RE_ _External_ RE_ U-4709 PJD Package

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Rerko, James J
Sent:Wednesday, August 28, 2019 3:54 PM
To:Steenhuis, Joanne; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US); Rachel Quindlen
Cc:Matuszewski, Sean P; Bob Lepsic; Steve Scott; Price, Gregory W
Subject:RE: \[External\] RE: U-4709 PJD Package
Joanne

The new corridors were reviewed so that stormwater discharge can be achieved for the project. That's why the
corridors go to the stream.

Jim

James J. Rerko, PWS
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation

910 364-0834 office
910 486 1959 fax
[e-mail] Email

1000 Transportation Drive
Fayetteville, NC 28302

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
_____________________________________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: Steenhuis, Joanne <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 3:49 PM
To: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>; Rachel Quindlen <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matuszewski, Sean P <[e-mail]>; Bob Lepsic <[e-mail]>; Steve Scott
<[e-mail]>; Price, Gregory W <[e-mail]>; Rerko, James J <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: \[External\] RE: U-4709 PJD Package

I'm with Liz on this. The expanded areas to Rockfish Creek make no sense and don't connect to any roads nor does it fit
with the proposed widening project as described in the Figure2 description.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:53 AM
To: Rachel Quindlen <[e-mail]>; Steenhuis, Joanne <[e-mail]>
1

Cc: Matuszewski, Sean P <[e-mail]>; Bob Lepsic <[e-mail]>; Steve Scott
<[e-mail]>; Price, Gregory W <[e-mail]>; Rerko, James J <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] RE: U-4709 PJD Package

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

Thank you Rachel.

I do have questions about the expanded study area. I know this is a PJD request and not a scoping meeting request or a
discussion about the purpose of the project. But, I feel that the questions should be addressed sooner rather than later.
First, why was the study area expanded? Second, why were those particular alignments chosen and why do they extend
to the Rockfish Creek floodplain? They don't really go anywhere, so the expansion doesn't make sense to me...I'm
guessing maybe the golf course is going to be redeveloped maybe, but still...seems strange to me.

Thanks,

Liz

-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Quindlen \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 9:48 AM
To: [e-mail]; Hair, Sarah E CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matuszewski, Sean P <[e-mail]>; Bob Lepsic <[e-mail]>; Steve Scott
<[e-mail]>; Price, Gregory W <[e-mail]>; Rerko, James J <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[Non-DoD Source\] U-4709 PJD Package

Hi Joanne and Liz,

Attached is the U-4709 PJD Package for your review. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

Best,

Rachel Quindlen

Project Scientist I

SEPI, Inc.

1 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27603
2

main: 919.789.9977 | direct: 919.573.9937 ext. 1776 | Blockedwww.sepiinc.com <Blockedhttp://www.sepiinc.com/>

Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain confidential or
proprietary information and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege or other confidentiality protections. If you
are not a designated recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this in error, please
notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

3