20160682 Ver 2_USACE Correspondence_20200623

Strickland, Bev
From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:15 AM
To: Mairs, Robb L
Subject: RE: [External] Ocean Isle Publix
• External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
All good, no worries
From: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:11 AM
To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sugg, Mickey T CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Ocean Isle Publix
Hey Brad,
Thanks for the email, and I'm sorry I missed your call, but I received your voicemail after a conference call with the folks
in Raleigh. Although I did not handle this project at the time, I support your on -site findings and determination in
regards to the permit condition for the monitoring requirements.
Thanks again,
Robb Mairs
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
910 796.7303 office
robb. mairsa-ncdenr.gov
Blockedhttps://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/401-
wetlands-buffer-Dermits
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
D
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)[maiIto: Brad. [e-mail]1]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:01 AM
To: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>

Cc: Mickey Sugg <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Ocean Isle Publix
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Good Morning Robb,
I tried giving you a call yesterday concerning the Publix close out. I did make it by there last week and the wetlands I was
concerned about look fine, as a matter of fact there was more water coming into them than I expected. I had forgotten
that we had them run water through the site into the wetlands. The ponds are also infiltration ponds so they should be
feeding the wetlands not pulling from them. I believe they have met the intent of our condition.
Now it was concerning that the outparcels they indicated as being necessary have not been constructed to date which
makes you wonder how critical they actually were. I think I will at least inquire about these in my response to the
consultant and developer. Finally there was still silt fence at the toe of fill around the pond that is in need of being
removed, I will ask them to do this as well.
If you have any questions just let me know,
Brad