SW6120201_HISTORICAL FILE_20120220

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW l%OtU(
DOC TYPE
El CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
60 HISTORICAL FILE
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD

r.
BLAKELY DESIGN GROUP
700 EXPOSTT.ION PLACE, SUITE 105
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27615
OJEUTEi ®1F UMMSEITURR,
[phone]
FAX [phone]
OA1'1: J06 NO.
ATTENTION
TO ----- Cl._!QNL1S._.F.._.t71�'11.W/'fl..l�._ ....__.._..-._.__...._.__._......._._............... AE:
_ . SIC' ,Du�r�... _ _................ ................... �,P�I�cY-�r
WE ARE SENDING YOU/ VAttaChed
❑ Shop drawings
❑ Copy of letter
❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Prints ZPIans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Change order ❑
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
Ann1 eo 5, A,X_�;
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
:�O/rvour
pppproval ❑ Approved as submitted
use ❑ Approved as noted
As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
REMARKS
COPY TO
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR SIDS DUE
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNED:
ff enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at
�12@[NVVRY
FEB 2 0 2012
DENR ' WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORWWATER WARCH

(to be provided by owr7)
,�ev�nrc.
NCDENR Y
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
BIORETENTION CELL SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part 111) most be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
1':.PROjECT1NFORMATION °r" ' w
1
Project name McStor Self Storage
Contact name Taylor Blakely
Phone number [phone]
Date May 26, 2011
Drainage area number 1
Il."DESIGN INFORMATION.
Site Characteristics
Drainage area 158,123 ft2
Impervious area 110,821 ft2
Percent impervious 70.1 % %
Design rainfall depth 1.0 inch
Peak Flow Calculations
Is pre/post control of the 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow required?
n (Y or N)
1-yr, 24-hr runoff depth
in
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
3.16 inlhr
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow
2 yr 15.23 Wisec
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow
2 yr ! 15.47 fl'Isec
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak control
#VALUE! Wlsec
Storage Volume: Mon -SA Waters
Minimum volume required
8,922.0 ft'
Volume provided
10,180.0 ft3
Storage Volume: SA Waters
1.5" runoff volume ft'
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff ft3
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff ft3
Minimum volume required 0 ft3
Volume provided W
Cell Dimensions
Pending depth of water
Ponding depth of water
Surface area of the top of the bioretention cell
Length:
Width:
-or- Radius
Media and Soils Summary
Drawdown time, ponded volume
Drawdown time, to 24 inches below surface
Drawdown time, total-.
In -situ soil:
Soil permeability
Planting media soil:
Soil permeability
Soil composition
% Sand (by volume)
% Fines (by volume)
% Organic (by volume)
Phosphorus Index (P-Index) of media
Form SW401-Bioretention-Rev.8
June 25, 2010
12 inches
1,00 ft
10,180.0 fl2
159 ft
64 ft
ft
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
Qo,�) hr
hr
0 hr
in/hr
2.00 in/hr OK
85% OK
10% OK
5% OK
Total: 100%
(unitless)
Parts I and 11. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2

fto be provided by DINO)
Basin Elevations
Temporary pool elevation
—'Type of bioretention cell (answer 'Y" to only one of the two
following questions):
fs this a grassed cell?
Is this a cell with trees/shrubs?
Planting elevation (top of the mulch or grass sod layer)
Depth of mulch
Bottom of the planting media soil
Planting media depth
Depth of washed sand below planting media soil
398.69 fmsl
y (Y or N) OK
n (Y or N)
397.6 fmsl
0 inches Insufficient mulch depth, unless installing grassed cell.
395.1 fmsl
2.5 ft
4ft
Are underdrains being installed?
y
(Y or N)
How many clean out pipes are being installed?
What factor of safety is used for sizing the underdrains? (See
BMP Manual Section 12.3.6)
Additional distance between the bottom of the planting media and
1 ft
the bottom of the cell to account for underdrains
Bottom of the cell required
390.1 fmst
SHWT elevation
fmsl
Distance from bottom to SHWT
390.1 ft
Intemal Water Storage Zone (IWS)
Does the design include IWS
n
(Y or N)
Elevation of the top of the upturned elbow
fmsl
Separation of IWS and Surface
397.6 ft
Planting Plan
Number of tree species
0
Number of shrub species
Number of herbaceous groundcover species
Additional Information
Does volume in excess of the design volume bypass the
n
(Y or N)
bioretention cell?
Does volume in excess of the design volume Flow evenly distributed
nla
(Y or N)
through a vegetated filter?
What is the length of the vegetated filter?
ft
Does the design use a level spreader to evenly distribute flow?
nla
(Y or N)
Is the BMP located at least 30 feet from surface waters (50 feet if
(Y or N)
SA waters)?
y
Is the BIAP located at feast 100 feet from water supply wells?
y
(Y or N)
Are the vegetated side slopes equal to or less than 3:1?
T y _ (Y or N)
Is the BMP located in a proposed drainage easement with access
y
{Y or N)
to a public Right of Way (ROW)?
Inlet velocity (from treatment system)
<05 ft/sec
Is the area surrounding the cell likely to undergo development in
n
(Y or N)
the future?
OK
Excess volume must bypass cell.
Enter Data
Enter Data
OK
OK
OK
OK
Insufficient inlet velocity unless energy dissipating devices are
being used.
OK
Are the slopes draining to the bioretention cell greater than 20%? ' n (Y or N) OK
Is the drainage area permanently stabilized? y (Y or N) OK
Pretreatment Used
(Indicate Type Used with an "X" in the shaded cell)
Gravel and grass
(8 inches gravel followed by 3-5 ft of grass) �(
Grassed swale
Forebay
Other
Form SW401-8ioretention-itev.8
June 25, 2010 Paris I and II. Design Summary, Page 2 or 2

Permit No:
Ito be assigned by DWQ)
III, REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporfing documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
initials
Sheet No.
1, Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing;
Design at ultimate build -out,
G-%
Off -site drainage (if applicable), kA
GAL ouZAI
Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
C - 2 G- Z a Cell dimensions,
3
C-2 C-2a.- Pretreatment system,
-�$
C-2
- High flow bypass system,
TB
G , Z
Maintenance access,
--f$
G-'
Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
-11,15
c ^Z
Clean out pipe locations,
-fig
G.y
Overflow device, and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
2. Plan details (1" = 30' of larger) for the bioretention cell showing:
G 2 C 2 0. Cell dimensions
r$
G • Z a
Pretreatment system,
High flow bypass system,
Maintenance access,
Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
G- 2
Design at ultimate build -out,
Off -site drainage (if applicable),
G . 2
Clean out pipe locations,
G_Zc- C-2-Overflow
device, and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
a3
G'-2a,
Indicate the P-Index between 10 and 30
3. Section view of the bioretention cell 0' = 20' or larger) showing:
Side slopes, 3:1 or lower
Underdrain system (if applicable), and
%8 Bioretention cell layers (ground level and slope, pre-treatment, ponding depth, mulch depth, fill media
depth, washed sand, filter fabric (or choking stone 4 applicable), #57 stone, underdrains (if applicable),
c4c` g �j° y�' SHWT level(s), and overflow structure]
5or j e 4. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information, All
elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (fmsl). Results of soils tests of both the planting soil and the in
situ soil must include:
Soil permeability,
�rf G -Z a Soil composition (°% sand, % fines, % organic), and
�� G"• 2e4 P-index.
5. A detailed planting plan (1" = 29 or larger) prepared by a qualified individual showing:
C-'1�exl A variety of suitable species,
Sizes, spacing and locations of plantings,
9 Total quantity of each type of plant specified,
A planting detail,
The source nursery for the plants, and
Fertilizer and watering requirements to establish vegetation.
C'z 6. A construction sequence that shows how the bioretention cell will be protected from sediment until the
G entire drainage area is stabilized.
The supporting calculations (including underdrain calculations, if applicable).
Gjg _:r8. A copy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (I&M) agreement.
7 J!'aL 9. A copy of the deed restriction.
Form SW401-13i0r0ention-Rev.7 Pad III, Page 1 of 1

BLAKELY DESIGN GROUP
Landscape Architecture Site Planning
700 Exposition Place, Suite 105, Raleigh, N. C. 27615
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
e-mail [e-mail]
February 17, 2012
t210 RZr&)JW .6�st>11 pJ�icu1 vnl _ � a� s��FSro �
POµ01-V4
C7 - K A4%L
N 1NV.X 3 5Ffi/2.5f1'
,d 1.4 iu%R
Q �. -mlo x 10,1�a$�> xCf /i2�x(�+"/3s �
a _ ,175 e. f -$. 416(d M''e,
vp = 51A -9 d
Vt,slO,1$os•
TiJOR, Dg)
7p� ✓p,Q
� 1)RAUJ 49a/h) -'l'65
la. 28 M05•
-M /s 15 W1r1 'Al ¢8 ,4k. �M)")
/U04 SEle PjA5(1A4Q953
(.DID , DfJ 4�A d )
_rAE_ed10114Sd4*1z:5�w
,*'F FILL Sale LoasE
use Pdjeosgy 4 o. 4 5-
A�_10M,u,g 01-Me Al 7ZP 9411
vs41 X 4 X2
Ifs to 106 s�F k d.�. � 0,
V - 1G2
-1-s _- g /Ia2 4.
­7s = z7, 764- sec•
T 5 w V 7/ llr_�.
UuD rP/J�U�I PIX 51 z1uG
dgZGtl PcP2; 1"d C Al 0 7 MES lu FG!*)14AKV41'
Qf .33 c.f.:s.X do = 3.3 c.f s. 16a.1
D¢ 16/CCQXh.;.s"!'
o.5/g
MX Dc 14XC33X .Cyb 1 .�5 3
4'e0 = 16x �•°4661319
A�Xo -16x ,3#7 � �07 �1
-7;�rOa 11,525 2 - *W PPFs M1*MdA4
5 - r...11 PiPts OF pRovt A-0

uR'j 4 _13e,Ra 1�wY-4X
Application Completeness Review
03/First Submittal ❑ Re -submittal Date Received: Z 7 /-1- Date Reviewed: Z 8 By Bill Diuguid (d,
DevelopmentlProject Name: W c- TG R S e:
Receiving stream name lM /ka- _sg * tr µ l gf 8-zo-13 - Classification: C
Ever Basin: C,4 PE p.�A-&
For post -construction requirements, a program will be deemed compliant for the areas where it is
implementing any of the following programs: WS-I, WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, HQW, ORW, Neuse River Basin
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient
Management Strategy,
High Density Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSW require 85% TSS, 30% TN and 30% TP removal.
T&E Species (Goose Creek, Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile Creek Water Sheds): /V ,+
Latitude and Longitude:.3 } rf 0 1 — 76 Z q V Jurisdiction C-+
Project Address: 1i1 G W Y Z r7 h_ o -To FEou sae/ y1 i- _
Engineer name and firm: R 4 yA�oR Bc-R,-r- 4. _ , A* K,`& G --fl 4-XIa
Phone: 919 -B7a — L. L S Email: Txly0X SL4f_,rL_y P9XJJ ;A . ArE i
is the project confirmed to be in the State MSI Stormwater Permit jurisdiction? GR-Yes or ❑ No
❑ Low Density (no curb and gutter) ❑ Low Density with curb and gutter outlets [R'High Density ❑ Other
00 ----a-401/404 im acts'to surface waters, wetlands, and buffers (add language to cover letter and/or add info letter)
UA o
Check for $505.00 included
:��Qriginal signature (not photocopy) on application
Legal signature (Corporation-VP/higher, Partnership -General Partner/higher, LLC-member/manager, Agent).
Check Spelling, capitalization, punctuation: http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/corporations/thepage.aspx
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which
includes the name, title, mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter.
w1pr --a-
,/For subdivided projects, a signed and notarized deed restriction statement
4Baled, signed & dated calculations
Gorrect supplement and 0&M provided for each BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
5 Bioretention
❑ Dry Detention Basin
❑ Filter Strip
❑ Grass Swale
❑ Infiltration Basin
❑ Infiltration Trench
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Permeable Pavement
❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
❑ Rooftop Runoff Management
❑ Sand Filter
❑ Stormwater Wetland
❑ Wet Detention Basin
❑ Low Density
❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Off -Site
❑ NCDOT Linear Road
5 Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details
❑ arrative Description of stormwater management provided
Soils report provided
--a-- Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans or in the accompanying documents that none exist on site and/or
adjacent property
t, Details for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter;
91/ Dimensions & slopes provided
,Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density
r� BMP o eration and maintenance agreements provided
r�Application complete ❑Application incomplete Returned: (Date)
C�osr< ��►ow[,�
Comments
May 5, 2011 Revision, Bill aiuguid

NODE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor
Mr. B. Taylor Blakely, RLA
Blakely Design Group
700 Exposition Place, Ste 105
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Blakely:
Director
February 10, 2012
Resources
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW6120201
McStor Self Storage
Harnett County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Division of Water Quality Central Office received a Stormwater Management Permit Application for
the subject project on February 7, 2012. A preliminary review of that information has determined that
the application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater
review:
l . Pretreatment is shown on the cross-section of the bioretention cell but not shown on the
plan view or indicated on the supplement form. Please revise these to show the provided
pretreatment.
2. Please provide calculation for sizing the under drains.
3. Please include the III. Required Items Checklist that goes along with the supplement form. It
can be found as one of the tabs for the excel document. Please verify all items are include in
your submittal.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The
requested information should be received by this Office prior to February 27, 2012, or the application
will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items,
including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail or fax your request for a time
extension to the Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The request must
indicate the date by which you expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90
days from the receipt of a completed application to issue the permit.
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Caroiina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91 M07-6300 L FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality,org
An Fqual Opportunely 4 Affirmativc Aclion Employer
NorthCarolina
Amorally

SW6120201- McStor Self Storage
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�;S7 --I
Brian Lowther
Environmental Engineer
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
SW6120101 File
Frank McLeod - owner

•
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
for
McStor Self Storage
N. C. Hwy 27
HARNETT COUNTY, N. C.
HARNETT COUNTY PIN. 9565-79-6200.000
BLAKELY DESIGN GROUP
700 EXPOSITION PLACE, SUITE 105
RALEIGH, N. C. 27615
[phone] fax: [phone]

R
f
1
i

0
BLAKELY DESIGN GROUP
Landscape Architecture Site Planning
700 Exposition Place, Suite 105, Raleigh, N. C. 27615
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
e-mail [e-mail]
February 6, 2012
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL LOT SIZE = 3,63 ACRES
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA = 3,63 ACRES (no offsite drainage)
USE RATI❑NAL METHOD - formula = Q=CIA
WHERE Q = peak flout from drainage area (c.f.s.)
C = runoff coefficient (cilmension(ess)
.25 for taWn & Woods
.95 for impervious area
I = rainfall Intensity for a given time to peak (7.22 In./hr.- 10 yr. storm)
A = drainage area In acres
PRE -DEVELOPMENT (10 year storm) PRE -DEVELOPMENT (2 year storm)
1110 = CIA Q2 = CIA
p10 = (.25)(7.22 In./hr.)(3.63 ac.) Q2 = (.25)(5.76 In./hr.)(3.63 ac.)
1R10 = 6.55 c.f.s. 02 = 5.23 c.F.s.
C
PAST-DEVELIIPHENT
FIND C COMPOSITE, INPERVIMS AREA=2.54 AC., LAWN AREA-1.09 AC.
(2.54 ac.)(.95) + (1,09 ac.)(.25)
comp. =
3.63 ac,
comp, = .74
POST -DEVELOPMENT (10 year storm) POST -DEVELOPMENT (2 year storm)
Q10 = CIA Q2 = CIA
010 = (.74)(7.22 In./hr.X3.63 ac,) Q2 = (.74)(5.76 In./hr.)(3.63 oc.)
010 = 19,39 c.f.s. Q2 = 15A7 c.f.s.
REQUIREMENT IS TO DETAIN DIFFERENCE IN PRE -DEVELOPMENT AND POST DEVELOPMENT, 2 YR. & 10 YR. STORM
PRE -DEVELOPMENT PEAK DISCHARGE, 10 YR. STORM = 6.55 c.f.s.
POST DEVELOPMENT PEAK DISCHARGE WITH BID-RETENTI❑N, 10 YR, STORM = 0.0 c.f.s.
PRE -DEVELOPMENT PEAK DISCHARGE, 2 YR. STORM = 15.47 c.f.s.
POST DEVELOPMENT PEAK DISCHARGE WITH BID-RETENTI❑N, 2 YR, STORM = 0.0 c.f,s.

BLAKELY DESIGN GROUP
Landscape Architecture Site Planning
700 Exposition Place, Suite 105, Raleigh, N. C. 27615
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
e-mail [e-mail]
February 6, 2012
BIG -RETENTION DESIGN & SIZING
DRAINAGE AREA TO BID -RETENTION = 3.45 AC.
IMPERVI❑US AREA (at max. louidout) = 2.54 ac. = 73.67.
Rv = 0.05 + 0.9 (Ia)
Ia = IMPERVI❑US FRACTI❑N
Rv = 0.05 + 0.9 (.736)
Rv = 0,7124
V = (3630)(Rd)(Rv)(A)
V = VOLUME OF RUNOFF THAT MUST BE CONTROLLED FOR DESIGN STORM (c.f.)
Rd = DESIGN STORM RAINFALL DEPTH (h) CUSE 1')
A = WATERSHED AREA (ac.)
V = (3630)(1')M7124)(3.45)
V = 8,922 c,f,
surface area @ 12' depth = 8,922 s.f.
surface area provided @ 12' depth = 10,180 s.f.

Table of Contents
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gpw
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hydrograph Return Period Recap....................................................................... 1
2 - Year
SummaryReport .................................................................................................................. 2
HydrographReports............................................................................................................. 3
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Development.................................................................. 3
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post-Development................................................................ 4
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Bio-Retention Basin............................................................ 5
PondReport .................................................................................................................. 6
10 -Year
.......................................................................
Summary Report ....................... ....................
7
HydrographReports.............................................................................................................
8
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Development..................................................................
8
..................
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post -Development ........................................ ...... 9
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Bio-Retention Basin..........................................................
10
PondReport ................................................................................................................
11
100 - Year
Summary Report.......................................................................... .. 12
....................................
HydrographReports........................................................................................................... 13
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Development................................................................ 13
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post-Development.......................................................... I... 14
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Bio-Retention Basin.......................................................... 15
PondReport ................................................................................................................ 16

Hydrograph Return Period Recap
Hyd.
Hydrograph
Inflow
Peak Outflow (05)
Hydrograph
No.
type
Hyd(s)
description
(origin)
1-Yr
2-Yr
3-Yr
5-Yr
10-Yr
25-Yr
50-Yr
100-Yr
1
Rational
4.178
5.223
—
—
6.549
------
-- --
8.815
Pre -Development
2
Rational
12.37
15.46
19.39
26.09
Post -Development
3
Reservoir
2
0.000
0.020
—
0.020
0.021
Bio-Retention Basin
Proj. file: McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gpw Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:23 PM
Hydrafiow Hydrographs by lntelisolve

Hydrograph Summary Report
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin}
Peak
flow
(cts)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
peak
(min)
Volume
(cult)
Inflow
hyd(s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Maximum
storage
(tuft)
Hydrograph
description
1
Rational
5.223
1
5
1,567
—
Pre -Development
2
Rational
15.46
1
5
4,638
----
------
- -
Post -Development
3
Reservoir
0.020
1
10
3,383
2
396.84
4,629
Bio-Retention Basin
McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gp
Return Period: 2 Year
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4;23 PM
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve

Hydrograph Plot
3
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Hyd. No. 1
Pre -Development
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Storm frequency
= 2 yrs
Drainage area
= 3.630 ac
Intensity
= 5.755 in/hr
OF Curve
= WakeCounty.IDF
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
r 01
1.00
0.00 11
0
Hyd No. 1
Pre -Development
Hyd, No. 1 -- 2 Yr
5
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:23 PM
Peak discharge = 5.223 cfs
Time interval
= 1 min
Runoff coeff.
= 0.25
Tc by User
= 5.00 min
Asc/Rec limb fact
= 111
Hydrograph Volume = 1,567 cuft
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
EN11107
`4- 0.00
10
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
4
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Hyd. No. 2
Post -Development
Hydrograph type =
Rational
Storm frequency =
2 yrs
Drainage area
= 3.630 ac
Intensity
= 5.755 in/hr
OF Curve =
WakeCounty.IDF
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
• m
.M
0.00 -y
0
Hyd No. 2
Post -Development
Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Yr
I
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:23 PM
Peak discharge = 15.46 cfs
Time interval
= 1 min
Runoff coeff.
= 0.74
Tc by User
= 5.00 min
Asc/Rec limb fact
= 1 /1
Hydrograph Volume = 4,638 tuft
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
3.00
N- 0.00
10
Time (min)

5
Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:23 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Bio-Retention Basin
Hydrograph type =
Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.020 cfs
Storm frequency =
2 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. =
2
Max. Elevation
= 396.84 ft
Reservoir name =
Bio-Retention Basin
Max. Storage
= 4,629 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
18.00
W11112I
12.00
•M
3.00
0.00 -u
0
5 10
Hyd No. 3
Bio-Retention Basin
Hyd. No. 3 -- 2 Yr
15 19 24
- Hyd No. 2
Hydrograph Volume = 3,383 cult
Q (cfs)
18.00
15.00
12.00
m
3.00
., ..L 0.00
29 34 39 44 48
Time (hrs)

Pond Report
[•�
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Pond No. 1
- Bio-Retention Basin
Pond Data
Bottom LxW
= 159.0 x 64.0 ft
Side slope = 3.0:1
Stage 1 Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft) I
0.00
396.40
10,176
0.08
396.48
10,283
0.16
396.56
10,391
0.24
396,64
10.499
0.32
396.72
10,608
0.40
396.80
10,717
0.48
396,88
10,827
0.56
396.96
10,937
0.54
397,04
11,047
0.72
397.12
11,158
0.80
397,20
11,269
0.88
397.28
11,381
0.96
397.36
11,494
1.04
397.44
11,606
1.12
397.52
11,720
1.20
397.60
11,833
1.28
397.68
11,948
1,36
397.76
12,062
1.44
397.84
12,177
1.52
397,92
12,293
1.60
398.00
12,409
Culvert 1 Orifice Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 18.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 18.00 0.00
0,00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1 0
0
0
Invert El. (ft)
= 392.60 0.00
0.00
0.00
Length (ft)
= 38.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Slope (%)
= 0.70 0.00
0.00
0.00
N-Value
= .013 .013
.013
.013
Orif. Coeff.
= 0.60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Multistage
= nla No
No
No
Stage (ft)
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0 00
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Bottom elev. = 396.40 ft Depth = 1.60 ft
ncr. Storage (cult)
0
818
827
836
844
853
862
871
879
888
897
906
915
924
933
942
951
960
970
979
988
Weir Structures
Total storage (cult)
0
818
1,645
2,481
3,325
4,178
5,040
5,910
6,790
7,678
8,575
9,481
10,396
11,320
12,253
13,195
14,147
15,107
16,077
17,065
18,043
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 397.40
0.00
0.00
0,00
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Riser
-
---
Multi-Stage
= Yes
No
No
No
Ezfiltration = 0.080 inlhr (Wet area) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft
Stage 1 Discharge
Now GulvertiDWICe outflows have been anatyzed under inlet and outlet oonlral.
Stage (ft)
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0,40
0.20
0 00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18,00
Total 0 Discharge (cfs)

Hydrograph Summary Report
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin)
Peak
flow
(cfs)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
peak
(min)
Volume
(cult)
Inflow
hyd(s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Maximum
storage
(tuft)
Hydrograph
description
1
Rational
6.549
1
5
1,965
------
Pre -Development
2
Rational
19.39
1
5
5,816
—
Post -Development
3
Reservoir
0.020
1
10
3,433
2
396,95
5,806
Bio-Retention Basin
McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gp
Return Period: 10 Year
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve

Hydrograph Plot
8
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hyd. No. 1
Pre -Development
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Peak discharge
= 6.549 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 3.630 ac
Runoff coeff.
= 0.25
Intensity
= 7.217 inlhr
Tc by User
= 5.00 min
OF Curve
= WakeCounty.IDF
Asc/Rec limb fact
= 1/1
Q (cfs)
7.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 11
0
Hyd No. 1
Pre -Development
Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Yr
5
Hydrograph Volume = 1,965 cuk
Q (cis)
7.00
. iI
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Y- 0.00
10
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
9
HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post -Development
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Peak discharge
= 19.39 cfs
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 3.630 ac
Runoff coeff.
= 0.74
Intensity
= 7.217 inlhr
Tc by User
= 5.00 min
OF Curve
= WakeCounty.IDF
AsclRec limb fact
= 111
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
• m
AM
3,00
MID
0
Hyd No. 2
Post -Development
Hyd. No. 2 — 10 Yr
5
Hydrograph Volume = 5,816 cuft
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
M
3.00
"- 0.00
10
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
10
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Bio-Retention Basin
Hydrograph type =
Reservoir
Peak discharge
= 0.020 cfs
Storm frequency =
10 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. =
2
Max. Elevation
= 396.95 ft
Reservoir name =
Bio-Retention Basin
Max. Storage
= 5,806 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Hydrograph Volume = 3,433 cuft
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
•M
CAM
0.00 A
0
5 10
Hyd No. 3
Bio-Retention Basin
Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Yr
15 19 24
- Hyd No. 2
Q (cfs)
21.00
18.00
15.00
12.00
[:16r+1
3.00
0.00
29 34 39 44 48
Time (hrs)

Pond Report
11
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisoive
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Pond No. 'I
- Bio-Retention Basin
Pond Data
Bottom LxW
= 159.0 x 64.0 ft
Side slope = 3.0,1 Bottom elev.
= 396.40 ft
Depth =
1.60 ft
Stage ! Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (cult)
0.00
396.40
10,176
0
0
0.08
396.48
10,283
818
818
0.16
396.56
10,391
827
1,645
0.24
396.64
10,499
836
2,481
0.32
396,72
10.608
844
3,325
0.40
396.80
10,717
853
4,178
0.48
396.88
10,827
862
5,040
0.56
396.96
10,937
871
5,910
0.64
397.04
11,047
879
6,790
0.72
397,12
11,158
888
7,678
0.80
397.20
11,269
897
8,575
0.88
397.28
11,381
906
9,481
0.96
397.36
11,494
915
10.396
1.04
397.44
11,606
924
11,320
1.12
397.52
11,720
933
12,253
1.20
397.60
11,833
942
13,195
1.28
397.68
11,948
951
14,147
1.36
397.76
12,062
960
15,107
1.44
397.84
12,177
970
16,077
1.52
397.92
12,293
979
17,055
1,60
398,00
12,409
988
18,043
Culvert ! Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 18.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 18.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 397.40 0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1 0
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33 0.00
0.00
0.00
Invert El. (ft)
= 392.60 0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Riser -
--
---
Length (R)
= 38.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= Yes No
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.70 0.00
0.00
0.00
N-Value
= .013 .013
.013
.013
Orif. Coeff.
= 0,60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Multistage
= nla No
No
No
ExCiItration = 0.080 inlhr (Wet area) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 It
Stage (ft)
2,00 -7
1.80 -
1.60 --
1.40 --
1.20 -
1.00 - -
0.80 --
0.60--
0.40 - -
0.20 - -
000--
Stage ! Discharge
Note: Culver110660a ouNlows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control
Stage (ft)
2,00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0 nn
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00
Total Q Discharge (cfs)

12
Hydrograph Summary Report
Hyd.
No.
Hydrograph
type
(origin)
Peak
flow
(cfs)
Time
interval
(min)
Time to
peak
(min)
Volume
(cuft)
inflow
hyd(s)
Maximum
elevation
(ft)
Maximum
storage
(cuft)
Hydrograph
description
1
Rational
8.815
1
5
2,644
--
--
Pre -Development
2
Rational
26.09
1
5
7,827
--
—
- -
Post -Development
3
Reservoir
0.021
1
10
3,517
2
397.13
7,817
Bio-Retention Basin
McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gp
Return Period: 100 Year
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hydrafiow Hydrographs by Intelisolve

Hydrograph Plot
13
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Inlelisolve Monday, Feb 6 2012, 424 PM
Hyd. No. 1
Pre -Development
Hydrograph type
= Rational
Peak discharge
= 8.815 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 3.630 ac
Runoff coeff.
= 0.25
Intensity
= 9.713 inlhr
Tc by User
= 5.00 min
OF Curve
= WakeCounty.IDF
Asc/Rec limb fact
= 1/1
Q (cfs)
10.00
WITIA
. M
E99z9>t
W81011
M
Hyd No. 1
Pre -Development
Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Yr
5
Hydrograph Volume = 2,644 cult
Q (cfs)
10.00
MI
MI
K911
2.00
y- 0.00
10
Time (min)

Hydrograph Plot
14
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Post -Development
Hydrograph type =
Rational
Peak discharge
= 26.09 cfs
Storm frequency =
100 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area =
3.630 ac
Runoff coeff.
= 0.74
Intensity
= 9.713 inlhr
Tc by User
= 5.00 min
iDF Curve =
WakeCounty.IDF
Asc/Rec limb fact
= 111
Q (cfs)
28.00
24.00
20.00
16,00
12.00
8.00
4.00
0.00
0
Hyd No. 2
Post -Development
Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Yr
5
Hydrograph Volume = 7,827 cuR
Q (cfs)
28.00
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
8.00
4.00
Y- 0.00
10
Time (min)

Hydrograph
Plot
15
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Bio-Retention Basin
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Peak discharge = 0.021 cfs
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No.
= 2
Max. Elevation = 397.13 ft
Reservoir name
= Bio-Retention Basin
Max. Storage = 7,817 cuft
Storage Indication method used.
Hydrograph Volume = 3,517 tuft
Q (cfs)
28.00
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
[1104
4.00
0.00 A
0
Bio-Retention Basin
Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Yr
Q (cfs)
28.00
24.00
20.00
16.00
12.00
m
4.00
1- 0.00
5 10 15 19 24 29 34 39 44 48
Time (hrs)
Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2

Pond Report
96
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve
Pond No. 1
- Bio-Retention Basin
Pond Data
Bottom LxW
= 159.0 x 64.0 ft
Side slope = 3.0:1
Stage I Storage
Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft) I
0.00
396.40
10,176
0.08
396,48
10.283
0.16
396.56
10,391
0.24
396.64
10,499
0,32
396.72
10,608
0.40
396.80
10,717
0.48
396.88
10,827
0.56
396,96
10,937
0.64
397.04
11,047
0.72
397.12
11,158
0.80
397.20
11,269
0.88
397.28
11,381
0.96
397.36
11,494
1.04
397.44
11,606
1.12
397.52
11,720
1.20
397.60
11,833
1.28
397.68
11,948
1.36
397.76
12,062
1.44
397.84
12,177
1.52
397.92
12,293
1.60
398.00
12,409
Culvert l Orifice Structures
[A] [B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 18,00 0.00
0,00
0.00
Span (in)
= 18.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1 0
0
0
Invert El. (ft)
= 392.60 0.00
0.00
0.00
Length (ft)
= 38.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Slope (%)
= 0.70 0.00
0.00
0.00
N-Value
= .013 .013
.013
.013
Orif. Coeff.
= 0,60 0.60
0.60
0.60
Multi -Stage
= nla No
No
No
Stage (ft)
2.00
1.80
1,60
1,40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0 00
Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:24 PM
Bottom elev. = 396.40 ft Depth = 1.60 ft
ncr. Storage (cuft)
0
818
827
836
8"
853
862
871
879
888
897
906
915
924
933
942
951
960
970
979
988
Weir Structures
Total storage (cuft)
0
818
1,645
2,481
3,325
4,178
5,040
5,910
6,790
7,678
8,575
9,481
10,396
11,320
12,253
13,195
14,147
15,107
16,077
17,055
18,043
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 397.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33
0.00
0.00
0,00
Weir Type
= Riser
-
-
-
Multi -Stage
= Yes
No
No
No
EAltration = 0.080 inlhr (Wet area) Taiiwater Elev. = 0.00 ft
Note: CulverlJOrif" outflows have been analyzed under inlet and pullet control.
Stage 1 Discharge
Stage (ft)
2,00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
n nn
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12,00 14.00 16.00 18.00
Total Q Discharge (cfs)

Bio-Retention Basin
stage
Top of pond
2.00
12.00 ft Ri;er Icy. $98.00
1.00
3.0
0.00 _---_------ _
r r r
r r r
r r
Cuh-A • $8.0 LF of 18.0 in @ 0.701 (100 yr)
S di01) 110 r
11TC ? yr
Schematic only. Not for construction.
Hydraflow Hydrographs Pond Draw Project: McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gpw Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:18 PM

Bio-Retention Basin
,59.4 ft
6b.4 ft
Outle structure --/
Inv. 3$2.60
sac40
qoR n
Plan View
IITS
--� (100 yr)
(,0 yr)
-(2 yr)
Schematic only. Not for construction.
Hydraflow Hydrographs Pond Draw I Project: McStor Self Storage, Harnett Co..gpw I Monday, Feb 6 2012, 4:20 PM

Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc,
P.O. Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Phone/Fax [phone]
Email [e-mail]
January 16. 2012
Mr. Taylor Blakely
Blakely Design Group
700 Exposition Place, Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: Hydraulic conductivity (permeability) analysis & seasonal water table determination
(SHWT) for stormwater retention areas, McStor Self Storage, NC Hwy. 27, Harnett
County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Blakely,
An evaluation of soil properties and hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) has been conducted at
your request on the aforementioned property. The purpose of the investigation was to
determine soil water table depths (SHWT). In addition, Ksat was to be provided at a
specified depth for use with bioretention pond design.
Saturated hydraulic conductivity of the unsaturated zone was measured in a similar
method as described in the Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 53, no 5, Sept. -
Oct. 1989, "A Constant Permeameter for Measuring Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of
the Vadose Zone" and Comparison of the Glover Solution with the Simultaneous
Equations Approach for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity."
Soils at this site are most similar to the Blaney soil series (see attached boring log). Two
borings were advanced to 8.0 feet. Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT) as determined by
evidence of colors of chroma 2 or less (and/or concentrations of high redox mottles) was
encountered at a depth of 90 inches below the ground (see attached chart). [Note:
Mottling noted (less than chroma 2) in the soil boring log from 44 to 73 inches is related
to lateral water movement.]
Two compact constant head permeameter (CCHP) tests were conducted at a depth of 3.5
feet. Hydraulic conductivity at this depth was extremely slow and averaged 0.082 inches
per hour (.208 cm/hr.)
SOIUSITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS • LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING
GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION 8 DESIGN

The attached map shoes locations of sample points as well as Ksat locations. The
attached chart provides a list or measured rates at the pond location.
I trust this is the information you require at this time.
Sincerelv,
Mike Eaker
President
sorc s
E oOf

Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
Phone/Fax (91 U) 822-4540
Email mikefsowheastemsoil.com
Measured Ksat Rates, McStor Self Storage, NC Hwy. 27, Harnett
County, NC
Ksat Ksat
Location Depth in em/hr in/hr
1 42 0.210 0.083
2 42 0.206 0.081
SOIL/SITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS • LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING
GROUNDWATER DRAINAGEIMOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION & DESIGN

Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 2a371
Phone/Fax [phone]
Email mike 6southesstemsoil.com
Typical Soil Boring Log, McStor Self Storage, NC Hwy. 27, Harnett County, NC
This map unit consists of well drained soils on uplands. These soils formed in loamy and
sandy sediments. Slopes range from 1 to 2 percent.
A - 0 to 6 inches; dark grayish brown (1 OYR 4/2) loamy sand; weak fine granular
structure; very friable; many fine roots; abrupt smooth boundary_
E - 6 to 24 inches; yellowish brown (I OYR 5/4) loamy sand; single grained; loose; very
friable; abrupt smooth boundary.
BtI - 24 to 36 inches; yellowish brown (I OYR 5/6) sandy clay loam; weak medium
subangular blocky structure; friable to firm; gradual, wavy boundary.
13t2 - 36 to 40 inches; yellowish brown (l OYR 5/6) sandy clay loam; many prominent red
(2.5YR 5/8) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure; firm; gradual, wavy
boundary.
BC - 40 to 44 inches; yellowish brown (I OYR 5/6) sandy clay loam; many prominent red
(2.5YR 5/8) and very pale brown (I OYR 7/3) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; brittle in about 20 percent of the mass; gradual wavy boundary.
C I - 44 to 73 inches; yellowish brown (I OYR 5/6) sandy clay loam; many coarse red
(2.5YR 5/8) and prominent light gray (I OYR 7/2) mottles; massive structure; firm; brittle
in about 30 percent of the mass; gradual wavy boundary.
C2 - 73 to 90 inches; red (2.5YR 5/8) sandy clay loam; pockets of sandy loam; massive;
firm; clear smooth boundary.
2Cg - 90 to 96 inches; light gray (10YR 7/1) clay; massive parting to angular blocky; very
firm;
SH WT @ 90 inches (1 OYR 7/ 1)
SOIUSITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING
GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION & DESIGN

Southeaste
r-n-foil_&-En ironmental.-Associates
----- -_ P.O. Box 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
k' = Soil Boring - McStor Self Storage
Harnett County, NC
US State Plane 1983 Scale 1:2,500 MCSTOR.SSF
North Carolina 3200 N
NAD 1983 (Canus) 0 _ 300.0 1/16/2012
�I OPS Pathfinder C"ce
US Survey Feet p'Yrimbic
SOtUSITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS - LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING
GROUNDWATER DRAINAGEIMOUNDING • SURFACEISUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION 8 DESIGN
C.

.t
/ %'•
HARNETT COUNTY TAX ID#
Excise Tax: 220.00
2011015254
FOR REGISTRATION REGISTER OF DEEDS
KiJh9ERLY 5, HRRGROVE
HARNETT COUNTY, NC
2011
OCT 19 01:22: 51 PM
BK : 291 B PG: 534-537 FEE : $26. 00
NC REV STAMP:$220,00
�NSr���(ENr # MINN
N
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Parcel Identifier No.09 9566 0001 Verified by County on the day of 20
By:
Mail/Box to: Lynn A. Matthews, Attorney
This instrument was prepared by: Lynn A. Matthews, Attorney at Law
Brief description for the Index: commercial lot/Mire Branch Estates
THIS DEED made this 13`h day of October, 2011, by and between
GRANTOR
BNS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
A North Carolina limited liability company
Post Office Box 727
Dunn, NC 28335
GRANTEE
B. Franklin McLeod III and
W. Stewart McLeod
6513 Wakefalls Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g.
corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the
City of Johnsonville Township, Harnett County, North Carolina and more particularly described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 2082 page 554.
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed _ includes or _X_ does not include the primary residence of a Grantor.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in PC 4D, Slide 5C and PC#F, Slide 85D.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in
fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
2012 ad valorem taxes not yet due and payable.
Easements, restrictions and rights of way of record.
Matters evident by a visible inspection of the premises.
Matters that would be sbown by a current survey of the real property described herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
BNS DE OPMENT, LLC (SEAL)
(Entity Na) Print/Type Name:
SEAL
Print/Type N4 & Title: QaM E. Norris, Manager Print/Type Name:
By:
Print/Type Name &
(SEAL?
Print/Type Name:
ley: (SEAL)
Print/Type Name & Title: Print/Type Name:
State of North Carolina - County or City of Harnett
1:, the undersigned Notary Public of the County or City of Harnett and State aforesaid, certify that DarME.Non-is personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this day of October 2011.
My Commission Expires: Lynn A. Matthews, Notary Public
(Affix Seal)
State of North Carolina County of Harnett
1, the undersigned Notary Public of the County or City of Harnett and State aforesaid, certify th y E. Norris
personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he is the manager of BNS Deveio ent, C a North Carolina limited
liability company, and that by authority duly given and as the act of such entity, he s' the pit ng instrument in its name on
its behalf as its act and deed. Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this y of c e 20
My Commission Expires: 5/31/2016 �C�,..•••• ••.,�'. •� L n . Matthews, Notary Public
(Affix Seal)
•NOTARY .tn
=� PUBLIC
pay • ........ ,
NC Bar Association Form No, 3 0 1976, Revised © 1/1r2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

F,
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Beginning at an existing iron on the eastern right of way on NCSR 1201(Ponderosa Road) and
the southwestern corner of lot 17 of Mire Branch Subdivision as shown on map recorded at Plat
Cabinet F, Slide 30D, Harnett County Registry; thence with lot 17 of Mire Branch Subdivision,
N 58 degrees 44'55" E 175.10 feet to an existing iron stake, being the southeast corner of lotl7
and the southern corner of lot 16 and southwest. corner of lot 15, Mire Branch Subdivision;
thence with lot 15, N 58 degrees 44' 55" E 126.53 feet to an existing pipe; corner of lot 15;
thence continuing with lotl5, S 65 degrees 22'51 "E 234.47 feet to an existing iron stake in the
western righf-of way of NC 27 W; thence with the western right of way of NC 27 W the
following calls: S 10 degrees 49' 59" W 103.49 feet, S 04 degreesl 1'00"W 103.54 feet, S 01
degree 58'00 E 87.80 feet, S 05 degrees 55' 30" E 53.43 feet, S 09 degrees 22'00" E 141.45 feet
id the intersection of the eastern right of way of NCSR 1201 (Ponderosa Road); thence with the
eastern right of way of NCSR 1201( Ponderosa Road) the following calls: N 62 degrees 49'00"
W 139.15 feet, N 57 degrees 16' 30 W 96.98 feet, N 50 degrees 48' 45" W 97.15 feet, N 44
degrees 36'12" W 96.93 feet, N 38 degrees 33'39" W 96.98 feet, N 32 degrees 47'36" W 98.16
feet, N 31 degrees 12'23" W 25.51 feet to point of beginning, containing 3.62 acres. Said tract
Iying south of Mire Branch Subdivision as shown on plat recorded in Plat Cabinet F, Slide 30D.
Being shown as "Commercial" lot on plat map entitled "Mire Branch Estates, Section 4" and
recorded in Plat Cabinet "F", Slide 86-D, Harnett County Registry.
The above description was taken from an unrecorded map entitled Franklin McLeod by Bennett
Surveys Inc. dated April 13, 2011, all bearings in this description are based on NC Grid NAD 83.

HARNETT COUNTY TAX ID#
0 By 1
2011015254
FOR REGISTRATION REGISTER OF DEEDS
KIMl3ERLY S. HFRGROVE
2011 OCT !9 01 &5N PM
8�; 2918 PG; 534-531 FEE; $26. 00
NC REV STAMP: $220, 00
f NSTRU�ENr # 20f f ���2�4
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: 220.00
Parcel Identifier No,09 9566 0001 Verified by County on the day of 120
By:
Mail/Box to: Lynn A. Matthews, Attorney
This instrument was prepared by: Lynn A. Matthews, Attorney at Law T
Brief description for the Index: commercial lot/Mire Branch Estates
THIS DEED made this 13t` day of October, 2011, by and between
GRANTOR
BNS DEVELOPMENT, LLC
A North Carolina limited liability company
Post Office Box 727
Dunn, NC 28335
GRANTEE
B. Franklin McLeod III and
W. Stewart McLeod
6513 Wakefalls Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g.
corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot orparcel of land situated in the
City of , Johnsonville Township, Harnett County, North Carolina and more particularly described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof'.
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised t0 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 2082 page 554,
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed — includes or _X_ does not include the primary residence of a Grantor.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in PC #D, Slide 5C and PC#F, Slide 85D.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in
fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor, will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
2012 ad valorem taxes not yet due and payable.
Easements, restrictions and rights of way of record.
Matters evident by a visible inspection of the premises.
Matters that would be shown by a current survey of the real property described herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
BNS DE )PMENT, LLC
{Entity N )
Print/Type NaZ & Title: Danny. E. Norris, Manager
Print/Type Name:
(SEALS
Print/Type'Name:
By: (SEAL)
Print/Type Name & Title: _ Print/Type Name:
By:
Print/Type Name & Title:
(SEAL)
Print/Type Name:
State of North Carolina - County or City of Harnett
I, the undersigned Notary Public of the County or City of Harnett and State aforesaid, certify that PME.Nonis personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this day of October 2011.
My Commission Expires:
(Affix Sea])
State of North Carolina
Lynn A. Matthews, Notary Public
County of Harnett
1, the undersigned Notary Public of the County or City of Harnett and State aforesaid, velcertify thh
personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he is the manager of BNS Deo ent
liability company, and that by authority duly given and as the act of such entity, he s�Cy
the�i g u
its behalf as its act and deed.. Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal, this of C�`ct : e 20
My Commission Expires: 5/31 /2016
(Affix Seal)
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association
�`• P, Ill ti 1
.•IAoYAR,. _
_'- PUBLIco
C
60.00w.'
E. Norris
Carolina limited
t in its name on
Notary Public

EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Beginning at an existing iron on the eastern right of way on NCSR 1201(Ponderosa Road) and
the southwestern corner of lot 17 of Mire Branch Subdivision as shown on map recorded at Plat
Cabinet F, Slide 30D, Harnett County Registry; thence with lot 17 of Mire Branch Subdivision,
N 58 degrees 44'55" E 175.10 feet to an existing iron stake, being the southeast corner of lotl7
and the southern corner of lot 16 and southwest. corner of lot 15, Mire Branch Subdivision;
thence with lot 15, N 58 degrees 44' 55" E 126.53 feet to an existing pipe; corner of lot 15;
thence continuing with lotl5, S 65 degrees 22'51"E 234.47 feet to an existing iron stake in the
western right `of way of NC 27 W; thence with the western right of way of NC 27 W the
following calls: S 10 degrees 49' 59" W 103.49 feet, S 04 degrees 1'00"W 103.54 feet, S 01
degree 58'00 E 87.80 feet, S 05 degrees 55' 30" E 53.43 feet, S 09 degrees 22'00" E 141.45 feet
to the intersection of the eastern_right of way of NCSR 1201 (Ponderosa Road); thence with the
eastern right of way of NCSR 1201( Ponderosa Road) the following calls: N 62 degrees 49'00"
W 139.15 feet, N 57 degrees 16' 30 W 96.98 feet, N 50 degrees 48' 45" W 97.15 feet, N 44
degrees 3612" W 96.93 feet, N 38 degrees 33'39" W 96.98 feet, N 32 degrees 47'36" W 98.16
feet, N 31 degrees 12'23" W 25.51 feet to point of beginning, containing 3.62 acres. Said tract
lying south of Mire Branch Subdivision as shown on plat recorded in Plat Cabinet F, Slide 30D.
Being shown as "Commercial" lot on plat map entitled "Mire Branch Estates, Section 4" and
recorded in Plat Cabinet "F", Slide 86-D, Harnett County Registry.
The above description was taken from an unrecorded map entitled Franklin McLeod by Bennett
Surveys Inc. dated April 13, 2011, all bearings in this description are based on NC Grid NAD 83.