HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060274 Ver 1_Year 1 Amended Monitoring Report_20100208oL,-0a114
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
February 5, 2010
S&EC Project No. 1021.E1
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attn: Ms. Jean Manuele
u9@90MAM
FF8 Q 8 2010
DEW - W4TER OtbWTY
WETLAWS AND STORMwA#A VMCH
NCDENR - DWQ
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Mr. Eric Kulz
Reference: Amended Year One Monitoring Report
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Warren County, NC
USACE Action ID No. 200221365
DWQ Project No. 20060274
Please find the enclosed Amended Year One Monitoring Report for the above referenced site.
The amended report contains more accurate information regarding the location and type of
structures installed during the stream restoration. Please replace the original report mailed on
December 30, 2009 with this amended report in your files. As you will find in the report, it is our
opinion that the stream, wetland, and vegetative components of the restoration have met the
success criteria as described in the Monitoring Plan.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest opportunity.
We thank you for your assistance to date and look forward to the continued success of this
project.
Sincerely,
SOIL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
. IV" t .
Davi ainey
SA&M Department Manager
Attachments: Amended Year One Monitoring Report dated January 2010
Cc: Mr. David Lee, Wake Stone Corporation
Newell Farm
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Amended Year One Monitoring Report
Warren County, North Carolina
January 2010
Cataloging Unit- Tar River Basin 03020102 RP=@ff20WjL4D
Prepared For: FEB 0 6 2010
boll & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
°
Wake Stone Corporation V&-TL rosA?0S o wAMVMCH
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Project History ....................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Mitigation Components .......................................................................................... 1
2.0 Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Methodoloy ............................................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring ........................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring ............................................................................ 3
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring ............................................................ 5
2.2 Results .................................................................................................................... 6
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria ................................................................... 6
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria .................................................................... 6
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria ..................................................... 8
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success ................................................................................... 8
Figure 1- USGS Vicinity Map
Appendix A - Monitoring Layout
Appendix B - Stream Cross-section and Overbank Event Photos
Appendix C - Groundwater and Rainfall Data
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Appendix E - Pebble Count Data
Appendix F - Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This monitoring report has been prepared by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) to
present and evaluate site monitoring data for the period October 2, 2008 through November 10,
2009, for the Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site located in Warren County,
North Carolina.
1.2 Project History
The Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site was restored by the Wake Stone
Corporation in order to offset an estimated 2,058 linear feet of stream channel impacts and an
estimated 6.28 acres of wetland impacts associated with the expansion of its Nash County
Quarry. The project site consists of approximately 28 acres and is located roughly 2.25 miles
southeast of the Town of Warrenton on the west side of Dr. King Road (SR 1001) in Warren
County, NC. A vicinity map is included as Figure 1.
Waters on-site drain to Fishing Creek (C;NSW) in the Tar River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloguing
Unit 03020102). Stream mitigation includes the restoration of approximately 2,551 linear feet of
stream and the enhancement of approximately 737 linear feet of stream. The wetland mitigation
effort involves a total of 18.55 acres of wetlands, including the restoration of prior converted
wetlands, the creation of new wetlands, and the enhancement and preservation of select existing
wetlands. Wetland acreage generated calculations on the Newell Farm Mitigation Site are based
on a wetland delineation performed by S&EC following the completion of site construction.
Construction of the restoration, enhancement, and creation areas on-site was performed during
the period January 2008 through June 2008. All construction and planting was performed by the
Wake Stone Corporation. Periodic construction observation was performed by S&EC in order to
ensure that construction was performed in general accordance with our design intent.
1.3 Mitigation Components
After the completion of the project construction, total accrued mitigation credits were tabulated.
Field data were gathered and evaluated to quantify the length of the stream channel and wetland
acreage on-site. Sheet 1 in Appendix A depicts the overall monitoring layout, with the A----A
section line (at Station 7+37) shown to separate stream enhancement from stream restoration
areas.
Mitigation Type Total
Stream Restoration 2,551 linear feet
Stream Enhancement 737 linear feet
Total Stream Length 3,288 linear feet
Wetland Restoration 5.17 acres
Wetland Creation 3.83 acres
Wetland Enhancement 3.55 acres
Wetland Preservation 6.00 acres
Total Wetland Acreage 18.55 acres
In November 2006, a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit was issued to the Wake
Stone Corporation for impacts at the Nash County Quarry. Required mitigation for these impacts
has been satisfied at the Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site. Surplus mitigation
credits resulted from Wake Stone's work at the site as detailed below in the column labeled
"Remaining Mitigation Credits". The permit Action ID Numbers are identified in the following
table:
Impacts on the Nash Mitigation Provided by the Newell Remaining
County Quarry Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation
(USACE Action ID Restoration Site Credits
Number 200221365,
DWQ Project Number
20060274
2,058 linear feet of 2,551 linear feet restoration and 737 493 linear feet
stream linear feet enhancement (total 3,288 (restoration) and
linear feet) 737 linear feet
(enhancement)
6.28 acres of 5.17 acres restoration, 2.72 acres
jurisdictional wetland 3.83 acres creation, (9 total acres of (restoration and/or
restoration and creation), 3.55 acres creation), 3.55
enhancement, and 6.00 acres acres
preservation (total wetlands 18.55 acres) (enhancement), and
6.00 acres
(preservation)
2
2.0 MONITORING
As described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan dated February 16,
2006, site monitoring will be performed for a period of 5 years or until approval is given by
USACE and DWQ (hereinafter Agencies) to discontinue monitoring. This report serves as the
Year One Monitoring report for the Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site. Stream
and wetland monitoring will occur annually, with quarterly site visits to assess general site
conditions. Physical, vegetative, and hydrologic data collection will also be performed as
required during these site visits. Monitoring reports will be submitted annually to the Agencies.
2.1 Methodology
This section includes information concerning; 1) hydrologic monitoring, 2) vegetation
monitoring, 3) stream morphology monitoring, and 4) evaluation of site monitoring success.
These data will be used for comparison with data from subsequent monitoring years.
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring
A total of eight (8) Infinities U.S.A., groundwater monitoring gauges (labeled Gauges A through
H) were installed on the site, with four (4) in wetland restoration areas, three (3) in wetland
creation areas, and one (1) in a wetland enhancement area. An Infinities U.S.A., rain gauge was
also installed on-site. The locations of all monitoring gauges are shown in Appendix A on the
Monitoring Layout (Sheets 1 through 6).
Gauges were installed on October 2°d, 2008 (during the growing season). Gauges were
operational for a total of 31 days during the 2008 growing season, and at the time of the last
download on November 10, 2009, had been operational for the entire 210 days of the 2009
growing season. Rainfall was recorded by the on-site Infinities rain gauge. Rainfall during the
2008 monitoring year (for the period October 2 through December 31, 2008) was 2.19 inches.
Rainfall during the 2009 monitoring year (for the period January 1 through November 10, 2009)
was 30.08 inches.
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring
Eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots labeled VP1 through VP8 are located across
the site. Each tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plot is a square, 10 meters (32.8 feet) on each
side (100 square meters, or approximately 1,075 square feet). Two (2) bank vegetation
monitoring plots are located adjacent to the restored stream channel. Each bank vegetation
monitoring plot includes the planted live stakes along approximately 65 linear feet of stream
channel. Three (3) herbaceous monitoring plots are located across the site. Each herbaceous
monitoring plot is a square, 3 meters (10 feet) on each side.
The locations of all monitoring plots are shown in Appendix A on the Monitoring Layout (Sheets
1 through 6). Photos of each vegetation plot are presented in Appendix F. Vegetation counts for
Monitoring Year One were performed on July 14 and 15, 2009 by S&EC.
To aid in future surveys, the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 1 Protocol was used to
prepare a map of the plants within each of the eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring
plots. These maps will be utilized in future years to aid in determining the survival of individual
planted stems within each vegetation monitoring plot. Each planted stem counted during
Monitoring Year One was flagged with pink or orange flagging.
A table indicating the total number of live, planted woody stems in each sample plot is included
below:
Plot VP I VP2 VP3 VP4 VP5 VP6 VP7 VP8 Total
Numbers
Planted
Woody
Stems- 16 35 7 0** 12 19 16 11 116
Year One
Count
** See Section 2.2.2.
Species diversity is described in the following table:
Planted Woody Stems, Year Plots
One (2009) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Year One Totals
River Birch
(Betula ni a)
1
--
1
0
--
--
--
3
5
Silky Dogwood (Cornus
amomum)
--
1
--
0
8
4
7
1
21
Persimmon (Diospyros
vir iniana)
--
2
--
0
--
--
--
1
3
Virginia Sweetspire (Itea
vir inica)
--
1
0
__
1
S icebush (Lindera benzoin) -- 1 -- 0 __ 1
American Sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis)
9
--
3
0
--
--
--
2
14
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus
michauxii)
2
5
1
0
--
--
--
1
9
Water Oak (Quercus ni ra) -- 2 -- 0 __ 2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus
pagoda)
3
8
2
0
--
--
--
1
14
Willow Oak ( uercus phellos) -- 13 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 13
Silky Willow (Salix sericea) 1 1 -- 0 4 9 7 1 23
Arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum) -- -- -- 0 -- 6 2 1 9
Possumhaw (Viburnum nudum) -- 1 -- 0 __ __ __ -- 1
Year One Totals 16 35 7 0 12 19 16 11 116
Plot Live Stem Density
(stems/acre)
648
1,417
283
0
486
769
648
445
671/587
Site Average
Live Stem Density
** o.... IN n ., 671 stems per acre is avg. of all plots except Plot 4**
587 stems per acre is avg. of all eight plots including Plot 4**
01,0 0"L1Vll L.L.L.
4
Planted live stakes were counted within the two (2) bank vegetation monitoring plots. Live stake
survival will be calculated based on data collected during the Year One Monitoring in 2009.
Future bank vegetation monitoring data will be compared with this monitoring data to determine
survival rates for live stakes planted along stream banks. Live stake counts by species and by
plot are presented in the following tables:
Year One (2009) - Bank Plot 1
Common Name Species Total Number Planted % of Total Species Composition
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 23 26%
Silk Willow Salix sericea 57 64%
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 9 10%
TOTAL 89 100%
Year One (2009) - Bank Plot 2
Common Name Species Total Number Planted % of Total Species Composition
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 23 44%
Silk Willow Salix sericea 17 33%
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 6 12%
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 6 12%
TOTAL 52 100%
Herbaceous vegetation varies throughout the restoration site. The three herbaceous monitoring
plots all meet the requirement of being over 50 percent covered with herbaceous vegetation.
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring
Fourteen (14) stream cross-sections consisting of seven (7) nested riffle-pool pairs were
established on-site and are shown in Appendix A on Sheet 1. The As-built stream survey,
including cross-section data, stream pattern data, and structure location, was performed by the
Wake Stone Corporation in October 2008.
The Monitoring Year One survey of the stream enhancement area and two representative
longitudinal profiles was performed by S&EC in July 2009, and the Year One cross-section
survey was performed by the Wake Stone Corporation in November 2009. Representative
Longitudinal Profile No. I was surveyed from Cross-section Pool 4 to Cross-section Pool 5.
Representative Longitudinal Profile No. 2 was surveyed from Cross-section Pool 6 to Cross-
section Pool 7.
The As-Built and Year One survey data will be compared to survey data collected in future years
to assess continued channel stability. Cross-section and representative longitudinal profile data
from these surveys are presented graphically in Appendix D. Photos of each surveyed stream
cross-section (all taken facing downstream) are presented in Appendix B.
5
2.2 Results
This section includes a summary of site monitoring as compared to established success criteria
for hydrologic, vegetation, and stream morphology. For additional information the interested
reader is referred to the appendices.
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria
Success criteria for wetland hydrology, as described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream and Wetland
Restoration Plan include the saturation of the upper 12 inches of soil for at least 18 consecutive
days during the growing season. There is no specific data regarding the average growing season
for Warren County, NC; however, the growing season for Vance County, located immediately
west of Warren County, is 210 days (from April 6th through November 1').
Hydrologic monitoring data for the 2009 (Year One) monitoring year indicates that the site is
experiencing conditions consistent with local jurisdictional wetlands. Data collected for the
monitoring period are presented in graphical format in Appendix C.
All eight (8) gauges on-site have met hydrology requirements for both the 2008 and 2009
monitoring years. Consecutive days of saturation for the 2008 growing season range from 28
days to the entire 31 days the gauges monitored hydrology during the 2008 growing season.
Consecutive days of saturation for the 2009 growing season range from 56 days to the entire 210
days of the 2009 growing season.
Based on our site observations and recorded groundwater gauge data, the site has
performed successfully during both the 2008 (Post-construction) and 2009 (Year One)
monitoring seasons with respect to hydrology.
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
The success criteria of planted woody stems within the riparian wetlands are based on the
combined survival of tree and shrub species for the 5-year monitoring period. Survival of woody
species planted within the restored buffers and wetlands must be at least 320 stems per acre
through Monitoring Year Three, 288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 4, and 260 stems
per acre through Monitoring Year 5. The stem count is based on an average of the stem counts
of the eight (8) evaluated 10x10-meter tree and shrub buffer vegetation plots. The success
criteria of the two (2) bank vegetation plots along the restored channels are based on the survival
of approximately 50 percent of live-stake bank plantings for the 5-year monitoring period.
Vegetative success criteria of 50% coverage will be required at the end of the 5-year period for
the herbaceous planting zones. This coverage will be qualitatively evaluated based on
observation of the three (3) herbaceous monitoring plots and herbaceous vegetation within other
planted areas.
The average number of stems per vegetation survival monitoring plot is 14.5 stems for
Monitoring Year One. Based on the eight (8) vegetation survival monitoring plots, the overall
site planted woody stem density is 587 stems per acre for the 2009 (Year One) monitoring
6
season. There are thirteen (13) different planted woody species represented within the eight (8)
tree and shrub monitoring plots.
** NOTE: Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is located within an area of wetland enhancement.
The area surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is heavily vegetated with natural
volunteer herbaceous species and is regularly inundated with shallow water approximately
6 to 24 inches in depth. Soil in this area has a high organic content. Enhancement of this
area consisted of modifications to the surrounding grade in order to improve the hydrology
of the area. This area was not planted due to the level of inundation at the time of planting.
Enhancement of this area consisted of grading the surrounding areas to improve
hydrology. Based on a visual inspection of the inundated portions of the wetland
enhancement area including and surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4, the area
appears functional, is a well vegetated wetland, and contributes to overall site diversity by
providing a more open wetland type necessary for many native plant and animal species.
We will continue to observe Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 and the surrounding wetland
enhancement area in subsequent monitoring years to assess its progression and the role of
this area in the overall ecosystem within the restoration site. Because the Restoration Plan
specifies a total of eight tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots, we have included
Vegetation Plot 4 in the calculations of site average stem density; however, it is our
opinion that the inundated wetland enhancement area including and surrounding
Vegetation Plot 4 will likely naturally revegetate without further planting efforts. Volunteer
woody species such as Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) have already begun to
appear within Vegetation Plot 4.
Native herbaceous species have become densely established and are dominant throughout the
site. Herbaceous species observed along stream banks and in the buffer and wetlands on-site
include:
• Jewelweed - Impatiens capensis
• Soft Rush - Juncus effusus
• Lizard's Tail - Saururus cernuus
• Sedges - Carex spp.
• Switchgrass - Panicum virgatum
• Joe-Pye Weed - Eupatoriadelphus fistulosus
• Duck Potato - Sagittaria latifolia
• Goldenrod - Solidago sp.
• Dog-fennel - Eupatorium capillifolium
• Boneset - Eupatorium perfoliatum
Many volunteer woody and herbaceous species have appeared likely due to surrounding forests
and mature trees preserved on-site, which provide a nearby seed source. Volunteer tree and
shrub species noted within the tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots include Swamp Rose
(Rosa palustris), Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Red Maple (Acer rubrum), American
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa), Black Willow (Salix nigra),
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), Tag Alder (Alnus serrulata), and Sweet Gum (Liquidambar
7
styraciflua). Volunteer woody stems within the tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots
were noted and counted, but not taken into account in calculating planted woody stem
densities within the plots.
Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiora) and Privet (Ligustrum sinense) are two invasive species that
have been observed on-site. Prior to site construction, the population of Multiflora Rose on-site
was treated with an herbicide to prevent it from dominating the restored wetland and buffer
areas. Currently, one small area of Multiflora Rose is still located on-site, and is being monitored
for future herbicide applications as needed. Privet, although it is a highly invasive species, is not
common on the Newell Farm site. Very few specimens of Privet were noted in the northern
portion of the stream enhancement area.
The vegetative component of the mitigation effort has been initially calculated and based
on current stem density is expected to meet the established success criteria of 320 live stems
per acre by the end of Monitoring Year 3, 288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 4,
and 260 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 5. Live stake counts within bank
vegetation monitoring plots have been performed and a baseline determined for future
survivability calculations. Herbaceous vegetation in all herbaceous monitoring plots and
other areas of the site is dense and vigorous.
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria
Based on visual observation of the restored stream channel, it appears that the restored channel is
quite stable. Multiple overbank events have been documented by the presence of wrack lines,
flotsam, and flattened vegetation observed in the floodplain during various site visits. No areas of
severe erosion or failing structures were observed during this year's monitoring. Any evidenced
erosion, bare banks, or failing structures observed in future monitoring years will be documented
and a plan implemented to repair the problem areas.
A representative pebble count was performed at cross-sections Riffle 5 and Pool 5. The pebble
count shows that Riffle 5 is currently composed mainly of gravel, and Pool 5 is composed of silt,
sand, and very fine gravel. Year One pebble count data will be compared to future year data in
subsequent monitoring reports. Data collected are presented in tabular and graphical form in
Appendix E.
Per the Mitigation Plan, success criteria have been met in that the stream bedform features
and cross-sections have remained stable (i.e. the restored portion of the stream has retained
its proposed Rosgen stream-type classification of C) through the current monitoring year.
Accordingly, it is our opinion that Year One monitoring of the stream channel confirms
morphological success.
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success - Year One (2009)
Based on vegetation data collected within the sample plots, existing groundwater gauge
data, and stream physical data, the site meets the success criteria as set forth in the
approved Restoration Plan.
8
t .!.
0
V/ ? AK5 ? ,J'?j ?? \ l?\I { _
??i???,s r C \
f
1-1 A-1
PO2 i tENo. Figure I - USGS
Vicinity Map
Project Mgr.: Wake Stone Corp. Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
DG Newell Farm Restoration 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 846-5900 • (919) 846-9467
Scale: Warren County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
i ° = 2,000
Warrenton and
812112009 Afton Quadrangles
APPENDIX A - MONITORING LAYOUT
[j:'oN 0 1 1nawl 9NNO1INOW 11";IAO
4224 :2pil 1924G
7N "M NJ2MM
ADIG JIVM 311S NOllt/91111N
I i'ni
x
W
W
H
0
Q
J
z
0
E-
z
J
J
W
0
IL
C
R
In
,nCS
VyR
C
E
c
O
C
W
O
V7
O
O
N
a•OHP®ssm"
OW909 X6[6) =?3 006S-M (616) MMW • V19LZ ml1-zrJ 4-11 IPIP11 • Pp'11 QMP V -TH 01011
Vd 6sluegnsuoa TB;uaWUOJIeug V UOS
'D;I*s
A9 600Z `0£ - 9Z J. n NO AQ/t21nG 9NRI;3N19N9 a311WIl £
';INO1S -:NVM
A9 90OF `0 21990190 NO AQA,1inS 9N1213AN19N2 QI11W11 Z
?1dWIX021dd`d g21`d Sg2iniv3d
3115 TV d0 SNOISN9W1a aNV `SNOIlbAT;l `SNOUVDO-I I
:SQlON
9-400 V 133NS Inavn ONNOIINOW
:•o I„y :211114224 ®°'aaplms-,
09 = I NOIIVNC)J 0? 7N "O? NJNWM L946-949 (616) :n3 • 006L-919 (616) -DW • 419LZ amlouo R1>oN LPN P•oN LPN -vu 0[011
3NOls ?IVM ;W;"Ij :u014mal Vd 6%uyjTnsuO:) Te4ualwuojl&u$ V IgOS
55TI 90
]IlS NOlMIDIN
"r i : ?6V4 W roe
I:1"IznI MVd T]N9N
Z lOl d
9NI?JOlINOW
NOIl`dl]9]n
(z- e +,L - eqG?
IM V _ V ?9 aliONIa_
NOUVt 1OiGl?l W` J KG N1919
i
s /
1
1 °
/ V U
I
Z ccAJ N
r'
Id
I ?l
r%
J
J
IAN
,
I % it
r
I ? I
FYI
I
Q
W
W
T
I iol cl
)N I? Oil NOA
NOlidi]09n
ONlsso?D
clvo?
(00 + 0 ' eqG)
iN]WIDN` PNI
AVJJ Iis N 1019
09 0 OF 09
.09 = 121VOG
PAON
0
Noop-r MOOT 4L
- Ir
GGMID )OMI
3Ndn
MOON-r 90l wir
-130 9NINS1J N
NOIIVNOIS3N
:
-
AV-
NIS
No N011035 M0199
1N3W90NVNN- 4
AV-:MIS - ..`d.. N01109G 3n09V
GV-:N d NOII` A'N9G-:4?ld aN`d113M
51V3?JV 1N3W30NV14N9 aNVIlgM
GV9?IV N0IIV-N0iG3-N (INYli3M
GV-:TN`d N O UV-q-N 0 4 N`dl 9M
S39flb'9 9NN0IIN0W .19010N(l kP
SN01103S-GGMID AVMUS ZdN <
d
SIMcl 9NN011NOW NOIIVI993n 0
S1NIOd 010Nd N0UV139;]A adw
Cl N ] 99?
O
Q
C?
Z
Z
9 d0 £ e 133NS incA i 9NNOIINOW
:'O app 4224G - ®°°'a8ms-AL&m
09 = . I N0I1V219-A ND 7N "OD N 7N2MM [946'946 (616) :-J • 006S 968 (6I6) =Kigd - 419a waRp¢J qwx vm-ll • Plod oupla 1 0I01I
C. JIVM :1u21I.U0l1r=j
vd Gsluu:tlnsuo:) ;UQUIUO JIS II [106
gi)G NOltOWA
:UM C1 :-?6 ro,
I T I ZO 1 MV=J 1l;]NgN
:-ON 1 2[bJJ :]771'01)
CA
09 O O£ 09
09 = 191VOS
PENON
0
lM d u
DNI?JOlINOW {?dN \, =
NOIl`dl???A NN`d9 n
NOIlO31021d 901 N30`21 Ctl?
MOON-f )IOOI Q
.A J
9N` A-SSO?JO'IOO?J ?° ,? `'? rr nn
MOON-f 90l ? 4• '?
V
-A99ND 9NINSI? ?? s I\ z
NOliVNO1S3'8 NV-:MiS - Ilb'u NOU09G MOT39 ® `? ' `LL
1N-qW3OMdNN9
W`d9'?I1S -Xi, NOIlO3S 9AO9`d
/ a
GV-:NV NOIl`d 19G_:?Jd aN` U9ffi ® --
Sd3?J`d 1N3W3OMdNN3 aNVlJ-gM
S` -:MV NOIl`d?JO1S3?J aNV119M i
Stl3?JV NOUV91JO aN`( IJ-QM
S39f1d9 9NI'NO11NON .k9OIMICJ.N
SNOIlO3S-SSO?JO W`d3211S UN
S1Old )NI?JOIINOW NOIl`dlgJgn O a
S1NIOd OlONd NOUVI293n =„ iau
110-14
DNI?OiINOW
SnOio`d9?Jg N
(NOI V10iGJJ)
.m E
0
(V
BMO•]MI{CIBYIYI511aNM1CffI11Ml?/I{?y?ITlJlll\fC-I LOOIIJ'1]Cl\
9 -0 it
o 1D3NS inow1 9NNO1INOW
IiIG NOUV9WA
MMI TINgN
Ilm.ogms•A&MA
[946.948 (616) M.4 • 0069-M (616) :mw • t•19LZ Mono 41nN viaPll • W-ll am -rd 01011
dd `siu'e:linsuo:) j83uaTauodjAu$ 7S dos
(iN9A9DN` PN9)
d 19n` 9 kgoiO? a?N
-V 1olci
DNI?OiINOW
NOliVi999n
(NOliV9`* 3)
EJA
gE)nvq
j
Z
e 10-1 cl
DNI'?IOiINOA
igndq
N I`d?
U
w
w
z
O
Q
I Z
` l0
rZd9
s
f O
zdu
IiViIDI n NN`d9
f NOIJ.-031O'N l 101 NOMI
Nool-I-r MOOT 4L
`
- Ir
3N
dn
SSO?JO )100?J
)loop-r 901 wir
)i9-:MD DNIPGI-4 CS
NOUV101ST
W
`
1
-
b
S
.M. N011035 Mo199
3?
I
f., e lOld 1N-9A93NVPN;]
N M-:NIG - N, VII N01103S DA09V
N I? Ol l N O W GV-:NV NOI-LVAN3S-7ZId aN`dlllM
SnO??d9 Nip
V
GV-:NV 1N3Wg0MdNN3 aN` li-gM Q
09 0 os GVAV NOIlV-NOiG9-N aNVligM
,05 =III IWDG (NOUVI?O) Sd3?Jd N OII`d-qS0 a Nd1.19M
S39nb'9 9NNOIINOA A9010'8a.IN
PAON ^ ^ n?^
J J J SNOIZIG-SSO?J0 Wb'?1S ZA
d E
O
n
01O'NQ^H S101d 9NI?IOIINOW NOI VI999n
S1NIOd 010Nd NOIl` i;I9;]A ? w
0
G? GN999? o
0
N
6mp•arote6uuoyuoyy\duimsOsdeyh lTIZO I\l£-159of\Z?+S1\
9-409 a 133146 inoAv) 9NNOIINOW
:-ON 4004:01411 1974?
09 = .I NOUvx).iA0:) 7N "CO N="M
:01 3NO1S JIVM :;u0i :uogrvo
311S NC)IV911I1N
unu :-?6y? ro?d
IT I zo I INSVd 113M3 N
(NOI1`d?JOiGJ?1)
9 igndq
A9O1O?alkN
9 101 cl
)N I"JOiI NOW
NOUVigDIn
9 iol cl
)NI'?1011NOW
NOUVigDIn
e iolcA
--9N N0il NOW
snoiovg,?ii N
(NOI VlOiGl?l)
o iqn` iD
?DOI O'?Ia/?N
L iM j
)NI?JOlINOW
NOUVi DIA
W
LU
Z
(S)
O
Q
z
ov
O
z
O
a
o? 0?9
.09 = I.1 -qlVOS
PiN0N
E
O
W
tl
O
N
O_
O
N
oyuoy4\5DwW,p s'I'm i;A 1 Z01)'T- 1 Wd\e-Ql
® 'ONMS-MAt&
L946-948 k616) :m3 • W69-M (616) Z-W • V19LZ Uq-0 qWX VWII'l • P DOd aM -WV 01011
Vd 6S4UV:jTnsuo:) 18JUal=UOJFAUR 70 dos
NO]IDDIO21d 301 X10021
MOON-r )1001 it
N
-
- Ir
3
Vn
9S0210 )100
N
MOON-r 001
?133?0 9NINSIJ
NOUVNOiGg?l
-
WV3?J15
.V.. N01103S M0199
IN3W30NVNN3
WVg'NIS - .IV.. N011035 9AOGV
Sd321V NOIIMl9c-;9'Nd aNV119M
Sd9'8V 1N3W30NVNN3 aW19M
SV3?JV NOIIV?JOIG91N aNV1JgM
SVJNV NOI1V3?J0 aNVligM
S39f1V9 )NI?IOIINOW .19010?Ja.IN
SN01103S-SSO?J0 WV3?JIS u"
SIOIA 9NNOIINOW NOIlVi999n (]
S1NIOd OIONd NOIlVi993n ?W
a N ? ???
9-409
3 133NS 1( owi 9NNOIINOMN
:21111 1224 ®o•?p®g•nnrr
NOINNICANOD T--: TN "07 N?2NM L946-946 (6[6) =m3 - 006G-9VB (616) ?0 M • Y19LZ -q-3 qWX Vull1i PION an -afl 01011
JNOIG JNVM :}uai Vd 4SjUV4jnsuo:) j[VjIIaMUOJjAUZ 7S lffoS
JAG NOI1d9111W
VI MV-4 T;lNgN
IN)
V9
,-?N
»J
DA
]A
(NOUVJ l3)
i igndq
w
w
n
g
Z
O
z
O
N0110310?Jd 901 NOMI et?
NooN-r NDMI L
-qMdn-SSO?J0 )10021 Ir
o13 0 0m9
09 = „ 131d0S
Nl?JON
0
MOON-r 901
N39-N0 9NINSIJ
NOUV101ST
-
Wd3M1S
X., NOIl03S M0139
1N3W30NVHN9
WNV-:NlS -.,V, N01103S 9n09`d
Sd3?Jd NOllMl-gS3?Jd aMdIl3M
GV-:NV 1N3W30MdNN9 aN`d113M
GV-gW NOIl` joiGA aNvgigM
S` AV NouvA0 aN`d113M
S39f1`d9 9NN0ilNOW k9010?Ja.IN
SNOIl03S-SSO?80 V4VA1S ZJN <
d
S1011 9NIWIINOW NOI-LVig93n ?
GAIOd 010Nd NOIlVi99-4n r,w
0
0
N
APPENDIX B - STREAM CROSS-
SECTION AND OVERBANK EVENT PHOTOS
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Riffle 1 - Year 1 (2009)
.d
4 Y y,
~??, y ! •A `??"Y?*?k?€>?{yi y. 'fit. ???' ??.
e a
1
4 ? Y" w ? •4 p? v+ ry' j
.
y?e?? 1. . ? J - ? ?? P .
Pool 1 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102 LE1
Appendix B
Riffle 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Stream Cross-Section Photos
nm ?:
Ail ;?: ? }? phi
S? l ? j1? ? Fc
4WO
t` a
r
"'L ek
? t t
s. ? .
M
Pool 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102 LE1
Appendix B
Riffle 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE1
Pool 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
p,
a
F '
?
•r s..
f ? .y r' F A a .
t
h 4 p}
' ?- 4 i
i 1
yM? 1 1? t? ,
Pool 4 -Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102111
Riffle 4- Year 1 (2009)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Riffle 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Pool 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year I Monitoring 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE1
Appendix B
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE 1
Riffle 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Pool 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
v
4 r ?.
4
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
F
the ??''
o
t.
1
I" f
n+
Riffle 7 - Year 1 (2009)
Pool 7 - Year 1 (2009)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE 1
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
a , K r
41
trfA ?t1 VP,;f? 7o,"FO%
?
°\T
W.,
Y
X2 ?4? ?i: t f V22ifi o !?,,,,???? •?at? i f ?1 li A1F'ri ? ?', i l r ?. ?:
N? ??? +w? l \t ?? V tip Jew r4 Nl 1.. '?. t M'4 r + M ?;
y ???'`'?l: tl ?t . ?, ?.. ? ?? ? ., , + ?, Rr. ? ,+ '. ti??'?, ?' at i VR' ??, ? ? + i f Y?? ? ?Y`14r ' /??
rpiKl?Kf •? ?'T•?1it' y ?{` Ir?:t .r?\? iti 4'?+ J I?t?? `?+?f? ?f-'.
,G
, vF
v?? ????, ?1Y ^??,. ;i .•
'''yttyl r?,„/,_ olv?'?t'i?MV?'a'`,
? +t;srr?' ? ; ?? i ,?,?r? '. ?VI {r . •W?rr.?;,?,??i qy- ? rF'n', ri? ? R y,? 1 ? ? ? ? ° g A+
su d?a !'i. ' i 7 !1
Overbank Photo 1 - July 2009
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Note Wrack Piles
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111
APPENDIX C - GROUNDWATER AND RAINFALL DATA
gp-090-0E
80-09a-U:
80-090-9
80-090-6
00
O
80-090-Z
Q
N
r gp-noN-SZ
M
i
-
80-noN-8 L
0 x
E gp-noN- L L 0
V
?
gp-noN-V
80-100-82
co (a
CD
O 80-100- L Z 0
N O
.
80-loo-b L
.,
E N a. U
90-100-L Co
L
m .?
0 L
O
gp-daS-pE
•?
-+
V
O
C
O
80-daS-EZ
0 80-daS-g L O
L 9+
80-daS-6
Z CL
E
gp-daS-Z a)
0)
:3
0
V
90-6ny-gZ cu
?n
v
?
gp-6ny-6 L
80-6ny-Z L
90-6ny-9
So-inf-6Z cu
=
So-Inr-ZZ T
0 SO-Inf-S L
80-Inf-8
80-Inf - L
L
ce O LO
) N L
r O L O L
' O L O L
N O
s aLloui `aa}sM o} Lild ea
gp-0aa-0c
gp-0aa-EZ
gp-oaa-9 L
80-090-6
i-. --r-
co
O
Q 80-090-Z
-
w * I 80-noN-SZ
r -
M
L
80-noN-8 l
-
80-noN- Z
-
gp-noN-},
Q
O
80-100-82
?
ANNA
rr
nn
co
O 80-100- Z
- - O
Q
N '-
II
E Nw
(i
d l 80-}00-L
L
i -
to m i L 0)
0
1 80-daS-p£
.
LL (u
0 c
O
80-daS-SZ
O O
80-daS-9
N A LL
L ?
80-daS-6 0
Z 0)
E gp-daS-Z =3
O Cu
V
90-6ny-gZ
v
V
?
90-6ny-6 ?
Q
W
90-6ny-Z 6
a)
0)
90-6ny-9
80-Inf-6Z
=
80-Inf -ZZ t
Alma
O 80-Inf -9
80-Inr-8
80-Inf -1
LO
c LO
o N L
? O L
- O LO L
r O LO
- N
s oyoui `ao4eM o} y;doa
80-090-0£
80-?ad-EZ
80-390-9
80-094-6
80-090-Z
80-noN-SZ
^ gp-noN-8 L
co
O
gp-noN- L L
N
r
gp-noN-,
M
L
80-300-82
E 80-300- LZ
v O
.
L
80-3?0-? L
Q 0.
E O
4.0 co
80-100-L =
L
tv co al mL
gp-daS-OE
N
N =
O
80-daS-EZ 2 _
4-
L
? O
gp-daS-g L ?
?
gp-daS-6
?
O
gp-daS-Z
ANNA
gp-6ny-9Z
Q
90-6nV-6 L
gp-6rnd-Z L
a
•-
80-Bny-S
80-InP-6Z
80-Inf -ZZ
80-Inf-S L
80-Inr-8
80-Inf - L
N o p C ? N w c 0 1 - N O
? ? ? ? O O O O
s
OLIO c
ui ll
ejui
eN
Al!ea
60-unr-SZ
O
O
N
w
O
M
O
f+
O
O
O
N
w
r
E 2m!%
L ?
U.
O
4) a
Z E
O
V
m
0
.i
*a
._
O
E
60-unr-8 6
60-unr- 6 l
60-unr-t7
60-AeUV-8Z
60-AeW- 6Z
60-AeW-tb l
0
60-Ae W-L
6o-jd`d-OE
Cu
60-jdy-CZ
0
6o-jd`d-9 L 'L
a U
60-jdy-6
c
60-jdy-Z
L
0 ,
AWN
C
6o-JeW-9Z
6o-aeW-6 l 0
t0
60-JBW-Z a)
60-aeW-9
cu
6o-gaj-9Z (D
60-ga=1-6 l
Q
60-gej-Z ?
CY,
60-qaj-9
Cu
60-Uer-6Z (11
60-uer-zz
60-uer-9 ?
60-Uer-9
60-Uer- l
LO LO LO LO LO
co N
? N
sououi `aojsM of yldoa
i
60-unr-SZ
-
60-unr-8 L
K 60-unr-
60-unr-t7
O 60-AeW-8Z
-
O
J
60-ABIN- LZ
..
O
M
J
60-Aew-7 L
60-ABW-Z Q?
- 0)
0 ?
60-Jdb-OE
O
60-add-s7
p - --
N C
- 60-jdy-9 L •
r G?
E 60-jdy-6
!Q _.
L
•
- L
60-jdy-Z p
-
J AMA
cu
r
60-JeW-9Z O
_
O
` ?
- 60-JBV4-6 L O
•-
L
?
CL 60-JeW-Z L 0
Z E r ?
O
60-JeW-S
?
cu
_ r
}+ 60-gaj-97
V
60-ga=l-6 L
? W
60-gej-Z L
-
0)
,; ? 60-qej-9 =3
? 60-Uer-6Z
60-Uer-ZZ
O -.
60-uer-5 L
-At
60-uer-9
60-Uer- L
L O 0 L O L O L L O
M N ? ' ? N
s aLloui `aaleM of Lildea
60-unf-SZ
60-unr-8 ?
60-unr- L L
60-unr-,v
60-AeW-8Z
60-ABIN- 6Z
60-AeW-b L
60-AeW-L
O
O
60-jdy-OE
N
O
M
60-jdV-CZ
= ma
O
60-ad`d-9 'L
O
AMA a
60-jdd-6
E O
O)
L O C
•-
N 60-ady-Z
U 0
•-
m =
r
60-aeW-gZ
o
60-JeW-6 l O •
=
cu
60-JeW Z ? ?
z ¦
60-MIN-9
Q
60-gaj-9Z
-
a
-
•? 60
g
6 ?
zl
60-qaj-Z ?
60-gaj-9
-UL- -
60
6Z
60-uef-ZZ
60-uef-9 L
-u8
-
60
f
9
60-uB - l
N 0 0 C
?r
s 0 I
- It
ay3 t
- lr
ui `l N
__
lsjui 0
sll / 0 (
O
Cued 0 q
O t
O N
O O
60-090-0£
60-0ad-£Z
60-394-9 L
60-3ad-6
07 60-0ad-Z
O
O
N 60-AON-GZ
O
r 60-AON-9 L
L
60-noN- 0
m *5
E
60-noN-I? a)
O ?
Z 60-}0p-gZ
O (D
}' 60-300- 6 Z M
0 60-300-V ?
E c4
a
U
r 60-300-2 a)
L
m %
L
60-deS-OC 4000 0)
?
LL
... - O
60-deS-£Z
60-daS-9 ?
rx ?
60-daS-6 MM
ZE
O ?
60-daS-Z
0)
=3
V
m
AMER
60-6ny-gZ Cu
60-6ny-6 l
Q
60-6ny-Z 6
IMP 60-6ny-5
?
_ ?
cu
'L 60-Inf-6Z
V
60-Inf-ZZ 1
? -
O
60-Inf-S?
--
60-Inf-9
-
60-Inf- 6
L
ce O L
) N O L
r O L
- O LO L O L
N O
s aLloui `ialeM of Lildaa
60-394-0£
60-390-£:
60-394-9 L
60-390-6
07 60-390-Z
O
O
N 60-noN-SZ
O
r 60-noN-9
L MMMr
60-noN-
?
E a)
0 60-noN-y CD
-
>
O ?
- 60-130-8Z
Z i
O
4w 60-330- ? Z M
0 ? O
0 i I
60-3301 ?r rn1
a V
N
E a) a)
r 60-330-L
0)
L
0
-?
60-d9S-pg 4
(u
LL
... O V
- - 60-daS-EZ
a
p ?- `
i ?y.
60-d9S-g O
. A LL
W 60-d9S-6 0 a)
0)
O
6p-daS-Z ?
cu
v
60-6ny-gZ
60-6ny-6 ?
?
- 60-6ny-Z 6
0)
i
60-6ny-9
'L - 60-Inf -6Z V
NE . 60-Inr-ZZ
> -
O ? -
60-Inr-S 6
-
- 60-Inr-9
60-Inf-?
-
L O L O L O L O LO LO L O
c o
N
'
N
s aLloui `ieliaM of yldea
N
v
60-daS-EZ
0
0 4-
C:
60-daS-9 cu
Z 60-daS-6
APPENDIX D - STREAM SURVEY DATA
J
O
CL
z
U- O
L U
w
w w
z cf?
t!7
O
U
O
N
N
m
Q
z
w
2
w
U
z
Q
Z
W
O O O O O O
Lo Lf)
N N N N N N
O
C9
O
O
Lfl
O
O
O
N
N
Z
o O
co
Q
O
O
N
+
O
O
+
O
O
O
+
O
L
ca
m
l?
I
(4004) N O UVAT:?
m
0
N
w
J ?
LL ?
F
U- Oz U
J F Q
w
w w u
???z
z ? w
5
O III
U
z
U
Q
z
w
O
O O O O O
N N N N N N
0
0
O
O
O
0
N
N
O
m z
+ Q
O
Q
H
(J7
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
i
Q?
m
l?
I
(gOOD NOlldn?1:1
O
QO
O
N
J
O
n
Q Z
LL O
j
L U
w
w w
z cn
N
U
N
V J
Q
IV
z
w
w
z
Q
L
Z
w
O O O
O O O
(Y) Ln
N N N N N N
O
LD
0
O
o -
L
v
z
O O y
0 (l?
I
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
O
(4004) N O UVA91:1
T)
L()
N +
W
J ?
IL
f?
?y
vJ
F
U- z0 U
Q
J F
W
? Z
z W
(S) w
U
U z
Q
L
z
W
O O O
O O O
cr)
N N N N N N
O
O
O
O
O
m
+
O
Z
O
Q
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
i
(ga04) NOUVA919
m
J
O
O V J
14L O U
J ~
w U
w LLJ z
z ct? O
O
O
U ?
(J7
O O O
O O O
Q0 C\j
u u L
N N N N N N
0
0
O
QO
O
0
0
O 4-3
+ i
O z
O
Q
N
O
m
0
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
O
L
1¦?
i
l?
I
(gaa4) NOI VA91:1
m
M m+
LI v ,
J
LL
LL
< z =
'COQ
J
Lu Uo?
w
(S) z z (j O
0
U OP
n
u
O O O
O O O
? A
C
9 C
D u u
N N N N N N
O
O
0
O
Ln
O
O
0
O
m
O
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
+
O
L
Q?
Z
O
Q
N
i
(4001) NOIUdn91:1
U-
J
J
w
z
L9
LO
J -
ca
OO (S)
z =
O
? Q
U ??
w
ct? O
N
c?
U O
u
O O O O O O
L6 m - m L(1
N N N N N N
O
C9
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
O
t
N ?
_N
z
O
Q m
?l
1
(4001) N O UVA91:1
z
Q
LL
J
J
w
z
LO
L -
J
LL-
LL
Z =
o u
U
w
? z
?O
O
CV
U OO
u
O O O O
O O
LO Cr)
u u u in Lr) Lr)
N N N N N N
O
0
0
0
O
LD
0
0
+
O
O
m
0
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
O
L
Z
O
Q Q?
?l
I
(4001) N O UVAgU
Q
LL
J
J
W
W
Z
m
?m
J
O
z =
U ??
`LLI
V 1 O
()
U O
N
u
T
(?
(
? J
0 ?
L
O p
O ?
„ o
O p
O
O O O O O
N O C0 C9 N
C9 L9 LO Ln Ln LO
N N N N N N
O
O
O
O
0
m
o
z
O N
Q
V J QV)
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
0
(4001) NOllbn;11-q
O
L
O
O
v
0
w -
_J
IL
LL j6
oC (j)
LL O U
J ?
W
z O
0
ILI
U O
()
R2
0 O O
0 O O O
N O ?O C9 N
N N N N N N
0
m
O L
Z
O
Q
O ?} VIQJ
N 1
+ T
O
0
0
0
0
0
(4004) N O UVA111:1
U ?
J N
ca
O ?
LL O U
J ~
w U
w
z
z O
C
U O
u
O O O O O O
?D N O c0
N N N N N N
O
O
O
L(1
O
O
O
O
m
O
O
N
+
O
O
O
O
O
O
L
c?
N
_N
Z
O
Q m
?l
I
(4004) N O UVAD J
N
C9 ?
J N
LL '
U
pL (J)
'L O U
w U
w
?? z
z O
O
oL
v O
v
0 O 0 0
0 00 0 0 O
C9 ?t N 0 ?0 LO
in 11) in d
N N N N N N
O
0
O
0
O
m
+
O
O
N
+
0
0
0
O
O
0
L
Z
O
Q m
N ?l
I
(1004) NOliVA91:q
O
U
0
0
0
0
v
O
t? O
m
O
w N
LL 0 U
w w
w z
z O
O
U Q
N
L
L4-
0
m z
0 0
Q m
I
0
N
O
O
O
O
Ln
N
O
O O
m = o?
to Ln
N N N
O
tll:
Nr
N
O
O
O O
N
(qaa}) N O I VA913
0
0
0
0
LO
N
L
Q z =
L. O U
w U
N z
W w
z (S) O
0
v O
?w
n
O
O
z
O O
+
I
O
N
+
O
O
O
O O O O
LD m -
N N
N N
(4004) NOIU`d/? 1:1
O
O
r
N
O
O O
N
W
J
lL
_O
IL
J
Q
_z
Q ?
J z
J O
J
W W
z >
Q
Z
W
cn
W
(I/
W
R/
Ln
J
O to
W
J
LL
x -
oC
N
x
w
LL
J X
O
O
x
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
c? N - O
N N N N
0 0 0
O C6 t-:
Ln Ln Ln
N N N
(4001) N O UVA9-1:1
0
m
0
N
+
O
O
O
co
+
co
O
co
0
CD
O
N
+
co
O
O
co
N
o ?
t? Z
O
o Q
O
N
+
O
O
r
O
co
O
O
+
C9
O
N
+
C9
O
0
0
co
Ln
0
0 0 0 0 -
Ln T)
N N N N
N
x
U
¦
O
O
N
OL
Q
LL-
J
J
W
Z
N
W
_J
O
_Z
Z
0
W
Q
Z
L!
W
fL.
W
oL
J
O
X
W
J
LL
x
U
w
J
LL
LL_
oL
LO
J
O
O ?
x
cn
x
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O
C9 Ln c? N - O 67 00 r? u
Ln Ln Ln In Ln Ln Ln I
N N N N N N N N N N N
0
m
0
m
0
0
m
0
m
m
N
O
O
N
O
Ln
+
N
0
m
m
N
O
N
O
co
N
O
r
co
N
O
co
N
O
m
co
cm
O
co
N
O
r
N
O
r
N
O
r
N
O
m
r
N
O
r
N
O
+
L9
N
O
N
O
+
C9
N
O
m
N
O
N
O
Ln
N
Z
O
Q
(1?
N
X
o?
H
U
cn
¦
O
O
IN
I
(4001) N O UVA9 ?
APPENDIX E - PEBBLE COUNT DATA
Pebble Count Data Form, Riffle 5 - Newell Farm Mitigation Site
Material Size Range (mm) Count % Cumulative
silt/clay 0 0.062 2 2% 2%
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 0 0% 2%
fine sand 0.13 0.25 0 0% 2%
medium sand 0.25 0.5 0 0% 2%
coarse sand 0.5 1 0 0% 2%
very coarse sand 1 2 1 1% 3%
very fine gravel 2 4 2 2% 5%
fine gravel 4 6 2 2% 7%
fine gravel 6 8 0 0% 7%
medium gravel 8 11 2 2% 9%
medium gravel 11 16 23 23% 32%
coarse gravel 16 22 41 41% 73%
coarse gravel 22 32 18 18% 91%
very coarse gravel 32 45 3 3% 94%
very coarse rave 45 64 2 2% 96%
small cobble 64 90 2 2% 98%
medium cobble 90 128 0 0% 98%
large cobble 128 180 2 2% 100%
very large cobble 180 256 0 0% 100%
small boulder 256 362 0 0% 100%
small boulder 362 512 0 0% 100%
medium boulder 512 1024 0 0% 100%
large boulder 1024 2048 0 0% 100%
very large boulde 2048 4096 0 0% 100%
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.E1
----------- -----------------
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------- -----------------
--------------------------------------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
N
cn
0
E
L
LL
N
Z
N
4
O
U
O
-------------------------------- ----------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---------- ---- -----
e ?p e 62 ?p ?p e e
0 m° o 0 0 o O
UeHi Joug quaojacj
0 0
N -
0
O
E
E
N
O in
N
°
L
U
_ l
0
-? o
C;
0
Pebble Count Data Form, Pool 5 - Newell Farm Mitigation Site
Material Size Range (mm) Count % Cumulative %
silt/clay 0 0.062 35 35% 35%
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 0 0% 35%
fine sand 0.13 0.25 2 2% 37%
medium sand 0.25 0.5 3 3% 40%
coarse sand 0.5 1 3 3% 43%
very coarse sand 1 2 16 16% 59%
very fine grave 2 4 13 13% 72%
fine gravel 4 6 4 4% 76%
fine gravel 6 8 2 2% 78%
medium gravel 8 11 3 3% 81%
medium gravel 11 16 4 4% 85%
coarse gravel 16 22 4 4% 89%
coarse gravel 22 32 9 9% 98%
very coarse grave 32 45 0 0% 98%
very coarse gravel 45 64 0 0% 98%
small cobble 64 90 1 1% 99%
medium cobble 90 128 1 1% 100%
large cobble 128 180 0 00 100%
very large cobble 180 256 0 0% 100%
small boulder 256 362 0 0% 100%
small boulder 362 512 0 0% 100%
medium boulder 512 1024 0 0% 100%
large boulder 1024 2048 0 0% 100%
very large boulde 2048 4096 0 0% 100%
bedroc
Total Particle Count: 100
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil and Enviromnental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 1021.E1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
(tn
O
c?
-F_
L
LL-
N
Z
O
O
1
4
O
U
O
C\
N
- ------------------------------------ ----------------
- ------------------------- ---------- ----------------
- ------------------------------------ ----------------
- ------------------------------------ ----------------
- ----------------------------------- ----------------
----- ---- ---------------------------------- -----
---------- ---------------------- ----------
----------- \ ---------------------------------------
-------------------- ---------------- -------------------
--------------------------------- -----------------------
-------------------------------- ---------------------
---------------------------------- ---- -----------------
---------------------------- ----------------------
O
O
N L
_
- o
N o
L
0
1 i I I I I I I I o
s e- e tp tp tp tp e e eo
O O O O O O O O o 0 0
O m 00 u L() d m N -
UeHi Jaug quaoja j
----------------------------------- - ----------------
-------------------------------------- ----------------
-------------------------------------- ----------------
-------------------------------------- ----------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
APPENDIX F - VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
<1
? p
A?,
•`,? t ` i9!rn ?.± `per .
t n
+ v
Y 4h s ,
IN'
y +eW' }{
r?
s t.
a,
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Ad. -
k r
h E / a AY:
yfi f ! f ie? +tlf ye yA
i I• r `1i Jf
A°
I As
07
:.? .. t "
/ r "fa
11 7 7??yp??
1f ? J?L r. ? h ?
n
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102111
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
4( i" !tt r
". ht '? w a it 4 t Ar? ) !t _ : !` ' sM
Tit.
f.r r{ 1 ,?N
e ????`???."?it ®?l?c'9??t?Q'!4?t? ????,.-? ?t.u; ? !`'1?s.?"Ir,??'li ??
¦
A
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 1 Monitoring 2009 Project No. 102 LE1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7- Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102 LE1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 -Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 - Year 1 (2009)
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102111
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 - Year 1 (2009)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 - Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 1 Monitoring 2009
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E1