20200959 Ver 1_401 Application_20200724

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#*
20200959
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Stephanie Goss: eads\szgoss
Select Reviewing Office:* Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:* 401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No
How much is r $240.00
owed?* r $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* r New Project r New Project Existing ID
r Pre -Application Submittal r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments r Stream or Buffer Appeal
r For the Record Only (Courtesy
Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Heather LaGamba
who is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Chapel Hill Country Club
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Orange
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
CHCC_PCN_7.24.20.pdf 1.39MB
Only pdf or lm7 files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;

• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in autorratically.

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Chapel Hill Country Club
2b.
County:
Orange
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Chapel Hill
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2263/447
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Mike Blazer
3d.
Street address:
103 Lancaster Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
3f.
Telephone no.:
919.945.0419
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9798689751
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.91619 Longitude: - 79.01079
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
100 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains a portion of a golf course and assoicated irrigation pond. An irrigation (pump) house is located along
the northern portion of the irrigation pond.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
—800' Little Creek, — 9 acre open water pond.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide bank stablization and repairs from previous erosion events to the
irrigation pond.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of repair and maintenance of the existing irrigation pond. The existing irrigation pond has
eroded banks that are jeopardizing failure of the irrigation pump house and affecting irrigation pond capacity. The pond
does not have an outlet structure and during discharge events, discharges to a non -jurisdictional swale. The irrigation
pump house and pond is the primary source of irrigation for the golf course at Chapel Hill Country Club. The proposed
project includes improvements to the irrigation pond including installation of a discharge structure and bank stabilization
measures to protect the irrigation pump house and to reduce future pond bank erosion. Impervious surfaces or other
structures are not proposed. To facilitate the proposed improvements, heavy equipment including graders, haulers and
excavators will be used during site construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: USACE
Name (if known): Sam Dailey
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Sam Dailey USACE Field Visit in 2018
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is part of a phased project. Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not
anticipated as a result of the proposed phased project.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number—
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Bank Stablization
Little Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
14
50
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
50
3i. Comments: The proposed irrigation pond discharge structure will permanently impact approximately 50 linear feet of the
southern stream bank of Little Creek with rip -rap stabilization. Bank stabilization is not proposed within the bed of Little of
Creek or will exceed 1 cubic yard per running foot below OHWM. Temporary stream impacts are not proposed.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
Discharge
01 ®P ®T
Structure/Construction
Fill
Pond
0.006/0.002
Access
02 ®P ®T
Bank Stablization
Fill
Pond
0.016/0.033
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0.022/0.035
4g. Comments: Pond impact 1 will permanently fill 0.006 acres with new riser structure and temporarily impact 0.002 acres for
construction access to install new riser structure.
Pond impact 2 will permanently fill 0.016 acres of pond with sheet piling and fil and temporarily impact 0.033 acres to install
sheet piling stabilization measures.
Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction grades.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: New lakes or ponds are not
proposed
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
impact
required?
T
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: A No Practical Alternative's Buffer Authorization request will be submitted to the delegated local municipality
separate of this application. We request NCDEQ-DWR conditional 401 approval without receipt of the buffer authorization.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Initial design alternatives included rip -rap armor and/or use of more sheet piling bank stabilization. However, the applicant
decided to lay down steep side slopes and re -stabilization with vegetation. Fill limits have been minimized to maximum extent
possible to allow for bank stabilization protection of the pump house and to install pond discharge structure. The discharge of
the pond to Little Creek has been designed to avoid permanent fill within stream bed
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The water in the pond will be lowered to allow for work in the dry. Silt fence and other BMPs will be used during construction
activities to prevent sediments from entering down -gradient waters. Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -
construction grade/conditions.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: Mitigation is not proposed.
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ®No
Comments: Buffer Authorization will be obtained from local delgated municipality.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Impervious
surfaces are not proposed.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Chapel Hill
® Phase II
® NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
® No
Comments: We are not aware of a NEPA or SEPA being required as part of this
project.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will not generate wastewater.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS identifes the following protected species within Orange County: Bald eagle, Cape Fear Shiner, Dwarf
wedgemussel, Michaux's sumac and smooth coneflower. Based on our observations, suitable habitat for this species are
not located within the project area. Therefore, we have made a determination of no effect for federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
According to the NC SHPO Historic Properties website (attached), eligible or listed resources are not located within the
proposed project area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The applicant will obtain FEMA approval from delegated local
municpality as needed to ensure the project meets FEMA requirements.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NFHL (attached)
Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
DN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
Enviromental, Inc., ou,
Bradley S. Luckey
r` email=[e-mail],
c=uS
7.24.20
Date: 2020.07.24 14:35:18-04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposal for Wetland Permitting Services
Pilot Proposal 3509
February 5, 2020
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: 0-44<-(_ ' Lt , Cc) •. �-y CC43
10,3 (A►`sCA.S uc
Applicant Information:
Name: ck,, a
Address: fhU-6
C,LA� - (_ -t- «`, Pli t- 2 7S ?
j4 r c� 13o zo&. , C7/-t / e
Telephone Number: f • [ `f S� 0 ` t I
Fax Number: r 1 l .3 Z zP9­7
E-mail Address: 026(E!_ C;-kA�rGC.CcY'-'�
Signature: Date: 7 Zd Z J

�E� QQ 0 �
\ N
w
LANCASTER �.
� FW �FwN
c POND
Qo o
QQ
�I
o0
Q Q i
ED Q,
m
I
E
YR
D
F
0
I_I I I I
STREAM BANK
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS- SEE EXHIBIT #1
STREAM BANK
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS- SEE EXHIBIT #1
WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACT
PROPOSED SHEET PILING- SEE EXHIBIT #2
POND BANK REPAIR
SEE EXHIBIT #3
0
7�
MEADOWMONT LN.
SITE -
LANCAS-
DRIVE
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: N.T.S.
LEGEND:
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM — • — • — • —
NON -JURISDICTIONAL DITCH — — —
FLOODWAY FW
100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN — 100-YR —
POND TOP OF BANK
PROJECT SITE (APPROX.)
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 500'
z z
0
00 ;a
L4 o
0 250 500
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
• CARQ I ��f�r
����,''��:1•
_z y
— a36$49 —
�.i UN
9
O'N .`5
w
Q
0
N
m
= z
w
0
N
W >
~
J 0
J J a v
a W
Z
z
W
a H J O
Q
0
oc z
_ 0 Z J
M
C) =
♦0 _O
�•/ J
a
C� d
z
w
o
Ww
N_
W
I-
0 J
d
0
z
BALLENTINE
ASSOCIATES PA
221 PROVIDENCE ROAD, CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514
(919) 929 - 0481 (919) 489 - 4789
SCALE: AS NOTED
DATE: 23 JUN 20
JOB NUMBER: 119011.01
DRAWN BY: T.L.P.
REVIEWED BY: A.R.S.
SITE
OVERVIEW

r
I
/ �TOB
TOB
TOB�_ �TOB TOB TOE TOB TOE TOB TOE TOB TOE�TOE� —
TOB� Tob TOE TOE — . —
g�T08 TOE TOB
/S�TO� �To���OE
/jOg i •
. / DISTURBANCE WILL PROPOSED STREAM BOLIN CREEK
/ OCCUR ABOVE WATER
/ BANK IMPACT
MARK OF STREAM
'•'•i � � 08 N N
i • �TOB
�TOB
EXISTING NON
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH l I
245
i
IMPACT SUMMARY:
PROPOSED POND PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY PIPE REPLACEMENT:
STREAM BANK = 50.0 LF.
STREAM BANK = 10.0 CY. FILL
JURISDICTIONAL POND TEMPORARY = 280.0 SF. (0.006 AC.)
JURISDICTIONAL POND PERMANENT = 95.0 SF. (0.002 AC.)
NOTES:
1. DISTURBANCE AT ALL IMPACTS SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT
PRACTICABLE FOR INSTALLATION OF THE CULVERT AND DAYLIGHT SWALE.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORANGE
COUNTY AND TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL STANDARDS.
3. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN
PROPER WORKING CONDITION THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
4. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO PROPOSED
MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY BASED UPON ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS.
240-- :TOE —TOES
TnF= _ 241— _
242 243- TOeTos
PROPOSED DAYLIGHT
SWALE W/ 2' BOTTOM
AND 6:1 SIDE SLOPES
ROPOSED JURISDICTIONAL
POND IMPACT (RISER AND
—
PERMANENT FILL)
KEY RIPRAP APRON INTO
CREEK BED TO MATCH
EXISTING GRADE. CLASS "B"
12'L X 11'W X 24"THICK.
PROPOSED RCP
PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACT DISTURBANCE
SCALE: 1" = 30'
EX. SHEET
PILING (TYP.)
\_j
POND TOP OF
BANK (TYP.)
IN FEET
•`�•����1'
Es
036849
••,x�9�yr0N
R .`5�`, �•`
W
H
Q
= Z
W
W
W >
L
~
J 0
J J a v
= V a W
Z
J Z
W Cc —
o
a H J
Q�
o
aza
_ z J
0 =
♦0 _O
v J
F-
d
z
W
Wo
U)
W
In
Lo
w
F-
J
7
CL
0
z
BALLENTINE
ASSOCIATES, PA
221 PROMOENCE ROAD, CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514
(919) 929 - 0481 (919) 489 - 4789
SCALE: AS NOTED
DATE: 23 JUN 20
JOB NUMBER: 119011.01
DRAWN BY: T.L.P.
REVIEWED BY: A.R.S.
EXHIBIT
1

\Fw \ l I \
Fw \ \
w �
\Flti �24 EX. SHEET
6— (TY PILING P.) /
Fw _ \
Fh, 245-
POP
IMPACT SUMMARY:
PROPOSED SHEET PILING AND GRADING IN JURISDICTIONAL POND:
JURISDICTIONAL POND TEMPORARY = 1,445.0 SF. (0.033 AC.
JURISDICTIONAL POND PERMANENT = 705.0 SF. (0.016 AC.)
NOTES:
1. DISTURBANCE AT ALL IMPACTS SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTEI
PRACTICABLE FOR INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED SHEET PILING.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
COUNTY AND TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL STANDARDS.
3. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAII
PROPER WORKING CONDITION THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
4. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO PROPOSED
MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY BASED UPON ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS.
-- EXISTING
PUMP HOUSE
'�, \
FW l �W
a� --7 FW /
PROPOSED
PERMANENT FILL IN
JURISDICTIONAL POND
TOP OF
(TYP. )
JURISDICTIONAL IMPACT DISTURBANCE
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
\
FW
A�
t5q
0 15 30
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
• CARQ I ��f�r
����,''��:1•
036849
khUN
I��'�20�,'�
0Noll
w
F-
Q
0
m
Z
w
V=
(/1
W
0)
~
J 0
J J a v
IL W
Z
J > Z
W— o
a
aHJ0Q�
Q Z Q .,
_ J
0 Z
,2
a00Z
V J
F-
LU
d
z
w
00
w
Lf)
w
F-
O
J
d
0
Z
BALLENTINE
ASSOCIATES, FA
221 PROMENCE ROAD, CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514
(919) 929 - 0481 (919) 489 - 4789
SCALE: AS NOTED
DATE: 23 JUN 20
JOB NUMBER: 119011.01
DRAWN BY: T.L.P.
REVIEWED BY: A.R.S.
EXHIBIT
2

ORDI�
WA
ISTING
'ADE
NOTES:
1. NO DISTURBANCE TO WATERS OF THE U.S. PERMITTED DURING BANK
STABILIZATION GRADING.
2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY.
BANK STABILIZATION SECTION A -A
SCALE: N.T.S.
F* /�� o BOLIN CREEK
TOB-
1000,
.
FW
PROPOSED BANK STABILIZATION A
DISTURBANCE (NON —JD IMPACT) —
A
(SHOWN IN ORANGE TYP.) �
POND
BANK STABLIZATION DISTURBANCE a 75 150
SCALE: 1" = 150'
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
• CARQ I ��f�r
.N���,''��:1•
= 036849
kUk�20�,'�
/sy 0N
w
Q
0
m
=ZW
m
W
~
J 0
JJa0
20 a W
Z
W 1 o
0
a H J O
Q04
a z a .•
0
M
_ Z-1
0 =
♦0 _O
v J
LLl
IL
z
w
oz
g)
w
-F-
W
O
J
CL
0
H
Z
BALLENTINE
ASSOCIATES, PA
221 PROMOENCE ROAD. CHAPEL HILL. N.C. 27514
(919) 929 - 0481 (919) 489 - 4789
SCALE: AS NOTED
DATE: 23 JUN 20
JOB NUMBER: 119011.01
DRAWN BY: T.L.P.
REVIEWED BY: A.R.S.
EXHIBIT
3

15 x
https:.,/n€.maps,ar€gis.com/appslwebappviewer/index.htmPid-d2d04dSd7e - — f_* :rk Orange County E,,, OC GIS Maps and Da... MC home -page NC ... NC Historic Prese,,, HPOWEB 2,D iN s
File Edit View Favo6tes Tools Help
Eon Offi€e 365 Portal
I i .■J•r'1-• r■ -- — — Ur.re•hl � y, Bri�'£ilf
HP WEB2.0 V fCES f Findadds+Ystoric ro�oe dr
� *01�la;7 4 y_ �y
ti.
° n o
Ydiildwood di _ [s
*e eplrerd `� L = h+ 37 Ikeri:tJrkrs D Ywaty OJrns
a 0 g} Hlllview Lri is. * �eerwoatls _ r. r Hudson FrrrmandStore 2015
_- 4 *hDr io a O is Jk Yale�n •�
Franklin
54� VIFeY Piki o * 6F
# fnr
�ahllla 9J#
`
a
dc
"'rP#TIt OtNS# z} rr� LL Rd F11IICfI #t'�rllx
:irefe qy %Flcrrst G` a c k
• 'q o- = e. Lans aslvr L)1 Glob,
�
❑ 3
2.4+ p^o sb Hcu& 0t, Cis 4 17 Glen LetttaaxQ
4 SLGI■rrdt o r n�Hi1 wU�4clfld� a4leDI 0Dull l-yC.uL.. �, � �#.
Grej"WJ7 Ln
m �F�
r Na a DURHAN9
{].rk 00d Roger■on
* ■ m D
■ * 4 spottRr•& reiGmt Ln d �
fiidlpe 4 n
`{ $ o m tJIullFgan h o - GLeona or, - -
i A o eSwllle Ru 4
� ,,+
Wada4Vmo + 0 5e
� 4
d IS ley Ru $ a o G
# 1P •
1r' '.( r 3
r
I h
' !i kerY] t ^ r4
St
C}W9 J HoLse. 1r 3C'fi701 r ,pee Cy F;�s marl+ PI Tht C.I:dara qP F�{r. I C4 �-h. qua
r Q19�9L} r,I'�rh�4c'88d E Ii
Wl ho .r ' At'Meacww+ rrt `a
Laurei Hlil C".-4 I'll
50
lee
-.
3 �4C R
011mi ORl IitJlrlarrd wor�rls #fir:
M Ic rC i 4., Ict 2ols r Chapel Hill, Orange Countyr NC, State -uf North Caroline DOrr, Esrir HERE, Garminr IINCREMENT Pr Pb&'Lr USGE ~

https :17s€,fern a,gov-- portal;'sear€h?AddressQuery=€ JD— Federal EmeFgen€y M... Cr* Orange Coun... HC GIS Maps an... NC home -page ,,, NC Historic ...
® Edit View Favorites Tools Help
Offi€e 365 Portal
Amwftk"" Iot8Lw hl�ed en lace iwpla
and dc-m riot reprwarr: in iulltortTWo
p�.Xw b6MpDh SPECIAL fLl]4D
m HAZARD AREAS
.� DdgW6oea L. L;iblf
No p�Kal LrMN.It M!
kfhP PANELS
NwiivF hfiwnai Flood P%e d
elFrw;*t0wtS OT14IR AREAS OF
Ar ofurrdadrnriedFbod.Wrd}-rcr FLaDD HAZARD
8thoraxo- Proenem Ali a
OTHERAff-A5®toavaFppmorftFDUIe 9.erwnLrys
werrMR I*M PANd DIIIINEbl "!4
;m. -k � +
With 9FEo Gdjth
AepurmnFluodx V <FLM.M.Y M
0.2%Arnual Cft r Flood Ha rd. Ar 5
[l l'tbnnuol CKMU Aadd Mtn aweiM,T
"pth kK ghan err took w wFth dmlm Ep
orca�c of Ina gtnn ocr grrre mile z,-: s
%6, fu4rre �ondluors l%14rwul
C ;i&c* flood RUi>tw Z: A
Arm wM fEedu�d flood Iffik due to
Le .See Holes 2.- A
F 10 Area with F bud Rnk due to Lesre: • :
HPOWEB 2.0 FEMA Fla... X
� sSectonswdh L%Annual"noe
—Z_Q. Wilcr 5,Mwo Elranoh
_— Cool lea hwl
—,a— &d Fkbd Elnniton L1rne;EFE]
WHEA _ , F`FofIrF�Aaletr�r
FEATURES rhd'ortloPlra Feah re
CEHErI}44I ---' Clennel Culrert w' •Sewer
STFdJCTlJKS 111 i 1 111 L249r}. Ddq .O Flaodnah