20190884 Ver 1_Final Draft Mitigation Plan_2020_20200710

ID#* 20190884 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 07/10/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/10/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20190884
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: White Farms Mitigation Site
County: Randolph
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: White _100112_FDMP 2020.pdf 16.52MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

FINAL DRAFT:
Mitigation
White Farms Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC
NCDMS Project No
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030003
May 26, 2020
Prepared for: Prepared by:
NC Department of Environmental Quality HDR Engineering
Division of Mitigation Services 555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27601-3034
rk
1�'
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Land Management Group Contributing Staff: Ben Furr, Ryan
Smith, Alex DiGeronimo, Chris Smith, Yvette Mariotte, Michael
Foster, Kevin Williams
This Mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• NCAC rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective November 1, 2015 and Nutrients Offsets Payments Rule 15A NCAC 02B.
0240, amended effective September 1, 2010 and DWR —1998. Methodology and Calculations for determining
Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment.

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I nMs Project No. 100112
Introduction
This document governs NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services operations and procedures for the delivery of
compensatory mitigation
Randolph County, NC Page 1 May 26, 2020

4LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
June 2, 2020
Jeremiah Dow
Project Manager
NCDEQ — Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Re: Task 3 Draft Mitigation Plan Comments
White Farms Buffer Site
Cape Fear River Basin; CU# 03030003
Randolph County, North Carolina
Contract No. 7860
Mr. Dow,
As per your letter dated April 24, 2020, we have reviewed and addressed the Department of Mitigation
Services' (DMS) review comments as follows:
1. Section 1.0 (pg. 1) — In the first paragraph please clarify if the enhancement area is just cattle
removal, or if there will be planting. If only cattle removal, please refer to as "enhancement via
cattle exclusion."
RE: Comply. The language in the first paragraph has been revised to read "The Site
encompasses approximately 12.2 acres of active cattle pasture and involves restoration and
enhancement via cattle exclusion of 504,566 square feet of riparian buffers along UT Muddy
Creek (UT MC, Index #17-9-(1)) and UT 1, UT 2, and UT 5".
2. Table 1 (pg. 1) — Please show Proposed BMUs out to three (3) decimal places.
RE: Comply. The BMUs are now shown to three decimal places.
3. Section 2.1 (pg. 4) — 1 a and 1 b reference "Reducing point (i.e. cattle accessing the channel)
and non -point source..." Please remove the references to point sources in this section as cattle
accessing channels does not constitute a point source. If any point source stormwater
conveyance is present and being plugged/removed, then mention that, and show on the Figures
and/or Appendix E.
RE: Comply. Point sources of pollution are not present on -site, therefore references to point
sources have been removed from this section.
4. Table 2 (pg.
7) — The drainage area for UT to Muddy Creek should be 245 acres (currently
shows 244).
RE: Comply.
The drainage area for UT to Muddy Creek now reads 245 acres in Table 2.
5. Section 4.1 (pg. 11) — Please remove the three (3) sentences in the first paragraph referencing
credit ratios.
Some of the ratios are incorrect, and this discussion is unnecessary here as the
ratios are shown in Table 4.
RE: Comply.
The sentences referencing credit ratios have been removed from Section 4.1.
1
www.lmgroup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court — Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27604

4LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
6. Table 4 (pg. 12)
a. DMS and DWR developed a buffer calculation tool/credit table. Please update Table
4 with the latest Credit Table which is available through the DMS Template and
Guidance spreadsheet or the DWR Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Program web
page.
RE: Comply. The most up to date credit table has been included as Table 4.
Please update your project areas to match the square feet in your GIS shapefiles. For
buffer projects, DMS now requests that providers use the shapefiles for asset table
areas.
RE: Comply. Project areas in the asset table now match the areas associated with the
GIS shapefile.
7. Asset Map (pg. 13) — Please change the color coding for the UT5 mitigation types to be
consistent with the rest of the map. Also, please show proposed fencing on this map and/or in
Appendix E.
RE: Comply. UT5 coloring is now consistent with the rest of the map. Proposed fencing has
been included in the Mitigation Plansheets in Appendix E.
8. Table 7 (pg. 16) — Please adjust your planting plan so Green Ash represents 5% or less of
planted stems. DWR has been limiting the amount of Green Ash planted on sites due to
concerns about the emerald ash borer.
RE: Comply. Green Ash now represents 5% of the proposed stems within all the planting plans.
9. Table 8 (pg. 17) — Recommend for the invasive and nuisance vegetation parameter to state
"Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped and treated as necessary."
Similarly, for the Project Boundary parameter, please state that fence damage, vegetation
damage, encroachments, etc. will be addressed in some way in addition to being mapped.
RE: Comply. The language in Table 8 now reads as follows:
• Invasive and nuisance vegetation - "Locations of exotic and nuisance
vegetation will be mapped and treated as necessary"
• Project Boundary - "Mapping of fence damage, vegetation damage, boundary
encroachments, etc. will be mapped and addressed as necessary."
10. Appendix E, Sheet 2D — See comment 8 and update the planting list as necessary.
RE: Comply. The planting plan table has been updated so Green Ash only represents 5% of
the proposed stems.
11. As required by contract and Section 4.7 of RFP 16-007703, HDR must submit, and receive
approval of, a performance bond for 15% of the total value of the contract before DMS will
authorize payment for Task 3.
RE: Understood. The performance bond will be obtained before the final Mitigation Plan is
approved.
12. This is also a reminder that Task 2 has not been completed and will not be complete until the
Conservation Easement is recorded for this project and all required deliverables have been
submitted to the DMS Project Manager and State Property Office.
RE: Understood.
2
www.lmgroup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court — Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27604

4LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
FlAr,trnnir, FilAc
1. Please provide DMS with updated features for the 0_100_Restoratio n_UT5 and
0_100_Enhancement shapefiles. These shapefiles would not render in ArcMap.
RE: The mitigation area shapefiles have now been combined into one shapefile. The UT5
restoration and enhancement areas are now incorporated. A Reach column has been added to
the Attribute Table to differentiate which area correspond with UT5.
2. Please consider consolidating your shapefiles into one and adding two attribute fields to this
single shapefile. One field could identify the relevant reach, and the next could identify the
buffer width.
RE: Comply. The creditable mitigation area polygons have been condensed into one shape file.
Two attribute fields have been added. One attribute now shows the buffer width and proposed
mitigation activity, and the second identities the area's relevant reach.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call
(843.830.1536).
Sincerely,
Land Management Group
Alex DiGeronimo
3
www.lmgroup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court — Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27604

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I eMs Project No. 100112
Introduction
Contents
1.0
Introduction......................................................................................................................................1
2.0
Mitigation Project Summary.............................................................................................................3
2.1
Restoration Project Goals and Objectives....................................................................................3
2.2
Project Location Information........................................................................................................4
2.3
Baseline and Existing Conditions..................................................................................................4
2.3.1
Landscape Characteristics.....................................................................................................4
2.3.2
Land Use —Historic and Current...........................................................................................
6
2.3.3
Existing Site Conditions.........................................................................................................
6
3.0
Regulatory Considerations..............................................................................................................
11
3.1
Protected Species........................................................................................................................
11
3.2
Cultural Resources......................................................................................................................
11
3.3
Waters of the United States — 404/401 ......................................................................................11
4.0
Mitigation Credits...........................................................................................................................
11
4.1
Credit Determination..................................................................................................................
11
5.0
Mitigation Work Plan......................................................................................................................
14
5.1
Planting Plan and Invasive Species Removal...............................................................................
14
5.1.1
Reference Vegetation Data.................................................................................................
14
5.1.2
Planting Plan.......................................................................................................................
15
5.2
Exclusionary Cattle Fencing........................................................................................................
16
5.3
Stream Bank Stabilization...........................................................................................................
17
5.4
Piped Channel Crossings.............................................................................................................
17
6.0
Monitoring Plan..............................................................................................................................
17
7.0
Success Criteria...............................................................................................................................
18
8.0
Stewardship....................................................................................................................................18
8.1
Ownership...................................................................................................................................18
8.2
Long Term Management Plan.....................................................................................................
18
9.0
References......................................................................................................................................19
Randolph County, NC Page i May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I eMs Project No. 100112
Introduction
=igures
Figure1. Vicinity Map...................................................................................................................................2
Figure2. NRCS Soils Map..............................................................................................................................
5
Figure3. Drainage Area Map........................................................................................................................
8
Figure4. Land Use Map................................................................................................................................9
Figure 5. Current Conditions Map...............................................................................................................
10
Figure6. Asset Map....................................................................................................................................13
W-17M
Table1. Project Attributes............................................................................................................................1
Table 2. Existing Stream Conditions.............................................................................................................. 7
Table 3. Regulatory Considerations............................................................................................................ 11
Table 4. Buffer Project Areas and Assets: Riparian Buffer Credits............................................................. 12
Table 5. Credit Release Schedule................................................................................................................14
Table 6. Reference Vegetation Plot Data.................................................................................................... 15
Table7. Planting Plan..................................................................................................................................16
Table 8. Monitoring Plan Components....................................................................................................... 17
Appendices
Appendix A—
Historic Aerial Photography
Appendix B —
Photo Log
Appendix C —Categorical
Exclusion Documentation
Appendix D
— Buffer Viability and Stream Determination
Appendix E —
Mitigation Plan Sheets
Appendix F —
Memorandum of Option
Randolph County, NC Page ii May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I nMs Project No. 100112
Introduction
1.0 Introduction
The White Buffer Mitigation Site (Site) has been selected by the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DIMS)
to provide Buffer Mitigation Units (BMUs) in the Cape Fear River Basin (Hydrologic Unit Code 03030003;
14-digit hydrologic unit code 03030003010060). This Site is located approximately 2.8 miles southeast
of Archdale in Randolph County, NC (Figure 1). The Site encompasses approximately 12.2 acres of active
cattle pasture and involves restoration and enhancement via cattle exclusion of 504,566 square feet of
riparian buffers along UT Muddy Creek (UT MC, Index #17-9-(1)) and UT 1, UT 2, and UT 5.
The intent of mitigation activities is to establish a vegetated buffer along the existing streams and
provide functional uplift of features within the existing landscape. Functional uplift will be provided
through the stabilization of actively eroding stream banks; planting of a riparian buffer; and excluding
cattle from the easement.
Toble 1. Project Attributes
Project Attributes
Project Name
White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site
County
Randolph
Project Area (acres)
12.2
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.887369,-79.927081
River Basin
Cape Fear (03030003)
14 digit HUC
03030003010060
EPA level IV Ecoregion
Southern Outer Piedmont
Proposed BMUs
469,459.424
Randolph County, NC Page 1 May 26, 2020

Oak Hollow •� — r.. �+ :I 7 vv I 3
fake —
35A
is A
�65jW66AAi66. —e, .'!! ! .� - 97B 33~� 71is
ssi
�211=56fr__?8�,
uo-A
Tg 9
VICINITY MAP
WHITE BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0 Mies 4 FIGURE 1

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100112
Mitigation Project Summary
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
The Site is located in Randolph County within the Muddy Creek Watershed, USGS 14-digit hydrologic
unit 03030003010060. Site streams flow directly to Muddy Creek (segment 17-9-(1)) approximately 1.0
mile east of the Site. Muddy Creek is a primary direct contributor to the Randleman Reservoir. A Local
Watershed Plan has not been developed for this hydrologic unit. However, the Site does fall within the
Deep River Basin (HUC 03030003) which is discussed within the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP) report (2009). The RBRP notes the goals for the Deep River Basin that are to protect
several mussel species recognized by the Wildlife Resource Commission as a priority for protection,
protect the federally endangered Cape Fear Shiner, and to improve water quality to waters draining to
Randleman Reservoir.
The latest Cape Fear Basinwide Water Quality Plan (2005) was reviewed to determine longstanding
water quality stressors within the overall basin and within the Site's sub -watershed. Some of the
identified stressors and recommendations identified in the Plan are listed below:
• Habitat Degradation — sedimentation, lack of organic material and channelization. A
recommendation was noted to maintain riparian buffers as an effort to assist in slowing
degradation.
• Arsenic, Chlorophyll a, Low Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Turbidity, Fecal Coliform Bacteria and
Enterococcus, Mercury in fish tissue.
• Agriculture — A recommendation noted was to continue and increase agricultural BMP's.
• Forestry — A recommendation noted was to continue and increase forestry BMP's.
In 2002, Muddy Creek was placed on the 303(d) list and a TMDL was created for Muddy Creek's
watershed in 2004 to address fecal coliform impairment. Two segments of Muddy Creek were
considered impaired due to fecal coliform. Site streams flow directly into one of those two segments
(17-9-(1)). Primary sources of fecal input as identified in the document include nonpoint sources and
Point Sources. Nonpoint sources were identified in the document as runoff from pasture and other
agricultural lands near streams, wildlife, and domestic animals. The document also notes that
agricultural land may contribute to greater runoff of fecal coliform compared with other inputs during
storm events due to the increased impact of agriculture on riparian corridors. Point Sources of fecal
coliform are identified as two low -scale wastewater treatment plants and urban stormwater discharging
directly to Muddy Creek. The document suggests reductions of fecal coliform to achieve the TMDL
should target storm -driven sources of runoff such as agricultural lands, residential areas, repairing aging
sewer and septic systems and removal of SSO's.
Two of the primary redundancies from watershed information listed above is that fecal pathogens and
nutrient/sedimentation from agricultural production is stressing the Cape Fear River Basin and
specifically the Muddy Creek Watershed. Buffer restoration at the Site will directly and significantly
address both fecal pathogens and agricultural production. Primary goals of this buffer restoration
project focus on:
Reduce water quality stressors associated with nutrient, sediment, and pathogen loading.
Enhance terrestrial and aquatic habitat.
Randolph County, NC Page 3 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100112
Mitigation Project Summary
These goals will be accomplished through the following objectives:
Reducing water quality stressors will be directly tied to the following:
a) Reducing non -point source (i.e. cattle accessing the channels, stormwater runoff
through pastures and feeding stations) pollution associated with on -site agricultural
operations by installing exclusionary fencing to remove cattle and machinery from
on -site streams and riparian buffers.
b) Reducing non -point pollution associated with on -site agricultural operations by
restoring and enhancing riparian vegetative buffers on adjacent floodplains to treat
surface water runoff from adjacent pastureland.
c) Further removing agricultural equipment and cattle by providing and/or improving
culverted agricultural crossings.
d) Treatment of pollution associated with off -site agricultural, institutional, and
residential properties by restoring and enhancing riparian vegetative buffers on -site
to attenuate nutrient and sediment laden floodwaters.
Enhancement of terrestrial and aquatic habitat will be directly tied to
a) Restoring native vegetation to the existing maintained and highly impacted riparian
corridors will diversify flora and create a protected habitat corridor that will provide
an abundance of available foraging and cover habitat for a multitude of mammals
and birds. Additionally, establishment of woody vegetation in the riparian corridor
will provide direct inputs of woody debris to adjacent conveyances that will assist in
increasing biomass and cover habitat for aquatic species.
2.2 Project Location Information
The Site is located within the Southern Outer Piedmont, approximately 2.9 miles southeast of Archdale,
NC. One air transport facility (Darr Field (FAA Identifier NC03)) is located approximately 3.5 miles
northwest of the Site. The facility is privately owned.
Directions to the Site:
From Raleigh -Durham International Airport: 1-40 west for 61.6 miles; keep left for 1-85 S, go 17.6 miles to
exit 113; turn left onto NC-62, go .2 miles; turn right onto Weant Rd, go to end; turn right onto Suits Rd,
the project site will be on the left.
2.3 Baseline and Existing Conditions
2.3.1 Landscape Characteristics
The Site is located within the Intrusive Rocks/ Metamorphosed Granite Rock region of the Piedmont
(NCGS, 1985). Onsite elevations range from a high of 805 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD)
to a low of approximately 740 feet NGVD.
Soil series depicted in the Randolph county Soil Survey are shown on Figure 2. The majority of lands
within the Site are mapped as Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes. These soils are moderately
well drained with slow permeability, and moderate to rapid runoff. Parent material is a residuum
weathered from a mixture of felsic, intermediate, or mafic igneous or high-grade metamorphic rocks.
Randolph County, NC Page 4 May 26, 2020

Project Streams-TOB �;! -
Proposed Easement#
- •� �.`_� �, .� _ ..r air �7
Project Boundary i• �"` , • ' . 1
HeB- Helena sandy loam, 2-6/o slopes�
HeC- Helena sandy loam, 6-10% slopes + 't t .;• .'-�
W- Open Water xti ti
-a •ems .K -- -
NRCS SOILS MAP
WHITE BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0 500 1,000 Feet FIGURE

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100112
Mitigation Project Summary
2.3.2 Land Use — Historic and Current
The watershed for UT Muddy Creek is 0.38 sq miles (245 acres) at the downstream extents of the Site
(Figure 3). Land use within the Site's watershed is dominated by forest, which totals approximately 32%
of the contributing watershed. The remaining contributing watershed is comprised of pasture and row
crops (approximately 27%) and residential/schools (approximately 17%). Figure 4 depicts land use within
the Site's watershed.
Historic aerial photographs were utilized to collect information on Site changes in recent history.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) provided aerials from the following years: 1937, 1948, 1950,
1959, 1964, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1983, 1993, 1999, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016. According to the
aerial photographs, current Site conditions and uses have changed little since 1959. It appears that the
pond located immediately southeast of UT 1 was dug sometime between 1950 and 1959. It also appears
that during this time frame the portion of the Site that is immediately north of UT Muddy Creek was
cleared to be used for agricultural purposes.
A review of historic aerial photography of lands proximal to the Site confirms rapid urban expansion
associated with the growth of the Triad, including residential housing, building of schools and business
and installation of new infrastructure, including Interstate 74 approximately 0.5 mile east of the Site.
Historical aerials provided by EDR can be seen in Appendix A.
2.3.3 Existing Site Conditions
Six unnamed tributaries to Muddy Creek are located within the conservation easement. Current Site
conditions are shown on Figure 5.
Biological Impairment
As noted above, most streams on the Site have various physical impairments that include:
• Significant fine sediment and nutrient loading from runoff from cattle pasture.
• Hoof shear of channel banks and bed form from cattle access and wading.
• Continual maintenance of riparian buffers and denudation of deep rooted vegetation from
those buffers.
• Fecal loading into the channels from unabated access of cattle.
• Agricultural machinery access.
These physical impairments have detrimental effects on water quality and on the biological integrity of
the Site. Effects of physical impairments include:
• Silting of habitat for fish species and other macrobenthos in the stream channels,
• Loss of essential bed form features,
• Probability of increased loading of nutrients and pathogens to all stream systems on -site due to
maintenance of fields within riparian areas and access of cattle to stream channels,
• Denudation of riparian vegetation reduces the ability of the Site to attenuate floodwaters and
uptake and store nutrients and other pollutant inputs,
• Denudation of riparian vegetation substantially reduces potential woody debris inputs to the
channel that are vital for aquatic propagation and cover habitat, and
• Denudation of riparian vegetation reduces semi -aquatic and terrestrial habitat corridors through
the Site.
Randolph County, NC Page 6 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100112
Mitigation Project Summary
Significant fecal and nutrient loads are entering UTMC and its tributaries because of direct cattle access
to streams and overland sheet flow from adjacent pastures. Evidence of this includes visual observation
of cattle in the stream channel during site visits and fecal matter along stream banks and within the
stream channel. HDR used equations and guidance set forth by DIMS in the document titled
"Quantifying Benefits to Water Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for
Stream Restoration" (June 15, 2016) to determine fecal load reductions that may result from proposed
restoration activities. Cattle exclusion (based on 30 animal units) and establishment of a riparian buffer
will decrease the fecal load of the site by 2.96E+14 col/year for both options. HDR also used equations
set forth in the NC DEQ memorandum titled "Approval of Cattle Exclusion Nutrient Reduction Practices"
(April 5, 2017) as well as the document titled "NC Division of Water Quality— Methodology and
Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment" to
determine nitrogen and phosphorous reductions for the Site. Cattle exclusion (based on 30 animal
units) and establishment of a riparian buffer will reduce the nitrogen loads for the Site up to 931 Ib/yr
and reduce the phosphorous load for the Site up to 88 lb/yr. Existing stream conditions are summarized
in Table 2.
Table 2. Existing Stream Condition
Reach
Historical Presence
Drainage
DWQ Score
Impairment
Area (acres)
UT to Muddy
Topological crenulations
245
38
Cattle access, poor
Creek (UT MC)
in the valley (USGS)
buffer
(Figure 2);
UT1
Topological crenulations
25
34.5
Cattle access, poor
in the valley (USGS)
buffer
(Figure 2);
UT2
Topological crenulations
19
22/30.5
Cattle access, poor
in the valley (USGS)
buffer
(Figure 2);
UT3
Topological crenulations
1
28
Cattle access
in the valley (USGS)
(Figure 2);
UT4
Topological crenulations
53
33.5
Cattle access
in the valley (USGS)
(Figure 2);
UT5
Topological crenulations
9
28
Cattle access, poor
in the valley (USGS)
buffer
(Figure 2);
Randolph County, NC Page 7 May 26, 2020

i Or,
mk
v
gro
Or
, . It

LEGEND' . ra _ f� ,� y ,•+1 \�
Project Boundary !'r�
Proposed Easementptlk' '� �'►t ��
1 w.
UT to Mudd Creek- 245 Ac r`" • b _
Project Streams-TOB
' Forested- 32% .r �� R �5`=' '• .a'ri "- :�. • � f •,
Pasture- 19% 7 ..
Maintained- 18%
+ Residential- 17% n � lT � . � r L-�,,,.w •
' Row Crops- 8% l•_: _.
Pond- 3%
f Roads- 3% �,t"' �� ' y - I!
• �# ; .ate + ;; `00-00
1•
1
1
1
1
1
L
4k
MiW_t
�y5
LAND USE MAP
WHITE BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0 700 1,400 Feet FIGURE

- w � } p v } ., ..� • - v-y/Fen f - LL-.—�
4.
Project Boundary
a.
000,
Proposed Easement
Existing Top of Banks
Active Eroding Bank Areas
Reference Vegetation Plot
40
Existing Culvert Crossings �'
i •i '
f Y '
1�,�
_ 1't ._
Ir
Jr
w y lot 0.
46
`_. - - A.
0 250 500 Feet
"r'4• jr,
•E
CURRENT CONDITION MAP
WHITE BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 5

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DIMS Project No. 100112
Regulatory Considerations
3.0 Regulatory Considerations
Table 3 provides a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site. Additional information concerning
protected species, cultural resources, and Waters of the United States (404) are presented in sections 3.1
through 3.3.
Regulatory
Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
No
N/A
N/A
Waters of the United States — Section 401
No
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes*
CE (Appendix C)
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
*The Categorical Exclusion has been submitted with the acknowledgement that a Site survey will be
conducted for the Schweinitz's sunflower during August of 2020.
3.1 Protected Species
Randolph County has 6 federally listed species as Threatened or Endangered. Records at the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) do not indicate an occurrence of a federally threatened or
endangered species on the Site. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) documentation provided in Appendix C
provides details concerning threatened and endangered species at the Site. The proposed project was
determined to have "no effect" on all listed federally protected species.
3.2 Cultural Resources
The CE for the Site was approved by FHWA on March 17, 2020. The CE included information regarding
cultural resources at the Site and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office (SPO). Basec
on results from the CE research and documentation there are no historic of cultural resources that
would be affected by this project. CE documentation is provided in Appendix C.
3.3 Waters of the United States — 404/401
Per email correspondence with David Bailey and Andrew Williams of the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), construction activities will not require a Nationwide General Permit 27. All bank
stabilization earthwork will take place above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and culvert work
qualifies as an agricultural exemption. Best management practices will still be implemented during
construction.
4.0 Mitigation Credits
4.1 Credit Determination
Mitigation credits presented in Table 4 are based upon the proposed design. Credit determination was
calculated by measuring 100 feet perpendicular to the proposed top of bank. Table 4 below and the
Asset Map (Figure 6) summarize the Site's credit generation. Table 5 summarizes the proposed credit
release schedule for the project. NCDWR will determine if performance standards have been satisfied
sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules outlined in Table 5.
Randolph County, NC Page 11 May 26, 2020

Table 4. White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site, DIMS Project No. 100112, Project Credits
Cape Fear -Randleman
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft�/pound)
N/A
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
(enter NO if
ephemeral or
'I
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (ft�)
Total
(Creditable) Area
of Buffer
Mwtweatwon (ftz)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:l)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:l)
Convertiblto
e
Riparian
uffer?
Bditch
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible
to Nutrient
Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: N (Ibs)
Delivered
Nutrient
Offset: P (Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
/ P
Restoration
0-100
UT to Muddy Creek,UTl, UT2, UTS
449,962
448,828
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
448,828.000
N/A
—
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
/ P
Restoration
101-200
UT to Muddy Creek,
UT1, UT2, UTS
42,577
42,577
1
33%
3.03030
Yes
14,050.424
N/A
—
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
/ P
Enhancement via
Cattle Exclusion
0-100
UT to Muddy Creek,
UTS
13,162
13,162
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
6,581.000
N/A
—
—
Totals:
505,701
504,566
Enter Preservation Credits Below
Elieible for Preservation (ft): 168,189
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer(Creditable)
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (sf)
Total
Area
for Buffer
Mitigation ft'
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credits
Buffer
Preservation
—
Preservation Area Subtotal (ft`):�
Preservation as %Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0/
Ephemeral Reaches as %Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0%
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
last updated 01/17/2020
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
491,405
462,878.424
Enhancement:
13,162
6,581.000
Preservation: 1
0
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
504,566
469,459.424
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
I Nitrogen:
1 0
0.000
Phosphorus:
0.000
Randolph County, NC Page 12 May 26, 2020

1
100,00.
Project Boundary
Proposed Easement
,I
Erosion Areas
,,i }► �■.
_ Existing Top of Bank 7": � •- - _ y.� - _ . ' -
New Culvert Crossing
OExisting Culvert Crossing- Upfit
Buffer Mitigation Areas
0-100' Enhancement { Y
0-100' Restoration
100-200' Restoration - �_� w �'
r ! �* i
4L
� r
�k& 'V
F)l I I I I I A
0 225 450 Feet
ASSET MAP
WHITE BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 6

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100112
Mitigation Work Plan
Table 5. Credit Release St
Task
Project Milestone
Interim Credit
Total Credit Release
Release
1
Submit Environmental Screening Report
5%
5%
2
Record Conservation Easement on the Site
30%
35%
Approved by SPO
3
Mitigation Plan (Final Draft) and Financial
20%
55%
Assurance Approved by DMS
4
Vegetative Planting and Baseline Monitoring
15%
70%
Report Approved by DMS
5
Submit Monitoring Report #1 to DMS (meets
5%
75%
success criteria)
6
Submit Monitoring Report #2 to DMS (meets
5%
80%
success criteria)
7
Submit Monitoring Report #3 to DMS (meets
5%
85%
success criteria)
8
Submit Monitoring Report #4 to DMS (meets
5%
90%
success criteria
9
Submit Monitoring Report #5 to DMS (meets
10%
100%
success criteria and complete project Close -Out)
5.0 Mitigation Work Plan
Buffer restoration on Site will be accomplished by planting cleared areas with native hardwood species,
removing and treating invasive vegetation, fencing cattle out of the easement area, stabilizing eroding
stream banks, and installation of new piped crossings. Herbaceous riparian vegetation will be planted in
areas disturbed during construction but will generally re-establish naturally.
5.1 Planting Plan and Invasive Species Removal
5.1.1 Reference Vegetation Data
A 30-foot reference data plot was randomly recorded in an ecologically stable climax forest community
downstream of the Site (Figure 5). Data collected within the plot in Table 6. The reference forest
community for the Site is the mature hardwood forest immediately southeast of the property which will
serve as a model for restoration efforts on Site. Historical aerial photographs show that the area of
forest chosen as the reference has remained undisturbed for a minimum of 82 years.
Randolph County, NC Page 14 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Mitigation Work Plan
Table 6. Referf- , Vegetation Plot Datr
Tree Species
Number of Individuals
Number of Individuals with
DBH > 5"
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanico)
7
1
White oak (Quercus alba)
1
1
Red mulberry (Morus rubra)
20
0
Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
3
2
Silver maple (Acersaccharinum)
5
0
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
2
1
Sweet gum (Liquidambarstyraciflua)
3
3
Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipafera)
2
2
Mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa)
1
0
Pignut hickory (Carya glabra)
1
0
American elm (Ulmus americana)
8
0
Total
53
10
Vegetation observed in the understory included Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), Chinese
privet (Ligustrum sinense), Trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia). Based on the species present in the reference data plot, the forest community type is
characteristic of a Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest (Schafale and Weakley, 1990).
5.1.2 Planting Plan
Within the easement boundary, Chinese privet is the dominant woody species along the banks of UT
MC. Prior to planting, privet will be cleared and treated to ensure re -colonization is deterred. Existing
privet root mass will remain intact to provide structure and stability to the stream banks. Sections of
stream bank to be stabilized will be planted with a streamside assemblage consisting of black willow, tag
alder, and other common streamside species. The remaining restoration areas located in the pasture
will be planted with species consistent with the target vegetation community Piedmont/Low Mountain
Alluvial Forest. The stream bank will be planted on approximately four foot spacing and the bare root
seedlings in the pasture will be planted on approximately eight foot spacing, corresponding to
approximately 680 stems per acre. It is expected that other characteristic species will recruit naturally
into these areas after completion of construction. The herbaceous layer will be restored by seeding
disturbed areas with a native riparian seed mix. Table 7 below identifies the proposed species
composition for each planting zone. A plan view of the planting zones is depicted in Appendix E,
Plansheet 8.
Randolph County, NC Page 15 May 26, 2020

F)I White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Mitigation Work Plan
Table 7. Planting Plat,
Zone 1: Streamside Assemblage
Footage: 1,452 ft
Plant Spacing 4 ft
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Black willow
Salix nigra
23.5
86
Tag alder
Alnus serrulata
23.5
86
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
23.5
86
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
19
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
23.5
86
TOTAL
363
Zone 2: Piedmont/ Low
Mountain Alluvial Forest
Area
11.38 acres
Plant Spacing
8 ft
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Tulip tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
11
852
River birch
eutela nigra
11
853
American hornbeam
Carpinus caroliniana
6
465
Water oak
Quercus nigra
16
1,240
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
11
853
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
388
Shagbark hickory
Carya ovate
6
465
American elm
Ulmus americans
6
465
Flowering dogwood
Cornus florida
6
465
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
11
852
Bitternut hickory
Carya cordiformis
11
853
TOTAL
7,751
Permanent Seed Mixture: Native Riparian Mix (Application Rate 20 — 25 lb/acre)
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
Autumn bentgrass
Agrostis perennans
15
Big bluestem
Adropogon gerardii
10
Lanceleaf coreopsis
Coreopsis lanceolate
10
Virginia wildrye
Elymus virginicus
20
Soft rush
Juncus effusus
5
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
15
Blackeyed susan
Rudbeckia hirta
10
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
5
Indian grass
Sorghastrum nutans
5
Eastern gamagrass
Tripsacum dactyloides
5
TOTAL
100
5.2 Exclusionary Cattle Fencing
Fencing will be installed along the easement boundary to exclude cattle and clearly demarcate the
easement boundary for the landowners. Fencing will be installed and incorporated into the existing
pasture fencing. Fencing will be erected to NRCS and DMS standards to restrict cattle from accessing
land within the easement. Existing fencing within the conservation easement will be removed.
Randolph County, INC Page 16 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Monitoring Plan
5.3 Stream Bank Stabilization
Bank stabilization is proposed for areas where banks are experiencing active erosion that is not expected
to stabilize naturally after cattle exclusion. Proposed bank stabilization areas along UT 1, UT 2, and UT
MC are shown in Appendix E, Plansheets 3 - 7. All work will take place above the OHWM. Bank
stabilization will consist of grading the banks at a 2.5:1 slope, spreading seed and straw over the
disturbed area, and installation of coir fiber matting. Livestakes and bare root seedlings will be planted
to establish a root system for permanent stabilization.
5.4 Piped Channel Crossings
Replacement and installation of piped crossings are necessary to allow farming operations to continue
on land adjacent to the project. The existing upstream crossing on UT 2 and the existing crossing on UT
MC will both be removed. The channel will be extended in place of the existing crossings by matching
upstream and downstream channel invert elevations and base widths. The banks will be sloped at a
2.5:1 gradient from channel toe to existing ground. Banks will be stabilized with seed and straw, coir
fiber matting, and planted with live stakes and bare roots. A typical cross section has been included in
the Pipe Removal detail on Plansheet 2A (Appendix E). The existing downstream crossing on UT 2 will be
upfitted with an 18 foot, 30 inch diameter corrugated plastic pipe. An 18 foot, 36 inch diameter
corrugated plastic pipe crossing will be installed on UT MC downstream of the existing cattle crossing to
maintain access to the pasture south of UT MC. Lastly, an 18 foot, 24 inch corrugated plastic pipe will be
installed at the upstream end of UT 1. All pipes will be covered with a minimum 1 foot of fill material. Fill
material will then be topped with a minimum 8 inches of crushed stone. Details for both crossings can
be found on Plansheet 2 (Appendix E).
6.0 Monitoring Plan
Annual monitoring reports will be produced and submitted to DIMS by December 15Y of the year for
which monitoring was conducted. The Site will be monitored annually for a duration of 5 years. The fifth
year monitoring report will include a Closeout Report that provides an assessment of monitoring data
collected from the entire monitoring period. Table 8 provides a summary of the monitoring plan
components for the project.
Parameter
Monitoring
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Method
Vegetation
CVS Level 2
Vegetation
Annual
Vegetation will be monitored using the
plots will be
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS)
placed on
protocols
—2% of the
planted area
Invasive and
Visual
Semi-
Locations of exotic and nuisance
nuisance
---
annual
vegetation will be mapped and treated as
vegetation
necessary
Project
Visual
Semi-
Mapping of fence damage, vegetation
Boundary
annual
damage, boundary encroachments, etc.
will be mapped and addressed as
necessary
Randolph County, NC Page 17 May 26, 2020

White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMS Project No. 100112
Success Criteria
7.0 Success Criteria
The Site will be evaluated based upon the density and growth of characteristic forest species. Upon
project closeout, the Site must demonstrate an average stem density of 260 stems per acre. No one,
individual species may account for greater than 50 percent of recorded stems. A minimum of four native
hardwood tree species or four native hardwood tree and native shrub species must be present. Natural
hardwood and native shrub volunteer species may be included to meet the final performance standard
of 260 stems per acre (Title 15A NCAC 02B .0295).
8.0 Stewardship
8.1 Ownership
Fran Alicia White (PIN 7727495773) and Gary Reece White and Patricia H. White (PIN 7727596383) own
lands that comprise the Site. Long term protection of the property is proposed through a conservation
easement. The conservation easement is proposed to be transferred to the State of North Carolina.
Attached in Appendix F is a signed Memorandum of Option between the property owners and HDR. The
final Site Protection Instrument will be included as an appendix in the Final Mitigation Plan.
8.2 Long Term Management Plan
Upon approval for close-out by the NCDWR the Site will be transferred to the NCDEQ Stewardship
Program (or 3rd party if approved). This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-
term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on
a yearly basis until such time an endowment is established. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is
developing an endowment system within the non -reverting, interest -bearing Conservation Lands
Conservation Fund Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North
Carolina General Statue GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the
purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if
applicable.
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage to identify boundary markings, as needed. Any
livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility of the owner of the
underlying fee to maintain.
Randolph County, NC Page 18 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
References
9.0 References
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). 2019. The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package. White Farms
Buffer Mitigation Site 5796 Suits Road, High Point, NC 27263. Inquiry Number: 5695494.8.
Shelton, Connecticut.
Lee, Michael & Peet, Robert & D. Roberts, Steven & Wentworth, Thomas. 2018. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation All Levels of Plot Sampling, Version 4.2.
North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC). Title 15A — Environmental Quality. Chapter 02 —
Environmental Management. SubChapter B. 15A NCAC 02B .0295. Mitigation Program
Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. Accessed on September 20,
2019.
http://reports.oah.state. nc. us/ncac/title % 2015a % 20-
%20envi ron menta l%20q ua l ity/cha Ater%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). Division of Water Quality.
2010a. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins,
Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
NCDENR. Division of Water Quality. 2014. Final 2014 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of water
quality limited segments. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
NCDENR. June 15, 2016. Quantifying Benefits to Water Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian
Buffer Establishment for Stream Restoration. Accessed on December 28, 2018.
https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Library/Guidance%20and%20Te
mplate%20Documents/Estimates%20for%20nutrient%20and%20FC%20reductions June15 201
6. pdf
NCDENR. Division of Water Quality. "NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology and Calculations for
Determining Nutrient Reductions Associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment." Nutrient
Practices and Crediting, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed on
December 26, 2018. https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient Offset
Rule/Ag-Buffer-Credit. pdf.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). 2017. "Design Specifications and
Nutrient Accounting for Cattle Exclusion." Nutrient Practices and Crediting, North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality, 5 Apr. 2017. Access on December 26, 2018.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient Offset Rule/Cattle Exclusion
Practice Signed 04-05-2017.pdf
Randolph County, NC Page 19 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
References
NCDNCR. Natural Heritage Program (NHP). 2013. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online
Database. 2013. Accessed on August 2, 2019. Last updated on November 15, 2017.
http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search
NCDNCR. North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO). 2010. The "Study List" and The
National Register of Historic Places in North Carolina. Website accessed on August 2, 2019. Last
updated on September 27, 2013. http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/stdylist.htm
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina.
USDA. 2012. Construction Specification Barbed Wire. Available under Woven Wire Fence NRCS
Specifications — 02/14/12 at http://porta1.ncdenr.org/web/DMS/fd-forms-templates
US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil
Survey. http:/websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey
Randolph County, NC Page 20 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Appendices
Appendix A — Historic Aerial Photography
Randolph County, NC Page 21 May 26, 2020

White Buffer Mitigation Site
5796 Suits Road
High Point, NC 27263
Inquiry Number: 5695494.8
June 24, 2019
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
IrE
��� Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 06/24/19
Site Name:
White Buffer Mitigation Site
5796 Suits Road
High Point, NC 27263
EDR Inquiry # 5695494.8
Client Name:
HDR, Inc.
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 2760130340
Contact: Alex Digeronimo
CEDW
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year
Scale
Details
Source
2016
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2016
USDA/NAIP
2012
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2012
USDA/NAIP
2009
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2009
USDA/NAIP
2006
1 "=500'
Flight Year: 2006
USDA/NAIP
1999
1 "=750'
Flight Date: March 04, 1999
USGS
1993
1 "=500'
Acquisition Date: February 02, 1993
USGS/DOQQ
1983
1 "=500'
Flight Date: April 04, 1983
NHAP
1980
1 "=500'
Flight Date: May 10, 1980
USDA
1973
1 "=500'
Flight Date: February 24, 1973
USGS
1970
1 "=500'
Flight Date: May 07, 1970
USDA
1969
1 "=500'
Flight Date: March 13, 1969
USGS
1964
1 "=500'
Flight Date: September 17, 1964
USGS
1959
1 "=500'
Flight Date: December 04, 1959
USDA
1950
1 "=500'
Flight Date: November 18, 1950
USGS
1948
1 "=500'
Flight Date: May 19, 1948
USGS
1937
1 "=500'
Flight Date: September 19, 1937
USDA
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
5695494 - 8 page 2

i
! yAft
db f
. +
i
CL

INQUIRY k 5695494.8 1 N
YEAR: 2012 - (rEDR
500'

INQUIRY k 5695494.8 jJr /� N
YEAR: 2009 �
= 500' FOR
f '
f ♦t
ov
�. r

L � �
4b
16%
qF rIf"
L �
r -, I �# .
f �
INQUIRY M 5695494.8
�N
YEAR: 1999 �
= 750' FOR
V
Subject boundary not shown because it
exceeds image extent or image is not
georeferenced.

p

INQUIRY #: 5695494.8 1 N
YEAR: 1983 jI Jr'
- = 500E�R

ot
■ '4 [{ sl rh
i
41 ,� f
.� a w
PTA

INQUIRYM5695494.8 jJr /� N
YEAR: 1973 �
= 500' FOR

F
�1
1 I-
��
r
t
ENQUIRY k 5695494.8 �jJr /� N
YEAR: 1959
= 500' FOR
r�a

i

t-M
JQUIRY #: 5695494.8 4N
EAR: 1937 (rEDR
500'

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Appendices
Appendix 6 — Photo Log
Randolph County, NC Page 40 May 26, 2020

Appendix B - Site Photo Log
Lack of vegetated buffer along UT 1
d.6Z.7.771
f :-
Lack of vegetated buffer along UT 2
Cattle crossing on UT 1
Existing downstream crossing along UT 2
y
P 1
Hoof shear and active erosion along left bank of Hoof shear along left bank of UT MC
UT 2
Randolph County, NC Page 41 May 26, 2020

Appendix B - Site Photo Log
Cattle in UT MC Chinese privet along the banks of UT MC
Buffer enhancement area along UT 4 Reference vegetation plot southeast of property
boundary
Randolph County, NC Page 42 May 26, 2020

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Appendices
Appendix C — Categorical Exclusion Documentation
Note: NCDMS can provide the full CE-ERTR document upon request. Results are summarized in
Section 3.0 Regulatory Consideration.
Randolph County, NC Page 43 May 26, 2020

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEYI company
March 13, 2020
Jeremiah Dow
NC DMS Project Manager
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
cc: Vickie Miller, HDR Project Manager
Dear Mr. Dow,
Attached is the Categorical Exclusion, submitted by Land Management Group on behalf of
HDR. This document contains all supporting documentation and any relevant correspondence
for the White Farms Buffer Site in Randolph County, North Carolina. The purpose of
Categorical Exclusion documentation is to assist the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services in satisfying the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) obligation to ensure
compliance with various federal environmental laws and regulations.
Correspondence between HDR and any federal, state or municipal agency is included within
the supporting documentation of the Categorical Exclusion, with the intent of providing
justification for satisfied compliance with each regulation. This includes correspondence
and/or responses from: US Fish and Wildlife Service; North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC); North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO); and Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
The Environmental Data Recourses (EDR) Report is included within the supporting
documentation enclosed.
Sincerely,
Land Management Group
Alex DiGeronimo
1
www.lmgroup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3101 Poplarwood Court — Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27604

Ep1TOFTrF2m F8t,& yre"..ram
N o United States Department of the Interior
a � _
�'qa —ti$a9 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
h 3, M,.,,Fs„,�`
C
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: March 12, 2020
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
❑✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
0 "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/Pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site
Date: March 12, 2020
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes 1 Documentation
Helianfhus schweinifzii
(Schweinitz's Sunflower)
No suitable habitat present
per correspondence with
Katy Matthews of USFWS
No effect
Email correspondence with USFWS
attached to submittal.
Fusconaia masoni
(Atlantic pigtoe)
No suitable habitat
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential
habitat present.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present.
No effect
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act permit required.
No nest within action area and not within
the county.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Signature /Title
Date

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
March 17, 2020
Alex DiGeronimo
Land Management Group
3101 Poplarwood Court, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Task 1 Categorical Exclusion Approval
White Farms Buffer Site
Cape Fear River Basin; CU# 03030003
Randolph County, North Carolina
Contract No. 7860
Dear Mr. DiGeronimo:
On March 13, 2020 DMS received one (1) pdf copy of the updated Categorical Exclusion for the White
Farms Buffer Site from Land Management Group (LMG). DMS and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) have completed the review of the Categorical Exclusion and have no additional
comments.
This letter serves as DMS's approval of the Categorical Exclusion (Task 1). Attached please find the
approved Categorical Exclusion Form for the subject full delivery project. Please include the original
form in your Mitigation Plan. You may now invoice for payment of this Task (5% of total contracted
amount).
If you have any questions, please contact me at any time. I can be reached at [phone], or email
me [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jeremiah Dow
Project Manager
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
cc: file
NORTH CAROuQ.
E
fy
o�wronrnaEnwwrarrowi� r
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street 1 1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
919.707.8600

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: White Farms Buffer Mitigation Project
Count Name: Randolph
EEP Number: 100112
Project Sponsor: HDR
Project Contact Name: Alex DiGerommo
Project Contact Address: 555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900, Raleigh, NC 27601
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
EEP Project Mana er: Jeremiah Dow
Project Description
Restoration and enhancement of buffers within the Cape Fear River Basin.
Specifically, restoration and
enhancement of buffers along UT Muddy Creek and several associated unnamed tributaries.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
3 -/7—ZD
L
Date
EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
3 _1( _2-08-
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
6 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Appendices
Appendix D — Buffer Viability and Stream Determination
Randolph County, NC Page 50 May 26, 2020

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Alex DiGeronimo
HDR
NORTH CAROLINA
9hWrvnMV" Quality
July 30, 2019
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, NC 27601
(via electronic mail: alex.digeronimo u,,hdrinc.com)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — White Site
Located near 5792-Suits Rd., Archdale, NC
Randleman Lake Watershed
Dear Mr. DiGeronimo,
DWR# 2019-0884
Randolph County
On June 14, 2019, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from HDR for an onsite mitigation determination near the above -referenced site (Site). The Site is
located within the Randleman Lake Watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin in the 8-digit
Hydrologic Unit Code 03030003. The Site is being proposed as part of a full -delivery riparian buffer
mitigation project for the Division of Mitigation Services (RFP #16-007703). On June 19, 2019, Ms.
Merritt performed an onsite assessment of riparian land uses adjacent to streams and channels onsite,
which are shown on the attached map labeled "Determination Features Map". Staff from the
Division of Mitigation Services were also present onsite.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015).
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
E J 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mall Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
°v� 919.707.9000

White Site
HDR
July 30, 2019
Feature classification 'Subject
Riparian Land use
Buffer
2Nutrient
Mitiation Tne QeterMinatinn
onsite to BuffBuffe
as ddacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
wAn riparian areas
Rule
(0-200,1
Viable
Viahle
UTl Stream Yes
Non -forested pasture grazed
Yes
N/A
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
by cattle
.0295 (n)
Minor bank stabilization and grading
needed where bank stability is
compromised and where erosional rills
Yes
N/A
and gullies are observed.
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
UT2 Stream Yes
Non -forested pasture grazed
(at DWR
by cattle with scattered
.0295 (n)
flag)
individual trees
Minor bank stabilization and grading
needed where bank stability is
compromised and where erosional rills
and gullies are observed.
UT3 Not Evaluated Not
Forested no cattle
N/A
N/A
N/A
evaluated
UT4 Stream Not
Forested cattle pasture
',"Yes
N/A
Preservation Site per 15A NCAC
evaluated
02B .0295 (o)(4) gl Enhancement
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
if fence is installed
UT5 Stream Yes
Combination of forested and
3-Yes
N/A
Forested Areas - Preservation Site
non -forested pasture grazed
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5) Qr
by cattle
Enhancement Site per 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o)(6) if fence is installed
Non -forested areas - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Page 2 of 4

White Site
HDR
July 30, 2019
Feature
Classification
onsite
'Subjec
to -Buffer
Riparian Land lAse
Buffer
Credi
2Nutrient
Offset
SMitigation Type Determination
e nt to Feature
w/in riparian areas
-2 0'Viable
Rule
Viable
N/A
UT to
Yes
Mostly non -forested pasture
3,4Yes
Muddy
grazed by cattle except
Forested Areas - Preservation Site
Creek
where privet canopy was
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5) Q
observed. Some areas of
Enhancement Site per 15A NCAC
forested pasture exist around
02B .0295 (o)(6) if fence is installed
UT3, UT4, and UT5 adjacent
to this feature
Partially forested areas -
Enhancement Site per 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (n) and required to be
planted
Non -forested areas - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Bank sloughing needs to be remediated
where observed.
A privet canopy was present
throughout and needs to be removed
with the area treated and replanted
prior to receiving buffer credit.
A stormwater drain exists within the
buffer, but is expected to be excluded
from credit and made into a
"crossing"
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated July 24, 2019 using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle
topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
4The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
5A11 features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even when no credit is viable within the 50' riparian
buffer.
The map attached to this letter was prepared by HDR and initialed by Ms. Merritt on July 30, 2019.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written approval REi2Lto
conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for buffer mitigation
credit.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for riparian buffer mitigation credits.
Page 3 of 4

White Site
HDR
July 30, 2019
This viability assessment will expire on July 30, 2021 or upon the submittal of an As -Built Report to
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in all stream and wetland,
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
KAH/km
Attachments: Determination Features Map
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Jeremiah Dow- DMS (via electronic mail)
Sincerely,
4aren Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 4 of 4

J
';

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Alex DiGeronimo
HDR
555 Fayetteville St
Raleigh, NC 27601
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Qua&ty
July 24, 2019
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Randleman Lake Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0250)
Subject Property: White Buffer Mitigation Site, 5796 Suits Rd, Archdale NC, Randolph County
DWR# 2019-0884
Dear Mr. DiGeronimo:
On June 19, 2019, at your request, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site determination to review features
located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state
regulations. Katie Merritt with the Division of Water Resources (Division) — 401 & Buffer Permitting
Branch was also present during the site visit.
The attached sketch depicts the channels that were reviewed during the site visit. Channels UT1, UT2,
UT to Muddy Creek, and UT5 as shown on the attached sketch were determined to be at least
intermittent channels and subject to the Randleman Buffer Rules cited above. UT3 and UT4 were not
evaluated as they exist within the buffer of UT to Muddy Creek. Please note that these regulations may
be subject to change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in
any future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336-776-9800

Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination
by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing
c/o 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that
dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface water from
the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within
Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have any additional
questions or require additional information, please contact me at 336-776-9693 or
sue.homewoodL),ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
� %�omeu.00d
456E D631098F411...
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
HDR Determination Features Map— DWR initialed/dated
Cc: Frann White, 1245 Watermark Ct, High Point NC 27265
Gary & Patricia White, 5796 Suits Rd, Archdale NC 27265
Katie Merritt, DWR (via email)
Jeremiah Dow, DMS (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Page 2 of 2

� • }``` '� #fit +� t�'.,,. '�' �+ � - ��o
r o 0
f w
. J-1 u, , u ,
Proposed Easement a., Nam►
t
Project Streams
F)l I I I I I A
0 225 450 Feet
_i
;-M~ r r
1
c
AL
DS
� 7/24/2019
*era I
rn _
A
F 46
,!
Ai
DETERMINATION FEATURES MAP
WHITE BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 3

M White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Appendices
Appendix E — Mitigation Plan Sheets
Randolph County, NC Page 59 May 26, 2020

0
a
s=
0
0
�o
0
L
m
0
a
cj
i
9.
m
0
t1
C)
N
0
L
CC'
D
No
�0N
7'
- —7 ROJ E-6 ,7
� r OCAT�ION
VICINITY MAP
INDEX OF SHEETS
TITLE SHEET......................................................I
DETAILS.................................................................2 - 2E ?.
PROJECT OVERVIEW NLAP........................3
PLAN SHEETS...................................................4 - 7
PLANTING PLAN SHVEI............................8 I �•
GRAPHIC SCALES
lil
PLANS
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
20 10 0 20 40
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
WHITE FARMS BUFFER
MITIGATION SITE
LOCATION: RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LAT: 35°53' 18" LONG: -79' 55' 35"
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
(GRADING, EROSION CONTROL
AND PLANTING)
PLANTING PLANS
STREAMSIDE
PIEDMONT/LOW
ASSEMBLAGE
MOUNTAIN
(LIN. FEET)
ALLUVIAL FOREST
(Sq FEET / Acres)
1,449
491,405 / 11.28
MITIGATION PLANS
MITIGATION
RIPARIAN RESTORATION
SO FEET
RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT
SQ FEET
AREA
0'-100' BUFFER
100'-200' BUFFER
0'-100' BUFFER
1 100'-200' BUFFER
-UT 1-
110183.7350
7230.3975
-
-
-UT 2-
181931.2718
4740.0347
-
-
-UT MUDDY -
CREEK
144836.3756
30276.3904
11416.3133
-UT 5-
1 11876.6604
329.7786
1745.4892
-
TOTAL
1 448828.0428
1 42576.6011
13161.8025
-
PIPE CULVERT ----
EXISTING X
FENCE
EXISTING
TOP OF BANK
CONSERVATION — E —
EASEMENT
PROPOSED WOVEN__ _
WIRE FENCE
PROPOSED BARBED
WIRE FENCE
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
EXISTING FENCE
TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED BANK
STABILIZATION
0'-100' BUFFER
- RESTORATION L I
100'-200' BUFFER
- RESTORATION
0'-100' BUFFER
- ENHANCEMENT
STREAMSIDE —
ASSEMBLAGE
PIEDMONT/LOW
MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
10M X 10M
VEG PLOT
Prepared in the Office of-
FN HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
R
555 Fayetteville St, Suite 900 Raleigh, N.C. 27601
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
CHRISTOPHER L. SMITH
PROJECT DESIGNER /ENGINEER

NOTES: TYPICAL BANK
1. GRADE BANK AT 2.5:1 MAINTAINING EXISTING STABILIZATION ENHANCEMENT
TOE LOCATION. SCALE: NTS EXISTING
2. GRADED BANK TO BE SEEDED, MULCHED AND GROUND
COIR FIBER MATTED.
Tl
PROPOSED GROUND
PLAN SHEET 4
-UT 1-
SIDE BEGINNING ENDING
COORDINATES COORDINATES
LT N= 779878.3915 N= 779852.2160
E= 1724118.3747 E= 1724121.9750
RT N= 779867.9627 N= 779786.4450
E= 1724101.5635 E= 1724162.6440
LT N= 779827.3210 N= 779775.0860
E= 1724142.1350 E=1724167.9520
LT N= 779681.6930 N= 779624.8630
E= 1724203.6530 E= 1724216.9020
RT N= 779583.2450 N= 779475.1050
E= 1724221.8250 E= 1724259.9270
LT N= 779516.5340 N= 779454.5940
E= 1724250.2000 E= 1724267.2410
LT N= 779448.6400 N= 779421.8440
E= 1724270.7870 E= 1724271.5100
RT N= 779435.4720 N= 779418.2130
E= 1724266.9280 E= 1724267.6840
LT N= 779405.4940 N= 779375.1380
E= 1724274.4260 E= 1724264.3600
BANK STABILIZATION LOCATIONS
PLAN SHEET 5
-UT 2-
SIDE BEGINNING ENDING
COORDINATES COORDINATES
LT N= 780049.6503 N= 780015.7110
E= 1725536.4213 E= 1725560.9830
RT N= 779814.3630 N= 779793.3840
E= 1725674.8080 E= 1725673.7010
LT N= 779703.4180 N= 779687.2070
E= 1725672.0403 E= 172568.0080
PLAN SHEET 6
-UT 2-
SIDE
BEGINNING
ENDING
COORDINATES
COORDINATES
LT
N= 779552.7196
N= 779317.5000
E= 1725675.9484
E= 1725639.7930
RT
N= 779506.7441
N= 779374.8970
E= 1725670.0829
E= 1725650.4110
PERMANENT STREAM
CROSSING NO. 2
W/ 36" CPP
SCALE: NTS
PLAN
SIDE
BEGINNING
ENDING
COORDINATES
COORDINATES
LT
N= 779091.8324
N= 779092.5336
E= 1725623.1663
E= 1725644.4629
LT
N= 779045.8490
N= 779039.8782
E= 1725774.9597
E= 1725805.1189
PLAN SHEET 7
-UT TO MUDDY CREEK -
SIDE
BEGINNING
ENDING
COORDINATES
COORDINATES
RT
N= 778973.1281
N= 7789867.0768
E= 1725860.1924
E= 1725885.9128
RT
N= 778980.6915
N= 778973.1566
E= 1725898.1675
E= 1725909.5820
LT
N= 778980.8734
N= 778903.7689
E= 1725913.1416
E= 1726093.0384
LT
N= 778945.0681
N= 778903.7689
E= 1725980.6596
E= 1726093.0384
RT
N= 778909.6377
N= 778895.3090
E= 1726046.6395
E= 1726096.4710
RT
N= 778859.1398
N= 778864.6218
E= 1726250.3374
E= 1726283.1286
RT
N= 778866.5946
N= 778868.7223
E= 1726312.9270
E= 1726377.2877
FLOW
II l l l I
------------ -- ----- --
30 "
CPP
-----------------------
STREAM
ICHANNELI
TOP OF BANK
PLAN VIEW
PERMANENT STREAM
CROSSING NO. 1
W/ 30" CPP
SCALE: NTS
10' SOIL PATH
TOP OF BANK
1.25' CHANNEL
EXISTING INVERT -
GROUND
Nw
EXISTING
30" CPP GROUND
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
PERMANENT STREAM
CROSSINGS NO. 3
W/ 24" CPP
SCALE: NTS
CONCRETE BAG
FLOW
HEADWALL FLOW
-----------------------------------
36" 24"
CPP 10' SOIL PATH CPP 10' SOIL PATH
10' MIN. TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK
STREAM STREAM
CHANNEL' �� CHANNEL
TOP OF BANK CONCRETE BAG
TOP OF BANK HEADWALL
3 3 PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW 1 �1 �REBAR
FILL MATERIAL
1 .25,
EXISTING
GROUND
36" CPP
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
CHANNEL
INVERT-7 36" CPP
EXISTIN Z I18
GROUND
PROFILE ALONG CULVERT
EXISTING
GROUND
CONCRETE BAG
24" CPP HEADWALL
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
1.
3 3
1� �1
FILL MATERIAL
30" CPP
18,
PROFILE ALONG CULVERT
10' MIN.
CONCRETE BAG 1' MIN FILL
HEADWALL MATERIAL
SOIL PATH
CHANNEL
INVERT FLOW
24" CPP
18 -!!T�EXISTING
GROUND
PROFILE ALONG CULVERT
u1
J
a
U
co
O
O
Z
DATE:06-01-2020
DETAILS
SHEET
2

TYPICAL MATTING LOCATION DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
PLACE TEMP/PERM SEED ALONG
WITH STRAW MULCH UNDER COIR
FIBER MATTING
CHANNEL TOE
OVERLAP
TOP OF BANK
CHANNEL TOE
-----
FLOW
1.5' MINIMUM
01 A KI I I T CIAI
5'
(TYP)
---0------ ❑ ❑-.-_
❑ 1❑
u
COIR FIBER MATTING
MUST EXTEND A MINIMUM
OF 1.5' PAST THE DISTURBED
BANK AREA ON ALL SIDES
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
STABILIZED SECTION OF BANK
COIR FIBER MATTING
MATTING STAKING VIEW
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
2
1.MINIMUM 1r
ORDINARY HIGH
WATER MARK
LJ HH
PLACE TEMP/PERM SEED ALONG
WITH STRAW MULCH UNDER COIR
FIBER MATTING
NOTES:
1. COIR FIBER MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG
SECTIONS OF THE BANK THAT HAVE BEEN REPAIRED
BY THE CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM AND
DOWNSTREAM OF THE BRIDGE.
2. USE WOOD STAKES (NOT METAL) FOR MATTING.
3. INSTALL STAKES ACROSS MATTING AT ENDS,
JUNCTIONS, OUTER EDGES, AND
DOWN THE CENTER .
4. 2' X 2" X 2" HARDWOOD STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED
ALONG THE OUTER EDGES (TOP OF BANK)AND DOWN THE
CENTER OF THE BANK WITH A MAXIMUM 5' SPACING.
SECTION A -A
2' LONG 2" x 2"
-- WOOD STAKES
w/ 2" GALVANIZED
ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO
HOLD MATTING
TRENCH AND
BACKFILL
6"
STABILIZED SECTION OF BANK
2' LONG 2" x 2"
WOOD STAKES
w/ 2" GALVANIZED
ROOFING NAIL
AT THE TOP TO
HOLD MATTING
PIPE REMOVAL DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
FLOW
REMOVE r
EXISTING��I
PIPE
'I I
II
II I
I II
II
STREAM
TOP OF CHANNELI
BANK
PLAN VIEW
7
EXISTING 1- /
GROUND S
EXISTING
PIPE BASE
WIDTH
VARIES
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
TOP OF
BANK
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SCALE:NTS
NOTES:
1. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE
LARGE TRUCKS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
2.ENTRANCE(S) SHOULD BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE
FOR UTILIZATION BY ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES.
3.MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL
PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO
STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH STONE WILL
BE NECESSARY.
4.ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BE
CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY.
5.GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE LOCATED
AT ALL POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE
IS STABILIZED. FREQUENT CHECKS OF THE DEVICE
AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE MUST BE PROVIDED.
6.FILTER FABRIC TO BE PLACED BENEATH STONE.
CLASS "A" STONE_
8" MIN. DEPTH
a
z
H
F-
J
U O
rr
oc LL' a
Lu D U
LL
LL. 2
J aF-
m LU
Cn H z
0n -
LL O F-
Lij H z
F-
CDO
� F—
H J
� O
0
z
a
LU
J
a
U
C7
O
H
H
O
z
DATE:06-01-20201
DETAILS
SHEET
2A

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT FENCE ON LOW SIDE
OF TOPSOIL STOCKPILE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT
FROM BEING WASHED INTO THE DRAINAGE
SYSTEM. FENCE TO EXTEND AROUND
APPROXIMATELY 70% OF THE PERIMETER OF THE
STOCKPILE.
2. LOCATE POSTS DOWNSLOPE OF FABRIC TO HELP
SUPPORT FENCING.
3. BURY TOE OF FENCE APPROXIMATELY 8" DEEP
TO PREVENT UNDERCUTTING.
4. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN
THE FABRIC AT A SUPPORT POST WITH OVERLAP TO
THE NEXT POST.
5. FILTER FABRIC TO BE ON NYLON, PLOYESTER,
PROPYLENE OR ETHYLENE YARN WITH EXTRA
STRENGTH-50LB/ LIN. IN. (MINIMUM) AND WITH
A FLOW RATE OF AT LEAST 0.3 GAL./FT / MINUTE.
FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY
INHIBITORS AND STABLIZERS.
MAINTENANCE
1. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK
AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REQUIRED
REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
2. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE
COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME
INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT PROMPTLY.
3. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT
RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE FENCE.
TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE
DURING CLEANOUT.
4. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE
SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO
GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY
STABILIZED.
MAX. SPACING = 12'
X X X
I TAIL DANIGI
WOVEN WIRE FENCE
STEEL POSTS
FENCE HEIGHT:
24" MAX.
18" MIN.
BARBED WIRE
• MIN CLASS 1 ZINC -COATING 12%2 GAUGE
WOVEN WIRE
• THE TOP AND BOTTOM WIRE SHALL BE 10 GAUGE
STEEL
• VERTICAL WIRES SHALL BE 12%? GAUGE STEEL
AND SHALL BE SPACED 6 TO 12 INCHES APART.
• FILLER WIRES SHALL BE 121/2 GAUGE STEEL
• WOVEN WIRE FENCE SHALL HAVE 1 STRAND
OF BARBED WIRE PLACED 4 TO 5 INCHES
ABOVE THE WOVEN WIRE
• MIN CLASS 3 ZINC -COATING FOR 121/2 GAUGE
HIGH TENSILE AND 151/2 GAUGE BARBED WIRE
• 2 TWISTED STRANDS WITH 151/2 GAUGE
TWO -POINT BARBS ON APPROX. 5 INCH
CENTERS.
STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
SCALE: N.T.S.
8' MAX. STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
6' MAX. EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE
ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANT
(BLACK) MIRIFI FILTER FABRIC
OR EQUAL
BOTTOM OF WIRE FENCE AND FILTER FABRIC
BURIED 8" IN EXCAVATION TRENCH.
�-4" WIDE
TRENCH
QFCTTIIAI
STEEL POST DRIVEN
24" INTO GROUND
WOVEN WIRE FENCING DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
11AV on 1-1 _ A'
SINGLE SPAN
BRACE ASSEMBLY
"H" BRACE ASSEMBLY
• BRACE WIRE SHALL BE 2 ROUNDS OF 121-2 GAUGE WIRE
(4 WIRES TOP TO BOTTOM) OR 1 ROUND OF 9 GAUGE
WIRE (2 WIRES TOP TO BOTTOM)
TWITCH STICK SHALL BE 3t" DIAMETER DOWEL
OR EQUAL AT BOTTOM AND TOP OF POST
POST REQUIREMENTS PULL AND BRACE POST
WOOD: L = 8 FT. MIN.
DIA. = 5 IN. MIN.
POST REQUIREMENTS HORIZONTAL BRACE
WOOD: L = 8 FT. MIN.
DIA. = 4 IN. MIN.
6" AND 12" X 3t" DIA DOWELS OR EQUIVALENT
SHALL BE USED TO ATTACH BRACE TO POST
STAY REQUIREMENTS
zx
BRACE
m m
BARBED POST
WIRE
n
z x
GROUND
LINE
m
J
0
POST REQUIREMENTS ALONG LINE
WOOD: L = 6%2 FT. MIN.
D = 24 IN. MIN.
DIA. = 3 IN. MIN.
STABLES SHALL BE 9 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE
MIN LENGTH 11/2" FOR SOFTWOODS
POST REQUIREMENTS AT CORNER
WOOD: L = 8 FT. MIN.
D = 31-j! FT. MIN.
DIA. = 5 IN. MIN.
TEMP SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
STEP 1:
DRIVE STEEL POSTS 24" INTO GROUND AND EXCAVATE
A 8"x 4" TRENCH UPHILL ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS.
STEP 2:
ATTACH WIRE FENCE TO POSTS AND EXTEND THE BOTTOM
OF THE FENCE 8" INTO THE EXCAVATED TRENCH.
STEP 3:
ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO THE POST AND EXTEND
THE BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC 8" INTO THE TRENCH.
STEP 4:
BACKFILL THE TRENCH AND COMPACT THE SOIL FIRMLY
TO ANCHOR THE BOTTOM OF THE SILT FENCE SO THAT
RUNOFF IS FORCED TO GO THROUGH THE FENCE AND
CANNOT GO UNDER IT.
c ti
'ago
BULL
Uz ••
�0
y � E
z
U o N
crn�
c<n�-
- _J
N - _j rm'J
c�LL
w
2 ,nZ
N
a
z
J
O
U
W
LINE POSTS
w co
LL °C =
Z) d ~
NINETY-FIVE PERCENT OF TOP
DIAMETERS OF WOODEN LINE
coLll
POST (TWO INCHES ABOVE THE
TOP WIRE) MUST BE THREE
O
INCHES LARGER. LENGTH MUST
BE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE
� r~i Z
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AT
LEAST A 42 INCH -HIGH FENCE
cc cn
TO PERMIT STAPLING OF THE TOP
WIRE WITHOUT SPLITTING.
< z
LL
TREATED POSTS SHALL BE MADE
OF BLACK LOCUST, TREATED
O Z
PINE OROTHER WOOD OF EQUAL
LIFE AND STRENGTH.
Lu
H <0
2
� � d
TREATMENT FOR
RETENTION LB/FT
Jo
PINE & OAK POSTS
o
z
a
Cc
CREOSOTE COAL TAR 6.0
PENTACHLOROPHENO 0.3
ACID COPPER CHROMATE 0.5
AMONIACAL COPPER ARSENATE 0.4
CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) 0.4
LU
J
a
NOTES
cl)
LINE POSTS MUST BE SET SOLIDLY IN THE GROUND A
O
H
MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO FEET.
H
POST BACKFILLED WITH CONCRETE SHALL HAVE NO STRESS APPLIED
z
UNTIL AT LEAST 24 HOURS AFTER CONCRETE IS POURED.
STEEL ASSEMBLY AND POST ASSEMBLY MUST BE PROTECTED
WITH GALVANIZATION OR RUST -RESISTANT PAINT OR COATING.
OATE:06-01-2020
WIRE CLIPS OR FASTENERS MUST BE GALVANIZED AND SIMILAR
TO STRENGTH OF FENCE WIRE.
DETAILS
LOCATION OF BRACES AND/OR END ASSEMBLIES ARE REQUIRED AT
SHEET
ALL CORNERS AND AT ALL DEFINITE ANGLES IN THE
FENCE.
2 B
WOOD: 11-2" DIA. MIN. OF DURABLE WOOD

MAX. SPACING = 20' WITHOUT STAY
25' WITH ONE STAY
30' WITH TWO STAYS
BARBED WIRE
X X X X k
X X X X k
X X X X k
LINE PANEL
BARBED WIRE BRACE = z
POST Co BARBED WIRE
121-'2 GAUGE CONVENTIONAL OR
r a 151Z2 GAUGE HIGH-TENSION
GROUND LINE • 2 TWISTED STRANDS WITH 14 GAUGE OR
n v co J HEAVIER TWO -POINT BARBS ON APPROX.
5 INCH CENTERS.
n
o CLASS 1 (MIN. OR EQUIV.) ZINC -COATING
AS PER ASTM A-121.
• 15" SPACING BETWEEN WIRES
POST REQUIREMENTS ALONG LINE
WOOD: L = 6 FT. MIN. STEEL: L = 5-1/2 FT. MIN.
D = 24 IN. MIN. D = 18 IN. MIN.
DIA. = 3 IN. MIN. STANDARD "T" OR "U"; > 1.25 LBS/FT OF LENGTH
POST REQUIREMENTS AT CORNER
WOOD: L = 7 FT. MIN. STEEL: L = 7 FT. MIN.
D = 3 FT. MIN. D = 3 FT. MIN. (SET IN CONC.)
DIA. = 5 IN. MIN. DIA. = ROUND 2-3/8 IN. O.D. OR
ANGLE IRON 2-1/2 X2-1/2 X1/4 (IN.)
TEMPORARY
BARBED WIRE FENCE DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
STAY REQUIREMENTS
WOOD: 1-1/2 IN. DIA. MIN. OF DURABLE WOOD
LINE POSTS
NINTY-FIVE PERCENT OF TOP DIAMETERS OF WOODEN LINE
POST (TWO INCHES ABOVE THE TOP WIRE) MUST BE THREE
INCHES LARGER. LENGTH MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AT LEAST A 42 INCH -HIGH FENCE
TO PERMIT STAPLING OF THE TOP WIRE WITHOUT SPLITTING.
UNTREATED OR TREATED POSTS MADE OF JUNIPER (CEDAR, EXCEPT
ROCKY MOUNTAIN), OAK, OSAGE ORANGE, BLACK LOCUST, AND
REDWOOD OR, BOIS-D-'ARC, TREATED PINE OR FEDERAL
SPECIFICATION TT-W-571c OR AS INDICATED BELOW.
TREATMENT FOR
PINE & OAK POSTS
RETENTION LB/FT3
CREOSOTE COAL TAR 6.0
PENTACHLOROPHENO 0.3
ACID COPPER CHROMATE 0.5
AMONIACAL COPPER ARSENATE 0.4
CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) 0.4
LINE POSTS MUST BE SET SOLIDLY IN THE GROUND A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO FEET.
STEEL ASSEMBLY AND POST ASSEMBLY MUST BE PROTECTED
WITH GALVANIZATION OR RUST -RESISTANT PAINT OR COATING.
WIRE CLIPS OR FASTENERS MUST BE GALVANIZED AND SIMILAR
TO STRENGTH OF FENCE WIRE.
LOCATION OF BRACES AND/OR END ASSEMBLIES ARE REQUIRED AT
ALL CORNERS AND AT ALL DEFINITE ANGLES IN THE
FENCE.
FENCE WIRE ACROSS BANKFULL CHANNEL SHALL BE A NON -BARBED
TYPE WIRE WITH SIMILIAR PROPERTIES AS THE BARBED WIRE.
a
z
H
F_ J
U O
oc w a
Lu D U
LL
LL 2
Z) L1 H
m LU
Cn F~L z
c
LL O ~
z
F_
<O
2
F—
H J
� O
0
z
a
LU
J
a
U
C7
O
H
H
O
z
DATE: 06-01-20201
DETAILS
SHEET
2C

SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S).
2. INSTALL STABILIZED PUMP AROUND INLET, UPSTREAM
PUMP, AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS CHANNEL PLUG
AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE PUMPING APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA.
AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL BE EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S
WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE
REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS CHANNEL PLUGS. REMOVE
IMPERVIOUS CHANNEL PLUGS, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE.
7. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED AT
THE END OF EACH WORK DAY WITHIN THE PUMP AROUND
AREAS. THE IMPERVIOUS CHANNEL PLUG LOCATION AS SHOWN
ON THIS SHEET ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF
WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF THE
IMPERVIOUS CHANNEL PLUG FOR EACH DAY'S WORK.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND BACKFILL.
STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED AND MULCH.
NOTES:
1.ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR
ISOLATED SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2.IMPERVIOUS CHANNEL PLUGS ARE TO BE USED TO
ISOLATE WORK FROM STREAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY.
3.SAND BAGS SHALL BE FILLED WITH CLEAN MASONRY SAND
OR CLEAN #57 STONE.
4.ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS.
5.MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE
INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
6.PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO
DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
7.SIDESLOPES OF RESTORED CHANNEL SHALL BE MATTED
PRIOR TO TURNING WATER INTO CHANNEL. SEE TYPICAL
MATTING LOCATION DETAIL.
B.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING & AQUIRING
THE PROPER SIZED PUMP.
9.WATER PUMPED FROM EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE DISCHARGED
INTO A GEOTEXTILE SILT BAG AND SHALL PROVIDE MEASURES
TO PREVENT DISCHARE FROM EXCEEDING 10 NTU'S.
CONTRACTOR MAY UTILIZE FLOCCULANTS TO SETTLE OUT
PARTICLES.
10.ALL SEDIMENT BAGS (GEOTEXTILE SILT BAG) MUST BE
EMPTIED OF ACCUMULATED MATERIAL SPREAD OUT AND
PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.
PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
SCALE:NTS
STABILIZED
PUMP -AROUND
INLET
PUMP -AROUND PUMP
TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS
CHANNEL PLUG
NOTES:
- SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS.
/----,— EXISTING STREAM
II CHANNEL
11
TEMPORARY 10l
FLEXIBLE HOSE it
11
/ DEWATERING PUMP
�( SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
I I
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN PDA-1 WITH ROCK PAD
WITH ROCK PAD (SEE PROJECT
SPECIAL PROVISIONS) UTILIZE
A STABILIZED OUTLET INSTEAD
OF A SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
IF PUMPING CLEAN WATER.
PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
DI ANI \/TMAI
r EXISTING GROUND
25' MIN.
SILT BAG — — — — — — —
EXISTING
CHANNEL
OPTIONAL 6"
CLASS A STONE
15'-2O' PLASTIC LINER OR
GEOTEXTILE LINER
NOTE: ALL SILT BAGS MUST BE DIRECTED
TO A NON -EROSIVE OUTLET.
NOTES:
1. PLACE ONE LIVE STAKE AT TOP OF
BANKFULL CHANNEL AND THEN THE
NEXT LIVE STAKE AT THE TOE OF
BANKFULL CHANNEL IN AN ALTERNATING
PATTERN.
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE EVENLY SPACED
4 FT. APART.
3. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN UNTIL
APPROXIMATELY 3/4 OF LIVE STAKE IS
WITHIN GROUND.
4. IF STARTER HOLE IS NEEDED, MINIMIZE
AIR POCKET.
5. UTILIZE ALL ON SITE TRANSPLANT
MATERIALS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE
OWNER. ONCE SOURCE OF TRANSPLANT
MATERIAL HAS BEEN HARVESTED, THEN
UTILIZE LIVE STAKING.
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
HIGH TENSILE
SAND BAGS FLEXIBLE HOSE INLET
IMPERVIOUS
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FLOW
F -
m;"gonw-IMPERVIOUS
r��� f
CHANNEL PLUG
SEE DETAIL 15'-20'
SHEET EC -
STABILIZED PUMP -AROUND INLET
SECTION A -A
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE
PUMP AROUND
INLET
SAND BAGS
CLEAN PLASTIC LINER
OR GEOTEXTILE LINER
TOP OF BANK
------- o --- ----- -- -----A ------------ TOE OF BANK
0000
FLOW
O O O O
-- ------ TOE OF BANK
TOP OF BANK
TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS
CHANNEL PLUG 15'-20'
CLEAN PLASTIC LINER
OR GEOTEXTILE LINER
STABILIZED PUMP -AROUND INLET
DI ANI \/TC1A1
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
NOTE:
SCALE:NTS
STAKING MAY BE REQUIRED THROUGH
MATTING, ROCK OR COMPACTED SOILS.
A STARTER HOLE MAY BE REQUIRED.
SQUARE CUT
LIVE STAKES
BUDS
(FACING UPWARD)
LIVE CUTTING STREAMBED� PROPOSED/
(1/2"-11-2" DIA) 2-3 FT.y� GROUND
ANGLE CUT
30'-45'
a
Z
H
F_ J
U O
oc w a
Lu D U
LL
LL- Ir 2
Z) IlF_
m LU
Cn F~L Z
LL O ~
Z
H
<O
2
F-
d
H J
� O
0
Z
a
LU
J
a
U
C7
O
H-
H
O
Z
BANK STABILIZATION DATE: 06-01-2020
LIVE STAKE W/ LIVE STAKES DETAILS
STILLING BASIN WITH ROCK PAD
SHEET
2D

Zone 1: Streamside Assemblage
Feet of Stream Bank
1,449 ft
Plant Spacing
4 ft
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Black willow
Salix nigra
23.5
86
Tag alder
AInus serrulato
23.5
86
Si I ky dogwood
Cornus amomum
23.5
86
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.0
19
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
23.5
86
TOTAL
363
Zone 2: Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial
Forest
Area
11.28 ac
Plant Spacing
8 ft
Common Name
Scientific Name
% Composition
# Planted
Tulip tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
11
845
River birch
Butelo nigra
11
845
American hornbeam
Corpinuscoroliniana
6
460
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
16
1228
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
11
845
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
384
Shagbark Hickory
Carya ovoto
6
460
American elm
U1musAmericono
6
461
Flowering dogwood
Comus fiondo
6
460
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
11
845
Bitternut hickory
Carya cordiformis
11
845
TOTAL
7,678
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
DATE TYPE PLANTING RATE
(LBS/ACRE)
JAN 1 - MAY 1 RYE GRAIN 120
KOREAN LESPEDEZA 50
GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE 2,000
10-10-10 FERTILIZER 750
STRAW MULCH 4,000
MAY 1 - AUG 15 GERMAN MILLET 40
GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE 2,000
10-10-10 FERTILIZER 750
STRAW MULCH 4,000
AUG 15 - DEC 30 RYE GRAIN 120
GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE 2,000
10-10-10 FERTILIZER 1,000
STRAW MULCH 4,000
PLANTING DETAILS
SEEDLING / LINER BAREROOT PLANTING
I-1ye\f11rM101
1. LOCATE A HEALING -IN SITE
IN A SHADY, WELL PROTECTED
AREA.
2. EXCAVATE A FLAT BOTTOM
TRENCH 12IN. DEEP AND
PROVIDE :DRAINAGE.7
3
4
BACKFILL THE TRENCH
WITH 2IN. OF COMPOST.
PLACE A 2IN. LAYER OF
COMPOST AT A SLOPING
ANGLE AT ONE END OF
THE TRENCH.
PLACE A SINGLE LAYER OF PLANTS AGAINST THE
SLOPING END SO THAT
THE ROOT COLLAR IS AT
GROUND LEVEL. 5. PLACE A 2IN. LAYER OF
COMPOST OVER THE
ROOTS MAINTAINING
A SLOPING ANGLE.
PLANTING METHOD
DETAIL USING A SHOVEL
4-0
DIG HOLE WITH SHOVEL 2. REMOVE SOIL FROM HOLE
TO APPROPRIATE DEPTH WITH SHOVEL. HOLE SHALL
AND WIDTH FOR SEEDLING. NOT BE MADE BY COMPACTING
SOIL AWAY FROM THE HOLE.
6. REPEAT LAYERS OF
PLANTS AND COMPOST
AS NECESSARY AND
WATER THOROUGHLY.
PERMANENT SEED MIXTURE
Recommended application rate: 20 to 25 lbs. per acre
Species
Common Name
Percent
Agrostis perennans
Autumn bentgrass
15
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lanceleaf coreopsis
10
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wildrye
20
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
5
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Rudbeckia hirta
Blackeyed susan
10
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
5
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
5
Tripsacum dactyloides
Eastern gamagrass
5
100
3. REMOVE SHOVEL AND
PLACE SEEDLING AT
CORRECT DEPTH.
4. FILL HOLE WITH SOIL
TAMP SOIL TO REMOVE
AIR POCKETS.
WATER THOROUGHLY.
PLANTING
NOTES:
PLANTING BAG
DURING PLANTING,
SEEDLINGS
SHALL BE KEPT
IN A MOIST
tA
CANVAS BAG OR
CONTAINER TO
SIMILAR
PREVENT THE
ROOT SYSTEMS
FROM DRYING.
y
ROOT PRUNING
ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT
PRUNED, IF NECESSARY, SO THAT
NO ROOTS EXTEND MORE THAN
24INCHES (24IN.) BELOW THE
ROOT COLLAR.
TREE REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED
8' ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING,
APPROXIMATELY 260 PLANTS PER ACRE.
a
z
F_ J
U O
oc Lu Q
ED DU
LL
LL- cc 2
= EL F_
m LU
(n F~L Z
cc
LoF_
Z
F_
<O
x
F—
H J
�o
z
Q
ac
w
J
Q
U
O
H-
O
z
GATE: 06-01-2020
PLANTING
DETAILS
SHEET
2E

PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP
' 1i
IV.
L i /+
y l /
I
c NOTES:
° 1.FOR BEGINNING AND ENDING COORDINATES
\' FOR PROPOSED BANK STABILIZATION AREAS
o SEE DETAIL SHEET 2.
2.ALL EXISTING FENCE INSIDE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT WILL BE REMOVED.
m
3
FOR STREAM DETAILS SEE SHEETS 2 THRU 2E
FOR PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 3
FOR PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 4 THRU 7
FOR PLANTING PLAN SHEET SEE SHEET 8
�o
�N
LEGEND
PIPE CULVERT PROPOSED BANK
STABILIZATION
EXISTING
FENCE x 0'-100' BUFFER
- RESTORATION
EXISTING
TOP OF BANK
100'-200' BUFFER
CONSERVATION - E - - RESTORATION
EASEMENT
0'-100' BUFFER
PROPOSED - ENHANCEMENT
BANKFULL
EXISTING FENCE 10M X 10M
TO BE REMOVED VEG PLOT
PROPOSED WOVEN 1.ANWNCP ;
WIRE FENCE
PROPOSED BARBED F2005-'"
WIRE FENCE 6cousi- A
�om
' o
U LL
Uz..
`m
L E
_ Z
c d N
� 3 a,
J
m�
c=u?
La ui
w
�m
O �n U
.s z
H
F J
i xW En
• LL O U
'+LLa x
mw cc:
±� H- o
�U z
w0 H
LLJ
z
_0 o
H a
� J
- a
x
0
0
N
Lu
J
d O
N r cf)
Z
f) Q
H J
2 a
a 0
d
C7
O
0
DATE: 06-01-2020
PROJECT
OVERVIEW
MAP
SHPET
3

r e�.
k XWAi
, k :x
k .k,,,-. f•-'....• k.i k
k k k , k . k 'k ' k' . k ti:k k. , k=:- ?., �... k. k k �-. k :'.�-. �.,,; k. • , :.�,, k . k k .. _
77
k
C' k k
k. k k., x k `x k k X, k k k•,:.: k :k k. k k k k ?�.''' k .'.. ,...k, .•k k X k k k k k k';: k r k "•
' k.. k k. k k .k k- k k. •k k k k: k' k. k:.k k x �< k k. k. k. k k ... k k x
.�"k .:k k k;. k k k k .. k k_ ;' k k k � •sc ,;: k.. k' k k k.k kk .k k k k k k'
k k k k r;
k k.k k k k k
k .k k .k k k k k. 'k. k. k ; ,� k k .. k k,..• '� k k. •k
k k kk. �k
k k r
k kc.'.,
� =:! r k k k k kk k k k k, k k '•k :'. - -. _,. •k' _ k k . k k, ..k: k k. _ Flo tion,C � k , ..; k •k .: . k,. k k • k' k
k k k k k k k k k
k k k k k k k k k;
k k f .' +��Y; --•, , ,k k k� k+ k= •k : ' k k k k)+ � k k k k k `k"
• k k k. k k' k k k k k, ..k ,k x
-y
k
� k k k k k•k k. k'. k. ,•k k k k ''k k :. k '`
r�`_,. k. k k k -.k k k k k k �. k k .. k. k k..k k k �• k k kk k:T �;'.;� k� ;� kk k kk k k k .k k- k k .,k -k -e.
r k k . k' k
," k k k k k k,
k
k.k k'Xt� k k k
.ti
k. '%aka•: k k:k k.k�,'°`"7+{� • k t k. k k k
k X Y k' ►' X k k k
k k k k k k k k k', ,k ,� ' k k��ti. "k J k. `k k k k k k k. k k�40
�"ci, k ek k k k k k i� 4•
k
k k X
k k k k .. . k
CROSSING #3
PROPOSED 24" CPP
W/ CONCRETE BAG
HEADWALLS -
x
•rvj
11� ,
i-
ilC
. �'f.

3 ..
FOR STREAM DETAILS SEE SHEETS 2 THRU 2E
FOR PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 3
FOR PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 4 THRU 7
FOR PLANTING PLAN SHEET SEE SHEET 8
PROPOSED MITIGATION PLAN
I
21
`10 .
4
LEGEND
PIPE CULVERT -
EXISTING x
FENCE
EXISTING
TOP OF BANK \
CONSERVATION E
EASEMENT
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED WOVEN
WIRE FENCE
PROPOSED BARBED
WIRE FENCE
EXISTING FENCE
TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED BANK
STABILIZATION
0'-100' BUFFER r
- RESTORATION L
100'-200' BUFFER
- RESTORATION
10M X 10M
VEG PLOT
NOTES:
1.FOR BEGINNING AND ENDING COORDINATES
FOR PROPOSED BANK STABILIZATION AREAS
SEE DETAIL SHEET 2.
2.ALL EXISTING FENCE INSIDE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT WILL BE REMOVED.
2
'ONO
ZE
�V LL
Uz..
a a
m. E
o�
_ Z
crn N
—a� c
� � U
� � J
c W
W mm
�LL
❑.r,U
x[ z -
a
z
�o
U OC
W
cc O U IL H
00Wo
U)�--z
H
N
< Z
O Z
H Lu�O
_ � 2
H J
O
cc
a
O
Ln
W
J
N N �
I I J
2 (L
� O
Q
Of
l7
Lo
N
DATE: 06-01-2020
PLAN
SHEET
5
N

ll�, ym� . �.
r� .p
r k A-
A- �..,
...' k k .,k kk' k..:k k
k;.' A
_ k A-k k k� k' k k 'k
k k k k j L k\' k k k k .k k
X .k k k A-k .k' .. A-k k k
k k' k-.k k k k k k. k k k k: t', •}''' N� • s...'.�,�; `.r k r `
k k.k k k k k k k .k k=k,A k k k k."
k k k X ;, : _.k.•.k k k k' .. k. k k k k k. k k :' r��'' ;f �c,�Q� k k �,
AAk k k k k k k. k k k k k k !. Fk k kAA-
k
k k k k k k k k k k k 4 P� �p k k k k
v AAk AAk k k k', .. k. �� Q0 k k
,.
k k k k k k k k k k ..� k k k k k` k AAA �� pP k k k k k: k k k k
k k k k k k k k k k k k k ..k k k k y��Jc��� k .. k k k k
k k k� k k . k k k �: `k k k k k a k k k.:'A k k ��pppG k k k �. k k k k,
AAAk k �,. k k k..k k k k k ,k ���� k k k k..
k k' k k �: �a k k k k k k k �;
k k k k k P k k k-
k k k k k AAk �r k k k k k
AAAAAAk k k k - - k k k k k. k k ;.CA-
Z c k
`• x. k k k k k
k k k k k ktk k k k k k k k` r k k k k k k k k k -Y'"�.
k k 'k ` ,''._ k k k k k k` k k .k k k k k. k �. F
k k k k k k �- ` k k k k k k k
k �:k,- k k k k k k k k k k
k k k k k" k k k k k_ � k. k k. k
k k k k �` „_' .1 k k k k AAk k _. 7
k k k kAr A-
k k k ' k k k' k k k'
xn k k A-
A- .k k r�7' k k o or ' k k`
k k k k k - a "� k k F�ec{� k k
k k k k k k k k k k k. A
k_ k k k k ' E.
A.. k k k' k k k k k.k
k A �C L
END BARBED WIRE FENCE
AND BEGIN WOVEN WIRE
N.0 E
a
Y
CROSSING #1
PROPOSED 30" CPP
REMOVE EXISTING PIPE
-UT5- 0'-100' BUFFER
ENHANCEMENT
a
-UT5- 0'-100' BUFFER
- RESTORATION

712
RESTORATION -7-77-T
II III BUFFER
WEN
RESTORATION
VEG PLOT
• �� "- � ,� �` =,�ti ; ^ _ �, ' ^ � ■, r�am�.
.. .. • p - : �'1 � ' `- .yam .� ��'.'•� ,•T: :.x"+c::�.'
.
. :`- +
r - •'y •r F .S. _ �. � _,�.-:,Y.: 1^'.G. R�^�d - _ �:ti--
f+'' ,'• tea` '''
'i� �` �-•�'.'f''�' i►- Imo- �
7.
.p•N`J:_7(,.4 ^ X •` /. /XX., v.. i� / .�` r�. Al y. \/ X' X.•_~- :X ' Jam. �...) _.
� X X' X, r x � � •�_ �� X /�\ :� X .-X /-\ X�.-_'`�'` �W .r x• •X� X s}:AXX .X X Xx••X`-X �X X � X
q
X •.X X'' -X. �'..X-�y�rS' •�'3<•�:.aX �� X -�C __/ �_FX _ � X -. X. X X X X -x -X. ._
" tiiFts: X X X X. X X 'X X
�
X X e 3s + X' /` a X /\may J•• %� -/
X X�
of
XX X X X ,.;�r X.. 1`'.+ '�.. X •,C - X x X X. �, �O xT
~ ► , � -' X. _ .X . '- . . p ; ; :, x �. X
x .�. _,• , X �Y�RE X x X .X x x X x
x X X . X x ' X _ � x -x _'` '` • x - ... \ X �K�: • ' x X x x X '`
X X X. '' ,X %� ^ X X X p• Flaw X X
�rect�on
X X x x X X
X' ' X .X X - ..� ' • x - X.. .X � ' X x X X X '� X X x: • .X x X X X . X
X X .. _ X. .. •x �c x. X X X - X X X -x X X X
X X X X •X X.:.X:°. = �., -..X X -:X' X:....yc X X X !� X, X'.. X X
X X ,, X•,: X X X X .. X
'AX . x.. x . X .•..•_ �, X - X X .X �TVR-'$Ak>1�ED 'WI E. F�JVCEX
X X X X X : - • 7C X. AND $ GIWAOV� �NIR -X
X X X •}L X• . X-. X-
•:X..- rX _ .X X ... X - � X :. x FYNCE, X • X ,: a X• .• • .
'X X x X X � X. • X X •X . .X X X .:x '' X„� � �' • �r
-.yy- X X X•,
=UT5- 100'=200' BUFF
RESTORAT-ION ,
,j. -- -UT5- 0'-100' BUFFER: -
RESTORATION
:o.l iiaii�;6l tMALI
At
r.=
BMARBED W
�X EN X X
X X X X x J- .
•'r
x::
X X X ,�• :I
-4�
xXXX X
xxx lop - X.
x xX•`x X
x
_
x
X X. •X X...X _ .
X7. X
` XX X X,. X
x.. X X X X
I"
_• X ,•X X X X X.
X X
x X
,
xx X XX X
Y
1
CROSSING #2.. +
PROPOSED 36fCPP

PLANTING PLAN
FOR STREAM DETAILS SEE SHEETS 2 THRI
- FOR PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET
t--.m 1- FOR PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 4 THRU 7
FOR PLANTING PLAN SHEET SEE SHEET 8
M
r Ak
Y a A
• 3
w
0 4
LEGEND
CONSERVATION E
EASEMENT
STREAMSIDE -
ASSEMBLAGE -
PIEDMONT/LOW
MOUNTAIN
ALLUVIAL FOREST
' o
U LL
Uz -•
L E
cs y
� 3 a,
� � J
N �
La w
u
(gym
O nU
l
z
F
W
J
•
cc
UJ
&
U
LLO
T '1 � u- O
_
Lu cc
UJ
`f-, -z •—x--x—x-- UJ Q O
= C3 CU
H
i JO
• I � z
' a
O
0
N
Lu
J
d O
N r
y
Z
u
H
J
S
d
a o
d
3 [j
O
-
DATE:06-01-2020
- --
_-
PLANTING
PLAN
lH-T
4
8

F)I White Farms Buffer Mitigation Site I DMs Project No. 100112
Appendices
Appendix F — Memorandum of Option
Randolph County, INC Page 73 May 26, 2020

13K 2630 PG 768 (5)
This document presented and filed
01/04/2019 08:49:45 AM
MEMORANDUM
Fee $26.00
III IIIIIIIINNI�IIIIIIIIN I� �
2nq�z�hs
Randolph County North Carolina
Krista M. Lowe, Register of Deeds
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
555 Fayetteville St, Suite 900
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Attention: Kenton Beal
MEMORANDUM OF OPTION
THIS MEMORANDUM OF OPTION (this "Memorandum") is made and entered into as of date of the last
execution, which is the 31st day of December, 2018 by and between Gary Reece White and Patricia H.
White ("Optionor"), and HDR ENGINEERING, INC. OF THE CAROLINAS, a North Carolina corporation
("Optionee").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Optionor and Optionee have entered into that certain Option Agreement dated as of an even
date with this Memorandum (the "Option Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Option Agreement pertains to certain premises in Randolph Counry North Caroling, said
premises being more specifically described on the attached Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part
hereof (the "Property"); and
Now, therefore, Optionor and Optionee desire to create notice of the Option Agreement in the Public
Records of Randolph Count by the following recitations:.
NOW, THEREFORE, For and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS [$10.00) in cash paid by
Optionee to Optionor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, (which amount is non-refundable and
shall be retained by Optionor), pptionor does hereby grant unto Optionee an option ("Option") to
purchase the Property upon the following terms and conditions:
The Option Agreement and Option shall expire on December 31, 2020.
This Memorandum is subject to all conditions, terms, and provisions of the Option Agreement,
which is hereby adopted and made part hereof by reference to the same in the same manner as
if all the provisions of the Option Agreement were copied herein in full.
The Option Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein and within the Option
Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the Optionor and
Optionee.
[EXECUTION PAGES TO FOLLOW]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionor and Optionee have executed this Memorandum effective as of the
date first written above.
OPTIONOR:
s
Print Name: Y �' G{ 7 ; e-1
Title:-Z kA�� -
Date:_ 12
STATE OF
COUNTY OF _f
r
I certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day, each acknowledging to me
that he or she signed the foregoing document:
Name(s) of principal(s)
Date:_ I��Q313 _
Notary Public
� 3E R-1.,,, al] [f`T•.
Print Name: &.
My commission expires: n:Z-O'7-�p0

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionor and Optionee have executed this Memorandum effective as of the
date first written above.
OPTIONOR•
By: a.,
Print Name; / r v+^
Title; ::�;- e
Date- /2 — ;111 -- IF
STATE OF _
COUNTY OF
I certify that the following person(s) personally appears efore m this day, ea¢h acknowledging to me
that he or she signed the foregoing document:
Nam(;Is) of p cipal(s)
Date: Jam'
„ IA#AOal Seal]
�•.
fn N-
41 • 'p�-:
Notary Public
Print Name: 1qM,:Ld -'-
My commission expires:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionor and Optionee have executed this Memorandum effective as of the
date first written above.
OPTI ONEE:
HDR ENGINEERING, INC. OF THE CAROLINAS
By:
Print Name; C A. ac
Title: Jk c-e- ` pp ,�
r e S; 11;ir
Date: % 1a lg
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
I certify that the following person(s) personally ap are before me this da , eacl} acknowledging to me
that he or she signed the foregoing document: V' .7
Na e(s) of principal(s)
[Official Seal]
L I 0
P(J8LIG
�-�-
-�ffq�F COU10���ti��,
Notary Publicc, 1\
Print Name: I(tIfY_L1 �, p )K-
My commission expires

.............
p............................
� O
� � N
o y
a

SK 2630 PG 764 (4)
This document presented and filed
01 /04/2019 08:49:44 AM
MEMORANDUM
Fee $26.00I
III IIIII��II �II��I
Randolph County North Carolina
Krista M. Lowe, Register of Deeds
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
JAND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
555 Fayetteville St, Suite 900
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Attention: Kenton Beal
MEMORANDUM OF OPTION
THIS MEMORANDUM OF OPTION (this "Memorandum") is made and entered into as of date of the last
execution, which is the 32" day of December. 2Q18, by and between Fran Allcia White ("Optionor"),
and HDR ENGINEERING INC. OF THE CAROLINAS, a North Carolina corporation ("Optionee").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Optionor and Optionee have entered into that certain Option Agreement dated as of an even
date with this Memorandum (the "Option Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Option Agreement pertains to certain premises in Rondotph County. North Carolina said
premises being more specifically described on the attached Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part
hereof (the "Property"); and
Now, therefore, Optionor and Optionee desire to create notice of the Option Agreement in the Public
Records of Randolph Counrw by the following recitations:.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS (S10.0D) in cash paid by
Optionee to Optionor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, (which amount is non-refundable and
shall be retained by Optionor), Optionor does hereby grant unto Optionee an option ("Option") to
purchase the Property upon the following terms and conditions:
1. The Option Agreement and Option shall expire on December 31, 2020.
2. This Memorandum is subject to all conditions, terms, and provisions of the Option Agreement,
which is hereby adopted and made part hereof by reference to the same in the same manner as
if all the provisions of the Option Agreement were copied herein in full.
3. The Option Agreement and the terms and conditions contained herein and within the Option
Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the Optionor and
Optionee.
[EXECUTION PAGES TO FOLLOW]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionor and Optionee have executed this Memorandum effective as of the
date first written above.
OPTIONEE:
HDR ENGINEERING, INC. OF THE CAROLINAS
By .
Print Name:
p+t.— cn
Title: Lk.. I raS:ddt}
Date: %/ 3% %ck,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
I certify that the following person(s) personally ap ared before me thi ay, a ch acknowledging to me
that he or she signed the foregoing document: 1} t
Nam(s) of principal(s)
Date /—
[Official Seal]
Notary Public
Print Name: m a x f
My commission expires: �� ��

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionor and Optionee have executed this Memorandum effective as of the
date first written above.
OPTION
BX
Print Name: -
Title
Date /2—/7—l�
STATE OF �✓-"(h (0vAZr---
COUNTY OF AIC- cnc.ti
I certify that the following person(s) personally app�red befor me this day, each acknowledging to me
that he or she signed the foregoing document: —P /I of
Name(s) of principal(s)
Date: 1 1 20 a b-
otary Poh
[Official Seal]
Print Name -- ♦-,
BARRY W. COCLNIB
,, hunanooC-O� 7North C*'°""' My commission expires: 7 / d 23
1-2os3

JL