20200980 Ver 1_401 Application_20200729

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#*
20200980
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Select Reviewing Office:* Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:* 401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No
How much is r $240.00
owed?* r $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* r New Project r New Project Existing ID
r Pre -Application Submittal r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments r Stream or Buffer Appeal
r For the Record Only (Courtesy
Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Micheal Brame
who is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Corvair Drive
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Guilford
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
5511.1_Corvair_PCN Application_7.29.20.pdf 11.23MB
Only pdf or lm7 files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certifythat:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;

• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
;itPt�r.�t � rr(�zr� rt�i
Submittal Date: Is filled in autorratically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1.Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type:Private Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6.Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7.Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8.Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9.Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10.Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11.Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
12.Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit # Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
X
X
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
Yes No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2.Project Information
2a. Name of project: The Landing at Sycamore Creek
2b. County: Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town: High Point
2d. Subdivision name: The Landing at Sycamore Creek
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Redwood Development Group, LLC (New Owners Corvair HP, Close on 7/30/2020)
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 00811902297
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Thomas Flanagan
3d. Street address: 348 North Elm Street
3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27401
3f. Telephone no.: 336-706-1222
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5.Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Michael T. Brame
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address: PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip: Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.: 336.708.4620
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 6892447563-000
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.011038° Longitude: -
80.032016°
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 16.5 acres
2.Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Hiatt Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3.Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land. A high-tension powerline and associated easement cross the site.
Residential development is located within the vicinity of the site.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.341 Ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=860 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct Phase 3 of River Walk Subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Phase 3 includes the construction of a 20 lot single-family residential lot subdivision with 8 additional town home lots,
associated access roads, landscaped areas and a stormwater device. The subdivision will rely on sanitary sewer
services. In order to connect to an existing sewer line, it is necessary to cross a small wetland pocket and a stream.
Other surface water and wetland impacts are beoing avoided. To facilitate construction on and development of the site,
clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during
grading and construction of the site.
4.Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
Yes No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Seren Homer
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
We are not aware of additional phases that will occur. Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this
application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1.Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2.Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404, other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
W1 P T Sewer Line PFO Yes
No
Corps
DWQ 0.008
W2 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
W3 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
W4 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
W5 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
W6 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.008
2h. Comments: In order to connect to an existing sewer line and manhole, it is necessary to temporarily impact a 0.008 acres
of forested wetland. The construction easement will be 30 feet wide and the permanent easement will be 15 feet wide. The
forested wetland within the permanent easement will be permanently converted to an emergent wetland. Following
installation, the area of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre-construction grades and will be seeded.
3.Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P T
Coffer dam/pump
around and open
cut in stream
channel
Unnamed PER
INT
Corps
DWQ 5 30
S2 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
S3 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
S4 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
S5 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
S6 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 30
3i. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will temporarily impact 30 linear feet of stream from the two coffer dam
footprints. The bed will be open cut and the pipe will be installed and covered with concrete beneath the bed of the stream.
The rip rap will then be keyed into protect the buried pipe and stream banks. Areas of temporary impact will be restored to
similar pre-construction conditions. The coffer dams will be removed and the stream flow will be vredirected back into the
channel. The permanently maintained easement will be 15 feet wide.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4.Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1 P T
O2 P T
O3 P T
O4 P T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5.Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other:
Catawba Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason
for
impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 P T Yes
No
B2 P T Yes
No
B3 P T Yes
No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The proposed impacts are allowable without mitigation.
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
With the exception of the temporary impacts from the sewer line, the applicant has designed the proposed residential sub-
division to avoid impacts to streams, buffers and wetlands. The roads, lots/pad fill and a stormwater device have been
designed in non-jurisdictional, upland areas. The applicant has designed the sewer line crossing in a narrow wetland area
and a relsatively straight stream reach given the constraints of tying into an existing manhole. The remaining 830 linear feet of
stream and 0.341 acres of wetland are being avoided.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. A temporary coffer dam will be installed upgradient and down-
gradient of the construction area. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprint. Appropriate
stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during construction and all excess excavated material will be
immediately removed from the stream bank crossing area. The pipe and concrete are being buried beneath the stream bed.
Rip rap is being keyed in to further minimize the impacts to the stream. Upon completion of the pipe installation, the
temporary sand bag coffer dams will be removed and flow will be diverted back into the channel. Following construction,
disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre-construction conditions, matted and seeded/live staked. Upon installation of the
sewer line, the wetland will be restored to grade and seeded.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4.Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5.Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6.Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: No concentrated flow discharge points are proposed into the buffers. Yes No
2.Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 10.9 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stormwater basin has been designed to treat stormwater from the site. The dry basin is 11,337 square feet and was
designed to treat a drainage area of 10.17 acres.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3.Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? High Point
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1.Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
Yes No
2.Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4.Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the proposed subdivision will be discharged into existing sanitary sewer lines located immediately
southwest of the project area. A small wetland and a stream will be temporarily impacted by the proposed line that is
identified in Section C.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5.Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the USFWS Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened species inhabit Guilford
County, NC. The bald eagle, Cape Fear shiner, Roanoke logperch, Schweinitz's sunflower and small whorled pogonia are
listed as federally protected species. Based on our observations, the proposed development will not disturb the bald
eagle. The site is not located within the current ranges for the Cape Fear shiner and Roanoke logperch based on a
review of the USFWS Environmental Conservation Online System. Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower and small
whorled pogonia was not observed withinn the project area. It is our opinion that the proposed project will have no effect
on federally protected species or their habitat.
6.Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of a stormwater device will prevent sediment from entering down-gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7.Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site.
The map does not identify eligible for listing properties at the site or on nearby properties. A copy of the map is included
as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The impacts are temporary. There are no improvements above
grade that will impact the 100-year floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? 3710689200K (Drawing 4)
Michael T. Brame, PWS
_______________________________
7.28.20
Date
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Proposal for Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal5511
January 3, 2020
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: 3661 Cw,em,
Owner Information: �r -
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: _ w��,�-T�. ��-�•x ,.4,a. kill.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: _Owner K Authorized_Agent
Date I t Sol �
Signatur o
J
7

IMPACT MAP
FOR
DEVELOPER:
— THE LANDING AT
PAC HOLDINGS, L.L.C. SYCAMORE CREEK
348 N. ELM ST. 150' 75' 0 150' 300' CITY OF HIGH POINT
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27401 GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1 " 150' DULY, 2020
JOB No. 2019-084
✓� `. [ `� ....... ................................................s.................. ................... .............. '.
i
IMPA
i
CT
✓�� - CORVAIR DRIVE W— % a
N _e
�✓ / `) ESTATES I SECT. 13
s ' ( PS 30 PC 29 }
\ 111 USE: RESIDENTIAL
# / Lr L_ ZONED: RS—
6M ,t
ILBWRNE
ool
W W
/ //
Ij
1p
�oT i
°, R\ USE: VACANT
°'• ZONED: RS-12Cl
/
am
D.61 0
W/ I
sd am cam
______ ______ a a, ' `D9 2M 22A8 ON
USE' HI 2
1

UTILITY NOTES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT THE WIDTH OF DISTURBED AREA 1. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, ALL WATER .AND SEWER LINES SHALL 13E INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM COVER c
' �' 2 AT THE STREAM CROSSING TO W. ALL REMAINING DISTURBED
ALAS WITHIN THE STREAM BUFFER WILL BE LIMITED TO A of a6 N THE TOP OF THE UTILPIPEITIES
((]] ��jj
MAXBAUM WIDTH OF 40°:. ALL AREAS � DISTURBANCE WITHIN 2. LOCATION. OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR <
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
THE STREAM BUFFER dt SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS WILL BE 3. ALL ON -SITE WATER &SEWER UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE CITY OF HIGH POINT STANDARDS,
RETURNED TO ORIGINAL GRASS NO H WILL BE ALLOWED HOWEVER, ALL UTILITIES NOT LOCATED WITHIN A PUBLIC EASEMENT OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE
WITHIN D FLORIGINA / '"' PRIVATE WITH MAINTENANCE OF THE STORM SYSTEMS PROVIDED BY THE HOA.
,- -_ - 4. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT --CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS DIVISION AT [phone]-
PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
1 - ..� .✓ / / . . 5. THE OWNER/ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT AS -BUILT DRAWINGS OF THE WATER, SEWER, AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS
STREAM [BUFFER SECTION DETAIL -- "='� - TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT UPON PROJECT COMPLETION INCLUDING WATER METER AND U
SEE HIGH POINT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE / '""�"'•`-�_1 / / SEWER CLEAN -OUT LOCATIONS.
AS AMENDED .DINE 1, 2000
FOR PRACTICES AND ACTIVITIES NOT ALLOWED - ' / , •. % �,"�__��'..\_.%"`r-` / .
a
IN ZONES i AND 2
ZONE 1 - (�ISNRBED AREA. OF VEGETATION - ` �� `- Z / -- N
EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET FROM TOP S w W
OF 6ANK (mac. s s(a». ZONE 2 - - — �`'o m f `� / \ L7 Z w
CS W ro LQ
'MCI
) AREA OF VEGETATION BEGINNING G 2 O. cq CO
10
AT THE OUTER EDGE OF ZONE 1 AND EXTENDING to ' . / ^' /' / + \ R) N 00
LANDWARD A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET. EXCEPTIONS 7D •� �._/ / / m Z a
MUST BE APPROVED BY THE WATERSHED REVIEW 'wO
\ � '.fy U) M CJ c0
COMMITTEE (WRC) PER SEC 8-7-6(4X3)D. / '' T m m m m m -� \ W a o zZ M o
// i % -Y,.✓ G�� o. ' , i / / / \ 0 STA 8+21.40 20 z 0 m m 3 s I
m m (= STA 11+17.51 O v
l �j�` / - / FLAT-l'OP MHOF-3 \ of v \ 1� WILLOWCREST ST.) 0 w F' c
/ t. • r / WETLANDS F a In
/ 4 � m m m m // // STA 6+21.59 / (8.5' TIT.) _ W a LLS
%ui
1 m "Soo 0
STA 4+00• % - y / .< l.r..✓�O �-� / / E`�`�/ \ p
TIE-IN TO MH
-LIMIT DtSTU NCE DURWG/ / c2y m / / / / / O�� \ \ W
'BEFORE YO10[O } / TRUC TO 30' / m m ems/ / .� Y/ m
CALL 811
:. (NE -CALL OENTER / :: PE ANENT
tt s THE uwT MOI10A1NANCE CORRIDOR,/ / r� 1/7T T"A C
%l • • /s�2o ,-- — I< / m � / � / / 150 '�^ � �r, o�e�,.....«.
FLAT -TOP MH OF-2 { w N
STA 3+14.47 , / Y••'$bO' '. q��
mm
04
on
m
FLAT -TOP MH OF-1 C 19 18 d• N
STA 1+06.61 00
APPROXIM TE 100 YEAR , w n rri
COFFER DAMS FOR FLOOD PLAIN j p 3E ui f
° e
/BY-PASS PUMP - , - (V mQ 0 F= = -
i (SEE DETAIL) TOPa853.87 40' 30' 20. 10' 0 40 e0• d
INV IN=844.93
INV OUT-842.93 SCALE: 1 "=40'
w
m
� � o
zzw
FINAL GRADE / p ¢ w < =
m inQ<
w
m
m
1
�- -- I NOTE PUMP STREAM AROUND WOW AREA
4
PUMP INT
STREAM
- -- - !N T 8 8. 4 5
RIP- AMON
-�-" .. 8 ...�... t-
B4Gloll lollr 8 � ACE V)
PULE
W
------ -- ----
m IDE _2 -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
r+ -
DISCHARGE HOSE
I V 82 .D DEWATENING BASIN
m _ � 30" CONST. EASEMENT
�_w
__ w
4I
E E 18 61 - j �RTm� ( IC PLAN MASS I RIP -RAP (TYP.)
w
11 � SANDBAGS (TIP")
• • i WATER . ACE
fV
0 19 87
CONCRETE FBI. Q
STREAM FK)TIOM(ROI70 Z
830 _ __ _ PROPOSED PIPELINE J
SECTION A - A NOEI ' TES
1. CONSTRUCT COFFER DAM AND UTILIZE U
DEWATERWG BASIN TO DRAIN WORK AREA.
SL_l2 - CROSSING VINEN N LONGM TO ER NEEDED. STREAM J l Z � z�
i J __
V 4. CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID tt�� 0
CONTAMINATIONCONCRETE
TO THE STREAM FROM LL H P-4 � CLZ
CLZ
i _ _ _ - - _ _ POURED CONfY2ETE SEALANT. C) 1:: i X:
COFFER DAM n O0A �7
FOR BY PASS PUMPING PIPELINE STREAM CROSSINGS L-3 pY =
iCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR ALL STREAM CROSSINGS pNr-
(SFE NOTE ABOVE CONCERNING NN'DES PERWT d �P;" iZ }_
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CREEK CROSSING AS I-�
SZO DETAILED. 7HE 1TBAP0RARY CREEK CROSSING SHALL BE
INSTALLED ON THE UPSTREAM P(MTION OF THE EASEMENT. AN FI�•��11 V
ADEQUATE DISTANCE TO ALLOW SEWER LINE INSTALLATION. I.I.I Nv
2. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE SEWER LDff ACROSS THE CREEK, THE ✓'(�' O
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ITMPORARY DAM UPSTREAMOFTHE Ll
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND PUMP THE STREAM FLOW AROUND THE J -
AREA OF DISNRBANCE. THE TEMPORARY DAM SHALL BE OF A
NON -ERODIBLE MATERIAL SUCH AS SAND BAGS OR PLASTIC SHEETING V,
OVER STONE.
1 UPON. COMPLETION OF THE SEWER LINE INSTALLATION CROSSING
THE CREEK, THE CONTRACTOR WALL STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS
WITH:R1P-RAP (SEE DETAIL).
4. UPON COMPLETION OF RIP -RAP, THE CONTRACTOR STALL REMOVE SHEET NO. , --,-
I THE TEMPORARY DAM. AND TERMINATE BYPASS PUMPING, n
t w tf --a �p fSt 2W VE la-
ao
5. AT WHICH TIME 1}ff SEWER LINE INSTALLATION HAS PASSED ALL �
TESTING, AND THE AREA SEEDED, THE CONTiTACTOR STALL REMOVE
THE TEMPORARY CREEK CROSSING, ANO RE-ESTABLISH OR[OINAL
I. CREEK BANK ELEVATIONS. RIP RAP SHALL BE KEYED IN TO THE
EXISTING BANK AND BOTTOM WITHIN THE 10'-MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR.
5+00 6+00 7+00 S+Ofl
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00

IMPACTS S— I & W—
FOR
THE LANDING AT
SYCAMORE CREEK
CITY OF HIGH POINT
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JULY, 2020
JOB No. 2019-084
30' 20' 10' 0 30' 60' DEVELOPER:
PAC SCALE: 1 = 30' 348 N HOLDINGS
ST. L.L.C.
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27401
".^f ��, Ir ^ fr „/ � ,.�..` ....� •�`.�.. ....... �....^ .ram' rf � f �/ �' � "" 3
rf d '"ram r"✓ t t
tom`,
W 11 �354 S '�f:! 0;,00 vW17
r
ell
'©� A CO,ISTkUCTION CORRIO�11R1
s 15 PEWANE-NT
/.�-\. ``ivy ..✓.. r� 4 �,".,.- m ^e ro � ,F �.f �•• � � 4 � ! �f f
f £S �A-
;� Ir J
r _ p
• �=� zz F � r ` J � �f i do

NOTE: PUMP STREAM AROUND WORK AREA
....--
PUMP
STREAM
P
DISCHARGE HOSE
POLYETHYLENE FABRIC
8 MIL. THICK (TYP.)
z °
WATER SURFACE
�t o
STREAM BOTTOM(ROCK)
SECTION A - A
COFFER DAM.
RAP APRON
IECK DAM WITH
STONE FACE
!ING BASIN
PLAN CLASS I RIP -RAP (TYP.)
SANDBAGS (TYP.)
low
0
CONCRETE FILL
PROPOSED PIPELINE
NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCT COFFER DAM AND UTILIZE
DEWATERING BASIN TO DRAIN WORK AREA.
2. PUMP STREAM AROUND WORK AREA.
3. CONVERT COFFER DAM TO STREAM
CROSSING WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED.
4. CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID
CONTAMINATION TO THE STREAM FROM
POURED CONCRETE SEALANT.
FOR BY-PASS PUMPING PIPELINE STREAM CROSSINGS
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR ALL STREAM CROSSINGS
(SEE NOTE ABOVE CONCERNING NPDES PERMIT)
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CREEK CROSSING AS
DETAILED. THE TEMPORARY CREEK CROSSING SHALL BE
INSTALLED ON THE UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE EASEMENT, AN
ADEQUATE DISTANCE TO ALLOW SEWER LINE INSTALLATION.
2. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE SEWER LINE ACROSS THE CREEK, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A TEMPORARY DAM UPSTREAM OF THE
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND PUMP THE STREAM FLOW AROUND THE
AREA OF DISTURBANCE. THE TEMPORARY DAM SHALL BE OF A
NON -ERODIBLE MATERIAL SUCH AS SAND BAGS OR PLASTIC SHEETING
OVER STONE.
3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE SEWER LINE INSTALLATION CROSSING
THE CREEK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS
WITH RIP -RAP (SEE DETAIL).
4. UPON COMPLETION OF RIP -RAP, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE
THE TEMPORARY DAM, AND TERMINATE BYPASS PUMPING.
5. AT WHICH TIME THE SEWER LINE INSTALLATION HAS PASSED ALL
TESTING, AND THE AREA SEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE
THE TEMPORARY CREEK CROSSING, AND RE-ESTABLISH ORIGINAL
CREEK BANK ELEVATIONS. RIP RAP SHALL BE KEYED IN TO THE
EXISTING BANK AND BOTTOM WITHIN THE 10' MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR.

1/3/2020 Property Report
gis.guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardjs/Default.aspx?pin=198449&mapImage=_ags_211f6c25f101446984070df04c623d5f.jpg&isTinyScreen=false&i…1/1
MobileMobile
MapsMaps
Guilford County, NC - Property Report Guilford County, NC - Property Report Convert to PDFConvert to PDF 1/3/2020 1/3/2020
Parcel IDParcel ID Property AddressProperty Address Legal DescriptionLegal Description
198449198449 3501 Near Corvair Dr3501 Near Corvair Dr SEE DEEDSEE DEED
Owner InformationOwner Information
Owner NameOwner Name Mailing AddressMailing Address City, State ZipCity, State Zip
REDWOOD DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLCREDWOOD DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 1913 CLEVELAND AVE1913 CLEVELAND AVE CHARLOTTE, NC 28203CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
Parcel InformationParcel Information
PINPIN ZoningZoning UseUse Tax DistrictTax District
6892447563-0006892447563-000 RS-12-Residential, Single-Family, 3 units per acreRS-12-Residential, Single-Family, 3 units per acre RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL 00
Parcel SizeParcel Size Appraisal NbrhoodAppraisal Nbrhood Plat/Condo Bk & PgPlat/Condo Bk & Pg
32.0132.01 6892B076892B07 N/AN/A
Recent SalesRecent Sales
Book & PageBook & Page Sale DateSale Date Sale PriceSale Price Qualified?Qualified?Improved?Improved?
0081190229700811902297 1/17/20191/17/2019 $200,000$200,000 YesYes YesYes
Appraisal ValuesAppraisal Values
LandLand BuildingsBuildings Extra FeaturesExtra Features Total ValueTotal Value
$372,100$372,100 $0$0 $0$0 $372,100$372,100
Disclaimer: Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal documentMap and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Disclaimer: Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal documentMap and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 1
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 3
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 4
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 5
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
North Arrow
Graphical Scale
Boundary of Review Area
Date
Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017 Page 6
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
•PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
•AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Proposal for Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal5511
January 3, 2020
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: 3661 Cw,em,
Owner Information: �r -
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: _ w��,�-T�. ��-�•x ,.4,a. kill.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: _Owner K Authorized_Agent
Date I t Sol �
Signatur o
J
7

1/3/2020 Property Report
gis.guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardjs/Default.aspx?pin=198449&mapImage=_ags_211f6c25f101446984070df04c623d5f.jpg&isTinyScreen=false&i…1/1
MobileMobile
MapsMaps
Guilford County, NC - Property Report Guilford County, NC - Property Report Convert to PDFConvert to PDF 1/3/2020 1/3/2020
Parcel IDParcel ID Property AddressProperty Address Legal DescriptionLegal Description
198449198449 3501 Near Corvair Dr3501 Near Corvair Dr SEE DEEDSEE DEED
Owner InformationOwner Information
Owner NameOwner Name Mailing AddressMailing Address City, State ZipCity, State Zip
REDWOOD DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLCREDWOOD DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 1913 CLEVELAND AVE1913 CLEVELAND AVE CHARLOTTE, NC 28203CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
Parcel InformationParcel Information
PINPIN ZoningZoning UseUse Tax DistrictTax District
6892447563-0006892447563-000 RS-12-Residential, Single-Family, 3 units per acreRS-12-Residential, Single-Family, 3 units per acre RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL 00
Parcel SizeParcel Size Appraisal NbrhoodAppraisal Nbrhood Plat/Condo Bk & PgPlat/Condo Bk & Pg
32.0132.01 6892B076892B07 N/AN/A
Recent SalesRecent Sales
Book & PageBook & Page Sale DateSale Date Sale PriceSale Price Qualified?Qualified?Improved?Improved?
0081190229700811902297 1/17/20191/17/2019 $200,000$200,000 YesYes YesYes
Appraisal ValuesAppraisal Values
LandLand BuildingsBuildings Extra FeaturesExtra Features Total ValueTotal Value
$372,100$372,100 $0$0 $0$0 $372,100$372,100
Disclaimer: Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal documentMap and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Disclaimer: Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal documentMap and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATI ON
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:February 24, 2020
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:Seren Homer, Pilot Environmental, Inc.
Post Office Box 128, Kernersville, North Carolina 27285
C. DISTRICT OFFICE,FILE NAME,AND NUMBER:Wilmington,Corvair Drive,SAW 2020-
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S)AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:The site is an approximate 16.5-acre wooded lot
located west of Corvair Drive that is proposed for residential development.The site currently contains undeveloped
wooded land. Overhead powerlines and the associated utility easement cross the southern portion of the site.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough:Guilford City:High Point
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):Lat.:36.011295°Long.:-80.031554°
Universal Transverse Mercator:WGS 84
Name of nearest waterbody:Hiatt Branch
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk)Determination.Date:
Field Determination.Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
SA 36.009523°-80.031634°770 LF Non-Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)Section 404
SB 36.008837°-80.03127°90 LF Non-Wetland Water
(Perennial Stream)Section 404
WB/WBA 36.009527°-80.031328°0.341 ac.Wetland Section 404
1)The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area,and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD)for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2)In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit,or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP)or other general permit verification requiring "pre­construction
notification"(PCN),or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity,the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that:(1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources;(2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization,and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3)the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization;(4)the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit,including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5)undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD;(6)accepting a
permit authorization (e.g.,signing a proffered individual permit)or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional,and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action,or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable.Further,an AJD,a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein),or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R.Part 331.If,during an administrative appeal,it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area,or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area,the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result,as soon as is
practicable.This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S.and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S.on the subject review area,and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity,based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA.Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file.Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.Rationale:
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters'study:
U.S.Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Drawing 1/High Point West (1999)& Kernersville
(1994)/1”=2,000’
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Drawing 2 (Web Soil Map)&
Drawing 2A (Published Soil Map)
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Drawing 3 (NWI Map)
State/local wetland inventory map(s):_
FEMA/FIRM maps:Drawing 4 (FEMA FIRM)
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs:Aerial (Name &Date):NC CGIA Aerial Dated 2018-Drawing 5 (Wetland Map)-Map Date 2/18/20
or Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE:The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms.If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.
2/24/20
USGS Topographic Map
Corvair Drive
Approximate 16.5-Acre Tract
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5511
Drawing 1
USGS Topographic Map
Kernersville and High Point West,
NC Quadrangles
Scale: 1” = 2,000’
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Web Soil Map
Corvair Drive
Approximate 16.5-Acre Tract
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5511
Drawing 2
USDA Web Soil Survey
of Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1” = 250'
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2A
NRCS USDA Published Soil Survey
of Guilford County, NC
Published 1977, Sheet 31
Not to Scale
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Published Soil Map
Corvair Drive
Approximate 16.5-Acre Tract
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5511
NWI Map
Corvair Drive
Approximate 16.5-Acre Tract
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5511
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1” = 250'
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
Other
FEMA FIRM
Corvair Drive
Approximate 16.5-Acre Tract
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5511
Drawing 4
National Flood Hazard Layer
From FEMA Web Map Service
Scale: 1” = 250'
LEGEND
Site Boundary
FLAG NUMBERS/INFORMATION
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM FLAGS =
Wetland Flags = 33
Stream Flags =4-Flagged at boundary
intersections and confluence; surveyor locate
Total Flags = 37
Wetland Map
Corvair Drive
Approximate 16.5-Acre Tract
High Point, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5511
Drawing 5
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot GPS Data
Scale: 1” = 250'
Date: 2.18.20
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY.THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR NCDEQ-
DWR.THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
DP-1
DP-3
SA770 LF
SB90 LF
WB 1-16/WBA 1-170.341 ac.
DP-2
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Perennial Stream
Wetland
Data Point
Flag Number/Feature ID
DP-1
WA 1-5
0 250 500125
Feet
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
5
0
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
City/County:Corvair Drive High Point/Gulford
DP-1
2/10/20
NC
No
Section, Township, Range:Pilot Environmental
2ConcaveSwale
Datum:WGS 84-80.031364° 36.009597°LRR P, MLRA 136
NoneNWI classification:Enon fine sandy loam (EnD)
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Sampling conducted within 48 hours of above-average rainfall event.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Requirement Control Symbol
EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
1
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP-1
7
8
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
297
0
104
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
5
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
87.5%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
10
Liquidambar styraciflua
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Acer rubrum
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Liquidambar styraciflua
30 )
70
Indicator
Status
30
20
Yes
Dominant
Species?
Yes
5
No2
5
Acer rubrum
Microstegium vimineum
Smilax rotundifolia 2
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FAC
FAC
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Lonicera japonica
4
1
25
2
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FAC
Total % Cover of:
79
5
(A)
(B)
(A)
237
0
20
Multiply by:
40
2.86Prevalence Index = B/A =
20
Yes FAC
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
35 14
20
0
Yes
Yes
FACW
FAC
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
FAC
No
410
=Total Cover
10
20
Vitis rotundifolia
5 Yes
Yes
YesSmilax rotundifolia
FACU
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
M10
Texture
Prominent redox concentrations
DP-1SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
C10YR 5/2
10YR 5/4
10YR 5/65-18
0-5
Loc2
90
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Requirement Control Symbol
EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Sampling conducted within 48 hours of above-average rainfall event.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Corvair Drive High Point/Guilford
DP-2
2/10/20
NC
No
Section, Township, Range:Pilot Environmental
1NoneTerrace
Datum:WGS 84-80.031471° 36.009525°LRR P, MLRA 136
PFO1ANWI classification:Enon fine sandy loam (EnD)
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X10
=Total Cover
10
20
Lonicera japonica
5 Yes
Yes
YesSmilax rotundifolia
FAC
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACU
FAC
Yes
4
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
38 15
Pinus taeda
15
0
10 No FAC
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
10
No
150
0
420
Multiply by:
0
3.68Prevalence Index = B/A =
FAC
0
FACU
Yes FACU
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FACU
Total % Cover of:
50
105
(A)
(B)
(A)
No
6
615
15
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FACU
FAC
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Vitis rotundifolia
30
Yes
Yes
10
Liquidambar styraciflua 5
10
Ligustrum sinense
Smilax rotundifolia
10Lonicera japonica FACU
Polystichum acrostichoides 10
30
Juniperus virginiana
Fagus grandifolia
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Juniperus virginiana
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
Acer rubrum
30 )
75
Indicator
Status
20
20
Yes
Dominant
Species?
Yes
10
5
No
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
5
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
27.3%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP-2
3
11
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
570
0
155
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 5/40-18
DP-2SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%Texture
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Requirement Control Symbol
EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Sampling conducted within 48 hours of above-average rainfall event.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Corvair Drive High Point/Guilford
DP-3
2/10/20
NC
No
Section, Township, Range:Pilot Environmental
6ConcaveSwale
Datum:WGS 84-80.032244° 36.012166°LRR P, MLRA 136
NoneNWI classification:Enon-Urban land complex (EuB)
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X1
=Total Cover2
2 No FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACU
UPL
No
1
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
18 7
10
0
5 No FACU
Yes
Yes
FAC
FACU
60
0
216
Multiply by:
0
3.76Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
FACU
Yes FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FACU
Total % Cover of:
20
54
(A)
(B)
(A)
Yes
1
718
2
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Lonicera japonica
4
No2
15
Liquidambar styraciflua
Stellaria media
Asplenium platyneuron 2
35
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Liquidambar styraciflua
Carya ovata
Quercus alba
30 )
35
Indicator
Status
10
10
Yes
Dominant
Species?
Yes
10
10
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
33.3%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP-3
2
6
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
10
286
2
76
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Sandy
Sandy
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/4
10YR 3/2
2-8
0-2
DP-3SOIL
8-18 2.5Y 5/3
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
100
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%Texture
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
- o x
S Nyn• p • . C. • wUapr mww.na C- _ HPVMB20. 0 4p�pps Oe�wECc taro._ + .,
x Cm glr . ]{yeerch• [-{Lxre Mae• `Sqn ln• l-
y� Gon9b M G C,"# GRe Uy ySun OyW Cw_ F ..n • Eoenv— SW—W n NINC w.,y lops. �•