20180196 Ver 2_Draft BPDP_dwr edits_20200713

ID# * 20180196 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Ka"ie rvkFritf
Initial Review Completed Date 4412712020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 4/24/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?" r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project: *
r Stream I! Wetlands W Buffer W Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply}
Project Contact Information
..................... ...............
CompanytOwner:* Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Andrea Eckardt [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
County: Durham
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Catfish Pond II BPDP Draft DWR Submittal
12.32MB
4.2D2D.pdf
Please upload only one PCF of the corroete file that needs to be subrn ted—
Signature
Print Name:* Andrea Eckardt
Signature:'

[ 0-7.1► I:4J,1'kTo I I
101W141191aLTA 14011
April 2020
CATFISH POND 11 MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Durham County, NC
DWR Project Number 2018-0196v2
Neuse River Basin
H U C 03020201
PREPARED BY:
WILDLANDS
E.f GI FE E F 41NC,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Bank Parcel Development Package
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Project Introduction..........................................................................................................................1
1.1
Parcel Location and Description...................................................................................................1
2.0
Mitigation Project Summary.............................................................................................................2
2.1
Project Goals................................................................................................................................. 2
2.2
Existing Parcel Conditions.............................................................................................................2
2.3
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation .............................................. 3
2.4
Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation.................................................................................4
2.5
Watershed Characterization......................................................................................................... 5
2.6
Geology and Soils..........................................................................................................................5
2.7
Existing Vegetative Communities.................................................................................................6
2.8
Threatened and Endangered Species...........................................................................................6
2.9
Cultural Resources........................................................................................................................7
2.10
FEMA Floodplain Compliance.......................................................................................................7
2.11
Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access...........................................................................7
2.12
Other Environmental Conditions..................................................................................................7
3.0
Site Protection Instrument................................................................................................................7
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan........................................................................................................................7
4.1
Parcel Preparation........................................................................................................................8
4.2
Riparian Area Restoration Activities.............................................................................................8
4.3
Riparian Area Enhancement Activities..........................................................................................8
4.4
Riparian Area Preservation Activities............................................................................................9
5.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan...................................................................................................9
5.1
Monitoring Protocol......................................................................................................................9
5.2
Parcel Maintenance......................................................................................................................9
5.3
Easement Boundaries and Fencing.............................................................................................10
6.0
Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management.........................................................................10
6.1
Financial Assurances...................................................................................................................10
6.2
Long-term Management.............................................................................................................10
7.0
Mitigation Potential........................................................................................................................10
8.0
References......................................................................................................................................13
WCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page i April 2020

FIGURES
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Service Area Map
Figure 3
Site Map
Figure 4
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5
Watershed Map
Figure 6
NRCS 1976 Soil Survey Map
Figure 7
Buffer Credits Map
Figure 8
Riparian Buffer Zones Map
Figure 9
Monitoring Map
Tables
Table 1
Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Table 2
Buffer Project Attributes
Table 3
Project Features
Table 4
Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Table 5
Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 6
Site Protection Instrument
Table 7
Selected Tree Species
Table 8
Catfish Pond II Project Mitigation Credits
Table 9
Catfish Pond II Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Table 10
Credit Release Schedule
APPENDIX
Site Photographs and Photo Log Map— February 14, 2020
Historical Aerials
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter— March 13, 2018
Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter Extension — February 19, 2020
USFWS Self -Certification Letter and Correspondence
SHPO Request for Review and Response
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page ii April 2020

Bank Parcel Development Package
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin
1.0 Project Introduction
The Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel") is proposed under the terms and conditions of the
Catfish Pond II Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument ("MBI"), made and entered
into by Wildlands Holdings V, LLC acting as Bank Sponsor ("Sponsor") and the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality ("NCDE(X") Division of Water Resources ("NCDWR"). The Parcel
shall be planned and designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0240 and the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 which became effective November 1, 2015.
The project is in Durham County approximately 12 miles north of the City of Durham, immediately
adjacent to the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services ("NCDMS") Catfish Pond Mitigation Site,
NCDWR Project Number 2018-0196v1 ("NCDMS Site") (Figure 1). The Parcel expands the protected
riparian area from 50 feet in the NCDMS Site to 100-200 feet on along Catfish Creek, two unnamed
tributaries and one ditch. The primary purpose of the project is to provide riparian buffer mitigation
credits and nutrient offset credits to compensate for unavoidable impacts in the Neuse River Basin
03020201 Hydrologic Unit Code ("HUC") within the Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 2).
1.1 Parcel Location and Description
The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201020040 and NCDWR Subbasin 03-04-01
in Durham County. To reach the Parcel from the City of Durham, travel north approximately 12 miles on
Highway 501/North Roxboro Street. The Parcel is on the left, 1/2 mile north of the roads intersection
with Patrick Road, just south of its intersection with Mountain Creek.
Catfish Creek and the other project features flow into Mountain Creek, which subsequently flows into
Little River, the Eno River, and then into Falls Lake. Falls Lake is classified as water supply water (WS-IV)
and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW) by NCDWR. The proposed project supports specific goals identified
in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan (RBRP) by promoting "nutrient and sediment
reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams and riparian buffers".
This riparian mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading, provide and improve
terrestrial and instream habitats, and improve stream and bank stability. The area surrounding the
streams proposed for mitigation is currently a mixture of active pasture, open fields, and some
woodlands (See the appendix for February 2020 site photos). By removing cattle access and restoring
the vegetation on areas up to 200 feet from the streams and ditch; the project will reduce nutrient and
sediment inputs in the tributaries to Mountain Creek, and subsequently Little River and Falls Lake. The
restored floodplain areas will filter sediment during high rainfall events. The establishment of riparian
vegetation around Ditch D will also create shading to minimize thermal heating. Finally, the new native
vegetation will provide cover and food for wildlife throughout the Parcel.
wCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 1 April 2020

2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goals of the proposed buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project are to provide ecological
and water quality enhancements to the Falls Lake Watershed in the Neuse River Basin by restoring the
riparian area to create a functional riparian corridor. Specific enhancements to water quality and
ecological processes are outlined below in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal
Objective
Exclude cattle from
project features and
Install fencing around conservation easement boundary, expanding the fenced
riparian area within 200
area beyond what was proposed in the NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site.
feet of project features.
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the agricultural fields
Decrease nutrient levels.
through restored native vegetation. The off -site nutrient input will also be
absorbed on -site by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain areas,
where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input.
Sediment from off -site sources will be captured by deposition on restored
floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Decrease water
temperature and increase
Planted riparian trees will shade the project features as they mature, reducing
dissolved oxygen
thermal pollution.
concentrations.
Create appropriate
Riparian areas will be restored by treating invasive vegetation and planting
terrestrial habitat.
native vegetation.
Permanently protect the
project Parcel from
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
harmful uses.
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The proposed buffer and nutrient offset mitigation project includes approximately 33 acres of open
cattle pasture along Catfish Creek, two unnamed tributaries (UT1 and Mountain Tributary for the
purposes of this project), and a ditch (Ditch D). Previously cattle had access to all streams but with the
recent conclusion of construction on the NCDMS Site, the first 50 feet from the project streams were
restored or enhanced via cattle exclusion, as a forested riparian area. The Parcel expands beyond that
boundary increasing easement widths from 0-50 feet to 100-200 feet and incorporating a new 200-foot
area surrounding Ditch D (Figure 3).
Portions of the Parcel's three jurisdictional streams (Catfish Creek, Mountain Tributary, and UT1), one
Ditch (D), and one ephemeral channel (EC1) were all part of the NCDMS Site. Catfish Creek flows east,
WCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 2 April 2020

beginning as an intermittent stream and becoming perennial. UT1 is a perennial stream that flows
northeast, joining Catfish Creek. Both EC1 and Ditch D flow east into UT1. Mountain Tributary begins in
the northwest corner of the project area and flows southeast before turning and flowing northeast into
Mountain Creek. The NCDMS Site also included an additional stream (UT2) that is not included in the
Parcel.
In general, this area has maintained its rural, farming character over the last 78 years with only minor
changes in land cover (see historical aerials in the appendix). This consistency in land use within the
project watershed indicates that watershed processes affecting hydrology, sediment supply, and
nutrient and pollutant delivery have not varied widely over this time period. With a lack of
developmental pressure, watershed processes and stressors from outside the project limits are likely to
remain consistent throughout the implementation, monitoring, and closeout of this project.
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes
Project Name
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Hydrologic Unit Code
03020201020040
River Basin
Neuse
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
36° 9' 48.03" N, 78° 54' 37.66" W
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)
To be recorded
Total Credits
371,089.000 buffer mitigation credits and 45,508.805 lbs. N
and 2,931.119 lbs. P
Types of Credits
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
BPDP Date
April 2020
Initial Planting Date
January 2021
Baseline Report Date
March 2021
MY1 Report Date
December 2021
MY2 Report Date
December 2022
MY3 Report Date
December 2023
MY4 Report Date
December 2024
MYS Report Date
December 2025
2.3 Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
NCDWR performed an onsite visit of the project area to determine viability for buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset mitigation on February 23, 2018 (letter dated March 13, 2018). Five of the six features
assessed were deemed viable by NCDWR to generate buffer mitigation. The sixth, Ditch D, required
more information before a determination of viability could be made. The additional information to
support buffer credit viability on Ditch D is included in Section 2.4. NCDWR issued an extension of the
"On -Site Stream Origin Determination for Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules" on February 19,
2020.
There have been no changes to the land use in the Parcel since the NCDWR 2018 site visit. The NCDMS
stream and buffer mitigation project is currently under construction. A copy of the "Site Viability for
Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset" letter and extension letter from the DWR are included in the
appendix and summarized in Table 3.
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 3 April 2020

Table 3: Project Features
Feature Name"
Feature Name
(NCDWR
Classification
Buffer Credit Viable
Nutrient Offset Viable
(BPDP)
Evaluation)
UT1
UT1
Stream
Yes
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
More information requested
Ditch D
D
Ditch
(See Section 2.4)
Yes
Catfish Creek
Catfish Creek
Stream
Yes
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
Catfish Creek
Catfish Pond *
In -line pond
Yes
Yes
(where stream is restored)
(non -forested fields only)
UT2
UT2
Stream
Yes
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
Mountain
Mountain
Yes
Tributary
Tributary
Stream
Yes
(non -forested fields only)
*Catfish Pond was restored as part of the NCDMS Catfish Pond Site, as documented in the NCDMS Catfish Pond As -
Built and Baseline Report (anticipated NCDMS and NCDWR submittal date May 2020)
** EC1 was not evaluated for buffer or nutrient viability and is therefore not included in any credit requests.
2.4 Alternative Mitigation for Buffer Mitigation
In addition to buffer restoration on subject streams, per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rules (15A
NCAC 02B 0.0295 (o)), alternative mitigation is proposed on the Parcel in the form of buffer preservation
of forested land on subject streams and buffer restoration on ditches. The proposed project is in
compliance in the following ways:
Preservation on Subject Streams (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5):
• The buffer width is at least 30 feet from the stream (See Figure 8 for buffer zones). The
minimum width of riparian areas on this site is 50 feet from top of banks.
The area meets the requirements of 15A NCAC 02R 0.0403(c)(7), (8), and (11) with no known
structures, infrastructure, hazardous substances, solid waste, or encumbrances within the
mitigation boundary (See Section 2.10 for EDR Radius Report summary).
Mitigation credits for preservation are being requested on no more than 25% of the total area of
buffer mitigation (See Table 8 for credit calculations).
Restoration on Ditches (15A NCAC 026 .0295 (o)(8):
• The ditch is directly connected with and draining towards an intermittent or perennial stream
(See Figure 3 for connection with UT1).
• The ditch is contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual
conservation easement (See Figure 3 and 7 for easement boundary).
• Stormwater runoff from overland flow drains towards the ditch (See Figure 5 for topographic
and watershed information).
• The ditch is between one and 3 feet in depth (See Figure 3 for depth at cross-section locations).
• The entire length of the ditch shall have been in place prior to the effective date of the
applicable rule (See appendix for historical aerial photographs).
• The width of buffer restoration on the ditch is no less than 30 feet and no more than 50 feet
(See Figure 8 for buffer zones).
• The watershed of the ditch is at least four times larger than the restored area along the ditch
(See Figure 5 for the watershed and Table 4 for the drainage areas).
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 4 April 2020

The following sections describe the existing riparian conditions on the Parcel in terms of watershed,
soils, geology, cultural resources, species of concern, regulated floodplain zones, and site constraints.
2.5 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the HUC 03020201020040. All onsite features drain to Mountain Creek,
which flows to Littler River, the Eno River, and then into Falls Lake. Falls Lake is classified as water supply
waters (WS-IV) and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW). The NSW designation applies to surface waters that
are experiencing excessive growths of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
The topography of the Parcel, as indicated on the Rougemont USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
shows mostly steeply sloped areas with some moderately sloped areas along UT1 (Figure 4). Drainage
areas for the project reaches (Figure 5) were delineated using 2-foot contour intervals derived from the
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program's 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. Land uses
draining to the project reaches are a mix of active pastures, fields, and woodlands. The watershed areas
and current land use are summarized in Table 4, below.
Table 4: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Reach Name
Mitigation Area
Watershed Area
Land Use
(acres)
(acres)
Catfish Creek
12.1
197
46% forested; 54% managed herbaceous
cover/pasture; 0.2% woody wetland
UTl
10.3
108
32% forested; 66% managed herbaceous
cover/pasture; 1%shrub
Mountain Tributary
1.5
30
92% forested, 8% managed herbaceous
cover/pasture
Ditch D
7.2*
23
17%forested, 83% managed herbaceous
cover/pasture
*Of the 7.2 acres of mitigation on Ditch D, 1.9 acres is buffer restoration. The Ditch D watershed is over 12 times the
area of buffer restoration on the ditch, meeting the requirements of 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) .
2.6 Geology and Soils
The project is located in the Ecoregion 45c - Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont physiographic province.
The Carolina Slate Belt extends from southern Virginia, across the Carolinas, and into Georgia. The
Carolina Slate Belt consists of metamorphosed igneous and sedimentary rock including gneiss and schist
that has been intruded by younger granitic rocks (NCGS, 2013). The underlying geology of the proposed
Parcel is mapped as late Proterozoic to Cambrian (1 billion to 500 million years in age) intermediate
metavolcanics rock (CZiv) and felsic meta -volcanic rock (CZfv) (NCGS, 1985). The intermediate meta -
volcanic rock is described as metamorphosed andesitic tuffs and flows that are medium to dark grayish
green in color with minor felsic and mafic meta-volcanics. The felsic meta -volcanic rock is described as
metamorphosed daeitic to rhyolitic flows and tuffs that is light gray to greenish gray in color that
interbedded with intermediate meta -volcanic rock.
The proposed Parcel is mapped by the Durham County Soil Survey. Project area soils are mapped
primarily as wehadkee silt loam, tatum gravelly silt loam, georgeville silt loam, and chewacla and
wehadkee soils. These soils are described below in Table 5. Catfish Creek, UT1, Mountain Tributary, and
Ditch D are all depicted as streams on the 1976 NRCS Soil Survey provided in Figure 6.
KCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 5 April 2020

Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name
Description
This soil is found on narrow floodplains with a slope of 0 to 2 percent and is
Wehadkee silt loam
typically poorly drained and frequently floods. The surface layer of the series
is loam with a thickness of about 8 inches. The subsoil of sandy clay loam has
a depth of 43 inches. This soil is fairly well suited for pasture.
This well -drained soil is found on uplands with a slope of 15 to 25 percent.
The surface layer has a gravelly silt loam of about 7 inches. The subsoil of silty
Tatum gravelly silt loam
clay loam extends to a depth of 42 inches and weathered bedrock is present
from 42 to 80 inches. This soil is well suited to pine and hardwood forest and
to pasture. Slope and the erosion resulting from runoff are the major
concerns in management.
This well -drained soil is found on narrow side slopes on uplands with a slope
of 6 to 10 percent. It has a surface layer of reddish -brown or brown silt loam
Georgeville silt loam
to about 7 inches. Its subsoil is red, firm silty clay or silty clay loam to about 10
inches. Slope and erosion resulting from runoff are the major concerns for
management.
These soils are about 60 percent Chewacla soil and 35 percent Wehadkee soil.
These are somewhat poorly drained soils on floodplains with slopes of 0 to 2
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils
percent that flood frequently. They occur as long, level areas parallel to the
major streams and rivers. These soils have a surface layer of loam to about 4
inches and a subsurface layer of silty clay loam to about 26 inches. These soils
are well suited to hardwood forest and pasture.
Source: Durham County Soil Survey, USDA-NRCS, http://efotg.nres.usda.gov
2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities
Upland portions of the Parcel maintained for cattle grazing are dominated by pasture grasses including
tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), and red fescue (Festuca
rubra). Herbaceous vegetation in wetland and riparian areas includes tearthumb (Polygonum
sagittatum), common rush (Juncus effuses), spotted ladysthumb (Polygonum persicaria), yellow
jewelweed (Impatiens pallida), Carex species (Carex spp.), and Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium
vimineum). Forested riparian areas are generally narrow or discontinuous, but common tree species
present in the canopy are American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and red
maple (Acer rubrum). Additional woody plants present in smaller proportions or lower strata include
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), white oak (Quercus alba), hazel alder (Alnus serrulata), black
willow (Salix nigra), paw paw (Asimina triloba), greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
Information for Planning and Consultation database (IPaC) were searched for federally listed threatened
and endangered plant and animal species in Durham County, NC. Two listed endangered species and
three species proposed for listing as endangered or threatened were identified: the River waterdog
(Necturus lewisi), Carolina madtom (Notorus furiousus), Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii), and the smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata). Wildlands performed a
pedestrian survey of the project parcel on April 13, 2018 and again on February 14, 2020. It was
determined that there is no suitable habitat for any of the listed species; therefore, the project will have
WCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 6 April 2020

"no effect" on the federally listed species. The USFWS Self -Certification Letter packet and the USFWS
response letter agreeing with the determinations are included in the appendix.
2.9 Cultural Resources
There are no existing structures in the project area. The Parcel is not located near any sites listed on the
National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO was contacted with request
for review and comment on March 2, 2020. SHPO responded on April 17, 2020 and stated they were not
aware of any historic resources that would be affected by the project. All correspondence with SHPO is
included in the Appendix.
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain, so a floodplain development permit will not be
required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
2.11 Parcel Location, Parcel Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is accessible via a gravel driveway off Roxboro Road. Three internal easement crossings for
farm use are part of the proposed conservation easement. These breaks are not included in the credits
calculated for the project. There are no other known constraints on the proposed Parcel.
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions
An EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel through Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. on January 29, 2018. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed
in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. There were no known or
potentially hazardous waste sites identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area. The
Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the Appendix.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the mitigation project includes
portions of the parcels listed in Table 6. The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its
entirety by an approved NCDWR long term stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed
in an approved NCDWR conservation easement.
Table 6: Site Protection Instrument
Site
Deed Book
Acreage
Landowner
PIN
County
Protection
and Page
to be
Instrument
Number
Protected
0827-02-68-
Jack B. Penny Jr, Richard P.
Penny, & Gary W. Penny
0515
Durham
Conservation
Easement
To Be
Recorded
33
0827-02-67-
0407
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The project will restore agriculturally impacted land along Catfish Creek, Mountain Tributary and Ditch D
on the Parcel to a protected riparian corridor, improving the ecological function of the area. The project
design will ensure that no adverse impacts to wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 7
illustrates the conceptual design for the Parcel. Figure 8 further depicts the riparian buffer zones for the
Parcel.
KCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 7 April 2020

4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within 200 feet from top of bank of the project features has been maintained as cleared for
cattle pasture except for a few small forested areas along Catfish Creek and Mountain Tributary. Those
areas will be preserved. Areas slated for restoration will require little site preparation because the land
has been maintained in agriculture. Site preparation will include select herbicide treatments and/or
limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation. Where needed, invasive species will be
selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide applicator.
The Parcel is being fenced during construction of the NCDMS Site to remove cattle from the easement
areas as shown on Figure 8, but the Parcel will continue to be used for agriculture until the Parcel
conservation easement has been recorded.
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species that
may out -compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the riparian areas of the
Parcel will include a mixture of the species listed in Table 7 below.
Table 7: Selected Tree Species
Species
Common Name
Density
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
20%
Betula nigra
River Birch
20%
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
10%
Acer negundo
Boxelder
10%
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
10%
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
10%
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
10%
Quercus alba
White Oak
10%
Trees will be planted at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species will be
greater than 50% of the established stems. An appropriate seed mix will also be applied to provide
temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during rain
events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Planting is scheduled for January 2021.
4.3 Riparian Area Enhancement Activities
No riparian enhancement activities are planned for the Parcel.
0 Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 8 April 2020

4.4 Riparian Area Preservation Activities
There will be no parcel preparation work done in the buffer preservation areas, as allowed under 15A
NCAC 02B .0295(o). There are sections along Catfish Creek and Mountain Tributary of mature hardwood
forest that will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement (Figure 7). No additional
treatment or planting is planned for these areas of the project.
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the buffer restoration
areas to measure the survival of the planted trees. The plots will be randomly placed throughout the
planted riparian areas. A total of 23 plots will be established within the riparian buffer restoration and
credit generation areas (Figure 9). The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted and follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the 25 plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in
the annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Planting is scheduled for January 2021. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end
of the first growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than
the fall season. Species composition, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by
plot. The total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure
of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species,
where no one species is greater than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density
of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of monitoring year five. Appropriate and desirable
native volunteer species may be included in the Parcel's density to meet the performance standards
with NCDWR approval.
The Sponsor shall submit the annual monitoring report to NCDWR by December 31" of each year for five
consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the Catfish Pond II Mitigation Banking
Instrument (MBI).
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought,
or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the
success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel
maintenance performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide
schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration
areas to prevent establishment of invasive species that may out -compete the planted native vegetation.
The only herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in
accordance with North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
NCDWR. If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must
wCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 9 April 2020

receive approval from NCDWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of
the Neuse buffers to ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.
5.3 Easement Boundaries and Fencing
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers that have been disturbed,
damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for
the conservation easement holder will be included on easement markers.
6.0 Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Catfish Pond II Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor shall provide a
Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best. The
Performance Bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as
described in the Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP, but not less than $150,000.00). In lieu of
posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit
release. In that case no performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will be
secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less
than $100,000.00. The Performance/Maintenance Bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring
period for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon NCDWR
approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are
submitted without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long-term Management
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved NCDWR long term
stewardship, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved NCDWR conservation
easement. The long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure
that the restrictions documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity.
7.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the 33.00 acres protected under the conservation easement, the mitigation activity for 28.30 acres is
riparian restoration. Of that 28.30 acres of restoration, 8.30 acres is proposed for buffer mitigation
credit and 20 acres is proposed for nutrient offset credit. There is also 2.76 acres of preservation within
the conservation easement proposed for riparian buffer credit. The mitigation credit calculations were
derived based on Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. The management
objectives, mitigation type, and proposed amount of buffer mitigation are presented in Tables 8 and 9,
below. All of the buffer restoration areas are viable for either riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset
credits and can be converted upon approval by NCDWR if within the first 100 feet from top of bank for
the areas on Catfish Creek, Mountain Tributary, UT1 or the first 50 feet from top of bank for the Ditch.
wCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 10 April 2020

Table 8: Catfish Pond 11 Project Mitigation Credits
Neuse 03020201 - Upper Falls Lake
Service Area
19.16394
N Credit Ratio (sf/credit)
297.54099
P Credit Ratio (sf/credit)
Tota I
Subject?
(Creditable)
Initial
Final
(enter NO if
feature
Mitigation
Min -Max
Feature
Area of
Credit
% Full
Credit
Convertible
Riparian
Convertible
Delivered
Delivered
Credit Type
Location
ephemeral
Type
Activity
Buffer
Name
Total Area (sf}
Buffer
Ratio
Credit
Ratio
to Riparian
Buffer Credits
to Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
or ditch')
Width [ft}
Mitigation
(x;1)
(x:1)
Buffer?
Offset?
Offset; N (lhs)
Offset: P (Ihs)
(sf)
331,748
Nutrient
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
CC
331,748
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
109,476.949
Yes
17,311.054
1,114.966
Offset
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I P
Restoration
0-100
CC
113,364
113,364
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
113,364.000
Yes
5,915.485
381.003
Nutrient
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
Ditch
145,237
145,237
1
33%
3,03030
No
-
Yes
7,578.661
488.124
Offset
Buffer
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-50
Ditch
83,456
83,456
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
83,456.000
Yes
4,354.846
280.486
Nutrient
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
0-100
Ditch
87,574
87,574
1
100%
1.00000
No
-
Yes
4,569.728
294.326
Offset
Nutrient
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
MT
19,658
19,658
1
33%3.03030
Yes
6,487.146
Yes
1,025.781
66.068
Offset
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
MT
25,585
25,585
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
25,585.000
Yes
1,335.059
85.988
Nutrient
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
UT1
287,911
287,911
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
95,010.725
Yes
15,023.581
967.635
Offset
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
UT1
138,555
138,555
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
138,555.000
Yes
7,229.985
465.667
Nutrient
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
CC
331,748
331,748
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
109,476.949
Yes
17,311.054
1,114.966
Offset
Eligible for
-
Preservation (sf):
120,320
Total
(Creditable)
initial
Final
Feature
Mitigation
Min -Max
Feature
Area for
Credit
% Full
Credit
Riparian
Credit Type
Location
Subjects
Buffer
Total Area (sf)
Buffer
Type
Activity
Width (ft)
Name
Buffer
Ratio
Credit
Ratio
Credits
Mitigation
(x:1)
(x:1)
(si)
10
10
10
10
10
10
100%
33%
100%
33%
100%
33%
10.00000
30.30303
10.00000
30.30303
10.00000
30.30303
6,830.500
516.681
1,561.800
181.302
798.800
239.514
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Preservation
0-100
CC
68,305
68,305
Rural
Yes
I P
101-200
CC
15,657
15,657
Rural
Yes
I P
0-100
MT
15,618
15,618
Rural
Yes
I P
101-200
MT
5,494
5,494
Rural
Yes
I / P
0-100
UT1
7,988
7,988
Rural
Yes
I / P
101-200
UT1
15,899
7,258
Preservation Area Subtotal (sf):
120,320
25.0%
Preservation
as %Total
Area of Buffer
Mitigation:
0.0%
Ephemeral Reaches as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation:
wCatfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 11 April 2020

Tahle 9: Catfish Pond Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigations
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
360,960
360,960,000
Enhancement:
0
OWO
Preservation:
120,320
10,129.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
481,280
371,089,000
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
Nitrogen:
872,128
45,508.805
Phosphorus;
2,931.119
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by NCDWR,
the mitigation credits associated with the Catfish Pond 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as
described in Table 10 below,
Table 10: Credit Release Schedule
Task
Project Milestone
% Credit Available
for Sale
1
Instrument and BPDP Approved by NCDWR, Conservation Easement
20
Recorded and Financial Assurance Posted
Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring
2
Devices Completed
20
3
Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As -Built Report
10
Monitoring Report #1-, Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
4
renewed
10
5
Monitoring Report #2- Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
10
renewed
6
Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
10
renewed
7
Item B(1) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and
5
approved by NCDWR
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an
approved land trust or stewardship
Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the NCDWR & financial assurance
8
renewed
5
I Monitoring Report #5. Approved by the NCDWR and final site visit by 10
NCDWR has been conducted
Total I 100%
Catfish Pond 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201 Page 12
Draft - BPDP
April 2020

8.0 References
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), 2010. 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration
Priorities Plan (RBRP).
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation/`205ervices/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/FINAL
%20RBRP%20Neuse%202010_%2020111207%2000RRECTED.pdf
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2009. Mineral Resources.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral/`20resources/mineralresources.html
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2019. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Durham County, NC. https://www.ncnhde.natureserve.org
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2006. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil
Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Durham County, North Carolina.
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Durham County, NC. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel Draft - BPDP
HUC 03020201 Page 13 April 2020

Figures

Project Location
' Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
NCDMS Conservation Easement
Catfish Pond II Bank Parcel Location
x:
�a
r aD, State F0se51 Hd
n
Cie
I
pkrrls li,. 01ge Hopkins Rd
1
!
. r
41" O
LJiLi I I a
�Y
Rw Park
I
r
i
r
I ss
�a
zr�
"1
c�tlC�
6
i
t _ � U
bill
n �
w�
f
ti
ro
Bahania
l!
4117
I �
G
s� a
r�
501, J0Irv) J0ne,
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
W T 1. D L A N D 5 0 0.5 1 Miles Catfish Pond II
%2ww is N G I N E E RING I 1 i 1 I Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

I
1
r"'r "'"
• I County Boundaries
1
Service Area - Riparian Buffer Credits (HUC 03020201)
I
Service Area - Nutrient Offset Credits (Falls Lake Watershed)
1
I
;
Catfish Pond II Bank Parcel Location
j
Upper
+` `�•_I'
Falls Lake ;
I
I I
Watershed
I
; 7[
�
I
rlr I
;
Ire. I �, ►
I• .I . rc
%ioursburg
Lower �•
- •••r_. - ^fi211$
I
Lake
'
Wate sin�d �.
.-. a
III
fir__
�
►r
♦ �
1
�• ►
r•ul, •I
}
Ap
s
IF
,,.{�� • +-.�,��
Raleigh.
F'{nsboro
[i ;
I
I.
9 atvererl
_,�rrr=r
Jorvart
r. r",/'+
. .
till'IXI-dI•{I
I
�•
x is; r.
.11d .I
f Ra n
f` .iliW PaA
@ F.
i
or
Creek
!�
Lrlhrlgtan
j
'%
iL
.w•
!•
Walkertrnvn
-f
F �
1
t•FI IIg Lal
4 I • `s_
Figure 2. Service Area Map
Catfish Pond II
W I L D L A N D S 0 5 10 Miles Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
ENGINEERING I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

H7yTT .Y i/ Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
NCDMS Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Project Stream
• r.
Project Ditch
Al
Project Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Streams
Topographic Contours (4')
` 'f� Existing Tree Line
40 ;_• Cross Sections
V.
/
QKX
.i �'■ �'
IK
XSEC 4,1'4-�.
r'
!?CSEC 3 ��� 14 r' �......_�tA.#�iri4.�►.. � � i' m'"
I�'•%'����i��4�,rf=1:69�+- yam' � �•'- ► ��- �, ��.
XSEC •2.-
:� ,! d-1.23 xSEC 1 .'
)3,'Ikq
Ij,
44
N
.R
{ - r '• J
Aq
Figure 3. Site Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Catfish Pond II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I i I I Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Figure 4. USGS Topographic Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 500 1,000 Feet Catfish Pond II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i i i I Riparian Buffer and Nutrient ❑ffset Bank Parcel
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Figure 5. Watershed Map
W I L D L A N D S Catfish Pond Il
E N G I N E E R I N G 0 300 600 Feet Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
I I i I Bank Parcel ❑evelopment Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
Yn �. NsC GeB C� GeB
Wn
N o ❑
Mom.
NaD`` � GeB
- GeD GeD
GeU LgB�� Gem fr .�� .,Z,
GeC/, �' f -' C
GeC
GeB
GeC
DaC
HrR
' Al. D a R
GeC]
NaDHrC
CSC
-- CI
Soil Survey of Durham County. NC -1 776
Figure 6. NRCS 1976 Soils Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 Feet Catfish Pond II
%OIWV E N G I N E E R I N C, I i I i I Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Project Location
Bank Parcel Conservation Easement
1__._i
® NCDMS Conservation Easement
Internal Crossings
- Project Stream
Project Ditch
Project Ephemeral Channel
�. Mitigation Concept
A Buffer Restoration Credits
Buffer Preservation Credits
• R� Nutrient Offset Credits
A No Credit
Non -Project Streams
Suveyed Tree Line
tt _ NCDMS Site Fencing
WLA
I
Figure 7. Buffer Credits Map
Q 20Q 4QQ Feet
W I L D L A N D S Catfish Pond II
ENGINEERING Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
�1�1�
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Figure 8. Riparian Buffer Zones Map
�
Q 2QQ 4QQ Feet ' W I L D L A N D S Catfish Pond II
ENGINEERING Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
� I l I
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Figure 9. Monitoring Map
�
Q 2Q0 40Q Feet ' W I L D L A N D S Catfish Pond II
ENGINEERING Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
I I I I I
Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake)
Durham County, NC

Appendix

CURRENT LAND USE PHOTOGRAPHS
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel

Catfish Creek
Photo Point 1— Reach 6 — Downstream (0211412020)
Photo Point 2 — Reach 7 — Downstream (0211412020)
r
i-
'•1
Photo Point 3 — Reach 7 — Downstream (0211412020)
Photo Point 4 — Reach 1 and 2 — Downstream (0211412020)
Photo Point 5 — Reach 3 — Downstream (0211412020)
Photo Point 6 — Reach 4 — Downstream (0211412020)
WVCatfish Pond 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

Photo Point 7 — Reach 5 — Downstream (0211412020) 1 Photo Point S — Reach 6 — Downstream (0211412020) 1
Photo Point 9 -- Reach 7 — Downstream (0211412020) 1 Photo Point 10 — Reach 7 — Downstream (0211412020) 1
Photo Point 11— Reach 7 — Upstream (0211412020)
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

TOZOZO£O Z)f1H
laaaed 31uea uoiieSIMAI II quad 451lle:
(OZOZIDIrIZO) WeOJISU nop — T 4aeaa -- LT ;ulod o;o
(OZOZ/DIr/ZO) WBOJIsumo(I — E yaeaH — ST lu[od OZO
(OZOZIVTIZO) weeitsdn — T 43eaa — ET %ulod o}o4,
dd
(OZOZATIZO) Weaa;sunnop -- y 4aeaa — 9i lulod 0104d
4d
(OZOZATIZO) WBOAtsumo(3 — Z yaeaa — yT aulod 0404d
l
(OZOZATIZ0) Weaa;Sumop — T yaeaa — ZT aulod 0104d
r r� .t•.l
r
t-
r
r _
un

Photo Point 18 — Reach 2 — Downstream (0211412020) 1 Photo Point 19 — Reach 2 — Upstream (0211412020) 1
Photo Point 20 — Reach 3 — Downstream (0211412020) 1 Photo Point 21-- Reach 4 — Downstream (0211412020) 1
WVCatfish Pond 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

Ditch D
Photo Point 22 — East/Downstream (0211412020)
Photo Point 23 — East/Downstream (0211412020)
`. Catfish Pond it Mitigation Bank Parcel
H UC 03020201

Mountain Tributary
' t
ri.
Photo Point 24 — East/Downstream (0211412020) Photo Point 25 — East/Toward stream (0211412020)
Photo Point 26 — Northeast/Downstream (0211412020)
WVCatfish Pond 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel
HUC 03020201

Project Location x
' Conservation Easement Boundary
RMS Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Ephemeral Channel
�r
Intermittent Stream
F - Perennial Stream
Non -Project Streams
1s k' �. /I }►s •' P i �' Topographic Contours t4'
or j"J"', A
• x' ;�_ + ' 3 � Existing Tree Line
QQ Reach Breaks
26 fir,
r 0 Photo Points
Y.
i ��J ¢fix r � •, ��� - J ',�' � r
6 a.{s j
ti 21,
L�S.iL3J.l � 'u. tea++ _ � � • � .� + �lb . � -_. � i, •' �. �-y�� }�
14
Is
11
ra
� r • i{ �.� f r i
12 17
r
L.
Photo Log Points
W I L D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
E N G I N E E R I N G I I i I I Neuse River Basin 03020201 (Falls Lake Basin)
Durham County, NC

.1%
- 60
•

r
i 1 ■}C t x 'y- .
.[7

. -, 7--, -, - �
CIF'. �A 'r F � M■� � 1 }
11 �R�7q r

Iwo Ao

Vlk
M

•+ � ., k+ �rr� 1� •�;�,�;• � I , i ;��'���y •_ .ry�-1`�i ' it}i' 'l��''i�: �1 ac_ .��
l� •i . igyp, f, .
ot
. �r� '+�+- `� �' t r. '� 'y� +:�•� ►. �� yy
'•i ,•aya ;[��� t' ' �} •'V�' .r :.�-�{, y.'4 ��ey, .�
i- y1.
y t s.� %R•f ¢�yr ; ,_ 'L +s';" �}+'� gti
■ �,. i. .. sir � i •, • � �
•Y�L�r• 1 �•. '•x'�•r-. ,,j� 3'>y. r� ��: �i' +• . ? '• �}'1': Z'�,[aw � �.-'r'''y'
_•.A.� -vf� yyrt �]'% ^ �( + �' Z �a • kr� :1. , f • .r{:. ;y rk r� -�
Y •• i r �'R� '�'1.� i� � S i;'. Y �.:[a �fS} �' � iY �r cs '� .'� �• + ''# ��C�. �yri � �'� 4� C r
si
qk
'r N � : - .�:; .�i,' .fir .� + �. • _ �`-, n�. 1
�• .; '` �� 'a,
rtw
�{,. .�il'�r •ti"�7�'�. +?�3 a �' F'r • rl•� ��1 � 1.. Jy, .pf'
t ;7
,i ,F
•�����1 �•�� .�'�����JY s? .,ry,j\N�y { ;tin
p ..
�y s •ki
L
ell
INQUIRY #: 4382018.1
YEAR: 2008
�►'
(rE QR
j?..
sp

-"Sft�
.. p mow+`
~•
.''1iC.
,�.r'-�
.
INQUIRY #. 4382018"1 4 N
YEAR: 2049
EDR
� 1 = rJa0'
w

f
{ r, z r {,
�v 64i�
• ''
t fir. ti +5 _. ' p �ti• s '' ! { r. `.. U r DO d '�
ail. � �� ,r±�►
r VC
Y' r ' •'
r� •: �
� ti'�.�Ll t+p il:.�a•r ••s ■RYw...w-�ipa�/.7• .1 Ri r.t•r
kv 3
� 6
4fit
b.'
OF
INQUIRY M 4382018.1
YEAR: 2012
= 500'
homew�r
4N
CEIM
t.�f.x`�f � • �.r
�� .r

Water Rrsources
tNV1PGN fNrALQUALIrx
March 13. 2018
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attn: John Hutton
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
(via electronic malt: scott(ci+wate.rlandsolutions.com 1
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
� a 1.'Ir•.1
LINDA CULPEPPER
hl0.,"J,I l),1ttIdr
DWR ID# 20I8-0196
Johnston County
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset— Catfish Pond Site
Off US-501 (36.158391.-78-907343)
Neuse 03020201 (Falls Lake WS)
Durham County
Dear Mr. Hutton,
On February 23, 2018, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources {DWR}, assisted you
and others from Wildlands Engineering, Inc. at the proposed Catfish Pond Mitigation Site (Site)
in Bahama, NC. The Site is located in the Falls Lake WS of the Neuse River Basin within the 8-
digt Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The Site is being proposed as part of a full -delivery
stream restoration project for the Division of Mitigation Services (Rl~ P 916-007279). Members
of the Interagency Review Team (IRT) and Division of Mitigation Services were also present
onsite. At your request, on February 23, 2018, Ms. Merritt performed an onsite assessment of
riparian land uses adjacent to streams and ditches onsite, which are shown on the attached map
labeled "Figure 6A Concept Map".
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination I'or the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was spade from Top of Bank (TOB)
out to 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (etiective
November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B ,0240-
Feature
Classification
'Subject
Riparian Land uses
Buffet
Nutrient
Mitilzation Type Determination w(in riparian
ad atent to Feature
areas
to Buffer
Credit
Offset Viable
Rule
0-200'
at 2,273
Viable
lbs acre
uTl
Stream &
Yes
Combination of
yes'
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Wetland
(where
forested and
forested fields
M95 (n)
complex
stream is
non/forested pasture
only)
Proposed for
restored)
grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
stream
NCAC 02B .0295 (a) (6)
restoration
Crossing I has impeded flow and Crossing 2 is
severely perched with impeded flow. Bath
crossings need be rep aired1reploced.
Slate of Nonlr Camllna Ewiniowntal Quahry Waier, Resources
1617 Mail ServiceVentcr RateigK Nrm6Carolina 27604-1617

Catfish Pond Full -Delivery Site
Wildlands
March 13, 2018
Feature
Classification
'Subject
Ri arian Land uses
Buffer
ZNutrient
Mitigation Type Determination wlin riparian
adjacent to Feature
areas
to Buffer
Credit
Offset Viable
Rule
0-20(r)
Viable
at 2,273
Ibs acre
D
Ditch
No
Non -forested pasture
*See
Yes
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
grazed by cattle
Note
.0295 (n)
*The ditch meets 1SA NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A,.
B, C & E). More information is needed for
complete assessment.
Catfish
Stream
Yes
Combination of
Yes4
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Creek
forested and
forested fields
.0295 (n)
non/forested pasture
only)
grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (6)
Crossing 3 has impeded flow and needs to be
repalred/replaced
Catfish
In -line pond
Yes
Combination of
•Yes°
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
Pond
(proposed
forested and
forested fields
.0295 (n)
for stream
non/forested pasture
only)
Restoration)
grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 028 .0295 (a) (6)
"If stream channel is created & restored
through the pond, the new riparian areas will be
viable as a Restoration Site
UT2
Stream
Yes
Mostly forested
Yes4
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
pasture with some
forested fields
0295 (n)
open canopy areas
only)
and grazed by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 026.0295 (a) (6)
Mountain
Stream
Yes
Mostly forested
Yes°
Yes (non-
Fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 028
Tributary
pasture with some
forested fields
.0295 (n)
open canopy areas
only)
and grated by cattle
Forested Areas - Enhancement Site per 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (a) (6)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 12, 2018 using the 1-,24,000
scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared
by the NRCS
z NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reduclions associated with
Riparian Buffer Establishment
'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total
area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (a)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation only site
to comply with this rule.
°The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B
.0295(o)(6).

Catfish Pond Full -Delivery Site
Wildlands
March 13, 2018
The attached map (Figure 6A Concept Map) showing the project site and features was provided by
Wildlands Engineering and was initialed by Ms. Merritt on March 13, 201 S. There were at least 3
crossings that need to he repaired or replaced to allow for aquatic passage and continuous
hydrologic connectively throughout the streams. This letter should be provided in any future
stream, wetland, buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written
approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for
buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240, a proposal regarding a proposed nutrient
load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior to any
mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240. For any areas
generating wetland mitigation credit, no buffer or nutrient offset credit can be generated.
This viability assessment will expire on March 13, 2020 or upon the submittal of an As -Built
Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. Please contact Katie Merritt at (919)-807-6371 if you
have any questions regarding this correspondence.
Sincerely,
1
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
KAH/km
Attachments: Figure 6A Concept Map
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
DMS - Jeff Schaffer (via electronic mail)
311

JN itZurro,7 iuoyina
4i
ToZoZQEo uiseg Dania asna��(]�a
all LIOI]p$I�I 1J nn� �NIa33NI�N3
S w puod qsi lei ;aa VL s Cf N d'i CT IT I M
(T uoiado)dew lda3uoD' Vg aanSi j
'41 o � r ►ire . ■
�1
*� r'rrrrrrrlrlrrrisrrrsorIminlmmraim irirrrMIN i.win
is,�F��
!• r
or..,
--
ir ` ►+!*.} eaae fid130
/j. y .-... 01 puellam siq; ppe
�. ,• —,� -law eiialpo ;r
_f
.. . f s�uaulnupagnq jol ppe
ueo inq a -,eta dW9 o�y
AA
��'YiC 'irr��r}��rr�a�i�rl�lr ir�rrwrrrrra�
uoileaolsaa Weails " 4
n luawa3ue4u3 weans
sleoig 43eaa
sweajls8uilsix3a-
sPuissoa:) pasodoad ® ��, �` �••� :i ' ►,'t
luawase3 uoile"asuo:) pasodoJd
uoileao1laafoad j r.r� �. , {

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Wildlands Engineering, Inc,
Attn: Andrea Eckardt
NORTH CAROLINA
En vtronmen Pat Quality
February I9, 2020
1430 South Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
(via electronic mail: aeckardt(epwildlandsene.com }
DWR ID# 2018-0196
Johnston County
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset - Catfish Pond Site
OfFUS-501 (36.158391,-78.907343)
Neuse 03020201 (Falls Lake Watershed)
Durham County
Dear Ms. Eckardt
On March 13, 2018. DWR issued a site viability letter for the Catfish Pond Site (DMS RFP#16-
007279), On February 18, 2020, you requested one (1) amendment be considered to the: previous
letter. Upon DWR review of the documentation you provided on February 18, 2020, this letter
replaces the previous letter with the following amendment only_
1. Expiration date for the viability assessment is extended through September 13, 2020.
This viability assessment will now expire on September 13, 2020 or upon the submittal of an As -
Built Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if
you have any questions regarding this correspondence.
Sincerely,
Mac Haupt, Acting Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Mfirknl
Attaclunents: Site Viability Letter dated March 13. 2018
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
North Carollna Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
E � 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mall Srrviot Center } Raleigh, Nmh Carolina 27699 1611
919707.9000

United States Department of the
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 03/02/2420
Self -Certification Letter
Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Dear Applicant:
71
FAAiL'1C'li
Interior
.y
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
+/ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect' determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Date: 03/02/2020
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Determination
Neuse River Waterdog
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
(Necturus lewisi)
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, ditch
size, and lack of constant water flow through all seasons. No
individuals of the species were found. The proposed project is
not in the proposed critical habitat area designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Carolina Madtom
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
(Noturus furiosus)
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, siltation,
ditch size, and lack of constant water flow through all seasons.
No individuals of the species were found. The proposed
project is not in the proposed critical habitat area designated
by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no
known element occurrences exist within the proposed project
area.
Atlantic Pigtoe
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
(Fusconaia masoni)
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, siltation,
and lack of constant water flow through all seasons. No
individuals of the species were found. The proposed project is
not in the proposed critical habitat area designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Michaux's Sumac
Suitable habitat present,
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on April 13, 2018 and February
(Rhus michauxii)
Species not present
14, 2020. Suitable habitat was found but cattle have full
access to the entire area and no individuals of the species
were found. There is no critical habitat designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Smooth Coneflower
Suitable habitat present,
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on April 13, 2018 and February
(Echinacea laevigata)
Species not present
14, 2020. Suitable habitat was found but cattle have full
access to the entire area and no individuals of the species
were found. There is no critical habitat designated by USFWS
for this species. Per NCNHP data explorer, no known element
occurrences exist within the proposed project area.
Bald Eagle
No known nests in area
Unlikely to disturb nesting bald
eagles
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present

Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about
impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Environmental Scientist
Signature /Title Date
03/02/2020

` United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
A-`'T- Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: February 21, 2020
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0708
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578
Project Name. Catfish Pond 11 Mitigation Bank Parcel
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECDS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List

02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/21/2020 EVent Code: 04EN2000.2020-E-01W8
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0708
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578
Project Name: Catfish Pond 11 Mitigation Sank Parcel
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Catfish Pond lI Mitigation Bank Parcel (Phase II) is a buffer restoration
project located approximately twelve miles north of the City of Durham
and approximately three miles east of the Orange County/Durham County
border. The project is comprised of approximately 31.5 acres along
Catfish Creek and three additional unnamed tributaries. The Parcel has
historically been disturbed due to livestock use. This project will establish
adequate buffers along these streams to improve water quality and
wildlife habitat, both aquatic and terrestrial. The project easement is
immediately adjacent to Catfish Pond Mitigation Site (Phase I of the
project), which is currently under construction. The Parcel expands the
riparian buffer area from 50 feet in Phase I to 100-200 feet on project
streams and ephemeral channels.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.16225387304823N78.91412318492708W
Counties: Durham, NC

02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: hqps:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164

02/21/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01578 4
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Tasha King
From: Wells, Emily N <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:02 AM
To: Mann, Leigh; Tasha King
Subject: Re: DUE DATE: MARCH 26, 2020 Fw: Online Project Review Certification Letter - Catfish Pond II
Mitigation Bank Parcel
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Hi Tasha,
Thank you for the information and descriptions of the site conditions. Based on the location and current
conditions of the site, we would agree with your conclusion table for these species. You do not need anything
further from the Service.
Thank you,
Emily
From: Mann, Leigh <[e-mail]> on behalf of Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 9:07 AM
To: Wells, Emily N <[e-mail]>
Subject: DUE DATE: MARCH 26, 2020 Fw: Online Project Review Certification Letter - Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank
Parcel
From: Tasha King <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 1:35 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Online Project Review Certification Letter - Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel
Good morning,
I have attached a copy of the Catfish Pond II Mitigation Bank Parcel online project review certification letter. The US Fish
and Wildlife Service has previously responded to Wildlands request for comment on NCDMS Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
(Phase I of the project), which is currently under construction, in a letter dated March 2, 2018. Catfish Pond II Mitigation
Bank Parcel (Phase 11) is a buffer restoration project adjacent to the current Phase I easement. The Parcel expands the
riparian buffer area from 50 feet in Phase I to 100-200 feet on project streams, ephemeral channels, and a ditch. The
three newly proposed endangered or threatened species in this area are included in the Species Conclusion Table.
I have also attached a map (Figure 1) to help clarify but please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you very much,
Tasha King

Ilb
W 1 LDLAND S
kI-40INetR0N0
March 2, 2020
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Catfish Pond Il Mitigation Bank Parcel
Durham County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Catfish Pond I Mitigation Bank Parcel (Phase Il) is a buffer restoration project located approximately twelve miles
north of the City of Durham and approximately three miles east of the Orange County/Durham County border. The
project is comprised of approximately 31.6 acres along Catfish Creek and three additional unnamed tributaries.
The project easement is immediately adjacent to the NCDMS Catfish Pond Stream Mitigation Site (Phase I of the
project), which is currently under construction. The Parcel expands the riparian buffer area on the project streams
from 50 feet in Phase I to 100-200 feet on project streams, ephemeral channels, and a ditch (Figure 1).
The State Historic Preservation Office has previously responded to our request for comment on Phase I (tracking
number ER 18-0328) in a letter dated March 5, 2018, stating they "are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected". WIIdlands Engineering, Inc. would like to request a review and comment on the additional area
covered by Phase II of the project JFigure 1j.
The project area has been historically disturbed due to livestock use. No surveyed sites listed on the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation office website are located within the project area, there are no existing structures in
the easement area, and no archaeological artifacts have been observed. A USGS Topographic Map and a Site Map
showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Rougemont
7.5-Minute USGS Topographic quadrangle, and the site is located at latitude 36.163542 longitude-78.911456. We
ask that you review the additional Phase II project area based on the attached information to determine the
presence of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
J
Tasha King
En vironmentol Scientist
t k i n g @ w i Idla ndseng.co m
919.851.9986 x116
Attachment:
Figure 15ite Map
Figure 2 U5G5 Topographic Map
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. lRl 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road. Suite 225 • Rateigh, NC 27609

5rATZ o
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
[Urnona M. Bartos, Adminimr .nor
Governor Ruy Cooper
srcrvarr Susi 1-i- Flamilttm
April 17, 2020
Tasha Tang
WiIdlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Catfish Pond Mitigation Site, Bahama, ER 18-0328
Dear Ms. Ding:
tking wildlandscn r, tern
Thank you for your email of March 2, 2020, concerning the above project.
[)F6ce uFAmIuves and History
Deputy secretory Kevin Chem
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 35 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If ),on have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-81 ¢G579 or
environmental.rei,iewgncdcr.g;Qv. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
amona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location. 109 EAst]unwsstrret. Ralrigh NC r7601 Mailing Address:4G17 Mail StTvicr Canter. R,iloil h NC. 276994W Telephone/Fax; [phone])/$rn-6599

N Roxboro Rd
N Roxboro Rd
Bahama, NC 27503
Inquiry Number: 5170975.2s
January 29, 2018
6 Armstrong Road, 4th Floor
Shelton, CT 06484
CEDR Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edmet-com
FORM-LBO-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
OverviewMap----------------------------------------------------------- 2
DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting
Source
Addendum
A-1
Physical Setting
Source
Summary
A-2
Physical Setting
Source
Map------------------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting
Source
Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-9
Physical Setting
Source
Records Searched
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC5170975.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
N ROXBORO RD
BAHAMA, NC 27503
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
36.1625620 - 36° 9' 45.22"
78.9100680 - 78° 54' 36.24"
Zone 17
687990.5
4003802.0
439 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5945265 ROUGEMONT, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140619
Source: USDA
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
N ROXBORO RD
BAHAMA, NC 27503
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
5170975.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS___________________ Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY ---------- Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF----------------- RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------ RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG--------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS --------- Engineering Controls Sites List
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US INST CONTROL_________ Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS------------------------ Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST_________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST ------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST ----------------- State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST___________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________ AST Database
INDIAN LIST ------------------ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP__________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP------------------ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS__________ A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY______________________ Recycling Center Listing
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI__________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS_______________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD__________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80--------------------
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR---------
RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD_________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS______-
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST ------------
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCP-
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS_________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS-------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD
Records Of Decision
RMP_________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS_______________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS__________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA --------------
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER________
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS___________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP_____________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA -
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US AIRS_____________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES --------------------
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES
Abandoned Mines
FINDS ------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO --------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO ------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
COAL ASH
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS--------------
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC---------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner ------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS-------------------- Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST___________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC5170975.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 5170975.2S
Target Property
0 va 112 uu�s
c
• Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
�_
�I
Indian Reservations BIA u Llpgradient Area
Sites at elevations lower than
100 ar flood zone Hazardous Substance
the er target property g p p ty
❑�
500-year flood zone Disposal Sites
L Manufactured Gas Plants
National Wetland Inventory
National Priority List Sites
❑
State Wetlands
Dept. Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display andlar hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: N Roxboro Rd CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: N Roxboro Rd CONTACT: Carolyn Lanza
Bahama NC 27503 INQUIRY #: 5170975.2s
LATILONG: 36-162562178-910068 DATE: January 29, 2018 2:29 pm
Comi0t ! 2018 EAR, Inc.:•2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 5170975.25
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
•
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1115 :'8 114 MIles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance '
F-I Disposal Sites
100-year flood zone
500-year flood zone i
■ National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display andlar hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: N Roxboro Rd CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: N Roxboro Rd CONTACT: Carolyn Lanza
Bahama NC 27503 INQUIRY #: 5170975.2s
LATILONG: 36-162562178-910068 DATE: January29, 2018 2:31 pm
Co pyrio ht :- 2018 EAR. Inc.:, 2015 To mTom Re I. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-CESQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC5170975.2s Page 4

Database
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
HIST LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
ODI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
US CDL TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
SPILLS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
IMD 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
SPILLS 90 TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
SPILLS 80 TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
TC5170975.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance
Target
Database
(Miles)
Property < 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1
> 1
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
US FIN ASSUR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
EPA WATCH LIST
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
TSCA
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
TRIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
SSTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
RMP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
RAATS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PRP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PADS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ICIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MLTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COAL ASH DOE
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
PCB TRANSFORMER
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
RADINFO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
HIST FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
DOT OPS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
LEAD SMELTERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
US AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
FINDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
DOCKET HWC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ECHO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
Financial Assurance
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NPDES
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
UIC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP
0 0 0 0 NR
0 NR NR NR NR
0 NR NR NR NR
Total
Plotted
1
NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC5170975.2s Page 6

Database
RGA LF
RGA LUST
- Totals --
Search
Distance
(Miles)
TP
TP
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Target
Property
Al
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
Total
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1 > 1
Plotted
NR
NR
NR
NR NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR NR
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
TC5170975.2s Page 7