19960342 Ver 1_Complete File_19960410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ,
Division of Coastal Management 4'
James B. Hunt, Jr_ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 27, 1996
RECEIVED
APR 1 0 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC DOT
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Project Location: Bridge #129, on SR1245, near Cove City, over Core Creek
Proposed Project: to replace existing bridge
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by April
17, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ted Tyndall at (919) 726-
7021. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED
DATE
,IT X.
1:3 FE F=1
P.O, Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employes 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
DEHNR Fax:[phone] May 13 '96 15:54 P.02/03
To: John Dornay
Planning Branch
DIVISION OF ENVIRONNEN1AL MANACENRNT
('.AMA/COE PERMIT APPLICATION REMW
VaRO PROJECT f Ap 1$o - e- - WQ SUPERVISOR: TH
REVIEWER: SAWYER DATE: 1,5
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKM
PERMIT YR: 92 amuff-
P T
PROJECT NAME.-He- D 1, T ,rr--??._..
PROJECT TYPE: 4- PERMIT TXPE: 6? 1;t K
COE # : ?-? WT #: "I?
KGD mom CDA: (__? DATE PROM CDA:
REG OFFICE: WaRO A1? SUB BASIN
STREAM a ADJACENT W TER BODY:
CLASS: _5AL2,,AISW STREAM INDEX : 7-
OPEN OR K0
WL IMPACT:. WL TYPE:
WL MUFSTED: WL ACR EST:
IMRO CNECT?: WL SCORSt
MITIGATION: MITIGATION TYPE:
MITIGATION SIZE: - -RATG SMIE.I:T ATTACHED?
RECOi'Q DOATION: ISSU&-_ ISSUE/COND DENY HOLD V n l
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: ? IF YES, DATE APPROVED; C 2 r_?9
?'S
OJECT DESCR TION: v-?.¢ a -e?,?.
-v- 7
WA M QUALITY CM. (4011
CERT. REQ'Ds 14
IF YES, TYPE!
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED:
(EXISTING, PROPOSED, SEPTIC TANK ETC.)
TO BE PZRMITTED BY:
(DEM DRS, COUNTY)
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE.-
WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA 0 FILL: WATER: WETLAND: r0
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE?
DREDGING „ /?
A.R?A TO BE DREDGID : ? lt?
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF
RESOURCE?
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
MARINA
ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY
SEWAGE DISPOSAL:
OKYGEN IN BASIN:
ADDRESSED? ! L"
MARINA SERVICES:
CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS;
(?C: WaRO; Central Files; DCM Field Offices; GUE Washington office
DEHNR
M MORANDUM
Fax:[phone] May 13 '96 15:54 P.03/03
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
To: Bill Moore, Environmental Engineer
Water Quality SeOti.On, WaRO
From: Deborah Sawyer, Environmental. Technician
Water Quality Section, WaRO
Date:
Subject: Request foz- Stormwater Review of Section 401 Applications
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUHBER •
rr
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE FINAL COMMENT:
4
NOTE: See attached description of project
COMMENTS:

P
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Craven County, Bridge #129 on SR 1245 near Cove City, over
Core Creek
Photo Index - 1989: N/A 1984: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,509,600 Y: 532,500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - December 19, 1995
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Revised Application Received - March 27, 1996
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Craven County 1993 LUP
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public Transportation
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
High Ground 1,110 ft2
[AREA]
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 1,110 ft2
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C Sw NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace an
existing bridge with a bridge.
f
Iq
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE #129/CRAVEN COUNTY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
Project Setting
Bridge #129 is located on SR 1245 near Cove City, over Core Creek, in Craven
County. The Inland Waters of Core Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, is located
approximately 2 miles upstream of Pitchkettle Landing. At the project site, the creek
is approximately 110' wide and has an average daily flow of approximately 32 cfs.
Water depth is approximately -8' below NWL. The existing timber bridge is 116 feet
long by 19.4 feet wide. It has a navigational clearance of approximately 6.5 feet. A
wooded swamp borders the project site on the southern shore, while low lying yards
border the creek on the north shore. Core Creek is classified C Sw NSW.
Project Description
The applicant proposes to replace the existing timber bridge with a 135'-long by
24'-wide concrete bridge. The NCDOT proposes to construct the bridge using three
45' prestressed cored slabs. Since the proposed bridge is longer than the existing
bridge, approximately 1,110 ft2 of high ground will be excavated to facilitate
construction. Resultant spoil would be trucked off site to a high ground location.
Rock rip rap will be placed beneath the bridge to stabilize the shoreline.
Anticipated Impacts
The project as proposed would have negligible impact on the Public Trust Area
AEC. No excavation or filling below the NWL or in any wetlands is proposed. And
since only limited high ground excavation is proposed (approximately 125 yds3) there
should be minimal adverse effects by project-related sedimentation. The project would
have no adverse effect on navigation (The project would actually increase the clearance
by 0.2 feet).
M. Ted Tyndall - Morehead City - March 27, 1996
i FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Cove City
C. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: SR 1245
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P. O. Box 25201
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC river, creek sound, bay) Core Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone] OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent: a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge with new bridge.
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax
C. Project name (if any) Craven County. C. Will the project be for public, private or
Replace Bridge No. 129 commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), methods of construction and daily operations
and/or project name. of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
Public Transportation. See cover letter for
details.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Craven
Revised 03/93
lJ1]L?C:?.J ? ? ..?
FORM DCM-MP-1
r1.`1 V1 MAP, 0 a t_,ns 14. LAND AND WA

,.ti ..4

CHARACTERISTICS
a.
b
d
e.
f.
Size of entire tract N/A
Size of individual lot(s) N/A
Approximate elevation of tract above MHW
or NWL Elev. +/-8 m from USGS Quad.
Drawings are on an assumed datum.
Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Mucky fine sandy loam and muckalee
sandy loam.
Vegetation on tract Upland vegetation,
wetland vegetation.
Man-made features now on tract 116' long
timber and steel bridge

Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
effluent, "wash down", and residential
discharges.) Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
No zoning
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? Yes No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, ifapplicable.)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
1.
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Phillip Wrenn Treadway
Address 157 Dover Road, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
Name Gregory and Deborah Y. Riggs
Address 160 Dover Road, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
Name Blanche D. and Bonnie Brown
Address P. O. Box 191, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
(4th Adjacent Property Listed Below)
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my nowledgge.
This is the ? day of , 19 9?
Print Name H. Fra klin Vick P.E.
Signature Z,/?,?Lxo
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space proWded at the bottom of each form.
(4) Donald Earl Riggs
9700 Old US Highway 70 t
Cove City, NC 28523 ..'r.;
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
Type of bridge (construction material)
Concrete
Water body to be crossed by bridge
Core Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL +/-9'
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 116 feet
(2) Width of existing bridge clear roadwa3=l9.4'
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge +/-6.5 feet
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) The existing bridge
will be removed.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
Revised 03/95
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge 135 feet
h. Width of proposed bridge 24' clear roadway
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
+/- 6.5 feet
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X -No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
+/- 6.7 feet
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
L
i

Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL X Yes No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated +/- 30'
(2) Width of area to be excavated +/- 37'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/- 125 cubic yards
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the High ground, off site
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
To be determined during construction.
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes X No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from

Revised 03/95 i L S

Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
(2) Width of area to be filled and erosion controlled? Standard NCDOT
(3) Purpose of fill Erosion Control Methods.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert (for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
result in any fill (other than excavated material dredge)? Typical bridge and roadway
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: NO construction equipment.
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
(2) Width of area to be filled to project site? Yes X No
(3) Purpose of fill If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
highground? Yes X No require any shoreline stabilization?
If yes, X Yes No
(1) Length of area to be filled If yes, explain in detail Rip rap to be placed on
(2) Width of area to be filled slopes beneath bridge as directed by engineer.
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detai
y'`', rte.. M,l.?
Revised 03/95' .W .?...:_i?
NCDOT, Craven County Bridge No. 129 Replacement
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
Date

I oil
1111 - .\ / -~••` 1171
to Y^i.n 1 '1. -`i!,(? l.r:) •?I / lilt lilt
i• 1p
.1 / 1.5
I F Mr11.d ` /?: ?wlwr... 7.1 lull r°u. Iw1 ?. 17
1 / 1
' lilt NO itw I low :.' ,0 1 Tw.•r Ovenu ?,.?• ?f ??..
_?_(' 471 u
? IIH loll
a l,h /• •? 11.1 _ _ ?•1
INI 'fill /t 11111 .7l ' f' ?_
IN
m=r.,
t to'•1. IM M•Mr • 11:7
fiN low ' ,Inn I1er.l r T rr j•
A." ch
r? 7 ??. 111
INI 1171' rT 11.7 ), a ? 1111 J1
• 111 ?'
? •, ? II11 I
.. IIM ^ 1
W-c-liw Ck
1111??- ? I
1
n r.
uu Jilt 9
177 r f
1 tout cm r
IOI. loo t^.• ',,'1 J "'? I,,11 , I!
10 ., :. ? llul 1114 ,?F [ILL
1447_ yo - 1"'j1? u Mo. b P
?? / lilt Yrp:• Ifill`;
1
CRAVEN COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA SCALE
I 0 I ) 7 . ANl1S
f ,,. )''•w I1 ?+?,,?HooAtr 1 Chico
;.may ?•.,±Ja._. 1 f + Bonnalon
??,s ?.7 21 Co. Gof uo.d) ,
_ Goldsboro 1 ?rlll°^ "
,rw.^?_I•• ' y i ? ?1 jyl It \ li \alounlCrte?-
.. - f t A f 4" 7tp on \II 1'Sb 1 ( t \ Cdw aid 11 i _l, ?!?•
7nUlluu Dt.tow n[e1J oil ao Aorel Ill! 1 -. I ?, // F Ain wtll I
.t '`?•? 11 C.Int1 If l .brl•11 Clrlon ^ '?
^.V.. .. Wllrw?. 101W. '7` 7 Yinston 1 ° • .I . _ 7,011 ,yIlt
m Gelk J ?L1 J f) ?' -
St.a ( C"".?..r.•, , r ? t I1?nN / 11 lC,,h Cornt
77.. /??1?7rr7 'Dover
l
?'a `r• ?iS pr•w /CSl 110.1 K"
::,. \ ?. ?... 1. 55 11 l.r? \ A 1lt• Co's Cilf l (J 1 ?r 1' C. en7j0an Beolrmo,l S
.l .Yt 7 E
N 0 1 Rte- ?LyfC1r011 70 dlllonp A .;?` ??,'- , ' ?c 7 r 0••. M
A 11 /, ll \ ?q+? g da?(A?1r't?r?e1?\1 ?G111 r I Montt
??\ ` I `'N Rn inl
•? r ?? ''+', . 1 C I PI11Nnl Ndl ,j T? ? . 1 f t? .
?? `. 1i? ai V, I _ \"-)`-' f 7 • f. rI"L\ 1D7 t
?., Pink IIiU I . r E 5
,; ortal?'rtiti ;. Ka neNY I 1 / ?1 of ?N .....11
? ;Y..:.....,,., i'- •:. ?^-\- M PdIocAllnll 4 Rl.ndlle\ \ ?Irlr ?°,e?
w to II </, 1 7l 'f_ CROA`TAN Go1Un q i e ch
II \ ?HOFMANN I-^ II ? ,K.•MIT'?l?\.
'. r• %k + 10 N +? 1 _ C'..1h.A? Lw,y r, 1 1?IUf lN•_
',1 J7 ?l , a, •,•1 7:' ••t Kenenlr IN PotTUt ,' \ •^, N'Ad t: LuAr /
Kill
?: '1 ' •'' ? I1 .yU•JI \ ?.lan bwl ? f • ?_ ? IA ar1rJ1' NATIONAL ? " f 7 NI
T . yfrf ,I l ; T..?? ?Jr ? ? + l? j N . C . DEPT. OF
TRANS-
, >..??;:. ,,:...._ ?........... .1J}ll..:._.,,., DIVISION OF HIG1-WAY3
a s to to to CRAVEN COUNTY
0 10 to 30 to a BRIDGE NO.. 129 ON
1<45 UVC:t?2
SCAJ(Of MILES 011( INCM(QIJACS A??110[ I1MK(S_ ,r bANUI-1RY 1.99(.,
so ;,u 's
ld - f J
--L
O 1-? m S G? 1 ti 3 M •?- r. ; ?c ?
1
-2A Lo
j°- a 1 1 3
v'l
o -
?1- °
w?
710
Y
1 ?
j
AL `j q '•° fa 1 ?C1 ce- Z
K H ?, . o J
ti
4i z o 1 ,a d o
S
ILI
O / O _zr r 7 / 05
??? 7 ,1n1 SC7/ `V"
o ' o ?z
Y vi TN% 4
S9J? - /Q %A ?' 1 5 1 d
? o or J
Q
T
Q rA `V
gyp,`" J N.(.'_ DEFT. OF TRANS.
DIVISION OF H1GFJWAYa
't a I CRAVEN COUNTY
_.....-... -.?._,.. t: RIDGE No- .129 ON
>I-%, 1.245 OVER
;" ! , j CORE CREEK
JANUAWt- 1.996
-ET Z OF r
J
At
tJ
a
w
_ a
jQ?
LAO
a
s o ? ? 0?1
L' I
77 (-t
h' ?16rG?
N
+-t 1
oc
0
Z
u..l
J
Q
U
h

l
? M
CID
4-
tJ
mow
V
:. ? ? ?r;•,,, is
Y

? ?` ec
S csi
?

w
or ?
? -
[}

Q
a x -

O
+cp ch'j-
~ ~'

o

off, ' J
L x
?zww

w
a +? r1 +° p
o
i ++ T n
x
- W
c Q p
J J
u- Q Z
,

LLI, tu Li
a,

-
-
# yl Z
4
M
Q r
3 I
?0 3 LLL
= ?? o
w t r .4 LL LL® b
_ ` + l]E +

W + 111 ,
J
i. La
a

y
? A 0
MAR 2'7 1996
J ?-x'14•
J1? 1
?i
J.- i Q" 1
V1 .
....
w 01

X
LLI
`-r'r
1,;j
fh
N.C. CAPT. OF TR MS.
, AY
DIVISIONS OF HIG S
E CRAVEN COUNTY
Z 9RIDGE # 129 ON '
S.R. 1245 OVER
O CORE CREEK

d JANUARY 1996
41 1n SHEET OF 9
-nAl -imI kinMT NJ= fTLIH t:)Kl TIJIJN"l.J c fT T CC e T T .'77M Mr- -1 P-?lN1.1
J'
o C)
L Lo
a
0
v, '
w
O
N
w? }
Q?
0
Ca
0
H
t-
U
W
k/l
0
O
M
01<
O i
cam'
Z
ID
H
Q U

I
IT 477.'.-
fm AR 0 3 ,r,z ^ i
i
D OO O ?
4
1yW? ?
cY ?[ ,
i
q ?
0
0
. N . C . DI=FAT . OF TRANS.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY3
CRAVEN COUNTY .
,BRIDGE NO. 129 ON
SR 1245 OVER
CORE CREEK
JONUARY 1.996
SHEE:T_S =0f=_5-
05 I I V-Ls I a N171

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
March 27, 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
AR.O.WaA
d MONNOMMIN aftommod Ift
1:3 EHNR
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC DOT
Project Location: Bridge #129, on SR1245, near Cove City, over Core Creek
Proposed Project: to replace existing bridge
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by April
17, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Ted Tyndall at (919) 726-
7021. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY:
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED
DATE
P.O. Box 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
F
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Craven County, Bridge #129 on SR 1245 near Cove City, over
Core Creek
Photo Index - 1989: N/A 1984: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,509,600 Y: 532,500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - December 19, 1995
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Revised Application Received - March 27, 1996
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Craven County 1993 LUP
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public Transportation
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
High Ground 1,110 ft2
[AREA]
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 1,110 ft2
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C Sw NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace an
existing bridge with a bridge.
It
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE #129/CRAVEN COUNTY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
Project Setting
Bridge #129 is located on SR 1245 near Cove City, over Core Creek, in Craven
County. The Inland Waters of Core Creek, a tributary of the Neuse River, is located
approximately 2 miles upstream of Pitchkettle Landing. At the project site, the creek
is approximately 110' wide and has an average daily flow of approximately 32 cfs.
Water depth is approximately -8' below NWL. The existing timber bridge is 116 feet
long by 19.4 feet wide. It has a navigational clearance of approximately 6.5 feet. A
wooded swamp borders the project site on the southern shore, while low lying yards
border the creek on the north shore. Core Creek is classified C Sw NSW.
Project Description
The applicant proposes to replace the existing timber bridge with a 135'-long by
24'-wide concrete bridge. The NCDOT proposes to construct the bridge using three
45' prestressed cored slabs. Since the proposed bridge is longer than the existing
bridge, approximately 1,110 ft2 of high ground will be excavated to facilitate
construction. Resultant spoil would be trucked off site to a high ground location.
Rock rip rap will be placed beneath the bridge to stabilize the shoreline.
Anticipated Impacts
The project as proposed would have negligible impact on the Public Trust Area
AEC. No excavation or filling below the NWL or in any wetlands is proposed. And
since only limited high ground excavation is proposed (approximately 125 yds3) there
should be minimal adverse effects by project-related sedimentation. The project would
have no adverse effect on navigation (The project would actually increase the clearance
by 0.2 feet).
M. Ted Tyndall - Morehead City - March 27, 1996
F FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Cove City
C. Street address or secondary road number
a. Landowner: SR 1245
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
Address P. O. Box 25201
C. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC river, creek sound, bay) Core Creek
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone] OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent: a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge with new bridge.
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
Fax
C. Project name (if any) Craven County, C. Will the project be for public, private or
Replace Bridge No. 129 commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), methods of construction and daily operations
andior project name. of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
Public Transportation. See cover letter for
details.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Craven
Revised 03/93

FORM DCM-MP-1
MAR 'v 6 E
,. ;i
4. LAND AND
CHARACTERISTICS
Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
C. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW
or NWL Elev. +/-8 m from USGS Quad.
Drawings are on an assumed datum.
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Mucky fine sandy loam and muckalee
sandy loam.
e. Vegetation on tract Upland vegetation,
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
effluent, "wash down", and residential
discharges.) Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
wetland vegetation.
f.. Man-made features now on tract 116' long
timber and steel bridge
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
No zoniniz
Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? Yes No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, ifapplicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Phillip Wrenn Treadway
Address 157 Dover Road, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
Name Gregory and Deborah Y. Riggs
Address 160 Dover Road, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
Name Blanche D. and Bonnie Brown
Address P. O. Box 191, Cove City, NC 28523
Phone
(4th Adjacent Property Listed Below)
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my owledgge.
This is the day of , 19 /? .
Print Name H. Fra klin Vic P.E.
Signature Z/?I?Lxo
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
(4) Donald Earl Riggs -...! . R
9700 Old US Highway 70
:.'.>a
Cove City, NC 28523,
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Concrete
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Core Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL +/-9'
Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 116 feet
(2) Width of existing bridge clear roadway=19.4'
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge +/-6.5 feet
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) The existing bridge
will be removed.
f Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
Revised 03/95
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert 1
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge 135 feet
h. Width of proposed bridge 24' clear roadway
Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
+/- 6.5 feet
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water
Yes X No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bri
+/- 6.7 feet
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes X No
If yes, explain
in. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands conta
no navigable waters? Yes X I
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
i
Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Revised 03/95
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other WetlandE
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated +/- 30'
(2) Width of area to be excavated +/- 37'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards +/- 125 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Hi ground, off site
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
To be determined during construction.
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes X No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
P j! rif 111 V l
I?
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detaiL,,.
s„
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Standard NCDOT
Erosion Control Methods.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Typical bridge and roadway
construction equipment.
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail Rip rap to be placed on
slopes beneath bridge as directed by engineer.
NCDOT, Craven County Bridge No. 129 Replacement
Applicant or Project Name
Signatur
Date
Revised 03/95

1 )art`/ a.. o lut
1
y 13 Ila, Ilia
10
Ir/e 1.17. 1'1 1
\ .T. . 10
J rr r . • .1 Nla'7:
l1 ??_ !nt • ` 1.7
r« HrwwM 1 ^ t r«I«ra. _ L.t i`. ( 1177
't
la•E IIN' IIM :• 10 1 Tvr Own•r
rift Ch .?, i . ..i
Ilw '^t`w1 - •.1 - lit Alts
llit n1r _ _ \_.
Iwi Jp P yr/r./r _
?re.110 1,11 1.1M
1711 IIw • tan iwr r
Ali,
ch.
?' ••
I/U 1111' ? 11.; ,?, • - 1,11 { ' TT
rut
r y , 111.
•' y`' ? 1111 ?
W_ C_ Cal,
. VIII/?
P.-h fill
l .-- r
n ^ 11
Q2 I 7i1 - -- Hyw
w1 i771 9
IiJr 1 Jim
cOvt Orr 1.5 list
POP. safe
' 1 ,:. 7111 •?-1iit1 , ?\
io y t 1174 l.,cll, lil S''
? 1447. .1? .l ? PPN '7 /
;' t 111 ,i11.1 . ...r J 1 nit Y+pin _\1,
CRAVEN COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA 1 0 I SCALE
7 ] .MILLS
-mss -_-?
".:.a. /:•St .'a. Il t 1 ?M-??' 1 O WITCO Ban" Ion
...y. J 1?lA+ S + 11 tI \
158 ' Gillian 'lJ 10 li \alount Crus c?tir.. .?/ t
°_^ I ?It . ??' t . 11 1 ' \ tdwsrd
n S . 5
Dtw•o n nlen Y,nteOOro Aord
.., .,, InsUluw ?
?'.. 2 ? 1 ) i,, ll F Inwtll 7
. •! n? t 1 Co ,nle , s IS A . Elrod Carlo
^ - -
.«»..
+.r•...' Willa ^ 1rlinston I
L_? ) HollTalle
.:,..._„ /
Sf•f { +Dov•f 1 \IunN i, 11 (Cash Cant
Mmoel
.,4??',•`.. ?- „"?+, ' 1wy/[ .1 Co•t GU l U 1 ' C"", B.rewo 1I
..?.'`??•/; Y': ,) S5 Ira?_• •Jc 55 ?OIr^1p.•0^rn (r
l ?• 1', A AAt[ L?1
I L E N
otrA y
o ct.+? I _ n Lutc•lw, .?o 1 r ata3np Mann
Deep M \ +q+ tB`1?1 BttA? ` f'?i?a?\a?crl 1y
`?\ I if 1 + R4=1 1 • ?,rt0 ?• T?? vV? i
i ?, , > .? ' w•.. I [ I ` rif•unl Hdi ./ T?V S '• I ?t ' •1: fo, [
' •>' a %• Kanet+Y PInA Hill ` 1 S Z? '
;.,.N
i ..•:.. Oe1 t, rn.ti7 ••... I _ / 7.x,1,
;^"?•'' w'' ;i^'.;c.•.•' `J Comlat.i P,nll• RlrfrdiIe illr(neso
r..?? r.
CROA`EAN C, p » I?gch
'HOFMANN N,
rr ::'r' + i• 1. 1? '` Cbrh.A? l.wru : r, l IV/,N,_
pMds 11
_j. LdAf ie f
j.?l •','S 7: it Kentns•\f a
) 111' ^ \ ..Jr+hil
1 ..--?.... t.+ - `s•r.' 11 - MaT N ,. .1 S ] HI
•x1 ? r41a•owf irrlll ATIONAL
? r
- 1 LCD Lu1. (N:
0 S to 10 )0
$CAL( Or MILES ONE pLM EQUALS APPRO1 11 MILES,
•„ tl
N+C. DEPT+ OF TRANS.
DIVISION ON HUGI-IWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 129 ON
? 1245 UVC:R
I4ANUllft ;' 1.991.,
? rN m SG?1' 3M 1?
1
"JA
o V,
0 7 ` i

V 1 `?
C(
4
3
N
4r? ?4
Q
Z?
N
0
i
0
W
Q

7'0
o.
r
r
v' Q 1 1 ?1`t, 2
C7 7-
J_.... o
41 z ` p \ S ? d u
,a
`' U v ?C
p
0
JQv ?Q ? ? 1 0?1 o?r
oz oc Z ? - - ? ? \ 1 % 1 0- c
A
%.A
J ?
? VI
J N.C. OF-PT. OF TRANS
U.LV.LSION OF H'I'GHWAY,
CRAVEN COUNTY
ORIDGE NO- 129 ON
U?' Sh 1.15 i)V?_h
CORE CREEK
]ANUAR'Y• 19V6
+?? `? SHEET Z_OF S_

L
0
U)
CL .0
"0z , .. 1
- z
ca z :- Q ?
l
4 N 1
oQ cL? a =
g o ?
M
flov
w
o6 °
V
o

1 'ice
1
ti' D16?G?
u "I r- I
?R ? R? AI: n ,•
------------ -------
' V

s
W
DI,
4-
f Q
K" Ld
z
ej
If n X _
L? W ff ? fl y ?}
_ b d ?[
ni ? J to Jt
w LL,
qu
} ?- 3 UA
x I w 'A
Ll (] 1I .1 ar -- c r
'D -W -3 J
I L X41
u+ 1 r #" c LL
V ?v} 0 t o cr
4 M Q 1 UA 6 V)
u ° MAR 2'7 1996 M?
10
Ln
olT' ?,:
Nl- it
it n VI ? ----- ------------ - -?,?---^
-Z
of Lu CQ
? W
N.C. DEPT. OF T NS.
DIVISIONS OF HIG AYS
E CRAVEN COUNTY
Z 9RIDGE # 129 ON
S.R. 1245 OVER
O CORE CREEP{
0 81
JANUARY 1996
41 SHEET I j OF S
__. ..._.??._. ,Y.lA r-TCf+ - nio TJ I kinm i N.17 lihll-I MK I T MkIH1-J " fT T CC ' T T fTQM Qr,. -1 ?-}IHI.?

0 0
O Q
Lo Loo
0.
0
H
L &I 0 !-?
:z i?
, ,Zj - , ,
O
Ln
0
?9
O ?i .

w? }
Q
?
,4
O
r 'Z .
0. 1
v 4
`a ?
? o ?
O
M

i
O .<

N ?.
O'
w

a O

?
?
? a o
r ?
,_
:
^ ,
r
m N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS.
,
;
'
6
d'1 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY .
-
a.j BRIDGE NO. 1`29 ON
SR 1245 OVER
CORE CREEK
JANUARY 1.996
S _OF
SHEE:T
-

O O _
.
_
00