19971061 All Versions_Complete File_19971121

State of North Carolina C6' '
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4
Division of Environmental Management A*AA'
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N F=1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretory
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E„ Director
December 11, 1995
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorn
From: Eric Galamb
G1
Subject: EA for the High Point Intermediate Loop
Guilford County
TIP # U-2536
DEHNR # 96-0328, DEM # 11105
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands.
The document states that approximately 0.6 acres of waters including wetlands will be
impacted. Approximately 100 feet of a tributary to Oak Hollow Lake will be relocated.
DOT has committed to implementing HQW soil and erosion control measures for this
project. Hazardous spill catch basins will be installed due to the water supply critical
area. Stream relocation will be accomplished using DOT's stream relocation
guidelines. Due to these commitments, DEM concurs with the project.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of an EA or FONSI by DEM would not preclude
the denial of a 401 Certification upon application if wetland or water impacts have not
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
hpintlop.ea
cc: Raleigh COE
Mark Reep, DOT
FAXED
DEC i 1 1995
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Auq 19'96 10:36 No.004 P.03
0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919.733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM
Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DEHNR
I lavid Cox, sci-v klighway Projectr ato
1lnbitat Conscrvatian Prograt

DATE: August 19, 1996
SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) for the High Point Intermediate Loop, from US 311 (North Main Street)
to Johnson Street and from NC 68 (Eastehester Drive) to SR 1471 (Monthuti Avenue),
Uuill6rd County, North Carolina. TIP No. U-2536, SCH Project No. 97-0029.
Staff biol Ligists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject FONSI
And arv familiar with habitat values in t}ao project arcs. The purpose of this review was to assess project
impnetS to fislt rind wildlife regourees. Our comments are provided in ac uurdanec with certain provisions
of the North Carolina Environmemal Policy Act. (G.S. 113A-I at seq,, rae amended; 1 NCAC 25).
NCDOT proposes to construct a two segments of the High Point Intermediate Loop, nosily on new
location, from US 311 to Johnson Street and from NC 68 to SR 1471 _ The proposed roadway is a multi-
lane, curb and gutter taeility, 77ae project length is approximately 2.4 miles. Approximately 0.60 ;acres
of wetland impacts are anticipated and will likely be covered under nationwide permits.
We have reviewed the additional information presented in the document and have no additional
comments. Due to the developed suture of the project area and the environmental commitments included
in the document, we concur with this FONS1.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this FONSL If we can he of any ftirth(,wr 11ssistance
please call me, at (9'19) 528-9886.
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Dec 01'95 14:48 No.004 P.02
Norrh Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
51Z N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919.733-33991
Charles R. FuU%%)od, Execudve DireetEw
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba Mcgco
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DBHNR
FROM: David Cox, Highway project ?oWr
Habitat Conservation Progretnl` [ ?. )
DATE: December 1. 1995
SUBJELM North Carolina Department of Transportatlon (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment
(LA) for tho High Point Intermediate Loop, from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson
Street and from NC 68 (Eastchettter Drive) to SR 1471 (Montliou Avenue), Guilford
County, North Carolina. TIP No. U-2536, SCH Project No. 96-0328.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject EA and
are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess project
impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in aaoordance with certain provisions
of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 et seq., as amended; I NCAC 25).
NCDOT proposes to construct a two segments of the High Point Intermediate Loop, mostly on now
location, from US 311 to Johnson Street and fi+om NC 68 to SR 1471. The proposed roadway is a multi-
lane, curb and gutter facility. no project longth.is approximately 2.4 miles. Approximately 0.60 acres
of wetland impacts are anticipated and will likely be covered under nationwide permits.
The EA adequately addreaaes impacts to wildlife and fisheries resources in the project area. Due to
the developed nature of the project area and the environmental comrnitmonts included in the document,
we concur with this GA and anticipate concurrence with the upcoming Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSO.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any further assistance please
call me, at [phone].
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs ^ ? Project ?ocated in 7th floor library
Project Review Form 11 w,
Project Number: County: Date: Date Response Due (firm dea Iine):
This project is being reviewed as Indicated below: U?Lf/ l? Il ??10 ?OV
Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville ? All RIO Areas ? Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries
? Fayetteville VAir ?Coastal Management ?Water Planning
Water ? Water Resources ? Environmental Health
? Mooresville
roundwater .. AC
Wildlife ?Solid Waste Management
? Raleigh VLand Quality Engineer Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
hi
? W
t ? Recreational Consultant ? Land Resources ? David Foster
on
as
ng E3 Coastal Management Consultant ? Parks and Recreation Other (specify)
? Wilmington
? Others E vironmental Management RECEIVED
Winston-Salem PVVS onica Swihart
NOV 0 71995 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional. Manager
? No objection to project as proposed
? No Comment
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Approve
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked)
? Recommended for further development with recommendations for
strengthening (comments attached)
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attachedlauthority(ies) cited)
In-House Reviewer complete individual response.
? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
?Applicant has been contacted
? Applicant has not been contacted
? Project Controversial (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement not needed
? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
NEPA and SEPA
? Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO:
Melba McGee Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
PS 104
Proposed Intermediate Loop
From US 31 1 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and From NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
High Point, Guilford County
State Project No. 9.8071087
TIP Project No. U-2536
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
In Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
For further information contact:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
NC Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
atc Franklin Vick, P. E., I Onager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Proposed Intermediate Loop
From US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and From NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
High Point, Guilford County
State Project No. 9.8071087
TIP Project No. U-2536
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Documentation Prepared By:
••.•`??N CAROB
' SE AL
19818 =
28 S G 1 .NE.`?? ,
Q
Dat Mark L. Reep, P. E. L R?,••••
Project Planning Engineer
9- 28- 95
Date Linwood Stone, CPM
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
Summary of Environmental and Special Project Commitments
A. A 4.3-meter (14-foot) by 2.4-meter (8-foot) reinforced concrete box
culvert is proposed at the existing High Point Greenway near McGuinn
Drive to allow bicycle and pedestrian traffic to cross under the Intermediate
Loop.
B. Hazardous spill catchment basins are proposed along the project between
Old Winston Road and Johnson Street because this portion is located
within the critical area of the Oak Hollow Lake watersupply watershed.
C. Sidewalks are proposed along both sides of the project between SR 1471
(Montlieu Avenue) and US 70A (Lexington Avenue). These sidewalks
will connect with the existing greenway.
D. The project relocates approximately 30 meters (100 feet) of unnamed
stream #2 (US #2). The relocated channel will be designed according to
the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) guidelines "NC Stream
Protection and Improvement Guidelines." The proposed channel design
will be similar to the original channel in width, depth, gradient, and
substrate. Site specific requirements for re-establishment of bank
vegetation with planting regime, meanders, and habitat structures will be
determined through coordination with the NCWRC field staff during the
hydraulic design phase of the project.
E. Erosion and sedimentation in the area draining to Oak Hollow Lake will be
controlled through the specification, installation, and maintenance of
erosion and sedimentation control appropriate for high quality waters.
F. The project may require a floodway modification. If required, the NCDOT
Hydraulics Design Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and local authorities during final design
regarding application and approval for the necessary floodway revisions.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. General Description 1
B. Cross Sections 1
C. Right of Way and Access Control 1
D. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control 2
E. Design Speed 4
F. Structures 4
G. Sidewalks 5
H. Bicycle Provisions 5
1. Cost Estimate 5
II. NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT 5
A. Existing Roadway Conditions 5
1. Cross Section 5
2. Right of Way 5
3. Curvature 5
4. Access Control 6
5. Structures 6
6. Intersecting Roads 6
7. Greenways 6
8. Speed Limits 6
9. Utilities 7
10. Geodetic Markers 7
11. School Buses 7
B. Route Classification and Thoroughfare Plan 7
C. Traffic Volumes and Capacity 7
1. Unsignalized Intersections 8
2. Signalized Intersections 9
D. Accident History 10
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 12
A. Highway Construction Alternatives 12
B. "Do Nothing" Alternative 15
C. Public Transportation Alternative 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
PAGE
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 16
A. Social Environment 16
1. Neighborhood Characteristics 16
2. Public and Private Facilities 16
3. Relocation Impacts 17
4. Cultural Resources 17
a. Architectural Resources 17
b. Archaeological Resources 18
B. Economic Environment 18
C. Land Use 18
1. Status of Local Planning Activities 18
2. Existing Land Use 18
3. Future Land Use 19
4. Farmland 19
D. Natural Environment 19
1. Biotic Resources 19
a. Terrestrial Communities 20
b. Aquatic Communities 25
2. Federally Protected Species 27
3. Federal Candidate and State Listed Species 28
4. Physical Resources 28
a. Topography and Soils 28
b. Water Resources 29
5. Surface Waters and Wetlands 32
6. Permits 34
7. Mitigation 34
8. Flood Hazard Evaluation 36
9. Air Quality 36
10. Traffic Noise 39
11. Hazardous Materials 44
12. Construction Impacts 44
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
PAGE
V
COMMENTS AND COORDINATION 46
A. Comments Received 46
B. Citizens Informational Workshop 46
C. Public Hearing 47
FIGURES
Figure I A - Vicinity Map
Figure 1 B - Project Area
Figure 1 C - High Point Thoroughfare Plan
Figure 2 - Aerial Mosaic
Figure 3A - Five-Lane Typical Sections
Figure 3B - Four-Lane Typical Sections
Figures 4A-4D - Proposed Intersection Treatments
Figure 5 - Boulding Branch Greenway
Figures 6A-613 - Projected Traffic Volumes
Figure 7 - Streams and Wetlands
Figure 8 - 100-Year Flood Zones
TABLES
Table 1 - Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service
Table 2 - Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
Table 3 - Accident Rates Along East College Drive
Table 4 - Accident Rates Along Intersecting Roads
Table 5 - Comparison of Alternatives
Table 6 - Anticipated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Table 7- County Soils in the Project Area
Table 8- Stream Characteristics
Table 9 - Anticipated Impacts to Wetlands
Table 10- Predicted CO Concentrations
APPENDIX
Appendix A - Relocation Assistance Report and Relocation Programs
Appendix B - Agency Comments
Appendix C - Air Quality and Traffic Noise Data
SUMMARY
Type of Action
This is a State Environmental Assessment.
2. Description of Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct the Intermediate Loop as a multilane facility involving mostly new
location. The project is divided into two parts: (I) Part A from US 31 1 (North
Main Street) to Johnson Street and (2) Part C from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue). The middle portion of the Intermediate Loop
(U-2536B) between Johnson Street and NC 68 is currently under construction.
The project is included in the 1996-2002 North Carolina Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). The estimated project cost in the TIP is
$12,625,000, which includes $5,425,000 for right of way, $5,700,000 for
construction, and $1,500,000 spent in previous years. Part C is scheduled for right
of way acquisition in fiscal year 1997 (FY 1997) and construction in FY 1998.
Part A is scheduled for right of way acquisition in FY 2000 and construction in
FY 2002.
Summary of Environmental Impacts
The proposed project will provide an overall positive benefit for Guilford
County and the City of High Point. The Intermediate Loop will complete a loop
around the High Point Central Business District. This proposed route connects
important radial facilities and relieves congestion along these facilities. Tile project
will improve the traffic flow as well as increase safety. The proposed multilane
facility will help reduce travel times and provide more efficient vehicle operation.
Some negative environmental impacts result from the project. Twenty-six
residences and one business will be relocated. The project crosses ten streams and
impacts approximately 0.3 hectare (0.6 acre) of wetlands. Approximately 30
meters (100 feet) of stream rechannel ization is required along unnamed stream 92
(US #2).
Although some of these impacts are substantial, the project will not have a
significant adverse impact on the human and natural environment. The proposed
alignment was selected to avoid surface waters and wetlands where possible.
Unavoidable impacts to streams and wetlands occur mostly between Centennial
Street and Lexington Avenue near the fixed endpoint of the alignment and between
development outside the corridor. The proposed curb and gutter cross section in
this location minimizes these water resource impacts with its relatively narrow
right of way requirements.
4. Alternatives Considered
A. Highway Construction Alternatives
Alternative I (Five-lane curb and gutter section)
2. (Recommended) Alternative 2 (Four-lane divided curb and gutter
section with raised median and Five-lane curb and gutter section)
Alternative 3 (Five-lane shoulder section and Five-lane curb and
gutter section)
4. Alternative 4 (Four-lane divided shoulder section with raised
median, Four-lane divided curb and gutter section with raised
median, and Five-lane curb and gutter section)
B. "Do Nothing" Alternative
C. Public Transportation Alternative
Coordination
The following federal, state, and local agencies were consulted during the
preparation of this environmental assessment:
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Environmental Protection Agency
Region Planning Agencies
State Clearinghouse
Department of Cultural Resources
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Department of Public Instruction
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Guilford County Commissioners
City of High Point
6. Permits Required
It is anticipated the proposed improvements can be performed under
Department of the Army Nationwide Permits for discharges Above Headwaters or
for Road Crossing Fills in accordance with 33 CFR 330.5(a)(26) and 33 CFR
330.5(a)(14) respectively. Final permit decisions are left to the discretion of the
US Army Corps of Engineers.
A 401 Water Quality Certification, administered through the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR), is required for the project
since a federal permit is involved.
Additional Information
Additional information concerning the proposal and assessment can be
obtained by contacting the following individual:
Mr. I-I. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Telephone [phone]
Intermediate Loop
From US 31 1 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and
From NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (IVlontlieu Avenue)
High Point, Guilford County
State Project No. 9.8071087
TIP No. U-2536
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. General Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct the Intermediate Loop as a multilane facility involving mostly new location. The
project is divided into two parts: (1) Part A, from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson
Street and (2) Part C , from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue), a
length of approximately 3.8 kilometers (2.4 miles). The middle portion of the
Intermediate Loop (U-2536 B) between Johnson Street and NC 68 is currently under
construction.
The project is included in the 1996-2002 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). The estimated project cost in the TIP is $12,625,000, which
includes $5,425,000 for right of way, $5,700,000 for construction, and $1,500,000
spent in previous years. Part C is scheduled for right of way acquisition in fiscal
year 1997 (FY 1997) and construction in FY 1998. Part A is scheduled for right
of way acquisition in FY 2000 and construction in FY 2002.
B. Cross Sections
The proposed cross section consists of a five-lane curb and gutter section and a
four-lane curb and gutter section with a raised median. The five-lane curb and gutter
section extends from US 311 (North Main Street) to Old Winston Road and from US 70A
(Lexington Avenue) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue). The four-lane curb and gutter
section extends from Old Winston Road to Johnson Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester
Drive) to Lexington Avenue. Refer to Figures 113, 3A, and 3B for proposed typical
sections and their locations.
The five-lane curb and gutter cross section provides a 19.2-meter (64-foot)
roadway with two travel lanes in each direction and a continuous center turn lane. All the
typical sections include 3.6-meter (12-foot) lanes. On each side of the roadway, 2.4-meter
(8-foot) berms are proposed behind the curb.
The four-lane divided curb and gutter section provides a 19.8-meter (68-foot)
roadway with two travel lanes in each direction and a 4.8-meter (16-foot) raised median.
On each side of the roadway, 2.4-meter (8-foot) berms are also proposed for this section
behind the curb.
C. Right of Way and Access Control
The five-lane curb and gutter section will require 27.4 meters (90 feet) of right of
way. Along existing East College Drive and Hartley Drive, right of way will be acquired
asymmetrically for the five-lane section. The four--lane divided curb and gutter section
with raised median also requires 27.4 meters (90 feet) of right of way. Temporary
construction easements are proposed along both sides of the project.
No control of access is proposed for the project. However, in the vicinity of the
proposed four-lane divided sections, the project will only allow right-in and right-out
access from adjacent properties. Left turns will be permitted at designated median
openings. Excidsive left turn lanes are proposed at intersections and median openings to
accommodate left turning and U-turning traffic.
D. Intersection Treatment and Tyne of Control
grade:
The following roadways intersect the proposed Intermediate Loop at
1. US 311 (North Main Street)
2. Old Winston Road
3. Pine Valley Drive
4. Johnson Street
5. NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
6. SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
7. US 70A (Lexington Avenue)
8. McGuinn Drive
9. SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
All but two of these intersections will be signalized. Pine Valley Drive and
McGuinn Drive will be stop sign controlled.
The recommended lane treatment for each signalized intersection is
discussed as follows (refer to Figures 4A - 4D for sketches of each intersection
treatment):
US 311 (North Main Street)
Two through lanes, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive right turn
lane are proposed along northbound US 311. One through lane, a shared through
and right lane, and exclusive dual left turn lanes are proposed along southbound
US 311. A shared through and left turn lane and an exclusive right turn lane are
proposed along eastbound Hartley Drive. One through lane, exclusive dual right
turn lanes, and an exclusive left turn lane are proposed along the westbound
approach of the Intermediate Loop.
Old Winston Road
One through lane, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive right turn
lane are proposed along the northbound and southbound approaches of Old
Winston Road. Two through lanes, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive
right turn lane are proposed along the eastbound and westbound approaches of the
Intermediate Loop.
Johnson Street
Two through lanes, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive right turn
lane are proposed along northbound Johnson Street and the eastbound and
westbound approaches of the Intermediate Loop. Two through lanes, dual
exclusive left turn lanes, and an exclusive right turn lane are proposed along
southbound Johnson Street.
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
Two through lanes, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive right turn
lane are proposed along northbound Eastchester Drive. Two through lanes, dual
exclusive left turn lanes, and an exclusive right turn lane are proposed along
southbound Eastchester Drive and the eastbound and westbound approaches of the
Intermediate Loop.
SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
Two through lanes, dual exclusive left turn lanes, and an exclusive right
turn lane are proposed along the northbound approach of the Intermediate Loop,
eastbound Centennial Street, and westbound Centennial Street. Two through
lanes, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive right turn lane are proposed
along the southbound approach of the Intermediate Loop.
US 70A (Lexington Avenue)
Two through lanes, an exclusive left turn, and an exclusive right turn lane
are proposed along the northbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. Two
through lanes, dual exclusive left turn lanes, and an exclusive right turn lane are
proposed along the southbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. One through
lane, dual exclusive left turn lanes, and an exclusive right turn lane are proposed
along both approaches of Lexington Avenue.
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
Two through lanes, an exclusive left turn, and an exclusive right turn lane
are proposed along the northbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. Two
through lanes, dual exclusive left turn lanes, and an exclusive right turn lane are
proposed along the southbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. One through
lane, an exclusive left turn lane, and an exclusive right turn lane are proposed along
eastbound and westbound Montlieu Avenue.
The recommended treatment for the unsignalized intersections is described
as follows:
Pine Valley Drive
A "T" intersection will be provided at Pine Valley Drive to provide direct
access only to the southern portion of Pine Valley Drive. A shared left and right
turn lane is proposed along the northbound approach of Pine Valley Drive. A
through lane and a shared through and right turn lane are proposed along the
eastbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. Two through lanes and an
exclusive left turn lane are proposed along the westbound approach of the
Intermediate Loop.
McGuinn Drive
A "T" intersection will also be provided at McGuinn Drive. A shared left
and right turn lane is proposed along the westbound approach of McGuinn Drive.
A through lane and a shared through and right turn lane are proposed along the
northbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. Two through lanes and an
exclusive left turn lane are proposed along the southbound approach of the
Intermediate Loop.
E. Design Speed
The proposed design speed is 70 kilometers per hour (km/h) (45 miles per hour
(mph))
F. Structures
The project involves only one major stream crossing at the existing
crossing of an unnamed tributary to Boulding Branch. Based upon a preliminary
hydraulic analysis at this crossing, the existing single barrel 3.0-meter (10-foot) by
2.1-meter (7-foot) reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) will be extended. The
existing culvert is undersized and will need to be supplemented to provide
adequate conveyance. Two options, described below, were investigated for
supplementing this culvert.
The first option consists of widening the existing culvert with an additional
3.0-meter (I 0-foot) by 2.1-meter (7-foot) barrel. This widening and culvert
extension requires raising the roadway grade approximately 0.3 meter (1 foot).
The channel will be widened a minor amount upstream and downstream to
accommodate the culvert extension and supplemental barrel. This option provides
a more desirable and cost effective hydraulics solution but requires bicyclists and
pedestrians using the Boulding Branch greenway to cross the project at grade
(refer to Section II.A.6 for a discussion of the existing greenway). To provide a
safer greenway crossing, this option was not recommended.
The second option consists of constructing a bicycle and pedestrian culvert
beside the existing stream culvert. A culvert with a desirable size of 4.3 meters (14
feet) by 2.4 meters (8 feet) is needed at this greenway. The floor elevation of the
culvert will be set approximately 1 meter (3 feet) above the existing stream bed,
and the roadway grade will be raised approximately 1.5 meters (5 feet) above the
existing East College Drive. The existing roadway is overtopped approximately
0.6 meter (2 feet) during the 100-year storm event, and the greenway culvert will
provide supplemental conveyance to compensate for the overtopping flow blocked
by the higher roadway grade. Although the larger greenway culvert will cost more
than widening the existing culvert, this option is recommended since it provides the
safest accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians.
The proposed greenway culvert will provide electrical conduit to allow for
lighting, and the City of High Point will be responsible for the lights.
Between Old Winston Road and Johnson Street, hazardous spill catchment
basins are proposed within the critical area of the Oak Hollow Lake watershed to
prevent contamination of the water supply.
G. Sidewalks
Due to the nature of the development in the project area, sidewalks are
justified along the project. In response to the City's request, sidewalks are
recommended along both sides of the roadway between Lexington Avenue and
Montlieu Avenue in the vicinity of High Point University. The sidewalks will
connect with the Boulding Branch greenway. NCDOT will participate in 60
percent of the sidewalk cost up to a maximum of 2 percent of the total project
construction cost. The City will be responsible for the remaining 40 percent, as
outlined in the NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines.
H. Bicycle Provisions
No special bicycle accommodations are recommended along the
Intermediate Loop. However, where the project crosses the existing greenway, a
culvert is proposed to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic underneath the
roadway.
Cost Estimate
Right of Way $ 1,684,500
Construction $ 6,565,000
Total Cost $ 8,249,500
II. NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
A. Existin Roadway Conditions
Cross Sections
The project follows the alignment of two existing roadways, Hartley Drive
and East College Drive. Hartley Drive, near the North Main Street intersection, is
a five-lane, 19.2-meter (64-foot) curb and gutter roadway, approximately 0.3
kilometer (0.2 mile) in length. East College Drive, between Lexington Avenue and
Montlieu Avenue, is generally a two-lane, 8.4-meter (28-foot) curb and gutter
roadway, approximately 0.9 kilometer (0.6 mile) in length.
Right of Way
The existing right of way width along East College Drive and Hartley
Drive is generally 27.4 meters (90 feet).
Curvature
East College Drive has limited sight distance from Montlieu Avenue to
north of McGuinn Drive. Six horizontal curves exist along the roadway, ranging
from a radius of 1 165 meters (1.5 degrees) to a radius of 250 meters (7 degrees).
The grades along the vertical alignment range from 0 to 6 percent.
Hartley Drive has a good alignment and adequate sight distance. One
horizontal curve with a radius of 295 meters (6 degrees) exists along Hartley
Drive. The grades along the vertical alignment range from 0 to 5.5 percent.
4. Access Control
No control of access exists along the existing facilities.
5. Structures
One culvert exists within the project area. A single barrel 3.0-meter
(10-foot) by 2.1-meter (7-foot) RCBC is located at existing East College Drive
along the unnamed tributary to Boulding Branch. No bridges exist along the
project.
6. Intersecting Roads
Four roadways intersect with Hartley Drive and East College Drive in the
project area.
1. US 311 (North Main Street)
2. US 70 A (Lexington Avenue)
3. McGuinn Drive
4. SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
All but one of these intersections are at grade and controlled by traffic signals.
The McGuinn Drive intersection is stop sign controlled.
7. Greenways
The project crosses the Boulding Branch Greenway near McGuinn
Drive. This greenway connects parks, schools, and neighborhoods in the
vicinity of the project. The greenway extends approximately 2 kilometers
(1.3 miles) along Boulding Branch from Armstrong Park west of the
project to Welborn Middle School east of the project (refer to Figure 5 for
greenway location).
The High Point greenway plan was adopted by the City Council in
1983, and a task force was formed in 1986 to promote the greenway and
raise funds for constructing the system. The Boulding Branch trail is the
only existing portion of the greenway system. However, the High Point
Greenway system will eventually include almost 9.5 kilometers (6 miles) of
trails and many acres of parks and natural landscape. The Boulding
Branch trail is proposed to extend northward to connect with the proposed
Lake to Lake trail which will link Oak Hollow Lake with the Piedmont
Environmental Center at High Point Lake. When these trails are complete,
the Greenway will connect with Guilford County's Bicentennial Trail, and
the communities of High Point, Jamestown, and Greensboro will be joined.
The City plans to complete the greenway by the year 2000.
8. Speed Limits
No speed limit is posted along existing Hartley Drive. The posted
speed along East College Drive in the project area is generally 60 km/h (35
mph).
9. Utilities
Telephone, cable television, gas, water, and sewer lines exist
underground in the project area. Overhead power lines also exist in the
area. The project will require utilities to be relocated, and the severity of
utility conflicts is considered to be moderate.
10. Geodetic Markers
The project will impact three geodetic survey markers. Tile NC
Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction regarding the
location of survey markers. Intentional destruction of a geodetic
monument is a violation of NC General Statute 102-4.
11. School Buses
Currently, 45 school buses use existing East College Drive,
generating 90 trips per day. These buses travel between Andrews High
School, located east of the project, and surrounding schools. In the
upcoming 1995-1996 school year, the number of buses on East College
Drive is expected to decrease because many buses will be moved to
another site west of the project. Twenty buses are expected to travel
within the project area in the upcoming school year, generating 40 trips per
day.
B. Route Classification and Thoroughfare Plan
The Intermediate Loop is classified as an urban minor arterial according to
the Statewide Functional Classification System. The route serves as a major
thoroughfare on the High Point Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan that connects and
reduces congestion along important radial facilities (refer to Figure 1 C for High
Point Thoroughfare Plan).
C. Traffic Volumes and CapacitX
The current (1994) average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along East College
Drive are 10,000 vehicles per day (vpd). Projected construction year (1999)
volumes range from 12,800 vpd near US 311 to 21,400 vpd near NC 68.
Projected design year (2019) volumes in these same locations range from 23,000
vpd to 41,400 vpd. The estimated traffic volumes are shown in Figures 6A and
6B. These estimates of average daily traffic include two percent truck tractor
semi-trailers (TTST) and four percent dual tired (DT) vehicles.
The level of service (LOS) of a roadway is a measure of its traffic carrying
ability. Levels of service range from LOS A to F. Level of service A represents
unrestricted maneuverability and operating speeds. Level of service B represents
reduced maneuverability and normal operating speeds. Level of service C
represents restricted maneuvering and operating speeds close to the speed limit.
This condition is considered acceptable in sparsely populated rural areas. Level of
service D represents severely restricted maneuvering and unstable, low operating
speeds. Level of service E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity
level. Breakdown conditions which are characterized by stop and go travel occur-
with level of service F.
Unsignalized Intersections
Two of the intersections along the project will be unsignalized and
stop sign controlled. These are at Pine Valley Drive and McGuinn Drive.
A capacity analysis was performed at these intersections to determine the
predicted levels of service for the years 1999 and 2019. The results of the
analysis represent the levels of service for left turns from the Intermediate
Loop and all movements from the intersecting roads. These results are
shown in Table 1.
At the Pine Valley Drive intersection, the through traffic and left-
turning traffic along the Intermediate Loop will operate at LOS B in the
year 1999 and LOS E or better in the year 2019. The turning movements
from Pine Valley drive will reach LOS F by the year 2001. A "T"
intersection is proposed at this location and will provide access only for the
southern portion of Pine Valley Drive. At the McGuinn Drive intersection,
the through traffic and left-turning traffic along the Intermediate Loop will
operate at LOS B in 1999 and LOS E in 2019. The turning movements
from McGuinn Drive will reach LOS F in the year 1999.
Although the turning movements on these intersecting roads will
operate at LOS F throughout most of the design life of the project, the
overall traffic operations will function at a better level of service since the
Intermediate Loop traffic will not be impeded at these intersections.
Signalization is not recommended at these intersections because the
projected traffic volumes on these roads are not high enough to warrant
signalization. Exclusive left and right turn lanes could be provided on Pine
Valley Drive and McGuinn Drive in the future, if warranted by traffic
volumes, to improve the level of service for right turning traffic.
Table I
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS)
Year
1999 2019 Reaching
Intersection i.OS LOS LOS F
Pine Valley Drive
Intermediate Loop Approaches B E --
Pine Valley Approach E F 2001
McGuinn Drive
Intermediate Loop Approaches C E --
McGuinn Drive Approach F F 1999
2. Si-nalized Intersections
The majority of the intersections along the project are signalized.
These intersections control the traffic capacity for the Intermediate Loop.
A capacity analysis was performed at each intersection using projected
construction year (1999) and design year (2019) traffic volumes. These
results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS)
Intersection
US 311 (North Main Street)
Old Winston Road
Johnson Street
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
US 70A (Lexington Avenue)
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
Year Year
1999 2019 Reaching Reaching
(LOS) (LOSS LOS E LOS F
D F 2001 2004
C D -- --
C F 2009 2012
E F 1999 2001
D F 2002 2005
D F 2003 2007
D E 2016 --
With the proposed lane configurations described in Section I.D and shown
on Figures 4A - 4D, all but one of the signalized intersections will reach capacity
(LOS E) before the design year (2019) . Only the Old Winston Road intersection
will operate at an acceptable level of service through the design year. The
proposed traffic operational characteristics of these intersections are described
below.
US 311 (North Main Street)
With the proposed improvements, the US 311 intersection will function at LOS D
in the year 1999. This intersection will reach LOS E by the year 2001 and LOS F by the
year 2004. To achieve an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) through the
design year, the intersection requires six through lanes on US 311 and triple left turn lanes
along the southbound approach of US 311. These additional lanes would exceed the
funding scope of the current project and are not recommended.
Old Winston Road
The Old Winston Road intersection will operate at an acceptable level of service,
LOS D, through the design year.

Johnson Street
The Johnson Street intersection will function at LOS C in the year 1999. This
intersection will reach LOS E in the year 2009 and LOS F in the year 2012. To achieve an
acceptable level of service through the design year, the intersection requires six through
lanes along the Intermediate Loop and Johnson Street and triple left turn lanes along
southbound Johnson Street. These additional lanes would exceed the funding scope of the
current project and are not recommended.
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
The Eastchester Drive intersection will function at LOS E in the year 1999 and will
reach LOS F in the year 2001. To achieve an acceptable level of service through the
design year, the intersection requires eight through lanes along the Intermediate Loop and
Eastchester Drive, triple left turn lanes along the eastbound Intermediate Loop approach,
and triple left turn lanes along the southbound Eastchester Drive approach. These
additional lanes would exceed the funding scope of the current project and are not
recommended.
SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
The Centennial Street intersection will function at LOS D in the year 1999. This
intersection will reach LOS E in the year 2002 and LOS F in the year 2005. Construction
is currently underway to widen Centennial Street to four lanes. To achieve an acceptable
level of service through the design year, the intersection requires six through lanes along
the Intermediate Loop and Centennial Street. These additional lanes would exceed the
funding scope of the current project and are not recommended.
US 70A (Lexington Avenue)
The Lexington Avenue intersection will function at LOS D in the year 1999. This
intersection will reach LOS E in the year 2003 and LOS F in the year 2007. To achieve an
acceptable level of service through the design year, the intersection requires six through
along the Intermediate Loop and four through lanes along Lexington Avenue. These
additional lanes would exceed the funding scope of the current project and are not
recommended.
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
The Montlieu Avenue intersection will function at LOS D in the year 1999 and will
reach LOS E in the year 2016. To achieve an acceptable level of service through the
design year, the intersection requires four through lanes along Montlieu Avenue. These
additional lanes would exceed the funding scope of the current project and are not
recommended.
D. Accident History
During the period from May 1, 1990 to January 31, 1994, 15 reported accidents
occurred along existing East College Drive, between SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue) and US
70 (Lexington Avenue). Four vehicles (26.7 percent) involved rear-end collisions, four
(26.7 percent) were vehicles which ran off the road, two (13.3 percent) were vehicles
making left turns, and two (13.3 percent) were angle accidents. These accident patterns
accounted for 80.0 percent of all accidents occurring along the facility.
rates.
The following table compares East College Drive accident rates to the statewide
Table 3
ACCIDENT RATES ALONG EAST COLLEGE DRIVE
(Accidents per 100 million vehicle kilometers)
Accident Type Rate along Statewide Average
E. College Dr.
Fatal 0 0.6
Nonfatal Injury 56.6 78.4
Nighttime 37.8 39.1
Wet Conditions 37.8 42.4
Total Rate 141.6 190.6
The total accident rate for East College Drive is 141.6 accidents per 100 million vehicle
kilometers (ACC/100 MVK), this is slightly less than the statewide average for similar
facilities.
Rear-end and run off the road accidents were the predominant accident patterns
identified along the corridor. These account for 53.4 percent of the total accidents. Left
turn and angle accidents account for 26.6 percent of the total accidents. The proposed
five-lane facility in this location will provide a center turn lane and additional travel lanes
to reduce the number of rear-end collisions, left turn, and angle accidents. The project
will also straighten the roadway curvature to prevent vehicles from running off the road.
Most of the roads crossing the project area have a higher accident rate than the
statewide averages. The following table compares the accident rates along these
roadways with the statewide averages for similar facilities.
Table 4
ACCIDENT RATES ALONG INTERSECTING ROADS
(Accidents per 100 million vehicle kilometers)
Facility Accident Rate Statewide Ave.
SR 1507 561.4 190.6
SR 1471 343.1 190.6
US 70 456.5 155.1
US 311 392.6 155.1
NC 68 149.2 170.6
Johnson St. 131.9 140.5
Rear-end collisions, left turn accidents, and angle accidents are the predominant accident
patterns that occur along these intersecting roadways. The proposed Intermediate Loop
will help reduce the accident potential by decreasing the traffic volumes and congestion on
these intersecting facilities. The proposed turn lane improvements on the intersecting
roads will increase the traffic carrying capacity and also help reduce the occurrence of
accidents.
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
The alternatives considered for the project consist of highway construction
alternatives, the "do nothing" alternative, and the public transportation alternative.
A. Highwax Construction Alternatives
Four cross sections were evaluated as alternatives for the project: a five-
lane curb and gutter section, a five-lane shoulder section, a four-lane divided curb
and gutter section with a raised median, and a four-lane divided shoulder section
with a raised median. These cross section alternatives are described as follows and
compared in Table 5 (refer to Figures 3A and 3B for sketches of typical sections).
Segment Location
Part A from US 311 (North Main Street) to
Johnson Street
A-1 from US 311 to Old Winston Road
A-2 from Old Winston Road to
Johnson Street
Part C from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
C- I from NC 68 to SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
C-2 from SR 1507 to US 70 A
(Lexington Avenue)
C-3 from US 70 A to SR 1471
Alternative 1 (Five-lane curb and gutter section)
Cross Section
-Five-lane curb and gutter
-Five-lane curb and gutter
-Five lane shoulder
-Four-lane raised median
section with curb and gutter
-Four-lane raised median
section with shoulder
-Five-lane curb and gutter
-Five-lane shoulder
-Four-lane raised median
section with curb and gutter
-Four-lane raised median
section with shoulder
-Five-lane curb and gutter
-Four-lane raised median
section with curb and gutter
-Five-lane curb and gutter
Alternative 1 consists of a five-lane curb and gutter facility along the entire project
length (Segments A-1, A-2, C-1, C-2, and C-3). This alternative is estimated to cost
$8,099,500, including $6,415,000 for construction and $1,684,500 for right of way
acquisition. Alternative 1 relocates 26 residences and one business. This alternative
impacts 0.3 hectare (0.6 acre) of wetlands. Traffic noise levels at 15 residences and three
businesses will exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria.
12
Advantages
Alternative 1 costs less than any other alternative. This alternative provides a
continuous center turn lane throughout the entire project length for direct accessibility to
adjacent properties.
Disadvantages
The City of High Point does not favor Alternative I because a five-lane section
will not control access along undeveloped portions of the project. Environmental review
agencies do not favor this alternative because the curb and gutter sections produce point
source discharges into the Oak Hollow Lake watersupply critical area.
Alternative 2 (Recommended)
(Four-lane divided curb and gutter section with raised median
and Five-lane curb and gutter section)
Alternative 2 consists of a combination of four-lane and five-lane curb and gutter
sections. A four-lane divided curb and gutter section with raised median is proposed from
Old Winston Road to Johnson Street and from Eastchester Drive to Lexington Avenue
(Segments A-2, C-1, and C-2). A five-lane curb and gutter section is proposed for the
remaining segments from North Main Street to Old Winston Road and from Lexington
Avenue to Montlieu Avenue (Segments A-1 and C-3). This alternative is estimated to
cost $8,249,500, including $6,565,000 for construction and $1,684,500 for right of way
acquisition. Alternative 2 relocates 26 residences and one business. This alternative
impacts 0.3 hectare (0.6 acre) of wetlands. Traffic noise levels at 25 residences and three
businesses will exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria.
Advantages
Alternative 2 costs less than the shoulder section alternatives (Alternatives 3 and
4). This alternative ties into the four-lane divided shoulder section under construction
along Part B and provides a continuous divided cross section from Old Winston Road to
Lexington Avenue. The median will control access along undeveloped portions of the
project.
Disadvantages
The raised median limits access to adjacent properties by restricting left turns at
intersections and median openings. Environmental review agencies do not favor
Alternative 2 because the curb and gutter sections produce point source discharges into
the Oak Hollow Lake watersupply critical area.
Alternative 3 (Five-lane shoulder section and Five-lane curb and gutter section)
Alternative 3 consists of a combination of five-lane shoulder and curb and gutter
sections. A five-lane shoulder section is proposed from Old Winston Road to Johnson
Street and from Eastchester Drive to Centennial Street (Segments A-2 and C-1). A five-
lane curb and gutter section is proposed for the remaining segments from North Main
Street to Old Winston Road and from Centennial Street to Montlieu Avenue (Segments
A- 1, C-2, and C-3). This alternative is estimated to cost $8,945,500, including
$7,065,000 for construction and $1,880,500 for right of way acquisition. Alternative 3
13
relocates 27 residences and one business. This alternative impacts 0.3 hectare (0.8 acre) of
wetlands. Traffic noise levels at 15 residences and three businesses will exceed the FHWA
noise abatement criteria.
Advantages
Alternative 3 provides a continuous center turn lane throughout the entire project
length for direct accessibility to adjacent properties. This alternative is favored by
environmental review agencies since a shoulder section filters runoff into the Oak Hollow
Lake watersupply critical area from Old Winston Road to Johnson Street and from
Eastchester Drive to Centennial Street.
Disadvantages
Alternative 3 costs more than any other alternative. The City of High Point does
not favor this alternative because a five-lane section will not control access along
undeveloped portions of the project.
Alternative 4 (Four-lane divided shoulder section with raised median, Four-lane divided
curb and gutter section with raised median, and Five-lane curb and gutter
section)
Alternative 4 consists of a combination of four-lane shoulder, four-lane curb and
gutter, and five-lane curb and gutter sections. A four-lane divided shoulder section with
raised median is proposed from Old Winston Road to Johnson Street and from Eastchester
Drive to Centennial Street (Segments A-2 and C-1). A four-lane divided curb and gutter
section with a raised median is proposed from Centennial Street to Lexington Avenue
(Segment C-2). A five-lane curb and gutter section is proposed for the remaining
segments from North Main Street to Old Winston Road and from Lexington Avenue to
Montlieu Avenue (Segments A-1 and C-3). This alternative is estimated to cost
$8,938,500, including $7,015,000 for construction and $1,923,500 for right of way
acquisition. Alternative 4 relocates 27 residences and one business. This alternative
impacts 0.3 hectare (0.8 acre) of wetlands. Traffic noise levels at 25 residences and three
businesses will exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria.
Advantages
Alternative 4 ties into the four-lane divided shoulder section under construction
along Part B and provides a continuous divided cross section from Old Winston Road to
Lexington Avenue. The median will control access along undeveloped portions of the
project. For these reasons, the City of High Point favors Alternative 4. This alternative is
also favored by environmental review agencies since a shoulder section filters runoff into
the Oak Hollow Lake watersupply critical area.
Disadvantages
Alternative 4 costs more than the curb and gutter section alternatives (Alternatives
1 and 2). The raised median limits access to adjacent properties by restricting left turns at
intersections and median openings.
14
T ble 5
COMPARISON 017 ALTERNATIVES
(Recom ended)
ALT. 1 ALL. 2 ALT. 3 ALT. 4
Description 5-Lane C&G 5-Lan C&G 5-Lane C&G 5-Lane C&G
(Segments) (A-1,A-2, C-1, (A-1 C-3) (A-1,C-2,C-3) (A- 1,C-3)
C-2,C-3) 4-Lan C&G 5-Lane Shldr 4-Lane Shldr
(A-2, -1,C-2) (A-2, 1) (A-2,C-1)
4-Lane C&G
(C-2)
Cost:
Construction $6,415,000 $6,565,000 $7,065,000 $7,015,000
Right of Way $1,684,500 $1,684,500 $1,880,500 $1,923,500
Total * $8,099,500 * $8,249,500 * $8,945,500 * $8,938,500
*Note: Hazardous spill catchment basins require an additional cost of $15,000 for
right of way and construction.
Social & Environmental
Impacts
Relocatees:
Residences 26 26 27 27
Businesses 1 1 1 1
Total 27 27 28 28
Wetland Impacts
(Hectares/Acres) 0.3/0.6 0.3/0.6 0.3/0.8 0.3/0.8
Noise Impacts
Residences 15 25 15 25
Businesses 3 3 3 3
Total 18 28 18 28
B. "Do Nothing," Alternative
The "do nothing" alternative was considered during project development.
The roadways in the vicinity of the project are mostly radial facilities which carry
traffic between the central business district and outlying suburban areas. Several
of these radials are currently experiencing congestion during peak periods and have
accident rates two to three times the statewide average for similar facilities. The
traffic operations along these roadways will continue to deteriorate as future
demands increase. In addition, the existing roadway network does not provide
adequate mobility between the radial facilities. The "do nothing" alternative
presents negative impacts to future traffic operations in the area. Enhanced safety,
greater traffic carrying capacity, and improved mobility are needed from a facility
that connects the existing radials. For these reasons, the "do nothing" alternative
was rejected.
15
C. Public Transportation Alternative
The City of High Point maintains a public transit system called HITRAN.
This system provides bus transportation throughout the High Point municipal area.
Three HITRAN routes operate within the project area: North Main Street (Route
10), Eastchester Drive (Route 15), and Montlieu Avenue (Route 13). The North
Main Street route provides service for retail centers and residences in the US 31 1,
Old Winston Road, and Hartley Drive area. The Eastchester Drive route services
the development along Eastchester Drive and Centennial Street. The City plans, in
late summer, to extend this route along the Intermediate Loop between
Eastchester Drive and Johnson Street to access the Oak Hollow Mall. The
Montlieu Avenue route provides access to schools, institutions, residences, and
shopping centers along Montlieu Avenue, Centennial Street, McGuinn Drive, and
Lexington Avenue.
The Winston-Salem Transit Authority operates a ridesharing program
called RSVP (Ridesharing Services and Vanpooling in the Piedmont). This
program sponsors carpooling and vanpooling services in the High Point/
Greensboro/ Winston-Salem metropolitan area. Currently, the RSVP system does
not provide ridesharing services within the project area, but the transit authority
plans to begin promoting its programs this year among major High Point
employers.
These transit and ridesharing programs alone will not fulfill the need of the
proposed project. However, the proposed improvements will enhance the safety
and efficiency for these modes of transportation since they rely upon highway
corridors.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Social Environment
1. Neighborhood Characteristics
Guilford County is located in the north central section of the state
and is bounded by Alamance, Randolph, Davidson, Forsyth, and
Rockingham Counties. According to the 1990 Census Data, Guilford
County has a population of 347,420.
The project vicinity is characterized by commercial, residential, and
institutional development. Commercial and retail development exist near
the US 31 1 project limits. In addition, a major retail shopping center, the
Oak Hollow Mall, is under construction between Johnson Street and
Eastchester Drive. Residential development is predominant throughout
most of the project. A university, schools, and churches are located near
Centennial Street, Lexington Avenue, and Montlieu Avenue.
2. Public and Private Facilities
The following public and private facilities are located in the vicinity
of the proposed Intermediate Loop:
16
I . North Pointe Crossing Shopping Center
2. Wal-Mart
3. Bi-Lo Supermarket
4. Lowe's
5. First Wesleyan Church, Educational Center, and
Retirement Community
6. Christ United Methodist Church
7. McCain Park
8. High Point Greenway
9. High Point University
The proposed improvements will have some impacts on the Wesleyan
Retirement Community, Christ United Methodist Church, the High Point
Greenway, and High Point University. Temporary construction easements
will impact several of the parking areas at the Wesleyan Retirement
Community, Christ United Methodist Church, and High Point University
but will not substantially impair the use of the parking lots. Temporary
construction easements will also impact a small portion of the track at the
university athletic fields, but the project will not impair the use of the track.
The project crosses the High Point Greenway where a culvert will be
provided to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Although the
Intermediate Loop will have some impacts on these public and private
facilities, the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
facilities.
Relocation Impacts
Based on preliminary studies, the recommended alternative will
relocate 26 residences and one business. A relocation assistance report
describing these relocatees is included in Appendix A. Adequate
replacement housing is anticipated to be available for all relocatees at the
time the residents and businesses must relocate. Last resort housing will be
considered, if necessary.
The NCDOT Relocation Program offers assistance to those families
or businesses relocated by the project. This prograrn provides replacement
housing payments, rent and/or down payment supplements, and increased
interest payments to prevent hardship for the displacees. Additional
information regarding the Division of Highways relocation program is
included in Appendix A.
4. Cultural Resources
Architectural Resources
The project is subject to compliance with North Carolina General
Statute 121-12(a). GS 121-12(a) requires that if a state action will have
an adverse effect upon a property listed on the National Register of
Historic Places, the North Carolina Historic Commission will be given an
opportunity to comment. The area of potential effect (APE) of the project
was delineated and reviewed in the field by NCDOT. No National
Register listed properties are located within the APE, and no further
compliance with GS 121-12(a) is required.
17
The project is also subject to the requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act since a federal US Army Corps of
Engineers permit will be required. Section 106 requires that if a federally-
funded, licensed, or permitted project has an effect on a property listed on
or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation must be given an opportunity to
comment. Crossing the tributary to Boulding Branch near High Point
University will likely require a Nationwide Permit 14 for road crossing fills.
The northern boundary of the High Point College historic district, an
eligible National Register property, is within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE) of the permit area. NCDOT has determined that the proposed
stream crossing will have no effect on the High Point College historic
district, and the SHPO concurs with this determination (refer to
concurrence form in Appendix B).
b. Archaeological Resources
During the project scoping meeting in July, 1994, a
representative from the SHPO commented that no recorded
archaeological sites are located within the project area. In addition,
the SHPO recommended that no archaeological survey be
conducted for the project.
B. Economic Environment
As of November, 1994, Guilford County had a total labor force of
210,370. Out of this total 203,840 persons were gainfully employed, while 6,530
persons were unemployed, or 3.1 percent of the total work force.
The proposed Intermediate Loop will provide easier access between North
Main Street and Montlieu Avenue. This project will help to increase the economic
efficiency and productivity of businesses providing services to the area. In
addition, the project will increase visibility and accessibility for businesses and
institutions along the proposed facility as well as reduce highway congestion.
C. Land Use
Status of Local Planning; Activities
Tile proposed improvement is located within the municipal limits of
the City of High Point. The City completed an update to its 1983 Land
Use Plan and zoning ordinance in 1992. The City has also adopted a
Greenways Plan and a Thoroughfare Plan, which was developed jointly
with the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
2. Existing Land Use
The project is located in an urbanized area, with a mix of land uses.
Part A of the project intersects US 311 where strip commercial
development has occurred. Several large discount retailers, including Wal-
Mart, Lowe's, and Bi-Lo are located near the proposed US 311
intersection. The remaining portion of Part A is developed with residential
land use, except along the recommended roadway corridor, which is
undeveloped and wooded.
18
Part C of the project is also located in a developed area. A large
facility operated by the Wesleyan Church, which includes apartments and a
convalescent care facility, is located at the intersection of NC 68 and the
Intermediate Loop. Like Part A, the remainder of the project area
supports suburban residential development, except at its terminus at
Montlieu Avenue where the privately owned High Point University campus
is located.
A public greenway exists along Boulding Branch within the project
area which leads to the High Point University area. Design elements which
accommodate the greenway are recommended. No Land and Water
Conservation Act funds (LWCF) were used to acquire or improve the
greenway; therefore, no Section 6(f) involvement is required.
Future Land Use
According to the 1992 Land Use Plan, no significant changes to the
existing land uses throughout the project area are anticipated. The
proposed Intermediate Loop is included in the Plan as a needed
transportation improvement. Zoning within the project area is also
consistent with the existing land uses in the project vicinity.
4. Farmland
No farmable land will be impacted by the project. Therefore,
consideration of potential farmland impacts, as directed by the North
Carolina Executive Order No. 96, Conservation of Prime Agricultural and
Forest Lands, does not apply.
D. Natural Environment
General field surveys were conducted along the proposed alignment by NCDOT
biologists on October 18 and October 24, 1994 and March 28, 1995. Plant communities
and their associated wildlife were identified and recorded. Wildlife identification involved
using one or more of the following observation techniques: active searching and capture,
visual observations (binoculars), identifying characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat,
tracks and burrows). Cursory studies for aquatic organisms were conducted using a hand
held dip net. Organisms captured during these searches were identified and then released.
Jurisdictional wetland determinations were performed utilizing delineation criteria
prescribed in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual" (Environmental
Laboratory, 1987).
Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section
describes those ecosystems encountered in the study area, as well as, the
relationships between fauna and flora within these ecosystems. Composition and
distribution of biotic communities throughout the project reflect the area's
topography, hydrologic influences and past and present land uses. Descriptions of
the terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community
classifications. Dominant flora and fauna observed, or likely to occur, in each
community are described and discussed. Fauna observed during the site visit are
denoted with an asterisk (*).
19
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are provided
for each animal and plant species described. Subsequent references to the same
organism will include the common name only.
a. Terrestrial Communities
Five distinct terrestrial communities were identified in the project study
area: disturbed community, mesic hardwood forest, bottomland hardwood
forest, pine forest, and mixed pine/hardwood forest. Many faunal species
are highly adaptive and may populate the entire range of terrestrial
communities discussed.
Disturbed Community
The disturbed community involves those habitats frequently disrupted
by human activities. This community type can be divided into two subtypes,
urbanized/residential and early successional.
Urbanized/Residential
Urbanized/residential communities have been modified by humans.
Habitats of this community include residential/ business lawns, roadside
shoulders, athletic fields, public greenways, and paved and gravel parking
lots. These habitats are typically maintained by mowing and/or herbicide
applications; consequently, they remain in a low-growing, non-successional
state. A large portion of segments C2 and C3 are urbanized along with a
residential neighborhood in segment A 1 and C 1.
The dominant vegetative cover of this community is fescue (Festuca
spp.), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), and other grasses. Other ground
vegetation includes wild onion (Allium canadense), goldenrod (Solidago
spp.), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica), microstegium (Microstegium virmineum), pokeweed
(Phytolacca americana), daisy (Engeron sp.), foxtail grass (Setaria sp.),
lespedeza (Lespedeza sp.), rose (Rosa sp.), trumpet vine (Campsis radicans),
English ivy (Hedera helix), kudzu (Pueraria lobata), dandelion (Taraxacum
sp.), broomsedge (Andropogon spp.), and clover (Trifolium sp.).
Trees located throughout this community are pine scrub (Pinus
virginiana), loblolly pine (P. taeda), willow oak (Quercus phellos), white oak
(Q. alba), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweet-gum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), red cedar
(Juniperus virginiana), and chestnut (Castanea dentata). Flowering dogwood
(Cornus florida), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), crepe myrtle (Lagerstroma
indica), winged sumac (Rhus copallina), privet (Ligustrum sinese), and other
ornamental shrubbery are scattered throughout residential and business
lawns.
Many faunal species found in this community have adapted to living
in or near the influence of man. Several mammal species living here include
Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), house mouse (Mus musculus), and gray
squirrel* (Sciurus carolinensis). The Norway rat and house mouse are
20
introduced from Europe and inhabit multiple environments, although these
prefer to live in close proximity to humans where food and shelter are
plentiful.
The mockingbird* (Mimus polyglottos), chipping sparrow (Spizella
passerina), American robin* (Turdus migratorius), European starling
(Sturnus vulgaris), yellow-rumped warbler (Dendroica coronata), house
sparrow (Passer domesticus), and common flicker (Coaptes auratus) are
avian species frequenting this habitat. Chipping sparrows are common
winter piedmont residents which feed on seeds. Starlings and house
sparrows are introduced species which may drive native, less aggressive
birds from their nests.
The redbelly snake (Storeria occipitomaculata) is a reptile often
found under logs, stones, and other sheltering objects in wooded residential
areas. Slugs and earthworms constitute the principal food items of this
reptile.
Early Successional Community
Early successional communities have been altered, but have since
been allowed to naturally revegetate. Tree species such as scrub pine,
loblolly pine, eastern red cedar, sweet-gum and red maple comprise the
dominant woody plants in this area. Other plants found in this community
include broomsedge, privet, blackberry, and Japanese honeysuckle.
One area in segment C3 has been fragmented by a utility project.
Species such as mondo grass (Ophiopogon japonica) and microstegium, as
well as fescue, now dominate the area. Other floral species found here
include rush (Juncus sp.), lespedeza and mimosa.
Avian species found in this habitat include rufous-sided towhee
(Pipilo erythrophthalmus), field sparrow (Spizella pusilla), eastern
meadowlark (Sturnella magna), mourning dove* (Zenaida macroura), and
blue grosbeak (Guiraca caerulea). The rufous-sided towhee and mourning
dove are commonly found along successional and woodland transition zones
(ecotones). The rufous-sided towhee, field sparrow, mourning dove, and
blue grosbeak consume seeds and occasionally insects while the eastern
meadowlark is an insectivore.
The dense patches of overhead cover found in this community
provide habitat for the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus), eastern
cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), and house mouse. Weed seeds are the
preferred foraging item for these rodents while the eastern cottontail
consumes herbaceous grasses and occasionally wood plants. Mammal
predators of these species include domestic dogs and cats.
Black racers (Coluber constrictor) are reptilian predators which
frequent this community in search of prey. These snakes are often found
hiding beneath boards, pieces of tin, and other surface cover.
21
Mesic Hardwood Forest
This community type dominates the segments of A2 and C 1. The
forest found in segment C I is disturbed and grades into a bottomland
hardwood. This forest is drained by unnamed stream 92 (US #2) and has a
canopy of red maple, sycamore, sweet-gum, and tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera) (refer to Section IV.DA.b for stream descriptions and locations).
Prevalent in areas are Japanese honeysuckle, poison ivy, and privet. Other
vegetation occurring in the community are trumpet vine, grape
(Vitus rotundifolia), crane-fly orchid (Tipularia discolor), microstegium, wild
onion, Christmas fern, and greenbrier (Smilax spp.).
The mesic hardwood forest occurring in segment A2 has little
disturbance and grades into alluvial forest. This forest is drained by
unnamed stream #1 (US #1) and several unnamed intermittent streams.
The dominant canopy trees found in segment A2 include white oak
and black oak. Other trees found scattered in the canopy are red cedar,
black walnut (Juglans nigra), basswood (Tilia sp.), red maple, sweet-gum,
hickory (Carya sp.), redbud (Cercis canadensis), and beech (Fagus
grandifolia). Privet and flowering dogwood occur here as well. Grape
(Vitus sp.) microstegium, greenbrier, Japanese honeysuckle, poison ivy,
jewel-weed (Impatiens sp.), saxifrage (Saxafraga sp.), and ebony spleenwort
(Asplenium platyneuron) grow throughout this community. Crane-fly
orchid, Christmas fern, greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and rattlesnake
plantain (Goodyera pubescens) dominate several areas of the forest. Wild
ginger (Hexastylis virginica) is also prevalent along the forest floor.
Several avian species inhabit mesic hardwood forests including wood
thrush* (Hylocichla mustelina), Cape May warbler (Dendroica tigrina),
eastern bluebird (Sialia sialis), Carolina chickadee* (Pares carolinensis), and
tufted titmouse* (P. bicolor). The downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens)
is often found with titmice, chickadees, and other small birds during the
winter months. All of these birds are highly insectivorous, although, during
the winter months, berries may be consumed. The titmouse may also
frequent bird feeders, while chickadees and downy woodpeckers readily
forage on sunflower seeds.
The white-footed mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus) and eastern
chipmunk* (Tamias striatus) occur in hardwood forests. This mouse builds
its nests along the ground or several feet above the forest floor. The eastern
chipmunk is a dinural creature which excavates a burrow system where they
live and store food items such as seeds, nuts, acorns, and berries.
Marbled salamander (Ambystoma opacum), slimy salamander*
(Plethodon glutinsos), and three-lined salamander (Eurycea guttolineata)
occur in forested habitats. The marbled salamander and slimy salamander
live under logs or rocks, while three-lined salamanders live near streams.
Other amphibians habiting this community are American toad
(Bufo americanus), Fowler's toad (B. woodhousei), spring peeper (Hyla
crucifer), and upland spotted chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata). These two
toads are highly insectivorous and may occupy a variety of habitats. The
spring peeper and upland chorus frog dwell on the forest floor and consume
small arthropods.
22
The eastern box turtle* (Terrapene carolina), black rat snake (Elaphe
obsoleta), ringnecked snake (Diadophis punctuas), and five-lined skink
(Eumeces fasciatus) are reptiles possibly frequenting these forested habitats.
Box turtles are terrestrial omnivores while rat snakes forage primarily on
rats, mice, small mammals, and birds and their eggs.
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Three parcels of bottomland hardwood forest occur in segment C 1,
between a nursing home and residential neighborhood. These forests grade
into a mesic hardwood forest community. These parcels are flooded
occasionally, although they are seldom disturbed by flowing water.
Disturbances such as concrete pipes, trash, and mounds of fill material are
found throughout these forests.
Dominant canopy constituents of this community include sycamore,
red maple, and sweet-gum. Black willow (Salix nigra) grows in the canopy
of one forest. Sub-canopy flora are beauty-berry (Callicarpa americans),
privet, greenbrier, rose (Rosa sp.), and blackberry (Rubus sp.). Japanese
honeysuckle and poison ivy dominate many areas of these forests. Other
vegetation found here is trumpet vine and false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica).
The American goldfinch* (Carduelis tristis), northern cardinal*, blue-
gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), and red-eyed vireo (Vireo olivaceus)
are avian species which occur in dense understory. This understory provides
excellent shelter, building materials, and food for the American goldfinch.
The blue-gray gnatcatcher is a summer resident of bottomland hardwood
forests and consumes insects, particularly gnats.
Mammals often found in this community include the golden mouse
(Ochrotornys nuttalli), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), and
raccoon* (Procyon lotor). The dense ground cover of Japanese
honeysuckle and greenbrier found in this community provides excellent
shelter for the golden mouse. This nocturnal mouse is active year round,
foraging on seeds near the nest both on the ground and in the trees and
vines. The Virginia opossum and raccoon* shelter in this community in yet
may frequent residential areas and roadways in search of food.
Pine Forest
A pine forest occurs in segment A2 with scrub pine prevailing
throughout the canopy. Sub-canopy vegetation includes eastern red cedar,
loblolly pine, sweet-gum, American holly (Ilex opaca), and various oaks.
For the most part, the understory is very sparce, especially along the ecotone
with the hardwood forest. Running cedar (Lycopodium sp.) dominates areas
further into this community. Poison ivy, wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata),
and Japanese honeysuckle occur sporadically throughout this forest.
Faunal species typically found in pine forest include blue jay
(Cyanocitta cristata), screech owl* (Otus asio), brown-headed nuthatch
(Sitta pusilla), and gray squirrel. Screech owls are permanent residents of
woodlands, prefering conifers. These owls primarily forage on rodents and
other small mammals. The brown-headed nuthatch feeds upon pine needles
and a wide variety of insects.
23
Mixed Pine/Hardwood Forest
This forest type contains a mixed canopy of evergreen species (scrub
pine) and hardwood species (sweet-gum, red maple, northern red oak).
Other types of vegetation found here include red cedar, tree of heaven
(Ailanthus altissima), flowering dogwood, Japanese honeysuckle, blackberry,
grape (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbrier, and poison ivy.
Avian species of this community include wood thrush, tufted
titmouse, northern cardinal* (Cardinalis cardinalis), and ovenbird (Seirus
aurocapillus). Ovenbirds favor dry, hilly forests and build their nests at
ground level. An ovenbird's nest has a domed roof with a side entrance.
The woodland vole (Microtus pinetorum) burrows just beneath the
surface of the ground. This vole consumes a variety of plant material,
primarily the shoots of grasses and forbs, although seeds and roots are
consumed in the winter. The southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans)
nests in natural cavities or woodpecker holes. This noturnal mammal
consumes acorns, nuts, berries, fruit, seeds, and grains which they store for
the winter.
Reptiles likely found in this community include the southeastern
crowned snake (Tantilla coronata), ground skink (Scincella lateralis) and
mole kingsnake (Lampropeltis calligaster). Mole kingsnakes burrow to
provide nesting for their young, although these snakes spend most of their
life above ground under surface cover. These constrictors forage on small
mammals, lizards, and snakes. Ground skinks live close to the surface and
need little cover to hide effectively.
Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative
abundance of each community present in the study area. Project
construction will result in clearing and degradation of portions of these
communities. Table 6 summarizes potential quantitative losses to these
biotic communities, resulting from project construction. Estimated impacts
are derived using the entire proposed right of way width of 36.4 m (120.0 ft)
for curb and gutter cross sections and of 45.5 m (150.0 ft) for the shoulder
sections. Easements, as denoted on plan sheets, were evaluated. Usually,
project construction does not require the entire right of way, therefore,
actual impacts may be considerably less.
2-1
Table 6
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO TERRESTRIAL COMMUNITIES
COMMUNITY TYPE
TOTAL
ALT DIST MHWF BHWF MPHWF PF IMPACTS
1 8.7 (21.9) 4.2 (10.2) 0.3 (0.7) 0.9 (2.1) -0- (-0-) 14.1 (34.9)
2 8.7 (21.9) 4.2 (10.2) 0.3 (0.7) 0.9 (2.1) -0- (-0-) 14.1 (34.9)
3 8.8 (22.3) 5.0 (12.3) 0.3 (0.8) 0.8 (1.9) 0.7 (1.7) 15.6 (39.0)
4 9.0 (22.7) 5.0 (12.3) 03 (0.8) 0.8(l.9) 0.8 (2.0) 15.9 (39.7)
Note: Values cited are in hectares (acres), SEG, DIST, MHWF, BHWF, MPHWF and PF
refer to segment, disturbed community, mesic hardwood forest, bottomland hardwood
forest, mixed pine/hardwood forest and pine forest, respectively.
Plant communities found along the proposed alignments serve as
nesting and sheltering habitat for various wildlife. Widening portions of
existing roadway eliminate disturbed communities and will have minimal
impacts on faunal species. Faunal species found foraging here will find such
opportunities in other places.
Construction on new location will result in more severe impacts to
biotic communities than biotic impacts from widening an existing roadway.
Fragmentation of communities and habitat reduction will result from project
construction. Plant communities will be altered, and these alterations of
habitat may create new wildlife dynamics such as shifts in species dominance.
Further alterations of biotic communities, such as development of land
otherwise isolated from humans, may result from new location construction.
Habitat reduction concentrates wildlife into smaller areas of refuge, thus
causing some species to become more susceptible to disease, predation, and
starvation.
Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become road
shoulders and early successional habitat. Traffic noise and reduced habitat
will displace some wildlife further from the roadway while attracting other
wildlife by the creation of more early successional habitat. Wildlife crossings
will become less frequent and more difficult especially for less mobile fauna.
Roadways act as barriers to faunal migrations, and widening any roadway
will likely increase the number of roadkills. Animals temporarily displaced by
construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for the species. This
temporary displacement of animals may result in an increase of competition
for the remaining resources.
b. Aquatic Communities
Two aquatic community types, Piedmont Perennial Stream and
Piedmont Intermittent Stream, will be impacted by the proposed project.
Physical characteristics of the water bodies and conditions of the water
25
resources reflect faunal composition of the aquatic communities. Terrestrial
communities adjacent to a water resource also greatly influence aquatic
communities.
Piedmont Perennial Stream
Streams found within the subject project study area are small and are
therefore expected to have a low diversity of aquatic fauna. Site visits
revealed that many faunal species occur in unnamed stream #I (US #I) and
Boulding Branch, although no species were viewed in US #2 during site
visits. A tree canopy covers both of these streams. These two streams,
particularly US #1, demonstrate effects of urbanization around them by the
scouring found along the stream banks.
Aquatic species such as crayfish* (Order Decapoda), northern dusky
salamander (Desmognathus fuscus), and queen snake* (Regina
septemvittata) occur in piedmont streams. Crayfish burrows were common
in the A2 segment of the project. Queen snakes are often found along the
water's edge and prey chiefly on crayfish.
Fish species commonly found in these streams include bluegill
(Lepomis macrochirus) and redbreast sunfish (L. auritus). These fish
inhabitat streams with sand and pebble substrates and moderate to slow
currents.
Piedmont Intermittent Stream
Intermittent streams experience interrupted water flows during dry
intervals, which usually occur during the summer months. These streams
may retain water in the form of pools during these dry times. Climatological
events greatly influence the faunal composition of these streams and may
cause the fauna to vary from year to year.
Fauna found within this community have adapted several strategies
to cope with dry intervals. Many insects have aquatic life stages and emerge
early in the spring. These organisms utilize intermittent streams by laying
eggs during the wet seasons (late fall-early winter) to ensure the completion
of developmental stages and metamorphosis before the streams dry in the
summer. Some insects survive periodic dry times by remaining in their egg
or nymph stages, or remaining dormant, a process known as aestivation.
Some species of amphibians deposit their eggs in intermittent streams
and pools in order to avoid egg and larva predation by fish. The larval stage
begins when eggs are deposited during wet seasons, and this particular stage
ends when metamorphosis ofjuvenile amphibians begins. Metamorphosis of
frogs and toads is marked by drastic morphological changes from a tadpole
(juvenile) to an adult. Adult amphibians will emerge from these streams
before the warm summer months dry the streams.
Pickerel frogs (Rana palustris) breed during the late winter and early
spring, usually with the advent of heavy rains. Females deposit globular
clusters of about 2500 eggs.
26
Impacts to Aquatic Communities
Aquatic communities are sensitive to even small changes in their
environment. Stream channelization, scouring, siltation, sedimentation, and
erosion from construction- related work will effect water quality and
biological constituents. Although direct impacts may be temporary,
environmental impacts from these construction processes may result in long
term or irreversible effects.
Alterations in the aquatic communities will result from the installation
and extension of pipes, as well as box culvert extension. Impacts often
associated with in-stream construction include increased channelization of
water and scouring of stream channels. Water movement through these
structures becomes direct, thus increasing the flow velocity. Scouring zones
at pipe outflows will likely result from channelization.
In-stream construction alters the stream substrate and may remove
streamside vegetation at the site. Disturbances to the substrate will destroy
aquatic vegetation and produce siltation, which cloggs the gills and/or
feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-
feeders), fish, and amphibian species. Benthic organisms can also be covered
by excessive amounts of sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or
repopulate a stream. Turbidity reduces light penetration, decreasing the
growth of aquatic vegetation.
The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material
at the construction site alters the terrain. Alterations of the streamside
enhance the likelihood of erosion and sedimentation. Revegetation stabilizes
and holds the soil to mitigate these processes. Erosion and sedimentation
carry soils, toxic compounds, and other materials into aquatic communities
at the construction site. These processes magnify turbidity and can cause the
formation of sandbars at the site and downstream, altering water flow and
the growth of vegetation. Streamside alterations also lead to more direct
sunlight penetration and to elevations of water temperatures which may
impact many species.
Best Management Practices (BMP's) and sedimentation guidelines
will be followed to reduce impacts to aquatic communities from project
construction.
2. Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E),
Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are
protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended. As of March 28, 1995, the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) lists one federally protected species for Guilford County, the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus). The USFWS has classified the bald eagle as
Endangered. This classification denotes a species that is threatened with extension
throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A brief description of the bald
eagle's characteristics and habitat follows.
27
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white
tail. The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight, bald
eagles can be identified by their flat wing soar.
Eagle nests are found in close proximity to water (within a half mile) with a
clear flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open
view of the surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon
otherwise suitable habitat. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
No habitat for the bald eagle exists in the project study area. Streams in the
area do not support foraging habitat for the bald eagle. No impact to the bald eagle
will result from the proposed construction.
A review of the Natural Heritage Program database of uncommon and
protected species revealed no recorded occurrence of federally-protected species in
or near the project study area.
3. Federal Candidate and State Listed Species
There are two federal candidate (Candidate 2 or C2) species listed for
Guilford County. Federal Candidate species are not afforded federal protection
under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions,
including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or
Endangered. Candidate species are defined as organisms which are vulnerable to
extinction although no sufficient data currently exist to warrant a listing of
Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, or Proposed Threatened.
Organisms which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern
(SC) by the North Carolina Heritage Program list of Rare Plant and Animal species
are afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the North
Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979.
The Greensboro burrowing crayfish (Cambarus catagius) and nestronia
(Nestronia umbella) are federal candidate species listed for Guilford County. Both
of these species have a state status of Significantly Rare (SR) and are not afforded
state protection. Suitable habitat for each species exists in the study area. This
species briefing is provided for information purposes as the status of these species
may be upgraded in the future.
Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit,
nor were any of these species observed. A review of the data base of the
NC Natural Heritage Program rare species and unique habitats revealed no
records of North Carolina rare and/or protected species in or near the
project study area.
4. Physical ical Resources
a. Topography and Soils
Guilford County lies in the Piedmont physiographic province. The
topography of Guilford County is characterized by rolling terrain with
moderately steep slopes along the dramageways.
28
Four soil types occur in the project area (refer to Table 7). The
dominant mapping unit found in the study area is Enon-Urban land complex,
a mixture of Enon soils and Urban land. Enon soils are typically well-
drained and found on side slopes and broad interstream divides. The urban
land part consists of areas where the original soil has been altered (cutting,
filling, grading, etc.) so that a soil series is not recognized.
Table 7
COUNTY SOILS IN THE PROJECT AREA
MAP UNIT SPECIFIC PERCENT HYDRIC
SYMBOL MAPPING UNIT SLOPE CLASSIFICATION
EuB Enon-Urban land complex 2 to 10 non-hydric
MuB Mecklenburg-Urban land
complex 2 to 10 non-hydric
MhB2* Mecklenburg sandy clay
loam 3 to 6 non-hydric
Ch Chewacla sandy loam none B
Note: "B" denotes soils with inclusions of hydric soils or which have wet spots.
"*" denotes eroded soil.
b. Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources
likely to be impacted by the project. Water resource information
encompasses physical aspects of the resource, its relationship to major water
systems, Best Usage Standards, and water quality of the resources. Probable
impacts to these water bodies are also discussed, as are means to minimize
impacts.
Waters Impacted and Characteristics
Ten streams occur in the project study area. These streams lie in the
Cape Fear River Drainage Basin and in the Deep Run River Sub-basin.
Three perennial streams and seven intermittent streams are crossed by the
subject project. Table 8 includes stream characteristics and further details
follow. Figure 7 shows stream locations and relationships to the subject
project.
29
Table 8
STREAM CHARACTERISTICS
m (ft) m (ft)
Stream Width Depth Substrate Flow
Boulding Branch 2.1 (7.0) 1.2 (4.0) sand, pebble moderate
Unnamed Tributary of
Boulding Branch 0.6 (2.0) 0.1 (0.3) sand, pebble moderate
Unnamed Perennial
Stream # 1 2.1 (7.0) 0.9 (3.0) sand, pebble moderate
Unnamed Intermittent
Tributary # 1 A 0.9(3.0) * clay
Unnamed Intermittent
Tributary #I B 0.6 (2.0) 0.1 (0.1) mud none
Unnamed Intermittent
Tributary #I C 0.6(2.0) * sand
Unnamed Intermittent
Tributary #I D 0.9 (3.0) 0.1 (0.2) sand, pebble none
Unnamed Perennial
Stream 42 0.9 (3.0) 0.1 (0.3) mud moderate
Unnamed Intermittent
Tributary #2A 0.3 (1.0) 0.1 (0.1) mud moderate
Unnamed Intermittent
Tributary 42B 0.6(2.0) * sand, pebble
"*" denotes no data available for stream due to dry conditions.
Algal growth was noted in Boulding Branch and its unnamed
tributary, as well as in Unnamed Streams #I and #2. Unnamed Streams #I
and 42 also have great amounts of detritus and Unnamed Stream # 1
exhibits scouring and sandbars.
Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the
Division of Environmental Management (DEM). An unnamed stream or
tributary carries the Best Usage Classification of the stream into which it
flows, other streams flowing into this water resource carry the classification
as well. All water resources located within the project study area have a best
usage classification of WS-IV. WS-IV are protected as water supplies
which are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds and
suitable for all Class C uses, Class C refers to waters suitable for aquatic life
30
propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and
agriculture.
Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-
II) nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 kilometers (1
mile) of project study area.
Water Quality
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is
managed by DEM and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality
monitoring program which addresses long term trends in water quality. The
program assesses water quality by sampling for selected benthic
macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Macro invert ebrates
are sensitive to very subtle changes in water quality, thus, the species
richness and overall biomass are reflections of water quality. No specific
BMAN information is available for the study area.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are
permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program. Any discharger is required to register for a permit. No
permitted dischargers exist in the project study area.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
The proposed project will impact water resources by one or more of
the following processes: new pipe construction, extension of pipes, and box
culvert extension and construction. Construction activities are likely to alter
and/or interrupt stream flows, as well as water levels at each aquatic site.
This disruption of the stream reduces stream flow. Temporary diversions of
flow will raise the water level upstream from the project and lower the water
level downstream of the project.
Approximately 30 meters (100 feet) of US 42 will be relocated with
the project. Coordination is required with the appropriate Wildlife Resource
Commission (WRC) district fisheries biologist prior to the permit application
process. The relocation of the stream will be similar in nature to the original
channel in terms of width, depth, gradient, and substrate. Site specific
requirements for re-establishment of bank vegetation with planting regime,
meanders, and habitat structures (root wads, wing deflectors, etc.) will be
determined through coordination with WRC field staff. These items will
follow WRC's established document entitled "NC Stream Protection and
Improvement Guidelines" and will incorporate any highway specific
guidance jointly developed between WRC and the NCDOT Hydraulics and
Roadside Environmental Units.
Construction activities surrounding streams compact the soils and
remove/bury vegetation with fill material. These modifications of the
streamside environment increase sedimentation and erosion which leads to
greater siltation of the water resource. Siltation can influence water flow
downstream frorn the project, thus altering the aquatic environment.
Widening this roadway will increase concentrations of toxic
compounds (oil, gas, etc.) from machinery during construction and from
31
increased, post-construction traffic volumes. These toxic compounds enter
streams via storm water run-off. Increased amounts of these compounds can
adversely alter the water quality of the water resource.
Project construction adjacent to streams flowing parallel to the
proposed roadway may result in these streams receiving greater amounts of
roadway effluent. Stream scouring will likely increase from storm run-off
Best Management Practices (BMP's) and sedimentation guidelines
will be followed to reduce the wash of sediment and toxic compounds into
study area water resources. Erosion and sedimentation in the area draining
to Oak Hollow Lake will be controlled through the specification, installation,
and maintenance of erosion and sedimentation control appropriate for high
quality waters. Elsewhere, standard erosion and sedimentation controls are
applicable. Groundwater resources will be evaluated to ensure that
measures are taken to prevent groundwater contamination.
5. Surface Waters and Wetlands
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the
United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CFR) Part
328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or
saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to
support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation
typically adapted to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposes to place
fill into these areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Jurisdictional wetlands were identified using the 1987 "Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual" and classified using the USFWS National Wetland
Inventory (NWI) classification scheme. Criteria to delineate jurisdictional wetlands
include evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydrology.
A wetland evaluation was conducted in accordance with methodologies
recommended by the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). This
evaluation provides a numerical rating system from 0-100 to gauge wetland quality.
The wetland rating system (Fourth Version) is weighted toward grading a wetland
community on water storage, bank/shoreline stabilization, pollutant removal, and
aquatic life values. Other wetland attributes considered are wildlife habitat and
recreational/ educational values.
Three jurisdictional wetland sites have been identified within the project
study area. A brief description of these sites follows. Figure 7 displays the location
of these sites in the study area.
Site 1
Site 1 is located along Segment C3 near Centennial Street. This site is a
bottomland hardwood wetland with hvdrophvtic vegetation and seasonally flooded.
Site 1 has the following characteristics:
32
Classification: PFOIC (Palustrine, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally
flooded forest)
Soil Color: 10 YR 5/2 (grayish brown)
Hydrological Evidence: Inundated
DEM Wetland Rating: 37
Site 2
Site 2 is located along Segment C3 and is associated with Unnamed Stream
#2. This site is a disturbed, bottomland hardwood with hydrophytic vegetation.
Site 2 has the following characteristics:
Classification: PFO I C (Palustrine, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally
flooded forest)
Soil Color: 10 YR 5/2 (grayish brown)
Hydrological Evidence: Saturated
DEM Wetland Rating:46
Site 3
Site 3 is located along Segment C3 and is also associated with Unnamed
Stream #2. This site is a disturbed, bottomland hardwood with hydrophytic
vegetation. Site 3 has the following characteristics:
Classification: PFO 1 C (Palustrine, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally
flooded forest)
Soil Color: 10 YR 5/2 (grayish brown)
Hydrological Evidence: Saturated
DEM Wetland Rating: 50
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Table 9 reports anticipated impacts to wetland sites within the study area.
Estimated impacts are derived using the entire proposed right of way width of 36.4
m (120.0 fl) for curb and gutter cross sections and of 45.5 m ( 150.0 ft) for the
shoulder sections. Easements, as denoted on plan sheets, were evaluated. Usually,
project construction does not require the entire right of way width, therefore, actual
wetland impacts may be less than reported.
Table 9
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO WETLANDS
hectares (acres)
AREAIMPACTED
Wetland Site Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4
Site 1 <0.1 (0.1)
Site 2 0.1 (0.2)
Site 3 0.1 0.3
Total 0.3 (0.6)
<0.1 (0.1) <0.1 (0.1) <0.1 (0.1)
0.1 (0.2) 0.1 (0.3) 0.1 (0.3)
0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4
0.3 (0.6) 0.3 (0.8) 0.3 (0.8)
33
6. Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters are anticipated. In
accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344), a permit will be required from the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for
the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States."
Impacts to surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands resulting from the
proposed project may be authorized under one or more Nationwide Permits (NWP),
i.e. NWP 14 or NWP 26. A NWP 14 is likely to be applicable at most ditch and
stream crossings found in the project study area provided criteria set by the permit
are met. A NWP 26 is anticipated for any discharge of dredged or fill material into
headwaters and\or isolated jurisdictional wetlands provided conditions set by the
permit are met.
In addition, this project will also require a 401 Water Quality General
Certification from the DEM prior to the issuance of a Nationwide Permit. Section
401 of the CWA requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any
federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in a discharge to Waters of
the United States. Final decisions concerning applicable permits for the subject
project rests with the COE.
7. Mitigation
The COE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands"
and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical,
biological and physical integrity of Waters of the United States, specifically
wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include:
avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing
impacts over time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these
three aspects (avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered sequentially.
Avoidance
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of
averting impacts to Waters of the United States. According to a 1990
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to offset
unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree
of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology, and logistics
in light of overall project purposes.
To avoid surface waters and wetlands, wetland delineations were performed
prior to establishing the roadway alignment. Wetland sites in the project study area
were located by Global Positioning Systems (GPS) mapping. The alignment was
located to avoid three wetland sites associated with US 91 between Pine Valley
Drive and Johnson Street. However, because of the fixed endpoints on Part C and
the extent of the development on each side of the project corridor, Sites 1, 2, and 3
along US #2 cannot be avoided.
34
Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps
to reduce the adverse impacts to Waters of the United States. Implementation of
these steps will be required through project modifications and permit conditions.
Minimization typically focuses on decreasing the footprint of the proposed project
through the reduction of median widths, right of way widths, fill slopes, and/or road
shoulder widths. Other practical mechanisms to minimize impacts to Waters of the
United States crossed by the proposed project include:
1) strict enforcement of sedimentation control BMP's for the protection
of surface waters during the entire life of the project.
2) reduction of clearing and grubbing activities.
3) reduction/ elimination of direct discharge into streams.
4) reduction of runoff velocity.
5) re-establishment of vegetation on exposed areas, with judicious
pesticide and herbicide usage.
6) minimization of "in-stream" activity; and litter/debris control.
Impacts to surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands can be
minimized by using the previously mentioned methods. The proposed
alignment and typical section has been selected to have the least amount of
impacts to surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands. Unavoidable impacts
to streams and wetlands occur mostly between Centennial Street and
Lexington Avenue near the fixed endpoint of the alignment and between
development outside the corridor. The proposed curb and gutter cross
section in this location minimizes impacts to wetland Sites 1, 2, and 3 with
its relatively narrow right of way requirements.
Compensatory Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated
impacts to Waters of the United States have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible. It is recognized that "no net loss of wetlands" functions
and values may not be achieved in every permit action. Appropriate and practicable
compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain
after all appropriate and practicable minimization has been required. Compensatory
actions often include restoration, creation, and enhancement of Waters of the United
States. Such actions should be undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the
discharge site.
Authorizations under Nationwide Permits usually do not require
compensatory mitigation according to the 1989 MOA between the EPA and the
COE. Final decisions concerning compensatory mitigation rest with the COE.
5
8. Flood Hazard Evaluation
The project crosses an unnamed tributary to Boulding Branch that
is included in the High Point Flood Insurance Study. This crossing is in a
designated flood hazard zone and is included in a detailed flood study. The
stream has established regulatory floodplain and floodway limits and
corresponding established water surface elevations (refer to Figure 8 for
100-year flood zones). Because the roadway grade will need to be raised
to accommodate the proposed culvert extension and supplementation, the
project may require a floodway modification. If required, the NCDOT
Hydraulics Design Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and local authorities during final design
regarding application and approval for the necessary floodway revisions.
The project will be designed so that the 100-year flood elevations are not
raised above the established regulatory floodway elevations.
There are no buildings in the project vicinity with floor elevations
below the 100-year flood level. During the final hydraulic design, existing
flooding conditions will be assessed in detail to minimize and reduce any
flooding problems which may exist.
9. Air ualit
Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from
industrial and internal combustion engines are the most prevalent sources.
Other origins of common outdoor air pollution are solid waste disposal and
any form of fire. The impact resulting from highway construction ranges
from intensifying existing air pollution problems to improving the ambient
air conditions. The traffic is the center of concern when determining the
impact of a new highway facility or the improvement of an old highway
facility. Motor vehicles emit carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NO),
hydrocarbons (HC), particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (SO-)), and lead (Pb)
(listed in order of decreasing emission rate). Automobiles are considered
to be the major source of CO in the project area. For this reason, most of
the analysis presented is concerned with determining expected carbon
monoxide levels in the vicinity of the project due to traffic flow.
In order to determine the ambient CO concentration for the
receptor closest to the highway project, two concentration components
must be used: local and background. The local concentration is defined as
the CO emissions from cars operating on highways in the near vicinity (i.e.,
distances within 100 meters) of the receptor location. The background
concentration is defined by the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources as "the concentration of a
pollutant at a point that is the result of emissions outside the local vicinity;
that is, the concentration at the upwind edge of the local sources."
In this study, the local concentration was determined by the
NCDOT Traffic Noise/Air Quality Staff using line source computer
modeling, and the background concentration was obtained from the North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR). Once the two concentration components were resolved,
36
they were added together to determine the ambient CO concentration for
the receptor in question and to compare to the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen
oxides. Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are carried
into the atmosphere where they react with sunlight to form ozone and
nitrogen dioxide. Area-wide automotive emissions of HC and NO are
expected to decrease in the future due to the continued installation and
maintenance of pollution control devices on new cars. Hence, the ambient
ozone and nitrogen dioxide levels in the atmosphere should continue to
decrease as a result of the improvements on automobile emissions.
The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide
require several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of ozone
generally occur 10 to 20 kilometers downwind of the source of
hydrocarbon emissions. Urban areas as a whole are regarded as sources of
hydrocarbons, not individual streets and highways. The emissions of all
sources in an urban area mix together in the atmosphere, and in the
presence of sunlight, the mixture reacts to form ozone, nitrogen dioxide,
and other photochemical oxidants. The best example of this type of air
pollution is the smog which forms in Los Angeles, California.
Automobiles are not regarded as significant Sources of particulate
matter and sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources account for less
than 7 percent of particulate matter emissions and less than 2 percent of
sulfur dioxide emissions. Particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions
are predominantly the result of non-highway sources (e.g., industrial,
commercial, and agricultural). Because emissions of particulate matter and
sulfur dioxide from automobiles are very low, there is no reason to suspect
that traffic on the project will cause air quality standards for particulate
matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded.
Automobiles without catalytic converters can burn regular gasoline.
The burning of regular gasoline emits lead as a result of regular gasoline
containing tetraethyl lead, which is added by refineries to increase the
octane rating of the fuel. Newer cars with catalytic converters burn
unleaded gasoline, eliminating lead emissions. Also, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required the reduction in the
lead content of leaded gasolines. The overall average lead content of
gasoline in 1974 was 2 grams per gallon. By 1989, this composite average
had dropped to 0.01 grams per gallon. In the future, lead emissions are
expected to decrease as more cars use unleaded fuels and as the lead
content of leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 make the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead
additives unlawful after December 31, 1995. Because of these reasons, it is
not expected that traffic on the proposed project will cause the NAAQS for
lead to be exceeded.
A microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine future
CO concentrations resulting from the proposed highway improvements.
"CAL3QHC - A Modeling Methodology For Predicting Pollutant
Concentrations Near Roadway Intersections" was used to predict the CO
concentration at the nearest sensitive receptor to the project.
37
Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO
concentrations consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions with
predicted traffic volumes, vehicle emission factors, and worst-case
meteorological parameters. The traffic volumes are based on the annual
average daily traffic projections. The traffic volume used for the
CAL3QHC model was the highest volume within any alternative. Carbon
monoxide vehicle emission factors were calculated for the completion year
of 1997 and the design year of 2017 using the EPA publication "Mobile
Source Emission Factors" and the MOBILE5A mobile source emissions
computer model.
The background CO concentration for the project area was
estimated to be 1.9 parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the Air
Quality Section, Division of Environmental Management, N.C. Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources indicated that an ambient
CO concentration of 1.9 ppm is suitable for most suburban/rural areas.
The worst-case air quality receptor for the build & no-build
scenario was determined to be located at the intersection of the proposed
Intermediate Loop and Lexington Avenue. The predicted one and eight
hour CO concentrations for the evaluation build years of 1999, 2004, and
2019 for the worst-case air quality scenario are shown in the following
table.
Table 10
PREDICTED CO CONCENTRATIONS PPM
One Hour Eight Hour
Receptors 1999 2004 2019 1999 2004 2019

R-191 (NW Corner) 5.0 5.4 6.6 3.5 3.8 4.6
R-193 (SW Corner) 4.9 6.7 9.2 3.4 4.7 6.4
R-194 (SE Corner) 10.9 10.3 11.1 7.6 7.2 7.8
R-190 (NE Corner) 7.6 7.6 9.2 5.3 5.3 6.4
Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations with the NAAQS
(maximum permitted for 1-hour averaging period = 35 ppm, 8-hour
averaging period = 9 ppm) indicates no violation of these standards. See
Tables A 1- A3 for input data and output.
The project is located in Guilford County, which is within the
Greensboro/ Winston-Salem/ High Point nonattainment area for ozone
(03) as defined by the EPA. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
(CAAA) designated these areas as "moderate" nonattamment areas for 03.
However, due to improved monitoring data, these areas were redesignated
as "maintenance" for 03 on November 7, 1993. Section 176(c) of the
CAAA requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform
to the intent of the state air quality implementation plan (SIP). The current
SIP does not contain any transportation control measures for Guilford
38
County. The Greensboro Urban Area 1995 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) has been determined to conform to the intent of the SIP.
The MPO approval date for the TIP is October 25, 1994. The USDOT
approval date of the TIP is January 24, 1995. The current conformity
determination is consistent with the final conformity rule found in 40 CFR
Part 51. There has been no significant change in the project's design
concept or scope, as used in the conformity analyses.
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting
from clearing and grubbing, demolition or other operations will be removed
from the project, burned or otherwise disposed of by the contractor. Any
burning will be done in accordance with applicable local laws and
ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in
compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Care will be taken to insure that
burning will be done at the greatest practical distance from dwellings and
not when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the
public. Burning will only be utilized under constant surveillance. Also
during construction, measures will be taken to reduce the dust generated by
construction when the control of dust is necessary for the protection and
comfort of motorists or area residents. This evaluation completes the
assessment requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the
NEPA process, and no additional reports are necessary.
10. Traffic Noise
This analysis was performed to determine the effect of the proposed
project alternatives on noise levels in the immediate project area. This
investigation includes an inventory of existing noise sensitive land uses and
a field survey of ambient (existing) noise levels in the study area. It also
includes a comparison of the predicted noise levels and the ambient noise
levels to determine if traffic noise impacts can be expected resulting from
the proposed project. Traffic noise impacts are determined from the
current procedures for the abatement of highway traffic noise and
construction noise, appearing as Part 772 of Title 23 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (23 CFR). If traffic noise impacts are predicted,
examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures for
reducing or eliminating the noise impacts must be considered.
Characteristics of Noise
Noise is basically defined as unwanted sound. It is emitted from
many sources including airplanes, factories, railroads, power generation
plants, and highway vehicles. Highway noise, or traffic noise, is usually a
composite of noises from engine exhaust, drive train, and tire-roadway
interaction.
The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound pressure.
Since the range of sound pressure varies greatly, a logarithmic scale is used
to relate sound pressures to some common reference level, usually the
decibel (dB). Sound pressures described in decibels are called sound
pressure levels and are often defined in terms of frequency weighted scales
(A, B, C, or D).
39
The weighted-A scale is used almost exclusively in vehicle noise
measurements because it places most emphasis on the frequency range to
which the human ear is most sensitive (1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound levels
measured using A-weighting are often expressed as dBA. Throughout this
report, references will be made to dBA, which means an A-weighted
decibel level. Several examples of noise pressure levels in dBA are listed in
Table N 1.
Review of Table N 1 indicates that most individuals in urbanized
areas are exposed to fairly high noise levels from many sources as they go
about their daily activities. The degree of disturbance or annoyance of
unwanted sound depends essentially on three things:
1) the amount and nature of the intruding noise.
2) the relationship between the background noise and the
intruding noise.
3) the type of activity occurring where the noise is heard.
Over a period of time, individuals tend to accept the noises which
intrude into their lives, particularly if the noises occur at predicted intervals
and are expected. Attempts have been made to regulate many of these
types of noises including airplane noises, factory noise, railroad noise, and
highway traffic noise. In relation to highway traffic noise, methods of
analysis and control have developed rapidly over the past few years.
Noise Abatement Criteria
In order to determine that highway noise levels are or are not
compatible with various land uses, the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) has developed noise abatement criteria and procedures to be used
in the planning and design of highways. These abatement criteria and
procedures are set forth in the aforementioned Federal reference (Title 23
CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise abatement criteria for various land
uses is presented in Table N2. The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is the
level of constant sound which in a given situation and time period has the
same energy as does time varying sound. In other words, the fluctuating
sound levels of traffic noise are represented in terms of a steady noise level
with the same energy content.
Ambient Noise Levels
Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the
project to determine the existing background noise levels. The purpose of
this noise level information was to quantify the existing acoustic
environment and to provide a base for assessing the impact of noise level
increases. The existing Leq noise levels along the proposed Loop as
measured at 15 meters from the roadway ranged from 63.4 to 70.2 dBA.
Additionally, one background reading was taken measuring 49.1 dBA. The
ambient measurement sites and measured exterior Leq noise levels are
listed in Table N3.
40
The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the
most current traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate existing
noise levels for comparison with noise levels actually measured. The
calculated existing noise levels were within 0.8 to 2.3 dBA of the measured
noise levels for the locations where noise measurements were obtained.
Differences in dBA levels can be attributed to "bunching" of vehicles, low
traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds versus the computer's "evenly-
spaced" vehicles and single vehicle speed.
Procedure for Predicting Future Noise Levels
In general, the traffic situation is composed of a large number of
variables which describe different cars driving at different speeds through a
continual changing highway configuration and surrounding terrain. Due to
the complexity of the problem, certain assumptions and simplifications
must be made to predict highway traffic noise.
The procedure used to predict future noise levels in this study was
the Noise Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and OPTIMA
(revised March, 1983). The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction) procedure is
based upon the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-
RD-77-108). The BCR traffic noise prediction model uses the number and
type of vehicles on the planned roadway, their speeds, the physical
characteristics of the road (curves, hills, depressed, elevated, etc.), receptor
location and height, and, if applicable, barrier type, barrier ground
elevation, and barrier top elevation.
In this regard, it is to be noted that only preliminary alignment was
available for use in this noise analysis. The proposed Intermediate Loop
will be constructed mostly on new location. Five-lane and four-lane
divided cross sections were evaluated as alternatives for the project. Only
those existing natural or man-made barriers were included. The roadway
sections and proposed intersections were assumed to be flat and at-grade.
Thus, this analysis represents "worst-case" topographic conditions. The
noise predictions made in this report are highway-related noise predictions
for the traffic conditions during the year being analyzed.
Peak hour design and Level of Service (LOS) C volumes were
compared, and the volumes resulting in the noisiest conditions were used
with proposed speed limits. Thus, during all other time periods, the noise
levels will be no greater than those indicated in this report.
The STAMINA 2.0 computer model was utilized to enable the
determination of the number of land uses (by type) which, during the peak
hour in the design year 2017 would be exposed to noise levels approaching
or exceeding the FHWA noise abatement criteria and those land uses
predicted to expect a substantial noise increase. Tile basic approach was to
select receptor locations such as 7.5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 480 meters
from the center of the near traffic lane (adaptable to both sides of the
roadway). The locations of these receptors were determined by the
changes in projected traffic volumes and/or the posted speed limits along
the proposed project. The result of this procedure was a grid of receptor
points along the project. Using this grid, noise levels were calculated for
each identified receptor.
41
The Leq traffic noise exposures associated with this project are
listed in Table N4. Information included in these tables consist of listings
of all receptors in close proximity to the project, their ambient and
predicted noise levels, and the estimated noise level increase for each.
The maximum number of receptors in each activity category that
are predicted to become impacted by future traffic noise under Title 23
CFR Part 772 is shown in Table N5. These are noted in terms of those
receptors expected to experience traffic noise impacts by approaching or
exceeding the FHWA NAC or by a substantial increase in exterior levels.
Alternatives 1 and 3 (five-lane typical sections) impact 15 residences and
three businesses. Alternatives 2 and 4 (four-lane sections) impact 25
residences and three businesses. Other information included in Table N5 is
the maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours. This
information should assist local authorities in exercising land use control
over the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within local
jurisdiction. For example, with the proper information on noise, the local
authorities can prevent further development of incompatible activities and
land uses with the predicted noise levels of an adjacent highway.
Table N6 indicates the exterior traffic noise level increases for the
identified receptors in each roadway section. Predicted noise level
increases for this project range to +19 dBA. When real-life noises are
heard, it is possible to barely detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5
dBA change is readily noticeable. A 10 dBA change is judged by most
people as a doubling or a halving of the loudness of the sound.
Traffic Noise Impact Analysis/ Abatement Measures
Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise levels
either:
1) approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria,
(with "approach" meaning within I dBA of the Table N2
value), or
2) substantially exceed the existing noise levels.
The NCDOT definition of substantial increase is shown in the lower
portion of Table N2. Consideration for noise abatement measures must be
given to receptors which fall in either category.
Highway Alignment
Highway alignment selection involves the horizontal or vertical
orientation of the proposed improvements in such a way as to minimize
impacts and costs. The selection of alternative alignments for noise
abatement purposes must consider the balance between noise impacts and
other engineering and environmental parameters. For noise abatement,
horizontal alignment selection is primarily a matter of citing the roadway at
a sufficient distance from noise sensitive areas. The proposed alignment
has been located to minimize costs and environmental impacts.
42
Traffic System Management Measures
Traffic system management measures which limit vehicle type,
speed, volume and time of operations are often effective noise abatement
measures. For this project, traffic management measures are not considered
appropriate for noise abatement due to their effect on the capacity and level
of service on the proposed roadway.
Noise Barriers
Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels can often
be applied with a measurable degree of success by the application of solid
mass, attenuable measures to effectively defract, absorb, and reflect
highway traffic noise emissions. Solid mass, attenuable measures may
include earth berms or artificial abatement walls.
The project will maintain only limited control of access, meaning
most commercial establishments and residences will have direct access
connections to the proposed roadway, and all intersections will adjoin the
project at grade.
For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it must be
high enough and long enough to shield the receptor from significant
sections of the highway. Access openings in the barrier severely reduce the
noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then becomes economically
unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small noise reduction. Safety at
access openings (driveways, crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted sight
distance is also a concern. Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction, a
barrier's length would normally be eight (8) times the distance from the
barrier to the receptor. For example, a receptor located 50 feet from the
barrier would normally require a barrier 400 feet long. Ail access opening
of 40 feet (10 percent of the area) would limit its noise reduction to
approximately 4 dBA (FUNDAMENTAL AND ABATEMENT OF
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE, Report No. FHWA-HHI- HEV-73-7976-
I, USDOT, chapter 5, section 3.2, page 5-27).
In addition, businesses, churches, and other related establishments
located along a particular highway normally require accessibility and high
visibility. Solid mass, attenuable measures for traffic noise abatement
would tend to disallow these two qualities and thus, would not be
acceptable abatement measures in their case.
Based on the above factors, physical abatement measures are not
recommended for this project.
"Do Nothing" Alternative
The traffic noise impacts for the "do-nothing" or "no-build"
alternative were also considered. If the traffic currently using the network
of roads in the project area should double, the future traffic noise levels
would only increase approximately 3 dBA. This small increase in the
present noise level would be barely noticeable to the people working and
living in the area.
43
Summary
Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is not
recommended, and no noise abatement measures are proposed. This
evaluation completes the highway traffic noise requirements of Title 23
CFR, Part 772. Unless a major project change develops, no additional
reports are required for this project.
11. Hazardous Materials
A reconnaissance survey was conducted to determine if hazardous
materials are present within the project vicinity. Two facilities with
underground storage tanks (UST's) were identified near the project. The
Oakview Oil Company is located at the intersection of Old Winston Road
and Peachtree Drive, approximately 150 meters south of the Intermediate
Loop. The Norwood Oil Company is located at the intersection of
Eastchester Drive and Bridges Street, approximately 300 meters south of
the project. Both sites are outside of the project corridor and no impacts
to UST's will occur.
According to the files of the Division of Solid Waste Management,
no landfills, dumps, or other hazardous materials sites are located within
the project area.
12. Construction Impacts
There are some environmental impacts normally associated with the
construction of highways. These are generally of short term duration, and
measures will be taken to minimize these impacts.
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting
from clearing and grubbing, demolition, and other operations will be
removed from the project, burned, or otherwise disposed of by the
contractor. Any burning done will be in accordance with applicable local
laws, ordinances, and regulations of the North Carolina State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for Air Quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2D.0520. Care will be taken to insure burning will be done at the greatest
distance practicable from dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions
are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will be performed
under constant surveillance.
Measures will be taken to allay the dust generated by construction
when the control of dust is necessary for protection and comfort of
motorists or area residents.
The major construction elements of this project are expected to be
earth removal, hauling, grading, and paving. General construction noise
impacts, such as temporary speech interference for passers-by and those
individuals living or working near the project, can be expected particularly
from paving operations and from the earth moving equipment during
grading operations. Overall, construction noise impacts are expected to be
minimal, since all alternative alignments generally traverse through low
density areas. However, considering the relatively short term nature of
44
construction noise, these impacts are not expected to be substantial.
Furthermore, the transmission loss characteristics of nearby structures and
wooded areas are believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of
intrusive construction noise.
The general requirements concerning erosion and siltation are
covered in Article 107-13 of the Standard Specifications for Roads and
Structures , which is entitled "Control of Erosion, Siltation, and Pollution".
The N.C. Division of Highways has also developed an Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Program which has been approved by the N. C.
Sedimentation Control Commission. This program consists of the rigorous
requirements to minimize erosion and sedimentation contained in the
Standard Specifications together with the policies of the Division of
Highways regarding the control of accelerated erosion and sedimentation
on work performed by State Forces.
Waste and debris will be disposed of in areas outside of the right of
way and provided by the contractor, unless otherwise required by the plans
or special provisions or unless disposal within the right of way is permitted
by the Engineer. Disposal of waste and debris in active public waste or
disposal areas will not be permitted without prior approval by the Engineer.
Such approval will not be permitted when, in the opinion of the Engineer, it
will result in excessive siltation or pollution.
NCDOT's general contract for right of way clearing allows the
contractor to market merchantable timber during construction to minimize
the need for piling and burning. This contract also includes specifications
to protect trees outside the construction limits.
Borrow pits and all ditches will be drained to alleviate breeding
areas for mosquitoes. In addition, care will be taken not to block existing
drainage ditches.
The construction of the project is not expected to cause any serious
disruptions in service to any of the utilities serving the area. Prior to
construction, a determination will be made regarding the need to relocate
or adjust any existing utilities in the project area. A determination of
whether the NCDOT or the utility owner will be responsible for this will be
made at that time. In all cases, the contractor is required to notify the
owner of the utility in advance as to when this work will occur. In
addition, the contractor is responsible for any damages to water lines
incurred during the construction processes. This procedure will insure that
water lines, as well as other utilities, are relocated with minimal disruption
in service to the community.
Traffic service in the immediate area may be subjected to brief
disruption during construction of the project. Every effort will be made to
insure the transportation needs of the public are met both during and after
construction.
45
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Comments Received
The following federal, state, and local agencies were consulted during the
preparation of this environmental assessment. Written comments were received
from agencies noted with an asterisk (*).
* Army Corps of Engineers
* U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Environmental Protection Agency
Region G Planning Agency
* State Clearinghouse
* Department of Cultural Resources
* Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Department of Public Instruction
Guilford County Commissioners
* City of High Point
These comments and related issues, included in Appendix B, have been
addressed in this document.
B. Citizens Informational Workshop
A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on October 4, 1994 for the subject
project at the Welborn Middle School Cafeteria. Approximately 25 people attended the
workshop including representatives from the City of High Point and the NCDOT. The
workshop was advertised in the local media. The High Point Enterprise and the Channel 8
(WGHP) News provided media coverage.
Citizens commented on the potential property acquisitions and access to adjacent
neighborhoods. Residents along existing East College Drive expressed concern about
losing property to the proposed project. A resident of the Wesleyan Arms Garden
Apartments near Centennial Street asked if consideration would be given to providing a
visual screen (shrubbery or fencing) between the proposed roadway and the apartment
buildings. NCDOT representatives indicated that some landscaping provisions could be
addressed during the final design stages of the project. Residents along Sunview Avenue
inquired about the project's effect on their properties. Some of these residents indicated
that the majority of houses on the north side of the street are rental houses that will
potentially be relocated by the project. Residents in a neighborhood nearby asked for the
northern portion of Pine Valley Drive not to be connected to the Intermediate Loop. They
commented that Pine Valley Drive has a curved alignment with poor sight distance.
According to these citizens, children frequently ride bicycles along the street and other
residents walk along the street. These neighborhood residents did not want Intermediate
Loop traffic to access this portion of Pine Valley Drive and increase traffic in this
neighborhood. A "T" intersection is proposed at Pine Valley Drive to provide direct
access only for the southern portion of the existing roadway (refer to proposed
intersection treatment in Section I.D).
46
C. Public Hearing,
A public hearing will be held for the subject project following circulation of
this document. This public hearing will provide more detailed information to the
public about the proposed improvements. The public will be invited to make
additional comments or voice concerns regarding the proposed project.
MR/plr
47
FIGURES
. Nigh Poin

1LN
,.,i?.tfsd? 7ph otc
'C., --*,-7-71F.1-

R D
F? ; O

/fo 11 o I
udlad' NS
?4fent?,l i S-
dlele
n I? !0 Sa?dye%
6 s ue, to Wms?teil
I t
h
label t *
?Greensbori
1 /s 2 PI\s enl Guden s

h I
lun
-O 1
Ir e') «I I
1 ?.
U-2536 A
PROJECT '
LIMITS
' ?100•?'?•?• U-2536 B '
0
III
rIyy y..?r.? `
o? ee
1 , ] 10
/ A .
rAU ,
I?.nVwn A.., ? .
A9
'So rAU 1-77
LID
S
U-2536 C
I s ?` PROJECT
LIMITS 'a
ZI cunroen e?,el+l HIGH POINT ill
ewNDOIIH 2v
oAVIDSON POP. 63,380 ^
_1`` 377 o. ? o
W ¦ a? A??v ? iI

NORTFI CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE LOOP
FROM US 311 TO SR 1471
HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY
U-2536
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE I A
uoa 1 e
IL 'Al
eo r.u
rnt

I I
.
- -
J• -
j*V
,n, c0 ? ? _ r/ t' rr
-- - ?1 ??RLLS IVINtl N'3D) LOS I ?1S r
---
¦
y ro
),
-!-
??.??
- .1o
- GC
7F
4F z
47
47
"u) U
utl 3153H'J / // NAGS, N Lx
- -_Z / ?V w O ?o ??
h0I IiW ON N. nAMI'.t?L?J ?\/?
NOSN wOf -? /.?A?l?
w
atloe,aM
-_-?? \ ??/ 1 ' 3C.r.S I v o ?1? I? O J a rJ ^ A j ?r ??C ,\
Lf)
C? ? U s
1 ?s o
KiPI(w Oct)
JG? \ ?.. Q
POSE W / VAV? ¢o F 3 ? ? a 6 .. ld 16
2
(/ a ? I loDs3ad
1 /-r \ 3 lb v 3 , i ,n II ?? ON6
?\, •/. n ¢ a o a ? = LAUREL ' > Sf+,d b0
° DIH PL
a ° o lN. `-Q EAT DN ?d
\,'
m co
\ ? _ ¢ ? WU ? p s bC ? ,W m
l LL W i o r 2 w 0 ^ D b (>. P w
3"n \ > > tr z ,f?' a c/>? C C7 ", "? 4,Z = NOOyE ¢ a
/ v ??jr•? ?. ? ?```v `? W =i? ? U "' o ??'O F?1-U `IE o
V V" lit ? Op.
i wa L .?
?G
?/ J`\ ,],v• C'/ '1 . GZ J 1. 6
q c (? _ /
slit w".1 .t li. S'ts
a
Q
Q
ov O Z I? ?? ??? - p , gnnP3n?e <<
?_ ? L. o ?.? t z
•x .,I?r.v:-1l r' 'N ;4':1,01-1;)
.aY •. )x•I?Ix ?«? 9r.ir+..4-f\..M h7iN lO r•OKunl
rxO+l al.sOJiNVn1 10 1N3w1nvd30 VNIIOnV7 H1nON
NV-Id 3dd3HJnouOHl
d3Hd a3ZINVOun
VNIIOaVD H1aON
1NIOd HJIH
,I
ti.
-1
I, I
I a
i -
t-
? 132:"1 ? I3
NOllvtlvtl JS 3t]vtl9
• • 7'JN'IN 7LllNI
-- -- s3ar3N9noaau aONlrv
_"-" a 3N i o
?•A??l ?.?. \vMl3tlf
s3arnlonoacN1 aOrvrv
03so"Oa.1 ONIISIX) ON 3037
Y I

-- r
T? r
A

( ? 1

?' ....

°
.
1l.IxCxfMVxl A

r
7

rW

-av-TT-vr n-s-l N LLI) ...•.?w....?.?..? -r
M
<
D
m
y

N
O O
3
m _, w
< N 3
m
O
O
C
r
0
m
7J .... w
x
x
O
<T
G
D
0
x
N
V
m
N
A
0
T
m
m
?w =
N O O ^7 O
3 v 3 0
m
7J
I3
w
N Q1
a
0l3 d
A
(T N
3

n
C
W
D
Z
0
G?
C
m
M
G)
x
O
n
C
D
v
x
V
A
m
?p
O
T
m
m

m
O
N ?
3
-a °a
N3

N
gw
3
O
Ol
3 ao
U7
r
D
Z
m
ca
Z n
0 D
G r
C
cn
m m
_ n
4
,0
V J

OD A
1N
3
N
Oil
r..r
ti
n
W
G
.D
D
m
0
N
2
O
C
r
O
m
m
-+
O
n
D
{
O
2
A
A
m
N
T
m
m
K
Z
c
m
N
O
m
?m
?(n
=m
O
cn
room
r- O
D
Oz
mcn
?m
n
-I
O
z

n
c
7J
w
D
z
O
O
c
--1
m
m
3l
2
O
n
G
D
{
O
2
N
v
A
m
T
m
m
.- W
N ?
? 3
A

N W
?
r
, 3 D
Z
m
_ cn -a
c

.?

A 1?

N
co m m
co

D \J
D
oZ
D
m r
C
:1-4 cn
m O m
Mz n

N O
3 Z
in

N a)
-- 3

0
N rn
3 !u
co A
vt ANA9IA
doo-i a}eipawialul Pm peod uoIsuM plp Jo uoiloasialul
dool alelpauuolul
dool alelpawialul yIIM anuo Aall1eH pue
(laails uleW 4JON) L L£ sn Jo uolloasjalul

doo-l alelpauualul
0
a
I I "
0
z
0
CL
c
N
u
I i I
d
i I I I ?
I I I La
I I
I I '"
anua AaRJeH
o'8 d 9£SZ-n loa(ad dll
lulod 461H ul anuany nallluoW pue d6Z sn of
(laajls MEW yIJON) 66£ sn wojj doo-l alelpauualul
at JNADIJ
door ajeipawjajul L41!M (anua Jaicayoase?I) gg ON Jo uolIoasJalul

7n-
door elelpauuejul I ?ItI }tI I N
I I?III? z

I I I I I
co
I II o
I I m
dool a;eipawia;ul y;lM;aang uosuyor jo uol;oesia;ul
door e)elpouuolul l I t I I C-
0
I I I I I
N

o'8 d 9£SZ-n ioaloid du
;ulod 461H ul anuany nail;uoVy pue y6Z sn o;
(10011s MEW 41JoN) 6?£ sn woj} door a;eipawja;ul
Dt7 AH 19I3
doo-l a;eipawialul pm anuany uo;6ulxal ?o uolIaasJa;ul

anuany uo36ulxa-l I I t I t I
I I I I I
I II m
I I °or
I I ?
dool alelpawialul y;lM;aaj;S leluua;uao ;o uol;oasia;ul
I I
I I I
II III I I
lilil ? I

jael3S leluua;uao

m
a
I III
I I 0
o'8 y 9£SZ-n }oaloid du
;ulod 1461H ul anuany nall;uoW pue y6Z sn o;
(;aal;S uleW 4
PoN) L?£ Sfl wog; door a;elpawia;ul
at, I'HiZf)IA
dool alelPa walul 4l!m anuany nalpuow pue `d6Z sn jo uol;oesiam
I I
I I
I I N
I I
I I I n
FI?I I
anuany naliluow

I I I I I w
I I i m
r
I I 00
I I ?
o v d 9£SZ-n;oafold dll
lulod 1461H u1 anuany nal1luoW pue y6Z sn o;
OaaJ;s MEW 4PoN) ?Lc sn uuojj doo-I aleiPowialul
1 'r ,' ? r d °?d ?d??c,o ° 000,? ?no? V
o Qo\
a / C??' °o O? (ao ???po d?nd
I?,oe,\ f---- D ° g o0 00 0 ? a p ? ?
:? mo= Cr
o o
/ Q ° o ao 00 QO ?A
° p° o? Qo
00
O
°
4:7 Q? 03
Do? a
En on
--
1, 1 O
II
° I
00
00
00
11 ,?` 11
4
D ?. ?4 ? O [ O tJ to
??o Q
-1 c
-IF" r
LJ
On 0
Q:i
?? ° o a t cep a ?a° ''111 d CD
C? [3?
ri tiJ d o do
a r ,,? p a
ILL'! C] Fp ? U CJ f5 N. 1? c? d fl L o ?
CENfE 1 L7 C) [? ? Q L3
? ° f ° ? CO °O lol]fJf? r7 ? T` ----.. ?-
,1 f? ? U
IaI O L._-? ? r ? ° "? a ?' i < V '?!q[C`1-\"I1\" n d n ?'7 °o °
? r 1Vryf, L J ?I?'''',IJ ?
El ° Ulf
y lJ ?r
a n ===o=?s ==_ a° o d ''o ?l 4 fl $ [? / ? ? o _I
r-t C3
E) 10
C) n Op cl
? ? o a LJ l ° ° t -r 1 0 rJ
[7 ?13 (]dna? ° °? c, o taq c? a g ,
T?wT_ -) i-- -- - ?? f? Q _ Crl ° . e n a ? ° ° Q ? p El G E:I
i1 r1!":'i r= =D r------ - I - -'
'a
------ 1 ! 11.a? n rl ???,? ?J D c] a u
::[:: ? ?raaa r -_ ----- --_ fJ????fj' (I ?0 D_ ?7l ?I ? °
??1 1??Ll FTI -. --n--- --_ ?ItlYllo, fJ ? a 4J ? U?
1 f? n /1i7 f7 ?,? aJO ? o r-? n
'7 [] C7 ,dli ° i (° (' ? ? Q
° n ?o i i f ?? ° O ° Q QO ?. u ° f?
? o ?
Ll O ...D
=.?r >D-? ?a ?C?o?? ?DEJ : C7?Q ° ° ? ? 13 ?? ! C-' rS O ou o O o O ° ?o PEI ?
f,7 [ lrJ [? I- °0 o p O O° ooo\D QO OQ ° ? EP
r-I a i
[ [7 a la n° L7 ? r I I ° O `. pQ pp? D
)Qs.ww.
4 G? °
p? ° Tf ll o ??? ° 0 O Q 000 p0 °v E3
0o n L7 H 0 O d O o ?
! ? a,. fl U O C? o o O00 0000 °? o? .
G?]??a f5 r3 ° ? °? _
?. 370?? ? '? d ? 0 -i" ca QQO q° ooo `? O n ? VC)
- °
P°
'?IOD F)
11
0? ?? n? \?? , II ? d o
[.7 C] [5 d [7 °[] CI N- ? CIQ [I p o 0 O ? QO -'OQ? ocr] ? i a 0 Q
rla C?? ?q n p Ca1?1?a° O?°o \ 00 00 ya O°O °o
13
b Q
cl,
c7i
??--d8
nn Can ?j? °'?n ? r? ???_
H )C? U? U° Q ?? ?O d ° O o
? ?d Cho °O? ? ° o ? ? r o O d O
J ? {] ? ? Y ? °° tl ti) ti ?' `gyp °
° r ? p? r; ° ?? d o O 4 ° 0? Q o O f? 4
,? El F] JI nn n El
:? n l r' 1?'\? <<?° o°` d o d0??° ° D? Q? O n
US-311 192 JOHNSTON ST. 332 NC-68
282 EASTCHESTER DR.
96 4 96 <PROpOSFO 166 r 166
59 4 33
Fo P
72 4 1 33 ?- 63 -
141 141 A .4 ?
nn- - -1 99
64 _J -t J 4,j ?57 > ?,'- B 72 63 5 40 90
7 ?° 5 59 -3 b . vJd 36 4 36
1 64 99 ?54 ?rF
8 ?y 40 / X17
lv7 54 <o?it`
0 Oy
84 5a 5
67 4 67 9o 17 g \`107 F
s
91 91 112 107 j C
D 88 V 104 LEXINGTON AVE.
43 7 ? /112 ?? \ 194
8 ?7 6 7103 116 161 } b b, 104 ,- 5 4497?P
147 .,7 V p 17 / 97
1 J 11 53 35 ? 18
294 ! v g a 4 7 116 43 88'°
147 103-! 3877 11? \D71 68 16 ) ? `' .'Is
36 71 V \ a 16 .? 8 53
ti
11 ? ,v
s lk??16 68 44 8?`'t 79 E. COLLEGE DR.
120 \120 54 11 16 79 \ t
??pp 6 \54 ?S US-29A
*6 35 53 6 f 3 ? 82 56 112
87 °.12 41 • 'i 82 \ 27 0%
17 L, 53 8 76 e; A- 23 / ' 56
62 e -,112 76 Q \ 42 47'•, i 6
124 35 J 0 97 152 13 6 62 10 40 13 a 4 42
?\l 119
119 Q\
US-311
N. MAIN ST
I
IA-OLD WINSTON RD.
S-PINE VALLEY.DR.
C-CENTENNIAL ST.
D-McGUINN DR.
i
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
a" 23
MONTLIEU AVE. 4
/ 40
e 15 2
-? 25 / p US-26A
104 15 / 52 V i 152
4`A p x'25
\104 104
129
129
258
PROJECT U2536
GUILFORD COUNTY
ESTIMATED 1999 ADT's IN HUNDREDS
FOR INTERMEDIATE LOOP FROM US-311
(N. MAIN ST.) TO US-29A AND MONTLIEU
AVE. IN HIGH POINT, NC.
FIGURE 6A
i
US-311 356 JOHNSTON ST.
456
P;j o
178 178 Sfo
_ _ Mq?? Sir f
p0OPInre 120 t51
130 7 51 x - 114
228 4' 228 A 176
115 `° `?,
X94 AI B 130 114 99 t ?,- "?•'?s,? 59 155
134 21 01 D 120 176 -'''Lf?gs ,-
,° 107
94 Ir 115
\? 21
134
F 19
107 5.? %, 44 4c
00
10 10 )/erh, 207 9A
m
140 p 4 140 155 44 \
135 155 29 209 207 C
21 76 ,;e- 150 O?? •-. 201 LEXINGTON AVE.
lie 169 28 r 30 / 209 31 B
21 AL- 205 35) ? l? l (vim 201 X172
Is) 159 //
240 d-? i 15 a- f 159
7 }? 6
30 /
-4 p 35g 109 2/
;, Q
430 ZO 76
4. 16 Q I ( 15 05 150
1\5 °
240 165 -5
•-° 113 31 ) L? ?,i G (26
20 a 126 117
55 \ 1261 \ o- _'' 31 ! 14 109
1128 69 3 = 72 ,v
188??188 88 28 ?; 117 14
' (20 Y' 149
R10 89 10") \ O ?0 88 149 = D U3 A
V 'J QD
61 / ? 155 96 196
t8 s/ ?? 4 155!
14710 , 69
51
107 31 `i R Sl 89 10 p\ 118 36 jf?98
.f \ 18 118 84 51
214 31 ) 13 i47 236 20.I?b"
107 61 ?'1 v _?•. \ 11
15 63 / 20 7 84
\e 4" 36
1II0 V \ 180 MONTLIEU AVE. 7 1
US-311 63
N. MAIN ST. RJ23
40 1 i US-29A
157\ 23\? 102 V 4 102
b(v40
157 204
197 ?? 197
394
A-OLD WINSTON RD.
9-PINE VALLEY 0R.
C-CENTENNLAL ST.
D-McGUIUN DR.
i
i
I
540 NC-68
i EASTCHESTER DR.
270 114 270
PROJECT U2536
GUILFORD COUNTY
ESTIMATED 2019 ADT's IN HUNDREDS
FOR INTERMEDIATE LOOP FROM US-311
(N. MAIN ST.) TO US-29A AND MONTLIEU
AVE. IN HIGH POINT, NC.

DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE GB
C)04 I 10 1
1
181.0 I ,`'
O Z 133RS HDiv N
y0?? PNEJ? ? O ? ??
M?
(NNJ :)d
w
0
H
W
O? d g
. 0
?a 0
CIO I ®m r
top
P °
O
' Q
" ® o
DO
rffi ° ? I _ -
N
ye*° 11 ? N
P
0
?- ? Q © 1 1
P
5 ? O rx-x- _x. % 1
x I 1
0 0 0 ? x 1 I- -- --
x <
o
L, 1 1 /0)" /
© x - a V ISFFDD Cl II xf \ Ini/ O \
! I Nay
® I ? 4
o ®o ?
o
0 0? ?
d ° `?,e l 0

? k
/
Cb / ?.
E1
/ I
n
CIOt 1
a
?_ 1 1
1 1 a
I !
0 ? 1 1
1 1
1 I 1 ;I
Q r1 I I O
I I
O °°•? I
I'll lo? oG
O
I
-00 ? I I
O ?I I
I
? , aKO ? ?; v
.1,nHS [I"xi'vW ?-
H?
1 O
O
w
0
w

M 8 ? 0
h S ? /
? _ ?? ? S? u S p 8 tr1
3 - ? ?? ,? yo ? © w
r, -
O
/YO
4

SHEET 4 OF 5

Q
Q '
C1z,
o ?
?i aisi
1-4 H
(an??and n??? i pow) «vt xs_-
/
/
° ? yw \
\ ?-, \
® ' ' P51
Pj-
n?o teT
/
fn Ln
J '
O
°

i
4d I
00
?o CO
,
I I
? I
I
`oy ? b I
`\ 1
s ' pl
Vj,
00.
? ??8??, .,• ? ® ;c \1 It d
1
\ k
%
r ?
a
?n
!n /
[il
oO

.0 •-+ z
WOW?P
Fi OV
qC7
w

x?[a
? f, !
a r O
P4 A-1
O??
a ?

\

s
l
8 ?2Il1? I3
SIN07 Q0013 HVIA-00I
1
8 3NOZZL6L
/ -,, W )i
0L6i w
9E,
l vyHA

is 0311V13?
J O l I W l'1 ! 98
8 3NOZ. it
/ co
i '
O 3NOZ
L wa
31lS 133rmi
N
8 3NOZ
lZ8
6P8

i
_-?AOnls 031IViaC jo llwn
wi / i
i,

r? Nil, EV 3NOZ 3NOZ
\ s
8 3NOZ
IOZ Wa o
i
8 3NOZ\ ??.
8 3NOZ
%'I 8d 3NOZ
8 3NOZ
-Ec8
$Z-Aonis 031Id130 j0 llWll
r),

XI(IN3ddV
SWPa6Oad U011POO M PUP laodaa aOUPlSISSd uOIgPOo[aa
V xlpuaddy
a.iuju uui,u).,la,j ujx? ?duj -
ido j t 3y lumauu
uua\` uunwulrj a11615

OR!(] X q PanO \' •. ; amCi luaa\a 110Tmoola-l
- 7' ?- 56-01-1'0 `IJO?IILLO21 NV'1\ 11

'1N10d 110111 N1 JNISAOil J111t"11VAV'IV1.Ol x11.1 JIVJIUNI 10N SAMI
(IN\• .L.*MHOHd 30 VJ21?"IV2iaNJJ 511 LL NI SU\I.LSI'1 1WHJ UJ'IIJ1W.*) SVAk.1-S1'I JNIS 1011 3'11IV1IVAV - J.LON
'9# IU J.II aJS 'tl
'1SI'l 7NISi10ll 3'IfIV'IIVAV 311.1-Afl U3.LVOlUN1 SV'Sa.l 'ZI
'.111210111f1V ONIS;10111N10.1 110111'11 ! ZNOI.IY3013-H
T woo of pluanlsa sgluom Ia(jumN ` I
'W-4 L;)Idl•J A H V 'Iaalnos
521:l11IVPI JJ21N'I ON'11A.ViV1Oll .1.:).11•021.1 SIILL .lfl Islll3lgellL'.1L s3l,s s,-)msng alyulnt. a1V 1-1
(1.11.)1:13\' (1J'lfll'SI(I (INS'.1'i21:JU'1:1':1lVOS'S:11'111UV.1 ZsllLallllel3llLllg
a.)N\"1 :M0S; aU AN U 3213111 1V11.I. 3 11IISSOd SI 11 'G lln{lu, au!snog Jo u]alquld e aq.4].4111 1P,11 t i X
upou')d U(Hle3olal juunP aµ1e1!ene au]snotl
'.\21VSSJJJN SV UJ.LNJIVJ1,M1 311 11M Jul?,nog SS(1 aluubape ay (P.» 31ay1 IIaJ 1!'1 'Z I x
Zalgel!u.%u ?msuog a!lgnd sl I I
k3AHAS'IV,ISIA UNV 11a3fold wJ P3p3a11ay au!snotl 3!lynd 11!,11 01 X
sH'AdVdS'AkAN'S'M 1NIOd 110III'S21O.1'1VJ21'IV701'9 ?sagtuluJ
3la '.11].4111.4 `P.4lyl slP '.4ijlL'j 31311) .41\I '6 I x
;p313p!snoa 3y ju!snol I llos321 ISe'1 PlnugN 8 N
'SS3NIsIIt1 A.1.1210N11V V ?•PaPc.3u sululaold a(1!snotl 1U1101 l)Pu IPA\ L
10N '(IV0'1 SS3NlS,1f1 01 0N1U2f0.):)V AUV.V 11s!I1 ?ulstwy a11e110AU 1oJ 3alllos 'o
(I 1,10.1\ JAA.L IMA (INV 31\I1'l'LIJ t (1:11.\ IULS1 „DSupoils Slnsnoq u asnu3 uopu3opi 11!,\1 y N
SS3NISAU JU2i31V.) - SH'A1H1.V.) A:)NVJ 'Y NIV'Id V "t 3la 'satluotntu'saa,(uldula
Jo loquinu palutupsa -3 d.Cl 'ozts -luoyti!
'1JJ('Oud HTL3V Va21V N1 .Paaujdsip ay ssatnsnq AUe IP.M -1, N
J'IUV'IIVAV JU AIM SJ:)IA21JS SSANISAU 21V'IIIVIS 'f Ll3afolcl
(.aquln-4q puo soul sxuvwia lajlu algul!uno aq I}!ls sa3LUas ssaulsny Il!M E
85 Oct 8 tl 'TY-to1 ;•Iuanla3eldslp
z yl uo9 Ot an 001 0 do 009 0 U1 001 .(q pojju, aq salj3mtj310 sloops I1!)11 Z X
Lt 009 ou? 6£ Wool'OL 0 009 000 t "00110- (.•?SS3aall ag SaaLllas U01It'301a1 1Claads 111.11 •1 X
yZ -T u? oiz Zf t
L
lvoL
-o?
oot-oiz 6 10L-or sza.asuv „S3.i„ Jln +zlnl -7, ojy >a_?
_
-
-
-
ll ---? Oiz-Oil flu ICOI ?-oz l oiz-oil iyot-oz
SNOIt8311 17VII3h1SN?
f oil u s I l\?ouo 0 oil u $ 0 lvoz-o 0
0 0 0 lyold-uoN
1114H .10A altvS.1o3 -sj61iua1- - s.1au,w0 _
0 0 0
0 ?w? I
.nuv,uv.sv ,) na,ru%%a ssa D'SPI'I3MU 10 3XIVA 0 1 _
0 I s3ssatnsnfl
0 I ti 01 --? S -- I U
_.__ t' -- b I 5 i t satl!ulua
O I O ? I ' L I O Z I' Z l S1e11PL11Pl11
d,'105 1V0? Si I lV?f SZ 1\SZ-Ql I IVsi-0 sal1uotn1v 1'101 slllull;)l s] umo Saa3e( stC1
Jo ?d.ij.
13.137 31103N1 S33aV'IdSIU (131VIVI1S3
NOI.L-)gS WI- CIL"lOIIS II.LL"
-
(ICI UAICI INX••
I t 't'-V .I.NHJVD3S ".I.S N0SNF10f 01 "IS NM V N Y1iOd-4 :IOEf021d 30 N011AMOSM

--- V;N T 1J3f02id 'V'3 v 9fSZ-11
sallluall?' f Jo r+R' aJeluallX j Q2 AILID AINAOJ L801 L08'6 :1J3f021d
:1J1.13c) \01.1VJO'1:?21 \':?21t' ..
l"MU 1OLisilu-1 (. JO tua?u)-1ud30 eull(hlu. y).luN: j
j
NUISJU ? 'd0U121'd0J ? •S•1.3 a
IAO(I]N NOIIV70-1.121
a.)tDouo,pu013-d na.rv 4doJ7
,uai'V U01tn301aa a,n,S .;doJ t : Inwrup
GLIS Fxr.: ?' r • ? u;;
ote4 riq pono?du? 1 an(] tu?1 uo!M3011-d
5714
t Cn-ot-ro ? -tDoxxiozt N-V-W x
'1V0d 110114\I O!NIS:11011311IV'IIVAV1Vi0131I131VD1G.U 10\111130Q
(1\l' ID21M }d 30 V3HV '11-213\39 3111.%0 S0NIISI l IVOH3 Q3'lldIVOO SVA1 ISI'I 9NIS:IOH 3'If V-1l Av - 310\
'9# TV 311 33S 'ti
'1SI'l O\ISA014 3'If1V'IIVAV 3H1 AH (131VJIQ I SV `S3.V 'ZI
'.111210}11.1`1' 9VS:10}I 1NIOd H9I1I'TT ?!?OI1t'JO'I32i
alal tnoo of paleulrlsa sipuoul IagtuliN S 1 I
Q31?3dX3 32IV IPoinos
SH39M.IN 39HY1 0N'H3A2LkkO1'133fOHJ SIHI AH Isil) algPFP.Ar salts sspuisnq algrlms aiv 'rl X
Q31D333V 433f1VSI(I QNV .i' MM113 3IVOS `S3l'1II'VV3 Lsimaul lrpmug
3'DHV'I 3Il'OS 3H AVIV 31131-111VH131HISSOJ SI II '6 unpLm 5uisno74-1o uialgold r aq a.Iaip MA ' £1 X
,,pound uoproolai nuunp algrlirnr. autSnoq
AHVSS303N SV (l31N31V3'ldM 39 'I'IL1V loinsnoq SSQ --arnbapr aq ULm aiaip 11a3 it sl Zl ? X
Lalgrlirnr Uutsnoq ,)ggnd sI 11 ! X
.UA2}:IS'IVIISIA USY Laoalold iol pap,-au aq auisnoq ot)gnd lp,,'A 01 X
SH3dVdSA13N'S1lk1 LQ0d H91H `S2i01'IV3H 'IV00'1 '9 Lsa?Ii??3
'3I0 `i.liapla `palgrsrp `02-ml alaip a.Iy •6 x
?poizlpisuoo aq ainsnofI uosad Isr-1 plnogS 'g X
'SS3NISill 9 Ulm0NIIV V Lpapaau sum.Iaold Qinsnoil lruogrppr lpi A 'L X ?
10N 'QVO'l SS31`ISflg 010 VQ2100DV AHKX .(asrf) ftms og algr.lrr,?r .Io3 aamoS -9
Q'l3OA13IVI11HVd Q,\'V 3IVI1'I1,13 b Q3IVIVIIS3 Laaruogs ginsnoq r asnro uograolal il?A1 s X
SS3NIS:lf} 0NId3IV0 ' SH3HH1V0 A0NV 3 T NIV ld V 'f '?l2 `saAuouttu `saa,ioldiua
do iaqumu p.-ju=sa `adAj`azis alr:)rpui
'103f021d m3i3V vaHv m, `os.II Lpaarldsip aq ssautsnq Cur 1it& T X
3'IfiV'IIVAV 3II "1'IIA1 S30IA2I3S SS3N7SIlS 2it''III?IS '£ ?oaCoid -
(.Ta(arnsi.+q puo saa) s-ruVl%-jrt Ja)jr algrlirnr aq pps somas ssarnsnq 11r,k1 £ X
8S OCT 8 t-I -ry.LOJ. ?iuomaorldsTp
z an 009 Ob an 001 0 an 009 10 I an 001 Xq laalp aq sagomgo .Io slooys IIIM •z }
LT oo9-oor 6£ ; Iti00I-OL 0 009-OOP t 1'4001-oL ?.kmssaxu aq saouras uopuiola! lrl0ads Iii.A1 i X
SZ oor-osz Z£ ivoL-or L oor-o>z 11 6 noL-OP S.1amsim „S31 " HD uVl 3 off so.k
It OSZ-osT 1 81 I mop-oz I 0SZ-0ST I ISOr-OZ sNoi.Lm 'TIV H-1(115.'4tl
f owo s T 1voz-0 0 nve s 0 Hoz-o 0 0 0 0 3901d-uoN
luau .103 j ales iod slueual sialimo 0 0 0 0 siuM3
3'igymy.1v f).Q ama ssa t) I=3ma 3o aa7VA 0 1 0 1 sassauisng
0 £ 01 S 0 r 81 s £I S211??3
0 10 1 I£ 1 0 £ I y £ I I slunpinipul
do 09 1VOs-S£ 1VS£-sz I1s(7-91 IV91-0 sapuoll IN lrloL l sluruol sipumo saxrl s-i4
I I j o AA L
'I3.-V3Z 3ItiOJl;I S33Jd'IdSIQ Q3ZVItiI1S3
NOLLDHS UHCI- llOHS
RNV-I S `£-d JNHI,\OHS `'ZS NOSNHOf O L "is Na vq 'N I/K'mu :13afO2}d JO NOLWI2I M
N/N .I73fo2Id 'V'3 d 9£SZ :rl :'011 'a'I
saletualld £ 3o E+IV 0)'CWalTV CTUO Eng i ?,I 1CIOO L801 L08'6 :IDHfO'dd
I1JISIG F1 2}OQI2RIoo ? 'S'I'3 INC
7
3JI330 SOIIVJO`lHH tJHV
tjoij .jodsut'.-T,L jo juawliedaQ imilowD gjio.?.T
iaoa3a Nolid00zax
RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
M E.I.S. 1:1 CORRIDOR D DESIGN
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT: I 9.8071087 1 COLrNTI' I GUILFORD Alternate A1+2 of 3 Alternates
I.D. NO.: I U-2536 A I F.A. PROJECT NIA
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: I FROM N. NIA N ST.. TO JOHNSON ST., SEGN EN'T A-3. 5 LANE C +
SECTION SEGI ENI- A2 - 4 LANE C & G SECTION WITH R_-USED NIEDIAti
ESTIhLATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of I i i I I I
Dis lacees Owners I Tenants Total I Minorities 0 15bi 15-25NI 25-3iM i 35-50M 1 50 UP
Individuals 1! 2 i 0' 2 1 l l 0 j 0
Families 13 5 18 4 0 j 5 10 - I 0
Businesses I 1 ! 0 l 0 VALUE OF DRELLL`G DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms j 0 I 0 0 0 Owuers Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 0 0-20%1 0 S 0-ISO 0 0-20%1 I I s 0-150 i 3
ANSWER ALL, QUESTIONS 20-401 1 l 150-2!0 I 1 20-40xi 1 18 l 150-2!0 I 11
Yes NO Explain all "IES" answers. 40-7051 ! 9 250-400 I 6 40-70%1 32 s 250-400 j 2;
I X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary" 70-100%1 j 4 ; 400-600 j 0 70-100M. 39 ° 400-600 I 17
X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 IT j 0 ! 600 uP I 0 100 uP I 40 I 600 UPI 2
displacement? TOTAL 14 7 130 S8
4 3. Will business services still be available after REbLU;tKS (Respond by Number)
project? 3. SIMILAR BUSINESS SERN7CES NN ILL BE AVAILABLE
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so, IN AREA AFTER PROJECT.
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, mirnorities, etc. 4. (A) PLAIN s FANCY CATERERS - CATERING BL'STN'ESS.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? ESTIMATED 4 FULL TIME AND PART TIME WOULD
X 6. Source for available housing (list). VARY ACCORDING TO BUSINESS LOAD. NOT
.l- 7. Will additional housing programs needed'' A MINORITY BUSTNESS.
X j S. Should Last Resort Housing be considered''
X 1 9. Are there laree, disabled, elderly. etc.
families, 6. LOCAL REALTORS, ITIGH POINT MLS, NEWSPAPERS
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? AND VISUAL SURVEY.
X I 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing S. WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS NECESSARY.
housing available during relocation period?
X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within 9. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE MAYBE SOME LARGE
financial means? FAMILIES, SOME ELDERLY AND DISABLED AFFECTED
X j 1-1. Are suitable business sites available (list BY THIS PROJECT. HOWEVER, NO LARGE NUMBEP.S
source). ARE EXPECTED.
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATIO`? ii. HIGH POINT HOUSING AUTHORITY.
12. YES, AS INDICATED BY THE AVAILABLE HOUSING LIST.
14. SEE I TEM #6.
?NOTE - AVAILABLE HOUSING LIST WAS COMPILED FROM LISTTNGS r\ THE GENERAL AREA OF PROJECT A.ND
DOES NOT INDICATE THE TOTAL AVAILABLE HOUSING IN HIGH POINT.

H. ALA'" ROTHROCI? 0a-10-95 k ' -- i? 1/ -
Rel?cation .went Date Ir\poroved b% Uaie
.-.- I i J P.-n-? "90
Original k 1 Copy. Sr to Relocation Agent
2 Cap} Area Relocation Office
RELOCATION REPORT
a E.I.S. F_? CORRIDOR ? DESIGN
!forth Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT: 19.8071087 I CO[N7Y GUILFORD
Alternate Al of 4 :Alternates
I.D. NO.: U-2536 C I F.A. PROJECT N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: I FRONT EASTCHESTER TO CEN FEh7,\-I.=1L. ST.. 5 LANE C & G SEMON
ESTDVIATED DISPLACEES .. INC n%fF I.Fl-Ft
Type of
Dis lacees Owners I Tenants i Total I Minorities 0-151NI 15-25\i 25-35NM ! 35-50M 1 50 LT
Individuals I 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 l i 0 1 0! 0
Families l l 1 2; 1 0 1! l 0! 0
Businesses ! 0 ! 0 0 I 0
Farms 0 VALUE OF DI ELLL\G DSS DwELU G AVAILABLE
0 0 0
N
P
f
! Owners Tenants For Sale i For Rent
on-
ro
it 0
0 0 0
! 3
0-zont 0' SO-150 0 0-20at ! 1 $0-150
ANSNVER ALL UESTIOIS 20-40- 150-250 O 20-40.M i 18 ( 150-250 I 11
yes NO EA lain all "YES" answers. 40-70at 1 1 250-400 ! 2 40-701 1 32 ' 2S0-400 25
1 X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70-10ONt 0 400-600 1 0 7o-boat ;
ago boo
39
I 17
X 2. NVill schools or churches be affect by 100 UP ! 0 i 600 up ! 0 loo UP 1 40 E 600 I'P I 2
displacement? TOT
aL ! 1 2
. 130 58
X 3. Will business services still be available after RE.NLUUZS (Respond kV Number)
project' 3
NO BUSENESSES ARE AFFECTED BY T
.
HIS PROJECT.
! X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so
,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
6. LOCAL REALTORS, HIGH POINT AILS, NEWSPAPERS
employees, minorities, etc. AND VISUAL SURVEY

! X
5. Will relocation cause a housing shortave? .
X 6. Source for available housing (list). S
WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS NECE
S

X
,. Will additional housing programs needed'? .
S
ARY.
t S. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? 9
IT IS POSSIBLE TIUT THERE MAY BE SOM

X j
a. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. .
E LARGE
FAMILIES, SOME ELDERLY AND DISABLED AFFECTED
fanulues? BY THIS PROJECT
HONN-EVER
NO LARGE N

l-
10. Will public housing be needed for project? .
,
UMBERS
ARE EXPECTED

X
11. Is public housing available? .
x j 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing 11. HIGH POINT HOUSING AUTHORITY.
housing available during relocation period?
1 X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within 12. YES, AS INDICATED BY THE AVAILABLE HOUSING
financial means? LIST

.1" !
14. Axe suitable business sites available (list .
source), 14
SEE ITEM #6

15. Number months estimated to complete .
.
RELOCATION? j
NOTE - A VAILABLE HOUSING LIST WAS COMPILED FROM LISTINGS I\' THE GENERAL AREA OF PROJECT :LND
DOES NO T INDICATE THE TOTAL AVAILABLE IIOUSING IN HIGH POINT.
i
H. ALAN ROTHROC R ! 0-4-10-95
1.., - ?
c-2%?t/( j?- -
4A 1
_ _
'
Relocation Agent Date I I Anoroved by Date
Oricfinal & l Copy Stare Relocation Agent
2 copy Arta Rclomion OlTice
RELOCATION REPORT
.North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
M E.I.S. E:1 CORRIDOR DESIGN
PROJECT: 9.8071087 CotmTY GUILFORD I Alternate A2 of 4 =alternates
I.D. NO.: U-2536 C , F.A. PROJECT N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: I FRUM CENTENNIAL. ST.. TO NNIO?1TLIEU AVE., ALT. 2 - 4 LANE C & G
SECTION ?NTI'I-i RAIS ED MEDIAN
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of I I I I
Dis laeees i Owners Tenants Total i h[inorities 0-15M 15-2sM I 25-35M I 35-50M 50 UP
Individuals 1 0 1 0 i 0 1 0 0 1 0 i 0 1 0 1 0
Families 2 0. 2 l 0: 0 j ' 0 0
Businesses i 0 I 0 0 0 VALUE OF DR'ELLL`G DSS D%4,YUEIG AVAILABLE
Farms 0 j 0 0 0 Owners ! Tenants For Sale 1 For Rent
Non-Profit 0 0 0; 0 0-2011 j 0; s 0-150 0 0-20NI 1 i i 0-150 3
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-40,N1 0 I 150-250 0 20-4011 18 l 150-250 11
Yes No Ex plain all "IES" answers. 40-70.',l I 0 I 250-400 i 0 40-7051 1 32 ? 250-400 25
I X I. Will special relocation services be necessary'? 70-100-M 2 I 400-600 0 70-10011 39 400-600 I 17
j X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 LT 0 j 600 UPI 0 100 LP 40 I 600 LP I 2
displac,-menr? TOTAL ! 2 0 130 58
X I 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by iNumber)
project? 3. NO BUSINESSES ARE AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT.
j X 4. Will any business be displaced'? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of 6. LOCAL REALTORS, HIGH POINT AILS, N ENVS PAPERS
employees, minorities, etc. AND VISUAL SURVEY.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
X 6. Source for available housing (list). S. NI ILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS NECESSARY.
X 7. Will additional housing programs needed''
X S. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? 9. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT TTIERE AIAY BE SOME LARGE
1 j 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. FAMILIES, SOME ELDERLY AND DISABLED AFFECTED
families'' BY THIS PROJECT. HONN"EVER, NO LARGE NUMBERS
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? ARE EXPECTED.
l 11. Is public housing available'
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing 11. HIGH POINT HOUSING AUTHORITY.
housine available during relocation period"
j X 13. 'WW there be a problem of housing within 12. YES, AS INDICATED BY THE AVAILABLE HOUSING
financial means.' LIST.
X j 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source). 14. SEE ITEM #6.
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION?
NOTE -AVAI LABLE HOUSING LIST WAS COMPILED FROM LISTLNGS IN THE GENERAL AREA OF PROJECT ?LND
DOES NOT INDICATE THE TOTAL AVAILABLE HOUSIN G UN HIGH POINT.
i
H. ?.LAN ROTHROCI: % 01-10-95 f i ,7-
Rcloc,vion r ?cnt Datc I Annrovcd M' Dmc
F- :r + R-,J On¢tnul S I Copy Stvc Pxloeat,on Agent 2 Copt Area P.elomion O`r
rtce
RELOCATION REPORT
'F'orth Carolina Department of Transportatic
E. LS. ? ?
CORRIDOR DES
AREA RELOCATION OFFIC
IGN
PROJECT:
I.D. No.: , 9.8071087 COUVrv I GUILFORD
U-2536 C Alternate A3 of Altern
F
t

.A. PROJECT N/A a
es
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: FROM EASTCHESTER TO CENTENNIAL
S

SECTION ,
T., FIVE LAINES SHOULDER
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES

Type of INCOtiIE LEVEL
Dis lacees

Individuals Owners Tenants
Total Minorities 0-15M I 15-25M I 25-3
p
S?I I 35-501 I

Families 1 1,
I

1 0
50 UP
0 1
0 1

Businesses ?
? p Q 0 1 O
I 1 t
1 I OI
1
Farms
O ( 0 0 0 VALUE OF DWELLLtiG DSS DINT.LLLNG AVAILABLE
0 Owners
Non-Profit p p
0 Tenants For Sale For Rent
Q 0-201I

Y es N.
E ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
„ ??
.t Lain aL! ID'S
, 0 S 0-I50 0
0-2011 1 S o-ISO 3
20-x011 I fl I50-250
I 0 20-4051 I 18 J 1
I
amm
ers.
i X 1. Will special relocation services b 1400
11
40- oaf ! 1 M-aoo
2 40-7 o?I I 32 ! 2`-0-40o I 25
X 2• e necessary?
Will schools or churches be affect by ?o-IOObI p Sao boo
I 0 70-0OSt i 39 400-600 17
100 up !
600
displacement? 0 UP
I 0 loo ur I
0 I 60o t? I 2
3. Will business services still be available after TOTAL 1 3
130
58
project? RE?IARSS (Respond bF Number)
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so 3. NO BUSLVESSES ARE AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT

,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities
etc .

6. LOCAL REALTORS, HIGH POINT tMLS, NEWSPAPERS

N 5. ,
.
Will relocation cause a housing shortage? AND VISUAL SURVEY.
x ' ti. Source for available housing (list)

X 7. .

Will additional housing programs needed?
8. IN-ILL BE IMPLEJIENTED AS NECESSARY.
8.
N I 9 Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
A 9. IT IS POSSIBLE THATTHERE
M

•
re there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families? ,
AY BE SOME LARGE
FAMILIES, SOME ELDERLY AND DISAB

N 10.

Will public housing be needed f LED AFFECTED
BY THIS PROJECT. IIONVTVER, NO LARGE NUMBERS

11. or project?
Is public housing available? ARE EXPECTED.
N 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing

housing available during reloc
ti
11. IHGH POINT HOUSING AGTHORITI .

N 13. a
on period?
Will there be a problem of housing within
financial
?
12. YES, AS INDICATED BY THE ANAIL

N
means ABLE HOUSING
LIST.
14. Are suitable business sites available (list

15. source).
Number months estimated to com
lete 14. SEE ITEM #6.
p
RELOCATION?
NOTL - AVAILABLE HOUSING LIST WAS COMPILED FROM LISTINGS rN THE GENERAL ARE. OF PROJECT AND
DOES NOT INDICATE THE TOTAL AVAILABLE HOUSING IN HIGH POINT.
14. ALAN ROTHROCK / 0-4-10-95
c,
Re l cation .went
Date t Annroved by
`?•.: s - a•.,:e c,?o Date
Ontiinal c 1 Copy State Relocation Aceot
2 Copp Area Relocation deice
=RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
El E.I.S. = CORRIDOR = DESIGN
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
PROJECT: 1 9.8071087 COUNTY I GUILFORD I Alternate A4 of 4 Alternates
1. D. NO.: U-2536 C F.A. PROJECT N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: I FRONT EASTCHESTER TO CENTENNIAL ST.. 4 LANE DIVIDED VVTTH
SHOULDER SECTION
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of i i
I
Dis lacees Owners I Tenants Total Minorities 15 25N t 25-35\1 I 35-50hi I 50 UP
0-151
Individuals I 01 1 1 1 0 01 1 1 01 0 0
Families 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0' 0
Businesses 0 I C 0 0 VALUE OF DWELLLNG DSS DWELUNG AVAIULBLE
Farms j 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit I 0 1 0 0 0 0-20-.7t 0 s 0.150 I 0 0-20NI j 1 $ 0-1501 3
ANSWER ALL UESUONS 20-40s1 0 I 150-250 j 0 20-40,M I 18 150-250 j 11
Yes No Exp lain all "YES" answers. 40-70M 1 1 250-400 ? 2 40-701.1 i 32 25aa00 25
j X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary'' 70-100M 0 400-600 I 0 70-100.1 39 , 400-600 I 17
j X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 LT 1 0 ; 600 LT , 0 100 UPI 40 I 600 uP j 2
....................
displacement'
TOTAL j 1 2 130 58
X j 3. Will business services still be available after RENLUZICS Res and b Number)
project`:' 3. NO BUSINESSES ARE AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT.
X d. Will anv business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of 6. LOCAL REALTORS, HIGH POINT NILS, NEWSPAPERS
employees, minorities, etc. AND VISUAL SURVEY.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
X 6. Source for available housing (list). S. WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AS NECESSARY.
I X 7. Will additional housing programs needed?
X , S. Should Last Resort Housing be considered'' 9. IT IS POSSIBLE TIIAT THERE MAYBE SOME LARGE
X I 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc. FAMILIES, SOME ELDERLY AND DISABLED AFFECTED
families? BY THIS PROJECT. HONE EVER, NO LARGE NUMBERS
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? ARE EXPECTED.
X 11. Is public housing available?
X j 12. Is it felt tliere will be adequate DSS housing 11. HIGH POINT HOUSING AUTHORITY.
housing available during relocation period?
X 13. Will there be a problem of housing ?iithin 12. YES, AS INDICATED BY THE AVAILABLE HOUSING
financial means? LIST.
X j 11. Are suitable business sites available (list
source). 14. SEE ITEM #6.
15. Number months estimated to complete
7-
RELOCATION? 11
1
'NOTE - AVAI LABLE IiOt!SING LIST WAS COMPILED FROM LISTINGS IN THE GENERAL AREA OF PROJECT A-ND
DOES NOT rNDICATE THE TOTAL AVAILABLE I10USING IN IIIGII POINT.
H. ALAN ROTHROCI`
Relocation A--erit Date Approved by Date
F- IS} F.1-i i 1G
OnRina & I Copy: ante tceiocanon Agent
2 Copt Area Relocation Otfice
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS
It is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable replacement
housing will be available prior to construction of state and
federally-assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina Board of
Transportation has the following three programs to minimize the
inconvenience of relocation:
* Relocation Assistance,
* Relocation Moving Payments, and
* Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement.
With the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be
available to assist displacees with information such as availability and
prices of homes, apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing
or other housing programs. The Relocation Moving Payments Program, in
general, provides for payment of actual moving expenses encountered in
relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or tenant to purchase
or rent property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing arrange-
ment (in cases of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments
or Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to $22,500 to owners who are
eligible and qualify and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and
qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in
accordance with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), and/or the
North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-5 through 133-18). The
program is designed to provide assistance to displaced persons in reloca-
ting to a replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one
relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced families,
individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations for
relocation assistance advisory services without regard to race, color,
religion, sex, or national origin. The NCDOT will schedule its work to
allow ample time, prior to displacement, for negotiations and possession
of replacement housing which meets decent, safe, and sanitary standards.
The displacees are given at least a 90-day written notice after NCDOT pur-
chases the property. Relocation of displaced persons will be offered in
areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and
commercial facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement property will
be within the financial means of the families and individuals displaced
and will be reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The
relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses,
non-profit organizations, and farm operations in searching for and moving
to replacement property.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will
receive an explanation regarding all available options, such as (1)
purchase of replacement housing, (2) rental of replacement housing, either
private or public, or (3) moving existing owner-occupant housing to
another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply
information concerning other state or federal programs offering assistance
to displaced persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in
order to minimize hardships to displaced persons in adjusting to a new
location.
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the dis-
placee for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses,
non-profit organizations, and farm operations acquired for a highway
project. Under the Replacement Program for Owners, NCDOT will participate
in reasonable incidental purchase payments for replacement dwellings such
as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals, and other closing costs and, if
applicable, make a payment for any increased interest expenses for
replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to owner-occupants for replacement
housing payments, increased interest payments, and incidental purchase
expenses may not exceed $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last
Resort Housing provision.
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed
$5,250, to rent a replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, includ-
ing incidental expenses, on the purchase of a replacement dwelling. The
down payment is based upon what the state determines is required when the
rent supplement exceeds $5250.
It is a policy of the state that no person will be displaced by the
NCOOT's state or federally-assisted construction projects unless and until
comparable replacement housing has been offered or provided for each
displacee within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement. No
relocation payment received will be considered as income for the purposes
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining
eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistance
under the Social Security Act or any other federal law.
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing
is not available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's finan-
cial means, and the replacement payment exceeds the federal/state legal
limitation. The purpose of the program is to allow broad latitudes in
methods of implementation by the state so that decent, safe, and sanitary
replacement housing can be provided. It is not felt that this program
will be necessary on the project, since there appear to be adequate
opportunities for relocation within the area.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REKY REFER TO November 23, 1994
Planning Division
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:

t
94
This is in response to your letter of August 8, 1994, requesting
our comments on the initiation of the study for "High Point,
Intermediate Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue),
Guilford County, State Project No. 9.8071087, TIP No. U-2536"
(Regulatory Branch Action I.D. No. 199404320).
Our comments involve impacts to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
projects, flood plains, and other environmental aspects, primarily
waters and wetlands. The roadway does not cross any Corps-
constructed flood control or navigation project. Enclosed are our
comments on the other issues.
We appreciate
can be of further
contact us.
the opportunity to comment on this project. If we
assistance to you, please do not hesitate to
Sincerely,
?J L ~
Wilbert V. Paynes
Acting Chief, Planning Division
Enclosure
November 23, 1994
Page 1 of 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
"High Point, Intermediate Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson
Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue),
Guilford County, State Project No. 9.8071087, TIP No. U-2536" (Regulatory
Branch Action I.D. No. 199404320)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC - Bobby L. Willis, Plan Formulation and Flood Plain
Services Branch, at [phone]
The proposed project is sited in High Point, ::high participates In the
National Flood Insurance Program. From a review of the November 1979 High
Point Flood Insurance Rate Map, Part A of the planned roadway appears to
come close to the flood plain of an unnamed stream which has been mapped
approximately. Part C of the planned roadway appears to cross the detailed
study reach of Stream No. 20, which has 100-year flood elevations determined
and a floodway defined. We suggest that you coordinate with High Point for
compliance with their flood plain ordinance and possible revision to their
flood insurance maps and report. Also, Executive Order 11988 should be
complied with.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - John Thomas, Raleigh Field Office, Regulatory
Branch, at [phone], Extension 25
Department of the Army permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of
'the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge
of excavated or fill material in waters of the United States or any adjacent
and/or isolated wetlands in conjunction with your proposed improvements,
including disposal of construction debris. On February 6, 1990, the
Department of the Army and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signed
a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to determine the
type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act
Section 404.0 M ) Guidelines. Under this MO/?, "first, impacts to waters and
wetlands should be avoided or minimized through the selection of the least
damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical
steps to minimize impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating
for any remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and
practical." When final plans for the Intermediate Loop US 311 are complete,
including the extent and location of any work within waters of the United
States and wetlands, our Regulatory Branch would appreciate the opportunity
to review those plans for a project-specific determination of Department of
the Army permit requirements. Should you have any questions, please contact
Mr. Thomas.
United States Department of the Interior
FIST i AND N? ILDLIFE SERVICE
Ecological Services
Post Office Egos 33726
Raleigh, Forth Carolina 27636:3726
October 11, 1994
Mr. H. Franklin Vick
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
N. C. Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
1

Subject: High Point, Intermediate Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to
Johnson Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471
(Montlieu Avenue), Guilford county, TIP No. U-2536.
Dear Mr. Vick:
This responds to your letter of August 8, 1994 requesting information from the
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on evaluating the potential
environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. This report provides
scoping information and is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
Preliminary planning by NCDOT calls for constructing a multilane facility on
new location. The project is divided into two, disjunct parts: (1) from US
311 to Johnson Street and (2) from NC 68 to SR 1471. These two projects would
constitute part of the High Point Intermediate Loop. The loop section between
the two, proposed sections is under construction. Several design alternatives
for the proposed sections are under consideration. These cross section
designs include five-lane curb and gutter, five-lane with shoulder, four-lane
divided with curb and gutter, and four-lane divided with shoulder.
The Service's review of any environmental document would be greatly
facilitated if it contained the following information:
1. A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within existing and
required additional rights-of-way and any areas, such as borrow areas,
which may be affected directly or indirectly by the proposed project.
2. A list of the wetland types which will be impacted. Wetland types
should follow the wetland classification scheme of the National Wetlands
Inventory. This list should also give the acreage of each wetland type
to be affected by the project as determined by the Federal Manual for
Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
3. Engineering techniques which will be employed for designing and
constructing any wetland crossings and/or relocated stream channels
along with the linear feet of any water courses to be relocated.
4. The cover types of upland areas and the acreage of each type which would
be impacted by the proposed project.
, I v_ . iv
Mitigation measures which will be employed to avoid, eliminate, reduce,
or compensate for upland and wetlands habitat impacts associated with
the project. These measures should include plans for replacing
unavoidable wetland losses.
The environmental impacts which are likely to occur after construction
as a direct result of the proposed project (secondary impacts) and an
assessment of the extent to which the proposed project will add to
similar environmental impacts produced by other, completed projects in
the area (cumulative impacts).
The attached page shows that no Federally-listed endangered or threatened
species are known to occur in Guilford County at the present time. However,
we encourage NCDOT to consider conducting surveys for the two candidate
species, nestronia (Nestronia umbellula), a colonial shrub, and the Greensboro
burrowing crayfish (Cambarus catagius). Candidate species are species being
considered by the Service for listing as endangered or threatened but not yet
the subject of a proposed rule. These species are not legally protected under
the Act or subject to its provisions, including section 7, until formally
proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. New data could result in the
formal listing of a candidate species. This change would place the species
under the full protection of the Endangered Species Act, and necessitate
surveys if its status in the project corridor is unknown. Therefore, it would
be prudent for the project to avoid any potential adverse impact to candidate
species or their habitat. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should
be contacted for information on species under State protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please
continue to advise us of the progress of this project, including your official
determination of the impacts of this project. If our office can supply any
additional information or clarification, please contact Howard Hall, the
biologist reviewing this project, at 919-856-4520 (ext. 27).
Sincerely yours,
L.K. "Mike" Gantt
Supervisor
REVISED SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
Guilford County
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for
listing as endangered or threatened, are under status review by the Service.
These "Candidate" (C1 and C2) species are not legally protected under the
Act, and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. We
are providing the below list of candidate species which may occur within the
project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification.. These
species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be protected
under the Act. In the meantime, we would appreciate anything you might do
for them.
Nestronia (Nestronia umbellula) - C2
Greensboro burrowing crayfish (Cambarus catagius) - C2
M206 ?G E V
U? 2 9 1994
Z u\.l"sIGN OF
HIG
MAILED TC: FNVIRON%
NORTH CARCLINA STATE CL=ARINGHuUSE
DEPARTMENT CF ACMINISTRATI3N
116 WEST JCNES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 2760`90C!3
Dr_MENT CF RECEIPT
FROM:
N.C. DEPT- OF TRANSPORTATION
FRANK VICK
PLANNING 6 ENV. ;RANCH
TRANSPORTATICN BL0G--/INTER-2FFICE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
MS- JEANETTE FURNEY
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
STATE CLE7ARINGHOUSE
SCOPING - PRCPOSED IMPRCVEMENTS TC THE INTERMEDIATE LCCP IN
HIGH PCINT FROM US 311 (N. MAIN ST-) TC JCHNSCN STREET AND FROM
NC 68 (EASTCHESTER DR.) TO SR 1471 (MONTLIEU AVE) TIP aU-2536
TYPE - SCOPING
THE N.C. STATE CLEARINGHCUSE HAS RECEIVED THE ABCVF PRCJECT FCR
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED STATE
APPLICATION NUMBER 95E42200110. PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER, WITH ALL
INQUIRIES CP. CORRESPONDENCE WITH THIS OFFICE.
REVIEW OF THIS PRCJECT SHOULD B= COMPLETED CN CR BEFCRE 10/19/94.
SHOULD YCU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL [phone].
'M206
NCR7H CARCLINA STATE CLrARINGHCUS_
r=PARTMENT CF ACMINISTR:,TICN
116 WEST JCN-S STR='T
PALcIGH NORTH CAROLINA 276C3-8003
ACKNC'WLEDGEMENT CF RECEIPT
MAILED TO:
-N-C• DEPT. CF TRANSPORTATION
FRANK VICK
PLANNING E ENV. BRANCH
TRANSPCRTATICN BLDG./INTER-3FFICE
FROM:
MS. JEANETTE FURNEY
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
STATE CLEARINSHOUSE
PROJECT DESCRIPTICN:
SCOPING - PRCPCSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERMEDIATE LOCP IN
HIGH POINT FR.CM US 311 (N. MAIN ST.) TC JCHNSCN STREET AND FROM
NC 68 (EASTCHESTER DR.) TO SR 1471 (MCNTLIEU AVE) TIP #U-2536
TYPE - SCOPING
THE N.C• STATE CLEARINGHOUSE HAS RECEIVFD THE ABCVE PROJECT FOR
INTERGCVERNMENTAL REVIEW. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED STATE
APPLICATICN NUMBF? 95E42200110. PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER WITH ALL
INQUIRIES CR CORRESPONDENCE WITH THIS OFFICE.
REVIEW OF THIS PR,CJECT SHOULD BE COMPLETED ON OR BEFORE 10/19/94.
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL [phone].
1
't' 2 3 1994
x
2 DIVISICN OF
HIGHWAYS
? 7RON %
Z \11
3 1 f i _??
z
North Carolina Z
Department of Administlratlo
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
October 19, 1994
Mr. Franklin Vick
N.C. Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
Highway Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:

O
/sica
G,c
C
.. A
RE: SCH File #95-E-4220-0110; Scoping - Proposed Improvements
to the Intermediate Loop in High Point from US 311 to
Johnson Street and from NC 68 to SR 1471 (TIP #U-2536)
The above referenced environmental impact information has been
reviewed through the State Clearinghouse under the provisions of
the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing
this document which identify issues to be addressed in the
environmental review document. For compliance with the North
Carolina Environmental Policy Act the appropriate document
should be forwarded to the State Clearinghouse for environmental
review. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 733-7232.
Sincerely,

Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region G
116 West Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 • Telephone [phone]
State Courier 51-01-00
An Equal opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs /James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DE H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Henry M. Lancaster II, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee"
Project Review Coordinator
RE: 95-0110 - Scoping Improvements to High Point
Intermediate Loop, Guilford County
DATE: October 12, 1994
The Department of Environment, Health, and
has reviewed the proposed scoping notice. The
list and describe information that is necessary
to evaluate the potential environmental impacts
More specific comments will be provided during
review.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
encouraged to notify our commenting divisic
assistance is needed.
attachments
Natural Resources
attached comments
for our divisions
of the project.
the environmental
The applicant is
ns if additional

P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Eauol Opportunity Affirmative Achcn Employer 50°b recycled; 10°0host-consumer peper

inter t\ncncy Projc::: r\cview L,\1cspo1iSC

;f r?». U53f/ 1c
'{!S'?1 _
roic•.:c Nzn . ??,N ?h??nzzc?ca? ?n ! ypc of Projccc . 5
- The applicant should be advised that pians and specifications ;:c,r all Nvar.e:* system:
---' improvements must be approved by the Division. of Environmer>.tal Hcalch.prior to.the award
of a contract or the initiation of construction (as requ -ed by !5A NCAC 1"C .0300 et. seq.).
For information, concacu the Public WAier Supply Se-cion, [phone].
- This project will be classified as a non-community ouc'ic water supply and must comply with
r
?
t-? state and federal drinking water monitoring requirements. For more information the applicant
should contact the Public Wacer Supple Section, (915'! 733.2321.
--, If this project is constructed as proposed; we will recc:-nmend closure of feet of adjacent
r
! - waters to the harvest of shellfish. For information -!gardin? the shellfish sar.itacion orogr?
m, the applicant should concacc the Shellfish SanicatiDn'Branch at [phone].
-? The spoil disposal area(s) proposed for this project ma..- roduce a mosquito breeding problem.
For information concerning appropriate mosqu'zo :oncrol measures, the applicant -should`
concacc the Public Tiealth Pest Management Section : [phone].
The applicant should 'cc advised '.hat prior to the -e noval or demolition o{ dilapidate-;
t---- scnsccures, an extensive rodtr.r control program rna. to necessary in order- to pr°venc che
migration of the -;;dents tr-) ?id;zcenr areas. The :.. o? cation ccncernin; rodent col, -1-0!
contact the local heaiuh 6epai,.nent cr r.he Public L _:,ith Pest N/lanagernenc Secu:icr, ac (919)
733-6407.
-? The applicant should be advised to contact the l:cai health departn.enc regarding their
?-? requirements for septic tank installations (as require- under 15A NCAC IoA .1900 et. se,.).
f
For inrormacio.n concerning septic tank and other o-. sae waste disposal rnet!-iods) concacc the
On-Site Wastewater Section ac (919)
--- The applicant should be advised to concrocr. ch-_ loca. catch deuar-trnenc regarding the saniCar
i
i
-- facili:ics rcquired [or ckis project.
If ex iSL inr, water sines will be relocated dur;n,? c`.,_ _onscruccion, plans for the w,,cer i:ne
relocation rnusr. be submitted ro the Div,sron of En' .:cnm ntal i-{cal.th, Public Wacer Suooly
cceiu:?, Plan Rcwi w hranch. '...'.i0 St. k4a;v'< St ec' ;Ici9,h, Ncrth Carolina, (919) 733-; :tin.
/_7
Zeviewer Seccion/Branch / ate
State of North Carolina Reviewing Office:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS I Proj tc Number* I Due Date:
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
O tions re ardin these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
ues g g
All applications. information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same
Normal Process
Regional Office. Time
(statutory time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS limit)
Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
? facilities, sewer system extensions. b sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging. into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 clays
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to
? discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment tacility•granted after NPDES. Reply (NIA)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPOES
permit•whichever is later.
30 days
Water Use Permit Pre•aciplicatlon technical conference usually necessary
N/A
)
I
7 days
Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued
prior to the installation of a well.
(15 days)
Aocllcatlon copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre•acolicatfon conference usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of 190 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days
r1
lJ facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.060 NIA (90 days)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 20.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A 60 days
NCAC 20 0525 Nruch requires notification and removal N•A
prior to demolition Contact Asbestos Control Group
919.733 0820 tGC daysi
Complex Source Permit recuired under 15A NCAC 20 0800
Tne Sedimentation Poilution Control Act of 1973 must be property acoress2d for any land Cist.uroing activity An erosion secimenla::o
control pion vill be required if one or more acres to be distureec. Dian filed win procer Regional Office ILdnd Oualil•/ Sac: 1 at 'east 20 2' davs
davs before Tecinnmo activity A fee of $30 for the first acre and 520 CO for each accirional acre or dart must accomdanv tnN pi-in i;0 'Jays,
r'1
1 The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed win respect to Ine referrenced Local Ordinance (30 days)
On-site inspection usual, Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bona amount
Mining Permit varies Nith type mine and number of acres of affected lane Any area 20 days
mined greater than one acre mus: be permiled The abproonate bond t60 daysi
must be received before the oermii can be issued.
f'1 North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
L? exceeds 4 days (N/Al
Special Ground Gearance Burning Permit 22 On site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "it more 1 day
LJ counties in coastal N C. with organic soils than live acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections INIA)
snould be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned.'
90.120 days
Oil Refining Facilities NIA (N/A)
If permit required. application 60 days before begin construction
Applicant must hire .14 C. qualified engineer to, prepare plans 2_0 clays
l_! Oarn Sdtety Permit inspect construction. certify construction is according to cHNR approv
ed plans May also require permit under mosquito control program. Ana 160 :%+ys)
a 4-: permit from Corps at Engineers. An inspection of site is neces
sary to verity Hazard Ciassificat:On A minimurn lee o' S"^i000 must ac
company the application An acCihonal prOCessmg :r?e pales] on a
or ;ha '0!3. drmel:! COS: 'Nil/ Ce re0 u.r.?C •.dOn ]Om Oie.On
Normal Process
Time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
?
Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well File surety bond of $5.000 with EHNR running to Slate of N.C.
conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations. 10 days
((?/A)

? Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with EHNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit
Application by letter. No standard application form. 10 days
(NIA)
St
L
? ate
akes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must Include
descriptions d drawings of structure & proof of ownership
of riparian property. 15.20 days
(NIA)
401 Water Ouality Certification NIA 60 days
• (130 days)
? CAMA Permit for MAJOR development 55 days
$250.00 fee must accompany application (150 days)
? days
CAMA Permit for MINOR development $50.00 fee must accompany application F(222
5 days)
? Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please nolify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey. Box 27687, Raleigh. N.C. 27611
? Abandonment of any wells, if required, must be in accordance with Title 15A. Subchapter 2C.0100.
I i Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered Curing any excavation operation.
? Compliance with 15A NCAC 21-1.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. 45 days
(NIA)
« Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority(:
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville
NC 28801 Suite 714 Wachcvia Building
,
[phone] Fayetteville. NC 28301
(919) 486.15.11
? Mooresville Regional Office ? R
l
i
R

919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville
NC 28115 a
gh
e
egional Office
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101
,
[phone] Ralei
(919) h. NC 27609
(919) 73327 t:
? Washington Regional Office ?r?11
L_ Wilmington Regional office
1424 Carolina Avenue 127 Cardinal Drive E(:unsion
Washington. NC 27889 Wilmington. NIC 28405
[phone] (919) 395.39CO
U Winston-Salem Reg enai Office
8025 North Point Blvd.
Suite 100
Winston Salem. NC in6
[phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 7, 1994
A X IV,
'T4j'o 0
1816A
IN mm., 7r? ?m
DEHNR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative Affairs
FROM: Monica Swihary' Water Quality Planning
SUBJECT: Project Review #95-0110; Scoping Comments - NC DOT
Proposed Improvements to High Point Intermediate Loop
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The
stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it
is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be
revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to
be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.
G. Wetland Impacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Summarize the total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from
DEM.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Melba McGee
October 7, 1994
Page 2
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas
should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the
contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable) ?
J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques
alleviate the traffic problems in the study area?
K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the
environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the
following:
1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after
wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible.
2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of
mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same watershed
is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation.
3. Mitigation should be in the following order:
restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking.
Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued
until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on Actions
During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents DEM from
issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of Decision
(ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the document. If
the 401 Certification application is submitted for review prior to
issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended that the applicant
state that the 401 will not be issued until the applicant informs
DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed by the Department.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under
our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require
written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be
denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to
the maximum extent practicable.
10715er.mem
cc: Eric Galamb
r Z-4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and N
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin, Governor PROJECT REVIEW COMIENTS
William W. Cobey, Jr., secretary
Project Number: county: L"/
C?
.; DECEIVED
DEHNR
Allr, ? 7 lg94
d Re ces
ii
LAND QUALITY RC" 7,',_
Charles H. C 'dnei•-
I
Project Name:
Geodetic Survey
_,?This project will impact -3 geodetic survey markers. N. C. Geodetic
Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at [phone].
Reviewer /,
' ),( Date
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
No comment
This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
? The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at [phone].
71
Reviewer Date
P.O. Box 27687 • R.ilelgh. N.C. 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunlty Affirmative Action Employer
I'Jl,lUrl- . 1-t-r , r HLL;7 LHI\ t I tL --11 1 - =+:,:: ,'J
111- t t) h 1-14 1 t_i :Ill h, N 1-1 . 11.1 1 P. 1.1 .'
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 276044188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO. Mclba McGee
Office of Policy Development, DEHNR
FROM : David Cox, Highway Project CootA.02: /
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: October 6, 1994
SUBJECT: Request for information from the N. C. Department
of Transportation (NCDOT) regarding fish and
wildlife concerns for the High Point Intermediate
Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson
Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR
1471 (Montlieu Avenue), Guilford County, North
Carolina, TIP No. U-2535, SCH Project No. 95-0110.
This memorandum responds to a request from Mr. H.
Franklin Vick of the NCDOT for our r_ortr..Prna regarding
impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the
subject project. Biologists on the staff of the N. C.
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
proposed project, and our comments are provider] in
accordance with provisions of the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 et seq., as amts nded; 1
NCAC 2 5) .
The NCWRC has no specific recommendations or concerns
regarding the subject project at this time. 'ro hell)
facilitate document preparation, our general informational
needs are outlined below:
Description of fishery and wildlife resources
within the project area, including a listing of
federally or state designated threatened,
endangered, or special concern sp,-uies. PoLential
borrow areas to be used for project construction
should be included in the inventories. A listing
1`ILWt, . rlt _t- , r HLL::- LHh t UI L UQ V4 1 V. UQ "U . Vy i r . Q4
Memo Page 2 October 6, 1994
of designated plant species can be developed
through consultation with:
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and R.ecroati.on
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
and,
Cecil C. Frost, CoordinatoL'
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. 0. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611,
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by
the project. The need for channelizing or
relocating portions of streams crossed and the
extent of such activities.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted
by the project. Wetland acreages should include
all project-related areas that may undergo
hydrologic change as a result of ditching, other
drainage, or tilling for project construction.
Wetland identification may be accomplished through
coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE). If the COE is not consulted, the
person delineating wetlands should be identified
and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland
wildlife habitat impacted by the proposed project.
Potential borrow sites should be included.
S. The extent to which the project will result in
loss, degradation, or fragmentation of wildlife
habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation; for avoiding, minimizing or
compensating for direct and indireco degradation
in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which
analyzes the environmental effects of highway
construction and quantifies the contribution of
this individual project to environmental
degradation.
8. A discussion of the probable iaya=S on natural
resources which will result from secondary
Memo Page 3 October 6, 1994
development facilitated by the improved road
access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be
coordinated with other state, municipal, or
private development projects, a description of
these projects should be included in the
environmental document, and all project sponsors
should be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the
early planning stages for this project, If I can further
assist your office, please contact me at [phone].
CC: Larry Warlick, District 5 Wildlife Biologist
Shari Bryant, District 5 Fisheries Biologist
Randy Wilson, Nongame/Endangered Species Section Mgr.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Re
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Bettv Ray McCain, Secretarv
?CE4?-
OCT 13 1994
Aurces
C C1i!/ISIC"10
HIGHWAY;:
??LII ON%V1 "
Divisio ves and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
October 11, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook
Deputy State 1-4istoric Preservation Officer t?
SUBJECT: High Point Intermediate Loop from US 311 to
Johnson Street, Guilford County, U-2536,
9.8071087, 95-E-4220-0110
We have received information concerning the above project from the State
Clearinghouse.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no National Register-
listed properties located within the planning area. However, High Point College
Historic District is located in the area of potential effect for the project. In
February 1989, the historic district was determined eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places during Section 106 compliance for a federally
funded project.
These comments are made in accord with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive Order
XVI. If you have any questions regarding them, please contact Renee Gledhill-
Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: State Clearinghouse
B. Church
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, ;north Carolina 27601-2807
n r
?it:R of `fpi44 'Voint
Wvrt4 c urc1Tna
REBECCA R. SMOTHERS
MAYOR
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, N. C. 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:

,q 1 5 1994
August 11, 1994
I would like to thank you for your letter of August 8, 1994
concerning the High Point Intermediate Loop, TIP Project No.
U-2536. As you know, this is a much needed project and we
have certainly worked to expedite it through right-of-way
reservation and dedication. We have forwarded most of our
information to Mr. Mark Reep, P. E.
A portion of this project is within the Oak Hollow Watershed
and special efforts need to be made to protect the water
quality. We would like to suggest that the cross section
between old Winston Road to Johnson Street, and NC 68 to
Centennial Street be four-lane divided with a shoulder. This
would match the section currently under construction, as well
as help with protecting the water quality. The section
between Centennial Street to Lexington Avenue should be
four-lane divided with curb and gutter. I am not aware of
any other environmental impacts of this project.
We will continue to assist the NCDOT with this project, while
at the same time push to move the timetable up in order for
our citizens to receive the benefits as soon as possible.
Thank you for your interest in this particular project.
Sincerely,
Rebecca R. Smothers, Mayor
City of High Point
PW:dwn
P. O. BOX 230, 211 SOUTH HAMILTON STREET, HIGH POINT, N. C. 27261 [phone], FAX [phone]
TDD _: 919.063-8517
TABLE Al
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION
JOB: U-2536, Intermediate Loop Guilford County RUN: Intermediate Loop BUILD 1999
DATE: 01/25/1995 TIME: 13:20:49.48
SITE 6 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
VS = .0 CM/S
U - 1.0 M/S
LINK VARIABLES
LINK DESCRIPTION
VD - .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
CLAS - 5 (E) ATIM - 60. MINUTES MIXH - 400. M AMB - 1.9 PPM
LINK COORDINATES (M) LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
X1 Y1 X2 Y2 (M) (DEC) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
1. Loop NB APPR 5.5 -304.8 5.5 .0
2. Loop NB QUE 5.5 -11.0 5.5 -59.5
3. Loop NBLT QUE .0 -11.0 .0 -96.0
4. Loop NB DEP 5.5 .0 5.5 304.8
5. Loop SB APPR -5.5 304.8 -5.5 .0
6. Loop SB QUE -5.5 11.0 -5.5 37.8
7. Loop SBLT QUE .0 11.0 .0 58.5
8. Loop SB DEP -5.5 .0 -5.5 -304.8
9. US 70A EB APP -304.8 -5.5 .0 -5.5
10. US 70A EB QUE -11.0 -5.5 -41.7 -5.5
11. US 70A EBLT QUE -11.0 .0 -47.6 .0
12. US 70A EB DEP .0 -5.5 304.8 -5.5
13. US 70A WB APPR 304.6 5.5 .0 5.5
14. US 70A WB QUE 11.0 5.5 61.4 5.5
15. US 70A WELT QUE 11.0 .0 47.3 .0
16. US 70A WB DEP .0 5.5 -304.8 5.5
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

COORDINATE S (M)
RECEPTOR X Y Z
• 1. REC 191 (NW CORNER) -129.5 30.5
2. REC 193 (SW CORNER) -15.2 -205.7
3. REC 194 (SE CORNER) 15.2 -19.8
4. REC 190 (NE CORNER) 30.5 39.6
MODEL RESULTS
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
305. 360. AG 820. 13.6 .0 13.4
49. 180. AG 1416. 100.0 .0 7.3 .60 6.1
85. 180. AG 934. 100.0 .0 3.7 1.33 14.2
305. 360. AG 1070. 13.6 .0 13.4
305. 180. AG 1070. 13.6 .0 13.4
27. 360. AC 1001. 100.0 .0 7.3 .43 4.5
48. 360. AG 726. 100.0 .0 3.7 .80 7.9
305. 180. AG 820. 13.6 .0 13.4
305. 90. AG 680. 13.6 .0 13.4
31. 270. AG 1418. 100.0 .0 7.3 .56 5.1
37. 270. AG 676. 100.0 .0 3.7 .97 6.1
305. 90. AG 970. 13.6 .0 13.4
305. 270. AG 970. 13.6 .0 13.4
50. 90. AG 1385. 100.0 .0 7.3 .80 8.4
36. 90. AG 859. 100.0 .0 3.7 .92 6.0
305. 270. AG 680. 13.6 .0 13.4
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
WIND ANGLE RANCE: 1.-360.
WIND ' CONCENTRATION
ANGLE ' (PPM)
(DECR)' REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4
------'------------------------
MAX 5.0 4.9 10.9 7.6
DECR. • 107 7 288 199
TABLE A2
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION
JOB: U-2536, Intermediate Loop Guilford County RUN: Intermediate Loop BUILD 2004
DATE: 01/25/1995 TIME: 13:21:28.14
SITE 6 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
VS - .0 CM/S
U - 1.0 M/S
T. TIDY VADTAnr cc
LINK DESCRIPTION
VD . .0 CM/S ZO - 108. CM
CLAS - 5 (E) ATIM - 60. MINUTES
LINK COORDINATES (M)
X1 Y1 X2 Y2
MIXH - 400. M AMD - 1.9 PPM
LENGTH BRr, TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
(M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
1. Loop NB APPR 5.5 -304.8 5.5 .0
2. Loop NB QUE 5.5 -11.0 5.5 -81.8
3. Loop NBLT QUE .0 -11.0 .0 -193.1
4. Loop NB DEP 5.5 .0 5.5 304.8
5. Loop SB APPR -5.5 304.8 -5.5 .0
6. Loop SB QUE -5.5 11.0 -5.5 44.9
7. Loop SBLT QUE .0 11.0 .0 85.8
8. Loop SB DEP -5.5 .0 -5.5 -304.8
9. US 70A ER APP -304.8 -5.5 .0 -5.5
10. US 70A EB QUE -11.0 -5.5 -46.9 -5.5
11. US 70A EBLT QUE -11.0 .0 -89.5 .0
12. US 70A EB DEP .0 -5.5 304.8 -5.5
13. US 70A WB APPR 304.8 5.5 .0 5.5
14. US 70A WB QUE 11.0 5.5 85.5 5.5
15. US 70A WBLT QUE 11.0 .0 118.7 .0
16. US 70A WB DEP .0 5.5 -304.8 5.5
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR X Y Z
1. REC 191 (NW CORNER) -129.5 30.5 1.8
2. REC 193 (SW CORNER) -15.2 -205.7 1.8
3. REC 194 (SE CORNER) 15.2 -19.8 1.8
4. REC 190 (NE CORNER) 30.5 39.6 1.8
MODEL RESULTS
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
305. 360. AG 1003. 11.2 .0 13.4
71. 180. AG 1201. 100.0 .0 7.3 .95 11.8
182. 180. AG 808. 100.0 .0 3.7 2.11 30.3
305. 360. AG 1320. 11.2 .0 13.4
305. 180. AG 1320. 11.2 .0 13.4
34. 360. AG 843. 100.0 .0 7.3 .53 5.7
75. 360. AG 629. 100.0 .0 3.7 .99 12.5
305. 180. AG 1003. 11.2 .0 13.4
305. 90. AG 803. 11.2 .0 13.4
36. 270. AG 1201. 100.0 .0 7.3 .63 6.0
79. 270. AG 743. 100.0 .0 3.7 1.06 13.1
305. 90. AG 1125. 11.2 .0 13.4
305. 270. AG 1125. 11.2 .0 13.4
74. 90. AG 1201. 100.0 .0 7.3 .96 12.4
108. 90. AG 743. 100.0 .0 3.7 1.11 17.9
305. 270. AG 803. 11.2 .0 13.4
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 1.-360.
WIND " CONCENTRATION
ANGLE " (PPM)
(DEGR)" REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4
------"------------------------
MAX " 5.4 6.7 10.3 7.6
DEGR. " 102 12 289 195
TABLE A3
CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - MARCH, 1990 VERSION
JOB: U-2536, Intermediate Loop Guilford County RUN: Intermediate Loop BUILD 2019
DATE: 01/25/1995 TIME: 13:23:03.71
SITE 6 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
' VS - .0 CM/S VD - .0 CM/S ZO - 108.
U - 1.0 M/S CLAS - 5 (E) ATIM - 60.
LINK VARIABLES
LINK DESCRIPTION LINK COORDINATES (M)
X1 Y1 X2
CM
MINUTES

Y2

MIXH - 400. M AMB - 1.9 PPM

LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF
(M) (DEG) (G/MI)

H

(M)

W

(M)

/C QUEUE
(VEH)
1. Loop NB APPR 5.5 -304.8 5.5 .0 305. 360. AG 1550. 10.0 .0 13.4
2. Loop NB QUE 5.5 -11.0 5.5 -809.9 799. 180. AG 1109. 100.0 .0 7.3 1.47 133.2
3. Loop NBLT QUE .0 -11.0 .0 -343.2 332. 180. AG 746. 100.0 .0 3.7 3.11 55.4
4. Loop NB DEP 5.5 .0 5.5 304.8 305. 360. AG 2070. 10.0 .0 13.4
5. Loop SB APPR -5.5 304.6 -5.5 .0 305. 180. AG 2070. 10.0 .0 13.4
6. Loop SB QUE -5.5 11.0 -5.5 80.4 69. 360. AG 792. 100.0 .0 7.3 .87 11.6
7. Loop SBLT QUE .0 11.0 .0 740.6 730. 360. AG 587. 100.0 .0 3.7 1.51 121.6
8. Loop SB DEP -5.5 .0 -5.5 -304.8 305. 180. AG 1550. 10.0 .0 13.4
9. US 70A EB APP -304.8 -5.5 .0 -5.5 305. 90. AG 1170. 10.0 .0 13.4
10. US 70A EB QUE -11.0 -5.5 -69.7 -5.5 59. 270. AG 1095. 100.0 .0 7.3 .87 9.8
11. US 70A EBLT QUE -11.0 .0 -335.7 -.1 325. 270. AG 666. 100.0 .0 3.7 1.38 54.1
12. US 70A EB DEP .0 -5.5 304.6 -5.5 305. 90. AG 1590. 10.0 .0 13.4
13. US 70A WB APPR 304.8 5.5 .0 5.5 305. 270. AG 1590. 10.0 .0 13.4
14. US 70A WB QUE 11.0 5.5 776.0 5.7 765. 90. AG 1135. 100.0 .0 7.3 1.48 127.5
15. US 70A WBLT QUE 11.0 .0 313.0 .1 302. 90. AG 686. 100.0 .0 3.7 1.44 50.3
16. US 70A WB DEP .0 5.5 -304.8 5.5 305. 270. AG 1170. 10.0 .0 13.4
RE CEPTOR LOCATIONS
COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR X Y Z
1. REC 191 (NW CORNER) -129.5 30.5 1.8
2. REC 193 (SW CORNER) -15.2 -205.7 1.8
' 3. REC 194 (SE CORNER) 15.2 -19.8 1.8
4. REC 190 (NE CORNER) 30.5 39.6 1.6
MODEL RESULTS WIND ANGLE RANGE: 1.-360.
WIND " CONCENTRATI ON
RE MARKS : In search of the angle corr esponding to ANGLE " (PPM)
the maximum concentration, only the f irst (DEGR)" REC1 REC2 REC3 RE C4
angle, of the angles with same maximum -------- ----------- ----- ---- ---
concentrations, is indicated as maximum. MAX 6.6 9.2 11. 1 9.2
DEGR. * 98 15 284 1 90
TABLE N1
HEARING: SOUNDS BOMBARDING US DAILY
140 Shotgun blast, jet 30 m away at takeoff PAIN
Motor test chamber HUMAN EAR PAIN THRESHOLD

130
Firecrackers
120 Severe thunder, pneumatic jackhammer
Hockey crowd
Amplified rock music UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD

110
Textile loom
100 Subway train, elevated train, farm tractor
Power lawn mower, newspaper press
Heavy city traffic, noisy factory LOUD

90
D Diesel truck 65 kmph 15 m away
E BO Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal
C Average factory, vacuum cleaner
I Passenger car 80 kmph 15 m away MODERATELY LOUD

B 70
E Quiet typewriter
L 60 Singing birds, window air-conditioner
S Quiet automobile
Normal conversation, average office QUIET

50
Household refrigerator
Quiet office VERY QUIET

40
Average home
30 Dripping faucet
Whisper 1.5 m away
20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves
AVERAGE PERSON'S THRESHOLD OF HEARING
Whisper JUST AUDIBLE

10
0 THRESHOLD FOR ACUTE HEARING
Sources: World Book, Rand McNally Atlas of the Human Body,
Encyclopedia Americana, "Industrial Noise and Hearing
Conversation" by J. B. Ollshifski and E. R. Harford
(Researched by N. Jane Hunt and published in the Chicago
Tribune in an illustrated graphic by Tom Heinz.)
TABLE N2
NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
Activity
Category Leq(h) Description of Activity Category
A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public
(Exterior) need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to
serve its intended purpose.
B 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels,
(Exterior) hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals.
C 72 Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above.
(Exterior)
D -- Undeveloped lands
E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and
(Interior) auditoriums.
Source: Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772, U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration
DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
Existing Noise Level Increase in dBA from Existing Noise
in Leq(h) Levels to Future Noise Levels
< 50 > 15
> 50 > 10
Source: North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Guidelines.
TABLE N3
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
(Leq)
Intermediate Loop
From US 311 to Johnson St. and From NC 68 to SR 1471
State Project N 9.8071087, TIP N U-2536
NOISE
LEVEL
SITE LOCATION DESCRIPTION (dBA)
1. US 311, 125 m South of Hartley Dr Paved 70
2. Johnson Street, 500 m North of NC 68 Paved 66-
3. Eastchester Dr, 50 m South of Lakeview Dr. Grassy 67
4. Centennial St., 600 m South of NC 68 Paved 64
5. Lexington Ave, intersection of College Dr. Grassy 63
6. College Drive at McCain Track Grassy 63
A. Background A, Sunview Ave, 100 m East Grassy 49
of Old Winston Road
Note: The ambient noise level sites were measured at 15 meters from
the center of the nearest lane of traffic.
-- - Ambient noise site was 7.5 meters from the center of the
nearest lane of traffic.
TABLE N5
FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA SUMMARY
Intermediate Loop, From US 311 to Johnson St. and
From NC 68 to SR 1471, Guilford County
State Project M 9.8071087 TIP N U-2536
Maximum Predicted Contour Approximate Number of Impacted
• Leq No ise Levels Dist ances Receptor s According to
dBA (Max imum) Title 23 CFR Part 772
Description 15 m 30 m 60 m 72 dHA 67 dBA A B C D E
Al ternative # 1, 5-Lanes Undivided
1. Beginning of Project to Old Winston Rd. 71 66 61 19 m 37 m 0 0 2 0 0
2. From Old Winston Rd. to Windchase Court 71 66 61 19 m 37 m 0 2 0 0 0
3. From Windchase Court to Johnson St. 71 66 61 19 m 37 m 0 0 0 0 0
4. From NC 68 to SR 1507 73 68 63 25 m 45 m 0 2 0 0 0
5. From SR 1507 to US 70A 73 68 63 25 m 45 m 0 B 1 0 0
6. From US 70A to McCain Track 71 67 62 21 m 40 m 0 1 0 0 0
7. From McCain Track to End 71 67 62 21 m 40 m 0 2 0 0 0
TOTALS 0 15 3 0 0
Alternative N 2, 4-Lanes Divided by a 16' Median
1. Beginning of Project to Old Winston Rd. 71 66 61 19 m 37 m 0 0 2 0 0
2. From Old Winston Rd. to Windchase Court 71 66 61 19 m 37 m 0 7 0 0 0
3. From Windchase Court to Johnson St. 71 66 61 19 m 37 m 0 0 0 0 0
4. From NC 68 to SR 1507 72 68 63 25 m 45 m 0 4 0 0 0

5. From SR 1507 to US 70A 72 68 63 25 m 45 m 0 11 1 0 0
6. From US 70A to McCain Track 71 67 62 21 m 40 m 0 1 0 0 0
7. From McCain Track to End 71 67 62 21 m 40 m 0 2 0 0 0
TOTALS 0 25 3 0 0
NOTES - 1. 15m, 30m, and 60m distances are measured from center of nearest travel lane.
2. 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of proposed roadway.
TABLE N6
TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE SUMMARY
Intermediate Loop, From US 311 to Johnson St. and
From NC 68 to SR 1471, Guilford County
State Project N 9.8071087 TIP N U-2536
Receptor Exterior Noise Level Increases Substantial Impacts I
Section <.0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 >•25 Increases(1) Criteria(
Alternative N 1, 5-Lanes Undivided
1. Beginning of Project to 0 2 0 2 0
Old Winston Rd.
2. Old Winston Rd. to
Windchase Court 0 29 39 21 2
3. Windchase Court to
Johnson St. 2 2 1 1 0
4. NC 68 to SR 1507 0 0 37 0 0
5. SR 1507 to US 70A 0 0 25 26 0
6. US 70A to McCain Track 0 0 0 1 0
7. McCain Track to End 0 0 2 0 0
TOTALS 2 33 104 51 2
Alternative N 2, 4-Lanes Divided by a 16' Median
1. Beginning of Project
to Old Winston Rd. 0 2 0 2 0
2. Old Winston Rd. to
Windchase Court 0 29 39 16 7
3. Windchase Court to
Johnson St. 2 2 1 1 0
4. NC 68 to SR 1507 0 0 37 0 0
5. SR 1507 to US 70A 0 0 25 26 0
6. US 70A to McCain Track 0 0 0 1 0
7. McCain Track to End 0 0 2 0 0
TOTALS 2 33 104 46 7
(1) As defined by only a substan tial increase (See bo ttom of Table N2).
(2) As defined by both criteria in Table N2.
0 0 2 0
0 0 2 2
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 10 2
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 15 4
0 0 2 0
0 0 7 2
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 13 5
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 23 7
October 7, 1994
Oct
t,
HEMBAN2MI
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative Affairs ^y25 3,b
FROM: Monica SwiharteWater Quality Planning
SUBJECT: Project Review #95-0110; Scoping Comments - NC DOT
Proposed Improvements to High Point Intermediate Loop
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The
stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated, it
is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be
revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to
be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.
G. Wetland Impacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Summarize the total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from
DEM.
Melba McGee
October 7, 1994
Page 2
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas
should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the
contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?
J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques
alleviate the traffic problems in the study area?
K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the
environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the
following:
1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after
wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible.
2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of
mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same watershed
is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation.
3. Mitigation should be in the following order:
restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking.
Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued
until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on Actions
During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents DEM from
issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of Decision
(ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the document. If
the 401 Certification application is submitted for review prior to
issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended that the applicant
state that the 401 will not be issued until the applicant informs
DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed by the Department.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required for this project. Applications requesting coverage under
our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will require
written concurrence. Please be aware that 401 Certification may be
denied if wetland impacts have not been avoided and minimized to
the maximum extent practicable.
10715er.mem
cc: Eric Galamb
PW -)
d o. STAR
t? a
i
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TANSPORTATION
JAMBS B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGI IWAYS
(;0VFRN0R RO. BOX 25201, RALEIGI1. N.C. 27611-5201
IZ. SAMUEI. HUNT I I I
SCCRP.IARY
August 8, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: High Point, Intermediate Loop from US 311 (North Main
Street) to Johnson Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester
Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue), Guilford County,
State Project No. 9.8071087, TIP No. U-2536
The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has
begun studying the proposed improvements to the High Point Intermediate Loop.
The project is included in the 1995-2001 North Carolina Transportation
Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way in fiscal year 1997 and
construction in fiscal year 1999.
The project calls for constructing a multilane facility on new location
(refer to the attached vicinity map). The project is divided into two parts:
(1) Part A (from US 311 to Johnson Street) and (2) Part C (from NC 68 to
SR 1471). The middle portion of the Intermediate Loop (U-2536 B) between
Johnson Street and NC 68 is currently under construction. A five-lane and a
four-lane divided cross section will be evaluated as alternatives for the
project. These cross sections are described below.
Location
US 311 (North Main Street) to
Old Winston Road
Old Winston Road to Johnson Street
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to
SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
Cross Section
Five-lane curb and gutter
Five-lane shoulder
Four-lane divided with curb and gutter
Four-lane divided with shoulder
Five-lane curb and gutter
Five-lane curb and gutter
Five-lane shoulder
Four-lane divided with curb and gutter
Four-lane divided with shoulder
K

August 8, 1994
Page 2
SR 1507 (Centennial Street) to
US 70 A (Lexington Avenue)
Five-lane curb and gutter
Four-lane divided with curb and gutter
US 70 A (Lexington Avenue) to
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
Five-lane curb and gutter
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful
in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable,
please identify any permits or approvals which may be required by your agency.
Your comments will be used in the preparation of a state funded Environmental
Assessment. This document will be prepared in accordance with the State
Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency respond by
October 19, 1994 so that your comments can be used in the preparation of this
document.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Mark
Reep, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone].
HFV/plr
Attachment
`WINSTDN-SALEM 14 M1. 'bb 1 /vvvvv rCEL / _.
yo , yep ?'sro ??\ Y? i I=' :??;1 - 'I J \?s m ?W
r1 ?? ?' F•?: • -:?•L 9Da i i ; / \ r'te` :y ? ?;// !II(( J??` / ,-?„) i
r c? ''1 I
3 V-1r,
1 ?8 -5 Y,
?_ w?' U-2536 A ?: f?,? -\; ?I # • G?j,?? ?I ?' /
?' ??•';°> :/..:?,
PROJECT *' o
Con
"Ch
LIMITS ?r,r
U-2536
PROJECT /
LIMITS
?r?MU 0::; laa' "'° °?, • (LEXINGTON AVENUI
/'!-J,?.7 ??'? .\? ? ? ??? C .III ' ? ! \ ? •lt,? I
U / W 1'S 7
?. ?1'.?r W P R AY AVE - J; I' I ?? Wa;hingtorl
Parl
8Z8 f? ( ?\.?t?,pX - ! y1 i. ?,. 'J / m ?1 q - -`..z?/ \ '(_i %?"_-~ '?` ??, • v
% .. a 4U rte. -/'~ r---_,?14'?J' Grecnl•ti -
I atgh ? a
0 7? S?7V pCit =I I;?
I, AST I
.4 '? ? ,?'.,,.? -/° ? ?. / `, ?. ..q.... 806 A ?? f. ?i• .?a ? r ? i
N V,
"?l _• _ ?? -? /;s `8 J I 111 Q1'W? V5 Z
J I PROJECT STUDY
Fa . 'ewe' I -J 1 AREA
f Seh I.
Quadrangle Maps: -_ •?' ?? `? )1'? r?? Proposed Intermediate Loop n
Sa a r? y W A„E from us 311 to Johnson Street and -
high Point East m
from NC 68 to SK 1471
and
! High Point, Guilford County
High Point West ((R)1 TIP No. U-2536 y
------ l lu /. 1i R
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
TO: . OR ROOM, SLOG..-.
REP. 00
+
FROMt REF. NO. OR ROOM. SLOG.:
Arc
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE - ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
- ? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? FER YOUR REQUEST -
- ? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
CI NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
D PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TARE APPROPRIATE ACTION _ ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT,
COMMENTS:
We/ J* ~A-01'y
nil-

A
c... STATE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GovERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
July 25, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Scoping Participants
FROM: Mark L. Reep, P. E.
? .?
Project Planning Engineer
SUBJECT: Intermediate Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to
Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471
(Montlieu Avenue), High Point, Guilford County, State
No. 9.8071087, TIP No. U-2536
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
Johnson
Project
On 7/11/94, a scoping meeting was held for the subject project. The
following people attended the meeting:
Phil Wylie
Kirk Miller
Robin Stancil
Eric Galamb
David Cox
Tom Norman
John Watkins
David Conner
Jerry Snead
Sid Autrey
Keith Johnston
Richard Davis
Linwood Stone
Mark Reep
Danny Rogers
Betty Yancey
John Maddox
Bill Bunting
Jamal Alavi
Ray Moore
Rick Benton
City of High Point City of High Point
Department of Cultural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
NC Wildlife Resources Commission I I
Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation ,
Division 7 Office
Feasibility Studies
Hydraulics ?Q
Location and Surveys
?y?
Photogrammetry
Planning and Environmental
Planning and Environmental Planning and Environmentald h
Program Development )AA
Right of Way
Roadway Design
Roadway Design
Statewide Planning
Structure Design
Traffic Control
The meeting began with a brief project description. The 1995-2001
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) calls for constructing the
Intermediate Loop as a multilane facility on new location. The project is
divided into two parts: Part A (from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson
Street) and Part C (from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu
Avenue)) (refer to the attached vicinity map). The middle portion o'f
Intermediate Loop (U-2536 B) between Johnson Street and NC 68 is currently
under construction.

Memorandum
Page 2
The following design issues were addressed during the meeting:
(1) cross section alternatives, (2) greenway crossing, (3) sidewalks, and
(4) reserved and dedicated right of way.
Five-lane and four-lane divided cross sections were discussed as
alternatives for the project. The meeting participants agreed that a five-
lane section should be evaluated throughout the entire project. Phil Wylie,
from the City of High Point, indicated that the City may want a divided
cross section to be considered. After the scoping meeting, he discussed the
project with City Officials. Based on their discussion, Mr. Wylie requested
that a four-lane divided section be evaluated between Old Winston Road and
US 70A (Lexington Avenue). This divided cross section will provide a 4.8-
meter (16-foot) median width except at major intersections where the median
flares out for dual left turn lanes. Between Old Winston Road and SR 1507
(Centennial Street), the project is either located in or drains into the
critical area of the Oak Hollow Lake Reservoir. Eric Galamb, from the
Division of Environmental Management, favored a shoulder section which
provides drainage ditches to filter the runoff before it reaches the
reservoir. He also indicated that hazardous spill catch basins are required
for the curb and gutter sections in this area to prevent any hazardous waste
spills on the roadway from entering the water supply critical area. Five-
lane and four-lane divided cross sections will be evaluated in the study.
These cross sections are described below.
Location
Cross Section
North Main Street to Old Winston Road Five-lane curb and gutter
Old Winston Road to Johnson Street
Five-lane curb and gutter
Five lane shoulder
Four-lane divided with curb and
gutter
Four-lane divided with shoulder
Eastchester Drive to Centennial Street Five-lane curb and gutter
Five-lane shoulder
Four-lane divided with curb and
gutter
Four-lane divided with shoulder
Centennial Street to Lexington Avenue Five-lane curb and gutter
Four-lane divided with curb and
gutter
Lexington Avenue to Montlieu Avenue Five-lane curb and gutter
An existing greenway crosses the project near High Point University.
This greenway parallels Boulding Branch and is including in the City's
Greenway Plan. Tom Norman, from Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation,
commented that the crossing should be included as an incidental element in
the project according to the NCDOT Interim Greenway Policy. He asked that a
culvert be considered to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic. A
3.7-meter X 2.4-meter (12-foot X 8-foot) culvert should provide lighting for
Memorandum
Page 3
safety. Mr. Norman also added that a similar culvert was proposed nearby
along the same greenway for the Centennial Street widening project.
According to Jerry Snead, from Hydraulics, supplemental barrels are needed
for the existing Boulding Branch culvert. To provide sufficient ground
cover over the existing and supplemental barrels, the grade will need be
raised at Boulding Branch. This grade change will help the greenway culvert
be a more feasible consideration.
After the scoping meeting, the City asked that sidewalks be considered
on both sides of the project between Lexington Avenue and Montlieu Avenue in
the vicinity of High Point University. The sidewalks should provide
connections to the greenway. The City will be responsible for justifying
the need for sidewalks. Where sidewalks are justified, NCDOT will
participate in 60 percent of the sidewalk cost, and the City will be
responsible for the remaining 40 percent, as outlined in the NCDOT
Pedestrian Policy Guidelines.
Some right of way has been dedicated or reserved throughout the
Intermediate Loop corridor. These areas are located in the vicinity of High
Point University, Wesleyan Manor, and Windchase Townhomes. The reserved and
dedicated right of way widths were based upon a five-lane curb and gutter
section. Phil Wylie indicated that a retaining wall should be considered at
the High Point University track field to minimize impacts to the field.
Other issues that were addressed during the meeting included wetlands
and cultural resources . Eric Galamb and David Cox, from the N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission, commented that wetlands are located in the vicinity of
the project north of Johnson Street. These wetlands should be avoided. A
wetlands delineation will be requested in time to incorporate necessary
alignment changes in the preliminary design. Robin Stancil, from the
Department of Cultural Resources, commented on historic architectural
properties and archaeological resources. The project is subject to
compliance with GS 121-12a which applies only to properties listed on the
National Register of Historic Places. No National Register listed
properties or State Study List properties are within the vicinity of the
project. However, part of the High Point University campus has been
determined eligible for National Register listing. Ms. Stancil requested
that the project minimize impacts to the campus property. She explained
that no recorded archaeological sites are in the vicinity of the project,
and no archaeological survey is recommended.
The schedule for the major project activities is listed below.
Activity Schedule
Citizens Informational Workshop October, 1994
Complete the Environmental Assessment August, 1995
Combined Public Hearing October, 1995
Complete the Finding of No Significant Impact April, 1 996
Right of way Acquisition
(Part A) October, 1998
(Part C) January, 1997
Construction
(Part A) October, 2000
(Part C) January, 1999
Memorandum
Page 4
John Maddox, from Roadway Design, agreed t
construction cost estimates by December 15
meeting, Betty Yancey, from Right of Way,
estimates can be completed two months from
requested.
MLR/
o provide preliminary designs and
, 1994. After the scoping
indicated that right of way cost
the time the estimates are
Attachment
'INSTON-SALEM 14 Ml. 58 1 700000 FEET 590 80"00 FRIENDSH!P 7 Ml.
VA? ' .c° •rQ?, .c ti•, \(%ll.j ` I 1 !II _/,b; i JJJj
I rJ
;jl,f ? %???:• •••_ '. -'? I ` ?-f- _' _?_ ?` ? fir. ? x??l ??'?,? p/oo.?.r?a >•
?-
?M,. - wsCl U-2536 A ?? I G??•??1 ?. `?, „°• I I'?'0%
PROJECT Conte MemonlP
V. ?Z
.. LIMITS ee2) r II
?/ I mli •E' it ' ?,"-`? J ?\ ''?Lr•?.•!"_??' ? `rTMf, ? _ ___. ?
•.. I ?i _.r ? ?t-,.` ,II',•r?;-? ;= ???? •, - U-2536 C ? !? ?\?*
PROJECT
LIMITS i
IYt "Sub La
y _ w. ,5 Imo'; • // -i.
?'? _ a _ " 4 : 111 ;"
US 70 A
-?• ?r. /? \ n 0.;. - , a??`? ? ?, . (LEXINGTON AVENUE)
'• qt , •. •I Jo on S;re , \ ).1II P 1 ??.,? r.?
?.J/\ h/ •,?' 1_ .>?°_Sch? I ? •\ y a \ ?AV 'o?+?? ''1?11ta ?
' 6 - t: ? b ? ? ?h «.a ?? 1onClieu ve ?• ??il •.
?,,'? r ,? ` v ?? r? cJIZ? wcr?ain, 41 Pal '
z?
6 \ I W1 / \\429 ?- l
1 / "? \ ?: ? ?1 ?;`? C III ! ??O I•
fTrSt/On
\ l?;,J S Qo -_-- \) I \L`1 Washington
•11•? ?" ? I. : ',/ v a wAY n wvE S. -} ? / ? L' I ? ?\,TBrrace
Park rl ty
yeze 1 ?Covrts ji J s'? ?1 S --l' m l rl a' _ i_ ` `.?J ?? ?s `• ?. PF;iv? .
? ? ' .V '\\•\ ? J/C ? ? is ? r- Av ti ? i ; i .ffh'?t ti l ?, ?3?F1a •\ lam
Green?It ?c..
l ? I!'•i \ ? ?FERNDA ',U 'BL . \-? t /rI ?-- I '
};\?^`•rr'1^,; ?^ Ili/\I Highi t¢h; ?•J y- ? / 1,,,.,, ? '?? !•_
Sf:h
rttO,q I F 1 y' .: o ty? '
•i?.. y is r _ ? /' i• ??. 1 ' z _ .. ? A s I oe ?'! I yT ?.
'? \?+,?_ ? ? mss' / .-?• 1• 6 .`?• .! ?. ?
' PIN STUDY
?- AY
¦. 1 7
J
B6J axra; 11 / _ ,tom- „ ?/ `Fa .ew i ?..J A RV6 i \ I_.
luadrang le Maps:
Proposed Intermediate Loop n
3ali In
\( 1 ' EVEfrom US 311 to Johnson Street and -•?,•.
High Point East y
j from NC 68 to SR 1471 ?.
and
High Point, Guilford County
High Point West
-2536
TIP No. U0
,_ I 1
N. C. DEI" R ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSIVINTAL SLIP oArc 4
t9
TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM. BLDG.
E21C Eah?.?.w.F? OEM- 04E44o4m
FROMI REF. NO. OR ROOM. BLDG.
M 4 t4f-' f?-? Q A 4.;
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
[I PLEASE ANSWER 21 FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
-
JUN

auw
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JIL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT I I I
GOVERNOR RO. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECREIARY
June 6, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for the Proposed Intermediate
Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu
Avenue), High Point, Guilford County, State Project
No. 9.8071087, TIP No. U-2536
Attached for your review and comments are the Scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting
of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project, previously scheduled for June 16, 1994, is now scheduled for
July 11, 1994 at 2:00 P. M. in the Planning and Environmental Branch
Conference Room (Room 434). Please note this schedule change and disregard
the previous scoping meeting notice. You may provide us with your comments
at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please
call Mark L. Reep, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842.
MR/pl r
Attachment
CV, L
Mao
t4f&c-t k
-Vira
Ci. 47k i7/
High Poi

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTA'T'ION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
*-. RRANCH
uS 31
I 0 mile 1/2 # FIG.1
INTERMEDIATE LOOP
FROM NORTH MAIN TO JOHNSON STREET
AND FROM NC 68 TO COLLEGE DRIVE
HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY
U - 2536
PROJi?CT SC'OPING SIIl`,1-1I'
DATE: 5/11/94
REVISION DATE;:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STAGF
PROGR:ANMM I NG :
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
TIP Q U-2536
PROJECT 0 9.8071087
F.A. PROJF,CT#: N/A
DIVISION: 7
COt?NI'Y : 6u i I ford
ROUTE: Intermediate. FUNC7IONAL:(1ASS.: Major Thoroughrarc
Loop
LENGTH: 3.5 kilometerq (2.2 milW
PURPOSE OF PROJECT :
The project will serve as a major thoroughfare connecting important radial
facilities. The proposed Intermediate Loop will n1so help reduce congestion
along, US 31l (North Main Street).
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ( INCLUDING SPECIFIC LIMITS) ;V'D MAJOR
ELEMENTS OF WORK: The project calls for constructing a multilane f acility on
new location from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street and Prom
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue). bdy\
t

'T'YPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT TO BE PREPARED: Completion Date
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCHEDULE:
State FA
State FONST
4/x)6

WILL. THERE BE SPECIAL, FUNDING PARTICIPATION BY MUNICIPALITY,
DEVELOPERS, OR OTHER? YES: NO: Y
IF YES, BY WHOM: V\ ? of
IF YES, BY WHAT AMOUNT:
HOW AND WHEN WILL THIS BE PAID:
PAGE; I
PROJEV I' SCOPT NG SHFET
TYPE, OF FA(1T,fTY: Proposed multilane major thoroughfare
TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL (FULl,A,PAI:r 1 AL\NONE) : Partial
TYPE OF ROAD41AY:Near the northern terminus, the project follows Hartley Drive.
an existing five-lane curb and gutter facility. Near the southern terminus,
thc: project fellows College Drive, an existing two-lane curb and gutter
street.
INTERCHANGES: 0 GRADE SEPARATIONS: 0 STREAM CROSSINGS: I
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY: Five-lane and four-lane divided cross sections are
proposed along the project.
CURRI,NT TRAFFIC: (1 QQ4) DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC: (2010) %TRUCKS :
(N/A) Ranges from 22,000 vpd to 42,000 vpd
D[?SlGN STANDARDS APPLIC'AhLF (AASHTO\3R): AASHTO
DESIGN SPEED (mph): 50
PRI-1I MINARY RI',SURFAC I Y(; DI!S IGN:
PRELIMINARY PAVT`ME`.NT I )FS I CIN :
CURRENT COST l•;STIMAIT
(Not available)
('ONSTRUCI' I ON COS'T' ( including engineering
and contingencies) .....................................
RIGHT OF WAY COST (including, rel., uti1.,
and acquisition) .......................................
FORCE ACCOUNT [TF.MS ..............................................
PRELIMINARY ENGINE.F',RTNG .........................................
TO'T'AL C'OS'T ................................................
TIP COST ESTIMATE
CONSTRUCTION ......................................................5 4,400,000
RIGHT OF WAY .....................................................5 7,400,000
TOTAL COST ......................................................:$12,400,000
PAGE 2
PROJECT SC'OP I NG S1II,F, I'
LIST ANY SPLC:IAl- Ff?ATURI?S, SUCH AS RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT. WHICH COULD
AFFECT COST OR SCHEDULE; OF PKOJ1;("I'S : I?x i s t i 119 greernvay crossing
ITEMS REQUIRED: COMMENTS
EST I MATT? COST OF I MPROVEMENI'S ...............................
PAVEMENT ....................................................
SURF AC'}? ................................................
BASE ...................................................
MIl_I,IN(:, & RE('Y('I,INC ....................................
TURNOUTS ...............................................
SHOULDERS. PAVED ........................................
E.ART1I .......................................
EARTI-(WORK ...................................................
SUBSURFACE, ITEMS ............................................
SUBGRADE AND STAR11,1`I,ATION ...................................
DRATNAGE (I,i.,t arlV -IPccial items) ...........................
SU}3-1)R.\1 `,A(,l ................................................ .
STRI;C°LUR1',S WI DTII x LENGTH
NJ, W BR I IX;E; x ........... .
WT DE?N BP I PKIF x ........... .
P.EMO\jF fIRTIx;I' ...........
NEW Cl1LV IERTS S I 7.E: LI,;NGTI1: FILL HT . .
CULVERT F,NTFNSION ......................................
RETAINING WALI,S: TYPE: AVE. HT.. SKEW:
NOT')'[- WALL.S ............................................
AND OTIIFR ?,I I ............................. .
CONC1:1?'lE ('UR{3 l (lU'1"1''':I .......................................
CONCRETE SIDE,WALK ...........................................
GUARDR.AIL ....................................................
FENCING: W.W.. and/car C.L.. .................
EROSION CONTROL ..............................................
LANDSC'APl? ...................................................
LIGHTING ....................................................
TRAFFIC CONTROL ..............................................
SIGNING: NEW ...........................................
UI'GRADING .....................................
TRAFFIC. SIGNALS. NEW ...................................
REVISED ...............................
RR SIGNALS: NEW .........................................
REVISED .....................................
WITH OR WITHOUT ARMS ........................
IF 3R: DRAT NA0,1; SAFETY EN} IANCEMENT ......................
ROADS] DE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ......................
REALIGNMENT FOR SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ................
PAVEMENT MARKINGS: PAINT: THERMO: THERMO: ....
DELINEATORS .................................................
OTHER .......................................................
CONTRACT COST (Subtotal) ......................
COST
PAGE 3
PR0.11,(1 S('Ol)IN(l ti!11;I,I
CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINE'ERING ...................................
11E COSTS .......................................................
FORCE ACCOUN'I......................................... ..........
SUBTOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY:
WILL CONTAIN WITHIN EXTSI' RIGHT OF WA)": Y1;S: NO:
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY WID'T'H:
NEW RIGHT OF WAY NEEDED WIDTH: IST . COS'T' ...... .
EASEMENTS TYPE: WIDTH: T?ST . COST ...... .
UTIL,ITTES:
RIGHT 01" WAY SUBTOTAL
TOTAL I?STINIATED COST
TNCI LIDF,S
PREPARED BY: Mark L. Recp 5/11/94
'THE ABOVE, SCOPI NG HAS BEEN RFVI F?FD AND ;1I'T'ROV"I''D' 'tl :
INIT. DATE, INIT. DATE
HIGHWAY DESIGN BOAI:_I) 01= TI:ANS. NlFNIR1',R _
ROADWAY DESIGN SECONDAI:Y ROADS, OFF. --
STRUCTURES PR(X )R;AM R- POLICY
DESIGN SERVICES PRCA?I:,','I !)I;?.`I,LOI"T1',NT
GEOTECHNICAL C'ONS'I`R[ ? "1'1 ON lW \N('H
HYDRAULICS ROADSI DI' FNVI IN'ONNIF NITAI, ------
LOC . & SURVEYS NIA 1 N'tTA7,\NCCE; I3RANC H _--
PHOTOGRAMMETRY MAINTENANCE
----------- --
PRF,L. EST. ENGR. CHIEF I;NGINFER-OPER. __---
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT ('III F F ENGT N}?T?R-I'RECONS . _ ___-_--
RIGHT OF WAY I)1 V IS I ON ENG I NEER _
R./W UTILITIES STATI•;WI DI', PL \NN ING _. - -
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BICYCT..E COORDINATOR
PROJECT MANAGEMENT FT TWA
COUNTY MANAGER DEPT. OF C'Ull'. RES. _-_--
('I_TY/MUNICIPALITY Dl?PT. Ol' F.H & N1:
OTHERS:
SCOPE SHEET FOR LOCAL. OFFICIALS WI1.1. RE SENT TO DIVISION ENGINEFR FOR
HANDLING.
COMMENTS OR REMARKS:
*IF YOU ARE NOT IN AGREEMEN'T' WITH PROPOSED PROJECT OR SLOPING, NOTE YOUR
PROPOSED REVISIONS IN COMMENTS OR RF,MARKS SECTION AND
AND INITIAL AND DATE AFTER COMMENTS.
PAGE 4
D
MAY 1 3 1994
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR DIVISION OF HIGI IWAYS R. SAMUEL. HUNT I I I
GowI NOR RO. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 Sec UTARY
May 11, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DFM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for the Proposed Intermediate
Loop from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu
Avenue), High Point, Guilford County, State Project
No. 9.8071087, TIP No. U-2536
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting
of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for June 16, 1994 at 10:00 A. M. in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please
call Mark L. Reep, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842.
MR/plr
Attachment
R. *14
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
112
FIG.I
INTERMEDIATE LOOP
FROM NORTH MAIN TO JOHNSON STREET
AND FROM NC 68 TO COLLEGE DRIVE
HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY
U - 2536
?A ??' ?r?? II -
? j ? ? ?? ?QO ? • 'ng \? -_?? ? •\\??1? ? \ /!?I t ?? IL. `` II ? `??li ???/ J cU? \ ? \ j ?g?'\- ? % ? m rJ? c - i -. _/ ? 1 /
PROJECT STUDY
AREA
?--? ? I?/ ?r Y? •.?-`_`\ 1?=`-`n`z"J i / .' ? !? `? : ?I i ? ??? ? ? .r•.?i?. ' ? X95 ,_"'f
j 71
40 -1
? -, A14,
1
' ? Q; ` ?L '?;?I ?/ , - _-. _ -???i ??- -' Con rnt{, Me monnl---?/mil •!?n ! r'.'?? ?I ? i ?',• /
• I- ..??? -- itI,?y ?J?r? "?< ; Ut 1.. ?V... •.1.?? /-
/
` .ro • r\.=%7 / -- l ???,j ;.,??0' ?.?
%
/r"1. '-??''` !? ?' ?. I --•r ? i I 1'? ?' 1,i II ?? ??, r 'I'? Tlv $?.a ! u
r L 1??-4;? ? ?'`_ ?. ?r / r '` I? ??1'- i . ? , ••- ?. ', / ti= j?j ' _ i / yQti? ' it <-., I ?I
-'. ?_?y/???: ? _ •• r 7't ..:$UbSfa _??'? ???/Iy? ? - ??l\ ?y 'I??R<? L \ ?? ? •? y??;l?o •
PROJECT STUDY X111 .,I
?' . ?? \ r \`,Ul 7" o AREA
? ' !r ., / ?r /? - ;? 1 ro,"J ? . ? I? 1 ? 11 •.:+ ?( J^
70 on Slre \ oN 1 1
% Sch ¦ ? ?.\ u ti - avt?' i"il?? ? ? ,J '\ ??
/? l r? ' F i ?p ?' LI 1n tJieuve~,/,
' 1 J L' ?? 8s'J' _
In?J? Y ? t I co ?? I 1 \ „ ?`? _
06
vl?
_ rmstron r ? ? ?? ?} 0
f F f
I Qv P a Av avE .T - \ i-? , -?- lY? ,t ;Wtington
o 1 ?hrace'i
• p o } :? 9 dtdi 1 _.r" 1 {` Park'
4eze
r " C i?
r ? Y ? J^ ?h'•ai I?Sch r-?--?. _ ¢ M ? ? 1 \ i? ? \
- v
ell
?? li ?'? ? V. ??. 'k - ` ? P? r 1 •J r Pfl ?-' j._ I i•?'.-- - GR €N71 t l , / '
?L z, PROJECT STUDY
8
6J AREA
C? AREA
y! Quadrangle Maps: Jrl?;?e I rv ?? Proposed Intermediate Loop
;m'eh?; n AVE y? from US 311 to Johnson Street and
High Point East
and from NC 68 to 5K 1471
High Point, Guilford County
Nigh Point West/ $11- V -2536
y V TIP No. U
I (TI\ 7V J.
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
DATE: 5/11/94
REVISION DATE:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STAGE
PROGRAMMING:
PLANNING: X
DESIGN:
TIP #: U-2536
PROJECT #: 9.8071087
F.A. PROJECT#: N/A
DIVISION: 7
COUNTY: Guilford
ROUTE: Intermediate FUNCTIONAL CLASS.: Major Thoroughfare
Loop
LENGTH: 3.5 kilometers (2.2 miles)
PURPOSE OF PROJECT:
The project will serve as a major thoroughfare connecting important radial
facilities. The propo ed Intermediate Loop will also help reduce congestion
along US 311 (North Man Street).
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT!(INCLUDING SPECIFIC LIMITS) AND MAJOR
ELEMENTS OF WORK: The Project calls for constructing a multilane facility on
new location from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street and from
NC 68 (Eastchester Dri e) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue).
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT TO BE PREPARED: Completion Date
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCHEDULE:
State EA 8/95
State FONSI 4/96
WILL THERE BE SPECIAL FUNDING PARTICIPATION BY MUNICIPALITY,
DEVELOPERS, OR OTHER? YES: NO: X
IF YES, BY WHOM:
IF YES, BY WHAT AMOUNT:
HOW AND WHEN WILL THIS BE PAID:
PAGE 1
I f f I ?.?: ;??I a I lt.`s:; ? I= ..:
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA LEGEND
North Carolina
Municipal Boundary
Major or All Hydrography
-============ Watersupply Watersheds Protected
Watersupply Watersheds Critical

1I1 I It I.I-I?Il?l?ltIt l
1 t Potential High Quality Water Zones
High Quality Water Zones
20. r/a/0 W-11,21,211 State Parks
Federal Lands
Primary Nursery Area
County Boundary
. •''•''• . 24K Quads
Major or All Hydrography
Primary or All Roads
Railroads
i^Nooloo Anadramous Fish Runs
Trout Streams
- Faults
. '.- Dikes
General Soils
el Watersupply Intakes
Natural Heritage Points
Non-Discharge Systems
NPDES Sites
Superfund Sites
Hazardous Waste Facilities
Groundwater Incidents
Sanitary Landfills
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
TYPE OF FACILITY: Proposed multilane major thoroughfare
TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL (FULL\PARTIAL\NONE P Partial
TYPE OF ROADWAY:Near the northern terminus, the project follows Hartley Drive,
an existing five-lane curb and gutter facility. Near the southern terminus,
the project follows College Drive, an existing two-lane curb and gutter
street.
INTERCHANGES: 0 GRADE SEPARATIONS: 0 STREAM CROSSINGS: 1
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY: Five-lane and four-lane divided cross sections are
proposed along the project.
CURRENT TRAFFIC: (1994) DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC: (2019) oTRUCKS:
(N/A) Ranges from 22,000 vpd to 42,000 vpd
DESIGN STANDARDS APPLICABLE (AASHTO\3R): AASHTO
DESIGN SPEED (mph): 50
PRELIMINARY RESURFACING DESIGN:
PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN:
(Not available)
CURRENT COST ESTIMATE
CONSTRUCTION COST (including engineering
and contingencies) ......................................
RIGHT OF WAY COST (including rel., util.,
and acquisition) ........................................
FORCE ACCOUNT ITEMS ..............................................
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ..........................................
TOTAL COST ...............................................
TIP COST ESTIMATE
CONSTRUCTION ....................................................:$ 4,300,000
RIGHT OF WAY ....................................................:$ 7,400,000
TOTAL COST ......................................................:$12,400,000
PAGE 2
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
LIST ANY SPECIAL FEATURES, SUCH AS RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT., WHICH COULD
AFFECT COST OR SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS: Existing greenway crossing
ITEMS REQUIRED: COMMENTS COST
ESTIMATE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS ................................
PAVEMENT .....................................................
SURFACE .................................................
BASE ....................................................
MILLING & RECYCLING .....................................
TURNOUTS ................................................
SHOULDERS: PAVED ........................................
EARTH ........................................
EARTHWORK ....................................................
SUBSURFACE ITEMS .............................................
SUBGRADE AND STABILIZATION ...................................
DRAINAGE (List any special items) ............................
SUB-DRAINAGE .................................................
STRUCTURES WIDTH x LENGTH
BRIDGE REHABILITATION x ............
NEW BRIDGE x ............
WIDEN BRIDGE x ............
REMOVE BRIDGE x ............
NEW CULVERTS SIZE: LENGTH: FILL HT.:
CULVERT EXTENSION .......................................
RETAINING WALLS: TYPE: AVE. HT.: SKEW:
NOISE WALLS .............................................
AND OTHER MISC. STRUCTURES ..............................
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER .......................................
CONCRETE SIDEWALK ............................................
GUARDRAIL ....................................................
FENCING: W.W.: and/or C.L.: ....................
EROSION CONTROL ................................. ...........
LANDSCAPE ....................................................
LIGHTING .....................................................
TRAFFIC CONTROL ..............................................
SIGNING: NEW ............................................
UPGRADING ......................................
TRAFFIC SIGNALS: NEW ....................................
REVISED ................................
RR SIGNALS: NEW ..........................................
REVISED ......................................
WITH OR WITHOUT ARMS .........................
IF 3R: DRAINAGE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT .......................
ROADSIDE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT .......................
REALIGNMENT FOR SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ................
PAVEMENT MARKINGS: PAINT: THERMO: THERMO: .....
DELINEATORS ..................................................
OTHER ........................................................
CONTRACT COST (Subtotal) ......................
PAGE 3
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
CONTINGENCIES AND ENGINEERING ...................................
PE COSTS ........................................................
FORCE ACCOUNT ...................................................
SUBTOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY:
WILL CONTAIN WITHIN EXIST RIGHT OF WAY: YES: NO:
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH:
NEW RIGHT OF WAY NEEDED WIDTH: EST. COST......:
EASEMENTS TYPE: WIDTH: EST. COST......:
UTILITIES:
RIGHT OF WAY SUBTOTAL
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
INCLUDES R/W
PREPARED BY: Mark L. Reep
THE ABOVE SCOPING HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED* BY:
HIGHWAY DESIGN
ROADWAY DESIGN
STRUCTURES
DESIGN SERVICES
GEOTECHNICAL
HYDRAULICS
LOC. & SURVEYS
PHOTOGRAMMETRY
PREL. EST. ENGR.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT
RIGHT OF WAY
R/W UTILITIES
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
COUNTY MANAGER
CITY/MUNICIPALITY
OTHERS:
INIT. DATE
DATE: 5/11/94
BOARD OF TRANS. MEMBER
SECONDARY ROADS OFF.
MGR.. PROGRAM & POLICY
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION BRANCH
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL
MAINTENANCE BRANCH
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE
CHIEF ENGINEER-OPER.
CHIEF ENGINEER-PRECONS.
DIVISION ENGINEER
STATEWIDE PLANNING
BICYCLE COORDINATOR
FHWA
DEPT. OF CULT. RES.
DEPT. OF EH & NR
INIT. DATE
SCOPE SHEET FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS WILL BE SENT TO DIVISION ENGINEER FOR
HANDLING.
COMMENTS OR REMARKS:
*IF YOU ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH PROPOSED PROJECT OR SCOPING, NOTE YOUR
PROPOSED REVISIONS IN COMMENTS OR REMARKS SECTION AND
AND INITIAL AND DATE AFTER COMMENTS.
PAGE 4