HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100091 Ver 1_Application_20100205&1y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GoVERNOR
January 15, 2010
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1 8 90
ATTN: Ms. Kimberly Garvey
FF9 rvL
#t't ?s e010
Eugene A. Contri, Jr."
SECRETARY
1® 0 ® e.1 1
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Madame:
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit #14 (Minor Road Crossing)
NCDENR 401 WQC 3704
Culvert Replacement SR-1860 (Gordon Williams Rd.)-Cumberland County
State Project Number: 6C.026065
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has scheduled to grade, drain, base
and pave SR-1860, (Gordon Williams Rd.) in Cumberland County. Total project length is 1.0
mile. The roadway will be paved to a width of 20 feet within a minimal 45 foot Right-of-Way.
The Right-of-Way coincides with the control access for I-95. This project will require the
replacement of one (1) wet cross line as shown below:
Crossing Roadway Location Existing Culvert Proposed Culvert
Permit site 91 ' A2Oa ?" F-
Sf4 zl +vS 40.5 LF 66" RCP 50 LF 72" CMP w/
Head and Wingwalls
New Stream Impacts = 9.5 linear feet
Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Cape Fear
River Basin; 03-06-18. Permit site #1 conveys water to UT of the Cape Fear River (Class WS-
V). This project is located within the 03030006 Hydrologic units.
Permit site #1 conveys a UT to the Cape Fear River; from there it flows under I-95 within a 72
inch RCP. The UT is a perennial channel. The existing 40.5 LF 66"RCP has signs of joint
separation, ie. Sink hole development. Although the culvert is described as 40.5 linear foot that
total length includes two short quarter pipe sections at the invert. The NCDOT Hydraulic
Section sized the replacement culvert; 50LF 72" CMP with Head and Wing walls.
Since this roadway serves a mixture of residential and agricultural uses, the stabilization of SR
1860 will improve the safety of the traveling public.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 283021150 - Telephone (910) 437-0208- Fax (910) 486-1959
RESOURCE STATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of replacing the culverts along SR-
1860 (Gordon Willams Rd.), in Cumberland County. A Nationwide Permit #14/NCDENR 401
WQC 3704 is required for the project.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 31, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
lists six federally protected species for Cumberland County.
Federally Protected Species for Cumberland County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A)
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Rhus michouxii Michaux's sumac E
Schwalbea ameriona American chaffseed E
Lysimachio osperuloefolio Rough-leaved loosestrife g
Linderia melissifolia Pondberry E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the November 3, 2009
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified within the 45-foot right-of-way.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit #14/ NCDENR
401 WQC 3704 as required by the above-described activities.
The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features.
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe size proposed is the minimum necessary to create a safe highway while
accommodating the 25-year design storm. There is no record within the NCDOT District 2
Office (Cumberland County) that the road experiences floods overtopping. By utilizing the
erosion control measures, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate
BMP's will be utilized during construction.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.
If you should have any questions, or need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at (910) 437-0207.
i l7u/S
erko. PWS
ision''6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: Brain Wren, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Ken Averitte, Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
Greg Bums, P.E., Division Engineer
o??F W A A T,F\qq
1Vu
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.0 November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
E] Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
.1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1860- Gordon Willams Rd
2b. County: Cumberland County
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Falcon
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 6C.026065
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: NA
3b. Deed Book and Page No. NA
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable): NA
3d. Street address: NA
3e. City, state, zip: NA
3f. Telephone no.: NA
3g. Fax no., NA
3h. Email address: NA
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Greg Burns, P.E./NCDOT/Div 6/ Division Engineer
4c. Busines s name
(if applicable): NCDOT
4d. Street address: PO Box 1150
4e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
4f. Telephone no.: (910) 486-1493
4g. Fax no.: (910) 486-1959
41h. Email address: gburns@ncdot.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: James J. Rerko, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable): NCDOT/Div 6/Division Environmental Officer
5c. Street address: PO Box 1150
5d. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
5e. Telephone no.: (910) 437-0207
5f. Fax no.: (910) 486-1959
5g. Email address: jjrerko@ncdot.gov
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1b: Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Permit site # 1: 35.1994'N - 78.6729'W
1c. Property size: 5.45 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Cape Fear River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-V
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing dirt road with maintenance limits 45 feet in width. Upstream is wooded and downstream is 1-95, there is a rural
homesite located at the end of the road. Also, this Access Rd is used primarily for tractor trailers in agricultural
operations.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
approximately 0 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
approximately 50 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
By Statue, NCDOT is required to pave all unpaved secondary roads. To ensure that the roadway meets current safety
standards, the road will be paved to a width of 20 feet, 2 foot grass shoulders will be installed on each side and 3:1 side
slope will be provided within the 45 foot right of way. This road is used extensively by tractor trailers for agriculture.
Currently CB radios are being used so that two trucks do not'get stuck on the road at the same time. NCDOT proposes
in stabilize SR 1860 so that two trucks can pass at the same time.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bring SR 1860 up to current safety standards, ie. 20 foot paving with 2 foot stabilized shoulders and 3:1 side slopes within
a 45 foot right of way. The exciting culvert has joint failure and needs to be replaced. Impacts will be minimized as much
as possible. The culvert will be replaced utilizing a track-hoe excavator. While front end loaders will place fill material.
Eventually a motor grader will finish grade the project prior to paving.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what ty pe
Preliminary El Final
El
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
61b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other)
Temporary T
W1 ? PEI T NA ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W4 El P r-1 T El Yes El No E:1 Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: NA
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact
number- impact intermittent(INT)? length
Permanent (P) or (linear feet)
Temporary (T)
S1 ® P ? T Culvert UT to Cape Fear ® PER ? INT 8 feet 9.5 ft
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S4 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S5 ?P?T. ?PER ?INT
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 9.5 ft
3h. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (if
(P) or applicable)
Temporary
01 ?P?T NA
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: NA
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID 5b.
Proposed use or 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1 NA
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: NA
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes El No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): NA
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): NA
5k. Method of construction: NA
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other: NA
? Catawba ? Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number-
Permanent (P)
or Temporary 6c.
Reason
for impact 6d.
Stream name 6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required? 6f.
Zone 1 impact (square
feet) 6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
61 ?P?T NA ?Yes ?No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: NA
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
SR 1860 has been an access road to 1-95 since the 1960's. NCDOT proposes to bring this secondary dirt road up to
statue. 2 foot grass shoulders have been designed to avoid fill impacts to resurrounding wetlands.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
SR 1860 does not currently meet the current safety standards, ie. 20 foot paved roadway with 2 foot stabilized grass
shoulders. NCDOT proposes to improve SR 1860 to the minimum standard. Guard rail will be installed in order to keep
stream impacts in the area to a minimum but also to ensure that two tractor trailers can navigate this road safely.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments: NA
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If us ing stream mitigation, stream temperature: 0 warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. . Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
NA
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
61b . If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zo ne 1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If bu ffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments: NA
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a . Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes ® No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ? Yes ® No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties
management programs (check all that apply)?. ? HOW
? ORW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the ? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Falcon
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ? Yes ? No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? 33%
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per ? Yes ®No
General Certifications 3704 and 3705?
4c. If the s ite is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
The existing roadway is 33% imperivous. No additional impervious surface proposed. Existing roadside ditches shall be
stabilized. ESC BMP's shall be utilized during construction in accordance with NCDO T's BMP's for construction and
maintenance activities.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted ? Yes ® No
for each stormwater BMP?
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
31b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 11 of 12
. PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
Raleigh
El
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage GIS layer and website, USFWS Endangered Species website, On-site field Survey
6.. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USFWS website- hftp://www.fws.gov/nc-es/fish/fish.htmi
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping website
Greg Burns, P.E.
J0
/
;t., lUS - ,»5
(,+? 01/15/10
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name pplicanUAgent's Signature
( sign Lure is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
gent's Date
is rovided.
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
Permit Site Impacts
Stream Impact= 9.5 LF in R/W
Wetland Impact = None in R/W
\?l? Proposed EOP
Flowline
of Ditch
100
Existing Neadvya I
40.5 LF of Existing 66" RCP w/ Headwall
Replace With Proposed
50 LF of 72" CAP
w/ Head and Wingwalls
/ Plan View of
Existing Pipe / Proposed Construction
Cumberland County, NC
SR 1860 - Gordon Williams Road
01/05/2010
Scale - 1" = 60'
Y
a
0
"0
/y
Y 11..
? Y
0 0
0-J
L
C O
f? C ?U
a)
L O U
O a)
N
O
Z U) (1)
x LO
cv
m b) a) ?
o
-
LL a co C)
rn a)
?
(n
n
LC) 70 o
o > ° C 1
co
o ^L
LL
O
V ?
CD?
c Q > ~ C O
ao ?
X
w ?
O
V/
p(7
} C
E
-
I I
` 7
'I
I II
I I `
\V O
1
J
1 CY)
CY C
4 O
W
L 0 (13
Q U
70
/?
N L V )
O
O
0-
1
0
^^L
LL
a) N
ON- Q)
O C Cc)
O
00
C
a)
N
LL :E
J
Y
a)
LL
O 3 C
LO
C ? N
6.L
U)
U)
>
60
U 2U"O X C
Lu-
00
c) N _ ?
ca N
-
o
r
CDO? O
=o
U o
-j
a
oFm
It
mM
O
I
) 0
O
T
CO
CO
SR 1860- Access Rd- Cumberland Co.
Y j ?C` J?hr
• ,
- `~
f
?•? `
;
?- ?? ?.
?
?;?':
13' '•
` ` '?
+ 'air
,JJ ? 1 1
/
1
Permit Site #1r `
?,., `',,, •• • -ait., „fir
_ _
.4 -_.r },..`! `ti` _
, . •. ?..
, - JI •'ooe.
it .
74
I_smw
10
0 1,250 2,500 5,000 Feet
f-i r i-}-i 1 t-j
1 inch equals 2,000 feet