20180196 Ver 2_BPDP Final_20200716

ID#* 20180196 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 07/17/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/16/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Andrea Eckardt
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20180196
Existing IDY
Project Type:
Project Name:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
County: Durham
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Catfish Pond II BPDP Final 7.16.2020.pdf 19.63MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Andrea Eckardt
Signature:*
(t WlrtlC

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203

July 16, 2020 

Katie Merritt 
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality  
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620 

RE:  DWR Draft BPDP Comments 
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Site (DWR # 2018‐0196v2) 
  Orange County, NC 

Dear Ms. Merritt: 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) has reviewed the Division of Water Resources (DWR) comments 
dated July 13, 2020 for the Draft Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) for the Catfish Pond II Mitigation 
Site.   All DWR requests for specific text changes were incorporated into the report.  A copy of the report 
showing track changes is available if needed. 

The DWR questions are listed below in bold, while Wildlands responses are noted in italics lettering. 

1. Appendix – Need additional items:  Approval letter from DWR of Catfish Pond DMS site (dated 
8/19/2019), approval letter from IRT of Catfish Pond DMS Site, Approved Concept Maps from 
Catfish Pond DMS site including Figure 8 of Buffer Plan for the DMS site. 
401 Water Quality Certification and 404 General Permit for the DMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site 
were added to the Appendix to document the most recent DWR and IRT approval of the DMS 
project.  The Buffer Concept and Monitoring figure from the June 2020 NCDMS Catfish Pond 
Mitigation Site As‐Built Report was also added to the Appendix rather than the figure from the 
Mitigation Plan. 
2. Section 2.1 ‐ Will there now be two fences?  One around the DMS site and then an outer fence 
around the bank boundary. 
No.  There will only be one fence, located around the outermost easement boundary, which is 
most areas is the bank boundary.  Language throughout the report has been added to clarify the 
fencing boundary.  Final fencing is also shown on Figure 7 Concept Map. 
3. Section 2.3 – Add a figure from the as‐built report that shows the final concept map.  
Reference that figure here [in Table 3]. 
The Buffer Concept and Monitoring figure from the June 2020 NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation 
Site As‐Built Report was added to the Appendix. 
4. Section 2.10 – Why isn’t this proposed as Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion as indicated in the 
viability letter?  Is Wildlands not installing a fence around the Bank’s easement boundary?  
Please explain. 
Wildlands has updated the BPDP to propose Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion in the areas 
approved for that mitigation type in the site viability letter. The fence was installed around the 
Bank’s easement boundary. 
5. Section 2.4 – Where were these measurements taken? 
The depth of the ditch at each cross‐section location shown on Figure 3 was made using the 
distance between the thalweg and the top of bank. 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203
6. Section 4.1 – I suggest ripping be performed to remove compact soils.  Also, Fescue can out‐
complete bare roots – no fescue treatment is proposed in the beginning to avoid this issue.  
Please explain how Wildlands plans to control fescue during site preparation. 
Wildlands will be ripping the soil prior to planning.  That information has been added to the 
BPDP.  Wildlands is proposing the use of a ring‐spray herbicide treatment of the fescue after 
planning, rather than a treatment during parcel preparation.  This has been a successful 
treatment at other recent buffer mitigation and nutrient offset sites. 
7. Section 4.1 – This paragraph is confusing.  Are there two fences?  One along DMS boundary 
and one along Bank’s outer boundary?  Please explain how agriculture will continue. 
There is one fence which is located outside the Bank boundary.  The cattle no longer have access 
to either the DMS or Bank areas, but the Bank area is still being mowed until the Bank project is 
approved and the Bank easement is recorded.   
8. Section 4.2 – Planting a permanent seed mix that is abundant in annual and perennial 
pollinator species is strictly voluntary but is strongly encouraged by DWR in other mitigation 
plans to promote diversity and enhance the health of herbaceous layer, which can also greatly 
benefit planted stems.   
The proposed seed mix contains taxonomic families such as Asteraceae and Lamiaceae which 
have beneficial relationships with many insects found within the Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and 
Diptera families.  
9. Section 4.2 What is your anticipated planting density? 
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards of 260 planted 
trees per acre at the end of five years.  The density is expected to be approximately 600 stems 
per acre.  
10. Section 4.3 and 4.4 – Enhancement and Preservation Activities 
Wildlands has updated the BPDP to propose Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion in the areas 
approved for the mitigation type in the site viability letter. The fence has been installed around 
the Bank’s easement area. 
11. Table 8 ‐ Requested edits to Tables 8 and 9 
All requested table edits have been made.  Preservation acreage was converted to enhancement 
via cattle exclusion acreage and the diffuse flow memo has been applied to the Ditch.  The 
diffuse flow memo deduction is documented in Table 8, Section 7.0, and Figure 7.  Table 9 has 
been updated accordingly. 
12. Figures 
All proposed figure edits were completed. 

Enclosed please find one (1) hard copy of the updated BPBP. The document has been uploaded to the 
Laserfiche system as well. Please contact me at 704‐560‐2997 if you have any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely,  

Andrea S. Eckardt 
Ecological Assessment Team Leader 
[e-mail] 

BANK PARCEL 
DEVELOPMENT 
PACKAGE 

July 2020 
CATFISH POND II MITIGATION BANK PARCEL 
Durham County, NC 
DWR Project Number 2018‐0196v2 

Neuse River Basin 
HUC 03020201 

PREPARED BY: 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 
Charlotte, NC  28203 
Phone: (704) 332‐7754 
Fax: (704) 332‐3306 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page i  July 2020 
Bank Parcel Development Package 
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  
Neuse River Basin 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
1.0  Project Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 
1.1   Parcel Location and Description ................................................................................................... 1 
2.0  Mitigation Project Summary ............................................................................................................. 2 
2.1   Project Goals ................................................................................................................................. 2 
2.2  Existing Parcel Conditions ............................................................................................................. 2 
2.3   Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation .............................................. 3 
2.4  Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation ................................................................................. 4 
2.5  Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................................... 5 
2.6  Geology and Soils .......................................................................................................................... 5 
2.7  Existing Vegetative Communities ................................................................................................. 6 
2.8  Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................................................... 6 
2.9  Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 7 
2.10  FEMA Floodplain Compliance ....................................................................................................... 7 
2.11  Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access ........................................................................... 7 
2.12  Other Environmental Conditions .................................................................................................. 7 
3.0   Site Protection Instrument ................................................................................................................ 7 
4.0  Mitigation Work Plan ........................................................................................................................ 7 
4.1  Parcel Preparation ........................................................................................................................ 8 
4.2  Riparian Area Restoration Activities ............................................................................................. 8 
4.3  Riparian Area Enhancement Activities .......................................................................................... 9 
4.4  Riparian Area Preservation Activities ............................................................................................ 9 
5.0  Monitoring and Maintenance Plan ................................................................................................... 9 
5.1   Monitoring Protocol ...................................................................................................................... 9 
5.2  Parcel Maintenance ...................................................................................................................... 9 
5.3  Easement Boundaries and Fencing ............................................................................................. 10 
6.0  Financial Assurance and Long‐Term Management ......................................................................... 10 
6.1  Financial Assurances ................................................................................................................... 10 
6.2  Long‐term Management ............................................................................................................. 10 
7.0  Mitigation Potential ........................................................................................................................ 10 
8.0  References ...................................................................................................................................... 14 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page ii  July 2020 
FIGURES 
Figure 1  Vicinity Map  
Figure 2  Service Area Map 
Figure 3  Site Map 
Figure 4  USGS Topographic Map 
Figure 5   Watershed Map 
Figure 6  NRCS 1976 Soil Survey Map  
Figure 7  Buffer Credits Map 
Figure 8  Riparian Buffer Zones Map 
Figure 9  Monitoring Map 

Tables 
Table 1  Ecological and Water Quality Goals 
Table 2  Buffer Project Attributes 
Table 3  Project Features  
Table 4  Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use 
Table 5   Project Soil Types and Descriptions 
Table 6  Site Protection Instrument 
Table 7  Selected Tree Species 
Table 8  Catfish Pond II Project Mitigation Credits  
Table 9  Catfish Pond II Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation  
Table 10  Credit Release Schedule 

APPENDIX  
Site Photographs and Photo Log Map– February 14, 2020 
Historical Aerials  
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter – March 13, 2018 
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter Extension – February 19, 2020 
USFWS Self‐Certification Letter and Correspondence  
SHPO Request for Review and Response 
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary  
NCDWR Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification Catfish Pond Mitigation Site  
USACE Approval of 404 General Permit Catfish Pond Mitigation Site   
NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site As‐Built Buffer Concept and Monitoring (Figure 5) 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 1  July 2020 

Bank Parcel Development Package 
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  
Neuse River Basin 

1.0 Project Introduction 
The Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel (“Parcel”) is proposed under the terms and conditions of the 
Catfish Pond II Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument (“MBI”), made and entered 
into by Wildlands Holdings V, LLC acting as Bank Sponsor (“Sponsor”) and the North Carolina 
Department of Environmental Quality (“NCDEQ”) Division of Water Resources (“NCDWR”).  The Parcel 
shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703 and the Consolidated Buffer 
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 which became effective November 1, 2015. 

The project is in Durham County approximately 12 miles north of the City of Durham, immediately 
adjacent to the Full Delivery North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (“NCDMS”) Catfish Pond 
Mitigation Site, NCDWR Project Number 2018‐0196v1, NCDMS ID Number 100039 (“NCDMS Site”) 
(Figure 1). The Parcel expands the existing conservation easement of the  riparian area from 50 feet 
adjacent to mitigated streams in the NCDMS Site to 100‐200 feet on along mitigated Catfish Creek, two 
mitigated unnamed tributaries and one agricultural ditch. The primary purpose of the project is to 
provide riparian buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits to compensate for unavoidable 
impacts in the Neuse River Basin 03020201 Hydrologic Unit Code (“HUC”) within the Falls Lake 
Watershed (Figure 2). 
1.1   Parcel Location and Description 
The Parcel is located within the Upper Falls Lake Watershed of the Neuse River Basin HUC 
03020201020040 and NCDWR Subbasin 03‐04‐01 in Durham County. To reach the Parcel from the City 
of Durham, travel north approximately 12 miles on Highway 501/North Roxboro Street. The Parcel is on 
the left, 1/2 mile north of the road’s intersection with Patrick Road, just south of its intersection with 
Mountain Creek. 
Catfish Creek and the other project features flow into Mountain Creek, which subsequently flows into 
Little River, the Eno River, and then into Falls Lake. Falls Lake is classified as water supply water (WS‐IV) 
and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW) by NCDWR. The proposed project supports specific goals identified 
in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan (RBRP) by promoting “nutrient and sediment 
reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams and riparian buffers”. 
This riparian mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, provide and improve 
terrestrial and instream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The area surrounding the 
streams proposed for mitigation is currently a mixture of active pasture, open fields, and some 
woodlands (See the appendix for February 2020 site photos). By removing cattle access and restoring 
the vegetation on areas up to 200 feet from the streams and ditch; the project will further reduce 
nutrient and sediment inputs in the tributaries to Mountain Creek, and subsequently Little River and 
Falls Lake. The restored floodplain areas will filter sediment during high rainfall events. The 
establishment of riparian vegetation around Ditch D will also create shading to minimize thermal 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 2  July 2020 
heating. Finally, the new native vegetation will provide cover and food for wildlife throughout the 
Parcel.  
2.0  Mitigation Project Summary 
2.1   Project Goals 
The major goals of the proposed buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are to provide ecological 
and water quality enhancements to the Falls Lake Watershed in the Neuse River Basin by restoring the 
riparian area located outside of the fifty foot (50’) conservation easement for the NCDMS Site to create 
a wider and more functional riparian corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological 
processes are outlined below in Table 1. 
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals  
Goal Objective 
Exclude cattle from 
project features and 
riparian area within 200 
feet of project features. 
Install fencing around the Bank conservation easement boundary, replacing 
the fenced area beyond what was proposed in the NCDMS Catfish Pond 
Mitigation Site.  
Decrease nutrient levels. 
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields 
through restored native vegetation. The off‐site nutrient input will also be 
absorbed on‐site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas, 
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation. 
Decrease sediment input. Sediment from off‐site sources will be captured by deposition on restored 
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities. 
Decrease water 
temperature and increase 
dissolved oxygen 
concentrations. 
Planted riparian trees will shade the project features as they mature, reducing 
thermal pollution. 
Create appropriate 
terrestrial habitat. 
Riparian areas will be restored by treating invasive vegetation and planting 
native vegetation.  
Permanently protect the 
project Parcel from 
harmful uses. 
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel. 
2.2  Existing Parcel Conditions 
The proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient offset project includes approximately 33 acres of open 
cattle pasture along Catfish Creek, two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and Mountain Tributary for the 
purposes of this project), and a ditch (Ditch D). Previously cattle had access to all streams but with the 
recent conclusion of construction on the NCDMS Site, the first 50 feet from the project streams were 
restored or enhanced via cattle exclusion, as a forested riparian area. The Parcel expands beyond that 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 3  July 2020 
boundary increasing easement widths from 0‐50 feet to 100‐200 feet and incorporating a new 200‐foot 
area surrounding Ditch D (Figure 3).  
Portions of the Parcel’s three jurisdictional streams (Catfish Creek, Mountain Tributary, and UT1), one 
Ditch (D), and one ephemeral channel (EC1) were all part of the NCDMS Site and were restored per the 
Stream Mitigation Plan. Catfish Creek flows east, beginning as an intermittent stream and becoming 
perennial. UT1 is a perennial stream that flows northeast, joining Catfish Creek. Both EC1 and Ditch D 
flow east into UT1. Mountain Tributary begins in the northwest corner of the project area and flows 
southeast before turning and flowing northeast into Mountain Creek. The NCDMS Site also included an 
additional stream (UT2) that is not included in the Parcel. 
In general, this area has maintained its rural, farming character over the last 78 years with only minor 
changes in land cover (see historical aerials in the appendix). This consistency in land use within the 
project watershed indicates that watershed processes affecting hydrology, sediment supply, and 
nutrient and pollutant delivery have not varied widely over this time period. With a lack of 
developmental pressure, watershed processes and stressors from outside the project limits are likely to 
remain consistent throughout the implementation, monitoring, and closeout of this project. 
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes  
Project Name Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel 
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201020040 
River Basin  Neuse 
Geographic Location (Lat, Long) 39.16334°, 78.91046° 
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG) To be recorded 
Total Credits 
371,089.000 buffer mitigation credits and 45,508.805 lbs. N
and 2,931.119 lbs. P 
Types of Credits Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits 
BPDP Date April 2020 
Initial Planting Date January 2021 
Baseline Report Date March 2021 
MY1 Report Date December 2021 
MY2 Report Date December 2022 
MY3 Report Date December 2023  
MY4 Report Date December 2024 
MY5 Report Date December 2025  
2.3   Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation 
NCDWR performed an onsite visit of the project area to determine viability for buffer mitigation and 
nutrient offset mitigation on February 23, 2018 and issued a site viability letter on March 13, 2018. Five 
of the six features assessed were deemed viable by NCDWR to generate either buffer mitigation or 
nutrient offset. The sixth, Ditch D, required more information before a determination of viability could 
be made. The additional information to support buffer credit viability on Ditch D is included in Section 
2.4. The original site viability letter expired in March 2020, but NCDWR issued an extension of the site 
viability letter on February 19, 2020. The Buffer Interpretation /Clarification Memo #2008‐019 applies to 
Ditch D where maintenance of diffuse flow onsite is unattainable.   The reduction in credit from the 
memo being applied is documented in Figure 7 and Table 8. 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 4  July 2020 
There have been no changes to the land use in the Parcel since the NCDWR 2018 site visit. The NCDMS 
stream and buffer mitigation project is currently under construction. A copy of the “Site Viability for 
Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset” letter and extension letter from the DWR are included in the 
appendix and summarized in Table 3. 
Table 3: Project Features  
Feature Name** 
(BPDP) 
Feature Name 
(NCDWR 
Evaluation) 
Classification Buffer Credit Viable Nutrient Offset Viable 
UT1  UT1  Stream  Yes  
Yes 
(non‐forested fields only)
Ditch D  D  Ditch 
More information requested 
(See Section 2.4) Yes 
Catfish Creek  Catfish Creek  Stream  Yes 
Yes 
(non‐forested fields only)
Catfish Creek  Catfish Pond *  In‐line pond 
Yes
(where stream is restored) 
Yes 
(non‐forested fields only)
UT2  UT2  Stream  Yes 
Yes 
(non‐forested fields only)
Mountain 
Tributary 
Mountain 
Tributary Stream  Yes 
Yes 
(non‐forested fields only)
*Catfish Pond was restored as part of the NCDMS Catfish Pond Site, as documented in the NCDMS Catfish Pond As‐
Built and Baseline Report submitted June 2020.  NCDMS Site As‐Built Concept and Monitoring Figure 5 is included in 
the Appendix.  
** EC1 was not evaluated for buffer or nutrient viability and is therefore not included in any credit requests. 
2.4  Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation 
In addition to buffer restoration on subject streams, per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rules (15A 
NCAC 02B 0.0295 (o)), alternative mitigation is proposed on the Parcel in the form of buffer 
enhancement via cattle exclusion on streams and buffer restoration on ditches. The proposed project is 
in compliance in the following ways: 
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6): 
 The area proposed for enhancement was assessed by NCDWR and determined to comply with 
all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6) as documented in the site viability letter.  Fencing has been 
installed around the Bank’s easement boundary (NCDMS Site’s As‐Built Figure 5 which is 
included in the Appendix). 
Restoration on Ditches (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8): 
 The ditch is directly connected with and draining towards an intermittent or perennial stream 
(See Figure 3 for connection with UT1). 
 The ditch is contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual 
conservation easement (See Figure 3 and 7 for easement boundary). 
 Stormwater runoff from overland flow drains towards the ditch (See Figure 5 for topographic 
and watershed information). 
 The ditch is between one and three (3) feet in depth based on the distance from the thalweg to 
the top of bank (See Figure 3 for depth at cross‐section locations). 
 The entire length of the ditch shall have been in place prior to the effective date of the 
applicable rule (See appendix for historical aerial photographs). 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 5  July 2020 
 The width of buffer restoration on the ditch is no less than 30 feet and no more than 50 feet 
(See Figure 8 for buffer zones).  
 The watershed of the ditch is at least four times larger than the restored area along the ditch 
(See Figure 5 for the watershed and Table 4 for the drainage areas). 
The following sections describe the existing riparian conditions on the Parcel in terms of watershed, 
soils, geology, cultural resources, species of concern, regulated floodplain zones, and site constraints.  
2.5  Watershed Characterization 
The Parcel is located within the HUC 03020201020040. All onsite features drain to Mountain Creek, 
which flows to Littler River, the Eno River, and then into Falls Lake. Falls Lake is classified as water supply 
waters (WS‐IV) and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW). The NSW designation applies to surface waters that 
are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.  
The topography of the Parcel, as indicated on the Rougemont USGS 7.5‐minute topographic quadrangle, 
shows mostly steeply sloped areas with some moderately sloped areas along UT1 (Figure 4). Drainage 
areas for the project reaches (Figure 5) were delineated using 2‐foot contour intervals derived from the 
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program’s 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. Land uses 
draining to the project reaches are a mix of active pastures, fields, and woodlands. The watershed areas 
and current land use are summarized in Table 4, below.  
Table 4: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use  
Reach Name Mitigation Area  
(acres) 
Watershed Area 
(acres) Land Use 
Catfish Creek  12.1  197 
46% forested; 54% managed herbaceous 
cover/pasture; 0.2% woody wetland 
UT1  10.3  108 
32% forested; 66% managed herbaceous 
cover/pasture; 1% shrub 
Mountain Tributary  1.5  30 
92% forested, 8% managed herbaceous 
cover/pasture 
Ditch D  7.2*  23 
17% forested, 83% managed herbaceous 
cover/pasture 
*Of the 7.2 acres of mitigation on Ditch D, 1.9 acres is buffer restoration. The Ditch D watershed is over 12 times the 
area of buffer restoration on the ditch, meeting the requirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) . 
2.6  Geology and Soils 
The project is located in the Ecoregion 45c ‐ Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont physiographic province. 
The Carolina Slate Belt extends from southern Virginia, across the Carolinas, and into Georgia. The 
Carolina Slate Belt consists of metamorphosed igneous and sedimentary rock including gneiss and schist 
that has been intruded by younger granitic rocks (NCGS, 2013). The underlying geology of the proposed 
Parcel is mapped as late Proterozoic to Cambrian (1 billion to 500 million years in age) intermediate 
metavolcanics rock (CZiv) and felsic meta‐volcanic rock (CZfv) (NCGS, 1985). The intermediate meta‐
volcanic rock is described as metamorphosed andesitic tuffs and flows that are medium to dark grayish 
green in color with minor felsic and mafic meta‐volcanics. The felsic meta‐volcanic rock is described as 
metamorphosed daeitic to rhyolitic flows and tuffs that is light gray to greenish gray in color that 
interbedded with intermediate meta‐volcanic rock.  
The proposed Parcel is mapped by the Durham County Soil Survey. Project area soils are mapped 
primarily as wehadkee silt loam, tatum gravelly silt loam, georgeville silt loam, and chewacla and 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 6  July 2020 
wehadkee soils. These soils are described below in Table 5. Catfish Creek, UT1, Mountain Tributary, and 
Ditch D are all depicted as streams on the 1976 NRCS Soil Survey provided in Figure 6.  
Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions  
Soil Name Description 
Wehadkee silt loam 
This soil is found on narrow floodplains with a slope of 0 to 2 percent and is 
typically poorly drained and frequently floods. The surface layer of the series 
is loam with a thickness of about 8 inches. The subsoil of sandy clay loam has 
a depth of 43 inches. This soil is fairly well suited for pasture. 
Tatum gravelly silt loam 
This well‐drained soil is found on uplands with a slope of 15 to 25 percent. 
The surface layer has a gravelly silt loam of about 7 inches. The subsoil of silty 
clay loam extends to a depth of 42 inches and weathered bedrock is present 
from 42 to 80 inches. This soil is well suited to pine and hardwood forest and 
to pasture. Slope and the erosion resulting from runoff are the major 
concerns in management. 
Georgeville silt loam 
This well‐drained soil is found on narrow side slopes on uplands with a slope 
of 6 to 10 percent. It has a surface layer of reddish‐brown or brown silt loam 
to about 7 inches. Its subsoil is red, firm silty clay or silty clay loam to about 10 
inches. Slope and erosion resulting from runoff are the major concerns for 
management. 
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils 
These soils are about 60 percent Chewacla soil and 35 percent Wehadkee soil. 
These are somewhat poorly drained soils on floodplains with slopes of 0 to 2 
percent that flood frequently. They occur as long, level areas parallel to the 
major streams and rivers. These soils have a surface layer of loam to about 4 
inches and a subsurface layer of silty clay loam to about 26 inches. These soils 
are well suited to hardwood forest and pasture. 
Source: Durham County Soil Survey, USDA‐NRCS, http://efotg.nrcs.usda.gov  
2.7  Existing Vegetative Communities 
Upland portions of the Parcel maintained for cattle grazing are dominated by pasture grasses including 
tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), and red fescue (Festuca 
rubra). Herbaceous vegetation in wetland and riparian areas includes tearthumb (Polygonum 
sagittatum), common rush (Juncus effuses), spotted ladysthumb (Polygonum persicaria), yellow 
jewelweed (Impatiens pallida), Carex species (Carex spp.), and Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium 
vimineum). Forested riparian areas are generally narrow or discontinuous, but common tree species 
present in the canopy are American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus 
pennsylvanica), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and red 
maple (Acer rubrum). Additional woody plants present in smaller proportions or lower strata include 
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), white oak (Quercus alba), hazel alder (Alnus serrulata), black 
willow (Salix nigra), paw paw (Asimina triloba), greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), Chinese privet 
(Ligustrum sinense), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). 
2.8  Threatened and Endangered Species 
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 
Information for Planning and Consultation database (IPaC) were searched for federally listed threatened 
and endangered plant and animal species in Durham County, NC. Two listed endangered species and 
three species proposed for listing as endangered or threatened were identified: the River waterdog 
(Necturus lewisi), Carolina madtom (Notorus furiousus), Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Michaux’s 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 7  July 2020 
sumac (Rhus michauxii), and the smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata). Wildlands performed a 
pedestrian survey of the project parcel on April 13, 2018 and again on February 14, 2020. It was 
determined that there is no suitable habitat for any of the listed species; therefore, the project will have 
“no effect” on the federally listed species. The USFWS Self‐Certification Letter packet and the USFWS 
response letter agreeing with the determinations are included in the appendix. 
2.9  Cultural Resources 
There are no existing structures in the project area. The Parcel is not located near any sites listed on the 
National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO was contacted with request 
for review and comment on March 2, 2020. SHPO responded on April 17, 2020 and stated they were not 
aware of any historic resources that would be affected by the project. All correspondence with SHPO is 
included in the Appendix. 
2.10  FEMA Floodplain Compliance 
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be 
required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project. 
2.11  Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access 
The Parcel is accessible via a gravel driveway off Roxboro Road. Three internal easement crossings for 
farm use are part of the proposed conservation easement. These breaks are not included in the credits 
calculated for the project. There are no other known constraints on the proposed Parcel.  
2.12  Other Environmental Conditions 
An EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel through Environmental Data 
Resources, Inc. on January 29, 2018. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed 
in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. There were no known or 
potentially hazardous waste sites identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The 
Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the Appendix. 
3.0   Site Protection Instrument 
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes 
portions of the parcels listed in Table 6. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its 
entirety by an approved NCDWR long term stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed 
in an approved NCDWR conservation easement. 

Table 6: Site Protection Instrument  
Landowner PIN County 
Site 
Protection 
Instrument 
Deed Book 
and Page 
Number 
Acreage
to be 
Protected 
Jack B. Penny Jr, Richard P. 
Penny, & Gary W. Penny 
0827‐02‐68‐
0515 Durham Conservation 
Easement 
To Be 
Recorded 33 0827‐02‐67‐
0407 
4.0  Mitigation Work Plan 
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land along Catfish Creek, Mountain Tributary and Ditch D 
on the Parcel to a protected riparian corridor, improving the ecological function of the area. The project 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 8  July 2020 
design will ensure that no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 7 
illustrates the conceptual design for the Parcel. Figure 8 further depicts the riparian buffer zones for the 
Parcel. 
4.1  Parcel Preparation 
The land use within 200 feet from top of bank of the project features has been maintained as cleared for 
cattle pasture except for a few small forested areas along Catfish Creek and Mountain Tributary. Areas 
slated for restoration will require little site preparation because the land has been maintained in 
agriculture. Site preparation will include ripping the soil and select herbicide treatments and/or limited 
mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation. Where needed, invasive species will be 
selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide applicator.   

The Parcel is being fenced during construction of the NCDMS Site to remove cattle from the easement 
areas as shown on Figure 8, but the Bank conservation easement area will continue to be mowed until 
the Parcel’s conservation easement has been recorded per Section 3.0.   
4.2  Riparian Area Restoration Activities 
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor. 
A ring spray herbicide treatment of the existing fescue will be done at the time of planting around the 
base of each planted tree.  Additional vegetation management and herbicide applications may be 
needed over the first few years of tree establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent 
encroachment of undesirable species that may out‐compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species 
planted across the riparian areas of the Parcel will include a mixture of the species listed in Table 7 
below. 
Table 7: Selected Tree Species  
Species Common Name Density Forest Strata 
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore  20% Canopy 
Betula nigra River Birch  20% Canopy 
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood  10% Canopy 
Acer negundo Boxelder 10% Subcanopy 
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 10% Subcanopy 
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 10% Canopy 
Quercus phellos Willow Oak  10% Canopy 
Quercus alba White Oak 10% Canopy 

Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A 
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will be 
greater than 50% of the established stems. An appropriate seed mix will also be applied to provide 
temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain 
events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. The proposed seed mix contains taxonomic families 
such as Asteraceae and Lamiaceae which have beneficial relationships with many insects found within 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 9  July 2020 
the Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Diptera families. Planting is scheduled for January 2021. The 
proposed planting area includes both the areas identified as Buffer Restoration Credits and Nutrient 
Offset Credits on Figure 7.  
4.3  Riparian Area Enhancement Activities 
Cattle will be excluded using permanent fencing around the conservation easement area (Figure 7) as 
followed by 15A NCAC 02B .0296(o).  The enhancement area will be protected in perpetuity under a 
conservation easement. 
4.4  Riparian Area Preservation Activities 
No riparian preservation activities are planned for the Parcel. 
5.0  Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 
5.1   Monitoring Protocol 
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the buffer restoration 
areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be randomly placed throughout the 
planted riparian areas. A total of 23 plots will be established within the riparian buffer restoration and 
credit generation areas (Figure 9). The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters.  
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2 
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner 
of each of the 25 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in 
the annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.  
Planting is scheduled for January 2021. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end 
of the first growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than 
the fall season. Species composition, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by 
plot. The total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure 
of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, 
where no one species is greater than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density 
of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of monitoring year five. Appropriate and desirable 
native volunteer species may be included in the Parcel’s density to meet the performance standards 
with NCDWR approval.  
The Sponsor shall submit the annual monitoring report to NCDWR by December 31st of each year for five 
consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the Catfish Pond II Mitigation Banking 
Instrument (MBI). 
5.2  Parcel Maintenance 
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section 
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site 
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high 
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, 
or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the 
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel 
maintenance performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide 
schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration 
areas to prevent establishment of invasive species that may out‐compete the planted native vegetation. 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 10  July 2020 
The only herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in 
accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.  
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary 
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to 
NCDWR. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must 
receive approval from NCDWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of 
the Neuse buffers to ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.  
5.3  Easement Boundaries and Fencing 
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and 
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree‐blazing, or other means as 
allowed  by  site  conditions  and/or  conservation  easement  prior  to  the  NCDWR  As‐Built  inspection. 
Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on 
an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation easement holder will be included on 
easement markers. 
6.0  Financial Assurance and Long‐Term Management 
6.1  Financial Assurances 
Following approval of the Catfish Pond II Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor shall provide a 
Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an “A‐“ as rated by A.M. Best. The 
Performance Bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as 
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP, but not less than $150,000.00). In lieu of 
posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit 
release. In that case no performance bond will be necessary. 
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will be 
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less 
than $100,000.00. The Performance/Maintenance Bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring 
period for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon NCDWR 
approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring. 
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring 
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWR with each annual monitoring report when 
applicable. NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are 
submitted without proof of bond renewals when applicable. 
6.2  Long‐term Management 
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved NCDWR long term 
stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved NCDWR conservation 
easement. The long‐term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure 
that the restrictions documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity.  
7.0  Mitigation Potential 
Of the 33.00 acres protected under the conservation easement, the mitigation activity for 28.30 acres is 
riparian restoration. Of that 28.30 acres of restoration, 8.28 acres is proposed for buffer mitigation 
credit and 20.02 acres is proposed for nutrient offset credit. There is also 2.96 acres of enhancement via 
cattle exclusion within the conservation easement proposed for riparian buffer credit. The mitigation 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 11  July 2020 
credit calculations were derived based on Wildlands’ conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. 
The management objectives, mitigation type, and proposed amount of buffer mitigation are presented 
in Tables 8 and 9, below. The Buffer Interpretation /Clarification Memo #2008‐019 applies to Ditch D 
where maintenance of diffuse flow onsite is unattainable, therefore a total of 3,795 square feet is 
removed from the creditable area at the top of Ditch A.   All of the buffer restoration areas are viable for 
either riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits and can be converted upon approval by NCDWR if 
within the first 100 feet from top of bank for the areas on Catfish Creek, Mountain Tributary, UT1 or the 
first 50 feet from top of bank for the Ditch.  
   Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP    HUC 03020201   Page 12  July 2020  Table 8: Catfish Pond II Project Mitigation Credits  Neuse 03020201 ‐ Upper Falls Lake Service Area   19.16394 N Credit Ratio (sf/credit)   297.54099 P Credit Ratio (sf/credit)   Credit Type Location Subject?  Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer Width (ft) Feature Name Total Area (ft2) Total (Creditable) Area of Buffer Mitigation (ft2) Initial Credit Ratio (x:1) % Full Credit  Final Credit Ratio (x:1)   Convertible to Riparian Buffer?   Riparian Buffer Credits   Convertible to Nutrient Offset?   Delivered Nutrient Offset: N (lbs)   Delivered Nutrient Offset: P (lbs)  Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 51‐100 Catfish Creek  113,364  1  100%  1.00000 Yes  113,364.000 N/A     Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 51‐100 Catfish Creek  68,305  2  100%  2.00000 Yes  34,152.500 N/A  —  — Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 101‐200 Catfish Creek  15,657  2  33%  6.06061 Yes  2,583.403 N/A  —  — Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101‐200 Catfish Creek 331,748   1  33%  3.03030 No  — Yes  17,311.054  1,114.966 Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 51‐100 Mountain Trib  25,585  1  100%  1.00000 Yes  25,585.000 N/A     Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 51‐100 Mountain Trib  15,618  2  100%  2.00000 Yes  7,809.000 N/A  —  — Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 101‐200 Mountain Trib  5,494  2  33%  6.06061 Yes  906.509 N/A  —  — Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101‐200 Mountain Trib 19,658   1  33%  3.03030 No  — Yes  1,025.781  66.068 Buffer Rural Yes I / P Restoration 51‐100 UT1  138,555  1  100%  1.00000 Yes  138,555.000 N/A     Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 51‐100 UT1  7,988  2  100%  2.00000 Yes  3,994.000 N/A  —  — Buffer Rural Yes I / P Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 101‐200 UT1  15,899  2  33%  6.06061 Yes  2,623.333 N/A  —  — Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101‐200 UT1 287,911   1  33%  3.03030 No  — Yes  15,023.581  967.635 Buffer Rural No Ditch Restoration 0‐50 D  80,277  1  100%  1.00000 Yes  80,277 N/A     Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 51‐200’ D 232,196   1  100%  1.00000 No  — Yes  12,116.298  780.383 NA Rural No Ditch Restoration 0‐100’ D – Credit Deduction 3,795 0  ‐  ‐  ‐ ‐  ‐ ‐  ‐  ‐   Eligible for Preservation (sf): 162,247  Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer Width (ft) Feature Name  Total Area (sf)   Total (Creditable) Area for Buffer Mitigation (sf)  Initial Credit Ratio (x:1) % Full Credit  Final Credit Ratio (x:1)   Riparian Buffer Credits    Buffer r    Preservation   0 0              Preservation Area Subtotal (sf): 0  Preservation as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0%    Ephemeral Reaches as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0%         

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 13  July 2020 
Table 9: Catfish Pond Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation  
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM) 
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits 
Restoration: 357,781  357,781.000
Enhancement: 128,961  52,068.746 
Preservation: 0  0.000 
Total Riparian Buffer: 486,742  409,849.746
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION 
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits 
Nutrient 
Offset: 
Nitrogen: 871,513 
45,476.713 
Phosphorus: 2,929.052 

Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by NCDWR, 
the mitigation credits associated with the Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as 
described in Table 10 below. 

Table 10: Credit Release Schedule  
Task Project Milestone % Credit Available 
for Sale 
1 
Instrument and BPDP Approved by NCDWR, NCDMS Full Delivery 
Mitigation Plans approved by the IRT and DWR, Conservation Easement 
Recorded and Financial Assurance Posted 
20 
2 
NCDMS Full Delivery As‐Built Report Submitted to NCDWR, all 
Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring 
Devices Completed for both the Catfish Pond Full‐Delivery Site (DMS ID 
#100039) and the Bank Parcel. 
20 
3  Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As‐Built Report  10 
4 Monitoring Report #1: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance 
renewed 10 
5 Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance 
renewed 10 
6 Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance 
renewed 10 
7 Item B(1) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and 
approved by NCDWR 5 
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an 
approved land trust or stewardship 
8 Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance 
renewed 5 
9 Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the NCDWR and final site visit by 
NCDWR has been conducted 10 
 Total 100% 

  Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  BPDP  
  HUC 03020201   Page 14  July 2020 

8.0  References 
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), 2010. 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration 
Priorities Plan (RBRP). 
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/FINAL
%20RBRP%20Neuse%202010_%2020111207%20CORRECTED.pdf 
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2009. Mineral Resources. 
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral%20resources/mineralresources.html 
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2019. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database, 
Durham County, NC. https://www.ncnhde.natureserve.org 
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2006. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil 
Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Durham County, North Carolina. 
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/ 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal 
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Durham County, NC. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ 

Figures 

Figure 1. Vicinity MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
^_
¹
Durham County, NC
0 10.5 Miles
2017 Aerial Photography
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
NCDMS Conservation Easement
^_Catfish Pond II Bank Parcel Location
Directions: Travel North approximately 12 miles on HWY 501/North Roxboro Street from the City of Durham. Parcel is on the left 1/2 mile north of the intersection with Patrick Road just south of Mountain Creek.
Figure 2. Service Area MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
^_
Upper Falls Lake Watershed
Lower Falls Lake Watershed
0 105 Miles ¹
County Boundaries
Service Area - Riparian Buffer Credits (HUC 03020201)
Service Area - Nutrient Offset Credits (Falls Lake Watershed)
^_Catfish Pond II Bank Parcel Location
2014 Aerial Photography
Durham County, NC
Figure 3. Site MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
XSEC 4depth=1.17'
XSEC 3depth=1.69'XSEC 2depth=1.23'XSEC 1depth=2.22'
Mou
n
t
a
i
n

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
Catfi
s
h

C
r
e
e
k
D
UT2
EC1 UT1Mountain Creek5004000 400200 Feet
Durham County, NC
¹
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement (200' from TOB)
NCDMS Conservation Easement (50' from TOB)
Internal Crossing
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Project Ephemeral Channel
Non-Project Streams
Topographic Contours (4')
Existing Tree Line
Cross Sections
2017 Aerial Photography
Figure 4. USGS Topographic MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
0 1,000500 Feet
Durham County, NC
¹
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Rougemont USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle
Figure 5. Watershed MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Mou
n
t
a
i
n

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
Catfi
s
h

C
r
e
e
k
D
UT2
EC1 UT1Mountain Creek50
0
600
40
0
0 600300 Feet
Durham County, NC
¹
Project Location
Watershed - Catfish Creek
Watershed - Mountain Tributary
Watershed - UT1
Watershed - Ditch D
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Ephemeral Channel
Topographic Contours (4')
Non-Project Streams
2017 Aerial Photography
Figure 6. NRCS 1976 Soils MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)Durham County, NC
0 300 600 Feet ¹
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Soil Survey of Durham County, NC - 1976
Catfi
s
h

C
r
e
e
k
UT1D
UT2
EC1
Mou
n
t
a
i
n

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
Mountain CreekFigure 7. Buffer Credits MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
0 400200 Feet ¹
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement (200' from TOB)
NCDMS Conservation Easement (50' from TOB)
Internal Crossings
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Project Ephemeral Channel
Mitigation Concept
Buffer Restoration Credits
Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion Credits
Nutrient Offset Credits
No Credit (Existing Forest)
No Credit (Diffuse Flow Deduction)
Non-Project Streams
Suveyed Tree Line
[[SIte Fencing
Durham County, NC
2017 Aerial Photography
Catfi
s
h

C
r
e
e
k
UT1UT2
D
EC1
Mou
n
t
a
i
n

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
Mountain CreekFigure 8. Riparian Buffer Zones MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
0 400200 Feet ¹
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement (200' from TOB)
NCDMS Conservation Easement (50' from TOB)
Internal Crossings
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Project Ephemeral Channel
Buffer Zones
50 from Top of Bank
100 from Top of Bank
200 from Top of Bank
Non-Project Streams
Durham County, NC
2017 Aerial Photography
Catfi
s
h

C
r
e
e
k
UT1D
UT2
EC1
Mou
n
t
a
i
n

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
Mountain CreekFigure 9. Monitoring MapCatfish Pond IIRiparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank ParcelBank Parcel Development PackageNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
0 400200 Feet ¹
Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement (200' from TOB)
NCDMS Conservation Easement (50' from TOB)
Internal Crossings
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Project Ephemeral Channel
Mitigation Concept
Buffer Restoration Credits
Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion Credits
Nutrient Offset Credits
No Credit (Existing Forest)
No Credit (Diffuse Flow Deduction)
Proposed Vegetation Plots
Non-Project Streams
Durham County, NC
2017 Aerial Photography

Appendix  

CURRENT LAND USE PHOTOGRAPHS 
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel 

Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 
Catfish Creek 
Photo Point 1 – Reach 6 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 2 – Reach 7 – Downstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 3 – Reach 7 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 4 – Reach 1 and 2 – Downstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 5 – Reach 3 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 6 – Reach 4 – Downstream (02/14/2020)

Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 
Photo Point 7 – Reach 5 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 8 – Reach 6 – Downstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 9 – Reach 7 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 10 – Reach 7 – Downstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 11 – Reach 7 – Upstream (02/14/2020)

Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 
UT1 
Photo Point 12 – Reach 1 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 13 – Reach 1 – Upstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 14 – Reach 2 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 15 – Reach 3 – Downstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 16 – Reach 4 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 17 – Reach 1 – Downstream (02/14/2020)

Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 
Photo Point 18 – Reach 2 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 19 – Reach 2 – Upstream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 20 – Reach 3 – Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 21 – Reach 4 – Downstream (02/14/2020)

Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 
Ditch D 
Photo Point 22 – East/Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 23 – East/Downstream (02/14/2020)

Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 
Mountain Tributary 
Photo Point 24 – East/Downstream (02/14/2020)Photo Point 25 – East/Toward stream (02/14/2020)
Photo Point 26 – Northeast/Downstream (02/14/2020)

Photo Log PointsCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank ParcelNeuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake Basin)
!P
!P !P
!P !P !P
!P
!P
!P
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
Catfish Creek
UT1
Ditch D
UT2 Mountain TributaryEC1
Reach 1 Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4 Reach 5
Reach 6
Reach 7
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
1
2
9
87
6
1110
19
22
1712
13
23
14
15
16
24
25
26
3
5
4
21
20
18
500
4000 500250 Feet
Durham County, NC¹
Project Location
Conservation Easement Boundary
DMS Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Ephemeral Channel
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
Non-Project Streams
Topographic Contours (4')
Existing Tree Line
!P Reach Breaks
GF Photo Points
2017 Aerial Photography
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
1940
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
1955
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
1972
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
1983
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
1993
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
2005
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
2006
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
2008
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
2009
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
2010
= 500'
INQUIRY #:
YEAR:
4382018.1
2012
= 500'
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 13, 2018
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attn: John Hutton
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
(via electronic mail: scottL&waterlandsolutions.com )
ROY COOPER
Governol
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secre twat
LINDA CULPEPPER
hllerim Director
DWR ID# 2018-0196
Johnston County
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Catfish Pond Site
Off US-501 (36.158391,-78.907343)
Neuse 03020201 (Falls Lake WS)
Durham County
Dear Mr. Hutton,
On February 23, 2018, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), assisted you
and others from Wildlands Engineering, Inc. at the proposed Catfish Pond Mitigation Site (Site)
in Bahama, NC. The Site is located in the Falls Lake WS of the Neuse River Basin within the 8-
digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The Site is being proposed as part of a full -delivery
stream restoration project for the Division of Mitigation Services (RFP #16-007279). Members
of the Interagency Review Team (IRT) and Division of Mitigation Services were also present
onsite. At your request, on February 23, 2018, Ms. Merritt performed an onsite assessment of
riparian land uses adjacent to streams and ditches onsite, which are shown on the attached map
labeled "Figure 6A Concept Map".
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
out to 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective
November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Feature
Classification
1Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
ZNutrient
Mitigation Type Determination w/in riparian
to Buffer
adjacent to Feature
areas
Credit
Offset Viable
Rule
0-200'
at 2,273
Viable
Ibs acre
UT1
Stream &
Yes
Combination of
Yes°
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Wetland
(where
forested and
forested fields
.0295 (n)
complex
stream is
non/forested pasture
only)
Proposed for
restored)
grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
stream
NCAC 026 .0295 (o) (6)
restoration
Crossing 1 has impeded flow and Crossing 2 is
severely perched with impeded flow. Both
crossings need be repaired/replaced.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Catfish Pond Full -Delivery Site
Wildlands
March 13, 2018
Feature
Classification
'Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
ZNutrient
Mitigation Type Determination w/in riparian
to Buffer
adjacent to Feature
areas
Credit
Offset Viable
Rule
0-200'
at 2,273
Viable
Ibs acre
D
Ditch
No
Non -forested pasture
*See
Yes
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
grazed by cattle
Note
.0295 (n)
*The ditch meets 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A,
B, C & E). More information is needed for
complete assessment.
Catfish
Stream
Yes
Combination of
Yes4
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Creek
forested and
forested fields
.0295 (n)
non/forested pasture
only)
grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 026 .0295 (o) (6)
Crossing 3 has impeded flow and needs to be
repaired/replaced
Catfish
In -line pond
Yes
Combination of
*Yes4
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Pond
(proposed
forested and
forested fields
.0295 (n)
for stream
non/forested pasture
only)
Restoration)
grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (6)
*If stream channel is created & restored
through the pond, the new riparian areas will be
viable as a Restoration Site
UT2
Stream
Yes
Mostly forested
Yes4
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
pasture with some
forested fields
.0295 (n)
open canopy areas
only)
and grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (6)
Mountain
Stream
Yes
Mostly forested
Yes4
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Tributary
pasture with some
forested fields
.0295 (n)
open canopy areas
only)
and grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (6)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 12, 2018 using the 1:24,000
scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared
by the NRCS
2 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with
Riparian Buffer Establishment
'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total
area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation only site
to comply with this rule.
'The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B
.0295(o)(6).
P #rc 213

Catfish Pond Full -Delivery Site
Wildlands
March 13, 2018
The attached map (Figure 6A Concept Map) showing the project site and features was provided by
Wildlands Engineering and was initialed by Ms. Merritt on March 13, 2018. There were at least 3
crossings that need to be repaired or replaced to allow for aquatic passage and continuous
hydrologic connectively throughout the stream/s. This letter should be provided in any future
stream, wetland, buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written
approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for
buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240, a proposal regarding a proposed nutrient
load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior to any
mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240. For any areas
generating wetland mitigation credit, no buffer or nutrient offset credit can be generated.
This viability assessment will expire on March 13, 2020 or upon the submittal of an As -Built
Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. Please contact Katie Merritt at (919)-807-6371 if you
have any questions regarding this correspondence.
KAH/km
Attachments: Figure 6A Concept Map
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
DMS - Jeff Schaffer (via electronic mail)
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 313

in
violin
tall -
'
�^
lNo BMP here but can
add for bLffer/nutrientF:
f criteria met.
add �this wetland to
CE/prj area
=�|
Figure 6AConcept Map (Option z)
WIl.DI~AND3 O 500Feat hPond Mitigation Site
r~o/mssn/ws MU euseRiver Basin O3OZU2O1
Durham County, N[
��

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 19, 2020
DWR ID# 2018-0196
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Johnston County
Attn: Andrea Eckardt
1430 South Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
(via electronic mail: aeckardt(a�wildlandseng com )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Catfish Pond Site
Off US-501 (36.158391,-78.907343)
Neuse 03020201 (Falls Lake Watershed)
Durham County
Dear Ms. Eckardt
On March 13, 2018, DWR issued a site viability letter for the Catfish Pond Site (DMS RFP#16-
007279). On February 18, 2020, you requested one (1) amendment be considered to the previous
letter. Upon DWR review of the documentation you provided on February 18, 2020, this letter
replaces the previous letter with the following amendment only:
1. Expiration date for the viability assessment is extended through September 13, 2020.
This viability assessment will now expire on September 13, 2020 or upon the submittal of an As -
Built Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if
you have any questions regarding this correspondence.
Sincerely,
Mac Haupt, Acting Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
MH/km
Attachments: Site Viability Letter dated March 13, 2018
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH CARC>LJNA
°ems°°'&,,,," �. s� 919.707.9000

Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726

Date:__________________________

Self-Certification Letter

Project Name______________________________

Dear Applicant:

Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.

The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:

“no effect” determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or

“may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or

“may affect, likely to adversely affect” determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;

“no Eagle Act permit required” determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2

We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the “no effect” or
“not likely to adversely affect” determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the “may affect” determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the “no Eagle Act permit required” determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.

Sincerely,

/s/Pete Benjamin

Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services

Enclosures - project review package
Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Date: 03/02/2020
Species / Resource Name Conclusion ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Determination
Notes / Documentation
Neuse River Waterdog
(Necturus lewisi)
No suitable habitat present No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, ditch
size, and lack of constant water flow through all seasons. No
individuals of the species were found. The proposed project is
not in the proposed critical habitat area designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Carolina Madtom
(Noturus furiosus)
No suitable habitat present No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, siltation,
ditch size, and lack of constant water flow through all seasons.
No individuals of the species were found. The proposed
project is not in the proposed critical habitat area designated
by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no
known element occurrences exist within the proposed project
area.
Atlantic Pigtoe
(Fusconaia masoni)
No suitable habitat present No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, siltation,
and lack of constant water flow through all seasons. No
individuals of the species were found. The proposed project is
not in the proposed critical habitat area designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Michaux’s Sumac
(Rhus michauxii)
Suitable habitat present,
Species not present
No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on April 13, 2018 and February
14, 2020. Suitable habitat was found but cattle have full
access to the entire area and no individuals of the species
were found. There is no critical habitat designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Smooth Coneflower
(Echinacea laevigata)
Suitable habitat present,
Species not present
No Effect A Field Survey was conducted on April 13, 2018 and February
14, 2020. Suitable habitat was found but cattle have full
access to the entire area and no individuals of the species
were found. There is no critical habitat designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Bald Eagle No known nests in area Unlikely to disturb nesting bald
eagles

Critical Habitat No critical habitat present
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about
impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Environmental Scientist 03/02/2020
_______________________________________________________________ ___________________________
Signature /Title Date

February 21, 2020
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0708
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578
Project Name: Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578   3

▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2020-SLI-0708
Event Code:04EN2000-2020-E-01578
Project Name:Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Project Type:LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description:Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel (Phase II) is a buffer restoration
project located approximately twelve miles north of the City of Durham
and approximately three miles east of the Orange County/Durham County
border. The project is comprised of approximately 31.6 acres along
Catfish Creek and three additional unnamed tributaries. The Parcel has
historically been disturbed due to livestock use. This project will establish
adequate buffers along these streams to improve water quality and
wildlife habitat, both aquatic and terrestrial. The project easement is
immediately adjacent to Catfish Pond Mitigation Site (Phase I of the
project), which is currently under construction. The Parcel expands the
riparian buffer area from 50 feet in Phase I to 100-200 feet on project
streams and ephemeral channels.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/36.16225387304823N78.91412318492708W
Counties:Durham, NC
02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578   3

1.
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed
Threatened
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed
Endangered
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed
Threatened
1
02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578   4

Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
1
Tasha King
From:Wells, Emily N <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:02 AM
To:Mann, Leigh; Tasha King
Subject:Re: DUE DATE: MARCH 26, 2020 Fw: Online Project Review Certification Letter - Catfish Pond II
Mitigation Bank Parcel
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
Hi Tasha, 

Thank you for the information and descriptions of the site conditions.  Based on the location and current 
conditions of the site, we would agree with your conclusion table for these species.  You do not need anything 
further from the Service. 

Thank you, 
Emily  
From: Mann, Leigh <[e-mail]> on behalf of Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 9:07 AM 
To: Wells, Emily N <[e-mail]> 
Subject: DUE DATE: MARCH 26, 2020 Fw: Online Project Review Certification Letter ‐ Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank 
Parcel  

From: Tasha King <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 1:35 PM 
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]> 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Online Project Review Certification Letter ‐ Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel  

Good morning, 

I have attached a copy of the Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel online project review certification letter. The US Fish 
and Wildlife Service has previously responded to Wildlands request for comment on NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site 
(Phase I of the project), which is currently under construction, in a letter dated March 2, 2018. Catfish Pond II Mitigation 
Bank Parcel (Phase II) is a buffer restoration project adjacent to the current Phase I easement. The Parcel expands the 
riparian buffer area from 50 feet in Phase I to 100‐200 feet on project streams, ephemeral channels, and a ditch. The 
three newly proposed endangered or threatened species in this area are included in the Species Conclusion Table.  

I have also attached a map (Figure 1) to help clarify but please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thank you very much, 
Tasha King 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

March 2, 2020
Renee Gledhill-Earley State Historic Preservation Office 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Durham County, North Carolina Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley, Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel (Phase II) is a buffer restoration project located approximately twelve miles north of the City of Durham and approximately three miles east of the Orange County/Durham County border. The project is comprised of approximately 31.6 acres along Catfish Creek and three additional unnamed tributaries. The project easement is immediately adjacent to the NCDMS Catfish Pond Stream Mitigation Site (Phase I of the project), which is currently under construction. The Parcel expands the riparian buffer area on the project streams from 50 feet in Phase I to 100-200 feet on project streams, ephemeral channels, and a ditch (Figure 1).
The State Historic Preservation Office has previously responded to our request for comment on Phase I (tracking number ER 18-0328) in a letter dated March 5, 2018, stating they “are aware of no historic resources which would be affected”. Wildlands Engineering, Inc. would like to request a review and comment on the additional area covered by Phase II of the project (Figure 1).
The project area has been historically disturbed due to livestock use. No surveyed sites listed on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation office website are located within the project area, there are no existing structures in the easement area, and no archaeological artifacts have been observed. A USGS Topographic Map and a Site Map showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Rougemont 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is located at latitude 36.163542 longitude -78.911456. We ask that you review the additional Phase II project area based on the attached information to determine the presence of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,

Tasha King
Environmental Scientist [e-mail] 919.851.9986 x116
Attachment: Figure 1 Site Map Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

April 17, 2020

Tasha King [e-mail]
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27607

Re: Catfish Pond Mitigation Site, Bahama, ER 18-0328

Dear Ms. King:
Thank you for your email of March 2, 2020, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,

Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer

FORM-LBD-CCA
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
N Roxboro Rd
N Roxboro Rd
Bahama, NC 27503
Inquiry Number: 5170975.2s
January 29, 2018
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-8
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-9
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC5170975.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
N ROXBORO RD
BAHAMA, NC 27503
COORDINATES
36.1625620 - 36˚ 9’ 45.22’’Latitude (North):
78.9100680 - 78˚ 54’ 36.24’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
687990.5UTM X (Meters):
4003802.0UTM Y (Meters):
439 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
5945265 ROUGEMONT, NCTarget Property Map:
2013Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140619Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
5170975.2s Page 2
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
N ROXBORO RD
BAHAMA, NC 27503
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
520
480 5606 40520
4 80
6 0 0
560
560600560480520520400
6 0 0
4804 805 6 0
600560600600600440560560
560 560560
56056056052 0
52052052
0
520520
520
52052048 0 480480480480480 48 0
4 80 48048
48048 0
44
0
4
4
0 4404
40440440440440440
4 404404 404 404004004004003 60
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.40048
0 480440 440
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
TC5170975.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
TC5170975.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS
TC5170975.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
0 0 0 0 0 0 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC5170975.2s Page 7
ROY COOPER
GOVmor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 1, 2019
DWR # 18-0196
Durham County
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Attn: Lin Xu
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Chris Roessler
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Dear Mr. Xu and Mr. Roessler:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your
application dated August 27, 2019, received by the Division of Water Resources (Division)
August 28, 2019. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General
Certification Number 4134 and the conditions listed below. This certification is associated
with the use of Nationwide Permit Number 27 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification(s) or
general permit and the following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific
and general conditions of the Certification are met. No other impacts are approved,
including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b) and/or (c)]
North Caroltna Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
D E �� 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707,9000

Catfish Pond
DWR# 18-0196
Page 2 of 4
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
(units)
Permanent
Amount Approved
(units)
Temporary
Stream
S1
0 linear feet
52 linearfeet
S2
0
112
S3
378
0
S4
0
72
S5
0
51
S6
99
0
S7
97
0
S8
0
35
S9
0
122
S10
0
88
S11
0
69
S12
0
134
S13
0
300
S14
444
0
S15
168
0
S16
0
28
S17
0
27
S18
0
411
S19
0
13
Total
1,186
1,514
404 401 Wetlands
W1
0.0086 acres
0.0691 acres
W2
0.0564
0
W3
0
0.0032
W4
0.0156
0
W5
0.0046
0
W6
0.1327
0.3357
W7
0
0.0032
Total 1
0.2179
0.4112
Open Waters
01 1
0.597 acres
0 acres
Total 1
0.597
0
2. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans
and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the
Certification. If you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may
be required to submit a new application package with the appropriate fee. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and

Catfish Pond
DWR# 18-0196
Page 3 of 4
General Certification(s)/Permit/Authorization and is responsible for complying with
all conditions. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2)]
3. The issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification for the restoration/enhancement
project does not represent an approval of credit yield for the project. [15A NCAC
02H .0500(h)]
4. You have our approval for your proposed final stream enhancements/restorations
plan. The stream restorations/enhancements must be constructed, maintained, and
monitored according to the plans approved by this Office and this Certificate of
Coverage. Any repairs or adjustments to the site must be made according to the
approved plans or must receive written approval from this Office to make the repairs
or adjustments. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(h)]
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143-215.5]
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B
by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative
Hearings (hereby known as OAH) within sixty (60) calendar days.
A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at httl2://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the
OAH Clerk's Office at [phone] for information. A petition is considered filed when
the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in the
OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm,
excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one
copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within
five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
Ifsending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Ifsending via delivery service (UPS,
Fed Ex, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to Department of Environmental Quality:
William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601

Catfish Pond
DWR# 18-0196
Page 4 of 4
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
Please contact Mac Haupt at 919-707-3632 or mac.haupt(a)ncdenngov if you have any
questions or concerns.
Sin erely,
.W-
Mac Haupt, Acting Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: GC 4134
cc: Todd Tugwell, Kim Browning, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file
Filename: 180196CatfishPond(Durham)_401_ approval Itr.October 1, 2019.docx

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2018-00424 County: Durham U.S.G.S. Quad: Rougemont

GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION

Permittee: NC Division of Mitigation Services Permittee: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Tim Baumgartner Attn: Chris Roessler
Address: 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Address: 321 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone] x111

Size (acres) 20.73 acres Nearest Town Bahama
Nearest Waterway Mountain Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 36.162562 °N Longitude: -78.910068°W

Location description: The NCDMS 20.73-acre Catfish Pond Mitigation Site includes Catfish Creek and three of its tributaries.
All drain to Mountain Creek. The site is located in Durham County, North Carolina, approximately 12 miles north of the city
of Durham and 3 miles east of the Orange County/Durham County border. PIN: 0827-02-67-0407, 0827-02-58-9864, 0828-04-
50-5560.

Description of projects area and activity: The co-applicants, NCDMS and Wildlands Engineering, Inc, have requested a
Department of the Army permit authorization to discharge dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States
associated with the NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site. Implementation of the proposed restoration and enhancement
activities will result in the discharge of fill material into 2,700 linear feet of stream channel and 0.6291 acres of wetlands
associated with mechanized land clearing, excavation, placement of fill material, and stream relocation activities for the
mitigation site. Compensatory mitigation is NOT required in conjunction with the aforementioned activities. Refer to the
enclosed Table 1 for a detailed summary of impacts

Applicable Law: Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)

Authorization: Regional General Permit Number and/or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 27 – Aquatic Habitat Restoration,
Enhancement, and Establishment Activities
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated August 27, 2019. Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class
I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.

This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional general
permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided
it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide and/or regional general permit authorization
expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the
nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon
the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the
date of the nationwide and/or regional general permit’s expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been
exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.

Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.

For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].

SAW-2018-00424

This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.

If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Kimberly Browning, 919.554.4884 x60.

Corps Regulatory Official: Date: October 3, 2019
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2022

SAW-2018-00424

Table 1. Authorized discharge of fill material into waters of the United States in association with the
NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site (SAW-2018-00424).

SAW-2018-00424

Stream Impacts Continued
*Impacts are associated with aquatic resource restoration and enhancement activities and are expected to result in a net gain in Waters
of the US.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1. The permittee understands and agrees that the document entitled “Final Mitigation Plan – Catfish Pond Mitigation
Site” dated July 18, 2019 is incorporated and made part of this permit. Execution of the work and terms given in the
approved mitigation plan are a condition of this permit.
2. This Nationwide Permit verification does not imply suitability of this property for compensatory mitigation for any
particular project. The use of any portion of this site as compensatory mitigation for a particular project will be
determined during the permit review process for that project.

SAW-2018-00424

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

Action ID Number: SAW-2018-00424 County: Durham

Permittee: NC Division of Mitigation Services Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Tim Baumgartner Attn: Mr. Chris Roessler

Project Name: NCDMS Catfish Pond Site

Date Verification Issued: October 3, 2019

Project Manager: Kim Browning

Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this certification
and return it to the following address:

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Regulatory Division Mitigation Office
Attn: Kim Browning
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27587

Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may result in the Corps suspending,
modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal
action.

I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms
and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions.

_______________________________________ ______________________
Signature of Permittee Date

Mountain TributaryUT2
Catfi
s
h

C
r
e
e
k
M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

C
r
e
e
k
Ditch
D
EC1
UT1
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 5. Monitoring Plan View Map KeyCatfish Pond Mitigation SiteBaseline Monitoring Report (MY0)Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Durham County, NC
0 400 800 Feet ¹
Project Location
Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Project Features
Project Stream
Project Ditch
Project Ephemeral Channel
Non-Project Stream/Channel
Mitigation Approach
Buffer Restoration (TOB-49')
Buffer Restoration (TOB-50')
Buffer Restoration (51'-100')
Buffer Restoration (101'-200')
Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion (TOB-50')
Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion (51'-100')
Buffer Enhancement Via Cattle Exclusion (101'-200')
No Credit
Vegetation Plot
[[Fence
2017 Aerial Photography