SW4130301_HISTORICAL FILE_20140110

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW + 3 0 3 o l
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
lam. HISTORICAL FILE
DOC DATE
20
YYYYMM D D

FG MG5 2012-12-26
FG MG5 2013-01-31
j`hcc P III rrl- zP
I (c C1
1.
O
m
O
9
s
n
January 31, 2013
LAND DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY OF:
DAVID R. SHEPHERD AND JANIE S. SCHWAB
AND
EVERETT C. BARHAM AND WIFE RACHEL H. BARHAM
BEGINNING at an existing nail on the western margin of the Right-of-way of U.S. Highway 220 North. Said nail being located
S84°l5'00"W, 88.10 feet from an existing iron pipe within the Right -of -Way of U.S. Highway 220 North; Said nail also being the
northeastern corner of Everett C. Barham as recorded in Deed Book 1841, page 680 and Deed Book 7104, page 2554 (Right-of-way
deeded to NCDOT). Thence from said point of beginning and along said western margin, S12"16'49"E, 79.01 feet to a new iron pipe;
Said iron pipe being located N12°16'49"W, 154.14 feet from an existing nail on said western margin; Thence leaving said western
margin and with a new line, S84° 15'00"W, 1954.03 feet to a new iron pipe on the eastern margin of the Right-of-way of the future N.C.
Highway 68/U.S. Highway 220 Connector as recorded in Deed. Book 7370, page 1770 and Deed Book 7406, page 2315- Thence with
said eastern margin, along a curve to the left, having a radius of 4675.01 feet, an are distance of 91.94 feet, and a chord bearing and
distance of N259710"E, 91.94 feet to a new iron pipe; Said new iron pipe being the northwest comer of Everett C. Barham as recorded
in Deed Book 1941, page 680 and Deed Book 7370, page 1770 (Right-of-way deeded to NCDOT), and the southwest comer of David R.
Shepherd and Janie S. Schwab as recorded in Deed Book 3421, page 1939 and Deed Book 7406, page 2315, (Right -of --way deeded to
NCDOT). Thence with said eastern margin and along a curve to the left having a radius of 4675.01 feet, an arc distance of 236.84 feet,
and a chord bearing and distance of N24°34'50"E, 236.81 feet to an existing nail; Thence continuing with said eastern margin,
N22°04'24"E, 223.55 feet to a new iron pipe; Said iron pipe being in the southern line of Simaan 220 LLC, as recorded in Deed book
4968, page 69; Said new iron pipe being located N85°08'37"E, 202.25 feet from an existing rebar; Thence with Simaan 220 LLC's
southern line, N85°08'37"E, 1570.58 feet to a new iron pipe on the western margin of U.S. Highway 220 North; Said point being the
northeast corner of David R. Shepherd and Janie S. Schwab as recorded in Deed Book 3 42 1, page 1939 and Deed Book 4654, page 483,
(Right-of-way deeded to NCDOT). Thence along said western margin, S 19°03'48"E, 189.78 feet to an existing bent rebar; Thence
S 18°29'00"E, 197.79 feet a new iron pipe; Thence N84°15'00"E, 15.57 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING.
Containing 18.91 acres and being that property recorded in Deed Book 3421, page 1939, save and except the Right-of-way of U.S.
Highway 220 North recorded in Deed Book 4654, page 483, and the Right -of --way of the future N.C. Highway 68/U.S. Highway 220
Connector recorded in Deed Book 7406, page 2315, and being the northern +.47 acres of the property recorded in Deed Book 1841, page
680, save and except Right-of-way of U.S. Highway 220 North recorded in Deed Book 7104, page 2554, and the Right -of --way of the
future N.C. Highway 68/U.S. Highway 220 Connector recorded in Deed Book 7370, page 1770. Deed Book 7063, page 1727 describes
access rights.
Also being all of Tax Parcel #0146905 and the northern portion of Tax Parcel #0146904.
1 1
ro
PP
P
P
1
V
� GENTEI2FIELD m a�0
d
z �
4 N
NO , e
51MAAN 220 LLG WEAL
DB 4gb8, P6. bcl m
PARCEL #0145845 \ 2s_ s �6v I NIP E11 \\ \ llt \ ly 1 1
1 ZONED GU -HI \ \ I I W
\ \
USE: AUTO REPAIR
L5'�IDIrYQ� MARK 1�1 I
v v � A A � �1 1 ro
1 I I r r h + I J_l- i I � J `� � � � � � � � \ \ \ \ \ \ ♦ ! 1 I 1
it f I y
i��l,�� � I PP �
1� -o
EYARD r
15'IN
SID 0' 30
2
Nay°oa'3 ts' �-_ _ _ — t ]1 I 1 1 f i i � ; I }
---- / ` 1 I I }
�- 2-251 � ���� � \ 1 / / , 1 � I I I l i I I '� i , I � 1 ; I i l v � i � - _ � A � v A A \ \ v � V � \ \ 1 `�� \
Ex.
REPAR \ \ \ \ `;�'`�
,
A A v �1 �� 11 ll } 1 111 1 1BEN
a I \
O
zQN \ \ WELL, �Q, \V " \
Rs-WELL,
ICY1 �+ 11`
o �j OUY
v \ �Rjall+,
Q lr �' v� v �� v V v V A\ \ V A\ \ l 1 \\ f! 1 1+ I 1 1 1 V VJ �ERIa - OKAB\ S NO v \ v \ to
—�9 1 � � � 4 1 } PP
1 1�. � � � `t` 0
CO� O�Om z \ \\ \\\ \ \\\ \ \� l \` \1 1� / v�✓' }';1 1 ti J
Q \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ \ 1 ' 1 lI r I rv`L �r' P� / � _ _ 1 \ � \ \ 1 1
,• �. \ \ \ 1 \ \ �`� I N� l 1 1 DB'by, PEz. 825- - \ L \ \ �1 0
y ea
V u_ v v o v v v I I I r 1 1 `� 1,
J'� �•�
REEL C�#46`405~-
,�
15;4�ACRE�
VICINITY MAP
o rh0� 'ZQNEDt R5 30 It A
EX. NAIL \ \1 > < } \\ 1 \ `'// f l I i'ti �! / \ \� - / /+ it 11 // �\� \ \� \ \\�\ �\ \ ♦\ \ v v rnni V A v
A
�y � f � , 1 I i 1 � \< ( / t ��;� � I I\\ 1 � 1,�� \\ \ \\\ \\ \.� - r Gr � __ _- __ / __ _ - ♦ t�l�\\\\ \ \ � \ \ ,\ l
V'+rY�2--
000
�f - 1 1 1 I+ l c #11'li 1 _ t 1 �\ v v ., -> > A 1 /- _ v♦ I v v A� v �� , v _ v v-
•�J.
-
/
D
-
ry
LHA�t�
--a8NJ��%` ANC ` del
\I'C�!?`lE1 }
�n I (1 ( i - - v \ V 1� \ -- r Oq.18 T �� - -- _ _ _ " 4pB
VI• 6' ` ^ \ 1 1 1 / / / 1 / / 1$ 1 �� 1 1 \ ��4 5'Ob"/YA
" >
/_,_ g
�/--
EIPo—AU NIP /4F-�-
,^0
°m v 1 1} i+ 1
Q —I 1 '� YARD
! 1 l5 51DE
1. QD 2rU
L
VQ A) a 1
=Qm NIP 1
1
1
l
584° t5'00"W
NOTE5:
TRACT "A"
1. DEED REFERENCES:
DB 5421, PG. Ig3q
OB 4654, PC. 483
DB 6776, PG. 525
DB 7063, PG, 1721
DB 7401 PG. 2315
2. AREA = 15.44 ACRES
3. PARGEL # 0146g05
TRAGT "B"
I. DEED REFERENGE5:
OB 1541, PG. 650
DE3 7370, PG. 17-10
D13 7104, PG. 2554
2. AREA = 3.47 AGRES
3. PARGEL # 0146gO4 (PORTION OF)
BOTH TRACTS
1. SITE 15 NOT IN A DESIGNATED WATERSHED.
2. PROPERTY 15 LOGATED IN ZONE "X" PER FEMA FIRM
PANEL 7&3clJ, EFFECTIVE DUNE 181 2007, MAP NO.
3710783g00J.
3. APPROXIMATE ZONING LINES AND 5GENIC CORRIDOR
LINE HERE SCALED FROM THE TONN OF 5UMMERFIELD
ZONING MAP G-3, DATED OGTOBER 2001
4. AG ZONE AND R5-30 ZONE BUILDING RE5TRIGTION5
TAKEN FROM THE TOWN OF 5UMMERF I ELD
DEVE LOPMENT ORD I NANGE :
MAXIMUM BUILIDN& HEIGHT = 50 FEET
MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE = 30% OF TRAGT
5. NO IMPROVEMENTS OBSERVED.
6. NO EVIDENGE OF SITE USE AS A SOLID WASTE DUMP, .
SUMP, OR SANITARY LANDFILL.
7. NO PARKING LOT ON SITE.
EVERETT C. BARHAM
RAGHE_ H. BARHAM
DB 1841, P6. 6&0
DB -73.0, PG. 1-170
DB -1104, P6. 2554
PORTION OF
PARCE- #014(og04
L E - END:
EIP = EXI5TIN6 IRON PIPE
NIP = NEW IRON PIPE
APPROX. = APPROXIMATE
RGP = REINFORGED CONCRETE PIPE
HDPE = HIGH DENSITY POLYETHELINE PIPE
T = OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
--- UT — = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
TP = TELEPHONE POLE
P = OVERHEAD POWER
PP = POWER POLE
GUY = GUY HIRE
G/A = CONTROLLED ACCESS
OHNER/DEVELOPER:
NATIONAL HERITAGE AGADEMIFS
3550 BROADMOOR 5E, 5TE. 201
&RAND RAPIDS, ML 4g512
REP., MR. DAN RILEY
TELE: 616-1154-2252
E-MAIL: DRILEY@HERITAC- EAGDEMIES.GOM
1
p L 1 LI °;5'00" 1�1 I
NI `( EIP,, , II
l� 1
NIP 0
1 �
�x
vo
1 jot A
Ex.
NAIL
�1
1
TO: NATIONAL HERETAGE ACADEMIES,
(LENDER)
(TITLE INSURANCE CO)
(OTHERS):
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH
IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 MINIMUM
STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS,
JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES
ITEMS 1,2,3,4.5,6(a)(b),8,9,11(a),(b),12,13,16,17,18, AND 19 OF TABLE A
THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JANUARY 29, 2013.
71 aaaaaY•O�fq,,I SEAL
SIGNED ,�O¢q'� CAP FEBRUARY 1. 2013
DATE F
SEAL
L 3189 2 1-3189 =? „
REGISTRAT10N NUMBER
Z.
PROGRESS DRAWING — SUBJECT TO REVIEW
ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
SUMMERF I ELDI CHARTER ACADEMY
NATIONAL HERI TAI ACADEMIES
5303 U.S. HIGHWAY =0 NORTH
BRUGE TOhW5HIP, GUILFORD COUNTY
FIELD, NORTH CAROLINA
L-DAT'ES DEC. 26, 2012' 51-ALE.I"=60' - - -I SHEET- -
HUGH CREED ASSOCIATES, INC., P.A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
-III I•�I lilpl — I�
P.O. BOX 9623 PHONE: [phone]
1306 W. WENDOVER AVE. OR 336� 275-8084
GREENSBORO, N.C. 27408 FAX: [phone]
FIRM LICENSE #C-0551 E-MAIL: HCAOTRIADBIZ.RR.COM
I j:

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No. SW4130301
Summerfield Charter Academy
Stormwater Permit No. SW4130301
Guilford County
Designer's Certification
RECEIVED
N.CMept. of ENR
JAN 13 2014
Winston-Salem
Reiglonal office
I, Charles J. Christy, PE , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (® periodically / ❑weekly 1
❑full time) the construction of the project,
Su_mmerfield Charter Academy _
(Project Name)
for Charter Development Company, LLC (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specification:
Sand filter for drainage area, D.A. #1, discharges to diversion ditch and sediment trap that was
constructed as part of the original temporary sediment erosion controls. Revised grading did not
permit the construction of a level, spreader per original plans. Diversion ditch and sediment trap is
stabilized and discharges, upstream of the buffers Discharge is diffused through rock check as part
of the sediment trap. There are no signs of erosion or channelization evident in the stream buffer.
See picture below.
Signa7ation
Regis Number 2 ,142
Date Januar 10, 2014
%`Q� F s o���
SEAL 's
029142
y9 ..•GIN,.• � .
SEAL
Page 5 of 6

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No. SW4130301
Certification Requirements:
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
✓ 2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
✓I All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
v 4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
✓5. The outlet/bypass structure elevations are per the approved plan.
�6. The outlet structure is located per the approved plans.
�7. Under drains are located per the approved plans.
'/8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation, per the vegetation plan.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
✓ 10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
11. The permitted amounts of surface area and volume have been provided.
7 12. Required drawdown devices are correctly sized per the approved plans.
3. All required design depths are provided.
'/14. All required parts of the system are provided, such as a sediment
chambers, sand chambers, under drains, and outlets.
15. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
Please submit this Designer's Certification to: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Surface Water Protection
565 Waughtown Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Page 6 of 6

N WADETRim
April 2, 2013
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
512 N. Salisbury St.
Archdale Building - 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attention: Mr. Robert D. Patterson, PE
Re: Stormwater Management Application, No. SW4130301
Summerfield Charter Academy
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Patterson:
i
UD�@ I
;A PR
i113
In response to your request for additional information dated March 21, 2013, we offer the
following corresponding responses for your consideration:
1. Enclosed please find an original signed and notarized authorization letter.
2. SWU-101
a. Attached please find a Basin Information Table for all the drainage areas.
b. We have indicated the proper off -site drainage areas.
3. We have revised plan Sheet C-4.0 to include all areas draining to each BMP
including off -site areas and the area of the BMP themselves. We have added
existing and proposed contours to the plan.
4. We have revised the drainage areas to include all off -site drainage. This is reflected
on plan Sheet C-4.0
5. We have revised and included our Storm Water Management and Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan, Revised April 2, 20103 to include calculations for: 1)
existing runoff pre -development, 2) post -development runoff from drainage areas, 3)
peak runoff rate from the outfalls post -construction, 4) stage -storage tables for sand
filters, 5) sand filter area is the area at the lowest elevation for the respective sand
filter, 6) underdrain pipe sizing, 7) hydraulic grade line for the sand filters for the
100yr-24hr storm event, 8) flow calculations for Pipe ZZ and Outlet OP#10.
Wade Trim, Inc. 828.255.1197
46 Haywood Street 828.255.1199 fax
Suite 334 www.wadetrim.com
Asheville, NC 28801

Page 2
Mr. Robert D. Patterson
April 2, 2013
Additionally, we have required water quality volume, areas, formulas, flow
calculations, pre and post flow from each drainage area, and tables on plan Sheet C-
4.0.
6. Attached please find the SHWT determinations for sand filter #1, #2, and #5.
7. The gravel hatching represented a temporary access route around the building for
building construction. We have eliminated the bio-retention cells from being our
BMP's. In place of bio-retention cells, these areas will now just be depressions to
collect the storm water for conveyance in the closed conduits to the sand filters.
8. We have eliminated the well site from the plan. Please refer to plan Sheet C-2.0.
We are just stubbing the gravel drive across the creek for future access and
maintenance to septic field. No water will be channeled, it will sheet flow off the
proposed gravel.
9. We have shown the drainage area for the water flowing to pipe ZZ on plan Sheet C-
4.0. We have provided calculations for the 100yr-24hr storm event in our Storm
Water Management and Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, Revised April
2, 2013. The flow of water can be dissipated with a rip -rap outlet protection. The
associated velocity is below the threshold for bluegrasslBermudagrass on highly
erodible soils
10. BMP Cross Section Detail on plan Sheet C-2.2.
a. We have indicated a clay core seal to be constructed under the rock weir.
b. This cross section is only for the sand filter.
11. We have eliminated all bio-retention cells. We have modeled the site for a 100yr-
24hr storm event. The hydraulic grade line in the sand filters and the top of pond
elevations are indicated in the Storm Water Management and Soil Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan, Revised April 2, 2013. There is nearly a foot of
freeboard in the ponds during this storm event.
12. The sand filter basins may/can be used during construction to ensure compliance
with the NPDES permit. Please reference the note under the Sand Filter Section
Detail on plan Sheet C-2.2. The BMP Manual recommends using chocking stone if
there is a potential for high sediment loads that would clog the washed stone. We
are eliminating this factor by telling the contractor not to install the underdrains,
stone, and filter media until the site has been stabilized to the greatest extent
possible.
13. We have eliminated sand filter, BMP #4, and propose to construct a drainage swale
to keep off -site surface water from entering the site.

Page 3
Mr. Robert D. Patterson
April 2, 2013
14. We have eliminated the bio-retention cells.
15. Noted.
We have included 2 full size copies of the following plan sheets, with revisions noted as #4:
• C-2.0
- Indicated the removal of bio-retention cells and sand filter #4.
- Indicated the enlargement of sand filter, BMP #1.
- Indicated proposed swale in vicinity of eliminated sand filter #4.
- Revised grading and gravel drive west of the creek.
C-2.1
- Pipe Schedule Table: Revised pipes F, H, K, & M from perforated to solid.
Eliminated pipes SS, TT, & VV. Adjusted pipe UU.
- Structure Table: Revised #1.1-R from 12" to 24". Revised rim elevations as
noted. Eliminated structures O.C.S. #4 and #4.2-R.
- Eliminated 6" underdrains from previous bio-retention cell #1-D & #3-A.
- Revised size of underdrain in sand filter #3.
- Eliminated sand filter #4.
- Clarified that underdrain collectors for sand filter #2 will be 12" and underdrain
laterals will be 6".
- Identified outlet protection, OP#10 for pipe ZZ.
C-2.2
- Eliminated Bio Retention Section Detail.
- Modified BMP table. Adjusted top elevation, WQv required & provided, rock weir
elevation, and riser elevation. Eliminated bio-retention cells and sand filter #4.
- Clarified note for Riser Detail.
- Adjusted note for Sand Filter Section Detail.
- Added outlet OP#10 to Outlet Protection Table.
- Eliminated outlet protection OP#6 and OP#7.
• C-2.3
- Eliminated bio-retention enlarged plan views.
- Adjusted weir elevation for O.C.S. #1, #2, & #3.
- Modified dimensions of sand filter #1.
- Eliminated O.C.S. #4 and enlarged plan view of sand filter #4.
C-4.0 (Changes not noted with a revision. Consider entire plan sheet changed)
- Modified Water Quality summary table; added impervious column, eliminated bio-
retention cells, eliminated sand filter #4, & corrected values.
- Added 'C' values, runoff depth, intensity values, and formulas.

Page 4
Mr. Robert D. Patterson
April 2, 2013
- Added pre and post flow rates from drainage areas tables for each of the
drainage areas.
- Modified drainage areas to include off -site areas and areas of the BMP's.
- Included existing and proposed contours.
- Eliminated drainage area #4 and included it in drainage area for sand filter #2,
drainage area #2, identifying it as drainage sub -area #2.13
- Note: drainage area #1 drains to sand filter #1, drainage are #2 drains to sand
filter #2, and so on. Each drainage area is comprised of several sub -drainage
areas. Drainage area #1 is comprised of sub -drainage areas #1.1 through #1,10.
Drainage area #2 is comprised of sub -drainage areas #2.1 through #2.13, and so
on.
We have included revised supplements for the sand filters and level spreader.
Please let us know if you have any other questions.
Sincerely,
Wade Trim, Inc.
eles J. Chr y, PE
or Associate
cc
EDD2077.02A
projectwise\Documents\Projects\E\Edd2077102a\DoesIPermits\DWQ\DWQ 3rd SubmittaftPatterson2013-04-02
cc: Mr. Dan Riley, National Heritage Academies
Mr. Jeff Chamberlain, National Heritage Academies
The information contained in the above message is privileged and confidential information solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify Wade Trim by telephone.

DWQ STORMWATER AUTHORIZATION
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attention: Mr. Robert D. Patterson, PE I1h�j�
Environmental Engineer �J V
Re: Summerfield Charter Academy Lia;�
Stormwater Management Permit Application N� ,
Stormwater Project No. SW41303014e
Guilford Countynch
Dear Mr. Patterson:
r
By signature below and on behalf of Charter Development Company LLC, I Jack M. Chance, hereby
authorize Jeff Chamberlain to sign the Stormwater Permit Application (SWU-101) and all required
Operation -and Maintenance Agreements for the respective BMP's on the above referenced project, on
behalf of Charter Development Company LLC.
By: Jack M. Chance, Manager, Charter Development Company LLC
Signature: Date:
Z�
I. 1�i{i�.l'Ll �-4 - Ili I P a Notary Public for the State of Michiean. County of
6�/ 1
n t do hereby certify that liy�W� �aersonally appeared before
me this day of MOWC , c 2013, and acknowledge the signature of the forgoing DWQ
Stormwater Authorization. Witness my hand and official seal, - Out,
RANI A. PHILLIPS
Notary Public -State of Michigan
County of Kent
My commission Expires Aug992,2113
Acting In the County of
SEAL G /�
My commission expires:

Summerfield Academy
Storm Water Management
and
Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
January 22, 2013
Revised February 14, 2013
Revised April 2, 2013
State Stormwater Project No. SW4130301
Project Location:
5303 US 220 North
Summerfield, NC 27358
CAR
`; "0 aF ssr '
2
Prepared by:
WADETFJM'
46 Haywood Street, Suite 334
Asheville, NC 28801
Charles J. Christy, PE
828.337.0251
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 11

Project Developer:
National Heritage Academies, DBA Charter Development Company LLC
3850 Broadmoor Ave, SE, Suite 201
Grand Rapids, MI49512
Contact: Dan Riley
Phone: [phone]
Proiect Location:
5303 US 220 North
Summerfield, NC 27358
Bruce Township, Guilford County
Lat/Long = 36.2181 /-79.9102
PIN: 7839097485 and a portion of PIN 7839098144
Combined Parcel PIN = (T.B.D.)
Surface waters:
Project surface water discharges to un-named tributary to Haw River, Cape Fear Watershed, Jordan Lake
River Basin.
Project is not located in a watershed water supply.
No wetlands are located on the property.
Project is located in Zone X per FEMA FIRM Panel 7839J, June 18, 2007, Map No. 3710783900J. There
are no flood plains or floodways on the property.
The proposed stream crossing will require a PCN form submitted to Corps and DWQ for NWP #39
(Section 404 Permit) and 401 Water Quality Certification.
Project Specifics:
Total Project Area = 18.91 Acres
On -Site Disturbed Area = 15.73 Acres (15.70 acres used for permit fee and surety requirements). (3.28
acres east of the un-named tributary for construction of main site and 6.42 acres west of the un-named
tributary far construction of septic the field)
Impervious area at completion: 22.45%
Pervious area at completion: 78.55%
Page 2 of 11

Description of System:
The proposed storm water management system consist of surface drainage, inlets & catch basins, closed
conduits, sand filters, level spreader and natural buffers.
There are four (4) sand filters, and one (1) level spreader. Sand filters are identified as #1 through #5.
Sand Filter #4 has been eliminated and combined with drainage area #2. Sand filters are numbered and
identified according to their respective drainage areas. Each drainage area consists of several smaller
sub -drainage areas. The drainage areas and sub -drainage areas are numbered according to their
respective sand filter. For example, Sand filter #1 collects and treats water from drainage area #1.
Drainage area #1 consists of sub -drainage areas #1.1 through #1.10. The level spreader is identified as
LS#1. The level spreader diffuses flow from the discharge of sand filter #1.
There are a total of three (3) discharge points on the site, identified as 0P#1, OP#3, and OP#8 as shown
on plan sheet C-2.1.
Sand Filter #1 discharges to OP#1.
Sand Filter #2 and #3 discharge to OP#3.
Sand Filter #5 discharges to OP#8.
Soils nn Situ
CkB, CIB2, CIC2 Clifford Sandy Loam, 2%-10% slopes
CnA Codorus Loam, 0%-2% slopes
PpD2, PpE2 Poplar Forest Clay Loam, 6%-25% slopes
Design Parameters:
Storm Basins and Conduits —10yr storm
Open Channels —100yr storm
Runoff Calculations — Rational Formula, Greensboro IDF Curve, and Model identified below.
Modeling — Bentley CivilStorm V8i (SELECTseries 2), 11/3/2011 [08.11.02.75]
Manning's Coefficients — PVC=0.010, Concrete=0.013
Pipe entrance loss coefficient = 0.80
Minimum Tc = 10 minutes
Rational C = roof's, pavement, concrete, gravel = 0.95
bare soil = 0.60
lawn areas = 0.20
Page 3 of 11

wooded areas = 0.15
unimproved areas = 0.35
Outlet Stabilization — Design per NC SESC Manual, reference Sheet C-2.2
Sediment Trap - Design per NC SESC Manual, reference Sheet C-3.6
Sediment Basin w/ Skimmer —Design per NC SESC Manual, reference Sheet C-3.1 and C-3.6
Design of Soil Erosion Control Measures indicated on Plan Sheets C-3.0 through C-3.6.
Storm Water Runoff:
A. Runoff from existing un-developed site, Pre -Construction
Drainage area east of tributary = 9.28 acres
Runoff Coefficient C = 0.15 (NC BMP Manual for wooded site)
Time of Concentration T, = 10 minutes (default, see beiow)
Storm Duration = 24 hours
L = 1,044ft
H = 864-816 = 48'
T, _ [LA3/H]A.385 / 128 = 5.4 min.
Storm Intensity
i1= 2.78"
i2 = 4.30„
i 10 = 5.80"
iioo = 7.90"
Peak runoff rate, pre -construction
Total of all drainage areas:
Q1= 3.04cfs
Q2 = 4.71cfs
Qlo = 6.35cfs
Q100 = 8.66cfs
Refer to plan sheet C-4.0 for individual drainage areas
B. Post -Development run-off flow rates from drainage areas:
Total Drainage Area Captured = 7.30 acres
Runoff Coefficient Weighted C = 0.61
T, = determined by Model
i = from Greensboro IDE Curve
Total of all drainage areas:
Page 4 of 11

Q1 = 13.19cfs
QZ = 20.42cfs
Q10 = 27.54cfs
Q1oo = 37.52cfs
Refer to plan sheet C-4.0 for individual drainage areas
Above flow rates are not discharge from the site, it is run-off from the post -developed drainage areas.
Above flow rates do not consider Tc, detention, retention, or routing.
C. Peak runoff rate, post -construction, total of three (3) outfalls (OP#1, OP#3, & OP#8) as determined
by computer model:
Q1 = 0.60cfs post vs. 3.04cfs pre
QZ = 0.69cfs post vs. 4.71cfs pre
Q10 = 1.00cfs post vs. 6.35cfs pre
Q100 = 1.48cfs post vs. 8.66cfs pre
Discharge from Individual Outfalls (cfs)
Outfall
BMP
lyr
2yr
5yr
10yr
25yr
50yr
100yr
OP#1
#1
0.17
0.19
0.25
0.28
0.33
0.38
0.41
OP#3
#2 & #3
0.43
0.50
0.64
0.72
0.85
0.95
1.06
OP#8
#5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
TOTAL
0.60
0.69
0.89
1.00
1.18
1.33
1.48
Refer to Sheet C-4.0 for Summary of Drainage Areas, BMP's, and Water Quality Volumes.
D. Stage - Storage Tables for Sand Filter Basins
Sand Filter #1
Elev.
Area (sft)
Inc. Vol.
(cft)
Cumm.
Vol. (cft)
849.0
1,806
850.0
2,440
2,123
2,123
850.5
2,837
1,319
3,442
851.0
3,169
1,502
4,944
851.5
3,515
1,671
6,615
Surface area of sedimentation basin = 240sft
Surface area of sand filter = 1,566sft
Volume contained in basin = 3,442cft
Page 5 of 11

Sand Filter #2
Elev.
Area (sft)
Inc. Vol.
(cft)
Cumm.
Vol. (cft)
823.5
3,863
824.0
4,275
2,035
2,035
825.0
5,167
4,721
6,756
825.25
5,504
1,334
8,090
826.0
6,257
4,410
12,500
826.25
6,600
1,607
14,107
Surface area of sedimentation basin = 593sft
Surface area of sand filter = 2,851sft
Volume contained in basin = 8,090cft
Sand Filter #3
Elev.
Area (sft)
Inc. Vol,
(cft)
Cumm.
Vol. (cft)
841.0
936
842.0
1,643
1,290
1,290
843.0
2,443
2,043
3,333
844.0
3,362
2,903
6,236
Surface area of sedimentation basin = 234sft
Surface area of sand filter = 721sft
Volume contained in basin = 3,333cft
Sand Filter #5
Elev.
Area (sft)
Inc. Vol.
(cft)
Cumm.
Vol. (cft)
852.0
545
853.0
1,037
791
791
854.0
1,602
1,320
2,111
Surface area of sedimentation basin = 68sft
Surface area of sand filter = 425sft
Volume contained in basin = 791cft
E. Underdrain Pipe Sizing
Sand media permeability = 6 feet per day = 6.9410-5 ft/sec
Flow rate = permeability * sand filter media area
Required underdrain size (in) = Dr
Dr = 16[Q*n/50.5]3/8
Slope = 0.5%
n = 0.011
Page 6 of 11

Sand Filter #1
Sand filter area = 1,566sft
Flow rate = 1,566sft * 6.94x10-5 ft/sec = 0.109cfs
Safety Factor of 10
Design flow rate = 0.109cfs * 10 = 1.09cfs
Required underdrain size based on design flow rate:
Dr = 16[1.09*.011/0.0050,13/8 = 8 23„
Underdrain size provided on plans = 12"
Sand Filter #2
Sand filter area = 2,851sft
Flow rate = 2,851sft * 6.94x10-5 ft/sec = 0.198cfs
Safety Factor of 10
Design flow rate = 0.198cfs * 10 = 1.98cfs
Required underdrain size based on design flow rate:
D, = 16[1.98*.011/0.005"']"' = 10.28"
Underdrain size provided on plans = 12"
Sand Filter #3
Sand filter area = 721sft
Flow rate = 721sft * 6.94x10-5 ft/sec = 0.050cfs
Safety Factor of 10
Design flow rate = 0.050cfs * 10 = 0.50cfs
Required underdrain size based on design flow rate:
D, = 16 [0.50 * .011/0.0050.51318 = 6.14"
Underdrain size provided on plans = 8"
Sand Filter #5
Sand filter area = 425sft
Flow rate = 425sft * 6.9410-5 ft/sec = 0.029cfs
Safety Factor of 10
Design flow rate = 0.029cfs * 10 = 0.29cfs
Required underdrain size based on design flow rate:
Dr = 16[0.29*.011/0.0050.1]3/11 = 5.00"
Underdrain size provided on plans = 6"
Page 7 of 11

F. Hydraulic Grade Line of Sand Filters
Maximum hydraulic grade line for sand filters during a 100yr— 24hr storm event as determined by
model:
BMP
HGL
To of Pond
Sand Filter #1
850.53
851.50
Sand Filter #2
825.33
826.25
Sand Filter #3
843.04
844.00
Sand Filter #5
853.00
854.00
G. Flow Calculations for Pipe ZZ & Outlet OP10
Drainage area = 19,363 sft (0.44Ac)
Weighted C = 0.35
Intensity for 100yr-24hr storm = 7.9"
Q = CiA = 1.22cfs
Velocity = V=Q/A, where A = 0.785 for 12" pipe, therefore V = 1.55fps
Where ground slope is greater than 10% on a highly erodible soil with a bluegrass or Bermudagrass
vegetation, the vegetation will be stable at a velocity of 2.5fps, therefore discharge is non -erodible.
H. Time to Drain Sand Filters
Permeability = 3.5ft/day
Sand Filter #1
100yr-24hr HGL = 850.53
Bottom of Media = 846.50
Max H2O Depth = 4.03'
Days to Drain = 4.03' - 3.5ft/day = 1.15 day X 24hrs/day = 27.6hrs
Sand Filter #2
100yr-24hr HGL = 825.33
Bottom of Media = 821.00
Max H2O Depth = 4.33'
Days to Drain = 4.33' - 3.5ft/day = 1.24 day X 24hrs/day = 29.8hrs
Sand Filter #3
100yr-24hr HGL = 843.04
Bottom of Media = 838.50
Max H2O Depth = 4.54'
Days to Drain = 4.54' - 3.5ft/day =1.30 day X 24hrs/day = 31.2hrs
Page 8 of 11

Sand Filter #5
100yr-24hr HGL = 853.00
Bottom of Media = 849.50
Max H2O Depth = 3.51'
Days to Drain = 3.51' _ 3.5ft/day = 1.00 day X 24hrs/day = 24.Ohrs
I. Maximum Head on the Sand Filter
hMaxFilter ({t) = WQVadj(ft) _ [AS(ftZ) + Af({t-))
WQVadj from Supplement
hA ({t) = hMaxFilter (ft) - 2
Sand Filter #1
WQVad; = 2,332.50ft3
A, = 240ft'
Af = 1,566ft2
hMaxFilter (ft) = 2,332.50 _ [240+1,566] = 1.29ft
hA (ft) = 1.29 - 2 = 0.65ft
Sand Filter #2
WQVadj = 5,898.00ft3
A, = 593ft2
Af = 2,85Ift2
hMaxFilter (ft) = 5,898.00 - [593+2,851] = 1.71ft
hA (ft) = 1.29 - 2 = 0.86ft
Sand Filter #3
WQVadj = 2,273.25ft3
AS = 2340ft2
Af = 721ft2
hMaxFilter (ft) = 2,273.25 - [234+721] = 2.38ft
hA (ft) = 1.29 _ 2 = 1.19ft
Sand Filter #5
WQVadi = 281.25ft3
A, = 68ft2
Af = 425ft2
hMaxFilter (ft) = 281.25 _ [68+425] = 0.57ft
hA (ft) = 1.29 - 2 = 0.29ft
J. Sedimentation Basin Surface Area
AS(ft) _ [240*R„ (unitless)*Ao(acres)]*Ro(ftZ)
Sand Filter #1
R„ = 0.40
AD = 2.14
Ro = 1.0
Page 9 of 11

AS(ft2) = [240*0.40*2.14]*1.0 = 205ft2 required
AS(ft2) provided = 240ft2
Sand Filter #2
R„ = 0.63
AD = 3.44
Ro = 1.0
AS(ft2) = [240*0.63*3.44]*1.0 = 520ft2 required
As(ft2) provided = 593ft2
Sand Filter #3
R„ = 0.55
AD = 1.53
Ro = 1.0
As(ft2) = (240*0.55*1.53]*1.0 = 202ft2 required
As(W) provided = 234ft2
Sand Filter #5
R„ = 0.54
AD = 0.19
Rp = 1.0
AS(ft2) = [240*0.54*0.19]*1.0 = 25ft' required
AS(ft) provided = 68ft2
K. Sand Filter Bed Surface Area
AF(ft) = (WQV)(dF) _ (k)(t)(hA + dF)
Sand Filter #1
AF(ft2) = 3,110*2 3.5*1.66*(0.65 + 2) = 404ft2 minimum area
Area of Sand Filter Bed Provided = 1,566ft2
Sand Filter 42
AF(ft2) = 7,864*2 - 3.5*1.66*(0.86 + 2) = 947ft2 minimum area
Area of Sand Filter Bed Provided = 2,851ft2
Sand Filter #3
AF(ft') = 3,031*2 _ 3.5*1.66*(1.19 + 2) =327ft2 minimum area
Area of Sand Filter Bed Provided = 721ft2
Sand Filter #5
AF(ft2) = 375*2 : 3.5*1.66*(0.29 + 2) = 46ft2 minimum area
Area of Sand Filter Bed Provided = 425ft2
Page 10 of it

L. Ensure that Water Quality Volume is Contained
[Af(ftz) + AS(ft')]x[h,axFlltef(ft)] >_ WQVId,(ft3)
Sand Filter #1
[1,S66 + 2401 x 1.29 = 2,330ft3 >_ 2,332.50ft3 awful Close to being equal
Sand Filter #2
[2,851 + 5931 x 1.71= 5,889ft3 >_ 5,471.25ft3
Sand Filter #3
[721 + 2341 x 2.38 = 2,273ft3 >_ 2,273.25ft3 awful close to being equal
Sand Filter #5
[425 + 681 x 0.57 = 281ft3 >_ 281.25ft3 awful Close to being equal
Spills and Non -Storm Water Contingencies:
Refer to design/construction plans.
Phasing of Construction and Sequence of Construction:
Refer to design/construction plans, Sheets C-3.0 through C-3.4.
Final Restoration:
Refer to drawing Sheets C-3.2, C-3.3, C-3.4, L-1.0, L-1.1, and L-2,0
Design Manuals used for Reference:
City of Greensboro Stormwater Management Division, Storm Drainage Design Manual, February 2008
Guilford County Planning and Development Department, Storm Sewer Design Manual, First Edition,
August 2002
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Stormwater Best Management practices Manual, July 2007,
including Errata
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission, Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
Manual, June 1, 2006 — Chapters 3, 6 and 8 revised March 2009.
Page 11 of 12

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into this
Z`� day of CT[,tC3»u . 2012 (the "Effective Date"), by and between David Rankin Shepherd
and Dana Hudspeth Shepherd, husband and wife, and Michael Paul Schwab and Janie Shepherd
Schwab, husband and wife (collectively, "Seller") having a mailing address at 126 Beech Street, Elkin,
North Carolina 28621; and Charter Development Company, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company,
and/or its assigns ("Buyer").
For and in consideration of the mutual agreements and undertakings herein set forth, and other
good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, it is
hereby agreed between Seller and Buyer as follows:
1. . Sale of Property. Seller agrees to sell, convey, assign, transfer and deliver to Buyer,.and Buyer
agrees to purchase, acquire and take from Seller the following described property (collectively, the
"Property"): (i) all of that certain approximately 15.3 acre parcel of land, with an address of 5303 US
220 North Summerfield, NC 27358, bearing Guilford County Parcel # 0146905, and the boundaries and
location of which are depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the
"Land"); (ii) all of the buildings, structures, parking lots, driveways, curb, gutter, sidewalks, pavement
and all other improvements located on the Land (collectively, the "improvements", and together with the
Land, the "Real Property"); and (iii) all appurtenances to the Real Property and any property affixed
thereto.
2. . Purchase Price. The purchase price (the "Purchase Price") for the Property shall be�=11
Thousand and No/Dollars per acre (based upon 15.3 acres the total Purchase Price would be 10
and No/100 Dollars At Closing, the
balance of the Purchase Price, subject to adjustments as hereinafter provided, shall be paid in.
immediately available funds.
3. Earnest Money Deposit. Within three (3) business days after the Effective Date, Buyer shall pay
and deliver to First American Title, Greensboro, North Carolina, or another title company acceptable to
Buyer ("Escrow Agent") the sum of Two Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($2,500.00) as
earnest money (the "Earnest Money Deposit") to be held in trust for the mutual benefit of the parties,
subject to the following terms and conditions:
(a) The Earnest Money Deposit shall not be invested but shall be maintained in a non -interest
bearing account in a bank in North Carolina, so as to provide availability of funds on no more
than two (2) days notice.
(b) In the event of a default by Buyer under this Agreement and termination of this Agreement
because of the same, Escrow Agent is instructed to deliver the Earnest Money Deposit to Seller.
(c) in the event of a default by Seller under this Agreement and termination of this Agreement
because of the same, Escrow Agent is instructed to deliver the Earnest Money Deposit to Buycr.
(d) In the event of a termination of this Agreement by Buyer pursuant, to Section - 10 of this
Agreement, Escrow Agent is instructed to deliver the Earnest Money Deposit to Seller.
WCSR 7504035v3

(e) In the event of the Closing (as hereinafter defined), the Earnest Money Deposit shall be
applied to the Purchase Price.
(f) Buyer and Seller agree that Escrow Agent shall not be liable for any reason except gross
negligence or willful misconduct.
(g) Escrow Agent shall comply with any specific terms contained in this Agreement with
respect to disbursement of the Earnest Money Deposit.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Escrow Agent shall have the right at any time to, or
immediately upon instructions from Buyer, pay the Earnest Money Deposit into a state court in North
Carolina, having jurisdiction relative to such matter and to interplead Seller and Buyer in respect thereof;
and, thereafter, Escrow Agent shall be discharged of any further or continuing obligations in connection
with the Earnest.Money Deposit. The parties shall enter into a separate escrow agreement with the
Escrow Agent as to such terms and conditions.
4. Closing. The closing (the "Closing") of the sale of the Property shall be held in the offices of
Escrow Agent or such other place as Buyer and Seller agree to, on or before that date which is thirty (30)
days after the expiration of the Inspection Period (the "Outside Closing Date"); provided that Buyer may
elect to close on an earlier date upon no less than five (5) days advance notice to Seller. The date on
which the Closing actually occurs is referred to herein as the "Closing Date". Buyer and Seller may elect
to close via an "escrow closing" (AKA a "mail -in closing"). Prior to Closing Seller shall vacate the
Property, including the house thereon, and shall cause all of Seller's relatives, agents, invitees,
contractors, subcontractors and licensees to do the same.
5. Closing Documentation. At Closing, Seller shall execute and deliver to Buyer the following (the
"Seller's Closing Deliverables"):
(a) A special warranty deed (the "SWD") on the North Carolina Bar Association form or other
form reasonably acceptable to Buyer, conveying to Buyer fee simple, marketable, indefeasible
and insurable (at regular title insurance rates) title to the Real Property free and clear of all liens,
charges and encumbrances, except any matters waived by Buyer pursuant to the terms hereof (the
"Permitted Exceptions").
(b) A quitclaim deed (the "QCD", and together with the SWD, the "Deeds"), in form and
substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer and seller. The legal description of the Real Property
contained in the QCD shall be the legal description taken from Buyer's survey or such other legal
description as Buyer may reasonably request.
(c) An affidavit, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, Seller and Buyer's
title company, indicating that, as of the Closing Date, there are no outstanding unsatisfied
judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Seller; that there has been no skill,
labor or material furnished to the Property by or at the insistence of Seller for which mechanics'
or materialmen's liens could be filed; and that there arc no unrecorded interests in the Property of
any kind; and that there are no parties with rights to possess the Property.
WCSR 75040350

(d) A 1099-S, inform and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer and Seller.
(e) A FIRPTA affidavit, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer and Seller.
(f) A closing statement, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer and Seiler.
(g) All other documents affecting title to and possession, of the Property and necessary or
reasonably desirable to transfer or assign the same to Buyer, marketable, indefeasible and
insurable (at regular title insurance rates), and free and clear of all liens,' charges and
encumbrances except the Permitted Exceptions.
6. Termination of Contracts. At or prior to Closing, Seller shall terminate all leases (if any),
vendor and service contracts related to the Property except as may otherwise be expressly provided for
herein.
7. Closing Costs. Seller shall furnish and pay the expense of preparation the Seller's Closing
Deliverables (except the aforementioned closing statement), the revenue stamps (AKA excise tax, AKA
dced stamps, AKA transfer taxes), Seller's- attorneys' fees, any deferred taxes, any rollback taxes, and the
costs of release of any liens on the Property. Buyer shall pay for the expense of filing the Deeds, the cost
of Buyer's investigations (including title examination costs), the title insurance premium for coverage
provided by the title company insuring Buyer's title, and the fees and costs of Buyer's attorneys. Except
as otherwise provided herein, each party shall bear its own expenses, including its own attorneys' fees.
8. Closing Adjustments and Apportionments. All items of income and expense that are
customarily apportioned in real property transactions of the character contemplated by this Agreement
shall be apportioned or adjusted between Seller and Buyer. Real estate taxes shall be prorated upon.a
calendar year basis. All apportionments and adjustments shall be made as of 12:00:01 a.m. on the
Closing Date.
9. Delivery of Seller's Items. No later than two (2) days after the Effective Date, Seller shall
deliver to Buyer the following items: any title report the Seller has in its possession, any survey the Seller
has in its possession, and such other information and/or documentation as Buyer shall reasonably request.
10. , Inspections. During the period from the Effective Date through. 5pm on that date which- is one.
hundred fifty (150) days after the Effective Date (the, "Inspection Period"), Buyer and its agents shall
have unlimited access to the Property (including but not limited to the personal residence) to inspect the
Property and perform such appraisals, building inspections, engineering tests, soil and groundwater tests,
surveys, environmental assessments, feasibility studies and other inspections, tests, studies and inquiries
as Buyer shall deem advisable in its sole discretion, all without any payment to Seller. In addition, Buyer
and its agents may cut, drill, dig, plow and use other such methods to (i) cut a path to the septic field and
related areas and improvements on the Property, and (ii) clear the septic field area as required by
regulatory agencies and/or as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
(collectively, the "Septic Clearing"). At the conclusion of the Inspection Period, Buyer shall not leave the
Property in a condition that violates local soil erosion regulations if such violation is due to the Septic
Clearing. Buyer and its agents shall have no other duties to restore or repair the Property. Buyer shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement during the Inspection Period in the event that Buyer
determines in its sole opinion that the Property is not suitable to Buyer. In the event that Buyer
determines in its sole opinion that the Property is not suitable to Buyer, then Buyer shall send written
3
WCSR 7504035v3

notice to Seller of its intention to terminate tiffs Agreement (the "Tern ination Notice") no later than the
expiration of the Inspection Period, the Earnest Money Deposit shall be delivered to Seller, and the
parties hereto shall have no further obligations to one another hereunder.
11. 'Title Examination. During the Inspection Period, Buyer shall examine the title to the Property
as Buyer deems appropriate in its sole discretion. Should Buyer not approve of any aspect or item of the
title to the Property to be received by Buyer, Buyer shall advise Seller in writing, during the Inspection
Period, of its objections to title, and Seller shall have a period often (10) days from the date of receipt of
the notice within which to remedy the objections to the satisfaction of Buyer. In the event the objections
are not cured or remedied within said ten (10) day period, Buyer, at its election and as its sole remedy,
shall have the right to either (i) accept title to the Property subject to the objections (which shall thereby
be deemed "Permitted Exceptions"), or (ii) terminate this Agreement and the parties shall have no further
obligations to each other hereunder. Any title exception not disapproved in writing within said time
period shall be deemed approved by Buyer and shall constitute a "Permitted Exception". Notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary Seller shall be obligated to remove, at or before Closing, and at Seller's
cost, all monetary liens and encumbrances affecting the Property.
12. Zonine. Buyer shall determine prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period whether the
current zoning of the Real Property includes Buyer's use. If such zoning does not, Buyer may terminate
this Agreement. The obligations of Buyer under this Agreement are in all respects conditioned upon and
subject to the Real Property being zoned at Closing the same as zoned as of the expiration of the
Inspection Period (or other zoning agreed to by Buyer in writing) and upon there then being no pending
or proposed application for any rezoning or change in zoning not consented to by Buyer in writing that
would apply to the Real Property or any portion thereof. In the event Seller obtains knowledge of any
application or proposal for rezoning or change in zoning of the Real Property or any portion thereof,
Seller shall immediately notify Buyer and then Buyer, in Buyer's sole discretion, shall have the option to
terminate this Agreement, in which event the Earnest Money Deposit shall be immediately refunded to
Buyer. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that it will not apply for, encourage or consent to any
zoning or rezoning of the Real Property without Buyer's prior written consent. Seller agrees to work in
good faith with Buyer in applying for and -pursuing such governmental and quasi -governmental
approvals, variances, rezoning and the like, including but not limited to site plan approval, that Buyer so
requests of Seller. Seller shall not be liable for any zoning -related application costs that are made at the
request of Buyer.
13. Representation and Warranties by Seller. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that:
(a) Seller has good and marketable fee simple title to the Property, and that there are no
mechanics' liens, contractors' claims, unpaid bills for material or labor pertaining to the
Property, and that there are not any other similar liens which might adversely affect Seller's title
to the Property.
(b) There are no persons or entities that will have a right of possession beyond the date of
Closing.
(c) There are no liabilities which encumber the Property that will survive the Closing and be
binding upon Buyer and/or the Property.
WCSR 7504O35v3

(d) Seller has received no notice of any action, litigation, pending or threatened condemnation
or other proceeding of any kind pending against the Seller which relates to or affects the
Property.
(e) To the best of Seller's knowledge, as of the date of this Agreement: (1) except for
f?:` ;':" ir=7 (collectively, the "Asbestos Items"), the Property does not
contain any hazardous wastes, hazardous substances, hazardous materials, toxic substances,
hazardous air pollutants or toxic pollutants, as those terms are used in the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 6901 et seq.), the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 9601 et seq.), the Hazardous Materials
Transportation Act (49 U.S.C.A. §§ 1801 et seq.), the Toxic Substances Control Act (15
U.S.C.A. §§ 2601 et seq.), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 7401 et seq.), and the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C.A. §§ 1251 et seq.), or in any amendments thereto, or any regulations promulgated
pursuant thereto, or in any applicable state or local law, regulation or ordinance; (2) the Property
is not subject to federal, state or local regulations or liability because of the presence of stored,
leaked, spilled or disposed petroleum products, waste materials or debris, "PCB's" or PCB items
(as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 761.3), underground storage tanks, "asbestos" (as defined in 40 C.F.R.
§ 763.63) (except the Asbestos Items) or the past or present accumulation, treatment, storage,
disposal, spillage or leakage of any dangerous, hazardous or toxic substance as defined in or
regulated by any federal, state or local laws, regulations or orders; (3) no portion of the Property
is filled land; and (4) no condition exists which is or may be characterized by any federal, state or
local government or agency as an actual or potential threat or danger to public health or the
environment. Seller further represents and warrants to Buyer that the Property shall be
maintained through the Closing Date in the condition represented and warranted above. Seller is
not required to remove the Asbestos Items.
(0 At Closing, the Property will be in the same condition as exists on the' Effective Date,
reasonable wear and tear only excepted.
(g) Seller has not made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, filed any voluntary
petition in bankruptcy, admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they come due or made
an offer of settlement, extension or composition to its creditors generally. Seller has received no
written notice of (a) the filing of an involuntary petition by Seller's creditors, (b) the appointment
of a receiver to take possession of all, or substantially all, of Seller's assets, or (c) the attachment
or other judicial seizure of all, or substantially all, of Seller's assets.
(h) Seller is not a foreign person within the meaning of Section 1445(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
(i) There are no legal proceedings pending or, to Seller's knowledge, threatened against Seller
which could affect Seller's title to the Property or the right, power, or ability of Seller to convey
the Property to Buyer in accordance with this Agreement.
0) Seller has not received written notice and has no knowledge:
WCSR 7504035v3

(i) concerning the possible or anticipated condemnation of any part of the Real
Property, or the widening, change of grade or limitation on use of streets abutting the
same or concerning any special taxes or assessments levied or to be levied against the
Real Property or any part thereof;
(ii) from any insurance company or bonding company of any defects or inadequacies in
the Property or any part thereof, which would adversely affect the insurability of the
same or cause the imposition of extraordinary premiums or charges therefor or of any
termination or threatened termination of any policy of insurance or bond; or
(iii) concerning any change in the zoning classification of the Real Property or any
portion thereof.
(k) From the Effective Date until the Closing, Seller shall:
(i) Maintain the Property in the same condition as presently exists, reasonable wear
and tear only excepted.
(ii) Perform all of its obligations under any contracts affecting the Property and
promptly notify Buyer of any default thereunder.
(iii) Provide Buyer and its agents reasonable access to the Property and reasonable
access to all engineering information, reports, soil tests, surveys, plans and records
available to Seller relating to the Property.
(iv) Refrain from entering into, or negotiating with regard to, any contract or
commitment or Gam incurring any expenditure or obligation affecting the Property or the
title thereto which would extend beyond the Closing or would involve payments that
would not be paid in full prior to the Closing.
(v) Make no lease or rental of the Property or any portion thereof, or negotiate, market
or enter into any discussions or other contract or option for the sale of the Property or
any portion thereof, or further encumber the Property with any lien, restriction or
easement..
Seller hereby agrees that the truthfulness of each of the foregoing representations and warranties is a
condition precedent to the performance by Buyer of its obligations under this Agreement, and all of the
foregoing representations and warranties shall be deemed to be repeated at Closing. Seller shall
execute and deliver certificate of representations and warranties satisfactory in form and substance to
Buyer at Closing reaffirming all said representations and warranties as of the Closing Date. Upon the
breach by Seller of any representation or warranty made in this Section, Buyer may terminate this
Agreement and receive the return of the Earnest Money Deposit. The foregoing remedy is not intended
to be an exclusive remedy of Buyer.
14. Defaults, Remedies. Upon the breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in
Section 13, or upon the breach by Seller of any other representation, warranty or agreement set forth in
this Agreement, Buyer may, prior to the Closing Date, by delivery of written notice to Seller, terminate
this Agreement and upon such termination the Earnest Money Deposit shall be returned to Buyer. The
6
WCSR 75o4035v3

foregoing remedy is not intended to be an exclusive remedy of Buyer. Without limiting any provision
herein or any remedy at equity at law, Closing shall not serve as a waiver of any fraudulent act or
misrepresentation by Seller which is first discovered after the Closing Date.
Seller agrees that its refusal to close the sale of the Property contemplated by this Agreement
will cause Buyer irreparable damages which cannot be measured in money damages, and that Buyer will
be entitled to institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the specific
performance by Seller of the terms of this Agreement.
If Buyer shall fail to close the transactions contemplated under this Agreement as required by
this Agreement, Seller shall be entitled to receive and retain the Earnest Money Deposit as Seller's
liquidated damages and sole remedy for Buyer's breach, and neither party shall have any other claim
against the other. The remedy provided to Seller in the preceding sentence is provided in recognition by
both parties that damages to Seller in the event of Buyer's breach would be difficult or impossible to
measure and is not intended as a penalty or forfeiture.
15. Risk of Loss. in the event the condition of the Property is materially changed prior to Closing,
Buyer may (i) terminate this Agreement and receive a full refund of the Earnest Money Deposit,
whereupon the parties hereto shall have no further rights, obligations or liabilities with respect to each
other hereunder, or (ii) complete the purchase of the Property with an equitable reduction of the Purchase
Price. Provided however that to the extent that the building is damaged by fire or any other casualty
which is covered by insurance, then Buyer shall have the option of accepting the proceeds of such
insurance and proceeding with Closing or cancelling this Agreement and receiving a refund of the
Earnest Money Deposit.
16. Assignment. Buyer may assign its rights, duties and obligations under this Agreement without
the consent of Seller. So long as the assignee accepts all of Buyer's of its duties, obligations and
liabilities under this Agreement, then upon such assignment Buyer shall be completely discharged from
all of its duties, obligations and liabilities under this Agreement. Seller may not assign this Agreement.
17. Survival -All of the terms, covenants, conditions, representations, warranties and agreements of
this Agreement shall survive and continue in full force and effect for a period of six (6) months after the
Closing.
IS. Notices. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given
the day of delivery if delivered in person (or such personal delivery is refused) or one (1) business day
after shipped by an overnight service, such as Federal Express, properly addressed as follows:
If to Buyer: Charter Development Company, L.L.C.
3850 Broadmoor SE, Suite 201
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512
Attention: Jeff Chamberlain
WCSR 7504035v3

With a copy to: Stephen M. Price
McShane & Bowie, PLC
1100 Campau Square Plaza
99 Monroe Avenue NW
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49501-0360
If to Seller: David R. Shepherd
126 Beech Street
Elkin, North Carolina 28621
19. Brokers. Buyer and Seller warrant to each other that it has taken no action in connection with
this transaction which would result in any real estate broker's commission or fee, or other fee being due
and payable to any party, other than Jason Tipton DB/A Tipton Commercial Real Estate ("Buyer's
Broker"). Buyer shall be responsible for the Buyer's Broker's- fee pursuant to a separate agreement.
Seller and Buyer shall indemnify each other for any claim for a commission or fee asserted by any party
as the result of the purported inaccuracy of the preceding representation by the representing party. Seller
shall indemnify Buyer for any claim for a commission or fee asserted by any party as the result of the
purported inaccuracy of the preceding representation by Seller. Buyer shall indemnify Seller for any
claim for a commission or fee asserted by any party as the result of the purported inaccuracy of the
preceding representation by Buyer. These indemnifications shall survive Closing.
20. "As Is Where Is". Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, the Property is to be. sold
"as is / where is".
21. Deadlines 1 Dates. Should any deadline or other date in this Agreement fall on a weekend or
holiday the deadline shall be automatically moved to fall on the next occurring business day.
22. Entire_ Agreement_ Modification. This Agreement constitutes the entire and complete
agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the
parties with respect to the Property. It is expressly agreed that there are no verbal understandings or
agreements which in any way change the terms, covenants and conditions herein set forth, and that no
modification of this Agreement and no waiver of any of its terms or conditions shall be effective unless
made in writing and duly executed by both parties.
23. B_ inding Effect. All covenants, agreements, warranties and provisions of this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors,
administrators, personal representatives, successors and permitted assigns.
8
WCSR 7504035v3

24. Severability. If any provision this Agreement should be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in
any respect in any jurisdiction, then, to the fullest extent permitted by law, all other provisions hereof
shall remain in full force and effect in such jurisdiction and shall be liberally construed in order to carry
out the intentions -of the party as nearly as maybe possible.
25. . Controlling Law. This Agreement has been made and entered into under the laws of the Statc of
North Carolina and those laws shall control the interpretation of this Agreement.
26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart copies, including faxed
counterparts, all of which counterparts shall have the same force and effect as if all parties hereto had
executed a single copy of this Agreement.
27, Et,>sa4 Date for Execution. This Agreement shall be null and void if not executed and delivered
by Seller and Buyer on. or before 5:00 PM EST on October_, 2012, unless both parties mutually agree
in writing to extend_
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer have caused this Agreement to be executed effective
as of the day and year first above written.
SELLER:
FARWI,miz 10IRM
0
Dana Hudspeth Shepherd
BUYER:
Charter Development Company, L.LC.
By: National Heritage Academies, Inc.
Its: Authorized Member
-Ma" IN NK VIA cw+r'i,1r
WOR 750403SV3
9
Michael Paul Schwab
Janie Shepherd Schwab

EXHIBIT A
Guilford Counq; NC
.ate=
-That 5J M; r F,?
ubject,Properl
)� ... - _ 'tom •�♦ f,...J'.'.-,h'C"�.-'V�4`-'�T'�"•:�hi.?` ,��1
71 w •.
• .. - _ �� mow_ ,�-�-�
' • m �.r rot � . i .rt .•11 - ���5
Old Parcel Number
130100370091600055
Condo Book
Parcel Number
0146905
Condo Page
PIN
7839097485
Total Assessed Value
$140,400
Owner Name
SHEPHERD, DAVID R , SHEPHERD, JANIE
Total Building Value
$12,200
SCHWAB
Mailing Address 1
126 BEECH ST
Total out Building
Value
$D
Mailing Address
ELKIN
Total Land Value
$128,200
City
Mailing Address
NC
Total Deferred Value
$0
State
Mailing Address
28621
Building Count
1
Zip
Property Address
15303 US 220 NORTH
Building Number
1
Legal Desc 1
Lot # 17.15AC PARRISH WILL06E1301
Year Built
1956
Land Units
17.150D
Heated Area
792
Deed Book
1003421
Bedrooms
2
Deed Page
01939
Bathrooms
EULL1 HALF.
0
Plat Book
Use Code
RESIDENTIAL
Plat Page
Appraisal Model
SFR
Code
Disclaimer. While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet Map_Scale
accurate and up-to-date, Guilford County does not certify the authenticily or accuracy of 1 inch W 398 feet

L-XHIBIT B
Guilford County, NC
' " L �. -' � ,;y( J tI � • � ..�-. , , � fib^
tee;' L 1 I, �� �-. ��2 4. 1_. •i.f 4 1,_+ ,~-�I'4 �C .r5 f'.• T,�.�114.. •i �• `�
Al
el
V. hl�
AX
Ni
Mt..r� •�F�. � .,,� � �' `r � i,`,y a •� r +i '�rA rJ a ' , � ? y `.; • 'ij �'• seQliC AreasiJ •�.� � � y.`ry. -' *, • {y- r:,' , Z • � {
`.r�...w�
•-
lit •ice ate: J. •! i+�s! A.: «Q, iSr -- ��T��.... ,}
14
17
'i;Pttfar'��FFFZIINGRIPlG51i a.. �
Disclaimer. • While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet
accurate and up-to-date, Guilford County does not certify the authenticity or accuracy of Map -Scale
such information. M warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records andlor 1 inch = 294 feet
mapping data herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.

PROJECT: Summertield Academy
Summerfiefd, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-1
1581-12-138
DATE DRILLED: 12l20112
ELEVATION: :p rj�
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 21I4" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 10.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: Dry at TOB
DRILLER: J.1Mn o
DRILL RIG: Diedrich DSO
U
J
�
z0
Lu a
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
(L
..
o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
M.
¢
(blowsrtt)
0
a
1 m
co z
z
10 20_30_
`Organic Laden Topsoil • 3" {Moist)
Residuum: Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
i
(MOISt) (MH)
Stiff White and Orange Tan Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
2 IX
14
5 —
(Moist) with Trace Mica (ML)
850.0_
IILL
—
3
8
Firm Red Brown and Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with
Trace Mica (ML)
Stiff Gray Tan and White Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) (ML)
4
0
10
10—
Boring Terminated at 10 Feet
A45"O
ryG
Its
d
�
Ice
Ile? I
d
� d
�
r
NOTES.
I. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PRQIECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D•1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of i
*S&ME
ENGINEERING ..TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summertield Academy
Summerfieid, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-2
1551-12-138
2J
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20/12
ELEVATION: .7�
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 21/4" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 15.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DryalIT08
DRILLER: J. %ffingo
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D50
ca
J
7
p:
W w
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
w a
a
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
a
CL
(blowsllq
a
o V
u,
>
a
_j
w V
U) z
z
10 20 30 fi0 80
\Organic Laden Topsail - 2"
Residuum: Stitt Red Brown and Tan Silty Fine Sandy
CLAY (Moist) (CH)
1
1 1
Stiff Gray and Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moisl) with
5 _
Trace Mica (ML)
860.0-
2
15
—
—
—
- -
Firm Brown and Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist)
3
8
(ML)
-
1
=
''
4
11
1a--
•. '
sss.a-
-
Looso Gray and Orange Tan Silty Fine SAND (Moist) (SM)
Medium Denso Gray and Orange Silty Fine SAND (Moist)
` ;
with Trace Mica (SM)
5
10
15
Boring Terminated at 15 Feet
NOTES:
1, THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING. SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0-1 SM.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4, WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of 1
ieo
S&ME
ENGINEERING --TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Summerfieid, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-3
1581-12-138
c7 ,7�
6
NOTES: 5tartdardPenehationTests
DATE DRILLED: 12120112
ELEVATION: 8 611•sV
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" NSA
BORING DEPTH: 20.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: Dry at TOB and 24 hours
DRILLER: J. Wingo
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
U
w
p :
W
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
?
ao
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
aW
(bEows/1ty
a
� a
a
rn z
z
W v
10 20 30 608
Lrganic Laden Topsoit - 3' /
_
Residuum: Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
i
(Moist) with Trace Organics and Trace Mica (MH)
1
12
2
11
5-
867.0-
----i
Stiff Gray and Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with
-
Trace Mica (ML)
3
10
4
9
10-
Stiff Tan and Brown Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) Micaceous
862.0-
—
-
- -
-
(ML)
15_
Stiff Purple Tan and Brown Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with
857 0-
5
_ _
10
Trace Mica (ML)
-
Firm Red Brown and Brown Fine Sandy SILT (Moist)
Micaceous (ML)
6
8
20-
- -
852.0-
-
Boring Terminated at 20 Feet
-
- -
gy 3,5�
NOTES;
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT,
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D• 15W.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of I
eome
aw"FI&I
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B4
1581-12-138
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20/12
ELEVATION: 869.0
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 15.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: 2aalTOB
DRILLl;R: J. Wln o
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D50
V
w
q m
a
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
r
Q. 8
a- 0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
7
J
a
Iblowsnt)Ac
a �'
C�7
a
W m
N z
z
�
w
10 20 30 6D 80
-
Lganic Laden Topsoil - 2"
.'�
Disturbed Soils: Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Silty CLAY
'
Y'
(Moist) (CH)
1
15
A'
N
5--
864.0-
-----
Residuum: Firm to Stiff Orange Brown and Tan Fine
Sandy SILT (Moist) (ML)
-
4
7
t0-
859.0-
—
Loose Tan and Gray Silty Fine SAND (Moist) (SM)
✓ _
5
7
15-''
Boring Terminated at 15 Feet
854.0-
-
- -
-
-
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING. SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D•1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1ofI
*S&ME
ENGINEERING -TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL' SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerlield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-5
1581-12-138
C65
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20/12
ELEVATION: 436" -5
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 10.0
LOGGED BY: S. Leez
WATER LEVEL: DryaITOB
DRILLER: J. wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
U
J
>
p =,
W w
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
to
a m
a o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
a
(blowslll)
a
-�
lit
9 m
LU
7
(3
¢
r m
� v
Z
3
10 20 30
Organic Laden Topsoil - 2' %
_
Disturbed Soils: Very Still Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey
-
SILT (Moist) with Trace Organics (MH)
1
21
Residuum: Very Still Red Brown Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
5 _
.
(Moist) with Trace Mica (ML)
858 0-
2
_
_
_
_
17
-
3 �1
7
Firm Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with Trace Mica
(ML)
4
8
10
Boring Terminated at 10 Feet'0
j{7
NOTES:
I. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PRQIECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0.1 WO.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of i
*SAME
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfleid Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-6
1581-12-138
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12120l12
ELEVATION: rC
performed using an autohommer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 10.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL; DryatT08
DRILLER: J. Wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich 0b0
U
J
�
Z J
w w
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
o<
o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
a m
(biowslftjlet
C7
Q
3
-J
w Y
Z
10 20 30_
Z
Lganic Laden Topsoil - 2" l
Disturbed Soils: Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
-
(Moist) (MH)
1
14
Residuum: Stiff Orange Tan Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
2
10
5—
(Moist) (ML)
856.0-
—
—
-
Loose Gray and Orange Tan Silty Fine SAND (Moist) (SM)
3A.
9
i_
4 I/j
7
Loose White Tan and Gray Silty Fine SAND (Moist) (SM)
10_
'0
Baring Terminated at 10 Feet
^^!! C
NOTES:
1• THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT,
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D•1588.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL (SAT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY,
Page 1 of 1
*S&ME
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerlield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-7
1581-12-138
DATE DRILLED: 12120112
ELEVATION: 8fi� 0 �j .7
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
perlormed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 10.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DryaITOB
DRILLER; J. VAngo
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D,50
c>
J
>
0 :"3
W w
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
ui
o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
W
a a.
(blowsdq
o
C7
Q
J +��'
Ui Z
3:
�
10 20 30 fi0_ BO
Organic Laden To soil - 5" (Moist)
Disturbed Soils: Stiff Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
(Moist) (MH)
1
11
Residuum: Stiff Tan and Orange Brown Clayey Fine
2
1 t
5-
Sandy SILT (Moist) (ML)
850.0-
-
Stiff Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with Manganese
3
10
(ML)
Stiff Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with Manganese
_
and Trace Mica (ML)
4
13
10
Boring Terminated at 10 Feet
-
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PRQIECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0-1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of 1
*Sam
ENGINEERING —TESTING
ENVIRONMENTALI SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfleld Academy
Sumn rfleld, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-8
1581-12-138
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/19/12
ELEVATION: .,832 t1 7.
performed using an autohalnmer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 10.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DryatT013
DRILLER: J. Wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D50
x
c>
>
w
Zp
w w
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
1u
_
W 8
¢ o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
c
(biowsltt)
a
o
¢
0
w
Q
>
J
¢
Z
>
Z
w
10 20 30 so
�ganic Laden Topsoil _3" l
_ _60
_
Residuum: Stiff Orange Tan Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) (ML)
1
13
Very Still Gray and Tan Fine Sandy Silty CLAY (Moist)
2
16
5-
(CL)
827.0-
—
-
-
-
-
3
4
Stiff to Firm Gray Tan and Red Brown Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) with Trace Manganese and Trace Mica (ML)
4
6
to -
Boring Terminated at 10 Feet
.82E70__
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG 1S ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2, BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D•1586•
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1of1
S& Mlff E
ENGINEERING -TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfleld Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-9
1581-12-138
$,��,�
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12120112
ELEVATION:
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" FISA
BORING DEPTH: 15.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DryatTOB
DRILLER: J. Wingo
DRJLL RIG: Diedrich D-50
>
a
w4
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
y
w
x
a o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Cr
7
W
a
(t�lowslft)
a
p
9
0
w
F-
,L °'
U�'
w Y
O
�z
z
�
1 D 20 30 60 80
Lganic Laden Topsoil - 2"
_
_
Residuum: Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
(Moist) (MH)
1
12
2
9
5-
Firm to Stiff Tan and Orange Brown Fine Sandy SILT
835.0-
—
—
-
(Moist) with Manganese (ML)
-
-
3
7
4 1j
9
to--
830.0--
Stiff Gray and Brown Fine Sandy SILT (Moist to Wet) with
Manganese (ML)
15
825.p
5
14
Boring Terminated at 15 Feel
v
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING. SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY,
Page 1 of 1
*S&ME
ENGINEERING - TESTING
ENVIRONMEWAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Surnmerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-10
1581-12-138
Q a
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20/12
ELEVATION: :0 l) 0
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 1/4" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 10.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: 22 at TOB
DRILLER: J. Wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-60
J
>
z
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
a
a o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
a:W
N
J 4w
faowsrrt)
j
a
a
z
c7
¢
3
_j
W
z
10 20_30_ 80
\Organic Laden Topsoil - 3" /
_ _60
Residuum: Very Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
�1
(Moist) (ML)
1
25
Very Stiff Gray Tan and Red Brown Clayey Fine Sandy
2
17
5-
SILT (Moist) (ML)
827.0-
-
—
-
-
— -
Stiff Gray Tan and Red Brown Silty CLAY (Moist) (CH)
3
15
4
19
Very Stiff Tan and Gray Silty Clayey SAND (Moist) (SC)
10
Boring Terminated at 10 Feet
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY,
Page 1 of 1
S a rim
ENGINEERING - •NESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summertleld Academy
Summerlield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-11
1581-12438
DATE DRILLED: 12/19/12
ELEVATION: 850.0 �'7 �� O
NOTES: performed using tandausingra Penetration Tests
an autahammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 20.0
LOGGED BY: S_ Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DrjatToe
DRILLER: J. Wfngo
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
0- g
c�
Q o
0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
w
a
3
p
> �
Wig;
w
w a
¢ �
Nz
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
(I�lowsJfq
10 20 30 8Q 80
W
z
\Organic Laden Topsoil-3' /
Residuum: Stiff Red Brown Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) (ML)
1
t 2
5-
Stiff Gray and Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) (ML)
845 0-
2
10
—
-
_
~
Stiff Yellow Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) (ML)
3
10
to -Stiff
Gray and Tan Fine Sandy Fine SAND (Moist) with
840-0
Trace Mica (ML)
-
15-
835.0-
5
- -
7
:'
—
-
Loose Tan White and Gray Silty Medium to Fine SAND
(Moist) with Trace Mica (SM)
20
Boring Terminated at 20 Feet
^� 0
6
10
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0-1566,
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of 1
dno
S&ME
ENGIN EERI NG::.TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Summerfleld, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-12
1581-12-138
_ /
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20/12
ELEVATION..859 0
performed using an autohammer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 20.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DryaIT08
DRILLER: J. Wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
U
a
p
w ul
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
o9
o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
co
<
a
iWowsrft)
La
C7
a
-1 m
U) z
z
3
10 20 30 fie 80
'Organic Laden Topsail - 2-
_
Residuum; Stiff Red Brown Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) (ML)
-
1
14
'
2
13
-
3
8
Loose to Medium Dense While and Orange Tan Silty Fine
-
SAND (Moist) (SM)
4
10
10 -
�' ''• ' •
849.0-
-
- -
5
8
Loose White and Orange Tan Slightly Silty Fine SAND
844.0-
- -
(Moist) (SM)
-
Loose Tan Gray and White Silty Medium to Fine SAND
=
(Moist) (SM)
6
8
20—
-
Boring Terminated at 20 Feel^
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0-1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1ofI
*S&ME
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-13
1581-12-138
/" ��
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12119112
ELEVATION: [U
performed using an autohammer.
Groundwater encountered at 34 feet at TOO.
DRILLING METHOD: 2114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 59.5
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: 30feeta124 hours
DRILLER: J. Wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
U
�
p
w w
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
w 9
o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
o
o
tNO11}
3
w
to 20 30 60 80
'\_Or Laden Topsoil - 2'
Residuum: Very Stiff Red Brown Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) (ML)
1
16
2
t1
5-
' •
858.0-
-
- -
3
9
Stiff Orange Tan Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) (ML)
to-
853.0-
- -
15--
:' :
848.0-
-
—
-
'
6
8
20-
; '•';
Loose to Medium Dense Tan and Gray Silty Fine SAND
843.U-
-
—
-
(Moist) (SM)
-
7
12
25-
838.0-
-
------
30-
'
V
ej({.0
' \
8
7
-
Firm to Stiff White Orange and Brown Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist to Wet) with Manganese and Trace Mica (ML)
-
svq
10
MOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0•1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4, WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page I of 2
*S=E
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summertield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-13
1581-12-138
L
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/19l12
ELEVATION: 863.0�ZJ
performed using an autohammer.
Groundwater encountered at 34 feet at TOB.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 1/4" NSA
BORING DEPTH: 59.5
LOGGED BY: S. Lacx
WATER LEVEL: 30 feet at 24 hours
DRILLER: J. Wingo
I DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
w
O N
w a
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
d9
i
Q o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
<
¢
(� U
C9
Q
� s,N
Z
Z
3
w v
10 20 30 so 80
Firm to Stiff White Orange and Brown Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist to Wet) with Manganese and Trace Mica (ML)
(continued)
10
12-
40-
823.0-
—
—
-
11
19
45-
Stiff to Very Stiff White Brown amd Gray Fine Sandy SILT
818.0-
-
—
(Moist to Wet) with Mica (ML)
'
12
23
50-
813.0-
----
-
-
i3 �
3B
55-
"
808.0-
-
Hard Gray and Brown Fine Sandy SILT (Wet) with Trace
Mica (ML)
i4
501
Partially Weathered Rock: sampled as Tan Brown and
White Fine Sand SILT (W o with Trace Mica
-
6
Boring erminated at 59.5 Feet
NOTES:
1, THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH AStM 0-1566.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 2 of 2
*SME
ENGINEERING
IJSERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-14
1581-12-138
Tests
NOTES:�i
DATE DRILLED: 12119l12
ELEVATION: .0 L1v
prformed using an n autohamomer.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 26.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: DryatTOB and 24 hours
DRILLER: J. Wingo
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D50
U
w
b
W W
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
z
w
a v
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
a
(blowslft)
o Y
2
C7
W
¢
w w
_j °1
¢
N Z
>
Z
LU V
10 20 30 60 80
Lrganic Laden Topsoil - 2" `
Fill: Stiff Orange Brown and Gray Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) Washed Stone at 2 • 2.5 feet (ML)
1
9
Residuum: Firm Tan and Orange Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
2
11
5-
'
(Moist) with Trace Mica (ML)
865.0-
-
—
-
-
Firm Tan and Orange Fine Sandy SILT (Moist) with Trace
3
8
Mica (ML)
Loose Tan White and Gray Silty Fine SAND (Moist) with
10-
Trace Mica IS
860.0
4
8
5
15-:
855.0-
-----
Loose to Medium Dense Tan White and Gray Silty Fine
SAND (Moist) with Trace Mica (SM)
20-
850.0-
—
- -
- -
25
8
7
it
Boring Terminated at 25 Foot
NQ_TES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1W6,
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT,
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1ofI
COME
ENGINEERING TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL` SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-15
1581-12-138
22' b
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12119112
ELEVATION: ,82B:S
performed using an autohammer.
ncountered auger refusal at 2.5 feet. Offset
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" NSA
BORING DEPTH: 13.5
8 feet toward B-16. Refusal at 3 feet. Offset
13 feet toward B-16. Refusal at 13.5 feet.
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: 10 feet at 24 hours
DRILLER: J. Wino
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
x
c�
Uj
w
Oz :
J a
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
W 9
a o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
¢
a
{blowslrt)
J
LU
7 y
LU m
(�
Q
a
w
in Z
Z
3
10 20 30 &a
\Organic Laden T2psoil - 3"
_ _60_
Residuum: Firm Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
i
(Moist) (ML)
AR
1
6
Stiff Red Brown and Gray Clayey Fine Sandy SILT (Moist)
2
15
5-
with Trace Mica (ML)
821.0-
—
-
-
3
13
••
Loose to Medium Dense White Orange Tan and Gray Silly
4 Ix
5
1 o-
: '
Fine SAND (Moist) with Trace Mica (SM)
0
816.0-
/� v F0
�1k li
V
AR
5
501
,Partially Weathered Rock: No Recovery ,.
Auger Refusal at 13.5 feat
0
NOTES:
I. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D•1588.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page 1 of i
ro
OWME
ENGINEERING - TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfleld Academy
Summerfield, Norlh Carolina
BORING LOG B-16
1581-12-138
NOTES: Standard Penetratlon Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20/12
ELEVATION: 827.0
performed using an autohalnmer. Groundwater
encountered at 12 feet at TOB.
DRILLING METHOD: 2 114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 15.0
LOGGED BY: S. Lacz
WATER LEVEL: 13 feet at 24 hours
DRILLER: J.1Mn o
DRILL RIG: Diedrich DSO
t7
W
O
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
z
a.
a o
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
w
N
Jaw
a
Ielows�rtl
"' v
14 20 30
-\Organic Laden Topsoil - 2"
Residuum: Stiff Red Brown Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
(Moist) (ML)
1
9
..
Medium Dense Orange Brown Clayey Silty Fine SAND
2
1 1
5---
;' ;'
(Moist) (SM)
822.0-
-
- -
-
3
14
Stiff Gray and Tan Silty Fine Sandy CLAY (Moist to Wet)
4
9
10-
(CL)
817 4-
—
-
- -
1-
Loose Brown and Orange Tan Silty Fine SAND (Moist to
15-
Wet)-(SM) -
812.0-
5
-
-
14
Boring Terminated at IS Feet
MOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING, SAMPLING AND PENETRATION! TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1586.
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page i of 1
e0mv
IM
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROJECT: Summerfleld Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
BORING LOG B-17
1581-12-138
NOTES: Standard Penetration Tests
DATE DRILLED: 12/20112
ELEVATION: 829.0
performed using an autchammer.
Groundwater encountered at 13 feet at TOB.
DRILLING METHOD: 2114" HSA
BORING DEPTH: 15.0
LOGGED BY: S. Locx
WATER LEVEL: 10 feet at 24 hours
DRILLER: J. Wingo
DRILL RIG: Diedrich D-50
=
U
w
p aw
En
w
cL
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA
w
a 0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
M
2
(taiovvs/ft)
a
o--rr
w
w to
a0
>
0
3
w :
z
z
10 20
\Organic Laden Topsoil - 3"__
Residuum: Stiff Red Brown Fine Sandy Clayey SILT
i
(Moist) (MH)
1
1 1
Stiff Red Brown and Tan Fine Sandy Clayey SILT (Moist)
2
14
5 -
(MH)
824.0-
—
—
-
3
14
Stiff Red Brown Tan and Gray Clayey Fine Sandy SILT
4 Y�
-
12
10-
(Moist) (ML)
819.0-
Firm Tan and Brown Fine Sandy SILT (Saturated) (ML)
-
5 YY"
6
15
814.0-
Boring Terminated at 15 Feet
NOTES:
1. THIS LOG IS ONLY A PORTION OF A REPORT FOR THE NAMED
PROJECT AND MUST ONLY BE USED TOGETHER WITH THAT
REPORT.
2. BORING. SAMPLING AND PENETRATION TEST DATA IN
GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1W,
3. STRATIFICATION AND GROUNDWATER DEPTHS ARE NOT
EXACT.
4. WATER LEVEL IS AT TIME OF EXPLORATION AND WILL VARY.
Page i of i
ro
aWME
ENGINEERING :TESTING
ENVIRONMEW L SERVICES

Fri�_'40p_ N -�b 9 a a A:i- 1r a H-0 4L -s- * 4
Application Completeness Review
&K' First Submittal ❑ Re -submittal
Development/Project Name: Sun
Receivinq stream name UV _
Date Received: a&3 Date Reviewed /2 By Bill Diuguid
r • rJ '--d J J n_ _11
assification: G , A[
fiver Basin: C&on
For post-construct-�quirements, a program will be deemed compliant for the areas where it is
implementing any of the following programs: WS-I, WS-II, WS-ill, WS-IV, HQW, ORW, Neuse River Basin
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient
Management Strategy.
Nigh Density Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSW require 85% TSS, 30% TN and 30% TP removal.
T&E Species (Goose Creek Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile Creek Water Sheds): Ali
Latitude and Longitude: a4 / 3 S JJ r7 5_3 l4 Jurisd/ ction -sxn • u; 1�'qq
Project Address: 53o 3 a. �. z z0 Ajdo it•f1 �'t�6,ZM ore �,� I oI Nr-_ 2 73 S g
Engineer name and firm: Ch&&!r_ r -1-. Ci�lcxs P• E.
Phone: Email:
Is the project confirmed to be in the State MSI Stormwater Permit jurisdiction? YYes or ❑ No
Ei Low Density (no curb and gutter) ❑ Low Density with curb and gutter outlets ❑ High Density Other
V' 401/404 impacts to surface waters, wetlands, and buffers (add language to cover letter and/or add info letter)
ra UA 7-2 , �5 0) -0
r�/ Check for $505,00 included
G� Original signature (not photocopy) on application
W'*' Legal signature (Corporation-VP/higher, Partnership -General Partner/higher, LLC-member/manager, Agent).
Check spelling, capitalization, punctuation: http://www.secretary,state.nc.us/corporations/tliepage.aspx
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which
includes the name, title, mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter.
C� For subdivided projects, a signed and notarized deed restriction statement
� Sealed, signed & dated calculations
Correct supplement and O&M provided for each BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
�d_ Bioretention
u Dry Detention Basin
� Filter Strip
a Grass Swale
❑ Infiltration Basin
❑ Infiltration Trench
Level Spreader
• Permeable Pavement
❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
SVooftop Runoff Management
and Filter
❑ Stormwater Wetland
❑ Wet Detention Basin
❑ Low Density
❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Off -Site
❑ NCDOT Linear Road
/Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details
�( Narrative Description of Stormwater management provided
Soils report, geotech information provided
Gr!' Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans or in the accompanying documents that none exist on site and/or
/adjacent property
' Details for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter;
rI Dimensions & slopes provided
Va' Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density
"MP operation and maintenance agreements provided
Application complete ❑ Application Incomplete Returned: (Date)
Comments
Oct 29 2012 Revision, Bill Diuguid

Patterson, Robert
From: Patterson, Robert
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:26 PM
To: Christy, Charles
Cc: [e-mail]; 'DAN RILEY ([e-mail])'; Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: SW4130301 - Summerfield Charter Academy - Additional Information Request
Chuck,
Regarding #14: The rules require that BMPs be sized conservatively based on the Simple Method and the
whole receiving drainage area at it's ultimate buildout. Essentially, BMPs are sized for an instantaneous volume for the V
runoff for the receiving DA. This applies to BMPs in series as well. The other option would be to design them in parallel
instead by not discharging the bioretention cells into the sand filters.
Regarding #6: I can try to work with you more on this item. However, this requirement is clearly stated in the BMP
manual that at least one boring is required w/in the footprint of each BMP. The SHWT separation is an extremely
important design factor for the success of these types of BMPs. The soil scientist or geotech engineer must be willing to
seal something stating that based on the soils information from the on -site evaluations that the SHWT is at least 2' below
the bottom of the media in each BMP. If they were not specifically looking for the SHWT elevation when the other
borings were done, that may be difficult. The SHWT elevation can be much different than just the elevation that water
was observed at some given point in time. It can also vary greatly across a site due to topography, clay lenses, etc. If
the separation was more than the minimum 2 feet in the one BMP that it was determined for, I might be more
comfortable with it. Also, the underdrains are only for discharging the filtered water, not for getting rid of incoming
groundwater. Without the separation, studies in NC show that there is almost always greater pollutant outflow than
flowing into the BMP.
Please let me know if you want to discuss further. Thanks.
Robert D. Patterson, PE
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (Mail) j 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 1 9th Floor
(Location & Parcels)
[phone] Phone [phone] Fax I [e-mail] Email
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su Website
Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Christy, Charles [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:25 PM
To: Patterson, Robert
Cc: [e-mail]; 'DAN RILEY ([e-mail])'; Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: SW4130301 - Summerfield Charter Academy - Additional Information Request
Robert,
Thank you for the quick review and comments.
understand all your comments, but have a few comments/questions:
Reference Comment #6 —The Owner drilled 17 borings on the property. Soil boring logs and a soil boring exhibit were
submitted indicating water table depths and bottom of media (BOM) for each BMP. The exhibit indicates that ground

water is deeper than the media in each BMP. I specifically want to point out the borings within the building envelope.
These borings are deeper than the others and, in particular, boring 413 is 33 feet below existing grade with no ground
water encountered. The exceptions to the above statement are sand filters #4 and #5. We have limited boring
information in the area of these two BMP's.
I understand the SHWT requirement. However, given the topology of the site, the larger regional topography indicated
on the quadrangle map, existing boring data, and the fact that ground water was only encountered near the creek (west
side, lower portion of the site), we feel that specific SWHT determinations for each BMP would provide the same
findings already presented. This concern is further mitigated with under drains installed for each BMP. Expending
additional time and money to verify the same conclusions is hard to justify given the data provided.
We do acknowledge the lack of boring data for sand filter #4 and #5 and proposed to conduct SHWT determinations for
these BMA's. We request a second review of the information provided and consideration that SHWT is not a concern
except as acknowledged.
Reference Comment #14 —A number of the BMA's are in series. Given the time of concentration, required 1-inch
treatment volume, and storage in each BMP, each BMP will receive the required treatment volume from its respective
treatment area prior to receiving storm water from the upstream drainage area/BMP, then the by-pass structures for
each downstream BMP will divert the upstream storm water and prevent upstream water from entering downstream
BMP's. Basically, all downstream BMA's will collect 1-inch of water from its respective drainage area prior to
receiving/by-passing upstream BMP by-pass water.
At the tail end of a storm, when high flows subside, storm water from the upstream BMP will be diverted to the
downstream BMP. However, at this point, the upstream water has already been treated or is not part of the 1-inch
required to be treated. The downstream BMP would have already captured the required 1-inch from its respective
drainage area.
Assuming a bioretention cell is an acceptable treatment method and the storm system functions hydraulically as
described above (I will provide verification), do you have any other specific concerns regarding the BMP's in series?
Thank you for your consideration. Naturally we are awaiting your decision on comment #6 prior to resubmitting.
Thanks,
Ch uck
WADETRM
Charles J. Christy, PE, Senior Associate
46 Haywood Street, Suite 334, Asheville, NC 28801
828.255.1197 office 1 828.337.0251 cell 1 828.255.1199 fax
From: Patterson, Robert [maiIto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:52 AM
To: Christy, Charles
Cc: Homewood, Sue; [e-mail]
Subject: SW4130301 - Summerfield Charter Academy - Additional Information Request
Charles,
Please see attached and let me know if you have any questions. An original is also in the mail to you.
Thanks.

Robert D. Patterson, PE
Environmental Enginecr
NCDENI? I DWQ I Stormwatcr Permitting
1617 Mail Senice Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 ,`Mail f 512 N. Salisbury St, 911, Floor, Raleigh, NC 27604 I.oc:.ition & i'tarccls
[phone] Phone [phone] Fax I Robert, Patterso rcncdenr.gov Email I http:1112ortal.ncdenr.orp/web/wa/ws/su Websitc.
w.A Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the envirorunent.
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is
exempt by statute or other regulation.
Please Consider the environment before printing this message.
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain informat+on intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone and delete the original message without malting any copies; any
unauthorized viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction and penalty.

AYAIF
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Charles J. Christy, PE
Wade Trim, Inc.
46 Haywood St., Ste. 334
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Mr. Christy:
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
March 21., 2013
Natural Resources
John E, Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW4130301
Summerfield Charter Academy
Guilford County
The Division of Water Quality Central Office received a Stormwater Management Permit Application for the
subject project on March 11, 2013. A preliminary review of that information has determined that the
application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater review:
✓ 1. The application (SWU-101) and the 0&M Agreements must be signed by a Manager/Member of
the LLC as shown on the NC Secretary of State database. Jim Chamberlain is not shown as a
Manager/Member, so an original letter from a Manager/Member would need to be submitted
authorizing him to sign these for the LLC.
2. On SWU-101, IV.10.:
✓a. One DA column should be filled out for each individual BMP proposed (except level
spreaders). The DA label in the table must match those shown on the plans and
calculations.
---b. Offsite area is shown as zero, but sht. C-4.0 shows runon from offsite area on the east side
of the property.
­�3. All areas draining to each BMP must be included and shown on the DA map. Sht. C-4.0 does not
show the delineated DA's to capture all the area draining to sand filters 1, 2, 4 and 5; including the
area of the BMPs themselves. Please revise. Also, please show the contours on the DA map.
-4. Based on the existing contours shown, it appears there is offsite area along the northeast of the
property that is not being shown in the DAs delineated to bioretention cells 1- A, 1-13, and 1-C.
✓5. The supplement forms are just a summary of results. Please provide all supporting calculations
for the results shown on the supplement forms (treatment volume using the simple method,
underdrain calcs., sand filter area calcs., stage -storage tables, etc.).
Wetlands and Slormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N, Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opperluaily 1 Alfirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Mr. Charles J. Christy, PE 'I IL
SW4130301 - Summerlield Charter Academy
March 21, 2013
6. A SHWT elevation determination must be done within the footprint of each BMP proposed. This
appears to have only been done for sand filter 42.
/7. Sheet C-2.0 shows gravel hatching on top of bioretention cells 1-A, 1-13, and 1-C. Please
explain/revise as needed to show that they will be covered in sod, not gravel.
8. Diffuse flow at a non -erosive velocity must be provided from the proposed swale, near the well
site, that discharges to the riparian buffer using a level spreader. Also, please provide calculations
for the swale to show that it is non -erosive for the 10-yr storm.
9. Diffuse flow at a non -erosive velocity must be provided from the outlet of pipe ZZ to the riparian
buffer using a level spreader.
10. On the BM Cross Section detail on sht. C-2.2:
a. With the forebay bottom below the top of the media, it appears that the water will short
circuit the full media depth by flowing latererally from the forebay into the media layer.
Please revise to prevent this. One possible option would be to line the forebays.
b.' Is this cross section only for the sand filters?
f11. Please show how larger storms will safely bypass/overflow from the bioretention cells. A
bypass/overflow must be provided for storm events larger than the 1" treatment volume.
12. A layer of choking stone is recommended instead of filter fabric between the media and gravel
layers of the BMPs.
13. The discharge from BM #5 is routed to BM 44, so the DA and impervious area for 5 must be
accounted for in the sizing for 4, and reflected on the supplement form and calculations.
14. The DAs and impervious area for all bioretention cells in series with sand filters 1 and 3 must be
included in the sizing for those sand filters. Please revise.
-/15. Please be sure to revise all forms, plans, and calculations to reflect any changes.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received by this Office prior to April 21, 2013, or the application will be returned as
incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application
fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail or fax your request for a time extension to
the Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The request must indicate the date by
which you expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of
completed application to issue the permit.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved
Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action
pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
All revised original signed documents must be returned or new originals must be provided. Copies are not
acceptable. Any revised calculations or plans must be sealed, signed, and dated. Please reference the State
assigned permit number SW4130301 on all correspondence. If you have any questions concerning this
matter please feel free to call me at [phone], or at [e-mail].
Page 2 of 3

hir. Charles J. Christy, PE
SM 30301 - Summerfield Charter Academy
Marcie 21, 2013
Sincerely,
2�� ��
Robert D. Patterson, PE
Environmental Engineer
Stormwater Permitting Unit
cc: [SW4130301 File
ec: Jeff Chamberlain - Charter Development Company, LLC
Sue Homewood - Winston-Salem Regional Office
Page 3 of 3

o Ki' n'- Lively, 222 Cormrce Placo,J%0. 1"k.)x
iMrarr I hLrqW i A H ob .1 1 -r.4, St— I,,.
IMONANKNT AMFWM or GRAf4rff.
:1 -41­ /7(4
Xadathis Ayt#.y.(.De,,Tb e,r. 19 84 by and ietw'erl.
,MARY SHEPHERD BARHAM and husband, on:c R. 13A i? H A.'l ,
4 Cu,lf--ro , .imt!' f,.!
called Grantor. and JACK F. SHEPHERD and wife, SHIRLEY H. S1iEPl1FRDr
. ..... of Guilford County and State of North Caroline, Kvittnsft#r railyd Cram".
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ton D441sr- and '-thrr 1z',od and valu&hle considers.
tions to him in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby arkno-ledged, hat frivon, granted, bargained, sold and
conv"ad, and by thew presents does give, grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee. hi% heir and!or successors
and asaffiris, premises in ...... .. BRL)= ........ . ................. Township, Guilford County, N6rth Carolina, Oestribed as follows:
Lying and being in Bruce Township, Guilford County, ,brth Carolina and being Tore
particularly described as follows:
HM1&zl4G at an iron pin near the Western niargin of the road to Stokesdale (Old Baggage Road),
corner with Leta Nall and running thence with Nall's 1—ric South 84 deg. 15 --in. West 2046.6
feet to a stake corner with Nall and Mitchell; thence *Io:th 4 deg. 45 Lan. East 413 feet
to an iron pin corner with Lucy Srruth; thence North 85 deg. 9 min. East 1839.4 feet with
Srrdth's line to an iron pin; thence South 25 deg. 2 sun. East 400 feat to t-ne point of
EM11,047ING, :Deing all of Lot No. 4 of the plat of the G. w. Holbzro6-, Farm according to
survey thereof by N. G. Walker, Sr. dated September, 1953, and conzaining 17.2 acres,
more or less, and bring a portion of the lands conveyed to G. W. Holbrook by deed
recorded in Book 517 at page 38 in the office of the Register of Deeds of Guilford County,
Worth Carolina.
CONSIMRATION See EXHIBIT "A" for Tract 11 (And Further Explanation)
lying and being in Bruce Township, Guilford Tmmship, North Carolina (meetes and
Bounds description in square, Book 2031, page 439) (1962 Deed)
This slo land was, conveyed to Grantor by ............................... ..................................... See Book No........................., Page..........._........
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD The above described prainim, with all the appurtenances :hereunto belonging, or in any wise apper-
baning %into do Grautea, his beirs and/or successors and asawns forever.
VV And the Grantor cotenants that he 12 salisid of said premises in fee, and has the right to convey the same in for simple; that said
premissis are fm from enembrancies (with the exmtianii abone
stated. if any) ; and the. he will warrant and defend the said title
to the sanse sawast the lawful claims. of an personaWhomsoever,
Wheat rebav"m is inede to the Grantor or Grantee. the singular shall include the plural and the masewl" awl include the fattli-
im at this canter.
IN WIT T G toy law hereunto set his hiss 1, theAnd par firstfibove written.
. ...... L­ ...... (SEAL) . ..... . . . .......... (SEAL)
Otis R. Barhm
..... . .. A99 ............................ ...........................................(SEAL) ........ . . .. ............ . ........ I . .........................(SEAL)
......................... I ........ I.- ­r .......... (SEAL) _%t'Wvotj_ .. ....... (SEAL)
STAT,"F NORTH CAWL1 Ul ORD COUNTY
U' 0
...... IL notary public of Uid county
44 Ic­
VO4'y ccylay that ...... MANSHU&IRD BARHAM and husband
. ......................... ­­­ .............................. I .......... .. I .......... . ­­.. C.-
e , ( ... � P'"t
UM R. BA.RHAM 11,
.................. .......... I ............. Grantor(a), personally appeared before
t�_
Use sidcowkdgtd the execution of the foregoing deed. Witness my hand
Mid nobuiw seaw"inp. This ..Afth day of Elpigember....... iq .84 PL-6LIC
Ky Cassunissift Ezvirw-. Notary Public
'A,
............... sirnature _" . .1;
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA—GU"GR6AUNTY
L .......... ............ I ............................................. . ... . a notary public of said county
dohereby amt* that _ ................... . - ........................ ­ .. . ............ ............
........... ...... _­ ........ ........... ...... Grantor(s), personally appeared before
me this d&7 anil acknowledged the execution of the foregoing deed. Witness my hand
a" notarial Vcmztam;L This ................ day of "'­ ................. . ......... W'd I 1* 6676 F1
My Ceftiminalon Expirass. No" Public
.. ....... ..... ........ _ . .......... . .. .........
STATE OF NORTH 'bCAROLINA—GUPI.RD COUNTlY X -7 The fonvWng certi6caft (9) of ......... .................. .......... ..... .. . ........... .............................
'I c' fi� e me
a Notary Public 01b.1- W61-1-1-11 is (arel certified correct. This 6e ................ day of ................
EGISTER OF. DREJK G�UWRD COUNTY. N. C.
.. ........ ....... . ........ I ... ... ­Iaolm'a F
K109
VIAT—SEAVOG
By... ....... ... ........
This; Dud drawn by Aent Lively.-M..
042 1 W-919.

Y
.�
EXHIBIT "A"
TRACT II
BEG'.NNING at an iron pipe, Helen Shepherd's corner in C. C. "dinfrae's
line and running thence South 25 deg. 30 ;yin. 'East 220.0 feet to an
iron pipe, a new corner; thence running with C. C. ;1inf.ee's line in
a northeastwardly direc•cion 52.6 feet to a pcint in the center of
U. S. Highway 220; thence northwardly with the center line of U. S.
Highway 220, 351.35 feet to a point in the center line of said
highway; thence South 53 deg. 30 :nin. west 79.4 feet to an .iron stake,
the going of BEGINNING.
This and another deed of even date herewith comprise a division of
propertj devised under the will of Helen Holbrook Shepherd to mart'
Shepherd Barham and Jack Franklin Shepherd.
L_ L_
l k. t
1:07832
RECORDED
'VLE �ff STL �58F DEE9E'
a LTORD ;aUJITY. NC
she
J

•
December 17, 2012
National Heritage Academies
3850 Broadmoor Ave., SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512
Attention: Mr. Dan Riley
Construction and Facilities Coordinator
Reference: Seasonal Nigh Water Table Determinations
Stormwater Management Facility
Summerfield Academy
Summerfield, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1581-12-138
Dear Mr. Riley:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has conducted Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Soil
Testing per S&ME Proposal No. 1581-12-P207 Revised dated December 11, 2012 to
provide information for a new Stormwater Management Permit Application to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) — Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) and/or local stormwater regulatory agencies. A soil scientist
investigation was conducted to evaluate the soil properties of a proposed Stormwater
BMP area to determine suitability for stormwater management systems. The soil
scientist investigation was conducted to evaluate seasonal high water table (SHWT)
elevations below existing ground surface (bgs).
DISCUSSION
The use of stormwater BMP's is subject to the suitability of site soils and regulatory
approval. Regulatory guidance on requirements for permitting of stormwater BMP's are
provided in the North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual (NCDENR-SW-BMP), dated July 2007 (Revised, 2009). The NCDENR-
SW-BMP requires that the SHWT, or confining layer must be 2 feet below the bottom of
most Stormwater BMP's.
SWE, INC. 13718 Old Battleground Road/ Greensboro, NC 274101 p 336.288.71801 f 336.288.89801 www,smeinc.com

Stormwater BMP Soil Testing SBME Project No. 1581-12-138
Summerfield Academy — Proposed Stormwater BMP December 17, 2012
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The subject area evaluated is associated with one (1) proposed Stormwater BMP for the
proposed Summerfield Academy. The proposed Summerfield Academy is located
approximately l mile northwest of the intersection of United States (US) Highway 220
and North Carolina (NC) Highway 150 in Summerfield, North Carolina. Mr. Chuck
Christy with WadeTrim provided Mr. Stephen Lacz with S&ME a revised site plan on
December 11, 2012 indicating the location of the proposed Stormwater BMP. S&ME's
scope of services consisted of evaluating the SHWT at the proposed location to a
minimum depth of eight (8) feet bgs, or until seasonal high soil wetness conditions were
encountered (whichever is first encountered), or until auger refusal, as determined by a
Licensed Soil Scientist. The area evaluated consisted of wooded cutover with dense
vegetation (Figure 2).
An S&ME soil scientist conducted an evaluation of the soils within the proposed BMP
system, identified on the provided site map. The soil scientist evaluation was conducted
to evaluate the suitability of the soil properties relative to Stormwater Management
permitted by the NCDENR-DWQ and/or local stormwater regulatory agencies.
FINDINGS
Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT) Determination
The SHWT evaluation was performed by advancing two (2) hand auger borings to depths
ranging from 90 to 108 inches bgs within the proposed stormwater management system
area. The locations of the SHWT evaluations were approximated in the field (Figure 2).
Hand auger borings were evaluated by a Licensed Soil Scientist for evidence of SHWT
influence. This evaluation involved looking at the actual moisture content in the soil and
observing the matrix and mottle colors. Depending on the soil texture, the soil color will
indicate processes that are driven by seasonally high water table fluctuations, such as iron
reduction and oxidation and organic matter staining.
Please note that SHWT evaluations are based on secondary evidence and not on direct
groundwater level measurements. Groundwater levels fluctuate for numerous reasons
and these findings do not indicate that groundwater levels have not or will not rise above
the noted depths. The approximate SHWT test locations are identified in Figure 2, and
the approximated SHWT depths are located in Table 1, and further identified in the
attached soil profile descriptions.

Stormwater BMP Soil Testing
Summerfield Academy- Proposed Stormwater BMP
Table 1: Approximated SHWT Depths
S&ME Project No, 1581-12-138
December 17. 2012
Summerfeld Academy - Stormwater BMP
Test Location
Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT below ground surface)
Hand Auger Boring # 16
68 inches
Hand Auger Boring 017
89 inches
CONCLUSION
Based on information obtained from each of the hand auger boring locations, variability
of SHWT depths exists within the area evaluated and careful consideration will need to
be made when determining stormwater BMP installation depths.
CLOSING
S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide these services to you. If you have any
questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
11/� 141dwe-�
Martin Mabe Rob Willcox, L.S.S.
Project Manager/Agronomist Natural Resources Services Leader
Tables: Table 1: Approximated SHWT Depths
Attachments: Figure] : Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Hand Auger Boring Location Map
Soil Profile Descriptions
S:1158811588 REPORTSIOlher l)epartments1158111581-12-138 Summertield Aeademylt581-12-138 Summerfeld
Academy - Stormwater BMP Soil Report.doc
M

3
,Flop`/no,
%
J`
l
�R 6
71X<
�f
SITE
I
`1
QT�
Note: This map is not survey �quafity.. All locations are"approximate.
Source:=�emap provided b"RI,' lnc1j h
SCALE: 1" = O.5 Mile i
DATE: Dec. MS&ME
DRAWN BY: MEM EM
PROJECT NO: I V.SMEIMC.COM
L 1581-12-138
D
C
c
XX
V Y
N
IF-
111i�'
FIGURE
VICINITY MAP T R NO.
AB�St�DETERNIINA AIONS
Summerfield Academy
SummerGeld, North Carolina

S&ME, INC.
SITE/SOIL EVALUATION
Project No. 15 9) -- / 2 -138 Phone No. Date: i-2fm Ir
Location ummE r Pin County: t-.L1tiFD20 Property ze
Aver-q
Proposed Facility: ,SToam1�1R7E� �f11 P Water Supply: On -Site Well ❑ Evaluation: Auger Boring
Community ❑ Pit ❑
Described By: fR ISwrltcD1C Public ❑ Cut ❑
Weather: Coo t- Antecedent Moisture Mo l 6 T Surface Water: r4A
FACTORS
PROFILE
r7
PROFILE ,
- ]7 ten+
PROFILE
PROFILE t
-J� ea tr
Landscape Position %
*/o
- 2 _ ] a
Horizon Depth 1
r
^
Color Munsell
4
, K T
Texture
$c
Structure
W S it
.vcIve
Consistence
SP fy
5s S
Boundary
'
Horizon Depth Il
Color - Munsell
a G
¢
Z
1, Z,4
Texture
c
Mottles
flc SA p 144
—
47 - M S
Structure
ryt
yy$ x
tyfwm—sm
WS
Consistence
5 '512ry
SS S
s 5
Boundary
Horizon Depth 111
-
(o
Collor - Munsell
Z� S
. S 4
7, s a 5
Texture
C
LC
Mottles
G t
- S a s L
/" - /O G
Structure
thsbx
M alss i vel
AJ&W
ttlsbK
Consistence
S S
s S
SS S
ft
Boundary
Horizon Depth IV
45 _
(pWS
Color - Munsell
4 ,
S
Texture
C1
SCI
C G
Mottles
4 /r
rn-/ 4 11,R
rG
C �D
Structure
a sj
+vS
AS 1 try
Consistence
IS
Boundary
Soil Wetness
Restrictive Horizon
Saprolite
LTA R
Classification
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE POSrr1
R
Ridge Intertluve
S
Shoulder
L
Linear Slope
S
Foot Slope
N
Nose Slope
H
Head Slope
Cc
Concave Slope
Cv
Convex Slope
T
Terrace
P
Flood Plain
TEXTURE
s
sand
Is
loamy sand
sl
sandy loam
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
sic]
silty clay loam
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sc
sandy clay
sic
silty clay
c
clay
Ns non -sticky
Ss slightly sticky
S e sticky
Vs very sticky
Np
non -plastic
Sp
slightly plastic
P
plastic
Vp
very plastic
MOIST
vfr
Very friable
fr
friable
fi
firm
vfi
Very firm
STRUCTURE
sg
single grain
m
massive
g0- 96t
cr
crumb
' 4,t fowlVir
granular
.e
sab
subangular blocky
blocky
1t ntt'S
ab
angular
liv;5 f to
PI
platy
Pr
prismatic