Revised PCN Application

Pre -Construction Notification
Aulander Holloman Solar, LLC
Proposed Solar Development
Joe Holloman Road
Aulander, North Carolina
H&H Job No. SEO.003
March 28, 2018
Revised June 6, 2018
hart '� hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

hart
hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via Email
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
US Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Attention: Mr. Kyle Barnes
Re: Pre -Construction Notification
Aulander Holloman Solar, LLC
NC Highway 11 S. & Joe Holloman Road
Aulander, Hertford County, NC
H&H Job No. SEO-003
Dear Kyle:
On behalf of Price Solar, LLC c/o SunEnergyl, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting this
revised Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the proposed construction of a solar
development on an approximate 1,206-acre property located off of NC Highway 1 l S. and Joe
Holloman Road in Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site; see Figure
1). H&H received comments from you via email on April 26, 2018. In response to your
comments, we offer the following:
Comment #1: Road crossings #3 and #11
• It will be helpful if the existing conditions were identified at these impact sites within
Section 3 of the introduction. Stream SCD is a perennial stream that flows in a generally
northeasterly direction towards Turkey Creek. SCD exhibits strong bed and bank
continuity, sinuosity, and in -channel structure. Strong baseflow was observed within
SCD during on -Site observations and it is likely that water is present in the channel
throughout the majority of the year. At the proposed crossing location (Stream Crossing
#3), SCD is approximately 10 ft wide and approximately 5 ft deep.
S aAA-Muter Projecta\ aaa EnerV I (SE0ySE0-003 AulandcrTCNNCN Updates May 201MAulander Hollo ro n cover leper doc
hart hickman
$MRRRR EWRONMEW&SOIOTONS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
Page 2
Stream SCG is also a perennial stream that flows in a generally southeasterly direction
towards Turkey Creek. SCD also exhibits strong bed and bank continuity, sinuosity, and
in -channel structure. Similar to SCD, strong baseflow was observed within SCG during
on -Site observations and it is likely that water is present in the channel throughout the
majority of the year. At the proposed crossing location (Stream Crossing #11), SCG is
approximately 10 ft wide and approximately 3 ft deep. Aerial imagery obtained from
Google Earth showing the existing aerial conditions of the proposed stream crossings is
included within Appendix B.
• These are existing crossings so stream impacts should be quantified as linear footage
of new fill, ex: if there is an existing 25' X 40" pipe and your new pipe is 31' then you
should only have 6' of impacts. Road crossings do not currently exist at the locations of
Stream Impacts #3 and #11, and these proposed roadway crossings will be installed to
facilitate the construction of vehicle ingress and egress roadways throughout the project
site. There are multiple existing roadway crossings throughout the Site; however, the
applicant does not propose improvements with additional stream impacts to these existing
roadway crossings.
• The dissipater pads are excessive for this area. NCDOT does not utilize this amount of
stream stabilization on major road projects for stream systems larger than this. Please
revise and reduce the size of the dissipater protection. It is not justified at this location.
Based on your recommendations, the stream crossings have been redesigned to include
aluminum box culverts rather than reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culverts. The rip rap
dissipater pads have been removed and the amount of streambank armoring has been
significantly reduced. Please refer to Appendix B for the newly designed stream crossing
details.
• Please indicate on the Holloman Wetland Impact sheet (EX-02) where impacts #3 and
#11 crossings are located. Holloman Wetland Impact sheet EX-02 has been revised to
more clearly indicate the locations of Stream Crossings #3 and #11, which is provided in
Appendix B.
S.%AAA-Muter AojectsrSun Energy I(SEOpSEO-003 Au)anderTCWCN Updates May 201 KAulander Holloman cover letter doe 14
hart hickman
SM R EWROHMEWAL SIXUIKKIS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
Page 3
• Stream SCD, where impact #3 is proposed, is not shown on Holloman Wetland Impact
sheet (EX-02). Please refine. Holloman Wetland Impact sheet EX-02 has been revised
to show the location of Stream SCD, which is provided in Appendix B.
Comment #2: Roadway connectivity
• Please indicate on the overall project where the ingress and egress roadway will exist.
The Holloman Wetland Impact sheet (EX-02) indicates the existing road system
through the proposed solar panel fields. The wetland boundaries are very tight against
those proposed panel locations and you will need new road alignments without wetland
impacts. Holloman Wetland Impact sheet EX-02 has been revised to show the locations
of new roadways throughout the project Site along with the existing roadways. The new
roadways do not propose additional wetland impact and an approximate 50-foot buffer
has been placed along the wetland boundaries to avoid additional impacts to wetlands.
The revised Holloman Wetland Impact sheet EX-02 is provided in Appendix B.
Comment #3: Wetland impact quantification
• All impacts need to be quantified on the PCN. This includes the conversion areas
within the panhandle violation. The two new transmission lines are included in the
NWP 12 to be issued for this site. This can be done as a total (2.95 acres) as indicated
on Figure 5 of the wetland restoration plan. This area will require mitigation at a 1:1
ratio as discussed in earlier meetings. Please modify the wetland impact table as well as
the quantity portion of the mitigation section on the PCN. The wetland impact table has
been revised to include the updated quantities of permanent wetland and temporary and
permanent stream impact and is included within Appendix B. The mitigation section of
Appendix C has been revised, as well.
H&H also received comments from Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh of the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR) via a letter dated April
26, 2018. In response to Mr. Scarbraugh's comments, we offer the following:
S.'AAAM... er Pre cesrSun Energy I(SEO)rSEO-000 Au1ander1PCMKN Updaies May 20ISIAulander Hollonun cover leaer doc Id
hart hickman
SM XEWAR MLMAL SOLV S

Mr. Kyle Barnes
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
Page 4
Comment #1: Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
• Please provide more details regarding avoidance and minimization of stream impacts
(specifically the justification for the dissipater pads for road crossing #3 and #11)
associated with the after -the -fact authorization for the construction of a solar project.
The avoidance and minimization discussion provided in Appendix C has been revised.
As discussed above in response to Mr. Barnes' Comment #1, the stream crossings have
been redesigned to include the removal of the rip rap dissipater pads and reduction in
armoring along the embankment. The newly designed stream crossings are included
within Appendix B.
• Specifically, please explain why the necessary 401-certification was not requested prior
to the unauthorized impacts. As discussed in SunEnergyl's response to NOV-2017-PC-
018 that was issued for unauthorized impacts to wetlands in the panhandle area of the site
in April 2017, SunEnergyl was operating under the idea that a permit was not required to
cut trees in the panhandle area. It was SunEnergyl's intention to only cut trees and grind
the stumps to ground level to allow for the installation of electrical poles in the
interconnection area, and not clear and grub the trees. However, it was recognized that
timber harvesting activities were performed outside of accepted practices. Since the
NOV was cited, SunEnergyl has established a written Control Plan which is included
within the revised Wetland Restoration Plan which is provided in Appendix H to prevent
such activities from occurring in the future. Please note that unauthorized impacts to
streams have not been performed, and that Stream Crossings #3 and #11 are newly
proposed roadway crossings.
Comment #2: Plan Detail — Culvert Crossing
• Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage and
showing the proper installation (below the streambed elevation) of the riprap pad at the
culvert outlets. Please refer to cross section details for Stream Crossings #3 and #11 are
provided in Appendix B.
• Per Condition I in GC 4133 "all culverts must be placed below the elevation of the
stream bed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches and 20
S 1AAA-Masser Projedsl un Energy l lSE0pSE0-003 Au1andedPC WCN Updates May 201 VAulander Hollon an cover letter doc Id
hart hickman
9M A LNNRONMFMAL SOLNgNS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
Page 5
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches."
Please revise your plans to meet this Condition or request an exemption from this
Condition and provide justification for the exemption request. Please refer to the cross
section details for Stream Crossings #3 and #11 provided in Appendix B.
Comment #3: Plan Details — Temp and Permanent Stream Impacts
• Per Condition 9 of GC 4133 all work must be done "in the dry". Therefore, dewatering
methods will be necessary to temporarily dewater the stream channel during pipe
installation. Please provide a construction sequence that details the method of
dewatering to be utilized at the site and the sequence of construction events to be
followed to ensure compliance with this condition. In addition, please ensure that the
location of the temporary impacts are shown on the construction drawings and clearly
indicate in the revised impact table. Stream Impacts #3 and #11 will be installed in dry
conditions and the following dewatering methods will be utilized to temporarily dewater
the stream channels during the installation of the aluminum box culverts. Prior to the
installation of the box culverts, impervious dikes lined with geotextile fabric will be
installed upstream and downstream of the construction area. Upstream water will be
pumped via a diversion hose to an area located downgradient of the downstream
impervious dike. A temporary rip rap energy dissipation pad will be installed at the
discharge location. A pump and dewatering filter bag will be utilized to drain the
construction area of any remaining water in the stream channel. The impervious dikes
will be removed once culvert installation is complete and the stream will be restored to its
original cross -sectional footprint. The dewatering details and areas of temporary stream
impact are detailed on the newly designed stream crossings provided in Appendix B.
Comment #4: Plan Details
• Please provide additional plan details for each of the wetland and stream impacts
including as individual figures and on the site plan and clearly label impacts (Wetland
Impact 1, etc.). The Division recommends highlighting by hatching or shading all
impact areas for temporary impact areas and permanent impact areas. The Holloman
S\AAA-Maser Projects\Sun Energy l(SEO)\SEO 003 AulandrrTCM N Updates May 20MAulander Holloman cover lenerdoc
hart hickman
SMNRFR EWM MFMAL 5oLU S

Mr. Kyle Barnes
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
Page 6
Wetland Impact site plan has been revised to more clearly indicate areas of wetland and
stream impact, and temporary and permanent impact areas (Appendix B). A detail for
monopole installation and stream crossings and a detailed description of roadway
installation is also provided in Appendix B.
Comment #5: Compensatory Mitigation
• Per Condition #3 in 401 Water Quality Certification #4133, mitigation is required for
losses of equal to or greater than 300 linear feet of stream (or equal to or greater than
I acre of wetlands). Please provide a mitigation plan that conforms to the
requirements of 15A NCAC 02H .0502(h) for 2.95 acres of wetlands. In addition,
please modify the wetland impact table to reflect the wetland impacts associated with
the two new transmission lines as discussed in previous meeting. The wetland impact
table has been revised and is included within Appendix B. The mitigation section of
Appendix C has been revised as well.
Please note that in addition to our responses to the comments listed above, SunEnergyl and their
attorneys are currently working with Mr. Ed Hajnos with the NC DEQ Stewardship Program to
develop a conservation easement to protect in perpetuity the recently restored areas in the
panhandle portions of the site. The wetland impact quantities have been recalculated based on
new conservation easement survey data, which is presented on the preliminary survey plat
prepared by Roanoke Land Surveying dated June 6, 2018.
S. AAA -Mazer Projeas\Sun Energy l lSEO1\SEO-0W AulanderTCMPCN UVdaoe A1zy 2018\Aulander Hollon en cover letterer.
hart hickman
S nEft FNNRONMfMAL S LMNS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
March 28, 2018
Revised: June 6, 2018
Page 7
Thank you for your review of this PCN document. Should you have any questions or need any
additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
111p-
Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
Attachments
Appendix A — Agent Authorization
Danielle Clark
Project Environmental Scientist
Appendix B — Proposed Impacts (Revised June 6, 2018)
Appendix C — Avoidance and Minimization (Revised June 6, 2018)
Appendix D — Revised PJD Request
Appendix E — Letter of Compensatory Mitigation Credit Availability
Appendix F — Information Request Letters to FWS and SHPO and Agency Responses
Appendix G — Stormwater Plan and Permit
Appendix H — Notice of Violation and Restoration Plan
cc: NC DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, Raleigh, NC (PCN review check of $240.00
sent in with previous PCN submittal)
Mr. Jeff McDermott, SunEnergyl (via email)
Mr. Bradley Fite, SunEnergyl (via email)
S.WAA-Masier Proleos\Su Energy l(SEO(`'SEO-001 Aulander\PCMPCN Updalee May2018\Aulander Hollona rover leLler doc 14
hart hikman
SMMIER EWN MfMAL 50W S

3/27/2018
Resume Submission
DWR
Dlvtslen of Water Revuureea
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
January 31, 2018 Ver 2.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk' below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do Is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.govANaterResmu s/0/edoct624704fPCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
(https://edop.deq.ne.govfWaterRewurces/0/dW603610/Pagel.aspx)
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project Is located:'
Hertford
Add additional county
Is this project a public transportation project?' (7)
Yes a No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:'
+ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of pennit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?'
+ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 12 - Utility Lines
Add additional NWP
NWP Number Other:
Lint ar NOW Mrnb you are applying W W on Na drop tloan fiat
1c. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:'
check all that apply
+ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certfication- Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Persil Riparian Buffer Authorization
id. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval Is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes a No
For the record only for Corps permit: Yes • No
https:/Iedor .deq.nc.gov/Formsform/resume/216/3984 1/12

3/27/2018 Resume Submission
te. Is payment Into a mitigation bank" In4leu fee program proposed for mitigation of Impacts?
e w, MW oea«eprnce rtl« fi«n mr2atmn care «inI fee pmpnm.
• Yes No
Acceptance Lager Attachment
cud u,a upbea bman «aep ra amp Nee n«e m.md aooimwt
Upload
Leger of Credit Availability - SAW-2016-01196 Hart Hickman - Aulander Hollomen Solar Project 03072018.pdf (/... 417.19KB
FILE TYPE MUST 6E PDP
If. Is the project located In any of NC's twenty coastal countles?e
Yes a No
1h. Is the project located Ina designated trout watershed? a
Yes • No
Link to bout Information: ht4)lh w.saw.usace.army.miVMisslonsRtegulatory-PerrNt-PmgmnVAgency-Cooidinatk n/hout.espx
(http:/Aw ..saw.usam.ermy.mIVMiwions/Regulatory-Permit.Pmgmm/Agency-Coordinationrrrout.aspx)
B. Applicant Information
Ia. Who Is the Primary Contact?
Kelly Hoyt
1b. Primary Contact Email: a
[e-mail]
tc. Primary Contact Phone: e
[phone]
1d. Who Is applying for the pem it?
Owner Y Applicant (other than owner) Agent(Consultent
(Chad at Nn apply)
2. Owner Information
2a. Narrate) on recorded dead:
,Price Solar, LLC
2b. Dead book and page no.:
Book 1599 Page 197
2c. Responsible party:
(rr cwp«euons)
Kenny Habul
2d. Address
so-eM aaa<aa
192 Raceway Drive
Ammw Line 2
car
Mooresville
Poarl /Zip coae
28717.
arb/PmNnq/Riven
NC.. ..
r Wy
'.USA .....
X
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/FormaMorm/resume/216/3984 2/12

3/27/2018 Resume Submission
2e. Telephone Number
�[phone]
21'. Faa Number:
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Add another owner
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant Is:
Agent
• Other project owner_ __._ ......
_
fatl pe spedry.
3b. Name:
,Kelly Hoyt
..
3c. Business Name:
fdepproI`W
---'__.._._._. _.. _. _.. ...
SunEnergyl
3d. Address
sbeereeme.
I192 Raceway Drive
Addnn Lbw 2
city
Slabs I PmNnpe / Region
Mooresville
NC
PM lIBP Code
C nby
28117
IUSA
3e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
(myna-xaa
3f. Fax Number:
(mbm-m<
3g. Email Address:
kelly.hoyt@sunenergyl.00m
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
In. Name of project:'
Aulander Hdioman Solar, LLC
https://edoes.deq.nc.gov/Form&lform/resume/216/3984 3/12

3/27/2018
Resume Submission
1b. Subdivision name
C4apwwriaa)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:*
Aulander
1d. Driving directions*
naaarc pmlentaM mn note"IyW]Wul b a GPSmmpptN sy em. Plwimpimddedtedbre.
From NC-11/42, head south on Joe Holtman Road
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number.
pax PIN orpamel ID)
,._-.—__..___....___.,_......_
5981-95-8848 and 5981-54-2022
2b. Property size:
(In ono)
11206
2c. Project Address
stwtaaaau
�No cunent address
•4dmm Line 2
City stnlProvince/ne9an
Penal/ZipC County
2d. Site coordinates In decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates In decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 dlgifs (unless you are using a sumeygrade GPS device) after the dermal place as
appropriate, based on how the location was determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to
map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude: * Longitude:*
36.249336 !47.067205
ev: M.299594-77.79n71
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
,Turkey Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water.
,'Class C Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Surface Water Lookup (hUps://nodenr.maps.arcgls.wr Vapps/webappviewerAndex.html7id=6el25ad7628r494694e259c80dd64265)
3c. What river basin(*) Is your project located In?
Chowan
hops://edom.deq.nc.gov/Fo"s/fomi/resume/216/3984 4/12

3/27/2018
Resume Submission
Add another river basin
River Basin Lookup(http://ncdenrmaps.arcgis.com/apps/PublfclnformadonAndu.html7appld=ad3ag5aOc6d644aOb97cdD69db238ac3)
4. Project Description
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the she and the general land use In the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: e
Primarily undeveloped land historically used for silviculture and agricultural use. Various unimproved roads and
ditches have been historically located at the site. Utility lines have been Installed in the northwastem portion of
the She. An electrical substation station exists adjacent and north of the site along Highway 11142 and Joe -
4b. Attach an 8 M X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map Indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
dkk ere wloed bdbn «deg erb dap nb. raw fro albcn document
Upload
USGS topo map.pdf (/Fans/handlers/downloadattachmenteshx?mq=Do Load&aid=31652&atdhkey=c8878b... 350.02KB X
Fee" mue tea px
4c. Attach an 8112 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project she. (for
DWR)
Gkk de upload buxpn or one and dop files hero m atexh document
Upload
Soil Report.pdf (/Foma/handlers/downloadaltachmentashx?mq=Do Load&aid=31653&authker--o6878b6o-5... 1.18MB X
Fde type must be pdr
4d. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
388.9
4s. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Bntemsem[aM pemmW)
28,148
4f. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:'
The project proposes to develop a solar utility farm that will connect to an existing nearby electrical substation.
4g. Describe the overall project In detail, Including Indirect Imapacts and the type of equipment to be used: e
Solar panels will be Installed at the site which relay power to an electrical substation. The project will Involve
Improvement of the existing access mad system and the construction of one new access mad in the
northwestern portion of the Site using typical construction equipment. Temporary impacts from the construction -
4h. Please upload project drawings for Via proposed project
pick the upload b fton or don act dmp fibs here to aeetl, document
Upload
Holleman Welland Impact 180322.pdf (/Fortis/handlers/downloadatiachment.ashx?mq-Do Load&aid=31654...
1.12MB X
Aulander Holloman Solar - Stream Impact #3- 2018.03.21.pdf(/Foms/handlers/downloadattachment.ashx?mq...
320.24KB X
Aulander Holloman Solar - Stream Impact#11- 2018.03.21.pdf(/Foms/handlers/dow oodattachment.ashx?m...
361.49KB X
Impact Tables.pdf(IFoms/handlers/downloadattachmentashx?req=Do Load&aid=31657&au6hkey=c6878b6c...
59.28KB X
Impact Tables 2.pdf (/Fours/ handlers/downloadattachmentashx?mq=Do Load&ak1=31658&authkey=c6878b...
56.34KB X
rats type must be pM
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed Impact areas? a
a Veer No Unknown
Comments:
See Section 5d..
5b. If the Corps made a judsdlctio tat determination, what type of determination was made? e
Preliminary Approved unknown N/A
https:/Woes.deq.nc.gov/Formstfomilresume/216/3984 5112

3/2712018
Resume Submission
Corps AID Number.
eumPe: sAW-2a1]-09p99
SAW-2016-01196
So. N Sa Is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (If known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Omer:
and Tomas Will
and Hickman
prevlousconsu6ants ------
Sit. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
IA PJD was Issued for project area on June 27, 2016 (SAW-2016-01198). At request of Corps, H6H delineated additional portions of project '.
area
between July 2017 and November 2017. Revisions to me original PJD which incorporate mesa additional areas have been submitted to
the Corps.
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Uk sw uplced roman «dr, end drop ffl eh. Waoemd .nt
Upload
SAW-2016-01196 Price Solar, LLC.pdf (/Forms/handlers/downloadattachment.ashx?req=DownLoadBaid=31669... 100.6KB X
2016 PJD updated with 20171nfo.pdf (/Forms/handlers/dow oadattachmenLashx?req=DownLoadBald=316608... 2.06MB X
Revised December 2017 wetland delineation PJD package.pdf (/Forms/handlers/downloadatlachment.ashx?mq... 11.47MB X
Fib type mum W PDF
6. Project History
Ga. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (Including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No unknown
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this a phased project?"
Yes • No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permil(a), or individual permits(s) used, or Intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed
project or related activity? This Includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army
authorization but donR require preconatruc ion notification.
oompleve pmjem ana a mis oevelopmenr wouia resort in Impacts m
'wetlands and streams. The PCN Is being submitted In order to provide
notification of the current development plans for the project, to advance
:rha raA ., mf ma P.In and m ry Ad. u.,.,.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the Impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
+ Wetlands + Stmams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If mere are wetland Impacts proposed on the she, men complete this question for each welland area Impacted.
2s. Site 0 - Reason for Impact* 2b. Impacttype * 2c. Type of wetland *
2d. Wetland name* 2e. 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Forested* Jurlsdlchlon* area*
httpsJ/edoes.deq.nc.gov/Forms/fonTVresumet2l6/3984 6/12

3/27/2018
Resume submission
2a. Sib / - Reason for Impact* 2b. Impacttype' 2c. Type of wetland`
Pccass Road (Impact 12)
P
Pine Flat
Map M1bM tea. Road CMWng 1. Cuherl,
Pannan a, (p) w
deaabdmg. et)
Tariertw m
,Mono Pole (Impact 13)
P
Pine Flat
Map label(.4. Road Cr..N l- C,dvwt,
PwmeosM(P)Or
dewenda0. etc)
Taneww M
IE)dsbng roads and benching (Im
P
• Pine Flat
Map label (ell. Road CnMeNa t -C Mat
pememnl (P) or
d..". ea)
Tempo M
' cows Road (Impact 15)
P
• Pine Flat
Map ($-a. Road CmWrg 1-WO
Pwmainrd(P)w
deal*,,, ea)
Tamp M
Access Road (Impact 16)
P
• Pine Flat
Map WW (e.g Road C ng 1-.hen,
Pame (P) w
dew WW, elc)
Temwwy(r)
Mono Pole (Impact 17)
P
• Pine Flat
Map WW (e.a. Road C..*Q 1-CuN t
Pemanwd (P) w
d bring, alit)
Tanowwr m
Construction equipment access
T
• Pine Flat
Map Mbel (e.a. Road Crossing 1-QU
Pvvaa M (P) or
doxabrina, at)
Tarn M
�Construction equipment access
T
• Pine Flat
Map 4bal(e.g. Road Cr Wl-OAw%
Pan (P)w
tlewendnp, Mc)
Twrywa M
Conatmallon equipment access
T
• Pine Flat
Map WW (e.a. Road Cnpndng 1-Wmt
Pem,MeM (P) w
�Wm, eW)
Tampenwy (T)
Construction equipment access
T
• Pine Flat
Map heel (e.p Road Croae W 1-QU
Pam (P) or
d.t.ft, sea)
Tenawa M
Add
2d. Wetland name*
2e.
2f. Type of
2g. Impact
Foresbd*
Jurisdicilion*
area*
• WAE
Yes
• Corps •
r,--_. _.
0.029 X
(404. 10) w CAW(01.
(.Mea)
OtlK4
• I AE
Yes
•. Cops •
0.007 X
(a0a, 10) or DWR(a 1.
(even)
aaen
• WAE _....
Yes
• Corps •
0088 - ...�C l
(a01, 10) w DWR(a01,
(eves)
OOer)
• WAE _-.
Yes
• Corps •
10.018 -.. X
(a0/,t0)-0WR(a01,
.lbw)
levee)
• WAE
Yes
• Corps •
i0.121... - -X
(aoa, 10) w DWR ta01,
I.)
anal
• WAE
yes
• Corps •
,0.007 X
(404,10)w DWR(401,
(*Deal
ae,an)
• WAE
Yes
• Corps .
P.149 X
(a0a, 10) w DWR(J01,
(avu)
• WAE
Yes
• Corps
,0.033 X
(a0o, 10)w DWR(dp1,
(eves)
au�e4
• WAE
Yes
• Corps •
i0.012 X
(aoa, t0)v OWR(a01,
(aaea)
Ou9n)
• WAE -
yes
• Corps •
�0.040 X
(aw. 10)w DWR(401.
(aMM)
2g. Total Temporary Welland Impact
0.234
2g. Total Permanent Welland Impact
0.270
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.504
2h. Comments:
This submittal Includes Impacts (Impact #14) which were made prior to submittal of this PCN and that were
Identified in NOV-2017-PC-0184. We request after -the -fact permit approval for these existing impacts.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream Impacts (Including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites
Impacted.
3a. Reason for Impact* 3b.lmpact 3c. TV" of Impact* 3d. Stream name * 3e. Stream 3f. Type of 3g. Stream 3h. Impact
type* Type* Jurisdiction* width* -length*
httpsJ/edocs.deq.nc.gov/FormaMomVresume/216t3984 7/12

3127/2018
Resume Submission
So. Reason for Impacts
3b.lmpact
3c. Type of Impact"
3d. Stream names
3e. Stream
3f. Type of
3g. Stream 3h. Impact
types
Types
Jurlsdictions
widths lengths
S1
iCUNen-Road Crossing
P
CuNert •
Unnamed tributary to T
Perennial •
Both •
f 57 X
use WW(e.g. Read Crosdlq
Pemwenl(P)r
Perennial (PER)r
A•raga (feel) 0.1eet)
1)
Trrorrr IT)
nMmlipemONn
52
Culvert -Road Crossing
P •
Culvert •
Unnamed tributary to 7
Perennial •'
Both •
r5 i59 X
Map steel (..a. Road C;ooem
Penrlaner(P)r
PareuYY(PER)a
Avrage(f.0 Pinearfael)
1)
Talnparery(T)
inbnninent(INT)
ConsWCUm equipmen
T •
Other •
Unnamed tributary toT
Perennial •
Both •
p 10 X
Map law (e.a. Road CreaWq
Pemenrd(P)r
P.1(PER)or
Arrege treat) nner feet)
,)
nnnPorrr(1)
Intenniaenl(INT)
S/
CansWction equlpmen
T •
Other •.
Unnamed tributary to T
.Perennial •
Both •
5 110 X
WP uael (e.g. Road Creasing
Pemarenl (P) or
Perennial (PER) or
Mere (sN) nnerh*)
11
Tenere m
Wdsordent(INT)
Add another impact
"All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
31. Total Jurisdictional ditch Impact in square feat:
0
31. Total permanent stream Impacts:
116
31. Total temporary stream Impacts:
20
-31. Total stream and tributary Impacts:
136
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
Ia. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing the project: s
Sae attached avoidance and minimization narrative.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques: s
See attached avoidance and minimization narrative.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Watsm of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
• Yes No
2c. it yes, mitigation Is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Y Corps
2d. it yes, which mitigation options) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program
Permlttes Responsible Mitigation
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/FormsMo"/resume/216t3984 8112

3/27/2018
Resume Submission
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
_____.-_ .___._ .__. ... .
the Great n DmalSwam P.ResturationBank-Timberlake Farts
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
_._ _
Non-ripatlan wetland • 0.27 �
Add additional credits
Attach Receipt and/or letter
Ca*Ne upbed Euaon Wares en4 dip film We b atlerh d rmrfi
Upload
Letter of Credit Availability - SAW-2016-01196 Hart Hickman - Aulander Holloman Solar Project 03072018.pdf If... 417.19KB
FILE TYPE MUST BE POF
3c. Comments
Credits for permanent Impacts will be purchased upon approval of the Nationwide Pemtlt.
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Conoepts tab on the Wilmington Districts RIBITS
(https://Hbb.usam.army.miMbits_apex/P7p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27_BUTTON_KEY.0) webs0e.
R Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
— Recent changes to the stornwater rules have required updates to this section
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project Include or Is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes • No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, dick here
(https://files.nc.gov/nodeq[Water%2OQuality/Surface%2OWater%2OPmtecUorV401 /Buffer%20CIadficaton%2OMemostOptions%20for%2OMeebng%20D!ffuse%20F]ow%2OPi
If no, explain why:
There are no protected riparian buffers within the She area.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOTs Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?e
Yes • No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low, density projects as defined In 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? e
Yee
No
To lookup low density requirement dick here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2) (http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/nmc0e%2016a%20-
%20enviranmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20tV15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf).
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
httpsJ/edocs.deq.nc.gov/Formstform/resume/216/3984 _ 9/12

3/27/2018
Resume Submission
1a. Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federallstateAocel) funds or the use of public (ledere0stete) land?
Yes • No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the she In violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 214.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (1SA NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR
Surface Water "Welland Standards" Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? s
• Yes No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? e
• Yes No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
sapling/shrub-stratum was removed, and large quantities of mulch produced by gdndirg were deposited In the
surrounding area. H&H has previously submitted a revised Restoration Plan for the Site (dated March 5, 2018)
to the USACE and DWR for approval which Is currently under review. -
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future Impacts) result In additional development which could impact nearby
downstream water quality? e
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Impacts to wetlands and streams. The PCN Is being submtted in order to provide notification of the current -
development plans for the project to advance the review of the PJD, and to provide supplementary
documentation to go along with the Restoration Plan in order to address the Notice of Violation.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? e
Yes No • WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur In or near an &me with federally protected specks or habitat? a
Yes • No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Impacts?*
• Yes No
5c. N yes, Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency Involved?e
Yea • No Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
Yes • No
51. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work In waters of the U.S.? e
• Yee No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? e
Yes • No
Unk to the NLEB SLOPES dooumem: http://sew-rag.usaoe.army.m!INLEB/1-30-17signed_NLE&SLOPES&appa.pdf(hBP:ifeaw-rag.umm.aimy.mIVNLEBH-3&17-
dgned_NLEBSLOPES&apps.pdf)
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/FomsMorm/resume/216/3984 10/12

3/27/2018
Resume Submission
5h. Does this project Involve the constructlonnnstallation of a wind turbIns(s)?•'
Yes a No
51. Does this project Involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
mechanized pile drivers, etc.?'
•. Yes No
If yes, please provide details to Include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
CIX*aH YPIoaE bU11W1IX d18a alld e0p filar hBf9 el M19C114 ent
Upload
"erunbe POF
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?'
Letter from US FWS (6-9-16) and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Element Ocim once detasets.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
ga. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?'
Yes a No
Ob. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact an Essential Fish Habitat?'
,EFH Mapper (NOAA- Habitat Protection) (httplAvvnv.habitat.rwea.gov/protecfion/eMethmapper/)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office, Historic Propertles Map (does not Include archaeological data: b1lPilgiiDfdf'sg0m' gCdleD1
(b(g1J/91s.Ood goympitlyaW
7a. WIII this project occur In" near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archseotogy)?'
Yes a No
7b. What date sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources?'
Letter from the NC Slate Historical Presentation Office (47-2015), The National Registry of Historic Places, NC
(Stale Historic Preservation Office databases, and on -she moonnalssance
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
C he uol bump asap and&W film here b ml d Mrt
Upload
Aulander Holloman SHPO Clearinghouse Letter.pdf (/Forms/handlers/do loadattachment.ashz?req=Dow Loa... 46.28KB x
USFWS Letter 6-73-16) (002).pdf (/Fomm/handlers/do loadattachment.ashx?req=Do LoadBald=316648aut... 1.16MB x
Fla m he PO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: httpslim .fema.gov/portal/search (httpsllmw.fama.gov/portal/search)
ga. WIII this project occur In a FEMA-designated 100year fioodplaln?'
• Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A small northern portion of the site is within the 100-year 800dplain No structures or impervious sureces are
proposed in the 100-year floodplain.
httpsJ/edocs.deq.nc.gov/Formstform/resume/216/3984 11/12

3/27/2018 Resume Submission
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? e
FEMABoodplain maps (https://msc.feme.gov/porteVseamh)
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
( su uob d ordrae bop eINM bBaBcb bxurmnt
Upload
Avold and Minimize.pdf (/Fomis/handlers/downloadattachmentashx?mq=DovmLoad&ald=31665&authkey=c68... 92.25KB X
Aulander Holloman-Agent AuNodzetion-PJD-2018-03-OS.pdf (/Fo s/handlers/do loadattechment.ashx?mq=... 10.74KB X
Aulander Holloman Cover Letter.pdf(/Forms/handlers/downloadaeachment.mhx?req=Do Load&ak1=31667&a... 148.89KB X
delineation maps.pdf (/Farms/handlem/downloadattachment.nhx?mq=Do Load&aid=31668&authkey=c6878... 218.2KB X
FYe muq be PDF orx
Signature
+ By checking the box and signing below. I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• 1 agree that submission of this PCN form is a `transaction' subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the 'Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act):
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the *Uniform Electronic
Tmnsac6ons Act);
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced In the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kelly Hoyt
Signature
x
Date
,3/27/2018 p j
SubmB Save as Draft
https://edoes.deq.nc.gov/Formstfom✓resume/216t3984 12/12

�`• \ II i ce' v +-\ 1 r �� 1� Cemo- �£
SITE
E
_
�
I
r0 ,reii.
_ v v
c _ e�..
6
•l. N
AS ^
f XR
!S—
�`a
.5E
APPROXIMATE TITLE
iV o z000 aaaa SITE LOCATION MAP
SCALE IN FEET PROJECT AULANDER-HOLLOMAN SITE
APPROX. 1,260-ACRES
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
hart ► hiekman
$tt,Nmhe.Ii.
Ch
Chulottc, Nonh Carolim 28203
2M3
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NORTH CAROLINA 1983 oasae-oom p>Toasae.onsl
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
QUADRANGLE DATE: 3-16-2016 REVISION NO: 0
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) JOB NO: SEO-003 FIGURE: 1

H
W
04 o O 2 =2
�,e ate°+&� a a a a \•,/w "s�4 = q ..
AA
zz
�a
a s
1+1 i a 4+1.t 1r\\ r1w
\♦♦ ____� -'wawx'van a *� i ^a a{a + _ a nags �'�\.I�i € z2.
�4t14
\ t
z;- \ as ia-ag+ia+� °i''-� xy +`'�°.� F `_ a, s g• � � a�X •A�k".`s'p �, �g��"=a
s4ro <� \ � ,..aaa + >a }� g \\ 1 "+. - ,.• � e s/� . / \ s's; ',
z.^•
l' +a+a+
+ae_=g :
Y? m `]•` "7 \4 a "�. "s y.� `°F /%3�`ii°ae"°°' J /�/ ad' 84e:..g„ �
%n `C` - •r, i� € Po'e�-< �` z <� •',�/��i:%a�;� �,°°.d �j y' Ali`as}Y'yi
�c \ •���' > � tt a`• /����`� �oe �OHmNOWANAN ROAD / B�F� 6s
y4 � N %M SSF e s
41
x
sa
a ww{ w rww s � d ws �\�\y'' + d d,• £g@g#
as- ,•°- x :i � `�S\f•\i - Iwp. _'4\ :g � g9� � is
as75
MII
m ny
M 3&
_ :r2
9100 xyaoN anay {I x

E ?TAs-ssaa
aw a as
'9•t � ya-L-_ .� ,rl =F�, `�\y a �'` f��., .i. mall R��' `\\ I �a °' W aN
1 i c • °4.� €.1 a ,"b, �:%- a \\•, I�-� 03 s
s
e-1a • ° Rap� a
°' - § a �� a ' tE•Os %: �..'( � i �'r a \\'= g � a' N3i c
y.
RDLL `?k
4iY h =C._ ti21� CLSti3 Sv _L�[ 1-4
NN
111
' j• 'S �j�B / �` F4I 'N :i s I .z\\ z NO Su
9
=SM!
a_
c •£- � - V`YjpV s
Fi
hi
ao��;;
14
a `o'a'ci
aory a- jw. sa
C u m t' e L e �•A

zGe � '61V3 .'. 3 C 'Sa 4A'S u � i•'
PIA
HSHON 21(1H.L 5
zx
_¢(uN
.. FY A 'CUE
3
w g.-:94a X33�bo :�.G.SwY��g� ro; - —
Yccw
�F^.YA�„^ea_`q <vAe7 0=. $ �ii//rii'� 9 p y �•
zw¢Y fx�Ad dd "A..i NO�A•0lBAN gUA �E �'�» %j/✓r'' a/' .oywc `o' �s</�/ frt� €4 g$ gg. Bf:
3� foe o..mOE"./•'i /ii, /. / r/i r�'�,„. ,+t 4.' a,,,'�� .% �x 4 �_ e�= X—
.,
i' .09
.00
mo
i%✓ rr//r a y,56 :>r ��� Hypaa n�;a B 4 =$��W�
_
-
�
di
a B
m
�i a,;F fF w WWF Wf WFwwwff�
�.. .,
I --I y

Appendix A
Agent Authorization
hart hickman
SMARIFR FHNRMMFN4L HHUfgHS

Agent Certification of Authorization
I,� 1— representing the prospective developer of Parcel Numbers 5961-
54-2022 and 5961-95-6646, which are located off of NC Highway 11 S. and Joe Holloman Road
in Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina (approximately 1,206 acres), certify that I have
authorized Hart & Hickman, PC to act on prospective developer's behalf and take all actions
necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination and 401/404 permitting for this property.
Prospective Developer's Signature
Name/Title:
Company:
.3/s // g,
Date
M
Agent's Signature
Matt Ingalls
Hart & Hickman, PC
1/2/1 S
Date

Appendix B
Proposed Impacts
10
hart hickman
S"MR EWRONMfNTAL SOW S

we lcsw-zeaaWl wm of BtRWBIt .-
$ 5[[ozeawt
<w
euez ox •im+•�eox r ${/02 S.
m
q �exaaetl ffiI �-
a
s OII NVIOS 2 Via- w
NVV40ll0H aOaNV],nv 11
00
T� r
$ ' r i t ��•, I � I i l
..
ram.- W
>Q>Q'z< �1I M
y/ 2C N Z M
wz$ i
li
,
+ i,- a
a , , a
+aa, + a
44 ii a #
a +a ,
a i
a

(ItBi ]N elMsa�wN
F IWL Ct
LL(
C
m
LL V
In O N
g z
Zp
UwU
ZOC
Oo
oil
<(n
2 U�
gel -
w y 6
U V
0 U 0
z m
�0
u) a
zi
gv
�
bm
0�n
nm
Al
m
Q
a
m
rn
w
U
U
Q
z
Z
W
a
0
w
ar
euaaao
¢w�
N
oll'avios<�
NVWOIIOH U3ONV-IOY
I
r
I I I
I
I
I I
I!
I
I
I
%
i
I
'
w a
w ao
m
y
Y O ow t
O Q
O wo< O
K K K O
)
FZ ZN yN
O F OU
u >a wo 60 i¢
w w<
W. w
W
—,
a�a
LLma
Z c
00c
c/zfn
zg>U-FU
Q
�o
w
a0.
*Ww
Q
vwZ
It J
LLa-inp>Q 00
d m a
Mo
J 0
00.1
2~
o(L0E-
fzo
0
Zao
ooa
a U w w
096
g O H\
a a
Z
HHU
zF- n
g0E-
��uJZU
SOa
g
LL
z X j
W Q
-
~
gwao
3z2
wz
-W�°�
z g
\
0op
0a
z
�
W
wz
F W
r
z t7j
�2 C) I
W -
LL Q Q
w�/n
Z'mi W O 9
0 fn=
<00
W 2U0
Z w 6 z
oog
IIIc� ~
U)
g"
CL
w
U 8a
Z
Ww
\�
Q F- S
L
X
J
wIq
xLL
x
;$
SB$ #E
534
J
333
§7 sp2 � gQQ 39 � �(
§$q fi
•E
42F 9y €INN
E
€a�9c
4
@ a c=
ss
4F#gj
s

Danielle Clark
To: Jeffrey McDermott
Subject: RE: Road Cross Section Detail
From: Daniel S Turner [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 4:37 PM
To: Jeffrey McDermott <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Road Cross Section Detail
Hi Jeff —see below for Dominion road spec. I do want to touch base on the remaining road repairs for Summit. I'm out
tomorrow but am in office all day Friday— can we have a quick call? Anytime after 11:30 work best for you?
From our 2018 EPC Master Services Agreement, Exhibit A. -- Scope of Work, Sec. 7.4.K:
K. All road dimensions and features shall be designed and constructed to allow delivery, ingress and egress
of all project components and construction Materials and equipment to their respective design and
working locations. All design requirements shall meet the local County, State, and local Governmental
Authorities, but shall be at the minimum of:
Main Access Road
0 20 feet wide from highway or main public road
0 Installed geotextile fabric prior to install of stone
0 9 inches crushed aggregate
- Interior Road
0 18 feet wide
o Installed geotextile fabric prior to install of stone
o 5 inches crushed aggregate
- All Road — 12 inches of sub -grade preparation
Thanks,
Sterling
D. Sterling Turner
Sr. Environmental Compliance Coordinator
Generation Construction
804-273-4182 (office)
804-629-6924 (mobile)
[e-mail]
From: Jeffrey McDermott [mailto:ieffrey.mcdermott(alsunenerciyl.coml
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 9:19 AM
To: Daniel S Turner (Generation - 34)
Subject: [External] Road Cross Section Detail
Good Morning Sterling,

g
c
8
9 9
B
3
y
E#-OVd W'
'
JIV-IV
259T-J
a
p
F
z
w
p
w Wd
U W. �
¢
W
z
m
S W
J
r
Q
p wi
z
_
d�3r
y
o
WO J�
m� U 3
m
y
> w w
J K O
�Qwm
O
y
z yw
Wm
r3rcr
w
w
W
o
O
Q pV
ZZIUYy
W9o¢
N
K¢>
O
W
Q
mtt mK
O
z
Z D Z
W_ Ur W J
W
o
Oa
f
N
u
r
J N
W on W p
d
J
y
dp Jo
o3
ZWUCZZoxwow
N�
c o w Sa U
¢¢ r M p W
N N
OWm
K>mUw
a
�
m
d>UZZ �U_m0
rym
F �OQm41
LL'QQM1�
NV•1�
m
O
z
s
� m
v
LZ
r
J �
wa
Wg
D 1
'Zw
^^ N
V! LLL
r
O�
R J
U Q
0 Z
Q Z
O of
W
W W
W
cn a
= LL
J
W
W N
Oa
Z Z
NVWOIIOH
f• �
'��.
Fm
Nm
i
F3N mums
[
�3
N \
,
m N
3
sz0
m .M
¢
OUP
wwk3
��mN
W W �
r�m
m
O s m
_
O I N N n a W
y�Z
LLzW
m m Q
jZ:-mfHO
OFF
ZOa<ww0
�3
�mQ�zzN
aWw
ZZ9
WOOr
p
33
�yc J
ro Ow
wr
C
m 7
o; m
w U

I hope you have been doing well, and that you are pleased with the progress that has been made to move towards closing out
Summit Farms. I will continue to push for the work to be completed on the roads, as I see that being the only major obstacle to
inviting the inspector to the site for a close-out inspection. I am working on another project that Dominion is involved with, in which
we need to supply the regulatory authorities a typical road cross section. Do you know if Dominion has a standard detail for the
roads built in their sites? I appreciate any information you can provide.
Thank You,
Jeffrey McDermott I Senior Environmental Specialist
0: [phone] 1 C: [phone]
192 Raceway Drive, Mooresville, NC 28117
www.SunEnergvl.com [e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please
contact the sender by reply email and delete the original and any copy of this email. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications by email, please so advise the sender immediately.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or
privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the
sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the
individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the
message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please contact the sender by reply email
and delete the original and any copy of this email. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive
communications by email, please so advise the sender immediately.
Total Control Panel
To: dbirmingham(dharthickman.com Remove this sender from my allow list
From:
Ieffrev. mcdermotttatsu ne ne rgvl.com
You received this message because the sender is on your allow list.
Login

c
c
€
SN011035
5502D £# I - lI9INX3 9NISSOTD Wtl3N1S
1p
__JtldWI
',-, l6 NVWOIIOH•b30Mdlf w
,
^ 3 g
ZS9I-D'ON 3SN30n VNnO.' N NON
; ` a.a,K�
ro �
�..�,..• dnOb9 SNOWWI1
•
W F�
U
m=
Dw0
(� N
3s Z.
W
m Z 0 W m> Z d w W Q F E W
O w
f
, W O . O 1' O LL w d
U
w O< v w< O O F
m ¢
W
0 Q. 0�Mw gzQ
u
zw� ?wwr O tt
O
07 NK wW :lWa
0:
oa
aoQJoQf
0<0<
¢o¢ w
QmQzQQom?w�_O
O> m J INN K U w m O
y
aODUO[O:dgQ���O
wou<uwiy arcn3¢3mw
r
O
4
IO_
`O
O
0
n
w
N
Z 69
{ a9

fc� r fF
t 1 +
*� ➢ A ra, i 1
m
0
F-

a
—• r
g
j8
i
g
g 3
TT# IDVdWI - J-I9IHX3
9NISSONO WV9HISwY
P F
°^
mom wwx .wmm'd
Jll '21tflOS N'dWOIIOH ""2134Nt/lfltl
Z59T-0'ON 39N30[T VNIIOtl HTNON
,.,•,..- dnoM9 SNOWWII
qa
o
o wz g2�F
m 101
i
❑ UW
�OZ
dw%2
O Nm S¢w
ZO F
t
Z a W w
J m W O~
Y W
Q
U
0 w m
O a0� Y[2'JLL�ZU
OWK Om?i
J.!O
¢W
€
�'
y
N
Q 2 YN
w �� <>9wz0
9w
Z• �'
�S2 S''wW
Z
op
iQ
W
O 9 x
3
a0 f¢t�sa
nWxILLgWZ�
w>
QamaC
a ❑
>
O
z JN wZ, wJ
❑�ZN>�m
wKap-2m
W❑
_,
0 O
U aw mm<MW/J
m2
QQN
w Z 0 >
6 QU 0OW WOW
KJLLO>
Om
40
- Tn_ W
xm wEW w
Ooomma,20W
Owsw a
OOUa
a0.N-Qmaz
a� cm DU
!n W F
w
a>Up�
wpwzf t-_m
QN NO:QQd�
S> 2
FmFm
c
�111-O
Z
O
Z • • • • •
J¢t:..
Z
O
i 0
02
N
wm
W ❑
W
fbi -.,
y
0000
ao
u�
O
N
Fm
NNv
A `�•
a �y
Zm
N ^O
wooL�
� V
1p2
'
�
cot
W a
V Q
NQ o'p
Z^ W
ILYL w w
w
a m m
\
Vr/
a
o
` /)
0 n m
U
O
J rc ❑
Q
O
w
/
Zwma
w
m y
U z Of
m_
LL
J m
m p m N q
0 Z Z
❑
y
oJoZ
Oan
N
Q W
W
w 0 m
>
0
�Niw
U
wo
Frww
a
a
oZoo
= LL
p
g m a
J
-
¢o0:w
y�
m a F
Q >>ga0
00
❑
Q
w a
K
0
Z
H r

z�
•• dnc
m
m W W
Z d U Z Y W
m
W
Odd
QWO U�jY�IW�L
ILLO2Q
m
Wa o�m
Wm�a
zJ1.
UOm
(JOa
rcw �ZaZgWwpQ
amZQFWWz
QOd
�OHmWUw
KJ QZhmQm�
ZUFam�QO4UmU
Z O
0O>2
pmmm
dO�mD
mou w
mF OZWmF�U<Mlw
Q Q LL W m W
O
z .
O
N O
O O
O
Z
J �
wa
Wg
D
0 Q
Z_ LU
U
O�
C Q
U Z
Z
Ow
w
cn a
_LL
F- J
W N
Q
OZ
Z _
o c a
0 0
O N
m
!a
Iw
9w
0w
zw!
0.1.—__-
—
a
m
CLOL
w U'
J
r
9'LOL
/ I
/
sLm
i x<
m3�
w
5zm
/
?ww
�cw
I
a `
E'COL
Q
h�o
m
�>
=w�
ZJ
-m
U
"MI

z

0
TCjSr0moDC�
O�3 =
m=ir°mw
Li
ZnOwmm Z
r770
m
mn<(�C�rv5'<<ini
mcrmO
om�'>
Z oZm1111ZJ
m
O
mAp m
Dc
>
5
rn
I
Z
<
m
zX
I
I
?c C
I
I
Nm
I
I
m r
I
I
Oc:
mA
I
I
rg
2
m
I
I
I
�z
oc
D
I
O
yI
I
T cn
i
C
r11
rz
r
z
0
W
0
o
r
m
0
0
o
�
°
w
m
Boo
s
AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR, LLC
c
�°"
HERTFORD COUNTY, NC IMPACT #I I
Apo
-
N
C

roll
£# II DN `A I.NMD Q2IOd
�
N
06a
,LDVJ
x
DZZ `2Id IOS NdY�iOI IOH 2IHQNd'Ifld
M
O
0
0
m
m
a
°
z
z
z J
W
W Q
W
ti WO
J
Q
zo
I
w
��
J
D5
I
I
�p
w
Q W
a n
W
I
I
I
F O x
I
I
I
J Oa
I
a
I
I
N LL
O
� z
� Z
I
I
�
IL
ih D m _
J
I
I
F J d
W Z
3
N>���W
Jzzi u�
Mo
Zw
I
I
? M�s�LUa a
W p
x
iW
I
I
LLZ)O>>z
OLLJpOw
I
W
1g
j
FrnZOw
m
a
I
I
x i o
oa
I
I
w
3�
I
I
Z
W
J �
J LL
H
LL N
0
0
O
�vvJll
O

00
N
N
u
N
N
u
U
f0
u
f0
00
O
�
�
Z
N
O
N
O
u
u
O
N
U!
U!
u
u
u
u
7
M
Y
Y
«
N
ma
E
E
c
N
c
N
E
m
vi
W
U
V
r
H
w
c
C
u
u
u
ur
"^
E
^
d
N
w
w
G
0-0N
E
tL-
Y
Y
m
a
m
r
o
r
CD
C
L
C
U
C
O
C
O
O
Y
O
u
u
o
0
_o
_o
Z
v
w
v
�
o
w
o
o
M
C
O
M
C
O
h0
O
E
.S
E
N
m
a
E
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
mmum
m
m
u
0
0
0~
O
C.
m
E�����
N
0
ft
Y
W
v
�n
�
a
E
IT
110,
W
u
U
C
�
Y
O
Y
a
E
C
—
3
N
v
.0
A
N
Z
n
O
in
m
x
o
Y
�
o
c
E
a
f0
w
m
A
v
�
NC
O
p
C
m
o
v
a
a
c
c
v
>
o
yin
v
C
�
J
C
0
d
3
N
in
m
m
u
a
W
OCL
m
u
N
n
mE
000
0'
E
N
'O
C
N
w
3
0
r

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
14
hart hickman

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Aulander Holloman Site
Hertford Co., North Carolina
Revised June 6, 2018
H&H Job No. SEO-003
Avoidance
In regards to Site alternatives, the prospective developer has considered and evaluated other
potential properties in the area for development of the proposed solar farm. However, this
property has been selected due to its close proximity to an existing electrical substation and
powerline grid and for the viability of interconnection with existing infrastructure. Initial drafts
of the Site plan containing additional solar panel arrays and stream crossings were revised in
order to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands. By utilizing an existing roadway infrastructure
and designing the solar panels to occupy upland areas, the solar development completely avoids
Wetland LA', Wetland `B', Wetland `C', Wetland `D', Wetland `P', Wetland `G', Wetland `H',
Wetland `I', and Wetland `P, Wetland `K', Wetland V, Wetland `M', Wetland `O', and
Wetland `P'.
Minimization
The proposed Site plan was designed to minimize wetland impacts to the maximum extent
practicable. Solar panels have been designed to fully occupy upland areas. Of the 386.9 acres of
on -Site wetlands, the developer proposes to impact less than 0.001% of on -Site wetlands.
Impacts to Wetland LE' have been designed to avoid wetland impacts to the greatest extent
practicable. Based on new survey information and installation methods, the impacts have been
reduced from 0.2704 acre as proposed in March 2018 to 0.2498 acre of current proposed wetland
impact. Temporary construction access roads through uplands will be utilized to install utility
poles wherever possible to minimize the use of heavy equipment in wetland areas. Utility pole
locations have been designed to utilize the greatest practicable span lengths to minimize impacts
to wetlands. In addition, the developer will implement best erosion and sediment control
practices during Site development. Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction Site
perimeter and along wetland and stream boundaries to prevent sediments from inadvertently
filling the on -Site jurisdictional areas during construction.
1 10
hart hickman
SWA -Master ftgecta\Sun Energy 1(SEO)\SEO-003 AulaaderTCMPCN Updates Nis, 20MAppeadix C- Axnid and Minimim&c
SMARILR LNNRONMFMRL SOLVWNS

The Site plan has been designed to utilize existing roadway so that only one additional access
road and two stream crossings will be necessary. Based on recommendations from USACE and
DEQ DWR, the stream crossings have been redesigned to include aluminum box culverts rather
than RCP culverts. Total stream impact has been reduced from 116 linear feet of impact as
proposed in March 2018 to a total of 56 linear feet of stream impact currently being proposed.
Furthermore, riprap dissipater pads have been removed and streambank armoring has been
significantly reduced to further minimize the impact to on -Site streams.
Mitigation
Mitigation is required by the USACE Nationwide Permit 12 for impacts greater than 0.10-acre.
Therefore, H&H obtained a reservation letter from The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank
confirming the availability of non -riparian wetland credits that will cover the 0.2498 acre of
wetland impacts for this project. The applicant will purchase 0.25 non -riparian wetland credits
from The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank upon approval of the Nationwide Permit 12
and General Water Quality Certification. This mitigation credit includes the unauthorized
impact of 0.088 acre for trenching and utility pole installation associated with (NOV-2017-PC-
0184).
Furthermore, the applicant was issued a Notice of Violation (NOV-2017-PC-0184) for
unauthorized impacts to Wetland WAE located in the panhandle area of the Site in April 2017.
A 30-foot power line easement currently exists in the panhandle and 60-foot powerline tract is
currently proposed in the panhandle. Both the existing easement and proposed powerline tract
require vegetation management buffers. In accordance with the NOV, the applicant was required
to restore approximately 7.95 acres of wetlands. However, in a meeting with representative of
USACE, DEQ DWR, H&H, and SunEnergyI, it was determined that the vegetation management
buffers did not have to be planted with trees in accordance with the NOV. However, because the
need for vegetative management buffers would convert a previously forested wetland into a
scrub shrub wetland, mitigation is required for impacts to the wetlands within the 30-foot
easement and 60-foot powerline tract vegetation management buffers. The area of wetlands
within the 30-foot vegetation management buffer is approximately 1.208 acres and the area of
wetlands within the 60-foot vegetation management buffer is approximately 1.599 acres.
2 14
hart hickman
S.%AAA-Master Projects\Sw Energy I (SEO)\SEO-003 Au -&,IPCN\PCN Updates May 2018\Appen6x C - Avoid and Minimize &,

Therefore, the applicant will perchance an additional 2.8 non -riparian wetland credits from The
Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank upon approval of the Nationwide Permit 12 and General
Water Quality Certification.
Mitigation is required by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Water
Quality Certification No. 4133 for impacts equal to or greater than 300 linear feet of intermittent
or perennial streams. Additionally, the USACE Nationwide Permit 12 allows the Corps District
Engineer to make a determination on case by case basis if compensatory mitigation is required
for stream losses < 150 linear ft. The proposed Site plan includes two stream crossings resulting
in 56 linear feet of total stream impacts. Compensatory mitigation for stream impacts is not
being proposed at this time due to the limited extent of the stream impacts.
3 14
hart _ hickman
S \A.AA-Master Preens\Sun EnerSy I (SEO)\SE0403 AulnnderPCMPCN Updaies May 2018%Appendix C - Awmd znd Minimize doc

Appendix D
USACE Jurisdictional Determination Request
14
hart hickman

Sent Via Email
December 21.2017
US Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Field Office
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
Attention: Mr. Kyle Barnes
Re: Updated Request for Preliminary JD
Aulander Holloman Site
NC Hwy 11 S and Joe Holloman Road
Aulander, Hertford County, NC
H&H Project No. SEO-003
Dear Kyle:
1.0 Introduction
hart ► hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL. SOLUTIONS
On behalf of our client Price Solar, LLC c/o SunEnergyl, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is pleased
to present this updated request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination (JD) for an
approximate 1,206-acre property located off of NC Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road in
Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina. The subject site is referred to as the Aulander
Holloman site and consists of undeveloped land most recently utilized for timbering activities.
The site is comprised of the following two adjacent parcels of land:
• Parcel ID # 5961-54-2022 — a 50.5-acre parcel located southwest of the intersection of N
Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road; and
• Parcel ID # 5961-95-6646 — a 1,155.5-acre portion of a larger 1,209-acre parcel located
southeast and southwest of the intersection of N Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road.
Please note, the portion of the parcel located south of Brickmill Road is not included in
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 1 919.847.4241 main

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 2
the project area for this PJD submittal.
According to the tax records, the two parcels that comprise the subject site are owned by Price
Solar, LLC and Alchemy Renewable Energy, LLC. Hertford County tax records for the
properties listed above are included in Appendix A and a copy of the signed Property Owner
Certification is included in the JD Request form in Appendix C.
H&H previously submitted a JD request to the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) dated June
8, 2017 and signed by the Corps on June 27, 2016 (SAW-2016-01196). Since signature, the
Corps requested additional evaluation of wetlands in the central and eastern portions of the Site.
Therefore, the purpose of this stream and wetland evaluation has been updated to include the
locations of stream and wetlands in areas of the subject site that were previously not evaluated
during the June 2016 JD submittal to the Corps. H&H performed additional flagging of potential
streams and wetlands on the parcels that comprise the subject site between July and November
2017 at the request of the Corps. The flagged stream and wetland locations have been reviewed
and approved by the Corps during previous and recent site visits conducted between 2016 and
2017. A summary of information obtained during wetland and stream surveying activities is
presented in the following sections and support documents gathered while conducting
preliminary JD activities are attached to this letter report.
2.0 Stream and Wetland Survey Methodology and Results
In order to evaluate the presence of streams and wetlands on the subject property, H&H reviewed
the following documents:
• US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map (Union, NC Quadrangle)
with coverage of the subject property (Figure 1);
• Hertford County Tax Records and Parcel Map (Appendix A);
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
SV -Meaer NopA =Ener®1(SEO)%.EO 3 AuWa 017 PNM r2017-w Mletmr Reryn

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 3
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map
(Appendix A);
• US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS)
Web Soil Survey website for soil series present on the subject property and a hardcopy of
the 1974 USDA-NRCS soil survey (Appendix A); and
• Flood Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) — Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for
flood zones and floor hazards (Appendix A).
USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Map
H&H reviewed the USGS 7.5-minute topographic map with coverage of the subject property.
According to the USGS map, the topographic gradient and surface drainage appear to be in a
generally north -northwesterly direction. There are two unnamed perennial tributary streams
depicted on the map that originate in the southeastern and southwestern portion of the site and
converge in the central portion of the site to form Turkey Creek (identified as a perennial
stream). Turkey Creek appears to flow off -site in a north -northwesterly direction. There are
several unnamed intermittent streams that flow into Turkey Creek and its perennial tributary
streams at locations in the southwestern and central portions of the site, and two small surface
water bodies are identified located adjacent to the unnamed perennial stream in the southwestern
portion of the subject property.
Hertford County, NC GIS Website
H&H reviewed the Hertford County, NC GIS website and identified Turkey Creek located in the
eastern portion of the site, and an unnamed tributary of Turkey Creek located in the western
portion of the property. No surface water bodies or flood plains are depicted on the map located
on subject site (Appendix A).
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUT10%
SVNA Aa PmjaaMV Enn I(SEO)5 l AulWaUOOPIrTOa ,2017 rer PI let¢r ReimQ

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 4
NWI Man
H&H reviewed a NWI map for potential jurisdictional wetlands on the subject site on the US
FWS NWI Mapper website. The NWI mapper identified palustrine semi -permanently flooded
fresh water wetlands located in the central and northern portions of the site.
USDA-NRCS Hertford Co. Soil Surve
H&H reviewed soil survey information and identified the following soil series depicted on the
subject property:
• Caroline fine sandy loam, 0 to 2% slopes (CaA) located in the southwestern portion of the
site;
• Craven fine sandy loam series, 0 to 1 and 1 to 4% slopes (CrA, CrB) located in the
northern and western portions of the site;
• Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2% slopes (ExA) located in the northern portion of the
site;
• Lenoir loam (Ln); Leaf (LF), and Roanoke (Ro) loams located throughout the subject site
Soils identified in the Lenoir, Leaf, and Roanoke series are poorly drained and are characterized
as potentially hydric soils. Soils from these series are mapped on the property at locations along
stream and in areas of suspected wetlands. Streams are depicted on the soil survey at locations
similar to those depicted on the USGS topographic map. No surface water bodies or flood plains
are depicted on -site in the soil survey.
FEMA — Flood Ma
H&H reviewed the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and noted that Turkey Creek
located in the northern portion of the subject site located in a Special Flood Hazard Area
14
hart hickman
SMARTER EWRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
S:. Mayer Pmja %- E.., I(SEO)\S.l RulaM 017P➢T Ixr 2017 mll FO` Iwr Feporl.tl

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 5
inundated by the 1% Annual Chance Flood. The Base Floor Elevation (BFE) has been
established at 49 ft above mean sea level (MSL) in the northern portion of the site. The central
and southern portions of Turkey Creek were not included in the flood study and additional flood
zones may exist at other locations on the property.
Stream Survey
Streams were surveyed on the property utilizing the North Carolina DWQ (currently DWR)
Stream Identification Form (Version 4.11) to evaluate the geomorphology, hydrology, and
biological characteristics on potential streams located in the project area. The following streams
were identified at the site:
• Approximately 12,193 linear ft of intermittent streams located in the southern and
southwestern portions of the site; and
• Approximately 15,955 linear ft of perennial streams located in the southwestern,
southeastern, and northern portions of the site.
Note, no additional streams were identified since the previous June 2016 JD submittal. The
streams identified at the site are summarized in the table below.
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
S WN-Mecee P�oj�s�5w Cne�ry I (SFA)VSfOOJ) Relvdn�I01t PI[TReenhr201'I re.isetl PNLLe�m Fepel.tlec

Mr. Kyle Bames
December 21, 2017
Page 6
Stream Designation
Approx. Stream Length
Perennial or Intermittent
SCA
2,052 LF
Intermittent
SCB
2,370 LF
Intermittent
SCC
3,025 LF
Intermittent
SCD
624 LF
Perennial
SCE
6,155 LF
Perennial
SCF
4,060 LF
Intermittent
SCG
9,176 LF
Perennial
SCH
686 LF
Intermittent
Approx. Total Stream Length
28,148 LF
Wetland Survey
H&H and a previous environmental consultant for SunEnergyl conducted wetland survey
activities on the property in accordance with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual — Atlantic and
Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0) for the JD issued on June 27, 2016. Findings from
wetland survey activities completed on the property are summarized below.
Hydric Soils - Soil within the suspected wetland areas exhibited the following characteristics
consistent with those of a hydric soil:
➢ low chroma (10YR 511) organic surlicial soil (0 to 4 inches);
➢ low chroma soil (10 YR 3/1) at 4 to 8 inches with redoxomorphic features including
concretions and mottling (1 OYR 3/6);
➢ saturated soil with abundant mottling below the mucky layer; and
➢ presence of the water table at, or within 12-inches of the ground surface.
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLIJTION5
5 WRA Aer NoA sS=Ener®1(SEO)\SEO 3A WnVO17 P➢ =4 r2017 se,v PIDTevr Rmm

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 7
Upland soils in the project area consisted of soil that exhibited a higher chroma (10 YR 5/3 to
5/4) without evidence of inundation or redoximorphic features
Hydrology - Primary hydrologic indicators identified in the suspected wetland areas included:
surface water, soil saturation, water marks, algal mat, and water stained leave. Secondary
indicators in the wetland areas included sparsely vegetated concave surfaces and geomorphic
position. Depth to water ranged from 0 to 6 inches below the ground surface.
Wetland Vegetation - Sufficient obligate to facultative wetland vegetation were identified
throughout the delineated wetland area to conclude that wetland vegetation is present in the
wetland areas. Vegetation identified in the wetland areas included the following:
➢ Tree Stratum: Pinus taeda, Acer rubrum;
➢ Shrub Stratum: Liquidambar styraciva, Sambucus canadensis, Viburnum dentatum;
Morella cerifera;
➢ Herb Stratum: Juncus effuses, Andropogon virginicus; and
➢ Woody Vine Stratum: Lonicera japonica
Based on the presence of hydric soils, hydrology, and vegetation, the three criteria required for a
jurisdictional wetland were observed in the suspected wetland areas sufficient to characterize this
them as wetlands. Based on preliminary wetland survey activities conducted by H&H and others,
the following wetland areas were identified at the site:
• Approximately 244 acres (total) of wetland areas were identified in the June 27, 2016 JD.
• Approximately 142.9 acres (total) of additional wetland areas were identified in the
delineation efforts conducted between July and November 2017 at the request of the Corps.
Id
hart hickman
SMARM EWRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
S WN Meaa Rojeas6w Enn®1(SEOpSF.Oro3 AuI11.11 U PN\R E017msised PIDLLener Repm.6-<

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 8
The wetland areas identified the June 27. 2016 JD are summarized in the table below.
Wetland Area Designation
Approx. Wetland Area
Area Included in June 27, 2016 PJD
WAA
19.3 acres
Yes
WAB
5.4 acres
Yes
WAC
85.2 acres
Yes
WAD
32.4 acres
Yes
WAE*
21.6 acres
Yes*
WAF
35.7 acres
Yes
WAG
3.2 acres
Yes
WAH
25.4 acres
Yes
WAI
4.6 acres
Yes
WAJ
3.3 acres
Yes
WAK
7.4 acres
Yes
WAL
1.3 acres
Yes
WAM*
13.6 acres
No
WAN*
56.3 acres
No
WAO*
69.7 acres
No
WAP*
1.5 acres
No
Approx. Total Wetland Area
386.9 acres
*=additional wetland areas identified since the June 2016 JD submittal
The flagged locations were surveyed by Roanoke Land Surveying, a NC licensed surveyor, and
are depicted on the attached survey map.
14
hart hickman
SMARTEN ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUnONS
S:UAA-M—%ojwlSun E—, I (SE.'11E.3 A.[ —In 1011 PlIN7eee W 1011--1 P1 1. , n Re M

Mr. Kyle Barnes
December 21, 2017
Page 9
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please contact us if you have
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart, Hickman, PC
M
Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
Attachments:
• Figures
• Appendix A
• Appendix B
• Appendix C
• Appendix D
Tomas Will
Assistant Project Environmental Scientist
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
S'.UPA-Me PmjwVRm En,rE I(SEgLSEO 3Aulm nU017PIDIR. hr 2017 mists PNIeiI RePcn dm'

Figures
• Newly Delineated Wetland Areas Map
• Newly Delineated Wetland Areas Map; Southeastern Project Area
• Newly Delineated Wetland Areas Map; Northwestern Project Area
(Panhandle)
• Survey Map; Eastern Project Area (Last revised November 30, 2017)
• Survey Map; Western Project Area (Last revised June 22, 2016)
hart hickman
fM R(WRONMEWALS UWNS

ofLO
m
O
O
O
n W
�U)
00
N
N �
E
Z
d
10
Nl C
d
a m
�a
c-
mm
d a)
�a
AD
,w
m o
CDa
c
- c
a,
o m
�U)
33
m�
z c
z
E
VI#
It ;
i

i i a z gg
"., ,;von _, � /+•,,•. a • ��: � � G4 � � a x
s m'°'•�� '°`� 3r � ' of � '1 ' +�' \i\ � u�vo i � �
't• a
z5 z' f k _a• a„y a+ + ±aa 1 a a1 Ia\ �an /� � g m
__ 's--- WRIWN xvaNN a. a •n _ � F+ a a - " 1 �, li Sa`S�
o.
aNa
'.y\ .�••a 1 � "s+Pa'r+tf+ s €e' - a°'° J,,re �"o�°$��%a °° 1\, a�Y�o�w
` aJ .5 n'� 1 1•'4`b �3 /�i`4% \9°pof -J mYd e.... I g
=�^pS3i
^ \ R & ,'. :"tt• O H4`g _�108 H011.OYAN ROAO o�ce'66
1108 e• lba. 2^M€F 3�
<Y F•Y rYY �\i`; a f �� a a�oS d d51
$ ;;e� \iI a qs' a �•t S 3 Rill' a S€@pgr
�3 Q. as `av V@ppS
§ 3636 ak
=s
a
1_ a .$S va.3c aye sypg
9M HJ.HON anHI I xl

tlCN
'
ssogis^
'_�#
a
tH
N
M.,
aJoz HJ80N anal
I
I xI

Appendix A
• USGS Topographic Map
• Tax Records (Hertford County)
• NWI Map (US FWS)
• Soil Survey Map (MRCS)
• Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA)

i it �� ����-; � � '�A 11�. t'_ rbm-•r
IIII It
bb
'Sobii'
If
It
Millennium.• J5 r
'�• 37i➢ennlu Rt , i
I �A
Y
6q ,
69 _
APPROXIMATE
N o Z000 <000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NORTH CAROLINA 1983
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
SITE
h.'
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
AULANDER-HOLLOMAN SITE
APPROX. 1,260-ACRES
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
14
hart
hickman 29235outh Tryo. s—,5oi¢l00
Chadovq North Cuolma 28203
78 586-"7 (p) 704586-0373 (f)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE:
3-16-2016
REVISION NO: 0
JOB NO:
SEO-003
FIGURE: 1

|
--
,
!
|Nw00000mooc
-
}
|§
.
,~
CC
w
!!ON
CD
N
]
]
§
§ow
)
\
J
`°
()
_
§§
|
)`
!
`
§
` )
§
•
`
A
§I
G
/
|�w
§
!~`
!§
.�
|!:
,
!!
r`
,
/
;
.
§\
#
5
` `
5
% \
��
�
/v q
\
M.
w
/\§0
o
o
,;
-
�«
��
<MWOM®OONW�
\
//&
Q
)
!®Q _
r
;
`
/
p!
}
\LU
2 33\-
|!i0(L
% wlea2
®
L
C!
f
-
\|);/
,C
_
a
§
j�
. �(»/)
§
_
\ §i\`
}
t�
z
/ \
))
}
§}
j
p
e
§
»
/
:
.
§
\°
r!
§[[[
y/
mz
zz)zz
2
/
§
��\
a-z
_�
/
{=jg
-
o
N`�°~
axwwwwwoww
\
e)/
&__���,
2
/���
/)olN;
±/)/2,.-/M/

)
/
!
�®
]|
§
§]
§
§
�
§:
§
�
�
\
00
(
§`
;
:,
)§
�§
)!
r
)
§
°
oc
is
)
CO
cc
0
\
&
/
!
y
\/\�
\
)
rIz
§
2ww^
) /|
S
|
2
\^
-
/
!
/
!6`
Q.!
��
)
E
-N-0
|
j
®.(`§
!
|
/
-
•
.&//;,!
\
)
/a§20
Rr_
/
_
0
0§
0
�
r2
)/�
)§
(
±
:
°
/
3
%
/
.
!
\
N
§
W&
|
(
\
-
§
/
{
.0
\�
/
)�
m
2`
2!
§
§j/
j
_
-W
(§§/
z
»..w
r
!
.
G!
\
§)
qN/,
§
00
e
]`\2`\(
•
/
/
r
§`

2
/
cJ
/\c
CL
k
}mow!ƒ§}ƒ
!�
�,
..
|
|!.
|�f
^�
\\
)!
O
!R!
0
�\g
§§
>
O
cc
z
�

..
i
1
E
�-Y !
f

M. z e
MASd
M.az.0 o `o

z
0
Q
0
LL
z
a
Q
0
z
w
0
w
J
a
CQ
L
° O C
W W m
E O c W c n my c
gn12y
E N aDi va E
p ,`o_YS upi g m nnq�o
U
E U E J
EW 05a Biv
00Hw mm2'oc O Zm So 3� W e
c w`o ncc @
a E! ul y n Cc
ul
m a'a w°c
o y W W` o y v E o U t d a E a
aayE
2 Wg2i oE..mott°y
a m W
oda Md .q �
tooE
Z O ONO La
E Ed00
p ooao
oc o mm m n ,
o W'A EE`oyg of o—
o o
m
a
m
a
o
a
m
NW
qm
Yt
mm
6
F!
m S
Q
p
_T
Z
Z
p�
Z
Z
_T
m�
_T
_T
_T
Z
Z
L M
a
c
C
c
�.
■000
■o
g
❑off❑❑❑❑❑❑2
w
nr
<
W
3
0 Y
O
OI

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Summary by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina (NC091)
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaA
Caroline fine sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
0
32.4
2.6%
CrA
Craven fine sandy loam,
0 to 1 percent slopes
0
110.3
8.8%
CrB
Craven fine sandy loam,
1 to 4 percent slopes
6
61.8
4.9%
ExA
Exum very fine sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
0
31.0
2.5%
LF
Leaf loam
90
677.9
54.2%
Ln
Lenoir loam
8
299.7
24.0%
Ro
Roanoke loam
90
37.0
3.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
1,250.2
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/18/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil types,
each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made up
dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric components in
the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made up dominantly
of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric components in the lower
positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based on its respective
components and the percentage of each component within the map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric components.
The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric components, 66 to 99
percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric components, 1 to 32 percent
hydric components, and less than one percent hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named'Rating'. In this column the percentage of each
map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register,1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are either
saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the
growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field. These
visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite
determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the
United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/18/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 6

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 16.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method., Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1812016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

— - �— -
!
§« 28! )`B$2«,\ )$
| y! 2
!\ ■ _ §) \r \` §zz �)kƒ $!
- - � 8
\}• �0 \ �l�0 ) �/
G&
\� y:\s« \TPP�
:� « • :� . a v .

Appendix B
• Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
• Aquatic Resources Data Table (Revised Wetlands)
• Photo Log (Revised Wetlands)
• Corps Wetland Forms (Revised Wetlands)

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington Dis,W
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: hU://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram asnx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 5544884
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
1515 NC Highway 11 S
Aulander, NC
Hertford Co.
see Figure 1 in letter report
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address I
5961-95-6646 (1,209 acres)
5961-54-2022 (50.6 acres)
Matt Ingalls
2923 South Tryon street, Suite 100
704.586.0007
ming [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Price Solar, LLC do SunEnergyl
Mailing Address:
192 Raceway Drive
Mooresville, NC, 28117
Telephone Number:
contact: Eric Schudt (252-825-1731)
Electronic Mail Address;:
edc.schudl@sunenergyl.00m
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
I If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Kenny Habul, Manager of Price Solar, LLC 2/18/16
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
❑ 1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
1 am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
For NCpOT requests following the current NCOOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E
Waters of the United states
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
F0Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 1,260 acres
nI verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination ForM6
Project Coordinates: 36.264985 Latitude-77.079182 Longitude
Maps (no larger than l lxl7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)7:
Wetlands:
Z Wetland Data Sheets$
Tributaries:
❑✓ USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑✓ Landscape Photos, if taken
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
71987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
htto://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/ree suoo.asox
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
htto://r)ortal.ncdenr.org/c/document librarv/eet file7uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&grouold=38364 and,
htto://www.saw.usace.a'my.mil/Portals/59/dots/reeulatory/oublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.odf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Aquatic Resource Table
Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Number
Lat
Long
Class
aquatic
Class of Aquatic Resource
resource in
review area
Wetland E
36.252866
-77.077091
Palustrine-
21.59 acres
Non -section 10; 404 wetland
Forested
Wetland M
36.251652
-77.061491
Palustrine-
13.60 acres
Non -section 10; 404 wetland
Forested
Wetland N
36.244506
-77.065011
Palustrine-
56.26 acres
Non -section 10; 404 wetland
Forested
Wetland O
36.250411
-77.056767
Palustrine-
69.70 acres
Non -section 10; 404 wetland
Forested
Wetland P
36.250729
-77.070303
Palustrine-
1.48 acres
Non -section 10; 404 wetland
Forested

0
0
W
CO
Photograph 1: Upland area O, contains rows of pine trees located on mounds with ditches in
between the mounds.
Photograph 2: Typical soils in Upland area O.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 Sun Energy Aulander Hollonnan Property
hart "'` hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 1515 NC Hwy 11S
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Aulander, NC

M
0
0
0
w
0
4
t
`}
may)
NO
n.
Photograph 3: Wetland area O, contains rows of pine trees located on mounds with ditches in
between the mounds that contain standing water.
Photograph 4: Typical soils in Wetland area O.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Sufte 100 Sun Energy Aulander Holloman Property I
hart hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 1515 NC Hwy 11SO4.586.0373(f) 704.586.0007(p) 7Aulander, NC

M
0
W
W
Photograph 5: Upland area M, grassy plain.
Photograph 6: Typical soils in Upland area M.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 Sun Energy Aulander Holloman Property
hart '` hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 1515 NC Hwy 11S
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Aulander, NC

M
O
0
0
0
.v jay
.1Prc.w„a:w.b..nF lAf:4�
Photograph 7:Wetland area M, slightly sloped grassy plain.
Photograph 8: Typical soils in Wetland area M.
I `® 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 Sun Energy Aulander Holloman Property I
hart hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 1515 NC Hwy 11S
Ift 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Aulander, NC

0
0
0
0
Photograph 9: Upland area N, grassy plain near agricultural ditches.
14
Photograph 10: Typical soils in Upland area N.
I
923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100Sun Energy Aulander Holloman Property Energy Aulander Holloman Properly
hart "1. hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 1515 INCNC Hwy 11S
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(Q Aulander, NC

0
0
W
M
Photograph 11: Wetland area N, contains small mounds where trees where formerly located,
significant amounts of standing water collects in this area.
Photograph 12: Typical soils in Wetland area N.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite too Sun Energy Aulander Holloman Property
hart 1%w hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 1515 NC Hwy 11S
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) 1 Aulander, NC

M
0
0
0
Photograph 11: Upland area P, dry wooded area.
Photograph 12: Typical soils in Upland area P.
I14 2923S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 I Sun Energy Aulander Holloman Property I
Char 1515 NCH 11S
hart � hickman 704.586e0 07(p) 704.586.0373(f) Aulander, NC

M
0
0
0
0
Photograph 11: Wetland area P, contains silvicultural areas with juvenile pine trees in close
proximity to an intermittent stream.
Photograph 12: Typical soils in Wetland area P.
I ,ah 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 I Sun Energy Aulander Hoollonnan Property I
hart ^�. ickman Charlotte, NC28203 1615NCH111S
704.586.0007(p) 764.586.0373(t) Aulander, NC

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holloman Road Solar Site
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s): TGW - Hart & Hickman, PC
City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co. Sampling Date: 812/17
State: NC Sampling Point: TP- M Up
Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A Lat. 36.252275 Long:-77.059986
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF) NWI classification: _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Y , Soil Y or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
Slope (%): G-2
Datum:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an
area that was historically used for silviculture activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled 'V'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
P❑9 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
LJ Drainage Patterns (810)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
D Moss Trim Lines (B16)
III'''❑_'''111 Water Marks (Bi)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
r-I
ut--I Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
nLnt
11 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
u Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-M Up
30
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (q)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B)
5
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of* Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Acer rubrum
5 Y FAC
FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.
3.
4.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
'Indicators
Festuca
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 sp.
50 Y FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Panicum amarum
40 Y FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
6.
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-M Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/4 100
loam
3-12 2.5 Y 613 80 10YR 6/6 20 loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis3:
Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) y 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -ILM
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
J
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O) T1 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Tu1 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
{I.�11 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Lj Redox Depressions (F8) ��I Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
In Mari (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Ochric (Ft 1) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
HCoast
Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
n Reduced Vedic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holloman Road Solar Site City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co. Sampling Date: 8/1/17
Applicant/Owner: SunEnergyl State: NC Sampling Point: TP-M Wet
Investigator(s): TGW- Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A Lat: 36.251652 Long: -77•061491 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF) NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Y , Soil Y , or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No _ Within a Wetland? Yes X No
This data point appears to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an area that
was historically used for silvicultural activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled V'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
El Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Indicators (minimum of one is requiredcheck all that apply)
fffPrimary
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
0 Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns
Q
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
LJ (B10)
LrlT Moss Trim Lines (1316)
II'_❑''11
Lt
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (132)
1Q
I+J Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Presence Reduced
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
8
of Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Ig-I
Drift Deposits (63)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
L Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position
IuI'''II
y1
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
(D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n❑n
Ly
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No— Depth (inches): 5"
Saturation Present? Yes X
No_ Depth (inches): 2"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: _
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1 Unidentified shrub
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5.
Sampling Point: TP-M Wet
Cover Sbecles9 Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species 1 x 2 = 2
FAC species 1 x 3 = 3
FACU species 1 x 4= 4
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 3 (A) 9 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3
= Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover:
5 Y
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1
Festuca sp.
40 Y
2
Panicumamarum
40 Y
3
Juncus anthelatus
10 N
4.
5.
_
6.
_
7.
_
B.
9.
_
10.
_
11,
_
12.
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
FACU be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
FACW
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
_ = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation. Tree stumps were observed in area,
species unknown.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-3 10YR 5/4 90
3-12 10YR 5/1 90
Sampling Point: TIP-M Wet
or confirm
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture _ Remarks
10YR 5/6 10 loam
10YR 6/6 10 clay loam
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
HHistic
Histosol (All
Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) TT❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
HStratified
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Layers (A5)
TLII Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
ID Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
V" Depleted Matrix (F3) IjAnomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) I__I
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRAI��I 150A)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153S)
I"� Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Marl (Flo) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D
❑
9
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
L Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Type:
Depth (inches):
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators.
Hydric Sail Present? Yes X No _
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holloman Road Solar Site City/county: Aulander/Henferd Co. Sampling Date: 812/17
Applicant/Omer: SunEnergyl State: NC Sampling Point: TP- N Up
Investigator(s): TGW - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A Lat: 36.245289 Long: -77•063162 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Y , Soil Y , or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation N , Soil N , or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an
area that was historically used for silviculture activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled 'Y'
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Sparsely Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that sooty)
❑
fffPrimary
_
_
❑
❑
Surface Water (At) 1❑-f Aquatic Fauna (Bl3)
High Water Table IQ) 1L-Jf Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) t❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Water Marks (B1) 1L�Jf Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (62) LJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (85) Other (Explain in Remarks)
El
LJ
17'�'r
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
D
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
_ No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
_ No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-N Up
30'
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheets
Total % Cover of: Multioly bw
OBL species x 1 =
g
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Acer rubrum
5 Y FAC
FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = 6/A =
2
3
4.
5'
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >5o%
6.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
)
'Indicators
Festuca sp.
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
30 Y FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Panicum amarum
30 Y FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3. Eupatodum capillifolium 10 N FACU
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
5,
6'
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35
20% of total cover: 14
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
1.
Hydrophytic
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
_ 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-N Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvce Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/4 90 2.5Y
6/6 10 loam
4-12 2.5 Y 5/3 80 2.Y 6/6 20 loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduod Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosol (Ai)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
D
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
T'I
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) 1III
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
H
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
j]
D
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7) r❑l Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions rDVery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
(A8) (LRR
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
(F8)
❑ Mad (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR O, S)
Lj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
9
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holloman Road Solar Site
Sampling Date: 8/l/17
Applicant/Owner: StmEnergyl State: INC Sampling Point: TP-N Wet
Investigator(s): TGW- Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A Let: 36.244506 Long: -77.065011 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF) NW classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation —Y, Soil Y or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an area that
was historically used for silvicultural activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled 'Y'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is requiredcheck all that aooly)
Surface Water (All ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
1❑T
1Q Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
Ifff--�111, Water Marks (81)
IJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
yet Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
g Crayfish Burrows (C8)
I —I Drift Deposits (63)
1❑r Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Q Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
fuI
Iron Deposits (135)
}❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
fu-I
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(67)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
nu
u Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No_ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No _ Depth (inches): 4„
Saturation Present? Yes X
No_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: _
Saoling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8._
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5. )
1 Arundinarea gigantea
2 Juncus anthelatus
3 Panicum amarum
q Eupatodum capillifolium
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11,
12.
50% of total cover: 47.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Sampling Point: TP-N Wet
% Cover Species Status Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
_= Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
20% of total cover: FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
-= Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
50 Y FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
30 Y FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10 N FACU
5 IN FACU Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
95 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 19
Hydrophytic
_ = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover I Present? Yes X No
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation. Tree stumps were observed in area,
species unknown.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-N Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvce Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/4 90 10YR 5/6 10
loam
3-12 7.5YR 5/1 90 7.5YR 5/8 10
clay loam
,Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
❑ Histosol (At)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
J—I Histic Epipedon (A2)
�l Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
D Black Histic (A3)
LTI Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O)
Reduced Venic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
T7
UI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
H
TI] Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
�I
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
ED
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
L Redox Depressions (178)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Lj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holleman Road Solar Site City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co. Sampling Date: 8/l/17
ApplicantlOwner: SunEnergyl State: NC Sampling Point: TP-O Up
Investigator(s): DCB - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A Let: 36.250925 Long: -77.057484 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Y , Soil Y , or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation N , Soil N , or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an
area that was historically used for silviculture activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled 'O'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) 'r❑�
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
LJ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
11''II Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bi)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
ffr--QIII
Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
EI-]-I Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
I --I
u Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
p❑
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Lt Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
ppLqJ
LJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑n FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
r-t Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Pinus teeda
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 30
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1 Rubus pensilvanicus
2 Pinus teeda
3. Acer sacchamm
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 35
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
1 Festuca sp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Sampling Point: TP-0 Up
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
60 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60 (A/B)
Total % Cover of Multiply bw
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
60 = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 12
50 Y FAC
15 Y FAC
5 N FACU
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
70 = Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover: 14
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
60 Y FACU be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. ITS cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Lonicemjaponica 30 Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Vegetation
Hydrophytic
30
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 3 Present?
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-O Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 2.5Y 5/4 100
loamy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (All
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
E
D
1I����II
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
L_I Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Verlic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
HStratified
Layers (A5)
TUI
Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
n
D
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(A8) (LRR
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
(F8) ��I
I --I
0 Mad (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
❑nn Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
D
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) 1_I
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
HCoast
Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Lj Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (1`78) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
8
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers _ Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Joe Holloman Road Solar Site
Sampling Dale: 6/l/17
Applicant/Owner: SunEnergyl State: NC Sampling Point: TP-0 Wet
Investigator(s): DCB - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave convex none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF)
City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co.
Let: 36.250411 Long:-77.056767
NWI classification: PF04
Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year.? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Y Soil Y , or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present. Yes No X
Are Vegetation N , Soil N , or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No —
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an area that
was historically used for silvicultural activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled V
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
T❑l Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
❑�
Q
Surface Water (Al) t❑7 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) LJ Marl Deposits U)
Q
Saturation (A3)
(815) (LRR
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor
LI Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Water Marks (Bl)
(Cl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
��df Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
El Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Q Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
u
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (B5)
1L�Jr
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n
r1
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No _ Depth (inches): 2-3"
Water Table Present? Yes X
No _ Depth (inches): 4"
Saturation Present? Yes X
No_ Depth (inches): 01.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-O Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Pinus taeda
ADsowre
% Cover
25
uommant maicaror
Species? Status
Y FAC
uommance iescwomsneec
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
8
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, )
1 Rubus pensitvanicus 35 Y FAC
2 Pinus taeda 20 Y FAC
3 Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
+
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
6.
7.
8.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
1 Phalads arundinacea 60 Y
2 Carex soopada 20 Y
3 Eupatodum capillifolium 10 N
4. _
5. _
6. _
7. _
8. _
9. _
10. _
11. _
12.
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 10
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
FACU
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
20 Y FAC
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine —AII woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
Hydrophytic
20 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: 4 Present?
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers _ Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TP-O Wet
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M clayey loam
Hydric
Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRS,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solle:
❑
L]
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑-I 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
f� Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) u 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
H "T�I
D
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F78) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Tut Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
j]
D
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (AIILRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) �u-1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Marl (1`10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
0
Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (Fl3) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
U Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Piedmont Flcodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Type:
Depth (inches):
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holloman Road Solar Site City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co. Sampling Date: 9/18/17
Applicant/Omer: SunEnergyl State: NC Sampling Point: TP-P Wet
Investigator(s): TGW- Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A Lat. 36.250729 Long: -77.077091 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF) NWI PFO
classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Y Soil Y , or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation N , Soil N , or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an area that
was historically used for silvicultural activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled 'INT'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q
High Water Table (A2)
1❑-f
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
7❑I
LJ Drainage Patterns (810)
Q
Saturation (A3)
fur
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (GI)
J11 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_Q
Water Marks (Bt)
t❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
1r,-.�f Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
1I�Jf
LJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (113)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑✓ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
f❑�
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (65)
ppLg�J
LJ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
El
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): '6„
Saturation Present? Yes X
No _ Depth (inches): 6"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No _
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: TP-P Wet
30'
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status_
Number of Dominant Species
1 Pinus Taeda
40 X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by
8
40 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% � of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, )
FAC species x 3 =
1, Unidentified shrub
5 Y
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3
4.
5'
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8'
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Fesluca sp.
5 N FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Panicum amarum
5 N FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3 Juncus anthelatus 10 Y FACW
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub— Woody plants, excluding vines, less
5.
6.
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
8.
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine —AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11,
height.
12.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: TIP-P Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/4 90 10YR 5/6 10
loam
3-14 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 6/6 10
clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosol (Al)
0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Epipedon (A2)
f}'.11 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
HHistic
n
Black Histic (A3) 1
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
I Loamy Mucky Mineral (1`1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
T 1 Reduced Vertic (F78) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_E1 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Li—iJ
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
IIl
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
E�
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Lj Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Dn Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
y� Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
HCoast
Prairie Redox (A16) (NILRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (Fl3) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, S)
U Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
HSandy
Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point appears to contain hydric soil indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Joe Holloman Road Solar Site City/County: Aulander/Hertferd Co. Sampling Date: 9/18/17
Applicant/Owner: SunEnergyl State: NC Sampling Point: TP- P Up
Investigator(s): TGW - Hart & Hickman, PC Section, Township, Range: Unincorporated area northeast of Aulander
Landrorm (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Coastal plain Local relief 'concave convex
e : None SI % 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T MLRA 153A
Soil Map Unit Name: Leaf loam (LF)
none).
Let: 36.245289 Long:-77.071454
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation Y , Soil Y or Hydrology Y significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation N , Soil IN, or Hydrology INnaturally problematic?
NWI classification:
ope, y
RBRI rtrliiIIIIIII
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No— Is the Sampled Area
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No X
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to be located within a wetland. This data point was collected in an
area that was historically used for silviculture activities. Flags for this wetland area are labeled 'INT'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouirecL check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (Bi 3)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
1❑-f
u Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
IL�d Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Q
Water Marks (Bt)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑I
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
--I
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
1❑1'''11
Lny
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
0 FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
u
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This data point does not appear to contain wetland hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Pinus taeda
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: _
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1 Acermbmm
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 Festuca sp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Sampling Point: TP-P Up
rm VIUc UUuinicui iuMi�aim wunnouw wa�we�aauem.
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
40 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B)
_ = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5 Y FAC
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by,
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
10 Y FACU be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 6 (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
height.
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes x No
This data point appears to contain hydrophytic vegetation.
US Army Corps of Engineers _ Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile
confirm the
Sampling Point: TP-P Up
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/4 90 2.5Y 6/6 10 loam
4-14 2.5 Y 5/3 80 2.Y 6/6 20 loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all Ll
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
❑
[]
Histosol (Ai)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
E
D
L]
HStratified
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Layers (A5)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) TTu Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) 3 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
RSandy
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox (S5)
Lj Delta Ochrc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
L]
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 15313)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
This data point does not appear to contain hydric soil indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Appendix C
• Signed Jurisdictional Determination Form (June 27, 2016)

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): June 27,
2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Eric Schudt, 192 Raceway Drive,, NC,
28117.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Price Soar, LLC/Hertford/PreAp, SAW-2016-
01196
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Hertford City: Ahoskie
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2514640 N, Long.-77.0700990 W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest water body: Turkey Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 28148 linear feet: -4 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: Palustrine
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: 242.2 acres.
Cowan in Class: Palustrine
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLIES):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Detennination. Date(s): Multiple site visits required with the final on June 2, 2016.
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit
applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other
general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby
made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which
does not make an official determination ofjurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD
could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any
form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on
the site affected in any way by that activity we jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal
court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as
is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or
individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal,
jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 33 L5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make
an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation ofjurisdictional waters
on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be " waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic
features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case
file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad time:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Ucal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth 2014.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): The aerial provided with this document has been reviewed by Corps project
manager.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should
not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations.
BARNES.KYLE.W a N" „",µ,,,am,,,,,
ILL IAM. 1388035
r��xawesm�Ewxuu+.ueemnn
397
m�r.xmsaev�a¢srwoa
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
Impracticable)

SAMPLE
Site
Dumber
Latitude
Longitude
C
Class lass n
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Class aquatic
resource
SCA
Palustrine
2052 LF
404 - Intermittent
SCB
Palustrine
2370 LF
404 - Intermittent
SCC
Palustrine
3025 LF
404 - Intermittent
SCD
Palustrine
624 LF
404—Perennial
SCE
Palustrine
6155 LF
404—Perennial
SCF
Palustrine
4060 LF
404—Perennial
SCG
Palustrine
9176 LF
404—Perennial
SCH
Palustrine
686 LF
404—Intermittent
WAA
Palustrine
19.3 acres
404
WAB
Palustrine
5.4 acres
404
WAC
Palustrine
85.2 acres
404
WAD
Palustrine
32.4 acres
404
WAE
Palustrine
20.2 acres
404
WAF
Palustrine
35.7 acres
404
WAG
Palustrine
3.2 acres
404
WAH
Palustrine
25.4 acres
404
WAI
Palustrine
4.6 acres
404
WAJ
Palustrine
0.6 acres
404
WAK
Palustrine
8.9 acres
404
WAL
Palustrine
1.3 acres
404

Appendix D
• PJD submittal package (June 8, 2016)

Sent Via Email
April 13, 2016
(Revised June 8, 2016)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Washington
Field Office
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
Attention: Mr. Kyle Barnes
Re: Request for Preliminary JD
Aulander Holloman Site
NC Hwy 11 S and Joe Holloman Road
Aulander, Hertford County, NC
H&H Project No. SEO-003
Dear Kyle:
1.0 Introduction
hart : hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL. SOLUTIONS
On behalf of our client Price Solar, LLC c/o SunEnergyl, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is pleased
to present this request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination (JD) for an approximate
1,260-acre property located off of NC Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road in Aulander,
Hertford County, North Carolina (see Figure 1). The subject site is referred to as the Aulander
Holloman site and consists of undeveloped land most recently utilized for timbering activities.
The site is comprised of the following two adjacent parcels of land:
• Parcel ID # 5961-95-6646 — a 1,209-acre parcel located southeast and southwest of the
intersection of Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road; and
• Parcel ID # 5961-54-2022 — a 50.6-acre parcel located southwest of the intersection of N
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 1 919.847,4241 main-

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 2
Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road.
According to the tax records, the two parcels that comprise the subject site are owned by Price
Solar, LLC. Hertford County tax records for the properties listed above are included in
Appendix A and a copy of the signed Property Owner Certification is included in the JD Request
form in Appendix C.
The purpose of this stream and wetland evaluation is to identify the locations of stream and
wetlands on the parcels that comprise the subject site in support of a proposed solar farm
development. H&H and a previous environmental consultant/wetland delineator hired by
SunEnergyl performed flagging of potential streams and wetlands on the parcels that comprise
the subject site between August 2015 and June 2016. The flagged stream and wetland locations
have been reviewed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). A summary of information
gathered in support of the preliminary JD is provided in the following sections.
2.0 Stream and Wetland Survey Methodology and Results
In order to evaluate the presence of streams and wetlands on the subject property, H&H reviewed
the following documents:
• US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map (Union, NC Quadrangle)
with coverage of the subject property (Figure 1);
• Hertford County Tax Records and Parcel Map (Appendix A);
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map
(Appendix A);
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
5U-� E—, I1SLOME0 3AUICMaWNm MgRgy sfm Prcm... n'N-Mm&,, NC (RniW I— S. 2016)d

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 3
• US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS)
Web Soil Survey website for soil series present on the subject property and a hardcopy of
the 1974 USDA-NRCS soil survey (Appendix A); and
• Flood Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) — Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for
flood zones and floor hazards (Appendix A).
USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Map
H&H reviewed the USGS 7.5-minute topographic map with coverage of the subject property.
According to the USGS map, the topographic gradient and surface drainage appear to be in a
generally northerly direction (see Figure 1). There are two unnamed perennial tributary streams
depicted on the map that originate in the southeastern and southwestern portion of the site and
converge in the central portion of the site to form Turkey Creek (identified as a perennial
stream). Turkey Creek appears to flow off -site in a northerly direction. There are several
unnamed intermittent streams that flow into Turkey Creek and its perennial tributary streams at
locations in the southwestern and central portions of the site, and two small surface water bodies
are identified located adjacent to the unnamed perennial stream in the southwestern portion of the
subject property.
Hertford County, NC GIS Website
H&H reviewed the Hertford County, NC GIS website and identified Turkey Creek located in the
eastern portion of the site, and an unnamed tributary of Turkey Creek located in the western
portion of the property. No surface water bodies or flood plains are depicted on the map located
on subject site (Appendix A).
14
hart hickman
SMARM ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
5 UAA-ALan FojwASw Ene�py I ISEOIISEO 3AuluNnWAim ITI1Rry�ea frt PMiminw ID-AWendm. NC (Rnimi Jame 8, IW'd

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 4
NWI Map
H&H reviewed a NWI map for potential jurisdictional wetlands on the subject site on the US
FWS NWI Mapper website. The NWI mapper identified palustrine semi -permanently flooded
fresh water wetlands located in the central and northern portions of the site (Appendix A).
USDA-NRCS Hertford Co. Soil Survev
H&H reviewed soil survey information and identified the following soil series depicted on the
subject property:
• Caroline fine sandy loam, 0 to 2% slopes (CaA) located in the southwestern portion of the
site;
• Craven fine sandy loam series, 0 to 1 and 1 to 4% slopes (CrA, CrB) located in the
northern and western portions of the site;
• Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2% slopes (ExA) located in the northern portion of the
site;
• Lenoir loam (Ln); Leaf (LF), and Roanoke (Ro) loams located throughout the subject site.
Soils identified in the Lenoir, Leaf, and Roanoke series are poorly drained and are characterized
as potentially hydric soils (Appendix A). Soils from these series are mapped on the property at
locations along stream and in areas of suspected wetlands. Streams are depicted on the soil
survey at locations similar to those depicted on the USGS topographic map. No surface water
bodies or flood plains are depicted on -site in the soil survey (Appendix A).
FEMA — Flood Map
H&H reviewed the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and noted that Turkey Creek
located in the northern portion of the subject site located in a Special Flood Hazard Area
inundated by the 1% Annual Chance Flood. The Base Floor Elevation (BFE) has been
14
hart 014m hickman
SMARTEN ENVIFONMENTAI SOLUTIONS
SU -Mager Rojmv\Sun En,,, I(SEOPSE6dO A.I.WaW,Iim ID( Nma fa Ymlimlmry N-A Ian@c NC(R is lme 8. 2016)6

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 5
established at 49 ft above mean sea level (MSL) in the northern portion of the site. The central
and southern portions of Turkey Creek were not included in the flood study and additional flood
zones may exist at other locations on the property.
Stream Survey
Streams were surveyed on the property utilizing the North Carolina DWQ (currently DWR)
Stream Identification Form (Version 4.11) to evaluate the geomorphology, hydrology, and
biological characteristics on potential streams located in the project area. During preliminary
survey activities, the following streams were identified at the site:
• approximately 12,193 linear ft of intermittent streams located in the southem and
southwestern portions of the site; and
• approximately 15,955 linear ft of perennial streams located in the southwestern,
southeastern, and northern portions of the site.
The streams identified at the site are summarized in the table below.
Stream Designation
Approx. Stream Length
Perennial or Intermittent
SCA
2,052 LF
Intermittent
SCB
2,370 LF
Intermittent
SCC
3,025 LF
Intermittent
SCD
624 LF
Perennial
SCE
6,155 LF
Perennial
SCF
4,060 LF
Intermittent
SCG
9,176 LF
Perennial
SCH
686 LF
Intermittent
Approx. Total Stream Length
28,148 LF
hart hickman
SMARTER EWRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
9\ -Wver N,pIs�mEnerO I lD'E0p5E0 Aul—lmhdm IIMrymf[4PrAiminmTD. AulnJ.NC (R--ilunc8, E016)d

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 6
The approximate locations of intermittent and perennial streams identified during survey
activities are depicted on Figure 2 and DWQ stream forms completed for the on -site streams are
included in Appendix B
Wetland Survey
H&H and a previous environmental consultant for SunEnergyl have conducted wetland survey
activities on the property in accordance with the 1987 UD Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual — Atlantic and
Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0). Hydric soil, wetland vegetation, and wetland
hydrology must be present to classify an area as a wetland. Findings from wetland survey
activities completed on the property are summarized below.
Hydric Soils - Soil within the suspected wetland areas exhibited the following characteristics
consistent with those of a hydric soil:
➢ low chroma (1 OYR 511) organic surficial soil (0 to 4 inches);
➢ low chroma soil (10 YR 3/1) at 4 to 8 inches with redoxomorphic features including
concretions and mottling (IOYR 3/6);
➢ gleyed soil (4/5 GY) identified in the WAC soil boring;
➢ saturated soil with abundant mottling below the mucky layer; and
➢ presence of the water table at, or within 12-inches of the ground surface.
Upland soils in the project area consisted of soil that exhibited a higher chroma (10 YR 5/3 to
5/4) without evidence of inundation or redoximorphic features.
Hydrology - Primary hydrologic indicators identified in the suspected wetland areas included:
surface water, soil saturation, water marks, algal mat, and water stained leave. Secondary
14
hart hickman
SMA R ENVIRONMENTAL SOLU rI0N5
5UAAMa.ue Pmj ,Sm Fn,m I(SE0NSEO 3Au],MeftdhmI Ryma fu Pldi nan M-AWanJ.NC (Rn'iuJ lune8, E016).L

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 7
indicators in the wetland areas included sparsely vegetated concave surfaces and geomorphic
position. Depth to water ranged from 0 to 6 inches below the ground surface.
Wetland Vegetation - Sufficient obligate to facultative wetland vegetation were identified
throughout the delineated wetland area to conclude that wetland vegetation is present in the
wetland areas. Vegetation identified in the wetland areas included the following:
➢ Tree Stratum: Pinus taeda, Acer rubrum;
➢ Shrub Stratum: Liquidambar styracii lua, Sambucus canadensis, Viburnum dentatum;
Morella cerifera;
➢ Herb Stratum: Juncus effuses, Andropogon virginicus; and
➢ Woody Vine Stratum: Lonicera japonica.
Based on the presence of hydric soils, hydrology, and vegetation, the three criteria required for a
jurisdictional wetland were observed in the suspected wetland areas sufficient to characterize this
them as wetlands. Based on preliminary wetland survey activities conducted by H&H and others,
the following wetland areas were identified at the site:
• approximately 244 acres (total) of potential wetland areas were identified in the northern,
southern, southeastern, western, and southwestern portions of the site.
The wetland areas identified at the site are summarized in the table below.
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
5r -Mager Pm"sVim Energy I(SEOpSE0. 3M1,0eNTtlimII Reyma fa Nei-nny M-A Ia,M ,NC ilkm fJ-6, 2016)d

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 8
Wetland Area Designation
Approx. Wetland Area
WAA
19.3 acres
WAB
5.4 acres
WAC
85.2 acres
WAD
32.4 acres
WAE
20.2 acres
WAF
35.7 acres
WAG
3.2 acres
WAH
25.4 acres
WAI
4.6 acres
WAJ
3.3 acres
WAK
7.4 acres
WAL
1.3 acres
Approx. Total Wetland Area
244.4 acres
The approximate locations of wetland areas identified during field activities are included on
Figure 2. Corps wetland forms completed for the wetland areas and a representative upland form
are included in Appendix B. The Corps Preliminary JD Form (with the Aquatic Resources
Table) and the JD Request document are included in Appendix C.
The flagged locations will surveyed by a NC licensed surveyor and will be depicted on a
finalized survey plat. The survey plat may be submitted to the Corps for written JD approval.
hart � hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
S'.0 M14vm Pmj slim EnaU I ISMiSE6 3AulWmWdim M,Rammfm PRliimm,M-AWender. NC (Rmi,d lm1S, 3016)d

Mr. Kyle Barnes
June 8, 2016
Page 9
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please contact us if you have
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Hart, Hickman, PC
Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
d� W&S4-&-
JC Weaver
Staff Environmental Scientist
14
hart hickman
SMARM EWMNMEWAL SOLUTIONS
S'.�Va Pwo s6Sw Enesg-I(SEO)\SEO 3fm PMminem M-AWendee,NC INe`ialJwe 9, E016)Em

I
e , > SITE
r'
•5ubsla,
IIW e '
a i aa.
as
� t
i — p
�.� CEm I ��•.
APPROXIMATE
N o 2000 a000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NORTH CAROLINA 1983
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
t
Ce.
�'I
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
AULANDER-HOLLOMAN SITE
APPROX. 1,260-ACRES
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
hart
hickman 29235ourh nr-sm--Suim 100
Ch d.o N.n Cu lm 28203
704-586-"7 (p) 704-586-0373 to
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE:
3-16-2016
REVISION NO: 0
JOB NO:
SEO-003
FIGURE: 1

Appendix A
Support Documents
• Tax Records (Hertford County)
• NWI Map (US FWS)
• Soil Survey Map (MRCS)
• Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA)
hart hickman
fMpR1ER fNNMM1MFM/�L HllUfgNf

\
\
M
.NO
!
\
])
-
,--
]�
r
))
;
,��
)ow
\
00
(
)
)E
\
\)
|
!
.
;
WW
{
!E
#
!,
,NM
§�,,
`
! /
§
•
!,
/
!
|;
!`\
_
,
R»& qGG
/
^
/kNl
0
\
00
. C-
--
-
/
"�
��!
�>
RCS
j
\gj
\
j
/\
\\
\
E
\
0
}0
\
\
\\\N
/
w
R2\7G/e
^
!NNNNNN
-
®G2
[
§).`
!
0
z
0
!:r
|E
!
2
WN
;4
\ZZZZZYZZ
]'N
,|
�§
\
|{j)jj
(
/
-/
j
_
:
�\
..
\
_-
�M
!`� _ ;eat
\
j
\�
__� /�,
\ \�\
\}\/\
\
\§
A
` ©°�
:!
§!!
r_
!
-

)
/
)®
!
`
)
j`
\§
;§
\�
ow
�
)]
:
`
)
)!
!
|
.
)
/
#
i
aoc
\
.
\
}
\
5 tooto_
0_
_
.
E
_
J
o
-
_ .. _�
- [©w|
2
;�� y //
\ y! §
§
�
:
!& $N }
§
;\\�\��`�
/
)rl�, !
E
§
_ !
`
,
-
\
U)
\
!
§
\
/
)
k
\N m
w(
/ / !
§
/
_
§
9J�` wo
o
-{
/
�(u
o w
(�§ (` '
`
o
\ )
!
§%§ Eoow
w
}
]
ƒ

`m
myg
o
N
y
C C
C .
8
Q
W ILL � C d
Y b V V b
C m
Y
1yya LL LL W W LL� K V
�aa
e g'y
a9
#os
v9�
Ell
�§c
cb5
$�E
�Z=
e `eE
F %ea
�Oa3
7
EEss"
1
O
a
E
f/1
Y
Y
y
a
!
1
L
Q%

1
E

2
w
N
x �
fp64T06 W6bIW OO6EI[Ib WY[Ob 006ZSOb OObZipb
M.ZEZ d
M.& s d
M.ZE.z �
l�
Im
N
0 m
o
y
J N
rp y
N
m o
y o
?� U
0
ca
z
�
u
Q
O c
O
Q
n
zQ
z0

o
S
d
'g
o
0
rn
C
y
N
M
y
C
aN
d
d A A
V
C O
�
.CC
y
N
'i
a
E
tilm
do NE
is
�
o
rn
�E
�'
No.
„
'0M 0
Z
m
E
d
.,o� �v�i
A`c
va'v y
$awe
y
c
`0h
E
5
dyH
O
d
L
'�'�
w 0 0
' m v
i
L N
o
� E
O y W
Q
O
y�
A
0 C 0 5
d
3
N
wQI
Q
N
6A
C Nm
7
Z�0yd
tMt�
a>yv
QaO
Y.
oU
Ao
o
g
LL
c
Od
-
U
a
t
EOry.2od
?
$
�t y
yNvQA
0n
o�
S9
d
mo ym
aaIE
d
ogiw
yv
>
'v
i
a
ZEE
yLna0
Z.
$o Nod
r
T«
L d 0
Ol N
N
`I
E
O
TNy
d
C E
d
N Z �'
U
d .F_ A A G
N q
9
(«p
4
A
y:
A
O V a o
6 a
Z
w
m
` E
y d
r$ C l0 N
E C A J C
O c
A
W
N
L C
a M - a
O
d
O y C
O
7
N W
m
2 2' 6
N
W m
�aa
�i N
n?!a`+'u
x�
N
E W
woo.WA
F
a E
vi U
2 n
P 5
y CO)
m `o
O N
H$ o
T
x
8
8 $
a 8
ad
M
i i
m
J a
Z
m
C
a
C
e
W
m
W
J
m
m
m
a
W
N
S
Q
8
8
e�
zw
J
,
O d T_
� O O m
a
W
-j
2
_T _T
_T _T
z
_T
Z
_T _Z Z N
C C
C
❑ ffi
O❑ El
11 El 11
El Q
1 l t
l R
\
• p 13
Q a 0 LL
W
;

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Summary by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina (NC091)
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres In AOI
Percent of AOI
CaA
Caroline fine sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
0
32.4
2.6%
CrA
Craven fine sandy loam,
0 to 1 percent slopes
0
110.3
8.8%
CrB
Craven fine sandy loam,
1 to 4 percent slopes
6
61.8
4.9%
ExA
Exum very fine sandy
loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
0
31.0
2.5%
LF
Leaf loam
90
677.9
54.2%
Ln
Lenoir loam
8
299.7
24.0%
Ro
Roanoke loam
90
37.0
3.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
1,250.2
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/1812016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 6

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil types,
each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made up
dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric components in
the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made up dominantly
of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric components in the lower
positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based on its respective
components and the percentage of each component within the map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric components.
The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric components, 66 to 99
percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric components, 1 to 32 percent
hydric components, and less than one percent hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named'Rating'. In this column the percentage of each
map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are either
saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the
growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field. These
visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite
determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the
United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
rNatural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/18/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Hertford County, North Carolina
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/18/2016
Ilill Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

4
� . -
i..
F%
f
{
F�
�
i
r
j#„
}
fSy
;.
3
�f _ ..
,..x.N

$ "3i A'k F€ff8 d p
i�REi-A� dd€€ Ed c 'k'Ri k
E � i
° Aa
" s i
°�� F e a • d � '� k
ES R
e =
6
6
m^ 5
s as 6€ .¢age "s
& gp k_
o Y FFk e @ e= S
�-• R c I
a?GE
'S CCCS[R �C - FE SY{`{' CYYC6R Y ,VSE
C- 5
n
P�
F `S
F P 4m
rA f•oE F^
e Q >
;Ps
$ a
-
�a�
§Gy 4�C � Ax° a-e 4$3 E g3 7ba
E? Yese o` � gE =aceeR
EF s DER F FR n �¢� E
d {Y
— vm
p'S
m \ `xR ;P pnp � • F Y
`7 toY
T I M M O N S GROUP .•"'y �w�°,w,,,"
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO C-1652 x
s AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECLOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
M 4 d o cO hI c¢ NORM
DETAILS '! @

v T �
e
v
k
5
.n 6md"
k
eLjM"
k
Gym
m
SC
m
"
A g88
E
E
? E ao
E-
e
dAix .
A :!F
v
3
C
5
\
k
'
5
n
pn
6
Y
Y§
n
\
\ \
\
[
e
x
q
m
� k�a-'p
3
gx oN
oSgo
4
R�&u
y
Y3
H
ageh
� o:zP
:3
�001-
'R € F p}f pR y¢ T•, i pE
% ie-5 ':' iL"Clx . . L � PR
=_ i 5 J)[ FFI C $ 4� S
•• E'x 6 t= a i^ a
eFr cr EH4 S "xcx eeEe �
er. n'2a ! ? _ "¢L'q E
-
_
F`a x
E
�� s
• ✓Rs f
�� 'x E
Ede
Fi E
E
R
\\z ig
s
5
"
\
8
E
M
d
_
M
e3 Y
�"Afig: 4
,.
TIMMONS GROUP •"'�
�w
�� "
n, _ .;.r�,
v
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
-
AUL NDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
...ono romr .FxNO—immix.
i
o c
8z
� z
I
DETAILS

�
)C52
-
^
�
�
�.»•
\
x
.�
.�
m
�
;
So)
•|�l�,(,!� •|_�•�,; „
51
� �
1 5
1
>�
T I M M OM S GROUP
:' ;%
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND � . _
V
DETAILS
•!,l,l.,!

iCBtCFG[YGEGiC=TYGEGGGEYiT RItCGE=GCGt6SL•:iS[CCSxCCS C-YTYT
�Ct2il:C�LLiCSl9CC4Gv YTiY'SCrY.:r-rerr- ivi•rvrG •v rrvir 4
668EYiC6--G48%]SGE:SG$EELtlBC]EpYEiiap
%%YSYYiYYYYYYYYYYYdYYYYC»YYX}YYYYYY:YYGS:GC::E::G:SCC C-%:
94..a'„a a..aYaaE .. 998tC99YCi]CCCYSS:Si - '"E.]:::dAS:[ddx:E v'r E ttcct
Y...0 'Y=-:- e�CberYSY-•••ivtnrYerve:r:vdvrv�ir �xr:r p
G!CCS4CBCjgC%6892GGCBGBpQCGBgLSiSLE�Li[iEBL99[EC%aYlSCBC C
ax v geB�ii i'siSiiG's eeeie_'Y SiS°ss°@5@ii7i6s i i iEi e'e'a ii iE ii
556555543599559➢i5$555555555S5SSS9593455535€555555i955335 $
666bi6EttE€€6EE€€E3tEi€66Efd€€!EE€€€€€6€66d€666€€€66E6686
li a6A iiaAAfr agA�A�ya¢3Ea;€g�A�GgAeE S¢fr&afr.a„yAErAAs�;a-AA=.€?� �
E
=�
g
dY
C
RI
"f If
L G
a
-R 56daY •B
gE [ 'G
v. E
•
g�5
S
a
p' .
b.v
�
F4Nm
=n;
o
x3
W
a
_..
c
H
�
GA6 %bE Eip � x%
-ESCY f GR a&Sad •B
p ox E ?4 s
/ n m
gnu -
TIMMONS GROUP .••':'�•
NORT1 CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1552
o e a i AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITEHER�ORR
o cDETAILSw" ' i; i
i

c`s 3w=,'5 a"° c sg«n,g,a'2?8o�y»as°;Yo➢osBa'FsYsy
£5. s €€E as• - z. xaa. •-'s a a;fFSR;mq.o xf a sRR� E n€;fe€Fn fix$
of"8€o °9F- a °smf coo nn '{Fs'at Sep,$« s EC cis ,�m3 °L=sR,ao'ss €
�Y«AF £ >_°FnmE^o Y se = - - ^em.^:ye 8; " W
FR-RB` F"O°yFF '-na_�avt:=E n e g °€ RS uE : n".$aE (:n;a'6 .'t ..Fm F3tf 6R� u'F F R:.f Fn P^$o 4xS
fs=c'g::g-:5 x`
M. F�= °.ige£n €P'a c m s "" €._ Rg;:g"gs:: �ggaey P�'n o""c Moog»m i�55«sn�3m4n E��°
. " g g,m _°Rfs =n»u Esg s`":g 1p#° =des
s-= "-E ss^a"Rc.Mc" a R..ex Am�aaxs€
fs• . o .. i > F w ➢ _ _€ `n„ox da €" a @u x=€'
=, s�
One :;Ec, R.z s;» ; mR,- gz am.£x,g'pii
ni § s €ofoE£M m•oa H.
s m -A : R F y m iF .- aq;€ s ` , @Rg,eS^aa a .sem n ay ova g ,5n �s ga spy;
1F Bsa $ a %Fs 8 Sx .f� spa 'm$"=:1 F s
F$ 8 4 m M a 5mF y E gs dF S &o QgYF' €ovAi€oe� £R �m
'? IRfr.mE y ° m z F=;,a _" = 5ss € m.. c€m[
5 =•a 4^ - 3 n "s R "a E .F§�s a, RIg�..n" r€a Yf
= c»=-` » & g » a4o RS:= o='s °@,
D8 m m& R 8 5 -^s_" x.. "yz€ . Be RR m a g u4°,wM F eo§ads
a 4 _ g o ; . § e „"x =m 4� g"w € �n RRs I`
_ "F mobg T, • f S., _ «RM
k 5 m2:frcE,S ��n °c a �fgg§g "i a'" nog":� �g"of2ao £
ig ° ?c»Ye ^.: 99S .- cm=,= c & o RB
»'"= Ao :a. a^p, £� ::Ox oFS£: g
o' - »£ P W o m m m - _ d o o`m F Z z$ H' £nM^ i -Fo eAi °='mH a
= i e. € R B z a e§ _ `5.. m35 F R E" F o"»° €W o ➢gip cf°'Rg1 P« o fg
E £ - t»=d,E Yp ^3 F Yg cq 6�: edY'^n.�
s %€ _ € R s"e= 9C" xm :� BEEM S a= m m Esc = a a$
im« F„5? gmS o f mB
o h
m O_c€`aI9 'S-'mac,"^a5 B>gn8 ^a^2o "°='i€? .maMg:'s s°m,Y
Z cx;,°m€= r, s a"s RRFmm '
:_ € xE= �ass`:'s o=°sm Qcsai4= g,=e: j=asetaoz
.A HAN m N� � « P3 Y r E ""e ARe � `R€ 8[�:;£8.» £3=' =«eA.B FE k«°>: IFN° g�f; 05"".
n ` € 55 g:a � c :e;„�vo §:o4r lit �"i"': gtE a
i'„�S ;;� d o _ �J m ih - g ` ' €€:m^= a€-ma7 £6-.'«. m..- ».en Vi
C) °fr,a a = °S ' i«a e ° uPA° esA:� m e=vE s➢.°m=n= x�•` "Eco so€
I` „ M.
O g ns a R:g . s s c=m x.xe P- V..? sE sm o.z; sFE zog
mman: n e £,] " Y a :ens ?n§g a o F� e� g€s� ga IL
.a€
uS➢E m5 a A _ _ •ft'!jtf g§ €: z a ozs�R 4r y F E j mEA b E:Y
.Z1 m=@°° 5 6 "° Y €A �F `! g io'=
6Z.
Z Eoyg e F L ., :.. ,ay G £ -ss xq i f sz Go sR i s Et
n .,n: g p •:�CitOi,� g msm �p j? a an g„ g :�
mN.Y eS">° R m °[6 h=
D
> g
1 P4
i P 9'pP
XD
IIL III
'I
R
9 [g
m
D
£azszema€m =
A _ jtj Pan-FQcFP°yy `^.o€ninyiGFR%ymH
=: NF`iA 6fr C`Eso «o.. "S:g R4 mm is Ev 35 _
se ^ I igae i ..«C:« Hnsl zffi.pF Y$mm^a 6i8=`e. oemaE:e`�
�51 :ER3 a 6R:gFSoG "e�° ^SovT 2A «:=-€x:R€u «^RFf'n =m8:
B.r�R"Sm.:'o
f°lz
.3e» _^'« -F: u« RGM S_csF S
is a"si « "u € F:.E Fri °=E ^�.£; C£F Red-o f aR
TIMMONS GROUP.--**
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO C4652 •
C g § AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE L
xOx,
w
' xEahoQo< <„o�..
DETAILS
A
A
bi;
Ly
'�
5m5
ac
g
»
Y«
s.
Fa:�
a-
m„
AFoa
Y4
ۥ
P
«
'O
FF
zg

})
, l\;;l:7omw7u7hmimo@zJR•, ■ §;■ I/ ||`\
,:.:..
\]:;;>G
7f.'M ; !
G� eeu\Eg2�
M,zl, !smell
!
min |1111 14
U 12 :o?"
/\� __COLLECTOR ._ ._jj§i

16HEU C2.1]
' MATCHUNE
1 j
I
• • I I
A I t
Zn
Im
XOnm Dm!^
,�, I
pCLCy
0
Y
Z�
NNnyyQ OZ OO
NNGp
12
p�
' Z�C��r�i D'93P qq yp,
8 ^ �_ N m C A N N
n 'v i
off
zyNm
0
A n H h u .„'n Q u m Fes. G
_
O
Dn
tip
_N
n r u
Norm mo az � 4
PY mm , 0
m
mFby7s 7yiF bd$�7s
m
m
pa
.�8
fi ego ��g 0z nE o
�n
k'� °S i
m 3�m��'Y o£
L)
o :
i s p
p
T I M M 0
N S GROUP
NORTH
CAROLINA LICENSE NO
.---:%.
C-1652
t AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
t
s
aye
xEC A.a �..owTMc ourvn
Fanctnm MMTonI pDI AN
F
a
f
pg
9
r e

M TONUNE
i m
. o'
e l
o
D�
om�o�ny°o3zom
r
i
n
��
Z.Zggl
10
I
z
m�s
F
u�',mxs"o6
��3--
z�—
�m
o= " RN}g °,d mk2.'c9S
8
's nno F`�"m
non€
n, o
z
O
zo z 5o'm
4m`gm
o
T I M M O N S GROUP
.�
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
AULANDER NOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND
SOLAR SITE
�:
o
XEnirOnO CO Xry XR Ca OUwA
'S
'!
EROSIONuCONTROL PLAN

SHEET C3 W \
WTCHUNE , -\
4 ® �
1
J WTCHUNE
YXT$3rs�,TiY6. 9
' SHEET 02ID
off= H�aaHom U ®¢ o
o cx TN N crni3P I , Oz
pgA n>.o zN a F
No=msmo m.m o
Do a oor yF�` S-' m
TIMMONS GROUP
J WTCHUNE
YXT$3rs�,TiY6. 9
' SHEET 02ID
off= H�aaHom U ®¢ o
o cx TN N crni3P I , Oz
pgA n>.o zN a F
No=msmo m.m o
Do a oor yF�` S-' m
TIMMONS GROUP
.••':�.
NORTH CARO INA LICENSE NO.
C-1652
a s
AULAN DER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR
y €
NO— oHN.
wNO COUNTY, N
'
`
EROSIONCONTROLPLAN
(7
s

Nm
2�
;➢; 2.mm.Z
u —Onm Dmm
Oy'i
s
Dy
O
O�n (OIyZOiv.m
OO.Z N~m_+ pOom
O>
T
8
n➢(�l '�'mm Dp Oyv�
my�DmS o0i
'i iPTa
ns
�z
yo
E
ti�
Do
m o "
N
Fn�
o
�o A
ggr
°: s> k
� SHEET���N
0
MAIGWNE
II
��; bRA��bF y87yZ+�
.TCf NE
SHEET C215
TIMMONS
GROUP
.••':�.
NORTH
CAROLINA LICENSE NO.
C-1652
v g
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
£
'
a
C e W c
NeN. D CouNn NORT C.0.oURA
$ P $
h §
EROSION CONTROLPLAN
\: is
3
I

SHEET Cz M
M1 TCHNNE
r
MATCHLINE
SH
SHEET C210
.o I O it y
Oi§f' ygaoo mm 1/ I • Z I I I 2
o
°maiN �x��amt v• 2 ^ yy
Z
op
E -?Zo Toy
°a - q Em:= o fFxm 7iF.Fn'" o
z
m
TIMM
OUP .••':'�
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE 11II of

\ \ T HHNE
-\ \ SHEET
~
fn l^
N I y
i
C-nx➢x�z.mm� 1/ I
mN�N-mimi�03npm
I I I I
p�
m oOn ZNScm I ,
z
O
O Iyy , 0
y
Z�ny�da
n O 1, E� rT m D➢ O i N G i m N L o i
o�y>>m N o
N m N L H S m O
A a
D z
E f
tmn S O n S �➢ n c9 �i
u-i
p
£ Z i5 !<5 IS i5 li5
N
'"➢��omp
Y
i€
0
0 ¢s°mS A
o s Y? o
� s m
TIMMONS GROUP .••':�.
NORTH CAROIINA LICENSE NO. C4662
g
a
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
` 9
m a
W a
�enTroxo 0.PLAN
EROSIONuCONTROL

SXEEf C3.01
.TCWINE
jR
V
v�
/n
\
I--"
£EFL-
MATCHUNE
SHEET
C212
z
m II x
zm
•'d
o I y
w•N_
0
m
a i vn�oonmNmmnDozyo zo
z 0
ymo
z
,-
�'IT
s€nnHm
o
^
m
-'"
zD C3
7 �7xy 4m i
zo
io = 's' E C
o
o
TIMMONS GROUP .•'':%•
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
G
- 9
`
o
� E W a HERMaom xry xonTx woux.
' £
EROSIONCONTROLPLAN
3

2
MATCHLINE
SHEET C3.13
-<z
2
Oz NOu. H II.
O •I
2
DS
$y
o=
�n2T3mm
yv.y _y O i
O
N^ m=a
z
0 ;
'O
g
o>
y
r
m »oiN�'�iyo $zN
F y�i ymcs �,N
8 oZi
I
z N
p 9m sN HFnN
2
O
y2
N p
mocyr- qc M
y O `e m O> n n m y@ 9=€
FP
_
O €
0
mo
S n�gF =g' yGg€_ @ v.
°a
mMA2 $a¢S�_
3m �€ 6,�
D
z9 0 fr€€g " :°s �".
m 7'�Pm
m
TIMMONS GROUP .••':�
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
g
t AULAN DER HOLLONIAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
F
c
e HERITORO[ NTr ND—aN.0-
o
EROSIONCONTROLs

=3
\�R
mm \
o=
Oy
Dp
O m
MTTCXLINE
I -
N
y Z
SVEET C3 d;
_
MD
0
i
n
_O
T_O
0
II
On
z m
>*
QI
o' 0
°mom"''''orm
p
i o
N
D
o. z x Nmm
i O
F
14Zt
ZOZ
NENHU_ z
oixTx"- "ygDovm 0
I �
O
or
f $oi H.,- 'm- i
o
yr E
m
18 n F m n 9 O< m 3 f A
pp yy
a n u w Y i u 8 u y
1
yo
'MOoomomaa m �di€ om€o mm€2S9cz'os
N
o7CmF£m
mriom
v
= ig� P^ O
; c+
O
T I M M O N S GROUP .•'':'�
�a��
NORTH
CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
ti s
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION ANO SOLAR SITE
e
exen.Fono
'�
CO mr xon.x4 o"�
VCONTROL
_
A e
EROSION PLAN

'p
II'A Ile
i
o
9m= MAR—m° 1�e l
o�
rc yoNr-~ " a 8om
Iyy
0
o>
m xai"Nm
i
Z
¢ $
o°" 'AO m fE�➢ i$F
A �-.-' c. Tin
O 1�e,
DZ
E
yo
oa
's bc5
cii�of mm
zop
p
Zom
. 00.. R^
O 3 �imFi"'
z
O
TIMMONS
GROUP
.��
. •"'�
��
NORTH
CAROLiNA LICENSE NO
C-1652
„�mw,,,�.,.
�.
ti s
o AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
a
f
" g
o,,..
VCONTROL pPLAN
E
i e
g
e
h
EROSION
'

1 SHEET c201
MATCHUNE
na
It
e -0:
o
j — —
MATCHNNE
SHEET C2W
0.=N0m =o9=m
x 'ozz:my'"yg Doom �
E s AO>maxcn <o= z��R Moog
yoi FHm'sM 4A t
TIMMONS GROUP . •"'��� .�.w..�.,._ •..
NORTH CAROl1NA LICENSE NO. C-1652
v N C AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTA�OHSATION AND SOLAR SITE t " 'q3
W F w c.,nc.n.nnnrnnH, R %I R %I • I 1

N�
1 MATCHNNE I
1
1
1
1
1
1
MATCHONE
SHEET C2
o o N=ra om I ;
oo.H..
e no^ �m�pooNy z��3 yyY$�
€ � &c ozn
TIMMONS GROUP .••':�.
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
A x AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE R
e EROSIONuCONTROL PLAN' '+

I........
I
A,
5
F➢
��
11 5
0
OA
0
C
0
/
1
zz
A0
I
td
m
p
Mp HLINE
m Z
mn
\•
SHEET C203
-
10
TO
yD
Z
0
I I
K
y
®
0
C
HO E'NVNi~ 3Noi
0I
O
O�
MI-
F unZNN�NpnmPmmmvmt
(, m➢ n 0 <N rm � i� m i N i d b^
oQ�Yn
y m a F F ax-.
u u o u
a
y
=Z
E
mSm `min ie pP a@9
NDODmmp€-0
m>n<<k
�� '.EFFS
EMU.
r3a-
0
0
mo
S "gg �`, ion
tea^
is
i
m z^
TIMMONS GROUP
•
•"''y
�u ly.Mrt,w,
E
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO
.
C-1652
.
.�.„"
a
b
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
x[x!LL!c xxn R SU Dunn
x
p
8
g
n
`r
PDl Ct(1N rl NTCl l D1 EU
+
s

T V
I
0
Ike
D
oi�'^o_ xonsy•°
II O
IR•im�
nn°ao�.�
M.€
Vz
"op
p
azgo Nc ooy
ES
° iN0
z°N
-
.� P m
TIMMONS GROUP .-O*o%
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE G E
EROSION CONTROL PLAN R ' "

\ SHEET Cl. 11
\ M TCHLWE
's
;sy�m Y��E4m
TIMMONS GROUP .••':'z
NORTH CAROINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
I
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
e
xEYTf E NC C xaamc. nNq
FX141Nf, fONDITTONS
t

SHEET Cf.1l
MAX.XI4E
/
D
/
/
D
O
zz
0.
O p
00
yy
Do
zz
D8
A O
O m
ym
y Z
D
m0
o
TO
O p
O
I I
D=
Z
0
y
0
O
m z
6. H u EI E G u w. F
O
Dn
wmse
;a �t �ti i Z, m11
z
�'2m"38n8�
D
o
S3n�7sa3€
YRm 7Ffg"
cmi
s
0
TIMMONS GROUP •..
•"'�
�=��Mo
.
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO C-1652
„
O g M 4
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
xEw.roao cwnry xox.x c.aoux.
o�
s
` p
•
@ F'`;'
$
S o
$ Q
f e
E%ISTING CONDITIONS
S

=�C,M
N TCHUNE
m;
=no
O /
O A /
0
N
0
z
D . /
O
0.
N m _ M CHUNE i
II
Z
Z O
m
I I
Oy
D
B£
u
m a '-� 'FO
5 z
on
o3
TIMMONS GROUP
.-*0;;%
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO.
C-1652
0 s V g
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COL1E110 IS�,UBITHtTION AND SOLAR SITE
i
` I9 `
@ &
EXISTING CONDITIONS
°
°

SHEET CI O]
MATLHl1NE '
m 3
Z Z
/D~
MATCHLINE
m
sHEET cr 11
n�
�+ o
n
II
N
n
ti
Ial
Or
s�
Rv
azd€db^'€benb
O
Sm
°z
m
D
y2g�3
Y'"na �m �m `yob
cmi
<
o
TIMMONS GROUP .••':�.
NORT1 CAROLINA LICENSE NO, C-1E52
D.
y g AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
E.
N e
al e NEa,<oao aou�vn NOR,»aaou..
EXISTING CONDITIONS'

MATC HIJNE
SHEET Cl 15
I
I
i
e �n���uaQa `au�a
B
TIMMONS GROUP .••':'�
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
C s u i AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
5
2
F
•`• e W �vrrn.ir_ �n.�n.T.n.ic
I"
8 Iv `

SHEET Cl
WTCHUNE
d iaaFG ✓.F PFmFN O
..�$ �Z>•i is �.hn �. Q.
Z.
a �3;¢�hP�3�ogm
zo
a
TIMMONS GROUP .••':%.
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
t
5 W d
x[xnoao COuxn NoRm—Oo TNA
EXISTING CONDITIONS

MATCHLINE
SHEET Cl 10
i
9
TIMMONS GROUP --0*0 •
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
s v § ALLAN DER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE a p ` B ` g
E 9 8 s e
o! F VICT1Nr rnNnTTT(NC �' �

M1 TCHUNE
SHEET Ctfl
I I I' 0
Y
0
'`A&ma7zmf4m i
o
T I M M O
N S GROUP .••':'�
�a-
. M,w,, .,._
NORTH
CAROLINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
C
N s
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
t
^
• =
g
8 _ _
an d
W E
Hf R1 o coOxry HORM CMOJ xn
�'�'
9
I
1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
�'

SHEET Cl W
uarcHUNE
M TCHNNE
SHEET C112
=2
I
K
y
II I
Z
<
5
OZ
%
0
O
NI
g yy
�a
Nm
$ 8 m
N
O
o;''&
YimsEm
o
TIMMONS GROUP •..
ou
,
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO C-1652
_
c
�s
a AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
xeaTwao m�xn naam cxaouxn
z
e g
8
g e
g` a
-
�e��E, ..w ..�a�..�.P•`s�
�s'"
EXISTING CONDITIONS'''

SHEET Cl 0
WTCHUNE
N�aaFm m
< o
TIMMONS GROUP .•••."%
.
NORTH CA0.0LINA LICENSE N0. C-1652
AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE G g
Z' a EXISTING CONDITIONS G '+' IT v

e �
MATCHLINE
SHEET CI.W -
I. II x
0
$�&FdbdbbFBld ?
$A r
T I M M O N S GROUP-••':�•�m
„_�,�a,a�r,.__
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
O N o AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
G
y 9¢
q
cvrcrrnir- cnninrrrnnic
a
� �'

� sNEeTc,.00
�MATCHLINE -
MAiCHLINE
SHEEED7_±tssi3
SHEET i w
TIMMONS GROUP •••'00: y.
NORTH CAROUNA LICENSE NO. C-1652
o AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
V d FYl CT1Nf.N fllNllTl1NC i

SHEET C101
A TCHNNE
i
-� --
0
O
Z
O
0
m
• MATCNLINE
m
i,=s'rc.u�"$.�$.f^SYfiiiSRFov
°.
z
sHEEIcl.
D
O
O
II
I
ZZDN
z
1
O
I
on
m
E
o
1 0
>o
s
y7rh dh�FA€�.i N
No
£
9g$p
;i;ANmg BF o
TIMMONS GROUP •..
NORTH CAROIINA LICENSE NO. C-1652
C p m s AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
u F" [YICTIMf fnfJnTT,I\NG { A v 9 9 4 Y

1 SHEET C1.01 \.
1 MATCHNNE
1 \
1
1
I
1 I
1 I 1
1
I
1 I
1
1 I
1 '
1 I
1 I
1 I
1
1 I
1 I
0 \ I
\ I
O
2Z
n y
OA
zz 1
.0
__
D y
AO
am
MArCHI rv6
m> SHEET Cl os
1 D
T_O
�O
10
yD 11111 II m
� I 0
O
z
Is I 0
o> m z
v_�
C C9sb6jo4'
p
Z
0 0
TIMMONS GROUP .00
•..
NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NO C-1662
D S € AULAN DER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE g ' S $ '`
EXISTING CONDITIONS

\ M TCHUNE
SHEET Cl Dl
^ I II
E�e a ag4 0 v
bdb���y&�7b
e ���➢�had7�3$m
ss�:a'" Y4=fsm
TIMM
UP . •"'%
sl V £I AULANDER HOLLOMANFCOLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE I R
W
i
E
e

SNUl1lUNJ 9NI15IX3 s N E 8 8 r 33 y 31I5 ldtl 05 ONV NOI1tl15005 N017311OJ3 NtlWOlIOH N30 Ntllfltl wuaio,�a.ais�.a, --j 'ON-37 VNO V3 H1HON
� � ` •� dnous SNOWWII
o
0O w
u ICI
U �
Z
fx �
W II
3NIlN]1bW
J
_
Il

e
f
6
No ddx9ES. llVH3A°.w^:
r
gg
�
31IS
NVlos (INV NOIlV159f15
L0133ll OJv NVW OIIOH N34 NVlfIV
orsno�a wrsiwn
V s
Z9910
dnObJ
ON 35N3JIl tlNl1011tlJ N1NON
SNOWWII
w
z o
/
�l
oLL
U U
zzh
rri
mo
oQ
ro
z z
of
Fy
V F
J O
� O
z z
O
/l
\�
l
--- --- _____
yn___
e
`
�
'
�/
- z__
�e
z
\
I
\
I
l
,
�
3
q
ba
r.__n•3
- 3

11
¢ <' dy airs a�nos arNv Nouvis ns ao�anoD NvwonoN aaaN�nnv
'ON 35NDI VNIIOaVD NINON
•� dnoaJ SNOWWll
a
p
w jW
a0
Z
�a
Wm
V) U
Z F
p U
Q oLL
U V
wo
mm
z
VJ zi
Q 0
U N
Z 7p
Kp
QOz
O 0 p
Z O J
Q
O M1 O W J Z
T_AM� w paNrygO
C3 '_ Z mYoz�
j0mam0 mU
N $Y�wmw
U�U2 QJ ZQ Vr
VJ n p z m z ww
m Cl) J
�iO6 z ~ wz�
Z ;ors mZN
pN 2N20NF22Wp
Q Q O ro Umg�o—pw•oNww
d wail>r jy C2
Q LOU
Q SLLQKWJS U'
LIB O � V � 0 ��wrcc�n'Qurz
OLL T w > zor>�O=ni�w
Z z
Z H F w J U F U z o f
Q LL Z QQY.QF�ZOVF
U U iZwX.5<w"a
O j z w¢>WZ W,oz
w O Z p m�aYUQUO
Z a Z U Z U E xU' 0 w 0 w
J a grw w'p 'j.
g �rc< w <Zw.
J /y N �u Q N O F x LL
J N w p w Ru5x7Um1-_gLLa
O Ow= W m N
U 0 m ^m
w z
Z Q p z"
O o w=< �_ ;
�HZ91
W J w — N
i J w Zw"v�aF
C O NY�wm
c Q m O a i
O f
J Y
J
O
n'
W
Z
Q
J
Q
§5
oo�s
°EEES848bEEdSdLdYKf
d�veo�od
Ep
6aa
sbsssseesaa$88�8�$€E€8€�€8o€ssssc....��
a55ccc.
y'F48�&�&°:aa:,,.»,,
Ioa�YYYYY====Ysa.v=Yap€aaaaaooaaasoa
'nFFGFGGGFG6FKKKS
°'p�0"pa&1566E1dEdd30.�w&&&:.6:K�6�`.��
F
$B&2�'�800�00°�"
1
jgeaeF
��sac�acccc���ciccEGeeeeeeeeeeaoGoaoonceee
aaseesae-__
veaaaaassaa=-__vesaseas

7
F
}�
1
G
ni

� ss
TIMMONS GROUP
Tt)l1N Vi"ON Ai HIFVID IHkOUGH 0tIHS
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.13
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.14
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.15
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C3.00
• Updated the Construction Sequence.
We hope this response will allow you to continue your review of this project however,
do not hesitate to contact us if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
Rick Baker, P.E.
Group Leader — Private Land Development
Cc: Kelly Hoyt, Sunenergyl

TIMMONS GROUP
beneficial (and we think it would be), we offer to schedule a meeting with you and to
bring copies of all plans and approval documents to review so we all have a clear
understanding of where we are and where we are going on this project. If that is
something you would like us to do let's schedule as soon as your schedule allows.
As we have discussed, on future projects we will submit with a clearer long term plan
so we can all plan accordingly.
For this plan, the following are comments related to the revisions that have been
clouded on the plans since the recent revision approval on 11/04/16.
CVR
• Updated Developer contact information.
• Added the approval table shown above.
C0.00
• Updated Disturbed Acreage from 866 AC to 1,015 AC.
• Updated legend to show a red hatch that indicates the wetland areas to
be clearing with no grubbing allowed. This area is also newly proposed
disturbed area.
C0.01
• Updated disturbed acreage area from 866 AC to 1,015 AC.
C2.04
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.05
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.06
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.07
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.06
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.08
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.11
• Added disturbed area.
• Added tree clearing area — No grubbing allowed.
C2.12
• Added disturbed area.

TIMMONS GROUP
rni,n i•. R,N 4(:,,ii 11.1, III„11.1GH "IL„l
August 15t, 2017
Richard Peed
NCDEQ -DEMLR
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
RE: Project Name: Aulander Holloman Solar (HERTF-2016-008)
Revision #4 —Additional Tree Clearing
Add 149 AC to disturbed acreage. Total: 1,015 AC
Hertford County, NC
Dear Mr. Peed,
This submittal contains (1) set of the revised approved plans for the Aulander Holloman
Solar project, revised narrative and calculation package, revised financial responsibility
form and a check for the additional disturbed acreage.
Since the last revision approval on November 4, 2016, we have received additional
requested revisions from the developer. Tree clearing areas have been included on the
plans, which also affects our total disturbed area. Sheet C0.00 on the plans outline the
newly proposed tree clearing area in red.
In our continued effort to keep a clearer record of approvals and revisions, please see
the table below for the HERTF-2016-008 project history with NCDEQ.
REVIEW
TOTAL
PLAN TYPE
LETTER TITLE
DESCRIPTION
DISTURBED
DATE
ACREAGE
4/7/2016
TREE
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL
INITIAL TREE CLEARING PLAN
383 ACRES
CLEARING
INFORMATION
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH
6/1/2016
TREE
PERFORMANCE
TREE CLEARING PLAN -
447 ACRES
CLEARING
ADDITIONAL 64 ACRES
RESERVATIONS
6/25/2016
SOLAR FARM
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH
REVISION #1- INITIAL SOLAR
866 ACRES
MODIFICATIONS
FARM PLAN
8/16/2016
TREE
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH
REVISION #2 - TREE CLEARING
533 ACRES
CLEARING
GUIDELINES
PLAN - ADDITIONAL 86ACRES
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH
REVISION #3 - SOLAR FARM
11/4/2016
SOLAR FARM
PERFORMANCE RESERVATION
PLAN REVISION #1 W/ NEW
866 ACRES
AND GUIDELINES
WETLAND INFO
As you can see from this chart, both tree clearing and the full solar farm grading
activities have been lumped under one permit number which is somewhat confusing as
can be seen form the acreages approved. Based on this confusion and the fact that
we will be coming in for additional solar farm erosion control plan revisions, now may
be a good time to separate the tree clearing from the full solar farm plans with separate
project numbers. Of course we will defer to you for that determination but if it would be
E
0
v,
0
E
E
3
3
3

SAMPLE
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Class
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Class of aquatic
resource
SCA
Palustrine
2052 LF
404 - Intermittent
SC6
Palustrine
2370 LF
404 - Intermittent
SCC
Palustrine
3025 LF
404 - Intermittent
SCD
Palustrine
624 LF
404 - Perennial
SCE
Palustrine
6155 LF
404 - Perennial
SCF
Palustrine
4060 LF
404 - Perennial
SCG
Palustrine
9176 LF
404 - Perennial
SCR
Palustrine
686 LF
404 - Intermittent
WAA
Palustrine
19.3 acres
404
WAR
Palustrine
5.4 acres
404
WAC
Palustrine
85.2 acres
404
WAD
Palustrine
32A acres
404
WAIT
Palustrine
20.2 acres
404
WAP
Palustrine
35.7 acres
404
WAG
Palustrine
3.2 acres
404
WAR
Palustrine
25.4 acres
404
WAI
Palustrine
4.6 acres
404
WAJ
Palustrine
0.6 acres
404
WAK
Palustrine
8.9 acres
404
WAL
Palustrine
1.3 acres
404

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United Steles on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic
features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case
life and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office, does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/L.ocal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Gargle Earth 2014.
or ❑ Other (Name & Dale):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter.
® Other information (please specify): The aerial provided with this document has been reviewed by Corps project
manager.
IMPORTAN 1' NOTE: The information recorded on this form bag not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should
not be relied upon for later mnsdretional determinations
BARNES.KYLE.W,°'.
ILLIAM.1388035-� R
397
aioxmm� moaram
Signalure and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary ID
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
Impracticable)

PRELIMINARI' JURISDICTIONAL DETERM[NATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): June 27,
2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQIJESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Eric Schudl, 192 Raeesvay Drive,, NC,
28117.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Price Soar, LI.C/Ilertford/PreAp, SAW-2016-
01196
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED'1'ABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Hertford City: Ahnskic
Center coordinates of site (fat/long in degree decimal formal): Lat. 36.2514640 N. Long.-77.0700990 NA'.
Universal'iransverse Mercator:
Name of nearest water body: Turkey Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 28148 linear feet: -4 width (n) and/or acres.
Cowxrdin Class: Paluslrine
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: 242.2 acres.
Cowardin Class: Palustrine
Name of any wafer bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE: EVALUATION (CHECK AL1. THAT APPLIES):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Datc(s): Multiple site visits required with the final on June 2, 2016.
1. Me Corps of Engineers believes that their may bejurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit
applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain un
approvedjurisdielional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Perri( (NWP) or other
general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporing NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved 1D for the activity, the pennit applicant is hereby
made aware of the following: (I) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary ID, which
does not make rat official determination ofjurisdiclional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved )D
before accepting the terms and conditions of the pennit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD
could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization: (4) that the applicant can accept a pennit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon die subject pemtit authorization without requesting an approved )D constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicahe;
(6) accepting a pennit authorization (c.g., signing a proffered individual pennit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any
form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary )D constiudes agreement that all wrilands and other water bodies on
the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United Stales, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal
court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved .ID or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon los
is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a prnlTered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained thercin), or
individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.P.R. Pan 331, and that in any administrative appeal.
jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make
an official determination wliether CWA lurisdienon exists over a site, or to provide an on vial delineation o l'jurisdicttmtal waters
on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. _

Appendix C
Revised Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form

Appendix B
Original Preliminary Wetland Survey Sketch

Custom Soil Resource Report
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
classthere are precisely defined limits forthe properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complexthat it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend (Aulander Holloman Solar,
LLC)
Sortie County, North Carolina (NC016)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CrA
Craven fine sandy loam, 0 to 1
percent slopes
51.6
1.2%
CrB
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4
percent slopes
16.5
0.4%
Lf
Leaf loam
894.4
20.0%
Ln
Lenoir fine sandy loam
69.7
1.6%
Pa
Pantego loam
413.6
9.3%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
1,446.8
32.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
4,462.9
100.0%
Hertford County, North Carolina (NC091)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaA
Caroline fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
91.3
2.0%
CrA
Craven fine sandy loam, 0 to 1
percent slopes
200.9
4.5%
CrB
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4
percent slopes
101.8
2.3%
ExA
Exum very fine sandy loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes
43.2
1.0%
LF
Leaf loam
1,992.2
44.6%
Ln
Lenoir loam
518.2
11.6%
Ro
Roanoke loam
60.5
1.4%
W
Water
2.6
0.1%
WN
Wilbanks silty clay loam
6.2
0.1%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
3,017.1
67.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
4,462.9
100.0 %
Map Unit Descriptions (Aulander Holloman
Solar, LLC)
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
10

O NO N N m c S O C
N (Np c ' _OOII(
NCP NN
N° N
p
'w'wp 1° h V t m
aE co E E
m 3�Z ymamm6Em'2m
OE amCl) oM00
E 9 Y m
Y L w OC7 OL YQ K m0 U O A m we m 0 ' t j
m m 2rn m a W Z UN L N .L.. O m ° u1
U E (�- W N O V O Zc0 GC TA 0 a m
a 0 yogm� j =m y,m EE2r- m m o
0 T w �'� i.w�cm ,$ cr oac aw'Y m c m o
�-`0om i�m imE0? u"i n y E
n Lm fnYN:.t VFU
Q $ 3 'owa0g
�j. amj
Za EmcE
=E m N ~�yb°c
£2Oy O,
m .� LD ov Q 90 m y m co
2OZ
O2 to L L�=wDvooY0u 2 m
ac F- aE vJ3U �n'va3 �� 05 r°n m' >°9 m`6 Ea° mo on H E
m
W T T
a U L @
@ G O 5 J W t1 tYJ' O p Y
a w LL 0 mq a
O T r N Y m g N m i V C
N
w auoQ€t.a m cc
� Y
0 3 m
ul
J
a
Q a r .2 rp�
» a° LL°
Y r N W n
C O 4 LL LL 6 0 LL T ° p O q m
m @ c B
$ O @ u c a § u
a@ 'o 'o 'o c o o N Y @ @ N W W C N o R m Y c C
@ a N N N C m m U U (7 U LL K V! h N N f9 8
$ 6
C q
a 00
E
Is
'0

� J
W1/� m./U
I WfW, //O // t -N 1
c
Q xs.
l j
1

4
•'Yn Gp.e Cli
�'1
•
fret{ .
p ..
Nil4nnlum.�
r
�r
— u

AppendixA
USGS MAP AND SOILS MAP

Aulander Holloman Solar LLC, Hertford County, NC
1.0 PROJECT/SITE DESCRIPTION
This project will consist of the construction of a Solar Farm on an existing farm at NC
HWY 42/11 & Joe Holloman Road (SR 1109), Aulander NC, Hertford County. More
specifically, the site is on the south side of NC HWY 42/11 just east of Aulander.
Initially, the project will consist of the clearing of trees from the site.
The site is in the Chowan River drainage basin and drains to Turkey Creek: 25-14-I-3; C;
NSW.
The site is relatively flat however there is some topographic relief across the site. There
are wetland areas present throughout the site. To the west and east there are areas mostly
vacant and wooded, with the existing tree line shown on the plans. To the northeast of
the site across NC HWY 42/11 are some developed subdivision homes that front State
Hwy 1 l Bus.
The total tract area of the site isjust over 1,208 acres, however the proposed limits of
disturbance will encompass approximately 1,015 acres. The majority of the project
boundary has been farmed for an undetermined number of years with multiple existing
farm paths drives present in the middle of the site, which connects to Joe Holloman Road
(SR 1109).
Solar panels will be mounted above ground throughout the site using a tracking system to
follow the sun for optimum power generation. Underground power cables will be run as
required and connected to multiple inverters throughout the site that are also mounted
above ground and connected to the existing power line infrastructure.
Grass will be planted throughout the site and maintained. Existing drainage patterns will
be maintained and storm water will sheet flow across the grassed areas to the existing and
proposed swales and existing features surrounding the site.
A gravel substation, gravel drives, inverter pads, laydown yards, and spoils piles will be
located on the site and will include 37.28 acres impervious, which is 3.08% of the site.
As the percentage is below 24%, the site is to be permitted as a Low Density project.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Project/Site Description
2.0 Planned Erosion Control and Sedimentation Control Practices
3.0 Maintenance Plan
List of Appendices
Appendix A — USGS Map & Soils Map
Appendix B — Original Preliminary Wetland Survey Sketch
Appendix C — Revised Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form

AULANDER HOLLOMAN COLLECTOR SUBSTATION AND SOLAR SITE
NC HIGHWAY 42
HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TIMMONS GROUP C-1652
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PLAN AND STORMWATER NARRATIVE
�N CARO"',
��QOFESS/0�1�9',
EAL
22�30
Zn
j11,11111000
Submittal: April 15th, 2016
Revisions: October 25th, 2017
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.

Appendix G
Stormwater Plan and Permit
hart hickman
SWMER EWRONMENTAL SOLMONS

o Forgo the installation of fencing, or create openings or gaps in fencing to allow
passage for mammals and turtles.
o If possible, the solar field should be designed with open areas spread throughout
the project site and planted and maintained with taller/pollinator friendly plant
species. This practice would benefit pollinators, create diversity throughout the
site, and provide much needed shelter islands to aid in the movement of small
mammals and birds.
o Mitigate for the loss of forested habitat. Though the loss of forested habitat cannot
be fully mitigated when cleared for solar facilities, we believe measures should be
implemented into the design plans to offset the impacts of the project to the
greatest extent practicable. We recommend the construction and placement of bat
and bird boxes throughout the site along with perch poles that are large enough to
be used by raptors.
o Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different
needs for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend designing the solar facility to
maintain a diverse array of habitats.to accommodate varied pollinators from
hummingbirds to butterflies to bees. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or
shrubs while many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants. Most bees nest in
the ground and in wood or dry plant stems. For additional information and actions
that can be taken to benefit pollinators please visit the following website:
http://www.fws.gov/pollinators/pollinatorpages/yourhelp.html
We appreciate the opportunity to continent on this project. If you have any questions
concerning these comments, please contact Kathy Matthews at [phone], Ext. 27,
or by e-mail at <[e-mail]>.
Sincerely,
�k �L P,
P to Benjamin
Field Supervisor
cc: Maria Dumn, NCWRC

seed mixes are persistent once they are established, thereby preventing the
reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotics plants are also aggressive
invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing already established
native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only native plant species be used
in association with all aspects of this project. Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found
at http://www.tneppc.org/ and http://www.invasive.org/eastem/srs/.
Pollinator Recommendations — Although solar energy production is a fast-growing
renewable energy source that can lessen overall impacts to natural resources when
compared to conventional energy sources (coal, oil, gas, etc.), we believe solar fanns can
adversely affect valuable natural resources if they are not properly planned and
constructed. Impacts to natural resources from the construction, operation, and
maintenance of solar farms include: the removal of forests and riparian buffers; creation
of monotypic habitat; introduction of invasive species; use of herbicides; creation of
large, clear open spaces; and barriers created from fencing. Recent evidence indicates
that pollinators, especially native bees and monarch butterflies, are in serious decline.
Loss of habitat and diminished native food sources has decreased the populations and
diversity of pollinators throughout the country. For these reasons, we recommend that
solar facilities be sited in areas that are previously disturbed (fallow fields, closed
industrial sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature forests, streams, or wetlands. To
offset the overall impacts of solar facilities and/or to increase the habitat and species
diversity within the solar facility area, we further recommend the following measures be
implemented into project design:
o Sow native seed mixes with plant species that are beneficial to pollinators
throughout the site. Taller growing pollinator plant species should be planted
around the periphery of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be
restricted during the summer months. Taller plants, left unmowed during the
summer, would provide benefits to pollinators, habitat to ground nesting/feeding
birds, and cover for small mammals. Low growing/groundcover native species
should be planted under the solar panels and between the rows of solar panels.
This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the amount of
maintenance such as mowing and herbicide treatment. Using a seed mix that
includes milk weed species (milk weed is an important host plant for monarch
butterflies) is especially beneficial. The following website provides a
comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
https:Hmail.google.com/mail/u/0/4advancedsearch/subject=pollinator&subset=all
&has=anita&within= l d&sizeoperator=s_sl&sizeunit=s_smb/ 14fo366dba7d3bda?
projector=l. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and
pollinator habitat requirements can be provided upon request.

z
Recommendations
• Listed Species - Our databases indicate that no listed species have been documented on
or within two miles of the site. Therefore, it is unlikely that federally -listed species occur
on the project site.
• In general, the Service recommends that solar facilities be sited in areas that are
previously disturbed, or sites that do not impact mature forest, wetlands, or streams. The
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum
(a copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and
mitigate secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources
and water quality. We recommend that you consider this document in the development
of your projects and in completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
• Riparian Buffers — The Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed
action might have on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to
sedimentation. Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent
streams and 100 feet wide along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100year
floodplain, whichever is greater]) should be created and/or maintained along all aquatic
areas. Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas,
transmission, etc.), and other infrastructures that require maintained, cleared rights -of -
way and/or compromise the functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur
within these riparian areas.
• Invasive Exotic Species — The Service is concerned with the introduction and spread of
invasive exotic species in association with the proposed project. Without active
management, including the re -vegetation of disturbed areas with native species, the
project area will likely be a source for the movement of invasive exotic plant species.
Exotic species are a major contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to
habitat loss. Exotics are a factor contributing to the endangered or threatened status of
more than 40 percent of the animals and plants on the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants.1 It is estimated that at least 4,000 exotic plant species
and 2,300 exotic animal species are now established in the United States, costing more
than $130 billion a year to control. Additionally, the U.S. Government has many
programs and laws in place to combat invasive species (see www.invasivespecies.gov)
and thus cannot spend money to counter these efforts. Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of
Executive Order 13112 Invasive Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to
"not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the
introduction or spread of invasive species in the United States or elsewhere." Despite
their short -terns erosion control benefits, many exotic species used in soil stabilization

United States Department of the Interior
0
s FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
d a
Raleigh Field Office
o Post OtTice Box 33726
� '0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
June 9, 2016
Mr. Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
Hart & Hickman, PC
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Aulander Holloman Site, Herford County
Dear Mr. Ingalls:
Jl1N 1 8 2016
This letter is in response to your May 16, 2016 request for assistance with an endangered species
survey for the Aulander Holloman site, located off of NC highway I 1 S and Joe Holloman Road
in Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
received the request on May 27, 2016. The Service has reviewed the maps and infomtation
provided for the proposed project.
Project Area and Proposed Activities
0 o, "'.
According to the submitted information, the project site consists of two parcels totaling
approximately 1,260 acres. Currently, the site consists of farm fields and wooded land, and a
power line is located in the center portion of the site. A solar array is proposed to be placed on a
portion of the site; however, a proposed site development plan has not been provided.
Federally Protected Species
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within Hertford County, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect that
species. The Service has reviewed its Geographic Information System (GIS) database for
recorded locations of federally listed threatened and endangered species on or adjacent to the
proposed project site. The GIS•database is a compilation of data received from several sources.
Federally -listed species that are known to be present in the county include red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manafus).

o Forgo the installation of fencing, or create openings or gaps in fencing to allow
passage for mammals and turtles.
o If possible, the solar field should be designed with open areas spread throughout
the project site and planted and maintained with taller/pollinator friendly plant
species. This practice would benefit pollinators, create diversity throughout the
site, and provide much needed shelter islands to aid in the movement of small
mammals and birds.
o Mitigate for the loss of forested habitat. Though the loss of forested habitat cannot
be fully mitigated when cleared for solar facilities, we believe measures should be
implemented into the design plans to offset the impacts of the project to the
greatest extent practicable. We recommend the construction and placement of bat
and bird boxes throughout the site along with perch poles that are large enough to
be used by raptors.
o Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different
needs for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend designing the solar facility to
maintain a diverse array of habitats to accommodate varied pollinators from
hummingbirds to butterflies to bees. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or
shrubs while many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants. Most bees nest in
the ground and in wood or dry plant stems. For additional information and actions
that can be taken to benefit pollinators please visit the following website:
http://www.fws.gov/pollinators/pollinatorpages/yourhelp.html
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions
concerning these comments, please contact Kathy Matthews at [phone], Ext. 27,
or by e-mail at <kathryn_matthewsCia fws.gov>.
Sincerely,
Qte Benjamin
Field Supervisor
cc: Maria Dunn, NCWRC

3
seed mixes are persistent once they are established, thereby preventing the
reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotics plants are also aggressive
invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing already established
native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only native plant species be used
in association with all aspects of this project. Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found
at hfp://www.tneppc.org/ and http://www.iiivasive.org/easteni/srs/.
• Pollinator Recommendations — Although solar energy production is a fast-growing
renewable energy source that can lessen overall impacts to natural resources when
compared to conventional energy sources (coal, oil, gas, etc.), we believe solar farms can
adversely affect valuable natural resources if they are not properly planned and
constructed. Impacts to natural resources from the construction, operation, and
maintenance of solar farms include: the removal of forests and riparian buffers; creation
of monotypic habitat; introduction of invasive species; use of herbicides; creation of
large, clear open spaces; and barriers created from fencing. Recent evidence indicates
that pollinators, especially native bees and monarch butterflies, are in serious decline.
Loss of habitat and diminished native food sources has decreased the populations and
diversity of pollinators throughout the country. For these reasons, we recommend that
solar facilities be sited in areas that are previously disturbed (fallow fields, closed
industrial sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature forests, streams, or wetlands. To
offset the overall impacts of solar facilities and/or to increase the habitat and species
diversity within the solar facility area, we further recommend the following measures be
implemented into project design:
o Sow native seed mixes with plant species that are beneficial to pollinators
throughout the site. Taller growing pollinator plant species should be planted
around the periphery of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be
restricted during the summer months. Taller plants, left unmowed during the
summer, would provide benefits to pollinators, habitat to ground nesting/feeding
birds, and cover for small mammals. Low growing/groundcover native species
should be planted under the solar panels and between the rows of solar panels.
This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the amount of
maintenance such as mowing and herbicide treatment. Using a seed mix that
includes milk weed species (milk weed is an important host plant for monarch
butterflies) is especially beneficial. The following website provides a
comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
https://mail.googl e.com/mail/u/O/#advancedsearch/subj ect=pollinator&subset=all
&has=anita&within= l d&sizeoperator=s—sl&sizeunit=s_smb/ 14f0366dba7d3bda?
projector=l. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and
pollinator habitat requirements can be provided upon request.

Recommendations
Listed Species - Our databases indicate that no listed species have been documented on
or within two miles of the site. Therefore, it is unlikely that federally -listed species occur
on the project site.
• In general, the Service recommends that solar facilities be sited in areas that are
previously disturbed, or sites that do not impact mature forest, wetlands, or streams. The
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum
(a copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and
mitigate secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources
and water quality. We recommend that you consider this document in the development
of your projects and in completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
Riparian Buffers — The Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed
action might have on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to
sedimentation. Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent
streams and 100 feet wide along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100year
floodplain, whichever is greater]) should be created and/or maintained along all aquatic
areas. Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas,
transmission, etc.), and other infrastructures that require maintained, cleared rights -of -
way and/or compromise the functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur
within these riparian areas.
Invasive Exotic Species — The Service is concerned with the introduction and spread of
invasive exotic species in association with the proposed project. Without active
management, including the re -vegetation of disturbed areas with native species, the
project area will likely be a source for the movement of invasive exotic plant species.
Exotic species are a major contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to
habitat loss. Exotics are a factor contributing to the endangered or threatened status of
more than 40 percent of the animals and plants on the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants.I It is estimated that at least 4,000 exotic plant species
and 2,300 exotic animal species are now established in the United States, costing more
than $130 billion a year to control. Additionally, the U.S. Government has many
programs and laws in place to combat invasive species (see www.invasivespecies.gov)
and thus cannot spend money to counter these efforts. Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of
Executive Order 13112 Invasive Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to
"not authorize, Rind, or carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the
introduction or spread of invasive species in the United States or elsewhere." Despite
their short-term erosion control benefits, many exotic species used in soil stabilization

a� United States Department of the Interior
P y
's FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
� a
Raleigh Field Office
aA ep Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
June 9, 2016
Mr. Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
Hart & Hickman, PC
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Aulander Holloman Site, Herford County
Dear Mr. Ingalls:
�, ��..EI VL
�y JON 13 2016
BY:
This letter is in response to your May 16, 2016 request for assistance with an endangered species
survey for the Aulander Holloman site, located off of NC highway I 1 S and Joe Holloman Road
in Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
received the request on May 27, 2016. The Service has reviewed the maps and information
provided for the proposed project.
Project Area and Proposed Activities
According to the submitted information, the project site consists of two parcels totaling
approximately 1,260 acres. Currently, the site consists of farm fields and wooded land, and a
power line is located in the center portion of the site. A solar array is proposed to be placed on a
portion of the site; however, a proposed site development plan has not been provided.
Federally Protected Species
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within Hertford County, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect that
species. The Service has reviewed its Geographic Information System (GIS) database for
recorded locations of federally listed threatened and endangered species on or adjacent to the
proposed project site. The GISS-database is a compilation of data received from several sources.
Federally -listed species that are known to be present in the county include red -cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealls) and the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus).

f
l
a
'S
3
t
i

COUNTY: HERTFORD
BERTIE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW IL
R11:ENERGY RELATED
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFIC..
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
CC&PS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
MID EAST COMMISSION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Commerce
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Review
STATE NUMBER: 15-E-4600-0490
DATE RECEIVED: 03/16/2015 J
AGENCY RESPONSE: 04/10/2015 Q
REVIEW CLOSED: 04/15/2015 V
LL
LL
0
pc
S
DESC: Application of Aulander Holloman Solar, LLC for Certificate to construct a 80 MW
Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Hertford and Bertie Co. Docket
#SP-5259 Sub 0. - View document at
http://starwl.ncuc.net/NCUC/portal/ncuc/page/Dockets/portal.aspx, Type SP-5259
Sub 0 in the Docket Number search line.
Located east of NC Hwy 42/Hwy 11 South at or near Joe Holloman Road, Aulander, NC
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: ® NO COMMENT COMMENTS ATTACHED
SIGNED BY: 10, ,( 1 / /ij DATE: '-('
U7
0
N
04
N
CL
all

NCDEQ - Species/Community Search Page 2 of 2
L•� am }.ry [..t North Carolina Natural Heritage Program • 121 West Jones Street • 1651 Avil Servire Center . Raleigh, NC 27699 1651
CONNECTNC
ti„25org inmr hare
Learn more llo, /1—nomrztnup.l aMut Governor IkCrorys plan to Connect NC through statewide investments inroads, education and parks.
North Carolina OeparEnvironmental Quality
VIM
Jo
NZ 2Tl est Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603
TO Free (W) 623-6198
http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search 5/17/2016

NCDEQ - Species/Community Search
Page 1 of 2
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Natural Heritage Program - Species/Community Search
Species/Community Search
(Data updated on April 15, 2016)
Help„(hpp;,(,/pony.;,ncan.,.wy�mcumeprtinb.ary]ke mnkruula=bl5eta3c,eso4anx-absn<aeaexveaeaagraup(e=nl sa7.) and DefinitfansCaup;]ipalul.emea..e7!c!mcyn,ene.nn....y!tk�nkr,
Count Reference Ma fM1tt:(/WrW.rcCmr,arealclEocumenLllMary(AxLNleluuN,(eM30a]6a1a 4256 adaa
.X...... P.......P ......... ......... ..... .....Imi0te,...ffijTR.kL
..... e]! Togo Reference Map
1 mrpa/Rorw;.Maengorp,(c(mcumenrrubn.M!.ge�Nlemuu=aaamvmsxesesoe]ac�aneuxcneu9.�uPie. nlser i
Search Parameters: Tope Map like union'
(Searched on Toe May 17 2016)
Do another search .DD.wninad.Resu[ts.
Show 10 J entries per page Filter search results:
Taxonomic Group Scientific Name Common Name NC Status Federal Status State Rank Global Rank Topo Map Topo Map
Status
Freshwater Fish
Acipenser oxyrinchus
Atlantic Sturgeon
SC
E
S2
G3
Union
Current
Vascular Plant
Asclepias
Purple Milkweed
SR T
S11
GSi
Union
Current
purpurascens
Crustacean
Orconectes
Chowanoke
SC _
FSC
S3
G3
Union
Current
virginiensis
Crayfish
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries
First Previous 0 Next Last
A species/community search provides lists of rare plants and animals, natural communities, and important animal assemblages (e.g.. heronries and colonial waterbird
nesting sites) known to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. By default, records are summarized by county, but you also have the option to summarize the records
by USGS topographic maps or simple statewide summaries. For more information or for an explanation of the results of the search, see the "Help' and -Definitions" links
above.
Partial search terms are acceptable. If you are unsure of the correct spelling, you could enter the beginning letters of either the genus or species in the Scientific
Name field.
To see distribution maps, click on the scientific or common name of an etement in the table of results from a county or tope database search. Note that there are no
maps for the statewide summary.
The results can be further refined by entering a text string in the -Filter search resultsfield.
Clicking the "Download Results button will give you the option of saving the results table to a comma -separated -values file. This type of file can be opened vdN most
spreadsheet programs, including Microsoft Excel.
If you have any questions or technical issues, contact a Conservation Information Manager.
Use of North Carolina Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the project area contains
suitable habitat for rare species. If a database search lists no records for a project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present. The
area may not have been surveyed by biologists, or the data may not have been reported to the Natural Heritage Program.
Information obtained from the heritage data search should be cited as follows: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Data Search. [search
date]- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC, Available at: www.nrnhp.org.
http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search 5/17/2016

Hertford County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, an... Page 2 of 2
petitioned by outside parties and other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans,
State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not
biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened
species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or
"PT", respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and
removed (de -listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took
effect August 8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16
U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of
bald and golden eagles and provides a statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The
USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land
managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid disturbing bald eagles. For mor information,
visit htti)://www.fws.izov/migratorybirds/baideagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of aoaearance(T(S/A)l•
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle
(from New York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from
Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T
(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles
from the southern population. The T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by
private landowners in North Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its
official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the
bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/hertford.html 5/9/2016

Hertford County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, an... Page I of 2
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Hertford County, North Carolina
Note:Marine Threatened and Endangered Species information can be found at the National Marine
Fiseries Service (NMFS) Endangered and Threatened Species website
Updated: 3-7-2015
Common Name
Scientific name
Federal
Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Current
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
West Indian manatee
Trichechus manatus
E
Current
Invertebrate:
Chowanoke crayfish
Orconectes virginiensis
FSC
Current
Vascular Plant:
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing. (Formerly "CV candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC=Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered
Species Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or
otherwise in need of conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/entylist/hertford.html 5/9/2016

6 :3anou
Coo-03S
ON 8Of
0 :ON NOISIn3M
%oz-9l-C
31VO
SNOLLMOS
7V1N3WN0NIYW3 tl31NVWS
0) E40'995404 K [OW99SY L
Sualm6}
Emoz lx.S-'l S -,(-.L
1, )i^ y .
fpl alm5-»+S uouy y,^^$fZbZ UIUI Ji
JG
p epLl
VNIl0HV0 HiWN 'A1Nn00 GHOd183H
SMJ0V-09ZVX0MddV
311S NVW0II0H-H30NVlnV
103road
dVW NOUV301 311S
31111
(OIHdVMOOd01) S3lH3S 31nNIW S'L
3lONVMOVnO
C866 VNIIOMVO H1MON \SaldVM 3N0NVOM
dM 310NVMaVno ,s,E)'S'n
133d NI 31V3S �N
000t• OOOZ 0 "
31HwIXMddV

May 16, 2016
Page 4
Conclusion
Based on the lack of suitable habitat, the potential for the proposed construction activities to
affect Federal protected species is low.
Please review the above information and provide a written response as to the potential for this
project to affect protected species. If possible, please respond to this request within 30 days. If
you would prefer, you may sign in the space provided below and return this letter to our attention
without a separate letter response.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
N
Matt Ingalls,
Project Manager
dc6jv"'e��
JC Weaver
Staff Geologist
Attachments Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Site Map
USFWS T&E Species List for Hertford County
NHP List for Union, NC Topo Map
US Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office response:
Based upon the available information, rare, threatened and endangered listed species are not
likely to occur on the project site.
US Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLU➢ONS

May 16, 2016
Page 3
• Red -cockaded woodpecker, Picoides borealis —Endangered
• West Indian manatee, Trichechus manatus - Endangered
H&H also reviewed NC Natural Heritage Program on-line database (Updated January 12, 2015)
for current, historic, and obscure records of threatened and endangered species occurrences
within the Union, NC 7.5-minite topographic map. None of the above protected species were
noted to have been identified on the 7.5 minute quad.
Correspondence with NC Wildlife Resources Commission
H&H submitted a written request for information and related comments to NC WRC on this site
as a separate letter. No response has been received yet
Critical Habitats
H&H reviewed federal registry information pertaining to Federally -Designated Threatened and
Endangered Species Critical Habitats for the Federal listed species in Hertford County. No
Federally -Designated Critical Habitats were identified in this area.
Visual Survey
Between August 2015 and May 2016, H&H conducted a visual survey of the subject site and
nearby properties. Because the subject site and nearby properties have been used for agricultural
and silvicultural purposes, mature strands of longleaf pines greater than 60 years were not
observed on the site or nearby properties. Therefore, suitable habitat for the Red -cockaded
woodpecker was not observed at the site or on nearby properties.
Additionally, surface waters with connection to the Chowan River and the Albemarle Sound
were not observed on the subject site or nearby properties. Therefore, suitable habitat for the
West Indian manatee was not observed on the subject site or nearby properties.
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

May 16, 2016
Page 2
There are two unnamed perennial tributary streams that originate in the southeastern and
southwestern portion of the site and converge in the central portion of the site to form Turkey
Creek (identified as a perennial stream). Turkey Creek flows off -site in a northerly direction.
There are several unnamed intermittent streams that flow into Turkey Creek and its perennial
tributary streams at locations in the southwestern and central portions of the site, and two small
surface water bodies are identified located adjacent to the unnamed perennial stream in the
southwestern portion of the subject property. Surrounding properties consist of undeveloped,
agricultural, and residential land.
In order to investigate the potential presence of endangered or protected flora and fauna on the
subject site, H&H recently conducted the following activities:
• Contacted the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) by this letter
• Contacted the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) office by a similar letter
• Reviewed the Federal Registry and the USFWS information pertaining to Federally -
Designated species located in Hertford County at the USFWS website
httl2://www.fws.jzov/ralciiah/st)ecies/cntylist/hertford.html.
• Reviewed data obtained from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) for
listed species and specially designated natural areas
• Conducted an on -site screening survey in order to screen the subject property and
peripheral area utilizing habitat suitability criteria (i.e., land cover type status, soils,
potential corridor qualities, primary food source availability, and buffer zone qualities)
Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List
H&H reviewed the US FWS Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List for Hertford
County, NC (Updated April 2, 2015) which includes the following protected species:
14
hart hickman
SMARTEN ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

14
hart hiekman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via US Mail
May 16, 2016
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Raleigh ES Field Office
PO Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Re: Request for Information and Comment
Proposed Solar Farm
Aulander, Hertford County, NC
H&H Job SEO-003
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information concerning the potential presence of
threatened and/or endangered species on an approximate 1,260-acre property located off of NC
Highway I I S and Joe Holloman Road in Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina (see Figure
1). The subject site is referred to as the Aulander Holloman site and consists of undeveloped
land most recently utilized for timbering activities. The site is comprised of the following two
adjacent parcels of land:
• Parcel ID # 5961-95-6646 — a 1,209-acre parcel located southeast and southwest of the
intersection of N Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road; and
• Parcel ID # 5961-54-2022 — a 50.6-acre parcel located southwest of the intersection of N
Highway 11 S and Joe Holloman Road.
According to the tax records, the two parcels that comprise the subject site are owned by Price
Solar, LLC. This request is submitted to satisfy corporate environmental stewardship and is
related to a Federal wetland permitting action.
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 1 919.847,4241 main

Appendix F
Information Request Letters to FWS and SHPO and Agency Responses
hart hickman
SM MR LNNRONMENM5 LUMNS

?'he Great Disma(Swam-p RestorationBank, LLC
P. O. Box 6186
Chesapeake, VA 23323
March 7, 2018
Mr. Tomas G. Will
Assistant Project Scientist
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Rd., Suite 301
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Aulander Holloman Solar Project
SAW-2016-01196
Dear Mr. Will:
Phone[phone]
Fax [phone]
This information is provided in reply to your request for the purchase of up to 3.25 Non -Riparian
wetland mitigation credits and 100 LF stream mitigation credits (HUC Code 03010203) from The Great
Dismal Swamp RestorationBank Timberlake Farm. These credits are currently available from our
Timberlake mitigation bank.
This letter of availability will expire on June 30, 2018. You will need to submit to the USCOE the
necessary application for said mitigation, and receive USCOE permission to furnish said required credits
from our Timberlake bank.
To complete this transaction, we will require payment in full. Once payment Is received, the credit sale
will be reported to the US Army Corps of Engineers. Please provide and/or confirm the following
information:
Corps Project q: SAW-2016-01196
Waterway: Non -Riparian
Permittee Name:
Locality of Impact:
Permit action (i.e., IP, NWP-39, enforcement, etc.)
Impacts (acres/linear feet):
Impacts Hydrologic Unit Code: 03010203
Mitigation Bank, Permittee, and Consultant agree not to discuss with any other party the details and/or
pricing of this agreement, unless necessary for regulatory matters. Information contained herein shall be
held in the strictest confidence.
Thank you for allowing us to quote this project. We look forward to working with you.
Si cerely,
Beverl M. hite
Manage —Accounting/Sales
GDSRB
CC: File

Appendix E
Letter of Compensatory Mitigation Credit Availability
14
hart hickman
S MtR 1WRONMFNTa SO NS

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
EJinclude an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
1-1 include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
'This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands maybe present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change In the law or our published regulotions,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this dote. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Monual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USAGE Action ID No..
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
FJMust include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 1 I "xl7"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x l7", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
ElMust be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
ElMust be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
ElMust include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
1-1 Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December2013 Page

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic conncction(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
'Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable) 7:
Wetlands:
nWetland Data Sheetss
Tributaries:
NOUSACE Assessment Forms
© Upland Data Sheets © Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
0 Landscape Photos, if taken
P] Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
Maps (no largerthan 1 Ix17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum. streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
btt2J/www.usacearmy.mil/MBSions]CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgra anOPermits/reg suooasox
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
htto'//oortalmdenroit/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58ii.da4g.4960-ba43-45b7faf06t4 & ro4 idc38364 and,
htto://www.saw.pso,cearIL)Y.mil/PortalsIS9/docs/regulatory/oublicnotices/20l3/­NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318 ndf
t Delineation information must Include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

F.
n
G.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 1,260
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
© Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Forms.
© Project Coordinates: 36.254985 Latitude -77.079182 Longitude
Maps (no larger than I W 7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
FLarge and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
© Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
'See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record ofthe property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act andlor Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Kenny Habul, Manager of Price Solar, LLC
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
2118116
Date
171 1 am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a prelimi na!y JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUSs and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
El1 am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
1 am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
' For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
' Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

A.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
1515 NC Highway 11 S
Aulander, NC
Hertford Co.
sae Figure 1 in letter report
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address'
5961-95-6646 (1,209 acres)
5961-64-2022 (50.6 areas)
Matt Ingalls
2923 South Tryon street, Suite f 00
704.566.0007
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ 1 am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental ConsultantZ
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Price Sclar, LLC do SunEnergyl
Mailing Address:
192 Raceway Drive
Mooresville, NC. 28117
Telephone Number:
oontact: Eric Schudt(252-825-1731)
Electronic Mail Address 3:
eric.schudl®sunenergy1.cum
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVrax Record data)
If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
' If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROQRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985, If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: Decemher 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
;M
US army Corps
of Engln..rs.
wln:n9tca 0."W
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Arnty Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: huvJ/www.saw.usace,army.mil/Missions/Re ulatoryPermitPro rag_ m aspxx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554AR94
Fax Number. [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 2514610
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. North Carolina 29403
General Number: 910-2514633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December2013 Page 1

Appendix C
JD Request Document and
Preliminary JD Form

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Veminn d_t t ewo
Date:
Project/Site'lIpla
9tude:34 Wig
Evaluator:
County: �,,
OAFeStream
Longitude:w� Os1�
Total Points:
Srream/sarennial least
�
Determ n (circle one)
__ .. rr "".�
OtherVAOX40/V
ifa3f-
i/2 19 orperennial i)z 30• �
Ephemeral I rml t Perennial
P
e. Quad Name:
9.
A. Geonnor holo (Subtotal f-LALiAbsent
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
p
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
p
O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
3
5. Active/relict floodpiain
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
3
8. Headcuts
YLV2
3
9. Grade control
1.5
10. Natural valley
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel=
3
-•-•.��. ��.NF�.��„ uc:cu, acc sco nsnirnanuai
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = • 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
3
14 Leaf lifter
0.5
0
1 . Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16, O anic debris lines or piles
1
1.5
17. oil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
05
1
1,5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC - 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
rL

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identifloation of Intermittent atl
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 C 6 _
Dale: �' ProJoouslte: titude:3` . 2
Evaluator. County: •� Longiluda's''�'
Total Points: Stream Determination (clro ne) other GfeQj �%
Sbeemaet iessflMermittent Epheineral Intermittent ran al e.g. Quad Neme' Vz i9 orperennisi frz so• i
ripple-poolse9uenca ........_ _ ,__., p 1 2
�4. Particle slze ofstretun substrete _ 0 i 1 1S29 111 3
( o_ uepoanronal bars or benches 1 0 1 1 1 1 9 E a I
3
0
-aranolel dachas are not rated; sea discuss) In manual ii
B.Hvdroloav fSuhtntal= .rI 3
12. Presence of Basellow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14.Leafliter
_
1
0.6
of 0
15.Sediment on plantsordebris
0.6
1
t 1.6
16. Organic dehtis lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidenos of high water table?
0.5
No= 0
1
1.5
J
l�Ja �)I�InUV�Kiil lflrl�� 1• 1�
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
2
1
p
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
) 0
20. Maorobenthos note erareiy and abundance)
V0
1
2
3
21. Aquallc Mollusks
22. Fish
1
0.6
3
1.5
23. Cra sh
0
1
, 1.5
24. hiblans
0.13
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Welland (ante in streambedrEE
FACVV=
0.75; OSL =1.5
_
Other
)
'perennial stroams may also be Identified ustng other methods. Sea p. 35 of manual
i
Notes:
I
Sketch:
i
i
{r
1
e
41

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for ldentlfication of htterndriont
Perennial Streams and Their Orialns v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identificatlion Form Version 4.11
Da ; ,Pro acuSlte- tr,dp,de
Evaluetar: County: iN�tCP'7`91'irltt� LanpitutNn:� 4�9 i
Total i'Cints
Stream Weilagsf %3000M Detemntnation (oirala one) Other
&tlemdl(erd Icphamefal btfl+;s49 nt Perennial a.g. OuadAf. t
ift f0or efennlallfa30'.. �.7
12. Presence of Baseflow 0
3
13. Iron wdd'ain bacteria
b9
i
2
(J 3
-i47 LRaf rNer 1
(1.5-5
1.5
1 S. Sediment on plantsordebris ^�
0.5
1
16. Organic debris lines cr piles 0
'I1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? .'Jc = D
4'es
C. Bloloav (Subtotal= {m 43 ) 9€
18. Fibrous roots in streembed
l
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In sueambed
i !
'I
0
20. Macrebenthos note diversity and abundance)
_
1
2`
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
9
�2
_
i 3
22. Fish
0.6
1
; 1.5
23.Crayflsh
0
1
i 1.5
24. Amphibians
(— 0.5
—
_
1
1.5
2.5 Algae
-1 0.6
—
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants to streembed
FACW - 0.75; 08L = 1.5
Other
j
•psraradal streams may elea be Identified using other methods. llae p. 35 of mu_mal.
1
Notes:
_
E
Sketch:
t
k
I
�r

NC Vivision of Water Q
Peres
NC DWQ Stream Idendficat
Date:
Evaluator.
Total Points: ��
Stream le at !seal 7nfermidanf
8a feoreerenrdalffa00•
-.AN
-Methodology for Identlfleatlon of Intermittent
Itrearns and Their Orlains v. 4.11
Latitude:
County:
Stream Datearr-O' (circle one) I Other
m Epheeral rfni nt Perennlat e.g. 0uad Name:
A.Geornor hold(Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
t Strong
1`Continuilyof channel bad and bank
0
1
2
2. Slnuoslty of channel siong thalweg
.0 ..
_. 1
2. _
i __.
3. In annei sbveture: ex. 6111 fool, step•poel,
tipple -pool sequence
0 _
1-
T"V 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5.AcIlvelroficttlood lain
0
1
3
6. Depositional hays or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
p
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
' 3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
f.5
TO. Natural valley
0
0.5
�j 1.6
11. Second or greater order channel
No
yes =
amnaar anmas are nor m a; see oscues+swns rn manuai v
B. Hvdroloov subtotal = & •i t r
12. Presence of Bese0ow
0
1
2
!
%fren oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
j 0
15, Sedlmenton plants or debris
0.5
1
1.6
10. Organic debris lines or piles
0.6
1
1.5
17. Wit -based evidence of high wat table?
No = 0
Yos
t
C. BiO10 Subtotal =
18. fibrous roots In streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
i
0
20. Mecrobenthos (note dhareityand abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
1 3
22. Fish
0i
1
f 1.5
23. Crayfish
0.6
1
# 1.5
24. Amphlbfans
0.6
1
1.5
20. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
28. Weiland plants In streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL
=1.5
Other
'perannlet streams may also be Identified using other matliods. Bee p. 35 of manual.
f
Notes:
t
Sketch:
t
f
r
'f

NC Division of Water
f Methodology kr identification of Int•brnntttent
Streams atnd Th<j1r Origina; v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form
Verslon 4.1j.
Date:
ProjectiSito• i; P1
i
�atllrade: Sit° Z
Evaluator.
Total Points:
4N1
county: I I'?
Il IP
Longitude;,
-�
Streamfselfassf ffI2:luant
m eelon circ
Stream Dtmlinat� .,„�e
other '
�J
tW
Sf, ��
1/zf9or erannlaiftx30�
rePnumeral Irc�arinittenti n
-
o.p.0umfprofile,
I
A, Geomorpholoav (Subtotal- 2PYl Absent Weak Moderate
{ Strong
_
1°•Condnui of channel bed and bank 0
2. Sinuosky of channel along the
3. In channel shucture: ex, rlHle pool, step•pool,
0
-
d 1 Ise uence
1
2
£
4. Parilcle size of stream substrate
5.Ac6vefreflctflcOdplain
_
0
0
i j
1�
-
I 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
_
3
}-
I
7. Recent alluvial de its
0
_
2 -
3
8. Headduts
_
0
f l 3
I rr. �econa or greawr orgerCltannel I t(a = 0 l Ye i; _�
srgridal ditches are not rated; see disw ns In manual ,
a_ )iVfirl11ftt1V lAuh}nfol _ /_ � 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
_ G
1
q?
i
--
0.6
3 3
14. Leaf litter
16. Sediment on plants or debris
%
0.5
1
; 1.6
16, organic debris lines or plies
0.5
1
wqi 1.6
17.Soli.basedevidence ofhigh water table?
_... IID-0
_
Yes
9r-._
16. Fibrous roots In Weambed .`
1
2
;
n _
10. Rooted upland pleas In streambe_d
r j_
2
20. Macmbenthos note dnersil and abundance)
__.. j
1
2 �.
r
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
l 1
-
2
3
22. Fish
o
t
t.5
23. Crayrrsh
O.S
_�_
1
t
1.5
24. Amphibians
_
O.5
1
1.6
25_ AI a
0.:3
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW 0,76; OBL
=115
Ott iar 0
1
•paramdal sseanle may also be Idantgied using other methods. See p.35 of mamval.
9
Notes:
Sketch:
i
4
f

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology fe r Identification of Intermittent aq f
Perennial Streams and Their Orldris; v. 4.11 @ i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11.
Date: (
Pro)ectl$ito:A 6
Latitudo:
Evaluator: l
County:
„ r
Longituda 716,
9?
Total Points:
Stream is of feaetieteanafent .1
a
Stream Dotarrni n (circle one)
Ephemeral lr(erm�tt t Perennial
Other (Idrld
Cvrnrname:
1�
((((((
HZ 19w arennlat;rz 30`
eV.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-� )
Absent Weak
Moderate
; Strong
1''Contimtkyofchannel bad and bank
1_ 0
I
2
1.
2. Sinuosity of channel along lhelweg
3. In -channel slrueture: fix. r (fl pool, step -pool,
0
_ •i
3
0
A
Z
d le -pool sequence
4. Particle size of sheam substrate
0
5. Aclivelrelct 0oodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
_�
2
3
I. Recent alluvial deposka
0
2
}
6. c
0 _
2
j 3
9. Graderadecontrol
0
.0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
-
0
�.No
-
1
i.5
11. Second or greater order channel
gtFa
Yos
aeficlel ditches are not Fated; see dis<weebns in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal
12. Presence of Base0ow
0 1 I
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
TI
2
R i 3
U. Leaf litter
s
0.5
; 0
16. Sediment on plants or debris
.5
16.0 nio debris lines or piles
_
1
1.5
17. Soil•based evidence of hlgh wat table?
No = 0
Yee
_
y
C. Blob Subtotal =dFL
18. Fibrous mots In streambed
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
2
2
1
- 1
t 0
0
20. Mgcrobanthos (note crwersity and abundahca
3
_
3
21.Aquatic Mollusks
_
_t
1
_ _
2
! 3
22• Fish
. 0.5
1 jl1
1.5
23. Crayfish
_
0zor
1 1 1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
25.Algae
0.5
1 ..� �� 1.5
26. Welland plants In streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other
'Verenntai streeme may also be identified using other methods.beo p. 35 of manual.
F
Notes:
Sketch:
i
s
i
a
a
t
41
tL

Date:
Evaluator:
Total POIr
Steamiest,
NC Division of Water
I
for Identification of Intermittent
air Origins v. 4.11
ProJaeNstto:
Coanty: e
Stream Date
99
Ephemeral l
I Loritudo 36. z f/ /3
Longltude�,.9z9 38
sole one) Othci• LPJJ. 1pej
Perennial eg. quell Naele:
a. mK9lanner SUUMM ex mne-pool. Step -pool,
rlpolaool sequence 2 3
4. Paniole size of stream substrate a �2 3
5. AoBvalrelict 0oodplain D 3
5.De0osl�ionaIbarsorbennhes .n .. . _.
19. Grade Control
0
-arsrlC161 dilMles ale not rated; see d Mum(lo�5ilin manual
R. Hvdmfmv M..M .l . 1 . ie I lit
12. Presence of samenow 0
1
II
bacteria
13. Iron oxid*af
2 3
fi
14. Lotter1,g
0 5a
IaP
16. Sediment on ante or debris
0.616.
OManlo debris lines or pies517.
Solrbased ev tlenee of h gh water fable? Pro ^a
15. Fibrous rooq In streambed
2
1
4
i
0
10. Rooted Wtand plants In sweambad
2
1
D
20. Macrobenthm (note Mvemi and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatto Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Cmybh
0
1
i
1.5
24.Amphibians
0.6
1
S
1.5
28. Algee
0.6
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
FACW - 0.75: OBL = 1.5
Other dE
'perondlil streams mayatao be Idensded uatrg other mathads. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes;
7
Sketch:
l
r
i
i
r,
41

NC Division of Water Quality
Perennial 4
Date:
Evaloator:
ex.
4.
for Identification of intertnitteat
oir Origins v. 4.11
1 .Sep
County: C^i e.wj"IFUr� Lon0hudcV, 1174 y
strtallDetern' circle one) other 4oljM i1�Yd0 _
EPhemoral 41 Itte Perennial e.9. Qust+lvcme:
Absent Waait Moderate i Strong
0
1
0 2 — 3
0
m
- smMal ancnes are not nod: see disousalons in manual
A. i4wirnlnev mGrd inimi rs ! .lr� 1 t
12. Presence of Basellow Y p
i 3
13. Iron oxidiang bacterin
14_ Leaf Eger _
16.Sedlmenton plantsordebrb
1
0.
2
0.6 —
1
3
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
_
77. Sol -based evidenaeofhigh water tahle? Ido=0
Y?z
6;1
\.. niumuy rbunrnna= / ._r I rr
I& Fibrous roots In streambed
�-
19. kooted uptand plards In streambed
j 2•�—
, 0
20. Maaobenthos (note tiversiy so abdrxtance
1
2
i 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
--
+'�'1
1
2
3
22. M
_ 691
0.5
7.3. Crayfish
r
24. Amphibians
25.Algae
I
_ _�—
0,5
0,5
{--_—
1
5 ..
L6
R
26. Welland plants in streambod
W = 0.75; OBL =1.5 Omer
_
'esrenNal streams may also bo Idonaned using ofhor mofto. ;ice p. 35 or mx.tual.
Notes:
— -
�—
Sketch:
i
i
l

SOIL
Profile Description: (Descrfbo to the depth needed to tlocumenl the Indicator or confirm the absenco of Indicators.) ng ram: v
Depth Maldx
moist
inc—he..s
110—
Cdor /mdsRll d% Tvoe i_ LoEr_
Texture
Remarks
_ g
r_'yIOO
Z Q Q4 100
e: C=Concentration D=De fetion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soli indicators: (Applicable 10 all LRRs, unless otharvdse noted.)
'LacaBon: PL=Pore Llnin ,M=Matrix.
_ Htstesd
_ PdyvaAre Beim Surface (S8) (LRR S, T. U)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Soils':
1 nn Muck (Ag) (LRR O)
Ifisticp�d
_ Black Eplpedon (A2)
Black
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S. T, U)
_
_ 2 crn Muck (A10) (LRR S)
en sulfide
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7)(LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vedic (F18)(outside MLRA 150A, e)
- Layers
_
_ Depleted Maldx(F3)
_ piedmont floodplein Shcs (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
AnomalousBrightLoamy Soils)(LR
Organic (AS(AS)
T,
genic Bodies (ral (7)
_ Redox Dark Surface (Fit)
_
(MLRA 1538)
(P,
,
_ 5 Muck Mucky ce (As) (LR (LRR P, T, U)
U)
(LRR
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1crn Muck
_ 1 (AS)
Muck (Am) (LRR P,R
_ Redox Depressions (Fit)
Mad (Fill) (LRR U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted u fa
Beim Dark Surface (A71)
_
_ Depleted Ochdc (Fl 1) (MLRA 151)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark
Dark Surface (A72)
Coast
._ Coast Prairie Redox (A76) (MLRA 150A)
_ Iron•Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13)
'Indicators Ofhydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sf)[LRR O, S)
(LRR P, T, U)
_ Della Ochdc(F77)(MLRA 151)
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Reduced Vedic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 7508)
problematic.
_ Sandy Red" (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soft$ (Fig) (M URA 149A)
_Strippedface(?) Matrix
_AnomalousBright Loamy Sons (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (SI) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
::::::jHYdr71cSoil
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants.
jEjE���vanmanr statusw r cj > Sfalus� .rn
3.
4.
5. --
f+e0=TctalCwer
50%of total corer j P 20-A of total Barer. u%
SaolinNMrub ehet (plot size: )
3.
4. --
5.
Sampling Point:
Number or Dominant Spades
That Are OHL. FACV[, or FAC:
_ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:'(g)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC:
Gov (A/B)
Total %Cover of,
Mulsoly by
OBL species
x 7 =
FACW species
x 2=
FACspedes
x3=
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A=
7. - -- .r[, 1 - Repld Test fa Hydrophy0c Vegdation
B. -- ,�2-Dom nanee Testis a50%
�O 3- Prevalence Index is$3.0'
=TotalCwer _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation,
50",o ofidel rover. .i� 20%oftotalcover. 7.(Explain)
Herh Stratum (Plot size: ) r
1. �S �JPn n` AAT pry f S ZO r� Indicators of hyddc soil and well nd hydrology must
G he present unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
3. --
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. -- TIM - Woodyplents, excluding vines, 3In. (7.6 cm) a
more In diameter et breast height (DBH), regardless of
5' height.
7.
8.
La=TdalCwer
50-A cricket cover: !J 20nA of tdel aver �_
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2. _
3.
4. --
5.
SaplingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.26 fi (i m) tell.
Herb -All herbaceous (nan-woody) plains, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28it tell.
Woody vine -API woody vines greater than 3.28 At In
height.
Hydrophytic
_-=Total Cover Vega on
50%of idol cover:_-20%of total ewer._ Present] YNZ No__,
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

//�l WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)acVStw, hl,a ty Y• /V(r 1 �JT n__'..,. ���..ISampling Dele:�, �'�P //
InvestanVni(q. State: Ne- Sampling Point• 1I ,j'7..r
Invesligalor(a): _) L r../ rA I).t^c SeUion, Township, Ramie;_ i/ I��OnI
Landrorm(hublope, lenaco, etc.): Fi,dd Localreliet(mncave, wnvez, none): /tpa� By
Sub reg(on(LRRor MLRA): L J celA)'�—L
Let • ��x , i S`"% Zs Long: ^ a� • t,21i 2� Dalun
Soil Map Unit Nams: _ , 1 l� ORb+,. Nli
N WI dassAiwlion:
Me d(malk / hydrdagle conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes No. (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sell __, or Hydrology. significangy disturbed?y@.S Are^Normal Circumstances• pncemi? Yes
Are Vegetation Son_, or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? No (It needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site man showinn eamnli.,,. —1-.
• -- ---- a•-•^• •--�•..,>, uan>eobs, Important tealures, etc.
L�S
c Vegetation present? Yes No
Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
drology Presents Yes_ NoJ/ vnlhln a Woeand? Yes— No
MVnonr
Pdmmvi ft lors fmin•mu of i
ui •Nadir
'="°'" z10— oIMO mr d)
Sddaxt Son Cracks(88)
_ Surfaceter Table( Water
_ High Wafer Table (A2)
icF 81
_Aquatic posit-(auns 15)
Mad sill (61g) to U)
_
_SparielyVegelaled CoumveSeace(8g)
_
_
igen
— Hydrogen or
Odor lot)
_ Drainage Panama (810)
Mess Ttim Linn (SIB)
Watersaturarks(
_, Watermarks
Depot)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
hIzOspsuirids
_ Ozidlud Rhlzesphedironng LNing Roofs (Gs)
—
_ DrySeason Wale Tahle(C2)
(Ba)
s(Bst
_ du (C4)
_ Crayfish Bugows (08)
_ Algal
_ Algol Mat Or Crust (BS)
Recent Iron Re
_Recent Iron Redudlon (n TNad Balls (CS)
Reduction In
Othl Mucktain
— SclunBon Viable on Aerial Ma L°rY (C9)
_ Iron Da posits 85
Deposits
P ( )
_
_Olher(Explasn in Remarks)
in Remarks)
_ Geomorpi Position D
(2)
_ ShalmvAquitant(03)
_ Inundation VisibleImagery
(B))
_ WalerSTalned leaves (89)
Leaws(89)
_, FAC-Neulrol Test(DS)
Flald Ohservadons:
Sphagnum moss D8
_ Sph( ) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No_ Depih Cmchna
Water Tldde Present? Yes_
No_ Depth(Nchar,
Setuntion Pfesenl7 Yes__
�pndudes caollIs' hinge
No__ Deplh(Inchos): WaUand Hydrology prosanl? Yes_ No,
US Amry Corps or Engineers
Atlantic and GuUCoeslal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. P'l NUS %% 4-=- 0/4 G o F:4L
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
�O = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
SaolinolShrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. LlS7T18,412&✓iS /O
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Herb ra um (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2_
5.
Z = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Samplino Point: V v77 L
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply bw
OSL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (8)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
" Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
y 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wedand hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (08H), regardless of
height.
Sapl(nglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 8 (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.288 tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
height. -
Hydrophytic /
Vegetation t/
Present? Yes_ No_
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf caste Plain Region
�t� -u-
ProJecVSite: _ fT V(�'Y4 /✓f.� 2 City/County: �-(r-2JMDampling Date: /iD-2 - -' I rp
ApplicanVOwner: late: Sampling Point: WA f_
Invesligalor(s): / r TT(��� L�t/� A V055a Section, Township, Range: t)(V ( cam/
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): r U'J `4f r -r F-C-A-TT Local relief (concave, convex, none): COW4K Slope (%): O .L
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: 3 Ca , Z57 Loan: -77 65X-00.? Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: LF r/al")L�l�z iCOAn/ofGF Q o NlM Gassificalion:
i
Are climate / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ (if no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _ significently disturbed? /S Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ No _
Are Vegetation_ Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Fwith[n
pled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes o tland? YesNo
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes �o
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
ace Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Edmm
Indicators minimum of one is re uir - check all that a
Surface Water (All ❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
'
h Water Table (A2)
t iiralion (A3)
r❑-r DapesBa (B15) (LRR U)
L�--dr'H�rogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bl)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
L `Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Presence
ll----�1
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
n_
11
Drift Deposits (83)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
�❑❑—ir Recent Iron Retluclion in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface
❑ S u(alion Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
�omorphic
posits (B5)
�L-Jj (C7)
1SOther (Explain In Remarks)
Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
V1,on
ion Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present?
Yes No _ Depth (inches): 00
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): ( -R
Saturation Present?
_
/
Yes L No _ Depth (inches): G
l /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes " No
includes capillary fri e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: I4 V W_
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc'
co YR _
Texture Remarks
—D oQ
'T : C=Concentration, D=De le0on, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
L] Histosol (Al)
HHistic Epipedon (A2)
Black Hisfic (A3)
L] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T. U)
5 ern Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
[] 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
HSandy Redox (S5)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Lo my Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
epieted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (rF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain In Remarks)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Venic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Flg) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrie Soil Present4 Yes— No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: IN/+Ot�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) for mois %
a-s �o
S=12 e YR. 3,71
Redox Features
_ COIN (moist) % Tvoe� Loci
i13
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
0 Histosol (At)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black His0c (A3)
PHydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
0 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
HMuck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Icm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)Marl
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (SS)
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 POlyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outsitle MLRA 150A6)
amy Gleyed Matrix (F2) TI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Lj Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Ochric (Fl1) (MLRA 151)
0 Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophyfic vegetation and
n Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
n Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (,97) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
FHYdrl
Depth (inches):
Present? Yes No _
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
2. prGJt r2VR2C1M _1 /V 4=4 e
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
%7D = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.-P:2AGrA aj­f A(15rKGC,S D 4'
3.
4.
_
5.
_
6.
7.
_
8.
_
9.
_
10.
_
11.
_
12.
_
501Y. of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
_
b = Total Cover
20% of total cover: _
2.
_
3.
_
4.
_
5.
_
50% of total cover:
_
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: WAX
Number of Dominant Species 2
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: z (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (AIB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW speces
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
k Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wel and hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 If (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 If tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 If in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND
,DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region q-LJ_1(o/
Project/Site: --v " L,p ���-'� City/County:-r�L"�� /flzt��
v � t"o � Sampling Date: G-1
Applicant/Owner: ,E,,-� State: �_ Sampling Point: W f�
Invesligalor(s): J 1- SG We -A V-r action, Tovmship, Range: t / of f 4 n1
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): - _F�LL/�" .1 f (&-I- Coca[ relief (concave, convex, none): ����" Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):: L {Q Let: 3�^ • �nrg �J Long: -7'7 Z %3 % Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: r�cf-rr �Ft�NY0?Cl-:, I` `J 4elto (/� N classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? /GSAre "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes— No _
Are Vegetation_ Soil- or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? AID (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes o within a Welland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
❑ Su ce Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Prima dicalors minimum of one is re uired� check all that I
Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
t❑-r�Fb*gh
Water Table (A2)
111-❑MMMaaari Deposits (815) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
lJSaturation
(A3)
ogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
ff-Oxidized
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (all
Sediment Deposits
Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Presence Reduced Iron
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
(82)
of (C4)
Crayfish urrows (C8)
_
Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat Crust
p❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ S alion Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
I-1
u
w (B4)
Iron Deposits (135)
LJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
7 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (02)
❑ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
to
In lotion Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Water-Slained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
rr
-�G
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _ Depth (inches):-�
Water Table Present? Yes
_�No _ Depth (Inches): / ' 1
Saturation Present? Yes _,LNo_ Depth (inches): War'/
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Version 2.0

SOIL
Point:
ProRle Des<rlptlon: (Descdba to iha tleplh neadetl to document the lndlcator or congrm the absanee oflndleat
(InchSampling
Depth
es Cdw lmtlsll %.
a Fea es
Cdar (mdstl
-_4 I.Q
% _ Twe L_ oc
Texture Remarks
�-�-- 0
Soil Indicators; (gppgca0io la all LRRs, unless otharWse noted.)
'F O=Concentrallon, D=De elloo RM=Reduced MaldX MS=Masked Sand Gfahs.
21.eca4en: PL=Pae Uni .M=Ma9Lc
losd (Ai)
4e Fpipeden (A2)
— PCIyVaIue BeIaN Surface(SB)(ERR S, T, UI_1om
ladlcalors for Problematic Nytltic Soils
Muek(A9) (LRR O)
ek Walic (A3)
— TMn Dede Surace S9 LRR S, T, U
()( J
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fi)(ERR O)_Reduced
_ 2 cm Muck (Af0) (LRR S)
rogen Sulfide (A4)
04ed Leyerc (A5)
oamyGleyed Matrix IQ)
-Depleted
VerUc (F1B)(oms(da MLRA 150A,B)
Pledmml floadp(eln Shcs (F79) ILRft P, S, T)
anic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
Matrix(F3)
Redoz Dade Surteee (f6)—
Anomalous SfIght Loamy Sells (F20)
n Mucky MIAMI(A7)(LRR P, 7, U)
k Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surrece F7)
(
(MLRA153BI
— Red Parent Materiel (TF2)
Muck (A9)(LR IP,n
_ Reda De
_Mad F70DlRR Us (FB)
( )( )
_VeryShaOow Dark Srrtece(TF7?)
ided Below Dark Surfatt Ail
( )
_ Depleted Oduk,IN 1)(MLRA 151)
— Other(Explain In Remarks)
_k Dark Surface (Al2) _ Ism -Manganese Masses (F72) (LRR O, P, T)
_Sundt
Rneral(Sit(ERRA150AJ Umbdc Surface (F13)(ERR P, T, U)
IndiCelaR dh
' ydraphyllcvegetalim and
Muck
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sit (ERR O, S)
_, Sandy Gkyed MetdX (Sa)
_ Della Ochric IN7)(MLRA 151)
Welland hydrology must be present,
unless dishubM aprcbleme0c.
_ Sandy Redoxd (SS)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Piedmont Flocdphdn Sells (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Matrix
_ Stripped MaidX 7) I
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P. S. T, U)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sots (P20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Roslr(et1Ve Layer(irobservad):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks.
Hyddc Sail Present? Yes,__ No
USArmyCerps of Engineers
Allangc and GIN C01151e1 Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Poiy:,—[A,(
Tfaft Stratum •(Plat &a9:
�1r
Absolute Dominant mdceta
orb Cwer -�aIZ$talus
Dominance Test Workshoel:
1. r'n.ei �e�,✓
p�
Number Or OBL. AC
edesML 2
That Me OBL, FACW,aFAD:
2'Aw ree(2r(
�'
, [. (q)
3.
---
Total Number of Dominantq,
Species '(B)
—_
Across All Strata: L
5,
--
--'
Percent of Dominant Species
That IOp
6.
Are OBL, FACW, a FAC; (AlB)
7'
Prevalence Index vrodcsheet:
id 1%Coverof• _ Mulifely1 ,
—Xf,L=Total Cover OBL species x 1=
50%of Ielei ewer. Yk1 20%of total cover.,J� FAC W species x 2 =
Saolinaral=• b oral (plot
size: ) FAC species x 3 =
2. L�td7r..a
i�1 --4:L__Y FAG FACU species xq=
UPL species x 5 =
_
Cdumn Taels: (A) tB)
5.
'-- --- Prevalence Index B/A=
6.
-- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation lndlcators:
7.
—' -- j[ 1 -Rapid Test la Nydrephy5< Vegetation
e.
-- -- {Z2-Dortdnen<e Test >50%
_, 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
-1,t�=TdalCwer
_prob(emetic HydrophyBc Vegdalian�(f3ylain)
50% oflotal cover; rs` 20%of total ewer:., 1.
Herb Stratum (plat size:
)
1. —ZVA
'Indicators ofhyddc sell and wetlandhydrology
2.
-- _,__ be present, unless dd:lurbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
q•
-- '—'— Tfeo - Woody plants, excluding Nnas, 3In. (7.5 cm) a
more In diameter at breast height(OBH), regardless of
height.
_
7•
�
DBH and oreeterl A n 3.29 n (udi
--thant3 1 m tell.less
9,.
--' -- Herb-M herbaceous(non•woody) plants, regardless
_,_ of size, and Woody Plants less than 3.28 8 tell.
it.
-- ---- Woody vine -M woody vines greater their 3.288(n
12.
-- -- height.
Total Cover
50%of lotel corer: __ 20% of tobI corer. '
Woodv Vi=e Slrelum (Pica size;
) --
2. --
3.
q.
-- Hydrophyllc
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%6rlel8Icaver.__ 20%ortdelcorer.__ Present] Yes No__
USArmy Caps of Engineers Mange and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
PA0jecYSim:,AU1gNdk
ApplicanvoVinct.. Samp9ng Cale: 11
Lsvesligntor(s): � p �751a,a:_G _ SamPb'n9 Panne•�412q�
Londfcrm(helslope. lermee. eto): y�i..�... ' �cl nN
, TownsMpUA
, Range; r �j Ll
Suhratllon (LRR Of MLRA):J�.se Lagl��ett�=wv mnveX,aone): �i1(6Gk `8bpe(%i, D•Z
Lei7264
Sall Map Unit Name: LIeC I/./ i� 3`�_ys''T, :-77.;Cr C17(o f _Calera:
Are ctlmanel hydmfu& eandlaons on the Site lyprwl for [his Umeoryear4 Cyes'--V— No NNA dassi9raew ,_�_
Am Vegmation,_, Sag (if no, explain in Remarks.)
or Hydmlagy_signlmmntlydistwbed)�/ES Ara'Nomol G'rcumslanxs•present? Yes�No
Are Vagelailon__� Soil __. arffydtaugy _ natural ---
YProhlemat(c?AJr7 Qtneetled, explafn any answers In Rerrwlks.l
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS_ Attach site map showing sera lin p g point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vagelailan Present? Yes No
Hydrle Soil Presenl7 Yes �—'— Is DID Sampled Area
Wetland HYdmtogy Presanl? Yes (tP wt'h10- Waamd? Yes No —
HYDROLOGY
Pdmarvindiato f in ormals
surface Waler(Ap
1 a• l k all that
._ Aquatic Fauna (Bia)
;ierandary lnm to a!_mf IAi�rcai�
6 data Soll Crack,(88)
gh Water Table (A2)
Mad DePorl(s 1816) (LRR U)
Sparsely Vegelaled Concave sudxe (a8)
-- Dretnago Puio$(m))
RS ter Mai(A3)
_
aterent
Hydmaen Suleds Odor(01)
^ Osfdlzed Rhtrospherea along UVng Rook
— Moss ThntlnaterTab
Badimenl Depoalls (B2) �-
Deposit.
fC31
_ Presenw of Reduced tron(C4)
•_ DrySemop Water Table (C1)
ft UlaIoramat
^Algal MalorCrus{(84)
_ Roamt Iron RedMIOn in Tiled Soilsc9
Ice)
— Crayfish Blaraws(08)
841umUan v>t'blc On Andallmegery
_ Iron o
_ TWn Muck Surlaiw(C7)
Olhu[Explain In Remarks)
(co)
•e tiaemOTII& Pusillol(D2)
ti
._ i urd4lbn Via@to on Aedal hnagary (87)
— ShellowA9ultard(03)
WaterSlelned Leaves(89)
_, FAC•Nouhal Tosl(D6)
a'smaoo water pmseld?
Wider Table Present?
Saturation Present?
US AMY Corps of Engliteem
INO — Daplh(Inehos): f� .L ��
1�0__ paplhpnsheq:'G•R (p_3
No— �Dtls Gnchesl: ff •+
- -^ —+-� Welland HytlroloeY Prosenl7 Yca__ No —
Allan( and GuilDoeslal Plaln Region -Version 2,n

SOIL
-ampong
Prorde Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or canllrm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matdx
n es Cdor(mdsll %
Red Features
Cdor(moist) % Tner�—
Texture Remarks
'T e; Zoom icatoron,D=De eUot all Reducedess iz MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hyade Intllcatorc: (Appllcablo to all LRRs, uNass othervAsa nolad.)
'Location: PL=Pore Lining.M=MaioL
loso
— Histfic
_ Pdyvaluc Delow Surface (Sit) (LRR S, T, U)
Indlwlorz far Problematic Hyddc Sails':
1 cm Muck (As) (LRR O)
1ped
— BlaHisck Eplpedon (A2)
Hln )
_ Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRR S, T. U)
—
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black
aullide
Hydlogenayere(A4)
Loamy Mucky MlnandJFJ)(LRR O)
Gamy Gleyed Matrix(F2)
_Reduced VerUc (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
_
Stralffl—
_
Oepieted Maidx(F3) .
_Piiedmont Flcodplaln Suits (F19)(LRR P, S. T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Scgs(F20)
Organic
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T. U)
— 5 an Mucky Mrneral (AT) ILRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_
IM LRA 153B)
— Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
—
— Red" Depressions(FS)
Parent
—Red Pent Material (rF2)
ha
Very Parent Dark Surface (TF12)
_ i an Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
— Depleted Oduic(F11)(MLRA 1511
—
— Other li In in Remarks)
— Thick Dark Surface(Al2)
— Coast PreMa Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
—Iron-Manganese Manes (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P. T, U)
'Indicators orhydrophylle vegdetlen and
— Sandy Mucky Mineml IS1)(LRR O, S)
_
— Della Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
wetland hydrdogy must be present,
unless disturbed a problematic.
— Sandy Gleyed Martz (64)
— Reduced Verge (F18)(MLRA 15oA, 150B)
— Sandy
((S
— Pledmml FloodPlNn Sails (F19) (MLRA 149A)
— StrippedRedox Maio
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
— Dark SURett (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
DakSuface ( 7) (
Resisletiva Layerjuobserved):
Type:
Depth (fnches);
/
Hydr)c Sol] Present?
Remarks:
Yes Y No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Allantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants.
Toe shakenrresaure
{Plot slZa:
)
uanmenl mdcetor
% w r a 'es Status
Oomrnahce Test worksAoet:
1,�„q .f�Y�
OpO
-s e) _Y_ M4
Number of DpNnanl Species
That Are OSL, FACW, or FAC:
2._Q �C ns r
_6�—
(A)
3.
--
Taal Number of Dadnant
4
—._
Species Across All Strata:
5•
--
--
Percent of Dominenl Species
That /00
6.
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A43)
7•
Pr -Valence lndez worksheets
8.
Tdel%Cover oh Mugmlvbr
9n = Total Cover
OBL species x 1=
501Adldalcover:_ Yr 20%oftdalewer.1�
FACWspecles x2=
6 ol( alSh ub a t m (Plot size:
)
FAC species x 3 =
FrA
FACU spMes z 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
3•
_
Column Totals: (A) (g)
4.
--
5,
-- --
Prevalence Index --EVA=
6,
-- ---
Hydrophytio Vegetation Indicators:
7,
----
�[ 1- Rapid Test far Hydrophylic Vegolagm
g,
--
2-DaNnance Test is>50%
Cover
— 3- Prevalence Index Is S3.Or
50%gflolel cover:
_Lf'Z=Total
c{' 20%ofldalcwer. sb
_Problematic FlydrapAylle Vepctagatr (Fi�leln)
Herh Slrelum (plot size:
)
��
hndcelas of hyddc soil and wagand hydrology must
2.
--
be present, unless dslurbed or probiemage
3.
-_ __
DeMlBons of Four Ve➢efatlon strata:
4.
-- --
Tres -Woody Plants. excluding vines, l In. Cr.6 am) er
5
_-
more In dameter el breast height (DBIt), regardkas of
height.
7
-- --
Saplingl3hrub-Woody plants,ezcludutgvina,less
than 3In. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tag.
6.
Herb -All herbaceous(nw,,,dy) plants, regardess
10.
of size, and woody plants less then 3.288Jet.
11.
vine- All woody vines greater then 3.28 it in
Wood--
12.
--
Wooly
Total Cover
50%ef total ewer._-
20%of total cover:
WaodvaAna Strslum (Plot size:
)
_
1- 41A
3.
�-
4.
--
5.
---
Total Cover
Hydrophyllc
Vegetation
50% ollolal toes:__
20%of ldetewer.__
Present? Yes No —
US ArMy Corps of Engineers Menge and Gul(Coastel Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM— Atlantic and Gulf coastal Plain Region
ProiecUSlle:1]y dlxt% !
MP�anWvmer, LSIylCounly:/1,. sampling Dale:
1-11gaiOnis): .�.s_t✓A �j(air IQ sampling Point
Section, Township, Renge iJA) 1 r7.�1
Land/arm (hllslopa, Iarmw, elo.}. a j Local relletfeanu
Subregmn (LRR or MLRA): _t1� aP, conwns, nor ap. �D.1'1. . � Slope 1%): 6' Z
Lal:;e'�(,r ,?TZ 22 � 77.pS2310 mlwn: Ale Map Uml Name: ):r a iter p /Il) m _ry %- - . s
Are d)maUc/h tlml lee WS'-I--`ter+ rs�•l NyA dagsllfglpr:.
Y °B orldldom on the drat typlwl fw mrs Ume of ycaR Yes No Or no, oxplein In Remarks.)
Am Vegetation Sol_.._, or Hydrology �_sia,dgcinUydistu,bed?�
A�e Vegeletion_�SWiI o Q$Aro'Normal Cireumslanees'prosenl7 Yes�Nn__
r Hydrology patwalyproblemaoc?Ate (Ifneeded,ezPlalnmyanowereln Remarks.)
sUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
HydrophylbVagelaRon Present? Yes
I.Wdc Sol Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
No = I Is the Sampled Area
No
No wilhkra Wetland? Yes No_
-semndwlndlnl mfm,d� ry W
L'd'e. r Mnuen ( 1 re u:r d check all that goohl 8 dace Sull Cracks (ris)
SuRaco Walar(AI) _ Aquatic Fauna(818)
�hWeterTebin(A2) - pmepr Vegetated Concave Swraco(88)
d Deposits (815) (LRR U) _ Drainage PeRems Cell,)
�S lumbon (AS)-14 ragan Sulfide Odw(Ct)
eler Marks (01) _ Mozs Trim Une¢(B16)
Osddhed Rhfiesphems along LMM Roofs(C3) _ DryScoson Water Table(c2)
_ SedimenlDeposits(D2y W PrcaencaolRedurndlron(txy
Dj8 D,12tor (as) —CroYreh Hunows (ee)
- ` Recent Iran Rcdudion In Tgled Solt (Dg) Salumtbn Viyblo an Acdel lmsgery(CB)
— aBal Matoer (83) (eq) ` Thh Muck SVRaze(C7) �e0mW phlc position (D2)
_ IrondQtbn is Visible
_ 0111w(Exdain In Remarks)
I undaUon Visible on Aodel imagery a7 `ShollowAqulleM (03)
gory( ) Wal_ FAC.Noutral Tost(0s)
erSlahod Leave, F7d _ SphagmrmLUI
moss(D8)fLRROhse n
Sudaco Wator Present? Yes
Water TatYa Present? Yes
No Oopth (Inchey; A .L ��
4o„ berth prrths¢I: •`—G•R�P--3
No— Depth(InchatY. s:• p
---�_ Wetland hydrology Present? Yes_i No —
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Reglon—Ymsion 2.0

SOIL
/_IAC
Profile Description. (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence orindicators.)—
Depth M tdz Redox Featu e
(inches) Cdcr rmdst) % Cdw fmdst) % Twet Loci _ Texture Remarks
J�J1 "Lo)(a-511,� so C m
'Type: C=CmcentraUm D=DepletionRM
Hydrtc loll Indicators; (Applicable to all
noted.)
_ Hislosd (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Pdyralue Beim Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cre Murk (Ali) (LRR O) ,
_
Black Hlstic (!O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 crn Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Leemy Mudry Mineral (F1)(LRR O)
am
Loy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vedic (Fla) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
_ Stratified Layers(A5)
_
_ Depleted Matrix(F3)
_ Piedmont Floodploin Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
rig
_Momelous Bright loamy Soils
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
edox Dark Surtece (F6)
(MLRA75
_ 5uc Mucky Mineral (LRR P, 7, U)
�epleted Dark Surface(F7)
_ Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ JLR U)
(LRR
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
I cm Muck
1 cm Muck (Ali) (ERR P,R
n
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Deple_ low u
Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick
_ Depleted OchdC(F71)(MLRA 151)
Dark
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Irm•Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
slndicetars orhydrophyacvegetailon and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
= Umbdc Surface IN 3) (LRR P. T. U)
Welland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mlneral(S7)(LRR O, S)
S GI
_ Della Ochdc(F17)(MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Andy eyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced VerUc(F18) (MLRA 150A,158B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fill) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86) _ Anomalous Bdghl Loamy So9s (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
Depth (inches):
HYddc Soil Present? Yes No_
US Army Caps of Engineers AUanUc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
sampling PoinC.INA irY
Tree nralu (Plot size:
.�L.trfvtar� -
Absciule Dominant Indicator
) % we Species?.^ etas
VL %t" G
�-
Dominance Test varksheat:
Number of DominaNSpades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _� (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: _ R
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ b,Zy (A'S)
2. N _` �,���I tl
3. -PA ,
4.
g
7.
Prevalence Index warksheet:
Total %Cwer or, MulUpWbv
e.
/D D = Taal Cwer
50%ortotalcwer. _20%0ftdalewer. •Zf)
Seolina/Shrub Slalom (Plot size: )
+• a+rtU� �hrrfa 2D / fdL
2.
OBL species x t =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACUspedes x4-
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (g)
Prevalence Index - B/A=
__
3.
4.
5,
g.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
,I Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
2-Domnance, Test is>W%
3- Prevalence Index is s3.01
_ Problematic °Phwc VegeteUonr(F�ylaln)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrdogy must
he present, unless disturbed or problematic.
7. '-- --
g, •---
=Total Cover
50%ortdalcwer:_ en 20%of total cover._
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
) )
2.
3.
.__ --
Degnitlonso'Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woodyplents, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) a
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/shrub-Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 31n. DSH and greater then 3.25 g (i m) tall.
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it fall.
Woody vine - All woody Nnas greater then 3.26RIn
height.
4. --
5'
e.'
7.
8.
g•. ---
10. --
��,
-- ___
12.
Wao1dv Vine Strehm (plot size:
2.
Total Cover
50%of total ewer:__ 20%of tdtaf cover._
)
3.
4. --
Hydrophytic
=Total Cwer Vegetation
50%oft01alcover:/_ 20e%oflataicover. I/ I
Present? Yesz No —
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

/1 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM— Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
�heusaa:..n V 1 AN(iLC
APPlkantlOwne(:
Clly/eoumy. w7 _�f s( /�
�� SamPurlg f�k: i II I
. pL
Investigate'(,): r
lal�.-r �= _Sampling Peinl:�« �r
Landform (hllslope, lemace eetc.): !
Section, Township, Range: (fA' ' de-j
!
Subreglen (LRR or MLRA): 1� Q
Local relief Pwrcave, eanvex, novel: ' iNYak.
Lai; �!•Z�'J((.(� (.eef:
Soil Map Unit Name:
J 77•g7&6if gstum:
NWl dassikwlion.
Are clmauc/hytlrotogieConditions an the alto lyPIWI for this 8moofycar7 Yes No
Are VegelMionSON or Hydrology_-slgrorcaMtydistueoedW/ESAra'No(mal
Are VegetaBonSoilyour
—_. (If no, explain in Remarks,)
Circumslanms'pm,mi7 Yes�Ne_
Hydrology__nalurallyproblemalk,?"D
of needed, explain any amy"m In Remelu,)
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing
HydmphYBo Vegelalion Present? Yoe
Hydrfo Sol Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
point locations, transects, important features, etc.
NO
f4o I Is the Sampled Area —
No within a Welland? Yes, � No
P(imarvdlr lnllam it E qm9ronetliregulfed.,
AZSudam Wall, (At)
sir Blhal ea
Bh Water Table (A2)
_ AWalfc Fauna(813)
_ Mad Deposits (BlS) (LRR U)
lurelion(A3)
— Hydrogen SuTideOdor(Ci)
,chMeft ant Dep0il
Deposits (B2)
8aI1
_ Oxidized Rhiaospheres along Living Real,(C3)
DEnl
C Deposaa (B3)
_ Preaeeca of Reduced Iron(C4)
_Rcwnt Iran Reduction in Tilled sob(Ce)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
` Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Bon Deposits (B5)
` Other (Explain In Remarks)
I undadon Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
V WalerSlained Leaves (BB)
surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Yes NeL Doplh(lechas): A -�.
Yes 0= Depth (inches): G•a+:
Yes ---�1��11���77/ No Depth Qnches): 42f-& 'y
_ s dace &oil Cracks (38)
AZ Sparsely Vegetated Conreve Surface (BB)
_ Drainage Patterns (010)
_ Moss Tdm Lines(818)
DrySeason Water Table(C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (Ce)
Saturation Visible on Aerial hnegery Ice)
e cseomorphle Position (02)
_,.., Shallow Aqui(ard(U3)
_ FAC•Neutral Tool(05)
— SPhagnummoss(DS)(LRRT,D)
Welland HydMIODY I'Maill7 Yes V NO
US Any Corps of Engineers
ABaMic and Gulf Coeslal Plo(n Reglm-Vernon 20

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Poll: JA/A
Tree Stratum {Plot size:
DominSpecies? Indicator
Dominance Tell worksnear:
r,
1. e:.nut lhaJ t
%CweAbsolute
%C er ecles Status Number d Dominant
`' Species
—ut_ "� �_ That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC:
2.
(A)
3.
—
Total Number of Dominant
4.
—_
21
Species Across All Strata: 3 -(g)
5.
-
Percent of Dominant Species
a
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC: (A/B)
7•
Prevalence Index workshael:
Total %Cove of-, MUIRDIVbv
081. species Xt=
8•
_`
9L7 Total Ower
50°%ofldaicwer:
_20%oftdalcwer._(g
FACW species x2=
Sa in /Sh b Strata (Plot size:
)
PAC spedes x3=
`�
1•. L4/i :4r� it ih t0%FI
---¢�Al
/O
fACU
species X4=
2.
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (8)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
3.
4.
5, —' --
S.--
H�y/tl/ophyflc Vegetation Indicators:
-V- 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�[ 2- Dominance Test is>50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is $3.01
7. ----
8, --
�D
50%of legal cover:
=Total Cover
; 20%or total cover. 2,YdrWhNio
_ Problematic H VegetetlM'(Expieln)
Herb stratum (Plot size: )
rindicatas or hyddc son a ad Wetland hydrdogymusl
�•
be present, unless disturbed or pfabtemalic.
4. - --
Tree - Woodyplenis, excluding Anw, 3In. (7.6 eon) a
mae In diameter el breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shmb- Woody plants. exdudingviras, less
then 3In. DBH and greater than 3,28 it (I m) tell.
Herb- All herbeceous(nm-woody) plants, regardless
Of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine -All Woody vines greater than 3.26 it In
helghl.
5'
7. --
B.
g' ---
--
10.
I i.
,_ ---
= Total Cover
50%0ftotelcwer:�_ 20%oflegalccver.
W V e stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3. -- --
z�
Hydrophy
— I llc
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%oftoteicova: /'o 20%of total cwer._Present? Yas No__
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2,0

SOIL
., ,./. 7A#"
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth nestled to tlocumenl Iha Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth MatrixRedox
Inches Color fmdstl %
Featu s
Cdorfmddl 94 iVne Lx
Texture Remarks
0-4 i o IL
Lo�rR 5� b 30 C, rn
(a -tti 1o�LL . o�
LOJ .1� C rA
e: C=Cancenua0on D=Da Ielion,RM=Reducetl Maldz, MS=Masked Sand Gralns.
Hydrle Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR', unless otherwise noted.)
'I'melion: PL=Pare Lining.M=Mab6t.
Histosd (Al)
Indicators for ProbiematIc Hyddc Soils :
_
_ Histic Fplpedon (A2)
_ PdWAtue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T. U)
_ Thin Dark Surface (Sir) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ 2 cm Muck (A70) (LRR S)
_ Black Hlstic(A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outsldo MLRA 150A, B)
_
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redmont Floodplein Soils (Fig) (LRR P, S, T)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
(MLRA163S)
_ 5 Col Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
_ Clher (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophyllcvegelalian and
_ Coast PraMe Redox (A16)(MLRA i50A)_ Umbdc SLrfaco(F13)(LRR P, T, U)
welland hydrdogy must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR O, S)
_ Della Ochric(FM JMLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (34)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox(85)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Solis (FIB) (MLRA 149A)
_ Shipped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)'
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hyddc Soll Presant7 Yes No
Remarks:
US Any Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—A(lantle and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ocUSlte: d(KV
GtylCdunly: ,,Ay./ryi:�,) Samppnp Dale: 14
Appicanlrovmet: J5 •-h'�—
() --3Lw C � Sampling Poirl: Invest alor s : ..
t _ Section. Townsldp, Range: QAa 'r)n)
Landform {hRslopa, (cocoa, file.); 1ecluW. ��b{!
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): Localrelief (Wnwvo,convex, nonat. CdkV&x _ shpe(Y.): 0•2
`,a..
Soli Map Ung Name: 1 Iaee� • -77•Cf. 8'7<i7Z_ OaNm:
NWI dassificeaw..
Are dimaticI hydrologic conditlonson the site lyplcal lot lhfs time of year? Yes No Are Vagstaff- —� Ofno, explain In Remarks.)
.Sod,,,, or HydrobgV_-sigrjrcinllydistu,Wd?YESAte'Namal Ckcumstanws'preeant? Yes No_ Are Vegetation. S011 , of Hydrology` naturally prubiemalk7A1p Ufneeded, explain any onswers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map Showing sampling polo locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytie Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soft Present? Yes
Wetland Hydroloov Presenn I -
HYDROLOGY
NO Is I wtho Sampled Area —
No
No— withlna Weiland? Yes No
a ndia mfmum i nai d• h
�-- is k it a at p01
�rafaee Water Ai
( )
aeranaary mmcolors rmtntm g(
rta;e Soil Crocks (86
(A2)
gh Wat�rwation
_Aquatic Fauna (sf3)
_ Mad Deposits (015) (LRR U)
Sparsely Vegetated Coneave Sudace(88)
A3)
SfftforMars(a
.flWaferAfarke (et)
_ Hydrogen sulfide Odor(Cl)
— Drainage Paltama(610)
_ MosaTdm Lines (816)
_ Sediment Deposits (32)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres along Odrg Rdols (C3)
._ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ DlySeason Water Table (C2)
_ 0 •fl Deposits nisi
Plgal Mator Cmst (84)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tithed Sops Cb
(Cal
?Tin Muck Surface
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
._ ¢elureaon Visible on Aerial lmeg¢ry (q)
Iron Deposits
marCj)
_Olha(Exdaln fn Remarks)
in
Gill"hlc Position(02)
_ 1 undalion Vislele On Aertallmagory (87)
_ ShallovAqullard(03)
Waler•Slahred Leaves (89)
— FAO•NeoOal Test (05)
Field observations:
Surface Water
/
l
_ Sphagnum moss (O(f)(LRRT, U)
pressrA? Yea
a/ No Depth(nchos)::V:
WeterTable Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
o_ Depth(inches):
No` Depth
^eludes capillary fringe)
(Inches);
_
rology Present? Yes t/ NO
LIS Army Corps of Engineers Atiank and Gulf Coastal plain Region -Vetalon 20

SOIL
amp PdnL
Profile Oescripllon; (Descrfbe to the depth needed to document the tndlcator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth M Mz
inches Cdor !moist) Y•
�b
Redox Featu s
Color mast • ��—
A �T 'Pe �Qc
Texture Remarks
9-(o v rt �o
jn3f L _sro --
e: C=Ceacentrafion. D=De letlon RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR9, unless otherwise noted.)
'Location: PL=Pore LNin , M=Matrix.
_ Hislosd (A1)
_ polyvakM Setae Surface (SO) (LRR S, T U)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Sulls•:
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Halle Eplpadoo (A2)
Black
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T U)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
_ Hydrogen
en Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Minera((FI)(LRR O)
Loamy(
Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Verne F18 outside MLRA 150A,8
)( 1
_ Layers
Layers (AS)
_
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Pletlmanl Floodpiain Solis (Fig) (LRR P, S. n
_- Anomalous Bright Loony Sots (F20)
OrganicStratifie
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, UJ
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ljedox Dark Surface (F6)
y6epteled Dark Surface IF?)
(MLRA 153B)
— Murk Presence (AS) (LRR U)
i cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
_ ReckerDepressions (F8)
_Red Parent Material (Tf2)
_ Very Parent
Dark Surface (TF72)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Ochdc(F71)(MLRA 151)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_,,, CuxstPralde Redoz(AI6)(MLRA150A)_
_ Iron-Men9anese Messes (F12) (LRR O, P. T)
Umbic SLrface(F11)(LRRP,T,U)
sNdontos orhydrophy0evegetauon and
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta OchdF17
()( MLRA 151 e 1
wdland hydrologyor prot be present.
unless disturbed rc0lemaec.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (Sq)
_Reduced Verfio(FIB)(MLRA150A, 1500)
_ Sandy (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F79) (M LRA 149A)
Stripped MafRedo
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 151C, 1510)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,
Darku face ( 7) ( T U)
Restrictive Layer (If obserVad):
;
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hyddc soi�ProsDnt? es, No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gull Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION(FourStrata) —Use scientific names of plants.
Absdute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test vmrksheet:
Tree Stratum .(Plot size: ) Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. _� __ 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3 -- Total Number of Dominant _
1. Species Across All SIM%:S. Percent or
G. — That Are OBL Dominant Species ACW, orFAC: I�� (AM)
7, Prevalence Index mrksheeh
8. Tool %Cover of: MullioN by..
= Total Carer 081. species x 1 =
500.5 of total corer: 20%of total cover. FACW species x2=
2120npMrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FAC species x 3 =
...Q//� /s�J(n L.w r/� � 2_ frA FACU species x q =
. �UN 4� U�sFT/'w. _(� s/ 4rAL_ UPL species x5=
3. _ _ —i'— Column Totals: (A) (g)
5
Prevalence Index - EVA=
8
=
H�raphytic Vegetation Indicators:
1-Ra Rapid for
pI ytlrophyUc Vegetation
V2- Dorrdnence Test is-50%
_ 3- Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
7,
--
B.
=Total Cwer
50 %of total cover: _1 20% of trial cover.
_ Problematic HydrophyUc Vagetellon' (EVIain)
Herb Stratum (plot size-
•�_
)
'Indicators
1 " AIA
soil and
of hydrology must
pentl h ic
unless
he present•uMass 6a(urtadwproblematic.
or
2.
_
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strap:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 310.(7.6 am) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
3.
3.
--
4'
5.
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody parts. excluding vases, Ian
6.'
?
Than 3 in. DSH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tail.
Herb -M herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
8.
8.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 A fall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.26 it In
height
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50%ottotal cover: 20%ofto al cover.
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size:
_
)
1 . AIA
-- Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% oftutei corer: 20%of total cover._ Present? Yes No__
USAmry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -A(lanticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjccgSito: A V 0
_CkylCwudy:
MplkengOvmer. pWjJ,-��� nh� Sampling Dete:
—'"75 'rT
i9 () �.�wk'°tf&� .. late% Sampling Palnk _ Inuesl alar s :
! Secl)on, Township, Range:
Landbtm (hklslope, lerrare, etc): _4-hcre4J. _
lal:�be�ncase,e�envaexnew.l: khSubregion (LRR or MLRA);2Slope%: D•Z
-77./576 SSa8 _ Soil Map Unit Nama:Flar /L-(') Lrs..w.� /itt a _..� i- ii�_� � Jg o<kae:
Are cimaliol hydrologic conditions onllcel (or lhk Uma dyearf Yes Nn NWl ciassilcatior..
Ave Vegolason __, Sell — pl n), explain In Remarks.)
___.or Hydrology syniricaNlydisluroed7�/�'SAre'Ho(gal Cirprmzlances'presanl? yes
Are Vegetation_a Sol'__, or HYdrd0gy,__nalurallypmNematWMr7 Ho (If needed, axplatn anyamwersNRemarks.) `-
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map Showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
HYdroPhygo Vegetation present? Yes
Hydde SN Present? YM
Wetland Hvdmloev Pr.s..,n
HYDROLOGY
No`
IIVAPb IatSpled Area `
NO Within a Wetland? Yes No
Pdmary lndirelors(minim morana
44"budam Wale((Al)
Is( n+ i d
Rh Water Table(A2)
_ Aquatio Fauna(Si3)
_ Mad DePosils(B16)(LRR U)
e[ turallon(A3)
_ Hydrogan Sulfide Odor (C1)
eter marks (B1)
— Sediment Deposit,(82)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along LMng Rools(C3)
R Deposlia (63)
_ presence otReducod lran(C4)
_ Recenl koo Redu;tion in Tiled Sal& (C6)
Algal Mat or Cmsl(84)
_ Thin Muck Burrare(O?)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ OBrer (Explain In Remarks)
_ Igundagon Visbla on Aerial Imagery (g?)
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Yoa ✓ No,_ Dopth(inches):
Yes __ Depth gnches);,1�
Yes-7 NO_Deplh((nchas):
dare Shc Cracks (86)
44 Sparsely Vegetated Coneavo Surface (88)
Drainage pattems (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (810)
_ OrySeason Water Tablo(C7)
A Crayrnh surrovrs (CS)
elurallon Visible on Aerel Imagery (Cg)
Geomarphic position (02)
_ ShallawAquilard(D3)
_ FAC-Noulral Teal (05)
_ Sphagnum MOSS (OSI(LRR T-IA
Welland RydroloOy Presant? Yes V ga_-
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlarao and WIGWAM Plain Region -Version 20

SOIL
S I' amp It
Point
Description: (Oea to the tleplh needed to document the Indleator or conflrm the absence of Indicators.)
DepthProfile
trix
Gache Matrix
Color fmdsll 46
Redox Features
Cda fmdst)s r
/. �e Loc
Texture Remarks
- i
b"5( tvjl,' J2
10R 4123v
__
'TWO: C=ConcentraUen, D=De Ietien, RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Send Grains.
Hyddc Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otharMse noted)
'Location: PL=Pae Linin,M=Malrix.
_ Histosd (All)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Soils
_ Pety aluo Below Surface (SS) (LRR S. T U)
1 an Muck (Al?)_ (LRR O)
Histic Eplpedon (A2)
Black Hlsic(A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (59) (LRR S, T, U)
_
_ 2 cm Muck (Al?) (LRR
_,
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft)(LRR O)
Loamygeyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vedic Fill) (outside MLRq 150A, B)
,_6Tretlfied Layers (AS)
_
Depleted Matrix(F3)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)ILRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (I
_ Organic Bodies (AS)(LRR P. T. U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_
(MLRA 153S)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
i an Muck (A9) (LRR P, 1)
_
_ Redox Depressions (Fit)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
,_
_ Depleted Belay Dark Surface (Ali)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Ochrio(H 1)(MLRA i51)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Sudece(Al2)
_ Coast Pralde Redox(A16)(MLRA150A)
_ Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umhdc Surface(Ft7)(LRRP,T,U)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (L RR O, S)
Sandy Cloyed Matrix (34)
` Della Ochria(F17)(MLRA 151)
Weiland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed a preblemetle.
_
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vatic (F1S) (MLRA 150A0 1508)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (SS)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 157C, 157O)
_ Dark SUrfeca (S7) (LRR P. S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth(Inches):
Hydric Soll Present? Yes, no-
Remarks:
_
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four strata) — Use scientific names of plants,
sampling Point:W,q 7i
Tree Stratum • (Plot size: )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
e
Dominance Test worksheet:
I. =(y�j
w So.wes? Status
Number of Dominant Spades
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �_ (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across
4
__
All Strata:
5.
Percent or Dominant Species
That Are
6
OBL, FACW, or FAC:
T•
Prevalence Index yrorksheel:
B•
Total%Cover of,• MutiioN by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 7 =
50% ortotal ewer:__
20%of total cover,
FACW species x2=
S plMafShrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species x 3 = -
t._Lez0,IOrLw.•
/O
FACU species x4=
2.
UPL species X 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (q) (g)
4.
—
3
----
Raveknce Index = IYA=
g
Hy/drof hytie Vegetation Indicators:
T•
✓ �!- Rapid Test for Hydraphygc Vegetation
3.
--
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
�fl
_3- Prevalence Index is s3.W
SO%oflotalcwer.
=TotelCwer
20%of total ewer. Z
_problematic g r(6xpialn)
Hydrophytic Ve elation
Herb Stratum (plot size: )
I. Js-NWI a
%
�Q _ _ �(�
'indicators Ofhyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
__
OeflnlUons of Fouf Vegotelion Strata:
3.
4,
---
Tree — Woody Plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 MI) or
5•
more in diameter at breast height (DBM, regardless or
height.
6.'
y
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, exotuding vines, less
—
Than 31n, DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tan.
6.
8.;
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.20 Itfall.
10,
11,
Woody vine —All Woody vines greater than 3.28 8 In
12.
height,
Total Cover
50%of tote( cover:
MA of total ewer- 2
Woods Vlnestratum (plots)ze,
5.
Hydrophytic
=TdelCwer Vegetation
50%oftote1 cover:_ 20%of total cover._ Presonl7 Yes Now
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Golf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal plain Region
pproablle: t1 My L-,
CNylCounlY%__��/ �OI.rL gamW6'B Dale.
AppPcanUOvmer. - �—ii''SS
Investigator(,): latel.,�G Sampling point lainA
LandleraSxtion, Township, Rongr.
Subregion
((LRAorhillslop% LRA):,eleJ: Local fellef(concevs,cmvex,'i' - ( k 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA];_�� 4i 1(.1 ISJTki�lek % tj•
i : �6.2 D .�e^J '%7.0821 Or�Z _ aaum
SOP Map Unit Name: k"4[�'i -
Amdimaee/hdr Jj typical y NWP elassificaltor.,r_�
hydrologic conditions on the site t cal for Ws lime of eaR yes
Are Vegetation_ Sal tea _(it no, explain in Remarks,)
or Hydrabgy�s n,neang tlisiutb�d?�/ >0 Y FSArs'Nvrmal Greumslancos'present7 Yes�No
Are VegotaUon—,_,Suit— or Hydrology^_ nalurag roblematic? ' YP Ala (If needed, explain any In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophyltc Vegetation set? yes
Hydrk soil Pr05ent7 Yes
Weland Hvdroloo, Prccnnn
HYDROI.00Y
No Is the Sampled Arm
No _~ ll
NO within Wotland7 Yes, — No__
Z'rIlry Indlmtor r Gd aRl 'ran
_VSurraw Water (At)
eauk d'c o all thataovl
Setondac Ind1��,-..._._._..
dM
dam Soli Cracks (86)
Bh Water Table (Ala)—
Aquatk Fauna (819)
_ Mad Deposits (815)(LRR U)
SparselY Vega late d Concave 9udace (aS)
tundlon (A3)
•_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01)
_ pmina tia Patterns (slot
lalerMerks(81)
— Sediment DCpoSRS (e2)
— Olddired Rhlrospheres along Living Roots �)
— A1os•Tdm Unos(sm)
— Dry -Season Water Table (Q)
D Tr Daposils (63)
presence of Reduced Iran (C;)
Recent Iron Reduction In Taod Seas (C6)
— Crayfish ewmws (08)
Algal Mdt or Crust (84)
_ Thkr Muck SWace(C7)
^ gsluration Visible on Aerial Imagery (co)
✓ `g ry(
— Iron Deposits(B5)
— Other (Explain In Remarks)
— Gecmoryhlo P0319cn(02)
--!JIUndQIIQA Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
— Sh1llewAqult8rd(D3)
WaleFStatnetl Leaves (Bg)
— FAC-Neutral Telt(D5)
field Ouserrextons:
Surface Water present?/
— Sphagnum mass Ina)(LRR T, u)
Yes
✓ — Depth (Incheck
Weleria6k present? Yes
Saturetfon present? Yes
nctudes
� Mplh(fnches):%s
_ Depth(inches): aJ• /i
ra
:talfna
/
ca Ole eln e
—. Welland Hydrology
present? Yes I
De — Recorded vans Stream gauge, mwell. aerial nlv,a.e ,...,a..... r____...___... _
•�—
US Amny Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
.xmPmg Pam JALfg'—
Profile Description: (Descrlbo to Iha depth needed to document the Indicator or conOrm the absence of IndlcatorsJ
Depth M t'x
(Inch s Cda rmdst) — %
RedaX Fealu es
Cdor /mdsD % Twee oc
Texture Remarks
e; C=Cmcenbelion, D-
-De Ietion RM=Ratlucatl MaldX. MS=Masked Sand Grelns.
Nyddc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othorvdsa nolotl.)
aLoceUon: PL=Pore Unin M=Malra.
_ Histosd (A1)
HIsOc Eplpedon (A2)
_ Pdy+aWe eelgv Surfoee (SB) (LRR S, 7, UI
Indleators for Problematic Hyddc Solle;
_ 1 crrr Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_
_ Slack Wstic (A3)
_Thin Dark 61Mece (S9) (LRR S, T, UI
Mudry Mlnerel (F7)(LRR O)
_ 2 nn Muck (A70) (LRR S)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ 9re0fied Layers (AS)
_Loamy
_Loamy payed Maldx (F2)
DepleleO MeldX
_Reduced Vertfc (F78)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Piedmont Flaodpleln Sills (F19)(LRR P, S. T)
_ Organic Bodies (Ati) (LRR P, T, U)
(FJ)
_ RadoX Derk Sudace (F6)
_Anomalous Brl9hf Loa my Sok(FX)
(MLRA153BI
_ 5 crn Mucky Mneral (A?) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Parent
_Red Parent Material (iF2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Very hall Dark Surface (TFi2)
kSurfaRemarks)
_ Depleted Beim Dark Surface (A11)
_
_ Depleted Odrdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Other in in
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Coast Pa1We Redo(A76)(MLRA150A)_
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umlaic Srdace(F13)(LRRP,T,U)
alndlcators ofhydrophy0c vegetation and
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (31)(LRRO, S)
Sandy Gleyed Maldx(S4)
_ Della Ochdc(F1?)(MLRA 151)
wa0endhytlrdogymuslbepresenL
unless disturbed a problematic.
_
— Sandy Redax (85)
_Reduced VEdfC(F1B)(MLRA I5DA, 1508)
_piedmont Floodplein Soils (F19) (MLRq 149A)
_ Stripped (SS)
_ Anomalous Bdght Loamy Sops (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
faceMat(
_Dark Surface ((it (LRRe T, U)
RasUlctive Layer (If observed):
:
Type:
Depth Qnches):
Remarks:
Hyddc Sol] Present? Yes f/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 14�e
Absolute Domhrant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet:
(Pool size: J !A Cover Species?Salus
1. � naitrlw Number of Dominant Speeles
2. st _ That Are ODL. FACW, or FAC: .r (A)
Q-.wh..J� G
3. IVA — Tolei Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strafe: '(a)
7.
8.
=Total Cover
50%olldalcover: Re 20°% of total cover: _
Senlinc/St,nib Stratum (Plot size: )
3.
3a =Total Cover
50°% ortdal cover.lt— 20%of total cover. _ f,
)(orb Stratum (plotsize; )
1._ ArA
5.�
6.'
= Total Cover
50%cftdslewer:__ 20°boftdsIcover:,__
Woody Vane Strahrm (Plot size: )
2. BNf6r� �w 3 O V _ KAL
3. T
Per"M OfDorNnent Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC; ,00 (A/B)
Total %Care F
Mullldv by
OBL species
x 1 =
FAGW species
X2=
FAC species
X3=
FACU species
X 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (13)
Prevalence Index - IVA=
VV IRapid Test for Hydrophyfic Vegebom
-Domnance Test is>so%
_ 3 • Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophyllc Vegetadm' (FYplala)
'Indicators of hyddc loll end Weiland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody Plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) a
more in dameler at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShm6 - Woedyplenls, excluding vines, less
then Sin. OBH end groaterlhen 3.28 it(I m) fall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non•woody) plants, regardess
of size, and Woody Plants less than 3.28 it tail.
Woody vine -Ad woody vines greeter than 3.28 It in
height.
Hydrophytic
'Ab=Tdalcover Vegetation
5046 ortdei cover: 20%of total cover. (� Present?
Yesz No__
US Army Caps of Engineers A)landc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

/� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pra)eevsde. A V I OLAd f SWpkanVOwncr.—
GySCounty: _/�ys76di, �/10Hh -1) _ SamPling Daly, �� pL
'state: N G" Sam
Invesligalor(s): _, \ ��k pling Point,Sso
$eelkn, Town -,hip, Range:
Landrorm (hillsbpa, terraee, et,): Loral retie! lmnrave, convex. panel: �JyLYdG 0-7-
Soil Subregion (I.RR or MLF1q): _1-QQ �(= � Z��Z (�.=.� . y�— �'rr'k
MOP UM Name: zaiji,r`^� • ti�9�. _Oalum:
NWl daafi0elkr,. _
Are oimalia) hydrologic condnionson the sl(e lypfcat WWs time oryear? Yes No
(N no, explain In Remarks,)
Ara Vegeletion__,Saa—ar Hydrology
__ 09nlritintly disturbed?./E$Arc"Normal CUamslances'present? Yos_ZNO__
Are lbgdolbnSuil____,or Hydrology—naluragyprcblemalie?APD (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytio Vegatatlon Pmaent? Yes _
Na Is the Sampled Area
Hydro Son Present? Yea No
Weiland Hydrology Present? _.. Yes No_ wahlna Wetland? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
P��d//a I ca ors (minimum of
_u 6udace Wnler (All)
k•....d..ache k aOr r us
mmarc rrw nto srmi bm morn or -Ui ea
^ data Sail Cracks 86
lCcks (861Con
__jagh Water Table(A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (013)
_ Mad Deposits(Bt6) IARU
( )
Sparsely vegetated Surface (Be)
S lure -on (y67)
Sedermarks
Hydrogen Sulfide (01)
_ Dminsgo Pallerns(810)
„ Moss Trim Lin"(816)
Sediment Deposits (02)
osit
ores
_ Presenredce of Reephemsdung Living Roots (C3)
_ Presence of RedueM Iron (C4)
_ DrySeason Water Table(C2)
fl Deposes (83)
Algal Mal ar CNst(134)
Reaanl Iron Rodudim In Tilled Soe(s C6 )
Tldn MudrSudace( C7)
_ Crayfish Borrow, (C8)
alumllm Vtsable an Aedai Imagery(C9)
n Deposits 8
Iran p° le (
_
_Other (ExplaNbRemarks)
Lf eeomorphk POSIUM (D2)
1ndalkn Visible on Aortal imagery
P
(67)
_ BhdImAqulmrd(03)
.ZL vralerSlained Leaves
s (B9)
_ FAC•Noubrat Test(D5)
etlObservallon
_ Sphagnum moss (08)(LRR L U)
a.
US Army Corps of [ng)neera Atlantic and Gulf COaalel Plain Raglan - Volition 2.0

SOIL
ProSampling Point fD ile escription: (Descrfbe to the depth naedatl to document the Indicator ar confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth
Mast)
.(Inches) Odor (moist) 15
Redox Features
_ Color fmoistt N. Typo' UocT—
0
Texture marks
�T e: C=Concentregon, D=De etlen, RM=Reduced Melds MS --Masked Send Grains.
Hyddc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to ail LRRs, uMess otherwise
'Location: PL=Pore Unfn , M=Matrb.
— Histosd (A7)
noted.)
Pdyvalue Wow Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U)
�,
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Solis ,
1
Fflsffc—
_ Black Eplpedon (A2)
Black Hlsl
— Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRR S, T. U)
— an Muck (A9) (LRR O)
— 2 m Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Mucky Mlnerel(F1)(LRR O)
_ LoamyGleyed Matrix(F2)
— Reduced Verge(Fig)(Outside MLRA 150A, B)
Layers
— Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Piedmont 8eys s) (LRR P, S, T)
OrganicStratille
— Organic Bodies (LRR T, U)
_ Red" Dark Surface (FS)
s Bright
—Anomalous &ighl Laartry Sotls (FZD)
Solis
Mineral R
— 5 Muck
Mucky Presence (AS) (A7) (LRR P, T, U
R UJ
— Muck Puck
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(d LRA 15Mat
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1pl Muck(Am (LRR
0 )(LRR P,
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
— Mad (F10)(LRR U)
V
— ere Shallow Oerk9arks)(iF12)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Surface (All)
—Depleted Ochdc (F71)(MLRA 151)
—Other (Explain In Remarks)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prelde Redoz (A16) (MLRA 750A )_
— Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbde Sldace(F13)(LRRP,T,U)
'Indicators of hydroPhygcvegetatien and
_ Sandy Mucky Minend (81) (LRR O, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Delta OMde(F17)(MLRA 151)
wetland hydrology, must be Present.
unless disturbed or problematic.
— SandyRedoxd (55)
_Reduced VeNe (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Piedmont Floodpla)n Sol$ (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_, DarkWipSu Matrix (SS)
Matt
_. Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 1e9A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydrie Soil Present? Yes, No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Poinl:.tdi
Tree Stralum .(Plot size: Ji d-te D=I ant Indicator Oominanoe Test vwrksheet:
1. ¢'ayt,V� Ypyl(A, ) o a '_�$�°���° Number or Dominant Species
To -�L x AL That Are OBL. FACW, a FAC: 3 (A)
2. Af•l nln.aaAti _- Cs/
3. _17.1�� Tdel Number of Oadnant
4 __ Species Across All Strata: 3 (g)
100 =Total Cover
50%dldalcover._ o 20%oftdalco'+er. S_
&RI( lSh- Stratum (Plot Size: )
1.
2. f
3. --
IPercent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: jV0 (A!B)
Total %Cw oh
Multiply by
061. species
x 1 =
FACWspedes
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU spedas
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (g)
Prevalence Ind" = SrA=
7 -- _ -- .)�Y/3 Rapid Test (or Hydrapnylic VegAaSan
S. = 2 - Dominance Test is a50%
_ 3- Prevalence Index Is s3.Or
Total Carer _Problemelic FiydrophyOc V.9.bdimr(F�lain) 50%Wlda(cwer:�20%ortdelcover. s
Herb Suatum (Plotsize:
1 ) rindicalas d hyddc sdt and wetland hydrdegy must
be present, unless disturbed or problamatic.
2.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strda:
q, _— Tree - Woody Plants. "eluding vines, 31n. (7.6 tin) or
more In diameter of breast height (0814), regardless of
5• helghL
-- SaplingrShrub-Woody plants, exdudingvines, less
than 3In. DBH and greater than 3.25 0 (1 m) tan.
-- Herb -All herbaceous(non•woody) platys, regardless
of Sim, and woody plants less than 3.23 it tall.
Woody vine -All Woody vines greater than 3.26 It In
-- height.
= Total Cover
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover. _
Wcodv Vine Stratum (Pod size: )
I.
2. l
ZG =TdalCwer Vegetation
50%of tdet cover: _1_ 20%of total rover. �f_ Present? Yes No
USArmy Caps of Engineers Allentic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
PplPffi'icalShe: tl IAf/
CHWCounIY•�s21dUtV/r�,rJ SamPgn90als:�
MplcanUOvmer. ?5 sue, r.
Invasltgabr(s): lade --Dim Sampins Point:_
Landfarm (hpislope, larreee, eta): , t. Secllon, Township, Range:
Sub:egion (LRR or M f —Hal relief (concave, convex, none}; A�/.f,
L�Ah_I Q (ast: —_ Sbpe(%): O.2
Zq 2769-r Lonj ; 77. - - — - Datum:
Sail Map Unit Name: kllll a!)se,� kL,Ft� '�'—_
Are Climatic I hydrologfc Wnddena on the site lypiral Por lh�{a Ilmeot NWI Classification, ,
year Yes Noi Vrna, expraln In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _, Soil �_, or Hydrology _ slgntaeantly disturbad7�/
Are Vegetation_" Solt F.SAre •Normal C(rcumsrances•prasanl7 Yes No
_, a Hydrology natura!y problematic? 1j,)
(7 (If needed, oxpidn any answers in Remarksa
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, importantfeatures, etc.
HYdrophyllo Vegelallon Prasent7 Yea
Hydrla Sell Present? yes
Wedand Hydrology pram(? Yee
HYDROLOGY
No I n a Welland? Is the Sampled All.
—
No within Yes No
Primarvindlant (1111111jMUM _f one is rilglutr9d,
AeSurfaCO Walor(Al)
rherdtallihata.atvl
gb WatarTable(A2)
_ Aquapo Foams(1313)
_Mad Depo:fls (B15) (LRR U)
sS Ilermn s(0As)
olarent
_ HYdroaen Surds Odor(01)
Depot)
_ Sedtmenf Deposits (B2)
_ Oxkllmd Rhizospheres along LMng Rools(03)
Orjg'
_ Plesence of Reduced Iron (Cq)
_ Raaml Iron Redrelion In Tiled Solis(CGJ
Matorsrust
-Ngal Motor Cruse (Uq)
_ Iron Deposers (85)
— Thin Muck Su darc(C7)
— 1 ndaOon Vrs6to on Aortal knagory
Olhar E
(137)— (zplaln M. Remarks)
SUrfa- Water present?
Water Table Presed?
Yes ✓ Now Dapth(InChas);
YesDepth Dnchas):
Yes No_ Depth(Indtes);
AI
dose Sop Cracks (US)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (ea)
_ DmAnage Patterns (810)
Maas Trim Lines (Biti)
_ DIYSeason Water Tubb (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (Cal
✓a
_ Saturation Visible on Aednl Imagery (Cg)
mmorphic Position (02)
_ ShallmAgdlard(D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test(DS)
_ Sphagnum rtloas(DU)(LRR T. U)
Watland Hydrology Prosenl7 Yes Y No__
US ARAY Corys of Engineers Atlantic and Wf 0083M Plain Rugion- Version 2.0

SOIL
e....-n__ n.:... /. 7 A Q
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color rmdsD % Cda lmds0 % Twe Locr _ Texture Remarks
0-4 t- _
'4o — 30 C M
to all
noted.)
_ Histosd (Ai)
lacEPlPedm (A2)
_ Pdyvalue Belau Sur(ace (88) (LRR S, T, U)
• �- _ �-
,_ 1 an Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_
B
Black
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (AID) (LRR S)
_
_ HydrogenenHIsSUMde (A4)
Sulfide
_ Loamy Mucky Mlneral(Ft)(LRR O)
_ oemy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
,Depleted
_ Reduced Vvgc (F18) (outside MLRA 15DA,S)
_ Pledmont Floodplah Soils (FI9)(LRR P, S, T)
Layes(AB)
_Organic
Matrix(F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F2D)
Bodies
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Redox Dade Surface (FB)
(MLRA153S)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (Fa)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 crn Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Expieln In Reinerks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Dchdc(Fi 1)(M LRA 1511
_ Thick Dark Surface (A72)
_ Irm-Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
sNdcators orhydrophyllevegetelim and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (AIS) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbdc Surface(F13)(LRR P, T, U)
welland hydrology must bepresent.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (FI7) (MLRA 151)
unfess disturbed a problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(84)
_ Reduced Vedic(FI8)(MLRA 150A, 150S)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedrtroril Floodploin Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (SB)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sall Present? Yes Y No
US Any Corps of Engineers Allanlic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - VeMlon 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
{Pia size: ) %Corer Sales
Dominance Test vmrksheet:
_ ftAL
Number of Dominant Species
Thet Are OBL, FACW, a PAC:
!�
(A)
ns�,sp�Aas. �_eL 64�
3.,�
.
Taal Number or Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
—_
4.
Percent or Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC:
f
(O a
(AB)
5,
S.
7.
Prevalence Index svorkshest:
Total%Coverof., MultioNW.
OBL species x 1 =
&
In Total Cover
50-AcItdalco✓er:,Ytr-_20%oftatalcover., Ig
FACW spedes x 2 =
Saollnm/6hrub
Stratum (plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
54„n1filt �� �J Fq4
FACUspecies X4=
2.
�� —j—
UPLspedes X5=
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
3,
4.
5. Prevalence Index - B/A=
6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicator,
7 „V. I - Rapid Test for Hydrophy0c Vegetation
8.
•�2- Dominance Test Is >5M
_ 3-blOrna H Index is53,0'
=Taei Corer _ problematic Hydrophygc Vegdetion'(F�Iein)
50°b of total cove: H 20%ot teal corer. L
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
I. rNA be present, unless disturbed a problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, e,dudingvinw. less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.26 0 (1 m) tag.
Herb -All herbaceous (rim -woody) plants, Mgerdess
of size, and woody plants less than 3.288 tag,
Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3,26 0 in
height,
4
5,
6.'
7•
8.
-- --
8 �
10.
11
12.
= Total Corer
50%0ft018l cove: 20% of total cover: _
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
5. Hydrophyllc
Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover:__ 20%of last cover._ I
Present? Yes No —
US Army Caps of Engineers Atientle and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Verslon 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
PrgecUSgc:_/]JI0.N� City)Counly: �[ �1� �/
r�r^rri Sampling pale;•,, llb
AppllcenVOsmer: T
Invesbgaku(s): f c tate;•�G Samping Poles'
1 Sectien,Tewnship,Rang¢ QJU, 0*4
Landform (hitlsbpf terrace,' O 1 ��, La_ml relef(coneave, coms .none: C
_filar r it t ) • L�yk�` Saps (t4R
Subregfan (LRR er MLRq): R Lei _r7I r+La►,y l•��' [��. 7�6�s1
Soil Map Una Name: L i7 V ZA
Are c"imalic/hydrolrsgle conditions on the site typical for lMs time ofyearr Yes No NWl dassificalfor,
Are WgeWlion Soil, (f no, ekPlain In Remarks.)
of Hydrology— ENnlfl®nllydisturbed7YE$Are'Normal CUcumstanmg,pmsenl7 Yes No
Ave Vegetation,_,Sol_, or Hydrology.__ naturallyproblemalio?"D (fneeded, explain arlyarimers in Remarks,)
4-1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -. Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophylk Vogelation present?
Hydee Sol present?
Weesnd Hvdrotoov Pr. —i7
HYDROLOGY
No -
No I litho Sampled Area
No within Welland? Yos No
EAMW Indicalmmini 2ritilg Is mqq
44S11dace WaIar(Al)
nod, checkadduta I
_ flfgh Water Table (q2)
_Aquatic Fauna (a18)
_ Mad Deposits (816) (LRR U)
i.,./ (uralien (A3)
„ Hydrogen Sulfide Oda (C1)
slam Marks SedimentDeposits (B21
_ Olddhed RMaospheres along UWng RONA (C3)
n Deposits ca3)_
`Algal
_ Presence Of Reduced Jim(C4)
Recant Iron Reduction In Tilled Seas (as)
Ma( or CNst Cal)
_ Thin Muck Suffaw(C?)
_ Non Deposils(8S)
`Olha(Fxpletn In Remarks)
I unotation Wsible on Aerial imagery (87)
sudaeo Water Pro sons? Yea >/ No__ Depth (inches); fin
Water?able Present? Yes o_ Deplh(Inches):1
Sa(umlon Present? Yes No__ Depth(nohes): y��o ••
(ndudas eyelhan. r....e nr
US Army Corps of Engineers
S dace soil craft(86)
ZSparsely Vegetated Comaw Surface (138)
— Drainage Pallems (a10)
_. Moss Trsn Lines (616)
_ Dry -Season Water Table(CL)
_ Crayreh Burrows (Ca)
Saturation Viable on Aerial imagery(Cg)
. f Geomorphic P021gon(02)
_ ShalfawAgldlard(03)
FAC-NoutM Toot (OS)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRRT.U)
Welland Hydrology Pmaant? Yes a= No —
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Velskm 2.0

SEO-001 Price Solar, LLC c/o SunEnergyl —Holloman-Aulander Site —Joe Holloman Road and Highway 11 S, Hertford
Co., NC
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Class
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (LF or
Acres
Class of aquatic
resource
Streams
SCA
36.245438
-77.084969
Riverine
2,052 LF
Intermittent Stream
SCB
36.245913
-77.072094
2,370 LF
Intermittent Stream
SCC
36.243955
-77.070425
3,025LF
Intermittent Stream
SCD
36.247008
-77.077497
624 LF
Perennial Stream
SCE
36.248000
-77.079803
6,155 LF
Perennial Stream
SCF
36.251330
-77.063192
4,060 LF
Intermittent Stream
SCG
36.254500
-77.068119
9,176 LF
Perennial Stream
SCH
36.256705
-77.058017
686 LF
Intermittent Stream
Wetland Areas
WAA
36.244275
-77.087517
Freshwater
Forested/Shrub
Wetland
19.3 Acres
Wetland
WAB
36.242769
-77.083147
5.4 Acres
Wetland
WAC
36.256852
-77.066292
85.2 Acres
Wetland
WAD
36.248169
-77.082106
32.4 Acres
Wetland
WAE
36.252658
-77.076558
20.2 Acres
Wetland
WAF
36.244072
-77.068767
35.7 Acres
Wetland
WAG
36.257416
-77.073664
3.2 Acres
Wetland
WAH
36.250616
-77.050794
25.4 Acres
Wetland
WAI
36.252922
-77.052310
4.6 Acres
Wetland
WAJ
36.247284
-77.060761
3.3 Acre
Wetland
WAK
36.248489
-77.062736
7.4 Acres
Wetland
WAL
36.251986
-77.055000
1.3 Acres
Wetland

Appendix B
• Corps Wetland Forms (WAC to WAH)
• DWQ Stream Forms (SCA to SCH)

May 25, 2017
Page 2 of 4
NC Department of Environmental Quality
2. Schedule of Construction Activities
October 1 to October 8, 2016 - Whitehurst Sand Company, SE1's subcontractor,
performed initial tree cutting at the Interconnection area. Trees were hand cut and
grappled with a feather buncher, then transported with a skidder to a trailer deck,
located in an upland area at the preliminary laydown and substation yards. During this
time, large trees were de -limbed and placed on a trailer for transport. Smaller trees and
limbs were processed through a chipper and collected in a mulch trailer to be hauled
offsite.
October 9 to November 21, 2016 — A delay in construction activities occurred due to
equipment issues. Also, on October 91h & 10", the Site received 12.3 Inches of
precipitation.
November 22 to November 29, 2016 - Whitehurst grinded tree stumps and wooden
debris with a Tiger Cat M726e mulcher. Large and small diameter stumps were ground
down to existing ground surface or higher. Mulch produced by the grinding was
deposited in the immediate area where it had been generated.
3. 401 Water Quality Certification and a 404 Permit
Per direction from the USACE's Kyle Barnes, SEl operated under the premise that a permit
would not be required if the trees in the panhandle were only cut, and not cleared and
grubbed. It was SEl's intention to only cut the trees and grind the stumps to ground level so
pole trucks could Install electrical poles in the interconnection area.
4. Site Documentation and Jurisdictional Waters
A survey map prepared by Roanoke Land Surveying dated September 15, 2025 and last revised
June 22, 2016, depicts all jurisdictional water features on -Site and is included as Appendix A.
H&H estimates that approximately 5.5 acres of jurisdictional features are within the panhandle
area of the Site.
To avoid further unauthorized impacts on the Site, H&H will prepare and submit a Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) for designed stream crossings, monopole installations, and a
potential substation access road to USACE and DEQ DWR.
192 Raceway Drvvei Moor"v Jle, NC 28117 Phone: 704.662 03.75 �njn•,,�unette✓nyl.cm�t

SL -i" 1
May 25, 2017
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Attention: Mr. Robert Tankard
Re: Response to Notice of Violation
SunEnergyl, LLC and Price Solar, LLC
Aulander Holloman Solar
NC Highway 11 South and Joe Holloman Road
Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina
NOV-2017-PC-018
Dear Mr. Tankard,
SunEnergyl, LLC and Price Solar, LLC (collectively, "SE1") submit the following information in response
to the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Division of Water Resources (DWR) Water Quality Regional Operations Section dated April 25, 2017 for
the Aulander Holloman Solar project (hereafter referred to as the "Site") (NOV-2017-PC-0184). The NOV
specifically alleges violations that occurred within the 13.5-acre "panhandle" area of the Site located
southeast of the existing Dominion Energy substation.
Based on the findings of the Site visit conducted on April 18, 2017 with Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh, Mr.
Kyle Barnes, Ms. Lindsey Hesch, Mr. Kelly Hoyt, Mr. Joel Sossamon, and Mr. David Harris, SEl has
prepared responses to the Requested Response section of the NOV, which are presented below:
1. Plan oJActlon
SEl has retained Hart & Hickman (H&H) to evaluate the impacts to the wetland areas cited in
the NOV. In addition, SE3 will work with H&H to create an approved restoration plan that
meets the requirements of DWR and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The Plan of
Action details, with specific time lines, are provided below for each item listed in the NOV.
192 RacewayDrwo: Moores-wite,, NC 28117 • Phone: [phone]

May 25, 2017
Page 4 of 4
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
SUNENERGY1, LLC
4?0-
Kenny Habul
President & CEO
KH/KH
Attachments —Appendix A -Survey Map (Roanoke Land Surveying)
cc: Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh, DEQ DWR (via email)
Mr. Shelton Sullivan, DEQ DWR (via email)
Mr. Kyle Barnes, USACE (via email)
Ms. Lindsey Hesch, SEl (via email)
Mr. Matt Ingalls, H&H (via email)
192 raceway V'_"C; MOOKIP111I1, NC 2,1117 Phone: [phone] c,iM-=}ienener:l� 7 crnr.
w",. ,,r 3. 3_.

May 25, 2017
Page 3 of 4
NC Department of Environmental Quality
S. Restoration Pion
a. Permit Application
Impacts applicable to this NOV will be mitigated through an approved restoration plan.
For future construction activities, once a Site design is finalized (approximately 30 days
from the date of this letter), H&H will prepare and submit a PCN to USACE and DEQ
DWR. The PCN will address only the installation of the substation monopoles and an
access road in the panhandle portion of the Site, plus the stream crossings outside the
panhandle area.
If the proposed wetland impacts total less than 0.5 acre, H&H can prepare and submit a
Nationwide Permit (NWP) PCN within approximately 30 days from the receipt of the
final design plan. If the proposed wetland impacts total greater than 0.5 acre, H&H can
prepare and submit an Individual Permit PCN within approximately 90 days from the
receipt of the final design plan.
b. Wetland Restoration Plan (Wetiond Impacts)
After the Site design plan is finalized and total wetland Impacts are quantified, H&H will
assist SE1 with developing a restoration plan and contracting a wetlands restoration
specialist to restore the unauthorized impacts to the wetlands. H&H and SEl can submit
the wetland restoration plan to DEQ DWR within approximately 45 days from the date
of this letter.
c. Restoration Schedule and Monitoring
SE1 & H&H will consult with the wetland restoration specialist to determine availability
of plant material and suitable dates to implement the wetland restoration. Along with a
three-year monitoring plan, SE3 will submit the dates of wetland restoration
implementation with the abovementioned wetland restoration plan to be approved by
DEQ DWR within approximately 45 days from the date of this letter.
6. Preventative Maintenance and Control Plan
SES is preparing a Control Plan specifying how future impacts to stream and wetlands on this
and future SES Sites can be avoided. SEl will submit this Control Plan to DEQ DWR within 30
days from the date of this letter. The core components of the Control Plan include
environmental, regulatory permitting, and construction management.
192 RaGewciy Drive; Mooresvi,lte, k'L 28117 Phoney 704,662,0375 �r(utr�wnenerRvl.cont

.._ _.... ..
SUNIEENEERCY1
ILERr>ERS R4 COMMERCIRL BOLRR
b. Wetland Permitting and Compliance
I. Field delineation and assessment of wetlands and surface waters. Consultant
will flag boundaries with supporting delineation map, GPG survey grid locations,
shapefiles, and text files.
ii. Request a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination from USACE and NCDWR for
404/401 Permitting.
iii. Professional Licensed Surveyorwill collect wetland boundary points and provide
a stamped/sealed map of the wetlands and surface waters.
iv. Environmental Team member to attend site visit with consultant and USACE
Engineer.
v. Upon field regulatory determination, either a PJD or AJD request will be
submitted. Engineering site plans shall be designed to AVOID all wetland
impacts and surface waters. If the design includes stream crossings of
jurisdictional waters, a PCN shall be submitted and approved by the USACE and
NCDWR prior to any construction activities in the sensitive areas.
vi. Buffered streams shall be reviewed and determined by NCDWR.
vii. Wetland and surface water buffer boundaries will be located, flagged and
AVOIDED during the entire course of the project.
viii. Sensitive wetland areas will be identified in an approved Erosion &
Sedimentation Control Plan which will address stormwater pollution control
measures, drainage areas, and stabilization methodologies.
c. Internal Communication and Training
i. Per the approved PJD or AJD, and PCN the environmental team leader will
conduct an environmental overview presentation to the Construction
Management Team and environmental team members. The presentation shall
identify regulatory environmental assessments, potential critical areas, means
of avoidance, and preliminary construction schedules. This presentation will
take place prior to the field Pre -Construction Meeting.
ii. During the field Pre -Construction Meeting, the Environmental Team will notify
all subcontractors, personnel, and management team of the environmentally
sensitive areas that shall be avoided, plus proper construction methodologies
that will be implemented. Meeting members will sign an acknowledgement
form that verifies their attendance and training.
192 1Za.ceway'Drive, Moorea4vLUz, NC 28117 • Phovie.' 704.662.0375

SLII��NRRCYI
LERCXERS IN COMMERCIF L- Sr]LFiR
iii. Ongoing environmental field training will be provided to personnel associated
with site activities. The training/orientation will include a review of all approved
environmental permits, delineated jurisdictional wetlands (non-404 wetlands
too) and surface water maps, Best Management Practices and Procedures, and
notification procedures.
iv. Field Construction Managers, Supervisors, and Foreman shall completely aware
of sensitive or exclusion areas prior to beginning work. At the start of each work
day, a Plan Of The Day (POD) meeting will be conducted which all construction
activities will be planned and discussed. Environmental field team members will
identify and address potential impacts and sensitive areas during this time.
3. CONCLUSION
By identifying and communicating potential environmental impacts prior to construction
activities, SEi will avoid future Notice of Violations and stay in compliance with federal, state,
and local regulations. Environmental communication, awareness training, and appropriate
construction methodologies are the foundation of this Control Plan. The Control Plan's policies
provide a basis for assessing environmental concerns and implementing authorized construction
practices.
192 Racewcw 17rWeG Moorewa&.. NC 28117 • Phone., 704.662

APPENDIX D. CONTROL PLAN
Sun Energy Control Plan
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Appendix

SUI**J=—NERC"el
LER0ER5 IN C0MMERC1F L- SOLFiR
Date: August 8`h, 2017
RE: Internal Environmental Control Plan
1. PURPOSE
SE1's mission is to build utility solar projects in a manner which complies with all federal, state,
and local environmental regulations. To meet these standards and regulatory guideline, SE1 has
implemented a Control Plan that outlines the strategic steps to assess potential environmental
impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters, threatened and endangered species, and
cultural resources. Additionally, this Control Plan addresses the critical component of
awareness training, coordination, and oversight of construction activities near wetlands or
surface waters.
The Primary objective of the Control Plan is to perform the work that is Authorized and per the
approved Scope of Work, while adhering to construction practices that secure and preserve the
environmental conditions of the site. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES WILL COMMENCE PRIOR
TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF APPROVED PERMITS, CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY,
AND POTENTIALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. The implementation of avoidance activities will be
supervised by the field environmental team during all phases of the project.
2. CONTROL PLAN COMPONENTS
a. Internal Critical Issues Analysis
L USFW - NWI preliminary review of Waters of the US.
ii. Phase 1 ESA.
iii. E&SCP and Stormwater Permit Submittal.
iv. LIDAR and initial drainage assessment.
v. FEMA — Flood zone risk.
vi. Threatened and Endangered Species and habitat via USFWS IPac Tool. Self -
Certification letter submittal.
vii. CAMA review and submittal.
viii. Cultural assessment per Clearinghouse comments and NCSHPO review.
192 Zacewa v Drive, MoorewaAe, NC 28117 - t h.one�.' 704.662.0375

Energy, Mlnerol
and Lond Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 16, 2018
Aulander Holloman Solar, LLC
Attn.: Mr. Kenny Habul
192 Raceway Drive
Mooresville, NC 28117
Subject: Permit No. SW7160406 MOD
Aulander Holloman Collector Substation
Low Density Stormwater Project
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Habul:
ROY COOPER
Unre, in,
MICHAEL S. REGAN
reeem�,
TOBY VINSON
Dunrrn In"",
The Washington Regional Office received a complete Stormwater Management Permit
Modification Application for the Aulander Holloman Collector Substation project on January 18,
2018. The modification changes the total project are to 1208.8 acres and changes the impervious
percentage from 0.29 to 3.08. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that
the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC
2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW7160406 MOD dated February 16, 2018, for the
construction of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supercede any other agency permit
that may be required. The designated permit holder, Aulander Holloman Collector Substation,
LLC, shall be responsible for meeting the conditions and limitations specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following
receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings,
6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made this permit
shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact
me at [phone],
Sincerely,
William Carl Dunn, PE
Environmental Engineer
cc Rick Baker, PE, Timmons Group (5410 Trinity Rd. Suite 102, Raleigh, NC 27607)
Hertford County Inspections (PO Box 424, Winton, NC 27986)
Washington Regional Office
Slate of North Carolina i Environmental Quality Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center i 512 N. SaInbury SI. I Raleigh, NC 27699
91970792oo T

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
LOW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
AulanderHolloman Solar, LLC
Aulander Holloman Collector Substation, Aulander, Hertford County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of a low density project in compliance with the
provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwater rules') and
the approved stormwater management plans and specifications, and other supporting
data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Energy, Mineral, and
Land Resources (Division) and considered a part of this permit.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject
to the following specific conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
This permit covers the construction of up to 24% of build -upon area coverage on
this 1208.8 acres tract of land.
2. The overall tract built -upon area percentage for the project must be maintained at
or below 24%, as required by Section 2H .1005 of the stormwater rules.
3. Approved plans and specifications for projects covered by this permit are
incorporated by reference and are enforceable parts of the permit and shall be kept
on file by the permittee at all times.
4. The only runoff conveyance systems allowed will be vegetated conveyances such
as swales with minimum side slopes of 3:1 (H:V) as defined in the stormwater rules
and approved by the Division.
5. No piping is allowed except that minimum amount necessary to direct runoff
beneath an impervious surface such as a road or to provide access.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center 1 512 N, Salisbury St. I Raleigh, NC 27699
919 707 9200 T

6. The built -upon areas associated with this project shall be located at least 50 feet
landward of all perennial and intermittent streams or other surface waters.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area does
not exceed the allowable built -upon area.
2. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified
in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for
modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide
copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes
have been made.
3. This project may not be sold or subdivided in whole or in part without first receiving
a permit modification from the Division.
4. Prior to the subdivision and/or sale of this project, in whole or in part, the following
deed restrictions must be recorded with the Office of the Register of Deeds:
a. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with
State Stormwater Management Permit Number SW7160406 MOD, as
issued by the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources under 15A
NCAC 2H.1000.
b. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the
extent necessary to maintain compliance with the Stormwater Management
Permit.
C. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and
parties claiming under them.
d. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded
without the express written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division
of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources.
e. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take
place without the concurrence of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land
Resources.
f. This project is permitted for a maximum of 24% of built -upon area.
Construction of additional built -upon area in excess of this amount will
require a permit modification.
g. This project may not be sold or subdivided, in whole or in part, without first
receiving a permit modification from the Division.
h. Construction of additional impervious areas such that low -density
requirements are no longer met will require a permit modification prior to
construction. An engineered system will be required to collect and treat the
runoff from all built -upon area associated with the project, including that
area permitted under the low density option.
i. Filling in or piping of any vegetative conveyances (ditches, swales, etc.)
associated with this development, except for average driveway crossings,
is strictly prohibited by any persons.
j. The built -upon areas shall be located a minimum of 50 feet landward of all
perennial and intermittent surface waters.
state orNorth Carolina I Emvonnnental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center 1 512 N. Salisbury St. I Raleigh, NC 27699
919 707 9200 T

5. A copy of the recorded restrictions must be received in this Office within 30 days
of the date of sale.
6. Filling in or piping of any vegetative conveyances (ditches, swales, etc.) associated
with the permitted development, except for average driveway crossings, is strictly
prohibited by any persons.
7. Please pay special attention to the Operation and Maintenance requirements in
this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for operation and
maintenance of the stormwater management system will result in future
compliance problems.
8. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed
below:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area.
e. Further subdivision, acquisition, or sale of the project area in whole or in
part. The project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee, for
which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval was sought.
f. Filling in, altering or piping any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
9. Please be aware that it is the responsibility of the permit holder, Aulander Holloman
Solar, LLC, to notify the Division of any changes in ownership and request an
ownership/name change for the stormwater permit.
10. Swales and other vegetated conveyances shall be constructed in their
entirety, vegetated, and be operational for their intended use prior to the
construction of any built -upon surface.
11. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded
areas of the swales or other vegetated conveyances will be repaired
immediately.
12. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary
to operate the permitted stormwater management systems at optimum efficiency
to include:
a. Inspections
b Sediment removal.
C. Mowing, and re -vegetating of the side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
13. Within 30 days of completion of the project, the permittee shall certify in writing
that the project has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality l Energy, Mineral and Lard Resources
1612 Mail Service Center 1 512 N. Salisbury St. I Raleigh, NC 27699
919 707 9200 T

14. The permittee shall submit all information requested by the Director or his
representative within the time frame specified in the written Information request.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. The Director may require modification or revocation and
re -issuance of the permit to change the name and incorporate such other
requirements as may be necessary. In the event of a name or ownership change,
a completed Name/Ownership Change form, signed by both parties, must be
submitted to the Division accompanied by the supporting documentation as listed
on page 2 of the form. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits,
and may or may not be approved.
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until the
Director approves a transfer of ownership. Neither the sale of the project nor the
transfer of common areas to a third party, such as a homeowner's association,
constitutes an approved transfer of the stormwater permit.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division, in accordance with
North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit
as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 15A NCAC
21-1.1000 of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 21-1.1000; and
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 et. al.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,
including those as may be required by the Division, such as the construction of
additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permittee grants permission to DEQ Staff to enter the property during normal
business hours, for the purpose of inspecting all components of the stormwater
management facility.
7. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and re -issuance, or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
8. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the swales must
follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment
Control Planning and Design Manual.
9. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
State ofNonh Carolina I Environmental Qualiry I Energy. Mineral and Lend Resources
1612 Mail Service Centef 1 512 N. Salisbury St I RaleiglL NC 27699
9197079200 T

10. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state and federal), which have jurisdiction.
11. The permittee shall notify the Division in writing of any name, ownership or mailing
address changes at least 30 days prior to making such changes.
Permit issued this the 16th day of February, 2018.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
r;Toby Vinson, Interim Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW7970815MOD
State of Nardi Carolina , Envtroninental Quality i Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center 1 512 N. Salisbury St. I Raleigb. NC 27699
9197079200 T

Appendix H
Notice of Violation and Restoration Plan
14
hart hickman
SMWER EWRONMFNM SO NS

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 25, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL #7016 0750 00010902 7136
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SunEnergy 1, LLC and Price Solar, LLC
Attention: Kenny Habul
192 Raceway Drive
Mooresville, NC 28117
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
NOV-2017-PC-0184
Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Habul:
ROY COOPER
Cnvemnr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secmlary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Orrecror
On February 16, 2027, Anthony Scarbraugh, Robert Tankard, and Chris Pullinger from the Washington
Regional Office and Shelton Sullivan from the Central Office of the Division of Water Resources (DWR)
along with Kyle Barnes and Krysta Stygar of the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) conducted a site
inspection of the site known as Aulander Holloman Solar, located off NC 11 South and Joe Holloman Road,
near Aulander, Hertford County NC. On April 18, 2017, a follow up inspection was conducted by Messrs.
Scarbraugh and Barnes. During the inspection, DWR and US ACE staff met with Lindsey Hesch, Kelly Hoyt,
Joel Sossamon, and David Harris with SunEnergy 1, LLC to discuss the site condition.
During the site inspections, the group observed that the trees had been removed, evidence of grading,
grubbing and filled with earthen fill and woody debris. The review of files from the USACE revealed that
approximately 6.5 acres of wetlands have been impacted from the above described activity.
As a result of the site inspections and file review, the following violations, detailed below, are noted:
(1) Failure to Secure a 401 Water Quality Certification
(2) Wetland Standard Violation
1) Failure to Secure 401 Water Quality Certification (Title 15A NCAC 02H .0500)
The impacts to the wetlands require permits from both the Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of
Water Resources. DWR site visits and file review confirmed that impacts occurred without a 404 Permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A file review indicates that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)
has not authorized use of a 404 Permit for this activity nor has notification been provided to the COE for
this activity. The file review confirmed that the Division of Water Resources has not issued 401 Water
Quality Certification for the subject site. A 401 Water Quality Certification is required prior to the above -
mentioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0500.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
+c+ nnc c,er

Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Page 2 of 3
Quality Certification for the subject site. A 401 Water quality Certification is required prior to the above -
mentioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0500.
2) Wetland Standard Violation (iSA NCAC 026.0231)
The grading, grubbing and clearing of jurisdictional wetlands represents violations of 15A NCAC 02B .0231
(b) (1) Liquids, fill or other solids or dissolved gases may not be present in amounts which may cause
adverse impacts on existing wetland uses; (5) Hydrological conditions necessary to support the biological
and physical characteristics naturally present in wetlands shall be protected to prevent adverse impacts
on: (C) The chemical, nutrient and dissolved oxygen regime of the wetland; (D) The movement of aquatic
fauna; (F) Water levels or elevations.
Requested Response
This Office requests that you respond to this fetter in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this
Notice. Your response should be sent to this Office at the letterhead address. Your response should
address the following:
1. Within 30 calendar days of receipt of this Notice, please provide a plan of action with specific time
frames and dates to accomplish the below items.
2. Please explain when construction (clearing, grading, grinding the woody debris) began at the site
and how these impacts occurred.
3. Please clearly explain why appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification and a 404 Permit were not
secured.
4. Please provide documentation (including a detailed site map/survey) depicting all jurisdictional water
features (e.g. streams, wetlands and/or waters) on the site. This documentation should describe and
quantify the impacts to those jurisdictional features, and should include plans to avoid further
unauthorized impacts on the site.
S. Please submit a Restoration Plan to this Office for review and approval. You are encouraged to secure
a consultant to assist you with your plan development and with obtaining any permit, certification,
and/ or authorization necessary to achieve compliance. This plan should include the following:
a.) Permit Application — If you wish for any impacts to remain in place, you must contact the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for information on the type(s) of permit required.
Depending on the type of permits USACOE requires, application for a 401 Water Quality
Certification to DWR will also be required.
b.) Wetland Restoration Plan (Wetland impacts) — The restoration plan must detail how the
unauthorized impacts to wetlands that cannot be permitted will be removed and how the
wetlands will be restored. This Information must be clearly depicted on a map that you
provide as a part of this response. This map should also indicate all of the wetlands locations
on the tract as well as the wetland areas that have been impacted.
Satisfactory wetland restoration requires the replanting of at least 2 native hardwood wetland
species and the maintenance of a stem density/survivorship of at least 260 trees per acre at

Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Page 3 of 3
the end of 3 years. This plan will also require an herbaceous wetland seed mix for all wetlands
that are disturbed.
c.) Please indicate in your response a schedule with dates detailing when the restoration will be
accomplished. This schedule should include a three-year monitoring plan to ensure that the
wetlands and stream are restored. it is the expectation of this Office that the restoration
will be completed by December 1, 2017.
6. Finally, you should include in your response an explanation of how you propose to prevent these
problems from reoccurring on this project and on future projects.
****You are encouraged to secure a consultant to assist you with your plan development, permit,
certification, and authorization necessary to achieve compliance. ****
Thank you for your attention to this matter. DWR requires that the violations, as detailed above, be
abated immediately and properly resolved. This Office is considering a recommendation for civil penalty
assessment to the Director of the Division of Water Resources and/or an injunction request to the
Attorney General's Office regarding the ongoing violations on your site.
Pursuant to G.S.143-215.6A, the above mentioned violations and any future violations are subject to a
civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. Pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6C, DWR can request injunctive relief through the courts to obtain compliance on the site. Your
above -mentioned response to this correspondence will be considered in any further process that may
occur.
This Office appreciates your attention to this matter and efforts to resolve the above noted concerns.
Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact Anthony Scarbraugh at (252) 948-
3924 or myself at [phone].
Sincerely, S
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Samir Dumpor— DELMR WaRO (via e-mail)
Shelton Sullivan —401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Kyle Barnes— US ACOE- Washington Office (via e-mail)
Kelly Hoyt, SunEnergy 1, LLC (via email: [e-mail])
Lindsey Hesch, SunEnergy 1, LLC (via email: [e-mail])
Matt Ingalls, Hart & Hickman (via email: [e-mail])
Jerry Settle, North Carolina Power (via email: [e-mail])
WaRO Files

I

Wetland Restoration Plan
Aulander Wetland Restoration Area
NC Highway 11 South and Joe Holloman Road
Hertford County, North Carolina
NOV-2017-PC-0184
PREPARED FOR:
SUNENERGYI, LLC & PRICE SOLAR, LLC
192 RACEWAY DRIVE
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
PREPARED BY:
14
hart hickman
2923 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 100
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
March 2018

Table of Contents
L0Introduction..........................................................................................
1.1 Site Location..............................................................................
1.2 Site Overview & Historic Conditions .......................................
2.0 Existing Conditions..............................................................................
2.1 Physiography.............................................................................
2.2 Water Quality............................................................................
2.3 Soils...........................................................................................
2.4 Vegetation & Hydrology...........................................................
3.0 Wetland Restoration Plan....................................................................
4.0 Vegetation Monitoring & Success Criteria ..........................................
5.0 References............................................................................................
Appendices
Appendix A. Figures
Figure 1.
Site Location
Figure 2.
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3.
Pre- and Post -Harvest Aerials
Figure 4.
Existing Conditions
Figure 5.
Restoration Plan
Appendix B. Photographs
Wetland Photographs (May 2017)
Appendix C. NOV Info
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement Letter
Response to Notice of Violation Letter
Appendix D. Control Plan
Sun Energy Control Plan
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
6
Aulander Welland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Table of Contents

AULANDER WETLAND RESTORATION AREA
WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN
NOV-2017-PC-0184
1.0 Introduction
SunEnergyl, LLC (Sun Energy) and Price Solar, LLC retained Hart & Hickman, PC to develop
this wetland restoration plan in response to Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by the NC
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR) Water Quality
Regional Operations Sections dated April 25, 2017. The NOV was issued for the Aulander
Holloman Solar project (N2017-PC-0184). The NOV specifically alleges violations that occurred
within approximately 7.90 acres of wetland within the Aulander Wetland Restoration Area, located
southeast of the existing Dominion Energy substations and west of Joe Holloman Road (SR 1 109)
(Figure 1, Appendix A).
The approximately 1080-acre Aulander Holloman Solar project, including the 16.2-acre Aulander
Wetland Restoration Area, consists of undeveloped land most recently harvested for timber. Trees
were removed and the area was cleared and grubbed resulting in impacts to 7.90 acres of wetland.
This document outlines a plan to restore the impacted wetlands. This plan summarizes conditions
prior to clearing and grubbing, current conditions, and proposed actions to restore the impacted
wetlands. Supporting figures are included in Appendix A.
1.1 Site Location
The Aulander Wetland Restoration Area is located 0.25 mile south of the intersection of NC I
South and Joe Holloman Road just over 2 miles northeast of Aulander in southern Hertford
County, North Carolina (Figures 1-2, Appendix A).
Directions to Site from Aulander:
• Travel northeast on NC-1 1 Business for — 2.5 miles.
• Turn left on NC-1 1 S and travel -- 0.4 mile.
• Turn right onto Joe Holloman Road (SR 1109) and travel —0.5 mile.
• The Aulander Wetland Restoration Area is accessed from Joe Holloman Road (SR 1109)
near the southeast corner of the Aulander Wetland Restoration Area.
• Coordinates near Access: 36.2504,-77.0746
1.2 Site Overview & Historic Conditions
The Aulander Wetland Restoration Area contains approximately 7.90 acres of impacted wetland
(Figures 3-4, Appendix A). Prior to timber harvesting activities, the area was characterized by a
loblolly pine (Pinits taeda) plantation. Other species sparsely scattered within the understory
included red maple (Ater rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracii loa), elderberry (Sambucus
canadensis), arrowwood viburnum (Viburnum dentatum), wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), soft rush
(Juncos effusus), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica).
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0 M) page 1

Timber harvesting activities occurred as follows.
October 1-8, 2016: Trees were hand cut and grappled with a feller buncher, then
transported with a skidder to a trailer deck located in an upland area. Large trees were
delimbed and placed on a trailer for transport; smaller trees and limbs were chipped
and hauled offsite.
October 9-November 21, 2016: Harvesting activities were delayed due to equipment issues
and a 12.3-inch rain event on October 9-10, 2016.
November 22-29, 2016: Tree stumps and wooden debris were ground. Large and small
diameter stumps were ground to the existing ground surface or below. Vegetation from
the woody vine, herb, and sapling/shrub stratum was removed with the exception of
tree stumps that remained in place. Large quantities of mulch produced by grinding
were deposited in the immediate area where it was produced and spread evenly
throughout the area.
These timber harvesting activities resulted in mechanical grubbing, disturbance of soil, and
placement of fill material within jurisdictional wetland areas. The timber harvesting activities
have been recognized to have been performed outside of accepted practices. Since the occurrence
of the wetland impacting timber harvesting activities, which took place in October and
November of 2016, Sun Energy has prepared a Control Plan to address their timber harvesting
and vegetation management practices. The purpose of the Control Plan is to address how
future impacts to streams and wetlands on this and future Sun Energy sites can be avoided
through various control measures. A copy of the Control Plan is included as Appendix D.
2.0 Existing Conditions
2.1 Physiography
The Aulander Wetland Restoration Area is located within the Mid -Atlantic Flatwoods portion of
the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Ecoregion of North Carolina. Regional physiography is
characterized by flat plains on lightly dissected marine terraces and swamps with low gradient
sandy and silty bottomed streams (Griffith et al. 2002). Elevations are relatively level averaging
between 65-66 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) (USGS Union and Aulander,
North Carolina 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles). Surrounding land use consists primarily of
managed timber, agriculture land, solar farms, and power substations.
2.2 Water Quality
The Aulander Wetland Restoration Area occurs within USGS 14-digit HUC and Targeted Local
Watershed 03010203050011 of the Chowan River Basin (Subbasin Number 03-01 -0 1). Panhandle
Area wetlands drain to an Unnamed Tributary to Turkey Creek (Stream Index 25-14-1-3), which
is not listed on the DWR final 2014 or draft 2016 303(d) lists (NCDWR 2014, NCDWR 2016).
Turkey Creek has been assigned a Best Usage Classification of C; NSW (NCDWR 2013).
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) page 2

2.3 Soils
Based on web soil survey mapping (MRCS 2017), the Aulander Wetland Restoration Area is
comprised of four soil series as follows (Figure 4, Appendix A).
Table 1. Aulander Wetland Restoration Area Soils
Map Unit
Map Unit Name
Hydric
Symbol
Classification
Status
Description
Craven fine sandy loam
Non-
This series consists of moderately well -drained found on
CrA
(Aquic Hapludu/ts)
hydric
0-1 percent slopes. The depth to the water table is
generally about 24-36 inches.
Exum very fine sandy loam
Non-
This series consists of moderately well -drained found on
ExA
(Aquic Paleud¢d(s)
hydric
0-2 percent slopes. The depth to the water table is
generally about 24-36 inches.
Leaf loam
This series consists of poorly -drained soils found on 0-2
LF
(Typic A/baguulls)
Hydric
percent slopes on flats on broad interstream divides. The
de th to the water table is generally about 0-12 inches.
This series consists of somewhat poorly -drained soils
Ln
Lenoir loam
Hydric
found on 0-2 percent slopes on flats on broad interstream
(Aeric Paleaquuhs)
divides. The depth to the water table is generally about
12-30 inches.
2.4 Vegetation & Hydrology
The Aulander Wetland Restoration Area was clear-cut in 2016 as described above. During a May
2017 site visit small clusters of unidentified emergent grass were beginning to establish naturally
and were the only live vegetation observed. In February 2018, significant vegetative growth within
the herbaceous stratum was observed. The herbaceous stratum was the only live vegetation
observed and was relatively homogenous with the dominant species identified as woolgrass
(Scirpus cyperirnts), an obligate wetland species. In addition, all identifiable species within the
test plot had an indicator status of obligate or facultative. The absolute vegetative cover for the
herbaceous stratum was less than 5% in May 2017, and increased to greater than 90% in February
2018 (80% obligate wetland species). Within the impacted wetland areas, surface water typically
ranges from 0-6 inches, and the water table is generally within 8 inches of the soil surface.
2.5 Jurisdictional Areas
Jurisdictional area delineations were updated within the Aulander Holleman Solar project area, at
the request of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), by Hart & Hickman staff between July -
November 2017. The flagged jurisdictional area locations were reviewed and approved by the
USACE during multiple site visits during 2016-2017. An updated Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination package was subsequently submitted to USACE representative Kyle Barnes on
December 21, 2017.
3.0 Wetland Restoration Plan
Approximately 7.90 acres of impacted wetland within the Aulander Wetland Restoration Area are
intended to be restored as depicted in Figure 5 (Appendix A). The restoration plan consists of
planting with native, hardwood tree species and application of an herbaceous wetland seed mix to
impacted wetland areas as discussed below. No site preparation is proposed at this time as all
mulch was distributed relatively evenly at the time grinding of tree stumps and remaining debris
Aulander Welland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) page 3

occurred. The thickness of existing mulch ranges from approximately 1-6 inches in depth and
averages 3 inches across the Aulander Wetland Restoration Area.
Planting Plan
Proposed development of the Aulander Holloman Solar project will require vegetation
management areas to be established underneath existing and proposed utility lines within the
Aulander Wetland Restoration Area. Approximately 2.95 acres of wetlands within the Aulander
Wetland Restoration Area would be subject to vegetation management under the proposed
development plan and approximately 4.95 acres of wetlands within the Aulander Wetland
Restoration Area would not be subject to vegetation management. Bare -root seedlings will be
planted in the 4.95 acres of wetlands not subject to vegetation management within the Aulander
Wetland Restoration Area in early 2018, prior to the requested April 13 extension at a density of
approximately 550 stems per acre as follows
,Area (acres)„.
4.95
species
# planted
% of total
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
2000
77
Cherry -bark oak (Quercus pagoda)
300
11.5
Willow oak (Quereus phellos)
300
11.5
TOTAL
2600
100
Bare -root plants will be planted in holes made by a mattock, dibble, or planting bar in a vertical
position with the root collar approximately 0.5 inches below the soil surface. The planting trench
or hole shall be of sufficient width and depth to permit roots to spread out and down without J-
rooting. After planting, the soil shall be tamped around the tree firmly to eliminate air pockets.
Permanent Seeding with Herbaceous Wetland Seed Mix
A native wetland grass seed mix will be spread at a rate of 20 pounds per acre, per manufacturer
guidelines and recommendations, throughout all impacted wetland areas.
T..61o'2 Wetland Coopil Miv*
Common Name (Scientific Name
Percent of Mix
Showy tickseed sunflower (Bidens aristosa
7
Fox sedge (Carex vul inoidea)
12
Deer tongue Dichanthelium clandestinum
8-
Riverbank wildr e El mus ri anus
20
Soft rush Juncos a usus, NC Ecotype)
4
Smooth panicgrass Panicum dicholomi arum
14
Redtop panicgrass (Panicum ri idulum)
8
Switchgrass Panicum vir alum
23
Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum ens lvanicum
2
Eastern bur reed S ar anium americanum
2
TOTAL
100
• Native Grass Mix - Wetland Seed Mix (available at Mellow Marsh Farms)
Seed should be sown with a spreader or a seeding machine, and should not be broadcast or dropped
when the wind velocity exceeds 5 miles per hour. Seed is to be evenly distributed by sowing in
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) page 4

two directions at right angles to each other. Wet, moldy, or damaged seed is not to be used. Seeded
areas are to be protected by spreading straw mulch uniformly to form a continuous blanket over
seeded areas. Straw mulch is to be spread by hand, blower, or other suitable equipment.
4.0 Vegetation Monitoring & Success Criteria
Monitoring will be conducted for a period of three years to ensure compliance with NOV (NOV-
2017-PC-0184) recommendations, which require the maintenance of a stem density/survivorship
of at least 260 trees per acre at the end of 3 years.
Once planting is complete, 5 sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter), for approximately 2.5%
coverage of the planted restoration area, will be installed and baseline data will be collected within
as per guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et
al. 2008). In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition
and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of herbaceous species will be
documented by photographs taken at the origin of each vegetation plot; however, no success
criteria are tied to herbaceous vegetation. Annual monitoring will occur in Years 1, 2, and 3
between July 15 and October 31; however, Year 1 vegetation measurements should not be
performed within 6 months of the initial planting.
Baseline and Year 1-3 annual monitoring data will be submitted in a letter format no later than
December 31 of each monitoring year. The letter will summarize monitoring results including a
table of vegetation plot results/tree densities, a figure depicting vegetation plot locations,
photographs taken at the origin of each vegetation plot, and a discussion of any areas of concern
within the restoration area. Table 4 summarized vegetation monitoring with the wetland
restoration area.
Tahle 4. Vegetatinn Mnnitnrino .Grmmnr
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frecluenev
Number
Data Collected
Vegetation
g
Permanent
vegetation plots
Baseline, Years 1, 2,
Species, height, location,
establishment and
0.0247 acre (10m x
and 3
5 plots
planted vs. volunteer, age,
vigor
10 m) in size
and photograph at plot origin
If vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from
combined plots over the entire restoration area, supplemental planting may be performed with tree
species approved by regulatory agencies. Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until
achievement of vegetation success criteria.
Aulander Weiland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) page 5

5.0 References
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level 1-2 Plot Version 4.2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2013. North Carolina River Basin
Classification Schedule (online). Available: https://deq.nc.gov/river-basin-classification-
schedule [January 2, 2018]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 2017. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App [January 2, 20181. United States Department
of Agriculture.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2014. Final 2014 Category 5 Water
Quality Assessments-303(d) List. Available: https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Water%20Quality/Planning/fMDL/303d/2014/2014_303dlist.pdf [January 2,
2018]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Draft 2016 Category 5
Assessments EPA Submittal-303(d) List. Available:
https:Hncdenr. s3.amazonaws.com/s3 fs-
public/W atcr%20Qua lity/Planning/TM DL/303 d/2016/NC_2016_Category_5_20160606.
pdf [January 2, 2018]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) page

APPENDIX A. FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Location
Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3. Pre- and Post -Harvest Aerials
Figure 4. Existing Conditions
Figure 5. Restoration Plan
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Appendix

Scale:
SITE LOCATION ao,00a CURE
14 AULANDER WETLAND RESTORATION AREA o m nr. CLF w
hart ► hickman WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN Del. I
Hertford County, North Carolina —Project, 2o1e
17-025

N Legend t'
j
Q Aulantler Watlantl Restoration Area = 16.2 acres
m
Aulander Holloman Solar Project Area = -10W acres „ ---s
`
Impactetl Wetlands =7.90 acres
_ Juristlidional Wetlamis=361]acres s
Jurisdictional Steams �^
1
'1
t fey
• •• F'` ''' ^�Of
a lop'
+.Y
Dominion Energy
CSubstations
s \N\
t±
66 1 � ,�
i%
W
t i Its , P�
• R ....,,.. --. It�•r
y.
p � i
V_
s �p0 1,000 2,000
49 �4 Feet
sage
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Date ey: 1,10,000 FIGURE
® AULANDER WETLAND RESTORATION AREA CLF
hart hickman WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN Date
Hertford County, North Carolina PIo'•d,nr1201e
17-026

Ln = Lenoir loam
�` 0 375
750
March 23, 2017 Google Earth ImageryME
Feet
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Scale:
1:3600 FIGURE
AULANDER WETLAND RESTORATION AREA
CLF
hart hickman
WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN
Date
2018
Hertford County, North Carolina
Project:
17-025

i
L 4 "��t,
Legend
[M Jurisdictional Wetlands = 361.7 acres
OAulander Weaand Restoration Area = 16.2 acres
Bare Root Planting Area = 4.95 acres
Herbaceous Wetland Seed Mix = 7.90 acres
® Vegetation Managment Areas/Utility Lines = 2.95 acres
Aulander Holloman Solar Project Area = —1060 acres
March 23, 2017 Google Earth Imagery -
Plutle WI
m lvenl 195
♦p4mM Jtl
0.axuh(F vapvSAviavl
(lwryeahoLfPvwWS�I IIS
Wx'utl �� M1AvI Xv 11.5
TOTAL 1 SW
Nate:
The xe11eM mEmia xJl berpretl e, a eYe o($O Saw�le
Sn aae.pa manxfaeNm gwhlvei W saommmJxions.
YuoupMw all imPo�lu1 xnhM uev.
0 375 750 I;e)
Feet If
Sole:
PLAN N 1:3600 FIGURE
STORATION AREA D by: cLF
MON PLAN O81e
Feezola 5
rth Carolina
Pmleq:
17-025

APPENDIX B. PHOTOGRAPHS
Wetland Photographs (May 2017)
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Appendix

n
0
0
d
w
W
Photograph 1: General view of the panhandle area of the Site (May 2017).
Photograph 2: General view of the observed disturbance within the panhandle area of theSite(May 2017).
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR
hart Psw hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 NC-11 SOUTH & JOE HOLLOMAN ROAD
® 704.58&0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA

0
0
0
Photograph 3: General view of disturbed soils observed within the panhandle area (May 2017).
0
l 4 '
* Ili 1\ � �'O}1• �•• •` � �yT,••
Photograph 4: General view of native soils observed within the undisturbed control area (May 2017).
4A 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR
hart hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 NC-11 SOUTH & JOE HOLLOMAN ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 7oa.5as.o373(0 AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA

n
0
0
0
w
N
Photograph 5: General view of a root mass observed above the ground surface within the panhandle area (May 2017).
Photograph 6: General view of stumping and charred surfaces on remaining stumps within the panhandle area (May 2017).
14 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR
hart W%W hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 NC -II SOUTH & JOE HOLLOMAN ROAD
® 704.586.0007(p) 704.58s.o373(f) AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA

0
0
0
w
0
Photograph 7: General view of area west of panhandle (May 2017).
Photograph 8: General view of area west of panhandle (May 2017).
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 1010 AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR
hart •� hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 NC-17 SOUTH & JOE HOLLOMAN ROAD
® 704.586.0007(p) 704.58&0373(0 AULANDER, NORTH CAROLINA

APPENDIX C. NOV INFO
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement Letter
Response to Notice of Violation Letter
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017.PC-01 84) Appendix

Water Resources
RNVIQONMENTAL QUALITY
April 25, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL #7016 0750 00010901 7136
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SunEnergy 1, LLC and Price Solar, LLC
Attention: Kenny Habul
192 Raceway Drive
Mooresville, NC 28117
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
NOV-2017-PC-0184
Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Habul:
ROY COOPER
Gomm"
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrerury,
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Dlreclor
On February 16, 2017, Anthony Scarbraugh, Robert Tankard, and Chris Pullinger from the Washington
Regional Office and Shelton Sullivan from the Central Office of the Division of Water Resources (DWR)
along with Kyle Barnes and Krysta Stygar of the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) conducted a site
inspection of the site known as Aulander Holloman Solar, located off NC 11 South and Joe Holloman Road,
near Aulander, Hertford County NC. On April 18, 2017, a follow up inspection was conducted by Messrs.
Scarbraugh and Barnes. During the inspection, DWR and US ACE staff met with Lindsey Hesch, Kelly Hoyt,
Joel Sossamon, and David Harris with SunEnergy 1, LLC to discuss the site condition.
During the site inspections, the group observed that the trees had been removed, evidence of grading,
grubbing and filled with earthen fill and woody debris. The review of files from the USACE revealed that
approximately 6.5 acres of wetlands have been impacted from the above described activity.
As a result of the site inspections and file review, the following violations, detailed below, are noted:
(1) Failure to Secure a 401 Water Quality Certification
(2) Wetland Standard Violation
1) Failure to Secure 401 Water Quality Certification (Title 15A NCAC 02H .0500)
The impacts to the wetlands require permits from both the Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of
Water Resources. DWR site visits and file review confirmed that impacts occurred without a 404 Permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A file review indicates that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)
has not authorized use of a 404 Permit for this activity nor has notification been provided to the COE for
this activity. The file review confirmed that the Division of Water Resources has not issued 401 Water
Quality Certification for the subject site. A 401 Water Quality Certification is required prior to the above -
mentioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0500.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality l Water Resources
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889

Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Page 2 of 3
Quality Certification for the subject site. A 401 Water Quality Certification is required prior to the above -
mentioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0500.
2) Wetland Standard Violation (i5A NCAC 02B .0231)
The grading, grubbing and clearing of jurisdictional wetlands represents violations of 15A NCAC 02B.0231
(b) (1) liquids, fill or other solids or dissolved gases may not be present In amounts which may cause
adverse impacts on existing wetland uses; (5) Hydrological conditions necessary to support the biological
and physical characteristics naturally present in wetlands shall be protected to prevent adverse impacts
on: (C) The chemical, nutrient and dissolved oxygen regime of the wetland; (D) The movement of aquatic
fauna; (F) Water levels or elevations.
Requested Response
This Office requests that you respond to this letter in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this
Notice. Your response should be sent to this Office at the letterhead address. Your response should
address the following:
1. Within 30 calendar days of receipt of this Notice, please provide a plan of action with specific time
frames and dates to accomplish the below Items.
2. Please explain when construction (clearing, grading, grinding the woody debris) began at the site
and how these impacts occurred.
3. Please clearly explain why appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification and a 404 Permit were not
secured.
4. Please provide documentation (including a detailed site map/survey) depicting all jurisdictional water
features (e.g. streams, wetlands and/or waters) on the site. This documentation should describe and
quantify the impacts to those jurisdictional features, and should include plans to avoid further
unauthorized impacts on the site.
5. Please submit a Restoration Plan to this Office for review and approval. You are encouraged to secure
a consultant to assist you with your plan development and with obtaining any permit, certification,
and/ or authorization necessary to achieve compliance. This plan should Include the following:
a.) Permit Application— If you wish for any Impacts to remain in place, you must contact the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for information on the type(s) of permit required.
Depending on the type of permits USACOE requires, application for a 401 Water Quality
Certification to DWR will also be required.
b.) Wetland Restoration Plan (Wetland impacts) — The restoration plan must detail how the
unauthorized impacts to wetlands that cannot be permitted will be removed and how the
wetlands will be restored. This information must be clearly depicted on a map that you
provide as a part of this response. This map should also indicate all of the wetlands locations
on the tract as well as the wetland areas that have been impacted.
Satisfactory wetland restoration requires the replanting of at least 2 native hardwood wetland
species and the maintenance of a stem density/survivorship of at least 260 trees per acre at

Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Page 3 of 3
the end of 3 years. This plan will also require an herbaceous wetland seed mix for all wetlands
that are disturbed.
c.) Please indicate in your response a schedule with dates detailing when the restoration will be
accomplished. This schedule should include a three-year monitoring plan to ensure that the
wetlands and stream are restored. It is the expectation of this Office that the restoration
will be completed by December 1, 2017.
6. Finally, you should include in your response an explanation of how you propose to prevent these
problems from reoccurring on this project and on future projects.
****You are encouraged to secure a consultant to assist you with your plan development, permit,
certification, and authorization necessary to achieve compliance. ****
Thank you for your attention to this matter. DWR requires that the violations, as detailed above, be
abated immediately and properly resolved. This Off ice is considering a recommendation for civil penalty
assessment to the Director of the Division of Water Resources and/or an injunction request to the
Attorney General's Office regarding the ongoing violations on your site.
Pursuant to G.S.143-215.6A, the above mentioned violations and any future violations are subject to a
civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. Pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6C, DWR can request injunctive relief through the courts to obtain compliance on the site. Your
above -mentioned response to this correspondence will be considered in any further process that may
occur.
This Office appreciates your attention to this matter and efforts to resolve the above noted concerns.
Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact Anthony Scarbraugh at (252) 948-
3924 or myself at [phone].
Sind
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Samir Dumpor — DELMR WaRO (via e-mail)
Shelton Sullivan —401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Kyle Barnes— US ACOE- Washington Office (via e-mail)
Kelly Hoyt, SunEnergy 1, LLC (via email: kellv.hovt(@sunenergvl,com)
Lindsey Hesch, SunEnergy 1, LLC (via email: [e-mail])
Matt Ingalls, Hart & Hickman (via email: [e-mail])
Jerry Settle, North Carolina Power (via email:[e-mail])
WaRO Files

11E
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 25, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL #7026 0750 00010901 7136
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SunEnergy 1, LLC and Price Solar, LLC
Attention: Kenny Habul
192 Raceway Drive
Mooresville, NC 28117
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
NOV-2017-PC-0184
Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Habul:
ROY COOPER
GoYer10r
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrernry
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
MARY.r
On February 16, 2017, Anthony Scarbraugh, Robert Tankard, and Chris Pullinger from the Washington
Regional Office and Shelton Sullivan from the Central Office of the Division of Water Resources (DWR)
along with Kyle Barnes and Krysta Stygar of the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) conducted a site
inspection of the site known as Aulander Holloman Solar, located off NC 11 South and Joe Holloman Road,
near Aulander, Hertford County NC. On April 18, 2017, a follow up inspection was conducted by Messrs.
Scarbraugh and Barnes. During the inspection, DWR and US ACE staff met with Lindsey Hesch, Kelly Hoyt,
Joel Sossamon, and David Harris with SunEnergy 1, LLC to discuss the site condition.
During the site inspections, the group observed that the trees had been removed, evidence of grading,
grubbing and filled with earthen fill and woody debris. The review of files from the USACE revealed that
approximately 6.5 acres of wetlands have been impacted from the above described activity.
As a result of the site inspections and file review, the following violations, detailed below, are noted:
(1) Failure to Secure a 401 Water Quality Certification
(2) Wetland Standard Violation
1) Failure to Secure 401 Water Quality Certification (Title i5A NCAC 02H .0500)
The impacts to the wetlands require permits from both the Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of
Water Resources. DWR site visits and file review confirmed that impacts occurred without a 404 Permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A file review indicates that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)
has not authorized use of a 404 Permit for this activity nor has notification been provided to the COE for
this activity. The file review confirmed that the Division of Water Resources has not issued 401 Water
Quality Certification for the subject site. A 401 Water Quality Certification is required prior to the above -
mentioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0500.
State of North Carolina I Environmen al Quality I Water Resources
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
'1CI If.IL LIVI

Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Page 2 of 3
Quality Certification for the subject site. A 401 Water Quality Certification is required prior to the above -
mentioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 02H .0500.
2) Wetland Standard Violation (15A NCAC 02B .0231)
The grading, grubbing and clearing of jurisdictional wetlands represents violations of 15A NCAC 02B .0231
(b) (1) Liquids, fill or other solids or dissolved gases may not be present in amounts which may cause
adverse impacts on existing wetland uses; (5) Hydrological conditions necessary to support the biological
and physical characteristics naturally present in wetlands shall be protected to prevent adverse impacts
on: (C) The chemical, nutrient and dissolved oxygen regime of the wetland; (D) The movement of aquatic
fauna; (F) Water levels or elevations.
Requested Response
This Office requests that you respond to this letter in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this
Notice. Your response should be sent to this Office at the letterhead address. Your response should
address the following:
1. Within 30 calendar days of receipt of this Notice, please provide a plan of action with specific time
frames and dates to accomplish the below items.
2. Please explain when construction (clearing, grading, grinding the woody debris) began at the site
and how these impacts occurred.
3. Please clearly explain why appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification and a 404 Permit were not
secured.
4. Please provide documentation (including a detailed site map/survey) depicting all jurisdictional water
features (e.g. streams, wetlands and/or waters) on the site. This documentation should describe and
quantify the impacts to those jurisdictional features, and should include plans to avoid further
unauthorized impacts on the site.
5. Please submit a Restoration Plan to this Office for review and approval. You are encouraged to secure
a consultant to assist you with your plan development and with obtaining any permit, certification,
and/ or authorization necessary to achieve compliance. This plan should include the following:
a.) Permit Application —If you wish for any Impacts to remain in place, you must contact the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for information on the type(s) of permit required.
Depending on the type of permits USACOE requires, application for a 401 Water Quality
Certification to DWR will also be required.
b.) Wetland Restoration Plan (Wetland impacts) — The restoration plan must detail how the
unauthorized impacts to wetlands that cannot be permitted will be removed and how the
wetlands will be restored. This information must be clearly depicted on a map that you
provide as a part of this response. This map should also indicate all of the wetlands locations
on the tract as well as the wetland areas that have been impacted.
Satisfactorywetland restoration requires the replanting of at least 2 native hardwood wetland
species and the maintenance of a stem density/survivorship of at least 260 trees per acre at

Aulander Holloman Solar
Hertford County
Page 3 of 3
the end of 3 years. This plan will also require an herbaceous wetland seed mix for all wetlands
that are disturbed.
c.) Please indicate in your response a schedule with dates detailing when the restoration will be
accomplished. This schedule should include a three-year monitoring plan to ensure that the
wetlands and stream are restored. It is the expectation of this Office that the restoration
will be completed by December 1, 2017.
6. Finally, you should include in your response an explanation of how you propose to prevent these
problems from reoccurring on this project and on future projects.
****You are encouraged to secure a consultant to assist you with your plan development, permit,
certification, and authorization necessary to achieve compliance.****
Thank you for your attention to this matter. DWR requires that the violations, as detailed above, be
abated immediately and properly resolved. This Office is considering a recommendation for civil penalty
assessment to the Director of the Division of Water Resources and/or an injunction request to the
Attorney General's Office regarding the ongoing violations on your site.
Pursuant to G.S.143-215.6A, the above mentioned violations and any future violations are subject to a
civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. Pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6C, DWR can request injunctive relief through the courts to obtain compliance on the site. Your
above -mentioned response to this correspondence will be considered in any further process that may
occur.
This Office appreciates your attention to this matter and efforts to resolve the above noted concerns.
Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact Anthony Scarbraugh at (252) 948-
3924 or myself at [phone].
Sin_cerely, J
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Samir Dumpor— DELMR WaRO (via e-mail)
Shelton Sullivan —401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Kyle Barnes — US ACOE- Washington Office (via e-mail)
Kelly Hoyt, SunEnergy 1, LLC (via email: [e-mail])
Lindsey Hesch, SunEnergy 1, LLC (via email: [e-mail])
Matt Ingalls, Hart & Hickman (via email: [e-mail])
Jerry Settle, North Carolina Power (via email: [e-mail])
WaRO Files

SUN
May 25, 2017
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Attention: Mr. Robert Tankard
Re: Response to Notice of Violation
SunEnergyl, LLC and Price Solar, LLC
Aulander Holloman Solar
NC Highway 11 South and Joe Holloman Road
Aulander, Hertford County, North Carolina
NOV-2017-PC-018
Dear Mr. Tankard,
SunEnergyl, LLC and Price Solar, LLC (collectively, "SE3") submit the following information In response
to the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Division of Water Resources (DWR) Water Quality Regional Operations Section dated April 25, 2017 for
the Aulander Holloman Solar project (hereafter referred to as the "Site") (NOV-2017-PC-0184). The NOV
specifically alleges violations that occurred within the 13.5-acre "panhandle" area of the Site located
southeast of the existing Dominion Energy substation.
Based on the findings of the Site visit conducted on April 18, 2017 with Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh, Mr.
Kyle Barnes, Ms. Lindsey Hesch, Mr. Kelly Hoyt, Mr. Joel Sossamon, and Mr. David Harris, SEl has
prepared responses to the Requested Response section of the NOV, which are presented below:
1. Plan of Action
SE3 has retained Hart & Hickman (H&H) to evaluate the Impacts to the wetland areas cited in
the NOV. In addition, SE3 will work with H&H to create an approved restoration plan that
meets the requirements of DWR and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The Plan of
Action details, with specific time lines, are provided below for each item listed in the NOV.
192 RacewayDrwa; Moores- vale, NC 28117 • Phone: [phone]

May 25, 2017
Page 2 of 4
NC Department of Environmental Quality
2. Schedule of Construction Activities
October 1 to October 8, 2016 - Whitehurst Sand Company, SEl's subcontractor,
performed initial tree cutting at the interconnection area. Trees were hand cut and
grappled with a feather buncher, then transported with a skidder to a trailer deck,
located in an upland area at the preliminary laydown and substation yards. During this
time, large trees were de -limbed and placed on a trailer for transport. Smaller trees and
limbs were processed through a chipper and collected in a mulch trailer to be hauled
offsite.
October 9 to November 21, 2016 — A delay in construction activities occurred due to
equipment issues. Also, on October 9`" & 10`h, the Site received 12.3 Inches of
precipitation.
November 22 to November 29, 2016 - Whitehurst grinded tree stumps and wooden
debris with a Tiger Cat M726e mulcher. Large and small diameter stumps were ground
down to existing ground surface or higher. Mulch produced by the grinding was
deposited in the immediate area where it had been generated.
3. 401 Water Quality Certification and a 404 Permit
Per direction from the USACE's Kyle Barnes, SE3 operated under the premise that a permit
would not be required if the trees in the panhandle were only cut, and not cleared and
grubbed. It was SEl's intention to only cut the trees and grind the stumps to ground level so
pole trucks could install electrical poles in the interconnection area.
4. Site Documentation and Jurisdictional Waters
A survey map prepared by Roanoke Land Surveying dated September 15, 2015 and last revised
June 22, 2016, depicts all jurisdictional water features on -Site and is included as Appendix A.
H&H estimates that approximately 5.5 acres of jurisdictional features are within the panhandle
area of the Site.
To avoid further unauthorized impacts on the Site, H&H will prepare and submit a Pre
Construction Notification (PCN) for designed stream crossings, monopole installations, and a
potential substation access road to USACE and DEQ DWR.
192 Raceway Drwv Moore*v Ve, NC 28117 Phone: [phone]ane4qergy1.co11i
r

May 25, 2017
Page 3 of 4
NC Department of Environmental Quality
5. Restoration Plan
a. Permit Application
Impacts applicable to this NOV will be mitigated through an approved restoration plan.
For future construction activities, once a Site design is finalized (approximately 30 days
from the date of this letter), H&H will prepare and submit a PCN to USACE and DEQ
DWR. The PCN will address only the Installation of the substation monopoles and an
access road in the panhandle portion of the Site, plus the stream crossings outside the
panhandle area.
If the proposed wetland Impacts total less than 0.5 acre, H&H can prepare and submit a
Nationwide Permit (NWP) PCN within approximately 30 days from the receipt of the
final design plan. If the proposed wetland impacts total greater than 0.5 acre, H&H can
prepare and submit an Individual Permit PCN within approximately 90 days from the
receipt of the final design plan.
b. Wetland Restoration Plan (Wetland impacts)
After the Site design plan is finalized and total wetland impacts are quantified, H&H will
assist SE3 with developing a restoration plan and contracting a wetlands restoration
specialist to restore the unauthorized impacts to the wetlands. H&H and SE1 can submit
the wetland restoration plan to DEQ DWR within approximately 45 days from the date
of this letter.
c. Restoration Schedule and Monitoring
SEl & H&H will consult with the wetland restoration specialist to determine availability
of plant material and suitable dates to implement the wetland restoration. Along with a
three-year monitoring plan, SE3 will submit the dates of wetland restoration
implementation with the abovementioned wetland restoration plan to be approved by
DEQ DWR within approximately 45 days from the date of this letter.
6. Preventative Maintenance and Control Plan
SE1 is preparing a Control Plan specifying how future impacts to stream and wetlands on this
and future SE1 Sites can be avoided. SE1 will submit this Control Plan to DEQ DWR within 30
days from the date of this letter, The core components of the Control Plan include
environmental, regulatory permitting, and construction management.
192 Raceway Drivc; Mooreavalu•, NC 28117 - Phone,: 704.662.0375

May 25, 2017
Page 4 of 4
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
SUNENERGY1, LLC
Kenny Habul
President & CEO
KH/KH
Attachments —Appendix A - Survey Map (Roanoke Land Surveying)
cc: Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh, DEQ DWR (via email)
Mr. Shelton Sullivan, DEQ DWR (via email)
Mr. Kyle Barnes, USACE (via email)
Ms. Lindsey Hesch, SE1(via email)
Mr. Matt Ingalls, H&H (via email)
192 racewayDrwe; Moom4wil&, NC 28117 • Phone: [phone]
s

APPENDIX D. CONTROL PLAN
Sun Energy Control Plan
Aulander Welland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Appendix

5UI**M—=IVEF2CY1
LEROERS IN COMMERCIRL 50LRR
Date: August 8`^, 2017
RE: Internal Environmental Control Plan
1. PURPOSE
SEI's mission is to build utility solar projects in a manner which complies with all federal, state,
and local environmental regulations. To meet these standards and regulatory guideline, SE1 has
implemented a Control Plan that outlines the strategic steps to assess potential environmental
impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters, threatened and endangered species, and
cultural resources. Additionally, this Control Plan addresses the critical component of
awareness training, coordination, and oversight of construction activities near wetlands or
surface waters.
The Primary objective of the Control Plan is to perform the work that is Authorized and per the
approved Scope of Work, while adhering to construction practices that secure and preserve the
environmental conditions of the site. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES WILL COMMENCE PRIOR
TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF APPROVED PERMITS, CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY,
AND POTENTIALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. The implementation of avoidance activities will be
supervised by the field environmental team during all phases of the project.
2. CONTROL PLAN COMPONENTS
a. Internal Critical Issues Analysis
i. USFW - NWI preliminary review of Waters of the US.
ii. Phase 1 ESA.
ill. E&SCP and Stormwater Permit Submittal.
iv. LIDAR and initial drainage assessment.
v. FEMA — Flood zone risk.
vi. Threatened and Endangered Species and habitat via USFWS IPac Tool. Self -
Certification letter submittal.
vii. CAMA review and submittal.
viii. Cultural assessment per Clearinghouse comments and NCSHPO review.
192 Raceway Drive, Moore vale, NC 28117 • Phoyw. 704.662.0375

I
SUt��N�RGY1
LEPIr.>ERS IN COMMERCIRL SOILRR
b. Wetland Permitting and Compliance
i. Field delineation and assessment of wetlands and surface waters. Consultant
will flag boundaries with supporting delineation map, GPG survey grid locations,
shapefiles, and text files.
ii. Request a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination from USACE and NCDWR for
404/401 Permitting.
iii. Professional Licensed Surveyor will collect wetland boundary points and provide
a stamped/sealed map of the wetlands and surface waters.
iv. Environmental Team member to attend site visit with consultant and USACE
Engineer.
v. Upon field regulatory determination, either a PJD or AJD request will be
submitted. Engineering site plans shall be designed to AVOID all wetland
impacts and surface waters. If the design includes stream crossings of
jurisdictional waters, a PCN shall be submitted and approved by the USACE and
NCDWR prior to any construction activities in the sensitive areas.
vi. Buffered streams shall be reviewed and determined by NCDWR.
vii. Wetland and surface water buffer boundaries will be located, flagged and
AVOIDED during the entire course of the project.
viii. Sensitive wetland areas will be identified in an approved Erosion &
Sedimentation Control Plan which will address stormwater pollution control
measures, drainage areas, and stabilization methodologies.
c. Internal Communication and Training
Per the approved PJD or AJD, and PCN the environmental team leader will
conduct an environmental overview presentation to the Construction
Management Team and environmental team members. The presentation shall
identify regulatory environmental assessments, potential critical areas, means
of avoidance, and preliminary construction schedules. This presentation will
take place prior to the field Pre -Construction Meeting.
ii. During the field Pre -Construction Meeting, the Environmental Team will notify
all subcontractors, personnel, and management team of the environmentally
sensitive areas that shall be avoided, plus proper construction methodologies
that will be implemented. Meeting members will sign an acknowledgement
form that verifies their attendance and training.
192 Raceway'Drfve, Mooreyv6Uv, NC 28117 • Phorw. 704.662.0375

5U"E=-i M,r--- (M`# 1
LERC>ERS IN SOLRR
Ill. Ongoing environmental field training will be provided to personnel associated
with site activities. The training/orientation will include a review of all approved
environmental permits, delineated jurisdictional wetlands (non-404 wetlands
too) and surface water maps, Best Management Practices and Procedures, and
notification procedures.
iv. Field Construction Managers, Supervisors, and Foreman shall completely aware
of sensitive or exclusion areas prior to beginning work. At the start of each work
day, a Plan Of The Day (POD) meeting will be conducted which all construction
activities will be planned and discussed. Environmental field team members will
identify and address potential impacts and sensitive areas during this time.
3. CONCLUSION
By identifying and communicating potential environmental impacts prior to construction
activities, SE1 will avoid future Notice of Violations and stay in compliance with federal, state,
and local regulations. Environmental communication, awareness training, and appropriate
construction methodologies are the foundation of this Control Plan. The Control Plan's policies
provide a basis for assessing environmental concerns and implementing authorized construction
practices.
192 Raceway'Drwr, Moorebvabev NC 28117 • Phorw. 704.662.0375

APPENDIX E. WETLAND IMPACT AND SERVICE ROAD EXHIBIT
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Appendix

APPENDIX F. PRELIMINARY SURVEY PLAT
Aulander Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration Plan (NOV-2017-PC-0184) Appendix

N.C. POWER COIF
D.B. ITT PC. 251
R�
2\
MORRIS ASKEW \`"�\a
D.B. 672 PG. 550
/ \ J
\
LINES Ll THROUGH L15
N.C.C.S. MONUMENT
COUG UNE U. uUNDEQ E SERWCE Rohn
( NICE J
].5' EACHy0E aF CEx1EaHnE
N.C. POWER
NCGS GRID COORDS.
.-Ila.76LOO
LI S 31-5702-E 40d6'
F-(2.567.... AS
Lz x sa'os•39T 52,30'
COMPANY
\
( BAD 63 i
Ln S 31-5r02-E 232AS'
0 B. 184 PG. 251
L4 5 31'5]'02-E 70.23'
\
Is x 5]-4. 3 I90.SI'
'T\4
W 532'I I'17-E DATE'
\\ r\
V N 5]'d0'4SE RR9T
\\ram\�•�\ h
tB 5JX56'OS-E 521.15E
L9 S JUG 1' 13Y/ 02,19'
\�\ \\ \
L10 N 90'00'OOY: 8B 69'
r\\rr�\
111 S JUTS 6'05.E 20141'
\6` r\�e`\\ 4
\
r \
L1252F57 36E 36652
\1, \\rr
\\ • r r\ PROPOSED MONOPOLE
�J P \r ARER IN WETLAND
\`A ..1L S q \\r \ 0.0011 ACRE
\v. h J \\
L13 5 63'0232Y/ IdJ.30'
114 5 26'S]'l8'E 557.89'
N 115 5 02'2J'I BIG fi I SUL
C
S ON OP '1
ICINITY
MAP
I
.ROOD'\
DARLENE H42
x 56'10'45-E 55.68'
i
(NOT TO
SCALE)
D.D. ne Pc.
/ 11
N 3R26211/
1.
LILAC ipl
PROPOSED LINE
AREA IN D
A WELL
0]99 ACRES
ACRES
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE
AREA IN WETLAND
LINES A TO
B
01AD ACRES
AETLAII LANE
5 5113'57-W 61.92'
S 7953'05-W 121 24'
5 7.B1'33-W 1306'
N 6,.Y7`A9.50'
5 57'57•dfi W 23.90'
5 3021 ISE 21 R.
s 1. 490YE 81.78'
5 21'23-UPW 34
60'
S 50'333]'W 1694
W 5 34'17139.75E
5 66'(I5'OT 3130'
N 6V5208'E 24 62'
N 6Y21 16-E 5B.67
N ]22551-E 3905'
N 73'02 31'E 19.94'
5 03'25'22T 47,30'
s 1]'I B'a9-]B2B'
5 78'd938'EW 33.99'
S 762044-E 4fi 02'
5 6Y22.03 E 76.79'
5 .1'24'S6YI 5960'
5 53'16'SUE 68.13'
S 01'50'18'W 116.18
S 43 3437-E GBYS'
S 7730' 51'E 27..3fi'
5 33 SA. 'E IJ.01'
5 6a'10'09b 19730'
5 30'40'55-W I IOSO'
N AST 3'20-E 162.20'
5 CUBA I3-E 143.17'
5 40'0415`N 51.27'
5 1T52'32-E 11132'
5 B4'21'ARTS I64 41'
s 03' 07 E 156,96'
s JUG W 128.78
5 ]V 39'57W 29,27
HOMEPLACE ENTERPRISES, LLC
0B. 777 PG, 202
AREA BY DMD:
( TOTAL BOUNDARY )
12,34 +/- ACRES
AREA IN PROPOSED UP POWER LINE TRACT
2,29 +/- ACRES
AREA IN EXISTING 30' POWER LINE EASEMENT
1,208 +/- ACRES
AREA IN PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
031t I/- ACRES
NET TOTAL AREA IN
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
B531 +/- ACRES
I CERTIFY TIUI:
LE SURVEY CREATES A SUBON SION OF LAND WITHIN THE AREA OF A COUNTY OR
PUNICIPAUTY THAAI HAS AN ORDINANCE THAT REGULATES LAND.
THE SURVEY IS LOCATED IN A PORTION OF A COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY THAT Is
UNREGULATED AS 10 AN ORDINANCE THAT REGULATES PARCELS OF LAND.
THE SURVEY 15 OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF HAND AND DOES NOT CREATE
A NEW STREET OR CHANGE AN EXETER. STREET.
THE SURVEY IS OF AN EXISTING BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE. OR NATURAL FEATURE
SUCH AS A WATERCOURSE.
THE SURVEY IS A CONTROL SURVEY.
THE SURVEY IS OP ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING X
PARCELS. A COURT -ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO ITS DEFINITION OF
SUBOMSI.N,
THE INFORMATION /RNBECLE TO THE SURVEYOR IS SUCH THAT EHE SURVEY IS UNABLE
TO MAKE A ORERMINANON TO THE BEST OF THE SURVEYORS PROFESSIONAL ABILITY A
TO PROVISIONS LISTED MOVE.
J \
TNN
\ r
K.
\ \\r \\\r\ �� \ m
,o \\ \�\\\
4 BJ�' JP�t TA, SIR I
\\\\\\\\ 1 `\
7.95 +/ ACRES
INCLUDING ALL EASEMENTS
A, ACCESS ROAD
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE IT
AREA IN WETLAND
0,947 ACRES
CEMIERIINE AT POWER TIRE
N 31'55'21Y7
EXISTING 14 POLES/ Jq \N
AREA IN WETLAND H�JB. T \
0.066 MORE /
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE iRAC
/ AREA IN ACRES -4
/ D2ACRES 00 6
/
/ EXISTING 30'
POWER LINE EASEME
AREA IN WETIANO
1.208 +/ ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE
AREA IN WETLAND
0.158 ACRES
PRICE SOLAR, LLC
D.B. 776 PG. 285
P.C. 2 SL 15J
All
CEXICA NE JO' l.R LANE
N 4T13'28`B
200 0 200 400 600
GRAPHIC SCALE —FEET
DRAWN: APPROVED:
BC RPN
I. RANDOLPH P, NICHOLSON, CERTIFY THAI THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUA'_ SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (.EEO
OESCRIP LICK RECORDED IN DOOKNEE , PACE NET). THAT HIS BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK
_____ ,PACE THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATES IS 10,000, THAT
THIS PLAT WAS PPEPARED IV ACCORDANCE WIT. G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. %RJOSS
HAND AGO SEAL THIS _�_ DAY OFFEELI . 20 JUL_ .
RANDOLPH P. RICHOLSON. P.L.S. L-2740
NONOPOLE
`\r I E 1 \\\ \\\ \ TT 1
LEGEND:
REFERENCES:
AC - ACRES
ECM - EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT
UP - EXISTING IRON PIPE
OB. 184 PG. 251
EPR - EXISTING PR NAIL
D.B. 778 PG. 285
IRS - IRON ROD SR-1/2 REBAR
EIR - EXISTING IRON ROD
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
SI - SUUARE FEET
NOTES:
EM - EXISTING IRON AXLE
ERRS - EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE
SUBJECT TO ALL R/W'S. EASEMENTS,
C55 - COTTON SPINDLE SET
,
ZONING REGULATIONS, AND/OR
END - EXISTING VAR A CAP
1..1
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS OF RECORD
L- CENTER L
Qi
AND NOT SHOWN HEREON.
Ti TELEPHONEINE PEDESTAL
PP - POWER POLE
0
LP - LIGHT POLE
- E - - ELECTRIC LINES
,Z
T - - TELEPHONE LINES
W
NPS - NO POINT SET
NOTE:
PRE - Px NI SET
END - EXISTING RAILROAD IRON a,
END. - DOUBLE MERIDIAN DISTANCE
Ey
D.E. - DEED BOON
PG. - PAGE
EVERY DOCUMENT OF RECORD
CC - CONTROL CORNER
REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED AS PART
AS- NAIL SET
OF THIS SURVEY IS NOTED HEREON.
P/L - PROPERTY LINE
NO ABSTRACT OF TITLE, NOR TITLE
WM - WATER METER
COMMITMENT, NOR RESULTS OF TITLE
SEARCHES WERE FURNISHED THE
SURVEYOR. THERE MAY EXIST OTHER
LINES L16 THROUGH L21
DOCUMENTS OF RECORD THAT WOULD
BOUNDARY
AFFECT THIS PARCEL.
1. DEED BOOK SEE_, PACE____
LJ6 S 3353'401E 10.00
2. AS NOTED.
LI7 5 5113'57`N 33A1'
ue S 33'As 05-E 826,92
STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA,
LT. S 26'5735-C454,31'
COUNTY
OF__H RTD
12. S lo'a. CSz TWMTD3'
_E___FOR_____
L21 N 3G'24.33w 55 50'
RENf
HERiM_ COUNTY,
OFFICER
CERTIFY
THAT OR PLOT AWHICH THIS
THAN THE MAP
CERTIFICATION
IS AFFIXED MEETS ALL L 5TAi0ARY
REQUIREMENTS
FOR ftECORDINC.
\ \\\'\\\ 'PROPOSED MONOPOLE
SERVICE ROAD
\, AREA IN
\\\; N" ` 0020
WETLAND
ACRES
AREA WORD PANNANOLE
f D
\( \\
\\ \
$XQ
TOTAL WR.1 AREA
\\\\
r
PARLANCE WETLAND IMPACTS TO BE PERMITTED fiY
ACTION 404/401 FEANB9 ( ACTION 10 SAW 2016
\\\\ \ \ \
\\ �C\\ \
''o \ \ r \E•
BIT96 / DART 2018 0456)
;MISTING 3W EAANENI A, PROPOSE. AD POWER ..I
RACT
`X]
\ \
Root[ 01 I. Zan le Pc oleo) PLANTED
RESTOMRGN AREA MG NW
\ \
\\4
CONARVAl10N EAANEX! 0.VG
O CJJ} . ys O �r \\\ \
PROPOSED MONOPOLE GEROGE ROAD
AREA IN UPLANDS
0,171 ACRES
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
ARG IN WETLAND
0.140 ACRES
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
TOTAL AREA
O3Hl +/- ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE TRACT
TOTA•- AREA IN WETLANDS
1.599 +/- ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE TRACT
TOTAL AREA IN UPLANDS
0.691 +/- ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE TRACT
( TOTAL AREA )
229 +/- ACRES
( PRELIMINARY )
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
TOTAL ACREAGE
CATO."..
795 ACRES
PROFE5 ..l StRAGGED AVDUNT OF
WETLANDS WITHIN THE PAAHAN0.E
1T25 AC Us
0.16 ACRE (IMPACTS FOR ROADWAY) 4 0,090
ACRE (IMPACT FOR MONOPOLES) -PERMITTED
WETLAND LUXTS IN THE PANHANDLE
160] ACRES
1.20. ACRES (50 EASEMENT AREA WITHIN THE
WFTVNO) + 1599 ACRES CLE POWER LINE
TRACT WITHIN THE WETVRD)
7YC RFE
6531 ACRES
REVISED; JUNE 06, 2018 — DESCRIPTION
REVISED; JUNE 04. 2018 — CONSERVATION BOUNDARY
REVISED; MAY 10. 2018 — ADDITIONAL NOTES
REVISED; MAY 09. 2018 — TABLE
REVISED; APRIL 27. 2018 — WETLANDS
REVISED; APRIL 11, 2018 — PROPOSED ROAD
WARY 22, 2018 SCALE 1" — 200 F
SURVEY FOR
AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR, LLC
ST. JOHNS TOWNSHIP —
ROANOKE
FJF; Pei
SURVEYING
FIRMLICENSENUlaER C-2104
P.O.BOXI/93 PH. [phone] CELL PHONE
W7LLLIMS70N, NC PH [phone] [phone]

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Wetland Area
Approx.
Wetland Area
Impacts
WAA
19.3 ac.
12
WAS
5.4 ac.
13
WAC
95.2 ac.
14
WAD
32.4 ac.
15
WAE
21.6 ac.
18
WAF
35.7 ac.
Total
WAG
3.2 ac.
WAH
25A ac.
WAI
4.6 ac.
Impact#
WAI
3.3 ac.
1
WAK
7.4 ac.
2
WAL
1.3 ac.
3
WAM
13.6 ac.
4
WAN
56.3 ac.
Total
WAD
69.7 ac.
WAP
1.5 ac.
Total Wetland
386.9 As.
Stream Channel
Total Length
SCA
2,052 LF
SCB
2,370 LF
SCC
3,025 LF
SCD
624 LF
SCE
6,155 LF
SCF
4,060 LF
SCG
9,176 LF
SCH
686 LF
TOTAL STREAM LENGTH
28,248 LF
y y
y y Jy
Y
y y y y
y y y y y
y y y y y
W.
y 4Y y AII
yyy y
1 yilyy �
Wetland Impacts
Total Stream Impacts
d Notes
Impacts
Permanent
Impact Size
Temporary
Impact Size
Stream
Channel
Stream Status
Notes
Access mad
3
28 LF
333 SOFT
SCD
Perennial
Crossing for access roetl
Monopole location
11
28 LF
299 SOFT
SCG
Perennial
Crossing for access road
Brisling pis and trenching
Total
68 LF
632 SOFT
Access mad
n
NOTE:
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED AND
MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMIT
Monopole location
Wetland Impacts
Existing Unimproved Road Crossings with No
Additional Impact
Crossings Stream Channel Culvert Lenght
1 SCB 30 FT 4
2 SCB 30 FT 0 2W 400' aW
4 WAG 30 FT
VVV// Yv �;1, _ __F __..
•y 10 SC90 FT
r wac
`
� a • is y YY ,
II Y'Y
�n-
,:-' Z
In
;$s
<�
U
. i y Yy 1 l i._ f� Yr u wno o• �'Y rY �I.yy 3 5 s a s s
\
y: y .,� J.. y or.,. _ y
%VA y y A, V y .6 a,.6 y y Z
y y y y
si, y �N �y YY y y L
�\ ram* y Aty y y 16 �... y y
VAi •� .. y y y �y
y y JY y / `\• YY
y LEGEND = J
A 1, \.
T w AQ, y �P" r Ali y PV ARRAY _ g
— _ — ----- IN
PV ARRAY SETBACK W O
war y y y y y y' EXISTING WETLAND
DELINEATION
EXISTING ROAD USEDiB
a o
y,iwaay •' _,---� ` ,'�: '., �/ � y +4 FOR SITE ACCESS ROAD o
Ala,y -i y�A\'\\y NEW SERVICE /SITE �7 j J 7 J /
ACCESS ROAD U LLLLIJ a R
TEMPORARY IMPACTS VV WETLAND IMPACT
AND SERVICE
EXISTING ROADWAY ROAD EXHIBIT
TEMPORARY — — — — EX-02
ACCESS ROAD
Wetland Notes
WAE LOFT Buser Access Roi
1
Yo ` 0111
pAAO
_
\Jy yY`y yy
yyam" y y y y y.wwnwn,:��4
yy y yyy y y y y y y
y y ItlFn y yy y '.
y J, � y •L stlt` y y
y
y y y y y y
y y . yy� it

VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
LINES A TO B
.11LANDS LANE
5 ST 1357Y161.92'
s 29'53 5w
5 ]WOH 2K W llR.
N 61-08'Wb 9.50'
S 5]'5]'46W 2390'
s 3T24'03-E 21 9]
5 ,P4..1-E 81.78'
5 212318-W 31XO*
S 50-3337, 16, 94'
S 3417,13.W 9.75'
5 88'OID7113939'
N 6V52'08'E 2462'
N 63.2716 E 5867'
N 72-25'51'E 39.05'
N 7YO231T 199"
5 03'25'22-E 47,30'
S 17'18'49-W ]1.29'
5 7849'38-E 33.98'
5 7V20'44Y 46.02'
5 ST22'03-E ]830'
S M'2{'S6^N 5960'
5 53'I6'S6-E ...13'
5 00'50'HEW 116.18'
5 4X3437-E 5606'
5 7T30'51-E 278.36'
5 33'S3'O6-E 4].M'
S 6C 10'ASHY L-7.30
5 30'40'55'W 110.5A
N 05'13'20-E 182.20'
s OV99't . 143_n'
5 15-W 51 Z]'
5 1W5232 E 111,31
5 84-21'06-E 164 41'
5 OR-21'FIT IE. 4B'
5 10'O6'S2-W 12&78'
S 7T3957-W 29.27
N.C. POWER
O.B. 184 PG.
N.C. POWER
\� COMPANY
\ D.B. 184 PG. 251
MORTIS ASKEWDO. 672 PC. 550 \ . \\��
S 5610'45 \\ v'W
/ GOOD' \
DARLENE BOONE
N MB10'45-E 56.68'
i
0.842. ]]9 PC. 42 / LI
H 3Y46
2A
B
PROPOSED 60' PO PT LINE iIUC J �.
ANU IN w- B
0.214 AC RCS
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE EGA,
AREA IN WETLWp
0.140 ACHES 1\,
HOMEPLACE ENTERPRISES, LLC
B.B. 777 PG. 202
AREA BY DMD:
( TOTAL BOUNDARY )
12.34 /- ACRES
AREA IN PROPOSED 60' POWER ONE TMC1
2.29 +/- ACRES
AREA IN EXISTING 30' POWER LINE EASEMENT
1.20B +/- ACRES
AREA IN PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
0311 +/- ACRES
NET TOTAL AREA IN
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
8.531 +/- ACRES
I CERTIFY 1.
THE SURVEY CREATES A SUSOMSION OF LAND WITHIN THE AREA OF A COUNTY OR
NUN HPALITY MAT HAS AN ORDINANCE THAT REGULATES IAAC
THE SURVEY IS LOCATED IN A PORTION OF A COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY THAT IS
UNREGULATED AS TO AN ORDINANCE THU REGULATES PARCELS OF LINO,
THE SURVEY IS OF AN DUBOSE PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND AND DOES NOT CREME
A NEW STREET OR CINNGE AN EXISTING SETTLE.
THE SURVEY 15 OF M EXISTING BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE. OR NATURAL FEATURE
SUCH AS A WATERCOURSE.
THE SURVEY IS A CONTROL SURVEY.
X THE SURVEY IS OF MOTHER CATEGORY, 5UCH JS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING
PARCELS. A COURT -ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO ITS DEFINITION OF
SUBDMMON.
THE INFORMATION AVNLPRLE TO THE SURVEYOR IS SOCH THAI THE SURVEY IS UNABLE
TO MAKE A DETERMINATION TO THE BEST OF THE SURVEYOR'S PROFESSIONAL ABILITY A'.
TO PROVISIONS LISTED ABOVE,
346.299 +/ SO. FT.
7A5 +/ ACRES
INCLUDING ALL EASEMENTS
h ACCESS ROAD
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE TF
AREA IS
WETLAND
0.947 ACRES
CEMEREW1 AD Pavrtx UM
N 3P5Y21w
N.C.CS. MONUMENT
( NICE )
NCGS GRID CWR05.
E-2.56].Io S
( NAO B3 )
\PROPOSED MONOPOLE
AREA IN WETLAND
LINES Ll THROUGH L15
CENTERUNE IS. MONOPOLE SEIMCE D.
'A. EARN SIDE OF CENTERUNE
tl S 31DU'O2 E LEAD
L2 N 5894'39-E 52.30'
05 31-57 ESTE 232.98'
L4 S 31-5702-E 70,23'
Ls N 5r48DYE 180.31'
Lfi 5 32'11.1]-E ADDS
L] N 5748.43-E 88.92'
LB 5 AA Sfi 05TE 521.15'
L9 5 561'I31M 82,19'
LIO N 9A.-CEPA..M.
LIT 5 3T56'O5'E 282.41'
L12 5 26'57'38'E 366.52'
LI] 5 6302'22DW 143.30'
L 4 5 2F57'30-E 557.89'
\ 00011 ACNE ED LI 5562' 23' 10 E(HUC
EXISTING 16 POLES-/
AREA IN WETWUD \
O.OBB ACRE /
/ 2°
PROPOSED 60' POwER LWE IMC
/ ARA Ix wETu4B y
/ D.xpO ACRES �,
/
/ EXISTING 30
i / POWER LINE EASEME:
AREA IN WETLAND
1308 4/ ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE
ARIA IN WETLAND
0.158 ACRES
PRICE SOLAR, LLC
O.B. 778 PG. 285
PC 2. ST, 15J
LEGEND:
REFERENCES:
AC - ACRES
EON - EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT
BE - EXISTING IRON PIPE
D.B. 184 PG. 251
TER - EXISTING PN XNL
D.B. 778 PG. 285
IRS - IRON ROD SET-1/2 RED AR
OR - EXISTING IRON ROD
5 /W - RIGHT OF WAY
QUARE FEET
NOTES:
OR - EXISTED IRON AXLE
ERRS - EXISTING RM.GAD SPIRE
SUBJECT TO ALL R/W'S, EASEMENTS.
C55 - COTTON SPINDLE SET
„ry
ZONING REGULATIONS, AND/OR
EEC - EXISTING MAR A, CAP
E.1
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS OF RECORD
- CENTER TINE
TO EP
TO - TELHONE EOEstN
AND NOT SHOWN HEREON.
PP - POWER POLE
O
LP - LIGHT POLE
- E - - ELECTRIC LINES
`z
T - -TELEPHONE LINES
W
XP5 - NO POINT SET
PBS - PX NAIL SET
EARL - EXISTING RAILROAD IRON
a
NOTE:
O.M.D. - MERIDIAN 015@NCE
Ey
GOOD
0.8. -DEED BOOB
PC - PAGE
EVERY DOCUMENT OF RECORD
CC - CONTROL CORNER
REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED AS PART
NS - NAIL SET
OF THIS SURVEY IS NOTED HEREON.
PA - PROPERTY LINE
NO ABSTRACT OF TITLE, NOR TITLE
wu - WATER METER
COMMITMENT, NOR RESULTS OF TITLE
SEARCHES WERE FURNISHED THE
SURVEYOR. THERE MAY EXIST OTHER
LINES L16 THROUGH L21
DOCUMENTS OF RECORD THAT WOULD
BOUNDARY
AFFECT THIS PARCEL.
1. DEED BOOK_$EE_, PAGE__
Llfi S 33'SS30-E ITT
2. AS NOTED.
m S 57-13'57w 33.41'
ufi 5 33'S6'O5-E 826,92'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
L20 S 265T38-E
COUNTY OF__DE_RTFORD
L20 5 10'O6'38-W 393.93'
R.3A'
_ --
m N 3V24 3319 55.W'
I, -SEE REVUE
OFFICER OF HERTFORD _ COUNTY.
CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR PLOT TO WHICH THIS
C EROFICATION IS AFFIXED MEETS ALL STATUARY
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING.
PROPOSED MONOPOLE
AREA IN WELLED REVICW OFEICFR DATE
\\ ^\\\^ L 0.0007 ACRE
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
AREA IN WETLAND
\\\(\ \\\ \ 0,020 ACRES
"f \ ARA W.I. PM HANDLE TOTAL ACPFACE LIL[UURON
AN 1` TOTAL WETLAND AREA J 95 ACRES WROEESSORALLY SURVEYED AMOUNT OF
)$ \`\ \`\ ^VL \ EFVNDA MIXI.Y TILE PMEANDLE
L jib �N, N, \ PMWNOLE WELAND IMPACTS TO BE PERMITTED BY 0,25 ACRES O.I6 ALXE (IMPACTS FOR ROADWAY) V COST
\ \\\ \ SEC DON 4O4/401 PERMITS ( ACTION ID SAW 2016 W RE (WPACI rBIT ... G1QES)-PERMtl FO
( 01196 / OWX/ 2016 0456) EDAXD IMPACTS IN THE PANHANDLE
"p5 \ \\ E. `\ \ EXISTING SD' EASEMENT A PROPOSED 60' POWER ONE 2.607 ACRES T209 ACRES I.. ANe.. AREA WITHIN ME
.•\\ .1..1 ` \\ 1 TRACT wFRMD) . T.599 ACNES (w POWER LINE
\\ 1.1 ANIAN THE WETTING)
\ \^ N DOE OF VOLITION GAIN 2011 PC 0184) PLANTED 13. ACRES LP5 ACRES DOTAL WERMG AREA
ENTOMRON AREA 0.15 (PERMITTED WETAND IMPCTS)=
`^\\\�.\ PUNTED ResrORwnOx AREA
x\a1�WS Ji-a: ; \\ \ CGNSERIION ASEMEXT AREA 8A^. .531 RES
\r�\\�^\ VA
CENTERUNE 511' POWER ONE
N 4r1328W
200 0 200 400 600
GRAPHIC SCALE -FEET
DRAWN. APPROVED
Be RPN
I, RANDOLPH P. NICHOLS N, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
SUPERVISION FROM M ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOONSDC , PAGE BE_F1, THAT ME BOUNDMIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK
PAGE _ : THE WOG 01' PRECISION AS CALCULATES IS 10,000, )HAT
THIS PAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G5. 47-30 AS AVV.NDED. MENE55
HAND AND SEAL THIS 12_ DAY O:LLEERTA%K . 20
- - RANDOLPH P. NICHOLSON. C.t5 L-2740 ----
�N\\Na WN;;
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
UP,L \
AREA IN LANDS
O.RD ACRES X
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
AflG IN WETUYO
0.140 ACRES
PROPOSED MONOPOLE SERVICE ROAD
TOTAL AREA
0311 +/- ACRES
PROPOSED 60 POWER LINE TRACT
TOTAL AREA IN WETLANDS
1.599 +/- ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE TRACT
TOTAL AREA IN UPLANDS
ANSI +/- ACRES
PROPOSED 60' POWER LINE TRACT
( TOTAL AREA )
2.29 +/- ACRES
( PRELIMINARY )
REVISED; JUNE 06, 2018 - DESCRIPTION
REVISED; JUNE 04. 2018 - CONSERVATION BOUNDARY
REVISED; MAY 10. 2018 - ADDITIONAL NOTES
REVISED; MAY 09, 201E - TABLE
REVISED; APRIL 27, 2018 - WETLANDS
REVISED; APRIL 11. 2018 - PROPOSED ROAD
RUARY 22. 2018 SCALE 1" = 200 F
AULANDER HOLLOMAN SOLAR, LLC
ST. JOHNS TOWNSHIP - HERTFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLIN
ROANOKE
LAND
SURVEYING
Fl"LICRNSENUMBER C-2104
P.O. BOX 1193 PH. [phone] CRLL PHONE
WILLUMSTON, NC. PH. [phone] [phone]

`�. • WETLAND IMPACT #16
`�, �.•� •,�,•\.•,, NEW MONO POLE LOCATION
\ WETLAND IMPACT = 0.0011 ACRES
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT #1 '� \,\ \ -
10' CONSTRUCTION BUFFER \ •\ \'\`• • \ `
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 0.149 ACRES `.` ' `•`. \
WETLAND IMPACT #15
15' x 33T ACCESS ROAD `• ': '\. \
WETLAND IMPACT = 0.140 ACRES ;\`•\;' \,
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT #2
10' CONSTRUCTION BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 0.033 ACRES
WETLAND IMPACT #14
\\ (14) EXISTING POLES
IN WETLAND AREA, PLUS TRENCHING \\ \ \
WETLAND IMPACT = 0.088 ACRES TOTAL '`\I \`\ ;`;
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT #3
10' CONSTRUCTION BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 0.012 ACRES
\\, •\ \ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT ACCESS PATH
`. THROUGH UPLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT#13
NEW MONO POLE LOCATION
WETLAND IMPACT = 0.0007 ACRES
0
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT #4
10' CONSTRUCTION BUFFER
�\
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 0.04 ACRES
\`\\ •`\ \"\:\ ,'\\
WETLAND IMPACT #12 ,\\ -
; `\•\ °\
15' X 88' ACCESS ROAD
.�.
WETLAND IMPACT = 0.02 ACRES
.. r..
-
WAS
`.
Area within Panhandle
Total Acreage
Calculation
Total Wetland Area
7.95 Acres
Professionally Surveyed Amount of Wetlands Within the SERVIft ENTRANCE FROM
Panhandle Area
\
Panhandle Weiland Impacts to he Permitted 6y
SW-2016-01196on 4041401 Permits (Action ID
0.25 Acres
0.18 acre (impacts for Roadway) + 0.09 acre (Impact for �`,\\I////� EXISTING J O E H O L L MA N RD
Monopoles) = Permitted Welland Impacts in the Panhandle �—
\
SAW-2n,6°„95/BWitM29,6045g)
TO ACCESS ROAD
Vegetation Management Buffer (EAsgng 30'
Easement 8 Proposed 60' Easement in
Wetlandyreas)
2.807 Acres
1.208 acres (30' Easement Area Within the Wetland) t 1.599
acres (W Tract Area Within the Wetland) = Vegetative U P LAND .033 ACRES
Management Buffer \\I//
`,'\\
—�
Notice ofUdation (N ration 7-PArea Pg184)
Planted Restoration
4.89 Acres
7.95 acres (total Weiland Area) - 2.807 acres (Vegetative
Management Buffer)- 0.25 ( Permitted Wetland Impacts)
Planted Restoration Area
Conservation Easement
8.53 Acres
See Survey Plat Included with Application
PV ARRAY
PV ARRAY SETBACK
EXISTING WETLAND
DELINEATION
EXISTING ROAD USED
FOR SITE ACCESS ROAD
NEW SERVICE / SITE
ACCESS ROAD
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
EXISTING ROADWAY
\�\` V TEMPORARY
'J&
r
0 sa tar sop
SCALE
E
B
0
WETLAND IMPACT
AND SERVICE
ROAD EXHIBIT
EX-02A

MONOPOLE FOUNDATION DETAIL
NOTE:
1. MONOPOLE CONCRETE FOUNDATION INSTALLED
rCLR. BY POURING IN PLACE INTO BORED HOLE
TOP OF FND. T.O.C. 2. CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS ARE MAXIMUM OF 7
a FT IN DIAMETER
GRADE - I • - I ry�
U
C S S
E S §
� g _
Q W
G' p
� pp
4 d
� a�'s sssss s�
• g _
Z
e Q
n � W BARS EQ. SPACED
IN A CIRCULAR CAGE O
J V o
J
J
Q �F
z . w s 0
LLI a wo
Z '<
e
MONOPOLE
FOUNDATION
DETAIL
EX-02B