20000505 Ver 1_Complete File_20000406

rF9 pG
otoF \ NA
Michael F. Easley
Governor
j r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
_r5 rti? ©v
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Dept of Transportation
P D and E A Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: DWQ #: 000505
TIP #: R-2112BB
COE #: 199601404
County: Martin
Rob Ridings
Mike Bell
file
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 6,000.00 check number 1174566, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore .25 acres of riparian wetlands in Cataloging Unit 03010107 of the
Roanoke River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
S' cerely,
'Ronald E. Ferrell
cc:
A
NCGENR
Customer Service
RECEIPT
July 6, 2001
\3 ,
Program Manager
Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748
OW A TF9oG
c
r
o r
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIPT
June 6, 2001
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Dept of Transportation
P D and E A Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: DWQ #: 001045
TIP #: U-92 A & B
COE #: 199603836
County: New Hanover
?SS
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 109,375.00 check number 1162327, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 875 linear feet of stream in Cataloging Unit 03030007 of the Cape
Fear River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
SIs erely,
Ronald E. Ferrell
Program Manager
cc: '*td1b#k
Rick Shiver
Dave Timpy
file
1 A
\ NCDENR
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748
o?oF w A rF,?QG
r
o ?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
'5.Suv- r- O C, RECEIPT
June 6, 2001
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Dept of Transportation
P D and E A Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: DWQ #: 000577
TIP #: U-2512A
COE #: 200030933 - 942
County: Mecklenburg
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 92,750.00 check number 1162326, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 742 linear feet of stream in Cataloging Unit 03050103 of the
Catawba River Basin.
if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell
Program Manager

cc
M
NCDEUR
Customer Service
Aft;'RifflnO
Larry Coble
Steve Lund
file
Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748
`o?0F W A rF9Q?
o ?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIPT
?SSc,?e O / July 6, 2001
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Dept of Transportation
PD and EABranch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 3 lnl
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: DWQ #: 001447
TIP #: B3055
County: Wake
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 32,826.82 check number 1174565, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 34,194.60 ft2 of riparian buffers in the appropriate portion of the
Neuse River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
Sincerely,.
Ronald E. Ferrell
Program Manager
cc
Vcw
NCGENR
Customer Service
Rob Ridings
Steve Mitchell
file
Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748
O?O,? W A rFq
r
o ?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
S S LL C? ( RECEIPT
July 6, 2001
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Dept of Transportation
P D and E A Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: DWQ #: 001232
TIP #: R-2206 A
COE #: 200031430
County: Gaston/Lincoln
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 2,080,750.00 check number 1174564, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 0.75 acres of non-riparian wetlands and 16,574 linear feet of stream
in Cataloging Unit 03050101 of the Catawba River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
Sincerely,
onald E. Ferrell
Program Manager
cc
NCDENR
Customer Service
Rob Ridings
Rex Gleason
Steve Chapin
file
Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748

r.
7 r F?vt 1 ?? 0 c
^? tI I;
.
t•rET?r•??? ,,
t'!ATER OW'd ITY Q,Ci
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DAVID McCOY
GOVENOR SECRETARY
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator 0 0 0
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-211213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWO
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
non- ??r:?#? -? pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Y Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesiand Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
Lo acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
T. Li y Riddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
Y Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-21121313.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PF01, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
APPLICATION FOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
OMB APPROVAL No. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing Instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, Including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington
Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204,
Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003),
Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be
submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activities in, or
affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge or fill material Into waters of the United States, and the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it Into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this
form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit Disclosure: Disclosure of requested Information is voluntary. If
information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be Issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must
be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An applicatlon that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 9 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION
COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE
(an agent is not requred)
N.C Department of Transportation D. R. Conner, P. E. Division Engineer-Division One
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
P. 0. Box 850
Edenton, NC 27932
9. AGENTS ADDRESS
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/ AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOS. W/ AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, , to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
R-2112BB
U.S. 17 South of Williamston to US 13-17 north side of Williarnston
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOW (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Tributary to Sweetwater Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Martin NC
County State
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
17. DIRECTIONS TO SITE
See application package
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
road construction
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
To improve safety and traffic flow on US 64, fulfill legislative mandate to include US 64 in the Intrastate Highway System
and to bring US 64 up to Intrastate Highway Standards.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/ OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for discharge
Road construction
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
See application package
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
5.43 acres wetlands and 770.0 linear feet of surface waters.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes X No
IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK.
Section BA as permitted in the July 2, 1996 Individual Permit issued by the USACE.
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can
be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
See application package
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/ Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agents for Work
Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE OF IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE DENIED
APPROVAL' NUMBER
USACE Ind. Permit 199601404 Feb. 29, 1996
NCDWQ 401 Cert. 960214 Feb. 29, 1996
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify
t at information in this application is complete and accurate. 1 further certify that I possess the authority to
ert ke the work described herei or a acting as the agent duly authorized agent of the applicant.
S ATURE OF APPLI ANT pAT SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it
may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or
agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or
disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or respresentations or makes
any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry,
shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Post office Box 99
Rounola Pupids. Aiwb Camlina
27870-()09()
TJORTH CAROLINA POWER
March 6, 2000
U -d! -
f?
Mr. Lindsey Riddick
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 850
Edenton, NC 27932
Dear Mr. Riddick :
Re: State Project 6.099010T (R-2112BB)
North Carolina Power has been asked to relocate its facilities that are in conflict with the above
mentioned State Highway Project. Part of the requested relocation involves areas designated as
'Wetlands". In those areas, North Carolina Power needs to know what if any requirements the US
Army Corps of Engineers will place upon us. After discussing this project with Henry Wicker of the
Corps office, he indicated all requests must be from the Department of Transportation. North Carolina
Power can not begin any work on this project until we know what the Corp will require. I have attached
copies of the NC DOT plan sheets for the areas that may impact "wetlands" and copies of North
Carolina Power's construction sketches detailing our work in these areas.
North Carolina Power will be removing its overhead facilities on sheets 9 and 12 and replacing them
with underground. There will be two underground road crossings from existing poles . These crossings
will be guide drilled. The underground cables installed in PVC conduit. North Carolina Power will also
guide drill the underground cables from Station 25+00 to Station 31+00 and from Station 36+00 to
Station 45+50. These guide drillings will be 45 feet to the left of the proposed centerline of the new US
64. The underground cables between the conduit runs will be direct buried using a backhoe. The
minimum depths of the underground cables are shown on the attached construction sketches. No
construction will take place in the areas designated as'Wetlands" on the NC DOT plan sheet 9.
On NC DOT plan sheet 10, North Carolina Power will be installing overhead facilities to maintain
service to the Martin Plaza Shopping Center and to Police Paris that will go through the areas
designated on this sheet as 'Wetlands". No poles will be set in the designated "Wetlands" area but
North Carolina Power will have to dear trees within a 30 foot right-cf-way corridor that is 15 feet each
side of the centerline of the proposed powerlines. All trees will be hand cut using chainsaws at or near
6" of the ground. No stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from the site. North
Carolina Power crews or its contractors will do all work. The area outlined in green on the attached NC
DOT plan sheet 10 is the area that needs to be cleared.
v Page 2
Post Ojjice Box 99
Rounokv Rupicls, Abrtb C mlin j
NORTH CAROLINA POWER
If you should have any questions or if you think an on site meeting is needed please contact me at 252-
308-1021. As stated earlier North Carolina Power can not begin its relocation until we are notified that
our plans meet with the US Army Corps of Engineers' approval.
Sincerely,
C. 4ZC-?,
C. Lee Wall
Senior Engineering Representative
CC: Mr. Mark Salter, NC DOT Raleigh
Mr. G. W. Jackson, North Carolina Power
X41 ? ?
u
y?`id v v
t y
HEFT g r< .{ •?,,, ? .
/ V
O• pN N C? v
m o p
c)D 0) (S
-,?4• 1 `? •- ? pQLv
IIJ
•
CC)
rT)
; 24•`D 0
N
In d .'
rr,
M CD
p1 ao co
co _n m D o A . t
cs' r a o m co n m m ?, `%, o Ia
is 0
o4i n 1 !j j! .? 1 I I 1 I I \• Al
S 1 W / -?
?nOry • r~? ` ? •I ? 4 ? Z
ZE mc) o
_ NDS I c?'ic'? `h w
W
D?7 0 I N W N LJ
NC=i I ?? I
cn o = O Nmw /
Nan '-In I '1Z m N
O 07A0 n map
a ;a
-n W z o z o
I N T o a I ~ rrl C. ? (n r
c=i a mm , \ A m cn ~ A
v
a
?? n z X
y m
C
;l z
I
m O
O "
z
m
=t ME ny -can
--4 CL
a"' ?-o y co On.
o•o o? om?
o- O
ANC M N o .? cn f r
_? \ZB m O o i ._.?. o n D? II
0 V) co
cn
m ?' J/? + 7 .. O)
M LA
m -i co
D ? O
m o m_ -4 =
v c,, m
0 Co )>
r" r
m
-si N1 ?mn
C/1
m r N L4 N
W I I cn
cn m w
-4 m
Z 'o m --1 co j
G TNO 00(/N Mn i
V1 D mOm V -1D I
T, Ti O ANN
4 W n N- R1 V i Th
U l
C-) .TI Z
rrl Vi
'b. 79r -o b c? a
aJ"???? 0• ? l7 8L?
/ F
kFR -P-?
m D ?cpi / It
-mi 'Zip ,-p OZ ••?? ? ?? ??
i
C+i
0 A o 3 t Y
O W W = o D '??" 11 F
c=i a °
D
C H m
? Z
m i
0
O
z
m
Sb
301/
3?N3? MM .Lfr ?? , ' m
: y I' V hvd dodd
o
2 ? y
o T SM0S-13' Z/
N
CA
? w
a NOI1dI-Id1SNl•, H1 w ?0- ?: _
Al SV a.S L ?•)
s
0 0
t? m r r
• ?e-? • r r 1
r ,
I
c n H
.10
;-7
C"•??Q? nO \ ? ? ??yCZ
a n -3OS Z n t v ? ''? ? ?? n
> _
CP O?
z -1 > qi -
Op U'? ' '
9b
I
I - ?
I -
_ a
2 ?
ul r-
>
--4
O (/1
y / N N ?
o ? o
ZN -
N O
? m

\\825
.000
• c
Q?.
h ?
•.. ,t ? ? ?
s m
0
L
c z
.?
?' yy
V V
Y?
O ?
? `- V YA

s -3
rl??C >
?C

=- -? z c°n

z ^ I --C)
zz
a
a
o
c„>
0
z

N n
-
to r
?„? v? >

N

? <
\
N n N r-
m N
O D
CO
N
-i
O O

• Z
.C/1
W
l

O
O
C3
0
O rA
v J
?o°v
?cr
?>
?zz
c?
r.3
Lb
77
02
rn? 8 3 5
, •?
o C3 \I
o
o .'/1 Z N
?' ?' l•
_ I
• r' ?"?
oil,
2
to /
'? }F N k
z
v •? \ I
?

?
"`VVV
?
11
l1? \

I o
?? z
241 i

I

I
I
i
I n
ony--? °? I o?

.". ? 'H C n cn r r : r*

C:
a?zoo

?e> >
> z?
,3 ° zz
r?
r ? r
y
r

i
8b
MC.) I \0`'.
I
?- -r m rn
z Ni > I
° -I NN I
3? o a?
N? 845
z •?
to •
7_n
m S 1 'in
- 1
P 1
cn 13. Li
ZVI
• 1
' l - 11 ' .0 1
.7 1 (n r
1 .
s ?• LA 1
1W ?
o m f v,
M
O
r-I
o ??z o r o
z(n
m o2Q -i C
r O Z2 > C
C1HO-•z ?r o
Q o > a z z
a O C7 CJI > p?q
z
0
a
n
vz
o°v
a?
C: r-
(? C7
zn
7•
04
6b
?- - _
LA r-
I N N _-
??.fl N N
z - - - - ' .?? • N r
.?? '-4 N
?''
N -
y r- Z
--1 --4 D W N N C)
L4 z
rrl
O
NZO J fj
> rrI
v
U2 I
i
oT 7r
i
I
un r- c-)
z W,
it N I
o ` \ ll. ill II, II?rz ?, Ilio
V
•
cn c)
rn
;zZo - '
22 z
? ' p C•? cZn
Z
a
c?
0
Q
m
rC "J
vz
o°v
n?
-P
Zz
cy
••}
L
•
cf?
1""I
m
:z
z
D
D
r
r
z
A
H
r
x

V/
S
m
rn
? Z
n
O 0n v?

M. O
-
00 n
z

ca
cfl
cnm0

om
N c.)
0 =z
a)n
-? cn
z Z? >
C N <
cn -?
? O O
Z
m

o

i
i
- .l
. r.
r
J
i
t
I
t
r
tE'
cu
;1t
T
O
O
1
11

ti
L,
N
L-1
O rri O ?' =
o v ; cn
D O D CT
0 r
m 0 M i m
0 z
M -n
f M M
D r M-t
lX\
Z Z w
o _
N N
M oz
I m
-i rv
>t

/
.

r I
?
T
c I
? ?
y

\\ GSU

i
? i

1

r J
L..I

I

m z I j
-v ?
m
o

- o
.?
v Q
D -?
n p -? <
L O
(n C)
D cn
?. .
M. ? Fn O C')
m
C00 -4
Z zm Z O
m M
= '
M cfl
m (3

- o -+ -i z
o
C
3 cn
i r -?
z ;:o D
ZZ
U --i
N
C
\ ? N c"n U
i L ij N L L j,,.
-
? O _
N O
z p y
m m
=
O

I
z5
v
ra
z
0
N
-n
r
z
r
a
z
v
N
?o
I CA!-4- o

0
855
I I
I 1
I ? ? I
I O ? ? I
C/) 1
__
how '-
?? of
zz of
v N
I
z
n cc co ? -

..? ;zZ » 'a
Z N .,? 2 O
-c> a
a 2 ?

? Z

rn
rn
• --ft I
,*(?>
b
I
a
C7
C7
`C
0
v?
2
O C
P C)
..;z
zz
r
'7+
ES
I \
v
Z
O
n
r
Z
2
z
v
Z
m
0
V
i2
c
a
a \
'?? \\?SIa•3
\
'- -Z
>
no
vrn
2 W
o h ??
r?
c z
\
oln
\ US
64
\ p
- \
zz-
\
\ \ • • '` • • ? • • ? ?'I' ? III 0
S ON
°
z
00 °v
O nvC
C??Zo
? oZC ?
a 0 NC7Z• >
C7?j O.,Z
Z y
Q
z

m n
cn r
-? >
N N
-+ ca
0
Z N
N -I
O
Z
m
?7p \\c
tic? \
D
V)
W
W
0
\

\

EJ>
b
C3
. 1
r
?zz
r.•
a
z?
v?
o°v
?c
cr
b5

?s• a i

3 :.

> > i Q,
al
'Q
a?? p l;
x
O

O
O TOE a
^
.
O M a ?

N ? I
\ ? f
A
x N 'v_
l + N
ITV 4
I a n V
(i-60. 9 ?3 ? r•Q non
S o +g M
17>
? // A
-- 7cz
n 0 4 - ON
4 •!4 % a
O ? ?? ? z R n N S W

r O w
zcn rn
I
ZO SR
cn?o iD
C O
O nnl Z C ??
Y? \ N ? m
`? ? I N
c. C G? cn

a

N r••
C7 ?
C
-- ov
g ?zz
•? r??a d r ?
, 1 r
I .:
C

rGo

::?^iz e co 1

Al j

1

t

=
m z
,

o cm
°
-
-0
o
<:? °
o
o
C
(n

,a)

> p ° - o

n
N
°o
?
c? ?Zm

z m0

Z m m
,
r1i -n m
v r\3

0 ?°„ n
o
= z
m
rrn u,
=
A 0 -1 c F m
i D r

?'
< Z Z
C
oN v o
a
? ?N Z
?C m

?. y
-Co. I

I^
i?
It
f _ o p -
^ n cn
m
? z o
rn
m
WNW;
m o '
I` ? N
m
w :?4
Z
'a
r
r
M
z
w
a
r
x
O
CA
I
I
I
i

N
r7
CD
C)

cn
m ?
m ? o
kA o v

0
'
0o ?
t
vQ
n O -?
m? 30
vo Zm
C S
m o Z C-1
-

N o n m
SZ
41. o
-?
D -
{ C
z -Np
G)
"0
>
z
t
? ?
-mac D
N ?'
a ? o o
m

.o
OHO o
D
v
C n L?
-
D D
? r
M
T m

O UN

m -n r 1 m

r- -i -{
D
N
O Z I?
lIx
woLi-j?
m p
S S
-{ N
r
v
;a
z
z
0
r
I
?3 sN4:
V1 \
Z -elzf
LA
' 523, m /
CA
'oil,
LS
Ul P
;-I 3> T J'
' N UI
O
1 m
00
•' ;' m c- 1 U-110o _
m
IV N 1
Win
m'. ?.
C.M
Ul /
-ti. U1
CCL-
f
>
z _0
"Z d ,/
a
1-, 02
-; a ? n
C
y zz
z
PLC Pb-" Q
/l r_
/ o
PROPERTY OWNERS (CON'T)
Williamston, NC 2789 Sites 29-30
Site 19 1. Lawrence E. Liliey
1. Artie T. Manson PO Box 670
412 Washington Street Wiigarrstcn, NC 27892. SC GT,r p
Wiriamston, NC 27892 Site 31
2. William H. Biggs, Jr. 1. Daniel M. Bcwen Q
PO Box 295 PO Box 802
Sharpsburg, NC 27878 `Nlliarrston, NC 27892
Site 20
1. Wiillam H. Biggs, Jr.
PO Box 295
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Site 21
1. Nina B. Gaynor
PO Box 41
Rocky Mount, NC 27802
2. Ivanetta L. Bums
Rt 5, Box 923
Williamston, NC 27892
3. Mary E. Williams
Rt. 5, Box 912
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 22
1. Mulester Butler, Heirs
c%AnnieKennedy

938 W. Franklintown Road S?crso,J
Baltimore, Md. 21216 a?
2. George W. Corey
402 Vance Street
Williamston, NC 27892 ,
Site 23
1. Mulester Butler, Heirs
c/o Annie Kennedy
938 W. Frankiintown Road
Baltimore, Md. 21216
2. George W. Corey
402 Vance Street
WIliamston, NC 27892
3. A.D. Hams-Farms
703 Dovercourt Place
Downingtown, Pa 19335
Sites 24-25
1. C. F. Hams
Rt 2, Box 40
WIliamston, NC 27892
Site 26
1. Ira Rogerson, Heirs
c/o Essie Mae Rogerson
Rt 2, Box 820
Wil:tamston, NC 27892
2. Roland B. Lilley
Rt. 2
Wiiliamston, NC 27892
Sites 27-28
1. Roland B. Liffey SEc.rro?J
Rt 2
Williamston, NC 27892
(3 6 SHEET 61 OF 61
IF INCORRECT RETURN TO
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 01 OFFICE
252-482-7977
WARRANT NO. 6120
DATE 03/03/2000
INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE AMOUNT NET ANIOUNT j
0303101953
'

i
I
I
i

i
j
I
I
i
i
I
I
i

'
j
i
I 02/28/2000 $475.00 $475.00
i
i
i

I

i

I
Detach Stub Before Depositing TOTAL: $475.00 , $475.00
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE 03/03/2000
DIVISION 01 OFFICE E6-1059 STATE TREASURER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
P. O. BOX 850 531 PAYADLE AT PAR THROUGH FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
EDENTON, NC 27932
. ^A 00/1 00 • r • ? r r r ? ? ? r • r • r r • r • • r
Pay arcr 11n ro ovonttf cvo o ari an
All
Pay NCDENR
to the P.O. Box 27687
Order of Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
?tJT}aCa?Z?D ? .....?r7E
II'0000 6 120,18 1:0 5 3 1 10 5941: 111100011164 bill
#01 1. 1 1] r_?Nt't4
it
i
i?nt?? yam.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[ES B. HUNT JR. DAVID McCOY
GOVENOR _SECRETARY
April 4, 2000
/ S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
6,
Tiki' S Gft06'
ATQ UAUTYSECU t

Army Permit Application for the
SUBJECT: Depa Va
Propos of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
sNorth Side of Williamston; Martin
Everett
County; 213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWQ
Project SACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Dep ftmen of Transportation is proposing to
Martin County (Figur 1). The deroken the project
relocate 8.9 miles of U 64 betwe \Southilliamston, d Williamston in
into two sections (f r funding anscheduling
purposes), identif' d as R-2112BA 17, south of
Williamston) and? -2112BB (US 17mston, to US 13-17,
north side of Wliamston). Howermit was issued for
both sections.y
Please refer_ the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and toe subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since'that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
n r-
,1 11
RECEIVED
r
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
• Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
• Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
fe??'? riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
• Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.

Y Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use X01 ,tiau?aN f
"'rte
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA sectionll?
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-2112136.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFOI (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFOI (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PFOI, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WO 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
/Z%
?- /
T. Li Y Riddick, Jr.
.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM

e r irv,
-?Ur?cs ci?au,. ?
ATER (QUALITY SECT'S"
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVENOR
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY

1f ? 6'F"I
NET XtiuS GRUU:
ATER guaiiTY SECT ,
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-211213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWQ
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
Of R-2112.

Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.
_P
Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-2112136.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PFO 1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PFO 1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PFO1/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PFO1, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
.,
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
T. Li y Riddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
J . .
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM

?. STATE o

,YETMNP S GRG,I

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVENOR
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-211213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWO
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.
*I, J -
• Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-211268.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wctland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft P1701/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PFOI, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
T. Lindsey Riddick, r.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
?'
i' arsr?rFo?
y r"„+
'2 C" 0 0
YETLANuS GROUP
ATE? quaurr sECnr STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVENOR
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-211213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWQ
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
O Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Y Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.
Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-211266.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PFO1/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PFO1, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality mitigation: is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
T. Li Y Riddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
. dIh .
J STATE o
?.ElLANDSGROU;
ATER QUALITY SECT'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVENOR
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-211213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWQ
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-21128B (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
A Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.

• Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-2112BB.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WE 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PFO1, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-sluub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
quality index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality mitigation: is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
Z?
?-
T. Li V Riddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF

Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
,. srArc o
L t_
55'ETLAN2GROUT ?
ATER QUALITY SECT:' STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVENOR
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-211213; Project No. 6.099002T, DWQ
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
J
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.
• Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-211266.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PFO1/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PFO 1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PF01, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WO 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
5475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
T. Li y Riddick, Jr.
V
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
0' IF
_T_ I , n
F .J-44 O Cl ?GJ
'?'ETL/%os` GROUF
ATER QUAL ITY SECT -
a ?. $TNF o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DAVID McCOY
GOVENOR SECRETARY
April 4, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Permit Application for the
Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin
County; TIP No. R-21126; Project No. 6.099002T, DWO
Project No. 960214, USACE Action ID Number 199601404.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to
relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in
Martin County (Figure 1). The department has broken the project
into two sections (for funding and construction scheduling
purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17,
north side of Williamston). However, a single permit was issued for
both sections.
Please reference the Department of the Army Permit issued July 2,
1996 and the subsequent application for renewal made January 25,
2000. Since that time, the NCDOT has been informed by telephone
that the referenced certification had expired and that a new
application would be required in order to construct the BB section
of R-2112.
w
Additionally, the NCDOT has been notified that North Carolina Power
will need to relocate several utility lines before construction can
begin. No relocations will be conducted in jurisdictional areas.
However, N. C. Power will need to clear a 30-foot right-of-way
corridor through a small amount of jurisdictional wetlands. All trees
will be hand cut using chain saws at or near 6" of the ground. No
stumps will be removed. All wood and debris will be removed from
the site. This work is detailed in the attached letter from N. C.
Power. It is also depicted in the attached permit drawings.
Additionally, a full size plan sheet is included for informational
purposes.
The Department has previously received authorization to
impact 5.43 acres of 404 wetlands for the BB section. Mitigation for
the 5.43 acres of riverine impacts has been provided by debiting
27.15 acres (5:1) from the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site.
However, mitigation requirements have changed since the original
permit was issued. The NCDOT is now required to meet the 1:1
restoration requirement. Therefore, to provide 5.43 acres of
restoration the NCDOT offers the following proposals:
Debit 5.43 acres from Vann Swamp Mitgation Bank. The
NCDOT is currently developing the prospectus for the MBI
for this site located near Plymouth in the Roanoke Basin
Coastal Plain. It is approximately 4500 acres with about 1500
acres of potential wetland restoration. The site has been
purchased by the Nature Conservancy and will be managed
by the WRC. The objective will be to restore the area from
pine plantation to a hardwood wetland community by
removal of the extensive drainage system and replanting of
appropriate tree species.
Debit 5.43 acres from Riverbend Mitigation Site. The
Riverbend site will provide approximately 60 acres of
riverine restoration in the Piedmont Region of the
Roanoke Basin. A hydrologic analysis is being conducted, to
be followed by a mitigation plan.
Debit 5.43 acres from the Grimesland Mitigation site is
located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort County line. It will provide approximately 50
acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of
preservation cypress-gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8
acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site.
Purchase credits from WRP for770.0 feet of stream impact
and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.
The NCDOT asks that careful consideration be given to each
potential mitigation option. There are no other clear mitigation
options. Furthermore, additional delays will deny the public the use
of a facility that is still expected to be built on a reasonable schedule.
The previous authorization also included the R-2112BA section.
Impacts to wetlands in the R-2112BA section totaled 34.53 acres. All
work has been completed in these areas and Section BA is now
complete. Table 1 details impacts associated with R-2112613.
Table 1. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2112BB: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 420.0 ft PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 350.0 ft PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PFO1 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Total 5.43 770.0 ft
Note: Values given are in acre(s); PF01, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous; SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a
composite score based upon its opportunity to perform each of the
functional attributes and its presumed effectiveness (based upon
field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute. Functional
attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most
important among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality
and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is
positioned in the landscape to receive surface flows from the
adjoining landscape or from overbank flooding of adjacent
streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression ?
(score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography
of site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent
upon ground water (and rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS
1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream system, or inputs
from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape
to intercept surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or
other development, and does it display suitable topography and
vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ? (score,
WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and
without topographic relief to hold particles and toxins ? (score,
WO 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage ditches from
farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken,
riparian corridor which provides opportunity for the movement
of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5, depending on how much
fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy and
understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system? (score
WH 1-3, depending on whether community is fragmented and to
what extent)
The Department of Transportation is planning to let this
project to contract as soon as all necessary permits are received.
Therefore, there is a sense of urgency in this request. Reacquiring
the necessary permits is critical. By copy of this letter, application is
also made to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for a
Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A check in the amount of
$475.00 is attached to cover the processing fee. The NCDOT
appreciates any assistance in this matter. If you have questions or
concerns, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
1
T. Lim Y Riddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. R. E. Capehart, PE, NCDOT
Mr. C. W. Bridgers, PE NCDOT
Mr. W. D. Gilmore, PE, NCDOT
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Sarah Winslow, NCDMF
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
STAYr
yd M+'A
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
March 29, 2000
Mr. Ron Ferrell
Wetland Restoration Program
Division of Water Quality
Mail Service Center 1619
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
U
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY

V,P.R 3 1 2ii)
y!" `TLAO G799F
',ER QUALITY SECTION
Re: Mitigation for Completion of the Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138, South of
Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of Williamston; Martin County; TIP No. R-211213;
Project No. 6.099002T, DWQ Project No. 960214.
`f 0 0
Dear Mr. Ferrell:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) requests that the Wetland
Restoration Program (WRP) perform stream and wetland mitigation for the proposed completion
of US 64, from US 17 south of Williamston, to US 13-17, north side of Williamston in Martin
County. Stream impacts for the project are 1250.0 ft. in Hydrologic Unit 03010107 of the+
Roanoke River Basin. These impacts require (2:1) mitigation totaling 2500.0 ft. to satisfy
permitting requirements of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USA E) and the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Wetland impacts are 5.43 acres of PFO1 Riverine wetlands
«itliin the Roanoke River basin. These impacts will only require 1:1 restoration as required by
Division of Water Quality. The balance of wetland mitigation las been previously been
pro% idcd through the preservation of 27.15 acres of riverine wetland,, at the Huskanaw Swamp
Mitigation Site.
PA
RE
IOQDN `gd `jTUTloduD •g -d
IOQDN `gd `aauuoY2i 'Cl
OAW `XauaoQ uTlof 'IN
HDvsfl `llag 31-m 'slN :oo
Ilouu.Tg stsXlnud luluauruoIlnug puu luowdolanaQ 133Co.zd
aaOuunIN Tlouulg "FI'd `alouzl!D -Q LU-01 M
`Alamouls
-IaIlnuT sTTI1 ui uolln.Tadooo tnoX zoj noX xuutU -LL6L-Z8t (ZSZ)
In xoippr-d Xospui-j -.iN jouluoo osuold `uotluuuojui luuoil!ppn paau io suotlsanb Xuu annTl noX jI
'gDVSfl.lo flag o)IIW '.iW Pu LOQDN of paHcuzgns soidoo
ip?m `OMQ 30 X3uloCI uqo f -aW of passa.Tppu ag plnoils iaHal snlZ -ZOQDN Xq paasonbai :Bonn
uolIu311TUT aril aplnoid of ,,?4Tligu pun ssouguilpm, jpigj 3uiluorpuT dUAt 3141 uwaJ 11131 luuuOJ
L, saztnbai ( ')MQ 3qj `pauuodZad ag lliM u011uORTUI JUT saoumnssu faolulnBaa Xplus of japio ui
-uoTjujuauzaldurT pun 2uiuuuld jo sisoo ;)ql aanoo of pauuojiad uotjuOillw punllann
p!w ureans jo looj .Tnauil .Tad SZ1$ jo junouzu OT uT &IAY
3o aTou/000`tZ$ PUL, Pauuojiad u0110
of spun] .T33suuia ii?^X LOQON `bMQ wOJJ uopvogploo Xilluno jojuM lot, aql jo Idpow uodfl
(IO3d) £b'S (I Odd) £b'S O'OOSZ O'OSZI LOIOIO£O
(ou) paicnbad CID
uocTu211!w sToudwl pannbaj (I:Z) ('8) slat!dwl
Puu[TaM puulTaM uoiTu511!w wua.gs T!ufl a?'o1olPXH
gg ZI IZ-,d loj spaaN uorjuOTj!W puu sloudwI jo olgul
-uoTju5TjiuT paIsanboi puu sloudwi sozinurums olgui Bumolloi Oqj `nnaina.T ajnjilionj 01
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC, 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
r
April 11, 2000
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed relocation of US64 from SR 1138, south of Everetts to US 13-17, Martin County (TIP R-
21121313).
WQC Project No. 000505 COE ID 199601404
' Martin County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3281 issued to The North Carolina Department of
Transportation dated April 11, 2000.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Attachments
000505.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Sincerely,
xf,
l?err . Steven
i
1
wetlands/401 Unit 1021 Mad Service Censer Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1631
"rclcphone 919-733-17S6 FAX [phone]
.wt Euuai Opportunity Affirmative :Action Emp!oyer ?G:c rc:•? ciec.tiiir post consumer paper
,
7
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. This certification authorizes the NCDOT to place fill material
in 5.43 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 770 linear feet of streams in Martin County. The project shall
be constructed pursuant to the application filed on the 4`h day of April 2000 to the relocation of US 64 from
SR 1138 south of Everetts to US 13-17 north of Williamston.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of Sweetwater
Creek and associated tributaries in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation
of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina
certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL
92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in
the Public Notice. Should your project change, you are required to notify the DWQ and submit a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you are required to comply with all the
conditions listed below. In addition, you should obtain all other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the
most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land
Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices) shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of
the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not
designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10
NTUs in trout waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands
and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division
of Land Resources has released the project;
3. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a FONSI
or ROD is issued by the State Clearinghouse;
4. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
5. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters
associated with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or
borrow sites be located in wetlands or stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is
a direct impact from road construction activities.
6. Compensatory mitigation shall be done for 5.43 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 770 linear
feet of streams. We understand that you have chosen to perform mitigation through an in lieu
payment to the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (NCWRP), and that the WRP has
agreed to implement mitigation for the project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R.0500, the
contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h). Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made
payable to DENR - Wetland Restoration Program), wetland or stream till shall not occur. Mr.
Ron Ferrell should be contacted at 919-733-5083 ext. 358 if you have any questi. ,i,s concerning
the Wetland Restoration Program. The payment to NCWRP shall be sent within two months of
issuance of the 404 permit.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions
are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or Coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification
shall expire upon the expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written
petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an
original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this
Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 4`° day of April 2000
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
?J
evens
WQC No. 3281
NORTH CAROLINA - DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, the North Carolina Department of Transportation is authorized to
impact the surface waters of the State of North Carolina as indicated below for the purpose of constructing
the relocation of US 64 from SR 1138 south of Everetts, to US 13-17 north of Williamston in Martin
County (TIP No. R-2112BB, DWQ No. 000505). All activities associated with these authorized impacts
must be conducted in accordance with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter.
THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WETLAND RESTORATION:
LOCATION: Improvements to US 64 from SR 1138 south of Everetts, to US 13-17 north of
Williamston in Martin County
COUNTY: Martin
BASIN/SUBBASIN: Roanoke, Cataloging Unit
DWQ No.: 000505
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate
for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and
surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade waters of the
state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be
rounded to one-quarter increments according to 15A 2R.0503(b).
5.43 acres of Class WL wetlands
5.43 acres of riparian wetlands
0.0 acres of non-riparian wetlands
0 acres of Class SWL wetlands
770 linear feet of stream channel
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through
payment of a fee to the Wetland Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option,
please sign this form and mail it to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice
for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE
ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR
PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
P.O. BOY 29535
RALEIGH, NC, 27626-0535
[phone]
Date
01/25/2000 14:47 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 19197339959 NO.686 901
I

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION ONE OFFICE
P. O. BOX 830
EDENTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27932
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX NUMBER [phone]
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: ITIME:
TO. 44. 'L ?L9?-C4?7 PHONE:
FROM: X d PHONE:
Numhor of pagos including cover sheet, 3

Tt
l
GCS C»'S
~?t4l
D'
P.9assag©
01/25/2000 14:47 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 19197339959 NO.686 D02

STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT M.
GOVENOR
January 25, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field office
P. 0. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Section 404 IndIVIdual permit imnewal application
for the Proposed Relocation of US 6A from OR 1138,
South of Eiveretts, to US 13.17, Worth Slide of
williamston; Martin CountV; TIP rio. n-211213; Project
trio. 6.0990027
The North Carolina Department of Transportation was Issued a
permit to relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and
Wllllamston in Martin County (USAC6 Action ID Number 199601404).
The department has broken the project into two sections (for
funding and construction scheduling purposes), identified as R-
21128A (Everetts to US 17, south of Wllliamston) and R-2112BB (US 17,
south of williamston, to US 13-17, north side of williamston). A single
permit was Issued for both sections. Construction of R-2112BA has
been completed.
Construction of R-2112 BB is currently scheduled for April of
2000. However, the Department of the Army authorization for this
project expired on December 31, 1999. Therefore, the department
requests that authorization to construct this project be renewed.
Mitigation has been provided for projects R-21128A and R-21128B at
the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, the Mildred Woods Mitigation
Site and the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site. The project has not
changed since the original permit was issued. Since this project (R-
P. O. Box 850 Edonton, NC 27932 [phone] FAX: [phone]
01/25/2000 14:47 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 19197339959
r
NU. bbb LOU,)
211268) Is scheduled for a April 2000 construction letting, the
department respectfully requests that the authorization renewal be
issued at the soonest possible opportunity. By copy of this letter,
the NCDOT also requests that the North Carolina Division of Water
duality renew the Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Project No.
960214).
If you have questions or comments, please don't hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
- -f -- /tom
T. binds Iddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, NCDOT Coordinator
Ms. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms. Sara WlnslOw, DMF
Mr. Bill Gilmore, PE
Mr. Bob Capehart, PE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of En in*
Post Office Box 1890 k,;..
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ?^:.,,,
Action ID No. 199601404
PUBLIC NOTICE
April 27, 2000
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT), DIVISION
OF HIGHWAYS, Post Office Box 850, Edenton, North Carolina 27932 has applied for a
Department of the Army (DA) permit to FILL 5.43 ACRE OF SECTION 404 RIVERINE
WETLANDS and 770 LINEAR FEET OF PERENNIAL WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
ADJACENT TO UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES OF SWEETWATER CREEK. THE NCDOT
PROPOSES TO RELOCATE 2.4 MILES OF US HIGHWAY 64 FROM US 17, SOUTH OF
WILLIAMSTON TO US 13-17, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILLIAMSTON, BETWEEN
EVERETTS AND WILLIAMSTON, IN MARTIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, TIP NO.
R-2112BB, STATE PROJECT NO. 6.099002T, DWQ PROJECT NO. 960214.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and
from observations made during a site visit by a representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans
submitted with the application show that the NCDOT proposes to relocate 2.4 miles of US
Highway 64 and construct a four-lane divided freeway from US 17, south of Williamston, to US
13-17, on the north side of Williamston, between Everetts and Williamston.
Adverse impacts to these wetlands located in the Roanoke River Basin result from
mechanized landclearing and the discharge of fill material into 5.43 acres of riverine, palustrine,
broad-leaved deciduous wetlands and 770 linear feet of perennial stream channel. These
wetlands are adjacent to unnamed tributaries of Sweetwater Creek. The median width for the
highway will generally be 60 feet, except through certain wetland crossings where the median
width will be reduced to 46 feet in order to minimize jurisdictional impacts to surface waters and
adjacent wetlands.
NCDOT debited 27.15 acres of riverine bottomland hardwood wetlands (5:1 preservation
ratio) from Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation site when the project was initially authorized on July 2,
1996. In order to compensate for the unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands described in
this Public Notice, NCDOT has proposed two options. The first involves debiting 5.43 acres
from the Grimesland Mitigation site located in the Tar-Pamlico Coastal Plain region near the Pitt
and Beaufort county line and submit payment to the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) for the
770 linear feet of stream channel impacts. The Grimesland Mitigation site will provide
approximately 50 acres of riverine restoration/creation and 300+ acres of preservation cypress-
gum swamp on the Tar River. About 8 acres have been constructed with a mitigation plan
available for the entire site. The second mitigation option is for NCDOT to purchase credits
from the VW for 770 linear feet of stream channel impact and 5.43 acres of wetland impact.

2
The purpose of the work is to facilitate the completion of the NCDOT Intrastate Corridor
Program for US 64. This program will eventually result in the construction of a four-lane
highway from Raleigh to the Coast of North Carolina. A site map is included with this public
notice. A copy of this public notice can be viewed on our web page at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil or at the following offices:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6512 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27889-1000
[phone], Extension 24
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Division
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
[phone]
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Mr. John Dorney
By phone only: [phone]
The applicant has determined that the proposed work is consistent with the North Carolina
Coastal Zone Management Plan and has submitted this determination to the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) for their review and concurrence. This proposal
shall be reviewed for the applicability of other actions by North Carolina agencies such as:
a. The issuance of a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ).
b. The issuance of a permit to dredge and/or fill under North Carolina General Statute 113-
229 by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM).
c. The issuance of a permit under the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) or their delegates.
d. The issuance of an easement to fill or otherwise occupy State-owned submerged land
under North Carolina General Statute 143-341(4), 146-6, 146-11, and 146-12 by the North
Carolina Department of Administration (NCDA) and the North Carolina Council of State.
1
3
e. The approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Land Quality
Section, North Carolina Division of Land Resources (NCDLR), pursuant to the State
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NC G.S. 113 A-50-66).
The requested Department of the Army (DA) permit will be denied if any required State or
local authorization and/or certification is denied. No DA permit will be issued until a State
coordinated viewpoint is received and reviewed by this agency. Recipients of this notice are
encouraged to furnish comments on factors of concern represented by the above agencies directly
to the respective agency, with a copy furnished to the Corps of Engineers.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army (DA) permit
will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and
reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as
required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein, and this site is not registered property or property listed as being
eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent
of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the
presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or
historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed
activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue this permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public
interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public
interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be
balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a
proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore
determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the
L'
4
national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof.
Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands,
cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with
Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral
needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States,
a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not
comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the
preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless
the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will not
be made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers
whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of the Army (DA)
permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), Wetland/401 Unit, 1621 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621, on or before May 12, 2000, Attention:
Mr. John Dorney.
1
5
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Mrs. Jean B. Manuele, until 4:15 p.m., May 12, 2000, or telephone
[phone], Extension 24.
,? Williamslan
UD7
I?
S.-1,s..i Everelfs - r
N
r 1
! A"Ir. J

Noll I""
1 arNll.. 1H A L ll3r n=3

V ? 1 1t '?
r p1.ww/ A

n, 9 r".1.... q
CIO q pool 4

LEI
,tlN{aa R-2312 A R -112 BB

A
1 ? ?-`

??? Mfiill{?? 6.01,10 7

J,P, TAfIOR 5.0940027

I.f[1AIt, 1.A!!

J
. SR 1 L38 SOUTH OF EVERETTS TO US 17 SOUTH OF WILtIILWSTON TO

n ? r
US 1T SOUTH Of WIL MAIIII 17S 13-17 RoRTH SLOE OF VML1ut5TOK

v:
sl
'« r
+
^ MARTIN / OIV_ 1 MARTIN / N_ 1
1 _ r
c? 6.5 miles / 90.4 ttm 2.4 Miles / .640 Km «w.
w 91 ,; / ivs T r WRNK T Gi
v,
-`` "ow •; ?.Tutor n"Cp1111 Gm
o .. ,I t . (Two V:+'

r i7mston\ go }

;1117a1tT 6111

?..?
- ?-
' 1 WASh ,
I cwt
?
M if
N
c11NasT Wrl.tar. (t.tllp
:? r PAN"
I. Gr
l
' 19
/\u01Ms , T
T 3 t
Yq,wll.la f0 / " I 1
' w.pvx.
' '
1
r
?
?

? all

1
-
-
f
•
I /FIIII 1 - 17 Pi". Resa =

? T
{Ya1M 1
T
{ r I

0
OIQ F
Ayr
f1 /
M
t t7 rf?j 1 metal«s a
11CM1, J
1ao G 1
1 St"IMfaw r . ,? "top
,« IvI1.f + \ 1 * I .6 1 Coo ?bac«MN,
'*
b
/
'
y talMlr? ?ITtltrl } r Nw '
.w
w.
?.e
?++rrwrrff??«?r
0 Eww 1 t r + G. .Y. _
rau{ena ? ? • r•?
l914 4- Llf ?. , «. 11 6190C1aY?rhh' ??;, R a te. d

?.I.r.1..

IISwa;11.
Art1t+T1 :. 34 a

i 1 b?
M.YO ,Hlt
r
I oldsbo`ra fomw w p
'
2
7 t , ? ?
'
_ - , ? I ?tat.lt GIw1 ?
`
ut:u
R
o-.n? 1 ...IIIY1. O
.ti r Y.rlgOara
G
?
? EO«a{ 1 QM Y
4
i`
?
!:' 11{Ulr owa1
? i
, f rne.M I RI)r,l Q ? ?
'
s
1 GI,{ 1
t
,
iq
• ,
`
11
/ <

{ CS{ wrr •a
"
1 1tt
f 11
?a. VICINITY MAP
I s
L E 1 N 0 1

AIOrI
1 c
Ipw.
r' N

DEPT
KC
OF TRANSPORTATION
9 .
.
DMSIDN OF MITI 4YS
I t, ,
c••• 'I`
,...qWl. / ` • „? IMAM
? MARTIN COUNTY
,%' • PROJECT C099002T - R-0112B
PASS
64 9Y
U
S
-
.
.
0 9 18
SHEET A- OF ? iJL JANUARY 199[1
SCALE IN MILES
ZZ~ __ f { a t<>"-Z
O
C D ? ? Z Z O $4"'T ... Z
c. cn
o _ v c?
-ZZ
p ? HD L
?f rrrQ `t -,
? A r; W
r r?
r r
T
T
r r
14 n
5 R A S IV
I M TH '.INSTALLATION e
F :cr
I I ?
Le)
H
1 1 1 l
/2.EL60WS z
Ln T F
LL
tri
. z
0
PROP R/W 1 y
47" WW FENCE
ttl ??ZTDE-t' f.
45
F ? Z
ZZ C>F?+0
z
<?' < ?TzcF
vc n .??- Z --of- u
z
I= 0
U p ZC D p
z?
0
O :a
V C C
b
Z cA
Z O .
O ?
Q t?1 d m I o
J N l+J I -K
J N U N
LA- F- In
N Z
< C? I
U N 'o
CL
w y•
Cc,
LU CD
O O Z /
.i
' +i _ N Lrn /
O < ?= / °2
U W / H
O
F
.00 41
• ''' I
' I
3 000\
' I
--------------- -
46

J T
CD z
c0>
! F
U C
- z
0 L)
° I
L'1 I
G I
o ?
.. I
I
I
I 3
I m
CL Li
o, \
\

'
v'
O >-
y Q
?
- cpi Q'
zz
... o??.nc
P z
= Z C
z-0O -U
V c:. a <=u-= 0
l To

i
a c. Ca
l
C
-'
?
?
n o z
c, " o
-? F
o zC`° c
o
0? L)
'
! c o o

Q O C C
V G G c.`
U

' I
o
I
?
!
1
I D.,:z
I
1
I n
N

I N. h

to ,
- 1
_ ?od
Noo
,, a
?. <
F
o S d? z
L40 III
<
-j
" o I
0
CL_
?U I
Q? I
47
F-
zzz
V U
U C
Z
= O
D
?z
O
V
a
v
z
44 1// CC

1 0
1 3
1
1
1
1
11
dop
?•• 5t7 9
I
I
I
I
Q I
I
z °
o
O
C
< ?
C
cn c
v
?z
? oaNo z
7 C =Z=
E"
o
' .
.? Z UOE= '
Z
Q
L <
L)
E OZc C
V Z
a v p ZC?
U ?
O

A t
A
d p ...
U p G C L-1
Z
i
i
o v, ? I
cn I Lu O
CL Zo Q)
LAJ
Ll-
M V
Q

W :
M

1% n I r? S Q
0
i N it

z

3
LLJ
I
Z 2
C)
I
N z
0
m ?
?
,
I Q

N N

I F

O
N
Q
J N
ED
?r 2
w

.?
0
I p

48

F
V
Z Z
C 2
U
L'
L C
_ Z
°o
?Z
? O
v
c
0
1 ANDS, .
`

Z

- j /f ?
Q p Z N
F- O z L•:
Z
`
i
C N N O
? I.-
Z

Z z C)
N Q N
LLJ
LA
La.
O Z N M \? J Z N
v L
w Q ~ -
-_ w-- ' p

V ?
I
__ - JN ?
v

. ? t ZUc O ?
CIS

aL -
OzQF
o
°-
°
? G c
a
F'
U O ..9
of ? .
• - ? >_ -, c
' ~ U C o v

-I~
N N
,I,
t?i• M L WO

H I N • _ - ar

`" t
D N
)
p I?, ?S, l V \ C
L
Uj
1
t'I w
I

cow I,• INN
49

z z
U
U F
Le)
Z
G O
Z G
Z
c O
G?
G
0
i
?d
r r?
d

Imo.
V
2
W
Z
O
L

c
?? nz
C 3 ?• cr O
ZZC E- Z
C ?
o

_ C
a=
/ -- G O
C

1 Zzz
e
at
• LL. M ? a
v? o U
O
i-n
1 N .I
I
? I
? I
558
I

0
n
0
0
h
a
Z
F
Z
Z
a
F
O
Z
m
a
52
a
Z
ZZ i? LD ???ci0 Z
O
/ s ?l v C? O C •?s
` Z -•OF U
UC m !• UcO"r
OU?
do
20 Cl-
E-
c \ cr- UO aG V
\ w Z
z
.r ? Z
C)
.?J CD
u?
0
O
w ? Q
. / \ O U
• • . WETLANDS Q o
! + + .? Z
1S8 = + ZZ:
E.CIS Riti ! _ - O
fit
53
a
V
zz
U
C O
O U
T
r1
L O
0

T 1 .

.
a
•.
Q Q
a

e

• ? al o a ._ ?
I / z

? C O
e Z Z yE..,n O
I
W
4 I r? ZzOF?
U C4 C)
C O Z
r.os J' E..
?. ' `
o C =

? ? U
~ O 2= C p
le C Fo V p
$ ti u b 2 _ C' ?y ?""
3 060,' Y , o a O C V
>` U G G La

SLS
? o
3, 0 0
p .r
N h W
? G
Y fN
V yW ?W
, 240.
------
r w -
S?
_ ? r` Cr b ?l Q ?
Z, 0
Y O W I Q
N y,• 1
? r
tti ?Q.
?I
I
/ I
jo0e
1
Goa, • ? ?
C
Z
Q
H
• ?. r L„ W Jj
o S
O ?
_¢`
4,19:1'
T
T %6S •\'? L
:L v,
c = = j z -cc a s-
r
N
r
r yt ? ?
54

z
o L
? o
M?•d ti / ! p
z z
•Si? / O C !?•`V 7-
zz oaE-No
G
U C Z -Un UO "W
~Z? / / // / ? u? DF FOZcC=..
zcz?
%. U
rn / b I I Z
W

.moo _
?\`
f In

z
O N
Ln z
??E--- )
N
-j V)
/ WW
Z ,
O ?
O
C .Pl1
n
U o
0
P
P

c:.
O
L`
Z
0
z
F
m
Z
C.
cza
O
z
s? 1 NN
W 1 Qh-

Z
JN , i
ON Z 1
i
WW
cn O 1 4,
Ln
uui
m
0
57
LL.
O
Z
W
~ 2
a: p 3 I
C
uii < C9
r F-
LL.
(] Li \ a_ a O 0
i J N \ LL1 p
U W Q C:j o z z g z m y
N L- I ? 4a m 0
to 0 "t O z Lj- CD C14
?
MtwN 4'O I z~ O Ucn
(I N III Q N
_J N M ..?..F+•.... 2 Q W W
Q SON
dy? ! CJ w3
Z ? ` •\``y,-7 1 :. ,. `? 1 ?1 III ?'/? ??! ? •?
1
USN
F- - t 11 J
U
4 ? 1J1 ° uj ? ? W =gym =
Q d o -J
u1 ifs
O
1, \ Q Q m '10\
ti \ \ ?:r i/, N LaJ p 1
co 1?1 w N W
LL, LU
Z JNO J bz? ? ? ? ` 4
I
Q O W
t77 ? p ?. ? I M ? i
N n \? Q', O w Q - 'Z
I ? a 1? ? H
C\j
? H
O?N(Z)4?
\j Qj
oLoNNpN K
tu
es C- _ J
s?
LL
2
C
O LL
Z
W
+ •f } L
rr Z O LL
?
W
-C 0 LL
z z C13 LL
O
Q of m
V C) ?D N
/ ? ? (? z ? U)
wo C4
CP ?? r ?? - Z Q W
in cz
QY i V ' ' 7 ? l 1.
co CC)
/ ? -Y9- +3a ?? y? •a
Q4.15 W -? n r o .
V 4 or ` p 'aq7
U-1 LO
LL Q)
ow \v?? CL L
\ tJ to irk ? ?-• N T ? ?- O
N N O? Q
liJ F- _
Q F- W Lu Q Ul f
I UW a°p Q-? p
f CD !- W „ Z LLIZ
? t
N W r 1 u
J i cnwcn ??-v, c
a OWN:
11 v 1 fn N rn C14
goo
1 11 v, `a w 3 z
E
Z t1J
Q
n N
w
Q p0 in 1.L Q c
rZ In ° 0 v
co LLJ
o /r N w
u u ?' + //r W cn
1 co N r/,
q J J V) ?. o W g-? aN b t?
Z 00 Q° p o o cv o o E
` V LLI + Z
O p0 N ? a
Li < r- 2D.
CC)
a3 C)
Q) 0
?C N N
?/
o?Q- Q-
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
} 4 ?l?jt P.O. BOX 1890
3 ^' WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO April 26, 2000
0 0 05 c ----
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199601404
APR 2 7 2t Tl'
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of ! -W TLA_IiDS G10U,
Environment and Natural Resources ' .'ATER QUALin SEC`
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Dear Mr. Domey:
Enclosed is the application of North Carolina Department of Transportation for
Department of the Anny authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to impact surface
waters associated with unnamed tributaries of Sweetwater Creek. The proposed project will
involve the mechanized landclearing and the proposed discharge of fill material into 5.43 acre of
riverine, palustrine broad-leaved deciduous wetlands and 770 linear feet of perennial streams.
The NCDOT proposes to relocate 2.4 miles of US Highway 64 and construct a four-lane divided
freeway beginning at US Highway 17 south of Williamston and extending northeast to its
tenninus with US 13-17 on the east side of Williamston, between Everetts and Williamston,
Martin County, North Carolina, TIP No. R-21121313, State Project No. 6.099002T. Your receipt
of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with
Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, and we have detennined that a water quality certification is required under the
provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted
until the certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a
request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on
the request, or asked for an extension of time, by June 26, 2000, the District Engineer will deem
that waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mrs. Jean B. Manuele, Raleigh Field Office,
telephone number, [phone], Extension 24.
Sincerely,
E. David Franklin
Chief, NCDOT Team
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
2
APPLICATION FOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
OMB APPROVAL No. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of Information Is estimated to average 5 hours per response, Including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of Information. Including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington
Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204,
Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (07100003),
Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be
submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activities In, or
affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge or fill material Into waters of the United States, and the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping It Into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this
form will be used In evaluating the application for a permit Disclosure: Disclosure of requested Information Is voluntary. If
Information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be Issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must
be attached to this application (see sample drawings and Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that Is not completed In full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION
?gq?o?yoy y Np,r aooo COMPLETED
ao c? MOO
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE
(an agent is not required)
N.C Department of Transportation D. R. Conner, P. E. Division Engineer-Division One
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
P. O. Box 850
Edenton, NC 27932
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/ AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOS. W/ AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
hereby authorize, . to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental Information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (seo Instructions)
R-2112BB
U.S. 17 South of Williamston to US 13-17 north side of Williarnston
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOW (if applicable)
Tributary to Sweetwater Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Martin NC
County
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
State
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
17. DIRECTIONS TO SITE
See application package
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
road construction
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, sea Instructions)
To Improve safety and traffic flow on US 64, fulfill legislative mandate to include US 64 in the Intrastate Highway System
and to bring US 64 up to Intrastate Highway Standards.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/ OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for discharge
Road construction
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
See application package
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
5.43 acres wetlands and 770.0 linear feet of surface waters.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes X_ No
IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK.
Section BA as permitted In the July 2, 1996 Individual Permit Issued by the USACE.
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can
be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
See application package
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/ Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agents for Work
Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE OF IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE DENIED
APPROVAL' NUMBER
USACE Ind. Permit 199601404 Feb. 29, 1996
NCDWQ 401 Cert. 960214 Feb. 29, 1996
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify
Y&k orma tion in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to
he work described here' or a acting as the agent duly authorized agent of the applicant.
q loo
:J? q1 S ATURE OF APPLICANT AT SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it
may be signed by a duly authorized agent If the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that Whoever, In any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or
agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, schema, or
disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or respresentations or makes
any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry,
shall be fined not more than $10,000 or Imprisoned not more than five years or both.

J r1a
w I I16RlS?a f1

ltd

S.w,ttai Evflrelll
- r `
\3
N +,
f 1`"t? J 54

..r, .. ' :all

«UI?,MII
fiats
7 - fia, 1N A L lu• n?
` /
! ?jItM1.11
tar . ,•..1 -?• r 7p 71

?t
!
?
f Mwlu?A 11
n{ c..• «.cs7 ?
l
{t
f LET 2 11.113
l
•
lQa
«« 0 M 1 R- 11 A R-2112 6a
.

Olr
1 6.OS9002T
JP. TAriQt MCIAU-021
/.r[MI( UR ?
J
SR 1178 SOUTH OF EYfRETTS TO US 17 SOUTH OF WLt1AUS7CN TO

w
^? US 11 SOUTH OF 1rLUWSTOtt US 13-11 NQRTN SIDE OF rUILLISMIC
ta.
a r MARTIN / Of Y. 1 MARTW / N. 1
- .? .
CAR
,"s / 10.1
6.5 W
9M 2 A Ides / .1110 K-
Walling
a
txa.?. ^aaru• 1
:I
{{ra{OM 't •Tr 2c• cae ,, f
ETI• t 1?" - 17R(.TjpA\ I{In i•tPaua at
4 WASh
UAIGAV 1 Q."
1 rIM10/r OrTlr{I
M N

hlriuL
t 11 1\ _ / +
1 lost Guc w..w + \.
004w .
4W 4?_
?
Ill
?
? ..
1
t
/INU..
j 1 r?uumeT
?-
Q
7w1«INn Ito"

r 1
was
Olir
e
T
?
,
Nli r
acit ,2 ,{A a
Ir.cselrf
-
?Inti ^?•
? i1
afJ+ll{ Ito cl to Il;!
1114111 =1 Ile,. L 1 1 AC1 Teas p`?1,?•OIwNe
* Cat I

..! tle•1
11 /c..: P l
i
l rd 4111"
T T
r
w
•.s ( 1 ll„w , el.«. If bwco-nwq
llaa#w IM
1 G`
:
1
? R kt
a
?
""
1
E
1
E
N .
. lam
ftPW4 Up
1 t
4
60111

+
N
ft
3
rte'
x
M
oldstarc
1 1 2 Cnllw . Gtfi "WON
17
Q. OM rrlll.to tir.
? 1 CWItx{ , C••t
?,
*?
Lwr
?
i I ?..«
K Ra11 Q
1
'
-y
G••t 7 ' I
T
r r?
1
?? `
11 1 Cr+.•..•.r.+
+ , ,
%
r
11 , 1?• ,
L E ' N 0 I rat
2, `fACIHITY IAAP
1
°aa0 a 1
214 / /
Afoul
' t two "a llif
KW "It f „" w
OF TRAWSKRTAT ON
DEFT
PLC
1 E? .
,
WS
HV'
RG
I
OMS
Oi
I?
OF
L
*/ ! ti . L+ jMAMM e?
V
??
I
?
p
Tf7
MAffM CQUt 1 1
PRgfECT 6,099002T - R-81128
PASS
Ba BY
S
-
U.
.
0 9 18
SHEET VOF la- JANUARY 199G
SCALE IN MILES
Sb
% - 4 3al
--33N.3-4 MM C3
?•
a --
<n
r
cr" ? r?
2 5 y
ul
o T TSM08?3' Z/ 1
H
M/d dOMd
• i
NOl1d-l-lt11SNl , H1 YV J- ?:`
Al Sv a 5 .I
u bl
0 0
r
_ f r
CA U 1 -I H
r ? ? O
00
.4 < l y
O n y .., 0 ?. 1 ?. . J` o r
4 .. • Z ^a
O rr„?yo4
C ? Z O ? 0 1 i• ,?` ?' ?
o ? - z
Z p ? ?
z N?? o z z
c z z z
.e - ?-? z
9b
-p \\825
i -
I - ,rig
v
Z '
% 12?
R7 /
r / m n
> cn r \
z
Un 40
/ N
l -4
o / O
C c^
a _ rrt
n
N
W G7 ? D
/ N (7 N r
0 1 ?. N r
o ?
z
N z --
z ? o
v
W
? o
o? ? Z"' y_ _ OC7
'OZ? rte. p ^? ai
C.. Q r.r z n.j 07 C
? y cn
z 2 zz3
C
? z ? =•3
C,
03
? 835 - `?
o ? -

c N
Z V,

.
!

.
• 'v'
LA S
z ?
' ?

z '\ \ I
V3

111 \

' ? \ 1 71

r1l

I
o I
I 0 24 I

I, .
I
- I

ti C
O
. ? ?
I
K
ny?
c
C) ` v y
c h
M-3ao?
? z°
C
v? (S'
r--..S C/)
_
-3 N
`- C G) cch
Y ' C i C- ?O c c-
z ?z= o a .. >

a a -.4 Y ? z0
?
o
Z -
;
c ,
C
,
8b

c ?- -r
-
?
? m P')
N
Z -.I
` •1 D
N N

Z
N
N
z I Z
M

Z I
v
? N

c1)
cr
O I
I
m ? VI
e O Dc;
5 lo o

11 t
CA a .A 1 m c7
v 1 N r
-? D
? 1
W N

L4 _
? n
Rl
?-
c n Z
rn INS
?,
D
rn Z
.

? n
oc d
LI1 o
?` ?
n
=
> o >
n
o o o
cCn n v -3
+ o < -?
0 :t
0 -3
C C
I a
T ^
"'3
^ Z Z
C O .
.,
1
Z

?. O
1 Z

i
I \
••C
845 .•
. 1
1
o `
0
v
L 1
I ?

?I
h?l
-e
? m
v?
o°v
z^
?n
nn
Z Z
n
r
-4
617
I (n r-
-1 D
' N? (n I
(n
-4 D O N`
Z
N
?n
•
'4 N I L4 N
w
- N O
Z
n

-. N N
A
-4
m
_
ONE c Z? _
i Oo
2 --I
N Z .? ?/

-?
r

? _-
> ?
Z
c
?

° • SONS ? ' ' ? '
• o o
I
• ? -73
I 7r
I
Js' u
I a
I ? r
cn- p ? '?? •?,I I
I
(m n
I- C)('!!?' o

o
Z (n4
z

11 4 3 ED
U2
• z
1

r

..• ,

J O
V
0
a
cs
-C
O?
v?
O C
cr
ZZ
C7
r
•-i
ZS
v
z
0
N
Z
a
z
v
N
n
U
O
O
0
a
0
855 i I
1 I I
I I I
jZ LA
I ' ? I °o "v
I n
co oI I
??
--4 D
NN I
N `_'______ r- < I
?, cZn-? - Q ' t • •
/ 0 1
ocn
Z (A :q
vn ?1\14?rIrJ?rlr?? _ 1
-? ~
> of
° I' • ND
Z N , 1?rlr?'11? Ir4;i I .,
•rJr?rlr? ? /
a O O C v ? /
Q y N f _ _ /
n
m
.Ifto
/'?>

j o N a
,??,
> ..3 z n?'•yn

a Z
p a c
' c
J
J Z
C?

1\1??1r I
I
S I s
l

LIT
0
C7
C7
O'
^7
Z
Iv=
O C
P n
?zz
?r
1 -?
ES
91
v
ca
Z
0
n
r
r
Z
Q
Z
O
r
--?? ? ??'??1Sra3
015•al =- ?SSq esr
O
•?.•?• .J
SONVii.
v .?
Ya
o
n - v to
CA o P-
r?
zz
cCn
cn Z
M 'o n
oo °c

Ap m > o
o z o
.,
?, ?
?
o Nn
? >
,
C-1 -?o -- z
>' Cc :n
_ --
z
>
c c >

C
??
.D z
D

m C)
cn r
-41..
N
N to
C--46
z N
N -4
O
z
m
??y \ o
T
Ftic? ?
W
D
W
W
O

NII

•1=
/
4

/j
1
f?
r

T\ j Y
0
Ivy
'cam
cs
?a
Z z
J
r'
VS
I
1 Q
- ; a ? 3 p? I O_ j
ool
;h A
••MVr/r t ??/? 2 _ ? M `? `t
U4 'A
v y
•?Ar? ? ?, ? 1- v Q ?? d A?Q \
C- If,
L }? 4 ^
-ir
?? M?a L ` V M I 4N ?O 1.
2A ii w
C . C .rNarMar4Or? • jr
a ?
Or/,Q /r •' ? ? v
%
?? ? ?r .
o • 0 ` ?? r? V
1
875
cn z
IT!
oc o• s ?. ??? o ..
?. z
o72
C p ?„ z p ;? o ? ? _ b
o
Z C)
r?? e /.
o :7 b IT
N n ^' C m i
'Ilk
a n- 3 O Z ?a \\ I 0 ?j
? C = Cn C' C' \ m N a r ? cr D
C ?? < Z Z , I I q? p D
0
Q
n
K
O
p '•3
O ?
C
zz
r
J
i
.:
LS
° Z-4
M / mc? I No
?D I z /
N
?co 1 •' ? (ter
z
m -
> i ' •.\
V1r // ? \

I ?
? O
1
Vl
s Z ?

en -

T
Z .\ /

°^-14?

O C ;=Zp r
N /

?
?
w
Z-p -3
°•
cn
- a
?o

'- c? -3 O •-• Z
>' C Q cn ..3 ?-
?- r a /
w S

/
O Z Z
> Z? ?>
.o Z

/
/
l+J
CG
b
0
a
;a
-e
0
Z
o°v
G ?
Z Z
O
r
7
-e•.?.r+?.T.,?___.:- .. ,. .. - ... ..?...??......... ?.. gyn.-- -- - - --' -
w
r
D
m
a
? D
D m
a
J ?
i H
H
n ?
n
a rn
r
b
7 Z
n c
c ? -o
?Sl? T
ca

h -o
7
? v
y ..
SNEER g - '• `\, .
I/
.
4,
ZOf

N.
'(C3

it U .. ?yr?pDb?
11 Co (.1) -c c
?N LO
Qj
^b -o '
Cl
C) b. d ?
O O D CU
Z ?
?2q. .ta
\kC
?// \ \Z9 ? N 0
m O
co
Ln CD
rr,
D o o N//,
L4 rn
L, co ~ m° m 01/1 A p ;rr. r- -n
.

• Loll 0

• ?' cn r*t

._
X
1 mom
0
0\
A- ? D
mom
m if.

?.an

N
m D
m ?
L C
0
O co A O
z
®n Co
1

NDS I

O I
X
o =
I
o
o ?
r
O v Z
? 0.. I
n >
a
Z .1
m
Z
O
T
N Ln 2
O.?`
(?3
1 0 'O
N, Ll
"" Q7 '-l Ln \ CO W
N W N
NrnW /
rri m Z m ,-`J-? co
^l om ?Nr
J mr v L, ?A
a o ?,. v .?, o co C) O
Let co ?>
D a N? p ? O y
z + o r,, O b
o oD O Z
?Z ANC p ° ?-
o
? ?B -> T a u 711 o
-'j -11 ur
-?-vn
-? N m I ?I/ \\ + n n n
m N ?,
D y
m cr,m v mo _ -{
Lmco n
=
7v F= „ -
N
p
P < j ,
P
i 1. ?mc-) Ch; / w
V) r-
n N W V) r W I
1 W _ I
n N m W ? ?
Z TZ? m-V) I
{D mc-) '
b n Ln p O (!f cn r
-/ In D m O m -I D
D 11 p C N N L/I
t
44 r- L-j
En Zt,
Q) Ul
C31 C7 Z n\ ??? /
Sp ,
••w D' 3• \ t7 6?
m D
M >
N C 2
n
O CO A O

,,?. _
cP V o RQ P a / /
J 7

LO co

o > o
O t 2 1
> ..
E5
N _m
H
T
n-a STATE .
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DAVID McCOY
GOVENOR SECRETARY
January 25, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. 0. BOX 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, PWS
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Section 404 Individual Permit Renewal Application
for the Proposed Relocation of US 64 from SR 1138,
South of Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of
Williamston; Martin County; TIP NO. R-21126; Project
No. 6.099002T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation was issued a
permit to relocate 8.9 miles of US 64 between Everetts and
Williamston in Martin County (USACE Action ID Number 199601404).
The department has broken the project into two sections (for
funding and construction scheduling purposes), identified as R-
2112BA (Everetts to US 17, south of Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17,
south of Williamston, to US 13-17, north side of Williamston). A single
permit was issued for both sections. Construction of R-2112BA has
been completed.
Construction of R-2112 BB is currently scheduled for April of
2000. However, the Department of the Army authorization for this
project expired on December 31, 1999. Therefore, the department
requests that authorization to construct this project be renewed.
Mitigation has been provided for projects R-2112BA and R-2112BB at
the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, the Mildred Woods Mitigation
Site and the Huskanaw Swamp Mitigation Site. The project has not
changed since the original permit was issued. Since this project (R-
P. 0. Box 850 Edenton, NC 27932 [phone] FAX: [phone]
. 4 -9 -
2112BB) is scheduled for a April 2000 construction letting, the
department respectfully requests that the authorization renewal be
issued at the soonest possible opportunity. By copy of this letter,
the NCDOT also requests that the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality renew the Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Project No.
960214).
If you have questions or comments, please don't hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
D. R. Conner, PE
Division Engineer
T. Linds Riddick, Jr.
Division Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, NCDOT Coordinator
Ms. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms. Sara Winslow, DMF
Mr. Bill Gilmore, PE
Mr. Bob Capehart, PE
?ondq Al??V`
?}ye.M SU ^. oil. '-
3
?a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201
February 29, 1996
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Smith
Chief, Northern Section
Dear Sir:
GARLAND B. GARRM J R.
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Section 404 Individual Permit Application for the Proposed Relocation
of US 64 from SR 1138. South of Everetts, to US 13-17, North Side of
Williamston; Martin County; TIP No. R-21128; Project No. 6.099002T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to relocate 8.9
miles of US 64 between Everetts and Williamston in Martin County (Figure 1). The
department has broken the project into two sections (for funding and construction
scheduling purposes), identified as R-2112BA (Everetts to'US 17, south of
Williamston) and R-2112BB (US 17, south of Williamston, to US 13-17, north side of
Williamston). However, a single permit application is being submitted for both
sections. The anticipated construction let dates for these two sections are June 1996
(R-2112BA) and, tentatively, January 1999 (R-2112BB). Immediately west of the
subject projects, improvements to US 64 from Tarboro to Everetts (R-2111 and R-
2112A) were previously permitted (Permit # 199400662) and are under construction.
Purpose and Need
In 1989, the North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 399,
establishing the North Carolina Highway Trust Fund. A portion of the funding allocated
through the Highway Trust Fund was designated for the establishment of an Intrastate
Highway System in North Carolina. Noting the importance of US 64 to regional travel,
commerce and overall economic development of northeastern North Carolina, the
General Assembly mandated that US 64 be included in the intrastate highway system,
and that the corridor be upgraded to a four-lane facility from Raleigh to the coast. The
General Assembly further specified that the new US 64 facility must be constructed as
a freeway with control of access between 1-95 and US 17 (DEIS, Sections S.1 and 1.0).
Furthermore, the project will fulfill the need identified in the thoroughfare plans of both
Robersonville (1984) and Williamston (1976) for a major east-west thoroughfare outside
of their respective city limits. Projected Level of Service (LOS) for most of the existing
US 64 roadway for the year 2010 is E or F (FEIS, Section 1.6.3):

Page 2
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
NEPA Documentation.
An EIS study was initiated by the department in July 1988 for the proposed
improvements to US 64 from SR 1302, west of Robersonville, to US 13-17 on the north
side of Williamston, a distance of approximately 17 miles. The project was designated
as R-2112. The DEIS was circulated for review on February 7, 1990 and the FEIS was
completed on April 30, 1992. The Record of Decision was approved October 30, 1992.
Alternatives Analysis
Preliminary Alternatives: The original study area (R-2112) was defined as
approximately 3+ miles wide by 16+ miles long from west of Robersonville to
Williamston (Figure 2). The DEIS for R-2112 identified five major preliminary build
alternatives (with numerous cross-over connectors) distributed north and south of
existing US 64 within this study area (Figure 3). Several non-construction
Alternatives, including the No-Build, the Transportation System Management
Alternative, and a Multi-Modal concept were also studied. Neither the Widen
Existing, nor the non-construction alternatives were found to be reasonable or
feasible.
No-Build: While the No-Build concept would result in the least damage to the
environment, it could not accomplish the mandated objective of providing a
multilane freeway (full control of access) facility. It was found that under the No-
Build scenario, Level of Service (LOS) would consistently decline until, by year
2010, nearly all segments of existing US 64 would experience LOS of E or F. Since
the stated purpose and need of the project is the establishment of a multilane
intrastate highway for improved traffic capacity and increased economic potential for
northeastern North Carolina, this alternative was eliminated from further study
(DEIS, Section 2.1).
Transportation System Management (TSM): This alternative evaluated low-cost
attempts to maximize the efficiency of the existing highway by examining the
potential for upgrading intersections, improved signalization and upgrading of
parallel and/or circumferential routes. It was determined that the lack of existing
potential circumferential routes precluded further consideration of a TSM remedy
(DEIS, Section 2.2).
• Multi-Modal Alternatives: Transportation concepts such as ride-sharing, satellite
parking, high occupancy vehicle lanes on existing roads and mass transit were
addressed, but since the proposed project is highly rural and such concepts have
been found to be effective only in urbanized areas with populations over 200,000,
this alternative was dismissed early in the DEIS study (DEIS, Sect!cn 2.3).
Page 3
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
Widen Existing: The widen existing alternative would result in large numbers of
relocated residences and businesses (100 and 20, respectively). In addition,
parking lots, a park, one cemetery and at least one historic structure would be
impacted by attempts to upgrade the existing roadway to a freeway design. In order
to maintain ingress and egress for homes and businesses along the freeway,
lengthy servile roads paralleling the existing facility would result in large disruptions
to communities and the environment. Widening of the existing facility to freeway
standards, even including bypasses of Everetts and Williamston would result in
additional impacts to the environment and would be highly expensive. (FEIS,
Section 2.4.1).
2. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives: The five preliminary study corridors, when
paired with study connectors, resulted in a total of 46 preliminary study routes.
Public hearings, steering committee guidance and further engineering study
resulted id narrowing these preliminary corridors to four major reasonable and
feasible alternatives with three connectors, which provide for variations to
two of the four basic corridors (Figure 4). The reasonable and feasible alternatives
include Northern (Segments A-A1), Middle (Segments B-B1-A1), Southern
(Segments C-B3-C1) and Composite (Segments B-B2-B3-B4). Specific details on
how these corridors were chosen for further study, and why other corridors were
rejected, can be found on pages 2-1 to 2-31 in the DEIS and Section 2 of the FEIS.
A comparison of anticipated environmental impacts for each of these reasonable
and feasible alternatives for R-2112B (Everetts to Williamston) is presented below:
Table 1. Comparison of Anticipated Environmental Impacts by R/F Corridors
ANTI CIPATED I MPACTS
Northern Middle Southern Composite Preferred
Costs (total in Smillions) 80.1 64.4 89.5 85.3 84.1
Relocatees
Residences 45 15 13 13 16
Businesses 6 0 0 1 1
TOTAL 51 15 13 14 17
Historic Properties" 0 0 0 0 0
Archaeological Sites 19 31 32 33 35
Churches/Cemeteries 3 0 0 1 0
Hazardous Sites 18 12 1 2 2
Wetlands (acres) 76 125 139 168 120
Stream Crossings 18 17 16 18 25
Biotic Communities (acres) 303 210 334 264 370
Prime Farmland (acres) 188 186 262 255 260
Total Farmland (acres) 248 222 300 255 346
Pic-tected Species 0 0 0 0 0
Note: Data shown is subset of data given in Table 2.3 in FEIS;* properties are listed, or
are candidates for listing in National Registry
Page 4
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
3. Recommended Alternative: Corridor Segments A-A3-B-B2-B3-C1-C2 were selected
as the preferred corridor for project R-2112 (Figure 5). Since R-2112A has been
permitted and is under construction, it is essential for the purposes of this
application to focus on the corridor segments from south of Everetts (east terminus
of R-21 12A) to US 13-17 in Williamston that would be feasible given the constraints
imposed by the permitted alignment of R-2112A. The recommended alternative
passes south of Everetts (B) and parallels existing US 64 to SR 1140, where the
corridor turns southward (132). South of SR 1126 the corridor turns eastward (133)
until it crosses US 17 where it turns northeastvrard (C1/C2), crossing US 64 enroute
to the project terminus at US 13-17. The reasons for selecting the preferred over
the other reasonable and feasible alternatives relate to: compatibility with purpose
and need, connectivity with R-2111 (and R-2112A), local preferences related to
improved access to the Martin County Municipal Airport, residential and business
relocations, wetlands and projected accident rates and noise (See Table 1 for raw
comparison). Specifics for these comparisons are presented in FEIS, Section 2.62.
Preliminary Design
During the development of a preliminary design, the roadway design team used
available knowledge, including EIS data to locate an alignment which would result in
the least damage to the human and/or natural environment, with particular emphasis
on avoiding and minimizing wetland impacts. This alignment was staked in the field
and wetland delineations were subsequently performed by NCDOT biologist, M.
Randall Turner during the hydraulic design phase of work. These delineations were
confirmed by the Corps of Engineers (Mr. Mike Bell) on November 13, 1995. The
alignment essentially requires +/- 250 ft of right of way and provides for four lanes of
traffic divided by a grassed median which is 60 ft wide, except through wetland
continuums where a 46 ft median is specified. Three grade-separated interchanges are
planned at SR 1138, south of Everetts; US 17, south of Williamston; and US 64, east
of Williamston.
Impacts To Waters of the U.S.
Impacts to wetlands will occur at 20 sites and surface water impacts will,occur at
an additional 13 sites. Impacts to wetlands will result from footprint fills, and as a result
of grading in cut sections (wetland sites 7 and 14) and installation of drainage ditches
(wetland sites 2, 3, 7 and 14). The estimated collateral impacts to adjacent wetlands
from the grading and/or installation of drainage ditches has been calculated. The
calculated perimeter of the zone of influence, which is dependent to a large extent upon
soil conductivity (permeability) and depth of proposed ditch, was used to estimate an
areal quantity to record as a presumptive impact. Rains soils are mapped at all four
sites. A site-by-site inventory of wetlands to be impacted by the project, including
community type and relative quality is provided in Table 2.
Page 5
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith-
Table 2. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-21128: Size, Community Type and Quality
Site River Basin - Impact Area Community Type Quality Index
Wetland Surface Water
1 Tar-Pamlico 3.10 - PF01 (R) FS 3-WQ 1-WH 4 = 8
2* Tar-Pamlico 2.37 - PF04/01 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 3 = 7
3* Tar-Pamlico 0.77 - PF01/04 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 3 = 7
4 Tar-Pamlico 0.43 - PF04 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 3 = 7
5 Tar-Pamlico 3.60 - PF04 (R) FS 3-WQ 2-WH 4 = 9
6 Tar-Pamlico 1.17 - PF01/04 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 2 = . 6
7* Tar-Pamlico 9.50 - PF04 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 2 = 6
8 Roanoke 0.57 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
9 Roanoke - 0.14 - -
10 Roanoke - 0.11 - -
11 Roanoke 1.56 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
12 Roanoke - 0.07 - -
13 Roanoke 0.95 - PF01%04 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 2 = 6
14* Roanoke 7.23 - PF01104 (NR) FS 2-WQ 2-WH 2 = 6
15 Roanoke - 0.07 - -
16 Roanoke - 0.02 - -
17 Roanoke - 0.04 - -
18 Roanoke - 0.02 - -
19 Roanoke - 0.15 - -
20 Roanoke - 0.03 - -
21 Roanoke - 0.16 - -
22 Roanoke - 0.09 - -
23 Roanoke 2.47 - PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 5-WH 4 = 13
24 Roanoke 0.86 - PFO1/SS (R) FS 3-WQ 3-WH 3 = 9
25 Roanoke - 0.05 - -

w
NCDOT° Project R 21_'f 2BA `_'. 7. . y .__
26 Roanoke - 0.05 - -
27 Roanoke 0.70 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
28 Roanoke 0.31 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
29 Roanoke 0.68 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
30 Roanoke 0.29 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
31 Roanoke 1.73 - PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
32 Roanoke 1.36 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
33 Roanoke 0.36 - PF01 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 4 = 12
Totals 40.01 1.00
Note: Values given are in acre(s);' denotes that impact is from fill and excavation (see below for areal
quantities due to draining): PF01, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine Forested Broad-leaved
Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine Forested Deciduous: SS
denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine, respectively; Quality Index
explained below
Page 6 .
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a composite score based
upon its opportunity to-perform each of the functional attributes and its presumed
effectiveness (based upon field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute.
Functional attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most important
among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is positioned in the
landscape to receive surface flows from the adjoining landscape or from overbank
flooding of adjacent streams and is wetland characterized by topographic
depression ? (score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography of
site) Or is wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent upon ground water (and
rainfall) sources of hydrology ? (score, FS 1-3, dependent upon distance to closest
stream system, or inputs from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape to intercept
surface runoff from agricultural lands, highways or other development, and does it
display suitable topography and vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain
toxins ? (score, WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is
wetland a flat expanse without opportunity to receive and without topographic relief
to hold particles and toxins ? (score, WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to
drainage ditches from farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken, riparian corridor
which provides opportunity for the movement of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5,
depending on how much fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy
and understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system ? (score WH 1-3,
depending on whether community is fragmented and to what extent)
Effect of Grading/Excavation on Wetlands: As indicated, four wetland sites will be
impacted by grading and/or excavation. The zone of influence by the grading and/or
excavation to adjacent wetlands through draining has been calculated by local soil
specialists with the US Natural Resource Conservation Service to be approximately 75'
laterally from any point of the ditch. This estimation has been confirmed independently
by a hydrogeologist with ESI, Inc, utilizing best judgment approximation. Therefore,
the results provided in Table 2 reflect the following impacts to wetlands from earth fill
and from draining due to excavation:
Wetland Site Impact by Fill Impact by Draining* Toth Impact
2 1.85 0.52
3 0.55 0.22 0.77
7 8.29 1.21 9.50
14 6.64 0.59 7.23
'
Note: * Value based upon length of exc avation (or grading) multi plied by 75
Page 7
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
Mitigation
Based upon the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the
Army and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which was executed on February
6, 1990, a process of verification and accountability for impacts to wetlands has been
put in place. Essentially, the process demands that a proposal must be able to
demonstrate that all reasonable steps have been taken to avoid impacts to wetlands
(and waters) to the maximum extent practicable, and, where prospective impacts have
been demonstrated to be unavoidable, evidence that all reasonable steps have been
taken to minimize impacts to these wetlands (and waters) must be demonstrated; and,
where applicable, compensation for the unavoidable loss of wetlands is required.
Avoidance: Given that approximately 50 % of the land within Martin County is
mapped as hydric soil and the preponderance of natural stream drainages that
blanket the landscape, it is unrealistic to expect that a 9-mile section of highway can
be built on new location without impacting wetlands and jurisdictional waters. In
point of fact, one of the early tasks undertaken by the environmental planners was
to map likely wetland areas and to attempt to establish study corridors which would
avoid, if possible, such areas. Of the corridors selected as reasonable and feasible,
the recommended alternative was estimated to impact the second lowest amount of
wetlands (among several alternatives, including composite alternatives). The
alternative with the least estimated wetland impacts is.expected to have the highest
number of relocations and the highest projected annual accident rate. In summary,
if the project is to be built, impacts to wetlands and waters are unavoidable.
Minimization: In part, selection of the preferred corridor minimizes wetland
impacts when compared to several other practicable alternatives. Furthermore,
attempts to minimize impacts to unavoidable wetlands have been undertaken
during the preliminary design. Evidence of this effort was demonstrated during field
review of the alignment by state and federal agencies on November 13, 1995 and
January 10, 1996. During this field review numerous questions were asked of the
NCDOT by agency staff concerning potential minimization efforts. These questions
and issues were subsequently addressed in a letter dated January 19, 1996 and is
included as an attachment. Fill sections in all wetland areas have been steepened
to 2:1 slopes. Median sections have been reduced in all wetland areas from 60 ft to
46 ft. Where possible, perpendicular, or near-perpendicular crossings of stream
channels have been the rule, rather than the exception.
Compensation: In spite of all efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands
and waters, a total of 40.01 acres of wetlands and 1.00 acre of surface waters will
be impacted by the proposed relocation of US 64 from Everetts to Williamston.
Wetland impacts include 17.59 acres of forested riverine wetlands and 22.42 acres
of forested non-riverine wetlands. The major portion of the project (Sites 8-33) lies
Page 8
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
in the Roanoke River Basin, but a small section near Everetts (Sites 1-7) is located
in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. The community breakdown, by River Basin, reveals
that 6.70 acres of riverine and 14.24 acres of non-riverine wetland impacts occur in
the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, while 10.89 acres of riverine and 8.18 acres of non-
riverine wetland impacts occur in the Roanoke River Basin.
The department acknowledges its responsibility to provide suitable
compensatory mitigation and therefore makes the following mitigation proposal.
The impacted wetlands which lie in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin (Sites 1-7) are to
be debited from the Mildred Woods Mitigation site. Construction of the Mildred
Woods Mitigation Site, including planting, has been completed. Monitoring wells
were installed in February 1996. Monitoring will have been underway 4-5 months
prior to initiation of construction on R-2112BA (contractor availability: July-August
1996), and +/- 3 years prior to initiation of construction on R-2112BB. According to
a November 15, 1995 letter from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 115 credit
acres are available at the Mildred Woods Mitigation Site. The department therefore
proposes that 21 acres of riverine (6.70 acres) and non-riverine (14.24 acres) be
debited from the creditable balance of 115 acres. This debit will leave a balance of
94 credit acres at the Mildred Woods site for future project debits.
2. The impacted wetlands which lie in the Roanoke River Basin (Sites 8-33) are to be
debited from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank. This batik was established as
a cooperative effort among several state, federal and private conservation agencies,
including the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Department
of Transportation, the (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Nature Conservancy.
The department therefore proposes that 19.07 acres, including riverine (10.89
acres) and non-riverine (8.18 acres), of wetland impacts be debited from the
Company Swamp Mitigation Bank using a ratio of 5:1. It should be noted that
MCCrain (Journal of Environmental Management, 1991, 35:153), using HEP
analysis to evaluate numerous wetlands to be impacted by the NCDOT, concluded
that a ratio of 3.4:1 was a defensible replacement ratio when applied to the
Company Swamp Mitigation Bank. Some of the proposed debits (8.18 acres) are
out-of-kind* (non-riverine); however, it is important to point out that the wetland .
systems at the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank are of a higher functional value
than the small non-riverine flatwoods for which mitigation credits are proposed. The
5:1 ratio would result in an overall proposed debit of 95.35 acres (equivalent to
4,567.27 habitat units). This debit, if approved, would result in a balance of 778.03
acres (equivalent to 37,267.64 habitat units) at the Company Swamp Mitigation
*ARhough, out-of-kind mitigation at the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank was not seen as the most desirable apprcation
of mitigation credits, it is not expressly prohibited. In fact, the Memorandum of Understanding explicitly permits the
application of out-of-kind credits if all signatory agencies agree beforehand. An informal poll of each of the three MOU
principles, conducted on February 23, 1996 revealed that none objected to the out-of-kind mitigation proposal. Those
contacted included Ms. Katherine Doak (Fish and Wildlife Service), Mr. David Cox (Wildlife Resources Commission) and
Ms. Este Stiefel (Nature Conservancy).
Page 9
February 29, 1996
Mr. Smith
Bank for future project debits. (At present, 873.36 acres (41,834 habitat units) are
available for debiting at the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, a figure which was
verified by the Fish and Wildlife Service on November 21, 1995.]
The department requests that this (these) project(s) be authorized by a Section
404 permit. A gepartment of the Army permit application (Eng Form 4345, dated Feb
94) and a set of drawings depicting wetland boundaries are provided for your
information. Since this project (R-2112BA) is scheduled for a June 1996 construction
letting, the department respectfully requests that the public notice process be initiated
at the soonest possible opportunity,.
If you have questions or comments, please call Mr. M. Randall Turner at (919)
331-4737.
Sincerely,
H. ranklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Mike Bell, COE, NCDOT Coordinator
Mr. John Dcrney, DEM, Water Quality Section
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, NCDOT Coordinator
Ms. Katherine Doak, USFWS, 404 Coordinator
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
Ms. Sara Winslow, DMF, Elizabeth City
Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., NCDOT, Program Development
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., NCDOT, Roadway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. John Smith, P.E., NCDOT, Structure Design
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., NCDOT, Design Branch
Mr. D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT, Division 1 Engineer
Mr. J. A. Bissett, Jr., P.E., NCDOT, Planning & Environmental Branch
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT, Division 1 Environmental Officer

6a
RAG 1 IGu
FIGURE 1
a
-cc
Zi
Z °
- - O
?
Q U
t
?r
C7
L ? Q
W
Q
e
O
Q U
C
0
H ?
N
N
W
Jr
gf\ 1
?} o
1 LO
qd? I,
? 9 i d ? R
%
i ? E f
x /
J ? yl
O ?? C7
- _ a 1 O a /
-1 v m /
.? d
? C d f
av E ^' A _ ai /
EQ` l? ? T S ? .., E
7 1 ? N q
??-
? Y ,
A
1
1
t
T
'hs
1
?? 1 ti ?N °I
...f a `le t
a
j
"e L.
_ O U sf

LIJ

w
4 z 1!
.. i ?
? a
I
IL .i

w
LL
Z
O
P
U
c
o 0
v
a
0 C
U °
to
cc
IL
WO
W Cd
a
Q Z
? W
GW
0. C
C
F- Zo
w 0 Z
O~~
E5 O
a
W Z
0
0
!r
s n
., _ ?_ ?#??? fit, ?1 ?f` ?a '•? 1` ?y^I ? ? y?=i

,1 s
(((?
/ V
L
J
t Q
z ?? W
z

J"
.. .. ,

?. / _I
- ' LIJ

(D 31
Li
o _
N U <

.I E Ld
w 11

I
a
D
c?
U.
0
U •
°
w v
o M
v 0 o
? Q z
o e
U °
v
-z 3
w
Q
a
U
w O
G.
Q Z
0 r
4. N
?zo
w o Z
Oa~
E? O
W Z
Q
1
3 ?
I?
s
' .`.. ? ? Jr Jw ? rl
o X-rl .1
l7 r -?
?-
cc A
• f W r -? h -
wj,
g '.
f
Q
o
?.Y l
l? ?,. 4f w?Sy1 LL. / .1 N
l - ?
I O U x
?' , x O ? Wyy
W oZ u
O
O Y
W
V
U.
O
U •
? c
WQ U
ac
v 0 0
ip Q 2
= cc c
O 2
U u
y
Z ?
cc
a
v
W O
UJ
QZ
? L
G>
?0^
t ?
a
ZO
Z Z
z H
O cc
ce 0
Z
Z
W
O
0
u
z
J?
z

J ?
61
0.1
ZI;l ?-
V-Y
m x CC o CC
?{ r. i/ fit{ -?/ 0 0 o am ?-
? li ? : }u' Q ? ac c7
CC X CC 0
W
/ 0 U U a W
W , W O a a W W _
2 / W m N Cn aN
_ w
_ a
f
W
a
n
U
a
V ul Z
•
Ul
LL
ra
y O
{7 a =
oxc
to
V
K O
a.
Q Z
N
C14.. ? ?
L Lt. N
CY
?? Z (O
w0z
0 cc ~
cs O
Z Ln
W Z
v; O
?o
z
Y+n
r i
i
,
III
=4
>s- f 7 ? I F•
yw S
10
00
NE
u L)
O O a W
? ` - p p O CL
0 y' = N CC p
0 0 LIJ
W ` w O O p W W
a W
W t j N N
/ J N
W 11
W
K
V
k i
UJ `
<- o
¦
LL ` U
Oz ? "
a Q? o
? Q z
W
N tlt > a:
7 ?F go
U
omc
uj ? a
a
wC
c
0
F
e
u
G'
Qd.
L
P
•Z
h
? C
W
? t
h
N h
' N
?O
n
,?4+ _,u
p JJ
t nl . -? N -1 O -4 Q
ti cai > •U1 iIJ Z7 C
is ! t j, 7
$4 14 (f) M L4
r< 1? 6° '' f • +i . j , b H ya ..{ L4 ?]. Lad (n O 14
-f 0 f 1 ,a ' Cllr -/F V W ?1 1 '? W ?J Q' A
'J? ?4 ID CA
41 >
•? i a 1 ° ???, A4.) U CJ ?- Qj i 1
04
l - 1.i A :j M N O 141 (6 O
C6 V, 14
44
j 4 - 1? -• 1 • f / ?' 1 - '
F .r J
1 M ? e f E I
a l
c' e M ? V _ f
I
ai o
k 00
1) •-I N
? w --
7
1-Y
( 1 ?' >, -ice ??cv?
0 --1
d a s( a - ro -- rd W A --1 U i J Q rn
> I I C
I
C: -4 C4 .-I ID NO
1 o x O sa i1 rn O C.
co (I S-4 CD (1)
4 S ¢. ' •'` H w •-4 L4 u. -r Q1 CL M O s_(
`* r °y i Via: L A . r ' A o Q =4 ? Sa Q7 ? V Cl ?
i- p Q iL E-{ n a O O r-1 Cca
y l-_._ l? a z CO
.? .. I
$4 H
N 4-J 4J
f rti vl O -1 4j O
' cry ` ?, ca O 0 m N 3 U .4
¢) - ; r i? r c -=r'`? U a al as cn A cn En
l -_ _f?#i t?- ? _ ? ?pt l ? ter..(". r \•` .tL.._.
??} 111"i'?s C. y• ? _ -I
o•
• _ tr
11.E i:.
W
i ? ? wc., ? ? +1C `,•. , •1• { r / I ? I U of 1
?,• ? U\j ? t •t , I? ?a
ti
!ly
Vv
?p?? ? fir ? 11 - '?,` ? ? r'?•?,•.1?L1 i s? ? ? f .: r ? r - ? ?. F : ,
?.? ry ^ ? •1 ! 4 ? -`^ i? f ?? ? .°? Y'r"a"> ? ?? , T"TS ?"4 ? F :? t i...
i
m/ n , f +x o r .II
?1?/mob.- •'i / n t tr"_? 1i•a ,_ - 'r? ? ~
9 y M1 f_ b ?4 l l -4 O
-« s ^`
16 04 :9
a? ? ?? - j • ?• H ••1.:11 ? -,`r1 ? ° ti, +.? ? I "'U :.. c?7
f u' V.11 }Oj H x ,? 1?i rb1 O Iv
mn h
t" W .rI •? Q :" ?1 w O S1
1-D 4-4
cox , ) ?r ?- a i ro Q? !7 c•1
rye ??i *? "`? 4j O ro O rn '-+ J N .. •?
14 h a m o c1+ O O r1 Ga
4J 4-) ?w
14 l >1
41 Q 4J
,eel
4 (1
Z5 r)
C3 f
73
t
• ° ??? 1t ?• E •lb?
m v
O a a\ I I y ?•? .• n_
N • ,\ •
1
?
?.
m
44
41 0
a \ I ??? ' I? a in W N
-nnHi
n n,2
VIvIt3 iarrrcv..+.. ---
APPL1CATlON FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARM`( PERMIT Explres October 1996
(33 CFR 325)
Public reporting burden for this collection of Information Is estimated to average 5 hours per response including the time for reviewing Instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of Information, including suggestions for roducing this burden, to Department of
Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA
22202432; and to the OMce of form to either of those addressefs Completed applications must e Paperwork submitted to the District Eng nee having jurisd ction over the occ tionOof thRETURN proposed
activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authonty 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1419, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities In, or affecting, navigable
waters or the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material Into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the
puroose of dumping It Into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used In evaluating the application for a permit
Disclosure: Disclosure of requested Information Is voluntary. If Information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can
a permit be Issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the laca1ion and character of the proposed activ!.y must be attached to this
application (son sample drawings and Instructons) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
An applicat!;In that Is not completed In full will be returned.
ITEIt1S 1 THRU 4.T0 8E F" r ED BY THE CORPS)
1'. APPLICATION NO. "Z FIELD OFFICE CODE "
------------
(ITEIMS BELOW TO BE FI
5. APPL :CANT'S NAME
H. Franklin Vick. P.E.
3. DATE RECEIVED
T.4 DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
:D BY APPLICAr4f)
3. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAWE AND TITLE ian agent is notrequire.)
N1. Randall Turner, Division Env renmental Ct`cer
9. ,AGENT'S ADDRESS
6. APPLICANT'S ACDRESS ;-lor-,h Carol na Cepartment of Transportation
;Jc h Cariina Department of Tran PO Box 1405
Planning a Errrironmental Branch Eli abeth C,ty. NO 27906-1405
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201 7ransportauon PO BOX 140r
PO Box 25201
10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS- W/Ar%EA CODE
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS, W/AREA CODE a. Residence [phone]
a. Residence b. Business 1919) 331-4137
b. Business (9191 733-3141
11 STATEMENT OF. AUTHORIZATION
ish, upon request,
I hereby suthoriz , M. Randall Tum•er to act I y behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furn
supple Ii o on in suppo s permit pp catio
...2- 2 9 ,p
DATE
APPL CANT'S SIGNATURE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Proposed Improvements to US 64 between Everetts and Williamston
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (U applicable)
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (If applicable)
Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Collie Swamp (crib). WA
Roanoke River Basin: Beaverdam Creek (tribs), Dog Branch, Sweetwater
Creek ltnbs)
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
klartin county __ Ncrth Carolina
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (sea Instructions)
From west of SR 1138 (South of Everetts) to US 17 (North of Williamston)
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Proceed East of Robersomiile, N.C. on US 64 to Everetts (+/- 5 miles); Turn South on SR 1138; Project Alignment crosses SR 1138 approx.
2400 Feet South of Everetts; nProject West Terminus Lies Approximately ear SR 1140; Alignment Turns So SoutheaOst tFeet West of SR 1138; Alignment Proceeds o a Point South of SR 126; Al g ment Tracks East oha Point +?/- 800
1139 eet Where it Tracks East to R
F
Feet East of US 17; Alignment Turns North-Northeast, Crosses US 64 (East of Williamston), Terminating at US 17 Northeast of 'iYlUams on
EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-0R)
ENG FORM 4346, Feb 94
13. Mature of Activity (Description of project. including all features)
Proposed work involves construction of 4-lane divided highway on new location. Wetlands and Surface Waters will be effected by the project.
In additicn to roadway fills, grade separations at major secondary roads and a railroad crossing will require structural bridges and ramps (at
interchanges). Hydraulic crossings involve reinforced concrete box culverts and pipe installations.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see Instructions)
Proposed work is a Transportation Improvement Mandated by the N.C. General Assembly to accommodate Increasing traffic demands and to
facilitate and encourage economic development in northeastern North Carolina. Improvements to US 64 frcm Tarboro to Everetts is presently under
construction. This project (Everetts to Williamston) is scheduled for a June 1996 construction letting.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Fill wiil be discharged into wetlands at 20 sites to accommodate rcachvay fcotprint.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
A3 Fiiis in wetlands will be frcm earth fill, derived from su,table upland borrow sites. See attachment fcr quantities
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
40.01 acres of wetlands and 1.00 acre of surface waters will be impacted by project constructicn. Cf the 40.01 acres of wetland impacts.
37.47 acres .vi(1 be from roadway fills and 2.54 acres will result from collateral impacts to wetlands by excavaticn and/or grading.
See attachment for site specific information.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete ? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here, please
attach a supplemental list).
See Attached List
25. List Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal/State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DEMED
None
'Would Include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and curate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duty at o ' agent of 77?-
IGNATURE OF APPLIC T DA SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duty
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner, within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements, or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
'U. S.GPO:1994-520-378!82018
r S'.ATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP,. SPORTATION
JANIEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201
January 31, 1996
{e 3' a, -y... . .?
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washlr,cton Rec,_,!ato^/ Field CTc°_
P.O. Box 1000
,Vashrngton: N.C. ?7839-fur.
iccr ?cif. c=li:
CiAKL1 N D B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
:it:'::.irC.Irado
cif 1,-_8 SOU," of =`•'?=yet ? 'i'G V`?- 1 -CUin :i ?i`ii;lier` StCI i ! iP
i i u(' _ ci : `0 :.?•;1 _....,; ? i .
°tir Iry .r. ' airs a!!e?:`!s -r
/(liC l ie( i -:e at 1 - in ^i'lel ic'Cc. i ct ti'lift C: CS:
nstr action ie t.inos for the two crciects are separated ty 21.5 vears: scirleculec tc lake
tl ... :. ?. jam. (...vii .. i.l.: .. .C av ,, .. ,iG i . .. -•C tJ. .?=
permit apollcations for eacn section \A/Guld not De accectarl .. COn-eCuQntiv. e
ccmcined.
R-211 25A
An interagency ttC;4
13, 1995. Attendees were given an oppcnunlty to inspect the proposed alignment and
sites of anticipated impacts to wetlands and surface waters. During this inspection a
number of relevant queries vrere made by one or more agency staff, including Mr. Cavid
Cox (Wildlife Resources Commission), Mr. Eric Galamb (Division of Environmental
Management) and Mr. Mike Bell (Corps of Engineers). A letter, which summarized and
listed the concerns expressed by the representative state and federal agencies, was
circulated among the attendees of the field inspection on December 8, 1995. The
contents of this letter were reported and discussed at an interagency (permit) meeting,
which was held in Raleigh on December 14, 1995. In addition to Messrs. Cox, Galamb
and Beil, the Raleigh meeting was attenoeo oy representatives from the r=isn and
Wildlife Service and the Division of Coastal Management. During the discussion at the
December 14 meeting, one additional agency concern was raised.
0
Page 2
January 31, 1996
Mr. Bell
The purpose of this letter is to provide responses to each of the five substantive
concerns raised by state and federal agencies during the field review and during the
subsequent discussion at the December 14 permit meeting. Each issue and the
NCDOT response is presented below.
• Question (1): Why can't the alignment be shitted to (adjacent to) the utility corridor
which lies immediately south of existing US-64 (between presect's western termin '.:s
and Meadow Road-SR 1140) ? [The underlying premise to this question is that a
disturbed utility corridor may exhibit less wetlands/waters than are part of forested
(relatively undisturbed) wetland continuums.]
Response: The North Carolina Department of Transportation initiated an EIS study for
R-2112 in 1987; the DEIS was circulated for review on February 7, 1990, the FEIS on
April 30, 1992. The Record of Decision was completed on October 30, 1992. A
Preferred Alternative was selected and a preliminary design was created within the
preferred corridor. This fact notwithstanding, shifting the alignment northward to a
position adjacent to the existing powerline corridor,,-vould result in moving the alignment
well outside any of the EiS study corridors. However, to adequately address the
concerns of the agencies, an analysis of potential wetland impacts was undertaken for
the area adjacent to the utility corridor (between a point approximately 3;000 feet west
of SR 1138 and Meadows Road-SR 1140). Figure 1 contrasts the alignment selected
within the EIS-Preferred Corridor (SPCA) with an hypothetical alignment adjacent to the
utility corridor (UCA), which lies immediately south of existing US 64. Note that all
floodplains to elevation 20 ft (above mean sea level) have been highlighted to contrast
each alignment's potential impacts to Waters of the U.S. Sites identified and
delineated by the NCDOT (and verified by the Corps of Engineers) are depicted for the
SPCA. Although no delineation of wetland sites along the UCA were conducted, a field
visit revealed that large wetland systems are !coated along the north- and south-sides of
the UCA. This was predicted based upon the large floodplain encroachment
(approximately 10,000 linear feet vs. approximately 8;000 linear feet for the EPCA).
Furthermore, note that the UCA undergoes parallel encroachment through the Collie
Swamp floodplain (south of Everetts), requiring multiple channel crossings either north
n- a?., aL. aiCL n? 'anr nj^e ==" 1 ..:5.. .. .. .. _ _ - _:
vl JoVL 1 Of a 1G? UU I. Y cu t!l -&, tip- - .. - sn .+. C.,.J .. ..? QQI. iy v1 C.
single channel in the same area. Finally, Figure 1 also reveals that the UCA crosses
the largest expanse of the Beaverdam Creek floodplains in an area where the
floodplains of two major tributaries overlap, while the EPCA crosses much narrower and
separate floodpains of the same two tributaries.
Based upon an analysis of both alignments, including a cursory field
examination of the UCA, there is little question that the EPCA minimizes impacts to
Waters of the U.S., when compared with the UCA.
• Question (2): Why can't the aiignment be shined to (aajacent to) the utility corridor
which lies immediately south of existing US-64 (between project's western terminus
Page 3
January 31, 1996
Mr. Bell .
and Meadow Rcad-SR 1140) ? [The underlying premise to this question is that
construction of a highway adjacent to a disturbed utility corridor (a previous
fragmentation) would result in wildlife habitat reduction, but not fragmentation.] Note:
This question was raised at the November 14 Raleigh meeting.
Response: Development in an "undisturbed" habitat continuum, which results in
segregating portions of natural communities on either side of the development is
routinely considered to be habitat "fragmentation", while development along the
boundaries of a previous fragmentation may be construed to be habitat reduction.
However, the development which resulted in separating habitat parcels in this instance
is a powerline corridor, not a structural entity like a shopping strip mail, or a highway.
i ne major difference is that the powerline corridor serves as a valuable and ecologically
relevant ecotone, in which foraging, nesting and migratory practices are carried out by a
very diverse assemblage of species. This area is neither an ecologically sterile
environment, nor is it a barrier to the movement of wildlife. The NC-COT does not
concur that its alternative would result in fragmentation to habitats that could be
avoided by re!ccoting the alignment to (adjacent to) the utility corridor. !n fact, it would
;e reasonable to consider the herbaceous and scrub-shrub dominated poweriine
corridor to be a functional ecotone within a larger ecological continuum.
• Question (3):Why is a ditch proposed at wetland site 97 (Stations 620+50 to
528+50)?
Response: Due to low-lying contours in this area. there is no other practicable wav to
drain the subgrade of the roadbed except by creating a drainage ditch. Elevation of the
roadbed would result In excessive costs and would further result in increased wetiand
losses to adjacent wetlands due to enlargement of the footprint.
Question (4): Why is a service road proposed in the vicinity of wetland sites #10
and 11 ? According to the CCE, this service road must be shifted to an upland
landscape.
Response. The prepcsea service maa pmvices access to four parcels which are being
landlocked by the new roadway. The proposed service road extends an existing service
road and lies adjacent to the proposed highway relocation. An examination of the
landscape in the vicinity of the proposed service road alignment confirms that any
northward shift of the service road alignment must cross wetlands and surface waters,
because the stream system encircles the forested area through which the service road
must pass. A southward shift of the service road cannot be accomplished without
crossing over or under the new highway alignment. An examination of the wetland
boundaries at wetland site # 11 reveals that the wetland expands to the east and west
as you move north of the project area. There are no realistic alternatives to the existing
service road alignment, which would minimize impacts to wetlands and/or waters.
Page 4
January 31, 1996
Mr. Bell
• Issue (5): The proposed crossing of Dog Branch (wetland site # 23) should be
bridged; wetland. at this site is a high quality bottomland system.
Response: A comparison of the costs to construct a spanning structure across
wetland site # 23 vs. a reinforced concrete box culvert, as proposed, reveals that a
typical spanning. structure would add approximately +/- S 2.0 million to the cost of the
culvert crossing. The estimated cost differential accounts for the cost of the culvert and
the associated fill work. Two parallel bridges approximately 550 feet long would be
required. Approximately 2.5 acres of wetlar:d would be filled by the proposed box
culvert, while only approximately 0.3 acre would be filled/impacted by the spanning
structure, resulting in an avoidance cost of +/- S 0.9 million per wetland acre. The
additional cost of S 2.0 million represents approximately 8.2 % of the total estimated
construction costs of the project (S 24.5 million). The NCDOT concludes that the
extraordinary costs do not constitute a practicable avoidance and/or minimization
expenditure.
R-2112BB
An interagency fie!d review of the subject project was conducted on January 10.
1996 Attendees were given an opportunity to inspect the proposed alignment and sites
of anticipated impacts to wetlands and surface waters. During this inspection relevant
queries were made by review agency staff, including Mr. David Cox (Wildlife Resources
Commission) and Mr. Eric Galamb (Division of Environmental Management).
The purpose of this letter is to provide responses to each of the substantive
concerns raised by state and federal agencies during the field review and during any
subsequent discussions with NCDOT staff. Each question/issue and the NCDOT
response is presented below.
• Question (1): Why can't alignment be shifted to the west (at the southern end of
the project) in order to avoid fragmenting the forested area at Station 796+00 ?
Response, Augnment is mating a tignt shift to the north-northeast on the east side of
US-17 from an almost due eastward alignment west of US-17. It would be impossible
to tighten this radius further in order to miss the wooded tract at Station 796+00. (A
shin to the east of the forested tract would simply result in fragmentation of a larger
forested tract and would potentially involve additional wetland impacts.
• Question (2): Can NCDOT provide some form of energy dissipation at the interface
between the proposed drainage ditch (Station 831+50 to 835+00) and the adjacent
wetland (Station 835+00) ?
Page 5
January 31, 1996
Mr. Bell
Response: Yes. The NCDOT will install rip-rap to insure that storm water flows do not
erode soils in the vicinity of the wetland.
• Question (3): Can't the proposed fly-over ramp (Ramp 3A) from existing westbound
US-64 to the new alignment be shifted to avoid impacting the small bottomland
wetland site at Station (+/-) 4+00 ?
Response: As can be observed in the field, this bottomland system parallels existing
US-64 for a considerable distance and is interrupted by uplands at only one site. It was
this site that Ramp 3A crosses as its alignment diverges from existing US-64.
Unfortunately, only a tighter radius has any chance of missing the bottomland pocket.
The radius must be held at the existing design parameter in order to affect a safe
divergence pattern from one principal travelway to another at safe design speeds.
Question (4): Can the NCDOT insure that isolated pockets of woody vegetation on
the interior of interchange ramps will be left undisturbed during construction, and
will not be subjected to vegetation management in the future ?
Response: Zones of woody vegetation (forest fragments) which lie outside the
construction limits and/or drainage easements of the project will be left in-tact. The only
vegetation management which will occur in these areas will be dictated by safety
concerns as the vegetation matures. If vegetation does not impede sight distance and
does not pose as a safety hazard to the traveling public, no further action is required by
the NCDOT.
Should the above information require clarification, or should additional questions
or comments arise, please contact Mr. M. Randall Turner, Division 1 Environmental
Officer at [phone].
Sincere ,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
Enclosure
co 0 E-4
y •? ?' •`
W (U
11
I ?aJ s ? °? o C1
?r+
'Y i,/ •?r ?? ?r O
i • I _0? _ n H q H \ I CP
w $4 O > s-a ? O >
(I E-4 i f^ u o N ro o a1 4-J U ?4
a a tj (D o ?i ?, F::4 E 3 >, a
0 A a (0 O UI CO H N U • •- I (ti
43 `O i ! F
I V ' •? .'? ..i k'??^ y* J o p• ley 13 -i g3 C) I Q'
I`I ry I .-1 n rZ •An cJ
rl --4 93 0
m rd
???a u d a)
- -------------
C c
?... - v f. __ .
?• ' L,'?'c1 •••! • •? ? ? i ter.. \ ? ? d `
1 a . ??r0• y aS l,?•jJ.?y? 14f t ? ? }t -_: 1 ? ,0
p M W
,[1 I h SS(??.la/l?j j?].?. '.i } K 7 k•//•? •? Y? ?.. '..j *1.?
, iiL-
.? Y'yf 1' "T'? ?} • !• ??- c ?IFL• -i f _ ff h•+1, ~ro_ • V . i
i
I'LL
i
i
E
l
i
y rrttW
1 C
.a ,LSa,OO.rs ID
•• i .-e 751 ,
Y4an :mei ' - - - -
e7..N
Samwler 13
Wsewc erlecn..u
s1 " 1301 1 9Ie'••n' 1n[GiNIA ' _.__ ' L--
Its 10" 3-
,oe,u
_ it gums
I ?- r rleas"I Mrli 1 art,.eiS,nNf Mme. UROWA I Gales `
•i4 y -+liRKe . YV4re•Cau 41
1 s. cti` 5 ...n e M G' A: T E S' 1
Guaha ?eMle / 1'.S o0lr BucallM r '
A6 ?? ee^ cn
I ??? th• ?'i3 r r ) 1 1!1 ,y ` q
o :51I It ier arrswt 1 fal.a. ^..j heestMw ve r;., ^$V+o.eY .
' utnae1.47G"eas.41 Rio
: OF '00. N T. AMPTON r ` l a Ga1t3WIll
;non 7
I 1 ;p srl.awn e 7 ? wmton Ot.Nlf
y 1 ! 1 j ?yS?nafvos?
SVmeslei 1/ 1y 1 r,teea / r
lacson J
'
: YeMS J -z
N , a , • ?• ? L,3KN r r^5A naa?. t:oheld ietlps.rlle
/ Mne u` ' Nanlas Gaa,ln r E Uw ' F O s5 [?• / CIr011?n
1? - e S I Man Uls.llI I R.r n 1
..,.-,... ? aunt ykMOSty xi Belvidere
erNMle.. ito ' i
1 . , e OA,atarn xl / / l r .6 , PE RQ.Rl Mm
a
wee Tyler f Rrcn Sit IF
- - 1 - - , •T- I) I 7
Easel most / / - 1p . / - ?_? ?e.flls.ale
Ma1.sIH y li 1' 41 xl y _1 AWlMft I / Co1Mlm r
1 Rln .ooa H A / L I/ X A0.0eel „c.. I .•L ,.
47 COenant[[ jCHQ,AN' O
SOnn[Nrll`?M•,ei` ,
rTl°?`'?1 I j
,:'J ?i awdee 1: L R°,c :
?' r Glerl.e. ' -"Enhe+a w 1;!3*
\1`u,1 p
coral +SCOt1,M N!p 3
y y p Ml.ret taro
1 r. 1 SF - L ton- hta ir•••.^? .-??
1 u V t - , 1 /ylw..,uf p ?' ,. ryASYe.?llf Aur,M I
I's 43 1 yl/wM U.M lj RosfM,tn !/ n riymn? B E R p? T I [e.nrra,?. /t
Gad Rocs p All
~t
•? 6,uleooeo y _ l y /
Red Ova r_E' 1 =x i.r\ i Mo0t0o0 lCanaaa .`` _ ?.
Latttti 3 yuseGh
y y \ y i I.Kelsns GaOto.n / stock v y'
-Ot B E I'
ttwnU l r 61A Sir. 41 ,mrlton 1 ..? „.' .L'•7 ?• leasant Grog
- ]•, ^r, \ Y.xOard - t r6/ir Snrooernortt
' 17 `.sr 1 r61/lfaff Ma'snl a M este.er_ CGes
ChOr
/ -t ? I?t?O w1. / 1 Ga0 Vnl sZ . 1 I??1\?l 7
J ``rr nsrosea 13 2 s ?t '' E.ere i u' _' .W utrtStoO?, Usrden t+Im+wm
/ e•nes.•11f• //
WASHINGTON
/ -? , e1 Tu d .[' Roo= III
Elm GI/ t ' hMlOes • '!°"'Ne M 1 cu , ' •:
BetMl 99
, d Yn.ti.L
t Bur Gass ?i Mmson 3, 45
_r %wd,anas . 7r ! 1 !3 ?'' ' 1 We_nona ????
h ?\ r < + "tibud Glsd Stan •17 71 ' _ t _ r W_vn'p•Le kv
`, I1SOO \ 1 /ialaun I I to IS Pile Road
•??,Y 1? •O \ N I . y 1 iowum Bruce '_ otlse ? 1
)//)TTGCC'' Seam p Mill 111 a1 ^ 1 9 ractaus 11 Old lord hoer °"• 4
5 a
;! ma
Iscs G { 9 i 1 1 t ??.. .r c FC t\ -54 '0 I ?S Aae Terra ?antat
e
,.. , Sentoniw 111 - • 111 Arttlurr 1 Leectl.rllt
w,lstonw[ rirmYlt! r ..Vson+ f \, ?IS?IC ? . )2 Cal ' 16+11 y * 13
' .?. , ??•- Grr *stand - Yeausaur _ i..
TI E,rrn, i 1\ Ie iyi , P r •? I T T / s 1 ,n 1 e , s3 Fe:,•.?..?...??_?(
ti •• \ Lrtte I Wmlerwee tl O'OC0"n't/ ' `d^ef (?i.? v
Ila ` i G E : ? y E ?amo« ? BlaaJ,o Z 1 w jc ^ 97 Sam
I Sl,eei
[ISto.n / Orn, AyOCn Snew"lljoe I '` iYr e , e wNr
t alrstari .r3 ? Mril r 0^os l 1
f `11 1 s 3~ ) .. IL S •k N Cwe 1 r•`'10
{iolds6oro • n C,Ir[e a YAknar ??t t?P.r.s.ca
1 / lam 14 253 i , Gn ltoe .. ` • U 10 f l l - N. Goa I C"Ta
? C E Insht,te Ot.sOn GM ^' 6'?
V,oceooro I?
„•t We a G,n[t \ '? , ly IN eM ` ' •rrara IZOYat 11 7 .
ICT t E.? 1
I r
stcn 1
'
N
M .•
^ a Cis tier / j
1 `
.
.
sr w

5 f r?
ref R
r
?? IYfYSr
y I U Ifa? ^rs

G..o.tan . L `r
I l rya ? u
AAwts I

IWn
MNI
1 N,saet Mr/
ePr
i rK
' ,j E

FAIANN
K--
s.dN ?ett,rs
Mill 1
0 9 18
SCALE IN MILES
VICINITY MAP
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MARTIN COUNTY
PROJECT 6.099002T - R-21126
U. S. 64 BY-PASS
SHEET I OF 61 JANU ART 1996
`; END ,?.
PROJECTS
US 64
/? ? - ? y` ? t ' !.? _ ?',j?,?? ]? A • a!! //?? _ \. fir?
? '' . ?•,• -- ?' '"''Vi'i`"'" . : ?C P?• !`• , ? _- o r
? y :?????r`\ • i ? ?.• + •? ` „ : Iwo O/'?? ? ? 1 ? ; .,,?-y..
20
19
F7 VZ
71.
r AN
d'i
01
7
LOCATION MAP
SHOWING SITES FOR PERMIT
>r,_??`39' \ APPLICATION ALONG PROPOSED U.S. 64 BY-PASS

04000' 8000
SCALE IN FEET
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MARTIN COUNTY
PROJECT 6.099002T - R-2112B
U.S. 64 BY-PASS
SHEET 2 OF 61 JANUARY 1991,

2
z
Qcn ?O C
cod zz cc, 0 z
F
2 O E-F U
UC QmUoO.P?
., .. a Fpz?N?)
z w F -- O ..,
ao U ?z F;
O U F ca O zC .. A O
E- A? °@U?
wz a? a. TWO
0 A
rr' W Q- C? 00
az
ra U p„ p., ?
1
la o 0
I ?, I N
W ZW
?? W? r V I 0< N
N f I o _ou id iaz
- y ? Z ^J V I ? W ?
W Q I? W W V W t O O
O O N N I J N V\ ?"? .?M
r Im=
?d\O ? , 11
N y J'1
.00
rt I ?' ' M ? a I `° i? w
ppA2' ? \ ? I` .?
rM00 Qq
o'
? I
W
W I `h: 1 2
W
" ° 1 fl ? o
I ? ? I
z
W? I
J N
.M006 . ¢ f.102' (i?
Nn0'=.5'S - u v ? 2.01
ppAO' I m' c Q 7'M` Z
,..Epo°
Q g
•oav?'za'E I ry _ 1%
O-• ? .1JI o F
o? ? o r a
I
ON I Q ? \ W
1 1 zo
I? ? ., 8N
=1- 00+912t 3NI-1 HO-L-M
4
C,
ni H I v' c
O w
_ >
Z m
N

N

N

CO

Z D
O
Q >-- LL.

N Z

Z

1- - zz
J a
R=, >-
~ o
H Q
F- W J
J F„ to - Z ?- U 'Q
W
W =
N U. w
y Q=
Ct LL p
U 0 0 cD
W

O
O
Z p
w F- .
i-- O
Z O
uj
m a
O _
J -
w O W
Q LL.O
0- ~
Q ?p
OW r
O U-) V O
p n
Jz > F- O LL
LO -. U) a. Q ?
p U0
w O
p ? a
Lr)
O
-?

T?v O

ro

-4 M

a w
z

j

73

nt rr,

?
N

z r
:fib E ?

Q
d ?
d'
V-7 90)
_ 27

m

N
(00 t7

C

.o
O ?
rv H ? ? mot- . ? °{
m m
o W m ?.
_ I o W
h N ? Z a3 } cr- o z
F- W J E- (D Z
?- U
W = li z
W = =O O cD
V) 3 Cr LL V O L fn
W o w LL 0 o
r 0
H CL Q 0 in- Q_ m uWi s
M o H o z c~ °- o
cn \ c i C) o
•
0-
00 ?
O LLI v (L cW
. I z =
U)
J
N `J
N 0 .\\
N
\ y
U
N i
• z
e
a
F
W
e ?
h
z
Q a
Q
z
A
0
0
s O ?
F
a
C7
z
W
U
a
O
T
FW
z
0
F
U
F
z
0
U
A
z
O
ra
c
P

C?
Z
C
Q
w
.a
U
r.
a
C.Q
Z
F
w
z
O
F
U
O
C
F
z
0
U
O
z
0
w
b
0
. .o
N t= J-1
o w co
_ > 2 c ?.
O O
O o Qyam- IZ
c, K • Z Fpp- Q z
}- J J Q = F- I- `'
W tt
W J W Z= N U
li O O (D
LL 0 X 00 Z 0 ? cn
O_ Z t :? U) Z Z }- 0O O
op f%i ?? I W O w LL O O
W
I O Q Ocn Q O?
a 3 I ? o F: ? E-0 It
Lo I CL Q o U ao 0
I o LJ? ?
0
i U a W
9D:oS%7 O I Z =
c II
C r,
V
i 1
moo. ;?,
1
t
sc - . ; 1
I
C I
.ZQ
> 1
I
.-777-1
O o.
_, > m
OZ N LL ?..
ON ` Z D Q (n V)
F-' Q ? z 2
>- O
Q I
~ w J -j C=7 Z Q
w w W Z2 = NU(o
p O (D
a LL. V) p Cr W U O W uj
Q O Z tit ~ {- O? a)=
W W p W Il.0 F- 00 _
?-a p
a o a
Cl)
U cr- O > %c O
U) n. a o U CL 0
o ?? o
O O ?- v ? W
n.
Z =
J V l -
F• I
1
1
I
t
%'Lci7 l
1-
l
1
I
i
o\
3 S
1
IS:
I
i
C O
N F-=
? O
N
F-
W
w
W
• :n ?; o z
w
J
LO U
cn
s0 O
s,
N
0
G
?r.
s:

1.0

z cV U ?, .
0 -
=0
N
'
cn
Z Z F- cn
gy- c CC O
z
J
J R
W J ?- cn - D F- v tt
N
w
W 3 Z2
W
ct
U O cD
O
W

N
w !-
F'O
? Vi
mom=
cn
? z
00
i F-
X ° O
W
cD
O
a n Q N
O (1 O U O
a.
Q ltJ 0
w O
O '? a
U
a W

z w
?

c
a
F
m
Q
z
a
Q a_
Q
z
Z a
F
C9?
71
r
.a
zz
-- o
Grua U
U
"z
0 O
A
W O
C?
0
a
z
k? cn @ y" c+ O Q
z
zz QrF?o z
., x z g F, @
J c^.? Q'ZVoO.??
F o .?
°Z
:4 Ozg 1z O
OU O@FW
n r ?.U
C)
CY) G Q O O V
N
z
? I
I
? I
c
? i
I ?I
I
09b .I \ 459 5 7-- L?
1 - _I
SuNd iam
\ Qo) of
M c' a_ -- U
i r ? o cn
N I-
P
O ? O
10 ISH
o
AC c
?I C z
0
NZ ? i Q a
o I z
mLn i I
V) U Q I
-v ,
J N I F
u w I o
z
L I I a
z \ I I
ui V U I V~
12
z0?
o°? f
ca
aoY?1-? 1
0
lool
i- TZ

LL
w \
z
,
•\
? N
O
N z ??
m O \

Q F-
J In
\
U W
C
i
I

a
z

N
z
z x>F
o z
_ a Q

Q V o 0
C o, L :; ?n
0 2 C,
? c`O
? oz
c o
tf)
?O,t.VO
1
A> oo
U

z
?I

-1 cr-

0
cr-
QL-
U- t?- It I i_
0 0
V Q ?'
°; Io w
a
I W o u

N C3
R?+ U-
Ln
p
co ?3
S
N
U
?.

I
I
?
?t

O
.n
0
D
z
e
a
F
14

z
H
0
z

F
.a
U
z
W
.a
U
a
O
Z
F
W
ti
z
0
H
U
O
F
z
0
U
a
2
O
r
w
c
15
F-?
a
U
z_
C
U
A
O
Z
F
z
0
F
U
C
F
z
0
U
A
z
0
b
0
16
N F=
2 ?
?? 00 O
N
H
W
W
LL
3f
'
`?1 O

p

Z_
N LtJ

; J
a
U
U)
'j 3-k
OLLI O

J
8L to, LLJ
D

YY O
Lli

. o
o

1 o`t
Iso)?,
O
3
Z?
Q
0
d

0
Q
3
w
z
O
Cie
o I
Q
L£ S9
r`
flI
Q!
3?

Z m
_cli LL r,

U O
~ O
N
Z)
Z Z 2 Q } 20 z

W J J

J 0

U

Z 1

f-
n
w _ E w )
z2 0 o0(D
O ° s a
SLR
F-O U 0JUj
m
LO

w w H

C) W
Z
LL

O
F-

it m
?
00

_
O Q ; to O (D
2 p
0
0
U
O
. Q W CL
o
U W-
a W
z z
N
r
ti
r
N
ti
c

L,
t
.o
C%
? m
O . w m
ZO N U-
QN N;
O Q
? I Lfj Z ? 1- ?Z 2
O
Z y _
1- W J F- (n (D Z U
W W li w_ =O ? O (D
li I in < cr u.. U O W
O_ Z_ Lr) W z !- O Z G) m
r w O W Op
J p Q O O v
O
tf J 0 cr. 0 - F- tt
cn o_ Q O U O
\ -,(r- 00
CL
O O LLJ
c? CL
CL w
W
J
I
o C4
• z
a
F
C ?
? R
\ ? z
a
? Q d
w
a
i
C?
w ?
I
F-
u
zz
-- o
C .,
W U
U C
.. H
"z
ao
O U
Z a
Uz
?o
w
q
0
19
,.,
O W co
z N W ?..
O ?. N O
N Z aV)
o z
Q? 3 r
F- W -? J
V) C=7 Z
J I- - F- U
W _ W z2 NOtD
Lt fn M W U 00 J
LLJ
O z W F- F- O z?=
W O W LL Z F- O° _
J ~ n. Q O cn Q
O
W CL Q I° w o 0
0
° o ate. ?t
_ O O j I U a w
I ?
I •
l
' I
I
I
I
I -v
N "' I
L7?? I n
Fy . L . a I ? ?
- U -
a
• :v f
i
1 1
fl
N F=
O
? N
H
W
w
LL
0 o z
f N -
w
J
Q
Lo
O O

i

a
C%
Q%
Z N W
t- cn N 0
a ?0 2
r
?(D
= Z ?U[t
Q
A L p
U NO w
L
L
Z 0 L
J
LL Z
O f-
-
Q O Q =
?p W
c
F f- 0 LL
?O
O
U

O

o C)
O C
N
-CL F-
W
2 W
cn

J
O
O
t
N
O
LO
o C31j

Z Z
? J J
W w

3 w ?-
v? z
W
h- O W
LL C
? 0
Q
CL Q
C?
z

1
2
• z
e
a
F
W
R
a
Q a
c?
I ?
Q
z
A
i
4
4
EF-
.a
zzz
U F
z
O U
4
wz
"o
44 a
0

I Qcs?
p C
G
-,
>F.c?O z
ZZ

?Uc O

W k\ N
wH Fpzoc?
C .. D p
c_la U O Z
O
U
?„ a ? ?.
j O cat
Q
a? ®o
am
I r l
ell U L
. ;_I ,??
N

Q• N
N ?
2
O
m~ O

?
1

4
N N ^
? `?' W i I I
I
C) I

'
m O C
CO
u
I
O p
O
' II
I
..a
O IC J
o ?
I
? o
w
U
f] ? ? A
ag
??
W
1 t
a
a<
6
O / f7 E+
E oil a z
I -
:

Q .
Oil
i

43 Q ??of ©Q L B4

i
22
F
a
zz
C ?
U
U F
a O
p U
za
az
"o
a
n
0
.,
cs
CC - _ z
F?
c
? ? cn c.. r? ca z @
zz
z I z .??" z-0FU ti
p n v
r 0..7
U-;
r I I E- 0 z 0
? I
"' 0@ FQ¢UEn rc?
E.
@ ?1 00
lu L5
I
"N I
? ?• N O
V W
? ti •S? V
V W fV ~
Q L? I Q
I @
o Ln
(\ I
I ( e o
0
11 z
Q ?? C
F
W ::1
W ( ° y
I o
.s. 3Val 7 y?!7w
515
23
F
z z
C ?
Q E-
U F
^z
0 U
A
z
0: O
c;
A
0

5z
zz
E-
W `
F
v, z
o :a
E? U
_N
A
I

O ?
I
I
I
I
r3

O
-
•Q?
N

•..?2
O
?
N

sl.es' 31 s?
W ?? T3•
N
y l
W

I

J

°' I

I

N
? I
m
N C
N N 2

ti N
J W
(
I
5
Is
I ?

CI
C\
z .

O ?

C. =Z- E-
z -OE-U
Q' ?Uo Oro
E,ozo?a s
z
oz
A o

a
E 00
A
U CC.,4

z
0
0
'? c

~ c
11

o
G
0
rl
z
4
F
z
z
F
O
z

24

1=
Z m
N LL r,

> O
H N O Q'
Z
i zZ a tr
O O w J J
? F- R_
N
H v
--
= LL w
3
z= cT
O H O (D

w cn
°w F- ?w
?-" 0 v owvi
m

LL r..
cf) Z
U
DO
0 O z m
. W
O
O
% ..
Q cn (
D
Q
C
j
Q
a Q
? o
c°fl
U C )CL
N
W CU m
CL w

z w
w
0 0
Z
v
QIJI
G
o
530 ?

W

528 ? 'n

0\0 I

N

W > J N
G

O
?
O ? N
522 ' h

N F-
tr !Y
_ >
0 O
C\j
I-
W
W
LL
T O Z
LLJ
a
U)
?O O

N
i ? Z 2
I w J J
_J F-
I Ltl
1 Ld
V) Z
UJ O U
a a
{ O
as
.o
. o,
rn
co Z N I N..:
0? NO
?3 r
Le) - U Ct
Q = O NO O cD
C: LL. V O W vi
E- O Z m (X:
LLZ OQO _
0 o a ID U LL,
o
Cl ?wo °
o -, a N
U d W
Z lit
2
U)
?.I

O
O

O
LO
o ?1
N

0

2
z
c
a
F
W
R
z
a
a
a.
I
Q
z
w
a
C?
F
a
C7
z
C
Q'
U
a
O
Z
F
U
z
0
F
U
a
F
z
Q
U
D
z
0
ca
p
0
28
L
0
Z z0
U
? G
C
c ?
r

Z N Li.
cn N O ter;
_ Z 9a z Z
J J
W J H ?- HUB
= U, Lp Q = O D O (0
O ? OJ
Z _ N V
' U-
oIJ .v i - W E- F-O z a)?j
1 m - (n Z Z
tij { 1 i W O V 00 0= W .-
I ( a0 ? in Q ° fn
O LL.
4. Q CL 0 UO O
f i
o ?? rn
CL
LLo: ?4: ?? I U a W
! to
Q \'I ?' Il i?` x i I Z =
Cl)
40
C4 <
M i ?; Ll
Ld
JY ?-- 3 OS /?1 \ \
cLi
W
Q
1 '?! I I ?? i 1 ? ? Z
C
Z7;y \
w f,` N \
101"
N N
Z
!" /' I !n V O
N
Q
F-
Q-? I ' W
W
n I I w z
<.? \A ?-
O J
-zi
N O
Z
W
Oil 1 O
N I-_ ?I ,COI
0, LLJ
a J O
1? N
I-
W
W
LL-
O Z
a
U) U
.2,0 0

co
Z NU ?i.
O N°

-j
j
ui

=
W -
I-
-
L?. W V) -

Z
2
?
0
E- U Ct
O 0 tD
V)
O Q
< LL U ° J
wuj
_ W f-
Q W ?-- 0
LL Z Z O)
0 0
W al (-) O
0 ID
!r 0 0 LL
CL Q W 0

° U O
LLJ
C)C 0

M
\ U IL
W
I
0 I
L?
? I
I
r
h
I
!• I
c
I
I
O ?
U
Z
2
z
e
a
H
m
Et
z
a
I ?
Q
z
A
F
:a
C?
z
W
U
a
O
Z
F
z
O
F
U
C
F
z
0
U
c
z
0
b
0
32
• O rn
N F= C ? ?
O W m
2 > z N LL
O_
N0

?
O
C\j W
Z O t-
co
la- Q
(= Z

F.
W
i W
= J H
LL W N C7
Q= -
p F- Ozi-
O tD
LL Q 3 a LL V O W vi
3' o z
W wZ
Now Ho
LL Z ? ?=?
o 0

w
H
a Q
0 o
o
a LL,
cr;
S

h
U')
a. Q
o O
U o LL
O
LLI h^
Pn

O
O U O a
a
°
W
cc ruc, Z ' w
I
I N
I
x
T I •.

1

\
I
I

c
I -Zz
\ I
,1
V
r I
J

cor6017 Z?
I

I
t
I V

c-P.Gj I
I
I
i
I
I

13
r
s
t

0, w
p I OZ NLL
0 o
ln. (\j I h- N .?
M Z a } mo
~ J J R_ ~ ?~ ti
W I W J !- (1) -? H v cf
W = W W Z2 O NOw
Li cn < W U 00 J
u1 O Z W F- 1--o Z m= to
T ?+ - - c
W W O W LLZ ~ C) in
J H CL U O-
O Q Q (p W
Q ??' (n (/?
LO = ZEE o p F- CL LL
cn lI p.. Q p. O U O
LLj O
ltl
°
0.
. ,n o O, 6 a w
z W
x
U)
J
N 0
0
0
1
a -L-)J
' I
Z
ti
a
R
• z
a
z
I
I
O ",4 O
- 00+SZ9 3nr-7 ?171tfVr

LL m
W 1 Z N LL.

C. j
I O_
N O
Z Z
=p
i to
Zp F- U)
HQ
?Zp
Z
t

J
1 n.
i < _
E-
J
-
i J Z F-<
'
= vr, C i I
N 3
1L U
?
OWui
- Z Q p
w F- ~O ?
cr)
rn?D

p"

I ula

w cn Z

O w Z F-

w O
O C )o

w
?

.--
r
-= F_ n.Q ? a
S N
c z ;V d j 1 ? N ?:? ? VQ U.
wo LO
s
b
., I ci a
a w

.. w
- - 1 Z = m
v I t
I
I t
1
? I
1? I
Q ? 1 L
1 -_

J
L \I
`

5 1
o ?yi 1 ?
_

LL ?

.mod
Uj4? l ? . 1

l C •
Q ? i

`

c
2 s
OC ? C

V ?
z
l<

w
J
h
Q
O •
N
Q
J
I-
w
H

w ?.
w
U. z
O z J
O - J_
w lL
J
Q
U
N N
w

F
O
Z
w
p
o ,
P
C?
N 0
Q ?-
y
U
?z
^ C
.? o
n
0
m
z N LL

cn
O
U)
Q .
N z m
z I
- a a Z
o Z
J H ?- M ~ U

rt`? w
_
tL w
z
=
O T
o o ca

N
W F- Q
a:
hO
Z

I= owuj
a) x
m

I V)
0 W
Oa c) ti. Z
o °- F-
m o o
? w
I cn O -Q,
a:
2: M N
t a- Q m c? 0
w 0
(t
o a- W
W
5 ' a w

?
J vl I ?

i

t
I
f ?
I
v ( I

tl

v I
-.
? r j ? ?? O D
I j \ O Q
`
1
D I
I
I?
w w
3
z_
O z J
w LL.
J
7 Q cn
w
u
N
O
z
w
D
36 O
L
.c,
zzz
U
?G
?. Q
0
c
3
J
:J
V
v
S I
r
I
I/
I
V
? I
i
i
Sz? N,
?v
M Z O
-z
?
w Q

J

w
?-
w
/ U)
O
NZ
w 0 w
H a. Q

c ?
CL
JS

w

c?

V:

I?

c

i
S
l
.r

z m
N
O
f'• N
N
I
}
a a
>- Z
? o
Z
R=

Cf)
H
I a
''
Q= p
V 0Ow
w
ALL
{- 0
= O
Ln
In m
?
LLz
O N Q 0p
W
W c.D
I
F= ?
O ie 0
0 LL
O
O w
a ~
ch
v
cr.
a

t~
w
w
_
,
V/

o v
N
Q
J

w
3
w
w z
LL -
O J
O z J
w w
J
N
Q w
U

O ?
O
z
w
0
0
Li
4 w ?'

v
`T
1t
? i
a\o
V
c?
N
O
al
h
O

t?

CWN
?C
O

OC ? ?, Z Z
? a
w
x J W
?
w

?,._ cn z
a W
Q
0
? a°
Q

`r f
V
`Q

Z C13
N LL
C
O
F- to
Q
N
I
-- Q Z Z
p
Z
? t
U d'
=

?
° U N
o (D
W
LL
I-- 0 .O
uj
a)c
W Z
o ?- 00
(D w
Q

O O
U 0O LL
O
° co na. co
CU M
M
W

z W
=

N
r•;
N
ix
O
2

0 O
0
S ?
H
w

LL
°
Z
?9 N
W
J
Q
U
U
5 "
. O O
S

C7
Z_
N_
L'`
.r
J
Z
O_
U
_?
r"
c!;
Z
C
..
Z
Q
p
0
.,
O
?.
N 4
m
ZO N LL
I
v Z Z lY 3 ?- ? ? .1
Q O 1 \
~ J J Cl. _ ~ ~ ~'
~ ( W J F- N (7 Z E- U
W = tL W Q= p NOw
Li lr lL W
N O U O
f- ~O ?
O Z W
U) Z
W O W lL0 C?
\ ~ CL a ?n a (D vW)
s
I v, o
U") V CL Q 0. c~j °- o
W WO o
° p om
CL
O O U CL W
I 2 =
U)
0
N
? I
d C? •
' I CU
I Z
N
I
e
a
H
I ?
• a
Q w
I ?
H a
I
I ?
I
o '
? T
C 0 J
1
C
C7 r,
Z Z
C O
Q J
C G
p .?
Z
'r
0
y. . I.
.C
O?
rI
LTME-

m
Z°
z
F_ Q
W J F-
W
lL W
N o'
M
cV W F-
N Z
W O W
LL Q
O
N (L

I
(
?u Q

?TOc ? -

? o

m
Z N W
O
F- cn N
t- a a :c)
it 3 >-
0 =
Z - j U tt
p NO to
< 0-1
rm- o m vi
Z Op p
O
W
O in Q ca cnn
a
?O 00
O Ccr.
L
U ?
a
z
N
N
h
h
I
t
Z
Q
cD
0
? a
IH
W
w
x
in
cn

N
J
1--
W

W
W Z
U-

? Z J
W u..
J
!n
Q W
U
?
O
z
w
D
O
N F=
F-
W
W
LL
Z
W
J
`. Q
U
J 0 O
J
J ?

O
i-
N
LO
t`

c

O o.
M C,
.-t
co
i
z
C\l o -LL ?.
cn f-' vi N a
LIJ ? zo ?Qr ?Z z
~ JJ Rs~ ?F-
W -? H to - ? F- U
= IL LLJ Q= p NOO(D
V) Lt U O J
LL) O W LL p~ O p
O cn Q O c
IY O Fp-?-O LL
Q W? WO
0 0O a. r
U CL W
, 2 Lt1
i =
Ln

I
J
M
cj
z
2
z
e
a
F
w
f?
z
Q a
a
I w
z
w
a
t-1
u
• c.
H 1 '? 47".?- FENCE_ z
\ Q cn ° C
zz°"?.~z? FoZoNa
o°e? 3 c w ozg''p o
z °U E4 wt
w z ? ? ti ^ 0
00 E-
r' ? p
L•]
p O i •? V C. C. Z
\L A S .,
N
2-GI FS ?\36 T D ,B' S C 10
O
15' C S P W1 /39 4;3 •? ••
2 ELBOWS
CAT-1 ca
? .a
,? ? ? o cUn
O
? o
ILA I
, ? /33 o H
a ,4
2-GI.? z
o
o ) .?
oo Q
GAT-I o
f _ z
/? ? j • PROP R/`N a
C'sp
-Y6A- PC 26+0095
4
44

c?
7
;3 Q
zzo >. _r_ zz

C'i
., w

ca o
OU
?
'
I C o z
pU
v
w z ., A o

r r
r -
r r -

14
a
c+
z

F O
O
Q ?F` 0
1
z
Z? Q ti
?
z ?oE~ v
?Uo O .o
o ..a
F ozo ?
.
`°
v
o z 0
O U
O
w >
D-OO
E'

z
.r
0
n
7 5 R AIS IV
-GI M TH INSTALLATION
0
F. ?.
o
y 1 y
A
/2 ELBOWS
- a
ED a
w
?u
PROP RAY ci _
47MV- FENCE
u, o
/TDE ~ ?.
A
45
I
f
i
cv

U W •\

r 10
•

?\\ I /
Ltl /
O 0 N /
•
•
/
LCl Lo
/
N
a ?- / H
z

o ? z

y• c3

46
a
c
z c
E- 0
zz ?'
zz 74
z
c° ? ?xz1F Q
a o
:z
UC o0
a'
V .o
H 7
co
ou
r

I ?z
?U
4z?..o
°
Ez., Ca P? o Q
C F 9 L) cn
Wz

c n
W 0.???0 v`
I 2 A- C 00
C
V
b Q V G 0.

I °

Q
V

I
i
t7z q I N °

I a N
o

i
??
-i
LLJ

O I
o
l
.._.
_ '• \

C-7 V
m

,
0

•. z
? • d•
z
S4 d? M
F-
J\x:5111 III ?.I •I • .]
I z "? II ?? I z
Ln m
I ..•0 d •.? J m / a
= yN, 8 ?.
47

F q
.4
•?
-+
T

E-
O

cQ

?

z C
?z Q
Q
?

d' F z
'" Q' y
?o
0 z z ?, z
U u
u ?
z
F
OF
F®Zc o
C
a0
0u ` 7, ?z
r o
oZ
o
a 0U z a
o
-
Z .u
o
?' o / Q o 0 0 F
C
z
// co U c
.

a I

= Ln I W o
.-?
o,. CL- p I 2
F- LLJ
M
In M ?
N 1
Q?
1 o V W I o
1 0 1
1 ? '_ 11
1 ? C:1
.

1
I /
v>
T S

LLJ
o

10
/
• c?
?
/? N G
• I ,t
- ? F

I
? LLJ
•
I z
0 i z
L/) z
m? N I Q
t
I N N
I F
O
ul
-j Ln z
t "`''

4
I

48
I
a

zz
? - I
- -
1 ? ca
z
+ z
v U • - ?2C F
U C // _
• w' • . C4 q
. S ?. Q

e?
Z

Fem., A
? ?
N 0
:: Q O
; O Q E? c:a
, F
O

W
Q? ?

? 00
A . , F
A A
I \ ??• ?, N z U?

? I i
41
LL
it
?
I? III
I'?III
III III ? II1 \ ?
z
?
/

-I C\i
N III III•

o I N
? U W

J N
4 a ~ \ Q Q

' A U

U W
1
I
N
I I t:2
?
? o cn
? •
w

?o I
•
I
?

J LJ W
z F

_
=
Z

r
VO
tl OzN
?f
/ • Q
t2 z?' m N O Z
O
z O
•

W _
r C)
.? N a cu
ON N M \\? f z W _ F

F` N
O
\\\
'

I m
--
p
I N Q
-?-_I
v a~ N ?? ? I
_ JN
U W
V
49
N F:
O w
o O
s N
F-
w
w
LL.
z
r w
J
a
cf)

O

C ?
N

C
m

C .a
C%
O.
m
p NLL
Cf) N ,a
Z o HQ
Z
~
w J J
J R=
cn (D Z ' U t7
= LL w Q=
MLL. O
U NO CD
Ow
°
i
i w cr)
o w LL. o
O f' 0 0
w
i oQ
cr. C ? Q ?
o s
a Q J° ?0
0

o
0
o C
U CL
CL
w

Z w
=
V)

\V
I Z
I
f
i
I I
11
i
i
1
I •.
i
O
1
2
z
e
a
F'
w
Fr
z
a
Q a
Q
z
w
a
t
I

cr-
O w

_ j O
C\j
H
w
w
Ll-
\ O Z
_
w
J
a

Y? Ln L)

O O
? F
;-SF
a
L
r1
e
N
c+?
W
Z 0
Z
~
W J
J

?
W J F-
W
u w
° M
w Z
0 w
_ H CL Q

{ t
i
? r
J
lL'
IL=
I
L
1
aQ
co
z N
O
C U) N.
?z
0
?(D Z F Uv
Q= O DO(D
F-O U owuj
tLZ 00=
o
0 a (D Cf)
f-? ?-0
?O U
o o O
0a-
L5 a:
IL
Z
a?
z
ti
LL
0
w
w
L
P.
Ft
? FF
.? b
zz?
U C
ao
0 U
a ?
c
as
0
c?
z
r O
F7 ?
19
oil ol/
N -- '- E? c.Z5, v' c
SpN z
c..
a r.

z
,.
?-U
ti
oe,
/ c
o
/ Q
o

I
''
\J
mo E. cn Z

Z
`

_ r
q

nz I
w I -

LUI I
I
-
I I
I
I uo
?F- ryt .
awl
`° S I L)
I M`
I I ? I
I I
I
I ? I I
? 558
0
0
n
y
0
z
Q
F
w
3
z
0
z
52
i
Z Z ?
C
UCH _
Z
A
O 4?
G `
\ tiJ \ x\" \
O
rr1
Q
w
z
\
?A °
~ N
\ V) NZ
O
? Co F
\
J cli
y
?
° ? -
-
F
\ -J N
U W
?\

z
O
E- 0
E. c?
7 E-
Z -OF U
Q ?Uc 9
C
i-• OZo w
?o C
pZz
OBE. w
A O O
U c. ?
z
zz
Fw F
U) z
O U
C?
0
a
C
ti

0
F
cv
G:V
0
0
n
• j .. WETLANDS}
V)
b9SlJ ???=_ f8•??C ??
ExiSr Ran . _ i - .
• UiC
53
r
a
z z
?o
U
a
U
.. c-
?
zz
0Q
A
?z
a
p
0
0
I
o
a °•• - ?` z Q Q z C F z
?\ .4r Q ¢ ITT • W \ n'? „w (? Ur •? .?1 f9
JB c3 . 1 W L. y Q V o O v
s .? _ ?- A F o z c '? ?
E- 0
U cn
M .?,yi< 9Z D8 5 "' a z A O O E?
o z 2, a GtiOS• as ?__ o A ?/ V
/
Sr U w '.1.
I
n h i
a
a 0Z
'
N N W /w O ' /
N 0 O \ N~ W I \
?W i7y ? f ? f O
VW ??W
f N

l•
W P
a, ?h3
\ ?m
_ l y
= O
` y
N,
?
SH
\ m? S
¢ ,

y?? Y
h .Q

i 'I / fl rfl rrflr
? ' % ? r,Qrrrfl'r'fl n ,. ? o
"•

` Q
:an
- Q
aN
2
??
L • f
,= 4 2 H P
q O t A• s
N

s

o= ?I

U
_
4 Q W
?
?O •Q rJ r?
.4
t
, r'
r
•
? O
? O a $ •` o

r?

I
I -
/ 5
= w
T v1 7 s_?
L:
W uS
M ¢ ° 2 h
I v o h
?' z
_
SNLi
?j

000,
r p?J` •?/,flrrru? ?/ I?
L?
00,
/
1 Q I
v
54
1
t
N h-

O W

O
N
F-
W
W
U-

W
J
a
? U

O O

%I;L
O.^. r_!

op_
M_
S
c?

w
J

C
JI

? Z
J
W J
~
J f--
W
v=i ?" 3
N w F-
M V) Z
W O W
H a a
O
a
i
\ \i
1
L
r
J
r 3
i
I
`tl
c
J
r
v

c?
CD }?
Z N lL .
O_
p
NO
Fa- Q z z
0:
O
Z= D NU
O

v O (D
0 _j
tom-o
Z OWU5

lL Z
O Fn
F-
Q a) j
on
cD ?
t= ? F- o u.
W°
L)
O
W
0
° O a
U CL
CL
W

2 W
=
Cf)
J
> m
O 1 N II Z 100
Z
?<
J J R=
I W J F- Cn v V
I = Li W Z= O Now
W N = lL U O
W
O Z W F- F-O z =
m=
W O W ILZO Op
w CL
J \ < O (n Q tD ( S
p
a Q ? o L) LL
0
L?
0 CL
? O O \\ I V ? W
• \ t Z w
i
I
I
'J
O ?
O
N
CID I
1
N 1
1
1 ?
Z ?
• z
? F
m
`: Ez
Iz
J
I
I ?
i
X7
i
O ?6
r
k'
i
i
I
i
F
a
zz
0
W U
U w
~z
U
G
wZ
..M 4
r-
r:
s, ,s
i
z
0 ?
0
d
/?- z z c ??-r o z
Z ¢
r' / C V Z y r 0F U
6W c:? C oo®.?
0 z o 0
in / l J / r \\?4?, ? ? o
IC3
• ? w
- - T o
ad1k \\ N IT
C? / -j to
\ U w
F
w
i
V z
00
N O ,
LLJ \ o ? w
i
O Z I < - ?? ?? ?? O
-j V)
OZ ' Uw,\i// p
NO I i 0
'• \ NON I
? J U) I?
Uw
57
WETLAND SUMMARY REPORT
SITE STATION
1 429+70 TO
434+70(L) .
2* 453+06 TO
457+12(L)
3* 458+00 TO
459+66(L•)
4 461+45 TO
462+50(L)
5 467+00 TO
482+57(L)
6 501+00 TO
504+16 (L)
7* 506+75 TO
528+55(L)
8 541+00 TO
542+11(L)
9 551+06 TO
551+30
10 570+84 TO
571+05(L)
11 580+75 TO
581+60(L)
12 602+36 TO
602+49(L)
13 609+00 TO
611+50(L)
14A 616+25 TO
630+30(L)
14B* 633+00 TO
639+35(L)
15 639+66 TO
639+72(L)
16 642+90 TO
642+96(L)
17 648+40 TO
648+46(L)
18 10+74(RP1 D) TO
10+80(RP1 D)
19 691+25 TO
691+59(L)
20 705+53 TO
705+59(L)
IMPACT AREA
Wetland Surface Water
3.10 -
1.85/0.52 -
0.55/0.22 -
0.43 -
3.60 -
1.17 -
8.29/1.21 -
0.57 -
- 0.14
- 0.11
1.56 -
- 0.07
0.95 -
4.50 -
2.14/0.59 -
- 0.07
- 0.02
- 0.04
- 0.02
- 0.15
- 0.03
STRUCTURE FILL
3-7'X 5' RCBC 72,000
20;000
18" RCP 4,650
3,550
15" RCP 47,800
7'x 3' RCBC 11,000
54,000
7'x 5' RCBC 6,900
24" RCP 700
30" RCP 800
.2-6'x 5' RCBC 24,800
18" RCP 800
11,000
2-36" RCP 44,000
18" RCP 9,200
350
130
24" RCP 290
30" RCP 350
36" RCP 1,450
18" RCP 150
SHEET 58 OF 61
f
t
k
I-
WETLAND SUMMARY REPORT (CON'T)
21 730+98 TO
731+08(L) - 0.16 30" RCP 2,500
22 745+52 TO '.
745+64(L) - 0.09 900
23 749+71 TO
757+00(L) 2.47 - 2-10' x 6' RCBC 80,000
24 782+27 TO
782+66(L)
0.86
-
36" RCP
25,200
25 792+21 TO
792+31(L)
-
0.05
30" RCP
1,600
26 809+22 TO
809+32(L) - 0.05 18' RCP 2,400
27 814+81 TO
816+06(L) 0.70 - 54" RCP 58,900
28 826+10 TO
826+60(L) 0.31 - 42" RCP 24,300
29 835+88 TO
836+68(L) 0.68 - 48" RCP 26,300
30 845+50 TO
846+45(L) 0.29 - 54" RCP 13,600
31 857+46 TO
860+06(L)
1.02
-
36" & 54" RCP
16,000
31 A 21+05 TO
22+00(RP3C)
0.29
-
36" RCP
12,500
32 870+96 TO
874+97(L)
1.36
-
60" RCP
22,000
33 8+50 TO
11+00(L)
0.36
-
66" RCP
3,000
37.47/2.54 1.00
TOTALS 40.01 1.00 609,620
Note: * denotes impacts by fill/excavation; RCBC and RCP denote reinforced concrete
box culvert and reinforced concrete pipe; values for impact area given in acres; values
for fill given in cubic yards

SHEET 59 OF 61
PROPERTY OWNERS
Site 4
1.
Site 5
1.
2.
Site 6
1.
2.
Site 7
1.
Site 8
1.
2.
Site 9
1.
2.
., Heirs
,mmon Avenue
Aon. NO 27892
,d & Olivia Southeriand, et al
Box 123
.reenville, NO 27835.
Randy T. Wynne
Rt 5, Box 319 • .
Williamston, NO 27892
Donald & Olivia Southeriand, et al
PO Box 123
Greenville, NO 27835
Roanoke-Tar Cotton, Inc.
c/o Taylor Slade
PO Box 246
Everetts, N.C. 23825
Roanoke-Tar Cotton, Inc.
c/o Taylor Slade
PO Box 246
Everetts, N.C. 23825
Randy T. Wynne
Rt 5, Box 319
Williamston, NO 27892
Randy T. Wynne
Rt. 5, Box 319
Williamston, NO 27892
Paul Bailey, Heirs
Route 4, Box 50
Williamston, NO 27892
Henry A Johnson, Heirs
do Kenneth Johnson
106 Rooseveit Drive
Williamston, NO 27892
Paul Bailey, Heirs
Route 4, Box 50
Williamston, NO 27892
Lois Bullock
PO Box 402
Jackson, NC 27845
Edwin T. Coulboum, Jr.
1009 Rogers St
Windsor, NO 27983
Margaret W. Clark
PO Box 131
Everetts, NO 27825
Leroy Outerbridge
Rt 4, Box 125
Williamston, NC 27892
Leroy Outerbridge
Rt 4, Box 125
Williamston, NC 27892
Paul Bailey, Heirs
Route 4, Box 50
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 10
1. Fernando Bowen, Heirs
c/o Elizabeth M. Bowen
Rt 4, Box 125
Williamston, NO 27892
2. James A Bowen
Rt 4. Box 122
Williamston, NO 27892
Site 11
1. James A Bowen
Rt 4. Box 122
Williamston, NC 27892
2. H.L. Meador, Heirs
3101 Sun Drive
Raleigh, NO 27614
3. Robert E. Bowen
305 York Street
Cary, NC 27511
4. J. Melvin Bowen
406 N. Smithwick Street
Wiliamston, NC 27892
Site 1
1. J. Melvin Bowen
406 N. Smithwick Street
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 13
1. J. Melvin Bowen
406 N. Smithwick Street
Williamston, NC 27892
2. H.L. Barnhill
125 W. Simmons Avenue
Williamston, NO 27892
Site 14
1. H.L. Barnhill
125 W. Simmons Avenue
Williamston, NC 27892
2. Robert U. Gurganus
Rt. 4, Box 80
Williamston, NO 27892
Sites 15-17
1. Johnny L. Simpson
Rt 4, Box 64
Williamston, NC 27892
2. Jimmy R. Council
Rt. 4, Box 56
Williamston, NC 27892
3. Smith Biggs
Rt 4, Box 48
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 18
1. J. Melvin Bowen
406 N. Smithwick Street
SHEET 60 OF 61

PROPERTY OWNERS (CON'T)
Williamston, NC 27892 Sites 29-30
Site 19 1. Lawrence E. Lilley
1. Artie T. Manson PO Box 670
412 Washington Street •Williamston, NC 27892
Williamston, NC 27892 Site 31
2. William H. Biggs, Jr. 1. Daniel M. Bowen
PO Box 295 PO Box 802
Sharpsburg, NC 27878 Williamston, NC 27892
Site 0
1. William H. Biggs, Jr.
PO Box 295
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
Site 21
1. Nina B. Gaynor
PO Box 41
Rocky Mount, NC 27802
2. Ivanetta L. Bums
Rt 5, Box 923
Williamston, NC 27892
3. Mary E. Williams
Rt. 5, Box 912
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 22
1. Mulester Butler, Heirs
c/o Annie Kennedy
938 W. Franklintown'Road
Baltimore, Md. 21216
2. George W. Corey
402 Vance Street
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 23
1. Mulester Butler, Heirs
c/o Annie Kennedy
938 W. Franklintown Road
Baltimore, Md. 21216
2. George W. Corey
402 Vance Street
Williamston, NC 27892
3. AD. Hams-Farms
703 Dovercourt Place
Downingtown, Pa 19335
Sites 2425
1. C. F. Hams
Rt 2, Box 40
Williamston, NC 27892
Site 26
1. Ira Rogerson, Heirs
c/o Essie Mae Rogerson
Rt 2, Box 820
Willamston, NC 27892
2. Roland B. Lilley
Rt 2
Williamston, NC 27892
Sites 27-28
1. Roland B. Lilley
Rt. 2
SHEET 61 OF 61
Williamston, NC 27892