NCG140486_Inspection and Coverage Recommendation_20200714

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG140486 Effective: Expiration: Owner : Chandler Concrete Company Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mebane Plant #610 - adjacent site
County: Alamance 2990 Senator Ralph Scott Pkwy
Region: Winston-Salem
Mebane NC 27302
Contact Person: Jamie Nelms
Title:
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From 1-85/40 eastbound, take Trollingwood exit 152, turn right on ramp, --1/4 mile turn right on Sen. Ralph Scott Parkway, proceed
—1.25 miles site location on right across from Lidl and Walmart Dist. Ctr
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/14/2020 Entry Time 08:40AM Exit Time: 09:35AM
Primary Inspector: Zac Lentz Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Technical Assistance
Permit Inspection Type: Ready Mix Concrete Stormwater/Wastewater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG140486 Owner -Facility: Chandler Concrete Company Inc
Inspection Date: 07/14/2020 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On July 14, 2020 this facility was inspected to evaluate the site following a General Permit NOI Application. The inspection
revealed no discrepancies with the application, housekeeping issues, or shortcomings with the SWPPP. As such, it has
been recommended to the application reviewer that the application be approved.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG140486 Owner -Facility: Chandler Concrete Company Inc
Inspection Date: 07/14/2020 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑■
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑❑■
Comment: The SWPPP was observed to be present on -site and was emailed to the inspector following the
inspection in order to optimize social distancing practices. The SWPPP was audited remotely
and found to sufficiently cover the reauirements of the General Permit.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: This is a new facility seeking permit coverage which has not been required to conduct QualitativE
Monitoring prior to the inspection.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: This is anew facility seeking permit coverage which has not been required to conduct Analytical
Monitoring prior to the inspection.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: All outfalls were observed during the insp
SWPPP.
❑❑■❑
on and were found to be consistent with the
Page 3 of 3