19991042 Ver 1_Complete File_19990920

TFR4
VA
> =1
p -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 9, 2005
Pender County
DWQ No. 991042
Mr. Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., Manager
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
Natural Environment Unit
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
RE: Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site, Pender County, TIP No. B-3011
Dear Mr. Harris:
This correspondence is in reference to your letter dated August 10, 2004, regarding the Moore's Creek Bridge
Mitigation site located in Pender County, North Carolina. This site is being utilized by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation as compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts associated with project B-3011.
By copy of this letter, we are notifying you that no further monitoring of the site will be required since the
construction and success criteria for the mitigation site has been met.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact Brian Wrenn at
919-733-5715.
Si er ly,
an W. Klimek, P. .
JEH/njt
cc: Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Dave Timpy, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Chris Militscher, USEPA
Mr. Travis Wilson, WRC
Mr. Ken Averitte, NCDWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
Mr. H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3 Engineer, 124 Division Dr., Wilmington, NC 28401
Mr. Mason Herndon, Division 3 Environmental Officer, 124 Division Dr., Wilmington, NC 28401
Central Files
File Copy
o e Carolina
Transportation Permitting Unit Ntimally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
>
40STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Mr. Doug Huggett
NC Division of Coastal Management
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
August 10, 2004
Parker Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
AUG 122004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
- Re: Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site, Pender County, State Project No.
8.1270801, TIP No.B-3011, USACE Action ID No. 199603340, DWQ Project No. 991042,
CAMA Project No. 11-99
Mr. Doug Huggett:
As you are aware, the Department has monitored the Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site since
its construction in March of 2002. Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site is located at Bridge No.
11 on NC 53 and NC 11 in Pender County. The site consists of approximately 1.48 acres of
mitigation restoration for wetland impacts associated with project B-3011. Vegetative
monitoring commenced in December of 2002. NCDOT proposed to monitor the Moore's Creek
Bridge site for at least three years; only vegetation monitoring was conducted each year. After
each growing season, annual monitoring reports were submitted to the appropriate regulatory
agencies.
There were approximately 1.48 acres of wetland restoration area planted on the site. There were
no plots established on the site. By visual observation the Moore's Creek Bridge site shows that
the planted species are surviving and that the impacted area is re-attaining jurisdictional status.
Yearly monitoring data is provided within the annual monitoring reports that were submitted
between 2002 and 2003.
During the annual monitoring report meeting on April 29, 2004, NCDOT and resource agencies
agreed that the Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site could be closed and that monitoring could
be discontinued. A site review was held on August 04, 2004 with representatives from NCDOT,
CAMA, USCOE, WRC, USFWS, and EPA. It was decided at this site review that the Moore's
Creek Bridge Mitigation Site could be closed and monitoring discontinued. NCDOT requests
that the appropriate resource agencies provide documentation stating that no further monitoring
is required and that the site is closed. If you have any questions about this project, please contact
Mr. Randy Griffin at [phone].
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
r
Sincerely,
I?e L'o
Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., CPM
PDEA- Office of Natural Environment
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Mr. Dave Timpy, USACOE
Mr. Travis Wilson, WRC
Mr. Chris Militscher, EPA
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Bill Arrington, CAMA
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, CAMA
Mr. Tommy Douglas, NCDOT
Mr. Jason Elliot, NCDOT
Mr. Mason Herndon, NCDOT
e

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
August 10, 2004
Mr. Doug Huggett
NC Division of Coastal Management
Parker Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
AUG 12 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Re: Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site, Pender County, State Project No.
8.1270801, TIP No.B-3011, USACE Action ID No. 199603340, DWQ Project No. 991042,
CAMA Project No. 11-99
Mr. Doug Huggett:
As you are aware, the Department has monitored the Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site since
its construction in March of 2002. Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site is located at Bridge No.
11 on NC 53 and NC 11 in Pender County. The site consists of approximately 1.48 acres of
mitigation restoration for wetland impacts associated with project B-3011. Vegetative
monitoring commenced in December of 2002. NCDOT proposed to monitor the Moore's Creek
Bridge site for at least three years; only vegetation monitoring was conducted each year. After
each growing season, annual monitoring reports were submitted to the appropriate regulatory
agencies.
There were approximately 1.48 acres of wetland restoration area planted on the site. There were
no plots established on the site. By visual observation the Moore's Creek Bridge site shows that
the planted species are surviving and that the impacted area is re-attaining jurisdictional status.
Yearly monitoring data is provided within the annual monitoring reports that were submitted
between 2002 and 2003.
During the annual monitoring report meeting on April 29, 2004, NCDOT and resource agencies
agreed that the Moore's Creek Bridge Mitigation Site could be closed and that monitoring could
be discontinued. A site review was held on August 04, 2004 with representatives from NCDOT,
CAMA, USCOE, WRC, USFWS, and EPA..It was decided at this site review that the Moore's
Creek Bridge Mitigation Site could be closed and monitoring discontinued. NCDOT requests
that the appropriate resource agencies provide documentation stating that no further monitoring
is required and that the site is closed. If you have any questions about this project, please contact
Mr. Randy Griffin at [phone].
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598

`t
Sincerely,
Philip S. Harris, III, P.E., CPM
PDEA- Office of Natural Environment
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Mr. Dave Timpy, USACOE
Mr. Travis Wilson, WRC
Mr. Chris Militscher, EPA
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Bill Arrington, CAMA
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, CAMA
Mr. Tommy Douglas, NCDOT
Mr. Jason Elliot, NCDOT
Mr. Mason Herndon, NCDOT
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 7, 1999
Pender County
DWQ Project # 991042
APPROVAL OF 40lQuality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Bill Gilmore
NC DOT
PO Box 25201
Raleigh NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 0.55 acres
of wetlands and temporary fill in 1.54 acres of wetlands for the purpose of replacing Bridge 11 at NC 53/11 over Moore's Creek
as you described in your application dated September 30, 1999. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater. Non-
Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit
expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit
expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed
in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. The wetlands which are temporarily impacted shall be returned to natural grade and replanted with indigenous plant species at
reference densities.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachment
cc: Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Doug Huggett;.DCM
S' el ,
err . Stevens
991042.1tr
r
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.ustwetiandc.html
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: J. Steenhuis
WO Supervisor: Rick Shiver
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NC DOT Bridge 11 County Pender
Project Number 99 1042 County2
Recvd From DCM Region Wilmington
Received Date 9/20/99 Recvd By Region
Project Type
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet r
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. .:..'j' ?•i +°s ?? 7«

Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue * Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
That the pro?ect he clone in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate
constr? fiction area to exceed 25 NTl1. The wetlands temporarily impacted meed to be restored to
their original grade and replanted with indigenou.;iplant Species.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name NC DOT Bridge 11 County Pender
Project Number 99 1042 Regional Contact: J. Steenhuis
Date: 9/28/99
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
I• APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Department of Transportation - Bridge (11V
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: NC 53/11 over Moore's Creek in Pender County
Photo Index -1995: No Coverage 1989: No Coverage
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2266775 Y: 28400 (Costin Quadrangle)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - August 18, 1999
Was Applicant Present - no
5. 98 'KtOCEDURE: Apphea ion Reeeved -. Augutf:;12, 1,999 4
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Pender County
Land Classification From LUP - Rural/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA "
(C) Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: replacement of an existing bridge(#11)
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - n/a
Planned - n/a
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - existing bridge
Planned - temporary detour bridge and associated
fill and construction of a new bridge.
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: n/a
Source - n/a /
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA] //
nRFnrPn pi r-:n
(A) Vegetated Wetlands 23995 sf
Permanent loss
(B) Vegetated Wetlands + open water 67270 sf V
Q
Temporary impact
(C) Other - high ground fill 123500 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 4.9 acs.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No (DCM)
(F) Water Classification: C SW Open: No(n/a)
8. PROJECT SUMMARY. The applicant proposes to replace the existing bridge in place and
use a temporary bridge to detour traffic around the work area.
Page Two
NC DOT - Bridge 11 over Moore's Creek
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - The project site is located on NC 53/11 at the Moore's Creek
crossing approximately 11 miles west of Burgaw, NC in Pender County. The existing bridge was
constructed in 1955 and has become a safety concern. The creek at this location has a
maximum width of approximately 100' and a maximum depth of approximately 3.5'. The
navigation clearance now provided by the existing bridge is approximately 6'. The dimensions
of the existing bridge are approximately 120' long by 26' wide. The vegetation in and around the
project site is somewhat a mix of wet and dry species. The construction of the original bridge
causeway created, in addition to the causeway feature, slight hummocks within the flood plain
of Moore's Creek on which high ground woody and herbacecious species are growing. The
unaffected areas are vegetated with typical wet species including Bald Cypress, Tupelo Gum,
Lizard Tail, Polygonum spp., etc. Other species include River Birch, Sweet Gum, Loblolly Pines
and several species.of Oak.
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge with another structure which will
be aligned in the same location. In order to accomplish this the applicant is proposing to
construct a temporary travelway and bridge on the downstream side of the existing road and
bridge. The dimensions of the new bridge are to be approximately 159' long by 26' wide. It will
provide for 8' of navigation clearance. The temporary detour will require that fill material be
placed along the south side of the existing causeway through the flood plain and stream channel
of Moore's Creek. The dimensions of this fill are approximately 1900' long by 44' wide. Of the
total length approximately 1565' will impact wetlands. During the final phase of construction the
elevation of the existing bridge approaches will be raised by approximately 1.5'. The dimensions
of the permanent fill are approximately 1900' long by 110' wide according to the information
provided in the application. In addition to the temporary detour the applicant is proposing to
construct two temporary rock causeways to facilitate the installation of the pile bents for the new
bridge platform. These structures are "U" shaped and each one is approximately 270' long by
30' wide. These features will be removed upon the completion of the bridge replacement.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS - The applicant has stated in the accompanying Categorical
Exclusion Document that an off site detour is not feasible at this location due to the length (6.6
miles); the projected volume of traffic use (2700+ vehicles per day); and ten daily school bus
trips rescheduling difficulties. The proposed on-site detour will result in the temporary loss of
use of approximately 67,270 s f (1.5 acres) of wetland habitat including stream bed. The
temporary rock causeways will fill approximately 16,200 of stream bed. In addition, the
refurbished bridge approaches to the new bridge will eliminate approximately 13,425 s f of
wetlands on the north side of the road bed and 10,570 s.f onthe south side. The project as
proposed will not directly iinpact coastal wetlands or estuarine waters.
Submitted by: C. Robert Stroud, Jr. Date: 8/31/99 Office: Wilmington
a.f swi ?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
July 30, 1999
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
ATTN: Mr. Bob Stroud
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY

SUBJECT: CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE NO. 11 OVER MOORE'S CREEK ON NC I I/NC 53, PENDER
COUNTY, TIP NO. B-3011.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
the referenced structure on existing location, along with associated approach
improvements. The new bridge will be approximately 159.0 ft in length with a'30.0 ft
wide travelway. Traffic will be detoured onto an on-site temporary detour for
approximately 6 months during construction. The scope of work for this project was
documented as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) approved by the Federal Highway
Administration [Federal Aid Project BRSTP-11(3), State Project 8.1270801] on
22 November, 1996. Copies of this document are available upon request.
On 31 January 1997, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a NWP 23,
Action I.D. 4 199603340 for the subject project. However, NCDOT failed to apply for a
Division of Coastal Management Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit at that
time. While the project description has not changed since the distribution of the CE and
the Natural Resources Technical Report, the following items in the CE need to be
clarified.
The length of structure will be 159.0 ft, not 138 ft.
• Permanent impacts to wetlands will be 0.33 ac not 0.89 ac.
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
An off-site detour is not reasonable at this location due to the volume of traffic
using NC 11/ NC 53 and the 6.6 mi of indirectional travel that would be incurred,
including rerouting of ten daily school bus trips. Two different alternatives were
considered north and south of the existing bridge for on-site detours. The detour to the
south of the existing bridge was chosen to avoid additional relocation of utilities
associated with the northern detour.
The project will result in 0.33 ac of permanent fill in wetlands, 1.48 ac of
temporary fill and 0.31 ac of mechanized clearing to construct the temporary onsite
detour. No stream relocation or channel change will be involved. Two rows of driven
piles on 53.0 ft centers, will be used for support for the new bridge. In order to set the
piles, a temporary causeway will be required. The causeway will consist of clean and
washed Rip Rap with 1.5:1 slopes, approximately 15 ft thick at the surface and 30 ft thick
near the base with an estimated volume is 480 yd3. After the project is completed the
causeway will be removed from the creek to the extent practicable without disturbing the
creek bottom. The area will then be graded to its original elevation and replanted with
vegetation at 320 stems per acre, similar to that of the adjacent area. Permit drawings
depicting this proposed work are attached.
Twenty-six deck drains will be installed on both sides of the bridge and will be
placed on 6.0 ft centers. A total of 18 deck drains will be placed directly over Moore's
Creek due to the grade of the bridge and the need for adequate drainage.
The navigational clearance of the bridge will basically remain the same since no
recognized demand for navigation exists. Moore's Creek is not susceptible for use as a
iiueans to transport interstate or foreign commerce and there is no evidence that boats
greater than 21.0 ft long cross under Bridge No. 11. Therefore, the Federal Highway
' Administration has determined that the project does not require a U. S. Coast Guard
Permit in accordance with 23 CFR 650.805(c)
_ Moore's Creek flows south into the Black River which is part of the Cape Fear
River Basin. It is classed as C Sw, indicating swamp waters, which are characterized by
low velocities, low pH, low dissolved oxygen levels, and high organic content.
NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Water, which
implements stringent erosion and sedimentation control, will be employed throughout
construction. During project planning, it was determined that no anadromous fish
spawning areas occur within 575.0 ft of the project, so no construction moratorium is
proposed.
It is anticipated these activities will be authorized by a CAMA Major Permit. A
permit application and a check in the amount of $250.00 (Warrant No. 421516) is
enclosed to cover the CAMA processing fee. The adjacent property owners have been
notified of this permit request. Copies of the letters sent to the property owners and the
certified mail receipts are attached. The signed return receipts from these property
owners will be forwarded to you as soon as possible. By copy of this letter, NCDOT
requests a renewal of the NWP 23, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
appropriate Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality.
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.
Chris Rivenbark at [phone].
Sincerely,
William Gilmore, . E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. Doug Huggett, DCM
Mr. David Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Len Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
r- S

FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT 11 miles west of Burgaw
C. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: NC 53/11
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P O Box 25201
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC river, creek sound, bay) Moores Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone]L---.,- OF PROPOSED PROTECT
b. Authorized Agent:
I ?
'n
Name i
r w
Address r Q 'L
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
C. Project name (if any) B-3011. Replace
Bridge Number 11 on NC 53/11 at
Moores Creek
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Pender
b.
C.
List all development activities you propose e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge.
Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Will the project be for public, private or
commercial use? Public Highway
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. A detour
bridge will be constructed to detour traffic
The existing bridge will be removed and the
new bridge constructed. The detour will be
removed and the site restored to pre-project
Conditions. See attached drawings for
details.
Revised 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL NWS EL = 18.6: Top of road = 28.5 discharges.) Highway surface runoff
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckalee loam and Autrvville fine sand
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e. Vegetation on tract bald cyress_ swamp tupelo. N/A
giant cane, netted chain fern (See CE).
L Man-made features now on tract
Bridge and utility poles
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land In addition to the completed application form, the
use plan) following items must be submitted:
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
_XX Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
mural agriculture)
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
* A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
Revised 03/95
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
7 7
i _
luopq

FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
* A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See Attached Sheet 20 of 20
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
USACE NWP 23 issued 1/16/98 (ID 199603340)-
NCDW . WOC'# 3107 issued 1/31/97
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the I-CQL- day of ! , 1949
Print Name William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Signature LJ-1 d7). QA-QrVLOA-O-,, AL
Landowner or thorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
r
oryv
?uv
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 159 feet
1. BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 26 feet
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 10.5 feet (from top of bridge)
span concrete cored slabs Q 53' each
20" square concrete battered12iles j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Moore's Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 3.5 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 8 feet
X Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge 120' reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge 26' opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain _ The new bridge will increase
bridge 6' the height of navigation opening.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All of the existing
bridge will be removed.
in. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the M1-1W or NWT - - - ° -=--_ concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
2 CULVERTS N/A
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
d.
Type of culvert (construction material, style)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Revised 03/95
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated At bridge
(2) Width of area to be excavated See drawings
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 350 c.y.
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
New roadway embankment
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
See drawings
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
sVi: :!.:v
Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b.
maintenance? X Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above. C.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d.
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled See drawings
(2) Width of area to be filled See drawings
(3) Purpose of fill Highway fill slopes. See
attached drawings for locations and
dimensions.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 1900 feet
(2) Width of area to be filled 110 feet
(3) Purpose of fill Raise existing roadway:
fill approximately 1.5 feet
-- - 2 1Kc
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any-existing utility lines? X Yes _No
If yes, explain in detail Temporary relocation
of one telephone hole for detour.
Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail A bridge approximately
125 feet in length will need to be constructed
just downstream
Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Through the use of
erosion control devices which follow NCDOT
erosion and sedimentation policy.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Typical earth moving equipment for
roadway fill - crane with boom and pile driver
for setting piles.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT: TIP Number B-3011
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
Date
Revised 03/95
MATCH LINE A ° W MATCH LINE A
0. z
° I
t,
0 o
I o,
a? ? O I I o? W
O W .i
h?
W ° J
I W
o
O
° I
I I .i
f ?y p M?
?

I o
W x c
. po°?zu

?? I o; x
®®
A
W I I
LL 1
°
•-+

I w
?.1
0
>
p

I R
w c cz Ia.

W 0
° I ° U W
'O W
a c? z

?o
I i
I
I ' CIO
°
a
> c L,LJ
00
'.
W ° I I 0
-?I
co I , °?
Q
Q °O I( I
I yOC W
,
°
W °' i C
?-
3
I
I °
W
o
f
a
0i N
0 L.lJ
V
I I 0

?°
I
I (
t?
0}
O?
O

7 O
00
i I t?.J
°
O
c I I I
J
71 +
I
I ° z
O 0Cl
b
cal l I 04 W w A
0 z
01 -N

? I I °q ? a e
W
° I I z F
o
?o ?o I I o .? a
a
I I °? a .
o I
I I
I npa W
o? ?
? o
t °' i~
z o I i I o

c I
d w
z
a ° I
I I
I ?
-_j zz zz
°9 W o a o 0

°
1
0
I I
_ t.
?1
I
I 00
°? 3 °o°o°o XlX)
0- ? ?O?O?O
°o°o°o
°? m
I V)
°o°0 0
1 I
1 I i
I
1 - °
MATCH LINE B PPo I ° MATCH, LINE 8 z
U?JJ
71 b

P

I

?
°°
? bo I °? w F ?
u °o
fo
I 0
b°? [
?
? O
? ? p W

? P I ?
I g O o
J
p I 0
Qpi ' I 1
W F? U
Q

°
0 °o
0 ® W
W
U w w W
0
' Z114 -0
0
° I 0 w GT] > C ca "'
C
(b?0
I p
.°
12 ?.

F

41 ?p
O p I p W

O
p ? C
0
f-O I a
w
?l

\
0
p -

I
S
0 - -?
-

a yF .
oop
w ?w
W b o

1
(
co
O
??
?j
W

I I
__? ? _ O
... w d F¦ U
W ......... Q .
. O ?

9 ? a
LL, LIJ 0
?
c to
/ c°< z a z
c
I I 0 e z
/ 0 3

Q ?o

o
I

I

I
'C,
?d
.
,

Q w
U
a ?

a

z

,
,
o I ? c H t
I o
-?
° °
°
°
z

p
°° z
c z
o
a

I
S
°s w

4
O
I

I 'O
°

0.q .06.
°°°°°°
0'0.0'0 0
°p°p°p
°
°
°
p
p p
?w o
0.
p
0
°0°O p
1

0 I p

p? 0,
'....
00
00
w °
0
I
0°?
MATCH LINE °
p
hod MATC NE A

% MATC LINE C 0 TCH LINE C
I I bfW O

1 I I °c
5
.?{
a 3
x a
q w
.0 ?l I I 1 ?,
102 021 c x Z c>

? o w
-a
j W
° U C4 o v

41 0
0
I
I
°?
®
lz
v e
w
o
°
W ®
G 00
0 q
° 0 N v ?? C
Ica ?'
0
O
A
cc
o
`'? go
0 I
I I
{
i v u
w

° -
m I I ,0, I?
O W I o? i Q
o

Q
1 q
oc{
o
W o W
c
°j
? W
I .
11
I o I
y? i i
L
Li 1 b0
. ,

I °

0
°
W

i W
I
00?
W I O4 Q
I? 1 1
O" W
0

w (? oQ
0 a z

I 0
`
0 W a
Z z
'"
m 40
z
I I o? o c? a ?
W v0 p I o?
c m z
a z
" E.
LU I 0 w o a
I °
I I 09
, L z
.1
LL
O I I O°4
O r4 L?
O

°
o

I

I
W
00.

F w

E. "

(''

o
? N
W
Lij DO I

I i

I 0? 0 o F
0
0
0
O
1
I o?
od W z
A z
A
o
w
°
I
I
O( °o
O
° XX >

}b?0

I

I

oil W O °
O
OOO
ooo°o°
0
0
I
1
°?I o°°ooo
o°o°o°
° I I o?' °
°

o o
oo
ooo
A 0 I I 0
MATCH LINE B
o ° W
'o MATCH LINE B

a I I o
I I F?
°? I I ax ?.. aw
1 1 E-? o U°
o
z u
?
LT.
1 z yoo ? 0
1 ?1 z x
1 ?I
c? us
I
)i w a
co
w c
I` 1 ? z F fl
I 1 l ! - ? a c
l I w ? w
I i I I 1 0 ? j a
II I I? ! ? ? ? w z
I I ?N ! II i Lu
+ w w
o i I ?, F F L6
II I ju- 1 o Q F
Z ? F F
I l I ,?? \• ?? w w z
o I I I 1, 1 1 o A ?
w I I 11 °o°o
I I w o0 oo0
I I 000
I I °?1
I 1 000
! I I I ??
000
i o 0oo0
MATC LINE C m TCH INE

:
'

1
c
?

w

J

W

U
o

° z
0
F
L2.
c/)
Q

F ,
®

H
12.

?
z

Q
?
C7

®
z

®
V)

+-b
E-' ?
? c

Ou
w F

z
[4 0

2.

W

0
- W
W
O U
W w

?o
0

l

0

F

W

? J ,J
U U

W

i o

/CD
r,r

r
? Q
w ? H

\ ?J
r-I

\ CD
a

° L x u
Lei

z zz

r
Q o Ll
J .?

CL
W

~ ' . .; ?
J
LO J L.

O
, ' N
OD

N i V N p
co!
C41 CN Ni CV; •- i
I
i
.?-.
PJ
. I
i
i
i
4 I
W
3

O
O

C 7, `.
' I

A

c?

a
_
Q

O

? g

u
u
.n?
O

CIA
it ;
HI H III
V
r1
z`
v,
- z
- z
® F ?-
w v
CIA
O
° z
z
-y
'_? ?T r
U ..a
• U
?- r2
- z ?
U
i ? I
z
I
I
I
0 i
O I
o
I
I
C ,.
0
3
A
ts.
? --
0
g
T
's
ttlll?
cq ---

r
A
z
a
F q
z ?
z H
e
a
F c:.
F H
O O
A q
\xX
.?
U
z ?
i
I I
j z

v,
Q
z

F
? z

z ?-
r

r E.
trl

Q
Q Q
N
cq
U
:n
z
i
i
1
O
0
i
o
V
f?
V
d°
c
I
I
I
I
Q?
r.i
L 1 I
z
o
H ?
0
z x z o ?
€ O ?
? cz, w
Foy
w
O z
42 w F w ?I
a (? L-
a ? wO?? al
O F
U W
G:V
z ?
a
z
a
F ?
Z ?
- z
.] r
r. 7
J ?
U z
G
F
- z
u
N N
I
T.-i
t
i
tea.
z
F
F ?
o
cn C7 F ,.., O
F Q U O
Z U
?I
W?? - F°z ti°Q
a
w R =I
p C e. F
U
z y
0
v
O z
O F
O z
A r1 f.
L7 ??_ mil,
n? N
O
I
i
? i

0
0
0
0
0
0
O
I 1? ?1 i ?1

W

g
? LL
a:
W o
? .- z

a
-

a
w
W

I
I MM
'I I? 1? II ? `? Ii
1, ??1 I?II!I? i???l? III•i?. ?1 'I
z
a
H

a 3 ?

v7 C7 Fy ..i O
O
C?
F fz,
a
.U C,4 C
Z U
o

W
z
?
H
W W f
t'{
- a g Q
z w ow
o

o F
U W
W
z ?

z
F
ca
z
z
z F
G
L z

?Vl L?
F t:1
F
4
a
c
L^:
?
i
1

CFi l

vl
rat
r t'
I?

I

I 1

-7
f

r
3
Q
Q
a
4go
?z-
0
O

a
i
?;illl
W I! CIA
?
7.
v;
z
z
Z L
^ i
CID
CU
L
.G
? U
I ?
i j
i
i
z
i ?
F
M a
R° y ? o ? W
ca
Few C6zU ?I
?z? Fww
in w0`? O
z O
ts]
L5
W
z ?
4ga
W;? z
F ?
z
J r
z
I i
WETLAND SUMMARY SHEET
8.1270801 (B-3011)
FILL IN TEMP. FILL IN CLEARING IN FILL IN TEMP. FILL
STATION WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS IN WETLANDS
(ACRES) (ACRES) (ACRES) (C.Y.) (C.YJ
18+40 0.33 1.48 0.31 4200
TO
33+75
' f:
28700
b
ON,
\ y
SZ , ?

z
0
F ? o
Q ° ts;
?. z o
? Ca F L7 ® tz.
® z A
G:V , Cq
_ U W
z
J
J r T
J
J
? ? I
1 ? O
:a
W
U
t?
F? W
t
z0
oa
® °F

O

? ? ? ro

oa
F
? W
?
W
a?
z z
® ,? o w

0 1 F
o
rZ z
W
o
l
? ? ? n
N F? ti
?
{ c> 0
as
-

{ ? U x
I ! ,J z

0

o
0

O l

o 6 1
N I

? M N O
C4
LO
N
N
0
0
aw
J U ? ?
?M F3
a
zaw. z?
cC cz
60
.00
X00
41
,
?F

Q

oa H m ;
?
=
t ? ? z ?

F O
a:
W
?
W
A: QI
h
j 0 Z , U o
? N F ci a ti ? ? ? I

I z v
z

? a

N' M
0
0
?O
N
?I M
I
i ?
d
NI
t
t
t
t
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
*10
N
N
M
N
b
c
U
O I O
N r-
e
0
w
m
Jw
aw
Ha
o?
z
o°z
4CO
z
0
a0
z-?ov
O U
? o w F O R: ? z
U ?, cza
?t 0 ® o z Q
? ? w U w
0 z
o
a
00
_ rn
?a N •? a
CIZ
5:1 o a
®rw
00
000,,
I rim F a
FIRA
OO O i F-
ro,
? ore,
? o
a?
a
N
FAME AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
A. WARD GRANT
JOHN H. MURPHY,SR
LANDMARK,
CHARLES MURPHY JR.
GEORGE MALCOLM KELLY
THOMAS KELLY,
11795 N. HWY 53 W.
ATKINSON. NC 28421
P0. BOX 264
BURCAW, NC. 28425
410- AS °I -y-7 3c1
P0. BOX 4127
WILMINGTON. NC 28406
P0. BOX 2091
JAMESTOWN>NC. ;'7.A ;.
RT,2 BOX 2442
BURGAW,NC. .1 $ys5
RIO-283-51A5
10545 N. HWY 53 W.
BURGAW,NC
9?o-ag3--7ag3
N. C. DEP'T'. OF TRANSPORTA'T'ION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT
si- -1

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Department of Transportation - Bridge 11
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: NC 53/11 over Moore's Creek in Pender County
Photo Index - 1995: No Coverage 1989: No Coverage
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2266775 Y: 28400 (Costin Quadrangle)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - August 18, 1999
Was Applicant Present - no
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - August 12, 1999
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Pender County
Land Classification From LUP - Rural/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA
(C) Water Dependent: yes
(D) Intended Use: replacement of an existing bridge(#11)
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - n/a
Planned - n/a
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - existing bridge
Planned - temporary detour bridge and associated
fill and construction of a new bridge.
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: n/a
Source - n/a
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands 23995 sf
Permanent loss
(B) Vegetated Wetlands + open water 67270 sf
Temporary impact
(C) Other - high ground fill 123500 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 4.9 acs.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No (DCM)
(F) Water Classification: C SW Open: No(n/a)
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace the existing bridge in place and
use a temporary bridge to detour traffic around the work area.
Page Two
NC DOT - Bridge 11 over Moore's Creek
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - The project site is located on NC 53/11 at the Moore's Creek
crossing approximately 11 miles west of Burgaw, NC in Pender County. The existing bridge was
constructed in 1955 and has become a safety concern. The creek at this location has a
maximum width of approximately 100' and a maximum depth of approximately 3.5'. The
navigation clearance now provided by the existing bridge is approximately 6'. The dimensions
of the existing bridge are approximately 120' long by 26' wide. The vegetation in and around the
project site is somewhat a mix of wet and dry species. The construction of the original bridge
causeway created, in addition to the causeway feature, slight hummocks within the flood plain
of Moore's Creek on which high ground woody and herbacecious species are growing. The
unaffected areas are vegetated with typical wet species including Bald Cypress, Tupelo Gum,
Lizard Tail, Polygonum spp., etc. Other species include River Birch, Sweet Gum, Loblolly Pines
and several species of Oak.
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge with another structure which will
be aligned in the same location. In order to accomplish this the applicant is proposing to
construct a temporary travelway and bridge on the downstream side of the existing road and
bridge. The dimensions of the new bridge are to be approximately 159' long by 26' wide. It will
provide for 8' of navigation clearance. The temporary detour will require that fill material be
placed along the south side of the existing causeway through the flood plain and stream channel
of Moore's Creek. The dimensions of this fill are approximately 1900' long by 44' wide. Of the
total length approximately 1565' will impact wetlands. During the final phase of construction the
elevation of the existing bridge approaches will be raised by approximately 1.5'. The dimensions
of the permanent fill are approximately 1900' long by 110' wide according to the information
provided in the application. In addition to the temporary detour the applicant is proposing to
construct two temporary rock causeways to facilitate the installation of the pile bents for the new
bridge platform. These structures are "U" shaped and each one is approximately 270' long by
30' wide. These features will be removed upon the completion of the bridge replacement.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS - The applicant has stated in the accompanying Categorical
Exclusion Document that an off site detour is not feasible at this location due to the length (6.6
miles); the projected volume of traffic use (2700+ vehicles per day); and ten daily school bus
trips rescheduling difficulties. The proposed on-site detour will result in the temporary loss of
use of approximately 67,270 s f (1.5 acres) of wetland habitat including stream bed. The
temporary rock causeways will fill approximately 16,200 of stream bed. In addition, the
refurbished bridge approaches to the new bridge will eliminate approximately 13,425 s f of
wetlands on the north side of the road bed and 10,570 s.f on the south side. The project as
proposed will not directly impact coastal wetlands or estuarine waters.
Submitted by: C. Robert Stroud, Jr. Date: 8/31/99 Office: Wilmington
w?I
y? r--..
1 ti..
-STATE-OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT 1R. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
July 30, 1999
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
ATTN: Mr. Bob Stroud
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY

SUBJECT: CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE NO. 11 OVER MOORE'S CREEK ON NC I I NC 53, PENDER
COUNTY, TIP NO. B-3011.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
the referenced structure on existing location, along with associated approach
improvements. The new bridge will be approximately 159.0 ft in length with a 30.0 ft
wide travelway. Traffic will be detoured onto an on-site temporary detour for
approximately 6 months during construction. The scope of work for this project was
documented as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) approved by the Federal Highway
Administration [Federal Aid Project BRSTP-11(3), State Project 8.1270801] on
22 November, 1996. Copies of this document are available upon request.
On 31 January 1997, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a NWP 23,
Action I.D: # 199603340 for the subject project. However, NCDOT failed to apply for a
Division of Coastal Management Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit at that
time. While the project description has not changed since the distribution of the CE and
the Natural Resources Technical Report, the following items in the CE need to be
clarified.
• The length of structure will be 159.0 ft, not 138 ft.
• Permanent impacts to wetlands will be 0.33 ac not 0.89 ac.
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
An off-site detour is not reasonable at this location due to the volume of traffic
using NC 11/ NC 53 and the 6.6 mi of indirectional travel that would be incurred,
including rerouting of ten daily school bus trips. Two different alternatives were
considered north and south-of the existing-bridge for on-site detours. The detour-to -the
south of the existing bridge was chosen to avoid additional relocation of utilities
associated with the northern detour.
The project will result in 0.33 ac of permanent fill in wetlands, 1.48 ac of
temporary fill and 0.31 ac of mechanized clearing to construct the temporary onsite
detour. No stream relocation or channel change will be involved. Two rows of driven
piles on 53.0 ft centers, will be used for support for the new bridge. In order to set the
piles, a temporary causeway will be required. The causeway will consist of clean and
washed Rip Rap with 1.5:1 slopes, approximately 15 ft thick at the surface and 30 ft thick
near the base with an estimated volume is 480 yd3. After the project is completed the
causeway will be removed from the creek to the extent practicable without disturbing the
creek bottom. The area will then be graded to its original elevation and replanted with
vegetation at 320 stems per acre, similar to that of the adjacent area. Permit drawings
depicting this proposed work are attached.
Twenty-six deck drains will be installed on both sides of the bridge and will be
placed on 6.0 ft centers. A total of 18 deck drains will be placed directly over Moore's
Creek due to the grade of the bridge and the need for adequate drainage.
The navigational clearance of the bridge will basically remain the same since no
recognized demand for navigation exists. Moore's Creek is not susceptible for use as a
Means to transport interstate or foreign commerce and there is no evidence that boats
eater than 21.0 ft long cross under Bridge No. 11. Therefore, the Federal Highway
?' 1?iministration has determined that the project does not require a U. S. Coast Guard
'P=it in accordance with 23 CFR 650.805(c)
- Moore's Creek flows south into the Black River which is part of the Cape Fear
?Rver Basin. It is classed as C Sw, indicating swamp waters, which are characterized by
10-NV velocities, low pH, low dissolved oxygen levels, and high organic content.
NQDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Water, which
implements stringent erosion and sedimentation control, will be employed throughout
construction. During project planning, it was determined that no anadromous fish
spawning areas occur within 575.0 ft of the project, so no construction moratorium is
proposed.
It is anticipated these activities will be authorized by a CAMA Major Permit. A
permit application and a check in the amount of $254.00 (Warrant No. 421516) is
enclosed to cover the CAMA processing fee. The adjacent property owners have been
notified of this permit request. Copies of the letters sent to the property owners and the
certified mail receipts are attached. The signed return receipts from these property
owners will be forwarded to you as soon as possible. By copy of this letter, NCDOT
requests a renewal of the NWP 23, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
appropriate Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality.
Thank you for your assistance. If-you have any-questions; please contact Mr.
Chris Rivenbark at [phone].
Sincerely,
William Gilmore, . E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. Doug Huggett, DCM
Mr. David Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Len Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
AUC7I
V'C'AS7',1L
IV1fiPV" n
A
?C?C?dT
FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
C.
a. Landowner:
Name N.C. Dent. of Transportation d.
b. City, town, community or landmark
11 miles west of Burgaw
Street address or secondary road number
NC 53/11
Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes _X_ No
Address _P. O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
e.
Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek sound, bay) Moores Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3.
Fax [phone] _ OF PROPOSED PROJECT
c 7\
b. Authorized Agent: !? I +I a.
Name f_t? is I I9
Df,
Address ,f _
-,.. Z J AACtt?ENT
,City
Zip Day Phone
State
Fax
Project name (if any) B-3011. Replace
_Bridge Number 11 on NC 53/11 at
Moores Creek
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Pender
b.
C.
DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
List all development activities you propose e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge
Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Will the project be for public, private or
commercial use? Public Highway
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. A detour
bridge will be constructed to detour traffic
The existing bridge will be removed and the
new bridge constructed The detour will be
removed and the site restored to pre-project
• Conditions. See attached drawings for
details.
Revised 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS NIA
a. Size of entire tract N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL _ NWS EL = 18.6; Top of road = 28.5 discharges.) Highway surface runoff
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckalee loam and Autrwille fine sand
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e. Vegetation on tract bald cypress, sm= Welo. N/A
giant cane. netted chain fern (See CE),
f.. Man-made features now on tract
Bridge and utility voles
5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land '
classification of the site? (Consult the local land In addition to the completed application form, the
use plan) following items must be submitted:
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community * A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
X Rural Other other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
h. How is the tract zoned by local government? claiming to be the owner of said property, then
RA (Rural agriculture) forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the from the owner to carry out the project.
applicable zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable.) * An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
been done for the tract? Yes X No Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
If yes, by whom? detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes -No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
Revised 03/95
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
j n
AUG 121999
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
* A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See Attached Sheet 20 of 20
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
USACE NWP 23 issued 1/16/98 (ID 199603340)
NCDWO WOC# 3107 issued 1/31/97
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 2Q_ day of ; , 1949
Print Name William D. Gilmore P E
Signature LJ ?sL
cam
Landowner or thorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project. -
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts _
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
,
FL
A U IQ 00 t- J
riiyrr
??=tyS7 ;L 10AINAGEMENT
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 159 feet
1. BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 26 feet
a. Public _X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 10.5 feet (from top of bridge)
3 span concrete cored slabs @ 53' each
20" square concrete battered piles j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Moore's Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 3.5 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 8 feet
X Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge 120' reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge 26' opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The new bridge will increase
bridge 6' the height of navigation opening
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All of the existing
_ -bridge will be removed.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. ' Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NVWtz-, 7?-?z,
, concerning their approval?
`
L= I Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.

Revised 03/95
r =NT
Form DCM-MP-5
2. CULVERTS N/A
a. . Water body in which culvert is to be placed
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes
If yes, explain
No
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
I
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Revised 03/95
I EXCAVATION ANp FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated At bridge
(2) Width of area to be excavated See drawings
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 350 c.y.
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
New roadway embankment
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
See drawings
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
?T -7 717
AUG 12 1099
DIViSjuty OF
`0ASTAL MANAGEMENT
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance?. Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X _ No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Tem =Z relocation
of one telephone pole for detour,
cC. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
_X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail A bridge approximately
X25 feet in length will need to be constructed
just downstream
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled See drawings
(2) Width of area to be filled See drawings
(3) Purpose of fill Highw-U fill slopes. See
attached drawings for locations and
dimensions.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 1900 feet
(2) Width of area to be filled 110 feet
(3) Purpose of fill Raise existing roadway:
fill approximately 1.5 feet
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Through the use of
erosion control devices which follow N DOT
erosion and sedimentation policy
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Typical earth moving equipment for
roadway fill - crane with boom and pile driver
for setting 12iles.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
9
X21999
NCDOT: TIP Number B-3011
Applicant or Project Name L IMANAOEMENT
Signature
?O. l ss
Date
Revised 03/95
9,6
\ ethm?/y° T r,.
Par r30mC•+ / "It
Rose Hill .\k 'ch,nQuap.. Cathenne Lake 5 1 i' ' 4
2[7 ::?C1 ?,\' "retriever ,• t p N >>¢
DDe S\ " ,0
mmon Gar anda -??tr ?1C d1J 7 + Jackson?illnq/ ?\ t Stella
l t Teacher- / •[i1? ?-? Sdverda!e s
'4 .? \ s. r \ : / ? 1 •?.. Lyp'ess .. ?i(. s ??• r/b Pe
tCd Creek 1 I6 r j•' Mltlwa Park
Tir F
i)BLADEN' = UI /1 4 y 'it O er1E ?Oe
L- Hanelis?? Wallace.
} .
- 24
•? f? .?. 1,-- _ - - -u U t `P. neY Teen ._ 'fee.
Haws
. a?M,A-KESr ! s ) TomanSa'k s / Wltlar Swan Rro?C4fr 7 t
\• [•••-.•6 d1 t\,? s, 5 Vernnz tyNUetr [u[uN[ ydr, C tlA
AT {ak e r 1 ?1 ' Pentledea ?l MaDI \ 6 I• NONE $As rl??"?j Bg?ue?
.:/ Ke r Watha ... ooa•••... ly °g
{? Ba r:.,• it , ? , i5 rou
ar •Q it hi/"q? LaA -, :c? / 111 172 Bear 1nIM:. .a
s? 53
?, \ D, aon 1 `t 7 Brotms's Intel: >'
s Ivanhoe 1 'SITE
4 • Y1 [`` f'eur 1
A 81 ?. r N 1e,r ,a / r,•1 BurCaw SD 3 21 ?. \ Sneads
Atkinso l rr
J Wards Corner 'L t //'olk%tOn 'em-Rive, lnlcl .' .
isbon 53 Kowa 53 11 E N n E R Holly Ridge 11 sle2y / lit-o . 0 A-1, Art-
...--?? 5 r•r• sn. ' !i 6 07 , z
lon o e 4or 1 1.: - •hv1
Kelly [ N• t 1 `V' + \1 2I, ' North TODSaiI Beach
r •i ?}1
Carvers 21 / aegwnol 6enrh Arreu
711 12 0 3 s ?? j Currie 6 Rocky Point l i ] li /
1 lOPSAII ISIAND
r?7`7 :3
87 lets 1 / 21 21 ? Ragienei Booth A..,
ou
Lnol Ne ' h t 33 111 1 amosteSurf City
East Arcadia 1WZ/'/? Topsail Beach
isCastle 1 - \ t •.,\ ^? vc--Tonsoil bdrl - -
alisboro is Lt ? *3 [ Rle¢elwootl Z,,i; HaYne Scotts Hill L---? .
- 6 7d .70 tAcme \\ 9 132 s1.:D Mile 47G'X Old Topsoil MW
5 21 a ?golton Freeman Deko1 Maco C- ' N W H A ?a.O V-'E, R .
W ecama,,^^,,,?yy// „A.,. SandyCreek j ) 5'rs? Pnoentx1 11 ich/n)el .
6 Wilmingt
Wol?rmnua• r -I)e'- N assn
' .-761 ` "U
M J 1 t?U' ° /Alasnn inlet - ..
/111--:---B ? U S 7 Leland ld /?, Goakrri -
s o- Pw.l J l t ? 76. 2 IrZRegrenol Dwrh Atreu . \/
- Cesd ?? - t 10 YO IWrightsrille Beach"' Y
1 Bishopl ?BnrTlern.e ra, 1 132 : Rpwwl ae«h A,,,. ~
Town
CretA_ / 'c.;i °•' t 1 4 1 y Musonboro ln!¢7
r l A
f M/ 1 V y .? Yl
'? dye!°F¢ Cy Cosrin S
1107 ?y,8 1]x .7 Z J
1x06 > 1.11! G 12!2 Ir
3 0 'T
j 1241 1?4L 121.1 Piny wood 11,1 1111 r `t
1137 1y+
1]011 , 1714
P
/ V 11 ? 31 h 101yn. J
116 1]11 ;!' G , ?fd4f0°d4
1 ? J .J
./ Ys `?? 1 l.r S7
v ll21 4 r?
1 7 X01 ATKINSON 11 WCtnf»r
_ ti \u
.3. v 's ror. ]+a 114 -
1 11 1,10
s?gTy ryi\' `tl]a ? I o
'7 att. J3d -
1lW ?e 1 al V J'? 11]6 Cl 4 ,, ?b 14011
1131 Y ' S, 7-E .21
V2a,n6 Yore now 9 t \ {n
*-•. 1 ?' ?a t v 1112]
1101
s - Cooks
n 1230 .? Ig11 -. T
o tj\ 14+ 1.0 1 \ S
RIVER v \ Is / o . ' u - lit. e
111, 1.52 1?
f 4 1111
(? G 5?57F5? N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
U ?% I lI I ?, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
?' FENDER COUNTY
AUG 2 1999
o_
u t PROJECT: 8.1270801 (B-3011)
dI1?I??IVIV `
COASTAL MIANgGEMENT BRIDGE NO.11 OVER
MOORES CREEK
SHEET 1 OF `l9
WATCH LINE A ° w WATCH LINE A
Z

0
0
0
0
° I 0O
o I ? oq a Q ^a

w
o
IJ o
? O
?
?
?
41
a
x ?.

°
°

°
°a
cal
to,
F 0 OU
-l 0
v
z
_
`6
` o z -A a w
L I u_) F.z woo O
o 05 a
LJ A

w

° I
°°j U
W

Q: 41
0

o
go

I

I

' O

o'
° Z x

cn
o c
od

w

0
r
J
3 bbp
P
I
I
i
I c49 1 t??
o?
o? w
I
I I
I
?o? 71 AUG 12 ?999

?°Qw CO" ?.]F .Wa
ASTAL
I I MANAGEMENT ?
I I ? U
L)
0
41
0
09
w

O I I A
I
? I I o4
. O
N
I
I ..?
bob w z

o? z H c
?'

g
I
I z
oq
z a
o
w

41
o
I
I z
o x w
e
o
? w z

0 I

I I

I '0 w a d
3 go
I
I F F cz
o
I
I I
I ° Q m W W
w
m

' I
°

I J ° °
d
z z z

?° I

o
I

L?j
i

I 0
o°? 3 o A o c
° 'F o00
0a w o°ooo°
° °o°0 0
m
I I (n
l I
? I I
I 1
? °o°o°o
?
MATCH LINE B
I MATH LINE B
?0
z
?{ u- w F
0
b
gP0 I
° I 0
POD W a x ?. a w
6P
o I I
0. z?q z o 0 Qd
b
pp[
P° I
Qo? O ?.
E.i 0 U 0 CYi
~.zU a
I
°
I 0 C•zw FwW nI
00 ca U0a w
?i o R? z m o 0-4
0
0
0
W ?
w, a
M
° Ey

--A
I
o
o?

I
0
w
W
0
a
0

0
W
a
\
L
1 77
? ?

w
' 1
1 0
?

s _ o
AUG 12 4'
999
b I I I ` 0
?

\ w
•
I
I '?-•

I
w oba 0 j
v,4 UF
COASTAL
w
MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
\ -----
I o --• •-
w
o °
------. ?
W I I
\l
` W I
N m Sbb?
`y z o /' U
rn
__ o w ----
o ?- w a
W 1.. 10 IL I .... w
•-•? a?
? --
owl

0
z

,? ?
i

I
0o Pf z co

Q ?o
° I

0
K
I a

z-

° F w

° o
w
°
I

° I ? z z z
w

I I Im
o 0
°
w

o I
0
o I ,
0 000
0?
o °o°o°o
0? °ooo°o
° °o°o°o
?J
71
LL1 °
o I
0 I o LZ1 000000
p? 000000
MATCH LINE 0
Sod MATC NE A
MATC LINE C
I
' ° TCH LINE C '
b

?(/? 1 w p
f I I I ? rn
1 1 ° 'w 3 M
°
M
° I I , x ?, a w
a
V) C7 F

a?
00
1
02
021
1
x o
w

O

??
?o
I
I
?
° ? C6I
ozw Fww

A
t?

0

0
w w
? C U (7 0;
? rz` w A O O
~
O
o
I
I O ^
W ° O
W
o A

w o
g

I.
I

I
i

1

w v
? ?

U w
z
Z>

I c

'
x
fA
m 7 I cI I
O W , i O
O
C
I 0?
J.
^I u I O?
w
1 I 1 O w

I O 5(???
O01 °°1 D V '
° TT 7, r Tg? All,
x
I
I w
O
1
A UG 1

w

1
I 2 7999 w
,
o? w C
?O? 1
o' U,gSTaL MANAGE
L)
MENT
1

1 I 5

o
w 4
I 0

W
@ O'
0' A
?{ I@ ' +? z

W 1+
@
I? 0
bo!
0
F p
-?

I I Vo
° w o z H A
0 Q
w
?{ O 1 f m z z H
1
, 0 w e 3
IN 00

i]

I

I
°z
W
°? `S ? ? j
-N
o I I oo w
F F LL

i t 0
o

0
0
o

I

1

I

o w

°J O p O

°
i oo
W

0
o
0 A q D
od
P ??

Al

°
0 I

1 000

pc 000000
)%
< o 0°o°
o
o
o °
oo
?cl W o
°
0
°°
0
o
o
°
I
I
I c 0
0
o
°c .0
0.0
ofl °o°o°o
°
o°
°
o c o
o
0 000
0
MATCH LINE 8 o °0 W MATCH LINE B
I I
? I
I I
I I

I?
I
I?
?- f
0
ti
U-i
0
w

z
O
F
d
v'

0 d
3
a x
r
n L
7
-? O

11 w
i \ AUG 12 1999
;Ln
COASTAL MANAGEMEI`??
1 1 n
\'t ---___--_QL? w
---
1 LU
Ul ) w O
i
I N o m ? 0a
O
zU Q
l
o z o u ?Id
'.
w
a 0-4 Z o a °o oIIf
c > a
a

?I
I z x
w to
I I w ?? zz
c
I / I c
I I w cn z w
z
,? I ? Ln a n:
Li Lu r,-
IN I ?a w
96
H H
I LU~ o c
I 1 w
W V) o W z
I I w Q
I l i \ A A
w o°oooo
X
000
o°o
oS o0 0
0 Li 000
X o
0
o M TCH ME
MATCF LINE C
w
Q
0
W
2•?
0
\, Z O
? o
V C-
? O
y
Ln
y V-

1 COASTAL MIA''aGEnIENT
z
C? -
z
Q
V o
d ?
W {{
? J
I co v N I p
N N N N N
z
Q

o
?
F O G
0
6
z
r?I
°
F z
ti o
?
m 9I
A Q 0.
W
U

z

? U U

r
a

x
.,? p
c
a

75 .5
F

0

s
R U
rr

a x U

a x ?

cr
F
2
O
Z A

r
' ? F
z

x
I
i
4 I
z
4 I
• o
O
0
i?
AUG 2 1999
©IVfSi?, ??r?=
COASTAL MANAGE - ' s
w ?
A ?
w I
? I
a-
c
z
O
-4

F ?
? 3 M a
cn C7 F

z
x
z .., O

F o ;w
o
U
?
z ?
o

0
O
a I
-
F O
? A
z U
ti (7
° O LL
O
. a mp
> a
o F
U w
z
?

0
z
e
c
z
r

`

u a
r ?
no
z
a

e
F
m
z
a I
a I
? I
a
I
I
z z
a ?
7-17 xx"
? - w
w
U ...a
z ?
0 L)
F
C2 w
Z ?^
O
i
o .
4
z
4
0
O
O
0
O
V
II
AUG ? 2 1999 J
ilES?v??E OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

i z
o

? t
c? F > .

o 0
w

[4
0 0
W

o O
D E°
U W w
L7 a'
G=,
-- E. z
14 ti Ao 0
Q > a' a m ?I
? F

z
XI 4:_

°
z
a to
? z
-- z ' H
. w
a
?:
z
I a a
I F
0 0
I
?? a c
?
c
z
c?
3 ?
Q° z
O
?. z
x

l) m %
U .tea
..a U
o U
? w
a ?
p p _?

i z
0

I F
c
zv
o

- F e z 1 n4
0 94

I o ca a
W
U

2ju mDMH J
AUG 12
t7fVfSi?,_, ,._
?aA TAL MAINAGE-4
A
c?
3
0
0
0
i!!? ? ?I IIiIIII

to
A
z
F ?
? z
i= Q
- z • '?
a
F ti
zz z

cl?

a
cr'
Z
o
p rrm
I I
I
i
0
O
TDN CU O
?D o
ALF ?r 'C `' -9 Q 01 O
{JJ
DIV;' . w
CO sTAL MAINAG-M N E
a
e
® i
? Z
Jill .:I,.;
3
s
g
z
0
F

v?'? C7 F b

P
o
.? W
ca
o co z U
® w O
- H z ao
Q > a °a wa
? ? F
U w
z
?
u? -

n k14D

~ 9

? -
a
z
a
a ?
- z
? r
a
c. z
a
l
U .?
z
0 U
X
0
I ?
I? ^1
cI
T-m
,C
AUG 12 1999
DIVIS? LF
COASTAL MA""NAGEMENT
W
A
e
a
0
0
w
It.
0
=o
0
0
0
0
0
O
?o
s 2

z
0

4
p 3 M

z x ?
o
P O z
w z w ?; ww n
F e z ti Ao
a
p =I

U W

z W
x

iliil!??I ??i?lllll ijl?l?!I I''iIIIII I Il; i?il
0
z
a
?
3
- z F

L

® F .

v
F s
?
°z
r -

s
- z
c
e

I?
I
0
0
0
O
C)
,M T
?L
i
V
AUC, 12 7999
GGAS
7'AL MANAGEMF
W
3
0
x

Mill IIIIHIII IIIII 111!11111
4g?
a ;
z
0

M (?
v? C7 F
..., O

Fo ? z c, o
0 O ? ? w W ?
- o. w O z o c1
A , a ca
o F.
U w

z ?

z
? c
a z
- z F
.s
z
F F
v w
L C C
Vc)
AT G7a
?J V1 ?
- z ?
o u
F
0 w
z
O
F ?
\?? cn C7 F .? O
z z o ?
w
ao Z U AI
G.. z W F W W rC
F O Z W Q O Q
a m r``
O E.,
U W
W
z x
?o
7.
a ?
0
o - z H
o U
,z
O z
O a ?
?? z z
C)
7? IE
/,
cod
L'?•
f
At??A?a 47EENT
E.
a w
cam' . a U
O .?
94 - z
0 U
•-. F
N rN.
e Q ?=
!:?ililll 1h Hill
W3Q
0
ri61 1 2 'ggg ? O
TA' MAN-AG'EMENT
w
a
c?
a
0
f?
z
0

o a M ?
_ can Cy.7 F m >

v ? o t:
E. o
- 0 ® z W oa
? o

a t~
U W
z
?

z
e
a
F ?
L-a D
z
F
c?
a ?
z
? z z
n
Q? w
.a
F ..a
- z ?
o U
?I a I?
WETLAND SUMMARY SHEET
8.1270801 (B-3011)
FILL IN TEMP. FILL IN CLEARING IN FILL IN TEMP. FILL
STATION WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS IN WETLANDS
(ACRES) (ACRES) (ACRES) (Cy.) (C.Y.)
18+40 0.33 1.48 0.31 4200 28700
TO
33+75
AUc- 12 19 q
Gar= .
CoA STR` ,?6?I A-M ENT
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS.
PENDER COUNTY
PROJECT. 8.1270801 (B-3011)
BRIDGE NO-11 OVER
MOORES CREEK
SHEET L5 OF a0
Ill,
COAL

S?boo?
E C;
u r .fJy
AUG
IVE;:, -
>T L M ANA-it'SENT
SZ /
/ I
/

f-A -,

I
4
s ?
G
I o
? b
1
S?d,O
? a
w
J
z a
I ?z
I on
zw
i ?
i ?
z
0
H
O

N M
c
j
a ? .
Z g
o ?
W
z o ? z

U
® U
GTM
Z A H
A
o w
o z 0
W , o ca
c o 0
? F
U W
W
z

c
N
Gzl
J
W

' z
0
E"
n ,.4
c
p3 F
z ? j A4
w
a?
?
z
z o ° p
?
a
U u
0 1
Fo
?
? z
w
of

oo w
o a
® ?c
N { W W
x O
rl
{ o c? o
a -

o F
x
z

t
' N
a
;T--4?
--- LO
i N
44
,` `l flu J 1 0
1 ; ®® H
Du I I
.UJa 2 1999
'aSTAL MANAGEMENT
o ? I z? ox
co M aU W?
CV { CN F a
M
L?zl k W ?
za zc
a? cZ
CC I M CV O
O
- a? z ? p w
z? o?? U
_ ! F o x ?. z w n ?.
! a ?, z w w O ?
U p
! o N ?p w w a
I o W j a?? col
? Iz
z
N
i ?
Au( 999 o0
r
COASTAL MN.,iGEMFNT
0
0
16
N
IRtI MI
? N
d
NX
!
!
I
I M
I N
I
I ,
I
I
I
N r-
C> c,
o

® ? w

U
b

? ® a
0
® ? w
m
Jw
J

P+ C
?O
d?
Ow
?d
Fa
w?
d
F?
O ?
z
oz

b??

w
z
0
'?y M
? o ? F m ? Qd
.. Z„
i i U 0 A E-H w p L-.
o Z
c?
? 0w o zoo 0 0
w
?j
6-4
Q: Q" a' U w
L) ? ? Z x
?z
w
F. ° 00
z , ,,a a
D
"-^ F
A(i 1 1999 ; z
COASTAL
MANAGEMENT
N cd ? o
w
DO a F,
10, azz
Uj a>
zi I d
z o

PROPERTY 0117NER
NAME AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS

A. WARD GRANT 11795 N. HWY 53 W.
ATKINSON. NC 28421

JOHN H. MURPHY,SR P0. BOX 264
BURCAW, NC. 2942S
410-asa-y?3q
LANDMARK, PO. BOX 4127
WILMINGTON. NC 28406
CHARLES MURPHY JR. PO.BOX 2091
C
JAMESTOWN, NC. A 7.29 L
RT,2 BOX 2442
GEORGE MALCOLM KELLY BURGAW.NC. a8Na5
q io- 2$3-569 3

THOMAS KELLY 10545 N. HWY 53 W.
, BURGAW.NC
9i0-X83-7a?3
i`
7°y0
0A,, -
r s IYAG -
-N T
N. C. DEPT'. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT