Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0005088_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200727DocuSign Envelope ID: 56169EC3-2C71-419D-9738-BOA9OB14ADA2 ROY COOPER Covernor MICHAEL S. REGAN secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Direct -or Steve Hodges Duke Energy Carolinas LLC 573 Duke Power Rd Cliffside, NC 28024 NORTH CAROLINA £nvrxontn"tal Quality July 27, 2020 SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report Rogers Energy Complex NPDES WW Permit No. NC0005088 Rutherford County Dear Permittee: The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Rogers Energy Complex on 7/22/2020. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No. NC0005088. The findings and comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report entitled "Compliance Inspection Report". There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this inspection report is not required. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Timothy Heim with the Water Quality Regional Operations Section in the Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4500 or via email at tim.heim@ncdenr.gov. ATTACHMENTS Ec: LF Sincerely, EDocuSigned by: fiKA61#Aj (�uwA 082B1105A3CA418... Tim Heim, P.E., Environmental Engineer Water Quality Regional Operations Section Asheville Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ N"NCarokisDepartment ofEnvironmental QualBy I OivisionofWater Resourres Ashevil ie Regional Office 1 2090 U.S_ 70 if� imay I Sw nanoa, North Carolaa 23773 '� 32S 29C-0500 DocuSign Envelope ID: 56169EC3-2C71-419D-9738-BOA9OB14ADA2 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 IN 2 u 3 I NC0005088 111 121 20/07/22 I17 18 L� ] 19 I s I 201 211IIIII 111111III II III III1 I I IIIII IIIIIIIII II r6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------------------- Reserved ------------------- 67 I 72 I n, I 73 � I 74 79 I I I I I I I80 70 I I 71 I LL -1 I I LJ Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 08:OOAM 20/07/22 18/09/01 Rogers Energy Complex Duke Power Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Cliffside NC 28024 11:00AM 20/07/22 23/07/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Steve D Hodges/ORC/828-657-2339/ Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Steve D Hodges,573 Duke Power Rd Cliffside NC 28024//828-657-2000/8286572060 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit 0 Operations & Maintenar 0 Records/Reports Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Wate Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Timothy H Heim DWR/ARO WQ/828-296-4665/ 7/27/2020 F�11"Signed by: K,6 (�6VA Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date D—Signed by: 712712020 EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page# DocuSign Envelope ID: 56169EC3-2C71-419D-9738-BOA90B14ADA2 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.) NC0005088 I11 12I 20/07/22 117 18 I c Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Tim Heim of the Asheville Regional Office performed a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of the facility and associated record keeping and datasheets on July 22, 2020. Steve Hodges (Environmental Coordinator and BORC) of Duke Energy was present at the time of the inspection. Mr. Hodges has resumed station environmental responsibilities at the Rogers Complex after the previous Station Environmental Coordinator departed. David Bridges remains the ORC and Crystal Robertson is BORC and lab manager. Jeff Joyce is assuming the role of Station Manager. This facility includes three Grade II biological "package plants" that process domestic wastewater from plant restrooms and discharge via internal outfalls to the newly constructed physical -chemical (PC) WWTP, which in turn discharges via NPDES Permit NC0005088. At the time of the inspection, the three package plants ("Unit 6 Admin," V5"and "FGD 6 Domestic") were active and appeared well maintained and operated. The physical -chemical WWTP, which commenced operation in April 2019 has replaced the existing Ash Pond for treatment and discharge of all internal waste streams and discharges via Outfall 005. Facility staff report that the new WWTP is operating in a satisfactory manner. Ash Basin Outfall 002 is now being piped to a "yard drain" and discharged via Outfall 005. Seepage at the facility is being addressed under a Special Order of Consent (EMC SOC WQ S17-009) which will expire on or before June 30, 2022. Current ongoing projects include the construction of a bioreactor unit for the Unit #5 FDG Scrubber wastewater. The facility appeared to be in compliance with Permit NC0005088 at the time of the inspection. Page# DocuSign Envelope ID: 56169EC3-2C71-419D-9738-BOA9OB14ADA2 Permit: NC0005088 Inspection Date: 07/22/2020 Operations & Maintenance Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Owner -Facility: Rogers Energy Complex Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Permit (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? Is the facility as described in the permit? # Are there any special conditions for the permit? Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? Comment: Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3