NC0020231_WASTELOAD ALLOCATION_19910911

UPDES DOCUWKMT SCAMlNIMS COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit: NCO020231
Louisburg V WTP
Document Type: Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Data Monitoring Report
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date: September 11, 1991
Thus docsxnmeat to priated oa reuse paper - iaaore any
contezlt CUM the reirer0e sfd.e

'"RAFT:
a DES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO020231 I
PERMITTEE NAME: Town of Louisburg
FACILITY NAME: Louisburg WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status:
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Modification/Up ade
Minor
Design Capacity: 1.37 MGD
Domestic % of Flow: 1 ar Put R
( ) 7 �O% � l�lq 1 To
Industrial (% of Flow): 39-9& ,y 10 a A^t4
Comments:°D .S
Requestfor a flow increase from 1.1MGD
Previously94%domestic 6% in`dustrial
RECEIVING STREAM: Tar River
Class: WS-III NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-03-01
Reference USGS Quad: C25SE, Louisburg (please attach)
County: Franklin
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/91 Treatment Plant Class: III _
Classification changes within three miles:
None within 3 mi. PLOTTED
Requested by: Charles M. Lowe
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
A
DD U 3o
Date: 8/2/91
Date: fo
Date:
1/rr_,
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
S�
g sai
3 Z,
Drainage Area (mil- ) 3 Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) (4 Winter 7Q10 (cfs)30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC 1-3 % Acut hromc
Instream Monitoring:
d
Parameters .Q c}3t< COI -I iMPef_ATUF_S 0oj4>u(_-l\1tTY
Upstream Location/LT s-t 1o0, LkFSrMeAM
Downstream Location It) APPX• 5-7 A'. -;;0LJA5VeW
B APPx . - 7.9 Al t,6s—1,000STREAM
Characteristics Summer
BOD5 (mg/1) I f
NH3-N (mg/1)
3
D.O. (mg/1)
S
TSS (mg/1)
',o
F. Col. (/100 ml)
200
PH (SU)
r _a
28
-3 —
2.
Non) rTaQ
A'stit ITo2
Winter
ZZ
�Z
MolUrto2
�toarTo2..
Comments: C°l Cr, CLL. Al,-, Sri C.N S,,GtA _n Be MOMIT040--t> HMI .
M�rkLS FiE UMcTf> i enC�11 Errr des RB /LtcT
IN -rNE SoG . SPE(JfF1-CON01ROM QA2T dtV c NOT
of INCLUDED AT ""'Break ',ft TH1S FEIG(L1TY 1C, PA TIC[PA7[ni4 N17TA5 M P'OINt S 96&
T2kDrnll� oD�nart ONruNCO' !N WS '[�rL-PP,,A NSW VVPLJaPaEJTA7110N 5TRR'r"4

RC EI VEd
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6309291991
Facility Name:
Louisburg WWTP
RALE1GH RLGr0it1,�L OFFICE
NPDES No.:
NCO020231.
Type of Waste:
>90% Domestic/<10% Industrial (this percentage was stated by
consultant 4/15/91)
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Modification
Receiving Stream:
Tar River
Stream Classification:
WS-III, NSW
Subbasin:
030301
County:
Franklin
SeamCharacteristic:
Regional Office:
RRO
USGS #
Requestor:
Charles Lowe
Date:
Date of Request:
8/2/91
Drainage Area (mi2): 437
Topo Quad:
C25SE
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 14
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 48
Average Flow (cfs): 460
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%): 13.2
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
The Town of Louisburg has now decided its final expansion will be to a design flow of 1.37
MGD. Pretreatment objectives are outlined in the current SOC. Tech Support recommends that
metals be monitored.
Facility is part of the Tar -Pam Basin Association, so that the TN limit will not be implemented (the
guidance of the Tar -Pam Basin Assoc. will be followed with regard to TN per SWT). However,
the TP limit will be implemented.
A renewal WLA and a WLA at 1.1 MGD have already been submitted. The TN limit inserted on
the 1.1 MGD WLA will be deleted.
Facility is required to do a FONSI.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
w
Recommended by: Date: O&A Ic"l
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: Date:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin,
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
S EP 2 5 111J I
"j„

Oq
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existina Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.8
0.8
BODS (mg ft
30
30
NH3N (mg/1):
n�
DO (mg/1):
5
5
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD):
1.37
1.37
BOD5 (mg/1):
11
22
WQ
NH3N (mg/1):
3
6
WQ (No3-N utm r Dae T- y7.o, coNSTIZAWTS'
DO (mg/1):
5
5
WQ
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
28
28
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
30
30
(60 Daily
max)
TP (mg/1):
2
2
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
(Accov*r,- wily &s,N Assoc. FoR tjorzic/i
SrRf rE5 Y
Limits Changes Due To:
Parameters Affected
Change in wasteflow
all parameters
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
TOXICS/M ETALS
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic
Existing Limit: Full range acute monitoring
Recommended Limit: Chronic Q P/F at 13% G!��
Monitoring Schedule: June, Sept., Dec., Mar.
Recommended Limit
Daily Max.
freq
Cadmium (ug/1):
monitor
1/month
Chromium (ug/1):
monitor
1/month
Copper (ug/1):
monitor
1/month
Nickel (ug/1):
monitor
1/month
Lead (ug/1):
monitor
1/month
Zinc (ug/1):
monitor
1/month I
Cyanide (ug/1):
monitor
1/month J

3
X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•'
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: at least 100 ft upstream
Downstream Location: A) appx. 5.7 miles downstream
B) appx 7.9 miles downstream
Parameters: D.O., Fecal coli, temperature, conductivity
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
qec onnmend The �tiow�nrj 3rXuo1 Cord-fzon U%. ' 7;
Special Instructions or Condition f..,m,fvdioro on +ofoJ n I h-DW,, have. n0P been +ncfLACieC( cd
f►rne Since. 4-hiz-5 javhc,(zh in 4he, ncnpp�t�nF�ou2e +rcicChn' oPhon o0ined )n+he_
T(ar- ml,co NStJ impfemer:(ci6on n � ccdc fed cember !� ►�i8r ,Fhe Cnvirarnnenetl
rV C( hf `A) fe' ,)�Vh� fm(f- t �KGt ti� nod `Com(��t v�r+h� she �tY�Jtcn
tt 11 � Inc(ncl
Was e o';9sent to PA? (Major) or) ( or N) Qc�
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name L Q�fll W W ]'{' Permit # WbO20231 Pipe # _ W i
CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
(**Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) ChV at j_� %, Jut!*0g;, AW , See Part-M, Condition
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit 48 hour acute toxicity as lethality in an
effluent concentration of 13 % nor measure a quarterly arithmetic average chronic value
less than this same percentage of waste. The,chronic value will be determined using the
geometric mean of the highest concentration having no statistically detectable impairment of
reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a statistically
detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The presence of 48 hour acute toxicity
will be determined using Fisher's Exact Test at 48 hours from test initiation. Collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are defined in: The North
Carolina Phase H Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure (July, 1991) or
subsequent versions.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using these procedures
to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after
thirty days from issuance of this permit during the months of fte
Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent
discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter measures 48 hour acute
toxicity or a chronic value less than that specified above, then multiple concentration testing
shall be performed, at a minimum, in each of the two following months.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the
Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were
performed, using the parameter code THP3B for the Chronic Value and TGA3B for the 48
hour Acute Toxicity measure (Pass/Fail). Additionally, DEM Form AT-3 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek.Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response
data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported
if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving
stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as
minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting (within 30 days of initial
monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance
with monitoring requirements.
Permitted Flow 1.37 MGD Basin & Sub -basin 03o3o t (TA2 alb
7Q10. l+ cfs Receiving Stream 'tR2 RlyEA
IWC % County r"AWL►AJ
Recommended by: ,ate.- 94 Date: S/� L
PIIQLR Version 7191

ado. - 5 6,1 z
Facility
ouIS&ut2. Wasteflow (MGD) 1,37 ✓y��
Summer/Winter (circle one)
6
NHS-N (mg/1)
,AxmcAp A % rT y
Potential effluent limit combinations:
BDDS NH3-N -
I S Z.0
o 3.3.

-
-71LN-$ W
4JKp
[,LHVKEI. HFfil7 "Wol'r 4RkG r-t (-ILFT
atLocATrNS so wWWEu W - -
No 6FFtL" A'r 7Ar ----
G"'sYCt�to� c.R�K
''Sf3dEp : L8DAT� lZ.
Lout S DTZ
Lo_Aj.s vd PTz_
CBt�A LCA6VK
1.37
_.E __7�i__�^�ic:5. r 7KE
G
-�_-----_------
..Vo�4N5?, ._.._.emu rs��s s ,, W,4,
Ft: ct.`.�
f'
6A lr.. err _.T wo/v
jq
jWpi,(r2u/D ?o Zb 6N5t
-IWAf

-TUM.PJAJ4 kwj
-Iell 4 dr,(Z-,
V.A
rr
S .41
_1, L
7� Ow
—3)
1-37
1, 4J3
4,4_
--------------
i— -- .—
C4s .1
208t -7(. SO -90, Vq
5 20 i? 1 C?A
tt ZORI -7 S--loo
ja
L '21
r.
C—i
lA-Jl : 10Y i 70 -2'7L,?
t�A i cj 5T 0 Z 08 j -7 �. 2.
izz . ......
q t
P,,jc, -�r,zost -, ec-f-,v, ;-: v)o-,Fj, AT 4�5 —4

Louis zz, WWI
110

91aN 46 Iv., �� �1�r�or� T
`(
U1o/7— pu 6 A --- _—
}
3
ce
10
r�/+aAPNlA LlAtf f /5 9A5E�-
-�. T
f � •

NGooZoZ3(
S� f
O 3o'3p!
--- ---- I /_vn.If�Y.�._. Gou,.s�u/1� -�f�s--7?.��7?rD,.-aN.: fl F't1aL_.-..F!rt'•9NsraNT�
--- -• --- �, 37 rip. G PE2 fr Witt,
L /�4_v (/?/ Pl7r �) /.
-
j f� WflsiE t-vAc? k1A �LQ-----A ., BEN _ `��uR.l 77 0 As >, --
----- �4 ACH 1iVGR 6VI r.L. / Sc, r�T�D die --l_� 3r% N_t4D t1.i %F/i5 -
+
.�__ �/t✓YI�, CSg�n��/�or:�L_ .W_I LL�.Gj� IISG/.� AS%uAS�IcSEr7 �R /�I �4A — ___ __
LDu_ISgu2�l__-r<s_ PA2i.pF Ifl[Z- fir, i>rsZook
jo_ M€Er TN+M rT CTIi_�2��i
--lo
Rssocr�r�/� �` C c7S 4Ni Qd -4g4W- GG La4i7 �aQ TN --
Soc � ,Q Fow�—QOd.S ,._i5_S F�CA4- eve�,
f -

SUMMER
QEFF=1.37 MGD,
BOD5=11
MG/L
NH3-N=3 MG/L,
DO=5 MG/L
----------
MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger
;
LOUISBURG
WWTP
Receiving Stream :
TAR RIVER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End
D.O.
is 5.21
mg/l.
The End
CBOD
is 1.43
mg/l.
The End
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NBOD
is 0.45
mg/l.
WLA WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD NBOD
DO Waste
Flow
(mg/1)
------
Milepoint
---------
Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1)
------- ---- ----
(mg/1)
-- ----------
(mgd)
Segment
1
5.08
5.70
3
Reach
1
16.50 13.50
5.00
1,37000
Reach
2
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00000
SAv6D '- I-ouI s
La'PA T A Iz

0. .
0
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER
Summer 7Q10 : 14.0
Design Temperature: 26.0
Subbasin : 030301
Stream Class: WS-III
Winter 7Q10 : 48.0
ILENGTHI
SLOPE]
VELOCITY
I DEPTHI Kd I
Kd
I Ka I
Ka I
KN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mile I
ft/mil
fps
I ft
Idesignl
@20;1
Idesignl
@20;1 Idesignl
Segment
1
I
.1 0.801
I
1.481
0.131
I
1 2.87
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.901
I
1.481
0.131
I
1 2.89
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 3.901
I
1.481
0.131
I
1 2.90
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------_----_-----------------------------------
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.301
I
1.481
0.130
I
1 2.91
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
I Flow I
CBOD I
NBOD I
D.Q. I
I cfs I
mg/1 I
mg/l I
mg/l I
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
1 2.123 1
16.500 1
13.500 1
5.000
Headwatersl 14.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Tributary
1 0.000 I
2.000 I
1.000 I
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 I
0.000
Tributary
1 0.200 I
2.000 1
1.000 I
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 I
2.000 I
1.000 I
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 3
Waste
1 0.000
1 0.000 I
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.300
1 2.000 ]
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000
1 2.000
1 1.000 I
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.000
] 2.000
1 1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000
1 2.000
1 1.000 1
7.300

SUMMER
QEFF=1.37 MGD,
NH3-N=3
MG/L,
Seg #
I Reach #
I Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow
1
1
0.00
7.00
3.91
2.65
16.12
1
1
0.08
6.92
3.87
2.60
16.12
1
1
0.16
6.85
3.83
2.55
16.12
1
1
0.24
6.78
3.79
2.51
16.12
1
1
0.32
6.71
3.76
2.46
16.12
1
1
0.40
6.65
3.72
2.42
16.12
1
1
0.48
6.58
3.68
2.38
16.12
1
1
0.56
6.52
3.64
2.34
16.12
1
1
0.64
6.46
3.61
2.29
16.12
1
1
0.72
6.40
3.57
2.25
16.12
1
1
0.80
6.35
3.53
2.21
16.12
1
2
0.80
6.36
3.52
2.20
16.32
1
2
0.90
6.29
3.47
2.15
16.32
1
2
1.00
6.22
3.43
2.10
16.32
1
2
1.10
6.16
3.39
2.06
16.32
1
2
1.20
6.10
3.34
2.01
16.32
1
2
1.30
6.04
3.30
1.97
16.32
1
2
1.40
5.98
3.26
1.92
16.32
1
2
1.50
5.93
3.22
1.88
16.32
1
2
1.60
5.88
3.18
1.84
16.32
1
2
1.70
5.83
3.14
1.80
16.32
1
2
1.80
5.78
3.10
1.76
16.32
1
2
1.90
5.73
3.06
1.72
16.32
1
2
2.00
5.69
3.02
1.68
16.32
1
2
2.10
5.65
2.98
1.65
16.32
1
2
2.20
5.61
2.95
1.61
16.32
1
2
2.30
5.57
2.91
1.58
16.32
1
2
2.40
5.53
2.87
1.54
16.32
1
2
2.50
5.50
2.84
1.51
16.32
1
2
2.60
5.46
2.80
1.47
16.32
1
2
2.70
5.43
2.77
1.44
16.32
1
3
2.70
5.46
2.75
1.43
16.62
1
3
3.00
5.38
2.65
1.34
16.62
1
3
3.30
5.31
2.55
1.25
16.62
1
3
3.60
5.25
2.46
1.17
16.62
1
3
3.90
5.20
2.37
1.10
16.62
1
3
4.20
5.15
2.28
1.03
16.62
1
3
4.50
5.12
2.20
0.96
16.62
1
3
4.80
5.10
2.12
0.90
16.62
1
3
5.10
5.09
2.04
0.84
16.62
1
3
5.40
5.08
1.96
0.79
16.62
1
3
5.70
5.08
1.89
0.74
16.62
1
3
6.00
5.08
1.82
0.69
16.62
1
3
6.30
5.09
1.75
0.65
16.62
1
3
6.60
5.11
1.69
0.60
16.62
1
4
6.60
5.11
1.69
0.60
16.62
1
4
6.70
5.11
1.67
0.59
16.62
1
4
6.80
5.12
1.65
0.58
16.62
1
4
6.90
5.13
1.63
0.57
16.62
1
4
7.00
5.13
1.61
0.55
16.62
1
4
7.10
5.14
1.59
0.54
16.62
1
4
7.20
5.15
1.57
0.53
16.62
1
4
7.30
5.16
1.55
0.52
16.62
1
4
7.40
5.17
1.53
0.51
16.62
1
4
7.50
5.17
1.51
0.49
16.62
1
4
7.60
5.18
1.49
0.48
16.62
BOD5=11 MG/L
DO=5 MG/L
I

1
4
7.70
5.19
1.47
0.47
16.62
1
4
7.80
5.20
1.45
0.46
16.62
1
4
7.90
5.21
1.43
0.45
16.62
I Seg #
I Reach #
I Seg Mi I
D.O. j
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow I

f z
WINTER
QEFF=1.37 MGD,
5OD5=22
MG/L
NH3-N=6 MG/L,
DO=5 MG/L
----------
MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger
:
LOUISBURG
WWTP
Receiving Stream :
TAR RIVER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End
D.O.
is 8.67
mg/1.
The End
CBOD
is 2.55
mg/l.
The End
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NBOD
is 1.53
mg/l.
WLA WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD NBOD
DO Waste Flow
(mg/1)
Milepoint
Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mgd)
Segment
1
------
8.67
---------
7.90
------- ---- ----
4
-- ----------
Reach
1
33.00 27.00
5.00
1.37000
Reach
2
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00000
SOW = LoU(SW

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
• Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP Subbasin : 030301
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER Stream Class: WS-III
Summer 7410 : 14.0 Winter 7Q10 : 48.0
Design Temperature: 14.0
ILENGTHI
SLOPEI
VELOCITY I
DEPTHI Kd I
Kd
I Ka I
Ka I
KN I
_--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mile I
ft/mil
fps I
ft
Idesignl
@2014
Idesignl
@20;6 Idesignl
Segment
1
I I
1 0.801
I
1.481
I
0.306 1
3.30
I I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I I
1 0.35 1
1
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.901
I
1.481
1
0.308 1
3.33
I I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I I
1 0.35 1
I
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 3.901
I
1.481
I
0.310 1
3.35
I I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I I
1 0.35 1
I
0.401
0.19 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.301
I
1.481
I
0.308 1
3.36
I I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I l
1 0.35 1
I
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1 Flow 1
CBOD
1 NBOD I
D.O. 1
1 cfs I
mg/l
I mg/l I
mg/l 1
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
1 2.123 133.000
1 27.000 1
5.000
Headwaters[ 48.000 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
Tributary
1 0.000 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000 I
2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
1 0.000 I
0.000
1 0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
I 1.100 I
2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000 I
2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
Segment 1
Reach 3
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000
I 0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.920 1
2.000
I 1.000 I
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000
1 0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.150
1 2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000
1 2.000
1 1.000 1
9.280

WINTER
QEFF=1.37 MGD,
NH3-N=6
MG/L,
Seg #
I Reach # I
Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow
1
1
0.00
9.10
3.31
2.10
50.12
1
1
0.08
9.09
3.30
2.10
50.12
1
1
0.16
9.08
3.30
2.09
50.12
1
1
0.24
9.08
3.29
2.08
50.12
1
1
0.32
9.07
3.28
2.08
50.12
1
1
0.40
9.06
3.27
2.07
50.12
1
1
0.48
9.05
3.26
2.06
50.12
1
1
0.56
9.04
3.25
2.06
50.12
1
1
0.64
9.04
3.25
2.05
50.12
1
1
0.72
9.03
3.24
2.05
50.12
1
1
0.80
9.02
3.23
2.04
50.12
1
2
0.80
9.03
3.20
2.02
51.22
1
2
0.90
9.02
3.19
2.01
51.22
1
2
1.00
9.01
3.18
2.00
51.22
1
2
1.10
9.00
3.17
1.99
51.22
1
2
1.20
8.99
3.16
1.99
51.22
1
2
1.30
8.99
3.15
1.98
51.22
1
2
1.40
8.98
3.14
1.97
51.22
1
2
1.50
8.97
3.13
1.96
51.22
1
2
1.60
8.96
3.12
1.96
51.22
1
2
1.70
8.95
3.11
1.95
51.22
1
2
1.80
8.95
3.10
1.94
51.22
1
2
1.90
8.94
3.09
1.94
51.22
1
2
2.00
8.93
3.09
1.93
51.22
1
2
2.10
8.93
3.08
1.92
51.22
1
2
2.20
8.92
3.07
1.91
51.22
1
2
2.30
8.91
3.06
1.91
51.22
1
2
2.40
8.90
3.05
1.90
51.22
1
2
2.50
8.90
3.04
1.89
51.22
1
2
2.60
8.89
3.03
1.89
51.22
1
2
2.70
8.88
3.02
1.88
51.22
1
3
2.70
8.89
3.0.0
1.86
52.14
1
3
3.00
8.87
2.97
1.84
52.14
1
3
3.30
8.85
2.94
1.82
52.14
1
3
3.60
8.84
2.92
1.80
52.14
1
3
3.90
8.82
2.89
1.78
52.14
1
3
4.20
8.81
2.86
1.76
52.14
1
3
4.50
8.79
2.84
1.74
52.14
1
3
4.80
8.78
2.81
1.72
52.14
1
3
5.10
8.76
2.78
1.70
52.14
1
3
5.40
8.75
2.76
1.68
52.14
1
3
5.70
8.74
2.73
1.67
52.14
1
3
6.00
8.73
2.70
1.65
52.14
1
3
6.30
8.72
2.68
1.63
52.14
1
3
6.60
8.71
2.65
1.61
52.14
1
4
6.60
8.71
2.65
1.61
52.29
1
4
6.70
8.71
2.64
1.60
52.29
1
4
6.80
8.70
2.64
1.60
52.29
1
4
6.90
8.70
2.63
1.59
52.29
1
4
7.00
8.70
2.62
1.58
52.29
1
4
7.10
8.69
2.61
1.58
52.29
1
4
7.20
B.69
2.60
1.57
52.29
1
4
7.30
8.69
2.59
1.57
52.29
1
4
7.40
8.69
2.59
1.56
52.29
1
4
7.50
8.68
2.58
1.56
52.29
1
4
7.60
8.68
2.57
1.55
52.29
BOD5=22 MG/L
DO=5 MG/L
I

1 4 7.70
1 4 7.80
1 4 7.90
Seg # I Reach # ( Seg Mi I
8.68
2.56
1.54
52.29
8.68
2.55
1.54
52.29
8.67
2.55
1.53
52.29
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow