20191750 Ver 2_401 Application_20200721

i0- WithersRavenel
.. our Peopte. Your Success.
07/21/2020
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Lyle Phillips
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. Paul Wojoski
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Holly Lane Townhome Subdivision
Raleigh, Wake County
NWP 3 & 13 & Riparian Buffer Authorization PCN Submittal
USACE AID# SAW-2019-01218
NCDWR Proj # 20191750
WR Project #02170003.00
Dear Mr. Phillips and Mr. Wojoski,
On behalf of MI Homes, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 3 & 13 for
48 If of permanent stream impacts (no functional loss) and 10 If of temporary stream impacts for
construction of the proposed project. We are also requesting a 401 WQC for the above
referenced impacts, as well as a Riparian Buffer Authorization from NCDWR for 13,578 sf of
permanent riparian buffer impacts (Zone 1: 8254 sf; Zone 2: 5324 sf).
The project is ±12.4 acres in size and is located at 3803 Holly Lane in Raleigh, Wake County
(Latitude: 35.833294°N; Longitude:-78.683321°W). The project consists of the following seven
parcels:
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795386748 - ±2.30 ac
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795388982 - ±1.83 ac
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795388580 - ±2.20 ac
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795481606 - ±1.88 ac
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795480255 - ±0.94 ac
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795482342 - ±1.61 ac
• Wake Co.
PIN: 0795483460 - ±1.60 ac
The project is located in the Neuse River basin (HUC: 03020201) and onsite waters drain to
Crabtree Creek (Stream Index: 27-33-(10); WQC: C;NSW).
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential townhome subdivision to meet
the need for residential housing in Raleigh. The proposed project consists of construction of an
88-unit townhome subdivision and associated infrastructure (roads, utilities, stormwater
management, etc.).
219 Station Road I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.622.0122 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Holly Lane Subdivision - NWP 3 & 13 PCN �: WithersRavene l
Our People. Your Success.
The City of Raleigh is requiring Holly Lane to be improved from an existing gravel driveway within
a public ROW to a paved two-lane road. The improvements to Holly Lane are necessary both for
the construction of the stormwater management pond as well as to meet City of Raleigh
requirements for site plan approval. The improvements to the existing Holly Lane requires the
replacement of the existing dual 36-inch RCP culverts, which are undersized and failing, with three
box culverts consisting of a 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert to carry base flow, and two 10-ft x 8-ft box
culverts which will carry high flow only. The significant increase in the size of the culverts is based
on the drainage study which determined the size and number of box culverts based on the
modeling for conveyance during high flows. In the existing condition, the dual 26-inch culverts
are undersized, and result in significant backwater and overtopping of the road during heavy rain
events. The head created by the backwaters and overtopping of the road has led to significant
erosion and undercutting of the existing culverts which has resulted in the failure and collapse of
the culverts. The three box culverts have been designed with the 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert carrying
the base flow, with the two 10-ft x 8-ft box culverts being installed at a higher elevation so they
carry high flow only. Retaining walls will be used to stabilize road fill in order to keep the proposed
culverts within the same footprint as the existing culverts.
Due to the flow velocity and volume during heavy rain events, the stream channel below the
culverts must be stabilized to prevent erosion of the stream banks and undercutting of the culverts
and road. In the existing condition, erosion has created an natural plunge pool below the culverts.
In order to stabilize the stream banks, the stream bed and banks will be lined with rip -rap. The
bank stabilization has been designed to stabilize the stream channel and banks as they exist now,
and no excavation of the stream banks to create formal dissipator is proposed. The rip -rap will be
installed by burying the rip -rap such that the top of the rip -rap matches the natural contours of
the streams, allowing for the passage of aquatic life and preventing a functional loss of this section
of stream.
The onsite sewer will connect to the existing City of Raleigh gravity sewer located near the
northwest corner of the project. An aerial crossing over Stream 2 will be constructed to avoid
stream impacts at this crossing (see Sheet B in the Buffer Impact Maps for the cross-section detail).
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and
techniques.
Proiect History
Ross Sullivan with the USACE field verified the wetland delineation for the project on 7/31/19
(SAW-2019-01218). As of the submittal of this PCN, the PJD has not been issued. WR is not
requesting issuance of a JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29. The Approved
Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit depicting the field verified delineation has been provided as
an attachment.
NCDWR issued a Riparian Buffer Determination Letter for the project on 6/3/19 (NBRRO#19-
156). A copy of the buffer determination letter has been provided as an attachment.
Page 2 of 5

Holly Lane Subdivision - NWP 3 & 13 PCN �: WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
In December 2019, WithersRavenel submitted an NWP 29 application requesting 118 If of
permanent stream impacts, 11 If of temporary stream impacts, 0.021 acres of permanent wetland
impacts and 0.026 acres of temporary wetland impacts for the project. All proposed stream and
wetland impacts were necessary for the improvements and widening of Holly Lane to meet City
of Raleigh requirements. In response to the USACE Incomplete Application letter dated
1/20/2020, WithersRavenel coordinated with the USACE on several occasions, including the
meeting on 3/4/2020 with the applicant, USACE and City of Raleigh to discuss the project. The
City of Raleigh was initially requiring Holly Lane to be improved to a 20-ft wide two-lane road,
with curb and gutter, a 6-ft wide planted strip and 6-ft sidewalks, and graded to accommodate the
future widening to 26-ft. The USACE ultimately determined that the proposed impacts for the
improvements to Holly Lane to meet City requirements had no immediate connection or purpose
and need and could not be authorized under an NWP 29 as a single and complete project. At the
meeting, the USACE stated that since there is a culverted crossing for an existing driveway and if
the road width could be reduced such that the proposed culverts were the same length as the
existing failing culverts, it would be considered maintenance of an existing structure and eligible
for a NWP 3.
On 5/5/2020, WithersRavenel submitted an email to the USACE and NCDWR formally
withdrawing the application submitted in December 2019. Following the withdrawal of the NWP
29 application, the applicant has worked with the City of Raleigh on redesign of the design of the
Holly Lane extension and the City has granted a variance to deviate from their standard road
design, allowing the road width to be narrowed at the stream crossing, which allows the proposed
culverts to be the same length as the existing failing culverts (44 If). The current application
request authorization of the stream impact necessary to replace the existing culverts (NWP 3), as
well as installation of a rip -rap dissipator to stabilize the stream below the culverts (NWP 13).
Proposed Impacts
NWP 3 Impacts (Maintenance)
The replacement of the existing dual 36-inch RCP culverts, which are undersized and failing, with
three box culverts consisting of a 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert to carry base flow, and two 10-ft x 8-
ft box culverts which will carry high flow only. The installation of the proposed three box culverts
will result in 4 If of temporary stream impacts (Impact 6) during construction.
NWP 13 Impacts (Bank Stabilization)
Due to the volume and velocity of flow during heavy rain events, the stream channel below the
culverts must be stabilized to prevent erosion of the stream and undercutting of the culverts and
road. 42 If of stream channel will be stabilized below the culverts (Impact 5). The rip -rap will be
installed by burying the rip -rap such that the top of the rip -rap matches the natural contours of
the stream, allowing for the passage of aquatic life and preventing a functional loss of this section
of stream. Please note that this is not a constructed rip -rap dissipator, but rather bank stabilization
that has been designed to stabilize the stream channel and banks as they exist now (see Sheet D
of the Wetland & Stream Impact Maps).
Page 3 of 5

Holly Lane Subdivision - NWP 3 & 13 PCN :: Withers Rave n e l
Our People. Your Success.
During installation of the rip -rap stabilization, 6 If of temporary stream impacts (Impact 4) beyond
the bank stabilization area may be needed.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
The sewer crossing necessary to connect the internal sewer to the existing City of Raleigh sewer
line will result in 2,189 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts and 1,361 sf of permanent Zone 2 impacts
for construction of the sewer line and perpetual mowing/maintenance of the entire 30' sewer
easement. The sewer crossing will a perpendicular crossing impacting less than 40 If of riparian
buffer and will have a permanent maintenance corridor greater than 10 If, which is classified as
"Allowable" in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses. Please note this will be an
aerial sewer crossing and will not result in impacts to Stream 2.
The improvements to Holly Lane will result in a total of 13,578 sf of permanent riparian buffer
impacts (Zone 1: 8254 sf; Zone 2: 5324 sf). The buffer crossings will be perpendicular, impacting
less than 150 If or 1/3 acre of riparian buffer, which is classified as "Allowable" in the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Impacts have been minimized to only those necessary for infrastructure. There are no proposed
wetland or stream impacts for lot fill.
The redesign of the improvements to Holly Lane has result in the avoidance of the previously
proposed 0.021 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 0.026 acres of temporary wetland
impacts.
The redesign of the Holly Lane improvements has reduced proposed permanent stream impacts
from the previously proposed 118 If to the currently proposed 48 If. Additionally, the redesign
shortened the proposed culverts to 44 If, which is the length of the existing culverts, eliminating
the previously proposed 67 If of permanent stream impacts with function loss for extension of the
culverts to accommodate the wider road. The proposed permanent impacts with no functional
loss have been reduced from the previously proposed 51 If to 42 If. Additionally, stream impacts
have been minimized through the use of retaining walls to stabilize road fill, as well as the use of
an aerial sewer crossing over Stream 2.
The rip -rap bank stabilization has been designed for the rip -rap to be installed so that the top of
the rip -rap matches the pre -construction elevation of the stream bed. This design allows for the
stabilized segment of stream to continue functioning as a natural stream by maintaining natural
water depths and allowing for passage of aquatic life.
The proposed 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert that will carry base flow will be installed so that bottom of
the culvert is at least 12-inches below the stream bed to maintain aquatic life passage during
periods of low flow. Additionally, the stream channel is approximately 12-ft wide at the location
Page 4 of 5

Holly Lane Subdivision - NWP 3 & 13 PCN :: Withers Rave n e l
Our People. Your Success.
of the proposed box culvert. Therefore, the installation of the 10'x10' box culvert will not result in
widening of the channel and the OHW depth will be maintained. The two additional 10-ft x 8-ft
box culverts will be installed at higher elevations so that they only convey high flow.
The proposed buffer impacts are necessary to construct a perpendicular road crossing and
perpendicular sewer crossing, which are both classified as "Allowable" uses in the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
The proposed permanent stream impacts consist of 48 If for banks stabilization and will not result
in a function loss. Therefore, stream mitigation is not proposed.
Buffer Mitigation
All proposed buffer impacts are classified as "Allowable" uses in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules Table of Uses, and therefore buffer mitigation is not required.
The current request is for 48 If of permanent stream impacts (no functional loss), 10 If of
temporary stream impacts and 13,578 sf of permanent riparian buffer impacts (see the attached
maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent & Access Authorization Forms
• Property Owner Information
• Approved Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Wake County Soil Survey
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• USFWS T&E Species List for Wake County
• Impact Exhibits
Page 5 of 5

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191750
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Holly Lane Townhome Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Troy Beasley
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
7/21/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek (Stream Index 27-33-(10))
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.833294-78.683321
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
L.1
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
NWP 13
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
03 - Maintenance
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Mark R Christopher Bensen
2b. Deed book and page no.:
B: 4642, P: 841; B: 4627, P: 24; B: 4627, P: 22; B: 16-E, P: 3223; B: 4177, P: 108
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
3801 Holly Lane
Address Line 2
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27612
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Hugh White
State / Rwince / Ifgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

2b. Deed book and page no.:
B: 96-E; P: 1238
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
2801 Glenwood Gardens Lane
Address Line 2
Unit 305
City
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zip Code
27608
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Michael & Carol Grajek
2b. Deed book and page no.:
B: 17294, P: 2190
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
3909 Blue Ridge Road
Address Line 2
aty
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Ode
27612
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Erica Leathern
3b. Business Name:
MI Homes
3c.Address
Street Address
1511 Sunday Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 100
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Troy Beasley
State / Rovince / Fegion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
21'. Fax Number:
State / Rmince / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
4b. Business Name:
WithersRavenel

4c.Address
Street Address
219 Station Road
Address tine 2
Suite 101
city
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28405
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
SIGNED_Agent Authorization_MI Homes.pdf
SIGNED —Access Authorization_Bensen.pdf
SIGNED —Access Authorization_Grajek.pdf
SIGNED —Access Authorization_White.pdf
Slate / Frmnce / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
80.11 KB
60.65KB
52.04KB
50.49KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^)
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appro)riate)
Holly Lane
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0795386748;0795388982;0795388580;
0795481606;0795480255;0795482342;
0795483460
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3803 Holly Lane
Address Line 2
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27612
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Crabtree Creek (Stream Index: 27-33-(10))
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010803
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
12.4
State / Rwnce / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site currently consists of an existing residential dwelling, yard and driveway, undeveloped woodlands and a drained pond. The general land use in the vicinity consists of a
mixture of residential and commercial land use.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
A previous 404/401/Buffer Authorization application was submitted for the project in December 2019 (USACE AID: 2019-01218/NCDWR Proj #: 20191750). Due to the inability to permit
the impacts for the City of Raleigh's requirements for the extension of Folly Lane, the application was formally withdrawn on 05/20/2020.

Project History Upload
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS Quads.pdf
596.09KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey.pdf 607.82KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetlands - ±1.51 ac; Pond: ±0.10 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
±1.004 If
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential townhome subdivision with 88 units to meet the need for residential housing in Raleigh.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The City of Raleigh is requiring Folly Lane to be improved from an existing gravel driveway within a public ROW to a paved two-lane road. The improvements to Folly Lane are
necessary both for the construction of the stormwater management pond as well as to meet City of Raleigh requirements for site plan approval. The improvements to the existing Holly
Lane requires the replacement of the existing dual 36-inch RCP culverts, which are undersized and failing, with three box culverts consisting of a 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert to carry base
flow, and two 10-ft x 8-ft box culverts which will carry high flow only. The significant increase in the size of the culverts is based on the drainage study which determined the size and
number of box culverts based on the modeling for conveyance during high flows. In the existing condition, the dual 26-inch culverts are undersized, and result in significant backwater
and overtopping of the road during heavy rain events. The head created by the backwaters and overtopping of the road has led to significant erosion and undercutting of the existing
culverts which has resulted in the failure and collapse of the culverts. The three box culverts have been designed with the 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert carrying the base flow, with the two 10-
ft x 8-ft box culverts being installed at a higher elevation so they carry high flow only. Retaining walls will be used to stabilize road fill in order to keep the proposed culverts within the
same footprint as the existing culverts.
Due to the flow velocity and volume during heavy rain events, the stream channel below the culverts must be stabilized to prevent erosion of the stream banks and undercutting of the
culverts and road. In the existing condition, erosion has created an natural plunge pool belowthe culverts. In order to stabilize the stream banks, the stream bed and banks will be lined
with rip -rap. The bank stabilization has been designed to stabilize the stream channel and banks as they exist now, and no excavation of the stream banks to create formal dissipator is
proposed. The rip -rap will be installed by burying the rip -rap such that the top of the rip -rap matches the natural contours of the streams, allowing for the passage of aquatic life and
preventing a functional loss of this section of stream.
The onsite sewer will connect to the existing City of Raleigh gravity sewer located near the northwest corner of the project. An aerial crossing over Stream 2 will be constructed to avoid
stream impacts at this crossing (see Sheet B in the Buffer Impact Maps for the cross-section detail).
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and techniques.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Stream&Wetland Impact Maps.pdf 1.62MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-01218
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Alyssa Ricci
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Other:
r Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
Ross Sullivan with the USACE field verified the wetland delineation for the project on 7/31/19 (SAW-2019-01218). As of the submittal of this PCN, the PJD has not been issued. WR is
not requesting issuance of a JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
NCDWR issued a Riparian Buffer Determination Letter for the project on 6/3119 (NBRRO#19-156). A copy of the buffer determination letter has been provided as an attachment.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Approved Wetland -Buffer Delineation Exhibit.pdf 442.48KB
Holly Lane Assemblage - NCDWR Buffer Determiantion - 06.03.2019.pdf 655.77KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?

No. The proposed project represents all property currently under contract for purchase by the applicant. At this time, there are no additional phases anticipated, and the proposed
project represents a single and complete project with no other permits or impacts required.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands m Streams -tributaries m Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact *
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Impact 4 - Temporary
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
12
6
Construction Access
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S2
Impact 5 - Rip -Rap Bank
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
12
42
Stablization
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S3
Impact 6 - Temporary
Temporary
Culvert
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
12
4
Construction Access
Average (feet)
(linearfcet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
42 10
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
52
3j. Comments:
The proposed 42 If of permanent stream impacts will result from bank stabilization and will not result in a functional loss.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
ai ck all that apply.
V Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
r" Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
❑ Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact 1 - Perpendicular Sewer Crossing
P
Stream 2
No
2,189
1,361
Impact 2 - Perpendicular Road Crossing
P
Stream 1
No
6,065
3,389
Impact 3 - Perpendicular Road Crossing
P
Stream 1
No
0
574
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 8,254.00 5,324.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 8,254.00 5,324.00
6i. Comments:
The proposed buffer impacts will occur from a perpendicular road crossing which is classified as "Allowable" in the %use River Buffer Rules Table of
Uses.
Supporting Documentation
Buffer Impact Maps.pdf 2.65MB

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be
minimized.
Impacts have been minimized to only those necessary for infrastructure. There are no proposed wetland or stream impacts for lot fill.
The redesign of the improvements to Holly Lane has result in the avoidance of the previously proposed 0.021 acres of permanent wetland impacts
and 0.026 acres of temporary wetland impacts.
The redesign of the Holly Lane improvements has reduced proposed permanent stream impacts from the previously proposed 118 If to the currently
proposed 48 If. Additionally, the redesign shortened the proposed culverts to 44 If, which is the length of the existing culverts, eliminating the
previously proposed 67 If of permanent stream impacts with function loss for extension of the culverts to accommodate the wider road. The proposed
permanent impacts with no functional loss have been reduced from the previously proposed 51 If to 42 If. Additionally, stream impacts have been
minimized through the use of retaining walls to stabilize road fill, as well as the use of an aerial sewer crossing over Stream 2.
The rip -rap bank stabilization has been designed for the rip -rap to be installed so that the top of the rip -rap matches the pre -construction elevation of
the stream bed. This design allows for the stabilized segment of stream to continue functioning as a natural stream by maintaining natural water
depths and allowing for passage of aquatic life.
The proposed 10-ft x 10-ft box culvert that will carry base flowwill be installed so that bottom of the culvert is at least 12-inches belowthe stream bed
to maintain aquatic life passage during periods of lowflow. Additionally, the stream channel is approximately 12-ft wide at the location of the proposed
box culvert. Therefore, the installation of the 10'x10' box culvert will not result in widening of the channel and the CHIN depth will be maintained. The
two additional 10-ft x 8-ft box culverts will be installed at higher elevations so that they only convey high flow.
The proposed buffer impacts are necessary to construct a perpendicular road crossing and perpendicular sewer crossing, which are both classified as
"Allowable" uses in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas and access during construction will be within uplands where possible.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If will not result in a functional loss and therefore mitigation is not proposed. Additionally, proposed buffer impacts are for "Allowable" uses,
and therefore buffer mitigation is not required.
LF. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
W Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
c Yes r No
r WA - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs

V Phase II W NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Raleigh
Comments:
The storm inter management plan consists of a wet detention SCM which will provide the required nitrogen removal and therefore diffuse flow is not required. Additionally, the pond
outfall will discharge through uplands and into the onsite wetlands, and not through the riparian buffers. The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the City of
Raleigh as the certified local government.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. lathe site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located within a heavily developed area of Raleigh, and there are no future phases of the proposed development anticipated.
The project is not anticipated to be a catalyst for future development that could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
City of Raleigh sanitary sewer
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home, as well as NCNHP GIS data to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent
occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or Within 1.0 miles of the project, see
attached NCNHP project review letter.
Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for bald eagle, red -cockaded woodpecker or Michauxis sumac.
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin, and therefore is not located within the known range of the Cape Fear Shiner. Additionally, the project
is not located within the known range of the Tar River spinyrrussel.
The project site is Within the known range of the Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, dwarf wedgemussel and yellow lance. The
proposed project is located within the lower reach the Lfr to Crabtree Creek. The onsite perennial stream was historically impounded prior to failure of
the pond dam in 2016. The onsite perennial stream is now located between two existing impoundments (ponds), which was historically a chain of four
impoundments. The presence of these impoundments would prevent the migration of these species to sustain viable populations. Therefore, the
perennial stream within the project area was not considered potential habitat for Carolina madtom, Neuse River waterdog, Atlantic pigtoe, dwarf
wedgemussel and yellow lance. Therefore, WR concludes that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on federally listed species.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Holly Lane - NCNHP Letter - 2020-07-21.pdf 255.74KB
USFWS T&E List -Wake Co_2020-07-17.pdf 140.17KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes
r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/indexhtml. There are
no waters in Wake County classified as EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: https:Hnc.maps.arcgis.corn/apps/webappvieAer/indexhtml?
id=79ea671ebdcc45639f0860257d5f5ed7, to determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed
project. The database reviewdid not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Cover Letter.pdf 144.71<13
Property Owner Info.pdf 111.86KB
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Troy Beasley
Signature
Date
7/21 /2020

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, MA Homes (Client) does hereby appoint
WithersRavenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the following ±12.4 acre_proiect area
located in Raleigh, NC:
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795386748, ±2.3 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795388982, ±1.83 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795388580, ±2.2 acre parcel, located at 3803 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795481606, ±1.88 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795480255, ±0.94 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
■ Wake Co. PIN: 0795482342, ±1.61 acre parcel, located at 3909 Blue Ridge Road
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795483460, ±1.64 acre parcel, located at 3915 Blue Ridge Road
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date:
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Signature of Client:
( e - rint) (Title)
(Signature)
16�-- 41f-�SlJ 16(5
Mailing Address
Ci L / tate Zip
Phone: 7�
Email: ea a",
L
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PROPERTY ACCESS
The undersigned owner(s), Mark & Christy her Bensen - Vladimir B Heirs, do(es) hereby authorize
WithersRavenel, Inc. to access the following parcels located in Raleigh, NC for the purpose of environmental
regulatory agency review (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of
Coastal Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, local Municipalities, etc.) and approvals (i.e. wetland
delineation, stream/buffer determination, environmental permitting, etc.) at the request of the contract
purchaser.
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795386748, ±2.3 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795388982, ±1.83 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795388580, ±2.2 acre parcel, located at 3803 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795481606, ±1.88 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
• Wake Co. PIN: 0795480255, ±0.94 acre parcel, located at 3801 Holly Lane
This authorization does not bind the current property owner(s) to financial responsibility for services
rendered on the subject property by WithersRavenel, Inc.
This agreement shall continue in effect until completion/termination of the purchase contract for the subject
property.
Contract Purchaser's Agent Info:
WithersRavenel Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. 919-4b9-3340
Date: I F t t3 2 01 q
Signature ofOwner(s):
jh A�� lL Y.. �e /J SZ✓ /.i� � Lt✓ fr1 C�
Name - P ' Title
,,-7
•,z,
ignature
H-o 1 t La-
Mailing Address
1---P
City U State Zip
Phone: q I q - ILO
- G 3�v
Email: rl �0-vL5e-A
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PROPERTY ACCESS
The undersigned owner(s), Michael & Carol Grajek, do(es) hereby authorize WithersRavenel, Inc. to access
the ±1.61 acre parcel, Wake Co. PIN: 0795482342 located at 3909 Blue Ride Road in Raleigh
NC for the purpose of environmental regulatory agency review (US Army Corps of Engineers, INC Division
of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, local Municipalities,
etc.) and approvals (i.e. wetland delineation, stream/buffer determination, environmental permitting, etc.) at
the request of the contract purchaser.
This authorization does not bind the current property owner(s) to financial responsibility for services
rendered on the subject property by WithersRavenel, Inc.
This agreement shall continue in effect until completion/termination of the purchase contract for the subject
property.
Date:
Contract Purchaser's Agent Info: Signature of Owner(s): r
rr f
WithersRavenel Inc. kot (j 631Awpvj,�p
Name - Print the
115 MacKenan Drive [ �%aa d nn;C�U
Cary, NC 27511 Signature /V,
Tel. M9)-469-3340
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Phone:
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PROPERTY ACCESS
The undersigned owner(s), Hugh White, do(es) hereby authorize WithersRavenel, Inc. to access the ±1.64
acre parcel, Wake Co. PIN: 0795483460, located at 3915 Blue Ridge Road in Raleigh, NC for the
purpose of environmental regulatory agency review (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, local Municipalities, etc.) and
approvals (i.e. wetland delineation, stream/buffer determination, environmental permitting, etc.) at the
request of the contract purchaser.
This authorization does not bind the current property owner(s) to financial responsibility for services
rendered on the subject property by WithersRavenel, Inc.
This agreement shall continue in effect until completion/termination of the purchase contract for the subject
property.
Contract Purchaser's Agent Info:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511 _
Tel. [phone]
Date: 2 I? _ I
Signature of Owner(s):
14 GI (,.' ,A e— -rTr �o �
Name - Print Title
Sligynature i A
7 O GI �Vcd� Gel raQ Lh
Mailing Address
I'A. Q ; r, 1,, N t' *Z-+ b 0$
City 6 State Zip
Phone: of I q - 630 - �q
Email: c,�l... {� i . (.. v►q.� , to�--
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
PIN:0795388982
REVIEW AREA MARK & CHRISTOPHER BENSEN
3801 HOLLY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27612
PIN: 0795386748 -� \
MARK & CHRISTOPHER BENSEN
3801 HOLLY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27612
PIN: 0795388580 -�
MARK & CHRISTOPHER BENSEN
3801 HOLLY LANE RALEIGH, NC 27612
HOLLY LANE ASSEMBLAGE
PIN:07954802551
MARK & CHRISTOPHER BENSEN
3801 HOLLY LANE RALEIGH, NC 27612
PROPERTY OWNER EXHIBIT
---' PIN:0795481606
MARK & CHRISTOPHER BENSEN
3801 HOLLY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27612
NO
PIN : 0795483460
/ HUGH WHITE
2801 GLENWOOD
GARDENS LANE, UNIT 305
RALEIGH, NC 27608
PIN:0795482342
MICHAEL & CAROL GRAJEK
3909 BLUE RIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27612
1!WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

-0 WithersRavenel
hi. Our People. Your Success.
3803 Hollv Lane
WR Proiect No. 02170003.00
Property Owner Information
PIN -
Wake Co. PIN: 0795386748,
0795481606 & 0795480255
Property Owner -
Mark & Christopher Bensen
Mailing Address -
3801 Holly Lane
Raleigh, NC 27612
Email -
[e-mail]
Phone-
919-740-4536
PIN - Wake Co. PIN: 0795482342
Property Owner - Michael & Carol Grajek
Mailing Address - 3909 Blue Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
0795388982, 0795388580,
PIN -
Wake Co. PIN: 0795483460
Property Owner -
Hugh White
Mailing Address -
2801 Glenwood Gardens Lane, Unit 305
Raleigh, NC 27608
Email -
[e-mail]
Phone-
919-630-7997
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

GRAPHIC SCALE 4 Yorkshire. C#nnt=�
o 1000 z000 a RFMRrR 6R Down. 2
Hill
A
1 inch = 2000 ft. Glen I'` 'rt o x FREN(mn r�r
w `1 r 4 m SUG.q,p
Forest - ' $ 57AHr♦ARR FRi } Q _} v
u ti VLF
K
255: Js N � li4 � � _ r ! k\ 4 .r� i I ���{� {� � ,� FP �,
—�k I y.
5YY5014G f7'_
sT
ON
IR
Q
North
rfitjhid-
�i-
r o M1 I ■'ar - 'Hills �a
CA7A1YddSF_.r.
ifr-fR by
fj
f ri, 3R CIYODD RO — _; _ f
oF. �+Y
-- rt
s'
s vFt� �_ Countr4,,: _-
� , {' 1Vcstchestcr 41,n�' Club IIills;I E.Q.
`vt 1 r q 1
pAS4tICTANK 9,4
It k
L=UT
o .dam L07T1�fi4ZlAF '+A—*�'rh'GSI�FCR :YSD'���f:i
E DR
¢'�I L`8!PdeJ Rft
C` 1 { DR F T ) ❑4- AJRR NFJAQ lej�
r- nnYi 11 a Meredith�' iM1 fie z _ U Sd h:14 Forest M
-MACON Pouo� e x l 5 r. �, * i W '- L I± (�J '°
4'' w Glen M" pr4JYRQ': z AlIrLderson
_.rl :•" I\ .. `. waRMOUIrIAD cr f - -_
Eden I a } Z, Heights
OCDTFCSr 07ER�
o U enwnod - I'
CIA
f l — LAXE 6rJCNE TRl
31
`s
HOLLY LANE TOWHOME SUBDIVISION USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST NO WithersRavenel
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
M
HOLLY LANE TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION
USGS QUAD (2013) - RALEIGH WEST
1!WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

GRAPHIC SCALE ' !
-
0 200 400 Cc ` '
1 inch = 400 ft. g lJ r _ .
Ak•
96
a —
i j M
A � i
C ll1 ,
E
CgC2
1 HOLLY LANE TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) — SHEET 38 NO WithersRavenel
4 RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

0
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION AND JURISDICTIONAL STATUS WAS FIELD VERIFIED BY ROSS
SULLIVAN OF THE USACE ON 07.31.2019 (SAW-2019-01218).
2) BUFFER DETERMINATION LETTER (NBRRO#19-156) ISSUED BY NCDWR ON 06.03.2019.
3) WETLAND/STREAM/POND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
LOCATION, WAKE CO. GIS DATA, AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
�9
HOLLY LANE TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION III APPROVED WETLAND/BUFFER DELINEATION EXHIBIT
1! WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

VICINITY MAP\\\\ ____ ______- /
\ \ \ �,�\ \o� MAP \\ \�\\\\\1\w `\\`\` 111 I III (/ I/ // /\�\�\\ _----- ^\ /{
1 -5000 ���� \ I� I I o o ��---------------\ g II / ,I =Q
�1 I i � Ili
�_ — -1 — �— — —
SITE PgND 1 1 1 \\ \ \\\\ \ / / , / i I VIP
CLv-M
Y
\I I I I \\ \ o N V STARAN /
S I / /
,..a • ,,,.a. a s, � � I �/ I\3o�NEu E\RI �I `�� v v,\ 1 v
��_
I \ for 118 \\ \ ✓ �� N\I \\ \ \ \ /r I I I I I I / \ 3 w
i
\ I I \ 1 1 1 1 1 N zo�E B �/ /� �� ,� 1 s , '►1 S \\ \ \ 1 I I / y
ND III
� / f ( f 50 RI ARIA
/ / J / R /
� TURE-Rtwi
A� I I // / / ♦ �ZO E2 OF 1 ' \ \ \\ S
_� RAN I• \ ' // Q U
30' NEUS RI I L �) \ � � I I / W
ZONE 1BVFFLn
R;
^�2� %��!� —�o� •\ �l �,I - 1 1 f 1 I \ o I \ I III / J —
�'�� ..- � III \� \ \ 1 \ \ \ II I Jp
\ \ MAP C I 1 I III f
2so. _ l I l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1� \ I I I III I Q
\II� wJ
`270 , rp w
LL
no v
ET PoND
Jz
LLJ
J
L AL
POND 2 \ lRU�L ) \ J �/ 3
�1\
OVERALL STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY
c~i
Qa
IMPACT SPECIFICATION
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
(NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT
(FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
3
m
3
v
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
m
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(AC)
TEMPORARY
4
6
107
0
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
GRAPHIC SCALE
RIPRAP DISSIPATOR
100 0 50 100 200
rhAw
5
STABILIZATION
-
-
TEMPORARY
6
4
26
1 inch - 100 ft.
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
7
133
42
821
ILLLLW

IMPACT LEGEND Eco.
\ \ \ \ \ I PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
S ST NG
�����
\l ! N \\ \\ \ \\ 1 I I I I TEMPORARY STREAM
I I I\
SANITARY \ \ SEWER
I /
ll
I
\ 1 ( —� J / / a)ja I EX MH, I � � � \ \ I \ \ — —
\\ \I III I A\ \ \ \ \ I�' >z
1 �\ ♦ \ \ 1 \\ li \\\ \ \ \\ I / // / — _ ro
\ \ 1 ♦ \ \� \ / \\ I 1 I I \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ / J / / J ac
�I
Nor -
EX S MH POND 1
RIM-2 7.13'
INV OUT-250.17'
\ \ \ \ I II \ \ I \ \\ <\ POND
PROP E� SUBJECTT050'
1 \ I I \ I I \ ) I \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ 1 I I SANITA Y / I BUFFERS
\ \ SEWE \ \ / / N
ILI IT \ \ \ \ \ V A \
DI�TI1Ac \ \ V A A \ \ V A V A
1IP j RRI�f�IPEIN\ 1 ) 7 I
qq \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ 16ITE� LCA�ING PIPE I /
I 1 II 1 \ v a 2-44 V A A\ \ V A \
Tl0P OF BANK \V \ \ \ I \ \ V A
AERIAL SEWER CROSSING.
\ \ } NO STREAM IMPACT.
�\ \ \ 1 1 A \
\SS
25
AEOSE RIPARIAN 52
�?ONE 2 BUFF STREAM
\ 3%' NELIS RIPARIAN / L
TONk1 BPFFER40
\ \ I I (r WETLANIYA \ I / I �,, \\ ` \ \ \�\\1 \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE
1 / / �/ v v \ ♦ ( \ \ V / 30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 ft.

v
L—J
STREAM 1 1
\` \ SUBJECT TO "I
BUFFERS
7LAND Q �P OF BANK
\\ \\ \ I I 1 C
\ \ \ J I IMITS OF
\ 50�USE RI IAN / DIST RBANCE
�6p \ ZON2 BUFF �A `
�3O NEKRIPARIAN
1 _ \ ,ONE 1BUFER I ` LIMITSQF
DISTURBRNCE�
\ \ \ I IMPACT #5
\ \ \ \ \ PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
(NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS) \ /
\ V v v RIP RAP STABILIZATION \ \
42 LF (821 SF) \ \
TEMPORARY STREAM IMP —ACT I . ►�m plF
y �� r
J�
Y GLASS
RAP TO
D
K
STA ILIZATION
TYPICAL DETAIL
RIPRAP APRON DETAIL
NTS
CULVERT UPSTREAM
270
PROPOSED GRADE
265
260
EXISTING GRADE
IMPACT LEGEND
L-iu
PERMANENT STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
TEMPORARY STREAM F—
CULVERT DOWNSTREAM
270 270 270
PROPOSED GRADE
265 265 1 1 1 1 1 265
260 260
255 255 255
PROPOSED 44 LF PROPOSED 44 LF
10'x10' BOX CULVERT WI
1Uff BOX CULVERT 10'x10' BOX CULVERT W/
I (2) ON THE OUTSIDE - WATER 10'x8' BOX CULVERT
0+00 ELEVATION (2) ON THE OUTSIDE
250 250 250
EXISTING 36" DUAL STREAM BED
CULVERTS (TBR) EXISTING GRADE J
\ 266 EXISTING PAVED _ 4*0
NOTE:
\ 2 +00 270 MIDDLE CULVERT TO BE BURIED 1'
\ \ \ 264 245 BELOW STREAM BEDI 245 245
\ EXIST9G DUAL 36" \ _ _ _ I`n0 10 � � Cl) M
\ DOLLY L -`\ — — — — / — I i f2CP'CULVERTS Lr) Ln (V N Co co 00 00
"NEIGHBORHOOD L AL \ \ -. Lr� Ln LnLo
/, N PUBLTE R./W) \\ \ C ` \ IMPACT #6 N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED 44 LF I \ — TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 0+00 0+50 1 +00 0+00
\ \ \ \ \ /x10'BOX CULVERT W/ \ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
10/
\ 10'X8' BOX CULVERT / ACCESS _
In\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ (2) ON THE OUTSIfD / / j 4 LF (26 SF) RED
\ \
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 inch = 30 Ft.L:
nnn
/ 255
WATER
ELEVATION
- I ",.
STREAM BED
EXISTING 36" DUAL
CULVERTS (TBR)
1 1 1245
N N
0+50 1+00
SCALE:
1" = 50' HORIZ.
1"=5'VERT.
0
Z
wQ
Co V
2a
W
H
E

RIPRAP DISSIPATOR
CROSS-SECTION
CULVERT PROFILE
SCALE:
1" = 30' HORIZ.
1 " = 30' V E RT.
SCALE:
��
�•'jL•.
•%SIC•
n�_.'.�,.ip,L•
1 " = 6' V E RT. 265
PROPOSED CENTRAL
i3i1�iY1�`i�iilii�i■G'GG■■■ ■
265
Mom--m-0-0-m--m—n—a—m—omm-TnO-BE�REPLA-CE�D
•
■■■■m
■■■■■■■����i■mil■■■■■■■■■■
MENNEN
-�'-
' •1
-:.
MEMEMEMEME"
No
■■
■■■■■■■■■■
• 1 • .
FOLLOWING
BOTTOMIPRAP LINING
■I I I I I I
■■■■■■■■■■
-
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■
■■■■■■■■■
■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
M,—
&M
� V
Z
Lu Lu N
Q 0
U

VICINITY MAP ` i\J\\\ \ \ \ \\\� /\\ \I MAPS\\\\\
\ ♦ \�
1 —5000 \
VW\\
i In
THE ii —_ _ —\ — J �� — � _ _ /
u►tntEL►uiL SITE t7k � 1 1 � I � I ll I �A\ � \��OND 1 � I \VA \VAA\\ ,�
I��`�'
FCREST BLEVHEIM PLACE
0411
TALL TREE CHA EAU HEDGE \ \ \ I 1 I NE�ISE 1\BUF` r �i'\\� ��� \ 1 SS S
l
\ I n I RR A�1\ \� o _
I �
% Z- _/ ��= � moo_ � I I z \ \ 1 1 /J � r rl • > , V\ ` � — \ \ -
1
— /�TU'fR&D JCdAYA
/ P,ART_ Fi�E IN LI / Li
LLJ
,MAP C
50' NEUSE,RIPARIAN I I y \ \ I \ \ I
ZONE"P-B FER
R4 III \ \ 1 \ I \) \ I 30'NEU9E PAR
ZONE 1 BUFFi
270
V V PONDI VA \/LL.
<\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \
POND
—
/" °
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
FCREST BLEVHEIM PLACE
0411
TALL TREE CHA EAU HEDGE \ \ \ I 1 I NE�ISE 1\BUF` r �i'\\� ��� \ 1 SS S
l
\ I n I RR A�1\ \� o _
I �
% Z- _/ ��= � moo_ � I I z \ \ 1 1 /J � r rl • > , V\ ` � — \ \ -
1
— /�TU'fR&D JCdAYA
/ P,ART_ Fi�E IN LI / Li
LLJ
,MAP C
50' NEUSE,RIPARIAN I I y \ \ I \ \ I
ZONE"P-B FER
R4 III \ \ 1 \ I \) \ I 30'NEU9E PAR
ZONE 1 BUFFi
270
V V PONDI VA \/LL.
<\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \
POND
—
/" °
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
IMPACT SPECIFICATION
OVERALL BUFFER IMPACT SUMMARY
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
30' ZONE 1
20' ZONE 2
30' ZONE 1
20' ZONE 2
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
1
SEWER CROSSING
2,189
0.050
1,361
0.031
2
ROAD CROSSING
6065
0.139
3,389
0.078
3
ROAD IMPROVEMENT
-
-
574
0.013
8,254
0.189
5,324
0.122

ImIIiS O \ i b\ \ \ \ I I 1 \ I I l I
\ I \ \ \\\ \ \♦ \ � \ � I � \ \N\\ \ \\\\ICI II �I I I \ \ I I � I � "'
r
\ 1
\\
�2go
EX S4MH \POND 1 EU�RWARIA
RIM-�57.13'
INV T-250.�T A�O\�UFER
�� \
\ '\ \ \ C \
%N UtT
Pogo; l l�\�'
/ BUFFERS T050� \\ \\ \I loll
8"� �P\rRRIELE/pj 6A�� EELk IN PE S I o
t
\ \ \ \
iM�
30TY OF RALEIGH , A C \ i A —NITARY SEWER STU B
_' CIo v \ o \ N \ my
_AERIAL SA
SEWER EASEMENT , 11 CROSSING_\'
IACT#1�A SS \ \ `� \ } 1 \ MP \
I( \ \ \ I PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS J
I \ \ SEWER CROSSING
\ }\ \ I ZONE 1 - 2189 SF (0.050 AC)
ZONE 2 -1361 SF (0.031 AC)
II
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■STREAM I
■■■■■II■■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■I■■■II SURFACE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1
NOON■ ■■■■■�■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■,II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1
■■■■ice. •,■■■[�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■:� •■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■��,■■■■■■■■■■ " I .' ' Ali
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■: �11\��' � : � - , i . , ■■■■►III■ �■L•��■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■ �y
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►15.xz:----- III :: i . ', nlu1��������� '
l
NEON .. I■:i" iiiiiii III■ii:■■■__!■yl■■■■■■■■■■ 1
��� ,l■LJ■■■■iiii:■■■1f�.7Gi■■■■■■
moom■■■■■■■■■■■■Im• ■I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
NOON■■■ ■■■■■ ■■I■■■■I■■■■■■■■ •.• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■ • - ■■■■■■I ■■■I■■■■I■■7■■Ioma ■■■■■■■ NONE •
■■■■■■■ - No ■0,I■■■■I■UMFIid■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ - ■■■■■■ •
■■■■■■■ _ ■■■■ ■■■I■■■■I/mi■■I■■■■■ _ NOON■■■ ■■■■■■ 111
■■■ _ ■■■■ _ - ■■■I■■1"Poomm
■■!I■ NOON■■ _ NOON■■
1 one • ' OEM ■ _ f on - onsono - - MEMNON
■■ ■■ ■I ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■
■ _ • ■■ . ■I■■ 1■■■■■ _ • ■■■■■■ NONE■■
■ No :•J■■i■■■■ ■ENNEN T NOON■■
NOON ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ NOON■■
NOON ■ENNEN E■■■■■ NOON■■
• 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1� 11 � 1 11 1
IMPACT LEGEND
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFER
PERMANENT
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIVER 20' BUFFER
NOV TAR LANE \
NEIGHBORHO YIELD(PUkC)
c\
�cco Co
cV N
ASS ~
I
l 7
rkAlw
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
E
'I L
i/ E
a
H
U
d
Of
LL]
LL
LL
Z)
Co
iM�
30TY OF RALEIGH , A C \ i A —NITARY SEWER STU B
_' CIo v \ o \ N \ my
_AERIAL SA
SEWER EASEMENT , 11 CROSSING_\'
IACT#1�A SS \ \ `� \ } 1 \ MP \
I( \ \ \ I PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS J
I \ \ SEWER CROSSING
\ }\ \ I ZONE 1 - 2189 SF (0.050 AC)
ZONE 2 -1361 SF (0.031 AC)
II
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■STREAM I
■■■■■II■■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■I■■■II SURFACE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1
NOON■ ■■■■■�■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■,II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1
■■■■ice. •,■■■[�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■:� •■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■��,■■■■■■■■■■ " I .' ' Ali
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■: �11\��' � : � - , i . , ■■■■►III■ �■L•��■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■ �y
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►15.xz:----- III :: i . ', nlu1��������� '
l
NEON .. I■:i" iiiiiii III■ii:■■■__!■yl■■■■■■■■■■ 1
��� ,l■LJ■■■■iiii:■■■1f�.7Gi■■■■■■
moom■■■■■■■■■■■■Im• ■I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
NOON■■■ ■■■■■ ■■I■■■■I■■■■■■■■ •.• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■ • - ■■■■■■I ■■■I■■■■I■■7■■Ioma ■■■■■■■ NONE •
■■■■■■■ - No ■0,I■■■■I■UMFIid■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ - ■■■■■■ •
■■■■■■■ _ ■■■■ ■■■I■■■■I/mi■■I■■■■■ _ NOON■■■ ■■■■■■ 111
■■■ _ ■■■■ _ - ■■■I■■1"Poomm
■■!I■ NOON■■ _ NOON■■
1 one • ' OEM ■ _ f on - onsono - - MEMNON
■■ ■■ ■I ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■
■ _ • ■■ . ■I■■ 1■■■■■ _ • ■■■■■■ NONE■■
■ No :•J■■i■■■■ ■ENNEN T NOON■■
NOON ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ NOON■■
NOON ■ENNEN E■■■■■ NOON■■
• 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1� 11 � 1 11 1
IMPACT LEGEND
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFER
PERMANENT
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIVER 20' BUFFER
NOV TAR LANE \
NEIGHBORHO YIELD(PUkC)
c\
�cco Co
cV N
ASS ~
I
l 7
rkAlw
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
E
'I L
i/ E
a
H
U
d
Of
LL]
LL
LL
Z)
Co
■■■■ice. •,■■■[�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■:� •■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■��,■■■■■■■■■■ " I .' ' Ali
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■: �11\��' � : � - , i . , ■■■■►III■ �■L•��■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■ �y
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►15.xz:----- III :: i . ', nlu1��������� '
l
NEON .. I■:i" iiiiiii III■ii:■■■__!■yl■■■■■■■■■■ 1
��� ,l■LJ■■■■iiii:■■■1f�.7Gi■■■■■■
moom■■■■■■■■■■■■Im• ■I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
NOON■■■ ■■■■■ ■■I■■■■I■■■■■■■■ •.• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■ • - ■■■■■■I ■■■I■■■■I■■7■■Ioma ■■■■■■■ NONE •
■■■■■■■ - No ■0,I■■■■I■UMFIid■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ - ■■■■■■ •
■■■■■■■ _ ■■■■ ■■■I■■■■I/mi■■I■■■■■ _ NOON■■■ ■■■■■■ 111
■■■ _ ■■■■ _ - ■■■I■■1"Poomm
■■!I■ NOON■■ _ NOON■■
1 one • ' OEM ■ _ f on - onsono - - MEMNON
■■ ■■ ■I ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■
■ _ • ■■ . ■I■■ 1■■■■■ _ • ■■■■■■ NONE■■
■ No :•J■■i■■■■ ■ENNEN T NOON■■
NOON ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ NOON■■
NOON ■ENNEN E■■■■■ NOON■■
• 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1� 11 � 1 11 1
IMPACT LEGEND
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFER
PERMANENT
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIVER 20' BUFFER
NOV TAR LANE \
NEIGHBORHO YIELD(PUkC)
c\
�cco Co
cV N
ASS ~
I
l 7
rkAlw
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
E
'I L
i/ E
a
H
U
d
Of
LL]
LL
LL
Z)
Co

F-
\ 56' NEUSE RIP♦ZDN
E2�UFF \
3C(NPPJSE/ (PA 111 I� I11f l I I y \) y\
/ZEE r TAI
y ` y
RENING r
WALL 7 1't
/IIII �J y 1 y 1 /
r o I 1 30' NEUSE RIPA♦ZfAN
ZONE 1BUJ;FER \�
50'NEUSERIPARIAN�
ZONE2BUFFER/ L
< y DISTURBTCOE /RETAINING \
W LL6
\TOP OF BANK y I f
NGf -2A P / WALL 9
€NSIONCRT� A WETLAN6
RETAINING / \\ \ \ � y I CD
WALLS \ \ \\ \ \ \ I I I N
\ y (
\ WET \ I I \ \ IMPACT #2
POND ` PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS
ROAD CROSSING
ZONE 1 - 6065 SF (0.139 AC) RETAIN ✓HALL 1 \
\ \ G I�( \ \
J \ \ ZONE 2 - 3389 SF (0.078 AC) (CULVT \ \ \ �WAL� ` /
\1 soLr/��l `ems
1
1 T
66
IMPACT #3 \ 264
PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS �--
ROAD IMPROVEMENT
ZONE 1 - N/A
/ ZONE 2 - 574 SF (0.013 AC) \\\ \\ \
POND 2
/
1 '
E LEI
I � III I\I
U)
U)
\
I
/ I
I
I
IMPACT LEGEND
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
NEUSE RIVER 30' BUFFER
PERMANENT
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIVER 20' BUFFER
pI�BNC\-\/) �—
} I EX. CULVERTS (TBR)
PROP! ED44LF 1
10'x 0' BO CULVERT W/
\ 10' BOX CULVERT / / / \ \ EXi TINk PAVED DRI (TBRJ\\ \
Y\ (2)l THE OUTSIDE / EX. 36" RCP
RE AINIR�G l / I NX. 3 aRCP �
,WA 11
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
LIMITS OF
SURVEY
— — — — — J 1 inch = 50 ft.
E
�U
aC
G
u
a
Lu
LL
LL
Z)
Co

a ■■N Roy Cooper. Governor
00 i NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
notan NATUPAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
E sow Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12515
July 21, 2020
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE. Holly Lane Townhomes; 02170003.00
Dear Troy Beasley.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1:1 W. JONES STREET, PALE01_ P<_ 27603 - 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEiGH. NC 276"
OFC !J19 707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Holly Lane Townhomes
Project No. 02170003.00
July 21, 2020
NCNHDE-12515
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Group
Observation
i
Date IMW
Dragonfly or
32043
Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
2004-Pre
Damselfly
Freshwater
15926
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper
1998-05-08
Bivalve
Vascular Plant
14844
Gillenia stipulate
Indian Physic
1985-05
Vascular Plant
6342
Thermopsis mollis
Appalachian Golden-
1956-05-01
banner
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Nam Representational Rating
NEU/Crabtree Creek Aquatic Habitat R5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Element
Occurrence
Rank
H?
H?
C
H
Accuracy Federal State
Status Status
A IL
5-Very
Low
3-Medium
4-Low
4-Low
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
Managed Area Name
ier Type MM
City of Raleigh Open Space - Laurel Hills Park
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Crabtree - Oak Park
City of Raleigh
Local Government
Greenway
City of Raleigh Greenway - Crabtree Valley Trail
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Glen Eden Pilot Park
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - House Creek Greenway
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Alleghany Trail
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - George F Marshall
City of Raleigh
Local Government
Memorial Park
City of Raleigh Greenway - Crabtree Valley Trail
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway Easement
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Crabtree Valley Trail
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Greenway - Crabtree Valley Trail
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space - Beckana
City of Raleigh
Local Government
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
Local Government
M i
--- Significantly
Rare
--- Threatened
Global State
Rank Rank
M
G5 S2?
G5 S3
--- Threatened G5 S2
--- Special G3G4 S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Page 2 of 4

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
City of Raleigh Greenway - Crabtree Valley Trail City of Raleigh
Owner Type
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on July 21, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-12515: Holly Lane Townhomes
Glen Forest
el
.I d'p b, -1
ze:
R'
c.tA—
MCIF
41A M-
4., 0
'01
S
L
�.
ir
flp"
SIII
A-14111- For
N
Tysonville 0
W+ L
aj
Glermood
Village
July 21, 2020
F-1
Project Boundary
❑
Suffered Project Boundary
NH P Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
1:22,470
0 0.175 0.35 07 mi
0 03 0.6 12 km
Sources:
Esn. HERE, Carmn. InIennap, nuen-nt P Corp., G r�o
`GS FA0, NPS, NRCAN, G—S.-. IGN. Yad-�er NL, Ordnance Survey.Es;i Japan.
ME7I.
F.i China (Hong KQrq. IQ) QpenSI'_tA.p cantrtprors, and the Ce15
Llw CanvnUftlry
Page 4 of 4

Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-17-2020
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Cape Fear shiner Range by Basin
Notropis mekistocholas
E
Current
Carolina madtom Range by Basin
Noturus furiosus
ARS
Current
Neuse River waterdog Range by_
Necturus lewisi
ARS
Current
basin
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
Southern hognose snake
Heterodon simus
ARS
Obscure
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Range by Basin
Fusconaia masoni
ARS
Current
Dwarf wedgemussel Range by_
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Current
basin
Green floater
Lasmigona subviridis
ARS
Current
Tar River spin- ussel Range by.
Parvaspina steinstansana
E
Current
basin
Yellow lance Range by basin
Elliptio lanceolata
T
Current
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Lindera subcoriacea
ARS
Current
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Current
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.

ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)_
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fvvs.goy/migratorvbirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A))_
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be extant in the
county.
Historical - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be historical in the
county, meaning that all recorded occurrences are either extirpated, have not been found in recent surveys, or
have not been surveyed recently enough to be confident they are still present.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.