Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080868 Ver 2_Huddles Cut Monitoring Discussion Notes_20191104202 Lv i �'i )� 5' C� Sf 6F L vCk..'7z} f,.�'b'r��-✓ I✓/�r�f dF G(��e c.S- C.� ( o c� 4 G I LA� Iff I- I o ✓n n<tc — Vyv�l�anAW7 Et N�3�fTiW« • I Ci iq •I��L ctn 1 ACC oRCti 2 a� oz i� .9J 3 5. Res � �iS2� 1�9z ANo �vJgt U4Sr�i.°A�� i4,4fU: l� - r jl -F I 'r. 203 i 't"S'• i'/>b��s� Pas=c,�.� ��Gt roe � r�-�2 c��-c� � � I. I tP c� I` I1G(i( G7 G w�Z, n 1 1�` i✓I , R.rvAi E ��,✓ v ( �' r' sa-Y i � r �- ik ✓ � Nu -4x 13 S0— n 10OV&on} aaczr 9 0 s. }a i "iT '—" �` G'ZKO Yi$'• h.eit9Css I c 4c.�v-Cw� a ,J M� 4n�tJ✓tcJ�3. � aM �,-L 19'-74( J Lc (� L v DN •'i Ql2i L_-MCM1Ae.v Part 1: How well does a hand held YSI unit compare in accuracy with salinity reads from AquaTROLLs at Huddles Cut? Note: Salinity data was highest at Huddles Cut AquaTROLLs from 2011 to 2013 so the data set from 2012 was used to examine the higher salinity among upstream AquaTROLLs to test the accuracy of instruments. AquaTROLL salinity used for comparison was taken same time as YSI salinity -instant read of AquaTROLL is part of normal download procedure. Figure 1: Sample year 2012 used to show accuracy of salinity reads between YSI and AquaTROLL at HS1. Figure 2: Sample year 2012 used to show accuracy of salinity reads between YSI and AquaTROLL at HS1. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 1 Figure 3: Sample year 2012 used to show accuracy of salinity reads between YSI and AquaTROLL at HS2. Figure 4: Sample year 2012 used to show accuracy of salinity reads between YSI and AquaTROLL at HS2. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 2 Figure 5: Sample year 2012 used to show accuracy of salinity reads between YSI and AquaTROLL at HS3. Figure 6: Sample year 2012 used to show accuracy of salinity reads between YSI and AquaTROLL at HS3. Part 1 Summary: The YSI is a reliable alternative to the AquaTROLL because its reads are accurate during site visits. Allowing a biologist to deploy the YSI during site visits would ensure that the salinity is being read from a legitimate water column. A biologist could produce 24 accurate reads with the ability to reduce errors encountered by changes in depth and probes affected by environmental conditions (sediment fluff, algae, debris, etc.). Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 3 Part 2: What is the difference in salinity for 5,840 reads per year (every 1.5hr/day) compared to 24 reads per year (twice a month on 1st and 15th) at Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek? • HSI- Salinity reads taken every 1.5 hours averaged annually • HSI*- Salinity reads taken from the 1" and 15"of each month then averaged annually Figure 7: Comparison of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours (HSI) and two salinity reads per month (HSI*) from AquaTROLL at HSI. Figure 8: Correlation of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours and two salinity reads per month from AquaTROLL at HS1. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 4 Figure 9: Comparison of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours (HS2) and two salinity reads per Figure 10: Correlation of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours and two salinity reads per month from AquaTROLL at HS2. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 5 Figure 11: Comparison of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours (HS3) and two salinity reads per month (HS3*) from AquaTROLL at HS3. Figure 12: Correlation of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours and two salinity reads per month from AquaTROLL at HS3. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 6 Figure 13: Comparison of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours (1CB51) and two salinity reads per month (1CBS1*) from AquaTROLL at JCBSI. Figure 14: Correlation of AquaTROLL salinity reads every 1.5 hours and two salinity reads per month from AquaTROLL at JCBS1. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 7 6.4 6.41 4.97 4.87 H51 HS1* HS1 H51* Pre Pre Post Post Pre and Post Means 6.96 6.83 4.82 4.87 HS2 HS2* HS2 HS2* Pre Pre Post Post 8.47 8.57 8.46 8.38 HS3 HS3* H53 H53* Pre Pre Post Post Figure 15: Comparison of annual salinity means from Huddles Cut AquaTROLLs (all data from every 1.5 hr reads) and annual salinity means from twice per month reads only (approximately 1" and 15" only = *) from Huddles Cut AquaTROLL data 1999-July 2019. JCBS1 Pre and Post Salinity Means 12 11.24 11.31 10 8 7.02 7.09 6 4 2 0 JCBS3 Pre JCBS3 Pre* JCBS3 Post JCBS3 Post* Figure 16: Comparison of annual salinity means from Jacobs upstream AquaTROLL (all data from every 1.5 hour reads) and annual salinity means from twice per month reads only (1't and 15"only = *) from Jacobs upstream AquaTROLL data July 2011-December 2018. Part 2 Summary: • When comparing two reads per month to annual means including salinity readings every 1.5 hours, it appears that using two reads per month is a potential alternative. Huddles Cut and Jacobs Creek AquaTROLL meeting with PCS/CZR/USACE/NCDWR 4 November 2019 Page 8 Pg-,� cry CW& -•f HS1 Aqua TROLL loss (damaged conductivity sensor due to low water) and number of days with at least one least one dry read. Note: in some conditions, sensor is "dry" but water may be present beneath it HS1 2015 2016 2017 2018 20198 MONTH # ATs # ATs # ATs # ATs # ATs # days # days # days # days # days Lost Lost Lost Lost Lost JAN 13 4 1 0 18 1 15 FEB 18 2 3 28 1 4 MAR 11 23 17 1 1 10 12 APR 22 15 17 15 16 MAY 19 14 1 10 1 19 1 21 JUN 21 1 26 23 0 15 JUL 21 1 23 1 29 1 11 1 4 AUG 1 7 16 1 17 5 6 SEP 2 1 8 1 20 0 OCT 1 5 2 11 1 16 1 25 1 NOV 2 0 1 25 1 4 DEC 5 0 27 0 Totals 2 146 5 142 6 185 5 155 5 93 a data through 30 Sept 2019 (nine months) and total Aqua TROLLs lost are based on ten months bold = the two highest number of "dry" days for each year HS2 Aqua TROLL loss (damaged conductivity sensor due to low water) and number of days with at least one least one dry read. Note: in some conditions, sensor is "dry" but water may be present beneath it HS2 MONTH 2O15 2016 2017 2018 20198 # ATs Lost # days #ATs Lost #days # ATs Lost # days # ATs Lost # days # ATs Lost # days JAN 14 1 0 29 21 FEB 3 4 0 28 1 5 MAR 1 2 1 16 4 19 18 APR 14 0 23 21 20 MAY 15 0 18 27 1 27 JUN 17 0 1 5 1 18 25 JUL 11 0 1 25 1 16 1 13 AUG 1 2 1 4 1 21 2 22 20 SEP 1 7 1 17 6 30 1 0 OCT 1 0 19 1 21 NOV 2 0 25 8 DEC 1 5 0 30 7 Totalsj 4 1 93 3 42 3 176 5 246 4 149 a data through 30 Spet 2019 (nine months) and total Aqua TROLLs lost are based on ten months bold = the two highest number of "dry' days for each year Qwd C N N Of � O D N � # � � N N Z L Q J V d a m N - D C N O O d `d a N s E y Nei t0 G y E # J ,a � a Z. o N ( d c0 a y= N N Q N I `o `o J # y n C C d d y> N T y N 9 N V C N C O N o E # d o � N E i 9 d V m y O y Z O # O N N a O G Q O V r a J C O N Q O N N F S = # N D � # m — 41 N Z' N a D � m c N O N (p W m a rn N # Y N � N Y F 3 Q N # D N w d O N C d a a # o — a m N N � � Q D d C a # 10 E �n m a 3 3 N # 3 � o p a cmi e V y F Q y # D O C T N a m C y a N # C < i Tj O Q v E c y N N w d � J N d � 10 `o N Q Q m N m # O N w m U m Z, o 0 m ry ry a a ro m .r .v ry N V O F Q R ti ti N 2,Q ry01mm�ONOONNtib O] e1 a N ' O F Q O # n a N O QN N ry .o O H # �n o - Q io n O T ti r1 N N N 1O T O N erot V s O R zo �o m N N rvTy m �o e a T rv� m a a V n Q # N Q y [� H H N n M N Vf fl O O O Q n� O O J F o u t o' 0 o 0 -- 0 Q # a o o a Ie pill•� _„ �Y Tv`'I . 1 g4MC`:; t e . �Y ♦ 1 � V y � 't lit -tea . �4.. . 1 i° • 1 I i J y 47t^ � «<�f� Z 4;\ }- ° . �z � ; — � )\ . >�;��\��� ���� /\ �. \\9|`��^ �� ���� ~ .. ; < : - ^� Q© ��`q||�� � .�����^/� /. .� {. \��|� �\ ���' . . .: :�`. ���°! . `2[�«|� �| � � }� � ��� \� } ' /� � ! �\./ �. ! �` C > � \���/ � ?�� � � �� . < , ! . .. v � � . , ©� _ . w � , , �? �.�. « , $ , �/ � �^�~ ' � !� � � «� ./ � ©� /.� � !| � . � .. � ~ � ! .{| �\\. � \ �`� . \/� .` �\. . Z , z�\ a��} \�\± � �\ 2�\ :' \ . ) \ \ \� /\�: \\2§. /�� .��� � «�� a y` 2} _ \ , / � /,� / �� °" . �� . � �� z� »�.� �1/ ? pF \�` .� �. hn. l ��. s..:. �� �� �� �� � �. ` .� i`_i ryr� .� � .. l\ _ --:. [^.i \ h � t rD U) r.+ r Zol n* aka � a � a f 414