HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020231_SPECULATIVE LIMITS_19900727NPDES DOCUWENT SCAMMIMS COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit: NC0020231
Louisburg WWTP
Document Type: Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Data Monitoring Report
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date: July 27, 1990
This document is printed on reuse paper -- 4pxo a s►ng
content on tla►e reV-erse side
lIM TS ir-A(ii,(Ty 'Ex c 1.5 AA
• r r f.� EA me G.0 1 f r t i t y✓ f T! ni I
16
3 equest No.: 5697
------------------- WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM -------------------
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Status:
Receiving Stream:
Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Quad:
Louisburg WWTP
NCO0202031
94% Domestic/6%
Existing/Modif
Tar River
WS-III, NSW
030301
Franklin
RRO
Jule Shanklin
4/13/90
C25SE
Industrial
1986
Drainage area: 437.0 sq mi
Summer 7Q10: 14,:=00 cfs
Winter 7Q10 : '4'8_ 00 -, cfs
Average flow: 46S,,00'''c'fs
30Q2: ' ! 2 c£s
-------------------- RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT
LIMITS -------------------------
EXISTING
PROPOSED
summer winter
Wasteflow (mgd) :
0.80
1.50
BOD5 (mg/1) :
30
10 /26
NH3N (mg/1):
3 /4
DO (mg/1) :
5
5
TSS (mg/1) :
30
30
Fecal coliform (#/100ml):
1000
200
pH (su) :
6-9
6-9 t PAILq
Phosphorous (mg/1):
2
Total Nitrogen (mg/1) :
4 /8
Chlorine (mg/1) :
0.028
Oil & Grease (mg/1) :
30(moAl0k) (oD"P-AR�N'*-A-0
Toxicity Testing Req.: Chronic Q P/F: 14%
---------------------------- MONITORING ----------------------------------
Parameters: D.O., temperature, Fecal coli, conductivity
Upstream (Y/N): Y Location: at least 100 ft upstream
Downstream (YIN): Y Location: approximately 5.7 miles downstream
of discharge.
----------------------------- COMMENTS -----------------------------------
Louisburg WWTP is expanding from 0.8 MGD to 1.5 MGD. Compliance data
indicates no problems at current limits. However, chlorine may be a
problem so facility should implement dechlorination with modification.
See the attached graph for the various BOD5 and corresponding NH3 limits
available to the facility. The Tar River is classified as NSW so a
phosphorous limit and total nitrogen limit will apply. rRe-i"ArA&wr 02"n.)G¢AW�'
MA" t Rs ,WAWC+ ro WLA Ra+h wR I.1 n�
Recommended by: �,.a, , / , Date: & t S/jd
Reviewed by
� 1
Teec�cch�h Support Supervisor: Date: (,0 1S qD
Regional Supervisor: �, w Date: _i/,2djy
Permits & Engineering: ,' P- Date: 7 Z7 go
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: JUL 311990
C+�}r,, e.,f R,I, LL—,,rr_..
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Govemor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
August 1, 1990
Mr. Michael S. Acquesta, P.E.
Peirson and Whitman, Inc.
P.O. Box 52099
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject: Town of Louisburg
NPDES No. NCO020231
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Acquesta:
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
The Technical Support Branch of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) has received your correspondence, dated May 4, 1990, requesting speculative
permit limits should the Town of Louisburg (NPDES No. NCO020231) choose to increase
its effluent discharge from 0.8 MGD to 1.5 MGD.
Departmental requirements effective July 27, 1989, state that any expansion greater
than 0.5 MGD requires the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) before the NPDES permit modification request is
processed. Therefore, this stipulation would have to be met should the Town choose to
expand to 1.5 MGD.
The Town of Louisburg's discharge point into the Tar River is characterized by
1986 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) flow estimates and are as follows:
drainage area = 437.0 square miles
average floe- = 41600 cubic feet per Second
SUI--ne."!. Q10 = ' .0 cubic fect per second
winter 7Q10 = 48.0 cubic feet per second
Using these flows and current modeling techniques, the following limits for the Louisburg
Wastewater Treatment Plant were determined:
Polludon Prevention Pays
Raj-isr, , Norm raroiin Z7-5ii-7687 T•eie:inone 919-733-7015
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATION
Monthly Average
Summr;r Winter
Flow (MGD)
1.50
1.50
BODS (mg/l)
10
26
NH3-N (mg/1)
3
4
DO (mg/1)
5
5
TSS (mg/1)
30
30
Fecal coliform (#/100m1)
200
200
pH
6-9
daily max 6-9
Phosphorous (mg/1) *
2
2
Total Nitrogen (mg/1) *
4
8
Chlorine (µg/1)
28
daily max 28
Oil & Grease (mg/1)
30
. 30 (60 mg/1 daily max)
Toxicity Testing Requirement: Chronic quarterly P/F at 14% (the facility is
required to perform the North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail test at an effluent
concentration of 14%, which is the instream waste concentration, on a quarterly
basis).
Instream monitoring of D.O., temperature, Fecal coliform, and conductivity will be
required.
Effluent monitoring of Lead will also be required.
* based on quarterly average of weekly samples
The Tar River is classified as a nutrient sensitive water (NSW), Therefore, a phosphorous
limit and total nitrogen limit were applied. The facility should implement
chlorination/dechlorination or another means of disinfection upon expansion.
These effluent limitations were developed only for your use in the engineering
study for expansion of the treatment works. Effluent limitations can only be made final
upon review of an official NPDES permit application and issuance of an NPDES permit.
Please call me at (919) 733-5083 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely, ;
J.;T'revor Clements, Assistant Chief
W a?er Quality Sec. or.
-
JTC:saw
cc: Don Safrit
Tim Donnelly
Central Files
I
.�. yam,;
May 4, 1990
A 0
CAS
Mr. Trevor Clemments
Water Quality Section
PERSON N
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
AND Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
WHITMAN Re: speculative Discharge Limits
Louisburg ME?
INC. P&W Project No. 0806
Dear Mr. Clenments:
ARCHITECTS The T wn of Louisburg is on the 1990 Contingency Funding List for an
EPA loan. As part of the requirements for obtaining this loan, I am
ENGINEERS in the pis of preparing a 201 Facilities Plan. In order to
properly plan the wastewater treatment facilities, I am hereby
PLANNERS requesting Speculative NPDES Discharge Limits for a 1.5 MOD plant on
the Tar River in Louisburg, at the site of the existing plant.
Your timely issuance of these limits would be greatly appreciated.
ESTABLISHED 1938 Very truly yam►
PEIRSON & WHI'"A++fP,N, INC.
0o ting Eng' eers
Michael S. Acquesta, E.
5510
MUNFORD ROAD MSA/la
P. O. BOX cc: Tcwn of Louisburg
52099 Arthur Mouber'y, P.E., Raleigh Regional Office
PHONE
919/782-8300
FAX P
949/783-7642 F'-
TWX
5109280511 MAY 4 7 1990
RALEIGH
N.C.
27612
U.S.A.
shy
Cr+crr
S, 7�rsz C54r r
a rG vJ C LkV 5U l fq UM (TS21 E 90 T/�c Y 'zvicL By uLC-D
Cso�� NOD
Or-
w(AlrOF 11
57
_
F w�NrG,e- Cflovs� 3LL: M t NN7 'Ile _
IurgRC�1�lr�o�C,� 7Qra� -14-u- o-LA.3c:�ll�f,��
! Paa os P_An1 ScoN So �tM �7 4 o-z5- OfAND DEG�[o�lnl/}��
Tq,e PAni 4I CO B/i�N �r�u��Y N�r±1 % G'.�P�NDLG � y D. 5 MGD
,ypk_L. CrorR��
—
IW C, - /¢. Z % C4e. Q Pl R%1_ Z° d�CT��-1*
WINTER
BOD5=26, NH3-N=4, D.Q.=5
WINTER
----------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O. is 8.88 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 2.40 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 0.85 mg/l.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1)
---------------------- ----
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment
1
8.88 7.90 4
Reach
1
26.00
4.00
5.00
1.50000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER
Summer 7Q10 : 14.0
Design Temperature: 14.0
Subbasin : 030301
Stream Class: WS-III
Winter 7Q10 : 48.0
ILENGTHI
SLOPEI
VELOCITY
I DEPTHI Kd I
Kd
I Ka I
Ka I
KN I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mile I
ft/mil
fps
I ft
Idesignl
@204
Idesignl
@204 Idesignl
Segment
1
I I
1 0.801
I
1.481
0.307
I
1 3.31
I I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I . I
1 0.35 1
I-
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
I
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.901
I
1.481
0.309
I
1 3.33
l I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I I
1 0.35 1
I
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 3.901
I
1.481
0.311
I
1 3.35
I I
l 0.16 1
0.21
I I
1 0.35 1
I
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
---------------------------------------___----------------------------------------
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 .1.301
I
1.481
0.309
I
1 3.36
l I
1 0.16 1
0.21
I I
1 0.35 1
l
0.401
I
0.19 1
Reach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
I Flow I
CBOD I
NBOD 1
D.O. I
I cfs I
mg/1 I
mg/1 1
mg/1
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
1 2.325 1
26.000 1
4.000 1
5.000
Headwatersl 48.000
1 2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
Tributary
1 0.000
1 2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000
1 2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
1 0.000
1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 1.100
1 2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000
1 2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.920 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000 l
2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.150 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
9.280
SUMMER
CBOD=01 SUMMER
---------- MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O. is 5.28 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 0.65 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 0.74 mg/l.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DO Min
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach #
Segment 1 5.06 5.10 3
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
WLA
WLA
WLA
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mgd)
0.00
24.00
5.00
1.50000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER
Summer 7Q10 : 14.0
Design Temperature: 26.0
Subbasin : 030301
Stream Class: WS-III
Winter 7Q10 : 48.0
ILENGTHI
SLOPEI
VELOCITY
I DEPTHI Kd I
Kd
I Ka I
Ka I
KN I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mile I
ft/mil
fps
I ft
Idesignl
@2046
Idesigni
@20;6 Idesignl
Segment
1
I I
1 0.801
I
1.481
0.132
I
1 2.87
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 I
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I 1
1 1.901
I
1.481
0.132
I
1 2.89
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I . I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I 1
1 3.901
I
1.481
0.133
I
1 2.91
I I
10.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.261
I
0.48 1
Reach
-----------------------------------------------------------•-----------__-----------
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.301
I
1.481
0.132
I
1 2.92
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
I Flow I
CBOD
I NBOD I
D.O. I
I cfs I
mg/l
I mg/l I
mg/l I
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
1 2.325 1
0.000
1 24.000 1
5.000
Headwatersl 14.000 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
7.300
Tributary
1 0.000 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000
I 1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000
1 0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.200 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000
1 1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste
I 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
I 0.300 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
I 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.000 1
2.000 I
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
SUMMER
NBOD=O,
SUMMER
----------
MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger
:
LOUISBURG
WWTP
Receiving Stream :
TAR RIVER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End
D.O.
is 5.06
mg/l.
The End
CBOD
is 2.41
mg/l.
The End
-------------------------------------------------------------------_---
NBOD
is 0.15
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1)
Milepoint
Reach # (mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
---
(mgd)
Segment
1
------
5.00
---------
6.30
------- ----
3
----
-----------
Reach
1
34.00
0.00
5.00
1.50000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
• Discharger : LOUISBURG WWTP Subbasin 030301
Receiving Stream : TAR RIVER Stream Class: WS-III
Summer 7Q10 : 14.0 Winter 7Q10 : 48.0
Design Temperature: 26.0
ILENGTHI
SLOPEI
VELOCITY I
DEPTHI Kd I
Kd
I Ka I
Ka I
KN I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mile I
ft/mil
fps I
ft
Idesignl
@20%
ldesignl
@20% Idesignl
Segment
1
1 I
1 0.801
I
1.481
I
0.132 1
2.87
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 1.901
I
1.481
I
0.132 1
2.89
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 3.901
I
1.481
I
0.133 1
2.91
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.261
I
0.48 1
Reach
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 . I
I
I
Segment
1
I I
1 1.301
!
1.481
I
0.132 1
2.92
I I
1 0.27 1
0.20
I I
1 0.29 1
I
0.251
I
0.48 1
Reach
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
I Flow I
CBOD I
NBOD I
D.O. I
I cfs I
mg/1 I
mg/1 I
mg/l I
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
1 2.325 1
34.000 1
0.000 1
5.000
Headwatersl 14.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Tributary
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 2
Waste
I 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
0.200 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 3
Waste
1 0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.300 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
Segment 1
Reach 4
Waste
1 0.000 I
0.000 1
0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300
* Runoff
1 0.000 1
2.000 1
1.000 1
7.300