19990670 Ver 1_Complete File_19990618

UNI'rED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
• A •
?Sel)
4WM-WCWQG/KM
Colonel Terry R. Youngbluth
District Engineer
REGION 4
Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.V.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 - 8960
JUN 11 ATTN: Mr. Dave Tirnpy
Wihnington District, Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890 -
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
SUBJ: NCDOT; Owen Drive Extension (T.I.P. U-2912)
Action ID No. 199901232
Dear Colonel Youngbluth:
I P

This is in response to the above-referenced public notice for North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT), dated June 3, 1999, for construction of the Owen Drive Extension
from U.S. Highway 301 to NC Highway 87, in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
The use of credits at the Dowd Dairy Farm Mitigation site is proposed as mitigation for the
wetlands impacts of this project. This letter replaces our June 10, 1999 letter concerning this
project. Please disregard the June 10, 1999 letter from our office concerning this public notice.
The public notice requests comments on a modified proposal, submitted by NCDOT,
leading to the identification of a least environmentally damaging alternative (LEDPA) for the
project. In previous reviews of this project, it was determined that the Owen Drive Extension on
new location was not the LEDPA, and that upgrading of existing Wilkes Road would satisfy the
project purpose and need. After denial of authorization to construct the project on new iocation,
the NCDOT has now submitted additional information outlining revisions to the project which
will result in minimization of wetland 'unpacts associated with the Owen Drive Extension
alternative. The alignment of the proposed Owen Drive Extension has not been revised.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Wetlands Section (EPA), has
reviewed this modified proposal and still sees no evidence that there was any attempt to avoid or
minimize wetland impact generated by this project. Prior to a discharge of fill material into waters
of the United States, the 404(b)(1) Guidelines of the Clean Water Act require a sequential
evaluation and reduction in impact. By Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and EPA dated February 6, 1990, this sequencing may be
circumvented when the Corps and EPA agree that the proposed discharge is either necessary to
avoid environmental harm, or can be reasonably expected to result in environmental gain or
'I r 4101
2
insignificant environmental loss. At this point in time, we have not agreed that this project meets
these requirements. Areas such as the one impacted are important to North Carolina in terms of
water quality, water quantity, and flood attenuation. It appears that there are other project
designs which will not cause such a significant or wetlands impact.
It is the opinion of EPA that this project, as proposed, may result in substantial and
unacceptable impacts to aquatic resources of national importance. Areas such as the one
proposed for impacts are important to North Carolina in terms of water quality, water quantity,
flood attenuation, and wildlife habitat and food chain maintenance. The construction of a
highway on new location through a high quality wetland may adversely affect all of these
functions. This design does not avoid or nliw-iiiize the proposed ipacts, and therefore appears
contrary to the 404(b)(1) Guidelines:
It still appears that the Wilkes Road alternative will satisfy the stated purpose and need of
this project. Further, it appears that the wetlands impacts involved in the Wilkes Road alternative
may also be minimized substantially, possibly to a total of 2.7 acres. EPA requests that the
NCDOT provide further information concerning the minimization or elimination of impacts to 2.1
acres of wetlands in the Wilkes Road alternative.
The Wilkes Road alternative is still expected to inpact less wetlands acreage (and, if the
minirization discussed above is possible, considerably less acreage) than the recommended
alternative. Further, the wetland area proposed to be impacted by the recommended alternative
described as relatively large and unfragmented, while the area proposed for impacts in the Wilkes
Road alternative are more disturbed and fragmented. At this time, EPA still does not concur with
selection of the Owen Drive Extension as the preferred alternative or the LEDPA for this project.
EPA still believes that the Wilkes Road alternative remains to be the LEDPA for this project.
Because EPA does not believe that this project has complied with the 404(b)(1)
Guidelines, and because of potential direct impacts to wetlands and waters of the U.S. we request
that authorization for this project be denied. This letter follows the field level procedures outlined
in the August 1992 Memorandum of Agreement between the EPA and the Corps, Part IV,
paragraph 3, regarding Section 404(q) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344(q). Thank you
for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these
comments, please contact Kathy Matthews at the above address or by telephone at (404) 562-
9373.
Sincerely
tlliam L. Cox, Chief
Wetlands Section

cc: NCDENR, Raleigh
USFWS, Raleigh
NCDOT, Raleigh
Ted Bisterfeld, OEA
/ i

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
June 10, 1999
Colonel Terry Youngbluth
District Engineer
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Dave Timpy
Dear Colonel Youngbluth:

This is the report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on Public Notice (PN) ID
4199901232, dated June 3, 1999. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
has applied for a Department of the Army (DOA) permit to construct the Owen Drive Extension
from US Highway 301 to NC Highway 87, at Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
(TIP No. U-2912). This report is submitted in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). It is to be used in your
determination of compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) Guidelines
(40 CFR 230) and in your public interest review (33 CFR 320.4) as they relate to protection of
fish and wildlife resources.
According to information provided in the PN the NCDOT is considering two alternatives; (1)
construction on new location of Owen Drive from I-95 Business/ US Highway 301 to NC
Highway 87 at East Mountain Drive (SR 2283), a distance of 1.9 miles (New Location
Alternative) and, (2) beginning at Owen Drive and I-95Business/US Highway 301, upgrade
existing Wilkes Road (SR 1007) to the overpass at NC Highway 87 (Wilkes Road Alternative)
The New Location Alternative will permanently impact 5.3 acres of wetland, primarily by
bisecting a relatively large, unfragmented wetland between Wilkes Road (SR 1007), East
Mountain Drive (SR 2283), and NC Highway 87. In addition, 246 feet of streams will be
impacted. The Wilkes Road Alternative will directly impact approximately 2.7 acres of wetland
and, in addition, will isolate 2.1 acres of wetlands by positioning of the interchange ramps.
Wetlands in the vicinity of the interchange support plant communities that are similar in type to
those impacted by the New Location Alternative. They appear, however, to be more fragmented
and disturbed from past drainage and agricultural practices, consequently they are of relatively
lower quality than those along the proposed new route. The Wilkes Road Alternative will not
cross any perennial or intermittent stream systems.
By letter dated June 10, 1998, the Service recommended the Wilkes Road Alternative as the
preferred alternative because it is the least environmentally damaging alternative that
accomplishes the purpose of the project, and requested that no Department of the Army (DOA)
permit be issued for the New Location Alternative.
Based upon review of this revised permit application the Service sees no compelling reason to
change our original recommendation. We continue to recommend the Wilkes Road Alternative
as the preferred alternative, and reiterate that no permit should be issued for the New Location
Alternative.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this public notice. Please advise us of
any action taken by the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers on this permit application. If
you have any questions regarding our recommendations, you may contact Tom McCartney at
919-856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerely
cc:
DNR, Creedmoor, NC (Cox)
DWQ, Raleigh, NC (Hennessey)
FHWA, Raleigh, NC (Graf)
EPA, Atlanta, GA (Bisterfield)
John M. efner
Ecological Services Supervisor
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:06/10/99:919/856-4520 extension 32:\pnl99901.232

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ? INEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2 492-.1890
IN REPLY REFER TO June 9, /tL
Regulatory Division
Action ID. 199901232, TIP U-2912, Owen
i
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:

We have received your application dated May 28, 1999, for the Owen Drive Extension
project. A 15-day public notice was issued on June 3, 1999. Please note that we will generally
grant requests for additional comment time.
As you are well aware, the identification and selection of the least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative and the 404 (b)(1) guidelines have been major issues with
regard to the ability for us to issue a DA permit for the proposed project. In that regard, NCDOT
was requested by letter as early as June 1, 1995 to provide the USACE with additional
information regarding alternatives. The information that we need is provided below.
NCDOT should examine the feasibility of connecting the proposed Owen Drive
Extension to East Mountain Drive further west than is currently proposed, relocating the entire
Owen Drive Extension to the west, and upgrading existing facilities including Wilkes Road, East
Mountain Drive, and U.S. 301/Business 95. All information, including wetlands data, should be
provided for each of these alternatives at the same level of detail as that provided for the
proposed project.
Should you have any questions on this matter please call me at the Wilmington Field office
at 910-251-4634.
Sincerely,
David L.Timpy
Regulatory Project Manager
S
ti
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Ms. Kathy Matthews
Wetlands Section, Region IV
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Frank McBride, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188

4

STATE Or NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
. ?l
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
E. NORRIS TOLSON
SECRETARY
May 28, 1999
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTN.: Mr. David Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Cumberland County, Owen Drive Extension from I-95 Business to NC 87,
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0620(1), State Project No. 8.244110 1,
T.I.P. U-2912.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to extend Owen
Drive from I-95 Business to NC 87 at East Mountain Drive (SR 2283). The purpose of
the proposed project is to complete a multi-lane corridor from Fort Bragg to I-95 as
shown on the Fayetteville Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed alignment uses
the existing Owen Drive roadbed to SR 1007(Wilkes Road) and traverses southeasterly
approximately 3.1 kilometers (1.9 miles) on new location to the interchange of East
Mountain Road and NC 87. The recommended cross section is a four-lane, 17.4-meter
(57-foot), curb and gutter section.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
A Federal Highway Administrative Action, Environmental Assessment was submitted by
the USDOT-FHWA and the NCDOT and approved on March 16,1995. The EA explains
the purpose and need for the project; provides a description of the project and the
alternatives that were considered. In addition, it characterizes the social, economic, and
environmental effects of the project. After the EA was approved and circulated, a
combined location and Design Public Hearing was held on November 21, 1995. On May
28, 1996 the FONSI was approved for U-2912. Copies of the EA and FONSI have been
provided to regulatory review agencies involved in the approval process. Additional
copies will be provided upon request.
RESOURCE STATUS
Wetland delineations: wetland delineations were conducted using the criteria specified in
the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The delineations were verified
in the field on October 2, 1996 by Mr. Scott McLendon of the DOA Wilmington
Regulatory Field Office. The attached permit application package consists of drawings
depicting jurisdictional wetland impacts. The permanent jurisdictional impacts consist
of a total of 6.27 acres as follows: 5.335 acres of fill in wetlands, 0.395 acres of
excavation in wetlands, 0.54 acres of mechanized clearing and grubbing in wetlands, and
0.05 acres of fill in surface waters. Sheet 11 of 12 provides site specific quantity
breakdowns for the impacts.
Based on 1994 and 1996 delineation data, the wetlands are primarily streamhead pocosin
(Shafale and Weakley, 1990). The 1996 delineation revealed a community dominated by
sweet gum (Liguidambar styraciflua), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), and sweet
pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia). Data collected in 1994 also show the presence of pond
pine (Pinus serotina), red maple (Acer rubrum), and white-wicky (Kalmia cuneata). In
addition, there is a small area (0.06 acres) of natural lake shoreline (Shafale and Weakley,
1990) characterized by soft rush (Juncus effusus), marsh bulrush (Scirpus cyperinus), and
cattail (Typha latifolia) adjacent to the former Jaycee pond site. The 0.03 acres of scrub
shrub wetlands in the utility corridor are dominated by red maple, sweet gum, and sweet
gallberry (Ilex coriacea).
Jurisdictional Streams: The project will impact a total of 75 meters (246 feet) of streams
at two sites. The impacts at Site 1 is 40 meters (131.2 feet) and at Site 2 is 35 meters
(114.8 feet). We propose to use the WRP at a ratio 2:1 to mitigate for these impacts.
Endangered Species: NCDOT biologists conducted surveys for the five federally
protected species listed in 1994 for Cumberland County: pondberry (Lindera
melissifolia), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysmachia asperulaefolia), St. Francis' satyr
(Neonympha mitchellii francisci), American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) and the
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). On June 21, 1995 the USFWS concurred
that the project is not likely to adversely affect Federally listed endangered or threatened
species under the jurisdiction of the Service and that requirements of Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act have been satisfied. The August 23, 1996 species list had an
additional species for Cumberland County, the small-whorled pogonia (Isotria
medeoloides). According to the USFWS Recovery Plan (von Oettingen, 1992), this
species occurs on upland sites in mixed deciduous or mixed deciduous/coniferous forests
that are generally in second- or third-growth successional stages. Therefore, since no
'A )
Y
such habitat exists on the project site the project will not affect the status of the small-
whorled pogonia. The May 2, 1997 species list added Michaux's sumac (Rhus
michauxii). Although suitable habitat is present, a plant by plant survey conducted on
June 17 and 19, 1997 by Tim Savidge, NCDOT biologist, did not reveal any populations.
Therefore, impacts to Michaux's sumac will not occur from project construction.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The Corps of Engineers had adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ), a wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of
wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the
chemical, biological, and physical integrity of the Waters of the United States.
Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include:
avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time
and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20)..Executive Order 11990 (Protection of
Wetlands) and Department of Transportation Order 5660.1A (Preservation of the Nations
Wetlands), emphasize protection of the functions and values provided by wetlands.
These directives require that new construction in wetlands be avoided as much as
possible and that all practicable measures were taken to minimize or mitigate impacts to
wetlands.
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features
to avoid and minimize wetland impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of
all remaining wetland impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and
SEA/FONSI phases; minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project
design.
AVOIDANCE: All wetland areas not affected by the project will be protected from
unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment, or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
MINIMIZATION: Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable
steps to reduce the adverse impacts. Minimization techniques were implemented as
follows:
1. Slopes: The slopes were steepened from a 2:1 slope to a 1.75:1 slope further
minimizing the wetland impacts by 0.118 acres.
2. Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion
control Best Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters
and wetlands.
3. Ditching: It is the policy of the NCDOT to eliminate lateral ditching in
wetlands as much as possible, thus preserving the hydrology of adjacent
wetlands.
4. Hydrologic Integrity: The hydrologic integrity of the wetlands will be
maintained by installing cross pipes at the lowest elevation of each site that is
divided by the proposed construction. In some cases, pipes are placed in
streams and are designed to handle the 50-year discharge from the drainage
area for that stream. All other cross pipes installed in the wetlands are 450
mm (1.5 feet) in diameter and will allow flow to stabilize from one side of
Owen Drive to the other. These pipes will be buried six inches below the
existing ground elevation. They are not designed to handle any specific
discharge, but the capacity of a 450-mm pipe is approximately 0.37 cros (9
cfs) based on a headwater depth of 0.55 m (1.8 feet).
5. Elevation Decrease: The elevation of the roadway was lowered 1.5 feet which
resulted in a total decrease of 0.22 acres of wetland impacts at all four sites.
6. Center Turn Lane: The center turn lane was eliminated and converted to a
four-foot concrete monolithic island. This resulted in a decrease in 0.74 acres
of wetland impact.
7. Berms: The width of the berms has been reduced. The standard berm width
is 10 feet. In our previous minimization effort we reduced the berm to an 8-
foot width. We have now further reduced the width to 4 feet, which decreased
the wetland impacts by 0.74 acres.
8. Control of Access: We have instituted a full control of access design, which
will limit the secondary impacts on adjacent Water of the United States.
COMPENSATION: The primary emphasis of the mitigation is to reestablish a condition
similar to that, which existed if the project were not built. As previously stated,
mitigation is limited to reasonable expenditures and practicable considerations related to
highway operation. Mitigation is generally accomplished through a combination of
methods designed to replace wetland functions and values lost as a result of construction
of the project. These methods consist of creation of new wetlands from uplands, borrow
pits, and other non-wetland areas; restoration of existing degraded wetlands; and
enhancement of existing wetlands.
All Compensatory Mitigation must be in compliance with 23 CFR Part 777.9,
"Mitigation of Impacts" that describes the actions that should be followed to qualify for
Federal-aid highway funding. This process is known as the FHWA "Step Down"
procedures:
Y

1. Consideration must be given to mitigation within the right-of-way and should
include the enhancement of existing wetlands and the creation of new wetlands in
the highway median, borrow pit areas, interchange areas and along the roadside.
2. Where mitigation within the right-of-way does not fully offset wetland losses,
compensatory mitigation may be conducted outside the right-of-way including
enhancement, creation, and preservation.
The NCDOT has purchased a tract known as Dowd Dairy Farm in Bladen County for use
as a wetland mitigation site. The Final Mitigation Plan for the Dowd Dairy Farm
Mitigation Site was completed and distributed to the review agencies on May 28, 1997.
The site is under construction. Both the project and the mitigation site are located within
the Cape Fear River Basin. The Dowd Dairy Farm Mitigation Site is located
approximately five miles from the Cape Fear River near the community of White Oak
along SR 1324 in Bladen County. This site encompasses approximately 660 acres of
previously converted (PC) farmland. The resource agencies have inspected the site and
approved the site for mitigation.
We propose to mitigate for this project at a ratio of 4:1 and thus offer 25.08 acres of
wetland restoration at the Dowd Dairy Mitigation Site to act as compensatory mitigation
for the subject project.
As stated above, we propose to mitigate for the impacts to stream by utilizing the WRP at
a ratio of 2:1. Therefore, we will purchase 492 feet of stream mitigation from the WRP
in the Cape Fear basin. _
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Individual 404 permit as
required for the above described activities. In addition, we are requesting a 401 Water
Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality. We anticipate an individual
401 Water Quality Certificate will apply to this project, and are providing seven copies of
this application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality, for their review. In addition, in compliance with Section
143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA we have enclosed a check for $475.00 to act as payment for
processing the Section 401 permit application
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N. Gordon
at [phone] Ext. 307.
Sincerely,
illiam D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Whitmel Webb, P.E. Program Development Branch
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. Terry Gibson, P.E., Division 6 Engineer
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing
this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis
Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington,
DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer
having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose
of dumping it Into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure:
Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a
permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to
this application (see sample drawings and Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the
proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9. AGENTS ADDRESS
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
7. APPLICANTS PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business 919-733-3141 b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon
request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OR PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions) U-2912- Owen Drive Extension
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (d applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (it applicable)
Various
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Cumberland NC
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) Section, Township, Range, Lat/Lon, and/or Accessors's Parcel Number, for example.
See Attached Vicinity Map
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
ENG FORM 4345 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
Construction of controlled access, multi-lane, highway partially on a new location
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
Public transportation
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of Highway
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
See attached drawings
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions) -
See cover letter and attached drawings
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes _ No x IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
See attached Sheet 12 of 12
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. II furthrtify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent
oft ypli nt.
Le 1] ?, l l d? NYC. qD SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized
agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE
(Proponent: CECW-OR)
r
Z., 12

ii
U-2912
FAY ETTFVI LL E
1111 '?
1 il,l`
I,

01111
r?
r

Fayetteville Area
w.c
W,
LXZ
o) '
_LL
aw
?r
w. ., ,.
yuc ? CGNSTRUCTIC ?,
,• M a 11Y @f ,
P uU
XLU r
?llu ) o.
N. C. DEPT. OF TR.?NSPORTATIC`
DIVISION C= HIGH-.' i S
CUMBERL a N D COUNTY
PRCJECT:8.2=-;1101 (li-2912)
OWEN DRI'\'E EXTE\SI,? E._ST OF
1-1),i BUSINESS C'S 501 73 \(? 67
REV. 5/21i 99
/ 9U
SH ::T I C: 12 4 /" 21
SITE 3:..L AP

DErjC
7
_
DENOTES :
;LL SURF, r wa'=-
(Pi?;D)

FILL IN
OEN07ES
?
WET
LANC
', •, •
• DENOTE= E-
'ED
,
' NC
CLE=RINr
F-- E- FLOW Di=E?TIC`:
TB
-_ TOP OF BANK
W=
_
-
EDGE OF WATEP
- -C- - PROP. _tmiT OF CU-
- -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-?- PROP. RIGHT OF 'WAY
- - NO- - NATURAL GROUND
?i
? - - -
PROPER-Y Li`1=
- TDE - TEMP.DR41NAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DR=iNA_=_
EASEMEN7
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNE-aRy
- EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED

I PLANT BOUNDARY
- - - - - - WATER SURF-_E
X
X
X LIVE ST.,KES
X
X
BOULDEP
- - - CORE ,_E -'__S
_ ADJACENT ^RL--` 1 \ 1u Nn.,?_
OR --

r .?
SINGLE TREE
,40CDS _!NE
¦ -
DRAIN:.,E INL=T
I

C?.?CC;=CCo `JANE
RIP RAP
I
RIP R-P ENERGY
DiSSIPATOR S:-SIN
X. C. DEPT. OF TRA SPORT:?TIO\
DIVISI,O\ OF HIGH??'.??"S
C'U?iB7RLA D C'Ot_ TY
PROJECT:8.2-;I'n1 'C'-2012'
'WEN DF,IV7- EXTFN_;ICX E.-',_,T OF
I-05 BUSINESS/ l' . 501 TO XC ?
?T EAST MM'XT.-?IX DRIVE
REV.
r <)9
SHEET 2 OI' 12
r
c0,
c C,
p O ??

F ?
o o
x 0

°p w U wz

m F ??

U W
?
.
a ur)
z 0

I W
U
? {3]
F
I
A
I z U z

W
I U.
U.
F
I I4 r ? ?
j
r
?
J rs
? W mo
t:- \
.

y

• O I
-.
(i
? r,• r? F F

I? fs ? ? O V A ?

10,
PDj-?
k?
r
W

}^[
V Oi
/ /
I #F
\

1 O
\ N
1

W

U
E
O
N
O
E
O
::- C C

e-I
F `'? F c ?z? n0

a
z ? U o QM?

F" ® J d Q
a
o W

p
z w
F
w w

?wLB ?-
?o
0 L•B• w w

1
-
. \ v ? I d

1 1 \ (
\i w ? °

9\ w

U z

i w W? z X z
Z
• . a z
d Wm0 w E..i w rwr w
W
m
9 Od
i O
z ° d
O ? z
w

O ,
Y F}'e7

/
It I

I I
? ? =
CLl
..a

U
U
W
U O
<'
W
J
J_ N
7
W
W
Y
4

O

O

c
o?

?' ?y., cn U J ? c+

p ? ? ? a w

w z
W
W J a6
W
wj ? Q Q?w
m F?
?

z
Q
a
W
F
d
p

D?6r
M1ti ?

?
? z
a
9, e
)°1
I
_ Fy
o ?
m \
< I ? m p
o z
z

T ? a F
> ? I
? w i
I o t. U p p
QLa U U`d i1
V)
o V
N u
¢ •
_ d
'
I
J
a
m

w

U

O
N
O
E
O
C,
c

C4 C4

C5 p W
pF-Z

HD1dW
i]3HS 3NI? Q z
H
??

ur
`'? \
? \ (?
J •n
a z? Q
Z
? a

a N i

? 2?
J? r
\ ? :-. '301 \ ? < a
\
a
r z

„]

?

,I m
z
` ? J
p o r 1
G>
w \ Ic d o z

? a w w UA W ..?
J 1
a + 2
A W
cmn ,
?J \
T .? i?
I
Fw w? O

z
;z Zu
A

uJ W J
1 d
1 r
?
yt
W W
#t
r
? w P ,

A

y

1 1

\ ?
1 l
\ ,
?J

O
E
O
M

z Cp.
CIO,
p
E.., co ? ?+ c~v

8 1l]HS JNI? HD1dW o z
?x z °
7 77T
1 \ 7 0
z
X, R Wi

\ 0Z F w

I ? ?\ CL

z

o
r 30d
a
4,
n
30d /

v
u * F
a

? a
/ i z
o;
? p Z
a N J ? ? F ..?
a W U D ? ..l

w z o3 cW
°

w
N u
b z
z-? o
0
z
?
V
30d w ? Q
.
?.

Y 30

\ y

r-30 A
\ \ m

w ?
? s
? a y

1 ?3H S Hsi I o

0

4
r ?
W ?
r u
?a
a
W ?
r
N N
W?
0
W
6
\
xu
ur
d ?
W lJ
J 6
Y Q
O N
? N
J p
6 133HS INI? H" iVA

F, °D W ? ci

C ? ?
z
w

pZ w r w w
U

z o
q
z

z w

d $ z

W ? p C7 v,
?
u F W ? ? O
? W ? U q
? o

!T

2 ?
i t/1

;u
a W L7 /
J a
/
OuQ
C Q
fV ? N /

?
r m
? o ?
a /
W
U
N
0
E
O
r,
L 113HS 3NI? HDiVA
a?
Z U
Wm
0
U0
Y N
?
Qm
o
c aW
4 Fed
0 0 0
d a Gb
Q
a Q°
0
n
? .a
n /I
w p i
fl ??? s
/ I lti
C1' ?
Cs Q3
W
.ti r ,..mss

O.a
• -z
' I
a
a
\ w U,
? U U,
cm
S? I R co
a o
o
w
LL ?

O O ^ ?
oo
w r
cv av

Z p v p F" 7 ?
I
z
?
H o ?
, wiz ?,
p C
4r x
O
Qz F- wz
Q 9Q W ?.
> V)
E"
w p
W> ? O ca
_ r

z o

W
Ll
-? a
7

g l??H?, ?f?ll?l H?1CV?
p
z
z ?
? o z
U p U] ..a
>C z ti u.
om z
cz °? o
iM
W
W
U
0
N
0
0
cC,
C, C.
w z
n w •a a6 w
N ? o w ? w z F °
cn
G? ? ? Qcsaw W
- z
0
O
?z•z?
a
in
in
z
;T-4 d
E ` O ? o a
® E=1 \ Z F
N z
o ? ?z a
Ln
LL w
F
za zz
9s•z? ? A z o
o ?
O
w
w
E
Ln
O O
?r Fr-) C`J
O
II ?
N
4

w M
I
_ c E
L
w U
T o
E
wU

V,E -9 c O N U')
?E
w
V U

Q
a o
N
w E
c
F v
~
3

W
U
N ^ 0
LL c 0 c

o
N L?

3 ^ O O N
O
co 10 O O O
C m
m

} Z
LL
Q T - O N
N
?g

I- U
a c
0 ?
0 co
0

Z w c

= h O
. V r
E
c

U)
O
°r° n
c c; O O

LL j

W
7 W
N - -

N

E

E _

E

m
+
? °
N t
M
_
O
uj
LL
Q l
+
?
p
+
QN?
}
O
+
ON N N
N M V ( n
J
O Q
N Z
H

OWNER'S X.%M'E' ?.DESS
I3n:n{,ill Contr.ttin, ?1om;,nnv ?),7h Sh..,,sill Road
Farette,ilie, NC "t??1I
Cumberland C ounty Wildlife Club, inc. 125 Roevland Circle
Fayetteville, NC 28501
Fayetteville Ja•cees Inc. P.O. Box 575
Fayetteville, NC 28502
Saral, C. Leech S3 Co11e,e Drive
Raeford, NC 28576
J.C. McL.mb 2505 Melk,..a Drive
Fayetteville, NC 28306
Myrover Reese Fellowship Home P.O. Box 6-1933
Fayetteville, NC 28306
`r'Jilliam L. P.risl,er 2' 05 Mell,vood Drive
Fayetteville, i`'C, 28306
Mary Berry :? lien, et al 58/ C Winaing Creel:
Fayetteville, NC 2'303
Talma D. Perry, et al 5650 R arwood Dr. SW
c// o Sheryl E. Perry Roanoke, VA 21018
Deter Stewart, et .1 929 Bragg Boulevard
STEWART NISSAN Fayetteville, NC 28302
Hazel Watson, et al 120 Kirkland Drive
c / o Tommy O'Brien Fayetteville, NC 28301
N. C. DEPT. OF TA:?NSPCR T .-?T ICN
DIVISION CF HIGHWAYS
CUNIBERL.A. D COUNTY
PRCJECT:8.2•-'1101 ct'-2()12%
0N1'E?N DRIVE '_?TI:?N`IDN E.-\ST
I I?,I'SINFSS. 1'S 501 TO NC 8
?T F. ?ST M'-' XT.M-N DRIVE
HEi.. 12 Jl 12 21-y `?`?