640040_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200730

-1 3 a -zj
W—Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
of Visit: Com lance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
m for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 -, -9-wl Arrival Time: U C b Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: ACL j Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: „Aot- t SL 14e s Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
i
acr
on -Layer
Wean !p Finish
VjeA Feeder
Feeder to Finish
(v
J o '
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
won-DaiTy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes �Noo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes rNo[:]
1 A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: c - Date of Ins ection: 7. G—
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ YesP�A�
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t rest, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No,�'❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): LL..e < Ai,, ,.,, ,• A
13. SoiI Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes VNo❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers [3'Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V RainfaIl Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - V
Date of Inspection: '7- ,50
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(cs) below.
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge Ievels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerAnspcetor fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewerrinspector Name. Phone: q /q ? 11 Y 20a
Reviewer, -'Inspector Signature: `I Lc 3 44t 0 Date: 7 - D by
Page 3 of 21412015