20200819 Ver 1_WoUS TE Report docx_20200723

.�.,W...7
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
June 11, 2020
ELECTRONIC SUBNHTTAL
deankbccgp.com
Mr. Dean Boik
Director of Development Services
BC Construction Group
10153 Grand River Ave.
Brighton, MI 48116
Dear Mr. Boik:
Subject: Preliminary Waters of the United States Determination and Delineation with
Protect Species Habitat Assessment
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC 28786
Parcel ID 8616-48-1684, Haywood County, NC
CEC Project 302-078
This Report constitutes the results of CEC's desktop review and on -site Waters of the United
States (WoUS), and Protected Species Habitat Assessment conducted May 30th and 31st for an
approximately 15.69 acre parcel located in Haywood County, North Carolina (Project or Project
Area). CEC understands the site has a proposed school building and associated structures in
Haywood County, North Carolina, Parcel ID 8616-48-1684.
1.0 BACKGROUND
WoUS are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as a jurisdictional wetland, hydrophytic
vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrologic indictors must be present.
In North Carolina, the USACE and the EPA jointly regulate the discharge of dredged and fill
material within jurisdictional WoUS under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act and
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. WoUS includes territorial seas, navigable
coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams (perennial and intermittent), and wetlands.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality (NC DEQ), (NC DWQ). Permit requirements
are specific to the type, location and amount of impacts, if proposed. Stormwater management
plans and/or mitigation for proposed impacts could be a requirement of the permit approval
process.
530 Howell Road, Suite 203 1 Greenville, SC 29615 1 p: 864-626-3140 f: 864-626-3135 1 www.cecinc.com

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 2
June 11, 2020
This WoUS and Species Habitat Assessment can be used to assist the BC Construction Group
(Client) with a preliminary review of the Project Area only and is not considered final until
verified by the USACE and NC DEQ. The following supporting documents are provided:
Figures:
Figure 1:
Vicinity Map;
Figure 2:
USGS Map;
Figure 3:
Aerial Imagery Map;
Figure 4a:
NRCS Current Soil Survey Map;
Figure 4b:
NRCS Published Soil Survey Map;
Figure 5:
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map; and
Figure 6:
Potential Jurisdictional Features Map.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Wetland Determination Data Form;
Attachment B: NC DEQ Stream Classification Forms; and
Attachment C: WoUS and Habitat Representative Photographs.
2.0 CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS AND DESKTOP REVIEW
The Project is located in a rural setting within a mixed -use commercial and multi to single-
family residential area in Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina (Figures 1 & 2). The
Project is bordered on the west by Russ Ave. (Hwy 276), north by Jule Nolan Dr. and south by
Maple Grove Church Rd. The Project consists of an open grassed field, pasture with
undeveloped wooded areas along the north, and more hedge row wooded areas along the west,
east and south boundaries. Adjacent land parcels include a combination of commercial buildings
and multi to single-family residential dwellings (Figures 2 & 3, Attachment A).
A review of available topography shows the surrounding area to be moderately to steeply
sloping. The Project contains elevations ranging from approximately 2,660 feet above sea level
to approximately 2,590 feet above sea level. The United States Geologic Survey (USGS) map
doesn't indicate any streams or wetlands on the Property (Figure 2).
A review of the published and on-line National Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil
Survey for Haywood County indicates no hydric soils within the Project Area (Figures 4a and
4b). However, a blue line or stream is indicated on the published soil survey running along the
eastern portion of the property, in a general south to north/northeastern direction toward Factory
Branch that flows to Lake Junaluska (Figure 4b).
A review of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map doesn't indicate any streams or
wetlands on the Property (Figure 5). The NWI map appears to concur with the USGS map but
differs from the published soil survey map.
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 3
June 11, 2020
CEC performed an in-house desktop study for protected species for the above referenced Project
Areas (Figures I & 2). Database searches of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPAC), were performed. The NCNHP revealed no known element
occurrence within a 1 mile radius of the project area. The USFWS; IPAC revealed the potential
for two known vascular element occurrences, the Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides)
and Spreading Avens (Geum radiatum), one Lichen, the Rock Gnome Lichen (Gymnoderma
lineare) as well as several potential mammal occurrences, the Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB)
(Myotis septentrionalis), the Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens), the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), and
the Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus), one Arachnid, the
Spruce -fir Moss Spider (Microhexura montivaga), and one Clam, the Appalachian Elktoe
(Alasmidonta raveneliana) within Haywood County, North Carolina. Detailed field
reconnaissance did not reveal the presence of any of the above -referenced species, or any
suitable habitat for same.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 WoUS Preliminary Jurisdictional Review
This assessment utilized the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual, the 2018 Field
Indicators of Hydric Soils of the United States along with the USACE 2010 Regional
Supplement: Supplemental Guide ERDC/EL TR-12-9 (Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
(Version 2.0), Wilmington, NC District office.
Potential jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and mapped with a
sub -foot Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the USACE Routine On -Site Determination Method.
Data representative of on -site jurisdictional wetland areas and non jurisdictional upland areas
was collected and reported using Wetland Determination Data Forms (Attachment A).
Potential jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to NC DWQ Stream
Identification Form Version 4.11. CEC utilizes the NC DWQ stream classification forms in order
to document on -site stream conditions as requested by the USACE Wilmington District field and
satellite offices. These classifications include sampling with a soil hand auger and D-shaped dip
net, collecting photographic documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at
which stream changes classification) within each on -site stream channel. NC DWQ Stream
Classification Forms representative of on -site stream channels were used to document stream
conditions (Attachment B).
Representative photographs were taken of on -site aquatic features and existing site conditions
(Attachment Q. The locations of mapped wetlands and other WoUS, Stream Classification
Points (SCP), Wetland or Upland Determination Data Points (DP), and representative
photographs, are depicted on (Figure 6).
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 4
June 11, 2020
3.2 Habitat Assessment
Vascular Plants and Lichen
CEC field scientists utilized a dichotomous key, developed by NC State Extension Service on
behalf of the USFWS, Krings, A., S. Goyette, D. Suiter, and M. Samuels. 2012—present. Rare
plants of North Carolina: Federally listed species and their congeners. Version 1.2. North
Carolina State University, Raleigh. [http://herbarium.ncsu.edu/rare/;], to identify rare/threatened
species outside of the proposed survey window.
In addition, natural plant communities were typified using Schafale's `A Guide to the Natural
Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation' (2012) published jointly by the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources.
Small Whorled Pogonia
The Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides), is a small to medium-sized (approximately
10 inches in height) rhizomatous terrestrial orchid that is native to eastern North America.
Foliage consists of 4 to 5 bluish -green leaves that occur along the stem in the same axis or
`whorl'- hence the common name. Flowers are usually borne singly on a small pedicel, although
two and rarely three flowers may also be seen. In North Carolina, flowering typically occurs in
mid to late May. This species requires acidic soil conditions in mesic to dry-mesic forests with
canopy gaps or a history of disturbance. In our region, Small Whorled Pogonia is usually found
growing in association with Eastern White Pine (Pious strobus), and New York Fern
(Parathelypteris noveboracensis). Soils in the project area would appear to be too basic in nature
for Small Whorled Pogonia, in addition to the fact that none of the aforementioned associated
species are found on the site, indicating a lack of suitable habitat for this plant at the project site.
Spreading Avens
Spreading Avens (Geum radiatum), is a member of the Rose Family that is narrowly endemic to
the states of North Carolina and Tennessee. Found growing in thin soils on high elevation rock
summits, cliffs, and ledges, it is a low -growing perennial with kidney -shaped basal leaves that
may be up to 6 inches across. Flowers, which may exceed 1.5 inches in diameter, are a deep
yellow coloration, and are typically produced in June and July. No Spreading Avens were
observed during this biological survey, and no suitable habitat of any kind for this plant is found
at the project site.
Rock Gnome Lichen
The Rock Gnome Lichen (Gymnoderna lineare), is a Federally Endangered species of the
southern Appalachians, and the only member of its genus in North America. Occurring in
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 5
June 11, 2020
moderate to dense colonies, this species has lobes of less than one inch in length, with bluish
gray upper surfaces, and white undersurfaces. Almost exclusively limited to vertical or near -
vertical rock faces, Rock Gnome Lichen requires a very moist micro -climate bathed in water
seepage and spray. No Rock Gnome Lichens were encountered during the biological survey, as
there is no suitable habitat or micro -climate conditions on the project site that would sustain this
plant.
Mammals
Northern Long -Eared Bat
The NLEB (Myotis septentrionalis), is a medium-sized bat with a body length of 3 to 3.7 inches,
with a wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. Fur color can be medium to dark brown on the dorsal surface,
and tawny to pale -brown on the ventral surface. As its name suggests, this bat is distinguished
by its long ears, particularly as compared to other bats in its genus, Myotis.
NLEBs spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. They use areas in
various sized caves or mines with constant temperatures, high humidity, and no air currents.
During the summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in
cavities or in crevices of both live trees and snags (dead trees).
During the summer, NLEBs roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities or in crevices
of both live trees and snags (dead trees). Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in
cooler places, like caves and mines. Northern long-eared bats seem to be flexible in selecting
roosts, choosing roost trees based on suitability to retain bark or provide cavities or crevices.
This bat has also been found rarely roosting in structures, like barns and sheds. Suitably large
trees or snags with the appropriate type of exfoliating bark were not noted during this biological
survey. Therefore, no suitable habitat for Northern Long -Eared Bats occur on the project site.
Gray Bat
The Federally Endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens), with a wingspan in excess of 11.5
inches, is the largest member of its genus in eastern North America. Fur coloration is a uniform
dark gray or brown, depending on the time of year. The Gray Bat requires caves for both
roosting and hibernation. Summer roost sites are typically in caves along rivers. Most foraging
activity takes place over open water. This biological survey at the project site did not reveal the
presence of any caves or large open water foraging sites suitable for Gray Bats.
Indiana Bat
The Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis), is another bat species that is currently classified as Endangered
by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A medium-sized member of the genus
Myotis, the Indiana Bat has variable fur coloration that ranges from black to light brown. Caves
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 6
June 11, 2020
are required for hibernation in winter, but summer roost sites consist of hollow snags and
appropriately sized trees with exfoliating bark. The present biological survey did not reveal the
presence of any caves, or the appropriate type of trees that could be utilized by Indiana Bats as
roost sites.
Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel
The Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus), is a subspecies of the
more widespread and abundant Northern Flying Squirrel that is found in coniferous and mixed
coniferous forests across the top of North America, from Alaska to Nova Scotia, south to the
mountains of North Carolina and west to Utah, Washington, and Oregon. Northern flying
squirrels generally nest in holes in trees, preferring large -diameter trunks and dead trees, and will
also build outside leaf nests called dreys and will also nest underground. Tree cavities created by
woodpeckers as suitable nest sites tend to be more abundant in old -growth forests. Coniferous
and mixed coniferous forest community types were not noted within the project site, and the
large -diameter trunks and dead trees needed for nesting sites are largely lacking. Therefore,
suitable habitat for the Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel is not present in the project site. No
critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Arachnids
Spruce -fir Moss Spider
The Spruce -fir moss spider lives in Fraser fir and Red spruce forests on mountain peaks at and
above 1,650 m (5,410 ft) in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina and
Tennessee. It has been recorded from Clingmans Dome and Mount Collins (both very small
populations), Mount Le Conte, Mount Mitchell (probably extirpated), Grandfather Mountain,
and Roan Mountain. The project site does not contain Fraser fir and/or red spruce forests, and is
not located on a mountain peak at or above 1,650 m (5,410 ft). Additionally, the areas designated
as critical habitat for the spider are within the boundaries of the Great Smoky Mountains
National Park (GSMNP); the Pisgah National Forest, and the Cherokee National Forest; and an
area privately owned but is being managed by The Nature Conservancy through an agreement
with the landowner. Therefore, suitable habitat for the Spruce -fir moss spider is not present in
the project site.
Clams
Appalachian Elktoe
The Appalachian Elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana), is a freshwater mussel that is endemic to
North Carolina and Tennessee, and is listed as Endangered in both states. Attaining lengths of up
to 4 inches, and with a brownish -yellow shell coloration, the Appalachian Elktoe requires high
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 7
June 11, 2020
quality waters that are cool, well -oxygenated and fast flowing. As no such waters are found
within the project area, no Appalachian Elktoe are found on site.
4.0 WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION AND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS
According to the NCDEQ, the Project is in the 8 digit HUC 06010106, French Broad River, the
10 digit HUC 0601010602, Richland Creek -Pigeon River, and 12 Digit HUC 060101060202,
Lower Richland Creek. Mandatory vegetative riparian buffers are not required by the NCDEQ
based on the site locality in a specific river basin or watershed. However, based on our
observations, potentially jurisdictional surface waters that may be subject to vegetative buffers
are located on the site. Development or stormwater setbacks that are specific to the proposed
development of the Project could be required by the NCDEQ. Consultation with the local zoning
authority is recommended to determine site specific vegetation buffers adjacent to the features
located on the site prior to submittal of zoning approval
5.0 RESULTS
5.1 WoUS
On May 30th and 31st, CEC scientists Kevin Thomas, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS) and
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist (NCLSS) and David Campbell Professional Botanist,
performed potential WoUS determinations and delineation, along with a Protective Species
Habitat Assessments within the Project Area. Based on the results of the WoUS investigation,
there are two features that would likely be considered potentially jurisdictional WoUS within the
Project Area (Figure 6).
The results of the Protective Species Habitat Assessment indicated there were no favorable
habitat for Protected Species (Figure 3 & Attachment C).
Streams
One potential jurisdictional stream channels exist within the Project Areas (Figure 6; Table 1).
The on -site streams origin begins within the on -site wetland, flows along the eastern portion of
the Project Area in a northeastern direction, and appears to be culverted and buried near the
Project Areas northeast boundary. The on -site stream appeared to maintain base flow throughout
the portions observed within the Project Area, with weak to moderate geomorphological,
hydrological, and biological characteristics that included soil based evidence of high water table,
iron oxidizing bacteria, and weak to moderate continuity of channel bed and bank (Attachment
B).
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 8
June 11, 2020
Table 1- Summary of on -site Non -Wetland Waters of the United States within the Project Area
Jurisdictional
Stream
SCP
NC DEQ
Classification
NC DEQ
Score(s)
Photograph(s)
Linear
Footage
SA 1
SCP 1
Intermittent
25.5
6, 7, 8 & 9
447
Stream Total
447
* Rounded up to nearest whole number
Wetlands
One potential jurisdictional wetland, Wetland Area (WA) 1, was identified within the Project
Area (Figure 6, and Table 2). The wetland originates off -site of the Project, along the southern
portion of the Project Areas boundary, and appears to be the hydrologic source to the on -site
stream identified.
WA 1 at DP I Wet at the time of the investigation, the potential wetland had surface water or
saturated soil. The potential wetland was dominated by herbs and grasses, Iron Weed (Vernonia
noveboracensis), Sallow sedge (Carex lurida), Spike Rush (Eleocharis spp.), Smartweed
(Persicaria spp.), Cardinal Flower (Lobelia cardinalis) Monkey Flower (Mimulus ringens) with
very few trees present, with the dominant being Box Elder (Acer negundo). These plants are
typically associated with wetlands. The soils display faint to prominent redox concentrations
with a depleted matrix, and meet jurisdictional standards for wetland (hydric) soils (Figure 6,
Attachments A & C; photographs 3, 4 & 5).
Table 2. Summary of On -Site Wetland Waters of the United States Within the Project Area
Jurisdictional
Wetland
Data Point
Cowardin
Classification
Photograph(s)
Acres
WA 1
DP 1 Wet
PEM/PFO*
3, 4 & 5
0.1
Wetland Total
0.1
*Palustrine Emergent & Forested Wetland
Upland Areas
No additional WoUS were identified within the Project Area (Figure 6 and Attachments A & C;
photographs 1 & 10 through 13). These upland areas were dominated by red clover in the
pastures, greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), and other mixed hard woods along the property
fringes and up slope of the on -site stream channel. Soils in the upland areas exhibited bright red
to orange soils with no indication of features associated with streams or wetlands.
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 9
June 11, 2020
5.2 Protected Species Habitat Assessment
The project area consists largely of agricultural lands that have been under some form of
clearance and/or cultivation for many decades. Single large individuals of Black Locust (Robinia
pseudoacacia) occur scattered at various points within the site. Small corridors of vegetation that
have not succumbed to the herbivory of horses include small individuals of Black Cherry
(Prunus serotina), Sassafras (Sassafras albidum) and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) (Figure
3 & Attachment C; photographs 6, 7, 9 through 13). Remnant small woodlots appear to be
degraded examples of the Montane Oak -Hickory Forest (Basic Subtype) as defined by Schafale
(2012) and include species typical of basic soils such as Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Shingle
Oak (Quercus imbricaria), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra), White Oak (Quercus alba), Mayapple
(Podophyllum peltatum) and Bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis). Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), and Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) were commonly encountered
woody vines.
There is also a small intermittent stream on site, with an associated small wetland. Trees found
in wooded riparian areas include Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), Box Elder (Acer negundo),
and Swamp Red Maple (Acer rubrum var. triolobum). Wet meadow sections of stream and
wetland feature Soft Rush (Juncus effusus), Southern Agrimony (Agrimonia parviflora), Blunt
Broom Sedge (Carex tribuloides var. tribuloides), Arrowleaf Tearthumb (Persicaria sagittata),
and Common Dwarf St. John's Wort (Hypericum mutilum var. mutilum).
Due to the prolonged history of human disturbance within the project boundaries, previous
natural community types have been heavily impacted and transformed. As a result, there is no
habitat present that would be suitable for any of the species of concern mentioned within this
document.
6.0 RECONIMENDATIONS
This Report provided by CEC represents our best professional judgment regarding the potential
of on -site wetlands, streams, and other water features, at the time of the investigation that can be
used for preliminary project planning only. However, until a Jurisdictional Determination (JD) is
issued by the regulatory agency USACE, these findings can only be considered preliminary and
is not an official governmental approval. CEC recommends that before any construction or other
earth disturbance activities occur on site, a formal JD should be obtained from the USACE.
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Dean Boik — BC Construction Group
289 Maple Grove Church Road, Waynesville, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Page 10
June 11, 2020
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this project. Please do not hesitate to
contact Kevin Thomas at 410-259-4745 or [e-mail] should you have any questions
or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Kevin Thomas, PWS, NCLSS
Senior Project Manager
Figures & Attachments
sort Scz�,
dlAll9 �
1282
��lOiMH
y�5 4.
I V
�s4,
KEVIN A. THOMAS
�s 2935 AW$
WETI.ANo�G
David Campbell, Professional Botanist
Project Manager
Civii & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

FIGURES

�yg Kentucky State Location Extent
Virginia _
Pa/a Dr ° Tennessee�,,.rf-r 71
NORTH
r _
11
l-__ti_1
South Carolina
Georgia f-
3�
nF
cK°th ynC .•,_h <
D° p6m cOr
"Ouzo,o
o�
°cw k a
y a
Y,arV Y and Pam°
°a
P aQ
Green Or g
°yerly Ln
N y Foy
e Cir
ac m C C�ei', / r C
k Fr a+ ar sbo Ra
'0i 0 s
s�•°op
d0 0 °f d Rd 1
3
Rd
Fo
aye Q_a 3 c ) r �apn P �o
�a°e0 O Z O
\
r-
ii.-.__�. ...„ ockin9bird Dr U� v v re Dr
- '-,tvy Hills °,, $`
- --_
Winchester Dr
GIB .•
_
a Lake
p o7 a __—
5 c e/Or rerl Da t �.�f�-.�-
F Linso Sec 6 Yon Or
° °O O` Junaluska La
a eldon h°`e i Juno
- Way N LaKes o
o ion fri 0` ,c
o A o' e0\\�\
- 2 Lake
o ! Junaluska
\� �der(d a
up sap Ta Q Jt°OP
S Lakes/ror,oO O O
\\
e ViewO aF o/an6 _ C,r�
-V
C,
O Harmon Ave l� shore U
nOder
= °Ra Ja
O o ej`'aK D -' r 0
4 F o n O` � JGo°te
q
adti
0
e
9 Or
o y z'
4 l
'
Lo
Cj p
Pa Gdve Rd o
o
i
Pepper Ave f my'RdLa .Z'
.pyg �ad�eY
c!/y RdA
1 p u Dt
o o
d 4
M
been
�, Fairway Mills H
r`4 rlmor"s r .115 Apple BlossolckprY
t 23
d arKD -- �4c
ev
o w o9
�O t' O 'N ?sng �+h
`,2'
Jrse m Lags
Jrl°aw;w
�j°` ,fit mollJourse e��
Rd a Jt``y w r��c bgr"6
2 o as
t m rN ps p/�
Nos
�°ac . �c� U T°P R
OM,O ha Ph �o ,'i
�o'O Wino/osKa
Torda TRC . 4foo
u Oaks Or
� U to
> grad\ey Sr / p
° oc
4
Y
O
c $ Raytown
R d
'PW°Od
f(/! 23_
Big JI
Lnl>
Ede
S 3
J I � iJ
h
v i y /
� WOOdsidev � �a�
n �/// HII^c�reNl
d � Ile oDr
o�
rdan
d
��.� Frazier Sr P ¢ 0`
Way- &-
o Recre r°n
Rd °, Park II-
0 9
r:
,I LEGEND s9Pea
r°
HoNe"M D d, cl�
�I Q PROJECT AREA (15.69 Acres)
T °
s` o
c ? h hH `aYrr ns lie Pl v oar ..ne 0r C
j.DUI
REFERENCE s <F.s/ fj„rde st ' SCALE IN FEET
ESRI STREETMAP /ARCGIS MAP SERVICE `o r R°9"Ss,
> t! y9,
y ACCESSED 07/29/2019 °ao i
�.s o 0 2,000 4,000
ea`�e
i
BC CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
111
289 MAPLE GROVE CHURCH ROAD
i
TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v 3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 2873
co
980-237-0373 • 800-365-2324
VICINITY MAP
r www.cecinc.com
L
S
L DRAWN BY: JCH
CHECKED BY: KT
APPROVED BY: *onfiesignature *KT
FIGURE NO: i
DATE: 6/11 /2020
1 SCALE: 1 'I = 2,000 '
PROJECT NO: 302 078
•

I in
o�
tn
r
NORTH 5),
V
we
§( ` > U 0
5' to GaR r > r- �t s'f°v • i o
vim` `+• >' l x� l `� •pG.
�Njjjv
`� q � a � • o ;� :� 'i�i�. 7:. y \Y. `\.-i 1. "� 1
n• r \\. .. , � - C�. / ` `fN� ems-•-� , ��
Youth centerA. 8M A 144
• � •'r Swimming-►yaluskq 2565
�` v • pool f1 .•
d •:<a 5�3• ' �., ��b ' ,2ry� L_axEzro EIEV 2562 258 • ;-
Trat
NmG��\, 'RellOwyhQp• �� � 4jd � f _.� � "�I
. \\1•OO}t�SJI
In Maple Grove i l!� • I _ 646
•Church : •
°� •� r= r �. ' • Golf
a _ cou
a v � . � • •' • :. Fair
V-
�_ opChu'ti .�'`,,. •% '� 1 �' ��� - o�'� - tit-� -
_ rer •, l M
..- •' . �. � �� .�"'[[[ . GAG ..
1 ` Oil.
1
/' i--. /"�^. .�� Q ° LJ , be c_ - �l "" _ �� '}-. • 1�l. lam_
• s—
�'0 ' ��•'•� • i ti;llcresxMemprial A!•c, a..` � o �'
q i �\ P.vo
LEGEND j ` :n }, . n- •" t i �o
:.:. ��' ,1 •` � '.e : � ago ,� —� ' ' : ,�-1 � ram/
C ] PROJECTAREA (15.69 ACRES) �41 ••o( i gyp J•� "'
�-
�i r/ /% "�t—/.'.' ."1 !i\ • //^yam ^r �% a• S
REFERENCE =, aynes01, /
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP/ ARCGIS MAP SERVICE: •'`a!�r`f 1"' ••'
HTTP://GOTO.ARCGISONLINE.COM/MAPS/USA TOPO MAPS, `t•``' ��nn I SCALE IN FEET
CCESSED 6/1 1 /2020.
L
a QUAD: CLYDE, NORTH CAROLINA R 0 2,000 4,000
,
fIA71AW
iBC CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
i
289 MAPLE GROVE CHURCH ROAD
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v 3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 2873
ro
980-237-0373 800-365-2324 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
L
r www.cecinc.com
S
L DRAWN BY: ,�CH CHECKED BY: KT APPROVED BY: *onfiesignature *KT I FIGURE NO:
DATE: 6/11 /2020 1 SCALE: 1 " = 2,000 ' PROJECT NO: 302-078 2

CD
s
i
u IJTW I
LEGEND
E
Q PROJECT AREA (15.69 Acres)
PROPERTIES
REFERENCE
ESRI WORLD IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE
SCALE IN FEET
i PARCELS OBTAINED FROM HAYWOOD COUNTY
a GIS CLEARINGHOUSE, ACCESSED 07/29/2019
0 400 800
c
s
FIA
1A BC CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
/7A7 289 MAPLE GROVE CHURCH ROAD
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v 3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 2873
co
980-237-0373 • 800-365-2324 AERIAL IMAGERY
L
r www.cecinc.com
S
L DRAWN BY: JCH CHECKED BY: KT APPROVED BY: onfiesignature *KT FIGURE NO:
DATE: 6/11 /2020 SCALE: 1 " = 400 ' PROJECT NO: 302 078 3

NORTH.
BoD2
,BScV-9
.�
LEGEND
Q PROJECT AREA (15.69 Acres)
rA
SCALE IN FEET
SOIL MAP UNIT
o 250 Soo
,co REFERENCE
Map Symbol
Unit Name Hydric Status Acres
N ._ESRI WORLD IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE
EvE
Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes Not hydric 0.73
EvD
Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes Not hydric 10.53
U.S.D.A., N.R.C.S
HaC2
Hayesville clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Not hydric 2.10
a SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATABASE FOR
Sfc
Saunook-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not hydric 0.08
a HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC, 2018.
DsC
Dillsboro loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Not hydric 2.26
ro
BC CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
289 MAPLE GROVE CHURCH ROAD
TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
Civil & Environmental Consultants,
Inc.
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v 3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 2873
co
980-237-0373 800-365-2324
NRCS CURRENT SOIL SURVEY MAP
w www.cecinc.com
DRAWN BY: JCH
CHECKED BY:
KT
APPROVED BY: *onfiesignature *KT
FIGURE NO:
DATE: 6/11 /2020
SCALE:
1 " = 250 '
PROJECT NO: 302 078
4A

NORTH
�e
y Dfi A
ose j
F� w.
EVD
�r r
Evil
� r I •
u
o LEGEND
OLE
n NRCS STREAM 1
SCALE IN FEET
PROJECT AREA (15.69 Acres) 0 250 500
REFERENCE Map Symbol Unit Name Hydric Status Acres
ESRI WORLD IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE EVE
Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes Not hydric
0.73
EvD
Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes Not hydric
10.53
U.S.D.A., N.R.C.S HaC2
Hayes\ille clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Not hydric
2.10
i SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPHIC (SSURGO) DATABASE FOR SiC
Saunook-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes Not hydric
0.08
a HAYWOOD COUNTY, INC, 1977. DsC
Dillsboro loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Not hydric
2.26
s
BC CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
1111ffA7V/1
289 MAPLE GROVE CHURCH ROAD
TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v 3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte, NC 2873
co
980-237-0373 800-365-2324
NRCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY MAP
r www.cecinc.com
L
S
L DRAWN BY: JCH
CHECKED BY: KT
APPROVED BY: *onfiesignature *KT
FIGURE NO: A
!�
DATE: 6/11 /2020
SCALE: 1 " = 250 '
PROJECT NO: 302 078

1.1Cr CI"f C I V%,g
ESRI WORLD IMAGERY / ARCGIS MAP SERVICE
CONTOURS DERIVED FROM NC ONE MAP GEOPORTAL
NOVEMBER, 2013.
NORTH
*NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES
HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE
USACE or NCDWQ.
zseo
DP = DATA POINT
SCP = STREAM COLLECTION POINT
PEM = PALUSTRINE EMERGENT
PFO = PALUSTRINE FORESTED
SRPW = SEASONAL RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATER
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
SRPW (Intermittent): 447 LF
447 LF
1
Waters of the US Abutting Wetland
Wetland A
PEM: 0.09 Acres
PFO: 0.01 Acres
Total: 0.1 Acres
O
LEGEND \r//
PROJECT AREA (15.69 ACRES) 10 FT INDEX CONTOURS
Co 0 PEM WETLAND 2 FT CONTOURS
o � PFO WETLAND EXISTING 24" CULVERT
— — INTERMITTENT STREAM �L DP SCALE IN FEET
a SCP 2 0 200 400
Co
[111AF
BC CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC
117
289 MAPLE GROVE CHURCH ROAD
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
v 3701 Arco Corporate Dr., Suite 400 - Charlotte. NC 2873
ro
980-237-0373 800-365-2324 POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES MAP
w www.cecinc.com
DRAWN BY: MAK CHECKED BY: KT APPROVED BY: KT* FIGURE NO:
DATE: 6/11 /2020 1 SCALE: 1 " = 200 ' PROJECT NO: 302-078
* Hand signature
on file

ATTACHMENT A

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Shining Rock School Citylcounty: Waynesville/Haywood Sampling Late: 05/31/2020
ApplicandOwner: BC Construction Group State: NC Sampling Point: DP 1 WET
Investigator(s): Kevin Thomas & David Campbell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,), Terrace Local r0ief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-N Lai: 35.5203814259961 Long:-82,9862293817913
Soil Map unit Name: EvD Evard Cowee Complex 15 to 30 percent slopes NWI classification: NA
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F-7 1 No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
-slope (%): 0-1 %
Daturn: NAD 83
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No =
Are Vegetation= Soil or Hydrology = naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �0No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I Y I Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary.Indicators fminim.urn of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
[D Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
❑ Drift Deposits (83) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (I34) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
0 Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
,❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes M No= Depth (inches): 1
0
n
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Free Water at finch below ground surface, soil saturated at surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feet ) % Cover Species? Status
1, Acer rubrum var. trilobum 30 YES FAG
2, Acer negundo 5 NO FAC
6.
50% of total cover: 8
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 Feet
1.
35 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Feet )
1 Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis 5 Y£5 FAC
5.
6.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 Feet )
1, Carex tribuloides
30
2.Juncus effusus
20
3, Carex vulpinoldea
15
4. Persicarla Sagittata
10
5. Eupatorium perfoliatum
5
6 Cerastium nutans
2
7. Hypericum mutilum
2
6.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 42
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feet )�
1.Toxicodendron radicans
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
FACt
FACt
nRl
UML
FACE
FAC
FAC)'
84 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
5 YES FAC
Sampling Point: DP IWET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 0131-, FACW, or FAC:
3
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
3
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBIT, FACW, or FAC:
100%
(AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
=
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7712 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
[� Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in,
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH,
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
5
Total Cover Vegetation 20% of total cover: 1 Present? �,/� Yes 1._: J No=
US Army Carps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -- Version 2,0

SOIL
Profile
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Sampling Point: IMP 1Wip
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 412 90 7.5YR 416 10 C M SOL
9-14 7.5YR 416 70 10 YR 412 30 D M SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
❑ Thick (lark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
=duced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Liningr M=Matrix,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
Ej 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
L] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147r 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
® Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147r 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
D Redox Dark Surface (F6)
j Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
® Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -- Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project,site: Shining Rock School city/county: Waynesville/Haywood sampling Date; 05/31/2020
Applicant(Owner: SC Construction Group State: NC Sampling Point: DIP 2 UP
Investigator(s): Kevin Thomas & David Campbell Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Saddle Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (l_RR or MLRA): LRR-N rat; 35.5204052237655 Long:-82.9862784188144
Soil Map Unit Name: EvD Evard Cowee Complex 15 to 30 percent slopes NWI classification: NA
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _y l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks,)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
Are Vegetation❑, Soil or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
- Slope (%): 0-1 %
Datum: NAD 83
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = NJ77 within a Wetland? Yes = No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No, TI.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary_ Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (810)
❑ Saturation 03) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (85)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
Ej Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAG -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No' r ' Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No ETJ Depth (inches):
n
Saturation Present? Yes ❑, No I Y I Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks;
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point; DP 2 UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feet ) % Cover Species? Status
Acer rubrum var. trilobum 5 YES AC Number of Dominant Species
F4
1, That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3, Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5, That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AB)
6.
5 = Total Cover rrevaiance iriaex wu1 n51MUL;
Total %Cover of: Multirrly l?Y:
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover:
(Plot size;
15 Feet OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum )
FACW species x 2 W
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3,
UPL species x 5 =
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 Feet f
1 Rosa palmtds
Prevalence Index = BIA =
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
a YES oar _❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
s = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 2
20% of total cover:
5 Feet
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 Agrimonia parviflora
40 YES FACt
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2, Trifolium repens
5 NO FACU
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3, Carex vulpinoidea
2 NO OBL
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
4.
than 3 in, (7,6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -- Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5.
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb --Ali herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, loss than approximately 3
9.
It (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
47 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 24
20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 Feet )
1. ToAcodendron radicans
5 YES FAC
4 5
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: Present? Yes I • E No=
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP 2 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color fmoisti % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-1 T5 YR 313 100 SCL A
1-14 7.5YR 416 100
Hydric Soil indicators:
0 Hlstosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 141, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks;
Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
SCL Bt
ZLocation; PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Q hark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
r] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
EJ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.n Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
® Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 21
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2,0

ATTACHMENT B

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams
and their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3.31.2020
Project/Site: Shining Rock
Latitude: 35.5212585002446
Evaluator: KT & DC
County: Haywood, NC
Longitude-82.9855794370495
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if > 30 * 26
Stream Determination: (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Stream ID: SA 1 & SCP1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal= 11
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
La Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. in -channel structure: ex. Riffle -pool, step -pool
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade Control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural Valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a -artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 8.5__)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal= 6.5_)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75 OBL= 1.5 Other=
0
Notes: Substrate mainly silt/sand/clay with some gravels/cobles. 1 Crane Fly Larva, no EPT, flow
throughout.
Sketch:

ATTACHMENT C

Photo Number: 1
.
Date: May 31, 2020
s
4
e �►
h' N
Description:
DP 1 UP Soil Profile
NY,
5'Atkl
x31Wtx
art
,ff
y iat �A
s k
MAW—
e
1
1p,,Pr,�-,
T,dMI�R, �S AI
Photo Number: 2
Date: May 31, 2020
A�.
aft
Description:
DP 1 UP View Looking East
v
Shining Rock Classical Academy
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
BC Construction Group
Charlotte, NC
Haywood County, North Carolina
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
CEC Project 302-078
1 I Page

Ir=Frl-
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Photo Number: 3
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
DP 1 Wet Soil Profile
Photo Number: 4
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
DP 1 Wet View Looking Southwest
Shining Rock Classical Academy
BC Construction Group
Haywood County, North Carolina
CEC Project 302-078
2 1 P a g e

Photo Number: 5
Date: May 31, 2020
ry
iPI� q.
Description:
DP 1 Wet View Looking East
il,R�
3
3y w
Y
la
xx
3 to � ;i Pt; .. t•.
Photo Number: 6
R
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
r ' ' .
SA 1 & SCP 1 Crane Fly Larva
M
y.
,_�_�=
Shining Rock Classical Academy
' A AV
BC Construction Group
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Haywood County, North Carolina
Charlotte, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
3 1 P a g e

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Photo Number: 7
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
SA 1 & SCP 1 View Looking Northeast Down
Reach
Photo Number: 8
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
SA 1 & SCP 1 Soil Based Evidence of High
Groundwater Table
Shining Rock Classical Academy
BC Construction Group
Haywood County, North Carolina
CEC Project 302-078
4 1 P a g e

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Photo Number: 9
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
SA 1 & SCP 1 View Looking Southwest Up
Reach
Photo Number: 10
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
View Looking East of Hedgerow Vegetation
Shining Rock Classical Academy
BC Construction Group
Haywood County, North Carolina
CEC Project 302-078
5 1 P a g e

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
Photo Number:11
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
View Looking North of Hedgerow Vegetation
Photo Number: 12
Date: May 31, 2020
Description:
View Looking North of Pasture
Shining Rock Classical Academy
BC Construction Group
Haywood County, North Carolina
CEC Project 302-078
6 1 P a g e

Photo Number: 13
Date: May 31, 2020
w:t '
Description:
View of Black Locust with Woodpecker Hole
;3
Photo Number: 14
Date:
Description:
,AV
Shining Rock Classical Academy
M W
BC Construction Group
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Haywood County, North Carolina
Charlotte, NC
CEC Project 302-078
Phone [phone] • Toll Free: 855/859-9932 www.cecinc.com
7 1 P a g e