate (Brent Anderson)
families? and local newspapers Indicate that sufficient DSS
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? housing properties will be available
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
n/a 14 . Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15 . Number months estimated to complete
relocation? 6
-cam C?-?-? 3 -2 7-
Relocation A ant Date Approved b Date
F?(rn 15.4 Hevlsed UZ/Vb 0 ?.,y.u.. ....,.Y.
v// 2 Copy Area Relocation Office
/_ %,0- 10; t / % r IJ
?E
•? 4rr ?
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
April 4, 1997
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Bridge 76 on NC 226 over North Muddy Creek,
McDowell County, B-2997, Federal Aid Project
BRSTP-226(4), State Project 8.1871501,
ER 97-8346
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
On March 11, 1997, Debbie Bevin of our staff met with North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning the above
project. We reported our available information on historic architectural and
archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations. NCDOT
provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of no historic structures
located within the area of potential effect. We recommend that no historic
architectural survey be conducted for this project.
A survey for archaeological resources should be performed prior to construction of
the project and on-site detour.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2507 gD,
Nicholas L. Graf
4/4/97, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: Vick
B. Church
T. Padgett

M STATF
9=,
? n
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
March 29, 1999
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
V y v j t/ Q
P, f., 9g
Re: Replace Bridge 76 on NC 226 over North Muddy
Creek, McDowell County, TIP B-2997, Federal-aid
Project BRSTP-226(4), State Project 8.187150 1, ER rl
99-8415
Dear Mr. Graf:
l•?r -W
S '
-or. V T,gt ANHL?i
Thank you for your letter of March 5, 1999, transmitting the archaeological survey report
by Nick Harper concerning the above project.
During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr. Harper
has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in connection
with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this project will not involve
significant archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
" David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: V. D. Gilmore
T. Padgett
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ??V