SW3191105_Millbridge 7-8- Isolated Excavated Pond Evaluation 5.15.17_20200723

LU
Q
J
F—
LU
r)
r)
D
F-
r)
z
O
o-
r)
LU
F—
Q
O
W
yl
.::
N 3
LU
N
r
r
'o
co co C
¢
zz R > > 0 0
w 2 a
P.
A
w w
Q
K
W O
J O O R •C R
U N
�
N y y a C
_
A
C
O R R M
❑zod: b
a
w
•..
R A
w
3
�•
a
r f'i .•
a �
r
0
7-
3
e
�
w
r
:�.
�
A
m
� .�
•oa
LU
�
:z
0:
N
;
0
a
V
LL
A
LU,�
V)
z g
Z a
LU.'��
a z
.=
g
o o
';
L
LU
g �
°�LU
V
w
w
w Q ;'•
� w
Ln
LU
Ln
H
Q :
V
g
~
z
g
W
~
a
z
o
g
W
0
a
3
� �
r
�
N
~
O
�
o
Q
2
H o
ti
00
LLI
9 Q
0 U
I
�
zoo
CJ
W
w
A

1
Q i
T! O C: `^
y O N Y O V
N
in
70
x 4-
O iv O O 0 N COCO
m
O
VO N Q �' T N w0
L
° cn maa� om Q- r
Ul L O O Q W Ir�� n ..
f0 7
CL o
m
m
00
`�� • O ��
.�rr�
-zLn
Q •� r-� f�p Q 7 O
c
0 � N
Z 0) �
-- Q O ._ m
w� � J in V
v ° cu
a N O
J „ ate° cncn 0
Q m - � m 0 _0
LU
- o
p '--"r 4-
Q
p 3 m m CU 0 O
N i"� i �1�.�17\ 4•L U Q O U
cn � Qw `° U•�N
m
O � L o
p a 0 , -r-cn
N
Q> Vf 7 •` 0
0 E E II N 1
D C.
J 1 1 1+r
U + - f.
CD
+ Q C N
d O O .0 II
U) -O
i/� C to c O
\ c4 -0 O
.
O L() O O �I . U .
V1
7 o c 3 m
o �
y
c
4_ 4F ooy
�� u w _ _ �-
a C W a O Oo
a
ca O 7 7 R
O Z J
U �
V o • 4L
m `. •
0
pp
O o
Z
a a
V
Q W G j
a 0
a�
V
N
W
0—
000
OO �Q
o
Q Z
-
O
fl
N
Z Ln
N
L L
N
N (B
N
LU
=3 O
LL
O
w
Qo
0
cn
o

-
i.- z
J
or
c,
t
■

ll
koi
At-
r
W -
7^�
a

- vi
$ i _ ?
�Av
- v - Ww
4 c„g j q yy s a vM s ;4 .
c°TV tc - d wT /+ •G `r7. .
i 3' -
f
■

„WF P_
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
PHOTO 17: Berm of Agricultural Pond 1.
Millbridge Phase 7 & 8 Pond Study
Union County, NC — Photos taken 05103117
Leonard S- Rindner, PLLC.

a
gsi
�8i13�%.�
V 1•1 S y,
r %
Y
� 1
r
. _ h
�aa'e��An .eH
s
1
B�
1F
r
i
Al
�...�'�'
1
a

PHOTO 21: Drainage area downslope of Agricultural Pond 2 (facing downslope).
.r
i
to4.
Jmi
PHOTO 22: Typical soils downslope of Agricultural Pond.
Millbridge Phase 7 & 8 Pond Study
WF1 Union County, NC — Photos taken 05103117
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S- Rindner, PLLC.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date: I
I Evaluator: I WEPG
I Easting:
- 80.780 W
Project:
I Millbridge Ph 7 & 8. Stormwater channel upslope of Stream L1
I Northing:
34.924 N
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
15.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
9.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Hydrology Subtotal
2.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
4.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
No water in channel
Silty, clay substrate. Small amounts of sand.
Fibrous roots in channel
Some scour but generally weak to non-existent OHWM
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)
Origins.

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
9/16/15 1 Evaluator: I HAC
Easting:
-80.7813 W
Project:
Millbridge: Seasonal RPW L (DP 6)
Northing:
34.92307N
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
21.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
14
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
4.5
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
3.0
. perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Representative Stream Form for intermittent Streams/RPW's C, D, and E
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)
Origins.