NCG060409_Inspection_20200720

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060409 Effective: Expiration: Owner: Amazon Com Services LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Amazon.com Services LLC - GSO1
County: Guilford 1656 Old Greensboro Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Kernersville NC 27284
Contact Person: Natalie Waid
Title:
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
West on 1-40 take exit 208 for Sandy Ridge Road, turn right travel 0.6 miles, turn left onto W Market Street go 1.3 Miles on S Bunker
Hill Rd, go 0.6 mil turn right on Old Greensboro Rd in 0.2 mi facility on left.
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/20/2020 Entry Time 01:55PM Exit Time: 02:40PM
Primary Inspector: Zac Lentz Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Technical Assistance
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG060409 Owner - Facility: Amazon Com Services LLC
Inspection Date: 07/20/2020 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On July 20, 2020 this facility was inspected to evaluate the site following a General Permit NOI Application. The inspection
revealed no discrepancies with the application, housekeeping issues, or shortcomings with the SWPPP. As such, it has
been recommended to the application reviewer that the application be approved.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG060409 Owner - Facility: Amazon Com Services LLC
Inspection Date: 07/20/2020 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑■
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑■
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑■
Comment: The Stormwater Polution Prevention plan was received on July 16, 2020 and was found to be
accurate and adequate.This is a new facility seeking permit coverage which has not been
required to conduct Qualitative Monitoring prior to the inspection.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: This is anew facility seeking permit coverage which has not been required to conduct Analytical
Monitoring prior to the inspection.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: This is anew facility seeking permit coverage which has not been required to conduct Analytical
Monitoring prior to the inspection.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: All outfalls were observed during the insp
SWPPP.
❑❑■❑
on and were found to be consistent with the
Page 3 of 3