Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200758 Ver 1_Mitigation Information_20200723 Wanucha, Dave From:Jim Mason <james.mason@threeoaksengineering.com> Sent:Monday, July 20, 2020 2:03 PM To:Nancy Oberle; David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil Cc:Wanucha, Dave; Parker, Jerry A; Wilver, David; Craig Young; Ketner, Brian K Subject:\[External\] RE: Request for Additional Information - NCDOT Division 7 - U-6010, Alamance County; SAW-2018-01083 CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam@nc.gov Dave- You should have received a DMS letter from Beth Harmon for this project. The amounts listed in the letter cover all of the permanent wetland impacts and all permanent stream impacts that result in a loss of waters. As you had stated previously we assumed 2:1 mitigation on all of these impacts. Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information regarding the DMS letter. Thanks and have a great day, Jim From: Nancy Oberle <nancy.oberle@threeoaksengineering.com> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 9:58 AM To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Jim Mason <james.mason@threeoaksengineering.com> Cc: Wanucha, Dave <dave.wanucha@ncdenr.gov>; Parker, Jerry A <jparker@ncdot.gov>; Wilver, David <David.Wilver@parsons.com>; Craig Young <craig.young@threeoaksengineering.com>; Ketner, Brian K <bkketner@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information - NCDOT Division 7 - U-6010, Alamance County; SAW-2018-01083 Hi Dave, Thank you for your review of the subject permit application. Here are the responses to your questions below: 1) Project U-6010 is an intersection improvement (University at S. Church Street) project and not tied to U- 2581B/R-2910. The 2020-2029 STIP shows U-2581 BC (section from Knox Road to Rock Creek Dairy Road) as unfunded (hanging out past 2029 in the STIP). R-2901 is not listed in the 2020-2029 STIP at all. 2) The seven lanes (dual thru, dual left, and separate right turn) is proposed to improve the intersection capacity and level of service. It has nothing to do with matching another project widening to the west. Also, S. Church Street was already five lanes at Westbrook Drive. Once the intersection was widened to accommodate dual left turn lanes, dual through lanes, and a separate right turn lane along with the required storage lengths it did not make sense to leave a short section of unwidened roadway along S. Church Street between University Drive and Westbrook Drive. 3) Site 1 – No floodplain benches are proposed at this culvert extension. This culvert is located in a FEMA study area and the entire opening is needed for compliance. Also, the existing stream width closely matches the existing culvert width at both the upstream and downstream sections. Site 2 – The existing culvert is only being extended on the downstream end. A 2’ tall sill is proposed in the northern barrel at the outlet as there is an existing 2’ sill already on the inlet side. There is an existing floodplain bench on the outlet end that will be maintained. 1 4) A DMS request will be submitted. Please let us know if you have any further questions. Thanks, Nancy Nancy Scott Oberle Three Oaks Engineering 324 Blackwell Street , Suite 1200 Durham, NC 27701 919 732 1300 office 919 900 6535 direct – please note my new number nancy.oberle@threeoaksengineering.com – please note my new email www.threeoaksengineering.com From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 3:41 PM To: Jim Mason <james.mason@threeoaksengineering.com>; Nancy Oberle <nancy.oberle@threeoaksengineering.com> Cc: Wanucha, Dave <dave.wanucha@ncdenr.gov>; Parker, Jerry A <jparker@ncdot.gov> Subject: Request for Additional Information - NCDOT Division 7 - U-6010, Alamance County; SAW-2018-01083 All, Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated 6/10/2020, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 (http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP14.pdf). Please submit the requested information below (via e‐mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file: 1) It appears that this project is a segment of the proposed U-2581B/R-2910 project, which completed Concurrence Points 1 and 2/2A of the Section 404/NEPA Merger Process in October 2011 and November 2013, respectively. The western-most segment of the U-2581B/R-2910 project was split off to become part of the Publix Distribution Center project (SAW-2018-00240). However, to our knowledge this overall project had not been dissolved or permanently shelved, and further piecemealing of this overall project presents additional questions regarding avoidance and minimization; further, it does not appear that the Merger team was advised of this segmentation. The Corps highly recommends notifying the remainder of the Merger Team of this action. 2) Per the above, does the project purpose and need justify increasing lanes from 2 to 7 on US Highway 70, west of University Drive, which then condense back down to two lanes within ~0.15 mile of the intersection? Or, does that aspect of the project design have more to do with tie-in to a future widened US Highway 70 to the west? 3) Are floodplain benches proposed at the inlet/outlets of Sites 1 and 2? If so, please provide cross-section views that clearly show the proposal; 4) Currently the proposal does not include compensatory mitigation. However, given that this project is a widening of a previous NCDOT project (U-2905), and the fact that the Corps views NCDOT projects cumulatively as a state- wide transportation network, compensatory mitigation would be required in this case for all stream and wetland impacts resulting in a loss of waters. Compensatory mitigation requirements typically start at a 2:1 mitigation to impact ratio with decisions to lower those ratios based on aquatic function of the resources proposed for impact. Note, however, that NCSAM and NCWAM forms provided with the PCN indicate medium or higher rated resources; as such, 2:1 mitigation is justified. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, 2 Dave Bailey --- David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE-SAW-RG-R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Phone: (919) 554-4884, Ext. 30. Fax: (919) 562-0421 Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0 Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey. 3