19960356 Ver 1_Complete File_19960411

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
/••
[D FE HNF=?L
June 21, 1996
Hertford County
DEM Project # 960356
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Franklin Vick
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Dept. of Transportation-
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval to place fill material in 400 square feet of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
replacing a bridge at SR 1152, Bridge #59, as you described in your application dated 11 April 1996. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water QualityCertification
Number 3025.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
John Parker; DCM
v

960356.1tr
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
.State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
?EHNFi
11 April 1996 ......__ ? __ _._.._
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
MEMORANDUM APR 1 1 1996
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director a
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application Review
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Location: On SR 1152 at Bridge #59 over Cutawhiskie Swamp near Ahoskie,
Hertford County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace an existing ±19' wide by ±70' long bridge with a ±24' wide
by ±90' long bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 2 May 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact David
Moye at 946-6481. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY A This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the proposed project only if the
recommended changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the proposed project for reasons described
in the attached comments.
Signed Date
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEME ( (?
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: N. C. Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Hertford County on SR 1152 at Bridge. #59overPtawhiskie
Swamp near Ahoskie, North Carolina
Photo Index - 1995: N/A 1989: N/A 1984: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,543,200 Y: 944,200
Woodland Quad. (upper right corner)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 3/29/96
Was Applicant Present - NO
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 04/08/96
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Hertford County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation (water, wetlands) Rural (land)
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public

(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A V0
Planned N/A C
(F) Type of Structures: Existing -Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A 7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:

[AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands ±400 ft2
404 Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands ±2,160 ft2
Cutawhiskie Swamp (shaded by bridge)
(C) Other ±1,386 ft2 ±420 ft2
Highground
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 0.04 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: NO
(F) Water Classification: C-NSW Open: NO
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace an existing ± 19' wide by ±70' long
bridge with a ±24' wide by ±90' long bridge.

NC DOT Bridge #59
Hertford County
Project setting
The N. C. Department of Transportation (NC DOT) proposes to replace bridge #59
located on SR 1152 crossing Cutawhiskie Swamp east of Ahoskie in Hertford County, North
Carolina. The existing bridge is ± 19' wide and ±70' long and has a navigable vertical clearance
of ±6' measured to the normal water level (NWL). The stream is ±40' wide at the bridge
crossing and the existing navigable width is t 15' on either side of the center bent. The bridge
is bordered on both sides by wooded wetlands vegetated with gum, tupelo, maple, bays, and
woody vines. The wooded wetland on the downstream (north) side has been logged in recent
years and is revegetating with the same species mentioned above. The wooded wetland vegetation
gives way to upland grasses on the road shoulder. This section of Cutawhiskie Swamp has been
channelized and an ± 10' wide spoil bank is present on both sides of the stream. Cutawhiskie
Swamp is classified as C-NSW by the Environmental Management Commission and is not open
to shell fishing.
Project description
NC DOT proposes to replace an existing ±19' wide by ±70' long bridge with an
approximately 24' wide by ±90' long bridge. The existing bridge which has 5 bents will be
removed and replaced with a new bridge which has 4 bents. Approximately 966 ft2 of high
ground (existing approach fill) will be removed which will increase the horizontal opening under
the bridge from ±70' to ±90'. The removal of the existing center bent will increase the
navigable width from ± 15' to ±25' . The existing vertical clearance of ±6' will be reduced by
0.6' to 5.4' measured to the NWL. Moving the end bents landward will result in the placement
of ±400 ft2 of fill in 404 designated wetlands in order to maintain access to the existing spoil
banks for future maintenance.
Anticipated impacts
The project as proposed would result in the excavation of ±1,386 ft2 of high ground. The
existing bridge has a navigable opening between existing bents of ± 15' wide with a vertical
clearance of ±6'. The proposed bridge will have a opening of ±25' wide with a vertical
clearance of ±5.4' which will enhance navigability while slightly lowering the existing vertical
clearance. The existing bridge width of ± 19' will be increased with the new bridge to ±24' .
Approximately 400 ft2 of 404 designated wetlands will be filled to maintain access to the existing
spoil banks. Localized turbidity would occur as a result of the construction activities.
David W. Moye - Washington Office - 10 April 1996
Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State N.C
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. City, town, community or landmark
Northwest of Ahoskie
c. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1152
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Cutawhiskie Swamp
b. Authorized Agent:
Name H. Franklin Vick P E Mgr ME Branch
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State N.C.
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Bridge 59 on SR 1152 in
Hertford County
NOTE. Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge with new bridge, high
ground excavation for new end-bents, fill in
wetlands to provide access to spoil banks
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? Both
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. RMose: Replacement of aging
deterioratirm bridge structure-, Use: Public
Transportation: Methods of Construction: Standard
Cored-Slab Bridae Construction Methods
a. County Hertford
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract NIA
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above M11W or
NWL 12.5 ft.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff
from bridge and roadway surfaces
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Wilibanks silty c1gy loam
e. Vegetation on tract Mixed hardwood bottomland
with herbaceous fringes along causeway
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
f. Man-made features now on tract Bridge 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan)
X Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
RA 20 (Residential and Agricultural)
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance cent f cate, if applicable)
J. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available) See Attached
• !.n accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to

Form DCM-MP-1
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
*A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
41A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name James E. Brittle
Address PO Box 62
Woodland, NC 27897
Name Marv Meacham
Address 7760 White Oak Rd.
Gamer, NC 27529
Name Debbie Vaugham
Address 673 Vanderbilt Ave, Apt 1-B
Brooklyn. N.Y. 11238
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
N/A
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
19 A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
10 A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 29 day of March , 19 96
Print Name H. F Vick. P4?
Signature r .
a downerorAuthorizedAgent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N/A
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Steel-reinforced concrete cored-slab
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Cutawhiskie Swamp
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL +/- 1.3 ft
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 70 ft
(2) Width of existing bridge 19 ft (clear roadway)
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge +/-11 ft
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) Entire existing bridge to
be removed
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
g. Length of proposed bridge 90 ft
h. Width of proposed bridge 24 ft (Clear Roadway)
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
+/- 2.3 ft
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
X Yes No
If yes, explain Improves water flow by eliminating
one vertical pier in center of channel
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
+/- 10.4 ft
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? X Yes No
If yes, explain Vertical clearance is decreased by
0.7 ft, Horizontal clearance is increased by
eliminating pier from center of channel
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.

Form DCM-MP-5
2. CULVERTS N/A
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
(4)
bridge
Will all, or a part of, the
removed? (Explain)
existing bridge be
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
. Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: No
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated +/- 33 ft
(2) Width of area to be excavated +/- 42 ft
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/- 110 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Upland site to be determined
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MEIW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
c.
Will the proposed project require the
of any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
(See Attachment)
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below d.
MEIW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1)
(2)
(3)
Length of area to be filled
Width of area to be filled
Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled +/-20' (at 4 sites)
(2) Width of area to be filled +/- 5' (at 4 sites)
(3) Purpose of fill To Provide Access to Spoil
Banks for Maintenance
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 10 ft
(2) Width of area to be filled +/- 42 ft
(3) Purpose of fill Backfill of end-bents
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best Mana ement
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters in
North Carolina
f What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? Crane, backhoe, trucks, etc.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
H. Franklin Mick- P.E.
Ap o ect Nam
1,7Z
n ure
March 29, 1996
Date
construction

Supplement to
Form MP-5, Part 3 (Excavation and Fill)
Subpart d. (2) thru (6)
Some of the excavated material, depending on its suitability, may be targetted
for required project fills. However, it is reasonable to predict that some undesirable
material will result from excavation. This material will be removed by the contractor to a
suitable off-site upland. More than likely the site will be privately-owned and the owner
has granted the contractor permission to deposit the excess spoil. The North Carolina
Department of Transportation requires the contractor to submit candidate spoil disposal
areas to the project inspector for approval by the Department. The Department
prohibits its contractors from using any wetland or surface water for the deposition of
spoil.

' t 158 3 au„1m 'dJ. / Chesapeake`
(}4?` h ' ??1 .,alb
?, 1 j o ?Y c 3?t .`1 z r
Awl Soykins Somerton 13 Neyrillt I 17 Northwe ?`KwJ is .; -S ,<<«f Yti
7 ! J "`• VIRGINIA -4r : ? .• 1: „r Y:
rt wlle - . CAROLINA • J Reynoldson Drum Hill Cmapea`e in t ^ `t M •. ?W.?r+•^'*c,{ tY *r?T ?? :} ?'#
1 rates ` \ °'F•,71F"ik ti'r :n r -?,t
Serer btA ?'
?Prir omo a 1 °
Penmet 35 258 G o A 7o T ucklanit E: $ 32 1'Y
S A ?r ti•?'R• ?"' t /
' •P. 13 ! J J I Mor South Mdl_ ?;az3r'! 17it`, L f'' !,a-t,:k?
Canwar /? ) 3 7 158 5\ s c. r '° .;. .• ,,Tt s',,
'?? 158 O -iturtreesDor ure Sun ury . Corne ?9 . ?•:Q ':?= 'S':;: ` Notra :?.?,;a'.?i?;,;? , i
Mi0llton 158 J I enh-ii Marowy IJ -t?i.j.y„^.rr ?.. `O C!+ •J.v N'i'p
TON , s-P•„
aleswlle
J Trotrill I.sukee + Winton
f 'r: ?'1.; •..1?S?S
'otecas, 7 ?! J •t" ) Sandyeross 0 154
_
er fools II - ^ .t p
J 258 enola? 6 ?
COfIlId 1 ?swllt
ceaie'" , H E um° J T/• F O ?s crd n Elizabett city* you a. ;?
/ r 5 .r hi :y ?
%
'S amt ion a` Ahoski 561 eln Harrells 'll Ryfan 6 .
dere `` L'0. 1 ' wt "j: }a - t.• C1 1 )
561 ( 6 1 1 10 '#? 6 ChaDan Okel IJ M• of Th• w'-Sy} •kic
! Rich Square PE U I MA N MhemoNe•9 '16S ?-, w: R ?+ j
1 l- ---- - ` tl ?-
S / lander ( Powelisiiflt nerl ) Jinfall I) w? H '„ ? t?,r -
)s00t1 rx 3 i !2 1 Coleram r O rtford ix nlo-nM?L
13 H WAN
1 Ilord t2 Corsicana.
i I
5 Burden 1! 6 R 4.:. •" -•. ,
7 ocr ?, 1 2, Dutants Neck t a; r
?j/C. S 1 Scale of Miles
0 S 10 20 30
S ?TT 10 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
One k1c11 equals appro+imatey 13 miles and appraeimately 21 kiklmeim.
Id ... 1141 ti'. n I1 x .. 1.6 , .° i,9 • ;' .61? Felifomia LLU
1?2 .•1` 1? i? ll)L L ..v ` ?PI••s°nl Ploins
t
, i.y ??`4' s "'_\Cleek ?L 4 ell)3 t? n io ?
r ? s q t s ll1LJ? 1,1 I
lJ24 t.o
.
t ,J V? tkiLt t.k U12 i e i !I II
• ••J ^. 111 F y 1]17• _Lbk
II I - _
)1tt Ilti .3 a 1 L1, ., (r U,3 tLi 9 ,emu
161
' L1 1170 4
if 1 ]
% C 9 r
aii,"'1_ .* l3. lad .a V, 1 t ,o
Hillis
^ fill
ti l].41 ;?• ?^, .6 11108 ?l .a 1130.6
1.s D ?s 9° - P - Froa•i•r' : J-
.. 1221 .}i' v , ' Ay 6 1, crams'..-J. 11
l,tt _ 712
• '? S•! / f'S ].0 1! sad ~ i -it
11}1 1 1.3 )? .9 1 1221
`
f Tri•Coonb Lull, S,. •c It swe0it• of Ahmki• < r`• a - 141)
17
' Airport ? 561 324 ]1?! ? lL Jolty,
1121 LLQf
1W 1122 (fr..o a? a
frs 112-4
!` ille , \ F 5
35
•f1s 1'- 561
+s a °? 6 O ` t 2 " ?? ' ql HpSKIE
Pop. 4.
tl••° 2 Store !a ti ? . !a ^:1
305 R1 .1 '00" 7 ':;!e `-
.`?`F'•`: ...`5
6 ' J A C0h 1210 .,211 Town J 12
?•!4ie 1<p 1111 w . ?' i!q4 r atr ,^:? 61
l? o
r \ 0 a e 14!
n a 1 It ? el Jest ;
.] .-/.
I7 ' Fl 1171 1,7 \ r f1],tV' ,7 to
L3 1111 d` °
^ t ! ? Turkey X, EeA•ys .. Y
1,1 ueR Y• 1100 " 1.1
/ 1.9 '? j \ r•J 1, ^ um
r c `? v 5
JJ.LL
Jl!
`!
e
_`
, "'
E
1 0 1111 :. 1 v

10 4 1111. e{ lit v ll9T 114! = b

1110 3 as} 119! rI 1101 1.1.40
-
ry
?
112 -.-?- ?- ?- - -•-- 1_Q -?-?- -? ?-
- ? -
1112 ) 11f33
/ / it
303 O u 12
`

10 / N.C.D.O.T.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RTFORD
HE COUNTY HERTFORD
BRIDGE # COUNTY
59 ON SR 11,52
.
v OVER CUTAWHISKIE CREEK
FEBRUARY 1996
SCALE SHEET / OF 3
1 0 1 2 3 . MILES

S?]] C
C: j f?o
C5 I a 1 Q n /?
LL,
Q, L
L I ?9 M Z
N IF ^ `
0
Q
? ? tl II ? ? lv
kq,
/?Ci'?/ 7/ oSS '? I i i `v ??b'? 7/ ?S L O
o
?j j ?s v
w` -
° I IQtnl ? w ? o LI ? V ??
Q Lu V w \
1
Q1
a
o
T
n
°
?
s
a
M
v

I
H ?
? J
O

e D
?
?

- n
k
Z
? ? o J

Lij

4

_ I:zl

C v

• c
A i
3
?

\4 St

N.C.D.O.T.
p p o DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HERTFORD COUNTY
BRIDGE # 59 ON SR 1152
OVER CUTAWHSKIE CREEK
FEBRUARY 10,96
SHEET 3 0 F .3
4*
DEHNR
Fax:[phone] Jul 22 196 14:18 P.11/18
To; John Dorney
Planning Branch
DIVISION OF EN VIRONMENUL Id,MGBMMT
COE PEeju PLICATION REVIV
C - 0 2
i?aRO PROJECT ? ?y WQ SUPSRV'ZSOR: T,RO`?
RMEWER: SAWYER DATE:
WETLAND INFORMATION ?FCR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKniG
FMMT YR: 9 P v2w?
COUNTYPROJECT NAt?: /lt' l PROJECT TYPE: TYPE: CE
COE #: DOT #:
RCO FROM CDA: " DATE FROM CDA:'
RBG OFFICE: H'aRO US
STREAM OR ADJAC WATER BODY: wg?
CLASS.- 4i sC? STREAM BE= #: -
MARINA
- -- ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? Phil"
A.P.EA. OF
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE?
DREDGING
AREA TO BE DREDGED: ?&l...e
IS DM- DING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF
RESOURCE?
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSEDY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
114 A7 4,e
:7
WATER UALIT3T. (401)
CERT. AMID:
IV YES, TYPE: dv-e
SWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROFOSED:
(EXISTING, PROPOSED, SEPTIC TANK ETC-)
TO BE PERMITTED BY:
(DEM, DRS, COUNTY)
IP BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PFMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE:
WATERNETI AND FILL FILX.• WATER• __D - WETLAND:
- WL TYPE:
WL ACR EST:
WL SCOREs
MITIGATION TYPE:
SHEET ATTACH?
R'ECOMMMATION: C zssuE ISSUED DENY HOLD
F?'
STORM ATER PLAN REQ' D : IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
OPEN OR CL05
WL IUA.CT:
WL REQ : $ t!
MRO CNEECT?;
KMGATXO Y
MITIGATION SIZE:
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: MARINA SERVICES:
OXYGEN IN BASIN: CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHXNG WATERS:
CC: We-RO; Central Files; DCM Field Offices; COE Washington Office
DEHNR
Fax:[phone] Jul 22 '96 14:18 P.12/18
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
To :
Y rom
Bill Moore, Environmental Engineer
Water Quality Section, WaRO
Deborah Sawyer, Environmental Technician
Water Quality Section, WaRO
Date:
Subject: Request for Starzwater Review of Section 401 Applications
VY-
PROJECT NAME : ? D rj-T- - ??"Ao
PROJECT NUMBER: FYJ / `
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE FINAL COMMENT;
- Wz
? -ell
NOTEa Sea attached descrintion of project
COMMENTS: