19970553 Ver 1_Complete File_19970616

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
AT4J;
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James Hunt, Jr., Governor [D E F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 22, 1997
Beaufort County
WQC 401 Project #970553
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Franklin Vick
N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick.
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill material in 0.16 acres of
wetlands or waters for the purpose of replacing a bridge with a bridge at NC 99, Bridge #70 over Smith Creek,
as you described in your application dated 24 June 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided
that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112. In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions
listed in the attached certification.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
John Parker, DCM
Sincerely,
0 n ow
970553.1tr
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
{
DEHNR Fax:[phone]
I I':
To: John.Dorney
planning Branch
Jul 15 '97 15:10
r•
DIVTSION OF OPAL MMGB[M
CAMA/m Pm4IT AppLICAmm RMVIN
P. 04/08
?Ta7t0;':PRO:7 T # 1iiQ SUPERVISORZ
• .? DATE:
Fjg bmc :?1 MATION. FOR Cim-ma 9"E CE TRACI(?TNG _?
NO.: Comm.
?RIZUT-,;U; 9Z
G
PRdJRC'r 7iYPS.? TYPE:
CO #: DOT #:
DATE ADM CAA: ?fled '
?: 'CDII: DM
w sub
a usIN -RIM
Dom, WIIM. WaRO
:STREAM ' JA _ FjATER BODY:
- '
CLASS: -C ?'' ` s,,,N IND7?C #: 9 ..,
.; ?0?? •OR :•LOS
..?1•
• •';HL ? IBS: WL AGE. LST:
' O• ( :T?: WL SCORE:
MITIGATION: KmGATION TYPE:
nr,,AT* SIZE: SBEE VATTACHW
$$Cp iIDATION: J ?SSUENOW DENY HOLD -
• • ' ? %. ?'? '? `?
,ST6iOXAlER PLAN RHQ+D.- - IF YES, DATE APFROVEb:
• 'k1t0CT DESCRIPTION-, ?;

WATHRt:' 01
CERT. ' REQ' D: 17'
„r?? `` "
gn YES, TYPE: 1 ?
' •SBWAGR • DISrFOSAL•
TYPE OF DISPOSAL FROPOSED•.
(EXISTTNG, PROPOSED, SEPTIC'TANK ETC.)
'TO lit PERMEITTBD $Y:
(hw, DHS, : COUNTY)
$X DEMl, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT. ISSUANCE PROBABLE:
XltTW`iH'!'LANDFIL_ T. ?' e u
--r 6
-AREA `;OF• FILL: WATER. t ' WETLAND.-
.'IS FIT.. ELIMINATI-NG A SIGNIFICANT SE7 to
AREA • TO BE IIREDGED : ` r
I$ DREDGING ACTIVITY UPECTED TO CAUSE A,'SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF
IiESOUAGN?
ZS. SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
MOM :ARE,TRE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? ? A SERVICES:
SEWAGE DISPOSAL:
OXY.GBN IN BASIN: CLOSURE OF SHF:LLFIsHTNG WATERS:
CG::, WaM; Central Files 7 DC 24 Field Officcs ; cog Washington Office
t
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
4 199?pNM??TAC SG,/FN p
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Beaufort County, on NC 99 at Bridge No. 70 over Smith Creek
Photo Index - 1995: No photo 1989: No photo 1984: 79-965, S9
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,712,000 Y: 646,400 Pantego LR
3.
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/Dredge and Fill
4
INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 10 June 1997
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 9 June 1997
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Rural
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area, Coastal Wetlands
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public highway
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: None
Source - DCM staff observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
r-W
9?p55?
[AREA]
DRF.DG;ED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Coastal wetlands ±261.36 sq. ft.
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Open Water ±6,795 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±7,056.36 sq. ft. or 0.16 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SC-NSW Open: No
8.
PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing bridge with a new 82' long
bridge which will have a 24' wide travelway and 8' wide offsets on each side.
F
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge No. 70 over Smith Creek
Beaufort County
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is at Bridge No. 70 over Smith Creek on NC 99 in Beaufort County.
Located at the site is a 75' long by 23. 61' wide bridge. The bridge has a 11.80' clearance between
the bottom of the bridge and the NWL. The existing approaches to the bridge are stabilized with
riprap. Adjacent to the northeast, southeast and northwest road shoulders are areas of coastal
wetlands which is dominated with Distichlis spicata, Juncus roemerianus, and 1 di m jamaicense.
The shoulders are vegetated with various upland grasses.
PROJECT PROPOSAL
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge with a new bridge along the same
alignment.The new bridge will consist of a three span cored slab on a concrete substructure and
will have a lefigth o f. Approximately 82 feet. There will be a 24' wide travelway plus 8' wide
offsets on each side. Their avigation clearance will remain. The environmental impacts which will
be discussed later will be the result of the approach widening. No temporary detours, stream
relocation or work channels will be involved
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The following environmental impacts will occur if the project is conducted as proposed :
1) Approximately 261.36 square feet of coastal wetlands will be filled at the
northwest corner of the bridge due to approach widening.
2) Approximately 6,795 square feet of open water area will be filled due to approach
widening and riprap stabilization.
3) An upland area approximately 125' by 17' located at the northeast corner of the
bridge, between the approach and an area of coastal wetlands, will be graded to
the elevation of the adjacent wetland. The site will be monitored for two growing
seasons to see if natural vegetation has colonized the site. If sufficient vegetation
has not reclaimed the area after that time then the applicant will replant the area
with native marsh plants.
David Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 12 June 1997
H e ?A? o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JIL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
May 13, 1997
Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, North Carolina 27889
ATTN: Mr. Terry Moore
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE NO. 70 OVER SMITH CREEK ON NC 99, BEAUFORT
COUNTY, TIP NO. B-2805.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
the referenced structure on existing location, along with associated approach
improvements. The new bridge, consisting of a three span cored slab on a concrete
substructure, will be approximately 25 meters (82 ft) in length with a 7.2 meter (24 ft)
wide travelway plus a 2.4 meter (8 ft) wide offset on each side and 1372 millimeter (54
inch) bicycle-safe rails. Traffic will be detoured onto existing roadways during
construction.
Whenever NCDOT replaces an existing bridge, it is the policy of the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials that the roadway and
approaches be up-graded to conform with current design standards. The standards for this
type of new bridge require an increase in width of approximately 5 meters (16.4 ft).
NC 99 is also a bicycling highway that normally requires a 4.2 meter (14 ft) travelway. In
order to reduce wetland impacts, the NCDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Unit agreed that the
narrower, 3.6 meter (12 ft) travelway would be sufficient for bicycle traffic. K

The project will require the fill of 0.156 acres of estuarine surface waters and
0.006 acres of wetlands. The dominant vegetation in the wetlands is smooth cordgrass
(Spartina alterniflora), saw grass (Cladium jamaicense), and black needlerush (Juncus
roemerianus). No temporary fill in wetlands, stream relocation, or channel change will be
involved. In order to mitigate for these impacts, NCDOT proposes to grade
approximately 0.05 acres of upland to the level of the adjacent salt marsh. This area is
located north of the bridge on the upstream side of Smith Creek between the edge of the
fill slope and the existing salt marsh. It is indicated as cross hatching on sheets three and
four of the permit drawings.
The area to be graded is small, approximately 125 feet x 17 feet. After grading is
complete, the NCDOT proposes to monitor this site for two growing seasons to determine
if natural vegetation has colonized the site. If sufficient vegetation has not reclaimed the
area at that time, then NCDOT will replant the area with native marsh plants.
The navigational clearance of the bridge will basically remain the same since no
recognized demand for navigation exists. Smith Creek is not susceptible for use as a
means to transport interstate or foreign commerce and there is no evidence that boats
greater than 6.4 meter (21 feet) long cross under Bridge No. 70. Therefore, the Federal
Highway Administration has determined that the project does not require a U. S. Coast
Guard Permit in accordance with 23 CFR 650.805(c)
Smith Creek flows east into Pungo Creek which is part of the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin. It is classed as SC NSW, indicating a supplemental classification of Nutrient
Sensitive Waters, which requires limitations on nutrient inputs. NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Water, which implements stringent
erosion and sedimentation control, will be employed throughout construction. During
project planning, it was determined that no anadromous fish spawning areas occur within
175 meters (575 feet) of the project, so no construction moratorium is proposed.
The scope of work for this project was documented as a Categorical Exclusion
approved by the Federal Highway Administration (Federal Aid Project BRSTP-99(1),
State Project 8.1150801) on 10 April 1995. It was distributed to the resource agencies 30
August 1995. More copies of this document are available upon request. Application for a
Major CAMA Permit is hereby made. Permit drawings depicting the proposed work are
attached. A check in the amount of $Z 9.00 Warrant No. 98074 is enclosed to cover
. the CAMA processing fee. The adjacent property owners have been notified of this
permit request. Copies of the letters sent to the property owners and the certified mail
receipts are attached. The signed return receipts from these property owners will be
forwarded to you as soon as possible.

Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact
Mr. Michael Wood at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerely
1141
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. David Lekson, COE
Mr. Mike Street, DMF
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P. E., Program Development
Mr. D. R. Morton, P. E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. William J. Rogers, P. E., Structure Design
Mr. Ed Latham, Division 2 Construction Engineer
.F01iM'DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT
C. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: NC 99
Name N.C. Dept of Transportation d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P. O. Box 25201
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC river, creek sound, bay) Smith Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone] OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent: a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name and excavation and/or filling activities.
Bridge replacement and approach work on
Address roadway.
City State
Zip Day Phone b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax
C. Project name (if any) T.I.P. No. B-2805; C. Will the project be for public, private or
State Project No 8.1150801 commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), methods of construction and daily operations
andlor project name. of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. The project
consists of replacing the existing bridge
over Smith Creek and improving the
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED approach roadways
PROJECT
a. County Beaufort
Revised 03/95
.li•'ORM'DCM-MP-1
A, I
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MIM effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL +/- 2 m discharges.) Highway surface runoff
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e. Vegetation on tract N/A
f.. Man-made features now on tract Road
and bridge
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (consult the local land use In addition to the completed application form, the
plan.) following items must be submitted:
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community * A. copy of the deed (with state application only) or
X Rural Other other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
h. How is the tract zoned by local government? claiming to be the owner of said property, then
N/A forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the from the owner to carry out the project.
applicable zoning? Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable.) * An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
been done, for the tract? Yes X No Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
If yes, by whom? detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes -No
Coastal (marsh) X Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
• FQRM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name **SEE PERMIT DRAWINGS
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthf}iI to the best of my knowledge.
This is the /day of , 19 _,gZg"A-J Print Name H. Franklin Vick. P.E. r,
Signature JL-
a dow er or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
r Form 5CM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
3-span cored slab on concrete
substructure
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Smith Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 22.9 m
(2) Width of existing bridge 7.2 in
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
. bridge 3.6 m
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All of the existing
structure will be removed.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert N/A
(2) Width of existing culvert N/A
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL N/A
(4) Will all, or apart of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
9. Length of proposed bridge 22.9 in
h. Width of proposed bridge 12.19 in
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
+/- 1.5 m
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain
M. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
2. CULVERTS N/A
a.
b.
C.
d.
Water body in which culvert is to be placed
Number of culverts proposed
Type of culvert (construction material, style)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MEW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs - Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated ill cubic
yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
N/A
(2) Dimensions.of spoil disposal area
N/A
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
1
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
, maintenance? Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes - No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the ME1W or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
b
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? X Yes No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 250 m+/-
(2) Width of area to be filled 2.5 m+/-
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway Construction
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material .
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
x Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 40 m +/-
(2) Width of area to be filled 1.5 m +/-
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway Construction
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Standard NCDOT
Erosion and Sedimentation control practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Backhoe, dozer, pile driver
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 140 m +/-
(2) Width of area to be filled 2 m +/-
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway Construction
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
if yes, explain in detail Rock fill will be used up
to elevation 0.40 m (See permit drawings -
Sheet 6 of 8).
NCDOT - TIP No. B-2805; State Proj. No. 8.1150801
Applicant or Project Name
ignature
S ?3 9
Date
Revised 03/95

I
u ? ?a
! A C K S O N
S W A M P
lzu

ll' C??r
Olympia ndEetonp
u, P. -1 ?
as Cit
Vj
1 ? an
/5. +
r \? 7 Swan Quarter
f..
off
Eaar Rnti. -Psmh D Be Rose Baa r '
O at?R , r
I ~ NAF L W1lDWE a 111??? q l
, .
Soul( j for
Creek o
_ i rwe n N,
a
\?'4
Royal 12? \ *'
r Hob
b SITE.
Mesa 3\ rr a \ "
HOllyvllle A.
(C. "I Corned S aar n' ? ' ? \
.14ndemere '
r ? I
Manbe 7 .?R R. IA- P1
Yboro V?N__QF?o arwe
fence ne.A
L C-1
Mernlt ,'bortons?rllE .
55 6 P!r ?t1111t°
/ Rattan
?•?? on'entay Bay S
r
iWesE Bain if
Scale of Miles
0 5 10 20 30
0 10 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
to
S1. Mats C
\?TT
? , lNTRACOASTAL
P U N
wants PaM
SCALE
1 0 1 2 3 1 MILES
1 MILE
SCALE FOR EPIIARGEMENIS
N.C DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.1150801 (B-2805)
PROPOSED
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
SHEET 1 OF 8 si9s
R:• t 1902 \1320(75\F'ROPOWNR.OON

I? I I
I .- M
I
'-
I < V) 00 -?
Zzi
I
? I
r I ?-=zv W
00 r-
' ' I
O co Lo
=
O
+1
M
0
Q
0
~
L11 0m
11 CO
O c6 5 LL'
0
f ZO
-- Q
f
h V ' W lL
F- Q C
ui 0
o I l I I -, o 0 0
m
N
'' I I I o _
w
L
J
L
SOIL
L
u
c
z
I I I IQ
? ~ {
I I I
i d ?, ?,
I I t
I
I ?? rn°
?
?
? N
0o OO? ?
_
-_
I
(l
W I l I
I I
I ?? ? my
LU
(? ?,
?
o
I I I I ,?
o ?,
I?/ J~ o !I? ° O
? N N
st w?,
-
I I ?,
? ?
W
.
?
Q
14
I

b
o ;lz
cn
i
oo I ?
?
,I
I
I j,0 o

( LRN W

N
I
t?J' I? w
w
N I I I I. z
__
I? Q 3
w
__
CL
N S

Z Z
J J
J J
LL Li
Li W
O O
Z Z
D Li
®1 e

z
U
0
Q
a
0
m
a r /
`
r
Z
z
0
J
L
L
Q c m
?Q? ?I
o m
a
== m
¢_o o o LL 0"Z
03
a
~W0Of ° Q n 00

oz
o
cf
= o
m
°Q °- W
Li > mv

V) m to
m
z ?
W
S

0
N

O

z

I

? ? i O
w

W.

< IV/ Cn
All

C)
LL- o?

W

z w
3
cn
w
_J Q
? J
F-
nn
L? w
cn 3
z
J J
LFy

En (A

00
r O O
Z
w
t

X3

Z
I
I
` •' M M
O c0

I _ --
a
?pp, gl, 8N I 70 52'06"

? ?
w ZLI

I
? Y
o °
N
N
? ?
o N ?
?o
z
W

?; BL P17+45.213
E
o
' ' I
- `L
LL ? ( I
?

? I I ?, I
I I Y
I I C I I
I? I w
I I C I I `' --
?
I
?
I Z
I °
? I
0 I
I-.
I

(
Y

I
I

r
m ?_ o
I I
? W
?J
o m N -

_ I m
LL, Q)
N

BL P16+88.187

i
? ? \ I I

I
I
I, - ?
M
??-

M
I
f ? ?

W O O W
o 0
W
i ..
J
lq`
llzi'
L
n
It
1 ml l
? I SII
? I? II
,r II
I I
r I I
Jv1• -? I ?-
_ ! p IGO
I I^! I
1~ 0)
I
J ?0- LL? i
I NO ? ? ?? ? I
i J N m
a (p
(3) ^ 00 `
1\ I I
?0 o
\1 I
• I I
..1.4 _•
11--
,1 i ,? I I I
i I.
I
'1, I I
It UW/ ss
I
1. \
? jm I ? 1t
I I? I it '
I I I;' '
I I,
I r .
it ; ..
I? I r Q
I I'
/
II ,.
II \ J•
II
I I ti ?-
II I ; 11
i, I .?
II I
II ? cl? ?
II ? I
I
I I i
I I?
I I r,
OC)
I
I •? r
r
?J
O
O? p
Q- Z;
?
m v

U
-1 Q?
?
U
J
? .
Q

° mo
?

uj ' (
^
IV v 1

Z
O
N

Q 0

N
O
3 Z
m Z
W
V
V) 00 M cr,
Q =U C U
LL.
O 0 (n
d J
0-
00
(.L O
O Z
? =
ap
jr W
Q:
O
LLJ

U - W LL.

O
W>m
`
o
O
0 cr-

0]
-
d
U
z n-
w
w

(nl
0
0
N
W
U
0- V)

of

W
_

z N
w
Q
Q 3
W N
o

D
w
V)

z
J
J
U- J
J
LL
GO V)
Z
o Z
Q

Z
If
0
m
N
m
W
K

w
O
Q
X
V
V
z
H
F-
N
W H
X
0
a w
?l
0
z
O
H

v
w
O
W
?
O
CL
O
N
In
a
J
a
O
U.1
O
U
E
O
,n
O d' M
N E N
it C4 N
II
f- >
N J
uj M W
68b'Z = 13
S69'ZI+Zl= Id
I
L
m
F- 0) 61
I
i p N O
E V) I Z > + N O
M H cr N II .
I
1 -.1 V V
N
V
" V II W
i it it I J Q Q W It
! ( H v'
z z >
w a

a- a
>
a .

i o o I

3 0 0

H H I

m m
I in
Q
H N

X Ix I H
J a
w M I v
U)
O
V'

v
O u?
-
O• II
~ \
n

N
N
-
O
T --
N
C9
z
H
a
w
O
? o N

to
d _
N
L
O
w
I W O
O U
o V ?' O
a_ z w
to ' ~ 0 w CL N
cOn E ?LL vw -
O V J w H
O ? In Q 3
I z ej o _
a a
1 LL) g
1 II II M
g ?
i I
i
i
?I 1 I I I
i
i +
.o
a-
v ?
z
O
?>- 0
X Q r N t-- g
O i-
_ m
v z
=
dz=0
r

° M

W

LL-
I-- 00

O w

O a

J
O O
Z O W op
O
LL ao WE
a Vg) ] w f- a
0 LLj
o
w>m c
i
w
° p m Ln
U

Z a
w
w
N

O 10 d N
W r r
? U U
_
C ! N
N N
p
z taJ
>

W O d'

W

m
w
3
U
a

n

1__t
LL

?
a J

F--
3
z z
J
J
LL J
LL.
Cf' W
z
w
O z
w
O

I
I
N
O N
F-
0=
E -

0 N
N
O
O /
J u /
LL-

0 LO

F-

U31VM 30 3003 E -
0NI1SIX3
. O
f/

/ E -
/ LO
O
O
O
O
O
+ L41-
N_
Q
F-

? F-
J
\ E -
\
\\ LO

831VM 30 3003 E -
0NI1SIX3
m
E \
00 \
\
O
\
J F-
O \
J
\
Li- u \ E -

O = \
or \
F-

E -
+9
N
N I CD I N

z
O_
~•
U) O
F-
? 3: m W

Q= O O
00 O U

cr-

LL
~

O w

(n J
-
o
~
O
Od
O
0 LL-
O
o0 a W
Of
00
0
Q ?
W
F- (n W U
wjm W 0 LL-
00 w O
m
U ?
Z ?
W
W
m
N
N

ww

LLJ Li LLJ La

U U m m
In WWDD
= S U U
lil
to

M
LO c o
LL1 6 0 o
V)
U m z

W F-
> W
z n
Q (
O W U
::) -iaw
c l c 1-?a
N D
0 1L.
'- LL!
W zzw?
_ U
JJC.?p
Q IL LA- S F-
U)

N
z
O
N
Lr
O
z 2
O

U
W
zN
Li
Li
J (n J Q
U- o
()/ ; ta- 3
ln
_j
LLJ
t- w

W U
F- Q
°z w
3 0 LL
zW
a ? o N
F-Il
?II

0?
J W
W
M
\ Q
W r
>°a
O w
Wa 2
?E o
O J
r o

o '- O
°- a
ua
w? ,
E
o -
zZ
00
0¢ o
ry
O ?Q
=x
W w

Q v
g LU
Z 0 v
M
O
U) J? W
W V O
Q

< 04
J -1 O
W 0
L? Zt
H
a Q
r
aw.. ~ U
O
z E O
O O
Q 0 CV
{- 00 M
? O
WI
H
N

i ?
I r
pp
,o
Ll _ J

F- L co
_ Z)
W
7
C? O r- W U
Or
co ¢

I C) IL- L-)
O r=
O
p J
CL
w

a{
0?=C?
O = =
G J
W > L 0
Li m
O r, I

?I

i i
1 ?
t
I i
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS
1. CHARLES 0. BOYETTE
P.O. BOX 310
BELHAVEN, NC 27810
2. LEE THOMAS SPENCE
110-27 19TH STREET
ST. ALBANS, NY 11412
N.C DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.1150801 (B-2805)
PROPOSED
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
SHEET 8 OF 8
6/96
.. R:•119y2\62A05\PRnPnVUP n.