Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020231_WASTELOAD ALLOCATION_19770225MPDES DOCVNENT SCANNING COVER SHEET NPDES Permit: NC0020231 Louisburg WWTP Document Type: Permit Issuance Allocation C!WLfteload Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Data Monitoring Report Speculative Limits Instream Assessment (67b) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: February 25, 1977 This aocsumont iM Zsrixft1P-a on reuse PMPOW - igaorft aIMy coxatMM-t ou the x-leYe siae FOR DATA MANAGEMENT USE ONLY: F/kCILITY, NO. WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION REQUEST /—/ Actual Facility Proposed Facility TO: Mike -McGhee, Technical Services FROM: 54- 41- -T-aj )d ! SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit No.(001 ) Permit Application.Received (802 ) AlA Date of Request / / .Ls-/ 7 7 Date Needed x /X r-/ 7'7 Pipe No.(003 } aft to Public Notice (805 ) Discharger Name (103 ). 717 / County (104 ) Type (400 ) %% Mu /r/Id Equiv. Population Served ( 02 } Latitude (115 ) 03 Longitude (116 ) 201 Area (263 ) L-ea . 208 Area (264 ) basin(112 ) T4r O Stream Classification (269 C Receiving S ream (109 ) Tr 1?.`Vj/` Drain. Area(267) I qQy 7/10 Flow(270) 1 / 7 Ratio Waste 7/10 (303 } Design Capacity (207 ) 2 3 In Design Temperature (NKP) Elevation (NKP) /oa Location Discharger (NKP) Principal Product (NKP) Sample No. 41 BOD5(mg/Z) 310 Fecal CaZiform 100mZ 31616 Temperature F 11 DO (mg/Z) 300 I - Mo. Average Concentration 01 / oa S" - Wk. Avera e Concentration 02 J - Minimum Concentration 03 K - Maximum Concentration 04 M - Month;Average Loadin 05 - WeekZy Average Loadin 06 P - Minimum Loadin 07 Q - Maximum Loadin 08 T -- Frequency of Analysis 09 W -S Ze fyEe 10 Total NFZ;T` (m/t) 530 NH3-N (m Z) 600 pfl (units) 400 iSS I - Mo. Average Concentration 21 O 6 - 3 �► - Wk. Average Concentration 22 J - Minimum Concentration 23 K - Maximum Concentration 24 M - MonthZy Average Loading Avera e Loadin d25Weekl P - Minimum Loadin Q - Maximwn Loadin T -- Fre uenc o AnaZ sis W -S Ze Type 30 UOD (NKP) r—i u ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY EVALUATION LEVEL "B" ANALYSIS SOURCE OF POLLUTION: L Areawide (208) Planning Area: w,,,,,- Facilities (241) Planning Area: L A. RECEIVING STREAM TW1+�^ Classification: *A 7/10 Flow (cfs) /7 B. ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY DATA Water Surface Slope (ft/mi) 1.6 q Stream Velocity (fps) . 5 _ Stream Depth (ft) /. 7 Elevation @ Discharge Pt. (ft) 100 Drainage Area (sq. mi.) _ *a 9 7/10 Yield (cfsm) , D y- Design Temperature oC) Q6 Groundwater Runoff cfs/mi) _61 Deoxygenation Rate Kl Base e) 50 Reaeration Rate (K2 Base e) 7* Min. Dail Avg. D.O. (mg/1) 3 Upstream tualit - BODU (mg/1 D.O. (mg/1 714 C. REQUIRED EFFLUENT LIMITS Design Flow (MGD) a' 3 BOD5 (mg/1) Ammonia Nitrogen m /1 �6 Dissolved Oxygen mg/1 .5 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1) 30 Fecal Coliform (N/100 ml)Rot) pH (S.U.) 6 D. COMMENTS 1.0 a.0 3,0 Design FI"w [mid] STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES ORIGINAL FIRST UPDATE PAGE SECOND UPDATE I THIRD UPDATE f -711 8 do; March 1, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Jiraw Lancaster FROM: R. Stan Taylor r' SUBJECT: Proposed poultry processing plant As you requested I have gathered information on the waste treatment requirements for the proposed poultry processing plant. The company, before becoming committed beyond the point of no return, should apply for and re- ceive a permit for waste treatment facilities to fit any site in question. If a discharge Permit (NPDES Permit) is involved, the company should apply 180 days before planning to begin the discharge. If a non -discharge permit (land application) is involved, the company should allow 90 days from the ,application date for processing of the application. Construction could be initiated after review and approval of plans for the system and issuance of the appropriate permit or in the case of the NPDES permit the Permit and .Authorization to construct. A preliminary check of the stream site, that you were interested in shows that any of the sites should be acceptable if'the company provides treatment to the level of new source performance standards as certained in the draft effluent guidelines published by EPA. I am enclosing a copy of the appropriate page 'for your use. Using the guidelines, the live weight. to be killed, and the projected flaw that you provided I calculated that the. -effluent quality for a discharge system would be as -follows based on a 30 day average; I . BOD5 - 5 mg/1 NH-N - 1 mg/l oil & Grease -- 1 mg/l TSS - 6.3 mg/l These effluent limits represent a very high degree of treatment. I also investigated the degree of treatment that would be -required'. for the -Town of Louisburg if the company located there. The technical services group has provided me with a tentative allocation for Louisburg ' of BODS - 17; NH3-N -.11; and TSS - 30 if the 1.3 MGD industrial waste were to be added.to,Louisburgss plant. If the -company wishes'to pursue. al Jimmy Lancaster w2_ March 1, 19 this route, you should immediately contact the :own and the Town's consulting engineer to determine if this can be dcne and what the effect on the Town's 201 program will be. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me. OPy Cen-ti a j i-i ,z �