19960831 Ver 1_Complete File_19960915

•«
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston How a rd, Jr., P.E.,Direc to r
WVA&T4 0
4;Ij- g
10
?EHNR
October 10, 1996
Pender County
DWQ Project # 960831
State Project No. 8.2271101,TIP# B-2602
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Franklin Vick
N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.43 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
replacing Bridge #115 over Holly Shelter Creek at SR 1523, as you described in your application. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number 3025.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and any additional conditions listed below. The area of temporary fill shall be removed to grade and
revegetated with native tree species. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincer ,
Ptest Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
John Parker; DCM
Cyndi Bell, NC DOT
960831.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge #115 crossing Holly Shelter Creek on SR 1523
between SR 1520 and Highway 53, approximately 6 miles east of Interstate 40, in Pender
County.
Photo Index - 1995: No Photo 1989: No Photo
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2359200 Y: 315600
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA, D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 4/10/96
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - cc: 8/26/96
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Pender
Land Classification From LUP - Rural, Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Replacement Bridge, Detour Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Wooded Swamp 1800 sf 18,786 sf
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
High Ground 4303 sf 129,954 sf
Open Water 3948 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 3.65 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: Yes
(F) Water Classification: C-Swamp Open: No resource
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation proposes the replacement of Bridge
#115 over Holly Shelter Creek, constructing a temporary detour bridge for use during
construction.
DOT SR 1523
Page 2
9. PROTECT DESCRIPTION 8/27/96
The project site is the State Road 1523 bridge crossing Holly Shelter Creek, a tributary to the Northeast
Cape Fear River in Pender County. This is a very rural area, and the only route between SR 1520 and
Highway 53. The creek is approximately 140' wide and 13' deep at the site location, with a flow rate
of 60 cubic feet per second. There are ravines on three of the four sides, apparently areas of
disturbance from construction of the original bridge. On the east side of the bridge, on both the north
and south sides, there is an expanse of wooded swamp. This system is vegetated primarily with Sweet
Gum, pines, Cypress, Holly, and Broom Sedge. Under the bridge on the south side and to the
southwest, there is a 4' escarpment to the lower areas vegetated with Soft Rush and Southern Cane.
The creek bottom is a clay/sand composition.
The Northeast Cape Fear and its tributaries are classified as inland waters. The Pender County Land
Use Plan classifies the area as Rural, with the area within the CAMA Area of Environmental Concern
as Conservation. The Division of Environmental Management classifies the waters of Holly Shelter
Creek as C-Swamp. The Division of Marine Fisheries has designated the area as Primary Nursery, and
there is no shellfish resource. While DOT states that there is no anadromous fish resource in the creek,
DMF sampling has shown significant numbers of shad and striped bass. An archeological assessment
has been done on the project site by the applicant.
The existing right-of-way is 60' for this roadway and bridge. The existing bridge extends approximately
208.5', spanning 138' over the creek, with a 17'9" travelway. The distance between bents on this
existing structure is 33', with a 14.43' vertical clearance.
The proposal is to replace the existing bridge with a 240' structure, having a 28.2' travelway, and 4'
shoulders on the approaches. The proposal calls for 68.9' between bents, with a final vertical clearance
of 14.8'. Because there are no alternate routes, a detour road is necessary. The detour was planned
for the east, or upstream side of the existing structure in order to minimize impacts. The proposal is
to construct a detour bridge with the same clearance as the existing one.
Construction of the proposed bridge and approaches will require the permanent filling of approximately
6000 square feet of wooded swamp (approximately 10' x 600'); another 12, 786 square eet w be
temporarily filled for the detour (approximately 213' x 30' and 246' x 26') -fie temporary fill will
be placed on ge?otextile fabric for ease of removal. Approximately 1800 square feet of wooded swamp
(265' x 6.6') will be excavated for the project. Approximately 4303 square feet of high ground (1312'
x 3.28') will be excavated, and another 129,954 square feet of high ground (1969' x 66') will be filled
and graded for the structure. The spoil removed during excavation will be a portion of the fill placed
in the roadway. The finished surface of the structure will be asphalt and concrete.
On the north side of the bridge, there is an existing steel pipe, 23' x 1,' connecting the wetlands. The
proposal calls for replacing this with a concrete pipe, 65.6' x 2.5', in order to maintain the hydrologic
flow. The 600 CSP shown on the plans is a temporary pipe placed in the roadway ditch.
The Department proposes to employ standard BMP's for sedimentation/erosion control purposes. There
is no shoreline stabilization associated with this project.
1
10. ANTICIPATED EMPACTS
The existing bridge on this location is in disrepair and in need of replacement. Construction of the
project as proposed will permanently fill and remove from jurisdiction approximately 6000 square feet
of wooded swamp, and temporarily remove another 12,786 square feet. Approximately 1800 square
feet of wooded swamp will be excavated. Approximately 4304 square feet of high ground will be
excavated and 129,954 square feet filled for the project. The bridge will incorporate approximately
3948 square feet of open water. Navigation in the creek will be improved horizontally and vertically.
Surface flow through the swamp should be improved. Turbidity impacts are to be expected during
construction.
Submitted by: T. Barrett Date: 8/27/96 Office: Wilmington

1??
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
March 14, 1996
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
ATTENTION: Mr. Bob Stroud
E D - TR? 0 1Tu H 711
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Pender County - Replacement of Bridge No. 115 over Holly Shelter
Creek on SR 1523; T.I.P. No. B-2602; State Project No. 8.2271101
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace the
referenced structure on existing location, along with associated approach
improvements. The new bridge is to be approximately 73.2 meters (240 feet)
long with a 6.6 meter (21.6 foot) travelway with 1.2 meter (4.0 foot)
shoulders on each side. Navigation will be accommodated with a vertical
clearance of 4.5 meters (14.8 feet) above ordinary high water and a
horizontal clearance of 21.0 meters (68.9 feet). The elevation of the entire
bridge will be raised approximately one meter (3.28 feet) in order to meet
current design standards requiring an increased superstructure depth. The
existing navigation clearance and roadway approaches will be maintained.
The replacement of the bridge on existing location will require 0.055
hectare (0.14 acre) of permanent fill in disturbed wetlands. Please note
that this reflects avoidance of larger wetland impacts (approximately 0.64 ha
{1.55 acre) which would have been incurred by placing the structure on new
location. NCDOT has also investigated the possibility of utilizing retaining
walls to minimize wetland fill areas. Placement of these structures to
eliminate side slopes in wetlands for this project would cost in excess of
$464,000.00. It is our opinion that this cost would be excessive considering
the minor wetland impact involved in this bridge replacement.
A temporary detour is to be constructed on the upstream side (east) of
the existing bridge. Vehicular traffic will be maintained on the run-around
detour throughout construction of the new bridge. The detour bridge will
also provide horizontal and vertical navigational clearance equal to the
existing bridge. Placement of the detour bridge will require temporary fill
in 0.11 hectare (0.27 acre) of wetlands. No excavation in wetlands will be
necessary. The temporary detour will be constructed of a readily removable
stabilization material such as geotextile fabric. This will minimize
intrusion into the organic layer of the soils and thus ensure preservation of
a seed bank in the topsoil. This should improve the speed of recovery of the
temporary fill area. All temporary fill will be removed following completion
of the permanent structure, and the detour area will be restored to its ?4
1
March 14, 1996
Page 2
original contour and surface texture. Please note that the upstream location
of the temporary detour was selected due to the presence of more extensive
wetlands, utility conflicts and a church on the downstream side of the
existing bridge.
No stream relocation or channel change will be involved. Due to the
minor area of permanent wetland fill area involved in this project, no
mitigation is proposed apart from restoration of the detour area. It is
anticipated that natural succession will lead to the re-establishment of
wetland vegetation within the footprint of the detour area.
Holly Shelter Creek has a Best Usage Classification of C Sw. It is a
tributary to the Northeast Cape Fear River and has a flow rate of 1.7 cubic
meters per second (60 cubic feet per second) at this bridge location.
NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will
be implemented throughout construction. NCDOT did not find that this system
is used by anadromous fish during spawning; therefore, no construction
moratorium is proposed.
No utilities are attached to the existing bridge. Overhead electrical
lines and an underground telephone line parallel to the structure are on the
downstream side of the bridge and will not be affected as a result of this
project.
The scope of work for this project was documented in a Categorical
Exclusion approved by the Federal Highway Administration on August 26, 1994.
Copies of this document are available upon request. Application for a Major
CAMA Permit is hereby made. By copy of this letter, a request for 401 Water
Quality Certification by the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management is hereby made. Permit drawings depicting the proposed work are
attached. A check in the amount of $250.00 has been transmitted to the DCM
office in Raleigh to cover the CAMA processing fee. A copy of the check is
included herein. The adjacent property owners have been notified of this
permit request. Copies of the letters sent to the property owners and the
certified mail receipts are attached. The signed return receipts from these
property owners will be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please
contact Cyndi Bell at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/tp
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Archie Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P. E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. Ernie Jahnke, DOA, Wilmington MAR 18 1996
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P. E., Project Management DIVISION OF
Mr. John Smith, P. E., Structure Design COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Mr. Don Morton, P. E., Highway Design
)r ORM tDCM-MP-1
APPLICATION JUL 81996
(To be completed by all applicants)
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Players
C. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: SR 1523
Name N.C. Dept of Transportation d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P. O. Box 25201
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC river, creek sound, bay) Holly Shelter Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone] OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent: a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing structure on same location
Address with adjacent temporary detour for vehicular
and boat traffic.
City State
Zip Day Phone b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax
C. Project name (if any) Bridge No. 115 c. Will the project be for public, private or
over Holly Shelter Creek commercial use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
Note: Perntit will be issued in name of landowner(s), methods of construction and daily operations
andior project name. of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. Bridge No. 115
needs to be replaced due to deterioration of
of existing structure (34.9/100 sufficiency
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED rating)SR 1523 is only paved road to Players.
PROJECT therefore, detour is needed for local traffic.
Projected traffic volume is 900 vehicles per
day for 2015 design year. Two school buses
a. County Pender use this route and cannot be detoured.
Revised 03/95
FORM-.DCM-MP-1
C IT WIR ,be existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER M /A
CHARACTERISTICS J U L 0 8 1996 LU)
Two-lane travelway DIVISION OF
a. Size of entire tract within 60' right, pf 3M COASL MANAGEMENT
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL Existing bridge 4.5 m (14.8 ft) above OHW discharges.) Surface runoff
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
A112in Autreville & Foreston fine sand
e. Vegetation on tract Mixed disturbance community
and coastal plain bottomland hardwoods.
Man-made features now on tract
Existing bridge and approaches.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
Holly Shelter Creek is Class C Sw
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Rural/Residential (not zoned)
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, ifapplicable.)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? X Yes No
If yes, by whom? NCDOT staff - see CE
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes -No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
,. FORM•DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary ro 7 C 13 T1V TIT I
number, landmarks, and the like. 6. ERTIFICATION AND
J U L 0 8 1996 ERMISSION TO ENTER ON
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necespsi ryS I O fV O LAND
TA ANAGEEMEENT
* A list of the names and complete ac?d?ses ot>?e runderstand that any permit issued in response to this
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See permit drawings
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
N/A - Existing bridge constructed 1953.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
application will allow only the development descnbed
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the -2 day of , 19 ?6 .
Print Name H. Franklin Vick P.E.
Signat re
Landowner o Authorized gent
Please indicate a ohme is pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
i AUG-26-196 MON oe:32 ID:NCDOT - HYDRAULICS TEL N0:9192504ioe
#695 P02
I. ForiT1,DCM, -;V1P-5
??FI?GES AND
CUL VERTS
7? \777
L AUG 2 6 1996
DIVI-SiO, OF
COASTAL MA14AGEMENT
Attach this form to Joint Application. for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a_ Public XX' - Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Asphalt and concrete
c_ Water body to be crossed by bridge
Holly Sheltar Creek
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) _
g• Length of proposed bridge 73.2 m (240 feet)h. Width of proposed bridge 8.8 m (28.21 feet)
-
J, Height of proposed bridge above wedands
4,0 m (13.12 feet )-
J. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow's
Yes xx No
If yes, explain .?
d_ Water depth at the proposed crossing at N LW or 1`. Navigation-elm:*anc-e•'un ernearh proposed bridge
d1t
1
14.1 feet Z 0 N W
N 1111, 4.3 m ,
_ _ _ 4, ! 4
-
e_ Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge3 I. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
No
' XX Yes reducing or increasing the existing navigable
-
If yes, opening? ...._- Yes ,.?x•..x No.
(I) Length of existing bridge 63.5 m {2Q8'5°) if yes, explain
.
(2) Width of existing bridge 5.4 m (17'9 )
_,
(3) Navigation - clearance underneath existing _? - -„
bridge 4.4m 14.43 feet
:,-• "; (4) Will alI or a part of, th6 existing bridge be
.. _ .. • -
. u• ;?>•.c::.•e removed? lain)) -All.-of. the in. ••Wi31 the proposed bridge cross wetlands Cclntainiug
existing bridge =65 xeglaced, no navigable waters7 Y Y__Yes No
a5ng with-some-approach imorovements . .?: If yes, explain •?a' ;.:. n• "`, :-
7, Aw
I a f Will propovW brid 'replace as existing bulvert(s)?
•
?
-
-
X X,
..
_-r i l?
.-n
.?w1w.N , '1 - • a
•
Yes

-'-
i .
•
1
?_
w
=+??
? f.r•
.
W .t'1:• ?f'+ w.:.r: i•`-,,.rri1` ?+w 4•.?1? ;'-C•
?
:
?
.
, ._-a
.•I
1 }
-
. r e •.7•'. •.,-.i '. .y ... i..• ..r.?• ra . „I, r' . •M ?M-.?-?, tip
Gtiatd ?
S A,Coast'?
?U
ed th
o
'
.(1) Length of existing ulvett
• .
•
•
_ '
! ?:
:•• •
• -
,
e
.
ntaet
c
n.Hive. -you' ;
tea. ... ^ ,•r:•'; .... ..I?•{v .+f•1..,
th
.
bf existing ,Avert
Width p . ?., . ,_ ..:??? .a: ?•?•??«r•:?•••,;.
' ; : • 'w- concer°ing
-•- ?
-
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above XX
_ - -
Yes -- - No...
i -- - - - ?.... the lvIHW or YYVJ. - - - , If. yes, please provide record of their action.

? ,. , •
e
?
) •' :a- ii•
• • •
_ •
-? •
.
,,:..
s
+asea al
. R .:
•
••
• •

' -AUG-26-'96 MON 15:35 ID:NCDOT -HYDRAULICS TEL N0:9192504108

Form DCI?t40-5

#709 P03
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
-- ----- potential? . yes x No . __ :. _. .
... If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed

b. Number of cuiveits.proposed I h n . 1 Te?>,?
t. Te of culvert (constniaion material, style)
e. 4
T n r
iAll
•.'d.'•: Will proposed culvert 'replace an existing bridge?
Yes
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clears m underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
so
r,?L- Yes -so
If yes,
(1) Length of existing eulve:•t 71 r-.,
('') Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the WRW or. NWL r+t
(4) Will ail, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Expnlainn) L 6- E i 6 e;'
f. Length of proposed culvert LO r"
g. Width of proposed culvert , , `1Sr•? -
h.' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL + L 4S,m
i. Will the proposed culvert affect misting water flow?
Yes )L No
If yes, explain
4.1
Revised 03145
3. • EXCAVATION AND,F L L
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MEW or NWL?
Yes X No .
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
'(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
Coastal Wedands _ SAVX(l Othgr Wetlands
If yes, Bin ?
(1) Length of area to be excsvated?m FT
(2) Width of area to be excavated"Iff, 7^2:L,13
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards i'7O ?u.YO.S.
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any bigbground excavation?
XX - Yes - No .
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated460m 1
(2) Width of area to be excavated I,,%
(3) Autount of material to be excavated in cubic
ids 220 tubas yards
d. If the plxct;ment of the bridge or culvert involve!
any excavation, please complete the following;
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
To be used for roadway fill.-
(2) I)imensions of spoil disposal area
2-0- ,. !-M_ " ar SC i GJAA ox) •
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
X Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission fror,
the owner.
r.,.._._AUC-26-'96 MON 15:36 ID:NCDOT - HYDRAULICS TEL N0:9192504108 #708 P04
rcorrh DOI-N- 0-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for furore b. Will the proposed project require the relo?tion of
maintenance? Yes X . No any existing utility lines? Yes V ion
?..
(5) hoes the disposal area include any coastal If yes, explain in derail
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands,?
_XX_ Yes - No
, (2
If yes. Live d' io,tsxif adg erent from
above, ft' c. WBI the proposed project require the ooaLstrartion of
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below any,t mporary detour structures?
the MHW or N` L? - Yes XX No XYes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 If yes, Onplain in detail A cent run-around -
aboY°' temoorarv fill to be resto ,,j
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in.-any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed?pXo act require any work X No
described in Item d. above) to be placed below If a nols? Form ACM- 2
M14W or NWL? - Yes - No yes, complete If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled c. Now will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?NCOOT Best Manaaement
(Z) Width of area to be filled - -
() Purpose of f11 Practices; silt fence, rock silt check
,
3 fTvne- 81 . Rock_$2&L memt Dam (TtMe )
Silt Basin Moe B)
f, '1 EI the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert f. What type of construction equipment will be used
result in. any fill (other than excavated material (for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
desaribed in Itent d. above) to be placed within: dredge)'? _ Heavy highway construction
_ Coastal Wetlands SAVs r ' . eauipment
0
If yes. 0,055Ha (0.•14 Acre) a- a
(1) Length. of area to`be filled
('_`) Width of area to be filled v a Wiil wetlands be crossed Lit transporting equipment
of fill tic), Flo project site? _ Yes XX No
(3) Purpose
soi.X/ If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
sand/rockfrom local source
y environmental impacts.. Z. • 'ViT'tlI the placement of the preposed bridge or culvert
•
result in arty fill (other than excavated material
descrfoed in Item d. above) to be placed on '
,
hiollground? xx__ Yes _ No h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
• •? if yam' a • • - .? ... ;. _ .. ' : yY ._ . ?,,.
Leaath of arsa to be, filled &-t Yes ' Xy No
..•:?:` -
(Z) Width of area to be filled M' X66 P % If yes, explain in derail
•-.
(3) purpose Of fill . .
- - - • Within footprint- of road/bridoe
•• '•?3?• _ ,r?•...? `?" •-- ? •:1-;•:,::?r';' ?. - for jCtt ? '.;y;?? '
In,
:•-.
•?`w•?,,`.r's;.
•m •.. - ..•' ? ? 't • .P. ~ , ••IYIStI ,?r,' : ?,e:,`:' "' . ; Sigoature •'' - - ...- ? 4 "? ..tip •,`.•!_r .i.-+-'••:'
. ed•projectinvoiv any g ,??? ",. '? :?:: =?•::.•-r: r_.
v • Y•!
.T• If yes, explain in detaill`,{Asstars?.ea-?f -?- bate - - -_ ^
`:tlet;oua area to orioinel- contour, .
elevation and surtace texture. •• -: _
. '- 2terised 03/95 • • ' .. ' • - .
s UG-16-'96 FRI 14:14 ID:NCDOT - HYDRAULICS TEL NO:9192504108 #666 Pad
STATE OF
IEPARTMENT
HAL
PROJECT
COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE ?.?-?-- STATION
P. O. BOX 23241 CHECKED BY ?- DATE --• - STR NO SHEET OP""'"-
NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT
OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIQHWAYS
s1L0 t
'3 noT?•rur. Chinquapin Catherine Lak¢ N 5 S\ M ^LeS um j , tl Tf 7A f
Par is burg U , Ingold XRose Hill E.
4 2
never ` Y 7 P
O ?\ 2t2 E t/ `??? STS I •'
l l.ah • Delwzyr? r " 10 41 J y114' I laeksanil.l L?
5 orseshoe Ammon Silver,
h
II !'`Gar and^""w*..•r=-x ?;•
Teachcy:? , t !f
53 L dke Cypress
ll Il 1 ? la•.! ?r, rk
J »} <:.-, f N l! y 4.1 k}idwa Pack
?- BLADE 41 N ?? Tin;City Creek 16
24
whcte Oak 'T x L Haire Is: i ?Wallacer•.
c . h \ .`).1 11 {'?: a v H 14 Haws P'ney reen
3 5 v
\t: st`Fy JLAKES ,?V 5 3 Tomatiaw Willard Run'?°"?„:y?tt? Z.
:•`? •? $ 41 1? J ?r ' S t?\?''e' .. Yerona? •1 err Cr.t+? (t/c;;w:
?C 10 ?•., \\ c 51 Fc,c
A i\ I p 6 1 r.r.r:i ci t
ST?AT?White / h ( Penderlea
L ke J ( J 6 a I Ef
Dublin; ?t r1\ 13rr mil(u` ree\a?" Kef' ll d Walha [1'
41 ?«k•?,???%14?J,i!e L u' ?! ?,. j ?5 '''.jl ?/ I, ill \ 18 ?' 112
2 ?'=y % Lae
2
Ehzabethtown? No Ivanhoe B I 53 I Dixon
1
r, t ?? FORES ,t•?. 3
A ©Feurl \ f! 4 - ? j
3 87 Q : E'-" N Burgaw 21 ?.
11 8 -`' S at ..r lore 210 \ r;,, 1 4 Qr
241 l?.? 8; ¢ I ` Sneads
17 y Atkinson 1 v Folk%ton Fer y x;NewRiccrl
ladenboro o, I 9 f
Wards Corner 0 vcq o or Eench .
a.Y Lisbon I; 53 c! \? 11 Holly Ridge! tooa 4 /?•_
53 P E ?t /
Rowan N ?oc? t 7 t' 0 !North Topsail Beach
\? , Moorc3 cck > APPROX. ARE,
rr Clarklon CIlOl.1N k'?ELGL.I West Onslow Beach
Kelly ! r I 4 Ih ? `/ 3
Carvers '\ \ 2 . •`? 110 f,i rcc •unal cro:h A<a•s.
i ` 111 12 -7 + 0 t? 3 t Q_? jCurrie 6 Rocky Point i 1? Tor ?.rt.rstarav_
Rune o E'eoch :.c ea
Z rl ?, Sx 87 \\ !«k 1 21 I ?3 0'1 21 . s 7 Surf City,
tyC"
k ounc,l ?` \ I 33 ' ' JJ !iampslead[
East Arcadia r'21? i ( ~'?` ?? ,? Topsail Beach
cric: ?; i• ?- ? 1 Castle ?A?cwTopsoiflnlcr \v
31 3 Aitt\lBek 7 3 ! Riegelwood "cr tW` ?`t NaYneScotts Hill 1 '
i- .C = -----? _? 6 4 -Acme \. 9;` 51.4 0 t c SOld Topsail Intel Q? 132
;T-•+ 4 HillsboroLake`s 214 6 'Bolton Freeman Delco? yMaco cs H, A 0 V-'
Rich /refer \
mn% SandyCreek??. x ,Phoen?><?\? IImI?DtQ
Waccamaw L b?
IBrunswick \ Llrpake ccarnow itwa?sa
0 5 10 20 30 SCALE OF MILES
SCALE OF KILOMETERS
0 10 20 30 40 48
? 1
b
1318
?D
1504
\.6
.? 1313
n ? -
32
C? t ti/
3.2
1303
A 130A BRI DGE ?
5ITE
S ? ?r
1.7
L 53 ` LU1
C, % V47
C,0 ASS P?- MA
K ?
.? r r
1.8
1532

Shaken
NORTH CAROLINA DEVIARTrMICNT OP TRANS 1:1ORTAT 1014
DIVISION Oh' HIGHWAYS
PENDER COUNT'S
0.2271101 (B-2602)
BRIDGE 4115 OVER I-JOLLY SHELTER CREEK AND
APPROACHES ON SR 1523
SCALE AS SHOWN
S:IEET.,,L,,,_ OP-2_ SEPTEMBER 1995
yfil(;nfill
T
?.. '.
0
z
L
A
z
0
O4
T
M

T

CA

X y

S r 7 C7 7 D
o rn - r? ? r?l
o O ? p? p ? m /iccIy
7 jR ? Ij1 '
C)
Lr ? r' 3 r' r ? r ???N,s?r?c?u r
N fn y oI > T ? I _
3 p J.,
}??. .C N 0 m
_ ' I I
E ti M
1 Z 1 ??;t ,'+ ? M
G ,fin
Z kr ? ?; ? JSnr ?
!/ r I • y
K
NO1.SSIJV ?OOi GQ -: `-=3 _ k. sckrrtL?a`"'? - / fit
? N
C?1J.fJ/JC'Jlk?'r" ' '
MATCH LINE >Y;
t STA. 14+3-7.35(-o
-L_
REV pO.T.
\I

r• i
1
f
ra'srr

SGGT ESONSId7S Jo - -'T's-al-Is
riMolis s NDS
[ZST us NO S7110VourlcTv
ONV )[7x`70 UZ1771IS N'I'IOI-l U'lAO STTlt IOCIRIG
,T:LNnoo usciN7d
S;WMMDlrl 00 NOISIAIO
NOIXV.lUOdSNVH 00 .TN7I417VdOG VNI'ICUVO I-IJUON
yl-
p o _
0 7
TI - ,{
7 U .? ? III ?
to
1I z w
W
3
N ZI
v
O
o
r
7
D
r
r:
rn
N
C
m
C`
D
r
U
r
M
7
<
T a
to r?
:.n .r
m)

r y66L'"
.tea
s??. ? ? obd ? ? 1 ? s
q
0o N
Vf m
O
tv Z
?n
? ,(tea
n
s
a
o ?
G
"? rI
r ,n
?I
I? IN p IN ik? IM

J
r Ik ?
I
t I?I ? 1 1 I.+ I ? ?
? rt I 1 th
I? n .°I 17J c o
G 1 t*+ W I T11 n<
N ?
I
7-
i
?A V? I - I
1 rv
t7 .a` I1f f' ? I i u' ?
a I eo
rI I ? o
I p
•? 1? I rn O r r
E?
?I
i
- V I
I
IV
Q(z
??l I

N
3
` -NV .. - I ? cn ?'` J F
c 6 JJ
lt• ? ? Y ti ,
1
_ AU s EL ? ', ?; ? g
rn m 1 U ,- y` ,?_r k
13
rry
• ti
-n ? m .,
r _r-
ni , to 1

? t e.r? ?V
1

U3

T X 4Gl 013 J^.Ll -'`•' _ u ?'
v ?
1
bN b' 7 t>r n
?p NO/ G1? y 7V ? vo,?
9661 60
7nI'
r-?
96GT 2INWSSd2S -"9-,10 sS?tas
Molls SV 37vos
czs;T US NO SSl10VOk7rciv
QNV X333 USW'MI-IS A710I-I 13AO STT# 210CIU0
(ZO9Z-G) TOTTLZZ'0
.T.LNfIOO i7:7QNSd
C(VMI-I0III .10 NOISIAIO
NOSx` lnodSNV:IS JO xNSWIuvdSQ VNlgouVO i•ILaON
N
Pi D _
D
_ O,
o° ?( o
° / TI
O o f rn?,? N 1_
" y .}. m f r??? r v
7 0 3U N lriy.
x
-n n, t5 S? k ? m n
)rj
r
d _ o J tit==
U I ? I
r
A _ h

r t

r ; + ?....
Q
rn
. mm
o

m ?

r

41 .
r
M
m
v?
F..?v
o s
m
D
0
3
b
d '
N
t>\
a
m z
a
a?
W
rn
r
Z
in
N <

1

o I
I.

_
-? I
I ', .
o ? I
I I
? I c
I

? I b
v ? ' In •

zlx+ v ?

V ?` r1 I N +

?1 1

II ? cri z

4`I. ? ui a

r -
i ? N
> p
U
N

0 f?- ?- 0

f`' f 13- P-,

SEG T 1 O N1 %%A -A,,,
14+Z0.D00
EL. r, .931
st . G.32D
PROP. I'ILi- '0a pzG-
2:I 4•1 ? PREP. TcMP F1Ll-
llc?
>00
L-X16`I RD SI-. 5.Z,5D \\ EXGA\/A i i D N IN
?-- ?wcTLa?l?s
_ _ _ ? PEKM.>:1LL. ?
N(;v N1GiI?NOJ 1
&--?
1J(,?-?
W?T?f`Ip ?7? 7L-MP. ?1LLiN l.?IETLA?1Dj
I I'. i I I Ll r't 1 T!? -I - ?I I I I
A-O 30 200 ) 0 0 10 ZO ?G ?g 0
144- (o.ooo -I, RGv.
14.1-&(a,q!3(v D(TOWR,
.S EGT 101?1,•t?- 8„ 4-1G"f?LAtlo ?
. L, M 1"I Z
PROP, FILL L?L.b.726
.D'
VArZ q:l
EX 15T RD.
I I I I ? I
40 J© 20 10 O 1D ,
I-IOFIZDn17AL SLALE
KEE-
10 5 0 10
V>=.R I LAS. SLAL.E
q- 2 -?
yC ?)1C
DEN DT E5 W ET L-N'\1 D5
DENOTE45,F) L-L_ 1N1 1A I i_ANID5
Dr::---ND T E5 TrMPDP,ARY FILL.
L INN WE.TLANL7fD'
DENOTES F_XGAVATIDN
I E-r L...AhI D s
8
2
2:1
? PREP. T? MP )<I J.L .?
'?EXGAVA'IICN In1 2.
W );TLAnI D5
I I I
20 30 o
NORT11 CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLNDGR COUNTY
0.2271101 (0-2602)
BRIDGE 4115 OVER HOLLY SHELTER CREEK AND
APPROACHES ON SR 1523
SCALE AS 511014N
SHEET OF ,? SEPTEMBER 1995
SITE 10, STATION STRUCTURE FILL TEMPORARY EXCAVATION
, TOTAL
IN FILL IN FILL
WETLANDS IN WETLANDS WETLANDS IN WETLANDS
(ha,/cu,m) (ha./cu,m) (ha,? (cu,m)
1 12+9ORt-14+28Rt-L-REV BRIDGE 0,030/470,0 0.062/1,190,0 0,006 1,660,0
10+46Rt-10+52Rt -Y1- OVER
HOLLY
SHELTER
CREEK
2 14+40Rt-15+08Rt-L-REV 750 RCP 0.025/685.0 0,052/1,120.0 0.011 1,805.0
10+12Lt-10+9OLt -Y1-
--------------------------
-----
---
-
-
-

TOTALS - --
-
---------
0.055/1,150.0 --------------
0.114/2,310.0 ------------
0.017 -------
--------
3,465.0
NOTE: SITE 1 IS BELOW HEADWATERS.
SITE 2 IS ABOVE HEADWATERS,
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.169 hectares / 3,465.0 cubic meters
TOTAL TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.114 hectares / 2,310.0 cubic meters
TOTAL EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS = 0.017 hectares
a

T.-
1
NORTE CAROLINA DLPARTNENT OP TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OP HIGHWAYS
PENDER COUNTY
0.2271101 (D-2G02)
BRIDGE 4115 OVCP HOLLY SHELTER CREEK AND
APPROACHES ON SR 152
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 0P --o- SEPTEMBER 1995
C