19990222 Ver 1_Complete File_19990310

F State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore WAJ
4 ffl1: • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 7, 1999
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Modification to the Proposed Replacement of Greene Street Bridge over the Tar River in Pitt County.
WQC Project # 990222 COE #199505645
Pitt County
Attached hereto is a modification to Certification No. 3234 issued to the North Carolina Department of
Transportation dated December 7, 1999 (original Certification was dated June 16, 1999). The attached
modification authorizes a change to the proposed mitigation plan. 0.036 acres of previously identified
cypress-gum swamp will be restored as emergent marsh to facilitate the construction of public utilities
through the site. It should be noted, the modification is applicable only to the additional proposed
activities. All the authorized activities and conditions of certification associated with the original
Water Quality Certification dated June 16, 1999 still apply.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Attachments:
Modification to WQC No. 3234
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Sincerely,
.S tevens
Division of Water Quality • 401 Wetlands Unit
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 211, Section .0500. This certification authorizes a modification to the proposed
mitigation plan. 0.036 acres of previously identified cypress-gum swamp will be restored as emergent
marsh to facilitate the construction of public utilities through the site. The project shall be constructed
pursuant to the Certification issued on June 16, 1999. All the authorized activities and conditions of
certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated June 16, 1999 still apply.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the proposed wetlands in
conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality
Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will
not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in
the Public Notice. Should your project change, you are required to notify the DWQ and submit a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you are required to comply with all the
conditions listed below. In addition, you should obtain all other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the
most recent version of two manuals. Either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the
Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices
shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes
and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and
the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
4. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters
associated with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or
borrow sites be located in wetlands or stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is
a direct impact from road construction activities;
5. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the Mitigation Proposal submitted with
your modification request and attached hereto. DWQ shall be copied on a detailed mitigation and
monitoring plans as well as the annual reports for the entire length of the monitoring period. The
draft mitigation plan shall be sent to DQW within one month of issuance of the 404 Permit.
6. All other conditions written into previous Water Quality Certifications for this project still apply.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions
are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification
shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written
petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an
original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this
Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 7 h day of December 1999
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
?tevens
Modification to WQC No. 3234
c:\ncdot\B-2225\wqc\B-2225 modification.doc
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore
1 ? •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 7, 1999
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Modification to the Proposed Replacement of Greene Street Bridge over the Tar River in Pitt County.
WQC Project # 990222 COE #199505645
Pitt County
Attached hereto is a modification to Certification No. 3234 issued to the North Carolina Department of
Transportation dated December 7, 1999 (original Certification was dated June 16, 1999). The attached
modification authorizes a change to the proposed mitigation plan. 0.036 acres of previously identified
cypress-gum swamp will be restored as emergent marsh to facilitate the construction of public utilities
through the site. It should be noted, the modification is applicable only to the additional proposed
activities. All the authorized activities and conditions of certification associated with the original
Water Quality Certification dated June 16, 1999 still apply.
If we can be of further -assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Attachments:
Modification to WQC No. 3234
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Doug Huggett, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Sincerely,
.S tevens
Division of Water Quality • 401 Wetlands Unit
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 211, Section .0500. This certification authorizes a modification to the proposed
mitigation plan. 0.036 acres of previously identified cypress-gum swamp will be restored as emergent
marsh to facilitate the construction of public utilities through the site. The project shall be constructed
pursuant to the Certification issued on June 16, 1999. All the authorized activities and conditions of
certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated June 16, 1999 still apply.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the proposed wetlands in
conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality
Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will
not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in
the Public Notice. Should your project change, you are required to notify the DWQ and submit a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you are required to comply with all the
conditions listed below. In addition, you should obtain all other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the
most recent version of two manuals. Either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the
Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices
shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes
and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and
the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
4. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters
associated with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or
borrow sites be located in wetlands or stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is
a direct impact from road construction activities;
5. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the Mitigation Proposal submitted with
your modification request and attached hereto. DWQ shall be copied on a detailed mitigation and
monitoring plans as well as the annual reports for the entire length of the monitoring period. The
draft mitigation plan shall be sent to DQW within one month of issuance of the 404 Permit.
6. All other conditions written into previous Water Quality Certifications for this project still apply.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions
are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification
shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written
petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an
original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this
Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 7" day of December 1999
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Modification to WQC No. 3234
.`5tevens
1
cAncdot\B-2225\wqc\B-2225 modification.doc
r'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
October 15, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box looo PAYME
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000 p NT
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject:
991200
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY

Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225
a

A `y
S
for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
Summary of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Mitigation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way ofthe proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,

910` William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.222060 1,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
L The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under

Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
/Y ? -4J7'
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
it
?72
A

VICINITY
MAPS
XAIE
J

Man

:nnuc +
C.«
9qc% 1
$Mlm*,dl

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO.Oil
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET OF 7
I sr' ,'E LOCATIONS
NI
1
S %*te
\10 CCL? ton

a /
7

i
. I
w
0
of
J?
I J
O
r.D
Y %I
1/ // ' I w 1
/ co
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 8.2220601
SHEETZ OF .7
T 8
WOODS
\ Ir
?A
h? Qp
WOODS `
G
\A
k
,%-T All

It
4
PA C DE PT o-? TRAkrspoR-rpj-T\oM
Tlr c:?3 e C_A -B - "2 Z Z 5'
sl?e?? 3 o-F 7 s[zs(q?

tea.
' GUY LEAD. TABLE
/ STIR. No. 13 s :f
\ AHEAD BACK
70'.64' 70'.64 t* ti •?; f''
\ `' + ,
?? .? ,? woods P:1. 1099,.4 ?
WHITE CONCRETE CO. STA. ''4 %9(47-
i.: • ,
558"ART.
DB W 43, PG 149 ' 89.2_5
.i ;. \ \ \ MB 6. PC 101
. 'sue • -'^? ' \ \ ' , ' ?!?' ? "?"'`•?'j i
? w
WOODS
JIM
. •k^`? GUY LEAD TABLE
. ?•`ti,J?„? /,. ...... ............. ?.. .... ........................ -...,...... , i
I.z.. .?t : STIR. No. 13-1 ...... \` , , , 1! I?
AHEAD BACK /TP-1116
50.44' 50',44
? a
----?----
• 13-1
- - - - -- - - - - - \ -------- 121-0'-1 - - 0---- / '?/
EQUATION - -
P.I. 1118 QQ' /
/ STA. 46+40.61 UNE BACK =
STA. 0+00 UNE AHEAD woods
5t 45'42'52" LT.
yy f
Prose c? /$1 _ ZZZ ?(?
?. PitY>h ?oGQ ?r l c oJi I r1 -coy- 1
t yY
5ti?-t 7 17- _T_
UVULt (, tiLiil i Jti bl
OB D 24, PG 573
Hill
•? ? /I Ji ? ??r r?R AI r? , ? i?a
J,(?J,?J,(? Jr?Jr 1 / '??. R MOND R.
JUD H. MIL R
it
?r?Jr?J / t 1 DB 25 G 7 7
J? 'I •l, /\ ,' .'' : ??j y/ /' 1 /// D G 52, 801
1•? w? ,? ?Ihx:,` ' ?i' ??' / % / /// 54, PC 827
PC 858
MON
I All t I •••?/.' / / / / MON
11005 co
A Hill H41 8086`
POV=1001 ?10 D8 6
1\ 0,0
"P
N WOODS WOODS 11
JIIJ ---
/po
I ...................... y r ...... .... ... .........._......::?. . .............. .__............ . ............ .........:.....
' ` 1•? 1r?i Q? ....... • ' P.1. 1048 -o
Sl'a 10+06.66
44'53'32' LT. ?'_ - - - -
-- J - -----,?--- - - ---- N
12
J? J. ,JAI ?i M ON ----- _ -_.? --_
1
s J N
•t??• - - I.1P1!1J7 J, J! J!?JI J?J', J; / In
TP-1141 R/W
WOODS GUY LEAD TABLE
S / STR. No. 12
AHEAD BACK
BOBBY RAY O'NEAL 90.84' 70',64' NOTE. FRAME AHEAD Gl
/ DB 641. PC 485
liltDATE
G
' • C ? •` • ?s,fill1111 1I?cl)
?ltiti i•??r • , /
. •? n?C ???? • , ? ?rmv?s.l?or'I-ot'?to?-?
Pro?e - I3 5
Ska-t,4 S 6 T rl2-•ri 9
:HURST
552
G u c. X/ w a,2 e 4
G PAL Yzlw /12%FA
,',,..
O'NEAL
G 485
WOODS
............
.......C.P..&.?............. .......................230..kV.....................
.........................................................7...............
-- -- -- -- -t?'??'?'' - -- -
_________ CIRCUIT 16
-- --- - • -- - (?1• J 1' --- CIRCUIT 17 OCT /-
11- '?? 1? ------ `
WOODS Q A r? i A A! -- EQUATION
P.I.
+ STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
V_ STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAE
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' X-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE. 4 34.02'30' LT.
VISIONS
B - zzZS
RerY,.l A Mod. -?' r -k/ (,cork
S4P& 6 ef 7 ?(zrig9
CONSULTING l- ......«n,, - - -- -•
I DWN: JGQ I CKD: SJB/HGB I APPD: RKS
N
IN (V
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 tbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 tbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 tbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER H ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.

LEGEND
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCA
TION
-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- -fll1- - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
GUY AND ANCHOR
COMBINATION
-?-S SPAN GUYS

- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
?- PROPERTY LINE
- - - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
IJ! I1IJ (jf (?J1(?1? WET AREA 4? 1 z 4 /4 9
OMMISSION
PLAN & PROFILE
115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
N OLINA CIRCUIT 1 / RELOCATION
o IFOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
0 KIt` Trahs{?-,*-,-c•r 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
plrolec?' ?-ZzZS
?-en v>n '?-? ?JV Y1 cd . 4r It l? 1.11o r k
5h..&-{- 7 rp 7 P I zs1'1q
N.C.D.O.T. PROJECT SHEET:
B-2225 2 OF 2
)UTH COORD FILE:

`N hf
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. DAVID MCCOY
27611-5201
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 15, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Washington Field Office a
P.O. Box 1000 i
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000 PAW ENT
A
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell. RECEIVED
91,
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225
for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit ft
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
Summary of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Mitigation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way of the proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
'?/ 644t /ja
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
' 1" `."I
3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAhMS B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No.. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1. The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under

Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
Y. ? .4zt,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
t
,y
A

VICINITY
MAPS
SCAIE
J

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET I OF 7
I
SI'c'C, LOCA,riovs
^ \ I
1v WI
r
S
S ??e
\10 Ca? tion .
I J
Q
0
4 ` I U)
J•' n
!r Y
ua
cc
~?I
? I
7-A°--d

VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 3.2220F01
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
sHEcr2 OF .7 1. . 8
\ r
? s ?• ? wooos
WOODS

O
k
O
O

cg?
J
i J J
/
Iii C DE PT o-? TRAAfsppR-Th-T%oN
-Prcd3 Z3 --2 z z S
Shez:?- 3 o-? 7 g(z5- (9°1
- moo.
GUY LEAD TABLE
? / rr.? .
Y \ STIR. No. 13
AHEAD BA(;
r / 70'.64' 70'.64 :?,,:•f; f'
\ .? I 1
IN WOODS
* \ WHITE CONCRETE CO. STA. +99.47' f r
;+• \! \ \? DB W 43, PG 149 O? 89'2¢'56"27 I I I
I• ;. ?, N? \ MB 6. PG 101 Q? 9y r •?,,'cEfi? '
CAP
.w
.-:i:s
` ? ?? ? rug. ` \N,
WOODS
t=u^.`?? GUY LEAD TABLE .4A I I
STIR. `? =• r ................... ?......,....... No. 13-1 NN
O AHEAD BACK
50'50'.44 O ?GZ. TPTQ1118 ,`
13-1
JIL --------- ,?` y1{J-1
EQUATION
P.I. 1118 QQ' /
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK WOODS
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD Jil
4 4542.52" LT.
p 14,11. J1, ?,j
Pro?e c? B - Z 2_ z
F3et?/1:
ezi
nuv,n n. UIiULC (, 1'1Li(lj Ud !d
D8 D 24, PG 57,3 \ 1 ly 1? r? r { r
? JI J1 .9R AI Jt J J / /
R MOND R.
JUD H. MIL R
At D G 52, 801
54, PG 827
B Q PG 858
MON
MON
1005 GI
• ' , ?'? '? ' fir' -'?-?-. ,
13
/?.• !t i ? ? ? '? ? ? , ? WOODS", BOBO
POt,'=1001 ?A;1p OB 6
N - ' WOODS
WOODS
/PO /1 // •
r, 'rxcnv ...................... .... .............. ........
................._........... ...... ........... .........:.....
.. • P.I. 1048
J; rr G?i % ; , STA. 10+06.66
/ `
P _'44.53'32' LT. - - - -
. M ON
N
' , 1 P,
?J' J' JI
x
TP-1141 J? J O0 G??? R/W
wooos GUY LEAD TABLE
STR. No. 12
AHEAD BACK
BOBBY RAY O'N A 90',84' 70',64' NOTE. FRAME AHEAD Gl
/ DB 641, PG 485
/ DATE

n?C ???? • 'A -Tirest^s{?ot-f-a+to?-N
l Pr0j2(f }- L3-2ZZS
S?`¢.?? S off' 8'I zs-194
r &
--HURST
552
6 u G K/w arz.EA
P ? c- F-1w A.2--A
O'NEAL
G 485
WOODS
-- - - R/W -- - - --J`-
........?. P.. &. ?........... ......................... 230.. k?............................................................. /
- -- -- -- -tlr?-R/W--- -- -- -- --
CIRCUIT 16
_001 J,PJ P. CIRCUIT 17
wocDS p n J ^ ^! - - EQUATION
p P.I.
+ STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAL
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE. 4 34'02'30' LT.
VISIONS
N c- R ?r a ns?a r-`?a+i'o r?
P?je c-F B - zzzs
Work
P?rw,' j IMod. -?' r /
S4ef 6 of -7 IzrI99
CONSULTING
DWN: JGQ I CKD: SJB/HGB I APPD: RKB

• IN
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER H ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.

LEGEND
EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCA
IO
T
N
-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- -fllf- - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
(
{ GUY AND ANCHOR
{
{ COMBINATION
--S--? SPAN GUYS

- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
-? PROPERTY LINE
- - - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
?J! (?fJ! (j? (j? (11!! WET AREA 4? z 4 /4 9
PLAN & PROFILE
OMMISSION 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
r0oa uNA CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
FOR THE GREEN STREET -PITT STREET
iiq,0 ??%p-} d?' ?ra-3sPer?(o•,.? 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
aJe?'} - Z z Z S SHEET:
_'• N.C.D.O.T. PROJECT
D, ?? ?'-} pG{ . ?r ?(Tl ?/ (,l1or k B-2225 2 OF 2
5k-,-+ 17 rp f1 f ZS' qc? )UTH COORD FILE:
i?
99.200
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. DAVID MCCOY
27611-5201
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 15, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office PAYMENT
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000 RECEIVE A..-
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell. 1
NCDOT Coordinator F
g? _ a
Dear Sir:
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.222060 1,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225
for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
Summary of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Miti ation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way of the proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,

William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1. The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under

Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
// ? .4zt,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
W. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
W. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
W. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
I 1Y
.?r• T ''? ' t J
l?
,v
A

VICINITY
MAPS
SCALE Fwmsm lace toddy Itl !.
IS+ I
' slog:
fy ? f
y JO
roust
?TJ;}! I? ?? 1P,Cloluh
rJ' ?II,?P..e 'il
p1 A„hwZ
,I wmu..?ue
'It
C,
IIM

nn t . •
neslon0 j
T
\ coot:
J Bloch 1
t
Shslmad,
.t
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET I OF 7

SI','E LOCATIONS
4evle ?a
5 %%Ve
1.o caA ton
w
U)
I
0
01
I
Tol
i
0
+ U?
D
lr. •?

II

r : ,
r I ? w

i?
7
?I
I-Aljl?

Q•
N.C. DEPT. OF TRA-NI SPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 3.2220601 SHr.,E-I'2 OF 7 nT 8 ?Zrf 9
T9?P
?4
\ ~ WOODS
\ 1
WOODS
, O
o

wooDs
100,
O
k
O
O
i
585%P??N? - ' '
PT o-? TRAAfsppR- Pj-V%oN
?ro?e i B - Z 'Z Z
sh?-? 3 0? q $(zs?9q
GUY LEAD TABLE
STIR. No. 13
\ <` AHEAD BACI?&jl! ,?;
z / 70',64' 70',64
WOODS P:I. 1099 I t
WHITE CONCRETE CO.
QC':I
DB W 43, PG 149 89?fG STA.C'44%5:47T.'
'? // •? \ MB 6. PG 101
WOODS \ ??' • y><c: ,,
' •u' `i GUY LEAD TABLE v •? < ^
.
STIR. No. 13 ?\...... ?,......
AHEAD BACK
X /.. • ` -1116 /
O 50',44' 50'.44'
?- ?O? ? Gam- ----?- -
' 13-1
!-- - - - - - - - - - - -------1 - - -----? / ' '
' EQUATION - -
P.I. 1118
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD WOODS
45'42'52" LT.
? 14m
Via! r'''' 1? ',
J1 ?
'00.(91 (??' C (??! ??r
/ RC C ..Y £ 1 Y?a ?'1S J o r 1 a
Pro?e c? /B1 ZZ2 S/? 1
?o? 10 r1 ?1t 't•Y 11Y.N/
5tieA.--t- ?F 7 ??ZSI4;
/// Bunn PI. uvut t r, 1Li(1J ! Uti Pd
DB D 24, PG 573 J'?,?
r i \
f •• .••,• \ \ /?JI I?JIr R Al ?1? v ? II / / C/
\ r J+? Jr? y, J11?Jt I J R MOND R.
?-JUD H. MIL R
,f?'? '? ?•. ,?n?JfJI?JI? / ! / DB 25 G 7 7
1 ,? J, '? ?, x? ?? ?,' ?? ' •?,I ,i /' // D G 52, 801
54, PG 827
B 0 PG 858 /
Iii ?'• ' ^, ??? / / / /
MON
MON
i t it t
J 41005
13
WOODS
it D8
:? fl
? N r WOODS J '% WOODS
' ?J i ?J r •.•.
? it,
,fJ' ..... /PO / 1 .... //........... .......... .................._ ...........»............. ? ........:...
Jilin ,f '?xrnv . .? • ::?YP.I. o
/ 1048 0 .
I r rJ r, G?P' / , / STA. 10+06.66
.:
/ ?_44'S3'32_
J ?
- --J--- - - - - - - - N
-1 CD
rr_ JI pji I 11
it ,J; J, J J M ON
a !! J4 ?"(?JI N
I L0
' TP-1141
± r .? J? J _ - - -
J
?I GUY LEAD TABLE
}', WOODS
STR. No. 12
-•? / O / AHEAD BACK
• 4?. ? / ?? // BOBBY RAY O'NEAL 901,84' 70,64' NOTE: FRAME AHEAD GI
/ DB 641, PG 485
lilt,DATE
c
- / , vJ / fir`, ` .? • S/(? •. ''?.
V/lam -
17
• pro?er?}^ I3-ZZZ-5-
Mod. P-2?'???t?' -Aov- L('?? ? t?{y G(JC9r
& _?_/ I
--HURST
552
C, U G K/ w A/Le4
G PAL YL?w 4a th
O'NEAL
0 485
WOODS
- - - - R/W - - - - - -. -?`
....... .P.. &. ?........... .......................... 30.. k V..............................................
try-R/W--- -- -- -- --
--------= ------ CIRCUIT 16
------------ -------
r
-- --- ' ??f I J'"J' - - CIRCUIT 17
-:OT- 11-- J' J. J'f'J ------T--------- i
WOODS 1 ii A 1 ! - - EQUATION
P.I.
+ STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAE
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE. 4 34'02'30' LT.
VISIONS
P?jec+ B - z.zzs
'Mod . -4o' r !? j l,Uo r k
SktA+ 6 of -7 ? (zr l q 9
CONSULTING --
OWN: JGQ CKD: SJB/HGB APPO: RKB
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER N ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.
LEGEND
OMMISSION 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
r"-DLINA CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
FOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
?Fq N ?? ??,.} d? Trar1S{?ir'`? e•h 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
I I^ 0 je c--+ 1- L Z Z 5- SHEET:
__,,•• / N.C.D.O.T. PROJECT
p, T-t^ ril 1+ M oc . 4r Lk (??? Work 8-2225 2 OF 2
Nc

EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCATIO
N
-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - 1 PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- -fllf- - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
WE GUY AND ANCHOR COMBINATI
ON
4-
S SPAN GUYS
-
-?
- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
$ PROPERTY LINE
- - - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
?II?(jflJ?(j? WET AREA 4r?z4/49
PLAN & PROFILE
5kko- + 7 arp 7 B 12S19q )UTH COORD FILE:
0
Y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
October 15, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers PAYMENT
Washington Field Office P.O. Box 1000 RECEIVED
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
9912 Cl
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY

. r
i

Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.222060 1,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225
for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit 4
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
Summary of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Mitigation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way of the proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.31)(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
?/ Cam.. /ja
b" William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID McCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(l), State Project No. 8.222060 1,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1 The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under

I
Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
Y. ? 4zt,
/ William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
R
?y
04
A

VICINITY
MAPS
5<w! E
J

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET I OF 7
I

ere ?a
S Este
Lo cCIA ton
7
?I

k/
?f
a?
i
SI'k'.C LOCATIONS
I
w
0
of
I ;l
Q
I ?
T
q
/i II
f : ?( II U1
LU i
/i cc
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS. RTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 3.2220601
3HEE'!'2 O F.7 4,4,4 - 8(2slq
i

WOODS
WOODS
` cp

,1p 4,

Cr
O
k
O
O

s"t
4
1\1 C' DE P-T 0-?
7rco3 13 -2ZZ?
4r• lht, t;+?
GUY LEAD TABLE
STIR. No. 13
\ f ?s
AHEAD BACK} ?,;,?;; ,,:
/ 70'.64' 70',64 t? ti.•'°., =t ' i
Wows RJ. 1099••'+rf
WHITE CONCRETE CO. ? STA. '4+99f.47.'
DB W 43, PG 149 pQ .9Y 89'25?58;T.
MB 6. PG 101 ? ?Fk 4
-' x.1,7".. \ ? ? /` , /
WOODS \ `?.?'e :;y'. ?? 1
7t'
All
GUY LEAD TABLE
.? r i'• „ai, ». » ............. , (J
STIR. No. 13-1
AHEAD BACK .? /TP-1116
O 50',44' 50',44' Q
--------- 13-1
14
' - EQUAMN
P.I. 1118 QQ' /
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK WOODS
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD 4?I /
4 45'42'52" LT. ?f I
I Jill 41.
1?l I,
C F {? T ?i?a r? S?, o r?at? 1 D 1'1
1 V
Pro?'e c? $ _ ZZZ ?'
5tiu?t q 7 17- -'r

ud NI
/Jl^\ OB D 24, PG 573 \ 1I?,?. r?
14
y-
17`
Al"
41??J,?J1? R MOND R.
1 , , 1 1
JUD H. MIL R
?I?• II' `• Q \\ J. '??', ?\?. DB 25 G 7 7
1 ' J? '?•I, x0 // D G R. 801
54, PG 827
0 PG 858 /
MON
I
I I I I , /., 0
Ju• 40'-1005
13
J I (•? I \ WOODS
/ I I I I J I I \ , ., / / \ /
BOBB
POf,'= ' . r DB E
10,0
/ ' ?? II I? I I \ / / `' p
r N / WOODS l' JI JI I // j j / WOODS
- - -+ / '.
' (Al I?J,
I I rll Q?/ .?=r ....../. .... ... .......... _........ __ .............. ............................... ? ...........
fit , ??'f? If I ?1 - ?.i. 1048
GP STA. 10+06.66 ° , . .
/ ?r (?J' J? ?>:?' ?•: ; I / 44'53 32' LT.
- -- C?-
12
I
M ON
04
r, LO
,.-... ?!i. TP-1141 IJ? ,I JI I OQ - - R/W - -
• J
i O
X G
• ?' ' /
WOODS GUY LEAD TABLE
.,?f '?'t• / ,
3 ?w STIR. No. 12
AHEAD BACK
. 'v,, •• ?? 90 ',84' 70',64' NOTE. FRAME AHEAD Gc
BOBBY RAY O'NEAL
/ DB 641, PG 485
DATE
cl)
.. e ?? . , ? -Try v`s{? o r'hcc ? t o ?-?
Qr-ale- L3-2zZ5'
:HURST
852
6 u c ot/ w a"2 c: a
=?r GP?L Alw 2?M
, O'NEAL
G 485
WOODS
J...............
............ P.. &. ?........... ...................... 30.. kV...............................................................................................
-- -- -- -- - A? r(?-"R/W--- -- -- --
--------= -----f CIRCUIT 16
;fir, ? ? : ----------- -------
__ CIRCUIT 17
WOODS A r? ; J A A ! - - EQUATION
P.I.
+ STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
v-
T STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAC
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE. 4 34'02'30' LT.
VISIONS
N c- 3e -?i . Tr a ns? a i-`tai+i'o >?
Prate C+ 13- 2.2 z 6-
P..e.r,M', Mc), 4. -fir U16r k
S4p+ 6 aF 7 S'IZr?g9
CONSULTING
DWN: JGQ CKD: SJB/HGB APPD: RKB

\\\ ?? Q
o ? x
\ IVO
IN4
\\
IN
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER ! I ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.

LEGEND
EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
Q PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED
INE
L
LOCATION
-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- - III - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
GUY AND ANCHOR
COMBINATION
?-S SPAN GUYS

- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
-$- PROPERTY LINE
- - - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
WET AREA 4? z g /`T g
PLAN & PROFILE
OMMISSION 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
LINA CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
F
OR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
rcn,030
?'1
?? r? ?p-ti- . -T-rA,?sp,s-•r(c.? SRIDGE CONNECTOR
! h O je LT ?n - Z Z Z SHEET:
p, P? Y?1 1 -?- (?}? Cd n r u'f 1 10?/ We r k N.C.O.B- PROJECT
B-2225 2 OF 2
5kAQ-+ 7 rp `7 g'ZS f ?fc? )UTH COORD FILE:
`Typw$T?'y
N N

991200
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. DAVID MCCOY
27611-5201
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 15, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers PAYMENT
Washington Field Office RECEIVED
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000

ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell. 1Vtk't~..
NCDOT Coordinator

Dear Sir: L
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt S treet, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225

for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
Summary of proiect impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Mitigation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way of the proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,

William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorsey, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
3
"b
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1. The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under
i
Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
Y. ? .4zt-
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

l?
J
A
VICINITY
MAPS
SVaE
J

? •wl
nnne +
?et?enC ?
.
u?
1 elec.
Sh.l.tod,

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET I OF
SI",'.C- LOCA'rzovs
w
U)
0
?'lere ra, ?°-
S ,If e
Lo c m? ton .
I J
Q
O
? p
r? ' k
n
w
w ,
j' co t.

_j:
_i
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 8.2220601
N.C. DEPT. OF TRAINSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLAMNIENT OF BRIDGE 411
SHEE'l'2 0 F .7 4"4
•
Waoos
.•?.,, c \ ST ,pO \
A

N C IE PT o-? -T"RAtjsppR-Tt'17toN
1'rn?3 eCA -B-2ZZ5-n
shit 3 0-? 7 :01-2 ?

O
A-
0
O
-CAI ! ?
moo.
GUY LEAD TABLE
STR. No. 13
AHEAD BACK tiy'i
70'.64' 70',64 , i?`ti•ji''?''I
YAMS
;fir` ;'Sr *\ WHITE CONCRETE CO. STA.
\(/ \ \ DB W 43, PG 149 p? 89'2rj582T.
MB 6. PG 101
°. \\?? `\\ xc .r
\ t N /
a P.R.
WOODS \? +••, a; ,' ' i
,. " GUY LEAD TABLE a a `.
1
e.t ??• \ \ .:?„? y ?- ................. ?.............. ........................ .....,...... I I
` til . No.
I 13-1 \
STR
's. AHEAD BACK
. .',?r • ?.?? ? ? ? TP-1116 ? ? I I I
O 50'.44 50',44'
'IN
13--1
- - - - - - - - - - `? -------1 - - ----
EQUATION
` P.I. 1118
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD WOODS
4 45'42'52" LT.
r n 1 1
e F ?Tr-ti, +tis?? or
1 ?-?o?,? 1 U 1'1
R c --b c T> P -T
Pro?e ? B - ZLZ S
1?..Fit?, ??' Ylno?! ??•? c a ? i s r1 `?•r ?? ? 1 ? ??
//? ?LIn n. vuu?tr, tlLiil / UC N1
08 D-
24, PG 573
? 1 J'?11 jr , / yam. \\
JI J1 ?JI
I I I I 1 1 1 // / / /
I'll R All 11 Yl
R MOND R.
' t i? i?'t?? ??? \` JUD H. MIL R
,f?Ir 11 `+, 0 ? ? ?J Ji?J1 / .? / DB 25 G 7 7
1 r? JI ?.1, ?? / ?r •?ii +i ir' / / D G 52, 801
1r 54, PG 827
JAI
f? ? , / , , / / 8 Q PG 858
MON
1 i I 1 j ?/? ,// ? / / / // MON
t t I?J?. 4-1005 ? / ?/ /
/
4,p pp
BOBEY
1,
PO?.61001 \J'?.o? DB E
\oo
w N / WOODS WOODS
1 I ?? • wow ..................... c.,. ?•,.' ...... .... ........................•...«.............................................. .a., .........:.....
t i RPM , / P.I. 1048 0
?? ?J I 1 G STA. 10+06.66 .. .
--- ?'- 'F - ---i---/ --- - - - - - - - - - - - - N
12 - - - - - --
eel ?'?` _ - - i1 f'f (?f Jt J! (?J? ?Jt J J7 f I ! rn
'1 I
TP-1141 p
1
? ? . •5 4 \1., 1
wooos GUY LEAD TABLE
r+a:s'h? •";t? ?lv STR. No. 12
AHEAD BACK
BOBBY RAY O'NEAL 90',84' 70',64 NOTE. FRAME AHEAD Gt
DB 641, PG 485
DATE
•.
• / • -
C,
• Qr-o?e?} L3-2225'
P?r'1A?& Y1?o? . Iv- Wcae-?
5a-&+ o-? 7 ?I 2.5-1 q9
& "X,
-HURST
552
U u c K/ w A,2 C- 4
w,-
O'NEAL
G 485
WOODS
1
C P & L 230 kV /
........................................................................ ....................................
-- -- -- -- -± r?-R/W---
- - - - - --: -----? ---- CIRCUIT 16
- --- -------
-- - ---- J' J J' J' -_- CIRCUIT 17
11
-
O ?A?AdAI - - - - - -
WOODS A
0

FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE.
EQUATION
P.I.
STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEA[
4 34'02'30' LT.
VISIONS
N c-
P,jec+ 13 -z2z6--
SI1e,e-f 6 of 7 ?I?? 9
CONSULTING uwn.CGnJ
I DWN: JGQ I CKD: SJB/HGB I APPD: f2KB
ti
ft
LEGEND
0 EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCATION
-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- -111 - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
E({?-- GUY AND ANCHOR COMBINATION
?- S SPAN GUYS
- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
-?- PROPERTY LINE
- - - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
WET AREA z 4 /4 9
PLAN & PROFILE
OMMISSION 115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
LINA
rcnza CIRC UIT 17 RELOCATION
FOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
?F1 N I\ ?C_p? d?' ?1-'ra?zspe+-?o•,.? 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
v; r o e c+ ?- Z Z Z S
------------?t?LLL /? ??t =N-CD.O.T. ROJEC T SHEET:
1+ M od . tb it (err!-1 I ? ?/ wo r k 5 2 OF 2
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60• (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER N ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.

5k,,+ 7 rp `1 g' Zs) c)q )UTH COORD FILE:
f
9 912 00
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. DAVID MCCOY
27611-5201
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 15, 1999 PAYMENT
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers RECEIVED
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225
for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
SummM of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Miti ation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way of the proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,

William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
3
?b
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JArvEs B. HuNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1. The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under

Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
'?- C - 4?'
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

l
A

VICINITY
MAPS
SURE
v

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 <B-2225>
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 411
OVER THE TAR RIVER
SHEET i OF 7
SI",'.E LOCATIONS
I
w
0
ere t`a-? ° ?
S Of e
1.o ca? ion .
I J
Q
D
is r Il Uj
7 ?? I w
?i cc
2 I

Q.
w'
i
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION I
OF STATE PROJECT 3.2220601 SHEE'I'2 0 F .7
11 IN, j rjYM
\ r
WOODS

4
N C I E PT o'F R AAf Sp p {Z-T?'C O n(
S3
1'r cu , G^? nZ Z1 Z S (? L
5?1e??' 3 0'? ! g?z.s(9°t

i
\` Y

O
k
O
O
moo.
GUY LEAD TABLE
/ STIR. No. 13
\ AHEAD BACi
\ 70.64' 70'.64
.•??.r " ? ,? \ \ wooos ? P:I. 1099. f ? ? I I
WHITE CONCRETE CO. STA.'S+99.4 fr
DB W 43, PG 149 89'25*6`RT '
i + . \ \ MB 6, PG 101
\ of 4 ?
WOODS
.-•Y" i GUY LEAD TABLE .
STR. No. 13-1
AHEAD BACK .? i -1116
r?' p 50',44' 50'.44' O `G Q ,
p X
14 _----- - -- /
EQUATION
P.I. 1118 QQ' /
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK =
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD WOODS
/ st 45'42'52" LT. ' ?! (?,?! I
IT.
/ I ?I JI 11 JI f I 1 ,
I V C a-Q- ?r?a r?S ?J o r? D ?'1
S4 1
5tie-c-} 7 ?iZS(9;
/ /?\ OB D 24, PG 73
??///' \ \
J
1 Jr JJ ?II ?J ?' / /
\ 4'I'T
?l?IryR A,?,,
J+? 41 ?Ji??y?11 R
\ r r r JI J MOND R.
JUD MIL R
O \ i ?? i?J%Jrl ail / / DB 25 G 7 7
1 11 it 'f1 x5 ,/\ /,' // 1'??j ?? IJ I / / D G 52, 801
' JJ, Aw \ /' i i / 54, PG 827
/ / / / B 0 PG 858 /
If / MON
MON
1 + 1 1 j ,?i / / If
1 J ' Lei .005 13 + Jr? ??
• /' /?
,' 1 1 1 1 1 r'
z;
t wooDS
1 1 1 1 , i
Ile If If
?, 11 1 1 J1 1 ,, BOBQ
,
PotgFOO1 Ay D8 E
If
A
If If
Jl ?1 i Jl , ?/ / / "'1?
N ' w00DS J+ ' If
W0005 `
1 1 ?? I f .......... ........ PO If
r ...... .... •....................................................................... . cr . ...............
P.I. 1048 'o
STA. 10+06.66 .. .
' N
;?J1 11 1,1111 M ON ___.__ _
i 1! IJ f, ?"((?Jr
I If
..' y •i TP-1141 J, - - - R/
„. 1 1 1 1 OQ ? W
=.•;,'' / // wooos GUY LEAD TABLE
'?•,a3• ?.. / STR. No. 12
AHEAD BACK
BOBBY RAY O'NEAL 90.84' 70',64' NOTE: FRAME AHEAD Gt
DB 641, PG 485
DATE
I
EVI
?. ??,,?? YpMt 1{ •,' 9 •• 0p
?J'*~??? j• '4. ,` 1111111 11\?t\
.. - ' l?l C ? '(roc ? t o ?-?
_ .fie ?? • . ? ?r>,t t^s o r
• Qr-oJ'e?}- I3-ZZZS
. P-?('?'t?•t?' 1Moc! . 't`o 1r (,C'}?? ? t`? ?lJc'?r?
SA 9 9
J
& "/" I
-HURST
552
G u c K/ L4) A,2 (: a
LAi 4a &A
O'NEAL
G 485
WOODS
........? ..... &. ?........... .................. ....... 230.. k?................................... ....................... /
-- -- -- -- -t? -R/W--- -- -- / --
-------? CIRCUIT 16
-----
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- --- - ---- ???P J,?r'I --- CIRCUIT 1-7 7 - - - -------?
11 (J. J J J t
- - ?r
li-j
0
to
EQUATION
P.I.
STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEAE
4 34'02'30" LT.

FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' X-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE.
VISIONS
NC- .fie -?i .R ?r a ASP a r-`?a'? I o h
Pr-p e CF B- z z Z6-
P-4-11 r Y.r,*A Mod. 4?r Work
Ska+ 6 of 7 (ZrIg9
CONSULTING ---c-cna
DWN: JGQ CKD: SJB/HGB APPD: f2KB
E
\
OMMISSION
PLAN & PROFILE
115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
N OLINA CIRCUIT 1 / RELOCATION
??, o IFOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
l?N K I r ?p+. 'x -T-?,.,.-u' --A-j .? 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
v
pr-aJeei Is-Zzzs-
sk Q-+ 7 rp 7 9 12S19q
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER H ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.

LEGEND
EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCA
IO
T
N
-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- -fIIF- - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
GUY AND ANCHOR COMBINAT
ION
-+- SPAN GUYS
-S-?
- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
$ PROPERTY LINE
- - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
WET AREA b z 4 /4 9
N.C.D.O.T. PROJECT SHEET:
B-2225 2 OF 2
)UTH COORD FILE:

SEATE
y
S
991200
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. DAVID MCCOY
27611-5201
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 15, 1999
PAYMENT
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers RECEIVED
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
r ?.
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell. g 16.
NCDOT Coordinator `Dear Sir:'' n
fuj,
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999.
On August 25, 1999 we submitted a letter to you describing work to be done by the
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) and a
request that the permit be modified to include the utility work. As we described in the
August 25 letter, the work will result in a minor change to the Greene Street Mitigation
site. Specifically, 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site located within the
transmission line right-of-way will become emergent marsh instead of cypress swamp.
This area will be graded as described in the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of
keeping the utility lines clear, the area will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area
will become 0.036 acres of emergent wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more
than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of
the impacts from project B-2225. Please be advised that the acreage of impacts and
mitigation has not changed from the original application. The only change was to convert
a 0.036 acre area of cypress swamp restoration to emergent marsh. The Greene Street
Mitigation site provided more cypress swamp restoration than needed by project B-2225
r
for a 2:1 restoration ratio. The following paragraphs, excerpted from the original permit
application, summarize the impacts from the construction of B-2225 and the proposed
mitigation.
SummM of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands were determined to be
0.66 acres which consisted of 0.11 acres of impacts from mechanized clearing and 0.55
acres of fill. In addition, there will be 0.50 acres of temporary fill in jurisdictional
wetlands and 0.04 acres of temporary fill in surface waters from the causeways that will
provide access for the construction equipment. There will be no permanent impact to
streams.
Mitigation: In addition to the avoidance and minimization measures implemented in the
design of the project, we are proposing compensatory mitigation from the Greene Street
Mitigation Site. This mitigation site will provide approximately 1.75 acres of
creation/restoration, 0.40 acres of enhancement, and 0.95 acres of preservation of upland
levee forest and adjacent bottomlands. The Greene Street Site is located adjacent to and
within the right-of-way of the proposed project.
Mr. John Hennessy of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality stated on October 1,
1999 that the DWQ must issue a revised Section 401 permit. Further he stated that the
processing of the permit application would require payment of a fee of $200.00 in
compliance with Section 143-215.30(e) of the NCAA. In compliance with this request,
we are herewith transmitting the check for $200.00 attached to a copy of the original
permit modification request.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
// axt
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 25, 1999
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Bell.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Greene Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225. AID 1995005645.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge
number 411 in its existing location with a new two-lane bridge that will accommodate
northbound traffic. Pitt Street will be extended across the Tar River with a second two-
lane bridge 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411 and will accommodate southbound traffic.
Section 404 and 401 permits were issued June 30, 1999. Two utility companies,
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) and Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) have now
informed us that the relocation of the utility lines will impact jurisdictional wetlands.
There will be two types of impacts.
1. The first will result from hand clearing less than 0.05 acres of wetlands. We
understand that this activity is not jurisdictional and therefore would not
require approval by either the USACE or the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). We are providing this information as a courtesy for your information
and because the hand clearing will take place adjacent to our bridge
construction zone.
2. The second impact will be from the placement of structures in jurisdictional
wetlands. The structures will be concrete in tightly sealed forms and the
material will be used as structural members for a standard support for the
transmission line footings. These are the types of structures permitted under
s
Nationwide permit number 25, a permit that does not require notification to
the USACE nor to the DWQ.
The CP&L line will not have any structures in jurisdictional water of the
United States. The GUC line will have three poles placed in jurisdictional
waters of the United States as shown on the attached drawings.
Further, it has come to our attention that 0.036 acres of the Green Street Mitigation Site is
located within the transmission line right-of-way. This area will be graded as described in
the Mitigation Plan. In keeping with the needs of keeping the utility lines clear, the area
will be planted with marsh vegetation and the area will become 0.036 acres of emergent
wetland. The mitigation site will still provide more than a 2:1 ratio of cypress swamp and
bottomland hardwood restoration for mitigation of the impacts from project B-2225.
As you requested during our meeting on August 24, 1999, we are providing drawings
depicting the overhead transmission lines. We request that the permit for the project be
modified to reflect the utility plans as noted in the attached plans.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at 919-733-1162.
Sincerely,
Y. ? 4?'
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
U Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Adrian Flowers, P.E. Utility Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
1

A

VICINITY
MAPS
SCALE
v
etreu
,
b
,
?fal?It? i
:
E Bract y .roux m
?l f
toddy 121
,hcwW,
,oaa*
' c ull"lGce nviile
? ell Arl?a?
l 1 ! • TOton ? v
• ? GnmefUna J
tl T
,/1' cl,aa
_ A
tree r wmlt..?at Bloc. 1
q?anlr I t
? Ayden Sntlmaer
ltoa

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 411
OVER THE ?TAR RIVER
SHEET I OF -7
Y

4ey-,e (,a-,
5 ,fie
1.o (-Q-"on

Q
Sr,'.c LOCA,riONS
wl
U)
m
oI
01
if 11
0
I U)
0
r; ` I? w
w
C
N.C. DEPT. OF TRA-Nt SPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLAMMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 3.2220601
SH FCr2 0 F 7 ? 8(ZsIq

41.rjI
11 r? r
?
?
+. . ?
?
1
1 ?
f f?
J? ??1 W000 S
?
\
(

CiVJ
4
t'l -T RAA C7 ,-rrj o/,(
?ro?eG? ?-ZZZ?
Ott, 1 y

It
`\ Y

A-
0
0
' GUY LEAD TABLE t
STIR. No. 13 "r'.ter
\ AHEAD
y \ / 70',64' 70',84tir.:?y
wooos + 1
r
+99.4= tf j
' WHITE CONCRETE CO. STA.
DB W 43, PG 149 OQ T.
MB 6. PG 101
• •.,^ 'til + ?f' p 'Q / ? •. M 'J /
WOODS
;_•,: -.r GUY
• LEAD TABLE
9L y ............. i i
STIR. No. 13-1 4Q\` ?,...., 1t ,j?1
AHEAD
T P-1116
'r k 50',44' BACK
50'.44'
O
i f 13-1 BOG
- - - - - __
----- -----? ----?i-
14 ---- ----?--- O_ ----- -------
E A10N
P.I. 1118 QQ` /
/ STA. 46+40.61 LINE BACK wooos
STA. 0+00 LINE AHEAD 4iI /
5t 45'42'52" LT.
?j!??!r
Jill . r, Pill
? Pro?e ? B - ZZ-Z S
n i?r1 niY t,1?
N. UvUL'. (, HLiil`_ t , i
\
0Q D 24, PG 573 ,?' ,? ? . JtS `d
/
1 , , 1 J1 ,?1 /??
?? •'? \ .,J.?i?J,?J,(?J,(? ? JI(?1 '?i / R MOND R.
(? I n? JUD H. MIL R
i / DB 25 G 7 7
O
I ,I JI ^? x D G 52, 801
\ \ , , / / r
f I Dl4j 54, PG 827
0 PG 858
J1 ''' MON
1 4. /
I I I I 1 ?/' ,// ? ?' MON
I JI I I (, ?'(/?,T -) 005 A %- /
13
WOODS
-' ' ?4J!?J??r BOBB
, I I I I I I I i, / / \o
" WOODS woods
-- /
I?a? '?J'I ?NP?''• /PO '1 // •
I I I I O' . , • .. ............... «................................»........«... ,
pip, 1'? JEL . '? / ' -P.I. 1048 .°o
STA. 10+06.66
_!?r_44 53 32" LT.
4 In
?. ?-, JII Ji?•I(?J, J'? halt . ,' , ? ?
J' 'J' 'J' J' M ON - - - - - - - _? - - -
x, 1 N
. w, .• a? J , JJ? ?, J ,?I I ? I, / o
TP-1141 I I I Q - - R/W - -
j / GUY LEAD TABLE
WOODS
_.; , sue` `k• i ?<v / STIR. No. 12
t / AHEAD BACK
90',84' '70',64' NOTE: FRAME AHEAD G,
BOBBY RAY O'NEAL
/ DB 641. PG 485
DATE
%
cl)
a
o? 2 C?- 'L3 ZZZS'
-'zrn%,t- Y1? oc? . 't`om L(+,,j %l/ wc)v-
Ska_,e,?- S o? ? 8'? zr? 99
:HURST
552
6uc- X/ Lo 4,.ILe4
?.,,..
O'NEAL
G 485
WOODS
.......... -C. P.. &. ?........... ...................... 230.. kV...................................................................... /
?.. ....................... 7...............
- - - t?? -R/W-
- - -
-------= ----- --- CIRCUIT 16 ---
f
-- --- -; ---- I f ?P?, f?---- CIRCUIT 17 ---------?
WOODS O EQUATION
P.I.
Lo STA. 19+65.17 LINE BACK
STA. 21+71.83 LINE AHEA[
FOR STATIC ON POLE 'C' 3'-6" MIN. FROM TOP OF POLE. ,2 34'02'30' LT.
VISIONS
PrbjeC+ 13 -22z6'-
P-ervh?? {Mod. -}or l,(-?, -k/ LbIork
SI?.e-f of 7 I zr 9 9
CONSULTING
DWN: JGQ CKD: SJB/HGB APPO: RKB

\
IN
IN IN
NOTES
1. TRANSMISSION - 115kV INSULATION
PHASE CONDUCTOR - THREE (3) 1272 kcmil AAC 61 STRAND (NARCISSUS)
LOADING DISTRICT - MEDIUM (DESIGN)/MEDIUM (ACTUAL)
DESIGN TENSION - 7,000 lbs.
BREAKING STRENGTH - 22,000 lbs.
RULING SPAN - 550 ft.
O.H.G.W. - DUAL 7 No. 9 ALUMOWELD
MAXIMUM CONDUCTOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE - 120' FINAL
DESIGN TENSION - 2,199 lbs.
O.H.G.W. SAG SET AT 80% OF 1272 "NARCISSUS" SAG AT
60' (NO WIND) INITIAL CONDITION.
2. DANGER N ALL LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ENERGIZED UNLESS
CLEARLY GROUNDED ON BOTH SIDES OF WORK AND PHYSICALLY CHECKED.
3. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE PLOTTED FROM REFERENCES AND ARE
NOT BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY.
4. RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES BY OTHERS.

LEGEND
0 EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE RETAINED
• EXISTING POLE LOCATION - TO BE REMOVED
0 PROPOSED POLE LOCATION
PROPOSED LINE LOCATION

-------- EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE REMOVED
- - - - EXISTING TRANSMISSION LINE - TO BE RETAINED
C - - PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY
- -fll1- - EXISTING OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE
({?? GUY AND ANCHOR COMBIN
T
A
ION
- SPAN GUYS
--S
- - - - RIGHT-OF-WAY
---?- PROPERTY LINE
- - - DITCH LINE
FENCE
WET AREA I Z 4 /4 9
OMMISSION
PLAN & PROFILE
115kV TRANSMISSION LINE
OLINA CIRCUIT 17 RELOCATION
IN IFOR THE GREEN STREET - PITT STREET
A r 3RIDGE CONNECTOR
rev 1 `? Q?-? OT TY A v? ? o'rl
proJe?'? -ZZZS
Moc(- 4r
5k-"-+ 7 rp 7 8 I zsl 9q
N.C.D.O.T. PROJECT SHEET:
B-2225 2 OF 2
)UTH COORD FILE:
R a NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone]

Jun 15 '99 1025 P.01
Post Ir Fax Note 7671 1D11r® 6/1519q 1pa9s' .:5 1
Tb r From ?` M . la Vt [?Tn.
COWDOPt NC (Z Co.
Phone N r 1 986 Phone A
F 3-9q5 F"s '733-IMMM
q7 `4
STATE pF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HuNT JR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5261
GOVERNOR
June 15, 1999
Mr. John R. Dorney
Water Quality Certification Program
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
DAVID MCCOY
ACTING SECRETARY
Subject: Replacement of Greene Street Bridge over. :the. Tar River, Pitt County
(State Project No. 8.2220601, TIP No.'-B-2225, Federal Aid Project No. BRM-
6964(1))
Dear Mr. Dorney,
We have received and reviewed your comments-for the Replacement of Greene Street
Bridge over the Tar River in Pitt County.- This letter is to address two concerns (Items D
and E -- June 3, 1999 correspondence) brought forth in your letter.
As mentioned in Item D, the DWQ "has concerns -about the proposed success criteria
for the restoration of the cypress-guru swamp..: " and. "that the site would have an
insufficient quantity of water to prevent the establishment of invasive tree species,
resulting in the restoration. of a bottomland hardwood.: forest in lieu of a cypress-gum
swamp."
The existing cypress swamp was found to be at.an. elevation of about 1 meter above
mean sea level with pockets of microtepography. When the mitigation (CADD) plans
were sent to NCDOT Roadway besign Group, they were notified to grade the proposed
cypress swamp to 1.0 meter, leaving areas of microtopography. This grading plan allows
the mitigated wetland area to be at the same elevation as the existing cypress swamp. At
this elevation, the existing cypress swamp receives frequent flooding for prolonged
periods of time. In areas of prolonged flooding, typically only obligate wetland species
survive. Consequently, this flooding regime will not allow invasive species to thrive.
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Jun 15 '99 10:26 P.02
Since the mitigated site is adjacent to the existing site, the likelihood that native
propagules will be dispersed to the newly constructed site is increased.
After conferring with Mike Bell (USACElE). and John Hennessy (DWQ), we have
changed the criteria for successful hydrologic restoration for the newly created/restored
cypress swamp. In the cypress swamp area to'be crcated/restored, success will be
determined using data from monitoring wells to -dewnstrate that inundation or saturation
within 12 inches of the ground has existed. consecutively for at least 25% of the growing
season-
Should either community fail to meet,their criieria (12.5% for bottomlands as stated
in the mitigation plan and 25% for swamp forest), a.comparative analysis of the hydraulic
data from the restoration/creation area and corresponding reference area will be
performed to determine whether the data are statistically different.
Success will be achieved if one of the. abovecriteria-(percentage of growing season or
statistically similar water levels between',wells) is met and if the planted vegetation are
successful.
We will amend the original mitigation plan to change the location of well #3 (labeled
#3 in the mitigation plan). Another set of wells, already proposed for the bottoniland area
(#2 in the plan) will be left in place. Duplicate surface water wells (#3a) will be placed in
between the bridges in the existing swam} forest, two years prior to mitigation
implementation. The hydrologic information obtained from: this well could be beneficial
for future mitigation projects- Two additional.s?face water wells (#3b) will be placed in
the restored /created swamp forest. Duplicate wells are being placed in the swamp forest
areas to reduce the chance of failure due to vandalism, malfunction or inundation.
Item E states that "The DWQ is concerned about the proposed success criteria for the
species diversity and composition for the cypress gum-swamp restoration site. The
application proposes that no one species should compose greater than 20% of the total
density. However, a cypress-gum swamp,systern.is characterized by the dominance of
primarily cypress and gum species,"
Cypress-gum swamps may be do, minated.by either cypress or gum species or both
species (Schafale 1990*). The particular cypress=swamp for which we arc-mitigating is
dominated by cypress (Taxodiunr distichum), along.with cottonwood (Populus
heterophylla), water hickory (Carya aquatica) and ash (Frayin:us spp.). We propose to
plant other species such as tupelo gum. (Nyssa aquatiea) which is highly beneficial for
wildlife. Since many cypress-guru, swamps contain predominately these two species, we
would prefer to plant a mixture of trees with cypress and tupelo gum comprising 40%
each of the total species. We proposethat the remaining 20% of the tree species consist
of two or more of the following trees species: green.ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), water
ash (F. caroliniana), ? toa d (Populus heterophylla), or water hickory
(Carya aqualica), depending on availability. Since these species presently occur onsite,
seed dispersal to the mitigated site is likely as well.

, , NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Jun 15 '99 10:26 P.03
It was also stated in Item. E, that "The DOT needs to compile a list of the specific
species to be planted in both the bottowland forest and cypress gum swamp." The
proposed species for the cypress-gum swamp arcJisted above. Bottomland hardwood
tree species will include sycamore (Platanus occidentahs),.green ash, river birch (Betula
nigra), water hickory and willow oak (Quercus phellos), As stated in the mitigation plan,
successful plantings will be determined by obtaining at least 260 trees per acre after five
years with an initial planting of 680 trees.
If you have furthcr questions. or comments: please contact Karen M. Lynch (733-
1173).
*Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of N Natural Comriaunitics of North Carolina. Third Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreatiun, NCDEkfN,R-
Sincerely,
William.. D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mike Bell, USACE Washington
David COX, WRC
John Hefner, US1; WS
David Franklin, USACE Wihnington
Alice Gordon, PD&EA
Karen M. ,Lynch, PD&EA
File B-2225
I it - .4
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
Regulatory Division
IN REPLY REFER TO April 13, 1999

APPI 9 7 8dd

Action ID No. 199505645
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:

By letter dated March 5, 1999, from the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT), you have been provided a copy of the application of NCDOT for a Department of the
Army (DA) authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to place fill material into 0.55
acres of Section 404 wetlands and mechanize land clear 0.11 acres of Section 404 wetlands
adjacent to the Tar River in Pitt County, North Carolina (TIP B-2225). The purpose of the
proposed work is to replace the Green Street Bridge (SR 1531) and construct a new parallel
bridge to extend Pitt Street across the Tar River in Greenville, North Carolina.
Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in
accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under the
provisions of Section 404 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted
until the certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a
request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. .Therefore, if you have not acted on
the request, or asked for an extension of time, by June 13, 1999, the District Engineer will deem
that wavier has occurred.
, r ; I
-2-
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Michael Bell at telephone [phone],
extension 26.
Sincerely,
Michael F. Bell, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
° SEW
RECEIVEi)
NAR 0.6 1997,
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIEN1E1
t rnU
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
March 3, 1997
Ms. Ann B. Deaton, Chief
Bridge Administration Section
United States Coast Guard
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004
Dear Ms. Deaton:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
i
Subject: Bridge No. 411 on SR 1531 (Greene Street) over the Tar River in
Greenville, North Carolina, Pitt County, State Project No. 8.2220601,
F. A. Project No. BRM-6964 (1), TIP No. B-2225
Please find enclosed a copy of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
subject project. This report records the determination that implementing the proposed
action will not have a significant effect upon the quality of the human or natural
environment.
Sincer
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/Igg
attachment
cc: Roy Shelton, FHWA w/attachment
David Lekson, USACOE w/attachment
1XIn Dorney, NCDEHNR w/attachment
G)

Pitt County, SR 1531
Bridge No. 411
over Tar River
State Project No. 8.2220601
Federal-Aid Project No. BRM-6964(1)
T.I.P. No. B-2225
Finding of No Significant Impact
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
2 /_
Date
z-/-7/ cc,7
Date
APPROVED:
?11. 1 1Q1u11111 • L%'1' 1 .L.' 1.1µ11µE,-.
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
/(Nich L. Graf, .E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Pitt County, SR 1532
Bridge No. 411
over Tar River
State Project No. 8.2220601
Federal-Aid No. BRM-6964(1)
TIP No. B-2225
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT MACT
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Administrative Action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The FHWA has determined the proposed project will
not have a significant impact on the human or natural environment. This FONSI is based
on the Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared for the replacement of Bridge No. 411
on SR 1531 over the Tar River in Greenville, North Carolina, approved December 17,
1996. The EA was independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately
and accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project.
Further, it provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining the preparation of an
Environmental Impacts Statement is not required.
tl.3S. Ge:??r#:?a?l±
% United States
Coast Guard
4
Commander
..,, :.,cast 17u.: , c 0'stnc,'
Federal Building
43 i Cra-wford Street
P-c;s; icst, VA 23704-5004
S;att Syrnboi: (Aowb)
Phone: [phone]
16590
30 Jan 97
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Planning and Environmental
North Carolina Department
Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Manager
Branch
of Transportation
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
The Environmental Assessment and Programmatic Section 4(f)
Evaluation for the replacement of Bridge No. 411 over SR 1531
across Tar River, mile 59.0, at Greenville, North Carolina, has
been reviewed.
The cover letter dated January 14, 1997, which requested the
Coast Guard's concurrence with the proposed minimum vertical
clearance of 20.7 feet between the normal water surface elevation
and the low chord in the channel for the proposed bridge has also
been reviewed. You state in your letter that this request is
based on the railroad bridge, mile 59.1, located upstream of
Bridge No. 411 which has an underclearance of 20.7 feet.
According to the case file for this railroad bridge, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers approved a minimum vertical clearance of
24 feet in 1951. If the present vertical clearance of the
railroad bridge is 20.7 feet, then we concur with the proposed
20.7-foot vertical clearance for the replacement of Bridge No.
411. Should it be revealed during the preliminary stages and
public review that the vertical clearance for the railroad bridge
is greater than 20.7 feet, we may have to rescind this
concurrence.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Environmental
Assessment and Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation. If you
should have any questions regarding this letter, please contact
Ms. Linda Gilliam, Bridge Management Specialist, at (757) 398-
6227.
EB u ? `:997.
2
OF 's
HIGH1A?f?lS ?R"
- Y???1?141F1\ ??.
Sincerely,

ANN B. DEATON
Chief, Bridge Administration Section
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
U.S. Department Commancer Federal Building
of Transportation' Fifth Coast Guard District 431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, VA(W61*f30P4
United States ® Staff
ne:ym M7) 398-6227
Coast Guard
16590
11 Dec 1996
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that we have received
the Categorical Exclusion/Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation for
the replacement of Bridge No. 411 across the Tar River (Pamlico
Tar Rivers), mile 59.0, at Greenville, North Carolina.
As discussed with Ms. Gail Grimes of your department and Mr. John
Wadsworth, Federal Highway Administration, we cannot accept a
Categorical Exclusion (CE) for this project. In accordance with
regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), each Federal agency is required to adopt procedures to
supplement those regulations. The Coast Guard's procedures and
policies are published in a Commandant Instruction entitled
"National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures and
Policy for Considering Environmental Impacts" (COMDTINST
M16475.1B). Under section 2.B.2.e.(32)(a) of Commandant
Instruction M16475.12.(as amended,. 59 FR 38654, 29 July 1994),
Categorical Exclusions can be used for modifications or
replacements of an existing bridge on essentially the same
alignment or location. Excluded are bridges with historic
significance or bridges providing access to undeveloped barrier
islands and beaches. Section 2.B.2.e.(32)(g) of this section
states that another Department of Transportation agency acting as
lead agency can classify a bridge program action as a CE;
however, in referring back to section 2.B.2.e.(32)(a), historic
bridges are excluded.
Since a CE will not be accepted, you will need to provide us with
a Finding of No Significant Impact for this project. In the
meantime, your application for a bridge permit will be held in
abeyance. If there are any questions concerning this matter,
contact Ms. Linda Gilliam, Project Officer, at [phone].
Sincerely,
NN B DEATON
Chief, Bridge Administration Section
By direction of the Commander
9 `V96j Fifth Coast Guard District
Z2 DdVISIGN OF Q?v
C HIGHWAYS
???t'?RONME???
16590
11 Dec 1996
Copy: Mr. Roy Shelton, FHWA
Mr. John Wadsworth, FHWA
.9i
C?
Regulatory Branch
September 28, 1995
Action ID No. 199505645
Mr. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Manager, P1-anning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:

Reference your application of August 24, 1995, for Department of
the Army (DA) authorization to discharge fill material within waters
of the United States, causing adverse impacts to approximately 0.8 acres
of high quality wetlands adjacent to the Tar River. The purpose of the
proposed project is to replace Bridge No. 411 across the Tar River on
State Road 1531 and extend Pitt Street by constructing a new bridge
330 feet upstream from Bridge No. 411, Greenville, Pitt County, North
Carolina (Federal Aid Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225).
The proposed work would directly impact 0.4 acres of Cypress-Gum
Swamp, 0.1 acres of Graminoid Marsh, and 0.3 acres of Bottomland Hardwoods.
These high quality wetlands filter sediments and nutrients from the Tar
River and provide very important functions for wildlife, waterfowl, and
other aquatic organisms within such an urban setting. Most importantly,
however, the construction of a fill causeway through these wetlands will
greatly impede t^e flows and circulation patterns of flood waters through
th_s already res:_,?ed r_ver corr_dor.
Based on the information you have submitted, and our knowledge of
this site, we have determined that your proposed project would cause
greater than minimal adverse impacts to the environment and cannot be
authorized under nationwide permit as presently proposed. Should you
wish to further pursue Department of the Army permit authorization, you
have the options of either applying for an individual Department of the
Army permit, or modifying your present proposal to reduce impacts. A
modified proposal could be resubmitted for authorization under nationwide
permit 23. Reduction of impacts can be accomplished through the sequencing
process of avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation. We
strongly recommend that you consider extending the proposed bridging as
a means of reducing fragmentation of fish and wildlife habitat, and adverse
impacts to the movement of flood waters. If mitigation is included in
your modified proposal, all final details of the mitigation plan must be
submitted with the proposal, including a monitoring plan and success criteria.
-2-
Thank for your time
you may contact Mr. Henry
telephone [phone],
and cooperation. Should
Wicker at our Washington
extension 2.
Sincerely,
you have any questions,
Regulatory Field Office,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Wetlands and Acuatic Plants
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 2851_6
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV
Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt Mr. David Cox
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement 512 North Salisbury Street
Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188
Raleigh North Carolina 27636-3726
-STATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
October 9, 1998
Commander (OAN)
Fifth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, VA 23704
Attn: Ms. Ann Deaton, Bridge Permits
Dear Ms. Deaton:
E. NORRIS TOLSON
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Green Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225.
Application is hereby made by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
for approval by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, of the location and plans of two bridges to be
constructed across the Tar River in Greenville, North Carolina. The bridges are located roughly 59
miles above the mouth of the waterway as shown on the attached plans. We propose to replace the
existing Greene Street bridge over the Tar River with a new bridge on the same location. A second
bridge, extending Pitt Street across the Tar River, will be located 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411.
The Greene Street bridge and the Pitt Street bridge will operate as a one-way pair circulating
northbound and southbound traffic through the central business district of Greenville.
We have provided a channel span with minimum vertical clearance of 7.018 meters (23.025
feet) above the O.H.W. for the Greene Street bridge and 8.685 meters (28.494 feet) above the
O.H.W. for the Pitt Street bridge. The minimum horizontal clearance is 25.609 meters (84.019 feet)
for the Greene Street bridge and 25.570 meters (83.891 feet) for the Pitt Street bridge. This vertical
clearance is in compliance with the 20.7-foot clearance that you concurred with in a January 30,
1997 letter from your agency (copy of letter enclosed).
These bridges do not have fender guide systems nor have they been designed for Vessel
Collision. Navigational lights will be provided if required by the USCG.

2
Legal authority for the bridge is found in the General Bridge Act of 1946. Federal funds
will be utilized for this project. However, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must approve this
project under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
The N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) must approve this project under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. The NCDOT is preparing and will submit a Joint Permit Application (JPA) for
both State and Federal Permits.
The NCDOT analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project in an
Environmental Assessment and Programmatic Section 4(f) evaluation (EA) that was. signed by the.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on December 17, 1996. The FHWA has determined that
this project will not have a significant effect on the human environment (FONSI signed
February 27, 1997). The environmental impacts of the project are listed on pages 35`-38. of the EA.
The bridge project over Tar River is designated as B-2225, and the impacts are given on Sheets 3
and 4. The names and addresses of the adjacent property owners are presented on the attached Sheet
5. Also, please find enclosed one original and three copies of the USCG drawings for the project.
Please initiate review of the proposed project for authorization under an U.S. Coast Guard
Permit. It is requested that any correspondence from your office regarding this project include the
NCDOT TIP Number (B-2225). Should you have any questions regarding this information, please
contact Ms. Alice Gordon at 919-733-7844, Extension 307.
Sincerely.
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manag?
Planning and Environmental Branch
WDG/ag
Encls: (1) Original and three copies of a vicinity map and plans of the bridge.
(2) Two copies of the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant
Impacts.
(3) Addresses of the adjacent property owners.
(4) One copy of the January 30, 1997 letter from the U.S. Coast Guard regarding the
proposed vertical clearance of the bridge.
cc: Mr. Michael Bell, COE, Washington
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, UFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, USNMFS
Mr. N. L. Graf, FHWA; Attn: Mr. Roy Shelton
Mr. Whitmel Webb, P.E., Program Development Branch
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., State Highway Engineer - Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
`r. (". E. Lassiter. P.E.. Division ? Engineer
k

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 2S201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GovERNoR

Commander (OAN)
Fifth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, Virginia 23704
Attn: Ms. Ann Deaton, Bridge Permits
Dear Ms. Deaton:

?pA
-L,.> V-11-,
E. NORRiS TOLSON
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Green Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.2220601,
T.I.P. No. B-2225.
Please reference the October 9, 1998 application made by the North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) for approval by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, of the location
and plans of two bridges to be constructed across the Tar River in Greenville, North Carolina.
The bridges are located roughly 59 miles above the mouth of the waterway as shown on the
attached plans. We propose to replace the existing Greene Street bridge over the Tar River with a
new bridge on the same location. A second bridge, extending Pitt Street across the Tar River,
will be located 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411. The Greene Street bridge and the Pitt Street
bridge will operate as a one-way pair circulating northbound and southbound traffic through the
central business district of Greenville.
The NCDOT is in receipt of your letter dated October 26, 1998 requesting additional
information on the subject project. Ms. Gail Grimes, P. E., of our Consulting Engineering Unit,
has indicated that through conversations with Ms. Linda Gilliam of your staff it has been
determined the following information will be sufficient to continue processing the permit
application.
1) Wetland impact report detailing the exact amount of impact to jurisdictional wetlands.

M,
2) Structure information detailing the proposed horizontal span lengths, vertical clearance
distances and the approximate normal water surface elevation for bridges up and downstream
of the Green Street bridge over the Tar River.
Please find attached the above listed information. The NCODT requests that review of
the proposed project for authorization under an U.S. Coast Guard Permit be continued. It is also
requested that any correspondence from your office regarding this project include the NCDOT
TIP Number (B-2225). Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact
Mr. Lindsey Riddick at 919-733-7844 extension 315.
Sincerely,
/)/- C4,L ixZL
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
WDG/plr
Attachment
cc: Mr. Michael Bell, COE, Washington
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, UFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, USNMFS
Mr. N. L. Graf, FHWA; Attn: Mr. Roy Shelton
Mr. Whitmel Webb, P.E., Program Development Branch
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., State Highway Engineer - Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

/1J 1 ?y' ?_ Arnl )°n ?)) '? IIUiAIP _
rrn 11•r.,ll• 1 \\\IA ?/? _ , t /•? ?'' _ I ?aS'°lr<Chita,
?: 1/?\F-_ ?...nln_n • 561,, '?
r)bi - ?. °r<n Sau,r• .nsl ' / - ,.a j PER UI M
Htalntrr llr -1 111 •?. '? _ ,?. Z
1
Hn,lr<1 ? Ci: S! - 1? y, 1. k7b as / AYr, nn.r / ,a°wtllt rrllt ?? ?I 1 InA
H A L I { t„rn r `; 37 r
ArnR-ood•? ?, F X? Ro?ooel ..c•. , 2 ., ° HQWANI p,l
{1 ! $onnq Nd, Connanlsa 131 ,
!.. , ktll0id .{2 .I •
r ?Glenvrew, ?? - Ewtltl J? ! Burden i RrSetrA\?OC+ ?' I (.* /
eenlland N.ek ?) a y Walhalla I ) 111.
Mount Gould
, (((k "«•
/ , h lellstnn.
b8 33 ' - `, ` /, 'Noo0:r11. C, r, Ai\r+rrll. ?Han raa''t.+w+? -_
Ainlan d 4 I rock
l'
bar wn.la\e,s - i Parm:, -a 1 J]
adz .heath B \ E R T _ ! •'1
Cold Roct { ?J0i1 I Edennai ,e 5
Dre-•`I M,dwa '?dLlltO.
* J2
.? Banrroa° D 33 \ •?A;. ll' Canada
Oak G - HnORdod
6 rat t,_rrnlt T 5 1 y7 . ,
'9 1 y ? a MIII
Datcnei 175 T wen
?, ,1 Rocky Mount 117 'l Hell t .st
e 9 IeRRNt YoeedOat C. IV ' {2 t J II Owlsna \/0 4
5
y I :• ° • •• G13010 n `? 'Mac\eYL-•?
' E D-5 C M/ B E , r..........? Ja `r -
• /2 amHton s
1 l - 64A I1 I .Pleasant Glove
, 1 woo°ard 1 5+ r
y easel /. u Ha stn J evovn $cuooernan
91
! J I: vrmcevrue , 11 175 ..I `? .5 37J? Cie
ire +Tarhor ; --_ . 42 t Gad vo,nl * ' ?+ ?r9 p + °°er Cner
P
?`?-.1osn,rosour 122 3 Evelenq 6 14 lymOUlh
illiam$tolt? awen
4 1 I 2 2S8 c Coneto csa ?Robersonvdle WASHINGTON
1 0. „melt T 10 5N _,x
Elm 2?I vmets I q etma M A R ? Bear Grass nks 121 13 30 6 I Hinson/ 32
14 t wenana
'I 11 Ut r 9
42 li Macnesheld' Gls0 U Pu _, Cokr
?'C + r
$t04eS 1 la C
77
5 Wilson I /F41an II J 15 Pike
Road, `
o% S - N) r Alounla,n e,o°e 5 3 1 30 -
'HOUSP '\
Ir I Saratoga Toddy 12111 43 J 0 ?P,ctaus 1 Oldfo,d 45
6 12 )y ' ~' Pmetow, u,..
:i JBlack Cleet\ 9 \ j? 26J _ 7 _ '? '*>;reenville t 264 10 15 - Fa ntt[o 1-1
1SlamonsDur /HS 121 +
••?.• -_ e11 AlIFur1 1 * ?S AUt terra Eeecmlle
walstonow Farmvlll oson s
R r Wuhington+ 3r c"' 261 7
lmes1an
fremdnl I 9 tl 3 ?• reale Srdlr
7 Eureka .° Clyy 13• -54AIP Gr I T T ,' ' ` arty , 92 'e y 99 - --' '??• --.
11' tune ! Win er"lle Cnocowrmty ?? 6 SiEne I -
I:.arl c,,,, y''•
Rountree Black lack
?P-ikeiile , R
G R E ' E s, PS 92? Bath wm:)eao?i}?
I, ID 0 '. rDU N.rNr•t anr1, 2 J 1?
Paletown I Mawr 0„n Ayden SITE \ ?h}n 5 + = Slades,
Saulston 13? Snow Hill + ondtvl .Ba2'ne ns0(nr?l a .? F
5 + l'6 ) too I eton ° I lot --'iect•' `5, s C
Calico •? J Cae :r.ffRRr? R;, 1
o r 12J Jy Wdma/ POIn ?' \>!^
?olasbor P ambcoBe b
.?/__; 1 758 C„non Bonne n
r la3on - \,r ` 43 10 I1 ? Co- Crossroads t r'--; =,-±?^
??11? 'Yt a S8 ' S J 19 ?loum Creek J - -? 7 ' ""a?
ttt I r Soul
'0u" m\ i Inslrlule Dawson
•,sor.- 1..? t in 55 - ' Edward Creet ?1 1.31+_aS? .
N E 0 La G,anRe r, /IS Rer: vanceboro
?1 \ ,1 For -ell
walnu 1 Amaa Royal 17
1 J3, k <
Creek, Until
7* Kinston Carton?^ J 'Vuu-e,
!I 5 Stye 6 CSSr •r, 6 ?• + '?-
.. N.,r,• •?Som Dover _ nn
L n i?-v ,D s o AskmI Mevc 1 er o.
N[ V` :. Haly.rnr 5 (l a
r I R E N
r? 55 (Wyse ` asoer ' (Cash Canerl
5 I fort `\ s Cove City 43' ngsmere. .,,"Y?er
55 I 3 + Mano`el Jot _a_ vR. . n..f?
I _ L E N (?.1 I R 31 55 cram .Baroao +,?''-:
v.f
'Olymoro soor0 , ?J f e e'
Deed Run. , •a Laic 7raa All,ince ?j
258 41 ± Bern , <.n p ^o!tons,aie
Albertson ..?fC1JaAes C 1 Merr11l GJ
.? n • 1 en.mB . ?? 'i1: \ • ?? 1 I I I b 55 a >'c0/ Rena,
Scale of Miles
0 5 10 20 3n
0 10 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
VICINITY- -N-L0 SHOWING LOCATION
0 F STATE PROJECT S."''20601
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
SHEET) OF $ _ -"L?• I
SITE LOCATIONS
I\ 1
SITE 1 ' 1 -
SITE 2
?' , END ?FfJJECT I f j 1r?
? ? f .- 1 SITE 3
r r
J ?
G7tlrNVl1,12
ru.. op
BEGIN PROJEC'

r
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OP STATE PROJECT 8.2-220601 =iEET.q OF g Juiv 199
SITE LCCAT'C

t
of
o?
J
N
i?

Z
40
cv
l V
n

?
?
x
z
x
o
(LO
0
c
c
z
?
E z
4 °°
- U ?

z
CL
cr?
W,
Q
Ch 0,
? I
C
v V'

iLL.
r ?
L.. ,
I ? ;, ;
C --
Z
U z
'ems :-
O
z
z
O
-c
3 ? c
z z Q
a
z z
z z
z

cV

o I
i ?
E i Q
j C\\j
1
w
I

I I
O
c O
?Jl
E- C) q
C-4

I '
(
Fl
a w o0

r
5
fa,
J
i
? I ?
E
1E I U
z a W
08,
.
in i.

j
z

r
J
Z J ?
?? v
r
Z U2

co z
co Z
. y
z 3

o
ppp C v

°
)°00
c
-Onoo f r
CO00
is 00 OC
O n0
J • .
000 ??, ?, I
0 00
{ 0.0 ? ?,
OC° ( a
I ©cc'6oo co
,° OC ?°
J j
..
?C' O
° O > x °coccoCO° J A I
U
' I

booo
o
a
a 0oc4o -
° o o0 GC .
rc
Y I M
0
0
Q . ,
Goo CS
,
;°`=1 I

iQ
o
° °
°
o
° I c
3
?oo oa ; • r
°
? ol = z
O

i
C
.-..

o
z z

<
000.
? o°oo 0 0 0 000 c` c' ° E
`oa a0 00 00 : o co?CfJR°C oc1 3

?°Q°O
c0
00 oodo

0000 OO
0 0
OCI

O ?
.
0

G

?
60
p C00 C
G°0 0 00GQ'
OOCOG
C
-C?
/

C

e
z
z

z
o
C) . ? c
cq
1 -,- Ln- _

i
l
i
?l 'aVn
I?I,f IUZ-
.11 b'
Q
C
00
%06I
1 PC (
p?
l ?<
K
1 4
i
H
hl
I I
l l
I ? ?cr? 4
w
0
ct
O O W
L
O? (.L

c- -,

M
W
cn
L:Ll
z

cli ==
o :r
c
?D c

? z
0 0
E-

E-
00
a

?
z
0
r
i
?i
o-
Ln -DO
c
z
L-'
r;
G i
U --
c I
? f.. I
O
z
D
J OI
u u
L ?
z z
U ?
3 3
z z
U
z z
a
Q
i
SUMMARY
WETLANDS
FILL EXCAVATION UNDERCUT TEMP. FILL *CLEARING
SITE IN IN IN IN IN
NO. STATION STRUCTURE WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS
(HA) (CM) (H-A) (HA) (HA)
22+40
1 LT & RT NO 0.093 0.011
-L- STRUCTURE
21=20
2 LT & RT NO 0.132 - - 0.025-
-L- STRUCTURE
3 20+67 RT NO 0.002. - - - 0.006
-L1- STRUCTURE
TO'T'ALS:
0.227 0 0 0 0.042, 1
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAivi _?ND _LDDRESS
PROJECT NO. 3.2220601 (B-2325)
REPLACEMENTT OF BRIDGE 411
PITT CCUNTY
SITE PARCEL OWNERS
NUMBER NUMBER NAME ADDRESS
29 ALMA A. DUDLEY, HEIRS
`?9 ALMA A. DUDLEY, HEIRS, NCDOT R/W
GREENVILLE UTILITIES R?W
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2320601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMET OF BRIDGE 411
sxr?T?:ran ::99-

a?aAAg°
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TkANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
December 15, 1998
Commander (OAN)
Fifth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, Virginia 23704
Attn: Ms. Ann Deaton, Bridge Permits
Dear Ms. Deaton:
E. NoRRIs TOLSON
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Pitt County, Replacement of Bridge No. 411 SR 1531 (Green Street) and
Construction of Parallel Structure on Extension of Pitt Street, over the Tar
River, Federal Project No. BRM-6964(1), State Project No. 8.222060 1,
T.I.P. No. B-2225.
Please reference the October 9, 1998 application made by the North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) for approval by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, of the location
and plans of two bridges to be constructed across the Tar River in Greenville, North Carolina.
The bridges are located roughly 59 miles above the mouth of the waterway as shown on the
attached plans. We propose to replace the existing Greene Street bridge over the Tar River with a
new bridge on the same location. A second bridge, extending Pitt Street across the Tar River,
will be located 330 feet upstream of Bridge 411. The Greene Street bridge and the Pitt Street
bridge will operate as a one-way pair circulating northbound and southbound traffic through the
central business district of Greenville.
The NCDOT is in receipt of your letter dated October 26, 1998 requesting additional
information on the subject project. Ms. Gail Grimes, P. E., of our Consulting Engineering Unit,
has indicated that through conversations with Ms. Linda Gilliam of your staff it has been
determined the following information will be sufficient to continue processing the permit
application.
1) Wetland impact report detailing the exact amount of impact to jurisdictional wetlands.

4
2) Structure information detailing the proposed horizontal span lengths, vertical clearance
distances and the approximate normal water surface elevation for bridges up and downstream
of the Green Street bridge over the Tar River.
Please find attached the above listed information. The NCODT requests that review of
the proposed project for authorization under an U.S. Coast Guard Permit be continued. It is also
requested that any correspondence from your office regarding this project include the NCDOT
TIP Number (B-2225). Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact
Mr. Lindsey Riddick at 919-733-7844 extension 315.
Sincerely,
/;/ C" ix-ZL /9?
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
WDG/plr
Attachment
cc: Mr. Michael Bell, COE, Washington
Mr.. John. Domey,.N.CDENR,.DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, UFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, USNMFS
Mr. N. L. Graf, FHWA; Attn: Mr. Roy Shelton
Mr. Whitmel Webb, P.E., Program Development Branch
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., State Highway Engineer - Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer

,s
?I! S amesrdlZ\ r It
\ 1 2 Coneto t" RobersonvrDe ?L. 5 W AS H I N GTO N
Elm GW ?'] ' vmetoos mmele
's3 d pcrM 1 7 258tZ etma M A R T to csa`N 5 as 55 Pt
Bear Grass I /S
??: wdeanks 3 i 177 13 30 16 I Hrnson/ 32
42 124 I Cnso / ') r , ?- I1 vl 9 rrenora
6 Mac Cles held , Slakes I _ _ Pu ?.°M
yy
' rr ? 1 Ir h /'
SY+ T' TIilso 1 \ /Falklan s 1 7 \ /" 15 Pike Road, `
J jl
? 5 ' ! N ! y .,fountain Bruce 5 ] Housf 30, ,
'k ! Saratbga7 ?t5 toddy In! t3 3 Il? ?Pactolus , OrdFad.1 Preto. ct., 45
n
?yBlack Creek\ 264
Plnleto
fG[E@n9111@ + Id
tie tantonsbur NS irl - ^+_• _ ell A t6ur? ' * I 1S , Aiena ! lettnnile
- - - - walslonoure rd"I'villE 1?/p ???/ oson Ns r Washinoon+ o ?2; Caa
' ? r G inesland `?• , : O 5
Fremont 6' 9 r ': ) 3 Yeatesvdte •?' 1
r ° Eureka :d .17 13 , 'siRl P I T T . ` , um 9T e -
I mrl
53 I bit.. `, : rtr Choco.
1 wrnlerrrue r k Q? R Sldae
i ike,d.le 'Black lack Y`.. .
92
?iAevHle , G R E E Rountree ?O1ii
Batn wrn:) `ad?i}
J -
.. p° a anr6 7?
$lades.
' II Pateto.n I Mawr IC
Ta... . She. tirlb ......11"Ayd
S T \ ??t'o Sir j . s ---i .E 6 aYiie r nsoln?IRe
Saul'sttin 13 - J. ' Y •\
,5 + `16 '?... jiookertoV a Idr •• ?-='fREf• -
y R J --- Cahto •~ ! Wdmar Pa°e•?t ffaaY? Ri..!. .:. • ?c - ?.?_.:
I •t{'._ Pamlico Be It _'- 41
.:?oldsboro
! ,?--•. ) 253 Grrftn - r Bonne n `-'-=
1 talon \ u O ` 43 Id Co. Crossroads
1 vs k 53 5 / 5 II " lount Creek J r
dra.
Soul
Sorr R` 1 /Instrlule Oa.son Edward GeekQ1 J t3"+_,
E ` r, La racy: 55 vanceboro I \ bbb U' ?i
'
zt 1alnu O la Granite ! /r For rnwell 7 1 Amaa
N V Royal 17 h
Creek >~Kmston Until Cavion? 33, ou«
7 HoD
!I 1 $eve 6 CSS 6 tG p 1 ^ _ - s
Sr.h fSoan N
.- ;wl ! ?+? ' Oorer ' Mevc
i-?• r0 R Askr 11 ' HOllrvrlle S °4
-55 'verse N asoer 'E N tCasnCaher)
5 IFOrk \ s Cove C,ty 3 / air R. .
OFF
55 + Mar,bel pr _fFSy R. -4- P,
L E N 0 1 R 31 55 v C•anrs Bayboto F it _-ZC
ymo,a D 7 J F a tr.;
?. d 7 - !' r .r ?Ol Crp r// _a.;.
A I C y?-+
Deep Run. , •t [us\rora 1 IO - rrA tetonp A IM nce •
\` <U 253 _ -: _ t! + iv Bern Ma...f tt ?G hqtons,.!ie-?\•'?r
Albertson \ ?e (rH R 'l7Aes C.1
" . 4r R
• 1 Rhms . 'i1: • N '\ 11 II 5S P
cb , R.11'
a xo land N.ck 5 tvA.rr
1 J ?h le>rslbn. ?,. Mount Gould
13 33 i ` /? Yrooev,llP ?' 4Skfwvrll• H""COCk ? -w?
Alhla.a
3 wnrtakers v75` Palmaa ;?
Gold Rock Ras.ne3lh I B \ E `J0t' R T l • •
t i•-- I Edennou ]I
*' 5
r
® r?.. Ba111ebOr0 / . \ O e_ R M,ewa7 I 'Qtnl 32
1 Oak 33 Hooeooo ,% .11 Canaba 1
•?R X1011. La -,!nce I!+ 1 All
1..1 ?/?ftv.Iv•s?? Dw.iches '(9I \ :75) J + w Merry
va'a6lr a ocky Mount tlr 'C -- •--- , o`?. Hill 6 .id
-a 9 letter YoeedOakGty 42 Ourts^a
' yy \ ' '... Gra0town ' `. rMacke
r1:J h• 1 f\ l2 amJ'o^ - -' it Ir ...... 64A Woodard r G? ' _.PlealGrove
rr
b4
Glseas 1- l / ' .? II Halsell ) esto.n Seuppertgn
I J ?' \
c 1: : Pnncev,ue 11 u'S j `I J?ooer Cie
+TafbOf i W Gold Point ?+ ?r9 O Cher
%•OSnirosou, RS5`?^ • V?IilliamSlOd\
` ' ) amen PI mourn
+ '?` ;13 1 ry1d d 3 ?i, yet o i / Y
yJ51 ?: (AA,nl )On ?!1 '? IIIJ'.RIP _
561.! .1. S C1RO,
Rrcnsbua,. ?D51 1 PER UIMA
FHA,7,IWiL I F `J \ ,2 =010„n ; : 1 32 /
$brrnt H,,, cbnnar,laa I31 ' CHOWANI !
Rt11o, 12
0 ? I " to .1 Gienvrr., ?`? 5 RrSc?raoc \1t1
? ! Burden \ ?* 2
Scale of miles
0 S 10 20 Jn
0 10 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
VICINITY ?•LkP SHO\VING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 8.22-20601
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COTJ--,\TTY
PROJECT 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
SHEET I OF ? -, V , ;?
SITE LOCATIONS

`
SITE 1

END Mj JECT? ? l1
J
`r

i }

BEGIN PRO JECT

r?

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 8.2-220601 SHEL• T a 3F ? JUIV 1199
SITE L' C A T 1 ",,'S
i
wl
0
1 a?
J
N
- IF a%
, p a
4
WG
CL
? - I
a
CL Od
O c-
v

5
z
z
GV
G-11
C/D
z??co
?_ Oo
O U C
?z 00
C p r
? C/D
a
5 O
Q Q ?
U p''
z

1 \
!\,`-1 \\
ti
? LL
;,

V n
q
J
z
U ?-
cn
z
z -
r
?z
o
z?
ra z
G
c
7e7_
c
I; II
3 a ?
z z Z
r? z z
o
z z
G ?_
I
v ?
CN
I
u ?
1 E
1
I
it L
I
i
h
IYV "-,IN
J_
L
10
I
' j
Ili ?
(I
I
J c
i
I
f
0
> x
LL: w
a
ICL
_
t^i Q? OC 00
0oo 0 00,
1000010
O°p
l0Opp O00 O
xoa° ooo° .0
r cq
W CO
EZ Z NOUcC''.? z
N ? z 06
r w O p E.?4
a ? cc J
r U)
i
U
r?
j L
I 1\ ?.
J t
Q
. J C
r
L Li ?1\ z
`OC/ L 1 m ..
L
?z
;000 U." ..? I
?f(jc J (a
00
OCCC C
DC ?J 'O I I
rr--,? I
Q `
r
„CS-7 i
_ 0
oo
Co ?? I
°?-;? ° not
0 OCCO O?C' o
0^? CnO OCof
O O 00CO -rc'? CO J
?QOO )00000 Ip p0 0 OC CCx-C
\Si Opp 0
O "O OCti.O, ° ?I ooo°_o0
0
U-?
Ln-
6
c M O
G O
II II
3
z z z
? > 3
w z z
r?
Z j z
L'
J W
,
Iy??
' f
t, I ? I 1 '
I?I,I (JC)
Ew
.o
ia1 0!

O
N ,%?CV
o
r po
r p G P
r og
r ?
r
I ?
0
a_
0 0 n

?- -, ?

n?
CO)
W
z

Cl)

r
?

0
z

0
?
c.?
C6

z
r? ..

E-? O WV 00'

z

a

? G
cr!

I
O
Ln -Cm
z
G
c;
z
N^ L
C rr
z
v; <
F L
G
z
?z
p J
p 0
d O OI
n n
z z Q
U
? I
c, z z
z z
c
I
SUMMARY
WETLANDS
FILL EXCAVATION UNDERCUT TEMP. FILL *CLEARING
SITE IN IN IN IN IN
NO. STATION STRUCTURE WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS
(HA) (CM) (HA) (HA) (HA)
22+40
1 LT & RT NO 0.093 0.011
-L- STRUCTURE
21-20
2 LT & RT NO 0.132 - - 0.025
-L- STRUCTURE
3 20+67 RT NO 0.002. - 0.006
-L1- STRUCTURE
TOTALS: 0.227 0 0 G 0.042 i
i
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2220601 (B-2225)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
* META OD iii CLEARING
f
ISHLET 7 OF $ JULY 1997
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAivlE A.ND --T=RESS
PROJECT NO. 3.2220601 (3-2325)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 411
PITT COUNT."
SITE PARCEL OWNERS
NTUMBER ?-1UMBER NANIE ADDRESS
1 29 ALMA A. DUDLEY, HEIRS
2 29 ALIVIAA. DUDLEY, HEIRS, NCDOTR/W
3 - GREENVILLE UTILITIES R?W
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT S.2220601 (B-2235)
REPLACEMET OF BRIDGE 411