20200887 Ver 1_PCN responses to USACE comments 072420_20200730

Strickland, Bev
From: Daniel Kuefler <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 10:08 AM
To: Johnson, Alan
Cc: Len Rindner
Subject: [External] Project URP (aka Centene)
Attachments: SAW_2020_00946 _ PCN responses to USACE comments 072420.pdf
• ' External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Alan,
I've attached the updated PCN package that we sent to Bryan (USACE) in response to his comments for
the Project URP (Centene) site. Our understanding is that they are working on issuing the permit by tomorrow.
Please give this a look over - I'll plan to catch up with you on the phone later today to go over any
questions/details and/or anything else you need.
Thanks,
Daniel
Daniel Kuefler
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
www.wetla,nds-epg.com
336.554.2728
1

Bryan,
Thank you for providing detailed and thoughtful comments on our PCN submittal for the
Centene Project (SAW-2020-00946). In cooperation with the project engineers, we have worked
to update the PCN in accordance with your comments.
In sum, the updated plans propose to further reduce and minimize the overall impacts,
effectively avoiding impacts to onsite wetlands entirely while also avoiding permanent impacts
within the FEMA floodplain. This will be achieved through the incorporation of a customized
CON/SPAN culvert with internal energy dissipation members and an additional bottomless
culvert. With these modifications, the total permanent impacts proposed to be permitted
under NWP 39 include 228 linear feet of intermittent warm water stream.
Please refer to the itemized responses to your letter comments below, as well as the attached
updated plans, PCN form, and NCSAM worksheets for further details. Please let us know if you
have any questions or need any further information to process this request. Thank you in
advance for your timely consideration of these materials.
Daniel
Response to Comment 'a':
The incorporation of a customized culvert with energy dissipating baffles has been used to
ensure that suitable velocities will be maintained as required for dissipating flows below the
proposed culvert. The Cross -Vanes are not necessary under this approach and have been
subsequently removed from the current plans.
Response to Comment 'b':
An additional qualitative assessment of Intermittent Streams C and Stream G was conducted
using the North Carolina Qualitative Stream Assessment Methodology (NCSAM). The functional
quality of Stream C ranked 'medium -to -high' and consequently a 2:1 mitigation ratio is
proposed for the 152 linear feet of permanent impacts to Stream C. The functional quality of
Stream G ranked 'low' and consequently a 1:1 mitigation ratio is proposed for the 76 linear feet
of permanent impacts to Stream G. Please refer to the attached NCSAM worksheets and
summary tables for details.
Response to Comment 'c':
The modification of the proposed design adheres to the general conditions of NWP 39 and,
subsequently, the PCN request has been updated accordingly to reflect that impacts are no
longer being proposed under NWP 14 or NWP 18.
Response to Comment 'd':
The updated plan presented here demonstrates substantial additional avoidance and
minimization measures to those previously proposed, in which 97% of the 6,761 linear feet of

stream channel and 100% of the 0.35 acres of wetlands onsite will be avoided. The scope and
scale of these impacts in the context of this project design was discussed and deemed
reasonable during a pre -application meeting with USACE, project engineers/planners, and
WEPG on March 19, 2020. A summary of some of the design rational as well as site and
engineering constraints that were discussed included the following.
• In regards to the overall scale of the Centene East Coast HQ Project, the proposed
campus is comprised of approximately 80 acres located within Charlotte City limits, and
within a research center known as University Research Park. The campus will serve
5,700 future employees. The campus is intended to be an active and wellness campus
environment. Security and privacy are the driving themes for the development
strategies for the project as a whole. The site has been studied to balance the
requirements of fire service, infrastructure requirements, code requirements and
servicing for the project. There are 4 main access points to the project (2 for the East
Campus and 2 for the West Campus). Each side will contain an employee entry and a
delegate entry — all of which are gated. The entire project will be gated for
security. Fire access will loop around the perimeter of the site to the south and will be
lower than the level of the central courtyard. Additionally, the site contains a Daycare
facility to serve the employees' needs. The location and functionality of the Daycare
facility is intentional as a separated component of the project. The single goal for the
relocation project is to provide a state of the art campus which will recruit and retain
the best employee base in the region.
• Site constraints, including existing topography; presence of rock; buffers;
floodplains/floodways; preserved wetlands and streams significantly influenced the
shape and function of the buildings.
• The campus is comprised of an East Campus and West campus, converging in the middle
by a connecting outdoor core space. The project program is as follows:
- East Campus — approximately 526,000 sf office space + 2,800 parking spaces
- West Campus — approximately 526,000 sf office space + 2,800 parking spaces
- University Training Center — 80,000 sf
- Daycare Facility—11,000 sf
- Data Center — 80,000 sf
- Fitness center and gym
- Restaurant and food service
• The functionality of the central amenity core is an important consideration for the entire
campus. It is critical for a number of reasons including:
- Serving as a pedestrian corridor for thousands of employees
- Connectivity essential for programming, educational functions, and outdoor events.
- Circulation between buildings for employee functions; meetings; and services

- Flexibility to host one large gathering; or multiple independent functions.
- Accessibility to people with disabilities
- Positioned at elevation 646.50;
- Provides essential connections at critical elevations, relative to building function;
• To further reinforce the topography and levels of the central amenity along with the
adjacent buildings, the following provides a breakdown of FFEs and critical grade
relationships;
The East Campus is comprised of (3) building sections;
North Wing (FFE 662.50) — Fitness Center / Terrace at Tree Save
South Wing (FFE 630.50) — F&B / Indoor -Outdoor Seating
Central Body (FFE 662.50) — Arrival Level / Terrace at Tree Save
The West Campus has the same building components;
North Wing (FFE 646.50) — Health Component / Direct Central Amenity Access
South Wing (FFE 646.50) — F&B / Indoor -Outdoor Seating
Central Body (FFE 646.50) — Arrival Level / Terrace at Tree Save
Response to Comment'e":
The current plans have been modified to incorporate a bottomless culvert as required for the
construction of emergency access road spanning Intermittent Stream C. This modification will
effectively reduce the total of impacts b 39 linear feet (34 permanent; 5 temporary) and will
eliminate the need for any permanent impacts or net fill in the FEMA floodplain.

M Gmail
Daniel Kuefler <[e-mail]>
SAW-2020-OO946_Project URP (Notice of Incomplete Pre -Construction Notification)
Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US) <Bryan.K.Roden [e-mail]>
To: Daniel Kuefler <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Mr. Kuefler,
Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:22 PM
On July 8, 2020, we received the Pre -Construction Notification you submitted on behalf of Summit Avenue URP, LLP on a property located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. I have completed my initial review of the
report and I have determined that it is incomplete. The following information is necessary before I will issue a determination:
a. The PCN states there will be permanent impacts to Stream C associated with cross -vane installation. This is quantified in acres; however, this impact needs to be quantified in linear feet of stream impacts.
b. The PCN proposed a compensatory mitigation of 1:1 for permanent stream impacts to Streams C and G. However, the PCN lacked any additional information and analysis, such as the North Carolina Stream
Assessment Methodology, to support the reduced ratio. Without additional information, the Corps cannot justify a reduction from a 2:1 ratio and assumes these impacted streams to be high quality.
c. The PCN requests the use of three different Nationwide Permits to construct a commercial development. The majority of impacts are proposed under Nationwide Permit 39 with 34 linear feet (permanent) and 5
linear feet (temporary) proposed under Nationwide Permit 14 and unknown linear feet (0.002 acre, permanent) proposed under Nationwide Permit 18. The stream impacts are associated with culvert installation,
construction access, and stream work (cross -vane) FOR THE COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENT. The Corps considers all impacts proposed as associated with the construction of the commercial development and
would then be permitted under Nationwide Permit 39. Please explain why the stream impacts are associated with Nationwide Permits, 14 and 18 and not included with the other permanent stream impacts
associated with Nationwide Permit 39.
d. Avoidance and minimization has not clearly be demonstrated for this project. General Condition 23(a) of Nationwide Permit 39 states "The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize
adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site." The term practicable means available and capable of being done after taking
into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of the overall project purposes (see 40 CFR 230.3(I)). The Corps is concerned that the applicant has not avoided and minimized impacts to waters
of the United States to the maximum extent practicable as required by regulation. The project as proposed has not demonstrated that it will have no more than minimal impacts to the environment.
e. Stream C impacts (34 linear feet; permanent and 5 linear feet; temporary) are associated with a culvert installation. However, a road to the east of this impact (south of the daycare) is proposed with a bottomless
culvert resulting in no temporary or permanent stream impacts. These roads have similar dimensions and since a bottomless culvert is proposed in another location, it likely would not be cost prohibitive and would
be feasible to use bottomless culverts onsite which avoids and minimizes impacts to waters of the United States, to extent practicable. Please provide additional detail/reasoning as to why this approach wasn't
considered and proposed.
PLEASE NOTE:
• Nationwide Permit 39, Regional Condition 4.1.3 states "Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands, within the floodway resulting in permanent above -grade fills are not
authorized by this NWP."
• The impacts you proposed for Nationwide Permits 14 and 18 are related to the development of the commercial development and would not occur if the commercial development was not constructed. You cannot
circumvent the regional conditions of one Nationwide Permit (i.e., Nationwide Permit 39) by parsing out those impacts not allowed and trying to permit them under a different Nationwide Permit (i.e., Nationwide
Permits 14 and 18). All impacts related to the development of a commercial development within the proposed project area will be considered under Nationwide Permit 39.
• Regional conditions are established by the District and approved by the Corps Division, to ensure that the implementation of the nationwide permit program in waters and wetlands of North Carolina are consistent with
meeting the program's goals of streamlining the permit process for those activities that have no more than minimal impacts to the environment.
• General Condition 28 in Nationwide Permit 39 states the use of multiple Nationwide Permits if the loss of waters of the U.S. authorized by those permits does not exceed the acreage limit of the Nationwide Permit with
the highest specified acreage limit. However, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, as previously stated you cannot circumvent the regional condition of one Nationwide Permit by parsing out those impacts not allowed and
trying to permit them under a different Nationwide Permit.
Please provide the information requested above in ONE consolidated response within 30-days of the date of this correspondence. If you do not respond within 30-days, the request will be administratively canceled. Please
contact me via telephone or e-mail if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Bryan Roden -Reynolds, PWS

Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: [phone]
2017NWP39.pdf
269K

d�OF W A rEq<
fl Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑X Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Project URP
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Summit Avenue URP, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
26940-583; 16950-506; 03421-396
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Matthew Browder
3d.
Street address:
1440 South Tryon Street, Suite 104
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 29203
3f.
Telephone no.:
646-346-8871
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Daniel Kuefler
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e.
Telephone no.:
336-554-2728
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
04713104
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.3276 Longitude:-80.769
1 c.
Property size:
80.9 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mallard Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
03040105
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is covered with successional mixed pine and hardwood forest, with slopes and drainages flowing into Mallard Creek which forms the southern site
boundary. Commercial properties surround the site and US Highway 85 is less than a mile southeast.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.347
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 6,761
3d.
Construction
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
of a corporate facility including East Campus, West Campus, Training Center, Day Care, and Data Center.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment- excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A PJD Request was submitted and approved (SAW-2020-00946) on 6/10/20. Please see the JD and Approvals section for details.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase 1-East Campus
Phase 2-West Campus
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream C
INT
3
152
S2 T
Coffer Dam/Dewatering
Stream C
INT
3
20
S3 T
Construction Access
Stream C
INT
3
20
S4 P
Fill
Stream G
INT
3
76
S5 T
Construction Access
Stream G
INT
3
5
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
273
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, location, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots
and access routes. As shown on the attached exhibits, building orientation and layout was chosen to reduce impacts on jurisdictional features and
preserve natural areas. Bottomless crossings have been proposed wherever practicable to avoid additional impacts. A large portion of the site is being
undistrubed/retained as tree save areas. Please refer to the cover letters for additional information.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Crossings have been minimized using headwalls and 2:1 slopes to avoid additional impacts Utility crossings will be bored wherever possible.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
228 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: a 1:1 ratio is proposed for 76 If of impacts to Stream G; a 2:1 ratio is proposed for 152 If of impacts to Stream C. NCSAM attached.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
36.7 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm
water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has
not yet been submitted to the City of
Charlotte but will be designed to meet their criteria
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Charlotte
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat may exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but the project is exempt as noted in the included T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Report by R.S. Webb is attached. State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) database http://gis.ncdnr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No permanent impacts or net fill will occur in the floodplain as a result of this project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov; FEMA's Community Floodway Map #3710457700K and as surveyed and represented on project survey.
Digitally signed by Daniel Kuefler
Daniel DN: cn=Daniel Kuefler, o=WEPG, ou,
email=daniel.kuefler@wetlands-
Daniel Kuefler
0US
Kuefler Date:2020.7. 24 08:52:39-04'00'
07-24-2020
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

NGS MONUMENT "HUNT"
ARIA AT THE PARK TOWNHOMES
HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION, INC
NAD 83.
2011
( )
D.B. 34094, PG. 602
N: 579,671.76'
PIN: 047-153-70
E: 1, 471, 498.12'
COS
ELEV: 702.25'(NAVD88)
M.B. 65, PG. 957
i
SUMMITAVENUE URP, LLC
S85'51'35"E 377.80'(GROUND)
D.B. PG. 583 !
( A-5)
C.F.=0.99984472
PINTRRACTACT
: 047-412-16
1­'
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE /
MALLARD CREEK ROAD
VARIABLE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
L1,C
AAA
COMEg
ME K COM 11
PN:YMQ�S. PG
w `01 2
o
DONNA BIXLER
"' i D.B. 26799, PG. 818
z PIN: 047-412-04
LOT 3, M.B. 5, PG. 418
NGS "IBM"
(SCALED FROM "HUNT") p
N: 575,024.15' PAeY
SHEET 3 o 2
E: 1,470,395.20'
ELEV: 732.10'(N AVD88)
2
CHARLOTTE
SERVIC
D.B. 3363,
PIN: 047
ROPERTY LINE
ROPERTYLINE(NOTSURVEYED) — — —
IGHT-OF-WAY
IGHT-OF-WAY (NOT SURVEYED) — — — — — — —
ETLAND PERIMETER
GF - COMBINED GRID FACTOR
_5 - DEED BOOK
IP -EXISTING IRON PIPE MECKLENBURG COUNTY
D.B. 4940, PG. 593
IR - EXISTING IRON ROD PIN: 047-412-09
.1
B. - MAP BOOK
. G. S. -NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY
IN - PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
BAINBRIDGE-GCA MALLARD
CREEK OWNER, LLC
D.B. 33055, PG. 317
PIN: 047-131-07
TRACT 1, M.B. 62, PG. 897
la
R-16
SUMMITA VENUE URP, LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
TRACT A-1)
PI : 047-412-01
SHEET2
HS DATA CENTERS - CHALOTTE
DEVELOPMENT, LLC
D.B. 29048, PG. 420
PIN: 047-152-47
LOT
M.B. 56, PG. 195
SUMMITAVENUE URP, LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
(PORTION OF A-2-A)
PERENNIAL PIN: 047-131-04
STREAM "A" AREA:
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
OR 80.6521 ACRES
INTERMITTENT
STREAM "B"
SHEET4
HS OB - CHALOTTE, LLC
D.B. 29048, PG. 429
HS DATA CENTERS - CHALOTTE PIN: 047-152-49 ` 1, L
DEVELOPMENT, LLC M.B. 5 PG. 195
D.B. 29048, PG. 423
PIN: 047-152-48
LOT2
M.B. 56, PG. 195 `.
INTERMITTENT
STREAM "C"
WETLAND "D"
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
D.B. 29352, PG. 342
PIN: 047-351-08
M.B. 56, PG. 686
SHEETS
/v
SHEET 6
WETLAND "II"
ELECTROLUXNORTH
•
AMERICA, INC.
= `\
D.B. 26629, PG. 679
PIN: 047-154-01
i' E
ECTROLUXNORTH
�%
AMERICA, INC.
NTERMITTENT
D.
28265, PG. 74
STREAM " P'
I N: 047-381-11
gLfl�
� 6p
P
SHEET 7
RIc d
l NT
op :ex
j.
AVAGO TECHNOI
OGIES
WIRELESS (U
.A)
PERENNIAL
MANUFACTURIN
, INC.,
STREAM "F"
D.B. 29418, P
. 329
-" INTERMITTENT
PIN: 047-41
—11
STREAM "G"
WETLAND "H"
SHEET8
"E"
SCALE: 1 "=350'
0 175' 350'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 1 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

.00,�
.01
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ERTY LINE
ERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) — — — —
T-OF- WAY
T--OF- WAY (NOT SURVEYED) — — — — — —
VENT
- DEED BOOK
- EXISTING IRON PIPE
- EXISTING IRON ROD
- MAP BOOK
- NEW IRON ROD
- PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
- REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
0
1/2"EIR �- � —
NIR
0000
00,
i
owo SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC o
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
(TRACT A-1) 4"ax�
PIN: 047-412-01
i
i
i
ABP DEVELOPMENT, LLC
D.B. 32486, PG. 444
PIN: 047-412-02
LOT 1, M.B. 5, PG. 418
JAME K. COMER
& CAROLS. COMER
D.B. 4272, PG. 173
PIN: 047-412-03
LOT 2, M.B. 5, PG. 418
NIR
PERENNIAL STREAM "A"
LENGTH: 1,795'
AREA:
23,583 SQ. FT.
OR 0.5414 ACRES
SB5' 10' 38"E 370.21'
J�
V�Q
SUMMITAVENUE URP. LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
(PORTION OF A-2-A)
PIN: 047-131-04
AREA:
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
OR 80.6521 ACRES
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 2 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ERTY LINE
ERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) — — — —
T-OF- WAY
T- OF- WAY(NO TSURVEYED)-------
VENT _
- DEED BOOK
- EXISTING IRON PIPE
- EXISTING IRON ROD
- MAP BOOK
- NEW IRON ROD
- PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
- REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 80 ft.
0
JAME K. COMER
& CAROL S. COMER
D.B. 4272, PG. 173
PIN: 047-412-03
LOT 2, M.B. 5, PG. 418
I oQ"
3/4-OR
DONNA BIXLER
D.B. 26799, PG. 818
PIN: 047-412-04
LOT 3, M.B. 5, PG. 41
DONNA BLUER
D.B. 26799, PG. 818
PIN: 047-412-05
LOT 4, M.B. 5, PG. 418
8
z
SUMMITA VENUE URP, LLC
Izmm D.B. 26940, PG. 583 1 rnoo (PORTION OF A-2-A)
1 PIN: 047-131-04
AREA:
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
1 11 OR 80.6521 ACRES
11 rt
1 i
I I
I I 1
I �
I
w.I I C /
/
I I PERENNIAL STREAM "A"
LENGTH: 1,795'
I r\ AREA:
I I 23,583 SQ. FT.
IOR 0.5414 ACRES
\ 13�3
3/4-EllR \ o \ 9
N05'11'47"E \
344.68'
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 3 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 3 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

„ z VICINITY MAP
"a NOT TO SCALE
c� 'b
z �+
dz
wn
o�
E��xc a xevrc
t�
�� ti'Rea assoC°' .
s
?GEND:
OPERTY LINE
OPERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) — — — —
3HT--OF-WAY
3HT--OF-WAY (NOT SURVEYED) —
SEMENT _
'P - CORR UGATED METAL PIPE
- CALCULATED POINT
1. -DEED BOOK
' - EXISTING IRON PIPE
EXISTING IRON ROD
3. - MAP BOOK
t - NEW IRON ROD
J - PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 80 ft.
0
\ p�N 26;,99' 5 7-14 R "4L07- 3• 04�' pG' 81
M.e 1R 8
G•14
418
N05'52'44"W 3/47EI111
383.13'
DONNA BIXLER
D.B. 26799, PG. 818
PIN: 047-412-05
LOT 4, M.B. 5, PG. 418
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
CHARLOTTE EDUCATION SERVICES, LLC
D.B. 33633, PG. 132
PIN: 047-412-07
_ —-ME6KLENBURG'COUNTY
D.B. 4940, PG.` 93
PIN: 04�412-�Q9
\ \ i
PERET
f
\q
\
o\
A\
\o
\
m \
15,\��
O
\
r
j /
00
\
/
`sue; \
\ to
3/4'EIR
v- ^
'C
N
aW
^
1/2'EIR
u'j
Z
ram\
SUMMITA VENUE URP, LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR
PARCEL 047-131-04
25' FROMMCfL TRAIL T605 /L CREEK
/ �6S L69 cP L70CP
-
---__-
CP
/4D- - ---
�� -J
1 /
I
I /
I I �
INTERMITTENT STREAM
LENGTH: 48'
I 1
AREA: I I
317 SQ. FT.
OR 0.0073 ACRES I I 1
I I /11
I_ 1
- - 153 1 ter' I
L54 / 1
� L52 L55
1 ` L47
(PORTION OF A-2-A) �R ��� L5161
PIN: 047-131-04 6� 48� / L7�/
AREA:-
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
OR 80.6521 ACRES
tp
� O� G• '1 i , � I
v /
J i I
CP
1
CP /
1 /1
r 1,
\ 1
/ CP D UKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
D.B. 29352, PG. 342
PIN* 047-351-08
^\ \ \\ M.B. 56, PG. 686
J \ \ N \
\ CP
\ CP �
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 4 OF 18) .0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC L lIIIL`
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG V

„ z VICINITY MAP
"a NOT TO SCALE
v�
a
v z,
i\pG 8 MAPp/c
�� ti'Rea assoc,.
s
?GEND:
OPERTY LINE
OPERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) — — — —
3HT--OF-WAY
3HT--OF-WAY (NOT SURVEYED) — — — — — —
'TLAND PERIMETER
SEMENT
P - CORR UGATED METAL PIPE
CALCULATED POINT
3. -DEED BOOK
' - EXISTING IRON PIPE
EXISTING IRON ROD
3. - MAP BOOK
t - NEW IRON ROD
- PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
P - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 80 ft.
0
C3
� � a
9�cO,o
� egF
o c�ti�o����C
os X/
L79-
\
l �
\ \l
_ pUbo
R�E
\
\ L88
L108 \ / L89
L107, [ /
L�06__”
PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR
PARCEL 047-131-04
25' FROM Cf L TRAIL TO CL CREEK
M.BB 60, PG. 60
I I
I
D18
0
0
D77
r
0
4'
SUMMITA VENUE URP, LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
(PORTION OF A-2-A)
PIN: 047-131-04
AREA:
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
OR 80.6521 ACRES
LL91
\_ D4
v
)5
�93
D6
D7
D8
D15 D14
25' SANIT — —
- �o
D.S. PG. EASEMENT - _ L
RY SEWER L103
102 T
-- °73 Linn
-L94
L95
,L96
,L97
D10
D11
C4
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 5 OF 18) .0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC L lIIIL`
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG V

h
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
'.: .....: :..... ..... .. \
LANSCAPE EA EMENT
\\ M•tl\ 21, PG. 426 Sys \\
AQ
20' P.S.D.E.
Nod M.B. 20, PG. 790
M.B. 21, PG. 108
�o \ L132
L131 7 i sib
L130 �O
PERENNIAL',; "F" �L129 \U€
LENGTH: 1,73T
AREA:
18,080 SQ. FT. \ \
OR 0.4151 ACRES
DETAIL:
WETLAND "II"
ERTY LINE
ERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) —
T-OF- WAY
T- OF- WAY(NO TSURVEYED)-------
4ND PERIMETER
VENT
- DEED BOOK
- EXISTING IRON PIPE
- EXISTING IRON ROD
- MAP BOOK
- NEW IRON ROD
- PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
- REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 80 ft.
0
INTERMITTENT STREAM "I"
LENGTH: 139'
AREA:
1,678 SQ. FT.
OR 0.0385 ACRES
114
\
\ V/8'OR
�0 \ \
L1164 \
ELECTROLUXNORTHAMERICA, INC.
D.B. 26629, PG. 679
PIN: 047-154-01
WETLAND "II"
SEE DETAIL
AREA:
560 SQ. FT.
OR 0.0129 ACRES
\
\
-Ale-,FS°S �3S \ 36 L138 \ \ `
M.eTO60
cSFM \ \ � L140
�� L141
eo \�y� \ �\ iC ,c�``���e� ^ p�ecyLO4j _
UA
SUMMITA VENUE URP, LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
(PORTION OF A-2-A-A)
PIN: 047-131-04 ;/ /�
AREA: \ �
3,513,206 SQ. FT. Uy 0o 1/2'EI
OR 80.6521 ACRES \ o,o� /
\ \ \ g$ o D.E. CONTINUOUS
r \\ \ ,, a°FEK
mq i
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 6 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

„ z VICINITY MAP
"a NOT TO SCALE
v -n
z�
v z,
w�
o�
i\pG 8 MAPp/c
�� ti'Rea assoc,. .
s
?GEND:
OPERTY LINE
OPERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) — — — —
3HT--OF-WAY
3HT--OF-WAY (NOT SURVEYED) — — — — — —
'TLAND PERIMETER
SEMENT _
3. -DEED BOOK
' - EXISTING IRON PIPE
EXISTING IRON ROD
3. - MAP BOOK
t - NEW IRON ROD
- PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
80 GRAPHICSCALE
o o 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 80 ft.
0
Uy
N °
,'
1/2-SR C7 (TIE) 1/2-OR
\ N�
LA
a
20 P.STOECREEKTIN000S
M.B. 20, PG. 790
M.B. 21, PG. 108
Ul
CP
i
tEAM „F”
yr
737'
i
TT.
RES
\
\
\ I
INTERMITTENT STREAM "G"
Y \
I
I
L196 ��
LENGTH: 81'
Co\\
\ I
L195
L193
I
�2�
AREA:
1,848 SQ. FT.
o
u�
r,
O \ I
\\ I
i L194
i
OR 0.0424 ACRES
1�
ao \\ I
I I L192
H1 L201
L197
\ \ I
H3
H2 H9
\\
H4
H5
I
H8
Cl
I
ll
I
L198
I
1
I +WE - �� 200 H�
�61 - - H8 \
v�
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES WIRELESS
I
- _
L 199
(U.S.A.) MANUFACTURING, INC.,
D.B. 29418,
14 4'(TIE)
PG. 329
SUMMITA VENUE URP, LLC
PIN: 047-412-11
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
WETLAND "H"
(PORTION OF A-2-A)
u? Z
AREA:
PIN: 047-131-04
I
I W
II I
I
1,283 SQ. FT.
W I
I I
I
OR 0.0295 ACRES
AREA:
1
�o
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
(°I
OR 80.6521 ACRES
�I f
Ira'
I
I Fml
uy rn
I
II b
I
a I
I
II
Co II I I
I
I
� I
I
I II
o) 11
1
Lry /
I _I I
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 7 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
Rom
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

G01gRNOR HUNTpR104D
a�
d2� my
wr. �
yARR/S ��e
&�0 2
NOT TO SCALE
?GEND:
OPERTY LINE
OPERTYLINE (NOT SURVEYED) — — — —
3HT--OF-WAY
BHT--OF-WAY (NOT SURVEYED) — — — — — —
'TLAND PERIMETER
SEMENT
- CALCULATED POINT
P - CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
3. -DEED BOOK
' - EXISTING IRON PIPE
EXISTING IRON ROD
3. - MAP BOOK
t - NEW IRON ROD
- PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 80 ft.
0
JI I I I
WETLAND "E" I I
AREA:
600 SQ. FT. 01 1
OR 0.0138 ACRES I I
JI I I
\ L164 L163 i I
\ PERENNIAL STREAM "F" L 1 65 I L 1 18
LENGTH: 1,737'
AREA:
\ 18,080 SQ. FT.
OR 0.4151 ACRES 4166 0 6 I I
,._I I Y
lVp
I
-jII
SUMMITAVENUE URP, LLC
D.B. 26940, PG. 583
(PORTION OF A-2—A)
PIN: 047-131-04
AREA:
3,513,206 SQ. FT.
OR 80.6521 ACRES
O
In
O
O
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES WIRI
(U.S.A.) MANUFACTURING, j
D.B. 29418, PG. 329
PIN: 047-412-11
1
F—
O\F'
,40\ L175
�ToR4j4 �1s,Fr F�
6aiNo
pcT940��\\
L176\
\MOo86\
\RFF
c\RFFk
\9\\\\
DBD4S 2PpGF?�W \ \
\
\ \S�ARY \
S_
\
\ 18 0 �
\2W��9SFyF�V o
1
�
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 8 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC
SCALE: 1 "=80'
0 40' 80'
Rom
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

00
�IIL pANp'A1LpR pR'�
a�
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
0
WATERS OF THE U.S.
WETLAND AREAS
LABEL
LENGTH
AVG. WIDTH
SO. FOOTAGE
ACRES
PERENNIAL STREAM "A"
1,795'
14'
23,583
0.5414
INTERMITTENT STREAM "B"
48'
7'
317
0.0073
INTERMITTENT STREAM "C"
486'
17'
6,661
0.1529
PERENNIAL STREAM "F"
1,737'
12'
18,080
0.4151
INTERMITTENT STREAM "G"
81,
17'
1,848
0.0424
INTERMITTENT STREAM "I"
139'
17'
1,678
0.0385
WETLAND D
N/A
N/A
12,680
0.2911
WETLAND E
N/A
N/A
600
0.0138
WETLAND H
N/A
N/A
1,283
0.0295
WETLAND II
N/A
N/A
560
0.0129
TOTAL
4 286'
N/A
67,290
11.5449
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S24'27'16'E
47.62'
L2
S05°55'52'E
62,15'
L3
S20°41'37'E
56.41'
L4
S03'17'39'W
30.37'
L5
S71'22'46'W
17.43'
L6
N50`01'24'W
29.59'
L7
S81-51'52-W
23,59'
L8
S18°26'44'W
48.71'
L9
S06'28'53'E
20,02'
L10
S30'Ol'2O'E
19,79'
Lll
N70°12'10'E
11.51'
L12
S56°14'13'E
27.49'
L13
S09°38'29'W
16,03'
L14
S38°38'26'W
28.75'
L15
S52°11'24'W
14,58'
L16
S13°46'59'W
12.45'
L17
S17°08'09'E
52.65'
L18
S00°32'1O'E
33,06'
L19
S44°03'29'E
29.13'
L20
S34°20'14'E
58.01'
L21
S11'23'28'E
51.22'
L22
S19'03'23'W
44,41'
L23
S31'26'35'W
29,91'
L24
S10°58'41'E
34.21'
L25
S41°03'03'E
33.79'
L26
S02'32'22'W
40.61'
L27
S21°29'30'E
11.28'
L28
S49'28'49'E
20.99'
L29
S10`23'08'E
39.26'
L30
S30`54'06'W
70,75'
L31
S02`50'20'E
28,66'
L32
S32'09'29'E
33,93'
L33
S70`16'48'E
26.81'
L34
S42"01'05'E
41,08'
L35
S10°37'41'E
93.84'
L36
S38°42'16'E
47.63'
L37
S31°12'19'E
34.91'
L36
S20°22'23'E
19,24'
L39
S09°03'38'E
23,96'
L40
S31°18'09'W
48.09'
L41
SO4'55'40'E
34.42'
L42
S18°10'47'E
28,93'
L43
S23°59'00'E
26.68'
L44
S13°14'32'E
11.19,
L45
SO4°50'53'E
29,30'
L46
S29°31'48'E
14,05'
L47
S47°ll'50'E
10,47'
L48
S89°15'47'E
11.59'
L49
N53°30'09'E
21.77'
L50
N68°34'54'E
11.38'
L51
N87°10'38'E
18,63'
L52
N22'50'46'E
13.37'
L53
N52'49'59'W
19.06'
L54
N33`55'21'W
15,50'
L55
S53'03'37'E
10.03'
L56
S44'34'03'E
58,57'
L57
S82"31'23'E
39.81'
L58
N59"08'30'E
55.09'
L59
N63°03'48'W
73.88'
L60
S88°47'49'W
100.99'
L61
NOO'OO'4O'E
40,15'
L62
N00°00'4O'E
54.73'
L63
N14'03'17'E
56.42'
L64
N21°48'30'E
49,12'
L65
N32"00'59'E
1 43,02'
L66
N26°34'34'E
30.59'
L67
N45°00'40'E
32.26'
L68
N75°58'30'E
37.60'
L69
S89°59'20'E
36.49'
L70
S71'33'14'E
57,68'
L71
S72'06'32'E
148.55'
L72
S10`29'22'E
75.12'
L73
S14*55'05'E
70.80'
L74
S17'05'20'E
62.03'
L75
S27°29'29'W
51.76'
L76
S24°51'49'W
31.94'
L77
S39°23'45'E
30.21'
L78
S25°29'18'E
35.95'
L79
S70°57'10'E
28.25'
LBO
S14°45'05'E
28.34'
L81
S02°44'10'E
35,05'
L82
S21'57'57'W
37.50'
L83
S13*12'22'E
54.97'
L84
S05'51'53'W
31.24'
L85
S36°20'19'E
27.09'
L86
S19°13'19'E
57.67'
L87
S05`05'04'E
35.54'
L88
S60`Ol'23'E
7,20'
L89
N89°26'51'E
15.11'
L90
I S87°23'40'E
29.89,
L91
S57°01'13'E
23.11'
L92
S36°32'33'W
27.87'
L93
S47°54'43'E
44.86'
L94
S68°04'55'W
23.94'
L95
S00'28'15'E
23.85'
L96
S22°39'38'E
39,34'
L97
I S57'04'06'E
22.06,
L98
SOl`27'30'E
19,20'
L99
N74'23'55'W
33.03'
L100
N74°45'29'W
37.58'
L101
N20`44'25'W
33,35'
L102
N73'00'40'W
31.96'
L103
N38°53'58'W
20.68'
L104
N00°36'38'E
29.12'
L105
NO3°15'57'W
33.33'
L106
N07°19'39'E
25,09'
L107
N55°35'49'E
19.59'
L108
S60`Ol'23'E
7.20'
L109
N54°25'56'E
80.26'
L110
S10°O1'26'E
29,38'
L111
S17°16'39'E
80.22'
L112
S05°32'34'E
63,65'
L113
S46°39'41'E
72.27'
L114
S65°35'22'E
69.43'
L115
S62°16'32'E
63.83'
L116
S51°55'56'E
13.52'
L117
N07°06'13'E
7.81'
L118
N22°33'29'E
28.30'
L119
N18'37'46'E
12.14'
L120
S48°09'59'E
10.17'
L121
S34'18'12'E
21,59'
L122
S26'32'51'W
11.94'
L123
N47'19'12'W
18.46'
L124
S30`43'48'W
14.21'
L125
S72"24'52'W
8.72'
L126
N21'55'43'W
21.26'
L127
N54'39'24'W
18.02'
L128
N63°14'58'W
21.18'
L129
N39°30'03'E
18.58'
L13O
NOO'49'17'E
10,81,
L131
N15'18'59'E
12.97'
L132
N51°02'05'E
13,89'
L133
N26°25'56'E
22,49'
L134
S56°57'42'E
47.17'
L135
S48°50'35'E
16.10'
L136
S56°36'32'E
22.25'
L137
S45°26'24'E
30.50'
L138
S23°50'46'E
1L55'
L139
S40°13'03'E
42,96'
L140
S30°24'28'E
13.90'
L141
S49°28'11'E
14.35'
L142
S22°34'38'E
20,66'
L143
S06°55'09'E
35.08'
L144
S30°30'54'W
64.90'
L145
S20°20'06'W
28.67'
L146
S02'19'48'E
5238'
L147
S29°58'14'W
30,65'
L148
S03°40'27'E
24,01'
L149
S18°08'23'E
29.81'
L150
S22°02'20'W
41.98'
L151
S08`36'11'E
88,11,
L152
S16*06'16'E
31.88'
L153
S00°49'30'W
34.83'
L154
S36'05'02'W
2137'
L155
S22°43'47'W
18.46'
L156
S14°29'22'W
67.37'
L157
S10'50'06'W
39,69'
L158
S18'42'10'W
31,87'
L159
S19°06'55'W
51.19'
L16O
S15°19'03'W
48,73'
L161
S14*55'50'W
35.98'
L162
S24'01'05'W
19.81'
L163
S84°19'17'W
33.27'
L164
N73°20'34'W
19,49'
L165
S22°32'54'W
8.00,
L166
S62°20'59'E
22,49'
L167
N84°19'17'E
31,85'
L168
S14°38'04'W
12.83'
L169
Sll'12'43'W
27.48'
L170
S20'17'15'W
53.66'
L171
S15'27'25'W
23.64'
L172
S15°42'31'W
45,68'
L173
S18°13'07'W
28.61'
L174
S14°12'13'W
31.11'
L175
S18°21'48'W
2032'
L176
S13'46'24'W
23.04'
L177
S31'20'13'W
15.37'
L178
S25'39'58'W
32,32'
L179
S62'13'40'E
97,92'
L180
S60°14'38'E
36,76'
L181
S39°16'46'E
64.82'
L182
N44°59'20'W
1935'
L183
N50°11'37'W
35,62'
L184
N41°10'01'W
48,48'
L185
N54°27'35'W
39.23'
L186
N57'58'20'W
43,02'
L187
N51'20'07'W
58,40'
L188
N39°47'40'W
35.61'
L189
N44°59'20'W
77.40'
L190
N49°22'38'W
42.05'
L191
N27°16'49'W
27,44'
L192
N81°20'57'E
27.05'
L193
N87°11'24'E
20,66'
L194
N77°14'38'E
21.42'
L195
N61°23'30'E
11.44'
L196
N84°32'47'E
5.13'
L197
S08°09'23'E
4.85'
L198
S67°49'02'W
26.08'
L199
S46°14'02'W
28.69'
L200
S78°00'32'W
27.25'
L201
N42°30'57'E
10.60'
L202
N23°02'24'E
24,76'
L203
N75°49'11'E
18.07'
L204
N35'19'40'E
27.78'
CURVE TABLE:
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
Cl
542.96'
28.41'
C2
542.96'
179.94'
C3
793.94'
275,97'
C4
793,94'
874,96'
C5
20.00'
30,73'
CIS
984,93'
715,66'
C7
1 984.93'
100.95'
CURVE
CHORD BEARING
CHORD LENGTH
Cl
N74`19'22'E
28.41'
C2
N85"18'57'E
179,12'
C3
N52"16'20'W
274.58'
C4
N86'11'55'E
831.35'
C5
S79'10'41'E
27.79'
CIS
IS56'04'17'E
700.02'
C7
S79'51'32'E
1 100.91'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • EXISTING CONDITIONS (SHEET 9 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

INSET - SEE SHEET 11
• PROPOSED CENTRAL PROJECT COURTYARD (NWP 39)
•• 152 LF OF PERMANENT IMPACT
TRAINING CENTER �OQ S \t
�Nj r INTERMITTENT STREAM C (486')
DECK
DECK
PERENNIAL STREAM A (1,795 LF) \ I 1 OFFICE
=BMP 2 —
INTERNAL CIRCULATION
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROADle
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT CROSSING
OFFICE
OFFICE
af►lm -
- WRIN"m M om' 91� iP • 7
INTERMITTENT STREAM B (48')
WETLAND D (0.291 AC)
DATA CENTER MALLARD CREEK
n BMP 5 INTERNAL CIRCULATION /
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
001V I"
/
LEGEND:
WETLANDS
(0.347 AC TOTAL)
SOT
INTERMITTENT STREAM 1 (139') %
WETLAND II (0.013 AC) j
PERENNIAL STREAM F (1,737 LF)
V
N; INSET - SEE SHEET 12
®DECK \1 `; \ ' i`I)PLAY AREA
11'j DAYCARE i .• PROPOSED
76 LF OF (PERMANENT STREAM MPACTP 39)
1 ,\\
INTERMITTENT STREAM G (81')
BMP1
I e I ii'
WETLAND H (0.030 AC)
BOTTOMLESSCULVERT CROSSING'
STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
WETLAND E (0.014 AC)
Xx
STREAM CENTERLINE
(4,286 LF TOTAL)
(228 LF OF PERMANENT IMPACTS)
SCALE: 1 "=350'
0 175' 350'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET 10 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

NNI
I EXIST. TREES TO REMAIN
'AS PART OF VEGETATED
SECURITY BUFFER
GOVERNOR HUNT RD. / / I I � \ I I
v - f"zi1 v I v-
\1\ VAV l�1
\ \ \ \ INTERMITTENT STREAM C (486')
1 \ \ \\\\ EXIST. STREAM TO REMAIN .<
UNDISTURBED
NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL
\;'\ 1\ \ ` -� - LIMIT ALL TEMP. IMPACTS TO
\ ��- WATERS OF THE US TO LESS
\ \� �- 50' STREAM BUFFER (TYP) C n wnv 1 �! THAN 901
CONSTRUCTION
4,�-
I?�l -, CANTILEVER
NOTE: BMP 3 & BMP 4 OVERLOOK, NO =
SHALL NOT ENCROACH �� I \- m 2 _ J
1 I J I I ,� y STREAM IMPACT
EXISTING JURISDICTIONAL /1 I/J // I �o �,� _ =: " OFFICE
LIMITS OF INTERMITTENT / I I/
I 11
- I I 1 / I I PROP. PUMP \
STREAM C r--II I I� 1 \ I III (( /� I �_�
II \ �\ $ _ -^�� Ili
IN LOCATION _
�����/�/ j �I//I/�\\� \�� FOR TEMP. ��
DEWATERING
PROP. COFFER DAM (20 LF I y
/l1// i I OF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT)
r G
/ ! I I PROP. RETAININ
/
WALL (TYP)
fr�� t77z� ljrr�_�/ �� ♦
-------
/ r� >----- \ (-- \ \ i ----- �^ ,_ � � � \ J \
INV.IN:620.32 BMP 4 \ Q \
V BMP 3 " I� = PROP.
OFFICE � _ JUNCTION BOX
� -
\ \ '/
lw
PROP. 129' OF 72" � INV. OUT: 618.62
tt
O��asas CULVERT (BURIED 1) - /�
16' L X 12' W X 6' H CON/SPAN \ _
O ( ) ( ) _ - r AMENITY \
I -SERIES CULVERT WITH z ^ WATER I OFFICE
ENERGY DISSIPATION MEMBERS -— BODY` _
�8
oo
la W.PROP. RETAINING
WALL (TYP)
i
5' TEMP. STREAM 30' x T BOTTOMLESS ------ -_--------
---__ _ - - - I � CULVERT - _ FOR WALL — IMPACT F�
CONSTRUCTION I s3
-��
PROP. FIRE & _ _ �% - - �/ — — — — INTERNAL
- — / ` I — CIRCULATION /
EMERGENCY
DOMESTIC WATER = �i� = _ - _ \ - — - EXIST. STREAM IN FLOODPLAIN _ I i / RGENCY SERVICES ROgp s
DISTRIBUTION - _ - _ - - - 10' TEMP. STREAM
_ _ TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
IMPACT FOR WALL
CONSTRUCTION
PROP. RETAINING \ \
WALL (TYP) \
LFOODPLAIN-_
100' POST CONS= BUFFER _
EXIST. WETLAND TO _ ` \ SCALE: 1"=80'
REMAIN UNDISTURBED - —_— — - �� \W,
ss
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC - INTERMITTENT STREAM C - IMPACT AREA BUFFER EXHIBIT (SHEET 11 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER
I ` 1
BORE UNDER EX. \
STREAM
NO STREAM IMPACT
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE TO DECK
SS
\ S
EXIST. FLOODPLAIN
50' STREAM BUFFER (TYP) I I
I\
\ I o I
FL
40' X 10' CONSPAN
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
EX. SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE TO DAYCARE
PROP. FILL TO PROVIDE OUTDOOR
PLAY AREA FOR DAYCARE. 76 LF
OF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
DAYCARE
FFE: 642.60
OUTDOOR PLAY AREA
ELEV: 642.00 \ /
641.50 TW
618.00 BW
619.00 BW \
I 5' TEMP. STREAM
\ \ \ IMPACT FOR WALL
CONSTRUCTION
1 11
641.00 TW
I `620.00 BW
PROP. FIRE &
DOMESTIC WATER
DISTRIBUTION
SPRING DRAIN TO BE
III INSTALLED PRIOR TO FILL.
I I DAYLIGHT TO EXIST. WETLANDS
\ \ PROP. RETAINING WALL
WITH SAFETY FENCE
EXIST. WETLAND TO
REMAIN UNDISTURBED
I DAVID TAYLOR DR
1 /2"EIR C6 �1 /2"EIR
_ 1
0 1
IO
x
w NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL
v LIMIT ALL TEMP. IMPACTS TO
> WATERS OF THE US TO LESS
wTHEN 90 DAYS
>_ I 1 - - -
U
z 1 \
w — — — — —
0 rA
uj
w— — — — — —
J I
� 1
U
U I 1
z
I I PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
3-5
1 �/jIf 1�1IIIIIIII\/ /�
/'
7
AVAGO TE
\ SCALE: 1 "=50' WIRED
�NUFA(
D.B. 29
PIN: c
1 0 25' 50'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC - INTERMITTENT STREAM G - IMPACT AREA BUFFER EXHIBIT (SHEET 12 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC Lanffl)esi�.
7/23/20204:45PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369—WETLANDSEXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

0
!--------- L--- -- ----- �,
\\%
r
\ X
I
SANITARY SEWER Arm
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER
COLLECTION
DOMESTIC & FIRE
WATER LINE
TRAINING
FACILITY
I'I >
n\
� I
•�I
II.
11 i
BMP OUTFACE V I --
BMP 2
DOMESTIC/FIRE
WATER SERVICE
CONNECTION TO EX.
PUBLIC WATER MAIN
DECK
DECK
I MECHANICAL YARD
l
�,a.,�e�saf�,es ouaM.u�
; k
+4"-
•
R.W1 NV
V
,.m0likll+\
DOMESTIC \ —�—---
_-- ---
—
_ ——
WATER LINE
EXISTING I �, �� j• ���_,�_- _� _ RDOMESTIC & FIRE
SANITARY SEWER _ I \A �\ I / / „ _ _ -- WATER LINE
CON/SPAN''----
BOTTOMLESS
'
ARCH PIPE \
I
' I
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX.
EXISTING
PUBLIC SEWER
COLLECTION SANITARY SEWER
I
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX..
•/ , \ \ 4�'\\\ 11 \\ PUBLIC SEWER
COLLECTION
BMP 5 \
; II g d I,I
SCALE: 1 "=200'
BMP OUTFALL
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN (SHEET 13 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

HS OB-CH LOTTE. LLC
WM"
"l M
1
♦ 1
♦\ H—TACENTERS- CHALOTTE DEVELOPMEM,
NNI
OFFICE
#FFICE►�� 0
BMP OUTFALL
�_----- - - -- - -
i
\
.SO MLTAVEMLEW LLC \ M �wi. ais� i-bi�l
v_ u
�u
�u
DECK
DECK BORE UNDER EX.
STREAM
NO STREAM IMPACT
UTILITY YARD
_ DOMESTIC & FIRE --A— ss� S`���— i I I
— __ I I I
WATER LINE�5s \ \ \
_---=--=_�_�__� a. > �_ .a,- _ •♦\ ��� \\ `. BMP 1
— —��— SANITARY SEWER'
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER.
'\ COLLECTION` \ �� �� ��` �� \\ BMP OUTFALL �I I
\ \ \ I I I 8
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER /
COLLECTION
/
d /
9�
9
W / SLE_ CA. NCRT9
-I /
DOMESTIC/FIRE
1 WATER SERVICE
\ \ \ I CONNECTION TO EX.
\ DAYCARE I , PUBLIC WATER MAIN
i II I I I
I IVAGO TECHNDLOGLES
I I mxeLEss Nsa.)
DOMESTIC &FIRE'
III �E� WATER LINE
CON/SPAN I
III I BOTTOMLESS I I
III ARCH PIPE I
I III I
'I IIj-� I 1
SCALE: 1 "=150'
I �I
l\ I 1 0 75' 150'
I I
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN (SHEET 14 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

670
665
660
655
650
645
640
635
630
PROF
W/
625
620
615
610
605
600
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • INTERMITTENT STREAM C PROFILE (SHEET 15 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC
7/23/2020 4:37 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-72 IN PROFILE.DWG
. 1
• •
• 1
•'
. 1
• 1
•
1
•
1
• 1
• 11
1
IEEE
■■■■■■■■■■■1■
INNEEMiiiiiiiNE
E
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
INNINEEiiiiiiEENIN
IMAIINEEMENEEN�m�
m
NWIMINEEMEMEME
MEIN
IFAMENEEMEMEN
MEN
1■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■1■
•' "
" • ■■■I■
■I■
iiiii
i
INEINE
IMEIMM
1■■I■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
INEENiiiiiiiii
■■E
1■■
I■■■■■■■■■■■■
I■
IN■EiiiiiiME
1■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■1■
1■■1■
■■■■■■I■
1■11111111Gv�"; �.
.,iZ�■■mom
■■Wyi=W■
- ON
■NEE
■■■■■■■■■■■I■
immimmmmmmmmm
MEIN
1■■■■
N■■■■■■■■■
IMMIMMEiiiiiiMEMIE
1■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■1■
INEEMENEEMEMENE�
INEENEiiiiiiNER
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
INEENiiiiiiiiNEE
1■■I■■■■■■■■■■■■I■
I■■EEMEiiiiMEN
IMM
iiiiiiEMEMEM
i
1■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■1■
INEEMiiiiiiiii■■ii
imummiiiiiimmmum
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
INEEMiiiiiiiii�i
1■■I■■■■■■■■■■■■�■
1■■I■■■■■■■■■■■■I■
11
•
•
LandDesign.

CONTECH I -SERIES
30'W X 7'H BOTTOMLESS CULVERT SECTION VIEW
SECTION VIEW - STA 0+34 650
635 635
PROP. GRADE @
ROAD 645
CENTERLINE
630 630
PROP.GRADE
PROP. FIRE & DOMESTIC
PROP. 30'W X 7'H WATER DISTRIBUTION
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT 640
625 625
EX. GRADE AT STREAM PROPOSED 12" RCP
CENTERLINE STORM PIPE
635
620 620
EXIST. GRADE
630
615 615 FI
PROP. FOOTINGS (DESIGN AND PROP. 12'(W) X 16'(L) X 6'(H)
DETAILS BY CONTECH I -SERIES CULVERT
OTHERS)
625
610 610
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
620 /
PROP. ENERGY DISSIPATION
MEMBER THROUGHOUT THE EXIST. GRADE
LENGTH OF THE CULVERT. NO
SUBGRADE SHALL BE EXPOSED
615
SCALE: 1"=5' V SCALE: 1"=20' H
61030 -20 -10 0
0 2.5' 5' 0 10, 20'
172"
650 650
645 645
640 640
635 635
630 630
625 625
620 620
615 615
10 610-30
1+50
650
645
640
635
630
625
620
EXIST. GRADE
615
20 30 10
- STA
CULVERT
0+93
RCP SECTION
VIEW
-STA
PROP.
GRADE
PROP.
72" RCP
/
10
20
30
-20
-10
0
10
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC • INTERMITTENT STREAM C - CROSS SECTION (SHEET 16 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LandDesign.
7/21/20203:42PM MTAYLOR N:\2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-72 IN CROSS SECTIONS.DWG

i_
\ ; /
\ RIGHT OF WAY /
J `� 60' PUBLIC
i
o Q • \\
,
o
0 o0
o
A
RNO%'A° ° \ OF -
- ° o
' - 0
°° \ 1 0
04
♦ - ��
----------------
---------------
y \
, Q� BMP4
BMP 3
N I
OFFICE
------
tt 88 (-------- -- '
-
--- --- --- - -- - -- - - -- --- -----------------
— — — ZO BMP OUTFALL II -----------------
ow
___, ,, °
° ° ---�� ` g% � OFFICE
BMP OUTFALL FL
j w
-
I
FL W ---
----------------
-
FL
F-L WL W I SS FL WL --
SANITARY SEWER'
WETLAN- SERVICE FROM EX.
DOMESTIC & FIRE / PUBLIC SEWER SCALE: 1"=60'
WATER LINE COLLECTION
1-. 0 30' 6 '
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC - OVERALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN (SHEET 17 OF 18) 0
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LanlAl.Jesign®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

40
TREE SAVE:
31.75 ACRES
INTERNAL CIRCULATION /
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
TREE SAVE:
0.025
DATA CENTER
BMP 5
I I,
1 1 I
1 \I
�
I
'
11
I
--- ----�--�/
l^ Il
/
I
lam/ it
I
TREE SAVE:
0.26 ACRES
TREE SAVE:
1.45 ACRES
OFFICE
MALLARD CREEK J _ lW"
INTERNAL CIRCULATION /
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
OFFICE
DECK
DECK
BMP 1
STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
SECTION 21-94 - TREE SAVE AREA PHASE I
OVERALL SITE ACREAGE: +/- 80.86 AC
ON -SITE TREE SAVE REQUIRED: +/- 12.1 AC (15%)
ON -SITE TREE SAVE PROVIDED: +/- 43.72 AC (54%)
LEGEND
TREE SAVE AREA
SCALE: 1 "=350'
0 175' 350'
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL TREE SAVE PLAN (SHEET 18 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMITAVENUE URP, LLC LandDesign.7/17/20204:31PM AELIASON \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30TREE SAVE.DWG

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user mianuai version &. i
USACE AID #: SAW-2020-00946 NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Project URP 2. Date of evaluation: 7/16/2020
3. Applicant/owner name: Summit Avenue, URP, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: H.Caldwell/WEPG
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: 03040105
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.3274N/-80.7657W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream C 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A .
valley shape (skip for ❑B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ®B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C El
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
01 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. [-]Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m M ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent g Y ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y LC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r o ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shri mp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ®Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Basef low Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ❑A ®A
❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ®B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
®C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A
Mature forest
❑B ®B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Intermittent stream possibly excavated to provide conveyance of stormwater. Right bank is adjaent to pedestrian walkway which is
maintained with turf and gravel. Limited wooded vegetation on right bank side of stream

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Project URP Date of Assessment 7/16/2020
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization
H.Caldwell/WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
MEDIUM
HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user mianuai version &. i
USACE AID #: SAW-2020-00946 NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Project URP 2. Date of evaluation: 7/16/2020
3. Applicant/owner name: Summit Avenue, URP, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: H.Caldwell/WEPG
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: 03040105
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.3263N/-80.7611 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream G 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A .
valley shape (skip for ❑B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
®C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ®B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C El
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather - watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. [-]Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses m M ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent g Y ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y LC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r o ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ❑Yes ®No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ®No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shri mp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
®A ®A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water > 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Basef low Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ®A
®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A
Mature forest
❑B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Stream hydrology only present during precipitation events. Adjacent historical grading contributes to alteration of hydrology to stream

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Project URP Date of Assessment 7/16/2020
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization
H.Caldwell/WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
OMITTED
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW